UNITED STATES
                   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                         Washington, D.C. 20549


                                FORM 8-K

                             CURRENT REPORT

                 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                             October 10, 2008
            ------------------------------------------------
            Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

                                Con-way Inc.
         ------------------------------------------------------
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         Delaware               1-5046              94-1444798
         ----------             ------              ----------
        (State or other        (Commission         (IRS Employer
        jurisdiction of        File Number)        Identification
        incorporation or                              Number)
         organization)

       2855 Campus Drive, Suite 300, San Mateo, California 94403
      -----------------------------------------------------------
                (Address of principal executive offices)
                               (zip code)

          Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
                             (650) 378-5200


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
     (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant
under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2
below):

[ ]  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities
     Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ]  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange
     Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
     the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
     the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

ITEM  8.01 OTHER EVENTS

   As  previously  disclosed,  on  August  11, 2008, Con-way Inc. ("Con-way")
filed  an arbitration demand and a federal lawsuit  against  Central  States,
Southeast  and  Southwest  Areas  Pension Fund ("Central States") in order to
resolve uncertainties created by Central  States' recent contact with Con-way
relating to Con-way's potential liability for  a portion of the multiemployer
pension  plan  withdrawal  liability  incurred  by  Consolidated  Freightways
Corporation ("CFC"), a former subsidiary of Con-way which  it spun off to its
stockholders  in  1996.   CFC  subsequently  went  bankrupt in 2002  and  the
multiemployer  pension  plans  to  which CFC was a party  (including  Central
States) subsequently assessed approximately  $400  million  in claims against
CFC  for "withdrawal liabilities" that they determined to be CFC's  share  of
unfunded  vested  benefits under those plans.  The withdrawal liability claim
that Central States  asserted  and  was allowed against CFC in the bankruptcy
was  in  the  approximate  amount of $319  million,  which  was  based  on  a
withdrawal from Central States  in  late  2002.   According  to  public court
filings,   CFC's   bankruptcy   estate   to  date  has  paid  Central  States
approximately $59.5 million of this amount  in  distributions on this allowed
claim.

   In  the  arbitration demand, Con-way asked the arbitrator  to  decide  and
resolve in Con-way's  favor  all arbitrable disputes between the parties.  In
the lawsuit, Con-way Inc. v. Central  States,  Southeast  and Southwest Areas
Pension Fund (United States District for the Northern District  of California
2008), Con-way asked the court to compel Central States to have all  disputes
between  the  parties  decided  in  the  arbitration  that Con-way filed, or,
alternatively, to declare that Con-way is not liable for  any of CFC's unpaid
withdrawal   liabilities,   and  to  enjoin  Central  States  from  violating
applicable statutory and plan requirements.

   Very  recently, Con-way received  a  demand  letter  from  Central  States
notifying  it  of  the  assertion  of  withdrawal liability against it in the
amount  of  $662 million (payable over a term  of  approximately  11  years).
Central States contends that this withdrawal liability arose on the date Con-
way sold a former  subsidiary  to  UPS in December 2004 (rather than the date
that CFC permanently ceased its obligation to contribute to Central States in
2002) based on Central States' position  that  the  2004  sale  resulted in a
'complete withdrawal' (within the meaning of applicable federal law).   As  a
result,  Central States contends that Con-way owes $662 million in withdrawal
liability.  The  higher  alleged  withdrawal  liability calculation primarily
reflects  the  fact  that  Central  States'  overall  level  of  underfunding
increased  substantially from 2002 to 2004.  Central  States'  demand  letter
also claims  that  it  is  without  prejudice  to a future claim or assertion
(which Con-way presumes would be in lieu of, and  not  in  addition  to,  the
claim  for  $662 million)  that Central States' proof of claim against CFC in
connection with  the  CFC  bankruptcy  was  effective  notice  of  withdrawal
liability to Con-way, therefore Con-way is in default and the amount  of such
liability   would  be  a  total  of  approximately  $412  million  (including
approximately  $319  of  withdrawal  liability and accrued interest thereon).
The letter does not refer to how previous recoveries made by Central States
in the CFC bankruptcy would be taken into account, if at all.

   Con-way continues to believe that its  actions  in connection with the CFC
spin-off  were  proper  and will continue to vigorously  defend  itself  from
claims brought against it  by  Central  States  and  any  other multiemployer
pension funds seeking to hold Con-way responsible for withdrawal liabilities.
However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of any  such  litigation
given  uncertainties  inherent  in  such  proceedings, including the possible
application of adverse judicial decisions rendered  in  unrelated matters not
involving Con-way. Con-way continues to believe that the amount of any claims
for unpaid withdrawal liabilities that multiemployer plans  may in the future
assert against Con-way could be material, and a judgment or arbitration award
against Con-way for all or a significant part of these claims  could  have  a
material   adverse  effect  on  Con-way's  financial  condition,  results  of
operations and cash flows.

   As a result  of  the  matters  discussed  above,  Con-way  can  provide no
assurance  that  matters  relating  to  the  spin-off of CFC will not have  a
material  adverse  effect  on  Con-way's  financial   condition,  results  of
operations or cash flows.


                            SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                         Con-way Inc.
                        ------------
                        (Registrant)

October 10, 2008        /s/ Jennifer W. Pileggi
                        --------------------------
                        Jennifer W. Pileggi
                        Senior Vice President, General Counsel
                        and Corporate Secretary