CMA-2013.6.30 10Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________
FORM 10-Q 
______________________________
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
Or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission file number 1-10706
____________________________________________________________________________________
Comerica Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________________________________________________________
Delaware
38-1998421
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Comerica Bank Tower
1717 Main Street, MC 6404
Dallas, Texas 75201
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(214) 462-6831
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 
_________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer ý
 
Accelerated
filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting
company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
$5 par value common stock:
Outstanding as of July 25, 2013: 184,961,609 shares


Table of Contents

COMERICA INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
(in millions, except share data)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
(unaudited)
 
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$
1,016

 
$
1,395

 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold
31

 
100

Interest-bearing deposits with banks
2,878

 
3,039

Other short-term investments
119

 
125

 
 
 
 
Investment securities available-for-sale
9,631

 
10,297

 
 
 
 
Commercial loans
29,186

 
29,513

Real estate construction loans
1,479

 
1,240

Commercial mortgage loans
9,007

 
9,472

Lease financing
843

 
859

International loans
1,209

 
1,293

Residential mortgage loans
1,611

 
1,527

Consumer loans
2,124

 
2,153

Total loans
45,459

 
46,057

Less allowance for loan losses
(613
)
 
(629
)
Net loans
44,846

 
45,428

Premises and equipment
604

 
622

Accrued income and other assets
3,822

 
4,063

Total assets
$
62,947

 
$
65,069

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing deposits
$
21,870

 
$
23,279

 
 
 
 
Money market and interest-bearing checking deposits
21,677

 
21,273

Savings deposits
1,677

 
1,606

Customer certificates of deposit
5,594

 
5,531

Foreign office time deposits
437

 
502

Total interest-bearing deposits
29,385

 
28,912

Total deposits
51,255

 
52,191

Short-term borrowings
131

 
110

Accrued expenses and other liabilities
1,049

 
1,106

Medium- and long-term debt
3,601

 
4,720

Total liabilities
56,036

 
58,127

 
 
 
 
Common stock - $5 par value:
 
 
 
Authorized - 325,000,000 shares
 
 
 
Issued - 228,164,824 shares
1,141

 
1,141

Capital surplus
2,160

 
2,162

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(538
)
 
(413
)
Retained earnings
6,127

 
5,931

Less cost of common stock in treasury - 42,999,083 shares at 6/30/13
and 39,889,610 shares at 12/31/12
(1,979
)
 
(1,879
)
Total shareholders’ equity
6,911

 
6,942

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
62,947

 
$
65,069

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries 


 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
INTEREST INCOME
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and fees on loans
$
388

 
$
408

 
$
778

 
$
819

Interest on investment securities
52

 
59

 
105

 
122

Interest on short-term investments
3

 
3

 
6

 
6

Total interest income
443

 
470

 
889

 
947

INTEREST EXPENSE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest on deposits
15

 
18

 
30

 
37

Interest on medium- and long-term debt
14

 
17

 
29

 
33

Total interest expense
29

 
35

 
59

 
70

Net interest income
414

 
435

 
830

 
877

Provision for credit losses
13

 
19

 
29

 
41

Net interest income after provision for credit losses
401

 
416

 
801

 
836

NONINTEREST INCOME
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
53

 
53

 
108

 
109

Fiduciary income
44

 
39

 
87

 
77

Commercial lending fees
22

 
24

 
43

 
49

Letter of credit fees
16

 
18

 
32

 
35

Card fees
13

 
12

 
25

 
23

Foreign exchange income
9

 
10

 
18

 
20

Bank-owned life insurance
10

 
10

 
19

 
20

Brokerage fees
4

 
4

 
9

 
9

Net securities (losses) gains
(2
)
 
6

 
(2
)
 
11

Other noninterest income
39

 
35

 
69

 
64

Total noninterest income
208

 
211

 
408

 
417

NONINTEREST EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries
182

 
189

 
370

 
390

Employee benefits
63

 
61

 
126

 
120

Total salaries and employee benefits
245

 
250

 
496

 
510

Net occupancy expense
39

 
40

 
78

 
81

Equipment expense
15

 
16

 
30

 
33

Outside processing fee expense
30

 
26

 
58

 
52

Software expense
22

 
21

 
44

 
44

Merger and restructuring charges

 
8

 

 
8

FDIC insurance expense
8

 
10

 
17

 
20

Advertising expense
6

 
7

 
12

 
14

Other real estate expense
1

 
1

 
2

 
4

Other noninterest expenses
50

 
55

 
95

 
115

Total noninterest expenses
416

 
434

 
832

 
881

Income before income taxes
193

 
193

 
377

 
372

Provision for income taxes
50

 
50

 
100

 
98

NET INCOME
143

 
143

 
277

 
274

Less income allocated to participating securities
2

 
2

 
4

 
3

Net income attributable to common shares
$
141

 
$
141

 
$
273

 
$
271

Earnings per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.77

 
$
0.73

 
$
1.48

 
$
1.39

Diluted
0.76

 
0.73

 
1.46

 
1.39

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income
15

 
169

 
152

 
329

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividends declared on common stock
32

 
29

 
64

 
49

Cash dividends declared per common share
0.17

 
0.15

 
0.34

 
0.25

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries


 
Common Stock
 
 
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
 
 
 
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
(in millions, except per share data)
Shares
Outstanding
 
Amount
 
Capital
Surplus
 
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Treasury
Stock
 
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011
197.3

 
$
1,141

 
$
2,170

 
$
(356
)
 
$
5,546

 
$
(1,633
)
 
$
6,868

Net income

 

 

 

 
274

 

 
274

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

 
55

 

 

 
55

Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.25 per share)

 

 

 

 
(49
)
 

 
(49
)
Purchase of common stock
(4.1
)
 

 

 

 

 
(125
)
 
(125
)
Net issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
1.1

 

 
(49
)
 

 
(27
)
 
60

 
(16
)
Share-based compensation

 

 
21

 

 

 

 
21

Other

 

 
2

 

 

 
(2
)
 

BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2012
194.3

 
$
1,141

 
$
2,144

 
$
(301
)
 
$
5,744

 
$
(1,700
)
 
$
7,028

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2012
188.3

 
$
1,141

 
$
2,162

 
$
(413
)
 
$
5,931

 
$
(1,879
)
 
$
6,942

Net income

 

 

 

 
277

 

 
277

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 
(125
)
 

 

 
(125
)
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.34 per share)

 

 

 

 
(64
)
 

 
(64
)
Purchase of common stock
(4.1
)
 

 

 

 

 
(146
)
 
(146
)
Net issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
1.0

 

 
(19
)
 

 
(17
)
 
45

 
9

Share-based compensation

 

 
18

 

 

 

 
18

Other

 

 
(1
)
 

 

 
1

 

BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2013
185.2

 
$
1,141

 
$
2,160

 
$
(538
)
 
$
6,127

 
$
(1,979
)
 
$
6,911

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



3

Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries


 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Net income
$
277

 
$
274

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Provision for credit losses
29

 
41

Provision for deferred income taxes
26

 
64

Depreciation and amortization
62

 
67

Net periodic defined benefit cost
44

 
41

Share-based compensation expense
18

 
21

Net amortization of securities
18

 
23

Accretion of loan purchase discount
(18
)
 
(43
)
Net securities losses (gains)
2

 
(11
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
(2
)
 
(1
)
Net change in:
 
 
 
Trading securities
4

 
(23
)
Accrued income receivable
(5
)
 
1

Accrued expenses payable
(35
)
 
(47
)
Other, net
(135
)
 
39

Net cash provided by operating activities
285

 
446

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
Maturities and redemptions
1,761

 
1,893

Purchases
(1,355
)
 
(1,689
)
Net change in loans
563

 
(1,379
)
Sales of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
41

 
3

Proceeds from sales of indirect private equity and venture capital funds

 
1

Other, net
(37
)
 
(34
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
973

 
(1,205
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Net change in:
 
 
 
Deposits
(636
)
 
1,689

Short-term borrowings
21

 
13

Medium- and long-term debt:
 
 
 
Maturities and redemptions
(1,055
)
 
(193
)
Common stock:
 
 
 
Repurchases
(146
)
 
(125
)
Cash dividends paid
(61
)
 
(40
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
2

 
1

Other, net
8

 
(2
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(1,867
)
 
1,343

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(609
)
 
584

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
4,534

 
3,556

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
3,925

 
$
4,140

Interest paid
$
61

 
$
69

Income taxes, tax deposits and tax-related interest paid
22

 
64

Noncash investing and financing activities:
 
 
 
Loans transferred to other real estate
9

 
20

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation were included. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. Certain items in prior periods were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Annual Report of Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s assessment of probable, estimable losses inherent in the Corporation’s loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses includes specific allowances, based on individual evaluations of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.
The allowance for business loans which do not meet the criteria to be evaluated individually is determined by applying standard reserve factors to the pool of business loans within each internal risk rating. In the first quarter 2013, the Corporation enhanced the approach utilized for determining standard reserve factors by changing from a dollar-based migration method for developing probability of default statistics to a count-based method. Under the dollar-based method, each dollar that moved to default received equal weight in the determination of standard reserve factors for each internal risk rating. As a result, the movement of larger loans impacted standard reserve factors more than the movement of smaller loans. By moving to a count-based approach, where each loan that moves to default receives equal weighting, unusually large or small loans will not have a disproportionate influence on the standard reserve factors. The change resulted in a $40 million increase to the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2013.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter 2013, the Corporation adopted amendments to GAAP which require enhanced disclosures about the nature and effect or potential effect of an entity's rights of setoff associated with its derivative and certain other financial instruments. The required disclosures are provided in Note 5 to these unaudited financial statements.
NOTE 2 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. The determination of fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, the Corporation uses present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of its financial instruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used.
Fair value is an estimate of the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (i.e., not a forced transaction, such as a liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date. However, the calculated fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the financial instrument.
Trading securities, investment securities available-for-sale, derivatives and deferred compensation plan liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Corporation may be required to record other assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as impaired loans, other real estate (primarily foreclosed property), nonmarketable equity securities and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve write-downs of individual assets or application of lower of cost or fair value accounting.

5

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The Corporation categorizes assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis and the estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis into a three-level hierarchy, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
 
Level 1
 
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
 
 
 
 
 
Level 2
 
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
 
 
 
 
 
Level 3
 
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
The Corporation generally utilizes third-party pricing services to value Level 1 and Level 2 trading and investment securities, as well as certain derivatives designated as fair value hedges. Management reviews the methodologies and assumptions used by the third-party pricing services and evaluates the values provided, principally by comparison with other available market quotes for similar instruments and/or analysis based on internal models using available third-party market data. The Corporation may occasionally adjust certain values provided by the third-party pricing service when management believes, as the result of its review, that the adjusted price most appropriately reflects the fair value of the particular security.
Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies and key inputs used to measure financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. The descriptions include an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified. Transfers of assets or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period, when applicable.
Cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks
Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. As such, the Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of these instruments as Level 1.
Trading securities and associated deferred compensation plan liabilities
Securities held for trading purposes and associated deferred compensation plan liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and included in “other short-term investments” and “accrued expenses and other liabilities,” respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets. Level 1 securities held for trading purposes include assets related to employee deferred compensation plans, which are invested in mutual funds, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and other securities traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Deferred compensation plan liabilities represent the fair value of the obligation to the employee, which corresponds to the fair value of the invested assets. Level 2 trading securities include municipal bonds and residential mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include securities in less liquid markets and securities not rated by a credit agency. The methods used to value trading securities are the same as the methods used to value investment securities available-for-sale, discussed below.
Loans held-for-sale
Loans held-for-sale, included in “other short-term investments” on the consolidated balance sheets, are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. Loans held-for-sale may be carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when fair value is less than cost. The fair value is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Corporation classifies both loans held-for-sale subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments and the estimated fair value of loans held-for sale as Level 2.
Investment securities available-for-sale
Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available or the market is deemed to be inactive at the measurement date, an adjustment to the quoted prices may be necessary. In some circumstances, the Corporation may conclude that a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate to estimate an instrument's fair value. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include residential mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored entities and corporate debt

6

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

securities. The fair value of Level 2 securities was determined using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or pricing models based on observable market data inputs, primarily interest rates, spreads and prepayment information.
Securities classified as Level 3, of which the substantial majority is auction-rate securities, represent securities in less liquid markets requiring significant management assumptions when determining fair value. Due to the lack of a robust secondary auction-rate securities market with active fair value indicators, fair value for all periods presented was determined using an income approach based on a discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow model utilizes two significant inputs: discount rate and workout period. The discount rate was calculated using credit spreads of the underlying collateral or similar securities plus a liquidity risk premium. The liquidity risk premium was derived from the rate at which various types of similar auction-rate securities had been redeemed or sold. The workout period was based on an assessment of publicly available information on efforts to re-establish functioning markets for these securities and the Corporation's own redemption experience. Significant increases in any of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value. Additionally, as the discount rate incorporates the liquidity risk premium, a change in an assumption used for the liquidity risk premium would be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the discount rate. The Corporate Development Department is responsible for determining the valuation methodology for auction-rate securities and for updating significant inputs based on changes to the factors discussed above. Valuation results, including an analysis of changes to the valuation methodology and significant inputs, are provided to senior management for review on a quarterly basis.
Loans
The Corporation does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, the Corporation may establish a specific allowance for an impaired loan based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Such loan values are reported as nonrecurring fair value measurements. Collateral values supporting individually evaluated impaired loans are evaluated quarterly. When management determines that the fair value of the collateral requires additional adjustments, either as a result of non-current appraisal value or when there is no observable market price, the Corporation classifies the impaired loan as Level 3. The Special Assets Group is responsible for performing quarterly credit quality reviews for all impaired loans as part of the quarterly allowance for loan losses process overseen by the Chief Credit Officer, during which valuation adjustments to updated collateral values are determined.
The Corporation discloses fair value estimates for loans not recorded at fair value. The estimated fair value is determined based on characteristics such as loan category, repricing features and remaining maturity, and includes prepayment and credit loss estimates. For variable rate business loans that reprice frequently, the estimated fair value is based on carrying values adjusted for estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. For other business loans and retail loans, fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow model that employs a discount rate that reflects the Corporation's current pricing for loans with similar characteristics and remaining maturity, adjusted by an amount for estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The rates take into account the expected yield curve, as well as an adjustment for prepayment risk, when applicable. The Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of loans held for investment as Level 3.
Customers’ liability on acceptances outstanding and acceptances outstanding
Customers' liability on acceptances outstanding is included in "accrued income and other assets" and acceptances outstanding are included in "accrued expenses and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets. Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. As such, the Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of these instruments as Level 1.
Derivative assets and derivative liabilities
Derivative instruments held or issued for risk management or customer-initiated activities are traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. Fair value for over-the-counter derivative instruments is measured on a recurring basis using internally developed models that use primarily market observable inputs, such as yield curves and option volatilities. The Corporation manages credit risk for its over-the-counter derivative positions on a counterparty-by-counterparty basis and calculates credit valuation adjustments, included in the fair value of these instruments, on the basis of its relationships at the counterparty portfolio/master netting agreement level. These credit valuation adjustments are determined by applying a credit spread for the counterparty or the Corporation, as appropriate, to the total expected exposure of the derivative after considering collateral and other master netting arrangements. These adjustments, which are considered Level 3 inputs, are based on estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default. The Corporation assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Corporation classifies its over-the-counter derivative valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Examples of Level 2 derivative instruments are interest rate swaps and energy derivative and foreign exchange contracts.

7

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The Corporation holds a portfolio of warrants for generally nonmarketable equity securities with a fair value of $3 million at June 30, 2013. These warrants are primarily from high technology, non-public companies obtained as part of the loan origination process. Warrants which contain a net exercise provision or a non-contingent put right embedded in the warrant agreement are accounted for as derivatives and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes valuation model utilizes five inputs: risk-free rate, expected life, volatility, exercise price, and the per share market value of the underlying company. The Corporate Development Department is responsible for the warrant valuation process, which includes reviewing all significant inputs for reasonableness, and for providing valuation results to senior management. Increases in any of these inputs in isolation, with the exception of exercise price, would result in a higher fair value. Increases in exercise price in isolation would result in a lower fair value. The Corporation classifies warrants accounted for as derivatives as Level 3.
The Corporation also holds a derivative contract associated with the 2008 sale of its remaining ownership of Visa Inc. (Visa) Class B shares. Under the terms of the derivative contract, the Corporation will compensate the counterparty primarily for dilutive adjustments made to the conversion factor of the Visa Class B to Class A shares based on the ultimate outcome of litigation involving Visa. Conversely, the Corporation will be compensated by the counterparty for any increase in the conversion factor from anti-dilutive adjustments. At June 30, 2013, the fair value of the contract was a liability of $3 million. The recurring fair value of the derivative contract is based on unobservable inputs consisting of management's estimate of the litigation outcome, timing of litigation settlements and payments related to the derivative. Significant increases in the estimate of litigation outcome and the timing of litigation settlements in isolation would result in a significantly higher liability fair value. Significant increases in payments related to the derivative in isolation would result in a significantly lower liability fair value. The Corporation classifies the derivative liability as Level 3.
Nonmarketable equity securities
The Corporation has a portfolio of indirect (through funds) private equity and venture capital investments with a carrying value and unfunded commitments of $13 million and $6 million, respectively, at June 30, 2013. These funds generally cannot be redeemed and the majority are not readily marketable. Distributions from these funds are received by the Corporation as a result of the liquidation of underlying investments of the funds and/or as income distributions. It is estimated that the underlying assets of the funds will be liquidated over a period of up to 17 years. The investments are accounted for on the cost or equity method and are individually reviewed for impairment on a quarterly basis by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value. These investments may be carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when they are deemed to be impaired and written down to fair value. Where there is not a readily determinable fair value, the Corporation estimates fair value for indirect private equity and venture capital investments based on the Corporation's percentage ownership in the net asset value of the entire fund, as reported by the fund, after indication that the fund adheres to applicable fair value measurement guidance. For those funds where the net asset value is not reported by the fund, the Corporation derives the fair value of the fund by estimating the fair value of each underlying investment in the fund. In addition to using qualitative information about each underlying investment, as provided by the fund, the Corporation gives consideration to information pertinent to the specific nature of the debt or equity investment, such as relevant market conditions, offering prices, operating results, financial conditions, exit strategy and other qualitative information, as available. The lack of an independent source to validate fair value estimates, including the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. On a quarterly basis, the Corporate Development Department is responsible, with appropriate oversight and approval provided by senior management, for performing the valuation procedures and updating significant inputs, as are primarily provided by the underlying fund's management. The Corporation classifies fair value measurements of nonmarketable equity securities as Level 3. Commitments to fund additional investments in nonmarketable equity securities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were insignificant and $2 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The Corporation also holds restricted equity investments, primarily Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) stock. Restricted equity securities are not readily marketable and are recorded at cost (par value) and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. No significant observable market data for these instruments is available. The Corporation considers the profitability and asset quality of the issuer, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience when determining the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The Corporation’s investment in FHLB stock totaled $48 million and $89 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and its investment in FRB stock totaled $85 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Corporation believes its investments in FHLB and FRB stock are ultimately recoverable at par. Therefore, the carrying amount for these restricted equity investments approximates fair value. The Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of such investments as Level 1.
Other real estate
Other real estate is included in “accrued income and other assets” on the consolidated balance sheets and includes primarily foreclosed property. Foreclosed property is initially recorded at fair value, less costs to sell, at the date of foreclosure, establishing

8

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

a new cost basis. Subsequently, foreclosed property is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell. Other real estate may be carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when fair value is less than cost. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised value or management's estimate of the value of the property. The Special Assets Group obtains updated independent market prices and appraised values, as required by state regulation or deemed necessary based on market conditions, and determines if additional write-downs are necessary. On a quarterly basis, senior management reviews all other real estate and determines whether the carrying values are reasonable, based on the length of time elapsed since receipt of independent market price or appraised value and current market conditions. Other real estate carried at fair value based on an observable market price or a current appraised value is classified by the Corporation as Level 2. When management determines that the fair value of other real estate requires additional adjustments, either as a result of a non-current appraisal or when there is no observable market price, the Corporation classifies the other real estate as Level 3.
Loan servicing rights
Loan servicing rights with a carrying value of $2 million at June 30, 2013, included in “accrued income and other assets” on the consolidated balance sheets and primarily related to Small Business Administration loans, are subject to impairment testing. Loan servicing rights may be carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when impairment testing indicates that the fair value of the loan servicing rights is less than the recorded value. A valuation model is used for impairment testing on a quarterly basis, which utilizes a discounted cash flow model, using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined by management. On a quarterly basis, the Accounting Department is responsible for performing the valuation procedures and updating significant inputs, which are primarily obtained from available third-party market data, with appropriate oversight and approval provided by senior management. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, loan servicing rights are adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Corporation classifies loan servicing rights as Level 3.
Deposit liabilities
The estimated fair value of checking, savings and certain money market deposit accounts is represented by the amounts payable on demand. The estimated fair value of term deposits is calculated by discounting the scheduled cash flows using the period-end rates offered on these instruments. As such, the Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of deposit liabilities as Level 2.
Short-term borrowings
The carrying amount of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings approximates the estimated fair value. As such, the Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of short-term borrowings as Level 1.
Medium- and long-term debt
The carrying value of variable-rate FHLB advances approximates the estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of the Corporation's remaining variable- and fixed-rate medium- and long-term debt is based on quoted market values when available. If quoted market values are not available, the estimated fair value is based on the market values of debt with similar characteristics. The Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of medium- and long-term debt as Level 2.
Credit-related financial instruments
Credit-related financial instruments include unused commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit. These instruments generate ongoing fees which are recognized over the term of the commitment. In situations where credit losses are probable, the Corporation records an allowance. The carrying value of these instruments included in "accrued expenses and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets, which includes the carrying value of the deferred fees plus the related allowance, approximates the estimated fair value. The Corporation classifies the estimated fair value of credit-related financial instruments as Level 3.

9

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

ASSETS AND LIABLILITIES RECORDED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
The following tables present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(in millions)
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred compensation plan assets
$
92

 
$
92

 
$

 
$

 
Residential mortgage-backed securities (a)
7

 

 
7

 

 
State and municipal securities
8

 

 
8

 

 
Corporate debt securities
3

 

 
3

 

 
Total trading securities
110

 
92

 
18

 

 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency securities
20

 
20

 

 

 
Residential mortgage-backed securities (a)
9,270

 

 
9,270

 

 
State and municipal securities
25

 

 

 
25

(b)
Corporate debt securities
56

 

 
55

 
1

(b)
Equity and other non-debt securities
260

 
114

 

 
146

(b)
Total investment securities available-for-sale
9,631

 
134

 
9,325

 
172

 
Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
428

 

 
428

 

 
Energy derivative contracts
138

 

 
138

 

 
Foreign exchange contracts
24

 

 
24

 

 
Warrants
3

 

 

 
3

 
Total derivative assets
593

 

 
590

 
3

 
Total assets at fair value
$
10,334

 
$
226

 
$
9,933

 
$
175

 
Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
153

 
$

 
$
153

 
$

 
Energy derivative contracts
23

 

 
23

 

 
Foreign exchange contracts
138

 

 
138

 

 
Other
3

 

 

 
3

 
Total derivative liabilities
317

 

 
314

 
3

 
Deferred compensation plan liabilities
92

 
92

 

 

 
Total liabilities at fair value
$
409

 
$
92

 
$
314

 
$
3

 
(a)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.
(b)
Auction-rate securities.

10

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

(in millions)
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred compensation plan assets
$
88

 
$
88

 
$

 
$

 
Residential mortgage-backed securities (a)
4

 

 
4

 

 
State and municipal securities
19

 

 
19

 

 
Corporate debt securities
3

 

 
3

 

 
Total trading securities
114

 
88

 
26

 

 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency securities
20

 
20

 

 

 
Residential mortgage-backed securities (a)
9,935

 

 
9,935

 

 
State and municipal securities
23

 

 

 
23

(b)
Corporate debt securities
58

 

 
57

 
1

(b)
Equity and other non-debt securities
261

 
105

 

 
156

(b)
Total investment securities available-for-sale
10,297

 
125

 
9,992

 
180

 
Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
556

 

 
556

 

 
Energy derivative contracts
173

 

 
173

 

 
Foreign exchange contracts
21

 

 
21

 

 
Warrants
3

 

 

 
3

 
Total derivative assets
753

 

 
750

 
3

 
Total assets at fair value
$
11,164

 
$
213

 
$
10,768

 
$
183

 
Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
218

 
$

 
$
218

 
$

 
Energy derivative contracts
172

 

 
172

 

 
Foreign exchange contracts
18

 

 
18

 

 
Other
1

 

 

 
1

 
Total derivative liabilities
409

 

 
408

 
1

 
Deferred compensation plan liabilities
88

 
88

 

 

 
Total liabilities at fair value
$
497

 
$
88

 
$
408

 
$
1

 
(a)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.
(b)
Auction-rate securities.
There were no transfers of assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis into or out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

11

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
 
 
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) (Pretax)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance 
at
Beginning
of Period
 
Recorded in Earnings
Recorded in
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
 
 
 
 
Balance 
at
End of 
Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
Realized
Unrealized
 
Sales
 
Settlements

 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal securities (a)
$
23

 
$

 
$

 
$
2

(b)
 
$

 
$

 
$
25

Corporate debt securities (a)
1

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
1

Equity and other non-debt securities (a)
153

 

 

 
(7
)
(b)
 

 

 
146

Total investment securities
available-for-sale
177

 

 

 
(5
)
(b)
 

 

 
172

Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants
3

 

 
1

(d)

 
 
(1
)
 

 
3

Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other
1

 

 
(2
)
(c)

 
 

 

 
3

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal securities (a)
$
23

 
$

 
$

 
$
2

(b)
 
$
(1
)
 
$

 
$
24

Corporate debt securities (a)
1

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
1

Equity and other non-debt securities (a)
320

 
6

(c)

 
7

(b)
 
(118
)
 

 
215

Total investment securities
available-for-sale
344

 
6

(c)

 
9

(b)
 
(119
)
 

 
240

Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants
3

 
2

(d)
1

(d)

 
 
(3
)
 

 
3

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal securities (a)
$
23

 
$

 
$

 
$
2

(b)
 
$

 
$

 
$
25

Corporate debt securities (a)
1

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
1

Equity and other non-debt securities (a)
156

 

 

 
(6
)
(b)
 
(4
)
 

 
146

Total investment securities
available-for-sale
180

 

 

 
(4
)
(b)
 
(4
)
 

 
172

Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants
3

 
1

(d)
1

(d)

 
 
(2
)
 

 
3

Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other
1

 

 
(2
)
(c)

 
 

 

 
3

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal securities (a)
$
24

 
$

 
$

 
$
1

(b)
 
$
(1
)
 
$

 
$
24

Corporate debt securities (a)
1

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
1

Equity and other non-debt securities (a)
408

 
11

(c)

 
11

(b)
 
(215
)
 

 
215

Total investment securities
available-for-sale
433

 
11

(c)

 
12

(b)
 
(216
)
 

 
240

Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants
3

 
3

(d)
1

(d)

 
 
(4
)
 

 
3

Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other
6

 

 

 

 
 

 
(6
)
 

(a)
Auction-rate securities.
(b)
Recorded in "net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale" in other comprehensive income.
(c)
Realized and unrealized gains and losses due to changes in fair value recorded in "net securities gains (losses)" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
(d)
Realized and unrealized gains and losses due to changes in fair value recorded in "other noninterest income" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

12

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES RECORDED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS
The Corporation may be required, from time to time, to record certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include assets that are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. All assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were classified as Level 3 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and are presented in the following table. No liabilities were recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(in millions)
 
Level 3
June 30, 2013
 
 
Loans:
 
 
Commercial
 
$
60

Real estate construction
 
24

Commercial mortgage
 
94

Total loans
 
178

Nonmarketable equity securities
 
1

Other real estate
 
20

Loan servicing rights
 
2

Total assets at fair value
 
$
201

December 31, 2012
 
 
Loans:
 
 
Commercial
 
$
42

Real estate construction
 
25

Commercial mortgage
 
145

Lease financing
 
2

Total loans
 
214

Nonmarketable equity securities
 
2

Other real estate
 
24

Loan servicing rights
 
2

Total assets at fair value
 
$
242

The following table presents quantitative information related to the significant unobservable inputs utilized in the Corporation's significant Level 3 recurring fair value measurement as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Corporation's significant Level 3 recurring fair value measurements include auction-rate securities where fair value is determined using an income approach based on a discounted cash flow model. The inputs in the table below reflect management's expectation of continued illiquidity in the secondary auction-rate securities market due to a lack of market activity for the issuers remaining in the portfolio, a lack of market incentives for issuer redemptions, and the expectation for the low interest rate environment continuing into 2015. The June 30, 2013 discount rates reflect changes in liquidity premiums based on sustained illiquid market conditions for the securities during the second quarter 2013.
 
 
 
Discounted Cash Flow Model
 
 
 
Unobservable Input
 
Fair Value
(in millions)
 
Discount Rate
 
Workout Period (in years)
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal securities (a)
$
25

 
5% - 9%
 
4 - 5
Equity and other non-debt securities (a)
146

 
6% - 9%
 
2 - 4
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal securities (a)
$
23

 
6% - 10%
 
4 - 6
Equity and other non-debt securities (a)
156

 
4% - 6%
 
2 - 4
(a)
Auction-rate securities.
Level 3 assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 included loans for which a specific allowance was established based on the fair value of collateral and other real estate for which fair value of the properties was less than the cost basis. For both asset classes, the unobservable inputs were the additional adjustments applied by management to the appraised values to reflect such factors as non-current appraisals and revisions to estimated time to sell. These adjustments are determined based on qualitative judgments made by management on a case-by-case basis and are not quantifiable inputs, although they are used in the determination of fair value.

13

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

ESTIMATED FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS NOT RECORDED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
The Corporation typically holds the majority of its financial instruments until maturity and thus does not expect to realize many of the estimated fair value amounts disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair value amounts for items that are not defined as financial instruments, but which have significant value. These include such items as core deposit intangibles, the future earnings potential of significant customer relationships and the value of trust operations and other fee generating businesses. The Corporation believes the imprecision of an estimate could be significant.
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
(in millions)
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$
1,016

 
$
1,016

 
$
1,016

 
$

 
$

Federal funds sold
31

 
31

 
31

 

 

Interest-bearing deposits with banks
2,878

 
2,878

 
2,878

 

 

Loans held-for-sale
9

 
9

 

 
9

 

Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses (a)
44,846

 
44,922

 

 

 
44,922

Customers’ liability on acceptances outstanding
13

 
13

 
13

 

 

Nonmarketable equity securities (b)
13

 
20

 

 

 
20

Restricted equity investments
133

 
133

 
133

 

 

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits (noninterest-bearing)
21,870

 
21,870

 

 
21,870

 

Interest-bearing deposits
23,791

 
23,791

 

 
23,791

 

Customer certificates of deposit
5,594

 
5,594

 

 
5,594

 

Total deposits
51,255

 
51,255

 

 
51,255

 

Short-term borrowings
131

 
131

 
131

 

 

Acceptances outstanding
13

 
13

 
13

 

 

Medium- and long-term debt
3,601

 
3,594

 

 
3,594

 

Credit-related financial instruments
(99
)
 
(99
)
 

 

 
(99
)
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$
1,395

 
$
1,395

 
$
1,395

 
$

 
$

Federal funds sold
100

 
100

 
100

 

 

Interest-bearing deposits with banks
3,039

 
3,039

 
3,039

 

 

Loans held-for-sale
12

 
12

 

 
12

 

Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses (a)
45,428

 
45,649

 

 

 
45,649

Customers’ liability on acceptances outstanding
18

 
18

 
18

 

 

Nonmarketable equity securities (b)
13

 
22

 

 

 
22

Restricted equity investments
174

 
174

 
174

 

 

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits (noninterest-bearing)
23,279

 
23,279

 

 
23,279

 

Interest-bearing deposits
23,381

 
23,381

 

 
23,381

 

Customer certificates of deposit
5,531

 
5,535

 

 
5,535

 

Total deposits
52,191

 
52,195

 

 
52,195

 

Short-term borrowings
110

 
110

 
110

 

 

Acceptances outstanding
18

 
18

 
18

 

 

Medium- and long-term debt
4,720

 
4,685

 

 
4,685

 

Credit-related financial instruments
(103
)
 
(103
)
 

 

 
(103
)
(a)
Included $178 million and $214 million of impaired loans recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
(b)
Included $1 million and $2 million of nonmarketable equity securities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

14

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
A summary of the Corporation’s investment securities available-for-sale follows:
(in millions)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency securities
$
20

 
$

 
$

 
$
20

Residential mortgage-backed securities (a)
9,260

 
100

 
90

 
9,270

State and municipal securities
27

 

 
2

 
25

Corporate debt securities
56

 

 

 
56

Equity and other non-debt securities
273

 

 
13

 
260

Total investment securities available-for-sale (b)
$
9,636

 
$
100

 
$
105

 
$
9,631

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency securities
$
20

 
$

 
$

 
$
20

Residential mortgage-backed securities (a)
9,687

 
248

 

 
9,935

State and municipal securities
27

 

 
4

 
23

Corporate debt securities
58

 

 

 
58

Equity and other non-debt securities
268

 

 
7

 
261

Total investment securities available-for-sale (b)
$
10,060

 
$
248

 
$
11

 
$
10,297

(a)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.
(b)
Included auction-rate securities at amortized cost and fair value of $187 million and $172 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2013 and $191 million and $180 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2012.
A summary of the Corporation’s investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 follows:
 
Temporarily Impaired
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or more
 
Total
(in millions)
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage-backed securities (a)
$
4,503

 
$
90

 
 
$

 
$

 
 
$
4,503

 
$
90

 
State and municipal securities (b)

 

 
 
25

 
2

 
 
25

 
2

 
Corporate debt securities (b)

 

 
 
1

 

(c)
 
1

 

(c)
Equity and other non-debt securities (b)

 

 
 
146

 
13

 
 
146

 
13

 
Total impaired securities
$
4,503

 
$
90

 
 
$
172


$
15

 
 
$
4,675

 
$
105

 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal securities (b)
$

 
$

 
 
$
23

 
$
4

 
 
$
23

 
$
4

 
Corporate debt securities (b)

 

 
 
1

 

(c)
 
1

 

(c)
Equity and other non-debt securities (b)

 

 
 
156

 
7

 
 
156

 
7

 
Total impaired securities
$

 
$

 
 
$
180

 
$
11

 
 
$
180

 
$
11

 
(a)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.
(b)
Auction-rate securities.
(c)
Unrealized losses less than $0.5 million.
At June 30, 2013, the Corporation had 156 securities in an unrealized loss position with no credit impairment, including 83 residential mortgage-backed securities, 50 equity and other non-debt auction-rate preferred securities, 22 state and municipal auction-rate securities and one corporate auction-rate debt security. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 85 percent of the aggregate par value of auction-rate securities have been redeemed or sold since acquisition, of which approximately 95 percent were redeemed at or above cost. The unrealized losses for these securities resulted from changes in market interest rates and liquidity. The Corporation ultimately expects full collection of the carrying amount of these securities, does not intend to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position, and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Corporation will be required to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position prior to recovery of amortized cost. The Corporation does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2013.

15

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

Sales, calls and write-downs of investment securities available-for-sale resulted in the following gains and losses recorded in “net securities (losses) gains” on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, computed based on the adjusted cost of the specific security.
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
Securities gains
$

 
$
11

Securities losses (a)
(2
)
 

Net securities (losses) gains
$
(2
)
 
$
11

(a)
Charges related to a derivative contract tied to the conversion rate of Visa Class B shares.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair values of debt securities by contractual maturity. Securities with multiple maturity dates are classified in the period of final maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
(in millions)
 
 
 
June 30, 2013
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Contractual maturity
 
 
 
Within one year
$
58

 
$
58

After one year through five years
267

 
266

After five years through ten years
104

 
103

After ten years
8,934

 
8,944

Subtotal
9,363

 
9,371

Equity and other non-debt securities
273

 
260

Total investment securities available-for-sale
$
9,636

 
$
9,631

Included in the contractual maturity distribution in the table above were auction-rate securities with a total amortized cost and fair value of $28 million and $26 million, respectively. Auction-rate securities are long-term, floating rate instruments for which interest rates are reset at periodic auctions. At each successful auction, the Corporation has the option to sell the security at par value. Additionally, the issuers of auction-rate securities generally have the right to redeem or refinance the debt. As a result, the expected life of auction-rate securities may differ significantly from the contractual life. Also included in the table above were residential mortgage-backed securities with total amortized cost and fair value of $9.3 billion. The actual cash flows of mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturity as the borrowers of the underlying loans may exercise prepayment options.
At June 30, 2013, investment securities with a carrying value of $2.8 billion were pledged where permitted or required by law to secure $2.2 billion of liabilities, primarily public and other deposits of state and local government agencies and derivative instruments.

16

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

NOTE 4 – CREDIT QUALITY AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The following table presents an aging analysis of the recorded balance of loans.
 
Loans Past Due and Still Accruing
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
30-59
Days
 
60-89 
Days
 
90 Days
or More
 
Total
 
Nonaccrual
Loans
 
Current
Loans (c)
 
Total 
Loans
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
39

 
$
3

 
$
5

 
$
47

 
$
102

 
$
29,037

 
$
29,186

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)

 

 

 

 
26

 
1,197

 
1,223

Other business lines (b)
3

 

 

 
3

 
2

 
251

 
256

Total real estate construction
3

 

 

 
3

 
28

 
1,448

 
1,479

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
6

 

 

 
6

 
69

 
1,668

 
1,743

Other business lines (b)
13

 
14

 
11

 
38

 
157

 
7,069

 
7,264

Total commercial mortgage
19

 
14

 
11

 
44

 
226

 
8,737

 
9,007

Lease financing

 

 

 

 

 
843

 
843

International
4

 

 

 
4

 

 
1,205

 
1,209

Total business loans
65

 
17

 
16

 
98

 
356

 
41,270

 
41,724

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
10

 
5

 

 
15

 
62

 
1,534

 
1,611

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
10

 
2

 

 
12

 
28

 
1,434

 
1,474

Other consumer
4

 
2

 
4

 
10

 
3

 
637

 
650

Total consumer
14

 
4

 
4

 
22

 
31

 
2,071

 
2,124

Total retail loans
24

 
9

 
4

 
37

 
93

 
3,605

 
3,735

Total loans
$
89

 
$
26

 
$
20

 
$
135

 
$
449

 
$
44,875

 
$
45,459

December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
23

 
$
19

 
$
5

 
$
47

 
$
103

 
$
29,363

 
$
29,513

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)

 

 

 

 
30

 
1,019

 
1,049

Other business lines (b)

 

 

 

 
3

 
188

 
191

Total real estate construction

 

 

 

 
33

 
1,207

 
1,240

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
20

 
4

 

 
24

 
94

 
1,755

 
1,873

Other business lines (b)
27

 
9

 
8

 
44

 
181

 
7,374

 
7,599

Total commercial mortgage
47

 
13

 
8

 
68

 
275

 
9,129

 
9,472

Lease financing

 

 

 

 
3

 
856

 
859

International
4

 

 
3

 
7

 

 
1,286

 
1,293

Total business loans
74

 
32

 
16

 
122

 
414

 
41,841

 
42,377

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
27

 
6

 
2

 
35

 
70

 
1,422

 
1,527

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
9

 
3

 

 
12

 
31

 
1,494

 
1,537

Other consumer
4

 
3

 
5

 
12

 
4

 
600

 
616

Total consumer
13

 
6

 
5

 
24

 
35

 
2,094

 
2,153

Total retail loans
40

 
12

 
7

 
59

 
105

 
3,516

 
3,680

Total loans
$
114

 
$
44

 
$
23

 
$
181

 
$
519

 
$
45,357

 
$
46,057

(a)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(b)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.
(c)
Included purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans with a total carrying value of $25 million and $36 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

17

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The following table presents loans by credit quality indicator, based on internal risk ratings assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and subjected to subsequent reviews, generally at least annually, and to pools of retail loans with similar risk characteristics.
 
Internally Assigned Rating
 
 
(in millions)
Pass (a)
 
Special
Mention (b)
 
Substandard (c)
 
Nonaccrual (d)
 
Total
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
27,505

 
$
950

 
$
629

 
$
102

 
$
29,186

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (e)
1,164

 
18

 
15

 
26

 
1,223

Other business lines (f)
245

 
2

 
7

 
2

 
256

Total real estate construction
1,409

 
20

 
22

 
28

 
1,479

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (e)
1,448

 
152

 
74

 
69

 
1,743

Other business lines (f)
6,613

 
204

 
290

 
157

 
7,264

Total commercial mortgage
8,061

 
356

 
364

 
226

 
9,007

Lease financing
837

 
4

 
2

 

 
843

International
1,182

 
27

 

 

 
1,209

Total business loans
38,994

 
1,357

 
1,017

 
356

 
41,724

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
1,532

 
10

 
7

 
62

 
1,611

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
1,428

 
13

 
5

 
28

 
1,474

Other consumer
619

 
19

 
9

 
3

 
650

Total consumer
2,047

 
32

 
14

 
31

 
2,124

Total retail loans
3,579

 
42

 
21

 
93

 
3,735

Total loans
$
42,573

 
$
1,399

 
$
1,038

 
$
449

 
$
45,459

December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
28,032

 
$
820

 
$
558

 
$
103

 
$
29,513

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (e)
921

 
77

 
21

 
30

 
1,049

Other business lines (f)
176

 
3

 
9

 
3

 
191

Total real estate construction
1,097

 
80

 
30

 
33

 
1,240

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (e)
1,479

 
213

 
87

 
94

 
1,873

Other business lines (f)
6,783

 
258

 
377

 
181

 
7,599

Total commercial mortgage
8,262

 
471

 
464

 
275

 
9,472

Lease financing
840

 
9

 
7

 
3

 
859

International
1,230

 
57

 
6

 

 
1,293

Total business loans
39,461

 
1,437

 
1,065

 
414

 
42,377

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
1,438

 
12

 
7

 
70

 
1,527

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
1,489

 
11

 
6

 
31

 
1,537

Other consumer
581

 
22

 
9

 
4

 
616

Total consumer
2,070

 
33

 
15

 
35

 
2,153

Total retail loans
3,508

 
45

 
22

 
105

 
3,680

Total loans
$
42,969

 
$
1,482

 
$
1,087

 
$
519

 
$
46,057

(a)
Includes all loans not included in the categories of special mention, substandard or nonaccrual.
(b)
Special mention loans are accruing loans that have potential credit weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention, such as loans to borrowers who may be experiencing financial difficulties that may result in deterioration of repayment prospects from the borrower at some future date. Included in the special mention category were $180 million and $303 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, of loans proactively monitored by management that were considered “pass” by regulatory authorities.
(c)
Substandard loans are accruing loans that have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, such as loans to borrowers who may be experiencing losses from operations or inadequate liquidity of a degree and duration that jeopardizes the orderly repayment of the loan. Substandard loans also are distinguished by the distinct possibility of loss in the future if these weaknesses are not corrected. PCI loans are included in the substandard category. This category is generally consistent with the "substandard" category as defined by regulatory authorities.
(d)
Nonaccrual loans are loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued. For further information regarding nonaccrual loans, refer to the Nonperforming Assets subheading in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - on page F-59 in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report. A significant majority of nonaccrual loans are generally consistent with the "substandard" category and the remainder are generally consistent with the "doubtful" category as defined by regulatory authorities.
(e)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(f)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.

18

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The following table summarizes nonperforming assets.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Nonaccrual loans
$
449

 
$
519

Reduced-rate loans (a)
22

 
22

Total nonperforming loans
471

 
541

Foreclosed property
29

 
54

Total nonperforming assets
$
500

 
$
595

(a)
Reduced-rate business loans totaled $6 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and reduced-rate retail loans totaled $16 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The following table details the changes in the allowance for loan losses and related loan amounts.
 
2013
 
2012
(in millions)
Business Loans
 
Retail Loans
 
Total
 
Business Loans
 
Retail Loans
 
Total
Three Months Ended June 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
544

 
$
73

 
$
617

 
$
632

 
$
72

 
$
704

Loan charge-offs
(30
)
 
(5
)
 
(35
)
 
(56
)
 
(8
)
 
(64
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off
15

 
3

 
18

 
15

 
4

 
19

Net loan charge-offs
(15
)
 
(2
)
 
(17
)
 
(41
)
 
(4
)
 
(45
)
Provision for loan losses
13

 

 
13

 
2

 
6

 
8

Balance at end of period
$
542

 
$
71

 
$
613

 
$
593

 
$
74

 
$
667

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
552

 
$
77

 
$
629

 
$
648

 
$
78

 
$
726

Loan charge-offs
(64
)
 
(9
)
 
(73
)
 
(111
)
 
(15
)
 
(126
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off
27

 
5

 
32

 
29

 
7

 
36

Net loan charge-offs
(37
)
 
(4
)
 
(41
)
 
(82
)
 
(8
)
 
(90
)
Provision for loan losses
27

 
(2
)
 
25

 
27

 
4

 
31

Balance at end of period
$
542

 
$
71

 
$
613

 
$
593

 
$
74

 
$
667

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As a percentage of total loans
1.30
%
 
1.91
%
 
1.35
%
 
1.47
%
 
2.02
%
 
1.52
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
56

 
$

 
$
56

 
$
119

 
$
3

 
$
122

Collectively evaluated for impairment
486

 
71

 
557

 
474

 
71

 
545

Total allowance for loan losses
$
542

 
$
71

 
$
613

 
$
593

 
$
74

 
$
667

Loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
314

 
$
42

 
$
356

 
$
569

 
$
49

 
$
618

Collectively evaluated for impairment
41,390

 
3,688

 
45,078

 
39,681

 
3,631

 
43,312

PCI loans (a)
20

 
5

 
25

 
55

 
7

 
62

Total loans evaluated for impairment
$
41,724

 
$
3,735

 
$
45,459

 
$
40,305

 
$
3,687

 
$
43,992

(a)    No allowance for loan losses was required for PCI loans at June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Changes in the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments, included in "accrued expenses and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets, are summarized in the following table.
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
36

 
$
25

 
$
32

 
$
26

Provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments

 
11

 
4

 
10

Balance at end of period
$
36

 
$
36

 
$
36

 
$
36



19

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans
The following table presents additional information regarding individually evaluated impaired loans.
 
Recorded Investment In:
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Impaired
Loans with
No Related
Allowance
 
Impaired
Loans with
Related
Allowance
 
Total
Impaired
Loans
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
9

 
$
88

 
$
97

 
$
165

 
$
23

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)

 
24

 
24

 
28

 
2

Other business lines (b)

 

 

 
1

 

Total real estate construction

 
24

 
24

 
29

 
2

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)

 
81

 
81

 
125

 
11

Other business lines (b)
4

 
108

 
112

 
150

 
20

Total commercial mortgage
4

 
189

 
193

 
275

 
31

Total business loans
13

 
301

 
314

 
469

 
56

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
33

 

 
33

 
39

 

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
6

 

 
6

 
8

 

Other consumer
3

 

 
3

 
10

 

Total consumer
9

 

 
9

 
18

 

Total retail loans (c)
42

 

 
42

 
57

 

Total individually evaluated impaired loans
$
55

 
$
301

 
$
356

 
$
526

 
$
56

December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
2

 
$
117

 
$
119

 
$
207

 
$
26

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)

 
26

 
26

 
31

 
4

Other business lines (b)

 

 

 
1

 

Total real estate construction

 
26

 
26

 
32

 
4

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)

 
99

 
99

 
159

 
18

Other business lines (b)

 
122

 
122

 
167

 
28

Total commercial mortgage

 
221

 
221

 
326

 
46

Lease financing

 
2

 
2

 
5

 

Total business loans
2

 
366

 
368

 
570

 
76

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
39

 

 
39

 
48

 

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
8

 

 
8

 
10

 

Other consumer
4

 

 
4

 
10

 

Total consumer
12

 

 
12

 
20

 

Total retail loans (c)
51

 

 
51

 
68

 

Total individually evaluated impaired loans
$
53

 
$
366

 
$
419

 
$
638

 
$
76

(a)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(b)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.
(c)
Individually evaluated retail loans had no related allowance for loan losses, primarily due to policy changes which resulted in direct write-downs of restructured retail loans. 

20

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The following table presents information regarding average individually evaluated impaired loans and the related interest recognized. Interest income recognized for the period primarily related to reduced-rate loans.
 
Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans
 
2013
 
2012
(in millions)
Average Balance for the Period
 
Interest Income Recognized for the Period
 
Average Balance for the Period
 
Interest Income Recognized for the Period
Three Months Ended June 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
103

 
$
1

 
$
215

 
$
1

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
26

 

 
61

 

Other business lines (b)

 

 
5

 

Total real estate construction
26

 

 
66

 

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
87

 

 
156

 

Other business lines (b)
119

 
1

 
194

 
1

Total commercial mortgage
206

 
1

 
350

 
1

Lease financing

 

 
3

 

International

 

 
2

 

Total business loans
335

 
2

 
636

 
2

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
33

 

 
41

 

Consumer loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
5

 

 
5

 

Other consumer
4

 

 
3

 

Total consumer
9

 

 
8

 

Total retail loans
42

 

 
49

 

Total individually evaluated impaired loans
$
377

 
$
2

 
$
685

 
$
2

Six Months Ended June 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
108

 
$
2

 
$
225

 
$
2

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
26

 

 
74

 

Other business lines (b)

 

 
5

 

Total real estate construction
26

 

 
79

 

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
91

 

 
153

 

Other business lines (b)
120

 
1

 
199

 
2

Total commercial mortgage
211

 
1

 
352

 
2

Lease financing
1

 

 
3

 

International

 

 
4

 

Total business loans
346

 
3

 
663

 
4

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
35

 

 
43

 

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
6

 

 
3

 

Other consumer
4

 

 
4

 

Total consumer
10

 

 
7

 

Total retail loans
45

 

 
50

 

Total individually evaluated impaired loans
$
391

 
$
3

 
$
713

 
$
4

(a)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(b)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.

21

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

Troubled Debt Restructurings
The following tables detail the recorded balance at June 30, 2013 and 2012 of loans considered to be TDRs that were restructured during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, by type of modification. In cases of loans with more than one type of modification, the loans were categorized based on the most significant modification.
 
2013
 
2012
 
Type of Modification
 
 
Type of Modification
 
(in millions)
Principal Deferrals (a)
Interest Rate Reductions
AB Note Restructures (b)
Total Modifications
 
Principal Deferrals (a)
Interest Rate Reductions
AB Note Restructures (b)
Total Modifications
Three Months Ended June 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
4

 
$

$
9

$
13

 
$
6

$
1

$

$
7

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (c)
5

 


5

 
16



16

Other business lines (d)
5

 


5

 
5

2


7

Total commercial mortgage
10

 


10

 
21

2


23

Total business loans
14

 

9

23

 
27

3


30

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
1

(e)
1


2

 

1


1

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
1

(e)
1


2

 




Total retail loans
2

 
2


4

 

1


1

Total loans
$
16

 
$
2

$
9

$
27

 
$
27

$
4

$

$
31

Six Months Ended June 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
11

 
$

$
9

$
20

 
$
27

$
1

$

$
28

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (c)
21

 


21

 
16


3

19

Other business lines (d)
11

 

10

21

 
14

2


16

Total commercial mortgage
32

 

10

42

 
30

2

3

35

Total business loans
43

 

19

62

 
57

3

3

63

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
1

(e)
1


2

 

1


1

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
2

(e)
1


3

 




Other consumer
1

(e)


1

 




Total consumer
3

 
1


4

 




Total retail loans
4

 
2


6



1


1

Total loans
$
47

 
$
2

$
19

$
68

 
$
57

$
4

$
3

$
64

(a)
Primarily represents loan balances where terms were extended 90 days or more at or above contractual interest rates.
(b)
Loan restructurings whereby the original loan is restructured into two notes: an "A" note, which generally reflects the portion of the modified loan which is expected to be collected; and a "B" note, which is either fully charged off or exchanged for an equity interest.
(c)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(d)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.
(e)
Includes bankruptcy loans for which the court has discharged the borrower's obligation and the borrower has not reaffirmed the debt.
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose terms have been modified in TDRs totaled $2 million and $5 million, respectively.
The majority of the modifications considered to be TDRs that occurred during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were principal deferrals. The Corporation charges interest on principal balances outstanding during deferral periods. Additionally, none of the modifications involved forgiveness of principal. As a result, the current and future financial effects of the recorded balance of loans considered to be TDRs that were restructured during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were insignificant.

22

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

On an ongoing basis, the Corporation monitors the performance of modified loans to their restructured terms. In the event of a subsequent default, the allowance for loan losses continues to be reassessed on the basis of an individual evaluation of the loan.
The following table presents information regarding the recorded balance at June 30, 2013 and 2012 of loans modified by principal deferral during the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and those principal deferrals which experienced a subsequent default during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. For principal deferrals, incremental deterioration in the credit quality of the loan, represented by a downgrade in the risk rating of the loan, for example, due to missed interest payments or a reduction of collateral value, is considered a subsequent default.
 
2013
 
2012
(in millions)
Balance at June 30
Subsequent Default in the Three Months Ended June 30
Subsequent Default in the Six Months Ended June 30
 
Balance at June 30
Subsequent Default in the Three Months Ended June 30
Subsequent Default in the Six Months Ended June 30
Principal deferrals:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
14

 
$
11

$
12

 
$
79

$
7

$
19

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
1

 


 



Total real estate construction
1

 


 



Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
27

 

16

 
41

23

23

Other business lines (b)
19

 
4

7

 
33

7

12

Total commercial mortgage
46

 
4

23

 
74

30

35

Total business loans
61

 
15

35

 
153

37

54

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
5

(c)


 



Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
5

(c)


 



Other consumer
2

(c)


 
3



Total consumer
7

 


 
3



Total retail loans
12

 


 
3



Total principal deferrals
$
73

 
$
15

$
35

 
$
156

$
37

$
54

(a)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(b)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.
(c)
Includes bankruptcy loans for which the court has discharged the borrower's obligation and the borrower has not reaffirmed the debt.

23

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The following table presents information regarding the recorded balance at June 30, 2013 and 2012 of loans modified by interest rate reduction during the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and those reduced-rate loans which experienced a subsequent default during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. For reduced-rate loans, a subsequent payment default is defined in terms of delinquency, when a principal or interest payment is 90 days past due.
 
2013
 
2012
(in millions)
Balance at June 30
Subsequent Default in the Three Months Ended June 30
Subsequent Default in the Six Months Ended June 30
 
Balance at June 30
Subsequent Default in the Three Months Ended June 30
Subsequent Default in the Six Months Ended June 30
Interest rate reductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$

$

$

 
$
1

$

$

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)



 
1

1

1

Total real estate construction



 
1

1

1

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other business lines (b)



 
19

4

4

Total commercial mortgage



 
19

4

4

Lease financing



 
3



Total business loans



 
24

5

5

Retail loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
1



 
6



Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
1



 



Total consumer
1



 



Total retail loans
2



 
6



Total interest rate reductions
$
2

$

$

 
$
30

$
5

$
5

(a)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(b)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.
During the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 loans with a carrying value of $38 million and $29 million at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were restructured into two notes (AB note restructures). For AB note restructures, a subsequent payment default is defined in terms of delinquency, when a principal or interest payment is 90 days past due. There were no subsequent payment defaults of AB note restructures during both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, as well as during the three months ended June 30, 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 there were $1 million of subsequent payment defaults of AB note restructures.
Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans
Acquired loans are initially recorded at fair value with no carryover of any allowance for loan losses.
Loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration at acquisition for which it was probable that the Corporation would not be able to collect all contractual amounts due were accounted for as PCI loans. The Corporation aggregated the acquired PCI loans into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics.
The carrying amount of acquired PCI loans included in the consolidated balance sheet and the related outstanding balance at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows. The outstanding balance represents the total amount owed as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, including accrued but unpaid interest and any amounts previously charged off. No allowance for loan losses was required on the acquired PCI loan pools at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Acquired PCI loans:
 
 
 
Carrying amount
$
25

 
$
36

Outstanding balance
119

 
138

Changes in the accretable yield for acquired PCI loans for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows.
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
12

 
$
20

 
$
16

 
$
25

Accretion
(2
)
 
(4
)
 
(6
)
 
(9
)
Balance at end of period
$
10

 
$
16

 
$
10

 
$
16


24

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

NOTE 5 - DERIVATIVE AND CREDIT-RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into various transactions involving derivative and credit-related financial instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rate, foreign currency and other market risks and to meet the financing needs of customers (customer-initiated derivatives). These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk. The Corporation presents derivative instruments at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets on a net basis when a right of offset exists, based on transactions with a single counterparty and any cash collateral paid to and/or received from that counterparty for derivative contracts that are subject to legally enforceable master netting arrangements. Market and credit risk are included in the determination of fair value.
Market risk is the potential loss that may result from movements in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates or energy commodity prices that cause an unfavorable change in the value of a financial instrument. The Corporation manages this risk by establishing monetary exposure limits and monitoring compliance with those limits. Market risk inherent in interest rate and energy contracts entered into on behalf of customers is mitigated by taking offsetting positions, except in those circumstances when the amount, tenor and/or contract rate level results in negligible economic risk, whereby the cost of purchasing an offsetting contract is not economically justifiable. The Corporation mitigates most of the inherent market risk in foreign exchange contracts entered into on behalf of customers by taking offsetting positions and manages the remainder through individual foreign currency position limits and aggregate value-at-risk limits. These limits are established annually and reviewed quarterly. Market risk inherent in derivative instruments held or issued for risk management purposes is typically offset by changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
Credit risk is the possible loss that may occur in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to a financial instrument. The Corporation attempts to minimize credit risk arising from customer-initiated derivatives by evaluating the creditworthiness of each customer, adhering to the same credit approval process used for traditional lending activities and obtaining collateral as deemed necessary. For derivatives with dealer counterparties, the Corporation utilizes counterparty risk limits and monitoring procedures as well as master netting arrangements and bilateral collateral agreements to facilitate the management of credit risk. Master netting arrangements effectively reduce credit risk by permitting settlement of positive and negative positions and offset cash collateral held with the same counterparty on a net basis. Bilateral collateral agreements require daily exchange of cash or highly rated securities issued by the U.S. Treasury or other U.S. government entities to collateralize amounts due to either party beyond certain risk limits. At June 30, 2013, counterparties with bilateral collateral agreements had pledged $123 million of marketable investment securities and deposited $78 million of cash with the Corporation to secure the fair value of contracts in an unrealized gain position, and the Corporation had pledged $23 million of investment securities and posted no cash as collateral for contracts in an unrealized loss position. For those counterparties not covered under bilateral collateral agreements, collateral is obtained, if deemed necessary, based on the results of management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral varies, but may include cash, investment securities, accounts receivable, equipment or real estate. Included in the fair value of derivative instruments are credit valuation adjustments reflecting counterparty credit risk. These adjustments are determined by applying a credit spread for the counterparty or the Corporation, as appropriate, to the total expected exposure of the derivative.
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on June 30, 2013 was $17 million, for which the Corporation had pledged collateral of $12 million in the normal course of business. The credit-risk-related contingent features require the Corporation’s debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. If the Corporation’s debt were to fall below investment grade, the counterparties to the derivative instruments could require additional overnight collateral on derivative instruments in net liability positions. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on June 30, 2013, the Corporation would have been required to assign an additional $5 million of collateral to its counterparties.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments utilized by the Corporation are negotiated over-the-counter and primarily include swaps, caps and floors, forward contracts and options, each of which may relate to interest rates, energy commodity prices or foreign currency exchange rates. Swaps are agreements in which two parties periodically exchange cash payments based on specified indices applied to a specified notional amount until a stated maturity. Caps and floors are agreements which entitle the buyer to receive cash payments based on the difference between a specified reference rate or price and an agreed strike rate or price, applied to a specified notional amount until a stated maturity. Forward contracts are over-the-counter agreements to buy or sell an asset at a specified future date and price. Options are similar to forward contracts except the purchaser has the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the asset during a specified period or at a specified future date.
Over-the-counter contracts are tailored to meet the needs of the counterparties involved and, therefore, contain a greater degree of credit risk and liquidity risk than exchange-traded contracts, which have standardized terms and readily available price information. The Corporation reduces exposure to market and liquidity risks from over-the-counter derivative instruments entered into for risk management purposes, and transactions entered into to mitigate the market risk associated with customer-initiated


25

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

transactions, by conducting hedging transactions with investment grade domestic and foreign financial institutions and subjecting counterparties to credit approvals, limits and collateral monitoring procedures similar to those used in making other extensions of credit.
The following table presents the composition of the Corporation’s derivative instruments held or issued for risk management purposes or in connection with customer-initiated and other activities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The table excludes commitments, warrants accounted for as derivatives and a derivative related to the Corporation’s 2008 sale of its remaining ownership of Visa shares.
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Fair Value
(in millions)
Notional/
Contract
Amount (a)
 
Gross Derivative Assets
 
Gross Derivative Liabilities
 
Notional/
Contract
Amount (a)
 
Gross Derivative Assets
 
Gross Derivative Liabilities
Risk management purposes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps - fair value - receive fixed/pay floating
$
1,450

 
$
229

 
$

 
$
1,450

 
$
290

 
$

Derivatives used as economic hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spot, forwards and swaps
245

 

 
2

 
475

 
1

 

Total risk management purposes
1,695

 
229

 
2

 
1,925

 
291

 

Customer-initiated and other activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Caps and floors written
526

 

 
3

 
545

 

 
3

Caps and floors purchased
526

 
3

 

 
545

 
3

 

Swaps
10,879

 
196

 
150

 
10,952

 
263

 
215

Total interest rate contracts
11,931

 
199

 
153

 
12,042

 
266

 
218

Energy contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Caps and floors written
1,699

 

 
76

 
1,873

 

 
112

Caps and floors purchased
1,699

 
76

 

 
1,873

 
112

 

Swaps
2,383

 
62

 
60

 
1,815

 
61

 
60

Total energy contracts
5,781

 
138

 
136

 
5,561

 
173

 
172

Foreign exchange contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spot, forwards, options and swaps
1,919

 
24

 
23

 
2,253

 
20

 
18

Total customer-initiated and other activities
19,631

 
361

 
312

 
19,856

 
459

 
408

Total gross derivatives
$
21,326

 
590

 
314

 
$
21,781

 
750

 
408

Amounts offset in the consolidated balance sheets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Netting adjustment - Offsetting derivative assets/liabilities
 
 
(221
)
 
(221
)
 
 
 
(279
)
 
(279
)
Netting adjustment - Cash collateral received/posted
 
 
(78
)
 

 
 
 
(11
)
 

Net derivatives included in the consolidated balance sheets (b)

 
291

 
93

 



460

 
129

Amounts not offset in the consolidated balance sheets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities pledged under bilateral collateral agreements
 
 
(108
)
 
(13
)
 
 
 
(180
)
 
(56
)
Net derivatives after deducting amounts not offset in the consolidated balance sheets


 
$
183

 
$
80

 


 
$
280

 
$
73

(a)
Notional or contractual amounts, which represent the extent of involvement in the derivatives market, are used to determine the contractual cash flows required in accordance with the terms of the agreement. These amounts are typically not exchanged, significantly exceed amounts subject to credit or market risk and are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets.
(b)
Net derivative assets are included in “accrued income and other assets” and net derivative liabilities are included in “accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets. Included in the fair value of net derivative assets and net derivative liabilities are credit valuation adjustments reflecting counterparty credit risk and credit risk of the Corporation. The fair value of net derivative assets included credit valuation adjustments for counterparty credit risk totaled $3 million and $4 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.


26

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

Risk Management
As an end-user, the Corporation employs a variety of financial instruments for risk management purposes, including cash instruments, such as investment securities, as well as derivative instruments. Activity related to these instruments is centered predominantly in the interest rate markets and mainly involves interest rate swaps. Various other types of instruments also may be used to manage exposures to market risks, including interest rate caps and floors, total return swaps, foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange swap agreements.
As part of a fair value hedging strategy, the Corporation entered into interest rate swap agreements for interest rate risk management purposes. These interest rate swap agreements effectively modify the Corporation’s exposure to interest rate risk by converting fixed-rate debt to a floating rate. These agreements involve the receipt of fixed-rate interest amounts in exchange for floating-rate interest payments over the life of the agreement, without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. Risk management fair value interest rate swaps generated net interest income of $18 million and $36 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $17 million and $34 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The Corporation recognized an insignificant amount of net gains (losses) in "other noninterest income" in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the ineffective portion of risk management derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges of fixed-rate debt for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Foreign exchange rate risk arises from changes in the value of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The Corporation employs spot and forward contracts in addition to swap contracts to manage exposure to these and other risks.
The Corporation recognized an insignificant amount of net gains on risk management derivative instruments used as economic hedges in "other noninterest income" in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. 
 The following table summarizes the expected weighted average remaining maturity of the notional amount of risk management interest rate swaps and the weighted average interest rates associated with amounts expected to be received or paid on interest rate swap agreements as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
 
 
Weighted Average
(dollar amounts in millions)
Notional
Amount
 
Remaining
Maturity
(in years)
 
Receive Rate
 
Pay Rate (a)
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps - fair value - receive fixed/pay floating rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medium- and long-term debt designation
$
1,450

 
3.9

 
5.45
%
 
0.45
%
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps - fair value - receive fixed/pay floating rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medium- and long-term debt designation
1,450

 
4.4

 
5.45

 
0.62

(a)
Variable rates paid on receive fixed swaps are based on six-month LIBOR rates in effect at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Management believes these hedging strategies achieve the desired relationship between the rate maturities of assets and funding sources which, in turn, reduce the overall exposure of net interest income to interest rate risk, although there can be no assurance that such strategies will be successful.
Customer-Initiated and Other
The Corporation enters into derivative transactions at the request of customers and generally takes offsetting positions with dealer counterparties to mitigate the inherent market risk. Income primarily results from the spread between the customer derivative and the offsetting dealer position.
For customer-initiated foreign exchange contracts where offsetting positions have not been taken, the Corporation manages the remaining inherent market risk through individual foreign currency position limits and aggregate value-at-risk limits. These limits are established annually and reviewed quarterly. For those customer-initiated derivative contracts which were not offset or where the Corporation holds a speculative position within the limits described above, the Corporation recognized an insignificant amount of net gains in “other noninterest income” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.


27

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

Fair values of customer-initiated and other derivative instruments represent the net unrealized gains or losses on such contracts and are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The net gains recognized in income on customer-initiated derivative instruments, net of the impact of offsetting positions, were as follows.
 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
 
Location of Gain
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Interest rate contracts
 
Other noninterest income
$
6

 
$
7

 
$
9

 
$
9

Energy contracts
 
Other noninterest income
1

 
1

 
2

 
2

Foreign exchange contracts
 
Foreign exchange income
9

 
9

 
18

 
18

Total
 
 
$
16

 
$
17

 
$
29

 
$
29

Credit-Related Financial Instruments
The Corporation issues off-balance sheet financial instruments in connection with commercial and consumer lending activities. The Corporation’s credit risk associated with these instruments is represented by the contractual amounts indicated in the following table.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Unused commitments to extend credit:
 
 
 
Commercial and other
$
26,394

 
$
25,659

Bankcard, revolving check credit and home equity loan commitments
1,750

 
1,681

Total unused commitments to extend credit
$
28,144

 
$
27,340

Standby letters of credit
$
4,728

 
$
4,985

Commercial letters of credit
101

 
78

Other credit-related financial instruments
3

 
1

The Corporation maintains an allowance to cover probable credit losses inherent in lending-related commitments, including unused commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and financial guarantees. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments, included in “accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets, was $36 million and $32 million, respectively. In 2011, the Corporation recorded a purchase discount for acquired lending-related commitments. An allowance for credit losses will be recorded on acquired lending-related commitments only to the extent that the required allowance exceeds the remaining purchase discount. At both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, no allowance was recorded for acquired lending-related commitments and $2 million of purchase discount remained.
Unused Commitments to Extend Credit
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to a customer, provided there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amount of commitments does not necessarily represent future cash requirements of the Corporation. Commercial and other unused commitments are primarily variable rate commitments. The allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments included $20 million and $19 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, for probable credit losses inherent in the Corporation’s unused commitments to extend credit.
Standby and Commercial Letters of Credit
Standby letters of credit represent conditional obligations of the Corporation which guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. Commercial letters of credit are issued to finance foreign or domestic trade transactions. These contracts expire in decreasing amounts through the year 2022. The Corporation may enter into participation arrangements with third parties that effectively reduce the maximum amount of future payments which may be required under standby and commercial letters of credit. These risk participations covered $297 million and $325 million, respectively, of the $4.8 billion and $5.1 billion standby and commercial letters of credit outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The carrying value of the Corporation’s standby and commercial letters of credit, included in “accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets, totaled $78 million at June 30, 2013, including $62 million in deferred fees and $16 million in the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments. At December 31, 2012, the comparable amounts were $82 million, $69 million and $13 million, respectively.


28

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The following table presents a summary of internally classified watch list standby and commercial letters of credit at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Corporation's internal watch list is generally consistent with the Special mention, Substandard and Doubtful categories defined by regulatory authorities. The Corporation manages credit risk through underwriting, periodically reviewing and approving its credit exposures using Board committee approved credit policies and guidelines.
(dollar amounts in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Total watch list standby and commercial letters of credit
$
122

 
$
144

As a percentage of total outstanding standby and commercial letters of credit
2.5
%
 
2.9
%
Other Credit-Related Financial Instruments
The Corporation enters into credit risk participation agreements, under which the Corporation assumes credit exposure associated with a borrower’s performance related to certain interest rate derivative contracts. The Corporation is not a party to the interest rate derivative contracts and only enters into these credit risk participation agreements in instances in which the Corporation is also a party to the related loan participation agreement for such borrowers. The Corporation manages its credit risk on the credit risk participation agreements by monitoring the creditworthiness of the borrowers, which is based on the normal credit review process had it entered into the derivative instruments directly with the borrower. The notional amount of such credit risk participation agreement reflects the pro-rata share of the derivative instrument, consistent with its share of the related participated loan. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the total notional amount of the credit risk participation agreements was approximately $629 million and $574 million, respectively, and the fair value, included in customer-initiated interest rate contracts recorded in "accrued expenses and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets, was insignificant for each period. The maximum estimated exposure to these agreements, as measured by projecting a maximum value of the guaranteed derivative instruments, assuming 100 percent default by all obligors on the maximum values, was approximately $7 million and $11 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. In the event of default, the lead bank has the ability to liquidate the assets of the borrower, in which case the lead bank would be required to return a percentage of the recouped assets to the participating banks. As of June 30, 2013, the weighted average remaining maturity of outstanding credit risk participation agreements was 2.5 years.
In 2008, the Corporation sold its remaining ownership of Visa Class B shares and entered into a derivative contract. Under the terms of the derivative contract, the Corporation will compensate the counterparty primarily for dilutive adjustments made to the conversion factor of the Visa Class B shares to Class A shares based on the ultimate outcome of litigation involving Visa. Conversely, the Corporation will be compensated by the counterparty for any increase in the conversion factor from anti-dilutive adjustments. The notional amount of the derivative contract was equivalent to approximately 780,000 Visa Class B shares. The fair value of the derivative liability, included in "accrued expenses and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets, was $3 million at June 30, 2013 and $1 million at December 31, 2012.
NOTE 6 - VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIEs)
The Corporation evaluates its interest in certain entities to determine if these entities meet the definition of a VIE and whether the Corporation is the primary beneficiary and should consolidate the entity based on the variable interests it held both at inception and when there is a change in circumstances that requires a reconsideration. The following provides a summary of the VIEs in which the Corporation has an interest.
The Corporation holds ownership interests in funds in the form of limited partnerships or limited liability companies (LLCs) investing in low income housing projects. The Corporation also directly invests in limited partnerships and LLCs which invest in community development projects which generate similar tax credits to investors. These tax credit entities meet the definition of a VIE; however, the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of the entities, as the general partner or the managing member has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entities and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the entities. While the partnership/LLC agreements allow the limited partners/investor members, through a majority vote, to remove the general partner/managing member, this right is not deemed to be substantive as the general partner/managing member can only be removed for cause.
The Corporation accounts for its interest in these entities on either the cost or equity method. Exposure to loss as a result of the Corporation’s involvement with these entities at June 30, 2013 was limited to approximately $379 million, which reflected the carrying value of the Corporation's investment and unfunded commitments for future investments.
As an investor, the Corporation obtains income tax credits and deductions from the operating losses of these tax credit entities. The income tax credits and deductions are allocated to the investors based on their ownership percentages and are recorded as a reduction of income tax expense (or an increase to income tax benefit) and a reduction of federal income taxes payable. Investment balances, including all legally binding commitments to fund future investments, are included in “accrued income and other assets” on the consolidated balance sheets, with amortization and other write-downs of investments recorded in “other


29

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

noninterest income” on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. In addition, a liability is recognized in “accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets for all legally binding unfunded commitments to fund tax credit entities ($128 million at June 30, 2013).
The Corporation provided no financial or other support that was not contractually required to any of the above VIEs during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
The following table summarizes the impact of these VIEs on line items on the Corporation’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Other noninterest income
$
(13
)
 
$
(14
)
 
$
(27
)
 
$
(28
)
Benefit for income taxes (a)
(14
)
 
(13
)
 
(28
)
 
(27
)
(a)
Income tax credits from low income housing tax credit/historic rehabilitation tax credit partnerships.
For further information on the Corporation’s consolidation policy, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report.
NOTE 7 - MEDIUM- AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Medium- and long-term debt is summarized as follows:
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Parent company
 
 
 
Subordinated notes:
 
 
 
4.80% subordinated notes due 2015
$
323

 
$
330

Medium-term notes:
 
 
 
3.00% notes due 2015
299

 
299

Total parent company
622

 
629

Subsidiaries
 
 
 
Subordinated notes:
 
 
 
7.375% subordinated notes due 2013

 
51

5.70% subordinated notes due 2014
261

 
267

5.75% subordinated notes due 2016
686

 
694

5.20% subordinated notes due 2017
572

 
593

Floating-rate based on LIBOR index subordinated notes due 2018
26

 
26

8.375% subordinated notes due 2024
185

 
186

7.875% subordinated notes due 2026
221

 
241

Total subordinated notes
1,951

 
2,058

Federal Home Loan Bank advances:
 
 
 
Floating-rate based on LIBOR indices due 2013 to 2014
1,000

 
2,000

Other notes:
 
 
 
6.0% - 6.4% fixed-rate notes due 2020
28

 
33

Total subsidiaries
2,979

 
4,091

Total medium- and long-term debt
$
3,601

 
$
4,720

The carrying value of medium- and long-term debt has been adjusted to reflect the gain or loss attributable to the risk hedged with interest rate swaps.
Subordinated notes with remaining maturities greater than one year qualify as Tier 2 capital.
Comerica Bank (the Bank) is a member of the FHLB, which provides short- and long-term funding collateralized by mortgage-related assets to its members. FHLB advances bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR and were secured by a blanket lien on $14 billion of real estate-related loans at June 30, 2013.

30

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

NOTE 8 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table presents a reconciliation of the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss and details the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, including the amount of income tax expense (benefit) allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (loss).
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period, net of tax
$
150

 
$
129

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period
(242
)
 
63

Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(89
)
 
23

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax
(153
)
 
40

Less:
 
 
 
Net realized gains included in net securities (losses) gains

 
11

Less: Provision for income taxes

 
4

Reclassification adjustment for net securities (losses) gains included in net income, net of tax

 
7

Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax
(153
)
 
33

Balance at end of period, net of tax
$
(3
)
 
$
162

 
 
 
 
Accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans adjustment:
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period, net of tax
$
(563
)
 
$
(485
)
 
 
 
 
Net defined benefit pension and other postretirement adjustment arising during the period, net of tax

 

Less:
 
 
 
Amortization of actuarial net loss
(44
)
 
(31
)
Amortization of prior service cost
(1
)
 
(1
)
Amortization of transition obligation

 
(2
)
Amounts recognized in employee benefits expense
(45
)
 
(34
)
Less: Benefit for income taxes
(17
)
 
(12
)
Adjustment for amounts recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during the period, net of tax
(28
)
 
(22
)
Change in defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans adjustment, net of tax
28

 
22

Balance at end of period, net of tax
$
(535
)
 
$
(463
)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of period, net of tax
$
(538
)
 
$
(301
)
NOTE 9 - NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic and diluted net income per common share are presented in the following table.
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Basic and diluted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
143

 
$
143

 
$
277

 
$
274

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income allocated to participating securities
2

 
2

 
4

 
3

Net income attributable to common shares
$
141

 
$
141

 
$
273

 
$
271

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic average common shares
183

 
194

 
184

 
195

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic net income per common share
$
0.77

 
$
0.73

 
$
1.48

 
$
1.39

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic average common shares
183

 
194

 
184

 
195

Dilutive common stock equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net effect of the assumed exercise of stock options
1

 

 
1

 

Net effect of the assumed exercise of warrants
3

 

 
2

 

Diluted average common shares
187

 
194

 
187

 
195

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted net income per common share
$
0.76

 
$
0.73

 
$
1.46

 
$
1.39


31

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

The following average shares related to outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because the prices of the options and warrants were greater than the average market price of common shares for the period.
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(shares in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Average outstanding options
12.2
 
15.7
 
13.6
 
16.7
Range of exercise prices
$37.45 - $61.94
 
$30.77 - $64.50
 
$34.78 - $61.94
 
$30.77 - $64.50
Average outstanding warrants
 
 
 
 
 
 
0.3
Exercise price
 
 
 
 
 
 
$30.36
NOTE 10 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Net periodic benefit costs are charged to "employee benefits expense" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Corporation's qualified pension plan, non-qualified pension plan and postretirement benefit plan are as follows.
Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost
$
10

 
$
8

 
$
19

 
$
16

Interest cost
20

 
21

 
39

 
40

Expected return on plan assets
(33
)
 
(28
)
 
(66
)
 
(56
)
Amortization of prior service cost
1

 
1

 
2

 
2

Amortization of net loss
19

 
13

 
38

 
26

Net periodic defined benefit cost
$
17

 
$
15

 
$
32

 
$
28

Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost
$
1

 
$
1

 
$
2

 
$
2

Interest cost
2

 
3

 
5

 
5

Amortization of prior service cost
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
Amortization of net loss
3

 
2

 
5

 
4

Net periodic defined benefit cost
$
5

 
$
5

 
$
11

 
$
10

Postretirement Benefit Plan
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Interest cost
$
1

 
$
1

 
$
2

 
$
2

Expected return on plan assets
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
 
(2
)
Amortization of transition obligation

 
1

 

 
2

Amortization of net loss
1

 
1

 
1

 
1

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
$
1

 
$
2

 
$
1

 
$
3

For further information on the Corporation's employee benefit plans, refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report.
NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES AND TAX-RELATED ITEMS
At June 30, 2013, net unrecognized tax benefits were $13 million, compared to $42 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease in unrecognized tax benefits of $29 million was primarily the result of federal settlements. The Corporation anticipates that there will be no change in net unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. Included in "accrued expense and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets was a $2 million liability for tax-related interest and penalties at June 30, 2013, compared to $4 million at December 31, 2012. The $2 million decrease was primarily a result of settlements with tax authorities.
Net deferred tax assets were $294 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $254 million at December 31, 2012. The increase of $40 million in net deferred tax assets resulted primarily from a decrease in unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale recognized in other comprehensive income, partially offset by the utilization of tax credits. Deferred tax assets were evaluated for realization and it was determined that no valuation allowance was needed at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. This conclusion was based on available evidence of loss carryback capacity, projected future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and assumptions made regarding future events.

32

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into certain transactions that have tax consequences. From time to time, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may review and/or challenge specific interpretive tax positions taken by the Corporation with respect to those transactions. The Corporation believes that its tax returns were filed based upon applicable statutes, regulations and case law in effect at the time of the transactions. The IRS, an administrative authority or a court, if presented with the transactions, could disagree with the Corporation’s interpretation of the tax law.
Based on current knowledge and probability assessment of various potential outcomes, the Corporation believes that current tax reserves are adequate, and the amount of any potential incremental liability arising is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Probabilities and outcomes are reviewed as events unfold, and adjustments to the reserves are made when necessary.
NOTE 12 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to various pending or threatened legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of business or operations. The Corporation believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and, with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously, litigating or settling cases according to management’s judgment as to what is in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders. Settlement may result from the Corporation's determination that it may be more prudent financially to settle, rather than litigate, and should not be regarded as an admission of liability. On at least a quarterly basis, the Corporation assesses its potential liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. On a case-by-case basis, reserves are established for those legal claims for which it is probable that a loss will be incurred either as a result of a settlement or judgment, and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving these claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts reserved. Litigation-related expense of $4 million and $20 million and legal fees of $14 million and $18 million were included in “other noninterest expenses” on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Based on current knowledge, and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that current reserves are adequate, and the amount of any incremental liability arising from these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows.
For other matters, where a loss is not probable, the Corporation has not established legal reserves. In determining whether it is possible to provide an estimate of loss or range of possible loss, the Corporation reviews and evaluates its material litigation on an ongoing basis, in conjunction with legal counsel, in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. Based on current knowledge, expectation of future earnings, and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes the maximum amount of reasonably possible losses would not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows.
 The damages alleged by plaintiffs or claimants may be overstated, unsubstantiated by legal theory, unsupported by the facts, and/or bear no relation to the ultimate award that a court, jury or agency might impose. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, the Corporation cannot state with confidence a range of reasonably possible losses, nor what the eventual outcome of these matters will be. However, based on current knowledge and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes the maximum amount of reasonably possible losses would not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows.
In the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporation's consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows.
For information regarding income tax contingencies, refer to Note 11.
NOTE 13 - BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Corporation has strategically aligned its operations into three major business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail Bank and Wealth Management. These business segments are differentiated based on the type of customer and the related products and services provided. In addition to the three major business segments, the Finance Division is also reported as a segment. Business segment results are produced by the Corporation’s internal management accounting system. This system measures financial results based on the internal business unit structure of the Corporation. The performance of the business segments is not comparable with the Corporation's consolidated results and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution. Additionally, because of the interrelationships of the various segments, the information presented is not indicative of how the segments would perform if they operated as independent entities. The management accounting system assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each business segment using certain methodologies, which are regularly reviewed and refined. These

33

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

methodologies may be modified as the management accounting system is enhanced and changes occur in the organizational structure and/or product lines.
In the first quarter 2013, the Corporation changed the method of assigning the allowance for loan losses to each business segment. In 2012, national probability of default and loss given default statistics were incorporated into the Corporation's allowance methodology. Each business segment was assigned an allowance for loan losses based on market-specific standard reserve factors applied to the loans in each segment, and the difference between the total allowance required on a national basis and the market-specific allowances was allocated based on the relative loan balances in each segment. Effective first quarter 2013, each segment is assigned an allowance for loan losses by applying national standard reserve factors to the loan balances in each segment by risk rating distribution. For comparability purposes, amounts in all periods are based on business segments and methodologies in effect at June 30, 2013.
The following discussion provides information about the activities of each business segment. A discussion of the financial results and the factors impacting performance can be found in the section entitled "Business Segments" in the financial review.
The Business Bank meets the needs of middle market businesses, multinational corporations and governmental entities by offering various products and services, including commercial loans and lines of credit, deposits, cash management, capital market products, international trade finance, letters of credit, foreign exchange management services and loan syndication services.
The Retail Bank includes small business banking and personal financial services, consisting of consumer lending, consumer deposit gathering and mortgage loan origination. In addition to a full range of financial services provided to small business customers, this business segment offers a variety of consumer products, including deposit accounts, installment loans, credit cards, student loans, home equity lines of credit and residential mortgage loans.
Wealth Management offers products and services consisting of fiduciary services, private banking, retirement services, investment management and advisory services, investment banking and brokerage services. This business segment also offers the sale of annuity products, as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance products.
The Finance segment includes the Corporation’s securities portfolio and asset and liability management activities. This segment is responsible for managing the Corporation’s funding, liquidity and capital needs, performing interest sensitivity analysis and executing various strategies to manage the Corporation’s exposure to liquidity, interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.
The Other category includes discontinued operations, the income and expense impact of equity and cash, tax benefits not assigned to specific business segments, charges of an unusual or infrequent nature that are not reflective of the normal operations of the business segments and miscellaneous other expenses of a corporate nature.
For further information on the methodologies which form the basis for these results refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report.
Business segment financial results are as follows:
(dollar amounts in millions)
Business
Bank
 
Retail
Bank
 
Wealth Management
 
Finance
 
Other
 
Total
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Earnings summary:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
$
748

 
$
309

 
$
92

 
$
(333
)
 
$
15

 
$
831

Provision for credit losses
31

 
11

 
(10
)
 

 
(3
)
 
29

Noninterest income
157

 
86

 
130

 
29

 
6

 
408

Noninterest expenses
293

 
352

 
157

 
5

 
25

 
832

Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
176

 
11

 
26

 
(112
)
 

 
101

Net income (loss)
$
405

 
$
21

 
$
49

 
$
(197
)
 
$
(1
)
 
$
277

Net credit-related charge-offs
$
28

 
$
11

 
$
2

 
$

 
$

 
$
41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selected average balances:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
$
35,899

 
$
5,967

 
$
4,783

 
$
11,786

 
$
5,301

 
$
63,736

Loans
34,854

 
5,274

 
4,628

 

 

 
44,756

Deposits
25,752

 
21,145

 
3,691

 
303

 
204

 
51,095

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statistical data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Return on average assets (a)
2.26
%
 
0.19
%
 
2.06
%
 
N/M

 
N/M

 
0.87
%
Efficiency ratio (b)
32.36

 
88.66

 
70.48

 
N/M

 
N/M

 
67.00

(Table continues on following page).

34

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

(dollar amounts in millions)
Business
Bank
 
Retail
Bank
 
Wealth Management
 
Finance
 
Other
 
Total
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Earnings summary:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
$
753

 
$
327

 
$
93

 
$
(313
)
 
$
18

 
$
878

Provision for credit losses
14

 
9

 
14

 

 
4

 
41

Noninterest income
164

 
90

 
131

 
30

 
2

 
417

Noninterest expenses
309

 
361

 
159

 
5

 
47

 
881

Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
184

 
16

 
18

 
(107
)
 
(12
)
 
99

Net income (loss)
$
410

 
$
31

 
$
33

 
$
(181
)
 
$
(19
)
 
$
274

Net credit-related charge-offs
$
54

 
$
21

 
$
15

 
$

 
$

 
$
90

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selected average balances:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
$
33,776

 
$
6,059

 
$
4,620

 
$
11,755

 
$
5,303

 
$
61,513

Loans
32,844

 
5,356

 
4,549

 

 

 
42,749

Deposits
24,070

 
20,449

 
3,626

 
165

 
181

 
48,491

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statistical data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Return on average assets (a)
2.43
%
 
0.30
%
 
1.44
%
 
N/M

 
N/M

 
0.89
%
Efficiency ratio (b)
33.79

 
86.21

 
74.44

 
N/M

 
N/M

 
68.62

(a)
Return on average assets is calculated based on the greater of average assets or average liabilities and attributed equity.
(b)    Noninterest expenses as a percentage of the sum of net interest income (FTE) and noninterest income excluding net securities gains.
FTE – Fully Taxable Equivalent
N/M – not meaningful
The Corporation operates in three primary markets - Texas, California, and Michigan, as well as in Arizona and Florida, with select businesses operating in several other states, and in Canada and Mexico. The Corporation produces market segment results for the Corporation’s three primary geographic markets as well as Other Markets. Other Markets includes Florida, Arizona, the International Finance division and businesses with a national perspective. The Finance & Other category includes the Finance segment and the Other category as previously described. Market segment results are provided as supplemental information to the business segment results and may not meet all operating segment criteria as set forth in GAAP. For comparability purposes, amounts in all periods are based on market segments and methodologies in effect at June 30, 2013.
A discussion of the financial results and the factors impacting performance can be found in the section entitled "Market Segments" in the financial review.
Market segment financial results are as follows:
(dollar amounts in millions)
Michigan
 
California
 
Texas
 
Other
Markets
 
Finance
& Other
 
Total
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Earnings summary:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
$
377

 
$
344

 
$
266

 
$
162

 
$
(318
)
 
$
831

Provision for credit losses
(11
)
 
28

 
14

 
1

 
(3
)
 
29

Noninterest income
180

 
71

 
64

 
58

 
35

 
408

Noninterest expenses
329

 
197

 
179

 
97

 
30

 
832

Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
84

 
70

 
48

 
11

 
(112
)
 
101

Net income (loss)
$
155

 
$
120

 
$
89

 
$
111

 
$
(198
)
 
$
277

Net credit-related charge-offs
$
9

 
$
22

 
$
3

 
$
7

 
$

 
$
41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selected average balances:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
$
14,031

 
$
13,976

 
$
10,841

 
$
7,801

 
$
17,087

 
$
63,736

Loans
13,624

 
13,728

 
10,125

 
7,279

 

 
44,756

Deposits
20,206

 
14,514

 
10,074

 
5,794

 
507

 
51,095

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statistical data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Return on average assets (a)
1.47
%
 
1.55
%
 
1.58
%
 
2.82
%
 
N/M

 
0.87
%
Efficiency ratio (b)
58.85

 
47.39

 
54.19

 
44.14

 
N/M

 
67.00

(Table continues on following page).

35

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Comerica Incorporated and Subsidiaries

(dollar amounts in millions)
Michigan
 
California
 
Texas
 
Other
Markets
 
Finance
& Other
 
Total
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Earnings summary:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
$
392

 
$
338

 
$
291

 
$
152

 
$
(295
)
 
$
878

Provision for credit losses
(10
)
 
3

 
35

 
9

 
4

 
41

Noninterest income
195

 
68

 
63

 
59

 
32

 
417

Noninterest expenses
354

 
197

 
181

 
97

 
52

 
881

Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
83

 
77

 
48

 
10

 
(119
)
 
99

Net income (loss)
$
160

 
$
129

 
$
90

 
$
95

 
$
(200
)
 
$
274

Net credit-related charge-offs
$
29

 
$
24

 
$
10

 
$
27

 
$

 
$
90

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selected average balances:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
$
14,060

 
$
12,591

 
$
10,174

 
$
7,630

 
$
17,058

 
$
61,513

Loans
13,794

 
12,372

 
9,400

 
7,183

 

 
42,749

Deposits
19,320

 
13,919

 
10,207

 
4,699

 
346

 
48,491

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statistical data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Return on average assets (a)
1.57
%
 
1.74
%
 
1.57
%
 
2.50
%
 
N/M

 
0.89
%
Efficiency ratio (b)
60.41

 
48.47

 
51.21

 
48.22

 
N/M

 
68.62

(a)
Return on average assets is calculated based on the greater of average assets or average liabilities and attributed equity.
(b)    Noninterest expenses as a percentage of the sum of net interest income (FTE) and noninterest income excluding net securities gains.
FTE – Fully Taxable Equivalent
N/M – not meaningful

36

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, the Corporation may make other written and oral communications from time to time that contain such statements. All statements regarding the Corporation's expected financial position, strategies and growth prospects and general economic conditions expected to exist in the future are forward-looking statements. The words, "anticipates," "believes," "contemplates," "feels," "expects," "estimates," "seeks," "strives," "plans," "intends," "outlook," "forecast," "position," "target," "mission," "assume," "achievable," "potential," "strategy," "goal," "aspiration," "opportunity," "initiative," "outcome," "continue," "remain," "maintain," "on course," "trend," "objective," "looks forward" and variations of such words and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "would," "should," "could," "might," "can," "may" or similar expressions, as they relate to the Corporation or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are predicated on the beliefs and assumptions of the Corporation's management based on information known to the Corporation's management as of the date of this report and do not purport to speak as of any other date. Forward-looking statements may include descriptions of plans and objectives of the Corporation's management for future or past operations, products or services, and forecasts of the Corporation's revenue, earnings or other measures of economic performance, including statements of profitability, business segments and subsidiaries, estimates of credit trends and global stability. Such statements reflect the view of the Corporation's management as of this date with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks materialize or should underlying beliefs or assumptions prove incorrect, the Corporation's actual results could differ materially from those discussed. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are changes in general economic, political or industry conditions; changes in monetary and fiscal policies, including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; volatility and disruptions in global capital and credit markets; changes in the Corporation's credit rating; the interdependence of financial service companies; changes in regulation or oversight; unfavorable developments concerning credit quality; any future acquisitions or divestitures; the effects of more stringent capital or liquidity requirements; declines or other changes in the businesses or industries of the Corporation's customers; the implementation of the Corporation's strategies and business models; the Corporation's ability to utilize technology to efficiently and effectively develop, market and deliver new products and services; operational difficulties, failure of technology infrastructure or information security incidents; changes in the financial markets, including fluctuations in interest rates and their impact on deposit pricing; competitive product and pricing pressures among financial institutions within the Corporation's markets; changes in customer behavior; management's ability to maintain and expand customer relationships; management's ability to retain key officers and employees; the impact of legal and regulatory proceedings or determinations; the effectiveness of methods of reducing risk exposures; the effects of terrorist activities and other hostilities; the effects of catastrophic events including, but not limited to, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, fires, droughts and floods; changes in accounting standards and the critical nature of the Corporation's accounting policies. The Corporation cautions that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive. For discussion of factors that may cause actual results to differ from expectations, please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In particular, please refer to "Item 1A. Risk Factors" beginning on page 13 of the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" beginning on page 68 of the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. The Corporation does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect facts, circumstances, assumptions or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made. For any forward-looking statements made in this report or in any documents, the Corporation claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

37

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net income of $143 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was unchanged compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. Decreases of $18 million in noninterest expenses and $6 million in the provision for credit losses were offset by decreases of $21 million in net interest income and $3 million in noninterest income. Noninterest expenses included no merger and restructuring charges for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Net income per diluted common share was $0.76 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0.73 for the same period one year ago. Average diluted common shares were 187 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 194 million for the same period in the prior year.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $277 million, an increase of $3 million from $274 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in net income in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, reflected decreases of $49 million in noninterest expenses and $12 million in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by decreases of $47 million in net interest income and $9 million in noninterest income and an increase of $2 million in the provision for income taxes. Noninterest expenses included no merger and restructuring charges for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net income per diluted common share was $1.46 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $1.39 for the same period one year ago. Average diluted common shares were 187 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 195 million for the same period in the prior year.
Full-Year 2013 Outlook Compared to Full-Year 2012
For full-year 2013, management expects the following compared to 2012, assuming a continuation of the current slow growing economic environment:
Continued growth in average loans at a slower pace, with economic uncertainty impacting demand and a continued focus on maintaining pricing and structure discipline in a competitive environment.
Lower net interest income, reflecting both a decline in purchase accounting accretion and the effect of continued low rates. Loan growth should partially offset the impact of low rates on loans and securities. Purchase accounting accretion is expected to be $25 million to $30 million for full-year 2013, compared to $71 million in full-year 2012.
Provision for credit losses declining, reflecting lower nonperforming loans and net charge-offs, partially offset by loan growth. The provision for credit losses for the second half of 2013 is expected to be similar to the provision for the first six months of 2013.
Customer-driven noninterest income relatively stable, reflecting cross-sell initiatives partially offset by regulatory pressures on certain fees. Outlook does not include expectations for non-customer driven income.
Lower noninterest expense, reflecting further cost savings due to tight expense control and no restructuring expenses. Full-year 2012 included restructuring expenses of $35 million.
Effective tax rate of approximately 27.5 percent.

38

Table of Contents

Net Interest Income
Quarterly Analysis of Net Interest Income & Rate/Volume - Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE)
 
Three Months Ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
(dollar amounts in millions)
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
 
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Commercial loans
$
28,393

$
233

3.29
%
 
$
25,983

$
227

3.52
%
Real estate construction loans
1,453

15

4.04

 
1,420

15

4.50

Commercial mortgage loans
9,192

88

3.86

 
9,983

112

4.46

Lease financing
855

7

3.22

 
869

7

3.28

International loans
1,262

12

3.81

 
1,265

12

3.66

Residential mortgage loans
1,602

16

4.04

 
1,487

17

4.53

Consumer loans
2,136

18

3.30

 
2,221

18

3.37

Total loans (a)
44,893

389

3.47

 
43,228

408

3.79

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
9,415

51

2.17

 
9,262

58

2.51

Other investment securities available-for-sale
378

1

0.56

 
466

1

0.85

Total investment securities available-for-sale
9,793

52

2.15

 
9,728

59

2.49

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks (b)
4,125

3

0.26

 
3,555

3

0.26

Other short-term investments
117


1.05

 
141


1.55

Total earning assets
58,928

444

3.02

 
56,652

470

3.35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
972

 
 
 
931

 
 
Allowance for loan losses
(625
)
 
 
 
(710
)
 
 
Accrued income and other assets
4,434

 
 
 
4,808

 
 
Total assets
$
63,709

 
 
 
$
61,681

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market and interest-bearing checking deposits
$
21,544

8

0.13

 
$
20,451

8

0.18

Savings deposits
1,658


0.03

 
1,607

1

0.07

Customer certificates of deposit
5,685

6

0.43

 
6,107

9

0.53

Foreign office time deposits
485

1

0.60

 
379


0.64

Total interest-bearing deposits
29,372

15

0.19

 
28,544

18

0.25

Short-term borrowings
193


0.07

 
68


0.12

Medium- and long-term debt
4,044

14

1.43

 
4,854

17

1.40

Total interest-bearing sources
33,609

29

0.34

 
33,466

35

0.42

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing deposits
22,076

 
 
 
20,128

 
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
1,042

 
 
 
1,085

 
 
Total shareholders’ equity
6,982

 
 
 
7,002

 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
63,709

 
 
 
$
61,681

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest income/rate spread (FTE)
 
$
415

2.68

 
 
$
435

2.93

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FTE adjustment
 
$
1

 
 
 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impact of net noninterest-bearing sources of funds
 
 
0.15

 
 
 
0.17

Net interest margin (as a percentage of average earning assets) (FTE) (a) (b)
 
 
2.83
%
 
 
 
3.10
%
(a)
Accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio of $7 million and $18 million increased the net interest margin by 5 basis points and 13 basis points in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(b)
Excess liquidity, represented by average balances deposited with the Federal Reserve Bank, reduced the net interest margin by 18 basis points and 18 basis points in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

39

Table of Contents

Quarterly Analysis of Net Interest Income & Rate/Volume - Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) (continued)
 
Three Months Ended
 
June 30, 2013/June 30, 2012
(in millions)
Increase
(Decrease)
Due to Rate
Increase
(Decrease)
Due to 
Volume (a)
Net
Increase
(Decrease)
Interest Income (FTE):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
(32
)
(b)
$
13

 
$
(19
)
(b)
Investment securities available-for-sale
(8
)
 
1

 
(7
)
 
Total interest income (FTE)
(40
)
 
14

 
(26
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
 
Medium- and long-term debt

 
(3
)
 
(3
)
 
Total interest expense
(3
)
 
(3
)
 
(6
)
 
Net interest income (FTE)
$
(37
)
 
$
17

 
$
(20
)
 
(a)
Rate/volume variances are allocated to variances due to volume.
(b)
Reflected a decrease of $11 million in accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio.
Net interest income was $414 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $21 million compared to $435 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in net interest income in the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012, resulted primarily from a decrease in yields and an $11 million decrease in the accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio, partially offset by an increase in average earning assets. Average earning assets increased $2.2 billion, or 4 percent, to $58.9 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $56.7 billion for the same period in 2012. The increase in average earning assets primarily reflected increases of $1.7 billion in average loans and $570 million in average interest-bearing deposits with banks. The net interest margin (FTE) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 decreased 27 basis points to 2.83% percent, from 3.10% percent for the comparable period in 2012, primarily from decreased yields on loans and mortgage-backed investment securities and a decrease in accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio, partially offset by lower deposit rates. The decrease in loan yields reflected a shift in the average loan portfolio mix, largely due to an increase in lower-yielding average commercial loans as well as a decrease in higher-yielding commercial mortgage loans, lower LIBOR rates and positive credit quality migration throughout the portfolio. Yields on mortgage-backed investment securities decreased as a result of prepayments on higher-yielding securities and new investments in lower-yielding securities impacted by the lower rate environment. Accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio increased the net interest margin by 5 basis points in the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 13 basis points in the same period in 2012, and excess liquidity reduced the net interest margin by approximately 18 basis points in both the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Excess liquidity was represented by $4.0 billion and $3.5 billion of average balances deposited with the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, included in “interest-bearing deposits with banks” on the consolidated balance sheets. The "Quarterly Analysis of Net Interest Income & Rate/Volume - Fully Taxable Equivalent" table above provides an analysis of net interest income (FTE) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and details the components of the change in net interest income on a FTE basis for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in the prior year.



40

Table of Contents

Year-to-Date Analysis of Net Interest Income & Rate/Volume - Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE)

 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
(dollar amounts in millions)
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
 
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Commercial loans
$
28,225

$
462

3.30
%
 
$
25,359

$
446

3.54
%
Real estate construction loans
1,384

28

4.10

 
1,437

32

4.54

Commercial mortgage loans
9,295

183

3.97

 
10,093

231

4.59

Lease financing
856

14

3.23

 
883

15

3.35

International loans
1,272

23

3.72

 
1,235

23

3.71

Residential mortgage loans
1,579

33

4.21

 
1,503

35

4.65

Consumer loans
2,145

36

3.33

 
2,239

38

3.43

Total loans (a)
44,756

779

3.51

 
42,749

820

3.86

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
9,532

104

2.18

 
9,312

120

2.60

Other investment securities available-for-sale
374

1

0.55

 
496

2

0.79

Total investment securities available-for-sale
9,906

105

2.16

 
9,808

122

2.57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks (b)
3,990

5

0.26

 
3,723

5

0.26

Other short-term investments
117

1

1.67

 
138

1

1.76

Total earning assets
58,769

890

3.06

 
56,418

948

3.39

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
975

 
 
 
965

 
 
Allowance for loan losses
(629
)
 
 
 
(723
)
 
 
Accrued income and other assets
4,621

 
 
 
4,853

 
 
Total assets
$
63,736

 
 
 
$
61,513

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market and interest-bearing checking deposits
$
21,442

15

0.14

 
$
20,623

18

0.18

Savings deposits
1,640


0.03

 
1,575

1

0.08

Customer certificates of deposit
5,715

13

0.45

 
6,042

17

0.55

Foreign office time deposits
505

2

0.57

 
369

1

0.61

Total interest-bearing deposits
29,302

30

0.20

 
28,609

37

0.26

Short-term borrowings
158


0.09

 
73


0.11

Medium- and long-term debt
4,374

29

1.37

 
4,897

33

1.37

Total interest-bearing sources
33,834

59

0.35

 
33,579

70

0.42

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing deposits
21,793

 
 
 
19,882

 
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
1,140

 
 
 
1,081

 
 
Total shareholders’ equity
6,969

 
 
 
6,971

 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
63,736

 
 
 
$
61,513

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest income/rate spread (FTE)
 
$
831

2.71

 
 
$
878

2.97

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FTE adjustment
 
$
1

 
 
 
$
1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impact of net noninterest-bearing sources of funds
 
 
0.15

 
 
 
0.17

Net interest margin (as a percentage of average earning assets) (FTE) (a) (b)
 
 
2.86
%
 
 
 
3.14
%
(a)
Accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio of $18 million and $43 million increased the net interest margin by 6 basis points and 15 basis points in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(b)
Excess liquidity, represented by average balances deposited with the Federal Reserve Bank, reduced the net interest margin by 18 basis points and 20 basis points in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

41

Table of Contents


Year-to-Date Analysis of Net Interest Income & Rate/Volume - Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) (continued)
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2013/June 30, 2012
(in millions)
Increase
(Decrease)
Due to Rate
Increase
(Decrease)
Due to 
Volume (a)
Net
Increase
(Decrease)
Interest Income (FTE):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
(71
)
(b)
$
30

 
$
(41
)
(b)
Investment securities available-for-sale
(20
)
 
3

 
(17
)
 
Total interest income (FTE)
(91
)
 
33

 
(58
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
(8
)
 
1

 
(7
)
 
Medium- and long-term debt

 
(4
)
 
(4
)
 
Total interest expense
(8
)
 
(3
)
 
(11
)
 
Net interest income (FTE)
$
(83
)
 
$
36

 
$
(47
)
 
(a)
Rate/volume variances are allocated to variances due to volume.
(b)
Reflected a decrease of $25 million in accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio.
Net interest income was $830 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $47 million compared to $877 million for the same period in 2012. The decrease in net interest income in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, resulted primarily from a decrease in yields and a $25 million decrease in the accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio in the six months ended June 30, 2013, partially offset by an increase in average earning assets. Average earning assets increased $2.4 billion, or 4 percent, to $58.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $56.4 billion for the same period in 2012. The increase in average earning assets primarily reflected increases of $2.0 billion in average loans and $267 million in average interest-bearing deposits with banks. The net interest margin (FTE) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased 28 basis points to 2.86 percent, from 3.14 percent for the comparable period in 2012, primarily due to the reasons cited in the quarterly discussion above. Accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio increased the net interest margin by 6 basis points in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 15 basis points in the same period in 2012, and excess liquidity reduced the net interest margin by approximately 18 basis points in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 20 basis points in the same period in 2012. Excess liquidity was represented by $3.8 billion and $3.6 billion of average balances deposited with the FRB in first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, included in “interest-bearing deposits with banks” on the consolidated balance sheets. The "Quarterly Analysis of Net Interest Income & Rate/Volume - Fully Taxable Equivalent" table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income (FTE) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and details the components of the change in net interest income on a FTE basis for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in the prior year.
For further discussion of the effects of market rates on net interest income, refer to the "Market and Liquidity Risk" section of this financial review.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses was $13 million and $19 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, and 2012, respectively, and $29 million and $41 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The provision for credit losses includes both the provision for loan losses and the provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments.
The provision for loan losses is recorded to maintain the allowance for loan losses at the level deemed appropriate by the Corporation to cover probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio. For discussion of the allowance for loan losses and the methodology used in the determination of the allowance for loan losses, refer to the "Credit Risk" and "Critical Accounting Policies" sections of this financial review. The provision for loan losses was $13 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and was $25 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $31 million for the same period in the prior year. Credit quality in the loan portfolio continued to improve in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same periods in the prior year, in part reflecting improvements in the U.S. economy. Improvements in credit quality included a decline of $949 million in the Corporation's internal watch list loans from June 30, 2012 to June 30, 2013. Reflected in the decline in watch list loans was a decrease in nonaccrual loans of $270 million. The Corporation's internal watch list is generally consistent with loans in the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful categories defined by regulatory authorities.
Net loan charge-offs in the three months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $28 million to $17 million, or 0.15 percent of average total loans, compared to $45 million, or 0.42 percent, for the first three months of 2012. The $28 million decrease in net

42

Table of Contents

loan charge-offs in the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily reflected decreases in Commercial Real Estate ($16 million) and Private Banking ($7 million). By geographic market, the decrease in net loan charge-offs in the second quarter 2013 compared to the second quarter 2012, primarily reflected decreases in Other Markets ($15 million), Texas ($7 million) and Michigan ($7 million).
Net loan charge-offs in the first six months of 2013 decreased $49 million to $41 million, or 0.18 percent of average total loans, compared to $90 million, or 0.42 percent, for the same period in 2012. The $49 million decrease in net loan charge-offs in the first six months of 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily reflected decreases in Commercial Real Estate ($30 million) and Private Banking ($13 million). Net loan charge-offs decreased in all geographic markets in the first six months of 2013, compared to the same period in 2012.
The provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments is recorded to maintain the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments at the level deemed appropriate by the Corporation to cover probable credit losses inherent in lending-related commitments. The provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments was zero, a decrease of $11 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012, and was $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $10 million for the comparable period in prior year. The $11 million and $6 million decreases in the provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively, resulted primarily from the reduction of specific reserves established in the second quarter 2012 for set aside/bonded stop loss commitments related to residential real estate construction credits in the California market. The reserves for set aside/bonded stop loss commitments were reduced in the second quarter 2013 as the underlying commitments were funded and simultaneously charged-off against the allowance for loan losses. Lending-related commitment charge-offs were insignificant for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
An analysis of the allowance for credit losses and nonperforming assets is presented under the "Credit Risk" subheading in the "Risk Management" section of this financial review.
Noninterest Income
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Customer-driven income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
$
53

 
$
53

 
$
108

 
$
109

Fiduciary income
44

 
39

 
87

 
77

Commercial lending fees
22

 
24

 
43

 
49

Letter of credit fees
16

 
18

 
32

 
35

Card fees
13

 
12

 
25

 
23

Foreign exchange income
9

 
10

 
18

 
20

Brokerage fees
4

 
4

 
9

 
9

Other customer-driven income (a)
27

 
27

 
50

 
48

Total customer-driven noninterest income
188

 
187

 
372

 
370

Noncustomer-driven income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank-owned life insurance
10

 
10

 
19

 
20

Net securities (losses) gains
(2
)
 
6

 
(2
)
 
11

Other noncustomer-driven income (a)
12

 
8

 
19

 
16

Total noninterest income
$
208

 
$
211

 
$
408

 
$
417

(a)
The table below provides further details on certain categories included in other noninterest income.
Noninterest income was $208 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $3 million compared to $211 million for the same period in 2012. Fiduciary income increased $5 million, primarily reflecting an increase in personal trust fees, largely driven by an increase in the volume of fiduciary services sold and increases in market value. Net securities (losses) gains reflected a $2 million charge related to a derivative contract tied to the conversion rate of Visa Class B shares in the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to gains of $6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily from the redemption of auction-rate securities. Other noncustomer-driven income increased $4 million, primarily due to a $5 million increase in deferred compensation asset returns in the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in deferred compensation asset returns in noninterest income is offset by an increase in deferred compensation plan expense in noninterest expenses.
Noninterest income was $408 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $9 million compared to $417 million for the same period in 2012. Fiduciary income increased $10 million and net securities (losses) gains decreased $13 million, primarily for the same reasons described in the quarterly discussion above. In addition, commercial lending fees decreased $6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in

43

Table of Contents

syndication agent fees. Other noncustomer-driven income increased $3 million, primarily due to a $4 million increase in deferred compensation asset returns in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase in deferred compensation asset returns in noninterest income is offset by an increase in deferred compensation plan expense in noninterest expenses.
The following table illustrates certain categories included in "other noninterest income" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Other noninterest income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other customer-driven income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment banking fees
$
6

 
$
4

 
$
11

 
$
10

Customer derivative income
7

 
8

 
11

 
11

Insurance commissions
3

 
4

 
7

 
7

All other customer-driven income
11

 
11

 
21

 
20

Total other customer-driven income
27

 
27

 
50

 
48

Other noncustomer-driven income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities trading income
3

 
5

 
8

 
9

Deferred compensation asset returns (a)
3

 
(2
)
 
6

 
2

Income from principal investing and warrants
3

 
4

 
5

 
6

Amortization of low income housing investments
(13
)
 
(14
)
 
(27
)
 
(28
)
All other noncustomer-driven income
16

 
15

 
27

 
27

Total other noncustomer-driven income
12

 
8

 
19

 
16

Total other noninterest income
$
39

 
$
35

 
$
69

 
$
64

(a)
Compensation deferred by the Corporation's officers is invested based on investment selections of the officers. Income earned on these assets is reported in noninterest income and the offsetting increase in liability is reported in salaries expense.
Noninterest Expenses
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Salaries
$
182

 
$
189

 
$
370

 
$
390

Employee benefits
63

 
61

 
126

 
120

Total salaries and employee benefits
245

 
250

 
496

 
510

Net occupancy expense
39

 
40

 
78

 
81

Equipment expense
15

 
16

 
30

 
33

Outside processing fee expense
30

 
26

 
58

 
52

Software expense
22

 
21

 
44

 
44

Merger and restructuring charges

 
8

 

 
8

FDIC insurance expense
8

 
10

 
17

 
20

Advertising expense
6

 
7

 
12

 
14

Other real estate expense
1

 
1

 
2

 
4

Other noninterest expenses
50

 
55

 
95

 
115

Total noninterest expenses
$
416

 
$
434

 
$
832

 
$
881

Noninterest expenses were $416 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $18 million compared to $434 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Salaries expense decreased $7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a reduction in staffing levels and lower expected executive incentive compensation, partially offset by a $5 million increase in deferred compensation plan expense and the impact of annual merit increases. Employee benefits expense increased $2 million, primarily reflecting increased pension expense. Outside processing fee expense increased $4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily due to increased activity tied to revenue growth, transactional costs related to increased volume and outsourcing of certain operational functions. Other noninterest expenses decreased $5 million, primarily reflecting a $10 million decrease in legal and litigation-related expenses, as well as small decreases in several other categories of other noninterest expense, partially offset by a $4 million write-down on other foreclosed assets in the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Noninterest expenses were $832 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $49 million compared to $881 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Salaries expense decreased $20 million and employee benefits expense increased $6 million, primarily due to the same reasons discussed above. Other noninterest expenses decreased $20 million,

44

Table of Contents

primarily reflecting a $19 million decrease in legal and litigation-related expenses, as well as small decreases in several other categories of other noninterest expense, partially offset by a $4 million write-down on other foreclosed assets in the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $50 million for both the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $100 million, compared to $98 million for the same period in 2012. The $2 million increase in the provision for income taxes in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, was primarily due to an increase in pretax net income.


45

Table of Contents

STRATEGIC LINES OF BUSINESS
The Corporation's management accounting system assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each segment using certain methodologies, which are regularly reviewed and refined. These methodologies may be modified as the management accounting system is enhanced and changes occur in the organizational structure and/or product lines.
In the first quarter 2013, the Corporation changed the method of assigning the allowance for loan losses to each segment. In 2012, national probability of default and loss given default statistics were incorporated into the Corporation's allowance methodology. Each segment was assigned an allowance for loan losses based on market-specific standard reserve factors applied to the loans in each segment, and the difference between the total allowance required on a national basis and the market-specific allowances was allocated based on the relative loan balances in each segment. Effective first quarter 2013, each segment is assigned an allowance for loan losses by applying national standard reserve factors to the loan balances in each segment by risk rating distribution. For comparability purposes, amounts in all periods are based on segments and methodologies in effect at June 30, 2013. For further information regarding the Corporation's segment methodologies, refer to page F-13 of the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report.
Business Segments
The Corporation's operations are strategically aligned into three major business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail Bank and Wealth Management. These business segments are differentiated based upon the products and services provided. In addition to the three major business segments, Finance is also reported as a segment. The Other category includes discontinued operations and items not directly associated with these business segments or the Finance segment. The performance of the business segments is not comparable with the Corporation's consolidated results and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution. Additionally, because of the interrelationships of the various segments, the information presented is not indicative of how the segments would perform if they operated as independent entities. Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements describes the business activities of each business segment and presents financial results of these business segments for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
The following table presents net income (loss) by business segment.
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)
2013
 
2012
Business Bank
$
405

 
86
%
 
$
410

 
86
%
Retail Bank
21

 
4

 
31

 
7

Wealth Management
49

 
10

 
33

 
7

 
475

 
100
%
 
474

 
100
%
Finance
(197
)
 
 
 
(181
)
 
 
Other (a)
(1
)
 
 
 
(19
)
 
 
Total
$
277

 
 
 
$
274

 
 
(a)    Includes items not directly associated with the three major business segments or the Finance Division.
The Business Bank's net income of $405 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $5 million, compared to $410 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest income (FTE) of $748 million decreased $5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to lower loan yields and a $17 million decrease in accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio, partially offset by the benefit provided by an increase of $2.0 billion in average loans, a decrease in net funds transfer pricing (FTP) charges and lower deposit rates. Average deposits increased $1.7 billion in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year. The provision for credit losses increased $17 million, to $31 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to first quarter 2013 enhancements to the approach utilized to determine the allowance for loan losses and loan growth, partially offset by improvements in credit quality and reflecting increases in Middle Market and Corporate Banking, partially offset by a decrease in Commercial Real Estate. Net credit-related charge-offs of $28 million decreased $26 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily reflecting a decrease in Commercial Real Estate. Noninterest income of $157 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $7 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in commercial lending fees ($6 million). Noninterest expenses of $293 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $16 million compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to decreases in corporate overhead expense ($8 million), salaries expense ($4 million), processing costs ($3 million) and small decreases in several noninterest expense categories, partially offset by an increase in outside processing fees ($3 million) and a write-down on other foreclosed assets in the second quarter 2013 ($4 million).
Net income for the Retail Bank of $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $10 million, compared to $31 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest income (FTE) of $309 million decreased $18 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to an $8 million decrease in accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired

46

Table of Contents

loan portfolio, a decrease in net FTP credits, lower loan yields and an $82 million decrease in average loans, partially offset by the benefit provided by an increase of $696 million in average deposits and lower deposit rates. The provision for credit losses of $11 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $2 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in Small Business, partially offset by a decrease in Retail Banking. Net credit-related charge-offs of $11 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $10 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily reflecting decreases in Small Business in the California and Michigan markets. Noninterest income of $86 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $4 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily reflecting a decrease in service charges on deposit accounts ($2 million) and a charge related to a derivative contract tied to the conversion rate of Visa Class B shares ($2 million) in the six months ended June 30, 2013. Noninterest expenses of $352 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $9 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in corporate overhead expense ($5 million) and small decreases in several other noninterest expense categories.
Wealth Management's net income of $49 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $16 million, compared to $33 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest income (FTE) of $92 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $1 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. Average loans increased $79 million and average deposits increased $65 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. The provision for credit losses was a benefit of $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $24 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily due to improvements in credit quality. Net credit-related charge-offs were $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $15 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Noninterest income of $130 million decreased $1 million from the comparable period in the prior year, as a decrease in net securities gains ($11 million) was partially offset by an increase in fiduciary income ($8 million) and small increases in several noninterest income categories. Noninterest expenses of $157 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $2 million from the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to a decrease in corporate overhead expense ($2 million).
The net loss in the Finance segment was $197 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to a net loss of $181 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest expense (FTE) of $333 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $20 million, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily reflecting a $16 million decrease in interest earned on mortgage-backed investment securities. Noninterest income of $29 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $1 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. Noninterest expenses of $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were unchanged from the comparable period in the prior year.
The net loss in the Other category of $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $18 million, compared to a net loss of $19 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in net loss primarily reflected a $22 million decrease in noninterest expenses, primarily due to a $15 million decrease in litigation-related expenses.
Market Segments
Market segment results are provided for the Corporation's three largest geographic markets: Michigan, California and Texas. In addition to the three largest geographic markets, Other Markets is also reported as a market segment. The Finance & Other category includes the Finance segment and the Other category as previously described in the "Business Segments" section of this financial review. The table and narrative below present the market results based on the structure and methodologies in effect at June 30, 2013. Note 13 to these consolidated financial statements presents a description of each of these market segments as well as the financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
The following table presents net income (loss) by market segment.
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)
2013
 
2012
Michigan
$
155

 
33
%
 
$
160

 
34
%
California
120

 
25

 
129

 
27

Texas
89

 
19

 
90

 
19

Other Markets
111

 
23

 
95

 
20

 
475

 
100
%
 
474

 
100
%
Finance & Other (a)
(198
)
 
 
 
(200
)
 
 
Total
$
277

 
 
 
$
274

 
 
(a)    Includes items not directly associated with the market segments.
The Michigan market's net income of $155 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $5 million, compared to $160 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest income (FTE) of $377 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $15 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to lower loan yields and the impact of a $170 million decrease in average loans, partially offset by lower deposit rates and a decrease in net FTP charges, reflecting the benefit provided by a $886 million increase in average deposits. The provision for credit losses was a benefit of $11 million

47

Table of Contents

for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $1 million compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to improvements in credit quality and largely reflecting decreases in Commercial Real Estate and Private Banking, partially offset by increases in Middle Market and Corporate Banking. Net credit-related charge-offs of $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $20 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily reflecting decreases in Commercial Real Estate, Middle Market and Private Banking. Noninterest income of $180 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $15 million from the comparable period in 2012, primarily due to decreases in card fees ($9 million) and commercial lending fees ($3 million). Noninterest expenses of $329 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $25 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to decreases in corporate overhead expense ($8 million) and small decreases in most noninterest expense categories.
The California market's net income of $120 million decreased $9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $129 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest income (FTE) of $344 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $6 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to the benefit provided by a $1.4 billion increase in average loans and a decrease in net FTP charges, reflecting the benefit provided by a $595 million increase in average deposits, partially offset by lower loan yields. The provision for credit losses of $28 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $25 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to loan growth and first quarter 2013 enhancements to the approach utilized to determine the allowance for loan losses, and primarily reflecting increases in Middle Market (primarily Technology and Life Sciences) and Private Banking, partially offset by a decrease in Commercial Real Estate. Net credit-related charge-offs of $22 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $2 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily reflecting decreases in Small Business and Commercial Real Estate, partially offset by increases in Technology and Life Sciences and Corporate Banking. Noninterest income of $71 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $3 million from the comparable period in prior year, primarily due to an increase in card fees. Noninterest expenses of $197 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 was unchanged from the comparable period in the prior year, as a write-down on other foreclosed assets in the second quarter 2013 ($4 million) was offset by a decrease in corporate overhead expense ($3 million) and small decreases in several noninterest expense categories.
The Texas market's net income decreased $1 million to $89 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $90 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest income (FTE) of $266 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $25 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in accretion of the purchase discount on the acquired loan portfolio of $24 million and lower loan yields, partially offset by the benefit provided by a $725 million increase in average loans. Average deposits decreased $133 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year. The provision for credit losses of $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $21 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily reflecting decreases Commercial Real Estate and general Middle Market, partially offset by an increase in Energy. Net credit-related charge-offs of $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $7 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily reflecting decreases in Commercial Real Estate and general Middle Market. Noninterest income of $64 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $1 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in card fees ($3 million). Noninterest expenses of $179 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $2 million from the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily reflecting a decrease in corporate overhead expense ($3 million).
Net income in Other Markets of $111 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $16 million compared to $95 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net interest income (FTE) of $162 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $10 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in net FTP credits, primarily the result of the benefits provided by increases of $1.1 billion in average deposits and $96 million in average loans. The provision for credit losses decreased $8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily reflecting a decrease in Private Banking, partially offset by increases in Middle Market and Commercial Real Estate. Net credit-related charge-offs of $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $20 million from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily reflecting decreases in Private Banking and Commercial Real Estate, partially offset by an increase in Environmental Services. Noninterest income of $58 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $1 million from the comparable period in the prior year, reflecting a decrease in net securities gains ($11 million), as the six months ended June 30, 2012 included net securities gains from the redemption of auction-rate securities, partially offset by an increase in fiduciary income ($5 million) and small increases in several other noninterest income categories. Noninterest expenses of $97 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were unchanged compared to the prior year.
The net loss for the Finance & Other category of $198 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $2 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. For further information, refer to the Finance segment and Other category discussions under the "Business Segments" subheading above.

48

Table of Contents

The following table lists the Corporation's banking centers by geographic market segment.
 
June 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Michigan
215

 
218

Texas
136

 
140

California
105

 
105

Other Markets:
 
 
 
Arizona
18

 
18

Florida
9

 
11

Canada
1

 
1

Total Other Markets
28

 
30

Total
484

 
493


49

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets were $62.9 billion at June 30, 2013, a decrease of $2.2 billion from $65.1 billion at December 31, 2012, primarily reflecting decreases of $666 million in investment securities available-for-sale, $598 million in total loans, $379 million in cash and due from banks, $241 million in accrued income and other assets and $161 million in interest-bearing deposits with banks. On an average basis, total assets decreased $548 million to $63.7 billion in the second quarter 2013, compared to $64.3 billion in the fourth quarter 2012, resulting primarily from decreases of $660 million in average interest-bearing deposits with banks, $457 million in average investment securities available-for-sale and $171 million in accrued income and other assets, partially offset by an increase of $774 million in average loans.
The following tables provide information about the change in the Corporation's average loan portfolio in the second quarter 2013, compared to the fourth quarter 2012.
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
Percent
Change
(dollar amounts in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Change
 
Average Loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial loans by business line:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General Middle Market
$
10,210

 
$
9,643

 
$
567

 
6
 %
National Dealer Services
3,638

 
3,141

 
497

 
16

Energy
2,922

 
2,816

 
106

 
4

Technology and Life Sciences
1,792

 
1,776

 
16

 
2

Environmental Services
727

 
678

 
49

 
7

Entertainment
569

 
637

 
(68
)
 
(11
)
Total Middle Market
19,858

 
18,691

 
1,167

 
6

Corporate Banking
3,211

 
3,354

 
(143
)
 
(4
)
Mortgage Banker Finance
1,815

 
2,094

 
(279
)
 
(13
)
Commercial Real Estate
758

 
741

 
17

 
2

Total Business Bank commercial loans
25,642


24,880

 
762

 
3

Total Retail Bank commercial loans
1,329

 
1,200

 
129

 
11

Total Wealth Management commercial loans
1,422

 
1,382

 
40

 
3

Total commercial loans
28,393

 
27,462

 
931

 
3

Real estate construction loans
1,453

 
1,299

 
154

 
12

Commercial mortgage loans
9,192

 
9,519

 
(327
)
 
(3
)
Lease financing
855

 
839

 
16

 
3

International loans
1,262

 
1,314

 
(52
)
 
(4
)
Residential mortgage loans
1,602

 
1,525

 
77

 
5

Consumer loans
2,136

 
2,161

 
(25
)
 
(1
)
Total loans
$
44,893

 
$
44,119

 
$
774

 
2
 %
Average Loans By Geographic Market:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan
$
13,598

 
$
13,415

 
$
183

 
1
 %
California
13,912

 
13,275

 
637

 
5

Texas
10,179

 
9,818

 
361

 
4

Other Markets
7,204

 
7,611

 
(407
)
 
(5
)
Total loans
$
44,893

 
$
44,119

 
$
774

 
2
 %
Average loans for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased $774 million, or 2 percent, to $44.9 billion, compared to $44.1 billion for the three months ended December 31, 2012, reflecting an increase of $931 million, or 3 percent in average commercial loans, partially offset by a decrease of $173 million, or 2 percent, in combined commercial mortgage and real estate construction loans. The $931 million increase in average commercial loans primarily reflected an increase in Middle Market ($1.2 billion), partially offset by decreases in Mortgage Banker Finance ($279 million) and Corporate Banking ($143 million). The decline in Mortgage Banker Finance, which provides mortgage warehousing lines, primarily reflected a decline in refinancing activity. The increase in Middle Market primarily reflected increases in general Middle Market ($567 million), National Dealer Services ($497 million) and Energy ($106 million). In general, Middle Market serves customers with annual revenue between $20 million and $500 million; while Corporate serves customers with revenue over $500 million, and Small Business serves customers with revenue under $20 million. Changes in average total loans by geographic market is provided in the table above.
Investment securities available-for-sale decreased $666 million to $9.6 billion at June 30, 2013, from $10.3 billion at December 31, 2012, primarily reflecting a slowing of the reinvestment of paydowns on residential mortgage-backed investment securities in the second quarter 2013 as well as a $242 million decrease in net unrealized gains, primarily due to rising interest

50

Table of Contents

rates late in the second quarter 2013. On an average basis, investment securities available-for-sale decreased $457 million in the second quarter 2013, compared to the fourth quarter 2012, primarily reflecting the slowing of the reinvestment of paydowns on residential mortgage-backed investment securities.
Total liabilities decreased $2.1 billion to $56.0 billion at June 30, 2013, compared to $58.1 billion at December 31, 2012, primarily due to decreases of $1.4 billion in noninterest-bearing deposits and $1.1 billion in medium- and long-term debt, partially offset by a $473 million increase in interest-bearing deposits. On an average basis, total liabilities decreased $468 million in the second quarter 2013, compared to the fourth quarter 2012, primarily due to decreases of $691 million in medium- and long-term debt and $682 million in average noninterest-bearing deposits, partially offset by an increase of $848 million in average interest-bearing deposits. The decrease in medium- and long-term debt primarily reflected the May 2013 maturity of $1 billion of Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The decrease in average noninterest-bearing deposits primarily reflected a decrease in general Middle Market ($730 million), largely due to a decline in the Financial Services Division ($460 million), which provides services to title and escrow companies. The increase in average interest-bearing deposits primarily reflected an increase of $774 million in money market and interest-bearing checking deposits. By geographic market, the increase in average total deposits of $166 million from the fourth quarter 2012 to the second quarter 2013 primarily reflected increases in Other Markets ($438 million), Texas ($378 million) and Michigan ($141 million), partially offset by a decrease in the California market ($785 million). The decrease in the California market primarily reflected decreases in general Middle Market and Technology and Life Sciences, partially offset by an increase in Corporate Banking.
Capital
Total shareholders' equity decreased $31 million to $6.9 billion at June 30, 2013, compared to December 31, 2012. The decrease in total shareholders' equity included a $125 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss, primarily reflecting a temporary unrealized loss on investment securities available-for-sale of $153 million, net of tax, largely due to the impact of rising rates on the fair value of mortgage-backed investment securities. The following table presents a summary of changes in total shareholders' equity in the six months ended June 30, 2013.
(in millions)
  
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2013
 
 
$
6,942

Net income
 
 
277

Cash dividends declared on common stock
 
 
(64
)
Purchase of common stock
 
 
(146
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
Investment securities available-for-sale
$
(153
)
 
 
Defined benefit and other postretirement plans
28

 
 
Total other comprehensive loss
 
 
(125
)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
 
 
9

Share-based compensation
 
 
18

Balance at June 30, 2013
 
 
$
6,911

The Federal Reserve completed its review of the Corporation's 2013 capital plan in March 2013 and did not object to the capital distributions contemplated in the plan. The capital plan includes up to $288 million of equity repurchases for the four-quarter period ending March 31, 2014. In January 2013, the Corporation increased the quarterly cash dividend from $0.15 per share to $0.17 per share, an increase of 13 percent, effective with the April 2013 dividend payment. The January 2013 dividend increase was contemplated in the Corporation's 2012 capital plan.

51

Table of Contents

On November 16, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Corporation authorized the repurchase of up to 12.6 million shares of Comerica Incorporated outstanding common stock and authorized the purchase of up to all 11.5 million of the Corporation's original outstanding warrants. On April 24, 2012 and April 23, 2013, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 5.7 million shares and up to an additional 10.0 million shares of Comerica Incorporated outstanding common stock, respectively. There is no expiration date for the Corporation's share repurchase program. For further information regarding the repurchase program, refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report. The following table summarizes the Corporation's repurchase activity during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
(shares in thousands)
Total Number of Shares and Warrants Purchased as 
Part of Publicly Announced Repurchase Plans or Programs
 
Remaining
Repurchase
Authorization (a)
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (b)
 
Average Price
Paid Per 
Share
 
Average Price Paid Per 
Warrant (c)
Total first quarter 2013
2,090

 
13,461

 
2,182

 
$
33.94

 
$

April 2013
542

 
22,919

(d)
545

 
35.41

 

May 2013
1,042

 
21,877

 
1,042

 
38.56

 

June 2013
326

 
21,551

 
326

 
38.58

 

Total second quarter 2013
1,910

 
21,551

 
1,913

 
37.67

 

Total 2013
4,000

 
21,551

 
4,095

 
$
35.68

 
$

(a)
Maximum number of shares and warrants that may yet be purchased under the publicly announced plans or programs.
(b)
Includes approximately 95 thousand shares purchased pursuant to deferred compensation plans and shares purchased from employees to pay for taxes related to restricted stock vesting under the terms of an employee share-based compensation plan during the six months ended June 30, 2013. These transactions are not considered part of the Corporation's repurchase program.
(c)
The Corporation made no repurchases of warrants under the repurchase program during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
(d)
Includes the impact of the additional share repurchase authorization approved by the Board on April 23, 2013.
Risk-based regulatory capital standards are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in credit risk profiles among banking institutions and to account for off-balance sheet exposure. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with specified risk-weighting factors. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items. As shown in the table below, the Corporation's capital ratios increased from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013.
The Corporation's capital ratios exceeded minimum regulatory requirements as follows:
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(dollar amounts in millions)
Capital
 
Ratio
 
Capital
 
Ratio
Tier 1 common (a) (b)
$
6,800

 
10.41
%
 
$
6,705

 
10.14
%
Tier 1 risk-based (4.00% - minimum) (b)
6,800

 
10.41

 
6,705

 
10.14

Total risk-based (8.00% - minimum) (b)
8,667

 
13.27

 
8,695

 
13.15

Leverage (3.00% - minimum) (b)
6,800

 
10.81

 
6,705

 
10.57

Tangible common equity (a)
6,256

 
10.04

 
6,285

 
9.76

(a)
See Supplemental Financial Data section for reconcilements of non-GAAP financial measures.
(b)
June 30, 2013 capital and ratios are estimated.
In July 2013, U.S. banking regulators issued a final rule for the U.S. adoption of the Basel III regulatory capital framework. The regulatory framework includes a more conservative definition of capital, two new capital buffers - a conservation buffer and a countercyclical buffer, new and more stringent risk weight categories for assets and off-balance sheet items, and a supplemental leverage ratio. As a banking organization subject to the standardized approach, the rules will be effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2015, with certain transition provisions phasing in through January 1, 2018.
According to the rule, the Corporation will be subject to the capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent, when fully phased in, to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonuses. However, the rules do not subject the Corporation to the capital countercyclical buffer of up to 2.5 percent or the supplemental leverage ratio. The Corporation estimates the June 30, 2013 Tier 1 and Tier 1 common risk-based ratio would be 10.1 percent if calculated under the final rule, assuming the Corporation elects to exclude most elements of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) from regulatory capital. If the option to exclude most elements of AOCI from regulatory capital is not elected, the estimated ratio would be 9.3 percent. Under both scenarios, the Corporation's June 30, 2013 estimated Tier 1 and Tier 1 common capital ratios exceed the minimum required by the final rule (7 percent and 8.5 percent, respectively, including the fully phased-in capital conservation buffer). For a reconcilement of these non-GAAP financial measures, refer to the "Supplemental Financial Data" section of this financial review.
The Basel III liquidity framework, which was revised by the Basel Committee in January 2013, includes two minimum liquidity measures. Rules are expected to be implemented between 2015 and 2019. Adoption in the U.S. is expected to occur over

52

Table of Contents

a similar timeframe, but the final form of the U.S. rules is not yet known. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) requires a financial institution to hold a buffer of high-quality, liquid assets to fully cover net cash outflows under a 30-day systematic liquidity stress scenario. The revisions announced by the Basel Committee in January 2013 eased several requirements related to the LCR, including certain outflow assumptions. The Net Stable Funding Ratio requires the amount of available longer-term, stable sources of funding to be at least 100 percent of the required amount of longer-term stable funding over a one-year period. The Corporation's liquidity position is strong, but if subject to the Basel III liquidity framework as currently proposed, the Corporation may decide to consider additional liquidity management initiatives. While uncertainty exists in the final form and timing of the U.S. rules implementing the Basel III liquidity framework and whether or not the Corporation will be subject to the full requirements, the Corporation is closely monitoring the development of the rules. We expect to meet the final requirements adopted by U.S. banking regulators within regulatory timelines.

53

Table of Contents

RISK MANAGEMENT
The following updated information should be read in conjunction with the "Risk Management" section on pages F-23 through F-41 in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report.
Credit Risk
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments. The allowance for loan losses represents management's assessment of probable, estimable losses inherent in the Corporation's loan portfolio. The allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments, included in "accrued expenses and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets, provides for probable losses inherent in lending-related commitments, including unused commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
The Corporation disaggregates the loan portfolio into segments for purposes of determining the allowance for credit losses. These segments are based on the level at which the Corporation develops, documents and applies a systematic methodology to determine the allowance for credit losses. The Corporation's portfolio segments are business loans and retail loans. Business loans are defined as those belonging to the commercial, real estate construction, commercial mortgage, lease financing and international loan portfolios. Retail loans consist of traditional residential mortgage, home equity and other consumer loans.
The allowance for loan losses includes specific allowances, based on individual evaluations of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. In the first quarter 2013, the Corporation implemented enhancements to the approach utilized for determining standard reserve factors for business loans not individually evaluated by changing from a dollar-based migration method for developing probability of default statistics to a count-based method. Under the dollar-based method, each dollar that moved to default received equal weight in the determination of standard reserve factors for each internal risk rating. As a result, the movement of larger loans impacted standard reserve factors more than the movement of smaller loans. By moving to a count-based approach, where each loan that moves to default receives equal weighting, unusually large or small loans will not have a disproportionate influence on the standard reserve factors. The change resulted in a $40 million increase to the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2013.
The U.S. economy showed evidence of ongoing moderate economic expansion through the second quarter 2013. A complex mix of forces remained engaged that provided some forward momentum, but prevented the economy from growing at a robust pace. Forward momentum was fueled by improving residential real estate conditions. The combination of growing homeowner equity and improved investment portfolios created a positive wealth effect for many homeowners, and contributed to an increase in consumer confidence, supporting consumer spending in the second quarter 2013, including spending on automobiles. This promoted moderate job growth through the quarter which further reinforced consumer spending. These positive forces were held in check by tightening fiscal policy. Federal spending was suppressed through the second quarter as a result of the spending sequester that took effect at the end of March. State and local government spending remained weak even though tax collections improved. Monetary policy was also an important economic factor in the second quarter. The Federal Reserve maintained highly accommodative monetary policy by keeping the federal funds rate near zero, by maintaining its program of asset purchases known as QE3, and by communicating its intent to keep policy highly accommodative for an extended period. However, the expectation that the Federal Reserve may begin to wind down QE3 sometime this fall has grown, contributing to an upward shift in the Treasury yield curve, particularly at the long end of the curve. Global economic demand remained impaired as the European recession lingered. China's economy also showed signs of cooling. As a result of this mix of opposing forces, U.S. real gross domestic product for 2013 is expected to grow by only 1.8 percent over 2012. The Texas economy is expected to continue to be a job growth leader for the remainder of the year. Michigan is expected to benefit from moderate gains in auto sales over the course of 2013, and from firmer commercial and residential real estate conditions. California should feel the broad positive effects of improved real estate markets through the end of the year.
The allowance for loan losses was $613 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $629 million at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $16 million, or 3 percent. The decrease reflected the impact of improvements in the U.S. economy as described above and resulted primarily from a reduction in specific reserves due to a decline in individually evaluated loan balances and a reduction in reserves required on collateral-dependent impaired loans, the elimination of certain incremental industry reserves and lower loan balances in pools of loans with higher standard reserve factors, partially offset by an increase in the allowance for loan losses resulting from the enhancements to the approach utilized for determining standard reserve factors described above. The $16 million decrease in the allowance for loan losses primarily reflected decreased reserves in Commercial Real Estate, Private Banking and general Middle Market, partially offset by increased reserves in Technology and Life Sciences, and Energy. By market, reserves decreased in Michigan and Other Markets and increased in California (primarily Technology and Life Sciences) and Texas (primarily Energy).
Acquired loans were initially recorded at fair value, which included an estimate of credit losses expected to be realized over the remaining lives of the loans, and therefore no corresponding allowance for loan losses was recorded for these loans at

54

Table of Contents

acquisition. Methods utilized to estimate the required allowance for loan losses for acquired loans not deemed credit-impaired at acquisition are similar to originated loans; however, the estimate of loss is based on the unpaid principal balance less the remaining purchase discount, either on an individually evaluated basis or based on the pool of acquired loans not deemed credit-impaired at acquisition within each risk rating, as applicable. At June 30, 2013, there was no allowance for loan losses on acquired loans, and $28 million of purchase discount remained, compared to a $3 million allowance for loan losses and $41 million of remaining purchase discount at December 31, 2012.
The total allowance for loan losses is sufficient to absorb incurred losses inherent in the total loan portfolio. Unanticipated economic events, including political, economic and regulatory instability could cause changes in the credit characteristics of the portfolio and result in an unanticipated increase in the allowance. Inclusion of other industry-specific portfolio exposures in the allowance, as well as significant increases in the current portfolio exposures, could also increase the amount of the allowance. Any of these events, or some combination thereof, may result in the need for additional provision for loan losses in order to maintain an allowance that complies with credit risk and accounting policies.
The allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments includes specific allowances, based on individual evaluations of certain letters of credit in a manner consistent with business loans, and allowances based on the pool of the remaining letters of credit and all unused commitments to extend credit within each internal risk rating.
The allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments was $36 million at June 30, 2013, an increase of $4 million from $32 million at December 31, 2012. The $4 million increase in the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments resulted primarily from an increase in specific reserves in the first six months of 2013 for standby letters of credit. An allowance for credit losses will be recorded on acquired lending-related commitments only to the extent that the required allowance exceeds the remaining purchase discount. The purchase discount remaining for acquired lending-related commitments was $2 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. No allowance was recorded on acquired lending-related commitments at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
For additional information regarding the allowance for credit losses, refer to the "Critical Accounting Policies" section of this financial review and Notes 1 and 4 to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets include loans on nonaccrual status, troubled debt restructured loans (TDRs) which have been renegotiated to less than the original contractual rates (reduced-rate loans) and foreclosed property. TDRs include performing and nonperforming loans. Nonperforming TDRs are either on nonaccrual or reduced-rate status. Nonperforming assets do not include purchased credit impaired (PCI) loans.

55

Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND PAST DUE LOANS
(dollar amounts in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Nonaccrual loans:
 
 
 
Business loans:
 
 
 
Commercial
$
102

 
$
103

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
26

 
30

Other business lines (b)
2

 
3

Total real estate construction
28

 
33

Commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
69

 
94

Other business lines (b)
157

 
181

Total commercial mortgage
226

 
275

Lease financing

 
3

Total nonaccrual business loans
356

 
414

Retail loans:
 
 
 
Residential mortgage
62

 
70

Consumer:
 
 
 
Home equity
28

 
31

Other consumer
3

 
4

Total consumer
31

 
35

Total nonaccrual retail loans
93

 
105

Total nonaccrual loans
449

 
519

Reduced-rate loans
22

 
22

Total nonperforming loans
471

 
541

Foreclosed property
29

 
54

Total nonperforming assets
$
500

 
$
595

Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans
1.04
%
 
1.17
%
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and foreclosed property
1.10

 
1.29

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans
130

 
116

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
$
20

 
$
23

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing as a percentage of total loans
0.04
%
 
0.05
%
(a)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(b)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.
Nonperforming assets decreased $95 million to $500 million at June 30, 2013, from $595 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease in nonperforming assets primarily reflected decreases in nonaccrual commercial mortgage loans ($49 million), foreclosed property ($25 million), and nonaccrual residential mortgage loans ($8 million). Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and foreclosed property was 1.10 percent at June 30, 2013, compared to 1.29 percent at December 31, 2012.

56

Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of changes in nonaccrual loans.
 
Three Months Ended
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
494

 
$
519

 
$
665

Loans transferred to nonaccrual (a)
37

 
34

 
36

Nonaccrual business loan gross charge-offs (b)
(25
)
 
(34
)
 
(54
)
Nonaccrual business loans sold (c)
(9
)
 
(7
)
 
(48
)
Payments/Other (d)
(48
)
 
(18
)
 
(80
)
Balance at end of period
$
449

 
$
494

 
$
519

(a) Based on an analysis of nonaccrual loans with book balances greater than $2 million.
(b) Analysis of gross loan charge-offs:
 
 
 
 
 
Nonaccrual business loans
$
25

 
$
34

 
$
54

Performing watch list loans
5

 

 

Retail loans
5

 
4

 
6

Total gross loan charge-offs
$
35

 
$
38

 
$
60

(c) Analysis of loans sold:
 
 
 
 
 
Nonaccrual business loans
$
9

 
$
7

 
$
48

Performing watch list loans
40

 
12

 
24

Total loans sold
$
49

 
$
19

 
$
72

(d) Includes net changes related to nonaccrual loans with balances less than $2 million, payments on nonaccrual loans with book balances greater than $2 million, transfers of nonaccrual loans to foreclosed property and retail loan gross charge-offs. Excludes business loan gross charge-offs and nonaccrual business loans sold.
There were 7 borrowers with balances greater than $2 million, totaling $37 million, transferred to nonaccrual status in the second quarter 2013, an increase of $3 million when compared to $34 million in the first quarter 2013. Of the transfers to nonaccrual greater than $2 million in the second quarter 2013, $31 million were from Middle Market.
The following table presents the composition of nonaccrual loans by balance and the related number of borrowers at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(dollar amounts in millions)
Number of
Borrowers
 
Balance
 
Number of
Borrowers
 
Balance
Under $2 million
1,692

 
$
253

 
1,609

 
$
277

$2 million - $5 million
24

 
74

 
35

 
112

$5 million - $10 million
10

 
69

 
11

 
82

$10 million - $25 million
4

 
53

 
4

 
48

Total
1,730

 
$
449

 
1,659

 
$
519




57

Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2013 and loans transferred to nonaccrual and net loan charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2013, based primarily on Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) industry categories.
 
June 30, 2013
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
(dollar amounts in millions)
Nonaccrual Loans
 
Loans Transferred to
Nonaccrual (a)
 
Net Loan Charge-Offs (Recoveries)
Industry Category
 
 
Real Estate
$
115

 
27
%
 
$

 
%
 
$
3

 
20
 %
Services
74

 
17

 
19

 
50

 

 
(2
)
Residential Mortgage
62

 
14

 

 

 

 

Holding & Other Investment Companies
36

 
8

 
5

 
13

 
3

 
18

Retail Trade
36

 
8

 
3

 
9

 

 

Manufacturing
28

 
6

 
10

 
28

 
1

 
4

Hotels
25

 
5

 

 

 
4

 
27

Utilities
18

 
4

 

 

 
3

 
18

Wholesale Trade
12

 
3

 

 

 

 
(2
)
Contractors
6

 
1

 

 

 

 
(3
)
Natural Resources
6

 
1

 

 

 
2

 
16

Finance
2

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
(7
)
Transportation & Warehousing
1

 

 

 

 

 
(1
)
Other (b)
28

 
6

 

 

 
2

 
12

Total
$
449

 
100
%
 
$
37

 
100
%
 
$
17

 
100
 %
(a)
Based on an analysis of nonaccrual loans with book balances greater than $2 million.
(b)
Consumer, excluding residential mortgage and certain personal purpose nonaccrual loans and net charge-offs, are included in the “Other” category.
The following table presents a summary of TDRs at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Nonperforming TDRs:
 
 
 
Nonaccrual TDRs
$
120

 
$
118

Reduced-rate TDRs
22

 
22

Total nonperforming TDRs
142

 
140

Performing TDRs (a)
78

 
92

Total TDRs
$
220

 
$
232

(a)
TDRs that do not include a reduction in the original contractual interest rate which are performing in accordance with their modified terms.
Performing TDRs included $53 million of commercial mortgage loans (primarily in the Commercial Real Estate and Small Business Banking business lines) and $25 million of commercial loans (primarily in the Middle Market and Private Banking business lines) at June 30, 2013.
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing are summarized in the following table.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Business loans:
 
 
 
Commercial
$
5

 
$
5

Commercial mortgage
11

 
8

International

 
3

Total business loans
16

 
16

Retail loans:
 
 
 
Residential mortgage

 
2

Other consumer
4

 
5

Total retail loans
4

 
7

Total loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
$
20

 
$
23

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest generally represent loans that are well collateralized and in a continuing process of collection. Loans past due 30-89 days decreased $43 million to $115 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $158 million at December 31, 2012.

58

Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of total internal watch list loans. Watch list loans with balances of $2 million or more on nonaccrual status or whose terms have been modified in a TDR are individually subjected to quarterly credit quality reviews, and the Corporation may establish specific allowances for such loans.
(dollar amounts in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Total watch list loans
$
2,886

 
$
3,110

 
$
3,088

As a percentage of total loans
6.5
%
 
6.9
%
 
6.7
%
The following table presents a summary of foreclosed property by property type.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Construction, land development and other land
$
8

 
$
11

 
$
16

Single family residential properties
9

 
10

 
19

Other non-land, nonresidential properties
9

 
12

 
12

Other assets
3

 
$
7

 
7

Total foreclosed property
$
29

 
$
40

 
$
54

At June 30, 2013, foreclosed property totaled $29 million and consisted of approximately 124 properties, compared to $54 million and approximately 149 properties at December 31, 2012.
The following table presents a summary of changes in foreclosed property.
 
Three Months Ended
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
40

 
$
54

 
$
63

Acquired in foreclosure
4

 
5

 
11

Write-downs
(7
)
 
(2
)
 
(3
)
Foreclosed property sold (a)
(8
)
 
(17
)
 
(17
)
Balance at end of period
$
29

 
$
40

 
$
54

(a) Net gain on foreclosed property sold
$
3

 
$
1

 
$
4

At June 30, 2013, there were 2 foreclosed properties each with a carrying value greater than $2 million, totaling $7 million, compared to 6 foreclosed properties totaling $27 million at December 31, 2012.
For further information regarding the Corporation's nonperforming assets policies and impaired loans, refer to Note 1 and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Commercial and Residential Real Estate Lending
The following table summarizes the Corporation's commercial real estate loan portfolio by loan category.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Real estate construction loans:
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
$
1,223

 
$
1,049

Other business lines (b)
256

 
191

Total real estate construction loans
$
1,479

 
$
1,240

Commercial mortgage loans:
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line (a)
$
1,743

 
$
1,873

Other business lines (b)
7,264

 
7,599

Total commercial mortgage loans
$
9,007

 
$
9,472

(a)
Primarily loans to real estate developers.
(b)
Primarily loans secured by owner-occupied real estate.
The Corporation limits risk inherent in its commercial real estate lending activities by limiting exposure to those borrowers directly involved in the commercial real estate markets and adhering to conservative policies on loan-to-value ratios for such loans. Commercial real estate loans, consisting of real estate construction and commercial mortgage loans, totaled $10.5 billion at June 30, 2013, of which $3.0 billion, or 28 percent, were to borrowers in the Commercial Real Estate business line, which includes loans to real estate developers. The remaining $7.5 billion, or 72 percent, of commercial real estate loans in other business lines consisted primarily of owner-occupied commercial mortgages which bear credit characteristics similar to non-commercial real estate business loans.
The real estate construction loan portfolio totaled $1.5 billion at June 30, 2013. The real estate construction loan portfolio primarily contains loans made to long-time customers with satisfactory completion experience. Of the $1.2 billion of real estate

59

Table of Contents

construction loans in the Commercial Real Estate business line, $26 million were on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2013. In other business lines, $2 million of real estate construction loans were on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2013.
The commercial mortgage loan portfolio totaled $9.0 billion at June 30, 2013 and included $1.8 billion in the Commercial Real Estate business line and $7.2 billion in other business lines. Loans in the commercial mortgage portfolio generally mature within three to five years. Of the $1.8 billion of commercial mortgage loans in the Commercial Real Estate business line, $69 million were on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2013. Commercial mortgage loan net charge-offs in the Commercial Real Estate business line were $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. In other business lines, $157 million of commercial mortgage loans were on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2013, and net charge-offs were $13 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
The geographic distribution and project type of commercial real estate loans are important factors in diversifying credit risk within the portfolio. The following table reflects real estate construction and commercial mortgage loans to borrowers in the Commercial Real Estate business line by project type and location of property.
 
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
Location of Property
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
(dollar amounts in millions)
Project Type:
California
Michigan
Texas
Florida
Other
 
Total
 
% of
Total
 
Total
 
% of
Total
Real estate construction loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Single family
$
112

$
8

$
36

$

$
18

 
$
174

 
14
%
 
$
156

 
15
%
Land development
52

2

2


1

 
57

 
5

 
44

 
4

Total residential
164

10

38


19

 
231

 
19

 
200

 
19

Other construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Multi-family
271


276

18

19

 
584

 
47

 
406

 
39

Office
123


19


2

 
144

 
12

 
121

 
12

Retail
53

4

82

1


 
140

 
11

 
182

 
17

Multi-use

8

23


4

 
35

 
3

 
43

 
4

Commercial
16

3

7


5

 
31

 
3

 
40

 
4

Land development
3


4



 
7

 
1

 
25

 
2

Other
5

8


2

22

 
37

 
3

 
6

 
1

Other real estate construction loans (a)


14



 
14

 
1

 
26

 
2

Total
$
635

$
33

$
463

$
21

$
71

 
$
1,223

 
100
%
 
$
1,049

 
100
%
Commercial mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Real Estate business line:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land carry
$
69

$
31

$
22

$
13

$
15

 
$
150

 
8
%
 
$
143

 
8
%
Single family
24

3

4

18

1

 
50

 
3

 
48

 
2

Total residential
93

34

26

31

16

 
200

 
11

 
191

 
10

Other commercial mortgage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Multi-family
163

45

98

80

14

 
400

 
23

 
376

 
20

Retail
127

96

68

39

37

 
367

 
21

 
368

 
20

Office
87

34

40


32

 
193

 
11

 
193

 
10

Commercial
70

24

22

1

22

 
139

 
8

 
167

 
9

Multi-use
104

7

1


9

 
121

 
7

 
161

 
9

Land carry
32

7

20

7

15

 
81

 
5

 
122

 
6

Other
23

2

31


13

 
69

 
4

 
69

 
4

Other commercial mortgage loans (a)
19

1

151

2


 
173

 
10

 
226

 
12

Total
$
718

$
250

$
457

$
160

$
158

 
$
1,743

 
100
%
 
$
1,873

 
100
%
(a)
Acquired loans for which complete information related to project type is not available.

60

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the Corporation's residential mortgage and home equity loan portfolios by geographic market.
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(dollar amounts in millions)
Residential
Mortgage 
Loans
 
% of
Total
 
Home
Equity 
Loans
 
% of
Total
 
Residential
Mortgage 
Loans
 
% of
Total
 
Home
Equity 
Loans
 
% of
Total
Geographic market:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan
$
429

 
27
%
 
$
829

 
56
%
 
$
433

 
28
%
 
$
871

 
57
%
California
620

 
38

 
388

 
26

 
523

 
35

 
404

 
26

Texas
326

 
20

 
215

 
15

 
320

 
21

 
212

 
14

Other Markets
236

 
15

 
42

 
3

 
251

 
16

 
50

 
3

Total
$
1,611

 
100
%
 
$
1,474

 
100
%
 
$
1,527

 
100
%
 
$
1,537

 
100
%
Residential real estate loans, which consist of traditional residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines of credit, totaled $3.1 billion at June 30, 2013. Residential mortgages totaled $1.6 billion at June 30, 2013, and were primarily larger, variable-rate mortgages originated and retained for certain private banking relationship customers. Of the $1.6 billion of residential mortgage loans outstanding, $62 million were on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2013. The home equity portfolio totaled $1.5 billion at June 30, 2013, of which $1.4 billion was outstanding under primarily variable-rate, interest-only home equity lines of credit and $125 million were closed-end home equity loans. Of the $1.5 billion of home equity loans outstanding, $28 million were on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2013. A majority of the home equity portfolio was secured by junior liens at June 30, 2013. The residential real estate portfolio is principally located within the Corporation's primary geographic markets. Substantially all residential real estate loans past due 90 days or more are placed on nonaccrual status, and substantially all junior lien home equity loans that are current or less than 90 days past due are placed on nonaccrual status if full collection of the senior position is in doubt. Such loans are charged off to current appraised values less costs to sell no later than 180 days past due.
Shared National Credits
Shared National Credit (SNC) loans are facilities greater than $20 million shared by three or more federally supervised financial institutions that are reviewed annually by regulatory authorities at the agent bank level. The Corporation generally seeks to obtain ancillary business at the origination of a SNC relationship. Loans classified as SNC loans (approximately 870 borrowers at June 30, 2013) were $9.2 billion and $9.4 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Comerica Bank (the Bank) was the agent for $1.6 billion of the SNC loans outstanding at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. SNC net loan charge-offs totaled $5 million and $8 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $4 million and $18 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Nonaccrual SNC loans decreased $12 million to $12 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $24 million at December 31, 2012. SNC loans, diversified by both business line and geographic market, comprised approximately 20 percent of total loans at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. SNC loans are held to the same credit underwriting and pricing standards as the remainder of the loan portfolio.
Energy Lending
The Corporation has a portfolio of energy-related loans that are included primarily in "commercial loans" in the consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation has over 30 years of experience in energy lending, with a focus on middle market companies. Loans in the Middle Market - Energy business line were $2.9 billion and $3.0 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, or approximately 6 percent of total loans each period. Nonaccrual Middle Market - Energy loans totaled $1 million and $3 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Middle Market - Energy net loan charge-offs were zero for both three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and totaled $2 million for both six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Energy loans are diverse in nature, with outstanding balances by customer market segment distributed approximately as follows at June 30, 2013: 66 percent exploration and production (comprised of approximately 53 percent oil, 27 percent mixed and 20 percent natural gas), 20 percent midstream and 14 percent energy services.
Automotive Lending
Substantially all dealer loans are in the National Dealer Services business line. Loans in the National Dealer Services business line include floor plan financing and other loans to automotive dealerships. Floor plan loans, included in “commercial loans” in the consolidated balance sheets, totaled $3.2 billion at June 30, 2013, an increase of $302 million compared to $2.9 billion at December 31, 2012. At June 30, 2013, other loans to automotive dealers in the National Dealer Services business line totaled $2.1 billion, including $1.4 billion of owner-occupied commercial real estate mortgage loans, compared to $2.2 billion of other loans to automotive dealers in the National Dealer Service line, including $1.5 billion of owner-occupied commercial real estate mortgage loans, at December 31, 2012. Automotive lending also includes loans to borrowers involved with automotive production, primarily Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers. Loans to borrowers involved with automotive production totaled approximately $1.2 billion at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.


61

Table of Contents

State and Local Municipalities
In the normal course of business, the Corporation serves the needs of state and local municipalities in multiple capacities, including traditional banking products such as deposit services, loans and letters of credit, investment banking services such as bond underwriting and private placements, and by investing in municipal securities.
The following table summarizes the Corporation's direct exposure to state and local municipalities as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Loans outstanding
$
42

 
$
53

Lease financing
347

 
359

Investment securities available-for-sale
25

 
23

Trading account securities
8

 
19

Standby letters of credit
108

 
108

Unused commitments to extend credit
43

 
24

Total direct exposure to state and local municipalities
$
573

 
$
586

Indirect exposure comprised $119 million in auction-rate preferred securities collateralized by municipal securities at June 30, 2013, compared to $127 million at December 31, 2012. Additionally, the Corporation is exposed to Automated Clearing House (ACH) transaction risk for those municipalities utilizing this electronic payment and/or deposit method and similar products in their cash flow management. The Corporation sets limits on ACH activity during the underwriting process.
Extensions of credit to state and local municipalities are subjected to the same underwriting standards as other business loans. At both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all outstanding municipal loans and leases were performing according to contractual terms, and one municipal lease was included in the Corporation's internal watch list. Municipal leases are secured by the underlying equipment, and a substantial majority of the leases are fully defeased with AAA-rated U.S. government securities. Substantially all municipal investment securities available-for sale are auction-rate securities. All auction-rate securities are reviewed quarterly for other-than-temporary impairment. All auction-rate municipal securities were rated investment grade, and all auction-rate preferred securities collateralized by municipal securities were rated investment grade and were adequately collateralized at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Municipal securities are held in the trading account for resale to customers. In addition, Comerica Securities, a broker-dealer subsidiary of the Bank, underwrites bonds issued by municipalities. All bonds underwritten by Comerica Securities are sold to third party investors.
On July 18, 2013, the city of Detroit filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection in federal court. The Corporation's direct exposure to the city of Detroit is insignificant.
International Exposure
International assets are subject to general risks inherent in the conduct of business in foreign countries, including economic uncertainties and each foreign government's regulations. Risk management practices minimize the risk inherent in international lending arrangements. These practices include structuring bilateral agreements or participating in bank facilities, which secure repayment from sources external to the borrower's country. Accordingly, such international outstandings are excluded from the cross-border risk of that country.

62

Table of Contents

The Corporation does not hold any sovereign exposure to Europe. The Corporation's international strategy as it pertains to Europe is to focus on European companies doing business in North America, with an emphasis on the Corporation's primary geographic markets. The following table summarizes cross-border exposure to entities domiciled in European countries at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
 
Outstanding (a)
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
Commercial and Industrial
 
Banks and Other Financial Institutions
 
Total Outstanding
 
Unfunded Commitments and Guarantees
 
Total Exposure
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United Kingdom
 
$
80

 
$
3

 
$
83

 
$
156

 
$
239

Netherlands
 
69

 

 
69

 
80

 
149

Germany
 
5

 
6

 
11

 
53

 
64

Ireland
 

 

 

 
30

 
30

Switzerland
 

 
19

 
19

 
3

 
22

Luxembourg
 
3

 

 
3

 
17

 
20

Sweden
 
8

 

 
8

 
11

 
19

Belgium
 
1

 

 
1

 
17

 
18

Italy
 
7

 
1

 
8

 

 
8

France
 

 
2

 
2

 
1

 
3

Spain
 
2

 

 
2

 

 
2

Hungary
 

 
1

 
1

 

 
1

Total Europe
 
$
175

 
$
32

 
$
207

 
$
368

 
$
575

December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United Kingdom
 
$
110

 
$
10

 
$
120

 
$
149

 
$
269

Netherlands
 
61

 

 
61

 
72

 
133

Germany
 
2

 
3

 
5

 
49

 
54

Ireland
 
18

 

 
18

 
12

 
30

Switzerland
 
13

 
7

 
20

 
2

 
22

Luxembourg
 
1

 

 
1

 
19

 
20

Sweden
 
9

 

 
9

 
10

 
19

Belgium
 
2

 

 
2

 
15

 
17

Italy
 
6

 
1

 
7

 

 
7

Spain
 
2

 

 
2

 

 
2

France
 

 
3

 
3

 

 
3

Total Europe
 
$
224

 
$
24

 
$
248

 
$
328

 
$
576

(a)
Includes funded loans, bankers acceptances and net counterparty derivative exposure.

For further discussion of credit risk, see the "Credit Risk" section of pages F-23 through F-35 in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report.
Market and Liquidity Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or prices, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and commodity and equity prices. Liquidity risk represents the failure to meet financial obligations coming due resulting from an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding, and the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significant changes in pricing, due to inadequate market depth or market disruptions.
The Asset and Liability Policy Committee (ALCO) of the Corporation establishes and monitors compliance with the policies and risk limits pertaining to market and liquidity risk management activities. ALCO meets regularly to discuss and review market and liquidity risk management strategies, and consists of executive and senior management from various areas of the Corporation, including treasury, finance, economics, lending, deposit gathering and risk management.
The Corporation's Treasury Department supports ALCO in measuring, monitoring and managing interest rate, liquidity and coordination of all other market risks. The area's key activities encompass: (i) providing information and analysis of the Corporation's balance sheet structure and measurement of interest rate, liquidity and all other market risks; (ii) monitoring and reporting of the Corporation's positions relative to established policy limits and guidelines; (iii) development and presentation of analysis and strategies to adjust risk positions; (iv) review and presentation of policies and authorizations for approval; (v) monitoring of industry trends and analytical tools to be used in the management of interest rate, liquidity and all other market risks; (vi) developing and monitoring the interest rate risk economic capital estimate; and (vii) monitoring of capital adequacy in accordance with the Capital Management Policy.

63

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk
Net interest income is the primary source of revenue for the Corporation. Interest rate risk arises primarily through the Corporation's core business activities of extending loans and accepting deposits. The Corporation's balance sheet is predominantly characterized by floating-rate loans funded by a combination of core deposits and wholesale borrowings. Approximately 85 percent of the Corporation's loans were floating at June 30, 2013, of which approximately 75 percent were based on LIBOR and 25 percent were based on Prime. This creates a natural imbalance between the floating-rate loan portfolio and the more slowly repricing deposit products. The result is that growth and/or contraction in the Corporation's core businesses may lead to sensitivity to interest rate movements in the absence of mitigating actions. Examples of such actions are purchasing investment securities, primarily fixed-rate, which provide liquidity to the balance sheet and act to mitigate the inherent interest sensitivity, and hedging the sensitivity with interest rate swaps. The Corporation actively manages its exposure to interest rate risk, with the principal objective of optimizing net interest income and the economic value of equity while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity.
The Corporation frequently evaluates net interest income under various balance sheet and interest rate scenarios, looking at a 12-month time horizon, using simulation modeling analysis as its principal risk management evaluation technique. The results of this analysis provides the information needed to assess the balance sheet structure. Changes in economic activity, whether domestic or international, different from the changes management included in its simulation analysis could translate into a materially different interest rate environment than currently expected. Management evaluates a base case net interest income under an unchanged interest rate environment and what is believed to be the most likely balance sheet structure. This base case net interest income is then evaluated against non-parallel interest rate scenarios that increase and decrease 200 basis points in a linear fashion from the base case over 12 months, resulting in an average change in interest rates of 100 basis points over the period. Due to the current low level of interest rates, the analysis reflects a declining interest rate scenario of a 25 basis point drop, to zero percent. In addition, consistent with each interest rate scenario, adjustments are made to assumptions regarding asset prepayment levels, yield curves, and overall balance sheet mix and growth. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model may not precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results may differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of changes in interest rates, market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. However, the model can indicate the likely direction of change. Existing derivative instruments entered into for risk management purposes are included in the analysis, but no additional hedging is forecasted.
The table below, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, displays the estimated impact on net interest income during the next 12 months by relating the base case scenario results to those from the rising and declining rate scenarios described above. The sensitivity increased from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013 primarily due to higher forecasted core deposits, though risk to declining interest rates is limited by the current low level of rates.
Sensitivity of Net Interest Income to Changes in Interest Rates
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(in millions)
Amount
 
%
 
Amount
 
%
Change in Interest Rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
+200 basis points
$
187

 
11
 %
 
$
178

 
11
 %
-25 basis points (to zero percent)
(29
)
 
(2
)
 
(23
)
 
(1
)
Corporate policy limits adverse change to no more than four percent of management's base case net interest income forecast, and the Corporation was within this policy guideline at June 30, 2013. Interest rate risk is actively managed principally through the use of either on-balance sheet financial instruments or interest rate derivatives to achieve the desired risk profile.
In addition to the simulation analysis, an economic value of equity analysis is performed for a longer term view of the interest rate risk position. The economic value of equity analysis begins with an estimate of the economic value of the financial assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments on the Corporation's balance sheet, derived through discounting cash flows based on actual rates at the end of the period. Next, the estimated impact of rate movements is applied to the economic value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments. The economic value of equity is then calculated as the difference between the estimated market value of assets and liabilities net of the impact of off-balance sheet instruments. As with net interest income simulation analysis, a variety of alternative scenarios are performed to measure the impact on economic value of equity, including changes in the level, slope and shape of the yield curve.

64

Table of Contents

The table below, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, displays the estimated impact on the economic value of equity from a 200 basis point immediate parallel increase or decrease in interest rates. Similar to the simulation analysis above, due to the current low level of interest rates, the economic value of equity analyses below reflect an interest rate scenario of an immediate 25 basis point drop, to zero percent, while the rising interest rate scenario reflects an immediate 200 basis point rise. The change in the sensitivity of the economic value of equity to a 200 basis point parallel increase in rates between December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013 was primarily driven by changes in market interest rates, an increase in period-end deposits, and a reduction in the Corporation's mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
Sensitivity of Economic Value of Equity to Changes in Interest Rates
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(in millions)
Amount
 
%
 
Amount
 
%
Change in Interest Rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
+200 basis points
$
823

 
8
 %
 
$
1,031

 
10
 %
-25 basis points (to zero percent)
(200
)
 
(2
)
 
(192
)
 
(2
)
Wholesale Funding
The Corporation may access the purchased funds market when necessary, which includes foreign office time deposits and short-term borrowings. Capacity for incremental purchased funds at June 30, 2013 included the ability to purchase federal funds, sell securities under agreements to repurchase, as well as issue deposits to institutional investors and issue certificates of deposit through brokers. Purchased funds totaled $568 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $612 million at December 31, 2012.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, Texas (FHLB), which provides short- and long-term funding to its members through advances collateralized by real estate-related assets. Actual borrowing capacity is contingent on the amount of collateral available to be pledged to the FHLB. At June 30, 2013, $14 billion of real estate-related loans were pledged to the FHLB as blanket collateral for current and potential future borrowings. As of June 30, 2013, the Corporation had $1.0 billion of outstanding borrowings from the FHLB maturing in May 2014.
Additionally, the Bank had the ability to issue up to $15.0 billion of debt at June 30, 2013 under an existing $15 billion medium-term senior note program which allows the issuance of debt with maturities between three months and 30 years. The Corporation also maintains a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission from which it may issue debt and/or equity securities.
The ability of the Corporation and the Bank to raise funds at competitive rates is impacted by rating agencies' views of the credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings of the Corporation and the Bank. As of June 30, 2013, the four major rating agencies had assigned the following ratings to long-term senior unsecured obligations of the Corporation and the Bank. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
 
Comerica Incorporated
 
Comerica Bank
June 30, 2013
Rating
Outlook
 
Rating
Outlook
Standard and Poor’s
A-
Stable
 
A
Stable
Moody’s Investors Service
A3
Stable
 
A2
Stable
Fitch Ratings
A
Negative
 
A
Negative
DBRS
A
Stable
 
A (High)
Stable
The Corporation satisfies liquidity requirements with either liquid assets or various funding sources. Liquid assets, which totaled $10.9 billion at June 30, 2013, compared to $12.1 billion at December 31, 2012, provide a reservoir of liquidity. Liquid assets include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits with banks, other short-term investments and unencumbered investment securities available-for-sale. At June 30, 2013, the Corporation held excess liquidity, represented by $2.8 billion deposited with the FRB, compared to $2.9 billion at December 31, 2012.

65

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Corporation’s consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of accounting policies, the most significant of which are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report. These policies require numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions, which may prove inaccurate or subject to variations. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions or estimates could have a material impact on the Corporation’s future financial condition and results of operations. At December 31, 2012, the most critical of these significant accounting policies were the policies related to the allowance for credit losses, valuation methodologies, goodwill, pension plan accounting and income taxes. These policies were reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors and are discussed more fully on pages F-42 through F-47 in the Corporation's 2012 Annual Report. As of the date of this report, there have been no significant changes to the Corporation's critical accounting policies, except as discussed below.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments.
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s assessment of probable, estimable losses inherent in the Corporation’s loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses includes specific allowances, based on individual evaluations of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.
The allowance for business loans which do not meet the criteria to be evaluated individually is determined by applying standard reserve factors to the pool of business loans within each internal risk rating. In the first quarter 2013, the Corporation enhanced the approach utilized for determining standard reserve factors by changing from a dollar-based migration method for developing probability of default statistics to a count-based method. Under the dollar-based method, each dollar that moved to default received equal weight in the determination of standard reserve factors for each internal risk rating. Under the count-based approach, each loan that moves to default receives equal weighting. The change resulted in a $40 million increase to the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2013.
For further discussion of the methodology used in the determination of the allowance for credit losses, refer to the “Allowance for Credit Losses” section in this financial review and Note 1 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

66

Table of Contents

SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following table provides a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures used in this financial review with financial measures defined by GAAP.
(dollar amounts in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio:
 
 
 
Tier 1 and Tier 1 common capital (a) (b)
$
6,800

 
$
6,705

Risk-weighted assets (a) (b)
65,312

 
66,115

Tier 1 and Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio (b)
10.41
%
 
10.14
%
Basel III Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio:
 
 
 
Tier 1 and Tier 1 common capital (b)
$
6,800

 
$
6,705

Basel III adjustments (c)

 
(39
)
Basel III Tier 1and Tier 1 common capital (c)
6,800

 
6,666

Basel III adjustments (d)
(537
)
 
(413
)
Basel III Tier 1 and Tier 1 common capital (d)
$
6,263

 
$
6,253

Risk-weighted assets (a) (b)
$
65,312

 
$
66,115

Basel III adjustments (c)
2,165

 
1,854

Basel III risk-weighted assets (c)
$
67,477

 
$
67,969

Tier 1 and Tier 1 common capital ratio (b)
10.4
%
 
10.1
%
Basel III Tier 1 and Tier 1 common capital ratio (c)
10.1

 
9.8

Basel III Tier 1 and Tier 1 common capital ratio (d)
9.3

 
9.2

Tangible Common Equity Ratio:
 
 
 
Common shareholders' equity
$
6,911

 
$
6,942

Less:
 
 
 
Goodwill
635

 
635

Other intangible assets
20

 
22

Tangible common equity
$
6,256

 
$
6,285

Total assets
$
62,947

 
$
65,069

Less:
 
 
 
Goodwill
635

 
635

Other intangible assets
20

 
22

Tangible assets
$
62,292

 
$
64,412

Common equity ratio
10.98
%
 
10.67
%
Tangible common equity ratio
10.04

 
9.76

Tangible Common Equity per Share of Common Stock:
 
 
 
Common shareholders' equity
$
6,911

 
$
6,942

Tangible common equity
6,256

 
6,285

Shares of common stock outstanding (in millions)
185

 
188

Common shareholders' equity per share of common stock
$
37.29

 
$
36.87

Tangible common equity per share of common stock
33.76

 
33.38

(a)
Tier 1 capital and risk-weighted assets as defined by regulation.
(b)
June 30, 2013 Tier 1 capital and risk-weighted-assets are estimated.
(c)
Estimated ratios based on the standardized approach in the final rule for the U.S. adoption of the Basel III regulatory capital framework and assuming the election to exclude most elements of AOCI.
(d)
Estimated ratios based on the standardized approach in the final Basel III capital rules, assuming no election to exclude most elements of AOCI.
The Tier 1 common capital ratio removes preferred stock and qualifying trust preferred securities from Tier 1 capital as defined by and calculated in conformity with bank regulations. The Basel III Tier 1 common capital ratio further adjusts Tier 1 common capital and risk-weighted assets to account for the final rule approved by U.S. banking regulators in July 2013 for the U.S. adoption of the Basel III regulatory capital framework. The final Basel III capital rules are effective January 1, 2015 for banking organizations subject to the standardized approach. The tangible common equity ratio removes preferred stock and the effect of intangible assets from capital and the effect of intangible assets from total assets and tangible common equity per share of common stock removes the effect of intangible assets from common shareholders' equity per share of common stock. The Corporation believes these measurements are meaningful measures of capital adequacy used by investors, regulators, management and others to evaluate the adequacy of common equity and to compare against other companies in the industry.

67

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures for the current period can be found in the "Market and Liquidity Risk" section of "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporation maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Corporation's management, including the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management has evaluated, with the participation of the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"). Based on the evaluation, the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b)
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the period to which this report relates, there have not been any changes in the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, such controls.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding the Corporation's legal proceedings, see "Part I. Item 1. Note 12 – Contingent Liabilities," which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Other than as set forth below, there has been no material change in the Corporation's risk factors as previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 in response to Part I, Item 1A. of such Form 10-K. Such risk factors are incorporated herein by reference.
Below we amend the following risk factor discussed in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Competitive product and pricing pressures among financial institutions within Comerica's markets may change.
Comerica operates in a very competitive environment, which is characterized by competition from a number of other financial institutions in each market in which it operates. Comerica competes with large national and regional financial institutions and with smaller financial institutions in terms of products and pricing. Some of Comerica's larger competitors, including certain nationwide banks that have a significant presence in Comerica's market area, may make available to their customers a broader array of product, pricing and structure alternatives and, due to their asset size, may more easily absorb loans in a larger overall portfolio. Some of Comerica's smaller competitors may have more liberal lending policies and processes.
Additionally, the financial services industry has recently been subject to increasing regulation. For more information, see “Supervision and Regulation.” Such regulations may require significant investments in technology, personnel or other resources or place limitations on the ability of financial institutions, including Comerica, to engage in certain activities. Comerica's competitors may be subject to a significantly different or reduced degree of regulation due to their asset size or types of products offered. They may also have the ability to more efficiently utilize resources to comply with regulations or may be able to more effectively absorb the costs of regulations into their existing cost structure.
If Comerica is unable to compete effectively in products and pricing in its markets, business could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on Comerica's business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
For information regarding the Corporation's purchase of equity securities, see "Part I. Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Capital," which is incorporated herein by reference.

68

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
3.1
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Comerica Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 4, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
3.2
 
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Comerica Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
3.3
 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Comerica Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
4
 
[In accordance with Regulation S-K Item No. 601(b)(4)(iii), the Registrant is not filing copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt because none of those instruments authorizes debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.]
 
 
 
10.1†
 
Comerica Incorporated 2006 Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
31.1
 
Chairman, President and CEO Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Periodic Report (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
 
 
 
31.2
 
Vice Chairman and CFO Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Periodic Report (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
 
 
 
32
 
Section 1350 Certification of Periodic Report (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).

 
 
 
101
 
Financial statements from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 
 
 
 
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


69

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
COMERICA INCORPORATED
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
/s/ Muneera S. Carr
 
Muneera S. Carr
 
Executive Vice President and
 
Chief Accounting Officer and
 
Duly Authorized Officer
Date: July 29, 2013

70

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
3.1
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Comerica Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 4, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
3.2
 
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Comerica Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
3.3
 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Comerica Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
4
 
[In accordance with Regulation S-K Item No. 601(b)(4)(iii), the Registrant is not filing copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt because none of those instruments authorizes debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.]
 
 
 
10.1†
  
Comerica Incorporated 2006 Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
 
31.1
  
Chairman, President and CEO Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Periodic Report (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 
 
31.2
  
Vice Chairman and CFO Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Periodic Report (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 
 
32
  
Section 1350 Certification of Periodic Report (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 
 
101
  
Financial statements from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
 
 
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

71