UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 27, 2009

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From                       to                      

Insteel Industries, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

North Carolina		56-0674867
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1373 Boggs Drive, Mount Airy, North Carolina		27030
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (336) 786-2141

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ                No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o                No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o                No þ

          The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of July 17, 2009 was 17,526,315.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations			3
Consolidated Balance Sheets			4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity			6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			26
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			26
Item 1A. Risk Factors			27
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			27
Item 6. Exhibits			27
SIGNATURES			28
EXHIBIT INDEX			29
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands except for per share data)

(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,				June 27,				June 28,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Net sales		$	56,963			$	104,332			$	169,166			$	247,572
Cost of sales			52,889				73,447				167,453				190,280
Inventory write-downs			2,898				—				25,853				—
Gross profit (loss)			1,176				30,885				(24,140	)			57,292
Selling, general and administrative expense			4,016				4,496				13,117				13,748
Other income, net			(1	)			(12	)			(50	)			(88	)
Interest expense			147				150				484				460
Interest income			(16	)			(125	)			(118	)			(568	)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes			(2,970	)			26,376				(37,573	)			43,740
Income taxes			(1,233	)			9,428				(13,855	)			15,669
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations			(1,737	)			16,948				(23,718	)			28,071
Loss from discontinued operations net of income taxes of ($6), ($12), $37 and $-			(12	)			(21	)			(61	)			(2	)
Net earnings (loss)		$	(1,749	)		$	16,927			$	(23,779	)		$	28,069
Per share amounts:
Basic:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.10	)		$	0.98			$	(1.37	)		$	1.59
Loss from discontinued operations			—				—				—				—
Net earnings (loss)		$	(0.10	)		$	0.98			$	(1.37	)		$	1.59
Diluted:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.10	)		$	0.97			$	(1.37	)		$	1.58
Loss from discontinued operations			—				—				—				—
Net earnings (loss)		$	(0.10	)		$	0.97			$	(1.37	)		$	1.58
Cash dividends declared		$	0.03			$	0.03			$	0.09			$	0.09
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic			17,392				17,330				17,364				17,618
Diluted			17,392				17,482				17,364				17,773

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands)

		(Unaudited)
		June 27,				September 27,
		2009				2008
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	21,569			$	26,493
Accounts receivable, net			24,635				49,581
Inventories			35,169				71,220
Prepaid expenses and other			18,284				3,122
Total current assets			99,657				150,416
Property, plant and equipment, net			65,396				69,105
Other assets			3,722				5,064
Non-current assets of discontinued operations			3,635				3,635
Total assets		$	172,410			$	228,220
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	16,346			$	23,581
Accrued expenses			4,434				29,081
Current liabilities of discontinued operations			217				188
Total current liabilities			20,997				52,850
Long-term debt			—				—
Other liabilities			5,245				5,306
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations			191				217
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock			17,526				17,507
Additional paid-in capital			44,640				43,202
Deferred stock compensation			(1,427	)			(1,456	)
Retained earnings			87,123				112,479
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(1,885	)			(1,885	)
Total shareholders’ equity			145,977				169,847
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	172,410			$	228,220

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

		Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,
		2009				2008
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net earnings (loss)		$	(23,779	)		$	28,069
Loss from discontinued operations			61				2
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations			(23,718	)			28,071
Adjustments to reconcile earnings (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization			5,395				5,337
Amortization of capitalized financing costs			374				374
Stock-based compensation expense			1,426				1,282
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation			(3	)			(27	)
Inventory write-downs			25,853				—
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment			24				55
Deferred income taxes			81				702
Gain from life insurance proceeds			—				(661	)
Net changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net			24,946				(11,139	)
Inventories			10,198				(25,595	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			(23,138	)			25,208
Other changes			(14,842	)			3,006
Total adjustments			30,314				(1,458	)
Net cash provided by operating activities — continuing operations			6,596				26,613
Net cash used for operating activities — discontinued operations			(58	)			(93	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			6,538				26,520
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures			(1,684	)			(8,397	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment			13				93
Decrease (increase) in cash surrender value of life insurance policies			85				(365	)
Proceeds from surrender of life insurance policies			413				—
Proceeds from life insurance claims			—				1,111
Net cash used for investing activities — continuing operations			(1,173	)			(7,558	)
Net cash used for investing activities			(1,173	)			(7,558	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt			22,796				877
Principal payments on long-term debt			(22,796	)			(877	)
Cash received from exercise of stock options			66				120
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation			3				27
Repurchases of common stock			—				(8,691	)
Cash dividends paid			(10,330	)			(1,616	)
Other			(28	)			(33	)
Net cash used for financing activities — continuing operations			(10,289	)			(10,193	)
Net cash used for financing activities			(10,289	)			(10,193	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			(4,924	)			8,769
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			26,493				8,703
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	21,569			$	17,472
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest		$	110			$	86
Income taxes			11,442				6,877
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment in accounts payable			39				272
Issuance of restricted stock			—				733
Declaration of cash dividends to be paid			526				524
Restricted stock surrendered for withholding taxes payable			9				76

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

																						Accumulated
										Additional												Other				Total
		Common Stock								Paid-In				Deferred				Retained				Comprehensive				Shareholders’
		Shares				Amount				Capital				Compensation				Earnings				Loss				Equity
Balance at September 27, 2008			17,507			$	17,507			$	43,202			$	(1,456	)		$	112,479			$	(1,885	)		$	169,847
Comprehensive income:
Net loss																			(23,779	)							(23,779	)
Comprehensive loss																											(23,779	)
Stock options exercised			20				20				46																66
Restricted stock units											732				(732	)											—
Compensation expense associated with stock-based plans											665				761												1,426
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation											3																3
Restricted stock surrendered for withholding taxes payable			(1	)			(1	)			(8	)															(9	)
Cash dividends declared																			(1,577	)							(1,577	)
Balance at June 27, 2009			17,526			$	17,526			$	44,640			$	(1,427	)		$	87,123			$	(1,885	)		$	145,977

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(1) Basis of Presentation

          The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Insteel Industries, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” or “Insteel”) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the audited financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should therefore be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2008 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

          The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of results for these interim periods. The results of operations for the nine-month period ended June 27, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending October 3, 2009 or future periods.

(2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Current Adoptions

          In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” and requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as in annual financial statements. Additionally, this FSP amends Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. These disclosures are required for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

          In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”. SFAS No. 165 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company has evaluated the period beginning June 28, 2009 through July 16, 2009, the date its financial statements were issued, and concluded there were no events or transactions occurring during this period that required recognition or disclosure in its financial statements.

Future Adoptions

          In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (“141R”), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose all of the information required to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. This statement is effective for acquisition dates on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008 and is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements to the extent that it does not enter into business combinations subsequent to adoption.

          In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for non-controlling interests in subsidiaries and for the deconsolidation of subsidiaries. This statement clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements to the extent that it does not obtain any minority interests in subsidiaries subsequent to adoption.

          In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 requires that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years, and requires that all prior period earnings per share data presented (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) be adjusted retrospectively to conform to its provisions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this FSP will have on its consolidated financial statements.

          In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 requires objective disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets which include disclosures about investment policies and strategies, categories of plan assets, fair value measurements of plan assets and significant concentrations of risk. This statement is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this FSP will have on its consolidated financial statements.

(3) Fair Value Measurements

          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB released FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities during the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

          SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires that the Company maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

          As of June 27, 2009, the Company held assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The following table presents information on these assets as well as the fair value hierarchy used to determine their fair value:

						Quoted Prices
						in Active				Observable
						Markets				Inputs
(In thousands)		Total				(Level 1)				(Level 2)
Current assets:
Cash equivalents		$	21,025			$	21,025			$	—
Other assets:
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies			3,440				—				3,440
Total		$	24,465			$	21,025			$	3,440

          Cash equivalents, which include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of the Company’s cash equivalents, which consist of money market funds, approximates fair value due to the short maturities of these investments. Cash surrender value of life insurance policies are classified as Level 2. The value was determined by the underwriting insurance company’s valuation models and represents the guaranteed value the Company would receive upon surrender of these policies as of June 27, 2009.

(4) Discontinued Operations

          In April 2006, the Company decided to exit the industrial wire business with the closure of its Fredericksburg, Virginia facility, which manufactured tire bead wire and other industrial wire for commercial and industrial applications. The Company’s decision was based on the weakening in the business outlook for the facility and the expected continuation of difficult market conditions and reduced operating levels. Manufacturing activities at the Virginia facility ceased in June 2006 and the Company is currently in the process of liquidating the remaining capital assets associated with the business.

          The Company has determined that the exit from the industrial wire business meets the criteria of a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Accordingly, the results of operations and related non-recurring closure costs associated with the industrial wire business have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Additionally, the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations have been segregated in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

          Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations as of June 27, 2009 and September 27, 2008 are as follows:

		June 27,				September 27,
(In thousands)		2009				2008
Assets:
Other assets		$	3,635			$	3,635
Total assets		$	3,635			$	3,635
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	1			$	1
Accrued expenses			216				187
Total current liabilities			217				188
Other liabilities			191				217
Total liabilities		$	408			$	405

          As of June 27, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was approximately $226,000 and $251,000, respectively, of accrued expenses and other liabilities related to ongoing lease obligations and closure-related liabilities incurred as a result of the Company’s exit from the industrial wire business, and approximately $3.6 million of its remaining capital assets held for sale.

(5) Stock-Based Compensation

          Under the Company’s equity incentive plans, employees and directors may be granted stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards. As of June 27, 2009 there were 850,000 shares available for future grants under the plans.

          Stock option awards. Under the Company’s equity incentive plans, employees and directors may be granted options to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value on the date of the grant. Options granted under these plans generally vest over three years and expire ten years from the date of the grant. Compensation expense and excess tax benefits associated with stock options for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, are as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,				June 27,				June 28,
(In thousands)		2009				2008				2009				2008
Stock options:
Compensation expense		$	200			$	182			$	665			$	665
Excess tax benefits			1				12				3				27

          As of June 27, 2009, the remaining unamortized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards was $752,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.21 years.

          The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo valuation model based upon assumptions that are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect market conditions and actual historical experience.

The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The dividend yield is calculated based on the Company’s annual dividend as of the option grant date. The expected volatility is derived using a term structure based on historical volatility and the volatility implied by exchange-traded options on the Company’s stock. The expected term for options is based on the results of a Monte Carlo simulation model, using the model’s estimated fair value as an input to the Black-Scholes-Merton model, and then solving for the expected term.

          The estimated fair value of stock options granted during the nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008 was $4.60 and $11.15, respectively, based on the following assumptions:

		Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,
		2009				2008
Risk-free interest rate			2.36	%			2.52	%
Dividend yield			1.51	%			1.09	%
Expected volatility			79.30	%			66.77	%
Expected term (in years)			4.85				3.87

          The following table summarizes stock option activity for the nine-month period ended June 27, 2009:

																						Contractual				Aggregate
		Options				Exercise Price Per Share																Term -				Intrinsic
		Outstanding																Weighted				Weighted				Value
		(in thousands)				Range												Average				Average				(in thousands)
Outstanding at September 27, 2008			531			$	0.18				–			$	20.27			$	11.17
Granted			98				7.55				–				7.55				7.55
Expired			(9	)			15.64				–				20.27				18.07
Exercised			(20	)			3.28				–				3.28				3.28							$	120
Outstanding at June 27, 2009			600				0.18				–				20.27				10.74			7.41 years					743
Vested and anticipated to vest in future at June 27, 2009			581																10.69			7.36 years					736
Exercisable at June 27, 2009			298																9.46			5.86 years					627

          Restricted stock awards. Under the Company’s equity incentive plans, employees and directors may be granted restricted stock awards which are valued based upon the fair market value on the date of the grant. Restricted stock granted under these plans generally vests one to three years from the date of the grant. Restricted stock grants and amortization expense for restricted stock for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, is as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,				June 27,				June 28,
(In thousands)		2009				2008				2009				2008
Restricted stock grants:
Shares			—				—				—				66
Market value		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	733
Amortization expense			142				191				583				617

          As of June 27, 2009, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards was $718,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.61 years.

          During the nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, 14,268 and 44,533 shares, respectively, of employee restricted stock awards vested. Upon vesting, employees have the option of remitting payment for the minimum tax obligation to the Company or net-share settling such that the Company will withhold shares with a value equivalent to the respective employee’s minimum tax obligation. A total of 1,120 and 6,870 shares, respectively, were withheld during the nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008 to satisfy employees’ minimum tax obligations.

          The following table summarizes restricted stock activity during the nine-month period ended June 27, 2009:

						Weighted
		Restricted				Average
		Stock Awards				Grant Date
(Share amounts in thousands)		Outstanding				Fair Value
Balance, September 27, 2008			165			$	15.16
Granted			—				—
Released			(39	)			12.77
Balance, June 27, 2009			126				15.91

          Restricted stock units. On January 21, 2009, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a change in the equity compensation program such that awards of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to employees and directors would be made in lieu of awards of restricted stock. RSUs granted under these plans are valued based upon the fair market value on the date of the grant and provide for a dividend equivalent payment during the vesting period, which is generally one to three years from the date of the grant. RSUs do not have voting rights. RSU grants and amortization expense for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, are as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,				June 27,				June 28,
(In thousands)		2009				2008				2009				2008
Restricted stock unit grants:
Units			—				—				97				—
Market value		$	—			$	—			$	732			$	—
Amortization expense			99				—				178				—

          As of June 27, 2009, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs was $507,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.73 years.

          The following table summarizes RSU activity during the nine-month period ended June 27, 2009:

						Weighted
		Restricted				Average
		Stock Units				Grant Date
(Unit amounts in thousands)		Outstanding				Fair Value
Balance, September 27, 2008			—			$	—
Granted			97				7.55
Released			—				—
Balance, June 27, 2009			97			$	7.55

(6) Income Taxes

          The Company has recorded the following amounts for deferred income taxes and income taxes receivable on its consolidated balance sheet as of June 27, 2009: a current deferred tax asset (net of valuation allowance) of $2.5 million in prepaid expenses and other, a non-current deferred tax liability (net of valuation allowance) of $517,000 in other liabilities, and income taxes receivable of $14.5 million in prepaid expenses and other. As of June 27, 2009, the Company has $9.7 million of gross state operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) that begin to expire in 2013, but principally expire in 2018 – 2024.

          The realization of the Company’s deferred income tax assets is entirely dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income in applicable jurisdictions. Generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires that the Company periodically assess the need to establish a valuation allowance against its deferred income tax assets to the extent that it no longer believes it is more likely than not they will be fully utilized. As of June 27, 2009, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $602,000 pertaining to various state NOLs that were not expected to be utilized. The valuation allowance established by the Company is subject to periodic review and adjustment based on changes in facts and circumstances and would be reduced should the Company utilize the state NOLs against which an allowance had been provided or determine that such utilization is more likely than not.

          In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN No. 48”) as of June 27, 2009, the Company had approximately $50,000 of gross unrecognized tax benefits netted against income taxes receivable in prepaid expense and other on its consolidated balance sheet, of which $47,000, if recognized, would reduce its income tax rate in future periods. The Company anticipates the remaining unrecognized tax benefit will be resolved during the current fiscal year.

          The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of June 27, 2009, the Company has accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of $17,000.

          The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns as well as state and local income tax returns in various jurisdictions. Federal and various state tax returns filed by the Company subsequent to tax year 2003 remain subject to examination together with certain state tax returns filed by the Company subsequent to tax year 2002.

(7) Employee Benefit Plans

          Retirement plans. The Company has one defined benefit pension plan, the Insteel Wire Products Company Retirement Income Plan for Hourly Employees, Wilmington, Delaware (the “Delaware Plan”). The Delaware Plan provides benefits for eligible employees based primarily upon years of service and compensation levels. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute amounts at least equal to those required by law. No contributions were made to the Delaware Plan during the nine-month period ended June 27, 2009 and no contributions are expected to be made during the fiscal year ending October 3, 2009. The Delaware Plan was frozen effective September 30, 2008 whereby participants will no longer earn additional benefits.

          The Company adopted the measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158, “Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans,” in the current fiscal year. As the Company already measured plan assets and benefit obligations as of its fiscal year-end, the adoption of the measurement date provision of SFAS No. 158 did not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

          Net periodic pension costs and related components for the Delaware Plan for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, are as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,				June 27,				June 28,
(In thousands)		2009				2008				2009				2008
Service cost		$	—			$	16			$	—			$	48
Interest cost			55				64				184				192
Expected return on plan assets			(61	)			(81	)			(193	)			(243	)
Recognized net actuarial loss			23				17				84				51
Net periodic pension cost			17				16				75				48
Settlement loss			—				—				—				109
Total pension cost		$	17			$	16			$	75			$	157

          During the nine-month period ended June 28, 2008, the Company incurred a settlement loss of $109,000 for lump-sum distributions to participants in the Delaware Plan.

          Supplemental employee retirement plan. The Company maintains supplemental employee retirement plans (each, a “SERP”) with certain of its employees (each, a “Participant”). Under the SERP, if the Participant remains in continuous service with the Company for a period of at least 30 years, the Company will pay to the Participant a supplemental retirement benefit for the 15-year period following the Participant’s retirement equal to 50% of the Participant’s highest average annual base salary for five consecutive years in the 10-year period preceding the Participant’s retirement. If the Participant retires prior to the later of age 65 or the completion of 30 years of continuous service with the Company, but has completed at least 10 years of continuous service with the Company, the amount of the supplemental retirement benefit will be reduced by 1/360th for each month short of 30 years that the Participant was employed by the Company. Net periodic benefit costs and related components for the SERPs for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, are as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,				June 27,				June 28,
(In thousands)		2009				2008				2009				2008
Service cost		$	30			$	39			$	90			$	117
Interest cost			68				66				204				198
Amortization of prior service cost			56				57				168				171
Recognized net actuarial loss			—				3				—				9
Net periodic benefit cost		$	154			$	165			$	462			$	495

(8) Credit Facilities

          As of June 27, 2009, the Company had a $100.0 million revolving credit facility in place to supplement its operating cash flow in funding its working capital, capital expenditure and general corporate requirements. As of June 27, 2009, no borrowings were outstanding on the revolving credit facility, $39.3 million of additional borrowing capacity was available and outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million.

          Advances under the credit facility are limited to the lesser of the revolving credit commitment or a borrowing base amount that is calculated based upon a percentage of eligible receivables and inventories plus, upon the Company’s request and subject to certain conditions, a percentage of eligible equipment and real estate. Interest rates on the revolver are based upon (1) a base rate that is established at the higher of the prime rate or 0.50% plus the federal funds rate, or (2) at the election of the Company, a LIBOR rate, plus in either case, an applicable interest rate margin. The applicable interest rate margins are adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the amount of excess availability on the revolver within the range of 0.00% – 0.50% for the base rate and 1.25% – 2.00% for the LIBOR rate. In addition, the applicable interest rate margins would be adjusted to the highest percentage indicated for each range upon the occurrence of certain events of default provided for under the credit facility. Based on the Company’s excess availability as of June 27, 2009, the applicable interest rate was 0.00% for the base rate and 1.25% for the LIBOR rate on the revolver.

          The Company’s ability to borrow available amounts under the revolving credit facility will be restricted or eliminated in the event of certain covenant breaches, events of default or if the Company is unable to make certain representations and warranties provided for in the credit agreement.

          Financial Covenants

          The terms of the credit facility require the Company to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than: (1) 1.10 at the end of each fiscal quarter for the twelve-month period then ended when the amount of excess availability on the revolving credit facility is less than $10.0 million and the applicable borrowing base only includes eligible receivables and inventories; or (2) 1.15 at the end of each fiscal quarter for the twelve-month period then ended when the amount of excess availability on the revolving credit facility is less than $10.0 million and the applicable borrowing base includes eligible receivables, inventories, equipment and real estate. As of June 27, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the credit facility.

          Negative Covenants

          In addition, the terms of the credit facility restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things: engage in certain business combinations or divestitures; make investments in or loans to third parties, unless certain conditions are met with respect to such investments or loans; pay cash dividends or repurchase shares of the Company’s stock subject to certain minimum borrowing availability requirements; incur or assume indebtedness; issue securities; enter into certain transactions with affiliates of the Company; or permit liens to encumber the Company’s property and assets. As of June 27, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of the negative covenants under the credit facility.

          Events of Default

          Under the terms of the credit facility, an event of default will occur with respect to the Company upon the occurrence of, among other things: a default or breach by the Company or any of its subsidiaries under any agreement resulting in the acceleration of amounts due in excess of $500,000 under such agreement; certain payment defaults by the Company or any of its subsidiaries in excess of $500,000; certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the Company; an entry of judgment against the Company or any of its subsidiaries for greater than $500,000, which amount is not covered by insurance; or a change of control of the Company.

          Amortization of capitalized financing costs associated with the senior secured facility was $125,000 and $374,000 for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively. Accumulated amortization of capitalized financing costs was $3.5 million and $3.0 million as of June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.

(9) Earnings (Loss) Per Share

          The reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008 are as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,				June 27,				June 28,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)		2009				2008				2009				2008
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(1,737	)		$	16,948			$	(23,718	)		$	28,071
Loss from discontinued operations			(12	)			(21	)			(61	)			(2	)
Net earnings (loss)		$	(1,749	)		$	16,927			$	(23,779	)		$	28,069
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)			17,392				17,330				17,364				17,618
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation			—				152				—				155
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted)			17,392				17,482				17,364				17,773
Per share (basic):
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.10	)		$	0.98			$	(1.37	)		$	1.59
Loss from discontinued operations			—				—				—				—
Net earnings (loss)		$	(0.10	)		$	0.98			$	(1.37	)		$	1.59
Per share (diluted):
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.10	)		$	0.97			$	(1.37	)		$	1.58
Loss from discontinued operations			—				—				—				—
Net earnings (loss)		$	(0.10	)		$	0.97			$	(1.37	)		$	1.58

          Options to purchase 495,000 shares and 264,000 shares for the three-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, were antidilutive and were not included in the diluted EPS calculation. Options to purchase 423,000 shares and 200,000 shares for the nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, were antidilutive and were not included in the diluted EPS calculation. Options and restricted stock awards representing 137,000 shares and 142,000 shares for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 27, 2009, respectively, were not included in the diluted EPS calculation due to the net loss that was incurred.

(10) Share Repurchases

          On November 18, 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved a new share repurchase authorization to buy back up to $25.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The new authorization replaces the previous authorization to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock which was to expire on December 5, 2008 and remains in effect until terminated by the board of directors. Under this previous authorization, the Company repurchased approximately $6.2 million, or 697,813 shares of its common stock in open-market or privately negotiated transactions and $76,000, or 6,870 shares of its common stock through restricted stock net-share settlements. No purchases of common stock were made during the three-month period ended June 27, 2009. During the nine-month period ended June 27, 2009, the Company repurchased $9,000 or 1,120 shares of its common stock through restricted stock net-share settlements. Repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The Company is not obligated to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be commenced or suspended at any time at the Company’s discretion without prior notice.

(11) Other Financial Data

          Balance sheet information:

		June 27,				September 27,
(In thousands)		2009				2008
Accounts receivable, net:
Accounts receivable		$	25,833			$	50,487
Less allowance for doubtful accounts			(1,198	)			(906	)
Total		$	24,635			$	49,581
Inventories:
Raw materials		$	16,440			$	30,793
Work in process			2,035				3,161
Finished goods			16,694				37,266
Total		$	35,169			$	71,220
Prepaid expenses and other:
Income taxes receivable		$	14,547			$	—
Current deferred tax asset			2,514				2,513
Capitalized financing costs, net			469				—
Other			754				609
Total		$	18,284			$	3,122
Other assets:
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies		$	3,440			$	3,938
Capitalized financing costs, net			—				844
Other			282				282
Total		$	3,722			$	5,064
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Land and land improvements		$	5,571			$	5,631
Buildings			32,447				31,819
Machinery and equipment			96,426				96,638
Construction in progress			260				2,195
			134,704				136,283
Less accumulated depreciation			(69,308	)			(67,178	)
Total		$	65,396			$	69,105
Accrued expenses:
Salaries, wages and related expenses		$	1,142			$	4,128
Property taxes			643				794
Cash dividends			526				9,279
Customer rebates			459				840
Worker’s compensation			357				673
Sales allowance reserves			236				1,493
Income taxes			—				10,861
Other			1,071				1,013
Total		$	4,434			$	29,081
Other liabilities:
Deferred compensation		$	4,728			$	4,476
Deferred income taxes			517				435
Deferred revenues			—				395
Total		$	5,245			$	5,306

(12) Business Segment Information

          Following the Company’s exit from the industrial wire business (see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements), the Company’s operations are entirely focused on the manufacture and marketing of concrete reinforcing products for the concrete construction industry. Based on the criteria specified in SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company has one reportable segment. The results of operations for the industrial wire products business have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

(13) Contingencies

          Legal proceedings. On November 19, 2007, Dywidag Systems International, Inc. (“DSI”) filed a third-party lawsuit in the Ohio Court of Claims alleging that certain epoxy-coated strand sold by the Company to DSI in 2002, and supplied by DSI to the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) for a bridge project, was defective. The third-party action seeks recovery of any damages which may be assessed against DSI in the action filed against it by ODOT, which allegedly could be in excess of $8.3 million, plus $2.7 million in damages allegedly incurred by DSI. The Company had previously filed a lawsuit against DSI in the North Carolina Superior Court in Surry County on July 25, 2007 seeking recovery of $1.4 million (plus interest) owed for other products sold by the Company to DSI and a judgment declaring that it had no liability to DSI arising out of the ODOT bridge project. The Company’s North Carolina lawsuit was subsequently removed by DSI to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. On March 5, 2008, the Magistrate Judge in the U.S. District Court issued his recommendation that the Company’s motion to remand the matter to the Surry County Court should be granted. The parties are awaiting a decision from the federal District Court judge on whether the recommendation will be adopted. The parties continue to contest the appropriate jurisdiction in which this litigation should proceed. The Company filed a motion for summary judgment in the Ohio Court of Claims lawsuit on June 25, 2009. Discovery has commenced on a limited basis in that lawsuit. The Company intends to vigorously defend the claims asserted against it by DSI in addition to pursuing full recovery of the amounts owed to it by DSI. The Company has concluded that a loss is not yet probable with respect to this matter, and therefore no liability has been recorded. In the event the ultimate resolution of the case is unfavorable, the Company has estimated that the potential loss could range up to $11.0 million.

          The Company is also involved in other lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including commercial, environmental and employment matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

          This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly under the caption “Outlook” below. When used in this report, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and we can provide no assurances that such plans, intentions or expectations will be implemented or achieved. All forward-looking statements are based on information that is current as of the date of this report. Many of these risks and uncertainties are discussed in detail, and where appropriate, updated in our periodic and other reports and statements, in particular under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2008, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You should carefully review these risks and uncertainties.

          All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. All forward-looking statements speak only to the respective dates on which such statements are made and we do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

          It is not possible to anticipate and list all risks and uncertainties that may affect our future operations or financial performance; however, they would include, but are not limited to, the following:

	•		general economic and competitive conditions in the markets in which we operate;
	•		credit market conditions and the impact of the measures that have been taken by the federal government on the

			relative availability of financing for us, our customers and the construction industry as a whole;
	•		the timing and magnitude of impact of the additional federal infrastructure-related funding provided for under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act;
	•		the anticipated reduction in spending for nonresidential construction, particularly commercial construction, and the impact on demand for our concrete reinforcing products;
	•		the severity and duration of the downturn in residential construction activity and the impact on those portions of our business that are correlated with the housing sector;
	•		the cyclical nature of the steel and building material industries;
	•		fluctuations in the cost and availability of our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, from domestic and foreign suppliers;
	•		our ability to raise selling prices in order to recover increases in wire rod costs;
	•		changes in U.S. or foreign trade policy affecting imports or exports of steel wire rod or our products, including the outcome of the trade cases that have been filed by domestic producers of prestressed concrete strand (“PC strand”) regarding imports of PC strand from China;
	•		unanticipated changes in customer demand, order patterns or inventory levels;
	•		the impact of weak demand and reduced capacity utilization levels on our unit manufacturing costs;
	•		our ability to further develop the market for engineered structural mesh (“ESM”) and expand our shipments of ESM;
	•		the actual net proceeds realized and closure costs incurred in connection with our exit from the industrial wire business;
	•		legal, environmental or regulatory developments that significantly impact our operating costs;
	•		unanticipated plant outages, equipment failures or labor difficulties;
	•		continued escalation in certain of our operating costs; and
	•		the “Risk Factors” discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2008.

Overview

          Insteel Industries, Inc. is one of the nation’s largest manufacturers of steel wire reinforcing products for concrete construction applications. We manufacture and market PC strand and welded wire reinforcement, including ESM, concrete pipe reinforcement and standard welded wire reinforcement. Our products are sold primarily to manufacturers of concrete products that are used in nonresidential construction. We market our products through sales representatives that are our employees and through a sales agent. Our products are sold nationwide as well as into Canada, Mexico, and Central and South America, and delivered primarily by truck, using common or contract carriers. Our business strategy is focused on: (1) achieving leadership positions in our markets; (2) operating as the lowest cost producer; and (3) pursuing growth opportunities within our core businesses that further our penetration of current markets served or expand our geographic reach.

          Following our exit from the industrial wire business (see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements), our operations are entirely focused on the manufacture and marketing of concrete reinforcing products. The results of operations for the industrial wire products business have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Results of Operations

Statements of Operations — Selected Data
(Dollars in thousands)

		Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
		June 27,								June 28,				June 27,								June 28,
		2009				Change				2008				2009				Change				2008
Net sales		$	56,963				(45.4	%)		$	104,332			$	169,166				(31.7	%)		$	247,572
Gross profit (loss)			1,176				(96.2	%)			30,885				(24,140	)			(142.1	%)			57,292
Percentage of net sales			2.1	%							29.6	%			(14.3	%)							23.1	%
Selling, general and administrative expense		$	4,016				(10.7	%)		$	4,496			$	13,117				(4.6	%)		$	13,748
Percentage of net sales			7.1	%							4.3	%			7.8	%							5.6	%
Interest expense		$	147				(2.0	%)		$	150			$	484				5.2	%		$	460
Interest income			(16	)			(87.2	%)			(125	)			(118	)			(79.2	%)			(568	)
Effective income tax rate			41.5	%							35.7	%			36.9	%							35.8	%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(1,737	)			(110.2	%)		$	16,948			$	(23,718	)			(184.5	%)		$	28,071
Loss from discontinued operations			(12	)			(42.9	%)			(21	)			(61	)			2,950.0	%			(2	)
Net earnings (loss)			(1,749	)			(110.3	%)			16,927				(23,779	)			(184.7	%)			28,069

“N/M” = not meaningful

Third Quarter of Fiscal 2009 Compared to Third Quarter of Fiscal 2008

Net Sales

          Net sales for the third quarter of 2009 decreased 45.4% to $57.0 million from $104.3 million in the same year-ago period. Shipments for the quarter decreased 28.7% while average selling prices declined 23.4% from the prior year levels. The reduction in shipments was primarily due to the continued general economic downturn and the tightening in the credit markets. The decline in average selling prices was driven by the collapse in steel prices that has occurred during the current year together with weakening demand following the unprecedented escalation in raw material costs and selling prices that occurred during the prior year.

Gross Profit

          Gross profit for the third quarter of 2009 was $1.2 million, or 2.1% of net sales, compared to $30.9 million, or 29.6% of net sales in the same year-ago period. Gross profit for the quarter reflects a pre-tax charge of $2.9 million for inventory write-downs to reduce the carrying value of inventory to the lower of cost or market resulting from the decline in selling prices for certain products during the quarter relative to higher raw material costs under the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method of accounting. Gross profit for the quarter was also unfavorably impacted by the reductions in shipments and selling prices, the consumption of higher cost inventory that was purchased prior to the recent collapse in steel prices and the escalation in unit conversion costs resulting from reduced operating schedules at our manufacturing facilities.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

          Selling, general and administrative expense (“SG&A expense”) for the third quarter of 2009 decreased 10.7% to $4.0 million, or 7.1% of net sales from $4.5 million, or 4.3% of net sales in the same year-ago period. The decrease was primarily due to reductions in employee incentive plan expense ($675,000) and travel expense ($74,000). The reduction in employee incentive plan expense was related to the decline in our financial performance during the current period. The reduction in travel expense was primarily due to the implementation of various cost reduction measures. These reductions were partially offset by an increase in bad debt expense resulting from higher estimates for customer payment defaults ($133,000) and legal expenses primarily associated with the trade cases that have been filed regarding imports of PC strand from China ($129,000).

Interest Expense

          Interest expense for the third quarter of 2009 was relatively flat at $147,000 compared with $150,000 in the same year-ago period primarily consisting of non-cash amortization expense associated with capitalized financing costs.

Income Taxes

          Our effective income tax rate for the third quarter of 2009 increased to 41.5% from 35.7% in the same year-ago period primarily due to a change in permanent differences resulting from the reduction of non-deductible life insurance expense, which had an amplified impact on the effective rate for the quarter as a result of the lower pre-tax loss.

Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations

          The loss from continuing operations for the third quarter of 2009 was $1.7 million, or ($0.10) per share compared with earnings from continuing operations of $16.9 million, or $0.97 per diluted share in the same year-ago period due to the decreases in net sales and gross profit.

Loss From Discontinued Operations

          The loss from discontinued operations for the third quarter of 2009 was $12,000 compared with $21,000 in the same year-ago period, which had no effect on the loss per share for either period. The current and prior year losses resulted from the facility-related costs associated with the remaining assets to be sold of the discontinued industrial wire business.

Net Earnings (Loss)

          The net loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $1.7 million, or ($0.10) per share compared to net earnings of $16.9 million, or $0.97 per diluted share in the same year-ago period primarily due to the decreases in net sales and gross profit.

First Nine Months of Fiscal 2009 Compared to First Nine Months of Fiscal 2008

Net Sales

          Net sales for the first nine months of 2009 decreased 31.7% to $169.2 million from $247.6 million in the same year-ago period. Shipments for the year decreased 37.3% while average selling prices rose 9.0% from the prior year levels. The reduction in shipments was primarily due to customer inventory destocking, the general economic downturn and the tightening in the credit markets. The increase in average selling prices resulted from price increases that were implemented by us over the course of 2008 to recover the unprecedented escalation in our raw material costs.

Gross Profit (Loss)

          The gross loss for the first nine months of 2009 was $24.1 million, or (14.3%) of net sales, compared with gross profit of $57.3 million, or 23.1% of net sales in the same year-ago period. The gross loss for the year reflects a pre-tax charge of $25.9 million for inventory write-downs to reduce the carrying value of inventory to the lower of cost or market resulting from the decline in selling prices for certain products during the year relative to higher raw material costs under the FIFO method of accounting. The gross loss for the first nine months of 2009 also reflects the unfavorable impact of the reduction in shipments, the consumption of higher cost inventory that was purchased prior to the recent collapse in steel prices and the escalation in unit conversion costs resulting from reduced operating schedules at our manufacturing facilities.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

          SG&A expense for the first nine months of 2009 decreased 4.6% to $13.1 million, or 7.8% of net sales from $13.7 million, or 5.6% of net sales in the same year-ago period. The decrease was primarily due to reductions in employee incentive plan expense ($2.0 million) and supplemental employee retirement plan expense ($263,000). The reduction in employee incentive plan expense was related to the decline in our financial performance during the current period. These decreases were partially offset by the net gain on a life insurance settlement in the prior year ($661,000), the decrease in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies ($317,000) in the current year resulting from the decline in the value of the underlying investments, and increases in stock-based compensation expense ($232,000) and legal expenses primarily associated with the trade cases that have been filed regarding imports of PC strand from China ($155,000).

Interest Expense

          Interest expense for the first nine months of 2009 increased $24,000 or 5.2% to $484,000 from $460,000 in the same year-ago period. The increase was primarily due to higher average outstanding balances on the revolving credit facility in the current year.

Income Taxes

          Our effective income tax rate for the first nine months of 2009 increased to 36.9% from 35.8% in the same year-ago period primarily due to permanent differences resulting from reductions in nontaxable insurance settlement proceeds, an increase in non-deductible life insurance expense and a reduction in the qualified production activities deduction resulting from the current year pre-tax loss.

Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations

          The loss from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2009 was $23.7 million, or ($1.37) per share compared with earnings from continuing operations of $28.1 million, or $1.58 per diluted share in the same year-ago period due to the decreases in net sales and gross profit.

Loss From Discontinued Operations

          The loss from discontinued operations for the first nine months of 2009 was $61,000 compared with $2,000 in the same year-ago period, which had no effect on the loss per share for either period. The current and prior year losses resulted from the facility-related costs associated with the remaining assets to be sold of the discontinued industrial wire business.

Net Earnings (Loss)

          The net loss for the first nine months of 2009 was $23.8 million, or ($1.37) per share compared to net earnings of $28.1 million, or $1.58 per diluted share in the same year-ago period primarily due to the decreases in net sales and gross profit.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Selected Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands)

		Nine Months Ended
		June 27,				June 28,
		2009				2008
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	6,596			$	26,613
Net cash used for investing activities			(1,173	)			(7,558	)
Net cash used for financing activities			(10,289	)			(10,193	)
Working capital			78,660				87,999
Total long-term debt			—				—
Percentage of total capital			—				—
Shareholders’ equity		$	145,977			$	162,917
Percentage of total capital			100.0	%			100.0	%
Total capital (total long-term debt + shareholders’ equity)		$	145,977			$	162,917

Cash Flow Analysis

          Operating activities provided $6.6 million of cash during the first nine months of 2009 compared to $26.6 million during the same period last year. The year-over-year change was primarily due to the loss that was incurred in the current year, which was partially offset by the cash provided by the net working capital components of accounts receivable, inventories, and accounts payable and accrued expenses. The current year loss reflects a pre-tax charge of $25.9 million for inventory write-downs. Net working capital provided $12.0 million in the current year while using $11.5 million in the prior year. The cash provided by net working capital in the current year was largely due to the $24.9 million decrease in accounts receivable resulting from the reductions in shipments and selling prices, and the $10.2 million decrease in inventories (excluding the impact of the inventory write-downs) resulting from our inventory reduction initiatives. These decreases were partially offset by the $23.1 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses that was primarily due to the payment of $10.9 million of accrued income taxes payable and lower raw material purchases. In addition to these changes in working capital, the $14.8 million of other changes in assets and liabilities in the current year reflects the impact of $14.5 million of income taxes receivable that was recorded in prepaid expenses and other resulting from the current year loss. The cash used by working capital in the prior year was primarily due to the $25.6 million increase in inventories and the $11.1 million increase in accounts receivable resulting from the escalation in raw material costs and selling prices. These increases were

partially offset by the $25.2 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses largely related to higher raw material purchases. While an economic slowdown adversely affects sales to our customers, it generally reduces our working capital requirements. As the impact and duration of the current economic slowdown become clearer, we may make additional adjustments in our operating activities, which could materially impact our cash requirements.

          Investing activities used $1.2 million of cash during the first nine months of 2009 compared to $7.6 million during the same period last year. The decrease was primarily due to the $6.7 million reduction in capital expenditures to $1.7 million from $8.4 million in the prior year. Capital expenditures are expected to total less than $3.0 million for fiscal 2009. Current year investing activities also include $413,000 of proceeds from the surrender of life insurance policies. Investing activities for the prior year include $1.1 million of proceeds from claims on life insurance policies and a $365,000 increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies resulting from the increase in the value of the underlying investments. Investing activities are largely discretionary and future outlays could be reduced significantly or eliminated should economic conditions warrant.

          Financing activities used $10.3 million of cash during the first nine months of 2009 compared to $10.2 million during the same period last year. During the current year, $10.3 million of cash dividends were paid, while in the prior year, $8.7 million of shares were repurchased and $1.6 million of cash dividends were paid.

Credit Facilities

          As of June 27, 2009, we had a $100.0 million revolving credit facility in place to supplement our operating cash flow in funding our working capital, capital expenditure and general corporate requirements. As of June 27, 2009, no borrowings were outstanding on the revolving credit facility, $39.3 million of additional borrowing capacity was available and outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million (see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements). During the three-month period ended June 27, 2009, ordinary course borrowings on our revolving credit facility were as high as $400,000.

          We believe that, in the absence of significant unanticipated cash demands, cash and cash equivalents, net cash generated by operating activities and amounts available under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to satisfy our expected requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividends and share repurchases, if any. However, further deterioration in general economic conditions could result in additional reductions in demand from our customers, which would likely reduce our operating cash flows. Under such circumstances, we may need to borrow additional amounts on our revolving credit facility, curtail capital and operating expenditures, delay or restrict share repurchases, cease dividend payments and/or realign our working capital requirements.

          Should we determine, at any time, that we required additional short-term liquidity, we would evaluate the alternative sources of financing that are potentially available to provide such funding. There can be no assurance that any such financing, if pursued, would be obtained, or if obtained, would be adequate or on terms acceptable to us. However, we believe that our strong balance sheet and capital structure as of June 27, 2009 together with the current borrowing capacity available on our revolving credit facility position us to meet our anticipated liquidity requirements.

Impact of Inflation

          We are subject to inflationary risks arising from fluctuations in the market prices for our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, and, to a much lesser extent, freight, energy and other consumables that are used in our manufacturing processes. We have generally been able to adjust our selling prices to pass through increases in these costs or offset them through various cost reduction and productivity improvement initiatives. However, our ability to raise our selling prices depends on market conditions and competitive dynamics, and there may be periods during which we are unable to fully recover increases in our costs. During the first nine months of 2009, selling prices for our products have declined in response to softening demand, lower wire rod costs and inventory destocking measures pursued by our customers, which negatively impacted our financial results as we consumed higher cost inventory that was previously purchased. In contrast, during 2008, we implemented price increases in response to the unprecedented escalation in wire rod costs, which materially increased our net sales and earnings as we consumed lower cost inventory.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

          We do not have any material transactions, arrangements, obligations (including contingent obligations), or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K of the SEC, that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future impact on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources or significant components of revenues or expenses.

Contractual Obligations

          There have been no material changes in our contractual obligations and commitments as disclosed in our Annual Report on form 10-K as of September 27, 2008 other than those which occur in the ordinary course of business.

Critical Accounting Policies

          Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on these financial statements. The preparation of our financial statements requires the application of these accounting policies in addition to certain estimates and judgments based on current available information, actuarial estimates, historical results and other assumptions believed to be reasonable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

          Following is a discussion of our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are both important to the depiction of our financial condition and results of operations and that require judgments, assumptions and estimates.

          Revenue recognition. We recognize revenue from product sales in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104 when products are shipped and risk of loss and title has passed to the customer. Sales taxes collected from customers are recorded on a net basis and as such, are excluded from revenue.

          Concentration of credit risk. Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by institutions in which our cash and cash equivalents are held and customers to the extent of the amounts recorded on the balance sheet. We invest excess cash primarily in money market funds, which are highly liquid securities that bear minimal risk.

          Most of our accounts receivable are due from customers that are located in the United States and we generally require no collateral depending upon the creditworthiness of the account. We utilize credit insurance on certain accounts receivable due from customers located outside of the United States. We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our assessment of the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. There is no disproportionate concentration of credit risk.

          Allowance for doubtful accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments on outstanding balances owed to us. Significant management judgments and estimates are used in establishing the allowances. These judgments and estimates consider such factors as customers’ financial position, cash flows and payment history as well as current and expected business conditions. It is reasonably likely that actual collections will differ from our estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in the allowances. Adjustments to the allowances may also be required if there are significant changes in the financial condition of our customers.

          Inventory valuation. We periodically evaluate the carrying value of our inventory. This evaluation includes assessing the adequacy of allowances to cover losses in the normal course of operations, providing for excess and obsolete inventory, and ensuring that inventory is valued at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Our evaluation considers such factors as the cost of inventory, future demand, our historical experience and market conditions. In assessing the realization of inventory values, we are required to make judgments and estimates regarding future market conditions. Because of the subjective nature of these judgments and estimates, it is reasonably likely that actual outcomes will differ from our estimates. Adjustments to these reserves may be required if actual market conditions for our products are substantially different than the assumptions underlying our estimates.

          Self insurance. We are self-insured for certain losses relating to medical and workers’ compensation claims. Self-insurance claims filed and claims incurred but not reported are accrued based upon management’s estimates of the discounted ultimate cost for uninsured claims incurred using actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and historical experience. These estimates are subject to a high degree of variability based upon future inflation rates, litigation trends, changes in benefit levels and claim settlement patterns. Because of uncertainties related to these factors as well as the possibility of changes in the underlying facts and circumstances, future adjustments to these reserves may be required.

          Litigation. From time to time, we may be involved in claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. Such matters involve uncertainty as to the eventual outcomes and the potential losses that we may ultimately incur. We record expenses for litigation when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We estimate the probability of such losses based on the advice of legal counsel, the outcome of similar litigation, the status of the

lawsuits and other factors. Due to the numerous factors that enter into these judgments and assumptions, both the precision and reliability of the resulting estimates are subject to substantial uncertainties. We monitor our potential exposure to these contingencies on a regular basis and may adjust our estimates as additional information becomes known or developments occur.

          Assumptions for employee benefit plans. We account for our defined employee benefit plans, the Insteel Wire Products Company Retirement Income Plan for Hourly Employees, Wilmington, Delaware (the “Delaware Plan”) and the supplemental employee retirement plans (each, a “SERP”) in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 87, Employer’s Accounting for Pensions, as amended by SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 87, we recognize net periodic pension costs and value pension assets or liabilities based on certain actuarial assumptions, principally the assumed discount rate and the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets.

          The discount rates we utilize for determining net periodic pension costs and the related benefit obligations for our plans are based, in part, on current interest rates earned on long-term bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings assigned by recognized rating agencies. Our discount rate assumptions are adjusted as of each valuation date to reflect current interest rates on such long-term bonds. The discount rates are used to determine the actuarial present value of the benefit obligations as of the valuation date as well as the interest component of the net periodic pension cost for the following year.

          The assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets for the Delaware Plan represents the estimated average rate of return expected to be earned on the funds invested or to be invested in the plan’s assets to fund the benefit payments inherent in the projected benefit obligations. Unlike the discount rate, which is adjusted each year based on changes in current long-term interest rates, the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets will not necessarily change based upon the actual short-term performance of the plan assets in any given year. The amount of net periodic pension cost that is recorded each year is based upon the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets for the plan and the actual fair value of the plan assets as of the beginning of the year. We regularly review our actual asset allocation and periodically rebalance the investments in the plan to more accurately reflect the targeted allocation when considered appropriate.

          For 2008, the assumed long-term rate of return utilized for plan assets of the Delaware Plan was 8%. We currently expect to use the same assumed rate for the long-term return on plan assets in 2009. In determining the appropriateness of this assumption, we considered the historical rate of return of the plan assets, the current and projected asset mix, our investment objectives and information provided by our third-party investment advisors.

          The projected benefit obligations and net periodic pension cost for the Delaware Plan are based in part on expected increases in future compensation levels. Our assumption for the expected increase in future compensation levels is based upon our average historical experience and management’s intentions regarding future compensation increases, which generally approximates average long-term inflation rates.

          Assumed discount rates and rates of return on plan assets are reevaluated annually. Changes in these assumptions can result in the recognition of materially different pension costs over different periods and materially different asset and liability amounts in our consolidated financial statements. A reduction in the assumed discount rate generally results in an actuarial loss, as the actuarially-determined present value of estimated future benefit payments will increase. Conversely, an increase in the assumed discount rate generally results in an actuarial gain. In addition, an actual return on plan assets for a given year that is greater than the assumed return on plan assets results in an actuarial gain, while an actual return on plan assets that is less than the assumed return results in an actuarial loss. Other actual outcomes that differ from previous assumptions, such as individuals living longer or shorter lives than assumed in the mortality tables that are also used to determine the actuarially-determined present value of estimated future benefit payments, changes in such mortality tables themselves or plan amendments will also result in actuarial losses or gains. Under GAAP, actuarial gains and losses are deferred and amortized into income over future periods based upon the expected average remaining service life of the active plan participants (for plans for which benefits are still being earned by active employees) or the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants (for plans for which benefits are not still being earned by active employees). However, any actuarial gains generated in future periods reduce the negative amortization effect of any cumulative unamortized actuarial losses, while any actuarial losses generated in future periods reduce the favorable amortization effect of any cumulative unamortized actuarial gains.

          The amounts recognized as net periodic pension cost and as pension assets or liabilities are based upon the actuarial assumptions discussed above. We believe that all of the actuarial assumptions used for determining the net periodic pension costs and pension assets or liabilities related to the Delaware Plan are reasonable and appropriate. The funding requirements for the Delaware Plan are based upon applicable regulations, and will generally differ from the amount of pension cost recognized under SFAS No. 87 for financial reporting purposes. No contributions were required to be made to the Delaware Plan in the prior year.

          We currently expect to record net periodic pension costs totaling $730,000 during 2009. However, we do not expect that any cash contributions to the Delaware Plan will be required during 2009. Contributions to the SERP plan are expected to total $155,000, matching the required benefit payments during 2009.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Current Adoptions

          In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” and requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as in annual financial statements. Additionally, this FSP amends Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. These disclosures are required for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

          In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”. SFAS No. 165 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. We have evaluated the period beginning June 28, 2009 through July 16, 2009, the date our financial statements were issued, and concluded there were no events or transactions occurring during this period that required recognition or disclosure in our financial statements.

Future Adoptions

          In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (“141R”), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose all of the information required to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. This statement is effective for acquisition dates on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008 and is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements to the extent that we do not enter into business combinations subsequent to adoption.

          In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for non-controlling interests in subsidiaries and for the deconsolidation of subsidiaries. This statement clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements to the extent that we do not obtain any minority interests in subsidiaries subsequent to adoption.

          In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 requires that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years, and requires that all prior period earnings per share data presented (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) be adjusted retrospectively to conform to its provisions. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this FSP will have on our consolidated financial statements.

          In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 requires objective disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets which include disclosures about investment policies and strategies, categories of plan assets, fair value measurements of plan assets and significant concentrations of risk. This statement is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this FSP will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Outlook

          Our visibility for business conditions through the remainder of 2009 is clouded by the continued uncertainty regarding future global economic conditions, the impact of the measures that have been undertaken to ease the tightening in the credit markets and the timing and magnitude of the impact of the additional federal infrastructure-related funding provided for under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Although we expect nonresidential construction, our primary demand driver, to decrease from the levels of recent years, particularly for commercial projects which have been the most severely impacted by the economic downturn, the additional infrastructure funding provided for under ARRA should serve to at least partially mitigate this decline. We anticipate that residential construction will remain weak, which would continue to adversely affect shipments to customers that have greater exposure to the housing sector.

          Following an extended downward trend that began in September 2008, prices for our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, appear to have bottomed out. In view of the recent upturn in scrap prices and announced closure of two U.S. rod mills that represented over 20% of total domestic capacity, wire rod prices appear likely to rise over the remainder of the year, although the magnitude of the increase and the impact on prices for our products are uncertain at this time. Considering the recent signs of stabilization in our markets and the progress made in realigning our inventory levels, we do not expect that our fourth-quarter results will be significantly impacted by the inventory write-downs and mismatching of higher raw material costs in inventory with lower selling prices that have persisted through the first nine months of the year. We expect that margins will improve during the fourth quarter as the lower replacement costs for wire rod are increasingly reflected in cost of sales.

          In response to the challenges facing us, we will continue to focus on the operational fundamentals of our business: closely managing and controlling our expenses; aligning our production schedules with demand in a proactive manner as there are changes in market conditions to minimize our cash operating costs; and pursuing further improvements in the productivity and effectiveness of all of our manufacturing, selling and administrative activities. We also expect gradually increasing contributions from the substantial investments we have made in our facilities in recent years in the form of reduced operating costs and additional capacity to support future growth when market conditions improve (see “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors”). In addition to these organic growth and cost reduction initiatives, we are continually evaluating potential acquisitions in our existing businesses that further our penetration in current markets served or expand our geographic reach.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

          Our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. We manage our exposure to these market risks through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes and we are not a party to any leveraged derivatives. We monitor our underlying market risk exposures on an ongoing basis and believe that we can modify or adapt our hedging strategies as necessary.

Commodity Prices

          We are subject to significant fluctuations in the cost and availability of our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, which we purchase from both domestic and foreign suppliers. We negotiate quantities and pricing for both domestic and foreign steel wire rod purchases for varying periods (most recently monthly for domestic suppliers), depending upon market conditions, to manage our exposure to price fluctuations and to ensure adequate availability of material consistent with our requirements. We do not use derivative commodity instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in prices as such instruments are not currently available for steel wire rod. Our ability to acquire steel wire rod from foreign sources on favorable terms is impacted by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, foreign taxes, duties, tariffs and other trade actions. Although changes in wire rod costs and our selling prices may be correlated over extended periods of time, depending upon market conditions and competitive dynamics, there may be periods during which we are unable to fully recover increased wire rod costs through higher selling prices, which would reduce our gross profit and cash flow from operations. Additionally, should wire rod costs decline, our financial results may be negatively impacted if the selling prices for our products decrease to an even greater degree and to the extent that we are consuming higher cost material from inventory. Based on our shipments and average wire rod cost reflected in cost of sales for the first nine months of 2009, a 10% increase in the price of steel wire rod would have resulted in a $15.5 million increase in our pre-tax loss for the nine months ended June 27, 2009 (assuming there was not a corresponding change in our selling prices).

Interest Rates

          Although we were debt-free as of June 27, 2009, future borrowings under our senior secured credit facility are sensitive to changes in interest rates.

Foreign Exchange Exposure

          We have not typically hedged foreign currency exposures related to transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, as such transactions have not been material in the past. We will occasionally hedge firm commitments for certain equipment purchases that are denominated in foreign currencies. The decision to hedge any such transactions is made by us on a case-by-case basis. There were no forward contracts outstanding as of June 27, 2009.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

          We have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 27, 2009. This evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Further, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

          There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 27, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

          On November 19, 2007, Dywidag Systems International, Inc. (“DSI”) filed a third-party lawsuit in the Ohio Court of Claims alleging that certain epoxy-coated strand sold by us to DSI in 2002, and supplied by DSI to the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) for a bridge project, was defective. The third-party action seeks recovery of any damages which may be assessed against DSI in the action filed against it by ODOT, which allegedly could be in excess of $8.3 million, plus $2.7 million in damages allegedly incurred by DSI. We had previously filed a lawsuit against DSI in the North Carolina Superior Court in Surry County on July 25, 2007 seeking recovery of $1.4 million (plus interest) owed for other products sold by us to DSI and a judgment declaring that we had no liability to DSI arising out of the ODOT bridge project. Our North Carolina lawsuit was subsequently removed by DSI to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. On March 5, 2008, the Magistrate Judge in the U.S. District Court issued his recommendation that our motion to remand the matter to the Surry County Court should be granted. The parties are awaiting a decision from the federal District Court judge on whether the recommendation will be adopted. The parties continue to contest the appropriate jurisdiction in which this litigation should proceed. We filed a motion for summary judgment in the Ohio Court of Claims lawsuit on June 25, 2009. Discovery has commenced on a limited basis in that lawsuit. We intend to vigorously defend the claims asserted against us by DSI in addition to pursuing full recovery of the amounts owed to us by DSI. We have concluded that a loss is not yet probable with respect to this matter, and therefore no liability has been recorded. In the event the ultimate resolution of the case is unfavorable, we have estimated that the potential loss could range up to $11.0 million.

          On May 27, 2009, a coalition of domestic PC strand producers, including us, filed antidumping and countervailing duty petitions alleging that imports of PC strand from China had caused material injury to the domestic industry. The petitions allege that imports of PC strand from China were being “dumped” or sold in the U.S. at a price that was lower than its fair value and that subsidies were being provided to Chinese PC strand producers by the Chinese government. On July 10, 2009, the U.S. International Trade Commission reached a preliminary determination that imports of PC strand from China threatened to injure the domestic PC strand industry. The petitioners are alleging dumping margins ranging from 140% to 315%, with an average margin of 223%. The entire investigative process is anticipated to take one year, with the final determinations of injury, dumping and subsidies expected to occur in mid-2010.

          We are also involved in other lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including commercial, environmental and employment matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

          There were no material changes during the quarter ended June 27, 2009 from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2008 and in our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. You should carefully consider these factors in addition to the other information set forth in this report which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks and uncertainties described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2008, as well as other reports and statements that we file with the SEC, are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also have a material adverse affect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

          On November 18, 2008, our board of directors approved a new share repurchase authorization to buy back up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions (the “New Authorization”). The New Authorization replaces the previous authorization to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our common stock which was to expire on December 5, 2008. Repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. We are not obligated to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be commenced or suspended at any time at our discretion without prior notice. The New Authorization continues in effect until terminated by the Board of Directors. We did not repurchase any of our common stock under the repurchase program or otherwise during the three-month period ended June 27, 2009.

Item 6. Exhibits

	31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.   Registrant

Date: July 20, 2009		By:		/s/ Michael C. Gazmarian        Michael C. Gazmarian
				Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
				(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number		Description
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.