e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q
 
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 1-32747
 
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware   86-0460233
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
One BriarLake Plaza, Suite 2000
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South
Houston, Texas 77042

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(713) 954-5500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer þ    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o 
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
     As of November 3, 2009, there were 101,774,108 shares issued and outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
PART I
       
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    7  
    32  
    47  
    49  
PART II
    50  
    51  
    52  
Items 1, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.
       
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
ASSETS
               
Current Assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 6,017     $ 3,209  
Receivables, net of allowances of $6,949 and $3,868 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
    136,424       219,920  
Insurance receivables
    12,414       13,123  
Derivative financial instruments
    4,434       121,929  
Intangible assets
    1,446       2,334  
Prepaid expenses and other
    23,264       14,438  
 
           
Total current assets
    183,999       374,953  
Property and Equipment:
               
Proved oil and gas properties, full-cost method
    4,897,001       4,448,146  
Unproved properties, not subject to amortization
    214,891       201,121  
 
           
Total oil and gas properties
    5,111,892       4,649,267  
Other property and equipment
    55,229       53,115  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization:
               
Proved oil and gas properties
    (2,745,601 )     (1,767,028 )
Other property and equipment
    (7,549 )     (5,477 )
 
           
Total accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
    (2,753,150 )     (1,772,505 )
 
           
Total property and equipment, net
    2,413,971       2,929,877  
Insurance Receivables
          22,132  
Derivative Financial Instruments
    920        
Other Assets, net of amortization
    74,689       65,831  
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 2,673,579     $ 3,392,793  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
               
 
               
Current Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 3,586     $ 3,837  
Accrued liabilities
    119,965       107,815  
Accrued capital costs
    128,781       195,833  
Deferred income tax
    15,772       23,148  
Abandonment liability
    47,977       82,364  
Accrued interest
    30,353       12,567  
Derivative financial instruments
    9,907        
 
           
Total current liabilities
    356,341       425,564  
Long-Term Liabilities:
               
Abandonment liability
    408,504       325,880  
Deferred income tax
    78,468       319,766  
Derivative financial instruments
    18,267        
Long-term debt
    954,503       1,170,000  
Other long-term liabilities
    29,037       31,263  
 
           
Total long-term liabilities
    1,488,779       1,846,909  
 
               
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 9)
               
 
               
Stockholders’ Equity:
               
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
           
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 101,855,521 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 88,846,073 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008
    10       9  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,250,151       1,071,347  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    10,198       78,181  
Accumulated deficit
    (431,900 )     (29,217 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    828,459       1,120,320  
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 2,673,579     $ 3,392,793  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

3


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands except share data)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Revenues:
                               
Natural gas
  $ 130,046     $ 192,804     $ 425,747     $ 622,705  
Oil
    80,908       97,987       220,787       356,157  
Natural gas liquids
    15,736       24,541       30,398       78,579  
Other revenues
    656       2,558       25,720       5,798  
 
                       
Total revenues
    227,346       317,890       702,652       1,063,239  
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Lease operating expense
    65,325       65,267       165,816       167,341  
Severance and ad valorem taxes
    4,406       4,813       11,668       14,686  
Transportation expense
    4,468       4,065       13,627       11,288  
General and administrative expense
    18,922       11,554       57,455       36,280  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    106,218       114,398       301,305       375,170  
Full-cost ceiling test impairment
                704,731        
Other miscellaneous expense
    1,193       125       11,960       965  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    200,532       200,222       1,266,562       605,730  
 
                       
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
    26,814       117,668       (563,910 )     457,509  
 
                               
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    56       369       443       976  
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (19,702 )     (17,507 )     (51,076 )     (53,641 )
 
                       
Income (Loss) Before Taxes
    7,168       100,530       (614,543 )     404,844  
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes
    (2,946 )     (35,839 )     211,860       (144,449 )
 
                       
Net Income (Loss)
    4,222       64,691       (402,683 )     260,395  
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
                      (188 )
 
                       
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO MARINER ENERGY, INC.
  $ 4,222     $ 64,691     $ (402,683 )   $ 260,207  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Income(Loss) per share attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.04     $ 0.74     $ (4.29 )   $ 2.98  
Diluted
  $ 0.04     $ 0.73     $ (4.29 )   $ 2.95  
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    100,752,532       87,595,792       93,848,859       87,447,280  
Diluted
    101,084,502       88,183,715       93,848,859       88,239,859  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

4


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
                                                 
                            Accumulated                
                            Other                
                    Additional     Comprehensive             Total  
    Common     Stock     Paid-In-     Income/     Accumulated     Stockholders’  
    Stock     Amount     Capital     (Loss)     Deficit     Equity  
Balance at December 31, 2008
    88,846     $ 9     $ 1,071,347     $ 78,181     $ (29,217 )   $ 1,120,320  
 
                                   
Common shares issued — equity offering
    11,500       1       159,673                   159,674  
Common shares issued — restricted stock
    1,709                                
Treasury stock bought and cancelled on same day
    (175 )           (1,991 )                 (1,991 )
Forfeiture of restricted stock
    (25 )                              
Share-based compensation
                21,114                   21,114  
Stock options exercised
    1             8                   8  
Comprehensive income (loss):
                                               
Net income (loss)
                            (402,683 )     (402,683 )
Change in fair value of derivative hedging instruments — net of income taxes of $(62,411)
                      (189,763 )           (189,763 )
Hedge settlements reclassified to income — net of income taxes of $68,115
                      121,780             121,780  
 
                                   
Total comprehensive income (loss)
                      (67,983 )     (402,683 )     (470,666 )
 
                                   
Balance at September 30, 2009
    101,856     $ 10     $ 1,250,151     $ 10,198     $ (431,900 )   $ 828,459  
 
                                   
                                                                 
                            Accumulated             Total                
                            Other             Mariner                
                    Additional     Comprehensive     Accumulated     Energy, Inc.             Total  
    Common     Stock     Paid-In-     Income/     Retained     Stockholders’     Noncontrolling     Stockholders’  
    Stock     Amount     Capital     (Loss)     Earnings     Equity     Interests     Equity  
Balance at December 31, 2007
    87,229     $ 9     $ 1,054,089     $ (22,576 )   $ 359,496     $ 1,391,018     $ 1     $ 1,391,019  
 
                                               
Common shares issued — restricted stock
    1,729                                            
Treasury stock bought and cancelled on same day
    (137 )           (4,239 )                 (4,239 )           (4,239 )
Forfeiture of restricted stock
    (23 )                                          
Share-based compensation
                11,766                   11,766             11,766  
Stock options exercised
    56             741                   741             741  
Comprehensive income (loss):
                                                               
Net loss
                            260,207       260,207       188       260,395  
Change in fair value of derivative hedging instruments — net of income taxes of $25,790
                      69,224             69,224             69,224  
Hedge settlements reclassified to income — net of income taxes of $(43,980)
                      (79,549 )           (79,549 )           (79,549 )
 
                                               
Total comprehensive income (loss)
                      (10,325 )     260,207       249,882       188       250,070  
 
                                               
Balance at September 30, 2008
    88,854     $ 9     $ 1,062,357     $ (32,901 )   $ 619,703     $ 1,649,168     $ 189     $ 1,649,357  
 
                                               
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

5


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
                 
    Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008  
Operating Activities:
               
Net (loss) income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.
  $ (402,683 )   $ 260,207  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Deferred income (benefit) tax
    (211,860 )     140,854  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    301,305       375,170  
Ineffectiveness of derivative instruments
    812       1,647  
Full-cost ceiling test impairment
    704,731        
Share-based compensation
    18,360       11,953  
Derivative financial instruments
    (14,128 )      
Other
    7,046       2,538  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Receivables
    83,357       (12,356 )
Insurance receivables
    22,841       64,378  
Cash from liquidation of hedges
    52,562        
Prepaid expenses and other
    (25,334 )     1,640  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    1,100       15,777  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    538,109       861,808  
 
           
Investing Activities:
               
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties
    (468,980 )     (952,105 )
Additions to other property and equipment
    (2,141 )     (49,647 )
Restricted cash designated for investment
          5,000  
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (471,121 )     (996,752 )
 
           
Financing Activities:
               
Credit facility borrowings
    350,221       938,000  
Credit facility repayments
    (855,221 )     (807,000 )
Repurchase of stock
    (1,991 )     (4,239 )
Debt redetermination costs
    (2,306 )      
Debt offering costs
    (5,906 )      
Proceeds from equity offering
    159,736        
Proceeds from debt issuance
    291,279        
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    8       741  
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (64,180 )     127,502  
 
           
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    2,808       (7,442 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
    3,209       18,589  
 
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
  $ 6,017     $ 11,147  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest (net of amount capitalized)
  $ 29,238     $ 35,059  
Income taxes, net of refunds
  $ (2,001 )   $ 2,906  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

6


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     Operations — Mariner Energy, Inc. (“Mariner” or “the Company”) is an independent oil and gas exploration, development and production company with principal operations in the Permian Basin and in the Gulf of Mexico, both shelf and deepwater. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “Mariner”, “the Company”, “we”, “our”, “ours” and “us” refer to Mariner Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries collectively.
     Interim Financial Statements — The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of a normal and recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended.
     Use of Estimates — The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company’s most significant financial estimates are based on remaining proved natural gas and oil reserves. Estimates of proved reserves are key components of Mariner’s depletion rate for natural gas and oil properties, its unevaluated properties and its full-cost ceiling test. In addition, estimates are used in computing taxes, preparing accruals of operating costs and production revenues, asset retirement obligations, fair value and effectiveness of derivative instruments and fair value of stock options and the related compensation expense. Because of the inherent nature of the estimation process, actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
     Principles of Consolidation — Mariner’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended September 30, 2009 and consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended December 31, 2008 include its accounts and the accounts of its subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
     Reclassifications — Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Amounts for certain producing well overhead were presented as “Lease operating expense” in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008. These amounts are presented herein as “General and administrative expense” for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Other reclassifications are insignificant in nature. These reclassifications had no effect on total operating income or net income.
     Income Taxes — The Company’s provision for taxes includes both federal and state taxes. The Company records its federal income taxes using an asset and liability approach which results in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be recovered.
     The Company had no uncertain tax positions during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 or for the year ended December 31, 2008.

7


Table of Contents

     Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance on the hierarchy of GAAP which established only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants upon adoption. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company began using the new guidelines prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in respect of the third quarter ending September 30, 2009. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
     In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued and sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
     In April 2009, the FASB amended existing authoritative guidance to provide guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with other authoritative guidance, enhance consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures and create greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions for the period ending March 31, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
     On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued the final rule, “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” (“Final Rule”), which adopts revisions to the SEC’s oil and gas reporting disclosure requirements and is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for years ending on or after December 31, 2009. Early adoption of the Final Rule is prohibited. The revisions are intended to provide investors with a more meaningful and comprehensive understanding of oil and gas reserves to help investors evaluate their investments in oil and gas companies. The amendments are also designed to modernize the oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them with current practices and changes in technology. Revised requirements in the Final Rule include, but are not limited to:
    Oil and gas reserves must be reported using average prices over the prior 12 month period, rather than year-end prices;
 
    Companies will be allowed to report, on an optional basis, probable and possible reserves;
 
    Non-traditional reserves, such as oil and gas extracted from coal and shales, will be included in the definition of “oil and gas producing activities”;
 
    Companies will be permitted to use new technologies to determine proved reserves, as long as those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable conclusions with respect to reserve volumes;
 
    Companies will be required to disclose, in narrative form, additional details on their proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs), including the total quantity of PUDs at year end, any material changes to PUDs that occurred during the year, investments and progress made to convert PUDs to developed oil and gas reserves and an explanation of the reasons why material concentrations of PUDs in individual fields or countries have remained undeveloped for five years or more after disclosure as PUDs; and

8


Table of Contents

    Companies will be required to report the qualifications and measures taken to assure the independence and objectivity of any business entity or employee primarily responsible for preparing or auditing the reserves estimates.
     The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the Final Rule. The SEC is discussing the Final Rule with the FASB staff to align FASB authoritative guidance with the new SEC rules. These discussions may delay the required compliance date. Absent any change in the effective date, Mariner will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
     In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The guidance also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008; the Company adopted it beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations. However, it did impact the presentation and disclosure of noncontrolling (minority) interests in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
     In September 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which defines fair value, establishes criteria to be considered when measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for all recurring measures of financial assets and financial liabilities (e.g. derivatives and investment securities) for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted the provisions for all recurring measures of financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance, which granted a one-year deferral of the effective date as it applies to non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Beginning January 1, 2009, Mariner applied the provisions to non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
     In March 2008, the FASB amended authoritative guidance, which requires enhanced disclosures about the Company’s derivative and hedging activities. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements beginning January 1, 2009. See Note 8 “Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional disclosures. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
2. Acquisitions and Dispositions
     Gulf of Mexico Shelf Acquisition. On January 31, 2008, Mariner acquired 100% of the equity in a subsidiary of Hydro Gulf of Mexico, Inc. pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement executed on December 23, 2007. The acquired subsidiary, now known as Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC (“MGOM”), was an indirect subsidiary of StatoilHydro ASA and owns substantially all of its former Gulf of Mexico shelf operations. Mariner paid $228.8 million for the acquisition of MGOM.
     Pro Forma Financial Information — The pro forma information set forth below gives effect to the acquisition of MGOM as if it had been consummated as of the beginning of the applicable period. The pro forma information has been derived from the historical Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the statements of revenues and direct operating expenses of MGOM. The pro forma information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different had MGOM been an independent company and had the companies always been combined. You should not rely on the pro forma financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the acquisition occurred in the past or the future financial results that the Company will achieve after the acquisition.

9


Table of Contents

                 
    For the Three Months   For the Nine Months
    Ended September 30, 2008
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro Forma:
               
Revenue
  $ 317,890     $ 1,077,932  
Net income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.
  $ 64,670     $ 263,806  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.74     $ 3.02  
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.73     $ 2.99  
     Permian Basin Acquisitions. On February 29, 2008 and December 1, 2008, Mariner acquired additional working interests in certain of its existing properties in the Spraberry field in the Permian Basin. Mariner operates substantially all of the assets. The purchase prices were $23.5 million for the February 2008 acquisition and $19.4 million for the December 2008 acquisition.
     Bass Lite — On December 19, 2008, Mariner acquired additional working interests in its existing property, Atwater Valley Block 426 (Bass Lite), for approximately $30.6 million, increasing its working interest by 11.6% to 53.8%. Mariner internally estimated proved reserves attributable to the acquisition of approximately 17.6 Bcfe (100% natural gas).
3. Long-Term Debt
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the Company’s long-term debt was as follows:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Bank credit facility
  $ 65,000     $ 570,000  
7 1/2% Senior Notes, due April 15, 2013, net of discount
    297,983       300,000  
8% Senior Notes, due May 15, 2017
    300,000       300,000  
11 3/4% Senior Notes, due June 30, 2016, net of discount
    291,520        
 
           
Total long-term debt
  $ 954,503     $ 1,170,000  
 
           
     Bank Credit Facility — The Company has a secured revolving credit facility with a group of banks pursuant to an amended and restated credit agreement dated March 2, 2006, as further amended. The credit facility matures January 31, 2012 and is subject to a borrowing base which is redetermined periodically. The outstanding principal balance of loans under the credit facility may not exceed the borrowing base. The most recent borrowing base redetermination concluded in September 2009 when the lenders notified the Company that they affirmed the existing $800.0 million borrowing base, its amount since June 2009, and that the next borrowing base redetermination is scheduled for February 2010.
     On June 10, 2009, the Company used aggregate proceeds from concurrent offerings of its 113/4% senior notes due 2016 and common stock, before deducting estimated offering expenses but after deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions, of approximately $446.2 million to repay debt under its bank credit facility. These offerings are discussed further below in this Note 3 and in Note 4 “Stockholders’ Equity.”
     As of September 30, 2009, maximum credit availability under the facility was $1.0 billion, including up to $50.0 million in letters of credit, subject to a borrowing base of $800.0 million. As of September 30, 2009, there were $65.0 million in advances outstanding under the credit facility and four letters of credit outstanding totaling $4.7 million, of which $4.2 million is required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of the Company’s offshore fields. As of September 30, 2009, after accounting for the $4.7 million of letters of credit, the Company had $730.3 million available to borrow under the credit facility.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the commitment fee on unused capacity was 0.250% to 0.375% per annum through March 23, 2009 and 0.5% per annum thereafter. Commitment fees are included in “Accrued interest” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report. Borrowings under the bank credit facility bear interest at either a LIBOR-based rate or a prime-based rate, at the Company’s option, plus a specified margin. At September 30, 2009, when borrowings at both LIBOR and prime-based rates were outstanding, the blended interest rate was 3.03% on all amounts borrowed.
     The credit facility subjects the Company to various restrictive covenants and contains other usual and customary terms and conditions, including limits on additional debt, cash dividends and other restricted payments, liens,

10


Table of Contents

investments, asset dispositions, mergers and speculative hedging. Financial covenants under the credit facility require the Company to, among other things:
    maintain a ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and
    maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of not more than 2.5 to 1.0.
     The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the bank credit facility as of September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities was 3.22 to 1.0 and the ratio of total debt to EBITDA was 1.57 to 1.0.
     The Company’s payment and performance of its obligations under the credit facility (including any obligations under commodity and interest rate hedges entered into with facility lenders) are secured by liens upon substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, except its Canadian subsidiary, and guaranteed by its subsidiaries, other than Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. which is a co-borrower, and its Canadian subsidiary.
     Senior Notes — On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 113/4% senior notes due 2016 (the “113/4% Notes”). In 2007, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 8% senior notes due 2017 (the “8% Notes”). In 2006, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 71/2% senior notes due 2013 (the “71/2% Notes” and together with the 113/4% Notes and the 8% Notes, the “Notes”). The Notes are governed by indentures that are substantially identical for each series. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. The 113/4% Notes mature on June 30, 2016 with interest payable on June 30 and December 30 of each year beginning December 30, 2009. The 8% Notes mature on May 15, 2017 with interest payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The 71/2% Notes mature on April 15, 2013 with interest payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year. There is no sinking fund for the Notes. The Company and its restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants under each of the indentures governing the Notes. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Notes as of September 30, 2009.
     113/4% Notes — The 113/4% Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (the “Base Indenture”), as amended and supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of June 10, 2009, among the same parties (the “Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “Indenture”). Pursuant to the Base Indenture, the Company may issue multiple series of debt securities from time to time.
     The 113/4% Notes were sold at 97.093% of principal amount, for an initial yield to maturity of 12.375%, in an underwritten offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). Net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriters’ discounts and estimated offering expenses but before giving effect to the underwriters’ reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering expenses, were approximately $284.8 million. The Company used net offering proceeds (before deducting estimated offering expenses) to repay debt under its bank credit facility.
     The 113/4% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, rank senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with the Company’s existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including the 71/2% Notes and the 8% Notes, and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to the Company’s senior secured indebtedness, including its obligations under its bank credit facility, to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of any non-guarantor subsidiaries.
     The 113/4% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries. In the future, the guarantees may be released or terminated under certain circumstances. Each subsidiary guarantee ranks senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, ranks equally in right of payment to all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary and effectively subordinate to all existing and future secured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, including its guarantees of indebtedness under the Company’s bank credit facility, to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.

11


Table of Contents

     The Company may redeem the 113/4% Notes at any time before June 30, 2013 at a price equal to the principal amount redeemed plus a make-whole premium, using a discount rate of the Treasury rate plus 0.50% and accrued but unpaid interest. Beginning on June 30 of the years indicated below, the Company may redeem the 113/4% Notes from time to time, in whole or in part, at the prices set forth below (expressed as percentages of the principal amount redeemed) plus accrued but unpaid interest:
2013 at 105.875%
2014 at 102.938%
2015 and thereafter at 100.000%
     In addition, before June 30, 2012, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the 113/4% Notes with the proceeds of equity offerings at a price equal to 111.750% of the principal amount of the 113/4% Notes redeemed plus accrued but unpaid interest.
     If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the Indenture) occurs, subject to certain exceptions, the Company must give holders of the 113/4% Notes the opportunity to sell to the Company their 113/4% Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages to the date of purchase.
     The Company and its restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain negative covenants under the Indenture governing the 113/4% Notes which are consistent with the negative covenants under each of the indentures governing the 71/2% Notes and 8% Notes. The Indenture limits the ability of the Company and each of its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things:
    make investments;
 
    incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock;
 
    create certain liens;
 
    sell assets;
 
    enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments from its subsidiaries to itself;
 
    consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its assets;
 
    engage in transactions with affiliates;
 
    pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; and
 
    create unrestricted subsidiaries.
     Capitalized Interest — For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized interest totaled $4.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized interest totaled $9.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
4. Stockholders’ Equity
     Common Stock Offering — On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued 11.5 million shares of its common stock, par value $.0001 per share, at a public offering price of $14.50 per share in an underwritten offering registered under the 1933 Act. The total sold includes 1.5 million shares issued upon full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. Net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriters’ discounts and estimated offering expenses but before giving effect to the underwriters’ reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering expenses, were approximately $159.2 million. The Company used net offering proceeds (before deducting estimated offering expenses of approximately $0.5 million) to repay debt under its bank credit facility.

12


Table of Contents

5. Oil and Gas Properties
     The Company’s oil and gas properties are accounted for using the full-cost method of accounting. All direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties are capitalized, including eligible general and administrative costs (“G&A”). G&A costs associated with production, operations, marketing and general corporate activities are expensed as incurred. These capitalized costs, coupled with the Company’s estimated asset retirement obligations recorded in accordance with accounting for asset retirement and environmental obligations under GAAP, are included in the amortization base and amortized to expense using the unit-of-production method. Amortization is calculated based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are applied to reduce net capitalized costs unless the sale or disposition causes a significant change in the relationship between costs and the estimated value of proved reserves. For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized G&A totaled $5.0 million and $4.5 million, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized G&A totaled $15.3 million and $14.2 million, respectively, of which $2.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to non-cash share-based compensation.
     Capitalized costs (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization and deferred income taxes) of proved oil and gas properties are subject to a full-cost ceiling limitation. The ceiling limits these costs to an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated future net cash flows from estimated proved reserves less estimated future operating and development costs, abandonment costs (net of salvage value) and estimated related future income taxes. The full-cost ceiling limitation is calculated using natural gas and oil prices in effect as of the balance sheet date, however, SEC rules provide that price increases subsequent to the end of the period may be used to calculate the ceiling limitation. This option will no longer be available to the Company starting December 31, 2009 due to adoption of the Final Rule. Prices are adjusted for “basis” or location differentials. Price is held constant over the life of the reserves. The Company uses derivative financial instruments that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting under GAAP to hedge against the volatility of oil and natural gas prices. In accordance with SEC guidelines, Mariner includes estimated future cash flows from its hedging program in the ceiling test calculation. If net capitalized costs related to proved properties exceed the ceiling limit, the excess is impaired and recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
     Based on commodity prices of $3.30 per Mcf for gas and $70.21 per barrel for oil at September 30, 2009, the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas properties exceeded the ceiling limit and the Company calculated a non-cash ceiling test impairment of $4.6 million ($3.0 million, net of tax) for the third quarter. The indicated impairment would have been $71.6 million ($46.0 million, net of tax) if the Company had not used hedge adjusted prices for the volumes that were subject to hedges. Subsequent commodity price increases may be utilized to calculate the ceiling value and reserves. Subsequent to September 30, 2009 the quoted market prices of gas and oil increased. Based on commodity prices of $4.10 per Mcf for gas and $77.04 per barrel for oil at October 30, 2009, the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas properties did not exceed the ceiling limit and the Company did not record an impairment for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
     No ceiling test impairment was recorded for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. At March 31, 2009, the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas properties exceeded the ceiling limit and the Company recorded a non-cash ceiling test impairment of $704.7 million ($454.6 million, net of tax) for the first quarter. The impairment would have been $808.0 million ($521.3 million, net of tax) if the Company had not used hedge adjusted prices for the volumes that were subject to hedges. The ceiling limit of its proved reserves was calculated based upon quoted market prices of $3.89 and $3.63 per Mcf for gas and $70.00 and $49.65 per barrel for oil, adjusted for market differentials for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009. No ceiling test impairment was recorded for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008.
6. Accrual for Future Abandonment Liabilities
     In accordance with accounting for asset retirement and environmental obligations under GAAP, the Company records the fair value of a liability for the legal obligation to retire an asset in the period in which it is incurred with the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Upon adoption, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligation to reflect the Company’s legal obligations related to future plugging and abandonment of its oil and natural gas wells. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. If the liability is settled for an amount other than the recorded amount, the difference is recognized in proved oil and gas properties.

13


Table of Contents

     To estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation, the Company employs a present value technique, which reflects certain assumptions, including its credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate, the estimated settlement date of the liability and the estimated current cost to settle the liability. Changes in timing or to the original estimate of cash flows will result in changes to the carrying amount of the liability.
     The following roll forward is provided as a reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of the asset retirement obligation:
         
    (In thousands)  
Abandonment liability as of January 1, 2009
  $ 408,244  
Liabilities incurred
    13,453  
Liabilities settled
    (26,999 )
Accretion expense
    25,390  
Revisions to previous estimates
    36,393  
 
     
Abandonment liability as of September 30, 2009
  $ 456,481  
 
     
7. Share-Based Compensation
     Applicable Plans — On May 11, 2009, the Company’s stockholders approved the Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). Restricted common stock and non-qualified stock options are outstanding under the Stock Incentive Plan. Options to purchase the Company’s common stock granted to certain employees in connection with a March 2006 merger transaction also are outstanding but are not governed by the Stock Incentive Plan (“Rollover Options”).
     The Company’s directors, employees and consultants are eligible to participate in the Stock Incentive Plan. Awards to participants may be made in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options or restricted stock. Effective May 11, 2009, the Stock Incentive Plan increased to 12,500,000 from 6,500,000 the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that can be issued to participants, and increased the number of shares that can be issued to any one employee to 5,700,000 from 2,850,000. Subject to the terms of the Stock Incentive Plan, the participants to whom awards are granted, the type or types of awards granted, the number of shares covered by each award, and the purchase price, conditions and other terms of each award are determined by the Company’s board of directors or a committee thereof appointed by the board to administer the Plan (the “committee”).
     Unless sooner terminated, no award may be granted under the Stock Incentive Plan after October 12, 2015. The Company’s board of directors or the committee may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate (collectively, “change”) the Stock Incentive Plan without the consent of any stockholder, participant, other holder or beneficiary of an award, or other person, except that:
    without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, no change can be made that would
  (i)   increase the total number of shares that may be issued under the Stock Incentive Plan, except as provided in the Stock Incentive Plan with respect to stock dividends or splits, or with respect to mergers, recapitalizations, reorganizations, spin-offs or other unusual transactions or events,
 
  (ii)   permit the exercise price of any outstanding option that is “underwater” to be reduced or for an “underwater” option to be cancelled and replaced with a new award,
 
  (iii)   include participants other than employees, non-employee directors and consultants, or
 
  (iv)   materially increase benefits accrued to participants under the Stock Incentive Plan; and
    no change can materially adversely affect the rights of a participant under an award without the participant’s written consent.
     In addition, the Stock Incentive Plan may not be amended or terminated in any manner that would cause the Plan or any amounts or benefits payable under the Stock Incentive Plan to fail to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to the extent applicable.

14


Table of Contents

     Plan Activity — The Company recorded total compensation expense related to restricted stock and stock options of $7.0 million and $4.8 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and $21.1 million and $12.0 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Under the Stock Incentive Plan, unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 2009 for the unvested portion of restricted stock granted was $52.4 million and for unvested options was $0.
     The following table presents a summary of stock option activity under the Stock Incentive Plan and under Rollover Options for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
                         
            Weighted        
            Average     Aggregate Intrinsic  
            Exercise     Value (1)  
    Shares     Price     (In thousands)  
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
    645,348     $ 13.88     $ 196  
Granted
                 
Exercised
    (726 )     11.59       (2 )
Forfeited
                 
 
                   
Outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2009
    644,622     $ 13.88     $ 194  
 
                   
 
(1)   Based upon the difference between the closing price per share of the common stock on the last trading date of the quarter of $14.18 and the option exercise price of in-the-money options.
     A summary of the activity for unvested restricted stock awards under the Stock Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and changes during the nine-month periods is as follows:
                 
    Restricted Shares under
    Stock Incentive Plan
    September 30,
    2009   2008
Total unvested shares at beginning of period: January 1
    2,697,926       1,484,552  
Shares granted (1)
    1,708,795       1,729,329  
Shares vested
    (591,049 )     (460,897 )
Shares forfeited (1)
    (25,131 )     (23,383 )
 
               
Total unvested shares at end of period: September 30
    3,790,541       2,729,601  
 
               
Available for future grant as options or restricted stock
    7,021,666       2,522,823  
 
(1)   Current year activity includes 4,741 shares granted and forfeited under the Stock Incentive Plan’s 2008 Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program discussed below during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
     The following table summarizes the status under the provisions of accounting for stock compensation under GAAP of the Company’s restricted stock, including long-term performance based restricted stock, at September 30, 2009 and the changes during the nine months then ended:
                                 
                            Weighted  
                    Aggregate     Average  
    Equity     Weighted     Intrinsic     Remaining  
    Instruments     Average     Value     Contractual  
    (thousands)     Fair Value     ($ thousands)     Life (Years)  
Unvested at January 1, 2009
    2,697,926     $ 28.22     $ 76,123          
Granted
    1,708,795       11.20       19,144          
Vested
    (591,049 )     22.30       (13,180 )        
Forfeited
    (25,131 )     14.16       (356 )        
 
                           
Unvested at September 30, 2009
    3,790,541       21.56     $ 81,731       6.32  
 
                           
     Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program — In June 2008, Mariner’s board of directors adopted a Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program (the “Program”) under the Stock Incentive Plan. Shares of restricted common stock subject to the Program were granted in 2008 and 2009. Vesting of these

15


Table of Contents

shares is contingent, begins upon satisfaction of specified thresholds of $38.00 and $46.00 for the market price per share of Mariner’s common stock, and continues in installments over five to seven years thereafter, assuming, in most instances, continued employment by Mariner. The fair value of restricted stock grants made under the Program is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. Stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock grants totaled $8.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
     Weighted average fair values and valuation assumptions used to value Program grants for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 are as follows:
         
    Quarter Ended
    September 30,
    2009
Weighted average fair value of grants
  $ 33.73  
Expected volatility
    42.29 %
Risk-free interest rate
    4.57 %
Dividend yield
    0.00 %
Expected life
  10 years  
     Expected volatility is calculated based on the average historical stock price volatility of Mariner and a peer group as of September 30, 2009. The peer group consisted of the following seven independent oil and gas exploration and production companies: ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Callon Petroleum Co., Energy Partners, Ltd., McMoRan Exploration Co., Plains Exploration & Production Company, Stone Energy Corporation, and W&T Offshore, Inc. The risk-free interest rate is determined at the grant date and is based on 10-year, zero-coupon government bonds with maturity equal to the contractual term of the awards, converted to a continuously compounded rate. The expected life is based upon the contractual terms of the restricted stock grants under the Program.
8. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
     The energy markets historically have been very volatile, and Mariner expects oil and gas prices will be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. In an effort to reduce the effects of the volatility of the price of oil and natural gas on the Company’s operations, management has elected to hedge oil and natural gas prices from time to time through the use of commodity price swap agreements and costless collars. While the use of these hedging arrangements limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from favorable movements. In addition, forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used to assess and measure the ineffectiveness of the Company’s open contracts at the end of each period.
     For derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges pursuant to accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP, the portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument that is effective in offsetting the variable cash flows associated with the hedged forecasted transaction is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (e.g., in “revenues” when the hedged transactions are commodity sales). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative contract in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any (i.e., the ineffective portion) is recognized in earnings during the current period. The Company currently does not exclude any component of the derivative contracts’ gain or loss from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
     In the third quarter 2009, the Company liquidated certain natural gas fixed price swaps that previously had been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes in respect of 10,205,560 million British thermal units of natural gas in exchange for a cash payment to Mariner of $32.0 million and total installment payments of $3.4 million to be paid monthly to Mariner through 2009. Since the forecasted sales of natural gas volumes are still expected to occur, the accumulated gains through the date of liquidation on the related derivative contracts remained in accumulated other comprehensive income, and will be reclassified into earnings as the physical transactions occur. Any changes in the value of these derivative contracts subsequent to the date of liquidation will no longer be deferred in other comprehensive income, but rather will impact current period income.
     In first quarter 2009, the Company liquidated crude oil fixed price swaps that previously had been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes in respect of 977,000 barrels of crude oil in exchange for a cash payment

16


Table of Contents

to Mariner of $10.0 million and installment payments of $13.5 million to be paid monthly to Mariner through 2009. In April 2009, the Company received a $10.5 million cash settlement on the hedges that were settled in monthly installments in the first quarter 2009. Since the forecasted sales of crude oil volumes are still expected to occur, the accumulated gains through January 29, 2009 on the related derivative contracts remained in accumulated other comprehensive income, and will be reclassified into earnings as the physical transactions occur. Any gain or loss realized on these derivative contracts in conjunction with installment payments received will be recognized in current period income.
     Derivative gains and losses are recorded by commodity type in oil and gas revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effects on the Company’s oil and gas revenues from its hedging activities were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Cash Gain (Loss) on Settlements (1)
  $ 52,644     $ (46,968 )   $ 173,648     $ (121,882 )
Reclassification of liquidated swaps (2)
    3,859             17,059        
Gain (Loss) on Hedge Ineffectiveness (3)
    (809 )     4,827       (812 )     (1,647 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 55,694     $ (42,141 )   $ 189,895     $ (123,529 )
 
                       
 
(1)   Designated as cash flow hedges pursuant to accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP.
 
(2)   Natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps liquidated in first and third quarters of 2009 that do not qualify for hedge accounting. These amounts include net losses of $1.8 million and $1.5 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
 
(3)   Unrealized loss recognized in natural gas revenue related to the ineffective portion of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral under GAAP due primarily to the basis differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale.
     As of September 30, 2009, the Company had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
                         
            Weighted Average     Fair Value  
Fixed Price Swaps   Quantity     Fixed Price     Asset (Liability) (1)  
                    (In thousands)  
Natural Gas (MMbtus)
                       
October 1—December 31, 2009
    783,380     $ 4.22     $ 410  
January 1—December 31, 2010
    12,775,000     $ 5.84       (4,405 )
January 1—December 31, 2011
    13,650,000     $ 6.45       (5,080 )
January 1—December 31, 2012
    6,588,000     $ 6.62       (2,262 )
January 1—December 31, 2013
    5,840,000     $ 6.76       (1,384 )
Crude Oil (Bbls)
                       
October 1—December 31, 2009
    228,160     $ 76.33       1,183  
January 1—December 31, 2010
    1,934,500     $ 67.48       (12,589 )
January 1—December 31, 2011
    978,100     $ 73.24       (3,369 )
January 1—December 31, 2012
    494,100     $ 80.77       668  
January 1—December 31, 2013
    408,800     $ 82.81       595  
 
                     
Total
                  $ (26,233 )
 
                     
 
(1)   Table excludes $3.4 million included in Derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet relating to the liquidation of 783,380 MMBtu to be paid in monthly installments through December 31, 2009.
     The Company has reviewed the financial strength of its counterparties and believes the credit risk associated with these swaps to be minimal. Hedges with counterparties that are lenders under the Company’s bank credit facility are secured under the bank credit facility.
     For derivative instruments that are not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes, all realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the statement of income during the current period. This will result in non-cash gains or losses being reported in Mariner’s operating results.
     As of September 30, 2009, the Company expects to realize within the next 12 months approximately $42.3 million in net gains resulting from liquidated fixed price swaps and $9.3 million in net losses resulting from hedging

17


Table of Contents

activities, of which $33.0 million is currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The net hedging gain is expected to be realized as a decrease of $3.0 million to oil revenues and an increase of $36.4 million to natural gas revenues.
     As of November 3, 2009, the Company has not entered into any hedge transactions subsequent to September 30, 2009.
Additional Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
     At September 30, 2009, the Company had derivative financial instruments under GAAP recorded in its balance sheet as set forth below:
                                 
    Fair Value of Derivative Contracts  
    Asset Derivatives  
    September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
    Balance sheet             Balance sheet        
    Location     Fair value     Location     Fair value  
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging contracts        
Fixed Price Swaps
  Current Assets: Derivative financial instruments     $ 611     Current Assets: Derivative financial instruments     $ 121,929  
 
  Long-Term Assets: Derivative Financial Instruments       920                  
 
                               
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging contracts        
Fixed Price Swaps
  Current Assets: Derivative financial instruments       3,823     Current Assets: Derivative financial instruments        
 
  Stockholders’ Equity: Accumulated other comprehensive income       38,844                  
 
                           
 
  Total     $ 44,198     Total     $ 121,929  
 
                           
                                 
    Fair Value of Derivative Contracts  
    Liability Derivatives  
    September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
    Balance sheet             Balance sheet        
    Location     Fair value     Location     Fair value  
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging contracts
     
Fixed Price Swaps
  Current Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments     $ 9,907     Current Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments     $  
 
  Long-Term Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments       18,267     Long-Term Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments        
 
                           
 
  Total     $ 28,174     Total     $  
 
                           
     For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the effect on income of derivative financial instruments under. GAAP was as follows:
                                                                 
                    Location of gain/(loss)     Amount of gain/(loss)             Amount of  
    Amount of gain/(loss)     reclassified from     reclassified from     Location of gain/(loss)     gain/(loss)  
Derivatives   recognized in OCI on     Accumulated OCI into     Accumulated OCI     recognized in income     recognized in income  
designated as cash   derivative (effective     income (effective     into income (effective     on derivative     on derivative  
flow hedging   portion)     portion)     portion)     (ineffective portion)     (ineffective portion)  
contracts under   Third Quarter           Third Quarter           Third Quarter  
GAAP   2009     2008           2009     2008           2009     2008  
Fixed Price Swaps
  $ 26,643     $ (46,498 )   Revenues-Natural Gas     $ 50,521     $ (17,102 )   Revenues-Natural Gas     $ (809 )   $ 4,827  
Fixed Price Collars
          (3,720 )   Revenues-Crude Oil       2,123       (29,866 )   Revenues-Crude Oil              
 
                                                   
Total
  $ 26,643     $ (50,218 )   Total     $ 52,644     $ (46,968 )   Total     $ (809 )   $ 4,827  
 
                                                   
                         
            Amount of gain/(loss) recognized in  
            income on derivative  
Derivatives not designated as cash   Location of gain/(loss) recognized in income     Third Quarter     Third Quarter  
flow hedging contracts   on derivative     2009     2008  
Fixed Price Swaps
  Revenues-Natural Gas     $ (1,837 )   $  
 
  Revenues-Crude Oil       5,696        
 
                   
 
  Total     $ 3,859     $  
 
                   

18


Table of Contents

9. Commitments and Contingencies
     Minimum Future Lease Payments — The Company leases certain office facilities and other equipment under long-term operating lease arrangements. Minimum future lease obligations under the Company’s operating leases in effect at September 30, 2009 are as follows:
         
    (In thousands)
2010
  $ 2,620  
2011
    2,587  
2012
    2,502  
2013
    2,173  
2014 and thereafter
    9,958  
     Other Commitments — In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into long-term commitments to purchase seismic data and other geological information such as maps, logs and studies. The minimum annual payments under these commitments are $0.3 million in 2011.
Insurance Matters
Current Insurance Against Hurricanes
     Mariner is a member of OIL Insurance Limited (“OIL”), an energy industry insurance cooperative, which provides Mariner windstorm insurance coverage subject to a $10.0 million per-occurrence deductible, a $250.0 million per-occurrence loss limit, and a $750.0 million industry aggregate per-event loss limit. Effective January 1, 2010, the windstorm coverage will be subject to a per-occurrence deductible under consideration, a $150.0 million per-occurrence loss limit per member, an annual maximum of $300.0 million per member, and a $750.0 million industry aggregate per-event loss limit. In addition, annual industry windstorm losses exceeding $300.0 million will be mutualized among windstorm members in two pools, one for offshore and one for onshore, with future premiums based upon a pool’s loss experience and a member’s weighted percent of the pool’s asset base. Mariner anticipates these changes to increase its loss retention by approximately $100.0 million for windstorm losses which it expects to either self insure, insure through the commercial market, insure through the purchase of additional OIL coverage or a combination of these.
     Each year, Mariner considers whether to purchase from the commercial market supplemental insurance which in the past has provided coverage when OIL limits have been exceeded (see discussion below under “Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (2005)”). The supplemental insurance coverage offered by the commercial market in 2009 would not have provided similar coverage and Mariner elected not to purchase it when it expired on June 1, 2009. Mariner believes its assets are sufficiently insured for 2009 through OIL and Mariner’s expected ability to cover losses in excess of OIL coverage. Mariner intends to monitor the commercial market for insurance that would, based on Mariner’s historical experience, cover its expected hurricane-related risks on a cost-effective basis once OIL limits are exceeded.
     As of September 30, 2009, Mariner accrued approximately $36.0 million for an OIL withdrawal premium contingency. As part of its OIL membership, Mariner is obligated to pay a withdrawal premium if it elects to withdraw from OIL. Mariner does not anticipate withdrawing from OIL; however, due to the contingency, Mariner periodically reassesses the sufficiency of its accrued withdrawal premium based on OIL’s periodic calculation of the potential withdrawal premium in light of past losses, and Mariner may adjust its accrual accordingly in the future.
     OIL requires smaller members to provide a letter of credit or other acceptable security in favor of OIL to secure payment of the withdrawal premium. Acceptable security has included a letter of credit or a security agreement pursuant to which a member grants OIL a security interest in certain claim proceeds payable by OIL to the member. Mariner has entered into such a security agreement, granting to OIL a senior security interest in up to the next $50.0 million in excess of $100.0 million of Mariner’s Hurricane Ike claim proceeds payable by OIL. Mariner has the ability to replace the security agreement with a letter of credit or other acceptable security in favor of OIL.

19


Table of Contents

Hurricane Ike (2008)
     In 2008, the Company’s operations were adversely affected by Hurricane Ike. The hurricane resulted in shut-in and delayed production as well as facility repairs and replacement expenses. The Company estimates that repairs and plugging and abandonment costs resulting from Hurricane Ike will total approximately $160.0 million net to Mariner’s interest. OIL has advised the Company that industry-wide damages from Hurricane Ike are expected to substantially exceed OIL’s $750.0 million industry aggregate per event loss limit and that OIL expects to initially prorate the payout of all OIL members’ Hurricane Ike claims at approximately 50%, subject to further adjustment. OIL also has indicated that the scaling factor it expects to apply to Mariner’s Hurricane Ike claims will result in settlement at less than 70%. Mariner expects that approximately 75% of the shortfall in its primary insurance coverage will be covered under its commercial excess coverage. In respect of Hurricane Ike claims that the Company submitted to OIL through September 2009, the Company received $16.9 million from OIL and as of September 30, 2009 had a receivable balance of approximately $12.2 million. Although in 2009 Mariner started receiving payment in respect of its Hurricane Ike claims, due to the magnitude of the storm and the complexity of the insurance claims being processed by the insurance industry, Mariner expects to maintain a potentially significant insurance receivable through 2010 while it actively pursues settlement of its Hurricane Ike claims to minimize the impact to its working capital and liquidity.
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (2005)
     In 2005, the Company’s operations were adversely affected by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, resulting in substantial shut-in and delayed production, as well as necessitating extensive facility repairs and hurricane-related abandonment operations. Since 2005, the Company has incurred approximately $204.6 million in hurricane expenditures resulting from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, of which $129.1 million were capitalized expenditures and $75.5 million were hurricane-related abandonment costs.
     Applicable insurance for the Company’s Hurricane Katrina and Rita claims with respect to the Gulf of Mexico assets acquired from Forest Oil Corporation in March 2006 is provided by OIL. Mariner’s coverage for such properties is subject to a deductible of $5.0 million per occurrence and a $1.0 billion industry-wide loss limit per occurrence. OIL has advised the Company that the aggregate claims resulting from each of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita are expected to exceed the $1.0 billion per occurrence loss limit and that therefore Mariner’s insurance recovery is expected to be reduced pro-rata (approximately 47% for Katrina and 67% for Rita) with all other competing claims from the storms. During 2008, the Company settled its Katrina and Rita claims with its excess insurers for a one-time cash payment of $48.5 million. The insurance coverage for Mariner’s legacy properties is subject to a $3.75 million deductible.
     As of September 30, 2009, the Company had recovered $52.9 million from OIL and $48.5 million from its commercial carriers in respect of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. With respect to Hurricane Katrina, the Company has received full and final settlement and maintains no insurance receivable balance. With respect to Hurricane Rita, although the Company had not yet submitted final claims and therefore maintained no insurance receivable balance at September 30, 2009, it expects to submit final claims and achieve settlement by 2010. Due to the magnitude of the storm and the complexity of the insurance claims being processed by the insurance industry, the timing of the Company’s ultimate insurance recovery cannot be assured. However, Mariner expects to recover substantially all of its outstanding OIL claims in respect of Hurricane Rita by 2010. Any differences between insurance recoveries and insurance receivables will be recorded as adjustments to oil and natural gas properties.
     Litigation — The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is a claimant and/or a defendant in various legal proceedings, including proceedings as to which the Company has insurance coverage and those that may involve the filing of liens against the Company or its assets. The Company does not consider its exposure in these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to be material.
     Letters of Credit — Mariner’s bank credit facility has a letter of credit subfacility of up to $50.0 million that is included as a use of the borrowing base. As of September 30, 2009, four such letters of credit totaling $4.7 million were outstanding of which $4.2 million is required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of Mariner’s offshore fields.

20


Table of Contents

10. Earnings per Share
     Basic earnings per share does not include dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss attributed to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur upon vesting of restricted common stock or exercise of options to purchase common stock.
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
Numerator:
                               
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.
  $ 4,222     $ 64,691     $ (402,683 )   $ 260,207  
Denominator:
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding
    100,753       87,596       93,849       87,447  
Add dilutive securities
                               
Options
    11       246             265  
Restricted stock
    321       342             528  
 
                       
Total weighted average shares outstanding and dilutive securities
    101,085       88,184       93,849       88,240  
 
                       
Net Income (Loss) per share attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.:
                               
Basic:
  $ 0.04     $ 0.74     $ (4.29 )   $ 2.98  
Diluted:
  $ 0.04     $ 0.73     $ (4.29 )   $ 2.95  
     Unvested shares of restricted stock and shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase common stock that would have been anti-dilutive are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. Due to the Company’s net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, all of the Company’s unvested shares of restricted stock and shares issuable upon exercise of stock options (approximately 1,969,881 and 644,721, respectively) were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, 1,793,914 unvested shares of restricted stock and 612,805 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, 400,000 and 381,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive and 1,138,785 and 444,711 unvested shares of restricted stock were excluded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
11. Comprehensive Income
     Comprehensive income includes net income (loss) and certain items recorded directly to stockholders’ equity and classified as other comprehensive income. The table below summarizes comprehensive income and provides the components of the change in accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (in thousands)  
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 4,222     $ 64,691     $ (402,683 )   $ 260,395  
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
                               
Change in fair value of derivative hedging instruments, net of income taxes of $(36,084), $150,590, $(62,411), and $25,790
    (64,513 )     272,381       (189,763 )     69,224  
Derivative contracts settled and reclassified, net of income taxes of $19,977, $(15,003), $68,115 and $(43,980)
    35,717       (27,138 )     121,780       (79,549 )
 
                       
Change in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
    (28,796 )     245,243       (67,983 )     (10,325 )
 
                       
Comprehensive (loss) income
    (24,574 )     309,934       (470,666 )     250,070  
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
                      188  
 
                       
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.
  $ (24,574 )   $ 309,934     $ (470,666 )   $ 249,882  
 
                       
12. Fair Value Measurement
     Certain of Mariner’s assets and liabilities are reported at fair value in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such assets and liabilities include amounts for both financial and nonfinancial instruments. The

21


Table of Contents

carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable (including income taxes payable and accrued expenses) approximated fair value at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. These assets and liabilities are not included in the following tables.
     GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. As presented in the table below, the hierarchy consists of three broad levels. Level 1 inputs on the hierarchy consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and have the highest priority. Level 2 inputs are market-based and are directly or indirectly observable but not considered Level 1 quoted prices, including quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; or valuation techniques whose inputs are observable. Where observable inputs are available, directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2. Level 3 inputs are unobservable (meaning they reflect Mariner’s own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the asset or liability based on the best available information) and therefore have the lowest priority. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Mariner believes it uses appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of its assets and liabilities.
     GAAP requires a credit adjustment for non-performance in calculating the fair value of financial instruments. The credit adjustment for derivatives in an asset position is determined based on the credit rating of the counterparty and the credit adjustment for derivatives in a liability position is determined based on Mariner’s credit rating.
     The following table provides fair value measurement information for the Company’s derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2009:
                                 
    Fair Value Measurements Using:  
                    Significant        
            Quoted Prices     other     Significant  
            in Active     Observable     Unobservable  
    Total Fair     Markets     Inputs     Inputs  
Derivative Financial Instruments   Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
    (In thousands)  
Natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps — Short Term
  $ (5,473 )   $     $ (5,473 )   $  
 
                               
Natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps — Long Term
    (17,347 )           (17,347 )      
 
                       
Total
  $ (22,820 )   $     $ (22,820 )   $  
 
                       
     The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of Mariner’s derivative financial instruments in the table above.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
     The fair values of the natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps are estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward commodity price curves, terms of each contract, and a credit adjustment based on the credit rating of the Company and its counterparties as of September 30, 2009.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
     The Company had no Level 3 financial instruments as of September 30, 2009.
     The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of accounting for financial instruments under GAAP, which Mariner adopted effective March 31, 2009 as described in Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and valuation methodologies described below. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

22


Table of Contents

     The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s long-term debt are as follows:
                                 
    September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
    Carrying             Carrying        
Long-term Debt   Amount     Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value  
    (In thousands)  
Bank credit facility
  $ 65,000     $ 65,000     $ 570,000     $ 570,000  
7 1/2% Notes, net of discount
    297,983       222,054       300,000       144,956  
8% Notes
    300,000       145,721       300,000       59,978  
11 3/4% Notes, net of discount
    291,520       147,051              
 
                       
Total long-term debt
  $ 954,503     $ 579,826     $ 1,170,000     $ 774,934  
 
                       
     The fair value of the amounts outstanding under the bank credit facility as of September 30, 2009 is based on rates currently available for debt instruments with similar terms and average maturities from companies with similar credit ratings in our industry. The fair value of the Notes is based on quoted market prices based on trades of such debt as of September 30, 2009.
13. Segment Information
     The FASB has issued authoritative guidance establishing standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses. Separate financial information is available and this information is regularly evaluated by the chief decision maker for the purpose of allocating resources and assessing performance.
     The Company measures financial performance as a single enterprise, allocating capital resources on a project-by-project basis across its entire asset base to maximize profitability. Mariner utilizes a company-wide management team that administers all enterprise operations encompassing the exploration, development and production of natural gas and oil. Since Mariner follows the full-cost method of accounting and all of its oil and gas properties and operations are located in the United States, the Company has determined that it has one reporting unit. Inasmuch as Mariner is one enterprise, the Company does not maintain comprehensive financial statement information by area but does track basic operational data by area.
14. Supplemental Guarantor Information
     On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 113/4% Notes. On April 30, 2007, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 8% Notes. On April 24, 2006, the Company sold and issued to eligible purchasers $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 71/2% Notes. The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company’s existing and certain of its future domestic subsidiaries (“Subsidiary Guarantors”). The guarantees are full and unconditional, and the guarantors are wholly-owned. In the future, the guarantees may be released or terminated under certain circumstances.
     The following information sets forth Mariner’s Consolidating Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, its Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and its Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
     Mariner accounts for investments in its subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting; accordingly, entries necessary to consolidate Mariner, the parent company, and its Subsidiary Guarantors are reflected in the eliminations column.

23


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
September 30, 2009
(In thousands except share data)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Current Assets:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 6,016     $ 1     $     $ 6,017  
Receivables, net of allowances
    91,928       44,496             136,424  
Insurance receivables
    56       12,358             12,414  
Derivative financial instruments
    4,434                   4,434  
Intangible assets
    1,446                   1,446  
Prepaid expenses and other
    21,635       1,629             23,264  
 
                       
Total current assets
    125,515       58,484             183,999  
Property and Equipment:
                               
Proved oil and gas properties, full-cost method
    2,445,514       2,451,487             4,897,001  
Unproved properties, not subject to amortization
    206,092       8,799             214,891  
 
                       
Total oil and gas properties
    2,651,606       2,460,286             5,111,892  
Other property and equipment
    19,871       35,358             55,229  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization:
                             
Proved oil and gas properties
    (1,421,006 )     (1,324,595 )           (2,745,601 )
Other property and equipment
    (5,718 )     (1,831 )           (7,549 )
 
                       
Total accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
    (1,426,724 )     (1,326,426 )           (2,753,150 )
 
                       
Total property and equipment, net
    1,244,753       1,169,218             2,413,971  
Investment in Subsidiaries
    440,538             (440,538 )      
Intercompany Receivables
    214,629             (214,629 )      
Intercompany Note Receivable
    7,175             (7,175 )      
Insurance Receivables
                       
Deferred income tax
    63,110             (63,110 )      
Derivative Financial Instruments
    920                   920  
Other Assets, net of amortization
    74,337       352             74,689  
 
                       
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 2,170,977     $ 1,228,054     $ (725,452 )   $ 2,673,579  
 
                       
Current Liabilities:
                               
Accounts payable
  $ 3,586     $     $     $ 3,586  
Accrued liabilities
    100,965       19,000             119,965  
Accrued capital costs
    95,888       32,893             128,781  
Deferred income tax
    15,772                   15,772  
Abandonment liability
    12,850       35,127             47,977  
Accrued interest
    30,353                   30,353  
Derivative financial instruments
    9,907                   9,907  
 
                       
Total current liabilities
    269,321       87,020             356,341  
Long-Term Liabilities:
                               
Abandonment liability
    71,984       336,520             408,504  
Deferred income tax
          141,578       (63,110 )     78,468  
Intercompany payable
          214,629       (214,629 )      
Derivative financial instruments
    18,267                   18,267  
Long-term debt,
    954,503                     954,503  
Other long-term liabilities
    28,443       594             29,037  
Intercompany note payable
          7,175       (7,175 )      
 
                       
Total long-term liabilities
    1,073,197       700,496       (284,914 )     1,488,779  
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 9)
                               
Stockholders’ Equity:
                               
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009
                       
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 101,855,521 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009
    10       5       (5 )     10  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,250,151       886,142       (886,142 )     1,250,151  
Partner capital
          31,438       (31,438 )      
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    10,198                   10,198  
Accumulated deficit
    (431,900 )     (477,047 )     477,047       (431,900 )
 
                       
Total stockholders’ equity
    828,459       440,538       (440,538 )     828,459  
 
                       
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 2,170,977     $ 1,228,054     $ (725,452 )   $ 2,673,579  
 
                       

24


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
December 31, 2008
(In thousands except share data)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Current Assets:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 2,809     $ 400     $     $ 3,209  
Receivables, net of allowances
    157,362       62,558             219,920  
Insurance receivables
    5,886       7,237             13,123  
Derivative financial instruments
    121,929                   121,929  
Intangible assets
    2,334                   2,334  
Prepaid expenses and other
    12,965       1,473             14,438  
 
                       
Total current assets
    303,285       71,668             374,953  
Property and Equipment:
                               
Proved oil and gas properties, full-cost method
    2,181,238       2,266,908             4,448,146  
Unproved properties, not subject to amortization
    185,012       16,109             201,121  
 
                       
Total oil and gas properties
    2,366,250       2,283,017             4,649,267  
Other property and equipment
    33,351       19,764             53,115  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization:
                               
Proved oil and gas properties
    (911,462 )     (855,566 )           (1,767,028 )
Other property and equipment
    (4,425 )     (1,052 )           (5,477 )
 
                       
Total accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
    (915,887 )     (856,618 )           (1,772,505 )
 
                       
Total property and equipment, net
    1,483,714       1,446,163             2,929,877  
Investment in Subsidiaries
    704,971             (704,971 )      
Intercompany Receivables
    123,142       113,064       (236,206 )      
Intercompany Note Receivable
    176,200             (176,200 )      
Insurance Receivables
    3,924       18,208             22,132  
Other Assets, net of amortization
    64,726       1,105             65,831  
 
                       
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 2,859,962     $ 1,650,208     $ (1,117,377 )   $ 3,392,793  
 
                       
Current Liabilities:
                               
Accounts payable
  $ 3,837     $     $     $ 3,837  
Accrued liabilities
    72,743       35,072             107,815  
Accrued capital costs
    144,710       51,123             195,833  
Deferred income tax
    23,148                   23,148  
Abandonment liability
    1,554       80,810             82,364  
Accrued interest
    12,567                   12,567  
 
                       
Total current liabilities
    258,559       167,005             425,564  
Long-Term Liabilities:
                               
Abandonment liability
    56,920       268,960             325,880  
Deferred income tax
    110,431       209,335             319,766  
Intercompany payables
    113,064       123,142       (236,206 )      
Long-term debt
    1,170,000                   1,170,000  
Other long-term liabilities
    30,668       595             31,263  
Intercompany note payable
          176,200       (176,200 )      
 
                       
Total long-term liabilities
    1,481,083       778,232       (412,406 )     1,846,909  
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 9)
                               
Stockholders’ Equity:
                               
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008
                       
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 88,846,073 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008
    9       5       (5 )     9  
Additional paid-in-capital
    1,071,347       886,143       (886,143 )     1,071,347  
Partner capital
          30,646       (30,646 )      
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    78,181                   78,181  
Accumulated deficit
    (29,217 )     (211,823 )     211,823       (29,217 )
 
                       
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,120,320       704,971       (704,971 )     1,120,320  
 
                       
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 2,859,962     $ 1,650,208     $ (1,117,377 )   $ 3,392,793  
 
                       

25


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Revenues:
                               
Natural gas
  $ 98,896     $ 31,150     $     $ 130,046  
Oil
    53,265       27,643             80,908  
Natural gas liquids
    13,226       2,510             15,736  
Other revenues
    597       59             656  
 
                       
Total revenues
    165,984       61,362             227,346  
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Operating expenses
    39,616       34,583             74,199  
General and administrative expense
    17,774       1,148             18,922  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    64,656       41,562             106,218  
Other miscellaneous expense
    445       748             1,193  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    122,491       78,041             200,532  
 
                       
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
    43,493       (16,679 )           26,814  
(Loss) Earnings of Affiliates
    (11,357 )           11,357        
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    133             (77 )     56  
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (19,632 )     (147 )     77       (19,702 )
 
                       
Income (Loss) Before Taxes
    12,637       (16,826 )     11,357       7,168  
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes
    (8,415 )     5,469             (2,946 )
 
                       
NET INCOME (LOSS)
  $ 4,222     $ (11,357 )   $ 11,357     $ 4,222  
 
                       

26


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Revenues:
                               
Natural gas
  $ 92,898     $ 99,906     $     $ 192,804  
Oil
    48,814       49,173             97,987  
Natural gas liquids
    13,055       11,486             24,541  
Other revenues
    1,198       1,360             2,558  
 
                       
Total revenues
    155,965       161,925             317,890  
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Operating expenses
    36,790       37,355             74,145  
General and administrative expense
    11,324       230             11,554  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    60,365       54,033             114,398  
Other miscellaneous expense
    101       24             125  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    108,580       91,642             200,222  
 
                       
OPERATING INCOME
    47,385       70,283             117,668  
Earnings of Affiliates
    52,556             (52,556 )      
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    2,522       62       (2,215 )     369  
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (17,637 )     (2,085 )     2,215       (17,507 )
 
                       
Income Before Taxes
    84,826       68,260       (52,556 )     100,530  
Provision for Income Taxes
    (20,135 )     (15,704 )           (35,839 )
 
                       
NET INCOME
    64,691       52,556       (52,556 )     64,691  
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
                       
 
                       
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO MARINER ENERGY, INC.
  $ 64,691     $ 52,556     $ (52,556 )   $ 64,691  
 
                       

27


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Revenues:
                               
Natural gas
  $ 307,051     $ 118,696     $     $ 425,747  
Oil
    159,210       61,577             220,787  
Natural gas liquids
    23,416       6,982             30,398  
Other revenues
    7,913       17,807             25,720  
 
                       
Total revenues
    497,590       205,062             702,652  
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Operating expenses
    103,091       88,020             191,111  
General and administrative expense
    56,247       1,208             57,455  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    171,449       129,856             301,305  
Full-cost ceiling test impairment
    342,595       362,136             704,731  
Other miscellaneous expense
    9,482       2,478             11,960  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    682,864       583,698             1,266,562  
 
                       
OPERATING LOSS
    (185,274 )     (378,636 )           (563,910 )
Loss of Affiliates
    (265,224 )           265,224        
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    3,849             (3,406 )     443  
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (50,880 )     (3,602 )     3,406       (51,076 )
 
                       
Loss Before Taxes
    (497,529 )     (382,238 )     265,224       (614,543 )
Benefit for Income Taxes
    94,846       117,014             211,860  
 
                       
NET LOSS
  $ (402,683 )   $ (265,224 )   $ 265,224     $ (402,683 )
 
                       

28


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Revenues:
                               
Natural gas
  $ 289,336     $ 333,369     $     $ 622,705  
Oil
    186,960       169,197             356,157  
Natural gas liquids
    50,339       28,240             78,579  
Other revenues
    1,573       4,225             5,798  
 
                       
Total revenues
    528,208       535,031             1,063,239  
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Operating expenses
    90,549       102,766             193,315  
General and administrative expense
    36,230       50             36,280  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    196,945       178,225             375,170  
Other miscellaneous expense
    888       77             965  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    324,612       281,118             605,730  
 
                       
OPERATING INCOME
    203,596       253,913             457,509  
Earnings of Affiliates
    186,430             (186,430 )      
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    8,056       84       (7,164 )     976  
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (53,444 )     (7,361 )     7,164       (53,641 )
 
                       
Income Before Taxes
    344,638       246,636       (186,430 )     404,844  
Provision for Income Taxes
    (84,431 )     (60,018 )           (144,449 )
 
                       
NET INCOME
    260,207       186,618       (186,430 )     260,395  
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
          188             188  
 
                       
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO MARINER ENERGY, INC.
  $ 260,207     $ 186,430     $ (186,430 )   $ 260,207  
 
                       

29


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 390,197     $ 147,912     $     $ 538,109  
 
                       
Cash flow from investing activities:
                               
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties
    (299,947 )     (169,033 )           (468,980 )
Additions to other property and equipment
    13,453       (15,594 )           (2,141 )
Repayments of notes from affiliates
    169,025             (169,025 )      
 
                       
Net cash used in investing activities
    (117,469 )     (184,627 )     (169,025 )     (471,121 )
 
                       
Cash flow from financing activities:
                               
Credit facility borrowings
    350,221                   350,221  
Credit facility repayments
    (855,221 )                 (855,221 )
Repayments of notes to affiliates
          (169,025 )     169,025        
Other financing activities
    235,478       205,342             440,820  
 
                       
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (269,522 )     36,317       169,025       (64,180 )
 
                       
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    3,206       (398 )           2,808  
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
    2,810       399             3,209  
 
                       
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
  $ 6,016     $ 1     $     $ 6,017  
 
                       

30


Table of Contents

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
                                 
                            Consolidated  
    Parent     Subsidiary             Mariner  
    Company     Guarantors     Eliminations     Energy, Inc.  
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
  $ 611,124     $ 437,114     $ (186,430 )   $ 861,808  
 
                       
Cash flow from investing activities:
                               
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties
    (520,363 )     (431,742 )           (952,105 )
Additions to other property and equipment
    (15,029 )     (34,618 )           (49,647 )
Restricted cash designated for investment
          5,000             5,000  
 
                       
Net cash used in investing activities
    (535,392 )     (461,360 )           (996,752 )
 
                       
Cash flow from financing activities:
                               
Credit facility borrowings
    938,000                   938,000  
Credit facility repayments
    (807,000 )                 (807,000 )
Other financing activities
    (28,144 )     24,646             (3,498 )
Net activity in investment from subsidiaries
    (186,430 )           186,430        
 
                       
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (83,574 )     24,646       186,430       127,502  
 
                       
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    (7,842 )     400             (7,442 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
    18,589                   18,589  
 
                       
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
  $ 10,747     $ 400     $     $ 11,147  
 
                       
15. Subsequent Events
     The Company’s evaluation has identified no matters which require disclosure as a subsequent event through November 5, 2009.

31


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our business and the results of operations together with our present financial condition. This section should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included in this Quarterly Report, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as amended. For meanings of natural gas and oil terms used in the Quarterly Report, please refer to “Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas Terms” under “Business” in Part I, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as amended.
Forward-Looking Statements
     Statements in our discussion may be forward-looking. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. We caution that a number of factors could cause future production, revenues and expenses to differ materially from our expectations. Please see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report regarding certain risk factors relating to us.
Overview
     We are an independent oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with principal operations in the Permian Basin and the Gulf of Mexico. As of December 31, 2008, approximately 70% of our total estimated proved reserves were classified as proved developed, with approximately 45% of the total estimated proved reserves located in the Permian Basin, 20% in the Gulf of Mexico deepwater and 35% on the Gulf of Mexico shelf.
     Our revenues, profitability and future growth depend substantially on prevailing prices for oil and natural gas and our ability to find, develop and acquire oil and gas reserves that are economically recoverable while controlling and reducing costs. The energy markets historically have been very volatile. Oil and natural gas prices increased to, and then declined significantly from, historical highs in mid-2008 and may fluctuate and decline significantly in the future. Although we attempt to mitigate the impact of price declines and provide for more predictable cash flows through our hedging strategy, a substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices or poor drilling results could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, quantities of natural gas and oil reserves that we can economically produce and our access to capital. Conversely, the use of derivative instruments also can prevent us from realizing the full benefit of upward price movements.
     The recent worldwide financial and credit crisis has reduced the availability of liquidity and credit to fund the continuation and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The shortage of liquidity and credit combined with recent substantial losses in worldwide equity markets could lead to an extended worldwide economic recession. A sustained recession or slowdown in economic activity could further reduce worldwide demand for energy and result in lower oil and natural gas prices, which could materially adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.
     Unconventional Resources and Canadian Opportunities. Since June 30, 2009, Mariner has added a team of approximately 10 geoscientists experienced in shale and other unconventional resource plays in the United States and Canada. It also formed a Canadian subsidiary which opened an office in Calgary. Mariner is investigating a variety of onshore hydrocarbon and unconventional resource opportunities in the United States and Canada, such as green field leasing, joint ventures and acquisitions. Mariner’s credit facility currently limits its investment in its Canadian operation to $25.0 million.
     Securities Offering. On June 10, 2009, we sold and issued in concurrent underwritten offerings $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 113/4% senior notes due 2016, and 11.5 million shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $14.50 per share. We used aggregate proceeds from the concurrent offerings, before deducting estimated offering expenses but after deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions, of approximately $446.2 million to repay debt under our bank credit facility.

32


Table of Contents

     Acquisitions. On December 19, 2008, we acquired additional working interests in our existing property, Atwater Valley Block 426 (Bass Lite), for approximately $30.6 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments, increasing our working interest by 11.6% to 53.8%.
     On February 29, 2008 and December 1, 2008 we acquired additional working interests in certain of our existing properties in the Spraberry field in the Permian Basin. We operate substantially all of the assets. The purchase prices were $23.5 million for the February 2008 acquisition and $19.4 million for the December 2008 acquisition.
     On January 31, 2008, we acquired 100% of the equity in a subsidiary of Hydro Gulf of Mexico, Inc. pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement executed on December 23, 2007. The acquired subsidiary, now known as Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC (“MGOM”), was an indirect subsidiary of StatoilHydro ASA and owns substantially all of its former Gulf of Mexico shelf operations. We paid $228.8 million for MGOM.
Third Quarter 2009 Highlights
     In third quarter 2009 we reported a net income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. of $4.2 million, which on a diluted earnings per share (EPS) basis was $0.04. During third quarter 2008, we reported net income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. of $64.7 million and $0.73 diluted EPS. Other financial and operational items include:
    Average daily production during third quarter 2009 increased to 362 MMcfe per day, compared to 294 MMcfe per day during third quarter 2008.
 
    Net cash provided by operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 decreased 38% to $538.1 million, from $861.8 million for the same period in 2008.
 
    Total revenues during third quarter 2009 were $227.3 million, a decrease of 28% from $317.9 million during third quarter 2008.
Operational Update
     Offshore — We drilled five offshore wells during third quarter 2009, two of which were successful. Information regarding these wells is shown below:
                         
        Approximate        
Well Name   Operator   Working Interest   Water Depth (Ft)   Location
Vermilion 380 A3 ST #1
  Mariner     100 %     340     Conventional Shelf
South Timbalier 316 A6 ST #1
  W&T Offshore     33 %     453     Conventional Shelf
     As of September 30, 2009 two offshore wells were drilling.
     Onshore — During third quarter 2009, we drilled two development wells and five exploratory wells in the Permian Basin, all of which were successful. As of September 30, 2009, four rigs were operating on our Permian Basin properties.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
     The following table sets forth summary information with respect to our oil and gas operations. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation:

33


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    September 30,     Increase     %  
Summary Operating Information:   2009     2008     (Decrease)     Change  
    (In thousands, except net production, average sales prices  
    and % change)  
Net Production:
                               
Natural gas (MMcf)
    24,121       18,357       5,764       31 %
Oil (MBbls)
    1,106       1,054       52       5 %
Natural gas liquids (MBbls)
    427       402       25       6 %
Total natural gas equivalent (MMcfe)
    33,316       27,091       6,225       23 %
Average daily production (MMcfe/d)
    362       294       68       23 %
Hedging Activities:
                               
Natural gas revenue gain
  $ 47,875     $ (12,275 )   $ 60,150       490 %
Oil revenue gain (loss)
    7,819       (29,866 )     37,685       126 %
 
                       
Total hedging revenue gain (loss)
  $ 55,694     $ (42,141 )   $ 97,835       232 %
 
                       
Average Sales Prices:
                               
Natural gas (per Mcf) realized(1)
  $ 5.39     $ 10.50     $ (5.11 )     (49 )%
Natural gas (per Mcf) unhedged
    3.41       11.17       (7.76 )     (69 )%
Oil (per Bbl) realized(1)
    73.15       92.97       (19.82 )     (21 )%
Oil (per Bbl) unhedged
    66.08       121.30       (55.22 )     (46 )%
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) realized(1)
    36.85       61.05       (24.20 )     (40 )%
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) unhedged
    36.85       61.05       (24.20 )     (40 )%
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) realized(1)
    6.80       11.64       (4.84 )     (42 )%
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) unhedged
    5.13       13.20       (8.07 )     (61 )%
Summary of Financial Information:
                               
Natural gas revenue
  $ 130,046     $ 192,804     $ (62,758 )     (33 )%
Oil revenue
    80,908       97,987       (17,079 )     (17 )%
Natural gas liquids revenue
    15,736       24,541       (8,805 )     (36 )%
Other revenues
    656       2,558       (1,902 )     (74 )%
Lease operating expense
    65,325       65,267       58       <1 %
Severance and ad valorem taxes
    4,406       4,813       (407 )     (8 )%
Transportation expense
    4,468       4,065       403       10 %
General and administrative expense
    18,922       11,554       7,368       64 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    106,218       114,398       (8,180 )     (7 )%
Other miscellaneous expense
    1,193       125       1,068       854 %
Net interest expense
    19,646       17,138       2,508       15 %
 
                       
Income before taxes
    7,168       100,530       (93,362 )     (93 )%
Provision for income taxes
    2,946       35,839       (32,893 )     (92 )%
 
                       
Net (Loss) Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.
  $ 4,222     $ 64,691     $ (60,469 )     (93 )%
 
                       
Average Unit Costs per Mcfe:
                               
Lease operating expense
  $ 1.96     $ 2.41     $ (0.45 )     (19 )%
Severance and ad valorem taxes
    0.13       0.18       (0.05 )     (28 )%
Transportation expense
    0.13       0.15       (0.02 )     (13 )%
General and administrative expense
    0.57       0.43       0.14       33 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    3.19       4.22       (1.03 )     (24 )%
 
(1)   Average sales prices include the effects of hedging
     Net (Loss) Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. for third quarter 2009 was $4.2 million compared to $64.7 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in revenue of $90.5 million due to lower realized prices, partially offset by higher production. Partially offsetting the decrease in revenue were decreases in income tax expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization of $32.9 million and $8.2 million, respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share for third quarter 2009 were $0.04 for each measure compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.74 and $0.73, respectively, for third quarter 2008.
     Net Production for third quarter 2009 was approximately 33.3 Bcfe, up 23% from 27.1 Bcfe from third quarter 2008. Natural gas production for third quarter 2009 comprised approximately 72% of total net production compared to approximately 68% for third quarter 2008.
     Natural gas production for third quarter 2009 increased 31% to approximately 262 MMcf per day, compared to approximately 200 MMcf per day for third quarter 2008. Oil production for third quarter 2009 increased 5% to

34


Table of Contents

approximately 12,018 barrels per day, compared to approximately 11,452 barrels per day for third quarter 2008. Natural gas liquids production for third quarter 2009 increased 6% to 4,641 barrels per day as compared to 4,369 barrels per day for third quarter 2008.
     Period over period changes in our production were primarily attributable to the following:
    Decreased production of 1.2 Bcfe, or 8%, from our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties as a result of normal depletion declines, gas balancing adjustments and production interruptions due to repairs on certain fields totaling 5.7 Bcfe, partially offset by increased production of 4.5 Bcfe at certain of our properties including High Island 116 (1.0 Bcfe).
 
    Increased production of 6.3 Bcfe, or 71%, from our Gulf of Mexico deepwater properties primarily due to the favorable impact of a full quarter of production at full capacity from, and our recently acquired incremental 11.6% working interest in Bass Lite (2.2 Bcfe) located in Atwater 426 and from our May 2009 start up of production from Geauxpher (5.7 Bcfe) located in Garden Banks 462. The increase was partially offset by normal depletion declines at Northwest Nansen (1.7 Bcfe) located in East Breaks 602.
 
    Increased production of 1.1 Bcfe, or 30%, from our onshore properties primarily as a result of our recently acquired additional working interests in certain of our existing properties in the Spraberry field in the Permian Basin.
     Natural gas, oil and NGL revenues for third quarter 2009 decreased 28% to $226.7 million compared to $315.3 million for third quarter 2008 as a result of decreased pricing (approximately $161.1 million, net of the effect of hedging) which was partially offset by increased production (approximately $72.5 million).
     During third quarter 2009, our revenues reflected a net recognized hedging gain of $55.7 million comprised of $52.6 million in favorable cash settlements on our hedges, a $3.9 million reclassification on our liquidated swaps and an unrealized loss of $0.8 million related to the ineffective portion of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral under accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP due primarily to the basis differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale. This compares to a net recognized hedging loss of $42.1 million for third quarter 2008, comprised of $46.9 million in unfavorable cash settlements and an unrealized gain of $4.8 million related to the ineffective portion not eligible for deferral under GAAP.
     Our natural gas and oil average sales prices, and the effects of hedging activities on those prices, were as follows:
                                 
                    Hedging    
    Realized   Unhedged   Gain (Loss)   % Change
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009:
                               
Natural gas (per Mcf)
  $ 5.39     $ 3.41     $ 1.98       58 %
Oil (per Bbl)
    73.15       66.08       7.07       11 %
 
                               
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008:
                               
Natural gas (per Mcf)
  $ 10.50     $ 11.17     $ (0.67 )     (6 )%
Oil (per Bbl)
    92.97       121.30       (28.33 )     (23 )%
     Other revenues for third quarter 2009 decreased $1.9 million to $0.7 million from $2.6 million for third quarter 2008 primarily as a result of imputed rent income of $1.2 million in 2008 from the lease of office property acquired in January 2008 coupled with a decrease in income from gathering systems of $0.6 million and a decrease of $0.5 million related to a cash arbitration award. These decreases were offset by an increase of $0.6 million related to third-party gas sales on commodities purchased to satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments (discussed in other miscellaneous expense).
     Lease operating expense (“LOE”) for third quarter 2009 increased approximately $0.1 million to $65.3 million, primarily attributable to increases of $7.8 million for repairs related to Hurricane Ike and $4.9 million in increased processing fees primarily related to Atwater 426 (Bass Lite) and Garden Banks 462 (Geauxpher) not included in third quarter 2008 due to production at those fields commencing subsequent

35


Table of Contents

to that period. These increases were offset by a $7.3 million OIL withdrawal premium contingency recognized in third quarter 2008 while no such recognition was necessary for third quarter 2009 coupled with lower service costs.
     Severance and ad valorem tax for third quarter 2009 decreased approximately $0.4 million to $4.4 million from $4.8 million for third quarter 2008 due to lower production taxes of $1.2 million, partially offset by increased ad valorem taxes of $0.8 million.
     Transportation expense for third quarter 2009 increased approximately $0.4 million to $4.5 million from $4.1 million for third quarter 2008 due primarily to our May 2009 start up of production from Geauxpher located in Garden Banks 462.
     General and administrative expense (“G&A”) for third quarter 2009 increased approximately $7.3 million to $18.9 million from $11.6 million for third quarter 2008 primarily due to increases of $3.1 million in salaries, wages and professional fees mainly due to increased headcount and non-recurring projects; $2.0 million in overhead related to field operations; $1.7 million in share-based compensation expense; and $0.8 million in litigation reserve.
     Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense (“DD&A”) for third quarter 2009 decreased approximately $8.2 million to $106.2 million ($3.19 per Mcfe) from $114.4 million ($4.22 per Mcfe) for third quarter 2008. This decrease primarily resulted from the effects of ceiling test impairments at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 of $525.6 million and $704.6 million, respectively, that substantially lowered the basis of our oil and gas properties. The change in the depletion rate resulted in a $35.6 million decrease in expense, partially offset by a $24.8 million increase due to higher production.
     Other miscellaneous expense for third quarter 2009 increased approximately $1.1 million to $1.2 million from $0.1 million for third quarter 2008 due primarily to third party gas purchases of $0.6 million made to satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments, the sales of which are included in other miscellaneous income.
     Net interest expense for third quarter 2009 increased approximately $2.5 million to $19.6 million from $17.1 million for third quarter 2008 due primarily to interest expense of $9.4 million on our 113/4% senior notes due 2016, partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest of $3.9 million and decreased interest expense on our credit facility of $3.2 million as a result of lower interest rates and reduced borrowings.
     Provision for income taxes for third quarter 2009 reflected an effective tax rate of 41.1% as compared to 35.7% for third quarter 2008. To the extent that the tax deduction we take on vested restricted stock awards is less than our cumulative stock compensation expense, we must expense the shortfall as we did for third quarter 2009.  This expensing and other provision adjustments increased third quarter 2009 tax expense by $0.4 million compared to third quarter 2008.  Without the impact of the shortfall, the effective tax rate for third quarter 2009 would have been 35.5%.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
     The following table sets forth summary information with respect to our oil and gas operations. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation:

36


Table of Contents

                                 
    Nine Months Ended              
    September 30,     Increase     %  
Summary Operating Information:   2009     2008     (Decrease)     Change  
    (In thousands, except net production, average sales prices and %  
    change)  
Net Production:
                               
Natural gas (MMcf)
    69,979       63,672       6,307       10 %
Oil (MBbls)
    3,255       3,905       (650 )     (17 )%
Natural gas liquids (MBbls)
    1,032       1,290       (258 )     (20 )%
Total natural gas equivalent (MMcfe)
    95,696       94,840       856       1 %
Average daily production (MMcfe/d)
    351       346       5       1 %
Hedging Activities:
                               
Natural gas revenue gain (loss)
  $ 149,685     $ (39,177 )   $ 188,862       482 %
Oil revenue gain (loss)
    40,210       (84,352 )     124,562       148 %
 
                       
Total hedging revenue gain (loss)
  $ 189,895     $ (123,529 )   $ 313,424       254 %
 
                       
Average Sales Prices:
                               
Natural gas (per Mcf) realized(1)
  $ 6.08     $ 9.78     $ (3.70 )     (38 )%
Natural gas (per Mcf) unhedged
    3.94       10.40       (6.46 )     (62 )%
Oil (per Bbl) realized(1)
    67.83       91.21       (23.38 )     (26 )%
Oil (per Bbl) unhedged
    55.48       112.81       (57.33 )     (51 )%
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) realized(1)
    29.46       60.91       (31.45 )     (52 )%
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) unhedged
    29.46       60.91       (31.45 )     (52 )%
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) realized(1)
    7.07       11.15       (4.08 )     (37 )%
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) unhedged
    5.09       12.45       (7.36 )     (59 )%
Summary of Financial Information:
                               
Natural gas revenue
  $ 425,747     $ 622,705     $ (196,958 )     (32 )%
Oil revenue
    220,787       356,157       (135,370 )     (38 )%
Natural gas liquids revenue
    30,398       78,579       (48,181 )     (61 )%
Other revenues
    25,720       5,798       19,922       344 %
Lease operating expense
    165,816       167,341       (1,525 )     (1 )%
Severance and ad valorem taxes
    11,668       14,686       (3,018 )     (21 )%
Transportation expense
    13,627       11,288       2,339       21 %
General and administrative expense
    57,455       36,280       21,175       58 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    301,305       375,170       (73,865 )     (20 )%
Full-cost ceiling test impairment
    704,731             704,731       N/A  
Other miscellaneous expense
    11,960       965       10,995       1139 %
Net interest expense
    50,633       52,665       (2,032 )     (4 )%
 
                       
(Loss) Income before taxes
    (614,543 )     404,844       (1,019,387 )     (252 )%
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes
    (211,860 )     144,449       (356,309 )     (247 )%
 
                       
Net (Loss) Income
    (402,683 )     260,395       (663,078 )     (255 )%
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
          (188 )     188       (100 )%
 
                       
Net (Loss) Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.
  $ (402,683 )   $ 260,207     $ (662,890 )     (255 )%
 
                       
Average Unit Costs per Mcfe:
                               
Lease operating expense
  $ 1.73     $ 1.76     $ (0.03 )     (2 )%
Severance and ad valorem taxes
    0.12       0.15       (0.03 )     (20 )%
Transportation expense
    0.14       0.12       0.02       17 %
General and administrative expense
    0.60       0.38       0.22       58 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    3.15       3.96       (0.81 )     (20 )%
 
(1)   Average sales prices include the effects of hedging
     Net (Loss) Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. for the first nine months of 2009 was $(402.7) million compared to $260.2 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was attributable to a $704.7 million impairment resulting from our full-cost ceiling test in first quarter 2009, a decrease in revenues of $360.1 million, and an increase in general and administrative expense of $21.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation, depletion and amortization of $73.9 million and a decrease in tax provision of $356.3 million. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the first nine months of 2009 were $(4.29) for each measure compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $2.98 and $2.95, respectively for the first nine months of 2008.

37


Table of Contents

     Net Production for the first nine months of 2009 was approximately 95.7 Bcfe, up 1% from 94.8 Bcfe from the first nine months of 2008. Natural gas production for the first nine months of 2009 comprised approximately 73% of total production compared to approximately 67% for the first nine months of 2008.
     Natural gas production for the first nine months of 2009 increased 10% to approximately 256 MMcf per day, compared to approximately 232 MMcf per day the first nine months of 2008. Oil production for the first nine months of 2009 decreased 17% to approximately 11,922 barrels per day, compared to approximately 14,252 barrels per day for the first nine months of 2008. Natural gas liquids production for the first nine months of 2009 decreased 20% to approximately 3,778 barrels per day, as compared to approximately 4,706 barrels per day for the first nine months of 2008.
     Period over period changes in our production were primarily attributable to the following:
    Decreased production of 9.7 Bcfe, or 18%, from our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties as a result of normal depletion declines and production interruptions due to repairs on certain fields totaling 18.6 Bcfe, partially offset by increased production of 8.9 Bcfe at certain of our properties including High Island 116 (2.8 Bcfe) and South Marsh Island 76 (2.0 Bcfe) and gas balancing adjustments.
 
    Increased production of 8.1 Bcfe, or 26%, from our Gulf of Mexico deepwater properties primarily due to Bass Lite located in Atwater Valley 426 (8.9 Bcfe) and Geauxpher located in Garden Banks 462 (8.3 Bcfe), partially offset by decreases from Pluto located in Mississippi Canyon 674 (3.6 Bcfe) and Northwest Nansen located in East Breaks 602 (3.6 Bcfe).
 
    Increased production of 2.5 Bcfe, or 23%, from our onshore properties primarily as a result of our drilling and development of existing acreage in the Permian Basin.
     Natural gas, oil and NGL revenues for the first nine months of 2009 decreased 36% to $676.9 million compared to $1,057.4 million for the first nine months of 2008 as a result of decreased pricing (approximately $390.0 million, net of the effect of hedging) which was partially offset by increased production (approximately $9.5 million).
     During the first nine months of 2009, our revenues reflected a net recognized hedging gain of $189.9 million comprised of $173.6 million in favorable cash settlements on our hedges, a $17.1 million reclassification on our liquidated swaps and an unrealized loss of $0.8 million related to the ineffective portion of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral under accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP, due primarily to the basis differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale. This compares to a net recognized hedging loss of $123.5 million for the first nine months of 2008, comprised of $121.9 million in unfavorable cash settlements and an unrealized loss of $1.6 million related to the ineffective portion not eligible for deferral under GAAP.
     Our natural gas and oil average sales prices, and the effects of hedging activities on those prices, were as follows:
                                 
                    Hedging    
    Realized   Unhedged   (Loss) Gain   % Change
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009:
                               
Natural gas (per Mcf)
  $ 6.08     $ 3.94     $ 2.14       54 %
Oil (per Bbl)
    67.83       55.48       12.35       22 %
 
                               
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008:
                               
Natural gas (per Mcf)
  $ 9.78     $ 10.40     $ (0.62 )     (6 )%
Oil (per Bbl)
    91.21       112.81       (21.60 )     (19 )%
     Other revenues for the first nine months of 2009 increased approximately $19.9 million to $25.7 million from $5.8 million for the first nine months of 2008 primarily as a result of a $16.6 million arbitration award related to a consummated acquisition and $7.0 million in third party gas sales on commodities purchased to satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments (discussed in other miscellaneous expense), partially offset by imputed rent income of $3.5 million in 2008 from the lease of office property acquired in January 2008.

38


Table of Contents

     Lease operating expense (“LOE”) for the first nine months of 2009 decreased approximately $1.5 million to $165.8 million from $167.3 million for the first nine months of 2008, primarily attributable to a $14.4 million OIL withdrawal premium contingency recognized in the first nine months of 2008 while no such contingency existed for recognition in the first nine months of 2009 coupled with lower service costs. These decreases were partially offset by increased costs of $12.5 million attributable to processing fees primarily related to Atwater 426 (Bass Lite) and Garden Banks 462 (Geauxpher) not included in first nine months of 2008 due to production on those fields commencing subsequent to that period, $9.1 million of repairs on certain properties including $3.3 million in pipeline repairs on Mississippi Canyon 674 (Pluto) and $12.2 million for repairs related to Hurricane Ike.
     Severance and ad valorem tax for the first nine months of 2009 decreased approximately $3.0 million to $11.7 million from $14.7 million for the first nine months of 2008 due to lower production taxes of $5.3 million, partially offset by increased ad valorem taxes of $2.3 million.
     Transportation expense for the first nine months of 2009 increased approximately $2.3 million to $13.6 million from $11.3 million for the first nine months of 2008 due primarily to increased expense at Bass Lite located in Atwater 426.
     General and administrative expense for the first nine months of 2009 increased approximately $21.2 million to $57.5 million from $36.3 million for the first nine months of 2008 primarily due to increases of $8.0 million in share-based compensation expense; $6.0 million in overhead related to field operations; $5.6 million in salaries, wages and professional fees mainly due to increased headcount and non-recurring projects; and $1.0 million in rent for our corporate headquarters expansion.
     Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense for the first nine months of 2009 decreased approximately $73.9 million to $301.3 million ($3.15 per Mcfe) from $375.2 million ($3.96 per Mcfe) for the first nine months of 2008. This decrease primarily resulted from the effects of ceiling test impairments at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 of $525.6 million and $704.6 million, respectively, that substantially lowered the basis of our oil and gas properties. The change in the depletion rate resulted in a $87.1 million decrease in expense, partially offset by a $3.2 million increase due to higher production for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the first nine months of 2008.
     Full-cost ceiling test impairment of $704.7 million was recognized for the first quarter of 2009 as a result of the net capitalized cost of our proved oil and gas properties exceeding our ceiling limit. See Note 5 “Oil and Gas Properties” in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more detail on this impairment.
     Other miscellaneous expense for the first nine months of 2009 increased approximately $11.0 million to $12.0 million from $1.0 million for the first nine months of 2008 due primarily to increased bad debt of approximately $2.9 million and third party gas purchases of $6.4 million made to satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments, the sales of which are included in other miscellaneous income.
     Net interest expense for the first nine months of 2009 decreased approximately $2.1 million to $50.6 million from $52.7 million for the first nine months of 2008 due primarily to increased capitalized interest of $8.2 million and decreased interest expense of $4.8 million on our credit facility as a result of lower interest rates and reduced borrowings in 2009 as compared to 2008, partially offset by interest expense of $11.5 million on our 113/4% senior notes due 2016.
     Provision for income taxes for the first nine months of 2009 reflected an effective tax rate of 34.5% as compared to 35.7% for the first nine months of 2008. To the extent that the tax deduction we take on vested restricted stock awards is less than our cumulative stock compensation expense, we must expense the shortfall as we did for the first nine months of 2009.  This expensing and other provision adjustments increased tax expense for the first nine months of 2009 by $7.6 million compared to the first nine months of 2008.  Due to our net loss for the first nine months of 2009, this increase in tax expense reduced our effective tax rate. Without the impact of the shortfall, the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2009 would have been 35.7%.

39


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
     Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $323.7 million to $538.1 million from $861.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease was due primarily to lower revenue resulting from a decrease in realized prices of $390.0 million partially offset by an increase in production of $9.5 million. The decrease was partially offset by $52.6 million received as a result of the liquidation of certain oil hedges and a $16.6 million arbitration award.
     As of September 30, 2009, we had a working capital deficit of $172.3 million, primarily due to non-cash current derivative liability, abandonment liability and deferred tax liability. In addition, working capital was negatively impacted by accrued capital expenditures. We expect to fund this deficit with cash flow from operating activities and borrowings under our bank credit facility, as needed.
     Net cash flows used in investing activities decreased by $525.7 million to $471.1 million from $996.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily due to decreased capital expenditures attributable to reduced activity in our drilling programs. Additionally, the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were impacted by the acquisition of MGOM, including approximately $15.0 million of mid-stream assets reflected in other property, and an investment of approximately $27.4 million in office property.
     Net cash flows used in financing activities increased by $191.7 million to $64.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to net cash flows provided by financing activities of $127.5 million for the comparable period in 2008. This increase was due primarily to $636.0 million net increased repayments under our bank credit facility, including the effect of borrowing $223.5 million in January 2008 to finance the purchase of MGOM. The increase was offset by $446.2 million of proceeds (before deducting estimated offering expenses but after deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions) from debt and securities offerings in June 2009.
     Capital Expenditures — The following table presents major components of our capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
                 
    In thousands     Percentage  
Capital Expenditures:
               
Offshore natural gas and oil development
  $ 232,074       51 %
Natural gas and oil exploration
    139,465       31 %
Onshore natural gas and oil development
    36,701       8 %
Other items (primarily capitalized overhead)
    27,138       6 %
Acquisitions (property and leasehold)
    15,925       4 %
 
           
Total capital expenditures
  $ 451,303       100 %
 
           
     The above table reflects decreased non-cash capital accruals of $67.1 million that are a component of working capital changes in the statement of cash flows.
     Bank Credit Facility — We have a secured revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks that matures January 31, 2012. The credit facility is subject to a borrowing base which is redetermined periodically. The outstanding principal balance of loans under the credit facility may not exceed the borrowing base. The most recent borrowing base redetermination concluded in September 2009 when the lenders notified us that they affirmed the existing $800.0 million borrowing base, its amount since June 2009, and that the next borrowing base redetermination is scheduled for February 2010.
     On June 10, 2009, we used aggregate proceeds from concurrent offerings of our 113/4% senior notes due 2016 and common stock, before deducting estimated offering expenses but after deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions, of approximately $446.2 million to repay debt under our bank credit facility. These offerings are discussed further below.
     As of September 30, 2009, maximum credit availability under the facility was $1.0 billion, including up to $50.0 million in letters of credit, subject to a borrowing base of $800.0 million.

40


Table of Contents

     As of September 30, 2009, there were $65.0 million in advances outstanding under the credit facility and four letters of credit outstanding totaling $4.7 million, of which $4.2 million is required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of our offshore fields. As of September 30, 2009, after accounting for the $4.7 million of letters of credit, we had $730.3 million available to borrow under the credit facility.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the commitment fee on unused capacity was 0.250% to 0.375% per annum through March 23, 2009 and 0.5% per annum thereafter. Borrowings under the bank credit facility bear interest at either a LIBOR-based rate or a prime-based rate, at our option, plus a specified margin. At September 30, 2009, when borrowings at both LIBOR and prime-based rates were outstanding, the blended interest rate was 3.03% on all amounts borrowed.
     Payment and performance of our obligations under the credit facility (including any obligations under commodity and interest rate hedges entered into with facility lenders) are secured by liens upon substantially all of our assets, except those of our Canadian subsidiary, and guaranteed by our subsidiaries, other than MERI, which is a co-borrower, and our Canadian subsidiary. We also are subject to various restrictive covenants and other usual and customary terms and conditions, including limits on additional debt, cash dividends and other restricted payments, liens, investments, asset dispositions, mergers and speculative hedging. Financial covenants under the credit facility require us to, among other things:
    maintain a ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and
 
    maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of not more than 2.5 to 1.0.
     We were in compliance with the financial covenants under the bank credit facility as of September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities was 3.22 to 1.0 and the ratio of total debt to EBITDA was 1.57 to 1.0. Our breach of these covenants would be an event of default, after which the lenders could terminate their lending obligations and accelerate maturity of any outstanding indebtedness under the credit facility which then would become due and payable in full. An unrescinded acceleration of maturity under the bank credit facility would constitute an event of default under our senior notes described below, which could trigger acceleration of maturity of the indebtedness evidenced by the senior notes.
     Senior Notes — On June 10, 2009, we sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 113/4% senior notes due 2016 (the “113/4% Notes”). In 2007, we sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 8% senior notes due 2017 (the “8% Notes”). In 2006, we sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 71/2% senior notes due 2013 (the “71/2% Notes” and together with the 113/4% Notes and the 8% Notes, the “Notes”). The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. The 113/4% Notes mature on June 30, 2016 with interest payable on June 30 and December 30 of each year beginning December 30, 2009. The 8% Notes mature on May 15, 2017 with interest payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The 71/2% Notes mature on April 15, 2013 with interest payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year. There is no sinking fund for the Notes. We and our restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants under each of the indentures governing the Notes. We were in compliance with the financial covenants under the Notes as of September 30, 2009.
     113/4% Notes — The 113/4% Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (the “Base Indenture”), as amended and supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of June 10, 2009, among the same parties (the “Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “Indenture”). Pursuant to the Base Indenture, we may issue multiple series of debt securities from time to time.
     The 113/4% Notes were sold at 97.093% of principal amount, for an initial yield to maturity of 12.375%, in an underwritten offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). Net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriters’ discounts and estimated offering expenses but before giving effect to the underwriters’ reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering expenses, were approximately $284.8 million. We used net offering proceeds (before deducting estimated offering expenses) to repay debt under our bank credit facility.

41


Table of Contents

     The 113/4% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, rank senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with our existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including the 71/2% Notes and the 8% Notes, and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to our senior secured indebtedness, including our obligations under our bank credit facility, to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of any non-guarantor subsidiaries.
     The 113/4% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our existing and future domestic subsidiaries. In the future, the guarantees may be released or terminated under certain circumstances. Each subsidiary guarantee ranks senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, ranks equally in right of payment to all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary and effectively subordinate to all existing and future secured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, including its guarantees of indebtedness under our bank credit facility, to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
     We may redeem the 113/4% Notes at any time before June 30, 2013 at a price equal to the principal amount redeemed plus a make-whole premium, using a discount rate of the Treasury rate plus 0.50% and accrued but unpaid interest. Beginning on June 30 of the years indicated below, we may redeem the 113/4% Notes from time to time, in whole or in part, at the prices set forth below (expressed as percentages of the principal amount redeemed) plus accrued but unpaid interest:
     2013 at 105.875%
     2014 at 102.938%
     2015 and thereafter at 100.000%
     In addition, before June 30, 2012, we may redeem up to 35% of the 113/4% Notes with the proceeds of equity offerings at a price equal to 111.750% of the principal amount of the 113/4% Notes redeemed plus accrued but unpaid interest.
     If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the Indenture) occurs, subject to certain exceptions, we must give holders of the 113/4% Notes the opportunity to sell to us their 113/4% Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages to the date of purchase.
     We and our restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain negative covenants under the Indenture governing the 113/4% Notes which are consistent with the negative covenants under each of the indentures governing the 71/2% Notes and 8% Notes. The Indenture limits the ability of us and each of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things:
    make investments;
 
    incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock;
 
    create certain liens;
 
    sell assets;
 
    enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments from our subsidiaries to us;
 
    consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets;
 
    engage in transactions with affiliates;
 
    pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; and
 
    create unrestricted subsidiaries.

42


Table of Contents

     Common Stock Offering — On June 10, 2009, we sold and issued 11.5 million shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $14.50 per share in an underwritten offering registered under the 1933 Act. The total sold includes 1.5 million shares issued upon full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. Net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriters’ discounts and estimated offering expenses but before giving effect to the underwriters’ reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering expenses, were approximately $159.2 million. We used net offering proceeds (before deducting estimated offering expenses of approximately $0.5 million) to repay debt under our bank credit facility.
Future Uses of Capital. Our identified needs for liquidity in the future are as follows:
    funding future capital expenditures;
 
    funding hurricane repairs and hurricane-related abandonment operations;
 
    financing any future acquisitions that we may identify;
 
    paying routine operating and administrative expenses; and
 
    paying other commitments comprised largely of cash settlement of hedging obligations and debt service.
     2009 Capital Expenditures. In the second half of 2008 and first nine months of 2009, a world-wide economic recession and oversupply of natural gas in North America led to an unprecedented decline in oil and gas prices. However, the inflated cost of oil field services resulting from sustained historically high commodity prices did not decrease in line with the decline in commodity prices. The prospect of continued low commodity prices and persistent high service costs has constrained the industry’s capital reinvestment and undermined rates of return in new projects, particularly those in areas characterized by high costs or long reserve lives. In order to manage our capital program within expected cash flows, we initially reduced our 2009 capital budget by more than 50% from 2008 and scaled back our infill drilling and development activities in the Permian Basin. Refer to “Item 1. Business—Impact of Worldwide Financial Crisis and Lower Commodity Prices on Capital Program” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended, for an outline of our planned 2009 activities in the Permian Basin and Gulf of Mexico. Service costs have started to decline and reached a level that together with existing crude oil prices we anticipate will allow us to achieve more acceptable rates of return, particularly in areas such as the Permian Basin where we now anticipate modestly more 2009 drilling activity than we had budgeted earlier this year.
     We have increased our anticipated base operating capital expenditures for 2009 to approximately $580.0 million (excluding hurricane-related expenditures and acquisitions). Approximately 58% of the base operating capital program is planned to be allocated to development activities, 36% to exploration activities, and the remainder to other items (primarily capitalized overhead and interest). In addition, we expect to incur additional hurricane-related costs of $50.0 million during 2009 related to Hurricane Ike that we believe are covered under applicable insurance. Complete recovery or settlement is expected to occur during the next 12 months.
     Future Capital Resources. Our anticipated sources of liquidity in the future are as follows:
    cash flow from operations in future periods;
 
    proceeds under our bank credit facility;
 
    proceeds from insurance policies relating to hurricane repairs; and
 
    proceeds from future capital markets transactions as needed.

43


Table of Contents

     As discussed above, we reduced our 2009 operating capital program (exclusive of hurricane-related expenditures and acquisitions) to remain within our projected operating cash flow so that our operating capital requirements are largely self-sustaining. We anticipate using proceeds under our bank credit facility only for working capital needs or acquisitions and not generally to fund our operations. We would generally expect to fund future acquisitions on a case by case basis through a combination of bank debt and capital markets activities. Based on our current operating plan and assumed price case, our expected cash flow from operations and continued access to our bank credit facility allows us ample liquidity to conduct our operations as planned for the foreseeable future.
     The timing of expenditures (especially regarding deepwater projects) is unpredictable. Also, our cash flows are heavily dependent on the oil and natural gas commodity markets, and our ability to hedge oil and natural gas prices. If either oil or natural gas commodity prices decrease from their current levels, our ability to finance our planned capital expenditures could be affected negatively. Amounts available for borrowing under our bank credit facility are largely dependent on our level of estimated proved reserves and current oil and natural gas prices. If either our estimated proved reserves or commodity prices decrease, amounts available to us to borrow under our bank credit facility could be reduced. If our cash flows are less than anticipated or amounts available for borrowing are reduced, we may be forced to defer planned capital expenditures.
     In addition, the recent worldwide financial and credit crisis may adversely affect our liquidity. We may be unable to obtain adequate funding under our bank credit facility because our lending counterparties may be unwilling or unable to meet their funding obligations, or because our borrowing base under the facility may be decreased as the result of a redetermination, reducing it due to lower oil or natural gas prices, operating difficulties, declines in reserves or other reasons. If funding is not available as needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our obligations as they come due or we may be unable to implement our business strategies or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     Letters of Credit — Our bank credit facility has a letter of credit subfacility of up to $50.0 million that is included as a use of the borrowing base. As of September 30, 2009, four such letters of credit totaling $4.7 million were outstanding.
Fair Value Measurement
     We determine the fair value of our natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps by reference to forward pricing curves for natural gas and oil futures contracts. The difference between the forward price curve and the contractual fixed price is discounted to the measurement date using a credit-risk adjusted discount rate. The credit risk adjustment for swap liabilities is based on our credit quality and the credit risk adjustment for swap assets is based on the credit quality of our counterparty. Our fair value determinations of our swaps have historically approximated our exit price for such derivatives.
     We have determined that the fair value methodology described above for our swaps is consistent with observable market inputs and have categorized our swaps as Level 2 in accordance with accounting for fair value measurements and disclosures under GAAP.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a net liability for the decrease in the fair value of our derivative financial instruments of $144.7 million, principally due to the decrease in natural gas and oil commodity prices below our swap prices. The decrease was comprised of a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $189.8 million, net of income taxes of $62.4 million, approximately $173.6 million of favorable cash hedging settlements and a $17.1 million gain on liquidated swaps during the period reflected in natural gas and oil revenues and an unrealized, non-cash loss due to hedging ineffectiveness under GAAP of $0.8 million reflected in natural gas revenues.
     The continued volatility of natural gas and oil commodity prices will have a material impact on the fair value of our derivatives positions. It is our intent to hold all of our derivatives positions to maturity such that realized gains or losses are generally recognized in income when the hedged natural gas or oil is produced and sold. While the

44


Table of Contents

derivatives settlements may decrease (or increase) our effective price realized, the ultimate settlement of our derivatives positions is not expected to materially adversely affect our liquidity, results of operations or cash flows.
Legal Proceedings
     MMS Proceedings — Mariner and its subsidiary, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. (“MERI”), own numerous properties in the Gulf of Mexico. Certain of such properties were leased from the Minerals Management Service of the United States Department of the Interior (“MMS”) subject to The Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”), signed into law on November 28, 1995. Section 304 of the RRA relieves lessees of the obligation to pay royalties on certain leases until after a designated volume has been produced. Four of these leases held by Mariner and two held by MERI that are producing or have produced contain lease language (inserted by the MMS) that conditions royalty relief on commodity prices remaining below specified thresholds. Since 2000, commodity prices have exceeded some of the predetermined thresholds, except in 2002. In May 2006, September 2008 and August 2009, the MMS issued orders asserting that the price thresholds had been exceeded in calendar years 2000, 2001, and each of the years from 2003 through 2008, and, accordingly, that royalties were due under such leases on oil and gas produced in those years. The potential liability of MERI under its leases relates to production from the leases commencing July 1, 2005, the effective date of our acquisition of MERI. Mariner and MERI believe that the MMS did not have the statutory authority to include commodity price threshold language in the leases governed by Section 304 of the RRA and accordingly have withheld payment of royalties. Mariner and MERI have challenged the MMS’s authority in pending administrative appeals for those leases for which the MMS has issued orders to pay.
     The enforceability of the price threshold provisions in leases granted pursuant to Section 304 of the RRA is being litigated in several administrative appeals filed by other companies in addition to us, as well as in Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. Allred, 554 F.3d 1082 (5th Cir. 2009). In the Kerr-McGee litigation, the district court in the Western District of Louisiana granted Kerr-McGee’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that the price threshold provisions are unlawful and unenforceable under Section 304 of the RRA. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. Allred, No. 2:06 CV 0439 (W.D. La.) (Mem. Ruling filed Oct. 30, 2007). The Department of the Interior (“DOI”) appealed that judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On January 12, 2009, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment that the price provisions are unlawful based on Section 304 of the RRA. On April 14, 2009, the Fifth Circuit denied the DOI’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc. On July 13, 2009, the DOI filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. On October 5, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit’s judgment that the price threshold provisions are unlawful and unenforceable under Section 304 of the RRA is final.
     Given the judicial history of the case, as of December 31, 2008, we ceased recording a liability for our estimated exposure to the MMS for royalties based solely on price threshold provisions in leases granted to us pursuant to Section 304 of the RRA (which, as of September 30, 2009, would have been approximately $73.8 million including interest) and began including in our estimated proved reserves those reserves attributable to these RRA Section 304 leases (approximately 18.1 Bcfe as of December 31, 2008). We intend to rely on the Kerr-McGee precedent as a defense in our pending administrative appeals and any other attempt by the MMS to collect royalties based solely on price threshold provisions in leases granted pursuant to Section 304 of the RRA.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance on the hierarchy of GAAP which establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009.  The Company began using the new guidelines prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in respect of the third quarter ending September 30, 2009.  As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

45


Table of Contents

     In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued and sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date.  The guidance is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2009.  The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
     In April 2009, the FASB amended existing authoritative guidance to provide guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with other authoritative guidance, enhance consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures and create greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions for the period ending March 31, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
     On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued the Final Rule, which adopts revisions to the SEC’s oil and gas reporting disclosure requirements and is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for years ending on or after December 31, 2009. Early adoption of the Final Rule is prohibited. The revisions are intended to provide investors with a more meaningful and comprehensive understanding of oil and gas reserves to help investors evaluate their investments in oil and gas companies. The amendments are also designed to modernize the oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them with current practices and changes in technology. Revised requirements in the SEC’s Final Rule include, but are not limited to:
    Oil and gas reserves must be reported using average prices over the prior 12 month period, rather than year-end prices;
 
    Companies will be allowed to report, on an optional basis, probable and possible reserves;
 
    Non-traditional reserves, such as oil and gas extracted from coal and shales, will be included in the definition of “oil and gas producing activities”;
 
    Companies will be permitted to use new technologies to determine proved reserves, as long as those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable conclusions with respect to reserve volumes;
 
    Companies will be required to disclose, in narrative form, additional details on their proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs), including the total quantity of PUDs at year end, any material changes to PUDs that occurred during the year, investments and progress made to convert PUDs to developed oil and gas reserves and an explanation of the reasons why material concentrations of PUDs in individual fields or countries have remained undeveloped for five years or more after disclosure as PUDs; and
 
    Companies will be required to report the qualifications and measures taken to assure the independence and objectivity of any business entity or employee primarily responsible for preparing or auditing the reserves estimates.
     We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the Final Rule. The SEC is discussing the Final Rule with the staff to align FASB authoritative guidance with the new SEC rules. These discussions may delay the required compliance date. Absent any change in the effective date, we will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
     In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The guidance also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between

46


Table of Contents

the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling (minority) owners. The guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and we adopted it beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. However, it did impact the presentation and disclosure of noncontrolling (minority) interests in our consolidated financial statements.
     In September 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which defines fair value, establishes criteria to be considered when measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for all recurring measures of financial assets and financial liabilities (e.g. derivatives and investment securities) for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We adopted the provisions for all recurring measures of financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance, which granted a one-year deferral of the effective date as it applies to non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (e.g. those measured at fair value in a business combination and asset retirement obligations). Beginning January 1, 2009, we applied the provisions to non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
     In March 2008, the FASB amended authoritative guidance, which requires enhanced disclosures about our derivative and hedging activities. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We adopted the disclosure requirements beginning January 1, 2009. See Note 8 “Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities” in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report for additional disclosures. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Commodity Prices and Related Hedging Activities
     Our major market risk exposure continues to be the prices applicable to our natural gas and oil production. The sales price of our production is primarily driven by the prevailing market price. Historically, prices received for our natural gas and oil production have been volatile and unpredictable.
     The energy markets historically have been very volatile, and we can reasonably expect that oil and gas prices will be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. In an effort to reduce the effects of the volatility of the price of oil and natural gas on our operations, management has adopted a policy of hedging oil and natural gas prices from time to time primarily through the use of commodity price swap agreements and costless collar arrangements. While the use of these hedging arrangements limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from favorable movements. In addition, forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used to assess and measure the ineffectiveness of our open contracts at the end of each period. If open contracts cease to qualify for hedge accounting, the mark-to-market change in fair value is recognized in oil and natural gas revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Not qualifying for hedge accounting and cash flow hedge designation will cause volatility in Net Income. The fair values we report in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements change as estimates are revised to reflect actual results, changes in market conditions or other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
     On January 29, 2009, we liquidated crude oil fixed price swaps that previously had been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes in respect of 977,000 barrels of crude oil in exchange for a cash payment to us of $10.0 million and installment payments of $13.5 million to be paid monthly to us through 2009. On April 16, 2009, we received a $10.5 million cash settlement on the hedges that were settled in monthly installments at January 29, 2009. Since the forecasted sales of crude oil volumes are still expected to occur, the accumulated gains through January 29, 2009 on the related derivative contracts remained in accumulated other comprehensive income, and will not be reclassified into earnings until the physical transactions occur. Any gain or loss realized on these derivative contracts in conjuction with installment payments received will be recognized in current period income.
     Derivative gains and losses are recorded by commodity type in oil and natural gas revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effects on our oil and gas revenues from our hedging activities were as follows:

47


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Cash Gain (Loss) on Settlements (1)
  $ 52,644     $ (46,968 )   $ 173,648     $ (121,882 )
Reclassification of liquidated swaps (2)
    3,859             17,059        
Gain (Loss) on Hedge Ineffectiveness (3)
    (809 )     4,827       (812 )     (1,647 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 55,694     $ (42,141 )   $ 189,895     $ (123,529 )
 
                       
 
(1)   Designated as cash flow hedges pursuant to accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP.
 
(2)   Natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps liquidated in first and third quarters of 2009 that do not qualify for hedge accounting. These amounts include net losses of $1.8 million and $1.5 million for the three-month and nine-months periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively
 
(3)   Unrealized loss recognized in natural gas revenue related to the ineffective portion of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral under GAAP due primarily to the basis differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale.
     As of September 30, 2009, we had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
                         
            Weighted Average     Fair Value  
Fixed Price Swaps   Quantity     Fixed Price     Asset (Liability) (1)  
                    (In thousands)  
Natural Gas (MMbtus)
                       
October 1—December 31, 2009
    783,380     $ 4.22     $  410  
January 1—December 31, 2010
    12,775,000     $ 5.84       (4,405 )
January 1—December 31, 2011
    13,650,000     $ 6.45       (5,080 )
January 1—December 31, 2012
    6,588,000     $ 6.62       (2,262 )
January 1—December 31, 2013
    5,840,000     $ 6.76       (1,384 )
Crude Oil (Bbls)
                       
October 1—December 31, 2009
    228,160     $ 76.33       1,183  
January 1—December 31, 2010
    1,934,500     $ 67.48       (12,589 )
January 1—December 31, 2011
    978,100     $ 73.24       (3,369 )
January 1—December 31, 2012
    494,100     $ 80.77       668  
January 1—December 31, 2013
    408,800     $ 82.81       595  
 
                     
Total
                  $ (26,233 )
 
                     
 
(1)   Table excludes $3.4 million included in Derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet relating to the liquidation of 783,380 MMBtu to be paid in monthly installments through December 31, 2009.
     We have reviewed the financial strength of our counterparties and believe the credit risk associated with these swaps to be minimal. Hedges with counterparties that are lenders under our bank credit facility are secured under the bank credit facility.
     As of September 30, 2009, we expect to realize within the next 12 months approximately $38.1 million in net gains resulting from liquidated fixed price swaps and $9.3 million in net losses resulting from hedging activities, of which $28.4 million is currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The net hedging gain is expected to be realized as a decrease of $4.2 million to oil revenues and an increase of $33.0 million to natural gas revenues.
     As of November 3, 2009, we have not entered into any hedge transactions subsequent to September 30, 2009:
     Interest Rate Market Risk — Borrowings under our bank credit facility, as discussed under the caption “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, mature on January 31, 2012, and bear interest at either a LIBOR-based rate or a prime-based rate, at our option, plus a specified margin. Both options expose us to risk of earnings loss due to changes in market rates. We have not entered into interest rate hedges that would mitigate such risk. As of September 30, 2009, the interest rate on our outstanding bank debt was 3.03%. If the balance of our bank debt at September 30, 2009 were to remain constant, a 10% change in market interest rates would impact our cash flow by approximately $49,000 per quarter.

48


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     Mariner, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including Mariner’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of its “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that Mariner’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2009 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Mariner in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
     Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
     There were no changes that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

49


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
     Please refer to Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as amended.
     Various statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”), including those that express a belief, expectation, or intention, as well as those that are not statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements may include projections and estimates concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, revenues, income and capital spending. Our forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “may,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “plan,” “goal” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report; we disclaim any obligation to update these statements unless required by law, and we caution you not to rely on them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and assumptions about future events. While our management considers these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. We disclose important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations described in Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of Part I and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. These risks, contingencies and uncertainties relate to, among other matters, the following:
    the volatility of oil and natural gas prices;
 
    discovery, estimation, development and replacement of oil and natural gas reserves;
 
    cash flow, liquidity and financial position;
 
    business strategy;
 
    amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future development costs;
 
    availability and terms of capital;
 
    timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas;
 
    availability of drilling and production equipment;
 
    operating costs and other expenses;
 
    prospect development and property acquisitions;
 
    risks arising out of our hedging transactions;
 
    marketing of oil and natural gas;
 
    competition in the oil and natural gas industry;
 
    the impact of weather and the occurrence of natural events and natural disasters such as loop currents, hurricanes, fires, floods and other natural events, catastrophic events and natural disasters;
 
    governmental regulation of the oil and natural gas industry;
 
    environmental liabilities;

50


Table of Contents

    developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries;
 
    uninsured or underinsured losses in our oil and natural gas operations;
 
    risks related to our level of indebtedness; and
 
    risks related to significant acquisitions or other strategic transactions, such as failure to realize expected benefits or objectives for future operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
                                 
                            Maximum Number (or
                    Total Number of   Approximate Dollar
                    Shares   Value) of
    Total           (or Units)   Shares (or Units)
    Number of   Average   Purchased as   that May Yet Be
    Shares (or   Price Paid   Part of Publicly   Purchased Under the
    Units)   per Share   Announced Plans or   Plans or
Period   Purchased   (or Unit)   Programs   Programs
July 1, 2009 to July 31, 2009 (1)
    9,626     $ 11.75              
August 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009 (1)
    2,250     $ 12.34              
September 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009 (1)
    16,375     $ 13.70              
 
                               
Total
    28,251     $ 12.93              
 
                               
 
(1)   These shares were withheld upon the vesting of employee restricted stock grants in connection with payment of required withholding taxes.

51


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits
         
Number   Description
       
 
  2.1*    
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 9, 2005 among Forest Oil Corporation, SML Wellhead Corporation, Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441) filed on September 19, 2006).
       
 
  2.2*    
Letter Agreement dated as of February 3, 2006 among Forest Oil Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. amending the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441) filed on September 19, 2006).
       
 
  2.3*    
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006).
       
 
  2.4*    
Letter Agreement, dated April 12, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006).
       
 
  2.5*    
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and between Hydro Gulf of Mexico, Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc., executed December 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008).
       
 
  3.1*    
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mariner Energy, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-132800) filed on March 29, 2006).
       
 
  3.2*    
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008).
       
 
  3.3*    
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005).
       
 
  4.1*    
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009).
       
 
  4.2*    
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009).
       
 
  4.3*    
Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2007).
       
 
  4.4*    
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006).
       
 
  4.5*    
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006).

52


Table of Contents

         
Number   Description
       
 
  4.6*    
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2008, between Mariner Energy, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008).
       
 
  4.7*    
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006).
       
 
  4.8*    
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006).
       
 
  4.9*    
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2006).
       
 
  4.10*    
Amendment No. 3 and Consent, dated as of April 23, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2007).
       
 
  4.11*    
Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 24, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2007).
       
 
  4.12*    
Amendment No. 5 and Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008).
       
 
  4.13*    
Master Assignment, Agreement and Amendment No. 6, dated as of June 2, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2008).
       
 
  4.14*    
Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 12, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2008).
       
 
  4.15*    
Amendment No. 8 and Consent, dated as of March 24, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2009).
       
 
  4.16*    
Amendment No. 9, dated as of June 2, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009).

53


Table of Contents

         
Number   Description
       
 
  4.17*    
Amendment No. 10, dated as of August 25, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2009).
       
 
  10.1*    
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009).
       
 
  10.2*    
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC, MC Beltway 8 LLC and Mariner LP LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009).
       
 
  10.3*    
Underwriting Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, among J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Representative of the several Underwriters listed in Schedule 1 thereto, Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, and Mariner Energy Texas LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2007).
       
 
  10.4*    
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy Texas LP and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006).
       
 
  10.5*    
Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of May 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2009).
       
 
  31.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  31.2    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
*   Incorporated by reference as indicated.
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.

54


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Mariner Energy, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on November 6, 2009.
         
  Mariner Energy, Inc.
 
 
  By:   /s/ Scott D. Josey    
    Scott D. Josey,   
    Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President 
 
 
     
  By:   /s/ Jesus G. Melendrez    
    Jesus G. Melendrez,   
    Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer,
Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 
 
 

55


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index
         
Number   Description
       
 
  2.1*    
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 9, 2005 among Forest Oil Corporation, SML Wellhead Corporation, Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441) filed on September 19, 2006).
       
 
  2.2*    
Letter Agreement dated as of February 3, 2006 among Forest Oil Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. amending the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441) filed on September 19, 2006).
       
 
  2.3*    
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006).
       
 
  2.4*    
Letter Agreement, dated April 12, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006).
       
 
  2.5*    
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and between Hydro Gulf of Mexico, Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc., executed December 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008).
       
 
  3.1*    
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mariner Energy, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-132800) filed on March 29, 2006).
       
 
  3.2*    
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008).
       
 
  3.3*    
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Mariner’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005).
       
 
  4.1*    
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009).
       
 
  4.2*    
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009).
       
 
  4.3*    
Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2007).
       
 
  4.4*    
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006).
       
 
  4.5*    
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006).

56


Table of Contents

         
Number   Description
       
 
  4.6*    
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2008, between Mariner Energy, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008).
       
 
  4.7*    
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006).
       
 
  4.8*    
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006).
       
 
  4.9*    
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2006).
       
 
  4.10*    
Amendment No. 3 and Consent, dated as of April 23, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2007).
       
 
  4.11*    
Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 24, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2007).
       
 
  4.12*    
Amendment No. 5 and Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008).
       
 
  4.13*    
Master Assignment, Agreement and Amendment No. 6, dated as of June 2, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2008).
       
 
  4.14*    
Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 12, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2008).
       
 
  4.15*    
Amendment No. 8 and Consent, dated as of March 24, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2009).
       
 
  4.16*    
Amendment No. 9, dated as of June 2, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009).

57


Table of Contents

         
Number   Description
       
 
  4.17*    
Amendment No. 10, dated as of August 25, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2009).
       
 
  10.1*    
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009).
       
 
  10.2*    
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC, MC Beltway 8 LLC and Mariner LP LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009).
       
 
  10.3*    
Underwriting Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, among J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Representative of the several Underwriters listed in Schedule 1 thereto, Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, and Mariner Energy Texas LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2007).
       
 
  10.4*    
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy Texas LP and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006).
       
 
  10.5*    
Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of May 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariner’s Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2009).
       
 
  31.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  31.2    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
*   Incorporated by reference as indicated.
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.

58