SPB 07.01.2012 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
_________________________________________
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2012
OR
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-34757
_________________________________________
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_________________________________________
|
| | |
Delaware | | 27-2166630 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
| | |
601 Rayovac Drive Madison, Wisconsin | | 53711 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(608) 275-3340
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
_________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | o | Smaller reporting company | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, as of August 3, 2012, was 51,462,645.
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED July 1, 2012
INDEX
|
| | |
| | Page |
| Part I—Financial Information | |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
| | |
| | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
Assets | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 62,389 |
| | $ | 142,414 |
|
Receivables: | | | |
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $14,288 and $14,128, respectively | 342,350 |
| | 356,605 |
|
Other | 45,090 |
| | 37,678 |
|
Inventories | 552,515 |
| | 434,630 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 26,359 |
| | 28,170 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other | 55,487 |
| | 48,792 |
|
Total current assets | 1,084,190 |
| | 1,048,289 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $127,271 and $107,357, respectively | 208,551 |
| | 206,389 |
|
Deferred charges and other | 34,510 |
| | 36,824 |
|
Goodwill | 688,045 |
| | 610,338 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 1,716,977 |
| | 1,683,909 |
|
Debt issuance costs | 43,901 |
| | 40,957 |
|
Total assets | $ | 3,776,174 |
| | $ | 3,626,706 |
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 28,251 |
| | $ | 16,090 |
|
Accounts payable | 251,135 |
| | 323,171 |
|
Accrued liabilities: | | | |
Wages and benefits | 67,175 |
| | 70,945 |
|
Income taxes payable | 26,102 |
| | 31,606 |
|
Accrued interest | 12,546 |
| | 30,467 |
|
Other | 104,642 |
| | 134,633 |
|
Total current liabilities | 489,851 |
| | 606,912 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities | 1,798,814 |
| | 1,535,522 |
|
Employee benefit obligations, net of current portion | 74,433 |
| | 83,802 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 368,100 |
| | 337,336 |
|
Other | 29,887 |
| | 44,637 |
|
Total liabilities | 2,761,085 |
| | 2,608,209 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | |
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 200,000 shares; issued 52,678 and 52,431 shares, respectively; outstanding 51,363 and 52,226 shares | 527 |
| | 525 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 1,385,868 |
| | 1,374,097 |
|
Accumulated deficit | (293,004 | ) | | (336,063 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (41,690 | ) | | (14,446 | ) |
| 1,051,701 |
| | 1,024,113 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost, 1,316 and 205 shares, respectively | (36,612 | ) | | (5,616 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,015,089 |
| | 1,018,497 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,776,174 |
| | $ | 3,626,706 |
|
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
(Unaudited).
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| THREE MONTHS ENDED | | NINE MONTHS ENDED |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Net sales | $ | 824,803 |
| | $ | 804,635 |
| | $ | 2,419,859 |
| | $ | 2,359,586 |
|
Cost of goods sold | 531,069 |
| | 508,656 |
| | 1,575,803 |
| | 1,506,283 |
|
Restructuring and related charges | 2,038 |
| | 2,285 |
| | 8,303 |
| | 4,932 |
|
Gross profit | 291,696 |
| | 293,694 |
| | 835,753 |
| | 848,371 |
|
Selling | 129,851 |
| | 133,187 |
| | 391,522 |
| | 403,768 |
|
General and administrative | 50,928 |
| | 60,323 |
| | 158,091 |
| | 179,588 |
|
Research and development | 8,597 |
| | 9,192 |
| | 23,790 |
| | 25,557 |
|
Acquisition and integration related charges | 5,274 |
| | 7,444 |
| | 20,625 |
| | 31,487 |
|
Restructuring and related charges | 1,858 |
| | 4,781 |
| | 7,587 |
| | 12,846 |
|
Total operating expenses | 196,508 |
| | 214,927 |
| | 601,615 |
| | 653,246 |
|
Operating income | 95,188 |
| | 78,767 |
| | 234,138 |
| | 195,125 |
|
Interest expense | 39,686 |
| | 40,398 |
| | 150,082 |
| | 165,923 |
|
Other expense, net | 2,224 |
| | 770 |
| | 2,225 |
| | 1,372 |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 53,278 |
| | 37,599 |
| | 81,831 |
| | 27,830 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense | (5,371 | ) | | 8,995 |
| | 38,772 |
| | 69,169 |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 58,649 |
| | $ | 28,604 |
| | $ | 43,059 |
| | $ | (41,339 | ) |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding | 51,342 |
| | 50,863 |
| | 51,669 |
| | 50,832 |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 1.14 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | (0.81 | ) |
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares and equivalents outstanding | 51,819 |
| | 51,005 |
| | 52,145 |
| | 50,832 |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 1.13 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | (0.81 | ) |
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
(Unaudited).
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| NINE MONTHS ENDED |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net income (loss) | $ | 43,059 |
| | $ | (41,339 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation | 28,708 |
| | 34,719 |
|
Amortization of intangibles | 46,550 |
| | 43,073 |
|
Amortization of unearned restricted stock compensation | 15,771 |
| | 22,815 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 5,273 |
| | 8,745 |
|
Payments of acquisition related expenses for Russell Hobbs | — |
| | (3,637 | ) |
Non-cash debt accretion | 169 |
| | 3,622 |
|
Write off of unamortized (premium) / discount on retired debt | (466 | ) | | 8,950 |
|
Write off of debt issuance costs | 2,945 |
| | 15,420 |
|
Other non-cash adjustments | 3,021 |
| | 8,312 |
|
Net changes in assets and liabilities | (210,808 | ) | | (102,037 | ) |
Net cash used by operating activities | (65,778 | ) | | (1,357 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (33,117 | ) | | (27,433 | ) |
Acquisition of Black Flag | (43,750 | ) | | — |
|
Acquisition of FURminator, net of cash acquired | (139,390 | ) | | — |
|
Acquisition Seed Resources, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (11,053 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 418 |
| | 188 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets previously held for sale | — |
| | 6,997 |
|
Other investing activities | (2,045 | ) | | (1,530 | ) |
Net cash used by investing activities | (217,884 | ) | | (32,831 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of 6.75% Notes | 300,000 |
| | — |
|
Payment of 12% Notes, including tender and call premium | (270,431 | ) | | — |
|
Proceeds from issuance of 9.5% Notes, including premium | 217,000 |
| | — |
|
Payment of senior credit facilities, excluding ABL revolving credit facility | (4,091 | ) | | (93,400 | ) |
Prepayment penalty of term loan facility | — |
| | (7,500 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | (11,163 | ) | | (10,769 | ) |
Other debt financing, net | 6,192 |
| | 15,349 |
|
Reduction of other debt | (2,992 | ) | | (905 | ) |
ABL revolving credit facility, net | 2,500 |
| | 55,000 |
|
Treasury stock purchases | (30,996 | ) | | (3,409 | ) |
Other financing activities | (953 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | 205,066 |
| | (45,634 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (1,429 | ) | | (2,414 | ) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (80,025 | ) | | (82,236 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 142,414 |
| | 170,614 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 62,389 |
| | $ | 88,378 |
|
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
(Unaudited)
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SB Holdings” or the “Company”), is a global branded consumer products company and was created in connection with the combination of Spectrum Brands, Inc. (“Spectrum Brands”), a global branded consumer products company, and Russell Hobbs, Inc. (“Russell Hobbs”), a global branded small appliance company, to form a new combined company (the “Merger”). The Merger was consummated on June 16, 2010. As a result of the Merger, both Spectrum Brands and Russell Hobbs became wholly-owned subsidiaries of SB Holdings. Russell Hobbs was subsequently merged into Spectrum Brands. SB Holdings trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SPB.”
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term “Company” is used to refer to both Spectrum Brands and its subsidiaries prior to the Merger and SB Holdings and its subsidiaries subsequent to the Merger.
The Company’s operations include the worldwide manufacturing and marketing of alkaline, zinc carbon and hearing aid batteries, as well as aquariums and aquatic health supplies and the designing and marketing of rechargeable batteries, battery-powered lighting products, electric shavers and accessories, grooming products and hair care appliances. The Company’s operations also include the manufacturing and marketing of specialty pet supplies. The Company also manufactures and markets herbicides, insecticides and insect repellents in North America. The Company also designs, markets and distributes a broad range of branded small appliances and personal care products. The Company’s operations utilize manufacturing and product development facilities located in the United States (“U.S.”), Europe, Latin America and Asia.
The Company sells its products in approximately 120 countries through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributors and original equipment manufacturers and enjoys name recognition in its markets under the Rayovac, VARTA and Remington brands, each of which has been in existence for more than 80 years, and under the Tetra, 8-in-1, Spectracide, Cutter, Black & Decker, George Foreman, Russell Hobbs, Farberware, Black Flag, FURminator and various other brands.
The Company’s global branded consumer products have positions in seven major product categories: consumer batteries; small appliances; pet supplies; electric shaving and grooming; electric personal care; portable lighting; and home and garden controls. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker manages the businesses of the Company in three vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances, which consists of the Company’s worldwide battery, electric shaving and grooming, electric personal care, portable lighting and small appliances, primarily in the kitchen and home product categories (“Global Batteries & Appliances”); (ii) Global Pet Supplies, which consists of the Company’s worldwide pet supplies business (“Global Pet Supplies”); and (iii) Home and Garden Business, which consists of the Company’s home and garden and insect control business (the “Home and Garden Business”). Management reviews the performance of the Company based on these segments. For information pertaining to our business segments, see Note 12, “Segment Results”.
| |
2 | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation: The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SB Holdings and its subsidiaries and are prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and, in the opinion of the Company, include all adjustments (which are normal and recurring in nature) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company at July 1, 2012, the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 and the cash flows for the nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
Intangible Assets: Intangible assets are recorded at cost or at fair value if acquired in a purchase business combination. Customer relationships and proprietary technology intangibles are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful lives of approximately 4 to 20 years. Excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) and trade name intangibles are not amortized. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level, with such groupings being consistent with the Company’s reportable segments. If an impairment is indicated, a write-down to fair value (normally measured by discounting estimated future cash flows) is recorded. Trade name intangibles are tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair value with the carrying value. Any excess of carrying value over fair value is recognized as an impairment loss in income from operations. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350: “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other,” requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested for impairment annually, or more often if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been incurred.
The Company’s annual impairment testing is completed at the August financial period end. Management uses its judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual impairment tests. Indicators such as unexpected adverse business conditions, economic factors, unanticipated technological change or competitive activities, loss of key personnel, and acts by governments and courts may signal that an asset has become impaired.
Shipping and Handling Costs: The Company incurred shipping and handling costs of $48,797 and $148,383 for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively, and $51,172 and $150,140 for the three and nine month periods ended July 3, 2011, respectively. These costs are included in Selling expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited). Shipping and handling costs include costs incurred with third-party carriers to transport products to customers as well as salaries and overhead costs related to activities to prepare the Company’s products for shipment from its distribution facilities.
Concentrations of Credit Risk: Trade receivables subject the Company to credit risk. Trade accounts receivable are carried at net realizable value. The Company extends credit to its customers based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and credit history, and generally does not require collateral. The Company monitors its customers’ credit and financial condition based on changing economic conditions and makes adjustments to credit policies as required. Provision for losses on uncollectible trade receivables are determined based on ongoing evaluations of the Company’s receivables, principally on the basis of historical collection experience and evaluations of the risks of nonpayment for a given customer.
The Company has a broad range of customers including many large retail outlet chains, one of which accounts for a significant percentage of its sales volume. This customer represented approximately 23% of the Company’s Net sales during both the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012. This customer represented approximately 25% and 23% of the Company’s Net sales during the three and nine month periods ended July 3, 2011, respectively. This customer also represented approximately 14% and 16% of the Company’s Trade accounts receivable, net at July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively.
Approximately 40% and 44% of the Company’s Net sales during the three and nine month periods ended both July 1, 2012, and July 3, 2011, respectively, occurred outside the U.S. These sales and related receivables are subject to varying degrees of credit, currency, political and economic risk. The Company monitors these risks and makes appropriate provisions for collectibility based on an assessment of the risks present.
Stock-Based Compensation: The Company measures the cost of its stock-based compensation plans based on the fair value of its employee stock awards and recognizes these costs over the requisite service period of the awards.
In September 2009, the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) adopted the 2009 Spectrum Brands Inc. Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). In conjunction with the Merger, the 2009 Plan was assumed by SB Holdings. Up to 3,333 shares of common stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations, could have been issued under the 2009 Plan. After October 21, 2010, no further awards may be made under the 2009 Plan (as described in further detail below) as the Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (the “2011 Plan”) was approved by the shareholders of the Company on March 1, 2011.
In conjunction with the Merger, the Company assumed the Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (formerly known as the Russell Hobbs, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Award Plan, as amended on June 24, 2008) (the “2007 RH Plan”). Up to 600 shares of common stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations, could have been issued under the 2007 RH Plan. After October 21, 2010, no further awards may be made under the 2007 RH Plan (as described in further detail below) as the 2011 Plan was approved by the shareholders of the Company on March 1, 2011.
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
On October 21, 2010, the Board adopted the 2011 Plan, which received shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting of the shareholders of the Company held on March 1, 2011. After such shareholder approval, no further awards will be granted under the 2009 Plan and the 2007 RH Plan. Up to 4,626 shares of common stock of the Company, net of cancellations, may be issued under the 2011 Plan.
Total stock compensation expense associated with restricted stock awards and restricted stock units recognized by the Company during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 was $4,490, or $2,918, net of taxes, and $15,771, or $10,251, net of taxes, respectively. Total stock compensation expense associated with restricted stock awards and restricted stock units recognized by the Company during the three and nine month periods ended July 3, 2011 was $8,528, or $5,543, net of taxes, and $22,815, or $14,830, net of taxes, respectively.
The Company granted approximately 42 and 759 restricted stock units during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively. Of these 759 grants, 18 restricted stock units are time-based and vest over a one year period and 42 restricted stock units are time-based and vest over a two year period. The remaining 699 restricted stock units are performance and time-based and vest over a two year period. The total market value of the restricted stock units on the dates of the grants was approximately $20,756.
The Company granted approximately 1,580 restricted stock units during the nine month period ended July 3, 2011. Of these 1,580 grants, 15 restricted stock units are time-based and vest over a one year period and 18 restricted stock units are time-based and vest over a three year period. The remaining 1,547 restricted stock units are performance and time-based with 665 units vesting over a two year period and 882 units vesting over a three year period. The total market value of the restricted stock units on the dates of the grants was approximately $46,034.
The fair value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is determined based on the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on the grant date. A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested restricted stock awards and restricted stock units as of July 1, 2012 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock Awards | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Fair Value at Grant Date |
Restricted stock awards at September 30, 2011 | 123 |
| | $ | 24.20 |
| | $ | 2,977 |
|
Vested | (110 | ) | | 23.75 |
| | (2,613 | ) |
Restricted stock awards at July 1, 2012 | 13 |
| | $ | 28.00 |
| | $ | 364 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock Units | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Fair Value at Grant Date |
Restricted stock units at September 30, 2011 | 1,645 |
| | $ | 28.97 |
| | $ | 47,656 |
|
Granted | 759 |
| | 27.35 |
| | 20,756 |
|
Forfeited | (53 | ) | | 28.08 |
| | (1,488 | ) |
Vested | (396 | ) | | 28.72 |
| | (11,373 | ) |
Restricted stock units at July 1, 2012 | 1,955 |
| | $ | 28.41 |
| | $ | 55,551 |
|
Acquisition and Integration Related Charges: Acquisition and integration related charges reflected in Operating expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) include, but are not limited to, transaction costs such as banking, legal, accounting and other professional fees directly related to acquisitions, termination and related costs for transitional and certain other employees, integration related professional fees and other post business combination expenses associated with mergers and acquisitions.
The following table summarizes acquisition and integration related charges incurred by the Company during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011:
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Russell Hobbs | | | | | | | |
Integration costs | $ | 1,573 |
| | $ | 6,718 |
| | $ | 6,766 |
| | $ | 22,088 |
|
Employee termination charges | 840 |
| | 310 |
| | 3,356 |
| | 5,206 |
|
Legal and professional fees | 587 |
| | 360 |
| | 1,508 |
| | 3,949 |
|
Merger related Acquisition and integration related charges | $ | 3,000 |
| | $ | 7,388 |
| | $ | 11,630 |
| | $ | 31,243 |
|
FURminator | 1,738 |
| | — |
| | 6,337 |
| | — |
|
Black Flag | 95 |
| | — |
| | 1,912 |
| | — |
|
Other | 441 |
| | 56 |
| | 746 |
| | 244 |
|
Total Acquisition and integration related charges | $ | 5,274 |
| | $ | 7,444 |
| | $ | 20,625 |
| | $ | 31,487 |
|
| |
3 | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
Comprehensive income (loss) and the components of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Net income (loss) | $ | 58,649 |
| | $ | 28,604 |
| | $ | 43,059 |
| | $ | (41,339 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation | (34,148 | ) | | 13,139 |
| | (30,538 | ) | | 33,009 |
|
Valuation allowance adjustments | 465 |
| | (216 | ) | | 214 |
| | 860 |
|
Pension liability adjustments | 422 |
| | — |
| | 953 |
| | — |
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments | 1,010 |
| | (653 | ) | | 2,127 |
| | (3,718 | ) |
Net change to derive comprehensive (loss) income for the period | (32,251 | ) | | 12,270 |
| | (27,244 | ) | | 30,151 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 26,398 |
| | $ | 40,874 |
| | $ | 15,815 |
| | $ | (11,188 | ) |
Net gains or losses resulting from the translation of assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are accumulated in the Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) section of Shareholders’ equity. Also included are the effects of exchange rate changes on intercompany balances of a long-term nature.
The changes in accumulated foreign currency translation for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 were primarily attributable to the impact of translation of the net assets of the Company’s European and Latin American operations, which primarily have functional currencies in Euros, Pounds Sterling and Brazilian Real.
| |
4 | NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
Net income (loss) per common share of the Company for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 is calculated based upon the following number of shares:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Basic | 51,342 |
| | 50,863 |
| | 51,669 |
| | 50,832 |
|
Effect of common stock equivalents | 477 |
| | 142 |
| | 476 |
| | — |
|
Diluted | 51,819 |
| | 51,005 |
| | 52,145 |
| | 50,832 |
|
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
For the nine months ended July 3, 2011, the Company has not assumed the exercise of common stock equivalents as the impact would be antidilutive due to the loss reported.
Inventories for the Company, which are stated at the lower of cost or market, consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
Raw materials | $ | 78,116 |
| | $ | 59,928 |
|
Work-in-process | 29,672 |
| | 25,465 |
|
Finished goods | 444,727 |
| | 349,237 |
|
| $ | 552,515 |
| | $ | 434,630 |
|
| |
6 | GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Goodwill and intangible assets of the Company consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Batteries & Appliances | | Global Pet Supplies | | Home and Garden Business | | Total |
Goodwill: | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2011 | $ | 268,148 |
| | $ | 170,285 |
| | $ | 171,905 |
| | $ | 610,338 |
|
Additions | — |
| | 70,023 |
| | 15,852 |
| | 85,875 |
|
Effect of translation | (4,089 | ) | | (4,079 | ) | | — |
| | (8,168 | ) |
Balance at July 1, 2012 | $ | 264,059 |
| | $ | 236,229 |
| | $ | 187,757 |
| | $ | 688,045 |
|
Intangible Assets: | | | | | | | |
Trade names Not Subject to Amortization | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2011 | $ | 545,804 |
| | $ | 205,491 |
| | $ | 75,500 |
| | $ | 826,795 |
|
Additions | — |
| | 14,000 |
| | 8,000 |
| | 22,000 |
|
Effect of translation | (5,216 | ) | | (8,125 | ) | | — |
| | (13,341 | ) |
Balance at July 1, 2012 | $ | 540,588 |
| | $ | 211,366 |
| | $ | 83,500 |
| | $ | 835,454 |
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2011, net | $ | 481,473 |
| | $ | 219,243 |
| | $ | 156,398 |
| | $ | 857,114 |
|
Additions | — |
| | 65,118 |
| | 17,000 |
| | 82,118 |
|
Amortization during period | (24,613 | ) | | (14,325 | ) | | (7,612 | ) | | (46,550 | ) |
Effect of translation | (6,500 | ) | | (4,659 | ) | | — |
| | (11,159 | ) |
Balance at July 1, 2012, net | $ | 450,360 |
| | $ | 265,377 |
| | $ | 165,786 |
| | $ | 881,523 |
|
Total Intangible Assets, net at July 1, 2012 | $ | 990,948 |
| | $ | 476,743 |
| | $ | 249,286 |
| | $ | 1,716,977 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization include proprietary technology, customer relationships and certain trade names, which were recognized as a result of fresh-start reporting upon the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 and through other acquisitions. The useful life of the Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization are 4 to 9 years for technology assets related to the Global Pet Supplies segment, 9 to 17 years for technology assets associated with the Global Batteries & Appliances segment, 15 to 20 years for customer relationships of the Global Batteries & Appliances segment, 20 years for customer relationships of the Home and Garden Business and Global Pet Supplies segments, 12 years for a trade name within the Global Batteries & Appliances segment and 4 years for a trade name within the Home and Garden Business segment.
The carrying value and accumulated amortization for intangible assets subject to amortization are as follows:
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
Technology Assets Subject to Amortization: | | | |
Gross balance | $ | 90,924 |
| | $ | 71,805 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (20,356 | ) | | (13,635 | ) |
Carrying value, net | $ | 70,568 |
| | $ | 58,170 |
|
Trade Names Subject to Amortization: | | | |
Gross balance | $ | 149,700 |
| | $ | 149,700 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (26,108 | ) | | (16,320 | ) |
Carrying value, net | $ | 123,592 |
| | $ | 133,380 |
|
Customer Relationships Subject to Amortization: | | | |
Gross balance | $ | 789,465 |
| | $ | 738,937 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (102,102 | ) | | (73,373 | ) |
Carrying value, net | $ | 687,363 |
| | $ | 665,564 |
|
Amortization expense for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Proprietary technology amortization | $ | 2,411 |
| | $ | 1,649 |
| | $ | 6,721 |
| | $ | 4,946 |
|
Customer relationships amortization | 10,181 |
| | 9,650 |
| | 30,041 |
| | 28,708 |
|
Trade names amortization | 3,509 |
| | 3,140 |
| | 9,788 |
| | 9,419 |
|
| $ | 16,101 |
| | $ | 14,439 |
| | $ | 46,550 |
| | $ | 43,073 |
|
The Company estimates annual amortization expense of intangible assets for the next five fiscal years will approximate $62,600 per year.
Debt consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| Amount | | Rate | | Amount | | Rate |
Term Loan, U.S. Dollar, due June 17, 2016 | $ | 521,146 |
| | 5.1 | % | | $ | 525,237 |
| | 5.1 | % |
9.5% Notes, due June 15, 2018 | 950,000 |
| | 9.5 | % | | 750,000 |
| | 9.5 | % |
6.75% Notes, due March 15, 2020 | 300,000 |
| | 6.8 | % | | — |
| | — | % |
12% Notes, due August 28, 2019 | — |
| | — |
| | 245,031 |
| | 12.0 | % |
ABL Revolving Credit Facility, expiring May 3, 2016 | 2,500 |
| | 4.0 | % | | — |
| | 2.5 | % |
Other notes and obligations | 24,275 |
| | 11.0 | % | | 19,333 |
| | 10.5 | % |
Capitalized lease obligations | 25,294 |
| | 6.5 | % | | 24,911 |
| | 6.2 | % |
| $ | 1,823,215 |
| | | | $ | 1,564,512 |
| | |
Original issuance premiums (discounts) on debt | 3,850 |
| | | | (12,900 | ) | | |
Less: current maturities | 28,251 |
| | | | 16,090 |
| | |
Long-term debt | $ | 1,798,814 |
| | | | $ | 1,535,522 |
| | |
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
The Company has the following debt instruments outstanding at July 1, 2012: (i) a senior secured term loan (the “Term Loan”) pursuant to a senior credit agreement (the “Senior Credit Agreement”); (ii) 9.5% secured notes (the “9.5% Notes”); (iii) 6.75% unsecured notes (the “6.75% Notes”); and (iv) a $300,000 ABL revolving credit facility (the “ABL Revolving Credit Facility”).
Term Loan
On December 15, 2011 and June 14, 2012, the Company amended its Term Loan. As a result, the aggregate incremental amount by which the Company, subject to compliance with financial covenants and certain other conditions, may increase the amount of the commitment under the Term Loan has been increased from $100,000 to $250,000. Certain covenants in respect to indebtedness, liens and interest coverage were also amended to provide for dollar limits more favorable to the Company and, subject to compliance with financial covenants and certain other conditions, to allow for the incurrence of incremental unsecured indebtedness.
The Term Loan contains financial covenants with respect to debt, including, but not limited to, a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, which covenants, pursuant to their terms, become more restrictive over time. In addition, the Term Loan contains customary restrictive covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make investments or specified payments, give guarantees, pay dividends, make capital expenditures and merge or acquire or sell assets. Pursuant to a guarantee and collateral agreement, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed the respective obligations under the Term Loan and related loan documents and have pledged substantially all of their respective assets to secure such obligations. The Term Loan also provides for customary events of default, including payment defaults and cross-defaults on other material indebtedness.
In connection with the amendments, the Company recorded $236 and $792 of fees in connection with the Term Loan during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively. The fees are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited) and are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the Term Loan. In connection with the amendments, the Company also recorded cash charges of $30 and $531 as an increase to interest expense during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively.
9.5% Notes
On November 2, 2011, the Company offered $200,000 aggregate principal amount of 9.5% Notes at a price of 108.5% of the par value; these notes are in addition to the $750,000 aggregate principal amount of 9.5% Notes that were already outstanding. The additional notes are guaranteed by Spectrum Brands’ parent company, SB/RH Holdings, LLC, as well as by existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries and secured by liens on substantially all of the Company’s and the guarantors assets. The additional notes will vote together with the existing 9.5% Notes.
The indenture governing the 9.5% Notes (the “2018 Indenture”) contains customary covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends on or redemption or repurchase of equity interests, the making of certain investments, expansion into unrelated businesses, creation of liens on assets, merger or consolidation with another company, transfer or sale of all or substantially all assets, and transactions with affiliates.
In addition, the 2018 Indenture provides for customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to make payments when due or on acceleration of certain other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Events of default under the 2018 Indenture arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the 9.5% Notes. If any other event of default under the 2018 Indenture occurs and is continuing, the trustee for the 2018 Indenture or the registered holders of at least 25% in the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 9.5% Notes may declare the acceleration of the amounts due under those notes.
The Company recorded $11 and $3,581 of fees in connection with the offering of the 9.5% Notes during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively. The fees are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited) and are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the 9.5% Notes.
6.75% Notes
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
On March 15, 2012, the Company offered $300,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Notes at a price of 100% of the par value. The 6.75% Notes are unsecured and guaranteed by Spectrum Brands’ parent company, SB/RH Holdings, LLC, as well as by existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries.
The indenture governing the 6.75% Notes (the “2020 Indenture”) contains customary covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends on or redemption or repurchase of equity interests, the making of certain investments, expansion into unrelated businesses, creation of liens on assets, merger or consolidation with another company, transfer or sale of all or substantially all assets, and transactions with affiliates.
In addition, the 2020 Indenture provides for customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to make payments when due or on acceleration of certain other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Events of default under the 2020 Indenture arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the 6.75% Notes. If any other event of default under the 2020 Indenture occurs and is continuing, the trustee for the 2020 Indenture or the registered holders of at least 25% in the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 6.75% Notes may declare the acceleration of the amounts due under those notes.
The Company recorded $450 and $6,265 of fees in connection with the offering of the 6.75% Notes during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively. The fees are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited) and are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the 6.75% Notes.
12% Notes
On March 1, 2012, the Company launched a cash tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) and consent solicitation (the “Consent Solicitation”) with respect to any and all of its outstanding 12% Senior Subordinated Toggle Notes due 2019 (the “12% Notes”). Pursuant to the Consent Solicitation, the Company received consents to the adoption of certain amendments to the indenture governing the 12% Notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants, certain events of default and other related provisions. The terms of the Tender Offer provided that holders of the 12% Notes who tendered their 12% Notes prior to the expiration of a consent solicitation period, which ended March 14, 2012, would receive tender offer consideration and a consent payment. Holders tendering their 12% Notes subsequent to expiration of the consent solicitation period, but prior to the March 28, 2012 expiration of the Tender Offer period, would receive only tender offer consideration. As of the expiration of the consent solicitation period, holders of the 12% Notes had tendered approximately $231,421 of the 12% Notes. Following the expiration of the consent solicitation period and as of the expiration of the Tender Offer period, an additional $88 of the 12% Notes were tendered. Following expiration of the Tender Offer period, the Company paid the trustee principal, prepaid interest and a prepaid call premium sufficient to obtain a notice of satisfaction and discharge (“Satisfaction and Discharge”) from the trustee for the remaining approximately $13,522 of the 12% Notes not tendered. The Company delivered funds sufficient to redeem the 12% Notes on the first redemption date, August 28, 2012 (the “Redemption Date”), and has irrevocably taken all steps on its part necessary to effect such redemption. The trustee under the indenture governing the 12% Notes (the “12% Trustee”) has accepted those funds in trust for the benefit of the holders of the 12% Notes and has acknowledged the Satisfaction and Discharge of the 12% Notes and the indenture governing the 12% Notes.
In connection with the Tender Offer, the Company recorded $23,777 of fees and expenses as a cash charge to Interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the nine month period ended July 1, 2012. In connection with the Satisfaction and Discharge process, the Company recorded cash charges of $1,623 to Interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the nine month period ended July 1, 2012. In addition, $2,097 of debt issuance costs and unamortized premium related to the 12% Notes were written off as a non-cash charge to Interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the nine month period ended July 1, 2012.
ABL Revolving Credit Facility
On May 24, 2012, the Company amended its ABL Revolving Credit Facility. As a result, the maturity date was extended from April 21, 2016 to May 3, 2016.
The amended facility carries an interest rate at the option of the Company, which is subject to change based on availability under the facility, of either: (a) the base rate plus currently 0.75% per annum or (b) the reserve-adjusted LIBOR rate plus currently 1.75% per annum. No principal amortizations are required with respect to the ABL Revolving Credit Facility.
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
Pursuant to the credit and security agreement, the obligations under the ABL credit agreement are secured by certain current assets of the guarantors, including, but not limited to, deposit accounts, trade receivables and inventory.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility contains various representations and warranties and covenants, including, without limitation, enhanced collateral reporting and a maximum fixed charge coverage ratio. The ABL Revolving Credit Facility also provides for customary events of default, including payment defaults and cross-defaults on other material indebtedness.
In connection with the amendment of the ABL Revolving Credit Facility, the Company recorded $525 of fees during the three and nine month period ended July 1, 2012. The fees are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited) and are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the Term Loan. In connection with the amendment, the Company also recorded cash charges of $482 as an increase to interest expense during the three and nine month period ended July 1, 2012. In addition, $382 of debt issuance costs were written off in connection with the amendment as a non-cash charge to Interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and nine month period ended July 1, 2012.
As a result of borrowings and payments under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility, at July 1, 2012, the Company had aggregate borrowing availability of approximately $194,909, net of lender reserves of $27,471 and outstanding letters of credit of $26,730.
| |
8 | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
Derivative financial instruments are used by the Company principally in the management of its interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate and raw material price exposures. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Derivative instruments are reported at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (unaudited). When hedge accounting is elected at inception, the Company formally designates the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure and documents both the risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. The Company formally assesses both at the inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the financial instruments that are used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in the forecasted cash flows of the related underlying exposure. Because of the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the underlying exposure being hedged, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instruments are generally offset by changes in the forecasted cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. Any ineffective portion of a financial instrument’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. For derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges, or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, the change in the fair value is also immediately recognized in earnings.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The Company discloses its derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with ASC Topic 815: “Derivatives and Hedging,” (“ASC 815”).
The fair value of the Company’s outstanding derivative contracts recorded as assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited) are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Asset Derivatives | | | July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815: | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | Receivables—Other | | $ | — |
| | $ | 274 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | Receivables—Other | | 4,959 |
| | 3,189 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | Deferred charges and other | | 326 |
| | — |
|
Total asset derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 | | | $ | 5,285 |
| | $ | 3,463 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815: | | | | | |
Foreign exchange contracts | Receivables—Other | | 271 |
| | — |
|
Total asset derivatives | | | $ | 5,556 |
| | $ | 3,463 |
|
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
The fair value of the Company’s outstanding derivative contracts recorded as liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited) are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Liability Derivatives | | | July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815: | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | Accounts payable | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,246 |
|
Interest rate contracts | Accrued interest | | — |
| | 708 |
|
Commodity contracts | Accounts payable | | 1,801 |
| | 1,228 |
|
Commodity contracts | Other long term liabilities | | 892 |
| | 4 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | Accounts payable | | 753 |
| | 2,698 |
|
Total liability derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 | | | $ | 3,446 |
| | $ | 5,884 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815: | | | | | |
Foreign exchange contracts | Accounts payable | | 1,780 |
| | 10,945 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | Other long term liabilities | | 1,504 |
| | 12,036 |
|
Total liability derivatives | | | $ | 6,730 |
| | $ | 28,865 |
|
Changes in AOCI from Derivative Instruments
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of AOCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness, are recognized in current earnings.
The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the three month period ended July 1, 2012, pretax:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
Commodity contracts | $ | (2,368 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | $ | (120 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | $ | (6 | ) |
Interest rate contracts | — |
| | Interest expense | | — |
| | Interest expense | | — |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | (395 | ) | | Net sales | | (129 | ) | | Net sales | | — |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | 5,973 |
| | Cost of goods sold | | 558 |
| | Cost of goods sold | | — |
|
Total | $ | 3,210 |
| | | | $ | 309 |
| | | | $ | (6 | ) |
The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the nine month period ended July 1, 2012, pretax:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
Commodity contracts | $ | (1,989 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | $ | (675 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | $ | 8 |
|
Interest rate contracts | 15 |
| | Interest expense | | (864 | ) | | Interest expense | | — |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | (61 | ) | | Net sales | | (339 | ) | | Net sales | | — |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | 2,426 |
| | Cost of goods sold | | (1,336 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | — |
|
Total | $ | 391 |
| | | | $ | (3,214 | ) | | | | $ | 8 |
|
The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the three month period ended July 3, 2011, pretax:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
Commodity contracts | $ | (109 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | $ | 587 |
| | Cost of goods sold | | $ | 16 |
|
Interest rate contracts | (42 | ) | | Interest expense | | (839 | ) | | Interest expense | | (44 | ) |
Foreign exchange contracts | (11 | ) | | Net sales | | 105 |
| | Net sales | | — |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | (5,011 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | (4,346 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | — |
|
Total | $ | (5,173 | ) | | | | $ | (4,493 | ) | | | | $ | (28 | ) |
The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the nine month period ended July 3, 2011, pretax:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
Commodity contracts | $ | 1,764 |
| | Cost of goods sold | | $ | 1,921 |
| | Cost of goods sold | | $ | 17 |
|
Interest rate contracts | (102 | ) | | Interest expense | | (2,527 | ) | | Interest expense | | (294 | ) |
Foreign exchange contracts | 216 |
| | Net sales | | (102 | ) | | Net sales | | — |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | (15,801 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | (8,438 | ) | | Cost of goods sold | | — |
|
Total | $ | (13,923 | ) | | | | $ | (9,146 | ) | | | | $ | (277 | ) |
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
Other Changes in Fair Value of Derivative Contracts
For derivative instruments that are used to economically hedge the fair value of the Company’s third party and intercompany foreign currency payments, commodity purchases and interest rate payments, the gain (loss) associated with the derivative contract is recognized in earnings in the period of change. During the three month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, the Company recognized the following gains (losses) on these derivative contracts:
|
| | | | | | | |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Under ASC 815 | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
2012 | | 2011 | |
Foreign exchange contracts | 7,941 |
| | (7,578 | ) | | Other expense, net |
During the nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, the Company recognized the following gains (losses) on these derivative contracts:
|
| | | | | | | |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Under ASC 815 | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
2012 | | 2011 | |
Foreign exchange contracts | 11,734 |
| | (17,468 | ) | | Other expense, net |
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to the risk of default by the counterparties with which it transacts and generally does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to credit risk. The Company monitors counterparty credit risk on an individual basis by periodically assessing each such counterparty’s credit rating exposure. The maximum loss due to credit risk equals the fair value of the gross asset derivatives that are concentrated with certain domestic and foreign financial institution counterparties. The Company considers these exposures when measuring its credit reserve on its derivative assets, which was $26 and $18 at July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively.
The Company’s standard contracts do not contain credit risk related contingent features whereby the Company would be required to post additional cash collateral as a result of a credit event. However, the Company is typically required to post collateral in the normal course of business to offset its liability positions. At July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the Company had posted cash collateral of $1,717 and $418, respectively, related to such liability positions. In addition, at July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the Company had posted standby letters of credit of $0 and $2,000, respectively, related to such liability positions. The cash collateral is included in Current Assets—Receivables-Other within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited).
Derivative Financial Instruments
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges with the changes in fair value recorded in AOCI and as a derivative hedge asset or liability, as applicable. The swaps settle periodically in arrears with the related amounts for the current settlement period payable to, or receivable from, the counter-parties included in accrued liabilities or receivables, respectively, and recognized in earnings as an adjustment to interest expense from the underlying debt to which the swap is designated. At July 1, 2012 the Company did not have any of such interest rate swaps outstanding.
The Company periodically enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the risk from forecasted foreign currency denominated third party and intercompany sales or payments. These obligations generally require the Company to
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Euros, Pounds Sterling, Australian Dollars, Brazilian Reals, Canadian Dollars or Japanese Yen. These foreign exchange contracts are cash flow hedges of fluctuating foreign exchange related to sales of product or raw material purchases. Until the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is recorded in AOCI and as a derivative hedge asset or liability, as applicable. At the time the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is reclassified as an adjustment to Net sales or purchase price variance in Cost of goods sold. At July 1, 2012 the Company had a series of foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding through June 2013 with a contract value of $120,804. The derivative net gain on these contracts recorded in AOCI by the Company at July 1, 2012 was $3,269, net of tax expense of $1,262. At July 1, 2012, the portion of derivative net loss estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings by the Company over the next 12 months is $3,065, net of tax.
The Company is exposed to risk from fluctuating prices for raw materials, specifically zinc used in its manufacturing processes. The Company hedges a portion of the risk associated with these materials through the use of commodity swaps. The hedge contracts are designated as cash flow hedges with the fair value changes recorded in AOCI and as a hedge asset or liability, as applicable. The unrecognized changes in fair value of the hedge contracts are reclassified from AOCI into earnings when the hedged purchase of raw materials also affects earnings. The swaps effectively fix the floating price on a specified quantity of raw materials through a specified date. At July 1, 2012 the Company had a series of such swap contracts outstanding through July 2014 for 16 tons with a contract value of $31,665. The derivative net loss on these contracts recorded in AOCI by the Company at July 1, 2012 was $2,225, net of tax benefit of $428. At July 1, 2012, the portion of derivative net losses estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings by the Company over the next 12 months is $1,479, net of tax.
Derivative Contracts
The Company periodically enters into forward and swap foreign exchange contracts to economically hedge the risk from third party and intercompany payments resulting from existing obligations. These obligations generally require the Company to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Euros or Australian Dollars. These foreign exchange contracts are fair value hedges of a related liability or asset recorded in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited). The gain or loss on the derivative hedge contracts is recorded in earnings as an offset to the change in value of the related liability or asset at each period end. At July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the Company had $189,538 and $265,974, respectively, of notional value for such foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding.
The Company is exposed to economic risk from foreign currencies, including firm commitments for purchases of materials denominated in South African Rand. Periodically the Company economically hedges a portion of the risk associated with these purchases through forward and swap foreign exchange contracts. The contracts are designated as fair value hedges. The hedges effectively fix the foreign exchange in U.S. Dollars on a specified amount of Rand to a future payment date. The unrealized change in fair value of the hedge contracts is recorded in earnings and as a hedge asset or liability, as applicable. Derivative gains or losses are realized as the hedged purchases of materials affects earnings. At July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the Company had $2,249 and $0, respectively, of such foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding.
| |
9 | FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
The Company’s net derivative portfolio as of July 1, 2012, contains Level 2 instruments and consists of commodity and foreign exchange contracts. The fair values of these instruments as of July 1, 2012 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Assets: | | | | | | | |
Foreign exchange contracts, net | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,519 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,519 |
|
Total Assets, net | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,519 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,519 |
|
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts, net | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,693 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,693 | ) |
Total Liabilities, net | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,693 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,693 | ) |
The Company’s net derivative portfolio as of September 30, 2011, contains Level 2 instruments and consists of commodity, interest rate and foreign exchange contracts. The fair values of these instruments as of September 30, 2011 were as follows:
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Total Assets | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,954 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,954 | ) |
Commodity contracts | — |
| | (958 | ) | | — |
| | (958 | ) |
Foreign exchange contracts, net | — |
| | (22,490 | ) | | — |
| | (22,490 | ) |
Total Liabilities, net | $ | — |
| | $ | (25,402 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (25,402 | ) |
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and non-publicly traded debt approximate fair value. The fair values of long-term publicly traded debt are based off unadjusted quoted market prices (level 1) and derivative financial instruments are generally based on quoted or observed market prices (level 2).
The carrying values of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets are tested annually, or more frequently if an event occurs that indicates an impairment loss may have been incurred, using fair value measurements with unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are summarized as follows ((liability)/asset):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
Total debt | $ | (1,827,065 | ) | | $ | (1,957,870 | ) | | $ | (1,551,612 | ) | | $ | (1,635,528 | ) |
Interest rate swap agreements | — |
| | — |
| | (1,954 | ) | | (1,954 | ) |
Commodity swap and option agreements | (2,693 | ) | | (2,693 | ) | | (958 | ) | | (958 | ) |
Foreign exchange forward agreements | 1,519 |
| | 1,519 |
| | (22,490 | ) | | (22,490 | ) |
Pension Benefits
The Company has various defined benefit pension plans covering some of its employees in the U.S. and certain employees in other countries, primarily the United Kingdom and Germany. These pension plans generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service.
The Company’s results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 reflect the following pension and deferred compensation benefit costs:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
Components of net periodic pension benefit and deferred compensation benefit cost | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Service cost | $ | 578 |
| | $ | 781 |
| | $ | 1,700 |
| | $ | 2,344 |
|
Interest cost | 2,552 |
| | 2,557 |
| | 7,030 |
| | 7,670 |
|
Expected return on assets | (2,051 | ) | | (1,965 | ) | | (5,378 | ) | | (5,896 | ) |
Recognized net actuarial loss | 242 |
| | 97 |
| | 508 |
| | 291 |
|
Employee contributions | (46 | ) | | (129 | ) | | (139 | ) | | (386 | ) |
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 1,275 |
| | $ | 1,341 |
| | $ | 3,721 |
| | $ | 4,023 |
|
The Company funds its U.S. pension plans in accordance with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) defined guidelines and, where applicable, in amounts sufficient to satisfy the minimum funding requirements of applicable laws. Additionally, in compliance with the Company’s funding policy, annual contributions to non-U.S. defined benefit plans are equal to the
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
actuarial recommendations or statutory requirements in the respective countries. The Company’s contributions to its pension and deferred compensation plans for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
Pension and deferred compensation contributions | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Contributions made during period | $ | 1,289 |
| | $ | 3,189 |
| | $ | 3,767 |
| | $ | 6,145 |
|
The Company sponsors a defined contribution pension plan for its domestic salaried employees, which allows participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company also sponsors defined contribution pension plans for employees of certain foreign subsidiaries. Company contributions charged to operations, including discretionary amounts, for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 were $545 and $1,694, respectively. Company contributions charged to operations, including discretionary amounts, for the three and nine month periods ended July 3, 2011 were $1,439 and $4,192, respectively.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions and is subject to ongoing examination by the various taxing authorities. The Company’s major taxing jurisdictions are the U.S., United Kingdom and Germany. In the U.S., federal tax filings for years prior to and including the Company’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 are closed. However, the federal net operating loss carryforwards from the Company’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and prior are subject to IRS examination until the year that such net operating loss carryforwards are utilized and that year is closed for audit. The Company’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2010 and 2011 remain open to examination by the IRS. Filings in various U.S. state and local jurisdictions are also subject to audit and to date no significant audit matters have arisen.
The Company manages its business in three vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances; (ii) Global Pet Supplies; and (iii) the Home and Garden Business.
Global strategic initiatives and financial objectives for each reportable segment are determined at the corporate level. Each reportable segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives and has a general manager responsible for the sales and marketing initiatives and financial results for product lines within that segment.
Net sales and Cost of goods sold to other business segments have been eliminated. The gross contribution of intersegment sales is included in the segment selling the product to the external customer. Segment net sales are based upon the segment from which the product is shipped.
The operating segment profits do not include restructuring and related charges, acquisition and integration related charges, interest expense, interest income and income tax expense. Corporate expenses primarily include general and administrative expenses and global long-term incentive compensation plan costs which are evaluated on a consolidated basis and not allocated to the Company’s operating segments. All depreciation and amortization included in income from operations is related to operating segments or corporate expense. Costs are identified to operating segments or corporate expense according to the function of each cost center.
All capital expenditures are related to operating segments. Variable allocations of assets are not made for segment reporting.
Segment information for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 is as follows:
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Net sales from external customers | | | | | | | |
Global Batteries & Appliances | $ | 500,724 |
| | $ | 505,213 |
| | $ | 1,669,973 |
| | $ | 1,661,177 |
|
Global Pet Supplies | 157,495 |
| | 143,839 |
| | 448,962 |
| | 425,106 |
|
Home and Garden Business | 166,584 |
| | 155,583 |
| | 300,924 |
| | 273,303 |
|
Total segments | $ | 824,803 |
| | $ | 804,635 |
| | $ | 2,419,859 |
| | $ | 2,359,586 |
|
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Segment profit | | | | | | | |
Global Batteries & Appliances | $ | 47,093 |
| | $ | 45,480 |
| | $ | 185,726 |
| | $ | 180,460 |
|
Global Pet Supplies | 22,470 |
| | 19,240 |
| | 57,778 |
| | 53,951 |
|
Home and Garden Business | 44,224 |
| | 42,921 |
| | 60,509 |
| | 51,008 |
|
Total segments | 113,787 |
| | 107,641 |
| | 304,013 |
| | 285,419 |
|
Corporate expense | 9,429 |
| | 14,364 |
| | 33,360 |
| | 41,029 |
|
Acquisition and integration related charges | 5,274 |
| | 7,444 |
| | 20,625 |
| | 31,487 |
|
Restructuring and related charges | 3,896 |
| | 7,066 |
| | 15,890 |
| | 17,778 |
|
Interest expense | 39,686 |
| | 40,398 |
| | 150,082 |
| | 165,923 |
|
Other expense, net | 2,224 |
| | 770 |
| | 2,225 |
| | 1,372 |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 53,278 |
| | $ | 37,599 |
| | $ | 81,831 |
| | $ | 27,830 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
Segment total assets | | | |
Global Batteries & Appliances | $ | 2,183,331 |
| | $ | 2,275,076 |
|
Global Pet Supplies | 973,559 |
| | 828,202 |
|
Home and Garden Business | 567,718 |
| | 476,381 |
|
Total segment assets | 3,724,608 |
| | 3,579,659 |
|
Corporate | 51,566 |
| | 47,047 |
|
Total assets at period end | $ | 3,776,174 |
| | $ | 3,626,706 |
|
| |
13 | RESTRUCTURING AND RELATED CHARGES |
The Company reports restructuring and related charges associated with manufacturing and related initiatives in Cost of goods sold. Restructuring and related charges reflected in Cost of goods sold include, but are not limited to, termination, compensation and related costs associated with manufacturing employees, asset impairments relating to manufacturing initiatives, and other costs directly related to the restructuring or integration initiatives implemented.
The Company reports restructuring and related charges relating to administrative functions in Operating expenses, such as initiatives impacting sales, marketing, distribution, or other non-manufacturing functions. Restructuring and related charges reflected in Operating expenses include, but are not limited to, termination and related costs, any asset impairments relating to the functional areas described above, and other costs directly related to the initiatives.
The following table summarizes restructuring and related charges incurred by segment for the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011:
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months | | Nine Months |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Cost of goods sold: | | | | | | | |
Global Batteries & Appliances | $ | 1,205 |
| | $ | 408 |
| | $ | 4,679 |
| | $ | 508 |
|
Global Pet Supplies | 833 |
| | 1,877 |
| | 3,624 |
| | 4,424 |
|
Total restructuring and related charges in cost of goods sold | 2,038 |
| | 2,285 |
| | 8,303 |
| | 4,932 |
|
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
Global Batteries & Appliances | 640 |
| | 1,678 |
| | 2,283 |
| | 2,295 |
|
Global Pet Supplies | 883 |
| | 1,855 |
| | 3,276 |
| | 5,435 |
|
Home and Garden Business | 192 |
| | 747 |
| | 1,163 |
| | 2,082 |
|
Corporate | 143 |
| | 501 |
| | 865 |
| | 3,034 |
|
Total restructuring and related charges in operating expenses | 1,858 |
| | 4,781 |
| | 7,587 |
| | 12,846 |
|
Total restructuring and related charges | $ | 3,896 |
| | $ | 7,066 |
| | $ | 15,890 |
| | $ | 17,778 |
|
Global Cost Reduction Initiatives Summary
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company implemented a series of initiatives within the Global Batteries & Appliances segment, the Global Pet Supplies segment and the Home and Garden Business segment to reduce operating costs, and to evaluate opportunities to improve the Company’s capital structure (the “Global Cost Reduction Initiatives”). These initiatives included headcount reductions and the exit of certain facilities within each of the Company’s segments. These initiatives also included consultation, legal and accounting fees related to the evaluation of the Company’s capital structure. Costs associated with these initiatives, which are expected to be incurred through January 31, 2015, are projected to total approximately $87,000.
The Company recorded $3,768 and $15,070 of pretax restructuring and related charges during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively, and the Company recorded $6,462 and $14,569 of pretax restructuring and related charges during the three and nine month periods ended July 3, 2011, respectively, related to the Global Cost Reduction Initiatives.
The following table summarizes the remaining accrual balance associated with the 2009 initiatives and the activity during the nine month period ended July 1, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Termination Benefits | | Other Costs | | Total |
Accrual balance at September 30, 2011 | $ | 8,795 |
| | $ | 3,021 |
| | $ | 11,816 |
|
Provisions | 1,051 |
| | 267 |
| | 1,318 |
|
Cash expenditures | (6,897 | ) | | (1,102 | ) | | (7,999 | ) |
Non-cash items | (108 | ) | | (436 | ) | | (544 | ) |
Accrual balance at July 1, 2012 | $ | 2,841 |
| | $ | 1,750 |
| | $ | 4,591 |
|
Expensed as incurred (A) | $ | 3,556 |
| | $ | 10,196 |
| | $ | 13,752 |
|
______________________________
| |
(A) | Consists of amounts not impacting the accrual for restructuring and related charges. |
The following table summarizes the expenses incurred during the nine month period ended July 1, 2012, the cumulative amount incurred to date and the total future expected costs to be incurred associated with the Global Cost Reduction Initiatives by operating segment:
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Batteries & Appliances | | Global Pet Supplies | | Home and Garden Business | | Corporate | | Total |
Restructuring and related charges during the nine month period ended July 1, 2012 | $ | 7,007 |
| | $ | 6,900 |
| | $ | 1,163 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,070 |
|
Restructuring and related charges since initiative inception | $ | 20,174 |
| | $ | 33,762 |
| | $ | 17,871 |
| | $ | 7,591 |
| | $ | 79,398 |
|
Total future restructuring and related charges expected | $ | 555 |
| | $ | 5,300 |
| | $ | 1,755 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 7,610 |
|
In connection with other restructuring efforts, the Company recorded $128 and $820 of pretax restructuring and related charges during the three and nine month periods ended July 1, 2012, respectively, and $604 and $3,209 of pretax restructuring and related charges during the three and nine month periods ended July 3, 2011, respectively.
| |
14 | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
The Company has provided for the estimated costs associated with environmental remediation activities at some of its current and former manufacturing sites. The Company believes that any additional liability which may result from resolution of these matters in excess of the amounts provided of approximately $5,490, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
The Company is a defendant in various other matters of litigation generally arising out of the ordinary course of business.
The Company does not believe that the resolution of any other matters or proceedings presently pending will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or cash flows.
In accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”), the Company accounts for acquisitions by applying the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires, among other things, that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination be measured at their fair values as of the closing date of the acquisition.
Black Flag
On October 31, 2011, the Company completed the $43,750 cash acquisition of the Black Flag and TAT trade names from The Homax Group, Inc. ("Black Flag"), a portfolio company of Olympus Partners. The Black Flag and TAT product lines consist of liquids, aerosols, baits and traps that control ants, spiders, wasps, bedbugs, fleas, flies, roaches, yellow jackets and other insects. This acquisition was not significant individually.
The results of Black Flag’s operations since October 31, 2011 are included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) and are reported as part of the Home and Garden Business segment.
Acquisition Accounting
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Black Flag acquisition have been measured at their fair values at October 31, 2011 as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The amounts recorded in connection with the acquisition of Black Flag are as follows:
|
| | | |
Inventory | $ | 2,509 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | 301 |
|
Intangible assets | 25,000 |
|
Goodwill | 15,852 |
|
Other assets | 88 |
|
Total assets acquired | $ | 43,750 |
|
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
The Company performed a valuation of the acquired assets of Black Flag at October 31, 2011. Significant matters related to the determination of the fair values of the acquired identifiable intangible assets are summarized as follows:
| |
• | Certain indefinite-lived intangible assets were valued using a relief from royalty methodology. Customer relationships and certain definite-lived intangible assets were valued using a multi-period excess earnings method. The total fair value of indefinite and definite lived intangibles was $25,000 as of October 31, 2011. A summary of the significant key inputs is as follows: |
| |
• | The Company valued customer relationships using the income approach, specifically the multi-period excess earnings method. In determining the fair value of the customer relationship, the multi-period excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the customer relationship after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. Only expected sales from current customers were used, which included an expected growth rate of 3%. The Company assumed a customer retention rate of approximately 95%, which was supported by historical retention rates. Income taxes were estimated at 40% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 13.5%. The customer relationships were valued at $17,000 under this approach and will be amortized over 20 years. |
| |
• | The Company valued trade names using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade name was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trademarks and trade names. Royalty rates used in the determination of the fair values of trade names were in the range of 2%-4% of expected net sales related to the respective trade name. The Company anticipates using the trade names for an indefinite period as demonstrated by the sustained use of each subject trademark. In estimating the fair value of the trade names, net sales for the trade names were estimated to grow at a rate of (15)%-8% annually with a terminal year growth rate of 3%. Income taxes were estimated at 40% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 13.5%. Trade names were valued at $8,000 under this approach. |
The Company’s estimates and assumptions for Black Flag are subject to change as the Company obtains additional information for its estimates during the measurement period. The primary areas of acquisition accounting that are not yet finalized relate to certain legal matters and residual goodwill.
FURminator
On December 22, 2011, the Company completed the $141,745 cash acquisition of FURminator, Inc. from HKW Capital Partners III, L.P. ("FURminator"). FURminator is a leading worldwide provider of branded and patented pet deshedding products. This acquisition was not significant individually.
The results of FURminator operations since December 22, 2011 are included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) and are reported as part of the Global Pet Supplies business segment.
Acquisition Accounting
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the FURminator acquisition have been measured at their fair values at December 22, 2011 as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The amounts recorded in connection with the acquisition of FURminator are as follows:
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
|
| | | |
Current assets | $ | 9,240 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | 648 |
|
Intangible assets | 79,000 |
|
Goodwill | 68,531 |
|
Total assets acquired | $ | 157,419 |
|
Current liabilities | 758 |
|
Long-term liabilities | 14,916 |
|
Total liabilities assumed | $ | 15,674 |
|
Net assets acquired | $ | 141,745 |
|
The Company performed a valuation of the assets and liabilities of FURminator at December 22, 2011. Significant matters related to the determination of the fair values of the acquired identifiable intangible assets are summarized as follows:
| |
• | Certain indefinite-lived intangible assets were valued using a relief from royalty methodology. Customer relationships and certain definite-lived intangible assets were valued using a multi-period excess earnings method. The total fair value of indefinite and definite lived intangibles was $79,000 as of December 22, 2011. A summary of the significant key inputs is as follows: |
| |
• | The Company valued customer relationships using the income approach, specifically the multi-period excess earnings method. In determining the fair value of the customer relationship, the multi-period excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the customer relationship after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. Only expected sales from current customers were used, which included an expected growth rate of 3%. The Company assumed a customer retention rate of approximately 95%, which was supported by historical retention rates. Income taxes were estimated at 40% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 14%. The customer relationships were valued at $46,000 under this approach and will be amortized over 20 years. |
| |
• | The Company valued trade names using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade name was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trademarks and trade names. Royalty rates used in the determination of the fair values of trade names were in the range of 4%-5% of expected net sales related to the respective trade name. The Company anticipates using the trade names for an indefinite period as demonstrated by the sustained use of each subject trade name. In estimating the fair value of the trade names, net sales for the trade names were estimated to grow at a rate of 2%-12% annually with a terminal year growth rate of 3%. Income taxes were estimated at 40% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 14%. Trade names were valued at $14,000 under this approach. |
| |
• | The Company valued technology using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the technology was not owned. Royalty rates used in the determination of the fair values of technologies were 10%-12% of expected net sales related to the respective technology. The Company anticipates using these technologies through the legal life of the underlying patent and therefore the expected life of these technologies was equal to the remaining legal life of the underlying patents, which is approximately 9 years. In estimating the fair value of the technologies, net sales were estimated to grow at a rate of 2%-12% annually. Income taxes were estimated at 40% and amounts were discounted using the rate of 14%. The technology assets were valued at $19,000 under this approach. |
The Company’s estimates and assumptions for FURminator are subject to change as the Company obtains additional information for its estimates during the measurement period. The primary areas of acquisition accounting that are not yet finalized relate to certain legal matters, income and non-income based taxes and residual goodwill.
| |
16 | NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)
Fair Value Measurement
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued amended accounting guidance to achieve a consistent definition of and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure concerning fair value between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This amended guidance was effective for the Company beginning in the second quarter of its fiscal year ending September 30, 2012. The new accounting guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which requires entities to present net income and other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. This accounting guidance is effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new accounting guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impairment Testing
During September 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance intended to simplify how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. The guidance will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This accounting guidance is effective for the Company for the annual and any interim goodwill impairment tests performed for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Additionally, in July 2012, the FASB issued new accounting guidance intended to simplify how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The guidance will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This accounting guidance is effective for the Company for the annual and any interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
On August 7, 2012 the Company announced a fiscal 2012 one-time special dividend of $1.00 per share to shareholders of record as of close of business on Monday, August 27, 2012.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SB Holdings”), is a global branded consumer products company and was created in connection with the combination of Spectrum Brands, Inc. (“Spectrum Brands”), a global branded consumer products company, and Russell Hobbs, Inc. (“Russell Hobbs”), a global branded small appliance company, to form a new combined company (the “Merger”). The Merger was consummated on June 16, 2010. As a result of the Merger, both Spectrum Brands and Russell Hobbs became wholly-owned subsidiaries of SB Holdings. Russell Hobbs was subsequently merged into Spectrum Brands. SB Holdings’ common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SPB.”
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms the “Company,” “Spectrum,” “we,” “our” or “us” are used to refer to SB Holdings and its subsidiaries subsequent to the Merger and Spectrum Brands prior to the Merger.
Business Overview
We manufacture and market alkaline, zinc carbon and hearing aid batteries, herbicides, insecticides and repellants and specialty pet supplies. We design and market rechargeable batteries, battery-powered lighting products, electric shavers and accessories, grooming products and hair care appliances. With the addition of Russell Hobbs we design, market and distribute a broad range of branded small household appliances and personal care products. Our manufacturing and product development facilities are located in the United States (“U.S.”), Europe, Latin America and Asia. Substantially all of our rechargeable batteries and chargers, shaving and grooming products, small household appliances, personal care products and portable lighting products are manufactured by third-party suppliers, primarily located in Asia.
We sell our products in approximately 120 countries through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and enjoy strong name recognition in our markets under the Rayovac, VARTA and Remington brands, each of which has been in existence for more than 80 years, and under the Tetra, 8-in-1, Spectracide, Cutter, Black & Decker, George Foreman, Russell Hobbs, Farberware, Black Flag, FURminator and various other brands.
Our diversified global branded consumer products have positions in seven major product categories: consumer batteries; pet supplies; home and garden control products; electric shaving and grooming products; small appliances; electric personal care products; and portable lighting. Our chief operating decision-maker manages the businesses in three vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances, which consists of our worldwide battery, electric shaving and grooming, electric personal care, portable lighting and small appliances, primarily in the kitchen and home product categories (“Global Batteries & Appliances”); (ii) Global Pet Supplies, which consists of our worldwide pet supplies business (“Global Pet Supplies”); and (iii) Home and Garden Business, which consists of our home and garden and insect control business (the “Home and Garden Business”). Management reviews our performance based on these segments. For information pertaining to our business segments, see Note 12, “Segment Results” of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Global and geographic strategic initiatives and financial objectives are determined at the corporate level. Each business segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives and has a general manager responsible for sales and marketing initiatives and the financial results for all product lines within that business segment.
Our operating performance is influenced by a number of factors including: general economic conditions; foreign exchange fluctuations; trends in consumer markets; consumer confidence and preferences; our overall product line mix, including pricing and gross margin, which vary by product line and geographic market; pricing of certain raw materials and commodities; energy and fuel prices; and our general competitive position, especially as impacted by our competitors’ advertising and promotional activities and pricing strategies.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Quarter and Fiscal Nine Month Period Ended July 1, 2012 Compared to Fiscal Quarter and Fiscal Nine Month Period Ended July 3, 2011
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q we refer to the three months ended July 1, 2012 as the “Fiscal 2012 Quarter,” the nine month period ended July 1, 2012 as the “Fiscal 2012 Nine Months,” the three month period ended July 3, 2011 as the “Fiscal 2011 Quarter” and the nine month period ended July 3, 2011 as the “Fiscal 2011 Nine Months.”
Net Sales. Net sales for the Fiscal 2012 Quarter increased $20 million to $825 million from $805 million in the Fiscal 2011 Quarter, a 3% increase. The following table details the principal components of the change in net sales from the Fiscal
2011 Quarter to the Fiscal 2012 Quarter (in millions):
|
| | | |
| Net Sales |
Fiscal 2011 Quarter Net Sales | $ | 805 |
|
Increase in pet supplies | 17 |
|
Increase in home and garden control products | 12 |
|
Increase in small appliances | 9 |
|
Increase in electric shaving and grooming products | 4 |
|
Increase in consumer batteries | 4 |
|
Increase in electric personal care products | 4 |
|
Decrease in portable lighting products | (1 | ) |
Foreign currency impact, net | (29 | ) |
Fiscal 2012 Quarter Net Sales | $ | 825 |
|
Net sales for the Fiscal 2012 Nine Months increased $60 million to $2,420 million from $2,360 million in the Fiscal 2011 Nine Months, a 3% increase. The following table details the principal components of the change in net sales from the Fiscal 2011 Nine Months to the Fiscal 2012 Nine Months (in millions):
|
| | | |
| Net Sales |
Fiscal 2011 Nine Months Net Sales | $ | 2,360 |
|
Increase in pet supplies | 28 |
|
Increase in home and garden control products | 27 |
|
Increase in small appliances | 18 |
|
Increase in consumer batteries | 15 |
|
Increase in electric personal care products | 10 |
|
Increase in electric shaving and grooming products | 9 |
|
Decrease in portable lighting products | (3 | ) |
Foreign currency impact, net | (44 | ) |
Fiscal 2012 Nine Months Net Sales | $ | 2,420 |
|
Consolidated net sales by product line for the Fiscal 2012 Quarter, the