sv1za
As filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2007
File
No. 333-141398
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO 3
TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
ALDABRA 2 ACQUISITION
CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
6770
|
|
20-8356960
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
c/o Terrapin Partners LLC
540 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor
New York, New York 10022
(212) 710-4100
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Jason Weiss, Chief Executive
Officer
c/o Terrapin Partners
LLC
540 Madison Avenue,
17th Floor
New York, New York
10022
(212) 710-4100
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
David Alan Miller, Esq.
Jeffrey M. Gallant, Esq.
Graubard Miller
The Chrysler Building
405 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10174
(212) 818-8800
(212) 818-8881 Facsimile
|
|
Raymond B. Check, Esq.
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, New York 10006
(212) 225-2000
(212) 255-3999 Facsimile
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the
following box. þ
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION
FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Amount being
|
|
|
Offering Price Per
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Security being Registered
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
Security(1)
|
|
|
Price(1)
|
|
|
Registration Fee
|
Units, each consisting of one share
of Common Stock, $.0001 par value, and one Warrant(2)
|
|
|
34,500,000 Units
|
|
|
$10.00
|
|
|
$345,000,000
|
|
|
$10,591.50
|
Shares of Common Stock included as
part of the Units
|
|
|
34,500,000 Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Warrants included as part of the
Units
|
|
|
34,500,000 Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Shares of Common Stock underlying
the Warrants included in the Units(4)
|
|
|
34,500,000 Shares
|
|
|
$7.50
|
|
|
$258,750,000
|
|
|
$7,943.63
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$603,750,000
|
|
|
$18,535.13(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 4,500,000 Units and
4,500,000 shares of Common Stock and
4,500,000 Warrants underlying such Units which may be
issued on exercise of a
45-day
option granted to the Underwriters to cover over-allotments, if
any.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
No fee required pursuant to
Rule 457(g).
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Pursuant to Rule 416, there
are also being registered such additional securities as may be
issued to prevent dilution resulting from stock splits, stock
dividends or similar transactions as a result of the
anti-dilution provisions contained in the Warrants.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
$13,139.60 of the filing fee has
been previously paid.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell
these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Filed pursuant to Rule 424A
SEC File No.: 333-141398
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION,
JUNE 13, 2007
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
$300,000,000
30,000,000 Units
Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. is a newly formed blank check
company organized for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital
stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business
combination with an operating business. Our efforts in
identifying a prospective target business will not be limited to
a particular industry. We do not have any specific business
combination under consideration and we have not (nor has anyone
on our behalf) contacted any prospective target business or had
any discussions, formal or otherwise, with respect to such a
transaction.
This is an initial public offering of our securities. Each unit
that we are offering has a price of $10.00 and consists of one
share of our common stock and one warrant. Each warrant entitles
the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price
of $7.50. Each warrant will become exercisable on the later of
our completion of a business combination
and ,
2008 [one year from the date of this prospectus], and
will expire
on ,
2011 [four years from the date of this prospectus], or
earlier upon redemption.
We have granted Lazard Capital Markets LLC, the representative
of the underwriters, a
45-day
option to purchase up to 4,500,000 units (over and above
the 30,000,000 units referred to above) solely to cover
over-allotments, if any. The over-allotment will be used only to
cover the net syndicate short position resulting from the
initial distribution.
Nathan Leight, our chairman of the board, and Jason Weiss, our
chief executive officer, secretary and director, have committed
to purchase from us an aggregate of 3,000,000 warrants at
$1.00 per warrant (for a total purchase price of
$3,000,000). These purchases will take place on a private
placement basis simultaneously with the consummation of this
offering. All of the proceeds we receive from the purchases will
be placed in the trust account described below. The
insider warrants to be purchased by these
individuals will be identical to warrants underlying the units
being offered by this prospectus except that the insider
warrants (i) will be exercisable on a cashless basis,
(ii) may be exercised whether or not a registration
statement relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrants is effective and current and (iii) will not be
redeemable by us so long as they are still held by the
purchasers or their affiliates. The purchasers of the insider
warrants have agreed that the insider warrants will not be sold
or transferred by them (except in certain cases) until the later
of ,
2008 [one year from the date of this prospectus] and
60 days after the consummation of our business combination.
There is presently no public market for our units, common stock
or warrants. We have applied to have the units listed on the
American Stock Exchange. Assuming that the units are listed on
the American Stock Exchange, the units will be listed under the
symbol AII.U on or promptly after the date of this prospectus.
Assuming that the units are listed on the American Stock
Exchange, once the securities comprising the units begin
separate trading, the common stock and warrants will be listed
on the American Stock Exchange under the symbols AII and AII.WS,
respectively. We cannot assure you that our securities will be
listed or will continue to be listed on the American Stock
Exchange.
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 14 of this
prospectus for a discussion of information that should be
considered in connection with an investment in our
securities.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
|
Proceeds, before
|
|
|
|
offering price
|
|
|
and commissions(1)
|
|
|
expenses, to us
|
|
Per unit
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
9.30
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
300,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
279,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Of the underwriting discount and
commissions, $9,000,000 ($0.30 per unit) is being deferred
by the underwriters and will not be payable by us to the
underwriters unless and until we consummate a business
combination.
|
$287,060,000 of the net proceeds of this offering (including the
$9,000,000, or $0.30 per unit, of underwriting discounts
and commissions payable to the underwriters in this offering
which are being deferred by them until we consummate a business
combination), plus the additional aggregate $3,000,000 we will
receive from the purchase of the insider warrants simultaneously
with the consummation of this offering, for an aggregate of
$290,060,000 (or approximately $9.67 per unit sold to the
public in this offering), will be deposited into a trust account
at Wells Fargo, maintained by Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee. These
funds will not be released to us until the earlier of the
completion of a business combination and our liquidation (which
may not occur
until ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this
prospectus]).
We are offering the units for sale on a firm-commitment basis.
Lazard Capital Markets LLC, acting as representative of the
underwriters, expects to deliver our securities to investors in
the offering on or
about ,
2007.
Lazard
Capital Markets
|
Ladenburg
Thalmann & Co. Inc.
|
|
,
2007
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights certain information appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. For a more complete understanding
of this offering, you should read the entire prospectus
carefully, including the risk factors and the financial
statements. Unless otherwise stated in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
references to we, us or our
company refer to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.;
|
|
|
|
initial stockholders or existing
stockholders refers to all of our stockholders prior to
this offering, including all of our officers and directors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial shares refers to the
8,625,000 shares of common stock that our initial
stockholders originally purchased from us for $25,000 in
February 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
insider warrants refers to the 3,000,000 warrants
we are selling privately to Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss upon
consummation of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the term public stockholders means the holders of
the shares of common stock which are being sold as part of the
units in this public offering (whether they are purchased in the
public offering or in the aftermarket), including any of our
existing stockholders to the extent that they purchase such
shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the information in this prospectus assumes that the
representative of the underwriters will not exercise its
over-allotment option; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
gives retroactive effect to a stock dividend of
0.5 shares of common stock for each outstanding share of
common stock on June 12, 2007.
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
different information. We have applied to have our securities
listed on the American Stock Exchange, thereby providing a state
blue sky exemption in every state. However, notwithstanding the
foregoing, we are not making an offer of these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.
We are a blank check company organized under the laws of the
State of Delaware on February 1, 2007. We were formed with
the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset
acquisition or other similar business combination with an
operating business. To date, our efforts have been limited to
organizational activities.
Our efforts in identifying a prospective target business will
not be limited to a particular industry, although we intend to
focus our efforts on seeking a business combination with a
portfolio company currently held by a private equity firm
specializing in either leveraged buyouts or venture capital.
We do not have any specific business combination under
consideration. Our officers and directors have neither
individually identified or considered a target business nor have
they had any discussions regarding possible target businesses
amongst themselves or with our underwriters or other advisors.
We have not (nor has anyone on our behalf) contacted any
prospective target business or had any discussions, formal or
otherwise, with respect to a business combination transaction.
We have not (nor have any of our agents or affiliates) been
approached by any candidates (or representative of any
candidates) with respect to a possible acquisition transaction
with our company. Additionally, we have not, nor has anyone on
our behalf, taken any measure, directly or indirectly, to
identify or locate any suitable acquisition candidate, nor have
we engaged or retained any agent or other representative to
identify or locate any such acquisition candidate.
We will have
until ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this prospectus]
to consummate a business combination. If we are unable to
consummate a business combination by such date, our corporate
existence will cease by operation of corporate law (except for
the purposes of winding up our affairs and liquidating). Our
initial business combination must be with a target business or
businesses whose collective fair market value is at least equal
to 80% of our net assets (all of our assets, including the funds
held in the trust account, less our liabilities) at the time of
such acquisition, although this may entail simultaneous
acquisitions of several operating businesses. The fair market
value of the target will be determined by our board of directors
based upon one or more standards generally accepted by the
financial
1
community (which may include actual and potential sales,
earnings, cash flow
and/or book
value). If our board is not able to independently determine that
the target business has a sufficient fair market value, we will
obtain an opinion from an unaffiliated, independent investment
banking firm with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria.
We anticipate structuring a business combination to acquire 100%
of the equity interests or assets of the target business. We
may, however, structure a business combination to acquire less
than 100% of such interests or assets of the target business but
will not acquire less than a controlling interest (which would
be at least 50% of the voting securities of the target
business). If we acquire only a controlling interest in a target
business or businesses, the portion of such business that we
acquire must have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of
our net assets. If we determine to simultaneously acquire
several businesses and such businesses are owned by different
sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our
purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous
closings of the other acquisitions, which may make it more
difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete the
business combination. With multiple acquisitions, we could also
face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs
with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence
investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the
additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of
the operations and services or products of the acquired
companies in a single operating business.
The target business or businesses that we acquire may have a
collective fair market value substantially in excess of 80% of
our net assets. In order to consummate such a business
combination, we may issue a significant amount of our debt or
equity securities to the sellers of such business
and/or seek
to raise additional funds through a private offering of debt or
equity securities. There are no limitations on our ability to
incur debt or issue securities in order to consummate a business
combination. If we issue securities in order to consummate a
business combination, our stockholders could end up owning a
minority of the combined company as there is no requirement that
our stockholders own a certain percentage of our company after
our business combination. Since we have no specific business
combination under consideration, we have not entered into any
such arrangement to issue our debt or equity securities and have
no current intention of doing so.
Our executive offices are located at c/o Terrapin Partners
LLC, 540 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, New
York 10022 and our telephone number is
(212) 710-4100.
2
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Securities offered |
|
30,000,000 units, at $10.00 per unit, each unit
consisting of: |
|
|
|
|
|
one share of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
one warrant.
|
|
|
|
The units will begin trading on or promptly after the date of
this prospectus. Each of the common stock and warrants may trade
separately on the
90th day
after the date of this prospectus unless Lazard Capital Markets
determines that an earlier date is acceptable. In no event will
Lazard Capital Markets allow separate trading of the common
stock and warrants until we file an audited balance sheet
reflecting our receipt of the gross proceeds of this offering.
We will file a Current Report on
Form 8-K
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including an
audited balance sheet, promptly upon the consummation of this
offering, which is anticipated to take place three business days
from the date the units commence trading. The audited balance
sheet will reflect our receipt of the proceeds from the exercise
of the over-allotment option if the over-allotment option is
exercised prior to the filing of the
Form 8-K.
If the over-allotment option is exercised after our initial
filing of a
Form 8-K,
we will file an amendment to the
Form 8-K
to provide updated financial information to reflect the exercise
and consummation of the over-allotment option. We will also
include in this
Form 8-K,
or amendment thereto, or in a subsequent
Form 8-K,
information indicating if Lazard Capital Markets has allowed
separate trading of the common stock and warrants prior to the
90th day
after the date of this prospectus. |
|
|
|
The units will continue to trade along with the common stock and
warrants after the units are separated. Holders will need to
have their brokers contact our transfer agent in order to
separate the units into common stock and warrants. |
|
|
|
Securities to be sold to insiders |
|
3,000,000 insider warrants at $1.00 per warrant (for a
total purchase price of $3,000,000) will be sold to Nathan
Leight and Jason Weiss pursuant to letter agreements among us,
Lazard Capital Markets and such purchasers. These purchases will
take place on a private placement basis simultaneously with the
consummation of this offering. The insider warrants will be
identical to the warrants underlying the units being offered by
this prospectus except that the insider warrants (i) will
be exercisable on a cashless basis, (ii) may be exercised
whether or not a registration statement relating to the common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and
current and (iii) will not be redeemable by us so long as
they are still held by the purchasers or their affiliates. The
purchasers have agreed, pursuant to the agreements, that the
insider warrants will not be sold or transferred by them (except
to employees of Terrapin Partners LLC, an affiliate of theirs,
or to our directors at the same cost per warrant originally paid
by them) until the later
of ,
2008 [one year from the date of this prospectus]
and 60 days after the consummation of our business
combination. Lazard Capital Markets has no intention of waiving
these |
3
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions. In the event of a liquidation prior to our initial
business combination, the insider warrants will expire worthless. |
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number outstanding before this offering
|
|
8,625,000 shares1 |
|
|
|
Number to be outstanding after this offering
|
|
37,500,000 shares2 |
|
|
|
Warrants: |
|
|
|
Number outstanding before this offering
|
|
0 warrants |
|
Number to be sold to insiders |
|
3,000,000 warrants |
|
|
|
Number to be outstanding after this offering and
sale to insiders
|
|
33,000,000 warrants |
|
|
|
Exercisability |
|
Each warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock. |
|
Exercise price |
|
$7.50 |
|
Exercise period |
|
The warrants will become exercisable on the later of: |
|
|
|
the completion of a business combination with
a target business, and
|
|
|
|
,
2008 [one year from the date of this prospectus].
|
|
|
|
However, the warrants held by public stockholders will only be
exercisable if a registration statement relating to the common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and
current. The warrants will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York
City time, on
,
2011 [four years from the date of this prospectus] or
earlier upon redemption. |
|
Redemption |
|
We may redeem the outstanding warrants (excluding any insider
warrants held by the initial purchasers or their affiliates)
without the prior consent of the underwriters: |
|
|
|
in whole and not in part,
|
|
|
|
at a price of $.01 per warrant at any
time while the warrants are exercisable,
|
|
|
|
upon a minimum of 30 days prior
written notice of redemption, and
|
|
|
|
if, and only if, the last sales price of our
common stock equals or exceeds $14.25 per share for any 20
trading days within a 30 trading day period ending three
business days before we send the notice of redemption.
|
1 This
number includes an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of common
stock that are subject to forfeiture by our initial stockholders
if the over-allotment option is not exercised by the
underwriters.
2 Assumes
the over-allotment option has not been exercised and an
aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of common stock have been
forfeited by our initial stockholders.
4
|
|
|
|
|
If the foregoing conditions are satisfied and we issue a notice
of redemption, each warrant holder can exercise his, her or its
warrant prior to the scheduled redemption date. However, the
price of the common stock may fall below the $14.25 trigger
price as well as the $7.50 warrant exercise price after the
redemption notice is issued. |
|
|
|
The redemption criteria for our warrants have been established
at a price which is intended to provide warrant holders a
reasonable premium to the initial exercise price and provide a
sufficient differential between the then-prevailing common stock
price and the warrant exercise price so that if the stock price
declines as a result of our redemption call, the redemption will
not cause the stock price to drop below the exercise price of
the warrants. |
|
Proposed American Stock Exchange symbols for our:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering proceeds to be held in trust |
|
$287,060,000 of the net proceeds of this offering plus the
$3,000,000 we will receive from the sale of the insider warrants
(for an aggregate of $290,060,000 or approximately $9.67 per
unit sold to the public in this offering) will be placed in a
trust account at Wells Fargo, maintained by Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, acting as trustee pursuant
to an agreement to be signed on the date of this prospectus.
This amount includes $9,000,000 of underwriting discounts and
commissions payable to the underwriters in the offering that is
being deferred. The underwriters have agreed that such amount
will not be paid unless and until we consummate a business
combination. Upon the consummation of our initial business
combination, the deferred underwriting discounts and commissions
shall be released to the underwriters out of the gross proceeds
of this offering held in the trust account. Except as set forth
below, these proceeds will not be released until the earlier of
the completion of a business combination and our liquidation.
Therefore, unless and until a business combination is
consummated, the proceeds held in the trust account will not be
available for our use for any expenses related to this offering
or expenses which we may incur related to the investigation and
selection of a target business and the negotiation of an
agreement to acquire a target business. |
|
|
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be released to us from
the trust account interest earned on the funds in the trust
account (i) up to an aggregate of $3,100,000 to fund
expenses related to investigating and selecting a target
business and our other working capital requirements and
(ii) any amounts we may need to pay our income or other tax
obligations. With these exceptions, expenses incurred by us may
be paid prior to a business combination only from the net
proceeds of this offering not held in the trust account
(initially $200,000). |
5
|
|
|
|
|
None of the warrants may be exercised until after the
consummation of a business combination and, thus, after the
proceeds of the trust account have been disbursed. Accordingly,
the warrant exercise price will be paid directly to us and not
placed in the trust account. |
|
Anticipated expenses and funding sources |
|
We believe that, upon consummation of this offering, the
$200,000 of net proceeds not held in the trust account, plus the
up to $3,100,000 of interest earned on the trust account balance
that may be released to us as well as amounts necessary to pay
our tax obligations, will be sufficient to allow us to operate
for the next 24 months, assuming that a business
combination is not consummated during that time. |
|
|
|
Over this time period, we will be using these funds for
identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates,
performing business due diligence on prospective target
businesses, traveling to and from the offices, plants or similar
locations of prospective target businesses or their
representatives or owners, reviewing corporate documents and
material agreements of prospective target businesses, selecting
the target business to acquire and structuring, negotiating and
consummating the business combination. We could use a portion of
the funds not being placed in trust to pay commitment fees for
financing, fees to consultants to assist us with our search for
a target business or as a down payment or to fund a
no-shop provision (a provision in letters of intent
designed to keep target businesses from shopping
around for transactions with other companies on terms more
favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a
particular proposed business combination, although we do not
have any current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter
of intent where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity
from a target business, the amount that would be used as a down
payment or to fund a no-shop provision would be
determined based on the terms of the specific business
combination and the amount of our available funds at the time.
Our forfeiture of such funds (whether as a result of our breach
or otherwise) could result in our not having sufficient funds to
continue searching for, or conducting due diligence with respect
to, potential target businesses. |
|
|
|
We anticipate that we will incur approximately: |
|
|
|
$1,000,000 of expenses for the search for
target businesses and for the legal, accounting and other
third-party expenses attendant to the due diligence
investigations, structuring and negotiating of a business
combination;
|
|
|
|
$250,000 of expenses for the due diligence and
investigation of a target business by our officers, directors
and existing stockholders;
|
|
|
|
$200,000 of expenses in legal and accounting
fees relating to our SEC reporting obligations;
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
$180,000 for the administrative fee payable to
Terrapin Partners LLC ($7,500 per month for twenty four
months); and
|
|
|
|
$1,670,000 for general working capital that
will be used for miscellaneous expenses and reserves, including
approximately $120,000 for director and officer liability
insurance premiums.
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to complete a business combination within
24 months from the date of this prospectus and are forced
to liquidate, we will pay the costs of liquidation from our
remaining assets outside of the trust account. If such funds are
insufficient, Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have agreed to
advance us the funds necessary to complete such liquidation
(currently anticipated to be no more than approximately $15,000)
and have agreed not to seek repayment for such expenses. |
|
Limited payments to insiders |
|
There will be no fees or other cash payments paid to our
existing stockholders, officers, directors or their affiliates
prior to, or for any services they render in order to
effectuate, the consummation of a business combination
(regardless of the type of transaction that it is) other than: |
|
|
|
|
|
repayment of an aggregate of $125,000
non-interest bearing loans made by Nathan Leight, our chairman
of the board, and Jason Weiss, our chief executive officer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
payment of $7,500 per month to Terrapin
Partners LLC, an affiliate of Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss, for
certain administrative, technology and secretarial services, as
well as the use of certain limited office space, including a
conference room, in New York City; and
|
|
|
|
reimbursement of
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by them in connection with certain activities
on our behalf, such as identifying and investigating possible
business targets and business combinations.
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation |
|
As discussed below, there are specific provisions in our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation that may not be
amended prior to our consummation of a business combination,
including our requirements to seek stockholder approval of such
a business combination and to allow our stockholders to seek
conversion of their shares if they do not approve of such a
business combination. While we have been advised that such
provisions limiting our ability to amend our certificate of
incorporation may not be enforceable under Delaware law, we view
these provisions, which are contained in Article Seventh of
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as
obligations to our stockholders and will not take any action to
amend or waive these provisions. |
|
|
|
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also
provides that we will continue in existence only
until ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this
prospectus]. If we have not completed a business combination
by such date, our corporate existence will cease except for the
purposes of winding up our affairs and liquidating, pursuant to
Section 278 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This
has the same effect as if our board |
7
|
|
|
|
|
of directors and stockholders had formally voted to approve our
dissolution pursuant to Section 275 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. Accordingly, limiting our corporate existence
to a specified date as permitted by Section 102(b)(5) of
the Delaware General Corporation Law removes the necessity to
comply with the formal procedures set forth in Section 275
(which would have required our board of directors and
stockholders to formally vote to approve our dissolution and
liquidation and to have filed a certificate of dissolution with
the Delaware Secretary of State). In connection with any
proposed business combination we submit to our stockholders for
approval, we will also submit to stockholders a proposal to
amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to
provide for our perpetual existence, thereby removing this
limitation on our corporate life. We will only consummate a
business combination if stockholders vote both in favor of such
business combination and our amendment to provide for our
perpetual existence. Accordingly, if stockholders approved a
proposed business combination as set forth below but did not
approve the proposal to provide for our perpetual existence, we
would not be able to consummate such business combination. The
approval of the proposal to amend our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation to provide for our perpetual
existence would require the affirmative vote of a majority of
our outstanding shares of common stock. We view this provision
terminating our corporate life
by ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this prospectus]
as an obligation to our stockholders and will not take any
action to amend or waive this provision to allow us to survive
for a longer period of time except in connection with the
consummation of a business combination. |
|
Stockholders must approve business combination
|
|
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, we will seek stockholder approval before we
effect any business combination, even if the nature of the
acquisition would not ordinarily require stockholder approval
under applicable state law. We view this requirement as an
obligation to our stockholders and will not take any action to
amend or waive this provision in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation. In connection with the vote
required for any business combination, all of our existing
stockholders, including all of our officers and directors, have
agreed to vote the shares of common stock owned by them
immediately before this offering in accordance with the majority
of the shares of common stock voted by the public stockholders.
We will proceed with a business combination only if (i) a
majority of the shares of common stock voted by the public
stockholders are voted in favor of the business combination and
(ii) public stockholders owning less than 40% of the shares
sold in this offering exercise their conversion rights described
below. Accordingly, it is our understanding and intention in
every case to structure and consummate a business combination in
which approximately 39.99% of the public stockholders may
exercise their conversion rights and the business combination
will still go forward. |
8
|
|
|
Conversion rights for stockholders voting to reject a
business combination
|
|
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, public stockholders voting against a business
combination will be entitled to convert their stock into a pro
rata share of the trust account (initially approximately $9.67
per share, or approximately $9.66 per share if the
over-allotment option is exercised), plus any interest earned on
their portion of the trust account but less any interest that
has been released to us as described above to fund our working
capital requirements and pay any of our tax obligations, if the
business combination is approved and completed. We view this
requirement as an obligation to our stockholders and will not
take any action to amend or waive this provision in our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation. Our existing
stockholders will not have such conversion rights with respect
to any shares of common stock owned by them, directly or
indirectly, whether included in or underlying their initial
shares or purchased by them in this offering or in the
aftermarket. Public stockholders who convert their stock into
their share of the trust account will continue to have the right
to exercise any warrants they may hold. |
|
|
|
|
|
An eligible stockholder may request conversion at any time after
the mailing to our stockholders of the proxy statement and prior
to the vote taken with respect to a proposed business
combination at a meeting held for that purpose, but the request
will not be granted unless the stockholder votes against the
business combination and the business combination is approved
and completed. Additionally, we may require public stockholders,
whether they are a record holder or hold their shares in
street name, to either tender their certificates to
our transfer agent at any time through the vote on the business
combination or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent
electronically using Depository Trust Companys DWAC
(Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System, at the holders
option. There is a nominal cost associated with this tendering
process and the act of certificating the shares or delivering
them through the DWAC system. The transfer agent will typically
charge the tendering broker $35 and it would be up to the broker
whether or not to pass this cost on to the converting holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
The proxy solicitation materials that we will furnish to
stockholders in connection with the vote for any proposed
business combination will indicate whether we are requiring
stockholders to satisfy such certification and delivery
requirements. Accordingly, a stockholder would have from the
time we send out our proxy statement through the vote on the
business combination to deliver his shares if he wishes to seek
to exercise his conversion rights. This time period varies
depending on the specific facts of each transaction. However, as
the delivery process can be accomplished by the stockholder,
whether or not he is a record holder or his shares are held in
street name, in a matter of hours by simply
contacting the transfer agent or his broker and requesting
delivery of his shares through the DWAC System, we believe this
time period is sufficient for an average investor. |
9
|
|
|
|
|
Any request for conversion, once made, may be withdrawn at any
time up to the date of the meeting. Furthermore, if a
stockholder delivered his certificate for conversion and
subsequently decided prior to the meeting not to elect
conversion, he may simply request that the transfer agent return
the certificate (physically or electronically). |
|
|
|
|
|
If a vote on our initial business combination is held and the
business combination is not approved, we may continue to try to
consummate a business combination with a different target until
twenty four months from the date of this prospectus. If the
initial business combination is not approved or completed for
any reason, then public stockholders voting against our initial
business combination who exercised their conversion rights would
not be entitled to convert their shares of common stock into a
pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the
trust account. In such case, if we have required public
stockholders to deliver their certificates prior to the meeting,
we will promptly return such certificates to the public
stockholder. |
|
|
|
|
|
Investors in this offering who do not sell, or who receive less
than an aggregate of approximately $0.33 of net sales proceeds
for, the warrants included in the units, and persons who
purchase common stock in the aftermarket at a price in excess of
$9.67 per share, may have a disincentive to exercise their
conversion rights because the amount they would receive upon
conversion could be less than their original or adjusted
purchase price. Because converting stockholders will receive
their proportionate share of the deferred underwriting discounts
and commissions and the underwriters will be paid the full
amount of their deferred underwriting compensation at the time
of the consummation of our initial business combination, we
(and, therefore, the non-converting stockholders) will bear the
financial effect of such payments to both the converting
stockholders and the underwriters. |
|
|
|
Liquidation if no business combination
|
|
As described above, if we have not consummated a business
combination
by ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this
prospectus], our corporate existence will cease by operation
of law and we will promptly distribute only to our public
stockholders (including our initial stockholders to the extent
they have purchased shares in this offering or in the
aftermarket) the amount in our trust account (including any
accrued interest then remaining in the trust account) plus any
remaining net assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
We cannot assure you that the per-share distribution from the
trust account, if we liquidate, will not be less than $9.67,
plus interest then held in the trust account, for the following
reasons: |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to liquidation, pursuant to
Section 281 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, we
will adopt a plan that will provide for our payment, based on
facts known to us at such time, of (i) all existing claims,
(ii) all pending claims and (iii) all claims that may
be potentially brought against us within the subsequent
10 years. Accordingly, we would be required to provide for
any
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
creditors known to us at that time as well as provide for any
claims that we believe could potentially be brought against us
within the subsequent 10 years prior to distributing the
funds held in the trust to our public stockholders. We cannot
assure you that we will properly assess all claims that may be
potentially brought against us. As such, our stockholders could
potentially be liable for any claims of creditors to the extent
of distributions received by them (but no more). |
|
|
|
While we will seek to have all vendors and
service providers (which would include any third parties we
engaged to assist us in any way in connection with our search
for a target business) and prospective target businesses execute
agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim
of any kind they may have in or to any monies held in the trust
account, there is no guarantee that they will execute such
agreements. Nor is there any guarantee that, even if such
entities execute such agreements with us, they will not seek
recourse against the trust account or that a court would not
conclude that such agreements are not legally enforceable.
Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have agreed that they will be
personally liable to ensure that the proceeds in the trust
account are not reduced by the claims of target businesses or
claims of vendors or other entities that are owed money by us
for services rendered or contracted for or products sold to us.
However, we cannot assure you that they will be able to satisfy
those obligations, if they are required to do so. Furthermore,
Messrs. Leight and Weiss will not have any personal
liability as to any claimed amounts owed to a third party who
executed a waiver (including a prospective target business).
Additionally, in the case of a prospective target business that
did not execute a waiver, such liability will be only in an
amount necessary to ensure that public stockholders receive no
less than $10.00 per share upon liquidation.
|
|
|
|
We anticipate the distribution of the funds in the trust account
to our public stockholders will occur
by ,
2009 [10 business days from the date our corporate existence
ceases], subject to our obligations under Delaware law to
provide for claims of creditors. Our existing stockholders have
waived their rights to participate in any liquidation
distribution with respect to their initial shares. We will pay
the costs of liquidation from our remaining assets outside of
the trust account. If such funds are insufficient, Nathan Leight
and Jason Weiss have agreed to advance us the funds necessary to
complete such liquidation (currently anticipated to be no more
than approximately $15,000) and have agreed not to seek
repayment for such expenses. |
|
Escrow of existing stockholders shares
|
|
On the date of this prospectus, all of our existing
stockholders, including all of our officers and directors, will
place their initial shares into an escrow account maintained by
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, acting as
escrow agent. Subject to certain limited exceptions (such as
transfers (i) to an entitys members upon its
liquidation, (ii) to relatives and trusts for estate
planning |
11
|
|
|
|
|
purposes or (iii) by private sales made at or prior to the
consummation of a business combination at prices no greater than
the price at which the shares were originally purchased, in each
case where the transferee agrees to the terms of the escrow
agreement), these shares will not be transferable during the
escrow period and will not be released from escrow until one
year after the consummation of our initial business combination
or earlier if, following a business combination, (i) the
last sales price of our common stock equals or exceeds
$18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within any
30-trading day period or (ii) we consummate a subsequent
liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction
which results in all of our stockholders having the right to
exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or
other property. |
RISKS
In making your decision on whether to invest in our securities,
you should take into account not only the backgrounds of our
management team, but also the special risks we face as a blank
check company, as well as the fact that this offering is not
being conducted in compliance with Rule 419 promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and, therefore,
you will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to
investors in Rule 419 blank check offerings. You should
carefully consider these and the other risks set forth in the
section entitled Risk Factors beginning on
page 14 of this prospectus.
12
SUMMARY
FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes the relevant financial data for
our business and should be read with our financial statements,
which are included in this prospectus. We have not had any
significant operations to date, so only balance sheet data are
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
|
$
|
281,284,000
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
281,284,000
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
101,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of common stock which may be
converted to cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,994,994
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
165,289,006
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the $3,000,000 we will
receive from the sale of the insider warrants. Assumes the
payment of the $9,000,000 deferred underwriters discounts
and commissions to the underwriters.
|
The as adjusted information gives effect to the sale
of the units we are offering, including the application of the
related gross proceeds and the payment of the estimated
remaining costs from such sale and the repayment of the accrued
and other liabilities required to be repaid.
The working capital excludes $23,468 of costs related to this
offering which were paid or accrued prior to February 28,
2007. These deferred offering costs have been recorded as a
long-term asset and are reclassified against stockholders
equity in the as adjusted information.
The as adjusted working capital and total assets
amounts include the $281,060,000 to be held in the trust
account, which will be available to us only upon the
consummation of a business combination within the time period
described in this prospectus. The total amount to be placed in
trust also includes $9,000,000 (or approximately $0.30 per
share) of deferred underwriting discounts and commissions
payable to the underwriters in the offering only if we
consummate a business combination. If a business combination is
not so consummated, the trust account totaling $290,060,000 of
net proceeds from the offering, including $3,000,000 of proceeds
from the private placement of the insider warrants, and all
accrued interest earned thereon less (i) up to $3,100,000
that may be released to us to fund our expenses and other
working capital requirements and (ii) any amounts released
to us to pay our income or other tax obligations, will be
distributed solely to our public stockholders (subject to our
obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of
creditors).
We will not proceed with a business combination if public
stockholders owning 40% or more of the shares sold in this
offering vote against the business combination and exercise
their conversion rights. Accordingly, we may effect a business
combination if public stockholders owning up to approximately
39.99% of the shares sold in this offering exercise their
conversion rights. If this occurred, we would be required to
convert to cash up to approximately 39.99% of the
30,000,000 shares sold in this offering, or
11,997,000 shares of common stock, at an initial per-share
conversion price of approximately $9.67, without taking into
account interest earned on the trust account. The actual
per-share conversion price will be equal to:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount in the trust account, including all accrued interest
after distribution of interest income on the trust account
balance to us as described above, as of two business days prior
to the proposed consummation of the business combination,
|
|
|
|
divided by the number of shares of common stock sold in the
offering.
|
Because converting stockholders will receive their proportionate
share of the deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and
the underwriters will be paid the full amount of their deferred
underwriting compensation at the time of the consummation of our
initial business combination, the Company (and, therefore, the
non-converting stockholders) will bear the financial effect of
such payments to both the converting stockholders and the
underwriters.
13
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of
risk. You should consider carefully the material risks described
below, which we believe represent all the material risks related
to the offering, together with the other information contained
in this prospectus, before making a decision to invest in our
units.
Risks
associated with our business
We are
a development stage company with no operating history and,
accordingly, you will not have any basis on which to evaluate
our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are a recently incorporated development stage company with no
operating results to date. Therefore, our ability to commence
operations is dependent upon obtaining financing through the
public offering of our securities. Since we do not have an
operating history, you will have no basis upon which to evaluate
our ability to achieve our business objective, which is to
acquire an operating business. We have not conducted any
discussions and we have no plans, arrangements or understandings
with any prospective acquisition candidates. We will not
generate any revenues until, at the earliest, after the
consummation of a business combination.
If we
are forced to liquidate before a business combination and
distribute the trust account, our public stockholders may
receive less than $10.00 per share and our warrants will
expire worthless.
If we are unable to complete a business combination within the
prescribed time frames and are forced to liquidate our assets,
the per-share liquidation distribution may be less than $10.00
because of the expenses of this offering, our general and
administrative expenses and the anticipated costs of seeking a
business combination. Furthermore, there will be no distribution
with respect to our outstanding warrants which will expire
worthless if we liquidate before the completion of a business
combination.
If we
are unable to consummate a business combination, our public
stockholders will be forced to wait the full 24 months
before receiving liquidation distributions.
We have 24 months in which to complete a business
combination. We have no obligation to return funds to investors
prior to such date unless we consummate a business combination
prior thereto and only then in cases where investors have sought
conversion of their shares. Only after the expiration of this
full time period will public stockholders be entitled to
liquidation distributions if we are unable to complete a
business combination. Accordingly, investors funds may be
unavailable to them until such date.
We may
proceed with a business combination even if public stockholders
owning 39.99% of the shares sold in this offering exercise their
conversion rights.
We may proceed with a business combination as long as public
stockholders owning less than 40% of the shares sold in this
offering exercise their conversion rights. Accordingly,
approximately 39.99% of the public stockholders may exercise
their conversion rights and we could still consummate a proposed
business combination. We have set the conversion percentage at
40% in order to reduce the likelihood that a small group of
investors holding a block of our stock will be able to stop us
from completing a business combination that is otherwise
approved by a large majority of our public stockholders. While
there are a few other offerings similar to ours which include
conversion provisions greater than 20%, the 20% threshold is
customary and standard for offerings similar to ours.
Our business combination may require us to use substantially all
of our cash to pay the purchase price. In such a case, because
we will not know how many stockholders may exercise such
conversion rights, we may need to arrange third party financing
to help fund our business combination in case a larger
percentage of stockholders exercise their conversion rights than
we expect. Additionally, even if our business combination does
not require us to use substantially all of our cash to pay the
purchase price, if a significant number of stockholders exercise
their conversion rights, we will have less cash available to use
in furthering our business plans following a business
combination and may need to arrange third party financing. We
have not taken any
14
steps to secure third party financing for either situation. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such third
party financing on terms favorable to us or at all.
You
will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to
investors of blank check companies.
Since the net proceeds of this offering are intended to be used
to complete a business combination with a target business that
has not been identified, we may be deemed to be a blank
check company under the United States securities laws.
However, since our securities will be listed on the American
Stock Exchange, a national securities exchange, and we will have
net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,000 upon the successful
consummation of this offering and will file a Current Report on
Form 8-K,
including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we
are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect
investors of blank check companies such as Rule 419.
Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or
protections of those rules such as completely restricting the
transferability of our securities, requiring us to complete a
business combination within 18 months of the effective date
of the initial registration statement and restricting the use of
interest earned on the funds held in the trust account. Because
we are not subject to Rule 419, our units will be
immediately tradable, we will be entitled to withdraw a certain
amount of interest earned on the funds held in the trust account
prior to the completion of a business combination and we have a
longer period of time to complete such a business combination
than we would if we were subject to such rule.
Because
there are numerous companies with a business plan similar to
ours seeking to effectuate a business combination, it may be
more difficult for us to do so.
Since August 2003, based upon publicly available information,
approximately
similarly structured blank check companies have completed
initial public offerings in the United States. Of these
companies,
only companies
have consummated a business combination,
while
other companies have announced they have entered into a
definitive agreement for a business combination, but have not
consummated such business combination,
and companies
have failed to complete business combinations and have either
dissolved or announced their intention to dissolve and return
trust proceeds to their stockholders. Accordingly, there are
approximately
blank check companies with more than
$ billion in trust that are
seeking to carry out a business plan similar to our business
plan. Furthermore, there are a number of additional offerings
for blank check companies that are still in the registration
process but have not completed initial public offerings and
there are likely to be more blank check companies filing
registration statements for initial public offerings after the
date of this prospectus and prior to our completion of a
business combination. While some of those companies must
complete a business combination in specific industries, a number
of them may consummate a business combination in any industry
they choose. Therefore, we may be subject to competition from
these and other companies seeking to consummate a business plan
similar to ours. Because of this competition, we cannot assure
you that we will be able to effectuate a business combination
within the required time periods.
If the
net proceeds of this offering not being held in trust are
insufficient to allow us to operate for at least the next
24 months, we may be unable to complete a business
combination.
We believe that, upon consummation of this offering, the funds
available to us outside of the trust account, plus the interest
earned on the funds held in the trust account that may be
available to us, will be sufficient to allow us to operate for
at least the next 24 months, assuming that a business
combination is not consummated during that time. However, we
cannot assure you that our estimates will be accurate. We could
use a portion of the funds available to us to pay commitment
fees for financing, fees to consultants to assist us with our
search for a target business. We could also use a portion of the
funds as a down payment or to fund a no-shop
provision (a provision in letters of intent designed to keep
target businesses from shopping around for
transactions with other companies on terms more favorable to
such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed
business combination, although we do not have any current
intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent where
we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a target
business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds
(whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might not
have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due
diligence with respect to, a target business.
15
A
decline in interest rates could limit the amount available to
fund our search for a target business or businesses and complete
a business combination since we will depend on interest earned
on the trust account to fund our search, to pay our tax
obligations and to complete our initial business
combination.
Of the net proceeds of this offering, only $200,000 will be
available to us initially outside the trust account to fund our
working capital requirements. We will depend on sufficient
interest being earned on the proceeds held in the trust account
to provide us with additional working capital we will need to
identify one or more target businesses and to complete our
initial business combination, as well as to pay any tax
obligations that we may owe. While we are entitled to have
released to us for such purposes certain interest earned on the
funds in the trust account, a substantial decline in interest
rates may result in our having insufficient funds available with
which to structure, negotiate or close an initial business
combination. In such event, we would need to borrow funds from
our initial stockholders to operate or may be forced to
liquidate. Our initial stockholders are under no obligation to
advance funds in such circumstances.
If
third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in
trust could be reduced and the per-share liquidation price
received by stockholders will be less than approximately
$9.67 per share.
Our placing of funds in trust may not protect those funds from
third party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all
vendors and service providers we engage and prospective target
businesses we negotiate with, execute agreements with us waiving
any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any
monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public
stockholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute such
agreements. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that, even if
such entities execute such agreements with us, they will not
seek recourse against the trust account. Nor is there any
guarantee that a court would uphold the validity of such
agreements. Accordingly, the proceeds held in trust could be
subject to claims which could take priority over those of our
public stockholders. If we liquidate before the completion of a
business combination and distribute the proceeds held in trust
to our public stockholders, Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have
agreed that they will be personally liable to ensure that the
proceeds in the trust account are not reduced by the claims of
target businesses or vendors or other entities that are owed
money by us for services rendered or contracted for or products
sold to us. Based on representations made to us by
Messrs. Leight and Weiss, we currently believe that they
are capable of funding a shortfall in our trust account to
satisfy their foreseeable indemnification obligations. However,
we have not asked them to reserve for such an eventuality.
Furthermore, our belief is based on our expectation that their
indemnification obligations will be minimal. Accordingly, if
that expectation turns out to be incorrect, we cannot assure you
that such individuals will be able to satisfy those obligations
or that the proceeds in the trust account will not be reduced by
such claims. Furthermore, Messrs. Leight and Weiss will not
have any personal liability as to any claimed amounts owed to a
third party who executed a waiver (including a prospective
target business). Additionally, in the case of a prospective
target business that did not execute a waiver, such liability
will only be in an amount necessary to ensure that public
stockholders receive no less than $10.00 per share upon
liquidation.
Additionally, if we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an
involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against us which is not
dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be
subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our
bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties
with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent
any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, we cannot
assure you we will be able to return to our public stockholders
at least $9.67 per share.
Our
stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties
against us to the extent of distributions received by
them.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that we will continue in existence only until 24 months
from the date of this prospectus. If we have not completed a
business combination by such date and amended this provision in
connection thereto, pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation
Law, our corporate existence will cease except for the purposes
of winding up our affairs and liquidating. Under
Sections 280 through 282 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, stockholders may be held liable for claims by
third parties against a corporation to the extent of
distributions received by them in a dissolution. If the
corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in
Section 280 of the Delaware General Corporation
16
Law intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for
all claims against it, including a
60-day
notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought
against the corporation, a
90-day
period during which the corporation may reject any claims
brought, and an additional
150-day
waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to
stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a
liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such
stockholders pro rata share of the claim or the amount
distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the
stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the
dissolution. However, it is our intention to make liquidating
distributions to our stockholders as soon as reasonably possible
after the expiration of the twenty four month period and,
therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures.
Because we will not be complying with those procedures, we are
required, pursuant to Section 281 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, to adopt a plan that will provide for our
payment, based on facts known to us at such time, of
(i) all existing claims, (ii) all pending claims and
(iii) all claims that may be potentially brought against us
within the subsequent 10 years. Accordingly, we would be
required to provide for any creditors known to us at that time
or those that we believe could be potentially brought against us
within the subsequent 10 years prior to distributing the
funds held in the trust to stockholders. We cannot assure you
that we will properly assess all claims that may be potentially
brought against us. As such, our stockholders could potentially
be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received
by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may
extend well beyond the third anniversary of the date of
distribution. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that third
parties will not seek to recover from our stockholders amounts
owed to them by us.
If we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary
bankruptcy case is filed against us which is not dismissed, any
distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under
applicable debtor/creditor
and/or
bankruptcy laws as either a preferential transfer or
a fraudulent conveyance. As a result, a bankruptcy
court could seek to recover all amounts received by our
stockholders. Furthermore, because we intend to distribute the
proceeds held in the trust account to our public stockholders
promptly
after ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this
prospectus], this may be viewed or interpreted as giving
preference to our public stockholders over any potential
creditors with respect to access to or distributions from our
assets. Furthermore, our board may be viewed as having breached
their fiduciary duties to our creditors
and/or may
have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposing itself and our
company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public
stockholders from the trust account prior to addressing the
claims of creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not
be brought against us for these reasons.
An
effective registration statement may not be in place when an
investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such
investor from being able to exercise his, her or its warrants
and causing such warrants to be practically
worthless.
No warrant held by public stockholders will be exercisable and
we will not be obligated to issue shares of common stock unless
at the time such holder seeks to exercise such warrant, a
registration statement relating to the common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrant is effective and current. Under the
terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed to use our best
efforts to meet these conditions and to maintain a current
prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise
of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants. However,
we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so, and if we do
not maintain a current prospectus related to the common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants, holders will be unable
to exercise their warrants and we will not be required to settle
any such warrant exercise. If the prospectus relating to the
common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not
current, the warrants held by public stockholders may have no
value, the market for such warrants may be limited and such
warrants may expire worthless. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the insider warrants may be exercisable for unregistered shares
of common stock even if no registration relating to the common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and
current.
17
An
investor will only be able to exercise a warrant if the issuance
of common stock upon such exercise has been registered or
qualified or is deemed exempt under the securities laws of the
state of residence of the holder of the warrants.
No warrants will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to
issue shares of common stock unless the common stock issuable
upon such exercise has been registered or qualified or deemed to
be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of
the holder of the warrants. At the time that the warrants
become exercisable (following our completion of a business
combination), we expect to continue to be listed on a national
securities exchange, which would provide an exemption from
registration in every state. Accordingly, we believe holders in
every state will be able to exercise their warrants as long as
our prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants is current. However, we cannot assure
you of this fact. As a result, the warrants may be deprived of
any value, the market for the warrants may be limited and the
holders of warrants may not be able to exercise their warrants
if the common stock issuable upon such exercise is not qualified
or exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the
holders of the warrants reside.
Since
we have not yet selected a particular industry or target
business with which to complete a business combination, we are
unable to currently ascertain the merits or risks of the
industry or business in which we may ultimately
operate.
We may consummate a business combination with a company in any
industry we choose and are not limited to any particular
industry or type of business. Accordingly, there is no current
basis for you to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the
particular industry in which we may ultimately operate or the
target business which we may ultimately acquire. To the extent
we complete a business combination with a financially unstable
company or an entity in its development stage, we may be
affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations
of those entities. If we complete a business combination with an
entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, we
may be affected by the currently unascertainable risks of that
industry. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the
risks inherent in a particular industry or target business, we
cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all
of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure you that
an investment in our units will not ultimately prove to be less
favorable to investors in this offering than a direct
investment, if an opportunity were available, in a target
business.
We may
issue shares of our capital stock or debt securities to complete
a business combination, which would reduce the equity interest
of our stockholders and likely cause a change in control of our
ownership.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes
the issuance of up to 85,000,000 shares of common stock,
par value $.0001 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share. Immediately
after this offering and the purchase of the insider warrants
(assuming no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option), there will be 14,500,000 authorized but unissued shares
of our common stock available for issuance (after appropriate
reservation for the issuance of the shares upon full exercise of
our outstanding warrants) and all of the 1,000,000 shares
of preferred stock available for issuance. Although we have no
commitment as of the date of this offering, we may issue a
substantial number of additional shares of our common or
preferred stock, or a combination of common and preferred stock,
to complete a business combination. The issuance of additional
shares of our common stock or any number of shares of our
preferred stock:
|
|
|
|
|
may significantly reduce the equity interest of investors in
this offering;
|
|
|
|
may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if we
issue preferred stock with rights senior to those afforded to
our common stock;
|
|
|
|
may cause a change in control if a substantial number of our
shares of common stock are issued, which may affect, among other
things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry
forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal
of our present officers and directors; and
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common
stock.
|
Similarly, if we issue debt securities, it could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues
after a business combination are insufficient to repay our debt
obligations;
|
|
|
|
acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even
if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we
breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain
financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation
of that covenant;
|
|
|
|
our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if
any, if the debt security is payable on demand; and
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the
debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to
obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding.
|
Our
ability to successfully effect a business combination and to be
successful thereafter will be totally dependent upon the efforts
of our key personnel, some of whom may join us following a
business combination.
Our ability to successfully effect a business combination is
dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our
key personnel in the target business, however, cannot presently
be ascertained. Although some of our key personnel may remain
with the target business in senior management or advisory
positions following a business combination, it is likely that
some or all of the management of the target business will remain
in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals
we engage after a business combination, we cannot assure you
that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be
correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the
requirements of operating a public company which could cause us
to have to expend time and resources helping them become
familiar with such requirements. This could be expensive and
time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which
may adversely affect our operations.
Our
key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements
with a target business in connection with a particular business
combination. These agreements may provide for them to receive
compensation following a business combination and as a result,
may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining
whether a particular business combination is the most
advantageous.
Our key personnel will be able to remain with the company after
the consummation of a business combination only if they are able
to negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection
with the business combination. Such negotiations would take
place simultaneously with the negotiation of the business
combination and could provide for such individuals to receive
compensation in the form of cash payments
and/or our
securities for services they would render to the company after
the consummation of the business combination. The personal and
financial interests of such individuals may influence their
motivation in identifying and selecting a target business.
However, we believe the ability of such individuals to remain
with the company after the consummation of a business
combination will not be the determining factor in our decision
as to whether or not we will proceed with any potential business
combination.
Our
officers and directors will allocate their time to other
businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in their
determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs. This
conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability
to consummate a business combination.
Our officers and directors are not required to commit their full
time to our affairs, which could create a conflict of interest
when allocating their time between our operations and their
other commitments. We do not intend to have any full time
employees prior to the consummation of a business combination.
All of our executive officers are engaged in several other
business endeavors (none of which are blank check companies) and
are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our
affairs. If our officers and directors other
business affairs require them to devote more substantial amounts
of time to such affairs, it could limit their
19
ability to devote time to our affairs and could have a negative
impact on our ability to consummate a business combination. We
cannot assure you that these conflicts will be resolved in our
favor. As a result, a potential target business may be presented
to another entity prior to its presentation to us and we may
miss out on a potential transaction.
Our
officers, directors and their affiliates may in the future
become affiliated with entities engaged in business activities
similar to those intended to be conducted by us and accordingly,
may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a
particular business opportunity should be
presented.
Our officers and directors may in the future become affiliated
with entities, including other blank check
companies, engaged in business activities similar to those
intended to be conducted by us. Additionally, our officers and
directors may become aware of business opportunities which may
be appropriate for presentation to us and the other entities to
which they owe fiduciary duties. Accordingly, they may have
conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a
particular business opportunity should be presented. We cannot
assure you that these conflicts will be resolved in our favor.
As a result, a potential target business may be presented to
another entity prior to its presentation to us and we may miss
out on a potential transaction.
All of
our officers and directors own shares of our common stock issued
prior to the offering and some of them will own warrants
following this offering. These shares and warrants will not
participate in liquidation distributions and, therefore, our
officers and directors may have a conflict of interest in
determining whether a particular target business is appropriate
for a business combination.
All of our officers and directors own shares of our common stock
that were issued prior to this offering. Additionally, certain
of our officers and directors are purchasing insider warrants
upon consummation of this offering. Such individuals have waived
their right to receive distributions with respect to their
initial shares upon our liquidation if we are unable to
consummate a business combination. Accordingly, the shares
acquired prior to this offering, as well as the insider
warrants, and any warrants purchased by our officers or
directors in this offering or in the aftermarket will be
worthless if we do not consummate a business combination. The
personal and financial interests of our directors and officers
may influence their motivation in timely identifying and
selecting a target business and completing a business
combination. Consequently, our directors and
officers discretion in identifying and selecting a
suitable target business may result in a conflict of interest
when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a
particular business combination are appropriate and in our
stockholders best interest.
The
American Stock Exchange may delist our securities from quotation
on its exchange which could limit investors ability to
make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional
trading restrictions.
We anticipate that our securities will be listed on the American
Stock Exchange, a national securities exchange, upon
consummation of this offering. We cannot assure you that our
securities will continue to be listed on the American Stock
Exchange in the future prior to a business combination.
Additionally, in connection with our business combination, it is
likely that the American Stock Exchange will require us to file
a new initial listing application and meet its initial listing
requirements as opposed to its more lenient continued listing
requirements. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet
those initial listing requirements at that time.
If the American Stock Exchange delists our securities from
trading on its exchange, we could face significant material
adverse consequences, including:
|
|
|
|
|
a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
|
|
|
|
a determination that our common stock is a penny
stock which will require brokers trading in our common
stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a
reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading
market for our common stock;
|
|
|
|
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for our company;
and
|
|
|
|
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain
additional financing in the future.
|
20
We may
only be able to complete one business combination with the
proceeds of this offering, which will cause us to be solely
dependent on a single business which may have a limited number
of products or services.
Our business combination must be with a business with a fair
market value of at least 80% of our net assets at the time of
such acquisition, although this may entail the simultaneous
acquisitions of several operating businesses at the same time.
By consummating a business combination with only a single
entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous
economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we
would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from
the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike
other entities which may have the resources to complete several
business combinations in different industries or different areas
of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success
may be:
|
|
|
|
|
solely dependent upon the performance of a single
business, or
|
|
|
|
dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single
or limited number of products, processes or services.
|
This lack of diversification may subject us to numerous
economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of
which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular
industry in which we may operate subsequent to a business
combination.
Alternatively, if we determine to simultaneously acquire several
businesses and such businesses are owned by different sellers,
we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase
of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of
the other business combinations, which may make it more
difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete the
business combination. With multiple business combinations, we
could also face additional risks, including additional burdens
and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due
diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the
additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of
the operations and services or products of the acquired
companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to
adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our
profitability and results of operations.
The
ability of our stockholders to exercise their conversion rights
may not allow us to effectuate the most desirable business
combination or optimize our capital structure.
When we seek stockholder approval of any business combination,
we will offer each public stockholder (but not our existing
stockholders) the right to have his, her or its shares of common
stock converted to cash if the stockholder votes against the
business combination and the business combination is approved
and completed. Such holder must both vote against such business
combination and then exercise his, her or its conversion rights
to receive a pro rata portion of the trust account. Accordingly,
if our business combination requires us to use substantially all
of our cash to pay the purchase price, because we will not know
how many stockholders may exercise such conversion rights, we
may either need to reserve part of the trust account for
possible payment upon such conversion, or we may need to arrange
third party financing to help fund our business combination in
case a larger percentage of stockholders exercise their
conversion rights than we expect. Since we have no specific
business combination under consideration, we have not taken any
steps to secure third party financing. Therefore, we may not be
able to consummate a business combination that requires us to
use all of the funds held in the trust account as part of the
purchase price, or we may end up having a leverage ratio that is
not optimal for our business combination. This may limit our
ability to effectuate the most attractive business combination
available to us.
We may
require stockholders who wish to convert their shares in
connection with a proposed business combination to comply with
specific requirements for conversion that may make it more
difficult for them to exercise their conversion rights prior to
the deadline for exercising their rights.
We may require public stockholders who wish to convert their
shares in connection with a proposed business combination to
either tender their certificates to our transfer agent at any
time prior to the vote taken
21
at the stockholder meeting relating to such business
combination or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent
electronically using the Depository Trust Companys
DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System. In order to
obtain a physical stock certificate, a stockholders broker
and/or
clearing broker, DTC and our transfer agent will need to act to
facilitate this request. It is our understanding that
stockholders should generally allot at least two weeks to obtain
physical certificates from the transfer agent. However, because
we do not have any control over this process or over the brokers
or DTC, it may take significantly longer than two weeks to
obtain a physical stock certificate. While we have been advised
that it takes a short time to deliver shares through the DWAC
System, we cannot assure you of this fact. Accordingly, if it
takes longer than we anticipate for stockholders to deliver
their shares, stockholders who wish to convert may be unable to
meet the deadline for exercising their conversion rights and
thus may be unable to convert their shares.
Because
of our limited resources and structure, we may not be able to
consummate an attractive business combination.
We expect to encounter intense competition from entities other
than blank check companies having a business objective similar
to ours, including venture capital funds, leveraged buyout funds
and operating businesses competing for acquisitions. Many of
these entities are well established and have extensive
experience in identifying and effecting business combinations
directly or through affiliates. Many of these competitors
possess greater technical, human and other resources than we do
and our financial resources will be relatively limited when
contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we
believe that there are numerous potential target businesses that
we could acquire with the net proceeds of this offering, our
ability to compete in acquiring certain sizable target
businesses will be limited by our available financial resources.
This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage
in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses.
Furthermore, the obligation we have to seek stockholder approval
of a business combination may delay the consummation of a
transaction. Additionally, our outstanding warrants, and the
future dilution they potentially represent, may not be viewed
favorably by certain target businesses. Any of these obligations
may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully
negotiating a business combination. Because
only
of
the
blank check companies that have gone public in the United States
since August 2003 have either consummated a business combination
or entered into a definitive agreement for a business
combination, it may indicate that there are fewer attractive
target businesses available to such entities like our company or
that many privately held target businesses are not inclined to
enter into these types of transactions with publicly held blank
check companies like ours. If we are unable to consummate a
business combination with a target business within the
prescribed time periods, we will be forced to liquidate.
We may
be unable to obtain additional financing, if required, to
complete a business combination or to fund the operations and
growth of the target business, which could compel us to
restructure or abandon a particular business
combination.
Although we believe that the net proceeds of this offering will
be sufficient to allow us to consummate a business combination,
because we have not yet identified any prospective target
business, we cannot ascertain the capital requirements for any
particular transaction. If the net proceeds of this offering
prove to be insufficient, either because of the size of the
business combination, the depletion of the available net
proceeds in search of a target business, or the obligation to
convert into cash a significant number of shares from dissenting
stockholders, we will be required to seek additional financing.
We cannot assure you that such financing will be available on
acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that additional
financing proves to be unavailable when needed to consummate a
particular business combination, we would be compelled to either
restructure the transaction or abandon that particular business
combination and seek an alternative target business candidate.
In addition, if we consummate a business combination, we may
require additional financing to fund the operations or growth of
the target business. The failure to secure additional financing
could have a material adverse effect on the continued
development or growth of the target business. None of our
officers, directors or stockholders is required to provide any
financing to us in connection with or after a business
combination.
22
Our
existing stockholders, including our officers and directors,
control a substantial interest in us and thus may influence
certain actions requiring a stockholder vote.
Upon consummation of our offering, our existing stockholders
(including all of our officers and directors) will collectively
own 20% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock
(assuming they do not purchase any units in this offering). Our
board of directors is and will be divided into three classes,
each of which will generally serve for a term of three years
with only one class of directors being elected in each year. It
is unlikely that there will be an annual meeting of stockholders
to elect new directors prior to the consummation of a business
combination, in which case all of the current directors will
continue in office until at least the consummation of the
business combination. If there is an annual meeting, as a
consequence of our staggered board of directors,
only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for
election and our existing stockholders, because of their
ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding
the outcome. Accordingly, our existing stockholders will
continue to exert control at least until the consummation of a
business combination.
Our
existing stockholders paid an aggregate of $25,000, or
approximately $0.003 per share, for their shares and,
accordingly, you will experience immediate and substantial
dilution from the purchase of our common stock.
The difference between the public offering price per share and
the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common
stock after this offering constitutes the dilution to the
investors in this offering. Our existing stockholders acquired
their initial shares of common stock at a nominal price,
significantly contributing to this dilution. Upon consummation
of this offering, you and the other new investors will incur an
immediate and substantial dilution of approximately 35.2% or
$3.52 per share (the difference between the pro forma net
tangible book value per share of $6.48, and the initial offering
price of $10.00 per unit).
Our
outstanding warrants may have an adverse effect on the market
price of our common stock and make it more difficult to effect a
business combination.
We will be issuing warrants to purchase 30,000,000 shares
of common stock as part of the units offered by this prospectus
and the insider warrants to purchase 3,000,000 shares of
common stock. To the extent we issue shares of common stock to
effect a business combination, the potential for the issuance of
a substantial number of additional shares upon exercise of these
warrants and option could make us a less attractive acquisition
vehicle in the eyes of a target business. Such securities, when
exercised, will increase the number of issued and outstanding
shares of our common stock and reduce the value of the shares
issued to complete the business combination. Accordingly, our
warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate a business
combination or increase the cost of acquiring the target
business. Additionally, the sale, or even the possibility of
sale, of the shares underlying the warrants could have an
adverse effect on the market price for our securities or on our
ability to obtain future financing. If and to the extent these
warrants are exercised, you may experience dilution to your
holdings.
If our
existing stockholders or the purchasers of the insider warrants
exercise their registration rights with respect to their initial
shares or insider warrants and underlying securities, it may
have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock
and the existence of these rights may make it more difficult to
effect a business combination.
Our existing stockholders are entitled to make a demand that we
register the resale of their initial shares at any time
commencing three months prior to the date on which their shares
are released from escrow. Additionally, the purchasers of the
insider warrants are entitled to demand that we register the
resale of their insider warrants and underlying shares of common
stock at any time after we consummate a business combination. If
such individuals exercise their registration rights with respect
to all of their securities, then there will be an additional
8,625,000 shares (or 7,500,000 shares if the
over-allotment option is not exercised) of common stock and
3,000,000 warrants (as well as 3,000,000 shares of common
stock underlying the warrants) eligible for trading in the
public market. The presence of these additional shares of common
stock trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on
the market price of our common stock. In addition,
23
the existence of these rights may make it more difficult to
effectuate a business combination or increase the cost of
acquiring the target business, as the stockholders of the target
business may be discouraged from entering into a business
combination with us or may request a higher price for their
securities because of the potential effect the exercise of such
rights may have on the trading market for our common stock.
If we
are deemed to be an investment company, we may be required to
institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities
may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to
complete a business combination.
A company that, among other things, is or holds itself out as
being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the
business of investing, reinvesting, owning, trading or holding
certain types of securities would be deemed an investment
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Since we will
invest the proceeds held in the trust account, it is possible
that we could be deemed an investment company. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, we do not believe that our anticipated principal
activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act of
1940. To this end, the proceeds held in trust may be invested by
the trustee only in United States government
securities within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940 having a maturity of
180 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain
conditions under
Rule 2a-7
promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940. By
restricting the investment of the proceeds to these instruments,
we intend to meet the requirements for the exemption provided in
Rule 3a-1
promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
If we are nevertheless deemed to be an investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, we may be subject to certain
restrictions that may make it more difficult for us to complete
a business combination, including:
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the nature of our investments; and
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the issuance of securities.
|
In addition, we may have imposed upon us certain burdensome
requirements, including:
|
|
|
|
|
registration as an investment company;
|
|
|
|
adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and
|
|
|
|
reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy, compliance policies
and procedures and disclosure requirements and other rules and
regulations.
|
Compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would
require additional expense for which we have not allotted funds.
The
determination for the offering price of our units and insider
warrants is more arbitrary compared with the pricing of
securities for an operating company in a particular
industry.
Prior to this offering there has been no public market for any
of our securities. The public offering price of the units and
the terms of the warrants, as well as the price of the insider
warrants, were negotiated between us and the representatives.
Factors considered in determining the prices and terms of the
units, including the common stock and warrants underlying the
units, and the insider warrants include:
|
|
|
|
|
the history and prospects of companies whose principal business
is the acquisition of other companies;
|
|
|
|
prior offerings of those companies;
|
|
|
|
our prospects for acquiring an operating business at attractive
values;
|
|
|
|
our capital structure;
|
|
|
|
an assessment of our management and their experience in
identifying operating companies;
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
general conditions of the securities markets at the time of the
offering; and
|
|
|
|
other factors as were deemed relevant.
|
However, although these factors were considered, the
determination of our offering price is more arbitrary than the
pricing of securities for an operating company in a particular
industry since we have no historical operations or financial
results to compare them to.
If we
effect a business combination with a company located outside of
the United States, we would be subject to a variety of
additional risks that may negatively impact our
operations.
We may effect a business combination with a company located
outside of the United States. If we did, we would be subject to
any special considerations or risks associated with companies
operating in the target business home jurisdiction,
including any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
rules and regulations or currency conversion or corporate
withholding taxes on individuals;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
regulations related to customs and import/export matters;
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles;
|
|
|
|
tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws
as compared to the United States;
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
challenges in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
cultural and language differences; and
|
|
|
|
employment regulations.
|
We cannot assure you that we would be able to adequately address
these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, our
operations might suffer.
If we
effect a business combination with a company located outside of
the United States, the laws applicable to such company will
likely govern all of our material agreements and we may not be
able to enforce our legal rights.
If we effect a business combination with a company located
outside of the United States, the laws of the country in which
such company operates will govern almost all of the material
agreements relating to its operations. We cannot assure you that
the target business will be able to enforce any of its material
agreements or that remedies will be available in this new
jurisdiction. The system of laws and the enforcement of existing
laws in such jurisdiction may not be as certain in
implementation and interpretation as in the United States. The
inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future
agreements could result in a significant loss of business,
business opportunities or capital. Additionally, if we acquire a
company located outside of the United States, it is likely that
substantially all of our assets would be located outside of the
United States and some of our officers and directors might
reside outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be
possible for investors in the United States to enforce their
legal rights, to effect service of process upon our directors or
officers or to enforce judgments of United States courts
predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties against
our directors and officers under Federal securities laws.
25
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering, in addition
to the funds we will receive from the sale of the insider
warrants (all of which will be deposited into the trust
account), will be as set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Over-
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
|
Allotment Option
|
|
|
Option Exercised
|
|
|
Gross proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From offering
|
|
$
|
300,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
345,000,000
|
|
From private placement
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross proceeds
|
|
|
303,000,000
|
|
|
|
348,000,000
|
|
Offering
expenses(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discount (7% of gross
proceeds from offering, 4% of which is payable at closing and 3%
of which is payable upon consummation of a business combination)
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
13,800,000
|
(2)
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
Miscellaneous expenses
|
|
|
125,590
|
|
|
|
125,590
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
American Stock Exchange filing and
listing fee
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
|
18,535
|
|
|
|
18,535
|
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
|
60,875
|
|
|
|
60,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total offering expenses
|
|
|
12,740,000
|
|
|
|
14,540,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held in trust
|
|
|
290,060,000
|
|
|
|
333,260,000
|
|
Not held in trust
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net proceeds
|
|
|
290,260,000
|
|
|
|
333,460,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of net proceeds not held in
trust and amounts available from interest income earned on the
trust
account(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal, accounting and other third
party expenses attendant to the search for target businesses and
to the due diligence investigation, structuring and negotiation
of a business combination
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
(30.3
|
)%
|
Due diligence of prospective
target businesses by officers, directors and existing
stockholders
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
Legal and accounting fees relating
to SEC reporting obligations
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
Payment of administrative fee to
Terrapin Partners LLC ($7,500 per month for two years)
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
Working capital to cover
miscellaneous expenses, D&O insurance, general corporate
purposes, liquidation obligations and reserves
|
|
|
1,670,000
|
|
|
|
(50.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,300,000
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Approximately $84,410 of the
offering expenses, including the SEC registration fee, the NASD
filing fee, the non-refundable portion of the American
Stock Exchange filing fee and a portion of the legal and audit
fees, have been or will be paid from the funds we received from
Messrs. Leight and Weiss described below. These funds will
be repaid out of the proceeds of this offering available to us.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
No discounts or commissions will be
paid with respect to the purchase of the insider warrants. For
purposes of presentation, the underwriting discounts are
reflected as the amount payable to the underwriters upon
consummation of the offering. An additional $9,000,000, or
$10,350,000 if the over-allotment option is exercised in full,
all of which will be deposited in trust following the
consummation of the offering, is payable to the underwriters
only if and when we consummate a business combination.
|
26
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The amount of proceeds not held in
trust will remain constant at $200,000 even if the
over-allotment option is exercised. In addition, $3,100,000 of
interest income earned on the amounts held in the trust account
will be available to us to pay for our working capital
requirements. For purposes of presentation, the full amount
available to us is shown as the total amount of net proceeds
available to us immediately following the offering.
|
|
(4)
|
|
These are estimates only. Our
actual expenditures for some or all of these items may differ
from the estimates set forth herein. For example, we may incur
greater legal and accounting expenses than our current estimates
in connection with negotiating and structuring a business
combination based upon the level of complexity of that business
combination. We do not anticipate any change in our intended use
of proceeds, other than fluctuations among the current
categories of allocated expenses, which fluctuations, to the
extent they exceed current estimates for any specific category
of expenses, would be deducted from our excess working capital.
|
In addition to the offering of units by this prospectus, Nathan
Leight and Jason Weiss have committed to purchase the insider
warrants (for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000) from
us. These purchases will take place on a private placement basis
simultaneously with the consummation of this offering. We will
not pay any discounts or commissions with respect to the
purchase of the insider warrants. All of the proceeds we receive
from this purchase will be placed in the trust account described
below.
$287,060,000, or $330,260,000 if the over-allotment option is
exercised in full, of net proceeds of this offering, plus the
$3,000,000 we will receive from the sale of the insider
warrants, will be placed in a trust account at Wells Fargo,
maintained by Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, New York, New York, as trustee. This amount includes a
portion of the underwriting discounts and commissions payable to
the underwriters in this offering. The underwriters have agreed
that such amount will not be paid unless and until we consummate
a business combination and have waived their right to receive
such payment upon our liquidation if we are unable to complete a
business combination. The funds held in trust will be invested
only in United States government securities within
the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 having a maturity of 180 days or less, or in
money market funds meeting certain conditions under
Rule 2a-7
promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940, so that we
are not deemed to be an investment company under the Investment
Company Act. Except with respect to interest income that may be
released to us of (i) up to $3,100,000 to fund expenses
related to investigating and selecting a target business and our
other working capital requirements and (ii) any additional
amounts we may need to pay our income or other tax obligations,
the proceeds will not be released from the trust account until
the earlier of the completion of a business combination or our
liquidation. The proceeds held in the trust account may be used
as consideration to pay the sellers of a target business with
which we complete a business combination. Any amounts not paid
as consideration to the sellers of the target business may be
used to finance operations of the target business.
The payment to Terrapin Partners LLC, an affiliate of Nathan
Leight, our chairman of the board, and Jason Weiss, our chief
executive officer, of a monthly fee of $7,500 is for certain
administrative, technology and secretarial services, as well as
the use of certain limited office space, including a conference
room, in New York City. This arrangement is being agreed to by
Terrapin Partners LLC for our benefit and is not intended to
provide Messrs. Leight and Weiss compensation in lieu of a
salary. We believe, based on rents and fees for similar services
in the New York City metropolitan area, that the fee charged by
Terrapin Partners LLC is at least as favorable as we could have
obtained from an unaffiliated person. This arrangement will
terminate upon completion of a business combination or the
distribution of the trust account to our public stockholders.
Other than the $7,500 per month fee, no compensation of any
kind (including finders, consulting or other similar fees)
will be paid to any of our existing officers, directors,
stockholders, or any of their affiliates, prior to, or for any
services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of
the business combination (regardless of the type of transaction
that it is). However, such individuals will receive
reimbursement for any
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by them in connection with activities on our
behalf, such as searching for and identifying potential target
businesses, performing business due diligence on suitable target
businesses and business combinations as well as traveling to and
from the offices, plants or similar locations of prospective
target businesses to examine their operations or meet with their
representatives or owners. Reimbursement for such expenses will
be paid by us out of the funds not held in trust and currently
allocated to Legal, accounting and other third-party
expenses attendant to the search for target businesses and to
the due diligence investigation, structuring and negotiation of
a business combination, Due diligence of prospective
target businesses by our officers, directors and existing
stockholders and Working capital to cover
miscellaneous expenses, D&O insurance, general corporate
purposes, liquidation obligations and
27
reserves. Since the role of present management after a
business combination is uncertain, we have no ability to
determine what remuneration, if any, will be paid to those
persons after a business combination.
Regardless of whether the over-allotment option is exercised in
full, the net proceeds from this offering available to us out of
trust for our search for a business combination will be
approximately $200,000. In addition, interest earned on the
funds held in the trust account, up to $3,100,000, may be
released to us to fund our working capital requirements. We will
also be entitled to have interest earned on the funds held in
the trust account released to us to pay any tax obligations that
we may owe. We intend to use the excess working capital
(approximately $1,670,000) for director and officer liability
insurance premiums (approximately $120,000), with the balance of
$1,550,000 being held in reserve in the event due diligence,
legal, accounting and other expenses of structuring and
negotiating business combinations exceed our estimates, as well
as for reimbursement of any
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by our existing stockholders in connection
with activities on our behalf as described below. We believe
these funds will be sufficient to cover the foregoing expenses
and reimbursement costs. We could use a portion of the funds not
being placed in trust to pay commitment fees for financing, fees
to consultants to assist us with our search for a target
business or as a down payment or to fund a no-shop
provision (a provision in letters of intent designed to keep
target businesses from shopping around for
transactions with other companies on terms more favorable to
such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed
business combination, although we do not have any current
intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent where
we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a target
business, the amount that would be used as a down payment or to
fund a no-shop provision would be determined based
on the terms of the specific business combination and the amount
of our available funds at the time. Our forfeiture of such funds
(whether as a result of our breach or otherwise) could result in
our not having sufficient funds to continue searching for, or
conducting due diligence with respect to, potential target
businesses.
The allocation of the net proceeds available to us outside of
the trust account, along with the available interest earned on
the funds held in the trust account, represents our best
estimate of the intended uses of these funds. In the event that
our assumptions prove to be inaccurate, we may reallocate some
of such proceeds within the above described categories.
We will likely use substantially all of the net proceeds of this
offering, including the funds held in the trust account, to
acquire a target business and to pay our expenses relating
thereto. Additionally, while we are not obligated to engage any
of the underwriters to assist us with locating a target business
following this offering, we are not restricted from doing so. If
we did, we may pay a fee to them for their services for
assisting us in locating a target business. To the extent that
our capital stock is used in whole or in part as consideration
to effect a business combination, the proceeds held in the trust
account which are not used to consummate a business combination
will be disbursed to the combined company and will, along with
any other net proceeds not expended, be used as working capital
to finance the operations of the target business. Such working
capital funds could be used in a variety of ways including
continuing or expanding the target business operations,
for strategic acquisitions and for marketing, research and
development of existing or new products. Such funds could also
be used to repay any operating expenses or finders fees
which we had incurred prior to the completion of our business
combination if the funds available to us outside of the trust
account were insufficient to cover such expenses.
To the extent we are unable to consummate a business
combination, we will pay the costs of liquidation from our
remaining assets outside of the trust account. If such funds are
insufficient, Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have agreed to
advance us the funds necessary to complete such liquidation
(currently anticipated to be no more than approximately $15,000)
and have agreed not to seek repayment of such expenses.
Nathan Leight, our chairman of the board, and Jason Weiss, our
chief executive officer, has each advanced to us $62,500 (for a
total of $125,000) which was used to pay a portion of the
expenses of this offering referenced in the line items above for
SEC registration fee, NASD filing fee, the non-refundable
portion of the American Stock Exchange listing fee, and a
portion of the legal and audit fees and expenses. The loans will
be payable without interest on the earlier of February 27,
2008 or the consummation of this
28
offering. The loans will be repaid out of the proceeds of this
offering available to us for payment of offering expenses.
We believe that, upon consummation of this offering, we will
have sufficient available funds (which includes amounts that may
be released to us from the trust account) to operate for the
next 24 months, assuming that a business combination is not
consummated during that time.
A public stockholder will be entitled to receive funds from the
trust account (including interest earned on his, her or its
portion of the trust account) only in the event of our
liquidation or if that public stockholder converts such shares
into cash in connection with a business combination which the
public stockholder voted against and which we consummate. In no
other circumstances will a public stockholder have any right or
interest of any kind to or in the trust account.
Upon the consummation of our initial business combination, the
underwriters will be entitled to receive the portion of the
proceeds held in the trust account attributable to the
underwriters discounts and commissions held in the trust
account.
29
DILUTION
The difference between the public offering price per share of
common stock, assuming no value is attributed to the warrants
included in the units we are offering by this prospectus and the
insider warrants, and the pro forma net tangible book value per
share of our common stock after this offering constitutes the
dilution to investors in this offering. Such calculation does
not reflect any dilution associated with the sale and exercise
of warrants, including the insider warrants. Net tangible book
value per share is determined by dividing our net tangible book
value, which is our total tangible assets less total liabilities
(including the value of common stock which may be converted into
cash), by the number of outstanding shares of our common stock.
At February 28, 2007, our net tangible book value was $532,
or approximately $0.00 per share of common stock. After
giving effect to the sale of 30,000,000 shares of common
stock included in the units we are offering by this prospectus,
and the deduction of underwriting discounts and estimated
expenses of this offering, and the sale of the insider warrants,
our pro forma net tangible book value at February 28, 2007
would have been $165,289,006 or $6.48 per share,
representing an immediate increase in net tangible book value of
$6.48 per share to the existing stockholders and an
immediate dilution of $3.52 per share or 35.2% to new
investors not exercising their conversion rights. For purposes
of presentation, our pro forma net tangible book value after
this offering is approximately $115,994,994 less than it
otherwise would have been because if we effect a business
combination, the conversion rights of the public stockholders
(but not our existing stockholders) may result in the conversion
into cash of up to approximately 39.99% of the aggregate number
of the shares sold in this offering at a per-share conversion
price equal to the amount in the trust account (a portion of
which is made up of $9,000,000 in deferred underwriting
discounts and commissions) as of two business days prior to the
consummation of the proposed business combination, inclusive of
any interest, divided by the number of shares sold in this
offering.
The following table illustrates the dilution to the new
investors on a per-share basis, assuming no value is attributed
to the warrants included in the units and the insider warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Net tangible book value before
this offering
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase attributable to new
investors and private sales
|
|
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value
after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth information with respect to our
existing stockholders and the new investors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.003
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
300,000,000
|
|
|
|
99.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
300,025,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Assumes the over-allotment option
has not been exercised and an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares
of common stock have been forfeited by our initial stockholders
as a result thereof.
|
30
The pro forma net tangible book value after the offering is
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value before
this offering
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
Net proceeds from this offering
and private placement
|
|
|
290,260,000
|
|
Offering costs paid in advance and
excluded from net tangible book value before this offering
|
|
|
23,468
|
|
Less: deferred underwriters
discounts and commissions payable on consummation of a business
combination
|
|
|
(9,000,000
|
)
|
Less: Proceeds held in trust
subject to conversion to cash ($290,060,000 × 39.99%)
|
|
|
(115,994,994
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
165,289,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of common stock outstanding
prior to this offering
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
(1)
|
Shares of common stock included in
the units offered
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
Less: Shares subject to conversion
(30,000,000 x 39.99%)
|
|
|
(11,997,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,503,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Assumes the over-allotment option
has not been exercised and an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares
of common stock have been forfeited by our initial stockholders
as a result thereof.
|
31
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization at
February 28, 2007 and as adjusted to give effect to the
sale of our units and the insider warrants and the application
of the estimated net proceeds derived from the sale of such
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
Notes payable to certain existing
stockholders
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par
value, -0- and 11,997,000 shares which are subject to
possible conversion, shares at conversion value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,994,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par
value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par
value, 85,000,000 shares authorized; 8,625,000 shares
issued and outstanding, actual; 25,503,000 shares issued
and outstanding (excluding 11,997,000 shares subject to
possible conversion), as adjusted
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
(2)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
24,137
|
|
|
|
165,287,456
|
|
Deficit accumulated during the
development stage
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity:
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
165,289,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
124,000
|
|
|
$
|
281,284,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the $3,000,000 we will
receive from the sale of the insider warrants.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Assumes the over-allotment option
has not been exercised and an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares
of common stock have been forfeited by our initial stockholders
as a result thereof.
|
If we consummate a business combination, the conversion rights
afforded to our public stockholders (but not our existing
stockholders) may result in the conversion into cash of up to
approximately 39.99% of the aggregate number of shares sold in
this offering at a per-share conversion price equal to the
amount in the trust account (a portion of which is made up of
$9,000,000 in deferred underwriting discounts and commissions),
inclusive of any interest thereon not previously released to us
for working capital requirements and tax obligations, as of two
business days prior to the proposed consummation of a business
combination, divided by the number of shares sold in this
offering. Because converting stockholders will receive their
proportionate share of the deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions and the underwriters will be paid the full amount of
their deferred underwriting compensation at the time of the
consummation of our initial business combination, the Company
(and, therefore, the non-converting stockholders) will bear the
financial effect of such payments to both the converting
stockholders and the underwriters.
32
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We were formed on February 1, 2007 to serve as a vehicle to
effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or
other similar business combination with an operating business.
We intend to utilize cash derived from the proceeds of this
offering, our capital stock, debt or a combination of cash,
capital stock and debt, in effecting a business combination. The
issuance of additional shares of our capital stock:
|
|
|
|
|
may significantly reduce the equity interest of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if we
issue preferred stock with rights senior to those afforded to
our common stock;
|
|
|
|
will likely cause a change in control if a substantial number of
our shares of common stock are issued, which may affect, among
other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry
forwards, if any, and most likely will also result in the
resignation or removal of our present officers and
directors; and
|
|
|
|
may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common
stock.
|
Similarly, if we issue debt securities, it could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues
after a business combination are insufficient to pay our debt
obligations;
|
|
|
|
acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even
if we have made all principal and interest payments when due if
the debt security contains covenants that require the
maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves and we
breach any such covenant without a waiver or renegotiation of
that covenant;
|
|
|
|
our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if
any, if the debt security is payable on demand; and
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, if
the debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to
obtain additional financing while such security is outstanding.
|
We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any
revenues to date. Our entire activity since inception has been
to prepare for our proposed fundraising through an offering of
our equity securities.
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of the units,
after deducting offering expenses of approximately $740,000 and
underwriting discounts of approximately $21,000,000, or
$24,150,000 if the over-allotment option is exercised in full,
will be approximately $278,260,000, or $320,110,000 if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full.
However, the underwriters have agreed that $0.30 per unit
of the underwriting discounts and commissions will be deferred
and will not be payable unless and until we consummate a
business combination. Accordingly, $287,060,000, or $330,260,000
if the over-allotment option is exercised in full, plus the
$3,000,000 we will receive from the sale of the insider
warrants, will be held in trust and the remaining $200,000 in
either event, will not be held in trust. We intend to use
substantially all of the net proceeds of this offering,
including the funds held in the trust account (excluding
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions), to acquire a
target business and to pay our expenses relating thereto. To the
extent that our capital stock is used in whole or in part as
consideration to effect a business combination, the remaining
proceeds held in the trust account as well as any other net
proceeds not expended will be used as working capital to finance
the operations of the target business. Such working capital
funds could be used in a variety of ways including continuing or
expanding the target business operations, for strategic
acquisitions and for marketing, research and development of
existing or new products. Such funds could also be used to repay
any operating expenses or finders fees which we had
incurred prior to the completion of our business combination if
the funds available to us outside of the trust account were
insufficient to cover such expenses.
We believe that, upon consummation of this offering, the
$200,000 of net proceeds not held in the trust account, plus the
up to $3,100,000 of interest earned on the trust account balance
that may be released to us as well as amounts necessary for our
tax obligations, will be sufficient to allow us to operate for
at least the
33
next 24 months, assuming that a business combination is not
consummated during that time. Over this time period, we will be
using these funds for identifying and evaluating prospective
acquisition candidates, performing business due diligence on
prospective target businesses, traveling to and from the
offices, plants or similar locations of prospective target
businesses or their representatives or owners, reviewing
corporate documents and material agreements of prospective
target businesses, selecting the target business to acquire and
structuring, negotiating and consummating the business
combination. We anticipate that we will incur approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
$1,000,000 of expenses for the search for target businesses and
for the legal, accounting and other third-party expenses
attendant to the due diligence investigations, structuring and
negotiating of a business combination;
|
|
|
|
$250,000 of expenses for the due diligence and investigation of
a target business by our officers, directors and existing
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
$200,000 of expenses in legal and accounting fees relating to
our SEC reporting obligations;
|
|
|
|
$180,000 for the administrative fee payable to Terrapin Partners
LLC ($7,500 per month for twenty four months); and
|
|
|
|
$1,670,000 for general working capital that will be used for
miscellaneous expenses and reserves, including approximately
$120,000 for director and officer liability insurance premiums.
|
We do not believe we will need to raise additional funds
following this offering in order to meet the expenditures
required for operating our business. However, we may need to
raise additional funds through a private offering of debt or
equity securities if such funds are required to consummate a
business combination that is presented to us, although we have
not entered into any such arrangement and have no current
intention of doing so.
We are obligated, commencing on the date of this prospectus, to
pay to Terrapin Partners LLC, an affiliate of Nathan Leight and
Jason Weiss, a monthly fee of $7,500 for general and
administrative services.
As of the date of this prospectus, Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss
have advanced an aggregate of $125,000 to us, on a non-interest
bearing basis, for payment of offering expenses on our behalf.
The loans will be payable without interest on the earlier of
February 27, 2008 or the consummation of this offering. The
loans will be repaid out of the proceeds of this offering not
being placed in trust.
Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have committed to purchase an
aggregate of 3,000,000 warrants at $1.00 per warrant (for a
total purchase price of $3,000,000) from us. These purchases
will take place on a private placement basis simultaneously with
the consummation of this offering.
34
PROPOSED
BUSINESS
Introduction
We are a recently organized Delaware blank check company
incorporated on February 1, 2007 in order to serve as a
vehicle for the acquisition of an operating business. We intend
to focus our efforts on seeking a business combination with a
portfolio company currently held by a private equity firm
specializing in either leveraged buyouts or venture capital. We
believe these types of companies represent attractive
acquisition targets for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Substantial Capital Has Been Invested by Private Equity Firms
in Recent Years. According to
Standard & Poors Leveraged Buyout Review,
U.S. leveraged buyout volumes have increased from
$40.5 billion in 2000 to $233.0 billion in 2006, a
compound annual growth rate of 33.9%. Furthermore, according to
Thomson Financial, $442.1 billion of venture capital has
been raised by private companies from 2000 to 2006. Therefore,
we believe that there should be a significant number of
businesses available for sale from private equity firms in the
coming years.
|
|
|
|
Private Equity Firms Have An Ongoing Need for Investment
Realizations. Because most private equity funds
are limited life investment vehicles, they continuously seek
liquidity events for their portfolio companies.
|
|
|
|
Higher Levels of Leverage Used to Fund Leveraged Buyouts
Increase the Need to Divest Non-Core
Assets. According to Standard &
Poors Leveraged Buyout Review, the average Debt to EBITDA
(adjusted for prospective cost savings or synergies) multiples
of leveraged buyout loans has increased from 4.2x in 2000 to
5.4x in 2006 and 5.7x in the fourth quarter of 2006. Given the
higher debt levels, private equity firms are encouraged to
quickly sell non-core assets, which we believe will create
attractive acquisition targets for us.
|
Accordingly, our principal strategy in sourcing our business
combination will be to search for an attractive company held by
such an investment fund.
Our efforts to identify a prospective target business will not
be limited to a particular industry. We intend to focus on
companies with positive operating cash flow that are
well-positioned to capitalize on one of the following two
investment themes:
|
|
|
|
|
Changing Socio-Economics and Demographics. We
intend to focus on portfolio companies that are well positioned
to capitalize on certain emerging socio-economic and demographic
trends. While many socio-economic and demographic trends have
been well researched and documented, such as the aging of the
population and the growing ethnic base of specific minorities,
we believe that few companies have actually altered their
strategy to specifically prepare for such trends. If we acquire
such a company, we intend to accelerate the steps needed to
position the company to better exploit the socio-economic and
demographic changes impacting its business.
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property, Proprietary Business Practices
and/or Other
Intangible Assets. We intend to focus on
companies that have potentially underexploited or not
fully-developed intellectual property, proprietary business
practices
and/or other
intangible assets. Such businesses generally have fewer tangible
assets and are generally more dependent on the implementation of
technology. We believe that such companies can be acquired for
attractive valuations. If we acquire such a company, we intend
to focus on applying new technologies or business models to
leverage or more fully develop its intangible assets, and
thereby increase growth and improve profitability.
|
While we may or may not consummate our business combination with
a company owned by a private equity firm (or a company with the
investment themes discussed above), we believe this focus will
allow us to find attractive acquisition candidates.
35
We believe that private equity firms will find the opportunity
to sell to us attractive for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Attractive Route to Liquidity. We may present
an easier and less risky route to liquidity for their portfolio
companies than going through an initial public offering.
|
|
|
|
Ability to Retain Upside in the Business. Our
ability to issue shares of our common stock in a business
combination provides a unique and attractive way for a private
equity firm selling a portfolio company to retain an equity
stake in the ongoing business.
|
|
|
|
Track Record of Aldabra 2 Management
Team. Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss served as the
Chairman and CEO, respectively, of Aldabra Acquisition
Corporation which recently completed a merger with Great Lakes
Dredge & Dock Corporation, a portfolio company of
Madison Dearborn Partners. We believe many private equity firms
will view the consummation of that merger (and the fact that the
securities of Aldabra Acquisition Corporation have appreciated
markedly since then) as a positive factor in considering whether
or not to sell a portfolio company to us.
|
Summary
of Aldabra Acquisition Corporation Merger with Great Lakes
Dredge & Dock Corporation
In February 2005, Aldabra Acquisition Corporation, a blank check
company founded by Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss with an
objective to acquire an operating business owned by a private
equity or venture capital fund (the same objective as ours),
consummated its initial public offering, raising
$55.2 million. On December 27, 2006, Aldabra
Acquisition Corporation completed a merger with Great Lakes
Dredge & Dock Corporation (Great Lakes), a
Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC portfolio company. Great Lakes,
with more than 180 specialized vessels, is the largest provider
of dredging services in North America and the only
U.S. dredging company with significant international
operations. Great Lakes also owns an 85% interest in North
American Site Developers, Inc., one of the largest
U.S. providers of commercial and industrial demolition
services, and a 50% interest in a marine sand mining operation
in New Jersey which supplies sand and aggregate used for road
and building construction. In the merger, Aldabra Acquisition
Corporation issued approximately 29 million shares of its
common stock to Great Lakes stockholders and assumed
approximately $250 million of Great Lakes debt. As a
result of the merger, Great Lakes is now owned approximately 28%
by Aldabra Acquisition Corporations former stockholders,
67% by Madison Dearborn Partners and 5% by Great Lakes
management. The funds held in Aldabra Acquisition
Corporations trust account were used to pay down Great
Lakes existing term bank debt by approximately
$50 million. Great Lakes common stock and warrants
currently trade on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbols
GLDD and GLDDW, respectively. Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss
currently serve as directors of Great Lakes.
Effecting
a business combination
General
We are not presently engaged in, and we will not engage in, any
substantive commercial business for an indefinite period of time
following this offering. We intend to utilize cash derived from
the proceeds of this offering, our capital stock, debt or a
combination of these in effecting a business combination.
Although substantially all of the net proceeds of this offering
are intended to be applied generally toward effecting a business
combination as described in this prospectus, the proceeds are
not otherwise being designated for any more specific purposes.
Accordingly, investors in this offering are investing without
first having an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or
risks of any one or more business combinations. A business
combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a
company which does not need substantial additional capital but
which desires to establish a public trading market for its
shares, while avoiding what it may deem to be adverse
consequences of undertaking a public offering itself. These
include time delays, significant expense, loss of voting control
and compliance with various Federal and state securities laws.
In the alternative, we may seek to consummate a business
combination with a company that may be financially unstable or
in its early stages of development or growth. While we may seek
to effect simultaneous business combinations with more than one
target business, we will probably have the ability, as a result
of our limited resources, to effect only a single business
combination.
36
We have
not identified a target business or target industry
To date, we have not selected any target business or target
industry on which to concentrate our search for a business
combination. Our officers and directors have neither
individually identified or considered a target business nor have
they had any discussions regarding possible target businesses
amongst themselves or with our underwriters or other advisors.
None of our officers, directors, promoters and other affiliates
has engaged in discussions on our behalf with representatives of
other companies regarding the possibility of a potential merger,
capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with us, nor have we, nor any of our agents
or affiliates, been approached by any candidates (or
representatives of any candidates) with respect to a possible
acquisition transaction with us. Additionally, we have not, nor
has anyone on our behalf, taken any measure, directly or
indirectly, to identify or locate any suitable acquisition
candidate, nor have we engaged or retained any agent or other
representative to identify or locate such an acquisition
candidate. We have also not conducted any research with respect
to identifying the number and characteristics of the potential
acquisition candidates. As a result, we cannot assure you that
we will be able to locate a target business or that we will be
able to engage in a business combination with a target business
on favorable terms.
Subject to the limitations that a target business have a fair
market value of at least 80% of our net assets at the time of
the acquisition, as described below in more detail, we will have
virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting
a prospective acquisition candidate. We have not established any
other specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise)
for prospective target businesses. Accordingly, there is no
basis for investors in this offering to evaluate the possible
merits or risks of the target business with which we may
ultimately complete a business combination. To the extent we
effect a business combination with a financially unstable
company or an entity in its early stage of development or
growth, including entities without established records of sales
or earnings, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in
the business and operations of financially unstable and early
stage or potential emerging growth companies. Although our
management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a
particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will
properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.
Sources
of target businesses
While we have not yet identified any acquisition candidates, we
believe based on our managements business knowledge and
past experience that there are numerous acquisition candidates
that we intend to target. We anticipate that target business
candidates will be brought to our attention from various
unaffiliated sources, including investment bankers, venture
capital funds, private equity funds, leveraged buyout funds,
management buyout funds and other members of the financial
community. Target businesses may be brought to our attention by
such unaffiliated sources as a result of being solicited by us
through calls, mailings or advertisements. These sources may
also introduce us to target businesses they think we may be
interested in on an unsolicited basis, since many of these
sources will have read this prospectus and know what types of
businesses we are targeting. Our officers and directors, as well
as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention target
business candidates that they become aware of through their
business contacts as a result of formal or informal inquiries or
discussions they may have, as well as attending trade shows or
conventions. While we do not presently anticipate engaging the
services of professional firms or other individuals that
specialize in business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may
engage these firms or other individuals in the future, in which
event we may pay a finders fee, consulting fee or other
compensation to be determined in an arms length
negotiation based on the terms of the transaction. Our
management has experience in evaluating transactions but will
retain advisors as they deem necessary to assist them in their
due diligence efforts. In no event, however, will any of our
existing officers, directors, stockholders or special advisors,
or any entity with which they are affiliated, be paid, from us
or a target business, any finders fee, consulting fee or
other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in
order to effectuate, the consummation of a business combination
(regardless of the type of transaction that it is). If we
determine to enter into a business combination with a target
business that is affiliated with our officers, directors,
special advisors or stockholders, we would do so only if we
obtained an opinion from an independent investment banking firm
that the business combination is fair to our unaffiliated
stockholders from a financial point of view. However, as of the
date of this prospectus, there are no affiliated entities that
we would consider as a business combination target.
37
We will not acquire an entity with which any of our officers or
directors, through their other business activities, is currently
having acquisition or investment discussions. Additionally, we
have not contacted any of the prospective target businesses that
Aldabra Acquisition Corporation contacted in connection with its
search for a business combination and do not intend to do so
unless the operations, profits or prospects of such target
business improved significantly and we were made aware of such
change. At this time, we do not anticipate this happening. We
also do not anticipate acquiring an entity with which our
officers or directors, through their other business activities,
had acquisition or investment discussions, nor do we anticipate
acquiring an entity that is either a portfolio company of, or
has otherwise received a financial investment from, an
investment banking firm (or an affiliate thereof) that is
affiliated with our management. However, if we determined to
acquire an entity affiliated with our officers, directors,
special advisors, initial stockholders or their affiliates, we
are required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment
banking firm that the business combination is fair to our
unaffiliated shareholders from a financial point of view.
Selection
of a target business and structuring of a business
combination
Subject to the requirement that our initial business combination
must be with a target business with a fair market value that is
at least 80% of our net assets at the time of such acquisition,
our management will have virtually unrestricted flexibility in
identifying and selecting a prospective target business. We have
not established any other specific attributes or criteria
(financial or otherwise) for prospective target businesses. In
evaluating a prospective target business, our management may
consider a variety of factors, including one or more of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
financial condition and results of operation;
|
|
|
|
growth potential;
|
|
|
|
experience and skill of management and availability of
additional personnel;
|
|
|
|
capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
competitive position;
|
|
|
|
barriers to entry;
|
|
|
|
stage of development of the products, processes or services;
|
|
|
|
degree of current or potential market acceptance of the
products, processes or services;
|
|
|
|
proprietary features and degree of intellectual property or
other protection of the products, processes or services;
|
|
|
|
regulatory environment of the industry; and
|
|
|
|
costs associated with effecting the business combination.
|
These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation
relating to the merits of a particular business combination will
be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well
as other considerations deemed relevant by our management in
effecting a business combination consistent with our business
objective. In evaluating a prospective target business, we will
conduct an extensive due diligence review which will encompass,
among other things, meetings with incumbent management and
inspection of facilities, as well as review of financial and
other information which is made available to us. This due
diligence review will be conducted either by our management or
by unaffiliated third parties we may engage, although we have no
current intention to engage any such third parties. We intend to
have all prospective target businesses execute agreements with
us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or
to any monies held in the trust account. If any prospective
target business refused to execute such agreement, it is
unlikely we would continue negotiations with such target
business. However, in no event will we enter into a definitive
agreement for a business combination with a target business
unless such entity executes a waiver agreement.
The time and costs required to select and evaluate a target
business and to structure and complete the business combination
cannot presently be ascertained with any degree of certainty.
Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and
evaluation of a prospective target business with which a
business combination is not ultimately completed will result in
a loss to us and reduce the amount of capital available to
otherwise complete a business combination.
38
Additionally, while we are not obligated to engage any of the
underwriters to assist us with locating a target business
following this offering, we are not restricted from doing so. If
we did, we may pay a fee to them for their services for
assisting us in locating a target business.
Fair
market value of target business
The target business or businesses that we acquire must
collectively have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of
our net assets at the time of such acquisition, although we may
acquire a target business whose fair market value significantly
exceeds 80% of our net assets. We anticipate structuring a
business combination to acquire 100% of the equity interests or
assets of the target business. We may, however, structure a
business combination to acquire less than 100% of such interests
or assets of the target business but will not acquire less than
a controlling interest (which would be at least 50% of the
voting securities of the target business). If we acquire only a
controlling interest in a target business or businesses, the
portion of such business that we acquire must have a fair market
value equal to at least 80% of our net assets. In order to
consummate such an acquisition, we may issue a significant
amount of our debt or equity securities to the sellers of such
businesses
and/or seek
to raise additional funds through a private offering of debt or
equity securities. Since we have no specific business
combination under consideration, we have not entered into any
such fund raising arrangement and have no current intention of
doing so. The fair market value of the target will be determined
by our board of directors based upon one or more standards
generally accepted by the financial community (such as actual
and potential sales, earnings and cash flow
and/or book
value). If our board is not able to independently determine that
the target business has a sufficient fair market value, we will
obtain an opinion from an unaffiliated, independent investment
banking firm with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria.
Since any opinion, if obtained, would merely state that fair
market value meets the 80% of net assets threshold, it is not
anticipated that copies of such opinion would be distributed to
our stockholders, although copies will be provided to
stockholders who request it. We will not be required to obtain
an opinion from an investment banking firm as to the fair market
value if our board of directors independently determines that
the target business complies with the 80% threshold.
Lack of
business diversification
Our business combination must be with a target business or
businesses that collectively satisfy the minimum valuation
standard at the time of such acquisition, as discussed above,
although this process may entail the simultaneous acquisitions
of several operating businesses at the same time. Therefore, at
least initially, the prospects for our success may be entirely
dependent upon the future performance of a single business.
Unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete
several business combinations of entities operating in multiple
industries or multiple areas of a single industry, it is
probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our
operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or
offsetting of losses. By consummating a business combination
with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:
|
|
|
|
|
subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory
developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse
impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate
subsequent to a business combination, and
|
|
|
|
result in our dependency upon the performance of a single
operating business or the development or market acceptance of a
single or limited number of products, processes or services.
|
If we determine to simultaneously acquire several businesses and
such businesses are owned by different sellers, we will need for
each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its business
is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other
acquisitions, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay
our ability, to complete the business combination. With multiple
acquisitions, we could also face additional risks, including
additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple
negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are
multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the
subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or
products of the acquired companies in a single operating
business.
39
Limited
ability to evaluate the target business
management
Although we intend to scrutinize the management of a prospective
target business when evaluating the desirability of effecting a
business combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment
of the target business management will prove to be
correct. In addition, we cannot assure you that the future
management will have the necessary skills, qualifications or
abilities to manage a public company. Furthermore, the future
role of our officers and directors, if any, in the target
business following a business combination cannot presently be
stated with any certainty. While it is possible that some of our
key personnel will remain associated in senior management or
advisory positions with us following a business combination, it
is unlikely that they will devote their full time efforts to our
affairs subsequent to a business combination. Moreover, they
would only be able to remain with the company after the
consummation of a business combination if they are able to
negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with
the business combination. Such negotiations would take place
simultaneously with the negotiation of the business combination
and could provide for them to receive compensation in the form
of cash payments
and/or our
securities for services they would render to the company after
the consummation of the business combination. While the personal
and financial interests of our key personnel may influence their
motivation in identifying and selecting a target business, their
ability to remain with the company after the consummation of a
business combination will not be the determining factor in our
decision as to whether or not we will proceed with any potential
business combination. Additionally, we cannot assure you that
our officers and directors will have significant experience or
knowledge relating to the operations of the particular target
business.
Following a business combination, we may seek to recruit
additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of
the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the
ability to recruit additional managers, or that any such
additional managers we do recruit will have the requisite
skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the
incumbent management.
Opportunity
for stockholder approval of business combination
Prior to the completion of a business combination, we will
submit the transaction to our stockholders for approval, even if
the nature of the acquisition is such as would not ordinarily
require stockholder approval under applicable state law. In
connection with any such transaction, we will also submit to our
stockholders for approval a proposal to amend our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation to provide for our
corporate life to continue perpetually following the
consummation of such business combination. Any vote to extend
our corporate life to continue perpetually following the
consummation of a business combination will be taken only if the
business combination is approved. We will only consummate a
business combination if stockholders vote both in favor of such
business combination and our amendment to extend our corporate
life.
In connection with seeking stockholder approval of a business
combination, we will furnish our stockholders with proxy
solicitation materials prepared in accordance with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which, among other
matters, will include a description of the operations of the
target business and audited historical financial statements of
the business.
In connection with the vote required for any business
combination, all of our existing stockholders, including all of
our officers and directors, have agreed to vote their respective
initial shares in accordance with the majority of the shares of
common stock voted by the public stockholders. This voting
arrangement shall not apply to shares included in units
purchased in this offering or purchased following this offering
in the open market by any of our existing stockholders, officers
and directors. Accordingly, they may vote these shares on a
proposed business combination any way they choose. We will
proceed with the business combination only if a majority of the
shares of common stock voted by the public stockholders are
voted in favor of the business combination and public
stockholders owning less than 40% of the shares sold in this
offering both exercise their conversion rights and vote against
the business combination.
Conversion
rights
At the time we seek stockholder approval of any business
combination, we will offer each public stockholder the right to
have such stockholders shares of common stock converted to
cash if the stockholder votes against the business combination
and the business combination is approved and completed. Our
existing
40
stockholders will not have such conversion rights with respect
to any shares of common stock owned by them, directly or
indirectly, whether included in or underlying their initial
shares or purchased by them in this offering or in the
aftermarket. The actual per-share conversion price will be equal
to the amount in the trust account, inclusive of any interest
(calculated as of two business days prior to the consummation of
the proposed business combination), divided by the number of
shares sold in this offering. Without taking into account any
interest earned on the trust account, the initial per-share
conversion price would be approximately $9.67.
An eligible stockholder may request conversion at any time after
the mailing to our stockholders of the proxy statement and prior
to the vote taken with respect to a proposed business
combination at a meeting held for that purpose, but the request
will not be granted unless the stockholder votes against the
business combination and the business combination is approved
and completed. Additionally, we may require public stockholders,
whether they are a record holder or hold their shares in
street name, to either tender their certificates to
our transfer agent at any time through the vote on the business
combination or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent
electronically using Depository Trust Companys DWAC
(Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System, at the holders
option. The proxy solicitation materials that we will furnish to
stockholders in connection with the vote for any proposed
business combination will indicate whether we are requiring
stockholders to satisfy such certification and delivery
requirements. Accordingly, a stockholder would have from the
time we send out our proxy statement through the vote on the
business combination to tender his shares if he wishes to seek
to exercise his conversion rights. This time period varies
depending on the specific facts of each transaction. However, as
the delivery process can be accomplished by the stockholder,
whether or not he is a record holder or his shares are held in
street name, in a matter of hours by simply
contacting the transfer agent or his broker and requesting
delivery of his shares through the DWAC System, we believe this
time period is sufficient for an average investor. However,
because we do not have any control over this process, it may
take significantly longer than we anticipated. Traditionally, in
order to perfect conversion rights in connection with a blank
check companys business combination, a holder could simply
vote against a proposed business combination and check a box on
the proxy card indicating such holder was seeking to convert.
After the business combination was approved, the company would
contact such stockholder to arrange for him to deliver his
certificate to verify ownership. As a result, the stockholder
then had an option window after the consummation of
the business combination during which he could monitor the price
of the stock in the market. If the price rose above the
conversion price, he could sell his shares in the open market
before actually delivering his shares to the company for
cancellation. Thus, the conversion right, to which stockholders
were aware they needed to commit before the stockholder meeting,
would become a put right surviving past the
consummation of the business combination until the converting
holder delivered his certificate. The requirement for physical
or electronic delivery prior to the meeting ensures that a
converting holders election to convert is irrevocable once
the business combination is approved. There is a nominal cost
associated with the above-referenced tendering process and the
act of certificating the shares or delivering them through the
DWAC system. The transfer agent will typically charge the
tendering broker $35 and it would be up to the broker whether or
not to pass this cost on to the converting holder. However, this
fee would be incurred regardless of whether or not we require
holders seeking to exercise conversion rights to tender their
shares prior to the meeting the need to deliver
shares is a requirement of conversion regardless of the timing
of when such delivery must be effectuated. Accordingly, this
would not result in any increased cost to shareholders when
compared to the traditional process.
Any request for conversion, once made, may be withdrawn at any
time up to the vote taken with respect to the proposed business
combination. Furthermore, if a stockholder delivered his
certificate for conversion and subsequently decided prior to the
meeting not to elect conversion, he may simply request that the
transfer agent return the certificate (physically or
electronically). It is anticipated that the funds to be
distributed to stockholders entitled to convert their shares who
elect conversion will be distributed promptly after completion
of a business combination. Public stockholders who convert their
stock into their share of the trust account still have the right
to exercise any warrants they still hold.
If a vote on our initial business combination is held and the
business combination is not approved, we may continue to try to
consummate a business combination with a different target until
twenty four months
41
from the date of this prospectus. If the initial business
combination is not approved or completed for any reason, then
public stockholders voting against our initial business
combination who exercised their conversion rights would not be
entitled to convert their shares of common stock into a pro rata
share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust
account. In such case, if we have required public stockholders
to tender their certificates prior to the meeting, we will
promptly return such certificates to the tendering public
stockholder. Public stockholders would be entitled to receive
their pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the
trust account only in the event that the initial business
combination they voted against was duly approved and
subsequently completed, or in connection with our liquidation.
We will not complete any business combination if public
stockholders, owning 40% or more of the shares sold in this
offering, both exercise their conversion rights and vote against
the business combination. Accordingly, it is our understanding
and intention in every case to structure and consummate a
business combination in which public stockholders owning 39.99%
of the shares sold in this offering may exercise their
conversion rights and the business combination will still go
forward. We have set the conversion percentage at 40% in order
to reduce the likelihood that a small group of investors holding
a block of our stock will be able to stop us from completing a
business combination that is otherwise approved by a large
majority of our public stockholders.
Investors in this offering who do not sell, or who receive less
than an aggregate of approximately $0.33 of net sales proceeds
for, the warrants included in the units, or persons who purchase
common stock in the aftermarket at a price in excess of
$9.67 per share, may have a disincentive to exercise their
conversion rights because the amount they would receive upon
conversion could be less than their original or adjusted
purchase price.
Liquidation
if no business combination
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that we will continue in existence only
until ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this
prospectus]. This provision may not be amended except in
connection with the consummation of a business combination. If
we have not completed a business combination by such date, our
corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of
winding up our affairs and liquidating, pursuant to
Section 278 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This
has the same effect as if our board of directors and
stockholders had formally voted to approve our dissolution
pursuant to Section 275 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law. Accordingly, limiting our corporate existence to a
specified date as permitted by Section 102(b)(5) of the
Delaware General Corporation Law removes the necessity to comply
with the formal procedures set forth in Section 275 (which
would have required our board of directors and stockholders to
formally vote to approve our dissolution and liquidation and to
have filed a certificate of dissolution with the Delaware
Secretary of State). We view this provision terminating our
corporate life
by ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this prospectus]
as an obligation to our stockholders and will not take any
action to amend or waive this provision to allow us to survive
for a longer period of time except in connection with the
consummation of a business combination.
If we are unable to complete a business combination
by ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this prospectus],
we will distribute to all of our public stockholders, in
proportion to their respective equity interests, an aggregate
sum equal to the amount in the trust account, inclusive of any
interest, plus any remaining net assets (subject to our
obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of
creditors as described below). We anticipate notifying the
trustee of the trust account to begin liquidating such assets
promptly after such date and anticipate it will take no more
than 10 business days to effectuate such distribution. Our
initial stockholders have waived their rights to participate in
any liquidation distribution with respect to their initial
shares. There will be no distribution from the trust account
with respect to our warrants, which will expire worthless. We
will pay the costs of liquidation from our remaining assets
outside of the trust account. If such funds are insufficient,
Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have agreed to advance us the
funds necessary to complete such liquidation (currently
anticipated to be no more than approximately $15,000) and have
agreed not to seek repayment of such expenses.
If we were to expend all of the net proceeds of this offering,
other than the proceeds deposited in the trust account, and
without taking into account interest, if any, earned on the
trust account, the initial per-share
42
liquidation price would be approximately $9.67. The proceeds
deposited in the trust account could, however, become subject to
the claims of our creditors (which could include vendors and
service providers we have engaged to assist us in any way in
connection with our search for a target business and that are
owed money by us, as well as target businesses themselves) which
could have higher priority than the claims of our public
stockholders. Messrs. Leight and Weiss have personally
agreed, pursuant to agreements with us and Lazard Capital
Markets that, if we liquidate prior to the consummation of a
business combination, they will be personally liable to pay
debts and obligations to target businesses or vendors or other
entities that are owed money by us for services rendered or
contracted for or products sold to us in excess of the net
proceeds of this offering not held in the trust account, but
only if, and to the extent, the claims reduce the amounts in the
trust account. We cannot assure you, however, that they would be
able to satisfy those obligations. Furthermore,
Messrs. Leight and Weiss will not have any personal
liability as to any claimed amounts owed to a third party
(including target businesses) who executed a waiver. If a claim
was made that resulted in Messrs. Leight and Weiss having
personal liability and they refused to satisfy their
obligations, we would have a fiduciary obligation to bring an
action against them to enforce our indemnification rights and
would accordingly bring such an action against them.
Accordingly, the actual per-share liquidation price could be
less than approximately $9.67, plus interest, due to claims of
creditors. Additionally, in the case of a prospective target
business that did not execute a waiver, such liability will only
be in an amount necessary to ensure that public stockholders
receive no less than $10.00 per share upon liquidation.
Furthermore, if we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an
involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against us which is not
dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be
subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our
bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties
with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent
any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, we cannot
assure you we will be able to return to our public stockholders
at least approximately $9.67 per share.
Our public stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from
the trust account only in the event of the expiration of our
corporate existence and our liquidation or if they seek to
convert their respective shares into cash upon a business
combination which the stockholder voted against and which is
completed by us. In no other circumstances will a stockholder
have any right or interest of any kind to or in the trust
account.
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, stockholders may be
held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to
the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution.
If the corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in
Section 280 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all
claims against it, including a
60-day
notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought
against the corporation, a
90-day
period during which the corporation may reject any claims
brought, and an additional
150-day
waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to
stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a
liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such
stockholders pro rata share of the claim or the amount
distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the
stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the
dissolution. However, as stated above, it is our intention to
make liquidating distributions to our stockholders as soon as
reasonably possible
after ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this prospectus]
and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those
procedures. As such, our stockholders could potentially be
liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by
them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may
extend well beyond the third anniversary of such date. Because
we will not be complying with Section 280,
Section 281(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law
requires us to adopt a plan that will provide for our payment,
based on facts known to us at such time, of (i) all
existing claims, (ii) all pending claims and (iii) all
claims that may be potentially brought against us within the
subsequent 10 years. Accordingly, we would be required to
provide for any claims of creditors known to us at that time or
those that we believe could be potentially brought against us
within the subsequent 10 years prior to our distributing
the funds in the trust account to our public stockholders.
However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an
operating company, and our operations will be limited to
searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only
likely claims to arise would be from our vendors and service
providers (such as accountants, lawyers, investment bankers,
etc.) and potential target businesses. As described above,
pursuant to the obligation contained in our underwriting
agreement, we will seek to have all vendors, service providers
and prospective target businesses execute agreements with us
waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any
43
kind they may have in or to any monies held in the trust
account. As a result, the claims that could be made against us
will be limited, thereby lessening the likelihood that any claim
would result in any liability extending to the trust. We
therefore believe that any necessary provision for creditors
will be reduced and should not have a significant impact on our
ability to distribute the funds in the trust account to our
public stockholders. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you of this
fact as there is no guarantee that vendors, service providers
and prospective target businesses will execute such agreements.
Nor is there any guarantee that, even if they execute such
agreements with us, they will not seek recourse against the
trust account. A court could also conclude that such agreements
are not legally enforceable. As a result, if we liquidate, the
per-share distribution from the trust account could be less than
approximately $9.67 due to claims or potential claims of
creditors.
If we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary
bankruptcy case is filed against us which is not dismissed, any
distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under
applicable debtor/creditor
and/or
bankruptcy laws as either a preferential transfer or
a fraudulent conveyance. As a result, a bankruptcy
court could seek to recover all amounts received by our
stockholders. Furthermore, because we intend to distribute the
proceeds held in the trust account to our public stockholders
promptly
after ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this
prospectus], this may be viewed or interpreted as giving
preference to our public stockholders over any potential
creditors with respect to access to or distributions from our
assets. Furthermore, our board may be viewed as having breached
their fiduciary duties to our creditors
and/or may
have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposing itself and our
company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public
stockholders from the trust account prior to addressing the
claims of creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not
be brought against us for these reasons.
Competition
In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business, we
may encounter intense competition from other entities having a
business objective similar to ours. There are
approximately
blank check companies that have completed initial public
offerings in the United States with more than
$ billion in trust that are
seeking to carry out a business plan similar to our business
plan. Furthermore, there are a number of additional offerings
for blank check companies that are still in the registration
process but have not completed initial public offerings and
there are likely to be more blank check companies filing
registration statements for initial public offerings after the
date of this prospectus and prior to our completion of a
business combination. Additionally, we may be subject to
competition from entities other than blank check companies
having a business objective similar to ours, including venture
capital firms, leverage buyout firms and operating businesses
looking to expand their operations through the acquisition of a
target business. Many of these entities are well established and
have extensive experience identifying and effecting business
combinations directly or through affiliates. Many of these
competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources
than us and our financial resources will be relatively limited
when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While
we believe there may be numerous potential target businesses
that we could acquire with the net proceeds of this offering,
our ability to compete in acquiring certain sizable target
businesses will be limited by our available financial resources.
This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage
in pursuing the acquisition of a target business. Further, the
following may not be viewed favorably by certain target
businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
our obligation to seek stockholder approval of a business
combination may delay the completion of a transaction;
|
|
|
|
our obligation to convert into cash shares of common stock held
by our public stockholders to such holders that both vote
against the business combination and exercise their conversion
rights may reduce the resources available to us for a business
combination; and
|
|
|
|
our outstanding warrants, and the potential future dilution they
represent.
|
Any of these factors may place us at a competitive disadvantage
in successfully negotiating a business combination. Our
management believes, however, that our status as a public entity
and potential access to the United States public equity markets
may give us a competitive advantage over privately-held entities
having a
44
similar business objective as ours in acquiring a target
business with significant growth potential on favorable terms.
If we succeed in effecting a business combination, there will
be, in all likelihood, intense competition from competitors of
the target business. We cannot assure you that, subsequent to a
business combination, we will have the resources or ability to
compete effectively.
Facilities
We maintain our executive offices at c/o Terrapin Partners
LLC, 540 Madison Avenue,
17th Floor,
New York, New York 10022. Terrapin Partners has agreed to
provide us with certain administrative, technology and
secretarial services, as well as the use of certain limited
office space, including a conference room, at this location
pursuant to a letter agreement between us and Terrapin Partners.
The cost for the foregoing services to be provided to us by
Terrapin Partners is $7,500 per month. We believe, based on
rents and fees for similar services in the New York City
metropolitan area, that the fee charged by Terrapin Partners is
at least as favorable as we could have obtained from an
unaffiliated person. We consider our current office space
adequate for our current operations.
Employees
We have two executive officers. These individuals are not
obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters
and intend to devote only as much time as they deem necessary to
our affairs. The amount of time they will devote in any time
period will vary based on whether a target business has been
selected for the business combination and the stage of the
business combination process the company is in. Accordingly,
once management locates a suitable target business to acquire,
they will spend more time investigating such target business and
negotiating and processing the business combination (and
consequently devote more time to our affairs) than they would
prior to locating a suitable target business. We presently
expect each of our executive officers to devote an average of
approximately 10 hours per week to our business. We do not
intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation
of a business combination, although Terrapin Partners has
indicated to us that it will make available to us, as part of
the administrative services to be provided to us in
consideration of the $7,500 per month administrative fee, the
services of two of its employees to assist us in our search for
a target business. These individuals will not be required to
devote any specific number of hours to our matters.
Periodic
Reporting and Audited Financial Statements
We have registered our units, common stock and warrants under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have
reporting obligations, including the requirement that we file
annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, our annual reports will contain financial statements
audited and reported on by our independent registered public
accountants.
We will provide stockholders with audited financial statements
of the prospective target business as part of the proxy
solicitation materials sent to stockholders to assist them in
assessing the target business. In all likelihood, these
financial statements will need to be prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles. We
cannot assure you that any particular target business identified
by us as a potential acquisition candidate will have financial
statements prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles or that the potential target
business will be able to prepare its financial statements in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles. To the extent that this requirement cannot be met,
we may not be able to acquire the proposed target business.
While this may limit the pool of potential acquisition
candidates, we do not believe that this limitation will be
material.
Comparison
to offerings of blank check companies
The following table compares and contrasts the terms of our
offering and the terms of an offering of blank check companies
under Rule 419 promulgated by the SEC assuming that the
gross proceeds, underwriting discounts and underwriting expenses
for the Rule 419 offering are the same as this offering and
that the underwriters will not exercise their over-allotment
option. None of the terms of a Rule 419 offering will apply
to this offering.
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terms of Our Offering
|
|
Terms Under a Rule 419 Offering
|
|
Escrow of offering
proceeds
|
|
$287,060,000 of the net offering
proceeds plus the $3,000,000 we will receive from the sale of
the insider warrants will be deposited into a trust account at
Wells Fargo, maintained by Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, acting as trustee.
|
|
$251,100,000 of the offering
proceeds would be required to be deposited into either an escrow
account with an insured depositary institution or in a separate
bank account established by a broker-dealer in which the
broker-dealer acts as trustee for persons having the beneficial
interests in the account.
|
Investment of net
proceeds
|
|
The $287,060,000 of net offering
proceeds plus the $3,000,000 we will receive from the sale of
the insider warrants held in trust will only be invested in
United States government securities within the
meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of
1940 with a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market
funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated
under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
|
|
Proceeds could be invested only in
specified securities such as a money market fund meeting
conditions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 or in
securities that are direct obligations of, or obligations
guaranteed as to principal or interest by, the United States.
|
Limitation on Fair Value or Net
Assets of Target Business
|
|
The initial target business that
we acquire must have a fair market value equal to at least 80%
of our net assets at the time of such acquisition.
|
|
We would be restricted from
acquiring a target business unless the fair value of such
business or net assets to be acquired represent at least 80% of
the maximum offering proceeds.
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terms of Our Offering
|
|
Terms Under a Rule 419 Offering
|
|
Trading of securities
issued
|
|
The units may commence trading on
or promptly after the date of this prospectus. The common stock
and warrants comprising the units will begin to trade separately
on the 90th day after the date of this prospectus unless Lazard
Capital Markets informs us of its decision to allow earlier
separate trading, provided we have filed with the SEC a Current
Report on Form 8-K, which includes an audited balance sheet
reflecting our receipt of the proceeds of this offering,
including any proceeds we receive from the exercise of the
over-allotment option, if such option is exercised prior to the
filing of the Current Report on Form 8-K. If the over-allotment
option is exercised after our initial filing of a Form 8-K, we
will file an amendment to the Form 8-K to provide updated
financial information to reflect the exercise and consummation
of the over-allotment option. We will also include in this Form
8-K, an amendment thereto, or in a subsequent Form 8-K,
information indicating if Lazard Capital Markets has allowed
separate trading of the common stock and warrants prior to the
90th day after the date of this prospectus.
|
|
No trading of the units or the
underlying common stock and warrants would be permitted until
the completion of a business combination. During this period,
the securities would be held in the escrow or trust account.
|
Exercise of the
warrants
|
|
The warrants cannot be exercised
until the later of the completion of a business combination and
one year from the date of this prospectus and, accordingly, will
be exercised only after the trust account has been terminated
and distributed.
|
|
The warrants could be exercised
prior to the completion of a business combination, but
securities received and cash paid in connection with the
exercise would be deposited in the escrow or trust account.
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terms of Our Offering
|
|
Terms Under a Rule 419 Offering
|
|
Election to remain an
investor
|
|
We will give our stockholders the
opportunity to vote on the business combination. In connection
with seeking stockholder approval, we will send each stockholder
a proxy statement containing information required by the SEC. A
stockholder following the procedures described in this
prospectus is given the right to convert his or her shares into
his or her pro rata share of the trust account. However, a
stockholder who does not follow these procedures or a
stockholder who does not take any action would not be entitled
to the return of any funds.
|
|
A prospectus containing
information required by the SEC would be sent to each investor.
Each investor would be given the opportunity to notify the
company, in writing, within a period of no less than 20 business
days and no more than 45 business days from the effective date
of the post-effective amendment, to decide whether he or she
elects to remain a stockholder of the company or require the
return of his or her investment. If the company has not received
the notification by the end of the 45th business day, funds and
interest or dividends, if any, held in the trust or escrow
account would automatically be returned to the stockholder.
Unless a sufficient number of investors elect to remain
investors, all of the deposited funds in the escrow account must
be returned to all investors and none of the securities will be
issued.
|
Business combination
deadline
|
|
Pursuant to our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation, our corporate existence
will cease 24 months from the date of this prospectus except for
the purposes of winding up our affairs and we will liquidate.
However, if we complete a business combination within this time
period, we will amend this provision to allow for our perpetual
existence following such business combination.
|
|
If an acquisition has not been
consummated within 18 months after the effective date of the
initial registration statement, funds held in the trust or
escrow account would be returned to investors.
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terms of Our Offering
|
|
Terms Under a Rule 419 Offering
|
|
Interest earned on the funds in
the trust account
|
|
There can be released to us, from
time to time, interest earned on the funds in the trust account
(i) up to an aggregate of $3,100,000 to fund expenses related to
investigating and selecting a target business and our other
working capital requirements and (ii) any amounts necessary to
pay our tax obligations. The remaining interest earned on the
funds in the trust account will not be released until the
earlier of the completion of a business combination and our
liquidation upon failure to effect a business combination within
the allotted time.
|
|
All interest earned on the funds
in the trust account will be held in trust for the benefit of
public stockholders until the earlier of the completion of a
business combination and our liquidation upon failure to effect
a business combination within the allotted time.
|
Release of funds
|
|
Except for (i) up to $3,100,000 we
may need to fund expenses related to investigating and selecting
a target business and our other working capital requirements and
(ii) any amounts that we may need to pay our tax obligations
that may be released to us from the interest earned on the trust
account balance, the proceeds held in the trust account will not
be released until the earlier of the completion of a business
combination and our liquidation upon failure to effect a
business combination within the allotted time.
|
|
The proceeds held in the escrow
account would not be released until the earlier of the
completion of a business combination or the failure to effect a
business combination within the allotted time.
|
49
MANAGEMENT
Directors
and Executive Officers
Our current directors and executive officers are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Nathan Leight
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Jason Weiss
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
and Director
|
Jonathan W. Berger
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard H. Rogel
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
Carl A. Albert
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Nathan Leight has served as our chairman of the
board since our inception. Mr. Leight is the co-founder and
a managing member of Terrapin Partners LLC (including its
affiliates), a co-founder and a managing member and the chief
investment officer of Terrapin Asset Management, LLC (including
its affiliates), and a co-founder and a managing member and the
chief investment officer of TWF Management Company, LLC
(including its affiliates). Terrapin Partners, established in
August 1998, is a private investment management firm focusing on
private equity investing. Terrapin Asset Management, established
in March 2002, focuses primarily on the management of
multi-manager hedge fund portfolios and as of April 30,
2007, managed, or provided
sub-advisory
services for, more than $500 million of assets. TWF
Management Company, established in December 2004, focuses on the
management of a water industry-focused hedge fund (The Water
Fund, LP), and as of April 30, 2007 managed approximately
$50 million. From November 2004 to December 2006,
Mr. Leight was the chairman of the board of Aldabra
Acquisition Corporation, a blank check company formed to acquire
an operating business. In December 2006, Aldabra Acquisition
Corporation completed a merger with Great Lakes
Dredge & Dock Corp. Mr. Leight has continued to
serve as a director of Great Lakes since December 2006. From
September 1998 to March 1999, Mr. Leight served as the
interim chief executive officer of
e-STEEL LLC,
an industry-specific
business-to-business
software enterprise, and from January 2000 to May 2002, he
served as interim chief executive officer of VastVideo, Inc., a
provider of special interest video content and related
technology to web sites and interactive television operators.
Both e-STEEL
and VastVideo were Terrapin portfolio companies. From February
1995 to August 1998, Mr. Leight was employed by Gabriel
Capital LP, a hedge fund with assets exceeding $1 billion
specializing in investing in bankruptcies, under-valued
securities, emerging markets, and merger arbitrage, and from
February 1995 to August 1997 he served as its chief investment
officer. From December 1991 to February 1995, Mr. Leight
served as a managing director of Dillon Read & Co., a
private investment firm, where he oversaw the firms
proprietary trading department which invested primarily in risk
arbitrage and bankruptcy/distressed companies. Mr. Leight
received a B.A. from Harvard College (cum laude).
Mr. Leight is the cousin of Jonathan W. Berger.
Jason Weiss has served as our chief executive
officer, secretary and a member of our board of directors since
our inception. Mr. Weiss is the co-founder and a managing
member of Terrapin Partners (including its affiliates), a
co-founder and a managing member of Terrapin Asset Management
(including its affiliates), and a co-founder and a managing
member of TWF Management Company. From November 2004 to
December 2006, Mr. Weiss was the chief executive
officer, secretary and director of Aldabra Acquisition
Corporation and has continued to serve as a director of Great
Lakes (Aldabras merger partner as described above) since
December 2006. From March 1999 to December 1999, Mr. Weiss
served as the chief executive officer of PaperExchange.com,
Inc., an industry-specific
business-to-business
software enterprise and a Terrapin portfolio company, and from
December 1999 to March 2000 he served as executive vice
president of strategy. He also served as a managing member of
e-STEEL LLC
from September 1998 to March 1999. Mr. Weiss also served as
a managing member of Terrapins portfolio company, American
Classic Sanitation, LLC, a construction site and special event
services business specializing in portable toilets, temporary
fencing, and sink rentals, from August 1998 to December 2000 and
from January 2004 to March 2004. He also served as its chief
executive officer from August 1998 to December 1999 and as a
consultant from August 1998 to January 2004. From November 1997
to August 1998, Mr. Weiss was a private consultant for
several companies. From April 1997 to November 1997,
Mr. Weiss was the president of Pacific EyeNet, Inc., a
privately held physician practice
50
management organization. From June 1996 to April 1997, he was an
associate with EGS Securities Corp., an investment banking and
private equity boutique focused primarily on the health care
sector, and from November 1994 to December 1995, he was an
associate with Booz Allen & Hamilton, a management
consulting firm. Mr. Weiss received a B.A. from the
University of Michigan (with Highest Distinction) and a J.D.
(cum laude) from Harvard Law School.
Jonathan W. Berger has served as a member of our
board of directors since our inception. Mr. Berger has been
associated with Navigant Consulting, Inc., a New York Stock
Exchange-listed consulting firm, since December 2001, and is the
managing director and co-practice area leader for the corporate
finance practice. He has also been president of Navigant Capital
Advisors, LLC, Navigant Consulting, Inc.s registered
broker-dealer, since October 2003. From November 2004 to
December 2006, Mr. Berger was a director of Aldabra
Acquisition Corporation and has continued to serve as a director
since its acquisition of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
Holdings Corp in December 2006. From January 2000 to March 2001,
Mr. Berger was president of DotPlanet.com, an Internet
services provider. From August 1983 to December 1999,
Mr. Berger was employed by KPMG, LLP, an independent public
accounting firm, and served as a partner from August 1991 to
December 1999 where he was in charge of the corporate finance
practice for three of those years. Mr. Berger received a
B.S. from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from Emory
University. Mr. Berger is a certified public accountant.
Mr. Berger is the cousin of Nathan D. Leight.
Richard H. Rogel has been a member of our board of
directors since our inception. Since 1997, Mr. Rogel has
been a private investor. Mr. Rogel served as chairman of
the board of CoolSavings, Inc., a provider of interactive
marketing services to advertisers, their agencies, and
publishers, from 1996 to December 2005, serving as its chairman
of the board from July 2001 to December 2005 and as the chairman
of its audit committee from 1998 to December 2005. In 1982,
Mr. Rogel founded Preferred Provider Organization of
Michigan, Inc., a preferred provider organization for health
care delivery, and served as its Chairman from its inception
until it was sold in 1997. Mr. Rogel has been a director of
Origen Financial, Inc., a Nasdaq Global Market listed real
estate investment trust, since August 2003. Mr. Rogel is
the chairman of The Michigan Difference, a $2.5 billion
endowment campaign for the University of Michigan. He is also on
the University of Michigan President Advisory Board and is the
past president of the University of Michigan Alumni Association.
He has self-funded over 200 scholarships for the University of
Michigan. He serves on the Board of Trustees of the Progressive
Policy Institute and the Board of Directors of the Gore Range
Natural Science School. Mr. Rogel received a B.B.A. from
the University of Michigan.
Carl A. Albert has served as a member of our board
of directors since our inception. Since April 2000,
Mr. Albert has served as the chairman of the board and
chief executive officer of Fairchild Venture Capital
Corporation, a private investment firm. From September 1990 to
April 2000, Mr. Albert was the majority owner, chairman of
the board and chief executive officer of Fairchild Aerospace
Corporation and Fairchild Dornier Corporation, and Chairman of
the Supervisory Board of Dornier Luftfahrt, GmbH, all aircraft
manufacturing companies. From 1989 to 1990, Mr. Albert was
a private investor. After providing start up venture capital,
Mr. Albert served from 1981 to 1988 as chairman of the
board and chief executive officer of Wings West Airlines, a
California based regional airline that completed an initial
public offering in 1983 and was acquired by AMR Corporation,
parent of American Airlines, in 1988. Following the acquisition
Mr. Albert served as President until 1989. Prior to this,
Mr. Albert was an attorney, specializing in business, real
estate and corporate law. Mr. Albert received a B.A. from
the University of California at Los Angeles and an L.L.B. from
the University of California at Los Angeles School of Law.
Our board of directors is divided into three classes with only
one class of directors being elected in each year and each class
serving a three-year term. The term of office of the first class
of directors, consisting of Carl A. Albert, will expire at our
first annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the
second class of directors, consisting of Richard H. Rogel and
Jonathan W. Berger, will expire at the second annual meeting.
The term of the third class of directors, consisting of Nathan
Leight and Jason Weiss, will expire at the third annual meeting.
51
Special
Advisors
We may seek guidance and advice from the following special
advisors. We have no formal arrangements or agreements with
these advisors to provide services to us and accordingly, they
have no fiduciary obligations to present business opportunities
to us, although they have a beneficial interest in the shares of
common stock held by Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership as a
result of their ownership interest in such entity. These special
advisors will simply provide advice, introductions to potential
targets, and assistance to us, at our request, only if they are
able to do so. Nevertheless, we believe with their business
background and extensive contacts, they will be helpful to our
search for a target business and our consummation of a business
combination.
Sheli Z. Rosenberg is an Adjunct Professor at
Northwestern Universitys J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of
Business. Ms. Rosenberg was vice chairman of Equity Group
Investments, LLC from January 2000 to October 2002, and from
1994 to January 2000, she served as president, chief executive
officer and a director of Equity Group Investments, LLC. At the
time of her retirement from Equity Group Investments, it was a
privately held real estate investment firm whose approximately
$10 billion in annual revenues was generated from 27
privately held companies, direct controlling interests in 15
publicly traded corporations, and an approximately 600 property
real estate portfolio. Ms. Rosenberg is currently on the
board of directors of CVS Corporation (NYSE:CVS), Avis Budget
Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAR), Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
(NYSE:ELS), Equity Residential (NYSE:EQR), and Ventas, Inc.
(NYSE:VTR).
Peter R. Deutsch has been an attorney in private
practice since January 2005. Mr. Deutsch was a member of
the United States House of Representatives from January 1993
until January 2005 representing the 20th Congressional District
of Florida. He served on the House Energy and Commerce Committee
from January 1994 until January 2005. He was the Ranking
Democrat on the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee during
the 104th, 107th and 108th Congresses. Mr. Deutsch was the
Ranking Democrat in the investigations of Enron Corporation,
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc., Bridgestone/Firestone
Tires and the conflict of interest abuses at the National
Institute of Health. He was also a member of the subcommittees
on Telecommunications and the Internet, the Environment and
Hazardous Materials and Consumer Trade and Protection. Prior to
serving in Congress, Mr. Deutsch served in the Florida
House of Representatives from November 1982 until November 1992
where he served on the Veterans Affairs Committee, the Health
Care Committee, the Criminal Justice Committee, and as Chairman
of the Insurance Committee. Mr. Deutsch has been a director
of Great Lakes since its merger with Aldabra Acquisition
Corporation and served as a director of Aldabra Acquisition
Corporation from its inception until its merger with Great
Lakes. Mr. Deutsch received a B.S. from Swarthmore College
and a J.D. from Yale University Law School.
These individuals will play a key role in identifying and
evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, selecting the
target business, and structuring, negotiating and consummating
its acquisition. We believe that the skills and expertise of
these individuals, their collective access to acquisition
opportunities and ideas, their contacts, and their transactional
expertise should enable them to successfully identify and effect
an acquisition.
Prior
Involvement of Principals in Blank Check Companies
Each of Nathan Leight, Jason Weiss and Jonathan W. Berger have
been involved in another blank check company. Aldabra
Acquisition Corporation, a blank check company with an objective
to acquire an operating business, consummated its initial public
offering on February 24, 2005, raising total gross proceeds
of $55.2 million at an offering price of $6.00 per
unit (SEC File
No. 333-121610).
Aldabras units, common stock and warrants traded on the
Over The Counter Bulletin Board under the symbols ALBAU,
ALBA and ALBAW, respectively. Prior to Aldabras merger
described below, Aldabras units, common stock and warrants
traded from a low of $6.00 per unit to a high of
$8.75 per unit, from a low of $5.10 per share to a
high of $6.00 per share, and from a low of $0.35 per
warrant to a high of $1.38 per warrant, respectively.
Following Aldabras merger, its units ceased trading while
its common stock and warrants began trading on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the symbols GLDD and GLDDW, respectively, and have
traded from a low of $6.35 per share to a high of
$9.30 per share, and from a low of $1.45 per warrant
to a high of $4.21 per warrant, respectively.
52
In December 2006, Aldabra consummated a merger with Great Lakes
Dredge & Dock Corporation. Pursuant to the Agreement
and Plan of Merger, Aldabra issued approximately 29 million
shares of its common stock to Great Lakes stockholders in
the merger and Aldabra changed its name to Great Lakes
Dredge & Dock Corporation. No Aldabra stockholder
exercised conversion rights or voted against the merger at the
special meeting of its stockholders. The funds held in
Aldabras trust account were used to pay down Great
Lakes existing term bank debt by approximately
$50 million. In December 2006, Aldabra deregistered its
original securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
From its inception until its acquisition of Great Lakes,
Mr. Leight was the chairman of the board of Aldabra,
Mr. Weiss was the chief executive officer, secretary and a
director of Aldabra, and Mr. Berger was a director of
Aldabra. None of such individuals received any salary for their
services to Aldabra. However, Terrapin Partners received a
$7,500 per month fee from Aldabra for certain
administrative, technology and secretarial services, as well as
the use of certain limited office space, including a conference
room, in New York City, from its inception until December
2006 (aggregating a total of $160,446). Prior to Aldabras
initial public offering, (i) Messrs. Leight and Weiss
had each purchased an aggregate of 851,850 shares of common
stock (at approximately $0.0125 per share),
(ii) trusts for the benefit of the families of
Messrs. Leight and Weiss had each purchased an aggregate of
92,150 shares of common stock (at approximately
$0.0125 per share), (iii) Terrapin Partners Employee
Partnership (of which Messrs. Leight and Weiss are the sole
owners and General Partners of Terrapin Partners LLC, Terrapin
Partners Employee Partnerships general partner) had
purchased 52,000 shares of common stock (at approximately
$0.0125 per share) and (iv) Jonathan W. Berger had
purchased an aggregate of 20,000 shares of common stock (at
approximately $0.0125 per share). Subsequent to
Aldabras initial public offering, Messrs. Leight,
Weiss and Berger (and/or their respective family trusts or IRAs)
purchased in the open market 16,000, 22,900 and 400 shares
of Aldabra common stock, respectively, at an average price of
$5.55, $5.52 and $5.76 per share, respectively.
Additionally, Mr. Leight purchased 7,000 units at
$6.44 per unit. Additionally, Terrapin Partners LLC
purchased 1,572,000 warrants in the open market (at an average
purchase price of $0.65 per warrant) and Mr. Leight
(or his affiliates) acquired 14,000 warrants as part of the
7,000 units purchased by him in the open market (as
described above). The current market value of each of Messrs.
Leights, Weiss and Bergers holdings (including
their respective affiliates) in Adabra Acquisition Corporation,
as of May 17, 2007, is $8,513,750, $8,460,375 and $178,500,
respectively, not including Messrs. Leights and
Weiss equal interests in the holdings of the Terrapin
Partners Employee Partnership which had a value of $455,000 and
Terrapin Partners LLC which had a value of $5,895,000.
The following table sets forth the foregoing information
relating to the holdings of such individuals (and their
respective affiliates) and entities in Aldabra Acquisition
Corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Return on
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
Name of Individual
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
To Date
|
|
|
Nathan Leight
|
|
$
|
145,680
|
|
|
$
|
8,513,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Weiss
|
|
$
|
138,208
|
|
|
$
|
8,460,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan W. Berger
|
|
$
|
2,554
|
|
|
$
|
178,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terrapin Partners Employee
Partnership
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
455,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terrapin Partners LLC
|
|
$
|
1,021,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,895,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the acquisition of Great Lakes, each of
Messrs. Leight and Weiss has continued to serve as
directors. As such, they may receive fees for their services as
directors, though as of the date of this prospectus they have
not received any compensation.
Executive
Compensation
No executive officer has received any cash compensation for
services rendered to us. Commencing on the date of this
prospectus through the acquisition of a target business, we will
pay Terrapin Partners LLC, an affiliate of Nathan Leight and
Jason Weiss, a fee of $7,500 per month for providing us
with certain administrative, technology and secretarial
services, as well as the use of certain limited office space,
including
53
a conference room, in New York City. However, this arrangement
is solely for our benefit and is not intended to provide
Messrs. Leight and Weiss compensation in lieu of a salary.
Other than the $7,500 per month administrative fee, no
compensation of any kind, including finders, consulting or other
similar fees, will be paid to any of our existing stockholders,
including our directors, or any of their respective affiliates,
prior to, or for any services they render in order to
effectuate, the consummation of a business combination. However,
such individuals will be reimbursed for any actual
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf
such as identifying potential target businesses, performing due
diligence on suitable business combinations and travel expenses,
meals and lodging incurred in visiting potential target
businesses. There is no limit on the amount of these actual
out-of-pocket
expenses and there will be no review of the reasonableness of
the expenses by anyone other than our board of directors, which
includes persons who may seek reimbursement, or a court of
competent jurisdiction if such reimbursement is challenged.
Director
Independence
The American Stock Exchange requires that a majority of our
board must be composed of independent directors,
which is defined generally as a person other than an officer or
employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other
individual having a relationship, which, in the opinion of the
companys board of directors would interfere with the
directors exercise of independent judgment in carrying out
the responsibilities of a director.
We have determined that, upon consummation of this offering,
each of Jonathan W. Berger, Richard H. Rogel and Carl A. Albert
will be an independent director as defined under the American
Stock Exchanges listing standards, constituting a majority
of our board. Our independent directors will have regularly
scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are
present.
Any affiliated transactions will be on terms no less favorable
to us than could be obtained from independent parties. Any
affiliated transactions must be approved by a majority of our
independent and disinterested directors.
Audit
Committee
Effective upon consummation of this offering, we will establish
an audit committee of the board of directors, which will consist
of Jonathan W. Berger, as chairman, Richard H. Rogel and Carl A.
Albert, each of whom is an independent director under the
American Stock Exchanges listing standards. The audit
committees duties, which are specified in our Audit
Committee Charter, include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
auditor the annual audited financial statements, and
recommending to the board whether the audited financial
statements should be included in our
Form 10-K;
|
|
|
|
discussing with management and the independent auditor
significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in
connection with the preparation of our financial statements;
|
|
|
|
discussing with management major risk assessment and risk
management policies;
|
|
|
|
monitoring the independence of the independent auditor;
|
|
|
|
verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit
partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the
audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by
law;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving all related-party transactions;
|
|
|
|
inquiring and discussing with management our compliance with
applicable laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit
services to be performed by our independent auditor, including
the fees and terms of the services to be performed;
|
|
|
|
appointing or replacing the independent auditor;
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
determining the compensation and oversight of the work of the
independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements
between management and the independent auditor regarding
financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an
audit report or related work; and
|
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment
of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls or reports which raise material issues
regarding our financial statements or accounting policies.
|
Financial
Experts on Audit Committee
The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of
independent directors who are financially
literate as defined under the American Stock Exchange
listing standards. The American Stock Exchange listing standards
define financially literate as being able to read
and understand fundamental financial statements, including a
companys balance sheet, income statement and cash flow
statement.
In addition, we must certify to the American Stock Exchange that
the committee has, and will continue to have, at least one
member who has past employment experience in finance or
accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting,
or other comparable experience or background that results in the
individuals financial sophistication. The board of
directors has determined that Jonathan W. Berger satisfies the
American Stock Exchanges definition of financial
sophistication and also qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert, as defined under rules and regulations
of the SEC.
Nominating
Committee
Effective upon consummation of this offering, we will establish
a nominating committee of the board of directors, which will
consist of Jonathan W. Berger, as chairman, and Richard H.
Rogel, each of whom is an independent director under the
American Stock Exchanges listing standards. The nominating
committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons
to be nominated to serve on our board of directors. The
nominating committee considers persons identified by its
members, management, shareholders, investment bankers and others.
Guidelines
for Selecting Director Nominees
The guidelines for selecting nominees, which are specified in
the Nominating Committee Charter, generally provide that persons
to be nominated:
|
|
|
|
|
should have demonstrated notable or significant achievements in
business, education or public service;
|
|
|
|
should possess the requisite intelligence, education and
experience to make a significant contribution to the board of
directors and bring a range of skills, diverse perspectives and
backgrounds to its deliberations; and
|
|
|
|
should have the highest ethical standards, a strong sense of
professionalism and intense dedication to serving the interests
of the stockholders.
|
The Nominating Committee will consider a number of
qualifications relating to management and leadership experience,
background and integrity and professionalism in evaluating a
persons candidacy for membership on the board of
directors. The nominating committee may require certain skills
or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to
meet specific board needs that arise from time to time. The
nominating committee does not distinguish among nominees
recommended by shareholders and other persons.
Code of
Ethics
Effective upon consummation of this offering, we will adopt a
code of ethics that applies to all of our executive officers,
directors and employees. The code of ethics codifies the
business and ethical principles that govern all aspects of our
business.
55
Conflicts
of Interest
Potential investors should be aware of the following potential
conflicts of interest:
|
|
|
|
|
None of our officers and directors is required to commit their
full time to our affairs and, accordingly, they may have
conflicts of interest in allocating their time among various
business activities.
|
|
|
|
In the course of their other business activities, our officers
and directors may become aware of investment and business
opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to our
company as well as the other entities with which they are
affiliated. Our management may have conflicts of interest in
determining to which entity a particular business opportunity
should be presented.
|
|
|
|
Our officers and directors may in the future become affiliated
with entities, including other blank check companies, engaged in
business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by
our company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial shares owned by our officers and directors will be
released from escrow only if a business combination is
successfully completed, and the insider warrants purchased by
our officers and directors and any warrants which they may
purchase in this offering or in the aftermarket will expire
worthless if a business combination is not consummated.
Additionally, our officers and directors will not receive
liquidation distributions with respect to any of their initial
shares. Furthermore, the purchasers of the insider warrants have
agreed that such securities will not be sold or transferred by
them until after we have completed a business combination. For
the foregoing reasons, our board may have a conflict of interest
in determining whether a particular target business is
appropriate to effect a business combination with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our directors and officers may purchase shares of common stock
as part of this offering or in the open market. If they did,
they would be entitled to vote such shares as they choose on a
proposal to approve a business combination.
|
|
|
|
Our special advisors have no fiduciary obligations to us.
Therefore, they have no obligation to present business
opportunities to us at all and will only do so if they believe
it will not violate their other fiduciary obligations.
|
In general, officers and directors of a corporation incorporated
under the laws of the State of Delaware are required to present
business opportunities to a corporation if:
|
|
|
|
|
the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;
|
|
|
|
the opportunity is within the corporations line of
business; and
|
|
|
|
it would not be fair to the corporation and its stockholders for
the opportunity not to be brought to the attention of the
corporation.
|
Accordingly, as a result of multiple business affiliations, our
officers and directors may have similar legal obligations
relating to presenting business opportunities meeting the
above-listed criteria to multiple entities. In addition,
conflicts of interest may arise when our board evaluates a
particular business opportunity with respect to the above-listed
criteria. We cannot assure you that any of the above mentioned
conflicts will be resolved in our favor.
In order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may
arise from multiple corporate affiliations, each of our officers
has agreed, until the earliest of a business combination, our
liquidation or such time as he or she ceases to be an officer,
to present to our company for our consideration, prior to
presentation to any other entity, any business opportunity which
may reasonably be required to be presented to us under Delaware
law, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary or contractual
obligations he might have. We have not established any
procedures to ensure that our officers observe these
requirements.
Each of Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss has a pre-existing
fiduciary obligation to Great Lakes as each is a director of
such entity. Additionally, each of these individuals has a
pre-existing fiduciary obligation to Terrapin Partners which is
a private investment management firm focusing on private equity
investing. Accordingly, due to these affiliations, each may have
a fiduciary obligation to present potential business
56
opportunities to such entities in addition to presenting them to
us which could cause additional conflicts of interest.
In connection with the vote required for any business
combination, all of our existing stockholders, including all of
our officers and directors, have agreed to vote their respective
initial shares in accordance with the vote of the public
stockholders owning a majority of the shares of our common stock
sold in this offering. In addition, they have agreed to waive
their respective rights to participate in any liquidation
distribution with respect to those shares of common stock
acquired by them prior to this offering. Any common stock
acquired by existing stockholders in the offering or aftermarket
will be considered part of the holdings of the public
stockholders. Except with respect to the conversion rights
afforded to public stockholders, these existing stockholders
will have the same rights as other public stockholders with
respect to such shares, including voting rights in connection
with a potential business combination. Accordingly, they may
vote such shares on a proposed business combination any way they
choose.
To further minimize potential conflicts of interest, we have
agreed not to consummate a business combination with an entity
which is affiliated with any of our existing stockholders,
including an entity that is either a portfolio company of, or
has otherwise received a financial investment from, an
investment banking firm (or an affiliate thereof) that is
affiliated with our management, unless we obtain an opinion from
an independent investment banking firm that the business
combination is fair to our unaffiliated stockholders from a
financial point of view. We currently do not anticipate entering
into a business combination with an entity affiliated with any
of our existing stockholders. We will also not acquire an entity
with which our management, through their other business
activities, is currently having acquisition or investment
discussions. Furthermore, in no event will any of our existing
officers, directors, stockholders or advisors, or any entity
with which they are affiliated, be paid any finders fee,
consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any
services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of
a business combination.
57
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of June 13,
2007 and as adjusted to reflect the sale of our common stock
included in the units offered by this prospectus (assuming none
of the individuals listed purchase units in this offering), by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than
5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our officers and directors; and
|
|
|
|
all our officers and directors as a group.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in
the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to
all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Offering
|
|
|
After
Offering(2)
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
of Outstanding
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
of Outstanding
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial
Owner(1)
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Nathan Leight
|
|
|
8,512,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
98.7
|
%
|
|
|
7,402,173
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
19.7
|
%
|
Jason Weiss
|
|
|
8,512,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
98.7
|
%
|
|
|
7,402,173
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
19.7
|
%
|
Jonathan W.
Berger(5)
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
32,609
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard H. Rogel
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
32,609
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Carl A.
Albert(6)
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
32,609
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Sanjay Arora
|
|
|
517,500
|
(7)
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
450,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group (five individuals)
|
|
|
8,625,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than 1%.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the
business address of each of the individuals is c/o Terrapin
Partners LLC, 540 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, New
York 10022.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Assumes no exercise of the
over-allotment option and, therefore, the forfeiture of an
aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of common stock held by our
initial stockholders.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents
(i) 8,261,250 shares of common stock held by the
Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership and
(ii) 251,250 shares of common stock held by the
Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership. Messrs. Leight and
Weiss are the general partners of the Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership and they
and/or their
family trusts are the owners of the Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership. Terrapin Partners LLC is the general partner of the
Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership and Messrs. Leight
and Weiss are the co-managers of Terrapin Partners LLC.
Accordingly, all shares held by the Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership and the Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership are
deemed to be beneficially owned by them. Terrapin Partners
Venture Partnership has allocated 517,500 shares to Sanjay
Arora, an employee of Terrapin Partners LLC, and
10,000 shares to each of Sheli Rosenberg and Peter R.
Deutsch, our special advisors. The remaining shares held by
Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership have been allocated to
Messrs. Leight and Weiss (or their affiliates).
Mr. Aroras shares vest over time commencing from the
consummation of our initial public offering for as long as
Mr. Arora remains employed by Terrapin Partners LLC. The
shares allocated to Messrs. Leight and Weiss (or their
affiliates) and Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Deutsch have no
vesting requirements and have already vested in full in the
individuals or entities. Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership
has allocated certain of its shares to employees and affiliates
of Terrapin Partners LLC. These shares vest in full in the
employees and affiliates when the shares are released from
escrow, as described below, provided such individuals are still
employed by or affiliated with Terrapin Partners LLC at such
time.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Does not include
1,500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
insider warrants that are not exercisable and will not become
exercisable within 60 days.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The business address of
Mr. Berger is c/o Navigant Consulting, Inc., 100
Colony Square, Suite 1900, 1175 Peachtree Street, N.E.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30361.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The business address of
Mr. Albert is 10940 Bellagio Road, Suite A, Los
Angeles, California
90077-3203.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Represents shares allocated by
Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership to Mr. Arora. The
shares vest over time commencing from the consummation of our
initial public offering, for so long as Mr. Arora remains
employed by Terrapin Partners LLC. To the extent such shares do
not vest, they will revert back to Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership.
|
58
Immediately after this offering, our existing stockholders,
which include all of our officers and directors, collectively,
will beneficially own 20% of the then issued and outstanding
shares of our common stock (assuming none of them purchase any
units offered by this prospectus). None of our existing
stockholders, officers and directors has indicated to us that he
intends to purchase our securities in the offering. Because of
the ownership block held by our existing stockholders, such
individuals may be able to effectively exercise control over all
matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the
election of directors and approval of significant corporate
transactions other than approval of our initial business
combination.
If the underwriters do not exercise all or a portion of the
over-allotment option, our initial stockholders will be required
to forfeit up to an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of common
stock. Our initial stockholders will be required to forfeit only
a number of shares necessary to maintain their collective 20%
ownership interest in our common stock after giving effect to
the offering and the exercise, if any, of the underwriters
over-allotment option.
All of the initial shares outstanding prior to the date of this
prospectus will be placed in escrow with Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as escrow agent, until one
year after the consummation of our initial business combination.
The initial shares may be released from escrow earlier than this
date if, within the first year after we consummate a business
combination:
|
|
|
|
|
the last sales price of our common stock equals or exceeds
$18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within any
30-trading day period; or
|
|
|
|
we consummate a subsequent liquidation, merger, stock exchange
or other similar transaction which results in all of our
stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common
stock for cash, securities or other property.
|
During the escrow period, the holders of these shares will not
be able to sell or transfer their securities except (i) to
an entitys members upon its liquidation, (ii) to
relatives and trusts for estate planning purposes or
(iii) by private sales made at or prior to the consummation
of a business combination at prices no greater than the price at
which the shares were originally purchased, in each case where
the transferee agrees to the terms of the escrow agreement, but
will retain all other rights as our stockholders, including,
without limitation, the right to vote their shares of common
stock and the right to receive cash dividends, if declared. If
dividends are declared and payable in shares of common stock,
such dividends will also be placed in escrow. If we are unable
to effect a business combination and liquidate, none of our
existing stockholders will receive any portion of the
liquidation proceeds with respect to their initial shares.
Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have committed to purchase the
insider warrants (for a total purchase price of $3,000,000) from
us. These purchases will take place on a private placement basis
simultaneously with the consummation of this offering. The
insider warrants will be identical to warrants underlying the
units being offered by this prospectus except that the insider
warrants (i) will be exercisable on a cashless basis,
(ii) may be exercised whether or not a registration
statement relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrants is effective and current and (iii) will not be
redeemable by us so long as they are still held by the
purchasers or their affiliates. The purchasers have agreed that
the insider warrants will not be sold or transferred by them
(except to employees of Terrapin Partners LLC or to our
directors at the same cost per warrant originally paid by them)
until the later
of ,
2008 [one year from the date of this prospectus] and
60 days after the consummation of our initial business
combination.
Messrs. Leight and Weiss are our promoters, as
that term is defined under the Federal securities laws.
59
CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS
In February 2007, we issued 5,750,000 shares of our common
stock to the individuals set forth below for $25,000 in cash, at
a purchase price of approximately $0.004 share, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Relationship to Us
|
|
Nathan
Leight(1)
|
|
|
5,507,500
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Jason
Weiss(1)
|
|
|
5,507,500
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
and Director
|
Jonathan W. Berger
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard H. Rogel
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Director
|
Carl A. Albert
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Director
|
Terrapin Partners Employee
Partnership
|
|
|
167,500
|
|
|
Stockholder
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These shares are held by the
Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership. Messrs. Leight and
Weiss are the general partners of the Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership and they
and/or their
family trusts are the owners of the Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership.
|
Effective June 12, 2007, our board of directors authorized
a stock dividend of 0.5 shares of common stock for each
outstanding share of common stock, effectively lowering the
purchase price to approximately $0.003 per share.
If the underwriters do not exercise all or a portion of their
over-allotment option, our initial stockholders have agreed to
forfeit up to an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of common
stock in proportion to the portion of the over-allotment option
that was not exercised. If such shares are forfeited, we would
record the aggregate fair value of the shares forfeited and
reacquired to treasury stock and a corresponding credit to
additional paid-in capital based on the difference between the
fair market value of the shares of common stock forfeited and
the price paid to us for such forfeited shares (which would be
an aggregate total of approximately $3,000 for all
1,125,000 shares). Upon receipt, such forfeited shares
would then be immediately cancelled which would result in the
retirement of the treasury stock and a corresponding charge to
additional paid-in capital.
If the underwriters determine the size of the offering should be
further increased or decreased, a stock dividend or a
contribution back to capital, as applicable, would be
effectuated in order to maintain our existing stockholders
ownership at a percentage of the number of shares to be sold in
this offering.
The holders of the majority of these shares will be entitled to
make up to two demands that we register these shares pursuant to
an agreement to be signed prior to or on the date of this
prospectus. The holders of the majority of these shares may
elect to exercise these registration rights at any time
commencing three months prior to the date on which these shares
of common stock are released from escrow. In addition, these
stockholders have certain piggy-back registration
rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent
to the date on which these shares of common stock are released
from escrow. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection
with the filing of any such registration statements.
Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have committed, pursuant to
written subscription agreements with us and Lazard Capital
Markets, to purchase the 3,000,000 insider warrants (for a total
purchase price of $3,000,000) from us. These purchases will take
place on a private placement basis simultaneously with the
consummation of this offering. The purchase price for the
insider warrants will be delivered to Graubard Miller, our
counsel in connection with this offering, who will also be
acting solely as escrow agent in connection with the private
sale of insider warrants, at least 24 hours prior to the
date of this prospectus to hold in an account until we
consummate this offering. Graubard Miller will deposit the
purchase price into the trust account simultaneously with the
consummation of the offering. The insider warrants will be
identical to warrants underlying the units being offered by this
prospectus except that the insider warrants (i) will be
exercisable on a cashless basis, (ii) may be exercised
whether or not a registration statement relating to the common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and
current and (iii) will not be redeemable by us so long as
they are still held by the purchasers or their affiliates. The
purchasers have agreed that the insider warrants will not be
sold or transferred by them (except to employees of Terrapin
Partners LLC or to our directors at the same cost per
60
warrant originally paid by them) until the later
of ,
2008 [one year from the date of this prospectus] and
60 days after the consummation of our business combination.
The holders of the majority of these insider warrants (or
underlying shares) will be entitled to demand that we register
these securities pursuant to an agreement to be signed prior to
or on the date of this prospectus. The holders of the majority
of these securities may elect to exercise these registration
rights with respect to such securities at any time after we
consummate a business combination. In addition, these holders
have certain piggy-back registration rights with
respect to registration statements filed subsequent to such
date. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the
filing of any such registration statements.
Terrapin Partners LLC, an affiliate of Nathan Leight and Jason
Weiss, has agreed that, commencing on the effective date of this
prospectus through the acquisition of a target business, it will
make available to us certain administrative, technology and
secretarial services, as well as the use of certain limited
office space, including a conference room, in New York City, as
we may require from time to time. We have agreed to pay Terrapin
Partners LLC $7,500 per month for these services.
Messrs. Leight and Weiss are each a managing member and 50%
owner of Terrapin Partners LLC. Accordingly, they will benefit
from the transaction to the extent of their interest in Terrapin
Partners LLC. However, this arrangement is solely for our
benefit and is not intended to provide Messrs. Leight and
Weiss compensation in lieu of a salary. We believe, based on
rents and fees for similar services in the New York City
metropolitan area, that the fee charged by Terrapin Partners LLC
is at least as favorable as we could have obtained from an
unaffiliated person. However, as our directors may not be deemed
independent, we did not have the benefit of
disinterested directors approving this transaction.
As of the date of this prospectus, Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss
have advanced to us an aggregate of $125,000 to cover expenses
related to this offering. The loans will be payable without
interest on the earlier of February 27, 2008 or the
consummation of this offering. We intend to repay these loans
from the proceeds of this offering not being placed in trust.
We will reimburse our officers and directors for any reasonable
out-of-pocket
business expenses incurred by them in connection with certain
activities on our behalf such as identifying and investigating
possible target businesses and business combinations. There is
no limit on the amount of
out-of-pocket
expenses reimbursable by us, which will be reviewed only by our
board or a court of competent jurisdiction if such reimbursement
is challenged.
Other than the $7,500 per-month administrative fee and
reimbursable
out-of-pocket
expenses payable to our officers and directors, no compensation
or fees of any kind, including finders fees, consulting
fees or other similar compensation, will be paid to any of our
existing stockholders, officers or directors who owned our
common stock prior to this offering, or to any of their
respective affiliates, prior to or with respect to the business
combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is).
All ongoing and future transactions between us and any of our
officers and directors or their respective affiliates, including
loans by our officers and directors, will be on terms believed
by us to be no less favorable to us than are available from
unaffiliated third parties. Such transactions or loans,
including any forgiveness of loans, will require prior approval
by a majority of our uninterested independent
directors (to the extent we have any) or the members of our
board who do not have an interest in the transaction, in either
case who had access, at our expense, to our attorneys or
independent legal counsel. We will not enter into any such
transaction unless our disinterested independent
directors (or, if there are no independent
directors, our disinterested directors) determine that the terms
of such transaction are no less favorable to us than those that
would be available to us with respect to such a transaction from
unaffiliated third parties.
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
General
We are authorized to issue 85,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $.0001, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $.0001. As of the date of this prospectus,
8,625,000 shares of common stock are outstanding, held by
five stockholders of record. No shares of preferred stock are
currently outstanding.
61
Units
Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant.
Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common
stock. The common stock and warrants will begin to trade
separately on the 90th day after the date of this
prospectus unless Lazard Capital Markets informs us of its
decision to allow earlier separate trading, provided that in no
event may the common stock and warrants be traded separately
until we have filed with the SEC a Current Report on
Form 8-K
which includes an audited balance sheet reflecting our receipt
of the gross proceeds of this offering. We will file a Current
Report on
Form 8-K
which includes this audited balance sheet promptly upon the
consummation of this offering. The audited balance sheet will
reflect proceeds we receive from the exercise of the
over-allotment option, if the over-allotment option is exercised
prior to the filing of the
Form 8-K.
If the over-allotment option is exercised after our initial
filing of a
Form 8-K,
we will file an amendment to the
Form 8-K
to provide updated financial information to reflect the exercise
of the over-allotment option. We will also include in this
Form 8-K,
an amendment thereto, or in a subsequent
Form 8-K
information indicating if Lazard Capital Markets has allowed
separate trading of the common stock and warrants prior to the
90th day after the date of this prospectus.
Common
stock
Our stockholders of record are entitled to one vote for each
share held on all matters to be voted on by stockholders. In
connection with the vote required for any business combination,
all of our existing stockholders, including all of our officers
and directors, have agreed to vote their respective shares of
common stock owned by them immediately prior to this offering in
accordance with the majority of the shares of our common stock
voted by our public stockholders. This voting arrangement shall
not apply to shares included in units purchased in this offering
or purchased following this offering in the open market by any
of our existing stockholders, officers and directors. Our
existing stockholders, officers and directors will vote all of
their shares in any manner they determine, in their sole
discretion, with respect to any other items that come before a
vote of our stockholders.
We will proceed with the business combination only if a majority
of the shares of common stock voted by the public stockholders
are voted in favor of the business combination and public
stockholders owning less than 40% of the shares sold in this
offering both exercise their conversion rights discussed below
and vote against the business combination.
Our board of directors is divided into three classes, each of
which will generally serve for a term of three years with only
one class of directors being elected in each year. There is no
cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors,
with the result that the holders of more than 50% of the shares
eligible to vote for the election of directors can elect all of
the directors.
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, if we do not consummate a business combination
by ,
2009 [twenty four months from the date of this
prospectus], our corporate existence will cease except for
the purposes of winding up our affairs and liquidating. If we
are forced to liquidate prior to a business combination, our
public stockholders are entitled to share ratably in the trust
fund, including any interest, and any net assets remaining
available for distribution to them after payment of liabilities.
Our existing stockholders have agreed to waive their rights to
share in any distribution with respect to their initial shares.
Our stockholders have no conversion, preemptive or other
subscription rights and there are no sinking fund or redemption
provisions applicable to the common stock, except that public
stockholders have the right to have their shares of common stock
converted to cash equal to their pro rata share of the trust
account if they vote against the business combination and the
business combination is approved and completed. Public
stockholders who convert their stock into their share of the
trust account still have the right to exercise the warrants that
they received as part of the units.
Preferred
stock
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of
1,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock with such
designation, rights and preferences as may be determined from
time to time by our board of
62
directors. No shares of preferred stock are being issued or
registered in this offering. Accordingly, our board of directors
is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred
stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other
rights which could adversely affect the voting power or other
rights of the holders of common stock. However, the underwriting
agreement prohibits us, prior to a business combination, from
issuing preferred stock which participates in any manner in the
proceeds of the trust account, or which votes as a class with
the common stock on a business combination. We may issue some or
all of the preferred stock to effect a business combination. In
addition, the preferred stock could be utilized as a method of
discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of us.
Although we do not currently intend to issue any shares of
preferred stock, we cannot assure you that we will not do so in
the future.
Warrants
No warrants are currently outstanding. Each warrant entitles the
registered holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a
price of $7.50 per share, subject to adjustment as discussed
below, at any time commencing on the later of:
|
|
|
|
|
the completion of a business combination; and
|
|
|
|
one year from the date of this prospectus.
|
However, the warrants will be exercisable only if a registration
statement relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrants is effective and current. The warrants will expire
four years from the date of this prospectus at 5:00 p.m.,
New York City time.
We may call the warrants for redemption (excluding any insider
warrants held by Nathan Leight or Jason Weiss or their
affiliates), without the prior consent of the underwriters,
|
|
|
|
|
in whole and not in part,
|
|
|
|
at a price of $.01 per warrant at any time after the
warrants become exercisable,
|
|
|
|
upon not less than 30 days prior written notice of
redemption to each warrant holder, and
|
|
|
|
if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the common
stock equals or exceeds $14.25 per share, for any 20
trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third
business day prior to the notice of redemption to warrant
holders.
|
The right to exercise will be forfeited unless they are
exercised prior to the date specified in the notice of
redemption. On and after the redemption date, a record holder of
a warrant will have no further rights except to receive the
redemption price for such holders warrant upon surrender
of such warrant.
The redemption criteria for our warrants have been established
at a price which is intended to provide warrant holders a
reasonable premium to the initial exercise price and provide a
sufficient differential between the then-prevailing common stock
price and the warrant exercise price so that if the stock price
declines as a result of our redemption call, the redemption will
not cause the stock price to drop below the exercise price of
the warrants.
We have agreed that the insider warrants may be exercised on a
cashless basis and will not be redeemable by us so
long as they are held by the initial purchasers or their
affiliates. The reason that we have agreed to this is because it
is not known at this time whether they will be affiliated with
us following a business combination. If they are, their ability
to sell our securities in the open market will be significantly
limited. If they remain insiders, we will have policies in place
that prohibit insiders from selling our securities except during
specific periods of time. Even during such periods of time, an
insider cannot trade in our securities if he is in possession of
material non-public information. Accordingly, unlike public
stockholders who could exercise their warrants and sell the
shares of common stock received upon such exercise freely in the
open market in order to recoup the cost of such exercise, the
insiders could be significantly restricted from selling such
securities. As a result, we believe that allowing the holders to
exercise such warrants on a cashless basis or restrict our
ability to redeem such warrants is appropriate.
63
The warrants will be issued in registered form under a warrant
agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, as warrant agent, and us. You should review a copy of
the warrant agreement, which has been filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, for a
complete description of the terms and conditions applicable to
the warrants.
The exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable
on exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain
circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, or our
recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation.
However, the warrants will not be adjusted for issuances of
common stock at a price below their respective exercise prices.
The warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant
certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the offices of
the warrant agent, with the exercise form on the reverse side of
the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated,
accompanied by full payment of the exercise price, by certified
or official bank check payable to us, for the number of warrants
being exercised. The warrant holders do not have the rights or
privileges of holders of common stock and any voting rights
until they exercise their warrants and receive shares of common
stock. After the issuance of shares of common stock upon
exercise of the warrants, each holder will be entitled to one
vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on
by stockholders.
No warrants held by public stockholders will be exercisable and
we will not be obligated to issue shares of common stock unless
at the time a holder seeks to exercise such warrant, a
registration statement relating to the common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrants is effective and current and the
common stock has been registered or qualified or deemed to be
exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of
the holder of the warrants. Under the terms of the warrant
agreement, we have agreed to use our best efforts to meet these
conditions and to maintain a current prospectus relating to the
common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the
expiration of the warrants. However, we cannot assure you that
we will be able to do so and, if we do not maintain a current
prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise
of the warrants, holders will be unable to exercise their
warrants and we will not be required to settle any such warrant
exercise. If the prospectus relating to the common stock
issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not current or if
the common stock is not qualified or exempt from qualification
in the jurisdictions in which the holders of the warrants
reside, we will not be required to net cash settle or cash
settle the warrant exercise, the warrants may have no value, the
market for the warrants may be limited and the warrants may
expire worthless.
No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the
warrants. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be
entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will,
upon exercise, round up or down to the nearest whole number the
number of shares of common stock to be issued to the warrant
holder.
Dividends
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date
and do not intend to pay cash dividends prior to the completion
of a business combination. The payment of cash dividends in the
future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any,
capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent
to completion of a business combination. The payment of any
dividends subsequent to a business combination will be within
the discretion of our then board of directors. It is the present
intention of our board of directors to retain all earnings, if
any, for use in our business operations and, accordingly, our
board does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the
foreseeable future.
Our
Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent
The transfer agent for our securities and warrant agent for our
warrants is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
American
Stock Exchange Listing
There is presently no public market for our units, common stock
or warrants. We anticipate that the units will be listed on the
American Stock Exchange under the symbol AII.U on or promptly
after the date of this prospectus. Once the securities
comprising the units begin separate trading, we anticipate that
the common
64
stock and warrants will be listed on the American Stock Exchange
under the symbols AII and AII.WS, respectively.
Shares Eligible
for Future Sale
Immediately after this offering, we will have
37,500,000 shares of common stock outstanding, or
43,125,000 shares if the over-allotment option is exercised
in full. Of these shares, the 30,000,000 shares sold in
this offering, or 34,500,000 shares if the over-allotment
option is exercised, will be freely tradable without restriction
or further registration under the Securities Act, except for any
shares purchased by one of our affiliates within the meaning of
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. All of the remaining
shares are restricted securities under Rule 144, in that
they were issued in private transactions not involving a public
offering. None of those shares would be eligible for sale under
Rule 144 prior to February 1, 2008. However, as
described below, the Securities and Exchange Commission has
taken the position that these securities would not be eligible
for transfer under Rule 144. Furthermore, all of those
shares have been placed in escrow and will not be transferable
for a period of one year from the consummation of our initial
business combination and will be released prior to that date
only if, following a business combination, (i) the last
sales price of our common stock equals or exceeds
$18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within any
30-trading day period or (ii) we consummate a subsequent
liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction
which results in all of our stockholders having the right to
exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or
other property.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
who has beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock
for at least one year would be entitled to sell within any
three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the
greater of either of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding,
which will equal 375,000 shares immediately after this
offering (or 431,250 if the over-allotment option is exercised
in full); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on
Form 144 with respect to the sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 are also limited by manner of sale
provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of
current public information about us.
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been
one of our affiliates at the time of or at any time during the
three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned
the restricted shares proposed to be sold for at least two
years, including the holding period of any prior owner other
than an affiliate, is entitled to sell their shares without
complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume
limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144.
SEC
Position on Rule 144 Sales
The Securities and Exchange Commission has taken the position
that promoters or affiliates of a blank check company and their
transferees, both before and after a business combination act as
underwriters under the Securities Act when reselling
the securities of a blank check company acquired prior to the
consummation of its initial public offering. Accordingly, the
Securities and Exchange Commission believes that those
securities can be resold only through a registered offering and
that Rule 144 would not be available for those resale
transactions despite technical compliance with the requirements
of Rule 144.
Registration
Rights
The holders of our initial shares issued and outstanding on the
date of this prospectus, as well as the holders of the insider
warrants (and underlying securities), will be entitled to
registration rights pursuant to an agreement to be signed prior
to or on the effective date of this offering. The holders of the
majority of these securities are entitled to make up to two
demands that we register such securities. The holders of the
majority
65
of the initial shares can elect to exercise these registration
rights at any time commencing three months prior to the date on
which these shares of common stock are to be released from
escrow. The holders of a majority of the insider warrants (or
underlying securities) can elect to exercise these registration
rights at any time after we consummate a business combination.
In addition, the holders have certain piggy-back
registration rights with respect to registration statements
filed subsequent to our consummation of a business combination.
We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing
of any such registration statements.
UNDERWRITING
In accordance with the terms and conditions contained in the
underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to each of the
underwriters named below, and each of the underwriters, for
which Lazard Capital Markets is acting as representative, has
individually agreed to purchase on a firm commitment basis the
number of units set forth opposite their respective name below:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
|
Lazard Capital Markets LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Pali Capital, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Ladenburg Thalmann & Co.
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A copy of the underwriting agreement has been filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus
forms a part.
Pricing
of Securities
We have been advised by the representative that the underwriters
propose to offer the units to the public at the offering price
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. They may allow
some dealers concessions not in excess of
$ per unit and the dealers
may reallow a concession not in excess of
$ per unit to other dealers.
Prior to this offering there has been no public market for any
of our securities. The public offering price of the units and
insider warrants and the terms of the warrants were negotiated
between us and the representative. Factors considered in
determining the prices and terms of the units, including the
common stock and warrants underlying the units, and the insider
warrants include:
|
|
|
|
|
the history and prospects of companies whose principal business
is the acquisition of other companies;
|
|
|
|
prior offerings of those companies;
|
|
|
|
our prospects for acquiring an operating business at attractive
values;
|
|
|
|
our capital structure;
|
|
|
|
an assessment of our management and their experience in
identifying operating companies;
|
|
|
|
general conditions of the securities markets at the time of the
offering; and
|
|
|
|
other factors as were deemed relevant.
|
However, although these factors were considered, the
determination of our offering price is more arbitrary than the
pricing of securities for an operating company in a particular
industry since the underwriters are unable to compare our
financial results and prospects with those of public companies
operating in the same industry.
Over-Allotment
Option
We have granted to the representative of the underwriters an
option, exercisable during the
45-day
period commencing on the date of this prospectus, to purchase
from us at the offering price, less underwriting
66
discounts, up to an aggregate of 4,500,000 additional units for
the sole purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. The
over-allotment option will only be used to cover the net
syndicate short position resulting from the initial
distribution. The representative of the underwriters may
exercise the over-allotment option if the underwriters sell more
units than the total number set forth in the table above.
Commissions
and Discounts
The following table shows the public offering price,
underwriting discount to be paid by us to the underwriters and
the proceeds, before expenses, to us. This information assumes
either no exercise or full exercise by the representative of the
underwriters of its over-allotment option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
|
Without Option
|
|
|
With Option
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
300,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
345,000,000
|
|
Discount(1)
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
21,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,150,000
|
|
Proceeds before
expenses(2)
|
|
$
|
9.30
|
|
|
$
|
279,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
320,850,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
$9,000,000 (or $10,350,000 if the
over-allotment option is exercised in full) of the underwriting
discounts will not be payable unless and until we complete a
business combination. The underwriters have waived their right
to receive such payment upon our liquidation if we are unable to
complete a business combination
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The offering expenses are estimated
at $740,000.
|
No discounts or commissions will be paid on the sale of the
insider warrants.
Lazard Frères & Co. LLC referred this transaction
to Lazard Capital Markets and will receive a referral fee from
Lazard Capital Markets in connection therewith.
Regulatory
Restrictions on Purchase of Securities
Rules of the SEC may limit the ability of the underwriters to
bid for or purchase our units before the distribution of the
units is completed. However, the underwriters may engage in the
following activities in accordance with the rules:
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing Transactions. The underwriters may
make bids or purchases for the purpose of preventing or
retarding a decline in the price of our units, as long as
stabilizing bids do not exceed the offering price of $10.00.
|
|
|
|
Over-Allotments and Syndicate Coverage
Transactions. The underwriters may create a short
position in our units by selling more of our units than are set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus. If the underwriters
create a short position during the offering, the representative
may engage in syndicate covering transactions by purchasing our
units in the open market. The representative may also elect to
reduce any short position by exercising all or part of the
over-allotment option.
|
|
|
|
Penalty Bids. The representative may reclaim a
selling concession from a syndicate member when the units
originally sold by the syndicate member are purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
Stabilization and syndicate covering transactions may cause the
price of our securities to be higher than they would be in the
absence of these transactions. The imposition of a penalty bid
might also have an effect on the prices of our securities if it
discourages resales of our securities.
Neither we nor the underwriters make any representation or
prediction as to the effect that the transactions described
above may have on the price of our securities. These
transactions may occur on the American Stock Exchange, in the
over-the-counter
market or on any trading market. If any of these transactions
are commenced, they may be discontinued without notice at any
time.
Other
Terms
Although we are not under any contractual obligation to engage
any of the underwriters to provide any services for us after
this offering, and have no present intent to do so, any of the
underwriters may, among
67
other things, introduce us to potential target businesses or
assist us in raising additional capital, as needs may arise in
the future. If any of the underwriters provide services to us
after this offering, we may pay such underwriter fair and
reasonable fees that would be determined at that time in an
arms length negotiation; provided that no agreement will
be entered into with any of the underwriters and no fees for
such services will be paid to any of the underwriters prior to
the date which is 90 days after the date of this
prospectus, unless the National Association of Securities
Dealers determines that such payment would not be deemed
underwriters compensation in connection with this offering.
Indemnification
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against some
liabilities, including civil liabilities under the Securities
Act, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be
required to make in this respect.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Graubard Miller, New York, New York is acting as counsel in
connection with the registration of our securities under the
Securities Act of 1933, and as such, will pass upon the validity
of the securities offered in this prospectus. Cleary Gottlieb
Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, New York, is acting as
counsel for the underwriters in this offering.
EXPERTS
The financial statements included in this prospectus and in the
registration statement have been audited by Goldstein Golub
Kessler LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
to the extent and for the period set forth in their report
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and in the registration
statement. The financial statements and the report of Goldstein
Golub Kessler LLP are included in reliance upon their report
given upon the authority of Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP as
experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1,
which includes exhibits, schedules and amendments, under the
Securities Act, with respect to this offering of our securities.
Although this prospectus, which forms a part of the registration
statement, contains all material information included in the
registration statement, parts of the registration statement have
been omitted as permitted by rules and regulations of the SEC.
We refer you to the registration statement and its exhibits for
further information about us, our securities and this offering.
The registration statement and its exhibits, as well as our
other reports filed with the SEC, can be inspected and copied at
the SECs public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information
about the operation of the public reference room by calling the
SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov
which contains the
Form S-1
and other reports, proxy and information statements and
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the
SEC.
68
ALDABRA 2
ACQUISITION CORP.
(A CORPORATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE)
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 F-10
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Aldabra 2
Acquisition Corp. (a corporation in the development stage) as of
February 28, 2007, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the
period from February 1, 2007 (inception) to
February 28, 2007. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. as of February 28, 2007, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period
from February 1, 2007 (inception) to February 28, 2007
in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ Goldstein
Golub Kessler LLP
Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
New York, New York
March 9, 2007, except for the third paragraph of
Note 1, the first paragraph of Note 2 and
Note 8,
as to which the date is June 13, 2007
F-2
ALDABRA 2
ACQUISITION CORP.
(A CORPORATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE)
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
Cash
|
|
$
|
101,532
|
|
Deferred offering costs
(Note 3)
|
|
|
23,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Notes payable to initial
stockholders (Note 4)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
101,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
(Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par
value Authorized 1,000,000 shares; none issued or
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par
value Authorized 85,000,000 shares issued and outstanding
8,625,000 shares
|
|
|
863
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
24,137
|
|
Deficit accumulated during the
development stage
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders
equity
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Financial Statements.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
|
to February 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Formation costs
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
8,625,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Financial Statements.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition
|
|
|
During the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stage
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to
initial stockholders on February 1, 2007 at $.003 per share
|
|
|
8,625,000
|
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
$
|
24,137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2007
|
|
|
8,625,000
|
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
$
|
24,137
|
|
|
$
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Financial Statements
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
|
to February 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares of
common stock to Initial Stockholders
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable to
Initial Stockholders
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Payment of costs associated with
Proposed Offering
|
|
|
(23,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
101,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
101,532
|
|
Cash at beginning of
period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
101,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Financial Statements
F-6
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Business Operations
|
Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (the Company) was
incorporated in Delaware on February 1, 2007 for the
purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset
acquisition or other similar business combination with an
operating business.
At February 28, 2007, the Company had not yet commenced any
operations. All activity through February 28, 2007 relates
to the Companys formation and the proposed public offering
described below. The Company has selected December 31 as
its fiscal year- end.
The Companys ability to commence operations is contingent
upon obtaining adequate financial resources through a proposed
public offering of up to 30,000,000 units
(Units) which is discussed in Note 2
(Proposed Offering). The Companys management
has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of
the net proceeds of this Proposed Offering, although
substantially all of the net proceeds of this Proposed Offering
are intended to be generally applied toward consummating a
business combination with an operating business (Business
Combination). Furthermore, there is no assurance that the
Company will be able to successfully effect a Business
Combination. Upon the closing of the Proposed Offering,
management has agreed that at least $9.67 per Unit sold in
the Proposed Offering will be held in a trust account
(Trust Account) and invested in United States
government securities within the meaning of
Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940
having a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market
funds meeting certain conditions under
Rule 2a-7
promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 until the
earlier of (i) the consummation of its first Business
Combination and (ii) liquidation of the Company. The
placing of funds in the Trust Account may not protect those
funds from third party claims against the Company. Although the
Company will seek to have all vendors and service providers
(which would include any third parties we engaged to assist us
in any way in connection with our search for a target business)
and prospective target businesses execute agreements with the
Company waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind
in or to any monies held in the Trust Account, there is no
guarantee that they will execute such agreements. Nor is there
any guarantee that, even if such entities execute such
agreements with us, they will not seek recourse against the
trust account or that a court would not conclude that such
agreements are not legally enforceable. The Companys
Chairman of the Board and the Companys Chief Executive
Officer have agreed that they will be liable under certain
circumstances to ensure that the proceeds in the
Trust Account are not reduced by the claims of target
businesses or claims of vendors or other entities that are owed
money by the Company for services rendered or contracted for or
products sold to the Company. However, there can be no assurance
that they will be able to satisfy those obligations.
Furthermore, they will not have any personal liability as to any
claimed amounts owed to a third party who executed a waiver
(including a prospective target business). Additionally, in the
case of a prospective target business that did not execute a
waiver, such liability will only be in an amount necessary to
ensure that public stockholders receive no less than
$10.00 per share upon liquidation The remaining net
proceeds (not held in the Trust Account) may be used to pay
for business, legal and accounting due diligence on prospective
acquisitions and continuing general and administrative expenses.
Additionally, up to an aggregate of $3,100,000 of interest
earned on the Trust Account balance may be released to the
Company to fund working capital requirements and additional
amounts may be released to us as necessary to satisfy tax
obligations.
The Company, after signing a definitive agreement for the
acquisition of a target business, is required to submit such
transaction for stockholder approval. In the event that
stockholders owning 40% or more of the shares sold in the
Proposed Offering vote against the Business Combination and
exercise their conversion rights described below, the Business
Combination will not be consummated. All of the Companys
stockholders prior to the Proposed Offering, including all of
the officers and directors of the Company (Initial
Stockholders), have agreed to vote their founding shares
of common stock in accordance with the vote of the majority in
interest of all other stockholders of the Company (Public
Stockholders) with respect to any
F-7
Aldabra 2
Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Business Operations (Continued)
|
Business Combination. After consummation of a Business
Combination, these voting safeguards will no longer be
applicable.
With respect to a Business Combination which is approved and
consummated, any Public Stockholder who voted against the
Business Combination may demand that the Company convert his or
her shares. The per share conversion price will equal the amount
in the Trust Account, calculated as of two business days
prior to the consummation of the proposed Business Combination,
divided by the number of shares of common stock held by Public
Stockholders at the consummation of the Proposed Offering.
Accordingly, Public Stockholders holding 39.99% of the aggregate
number of shares owned by all Public Stockholders may seek
conversion of their shares in the event of a Business
Combination. Such Public Stockholders are entitled to receive
their per share interest in the Trust Account computed
without regard to the shares held by Initial Stockholders.
The Companys Certificate of Incorporation will be amended
prior to the Proposed Offering to provide that the Company will
continue in existence only until 24 months from the
Effective Date of the Proposed Offering. If the Company has not
completed a Business Combination by such date, its corporate
existence will cease and it will dissolve and liquidate for the
purposes of winding up its affairs. In the event of liquidation,
it is likely that the per share value of the residual assets
remaining available for distribution (including Trust Fund
assets) will be less than the initial public offering price per
share in the Proposed Offering (assuming no value is attributed
to the Warrants contained in the Units to be offered in the
Proposed Offering discussed in Note 2).
Concentration of Credit Risk The Company
maintains cash in a bank deposit account which, at times,
exceeds federally insured (FDIC) limits. The Company has not
experienced any losses on this account.
Deferred Income Taxes Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the
financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities
that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts and are
based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in
which the differences are expected to effect taxable income.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Loss Per Share Loss per share is computed by
dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements Management does
not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective,
accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material
effect on the accompanying financial statements.
|
|
2.
|
Proposed
Public Offering
|
The Proposed Offering calls for the Company to offer for public
sale up to 30,000,000 Units at a proposed offering price of
$10.00 per Unit (plus up to an additional
4,500,000 units solely to cover over-allotments, if any).
Each Unit consists of one share of the Companys common
stock and one Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant
(Warrants). Each Warrant will entitle the holder to
purchase from the Company one share of common stock at an
exercise price of $7.50 commencing the later of the completion
of a Business Combination and one year from the effective date
of the Proposed Offering and expiring four years from the
effective date of the Proposed Offering. The Company may redeem
the Warrants, at a price of
F-8
Aldabra 2
Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Proposed
Public Offering (Continued)
|
$.01 per Warrant upon 30 days notice while the
Warrants are exercisable, only in the event that the last sale
price of the common stock is at least $14.25 per share for
any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the
third day prior to the date on which notice of redemption is
given. In accordance with the warrant agreement relating to the
Warrants to be sold and issued in the Proposed Offering, the
Company is only required to use its best efforts to maintain the
effectiveness of the registration statement covering the
Warrants. The Company will not be obligated to deliver
securities, and there are no contractual penalties for failure
to deliver securities, if a registration statement is not
effective at the time of exercise. Additionally, in the event
that a registration is not effective at the time of exercise,
the holder of such Warrant shall not be entitled to exercise
such Warrant and in no event (whether in the case of a
registration statement not being effective or otherwise) will
the Company be required to net cash settle the warrant exercise.
Consequently, the Warrants may expire unexercised and unredeemed.
The Company will pay the underwriters in the Proposed Offering
an underwriting discount of 7% of the gross proceeds of the
Proposed Offering. However, the underwriters have agreed that 3%
of the underwriting discounts will not be payable unless and
until the Company completes a Business Combination and have
waived their right to receive such payment upon the
Companys liquidation if it is unable to complete a
Business Combination.
|
|
3.
|
Deferred
Offering Costs
|
Deferred offering costs consist of legal and other fees incurred
through the balance sheet date that are directly related to the
Proposed Offering and that will be charged to stockholders
equity upon the receipt of the capital raised or charged to
operations if the Proposed Offering is not completed.
|
|
4.
|
Notes Payable,
Stockholders
|
The Company issued unsecured promissory notes in an aggregate
principal amount of $100,000 to two of the Initial Stockholders
on February 27, 2007. The notes are non-interest bearing
and are payable on the earlier of February 27, 2008 or the
consummation of the Proposed Offering. Due to the short-term
nature of the notes, the fair value of the notes approximates
their carrying amount.
Significant components of the Companys future tax assets
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses deferred for income tax
purposes
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has recorded a full valuation allowance against its
deferred tax assets because it does not believe it is more
likely than not that sufficient taxable income will be generated.
The effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate of 34%
due to the increase in the valuation allowance.
The Company presently occupies office space provided by an
affiliate of two of the Initial Stockholders. Such affiliate has
agreed that, until the Company consummates a Business
Combination, it will make such office space, as well as certain
office and secretarial services, available to the Company, as
may be required by the Company from time to time. The Company
has agreed to pay such affiliate $7,500 per month for such
services commencing on the effective date of the Proposed
Offering.
F-9
Aldabra 2
Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Commitments (Continued)
|
Pursuant to letter agreements which the Initial Stockholders
will enter into with the Company and the underwriters, the
Initial Stockholders will waive their right to receive
distributions with respect to their founding shares upon the
Companys liquidation.
The Companys Chairman and the Companys Chief
Executive Officer have committed to purchase a total of
3,000,000 Warrants (Insider Warrants) at
$1.00 per Warrant (for an aggregate purchase price of
$3,000,000) privately from the Company. These purchases will
take place simultaneously with the consummation of the Proposed
Offering. All of the proceeds received from these purchases will
be placed in the Trust Account. The Insider Warrants to be
purchased by such purchaser will be identical to the Warrants
underlying the Units being offered in the Proposed Offering
except that the Insider Warrants may be exercised whether or not
a registration statement relating to the Common Stock issuable
upon exercise of the Warrants is effective and current, may not
be called for redemption and may be exercisable on a
cashless basis, at the holders option, so long
as such securities are held by such purchaser or his affiliates.
Furthermore, the purchaser has agreed that the Insider Warrants
will not be sold or transferred by them, except for estate
planning purposes, until after the Company has completed a
Business Combination.
The Initial Stockholders and the holders of the Insider Warrants
(or underlying securities) will be entitled to registration
rights with respect to their founding shares or Insider Warrants
(or underlying securities) pursuant to an agreement to be signed
prior to or on the effective date of the Proposed Offering. The
holders of the majority of the founding shares are entitled to
demand that the Company register these shares at any time
commencing three months prior to the first anniversary of the
consummation of a Business Combination. The holders of the
Insider Warrants (or underlying securities) are entitled to
demand that the Company register these securities at any time
after the Company consummates a Business Combination. In
addition, the Initial Stockholders and holders of the Insider
Warrants (or underlying securities) have certain
piggy-back registration rights on registration
statements filed after the Companys consummation of a
Business Combination.
The Company has also agreed to pay the fees to the underwriters
in the Proposed Offering as described in Note 2 above.
The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of
preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights
and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the
Board of Directors.
The agreement with the underwriters will prohibit the Company,
prior to a Business Combination, from issuing preferred stock
which participates in the proceeds of the Trust Account or
which votes as a class with the Common Stock on a Business
Combination.
Effective June 12, 2007, the Companys Board of
Directors authorized a stock dividend of 0.5 shares of
common stock for each outstanding shares of common stock. On
June 12, 2007, the Companys Certificate of
Incorporation was amended to increase the authorized shares of
common stock from 60,000,000 to 85,000,000 shares of common
stock. All references in the accompanying financial statements
to the number of shares of stock have been retroactively
restated to reflect these transactions.
In June 2007, the Company and underwriters amended certain terms
of the Proposed Offering. All disclosures herein reflect the
amended terms.
F-10
Until ,
2007, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities,
whether or not participating in this offering, may be required
to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the
dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as
underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
No dealer, salesperson or any other person is authorized to give
any information or make any representations in connection with
this offering other than those contained in this prospectus and,
if given or made, the information or representations must not be
relied upon as having been authorized by us. This prospectus
does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an
offer to buy any security other than the securities offered by
this prospectus, or an offer to sell or a solicitation of an
offer to buy any securities by anyone in any jurisdiction in
which the offer or solicitation is not authorized or is unlawful.
$300,000,000
30,000,000 Units
PROSPECTUS
Lazard
Capital Markets
Pali
Capital, Inc.
Ladenburg
Thalmann & Co. Inc.
EarlyBirdCapital,
Inc.
,
2007
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The estimated expenses payable by us in connection with the
offering described in this registration statement (other than
the underwriting discount and commissions) will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Trustees fee
|
|
$
|
1,000.00
|
(1)
|
SEC Registration Fee
|
|
|
18,535.13
|
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
|
60,875.00
|
|
American Stock Exchange filing and
listing fee
|
|
|
80,000.00
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
50,000.00
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
100,000.00
|
|
Directors & Officers
liability insurance premiums
|
|
|
120,000.00
|
(2)
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
305,000.00
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
124,589.87
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
860,000.00
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In addition to the initial
acceptance fee that is charged by Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as trustee, the registrant
will be required to pay to Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company annual fees of $3,000 for
acting as trustee, $4,800 for acting as transfer agent of the
registrants common stock, $2,400 for acting as warrant
agent for the registrants warrants and $1,800 for acting
as escrow agent.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount represents the
approximate amount of director and officer liability insurance
premiums the registrant anticipates paying following the
consummation of its initial public offering and until it
consummates a business combination.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This amount represents additional
expenses that may be incurred by the Company in connection with
the offering over and above those specifically listed above,
including distribution and mailing costs.
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Our certificate of incorporation provides that all directors,
officers, employees and agents of the registrant shall be
entitled to be indemnified by us to the fullest extent permitted
by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
concerning indemnification of officers, directors, employees and
agents is set forth below.
Section 145. Indemnification of officers, directors,
employees and agents; insurance.
(a) A corporation shall have power to indemnify any person
who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other
than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason
of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer,
employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at
the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee
or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in
connection with such action, suit or proceeding if the person
acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the persons
conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or
proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a
plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself,
create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith
and in a manner which the person reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable
cause to believe that the persons conduct was unlawful.
II-1
(b) A corporation shall have power to indemnify any person
who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the
right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by
reason of the fact that the person is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was
serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses
(including attorneys fees) actually and reasonably
incurred by the person in connection with the defense or
settlement of such action or suit if the person acted in good
faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and except
that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim,
issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged
to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent
that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or
suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite
the adjudication of liability but in view of all the
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of
Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
(c) To the extent that a present or former director or
officer of a corporation has been successful on the merits or
otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred
to in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, or in
defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, such person shall
be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection
therewith.
(d) Any indemnification under subsections (a) and
(b) of this section (unless ordered by a court) shall be
made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case
upon a determination that indemnification of the present or
former director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the
circumstances because the person has met the applicable standard
of conduct set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of
this section. Such determination shall be made, with respect to
a person who is a director or officer at the time of such
determination, (1) by a majority vote of the directors who
are not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, even though
less than a quorum, or (2) by a committee of such directors
designated by majority vote of such directors, even though less
than a quorum, or (3) if there are no such directors, or if
such directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a
written opinion, or (4) by the stockholders.
(e) Expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred by
an officer or director in defending any civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding may
be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition
of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an
undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay
such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such
person is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation as
authorized in this section. Such expenses (including
attorneys fees) incurred by former directors and officers
or other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and
conditions, if any, as the corporation deems appropriate.
(f) The indemnification and advancement of expenses
provided by, or granted pursuant to, the other subsections of
this section shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights
to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of
expenses may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of
stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to
action in such persons official capacity and as to action
in another capacity while holding such office.
(g) A corporation shall have power to purchase and maintain
insurance on behalf of any person who is or was director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was
serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability
asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any
such capacity, or arising out of such persons status as
such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to
indemnify such person against such liability under this section.
(h) For purposes of this section, references to the
corporation shall include, in addition to the resulting
corporation, any constituent corporation (including any
constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or
merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would
have had power and authority to indemnify its directors,
officers, and employees or agents, so that any person who is or
was a director, officer, employee or agent of such constituent
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such
constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee or
agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust
or
II-2
other enterprise, shall stand in the same position under this
section with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation
as such person would have with respect to such constituent
corporation if its separate existence had continued.
(i) For purposes of this section, references to other
enterprises shall include employee benefit plans;
references to fines shall include any excise taxes
assessed on a person with respect to any employee benefit plan;
and references to serving at the request of the
corporation shall include any service as a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation which imposes
duties on, or involves services by, such director, officer,
employee or agent with respect to an employee benefit plan, its
participants or beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good
faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in
the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an
employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation
as referred to in this section.
(j) The indemnification and advancement of expenses
provided by, or granted pursuant to, this section shall, unless
otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue as to a
person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or
agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and
administrators of such a person.
(k) The Court of Chancery is hereby vested with exclusive
jurisdiction to hear and determine all actions for advancement
of expenses or indemnification brought under this section or
under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or
disinterested directors, or otherwise. The Court of Chancery may
summarily determine a corporations obligation to advance
expenses (including attorneys fees).
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers, and
controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC,
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment of expenses incurred or paid by a
director, officer or controlling person in a successful defense
of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director,
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities
being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of its counsel
the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to
the court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
Paragraph B of Article Ninth of our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation provides:
The Corporation, to the full extent permitted by
Section 145 of the GCL, as amended from time to time, shall
indemnify all persons whom it may indemnify pursuant thereto.
Expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred by an officer
or director in defending any civil, criminal, administrative, or
investigative action, suit or proceeding for which such officer
or director may be entitled to indemnification hereunder shall
be paid by the Corporation in advance of the final disposition
of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an
undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay
such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he is not
entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation as authorized
hereby.
Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1
to this Registration Statement, we have agreed to indemnify the
Underwriters and the Underwriters have agreed to indemnify us
against certain civil liabilities that may be incurred in
connection with this offering, including certain liabilities
under the Securities Act.
II-3
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
|
(a) During the past three years, we sold the following
shares of common stock without registration under the Securities
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Nathan Leight(1)
|
|
|
5,507,500
|
|
Jason Weiss(1)
|
|
|
5,507,500
|
|
Jonathan W. Berger
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Richard H. Rogel
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Carl A. Albert
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Terrapin Partners Employee
Partnership
|
|
|
167,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These shares are held by the
Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership. Messrs. Leight and
Weiss are the general partners of the Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership and they
and/or their
family trusts are the owners of the Terrapin Partners Venture
Partnership.
|
Such shares were issued on February 1, 2007 in connection
with our organization pursuant to the exemption from
registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act as they were sold to sophisticated, accredited, wealthy
individuals and entities. The shares issued to the individuals
and entities above were sold for an aggregate offering price of
$25,000 at an average purchase price of approximately
$0.004 per share. Effective June 12, 2007, our board
of directors authorized a stock dividend of 0.5 shares of common
stock for each outstanding share of common stock, effectively
lowering the purchase price to approximately $0.003 per share.
In addition, Nathan Leight and Jason Weiss have committed to
purchase from us 3,000,000 warrants at $1.00 per warrant
(for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000). These purchases
will take place on a private placement basis simultaneously with
the consummation of our initial public offering. These issuances
will be made pursuant to the exemption from registration
contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The
obligation to purchase the warrants undertaken by the above
individuals was made pursuant to Subscription Agreements, dated
as of February 28, 2007 (the form of which was filed as
Exhibit 10.11 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1).
Such obligation was made prior to the filing of the Registration
Statement, and the only conditions to the obligation undertaken
by such individuals are conditions outside of the
investors control. Consequently, the investment decision
relating to the purchase of the warrants was made prior to the
filing of the Registration Statement relating to the public
offering and therefore constitutes a completed private
placement.
No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid with respect
to such sales.
II-4
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this
Registration Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-laws.**
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Unit Certificate.**
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Specimen Common Stock
Certificate.**
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Specimen Warrant Certificate.**
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement between
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the
Registrant.
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Graubard Miller.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Letter Agreement among the
Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Nathan D. Leight.**
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Letter Agreement among the
Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Jason G. Weiss.**
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Letter Agreement among the
Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Jonathan W. Berger.**
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Letter Agreement among the
Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Richard H. Rogel.**
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Letter Agreement among the
Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Carl A. Albert.**
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Investment Management
Trust Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company and the Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Stock Escrow Agreement
between the Registrant, Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company and the Initial Stockholders.
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Letter Agreement between
Terrapin Partners LLC and Registrant regarding administrative
support.**
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Form of Promissory Note issued to
each of Nathan D. Leight and Jason G. Weiss.**
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Registration Rights
Agreement among the Registrant and the Initial Stockholders.**
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreements
among the Registrant, Graubard Miller and each of Nathan D.
Leight and Jason G. Weiss.**
|
|
14
|
|
|
Form of Code of Ethics.**
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Goldstein Golub Kessler
LLP.
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Graubard Miller
(included in Exhibit 5.1).**
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on
signature page of this Registration Statement).**
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Form of Audit Committee Charter.**
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Form of Nominating Committee
Charter.**
|
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
i. To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
ii. To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the
II-5
changes in volume and price represent no more than
20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price
set forth in the Calculation of Registration Fee
table in the effective registration statement;
iii. To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4) That for the purpose of determining any liability under
the Securities Act of 1933 in a primary offering of securities
of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell
the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered
or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to
the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such
securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(b) The undersigned hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreements, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
(c) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
(d) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
II-6
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of New York, State of New York, on the
13th day of June, 2007.
ALDABRA 2 ACQUISITION CORP.
Name: Jason G. Weiss
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Nathan
D. Leight
Nathan
D. Leight
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
June 13, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jason
G. Weiss
Jason
G. Weiss
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
and Director (Principal executive officer and principal
financial and accounting)
|
|
June 13, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Jonathan
W. Berger
|
|
Director
|
|
June 13, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Richard
H. Rogel
|
|
Director
|
|
June 13, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Carl
A. Albert
|
|
Director
|
|
June 13, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By Jason G. Weiss, Power of
Attorney
|
|
|
|
|
II-8