FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
BADGER METER, INC.
4545 W. Brown Deer Road
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53223
(414) 355-0400
A Wisconsin Corporation
IRS Employer Identification No. 39-0143280
Commission File No. 001-06706
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). (Registrant
is not yet required to provide financial disclosure in an Interactive Data File format.)
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 14, 2009, there were 14,890,096 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a par value
of $1 per share.
BADGER METER, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Period Ended June 30, 2009
Index
2
Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as other
information provided from time to time by Badger Meter, Inc. (the Company) or its employees, may
contain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements. The words anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect, think, should, could and objective or similar expressions
are intended to identify forward looking statements. All such forward looking statements are based
on the Companys then current views and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that
include, among other things:
|
|
|
the continued shift in the Companys business from lower cost, manually read meters
toward more expensive, value-added automatic meter reading (AMR) systems and advanced
metering infrastructure (AMI) systems; |
|
|
|
|
the success or failure of newer Company products; |
|
|
|
|
changes in competitive pricing and bids in both the domestic and foreign marketplaces,
and in particular in continued intense price competition on government bid contracts for
lower cost, manually read meters; |
|
|
|
|
the actions (or lack thereof) of the Companys competitors; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the Companys relationships with its alliance partners, primarily its
alliance partners that provide AMR/AMI connectivity solutions, and particularly those that
sell products that do or may compete with the Companys products; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the general health of the United States and foreign economies, including to
some extent such things as the length and severity of the current global economic downturn,
the ability of municipal water utility customers to authorize and finance purchases of the
Companys products, the Companys ability to obtain financing, housing starts in the United
States, and overall industrial activity; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the United States and foreign government programs to stimulate national
and global economies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the cost and/or availability of needed raw materials and parts, including
recent volatility in the cost of brass castings as a result of fluctuations in commodity
prices, particularly for copper and scrap metal, at the supplier level and plastic resin as
a result of changes in petroleum and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys expanded role as a prime contractor for providing complete AMR/AMI systems
to governmental entities, which brings with it added risks, including but not limited to,
Company responsibility for subcontractor performance, additional costs and expenses if the
Company and its subcontractors fail to meet the agreed-upon timetable with the governmental
entity, and the Companys expanded warranty and performance obligations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign economic conditions, particularly currency fluctuations in the United
States dollar, the euro and the peso; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of certain single-source suppliers, and; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations, particularly laws dealing with the use of lead (which
can be used in the manufacture of certain meters incorporating brass housings) and the U.S.
Federal Communications Commission rules affecting the use and/or licensing of radio
frequencies necessary for AMR/AMI products. |
All of these factors are beyond the Companys control to varying degrees. Shareholders,
potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating
the forward looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward
looking statements. The forward looking statements made in this document are made only as of the
date of this document and the Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any obligation, to
update any such forward looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
3
Part I Financial Information
Item 1 Financial Statements
BADGER METER, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
6,330 |
|
|
$ |
6,217 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
34,380 |
|
|
|
35,767 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods |
|
|
12,572 |
|
|
|
13,484 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
10,675 |
|
|
|
10,990 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
15,450 |
|
|
|
14,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
|
38,697 |
|
|
|
39,315 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
85,405 |
|
|
|
86,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
137,916 |
|
|
|
133,934 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(74,967 |
) |
|
|
(72,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
62,949 |
|
|
|
61,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, at cost less accumulated amortization |
|
|
24,316 |
|
|
|
25,030 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,172 |
|
|
|
9,305 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,958 |
|
|
|
6,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
194,715 |
|
|
$ |
195,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
6,440 |
|
|
$ |
9,995 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
10,329 |
|
|
|
9,675 |
|
Payables |
|
|
14,411 |
|
|
|
13,230 |
|
Accrued compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
6,435 |
|
|
|
8,714 |
|
Warranty and after-sale costs |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
Income and other taxes |
|
|
6,218 |
|
|
|
7,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
45,138 |
|
|
|
50,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
Accrued non-pension postretirement benefits |
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
5,585 |
|
Other accrued employee benefits |
|
|
18,467 |
|
|
|
21,265 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
21,132 |
|
|
|
21,074 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
32,708 |
|
|
|
31,563 |
|
Reinvested earnings |
|
|
119,361 |
|
|
|
107,887 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(16,269 |
) |
|
|
(16,672 |
) |
Less: Employee benefit stock |
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
(659 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(32,039 |
) |
|
|
(32,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
124,308 |
|
|
|
111,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
194,715 |
|
|
$ |
195,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
BADGER METER, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands except share and per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
67,763 |
|
|
$ |
74,660 |
|
|
$ |
133,087 |
|
|
$ |
143,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
41,162 |
|
|
|
48,286 |
|
|
|
80,314 |
|
|
|
92,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
26,601 |
|
|
|
26,374 |
|
|
|
52,773 |
|
|
|
50,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, engineering and
administration |
|
|
13,944 |
|
|
|
14,624 |
|
|
|
28,648 |
|
|
|
29,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
12,657 |
|
|
|
11,750 |
|
|
|
24,125 |
|
|
|
21,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
12,350 |
|
|
|
11,415 |
|
|
|
23,418 |
|
|
|
21,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
4,593 |
|
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
8,688 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
7,757 |
|
|
$ |
7,041 |
|
|
$ |
14,730 |
|
|
$ |
13,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computation of earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,769,853 |
|
|
|
14,509,709 |
|
|
|
14,745,728 |
|
|
|
14,466,785 |
|
Impact of dilutive securities |
|
|
158,085 |
|
|
|
314,127 |
|
|
|
174,630 |
|
|
|
334,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,927,938 |
|
|
|
14,823,836 |
|
|
|
14,920,358 |
|
|
|
14,801,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
BADGER METER, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
14,730 |
|
|
$ |
13,061 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
earnings to net cash provided
by (used for) operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Noncurrent employee benefits |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
Contribution to pension plan |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
(7,083 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(781 |
) |
|
|
(990 |
) |
Current liabilities other than debt |
|
|
(3,035 |
) |
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
(2,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations |
|
|
15,863 |
|
|
|
10,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment additions |
|
|
(4,854 |
) |
|
|
(7,490 |
) |
Acquisition of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,650 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(5,097 |
) |
|
|
(33,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt |
|
|
(3,520 |
) |
|
|
21,649 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(4,850 |
) |
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(3,254 |
) |
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
Tax benefit on stock options |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
Issuance of treasury stock |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(10,575 |
) |
|
|
20,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(3,269 |
) |
Cash beginning of period |
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
8,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash end of period |
|
$ |
6,330 |
|
|
$ |
5,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
6
BADGER METER, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements of Badger Meter, Inc. (the Company) contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring accruals except as otherwise discussed) necessary to present fairly the Companys
consolidated condensed financial position at June 30, 2009, results of operations for the three-
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 165, Subsequent
Events (SFAS 165), which addresses the types and timing of events that should be reported in the
financial statements for events occurring between the balance sheet date and the date the financial
statements are issued or available to be issued. SFAS 165 was effective for the Company on June
30, 2009. The Company reviewed events for inclusion in the financial statements through July 22,
2009, the date that the accompanying financial statements were issued. The adoption of SFAS 165
did not impact the financial position or results of operations.
Note 2 Additional Balance Sheet Information
The consolidated condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2008 was derived from amounts
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Refer
to the footnotes to the financial statements included in that report for a description of the
Companys accounting policies and for additional details of the Companys financial condition. The
details in those notes have not changed except as discussed below and as a result of normal
adjustments in the interim.
Warranty and After-Sale Costs
The Company estimates and records provisions for warranties and other after-sale costs in the
period in which the sale is recorded, based on a lag factor and historical warranty claim
experience. After-sale costs represent a variety of activities outside of the written warranty
policy, such as investigation of unanticipated problems after the customer has installed the
product, or analysis of water quality issues. Changes in the Companys warranty and after-sale
costs reserve for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Net additions |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
beginning |
|
|
charged to |
|
|
incurred and |
|
|
at |
|
(In thousands) |
|
of year |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,327 |
|
|
$ |
416 |
|
|
$ |
(438 |
) |
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,917 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
(486 |
) |
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
7
Note 3 Employee Benefit Plans
The Company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan for its domestic
employees and a non-contributory postretirement plan that provides medical benefits for certain
domestic retirees and eligible dependents. The following table sets forth the components of net
periodic benefit cost for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 based on December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2007 measurement dates, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 based on December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2007 measurement dates,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations |
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2008 that it anticipated making a contribution of $4.9 million to its pension plan in 2009 for the
2008 plan year due to the reduction in the market value of the underlying investments as of the
December 31, 2008 actuarial measurement date. In the second quarter of 2009, it was determined
that the required contribution for the 2008 plan year was $4.6 million and the Company made a $3.5
million contribution toward that amount. In addition, the Company made a $0.5 million contribution
in the second quarter of 2009, which represents the first quarterly installment payment for the
2009 plan year.
The Company disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 that it
estimated it would pay $0.6 million in other postretirement benefits in 2009 based on actuarial
estimates. As of June 30, 2009, $54,000 of such benefits were paid. The Company believes that its
estimated payments for the full year may be less than the prior full-year estimate. However, such
estimates contain inherent uncertainties because cash payments can vary significantly depending on
the timing of postretirement medical claims and the collection of the retirees portion of certain
costs. Note that the amount of benefits paid in calendar year 2009 will not impact the expense for
postretirement benefits for the current year.
Note 4 Guarantees
The Company guarantees the outstanding debt of the Badger Meter Employee Savings and Stock
Ownership Plan (ESSOP) that is recorded in short-term debt, offset by a similar amount of
unearned compensation that has been recorded as a reduction of shareholders equity. The loan
amount is collateralized by shares of the Companys Common Stock. A payment of $74,000 was made in
the first quarter of 2009 that reduced the debt and the corresponding employee benefit stock
balance included in shareholders equity.
8
Note 5 Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $8.1 million
and $7.2 million, respectively. Comprehensive income for the six-month periods ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was $15.1 million and $13.8 million, respectively.
Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,639 |
|
Unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit
plan liabilities (net of tax of $10.9 million and
$11.2 million for 2009 and 2008, respectively) |
|
|
(17,907 |
) |
|
|
(18,311 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(16,269 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,672 |
) |
|
Note 6 Contingencies, Litigation and Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company is named in legal proceedings. There are
currently no material legal proceedings pending with respect to the Company. The more significant
legal proceedings are discussed below.
The Company is subject to contingencies related to environmental laws and regulations.
Currently, the Company is in the process of resolving matters relating to two landfill sites where
it has been named as one of many potentially responsible parties and to a parcel of land adjoining
the Companys property. The landfill sites are impacted by the Federal Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act and other environmental laws and regulations. At this
time, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations, either from a cash
flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based on the Companys
assessment of its limited past involvement with these landfill sites as well as the substantial
involvement of other named third parties with these landfill sites. However, due to the inherent
uncertainties of such proceedings, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these
matters. A future change in circumstances with respect to these specific matters or with respect
to sites formerly or currently owned or operated by the Company, or with respect to off-site
disposal locations used by the Company, could result in future costs to the Company and such
amounts could be material. Expenditures for compliance with environmental control provisions and
regulations during 2008 and the first half of 2009 were not material.
Like other companies in recent years, the Company has been named as a defendant in numerous
multi-claimant/multi-defendant lawsuits alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to
asbestos, manufactured by third parties, and integrated into or sold with a very limited number of
the Companys products. The Company is vigorously defending itself against these claims. Although
it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company does not believe
the ultimate resolution of these issues will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the
financial statements as a whole. This belief is based in part on the fact that no claimant has
demonstrated exposure to products manufactured or sold by the Company and that a number of cases
have been voluntarily dismissed.
The Company relies on single suppliers for certain castings and components in several of its
product lines. Although alternate sources of supply exist for these items, a loss of certain
suppliers could temporarily disrupt the Companys operations in the short term. The Company
attempts to mitigate this risk by working closely with key suppliers, purchasing minimal amounts
from alternative suppliers and by purchasing business interruption insurance where appropriate.
The Company reevaluates its exposures on a periodic basis and makes adjustments to reserves as
appropriate.
9
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Business Description and Overview
The Company is a leading manufacturer and marketer of products incorporating liquid flow
measurement and control technologies, developed both internally and in conjunction with other
technology companies. Its products are used in a wide variety of applications to measure and
control the flow of liquids, but primarily water. The Companys product lines fall into two
general categories, utility and industrial. The utility category is comprised of two primary
product lines residential and commercial water meters that are used by water utilities as the
basis for generating water and wastewater revenues. The market for these product lines is North
America, primarily the United States, because these meters are designed and manufactured to conform
to standards promulgated by the American Water Works Association. The utility flow measurement
products constitute a majority of the Companys sales.
Industrial product line sales comprise the remainder of the Companys sales and include
precision valves, electromagnetic inductive flow meters, impeller flow meters, and turbine and
positive displacement industrial flow meters. Rounding out the industrial product line are
automotive fluid meters used for the measurement of various types of automotive fluids.
Residential and commercial water meters have generally been classified as either manually read
meters or remotely read meters via radio technology. A meter that is manually read consists of the
water meter and a register that gives a visual display of the meter reading. Meters equipped with
radio transmitters convert the mechanical measurement to a digital format which is then transmitted
via radio frequency to a receiver that collects and formats the data appropriately for a water
utilitys billing computer. Drive-by systems are referred to as automatic meter reading (AMR)
systems and have been the primary technology deployed by water utilities over the past decade,
providing cost effective and accurate billing data. In a drive-by AMR system, a vehicle equipped
for meter reading purposes, including a radio receiver and computer, collects meter reading data.
Of growing interest to water utilities are fixed network advanced metering infrastructure
(AMI) systems. These systems do not rely on a drive-by data collector, but rather incorporate a
network of permanent radio receivers or data collectors that are always active or listening to the
radio transmission from the utilitys meters. Not only do fixed network systems eliminate the need
for meter readers, but they have the ability to provide the utility with more frequent and diverse
data at specified intervals. The Companys response to these market requirements is detailed
further in the Business Trends section.
The Companys net sales and corresponding net earnings depend on unit volume and mix of
products, with the Company generally earning higher margins on meters equipped with AMR or AMI
technology. In addition to selling its proprietary AMR/AMI products, including the Orion® drive-by
AMR technology and the Galaxy® fixed network AMI system, the Company also remarkets the Itron®
drive-by AMR product under a license and distribution agreement. The Companys proprietary AMR/AMI
products generally result in higher margins than the non-proprietary AMR/AMI products that the
Company remarkets. The Company also sells registers and radios separately to customers who wish to
perform a field upgrade of their existing meters.
One distinct advantage of the Orion® AMR technology is that while it is fundamentally a
drive-by AMR system, the proprietary receiver technology of Orion® has been licensed to other
technology providers, including those providing AMR/AMI products that communicate over power lines,
broadband networks, and proprietary radio frequency networks. In addition, the Company produces a
universal gateway receiver for Orion® that enables Orion® AMR data to be transmitted to a utility
customer over a variety of public wireless networks.
The sales of utility flow measurement products, including AMR/AMI product sales, are generally
derived from the water meter replacement requirements of customers, along with their plans for
adoption and deployment of new technology. To a much lesser extent, housing starts also contribute
to the base of new product sales. Over the last decade there has been a growing trend in the
conversion to AMR/AMI from manually read water meters. This conversion rate is accelerating and
contributing to an increased base of business available to meter and AMR/AMI producers. The
Company estimates that less than 30% of water meters installed in the United States have been
converted to AMR/AMI systems. The Companys strategy is to fulfill customers metering
expectations and requirements with its proprietary meter reading systems or other systems available
through its alliance partners in the marketplace.
10
The industrial products generally serve a variety of niche flow measurement and control
applications across a broad range of industries. For instance, the impeller product line is widely
used in irrigation, HVAC and fire prevention equipment. Some of the flow measurement technologies
used for industrial applications have
been derived from utility meter technologies, such as positive displacement and turbine flow
measurement. Other technologies are very specific to industrial applications. In addition, a
growing requirement is for industrial meters to be equipped with specialized communication
protocols that control the entire flow measurement process. Serving both the utility and
industrial flow measurement market enables the Company to use its wide variety of technology for
specific flow measurement and control applications, as well as to utilize existing capacity and
spread fixed costs over a larger sales base.
Business Trends
AMI is the growing standard of technology deployment in the electric utility industry. AMI
provides an electric utility with two-way communication to monitor and control electrical devices
at the customers site. AMI deployments are fixed network technologies. Although the Company does
not participate in the electric market, the trend toward AMI is now affecting the markets the
Company does participate in, namely water and gas utility markets. Specifically, in the water
industry, fixed network AMI enables the water utility to capture interval readings from each meter
on a daily basis. While two-way communication is currently limited in water fixed network AMI,
utilities are contemplating how two-way networks could benefit them. As noted above, the Company
markets the Orion® drive-by AMR product line as well as the Galaxy® fixed network AMI product line.
The Company is positioned to sell either product in responding to customer requirements. Since
both products have comparable margins, any acceleration or slowdown in this trend is not expected
to have a significant impact on the Company.
Although there is growing interest in fixed network communication by water utilities, the vast
majority of utilities currently installing AMR/AMI continue to select drive-by AMR technologies for
their applications. The Companys Orion® technology has experienced rapid acceptance in the United
States. By the end of 2008, an increasing number of water utilities had selected Orion® as their
AMR solution of choice. There are approximately 53,000 water utilities in the United States and
the Company estimates that less than 30% of them have converted to an AMR or AMI technology. The
Company anticipates that even with growing interest in fixed network AMI, drive-by AMR will
continue to be the primary product of choice by water utilities for a number of years. Drive-by
AMR technology is simply the most cost effective form of AMR currently available to water
utilities.
Revenue and Product Mix
Prior to the Companys introduction of its own proprietary Orion® products, Itron® water
utility-related products were a dominant AMR contributor to the Companys results. Itron® products
are sold under an agreement between the Company and Itron, Inc. that expires in early 2011. The
Companys Orion® products directly compete with Itron® water AMR products and, in recent years,
many of the Companys customers have selected Orion® products. While Orion® sales were 2.4 times
greater than those of the Itron® licensed products for the full year of 2008, and 2.5 times greater
for the first half of 2009, the Company expects that the Itron® products will remain a significant
component of utility sales. Continuing sales in both product lines underscores the continued
acceptance of the AMR technology by water utilities and affirms the Companys strategy of selling
Itron® products in addition to its own proprietary products.
As the industry continues to evolve, there may be additional opportunities for revenue
enhancement. For instance, in recent years the Company has been asked to oversee and perform the
installation of its products in the field for a limited number of customers. This is usually
accomplished by the Company assuming the role of the general contractor, hiring a subcontractor and
supervising their work. The Company also sells certain extended warranty programs for the
technology sold with its products. The extended warranties provide additional services beyond the
one-year standard warranty. In 2008, the Company also began to sell the Orion® technology to
natural gas utilities for installation on their gas meters. Revenues from such products and
services are not yet significant and the Company is uncertain of the potential growth achievable
for such products and services in future periods.
Results of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2009 declined $6.9 million, or 9.2%, to $67.8
million from $74.7 million in the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven by lower sales of
the Companys products due primarily to volume declines, partially offset by higher prices for
certain product lines.
11
Residential and commercial water meter and related AMR/AMI sales totaled $58.3 million and
represented 86.0% of total sales in the second quarter of 2009, compared to $62.2 million, or
83.3%, of total sales in the second quarter of 2008. The decrease of $3.9 million, or 6.3%, was
the result of lower sales volumes
of water meters and related technologies. During the second quarter of 2009, residential and
commercial sales declined 3.1% and 18.5%, respectively, compared to the second quarter of 2008.
Orion® and Itron® related sales declined by 9.3% and 7.4%, respectively, in the second quarter of
2009 compared to the same period in the prior year. The Orion® related products outsold the Itron®
related products by a ratio of nearly 2.3 to 1 for the second quarter of 2009. While the sales
declines may be attributable to the weaker economy, the Company believes that some customers may be
delaying orders because of the possibility that funds will become available under U.S. Federal
stimulus programs.
Industrial sales for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $9.5 million, or 14.0%, of
total sales. This was a decline of $3.0 million, or 24.0%, from sales of $12.5 million, or 16.7%,
of total sales in the same period in 2008. The decline was due to lower volumes of products sold
in each of the Companys industrial product lines as a result of the continuing weak economy,
offset somewhat by higher prices in several of the product lines. Sales of the Companys
industrial products generally fluctuate with the condition of the overall economy.
The total gross margin percentage increased in the second quarter of 2009 to 39.3% from 35.3%
for the same period in 2008. The increase was primarily due to the favorable effects of lower raw
material costs, including decreasing prices for metal castings that fluctuate with the metals
market, and for radio boards that are sourced in Europe as a result of the strengthening U.S.
dollar.
Selling,
engineering and administration costs declined by $0.7 million, or 4.6%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decline was due in part to
lower selling expenses as a result of sales volume declines, reduced healthcare and related
expenditures due to favorable healthcare experience and continued cost containment efforts.
The provision for income taxes as a percentage of earnings before income taxes for the second
quarter of 2009 was 37.2% compared to 38.3% for the same period in 2008.
As a result of the above mentioned items, net earnings for the three months ended June 30,
2009 increased $0.8 million to $7.8 million from $7.0 million for the same period in 2008. On a
diluted basis, earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased by $0.04 to
$0.52 from $0.48 for the same period in 2008.
Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009 declined by $10.0 million, or 7.0%, to $133.1
million from $143.1 million in the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven by lower sales of
the Companys products due primarily to volume declines, partially offset by higher prices for
certain product lines.
Residential and commercial water meter and related AMR/AMI sales totaled $114.4 million and
represented 86.0% of total sales in the first half of 2009, compared to $117.7 million, or 82.3%,
of total sales in the first half of 2008. The decrease of $3.3 million, or 2.8%, was the net
result of higher residential sales and lower commercial sales. Residential sales increased 2.7%
while commercial sales declined 23.3% for the first half of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008. Orion® related sales declined 1.3% while Itron® related sales increased 1.2% for the first
six months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The Orion® related products outsold the
Itron® related products by a ratio of 2.5 to 1 for the first half of 2009.
Industrial sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $18.7 million, or 14.0%, of total
sales. This was a decline of $6.7 million, or 26.4%, from total sales of $25.4 million, or 17.7%,
in the same period in 2008. The decline was due to lower volumes of products sold in each of the
Companys industrial product lines as a result of the continuing weak economy, offset somewhat by
higher prices in several of the product lines. Sales of the Companys industrial products
generally fluctuate with the condition of the overall economy.
The total gross margin percentage increased for the first six months of 2009 to 39.7% from
35.6% for the same period in 2008. The increase was primarily due to the favorable effects of
lower raw material costs, including decreasing prices for metal castings that fluctuate with the
metals market, and for radio boards that are sourced in Europe as a result of the strengthening
U.S. dollar. Gross margins were favorably impacted by the higher
gross margin percent for the first half of 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008, while lower volumes in the first half of 2009 mitigated some of the impact.
12
Selling, engineering and administration costs declined by $0.6 million, or 2.2%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decline was due in part to
lower selling expenses as a
result of sales volume declines, reduced healthcare related expenditures due to favorable
healthcare experience and continued cost containment efforts.
The provision for income taxes as a percentage of earnings before income taxes for the six
months ended 2009 was 37.1% compared to 37.9% for the same period in 2008.
As a result of the above mentioned items, net earnings increased by $1.6 million to $14.7
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $13.1 million for the same period in
2008. On a diluted basis, earnings per share increased by $0.11 for the six months ended June 30,
2009 from $0.99 compared to $0.88 in the same period in 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The main sources of liquidity for the Company are cash from operations and borrowing capacity.
Cash provided by operations for the first six months of 2009 was $15.9 million compared to $10.3
million for the same period in 2008. The increase was due to the increase in net earnings and
reductions in inventories and receivables from their 2008 year-end balances, partially offset by
payments into the Companys pension plan and a decrease in current liabilities other than debt.
The receivables balance decreased from $35.8 million at December 31, 2008 to $34.4 million at
June 30, 2009 primarily due to lower sales, the timing of those sales and certain cash collections.
The Company continues to believe that the current economic downturn will not significantly impact
collections of the Companys outstanding receivables.
Inventories at June 30, 2009 decreased to $38.7 million from $39.3 million at December 31,
2008 due primarily to lower than expected industrial sales and the timing of purchases.
Prepaid expenses and other current assets at June 30, 2009 increased to $3.1 million from $2.3
million at December 31, 2008 primarily due to the payment of certain calendar year insurance
premiums that are expensed ratably over the policy period.
Net property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2009 increased by $1.1 million compared to the
balance at December 31, 2008 as the result of $4.9 million of capital expenditures, offset by
depreciation expense.
Short-term debt at June 30, 2009 decreased by $3.6 million compared to the balance at December
31, 2008 as cash provided from operations in 2009 was used to pay down short-term debt. During the
same period, long-term debt, including current maturities decreased by $4.9 million on a net basis
due to regularly scheduled payments. All of the Companys debt is unsecured and does not carry any
financial covenants.
Payables increased to $14.4 million at June 30, 2009 from $13.2 million at December 31, 2008
primarily due to the timing of payments. Accrued compensation and employee benefits at June 30,
2009 decreased to $6.4 million from $8.7 million at December 31, 2008 due to the payment of
employee incentive compensation amounts accrued at December 31, 2008, offset somewhat by current
year accruals.
Accrued income and other taxes decreased to $6.2 million at June 30, 2009 from $7.8 million at
December 31, 2008 due to the timing of income tax payments.
Other accrued employee benefits decreased to $18.5 million at June 30, 2009 from $21.3 million
at December 31, 2008 due to payments contributed into the Companys pension plan, offset somewhat
by accruals of pension expense.
Common stock and capital in excess of par value both increased since December 31, 2008 due to
new stock issued in connection with the exercise of stock options. Employee benefit stock
decreased as a result of a payment made on the Badger Meter Employee Savings and Stock Ownership
Plan loan during the first quarter of 2009.
The Company believes its financial condition remains strong. In October 2008, the Company
renewed its principal line of credit ($30.0 million) for one year with its primary lender. The
Company believes that its operating cash flows, available borrowing capacity, and its ability to
raise capital provide adequate resources to
13
fund ongoing operating requirements, future capital
expenditures and the development of new products. The Company has $39.6 million of unused credit
lines available at June 30, 2009.
Other Matters
There are currently no material legal proceedings pending with respect to the Company. The
more significant legal proceedings are discussed below.
The Company is subject to contingencies related to environmental laws and regulations.
Currently, the Company is in the process of resolving matters relating to two landfill sites where
it has been named as one of many potentially responsible parties and to a parcel of land adjoining
the Companys property. The landfill sites are impacted by the Federal Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act and other environmental laws and regulations. At this
time, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations, either from a cash
flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based on the Companys
assessment of its limited past involvement with these landfill sites as well as the substantial
involvement of other named third parties with these landfill sites. However, due to the inherent
uncertainties of such proceedings, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these
matters. A future change in circumstances with respect to these specific matters or with respect
to sites formerly or currently owned or operated by the Company, or with respect to off-site
disposal locations used by the Company, could result in future costs to the Company and such
amounts could be material. Expenditures for compliance with environmental control provisions and
regulations during 2008 and the first half of 2009 were not material.
Like other companies in recent years, the Company has been named as a defendant in numerous
multi-claimant/multi-defendant lawsuits alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to
asbestos, manufactured by third parties, and integrated into or sold with a very limited number of
the Companys products. The Company is vigorously defending itself against these claims. Although
it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company does not believe
the ultimate resolution of these issues will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the
financial statements as a whole. This belief is based in part on the fact that no claimant has
demonstrated exposure to products manufactured or sold by the Company and that a number of cases
have been voluntarily dismissed.
See the Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements at the front of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a discussion of risks and uncertainties that could impact
the Companys financial performance and results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations are discussed in Part
II, Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
under the headings Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and have not materially changed
since that report was filed.
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Companys quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in Part
II, Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
under the heading Market Risks in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, and have not materially changed since that report was filed.
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act),
the Companys management evaluated, with the participation of the Companys Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the quarter
ended June 30, 2009. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the
Companys Chairman, President and Chief
14
Executive Officer and the Companys Senior Vice President -
Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to ensure that
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made
known to management by others within those entities as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure of the information, particularly during the period in which this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 24, 2009, the following
individuals were elected to the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
|
WITHHELD |
|
|
Not Voted |
|
Ronald H. Dix |
|
|
11,461,454 |
|
|
|
234,287 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
Thomas J. Fischer |
|
|
11,284,727 |
|
|
|
411,014 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
Richard A. Meeusen |
|
|
11,463,776 |
|
|
|
231,965 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
Ulice Payne, Jr. |
|
|
11,086,135 |
|
|
|
609,606 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
Andrew J. Policano |
|
|
11,229,879 |
|
|
|
465,862 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
Steven J. Smith |
|
|
11,052,534 |
|
|
|
643,207 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
Kenneth P. Manning |
|
|
11,036,389 |
|
|
|
659,352 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
John J. Stollenwerk |
|
|
11,215,754 |
|
|
|
479,987 |
|
|
|
3,115,479 |
|
Item 6 Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BADGER METER, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: July 22, 2009
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Richard A. Meeusen
Richard A. Meeusen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Richard E. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Beverly L. P. Smiley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverly L. P. Smiley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President Controller |
|
|
16
BADGER METER, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Period Ended June 30, 2009
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
17