As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2018
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________
FORM 20-F
_______________
¨ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
¨ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 001-32221
Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Gol Intelligent Airlines Inc.
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
_________________
The Federative Republic of Brazil
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Richard F. Lark, Jr.
+55 11 5098-7881
Fax: +55 11 5098-2341
E-mail: ri@voegol.com.br
Praça Comandante Linneu Gomes, S/N Portaria 3,
Jardim Aeroporto
04626-020 São Paulo, São Paulo
Federative Republic of Brazil
(+55 11 2128-4700)
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
___________________________________________
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class: |
Name of each exchange on which registered: |
Preferred Shares, without par value |
New York Stock Exchange* |
* Not for trading purposes, but only in connection with the trading on the New York Stock Exchange of American Depositary Shares representing those preferred shares.
___________________________________________
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
___________________________________________
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
___________________________________________
The number of outstanding shares of each class of stock of Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A. as of December 31, 2017:
2,863,682,710 Shares of Common Stock
265,899,432 Shares of Preferred Stock
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
If this is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated Filer ¨ |
Accelerated Filer x |
Non-accelerated Filer ¨ |
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the Registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ¨ |
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board x |
Other ¨ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Table of Contents | ||
Presentation of Financial and Other Data | 1 | |
Cautionary Statements about Forward-Looking Statements | 2 | |
ITEM 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers | 3 |
ITEM 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | 3 |
ITEM 3. | Key Information | 4 |
A. | Selected Financial Data | 4 |
B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness | 8 |
C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds | 8 |
D. | Risk Factors | 8 |
ITEM 4. | Information on the Company | 16 |
A. | History and Development of the Company | 16 |
B. | Business Overview | 22 |
C. | Organizational Structure | 44 |
D. | Property, Plant and Equipment | 44 |
ITEM 4A. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 45 |
ITEM 5. | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects | 45 |
A. | Operating Results | 45 |
B. | Liquidity and Capital Resources | 64 |
C. | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. | 71 |
D. | Trend Information | 71 |
E. | Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements | 71 |
F. | Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations | 72 |
ITEM 6. | Directors, Senior Management and Employees | 72 |
A. | Directors and Senior Management | 72 |
B. | Compensation | 76 |
C. | Board Practices | 77 |
D. | Employees | 78 |
E. | Share Ownership | 79 |
ITEM 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions | 79 |
A. | Major Shareholders | 79 |
B. | Related Party Transactions | 80 |
C. | Interests of Experts and Counsel | 81 |
ITEM 8. | Financial Information | 82 |
A. | Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information | 82 |
B. | Significant Changes | 87 |
ITEM 9. | The Offer and Listing | 87 |
A. | Offer and Listing Details | 87 |
B. | Plan of Distribution | 89 |
C. | Markets | 89 |
D. | Selling Shareholders | 91 |
E. | Dilution | 91 |
F. | Expenses of the Issue | 91 |
ITEM 10. Additional Information | 92 | |
A. | Share Capital | 92 |
B. | Memorandum and Articles of Association | 92 |
C. | Material Contracts | 100 |
D. | Exchange Controls | 101 |
E. | Taxation | 101 |
F. | Dividends and Paying Agents | 110 |
G. | Statement by Experts | 110 |
H. | Documents on Display | 110 |
I. | Subsidiary Information | 111 |
ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 111 | |
ITEM 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities | 111 | |
A. | American Depositary Shares | 111 |
ITEM 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies | 113 | |
ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | 113 | |
ITEM 15. Controls and Procedures | 113 | |
ITEM 16. Reserved | 114 | |
ITEM 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert | 114 | |
ITEM 16B. Code of Ethics | 114 | |
ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 114 | |
ITEM 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees | 115 | |
ITEM 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers | 115 | |
ITEM 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant | 115 | |
ITEM 16G. Corporate Governance | 115 | |
ITEM 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure | 117 | |
ITEM 17. Financial Statements | 118 | |
ITEM 18. Financial Statements | 118 | |
ITEM 19. Exhibits | 118 | |
Signature | 120 |
The consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB, in reais.
We have translated some of the real amounts contained in this annual report into U.S. dollars. The rate used to translate such amounts in respect of the year ended December 31, 2017 was R$3.308 to US$1.00, which was the commercial rate for the sale of U.S. dollars in effect on December 31, 2017, as reported by the Central Bank. The U.S. dollar equivalent information presented in this annual report is provided solely for the convenience of investors and should not be construed as implying that the real amounts represent, or could have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at the above rate. See “Item 3A. Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rates” for more detailed information regarding the Brazilian foreign exchange system and historical data on the exchange rate of the real against the U.S. dollar.
In this annual report, we use the terms “the Registrant” to refer to Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A., and “Gol,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” to refer to the Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries together, except where the context requires otherwise. The term GLA refers to Gol Linhas Aéreas S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant. The term “VRG” refers to VRG Linhas Aéreas S.A. – the company formed from assets of the former Varig group, which we acquired in April 2007, and which is now called GLA. References to “preferred shares” and “ADSs” refer to non-voting preferred shares of the Registrant and American depositary shares representing those preferred shares, respectively, except where the context requires otherwise.
The phrase “Brazilian government” refers to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil, and the term “Central Bank” refers to the Brazilian Central Bank (Banco Central do Brasil). The term “Brazil” refers to the Federative Republic of Brazil. The terms “U.S. dollar” and “U.S. dollars” and the symbol “US$” refer to the legal currency of the United States. The terms “real” and “reais” and the symbol “R$” refer to the legal currency of Brazil. We make statements in this annual report about our competitive position and market share in, and the market size of, the Brazilian and international airline industries. We have made these statements on the basis of statistics and other information from third party sources, governmental agencies or industry or general publications that we believe are reliable. Although we have no reason to believe any of this information or these reports are inaccurate in any material respect, we have not independently verified the competitive position, market share and market size or market growth data provided by third parties or by industry or general publications. All industry and market data contained in this annual report are from the latest publicly available information.
Certain figures included in this annual report have been rounded. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic sum of the figures that precede them.
This annual report contains terms relating to operating performance in the airline industry that are defined as follows:
“Aircraft utilization” represents the average number of block-hours operated per day per aircraft for the total aircraft fleet.
“Available seat kilometers” or “ASK” represents the aircraft seating capacity multiplied by the number of kilometers flown.
“Average stage length” represents the average number of kilometers flown per flight.
“Block-hours” refers to the elapsed time between an aircraft’s leaving an airport gate and arriving at an airport gate.
“Breakeven load factor” is the passenger load factor that will result in passenger revenues equaling operating expenses.
“Load factor” represents the percentage of aircraft seating capacity that is actually utilized (calculated by dividing revenue passenger kilometers by available seat kilometers).
1
“Low-cost carrier” refers to airlines with a business model focused on a single fleet type, low cost distribution channels and a highly efficient flight network.
“Operating expense per available seat kilometer” or “CASK” represents operating expenses divided by available seat kilometers, which is the generally accepted industry metric to measure operational cost-efficiency.
“Operating expense excluding fuel expense per available seat kilometer” or “CASK ex-fuel” represents operating expenses less fuel expense, divided by available seat kilometers.
“Operating revenue per available seat kilometer” or “RASK” represents operating revenue divided by available seat kilometers.
“Passenger revenue per available seat kilometer” or “PRASK” represents passenger revenue divided by available seat kilometers.
“Revenue passengers” represents the total number of paying passengers flown on all flight segments.
“Revenue passenger kilometers” or “RPK” represents the number of kilometers flown by revenue passengers.
“Yield per passenger kilometer” or “yield” represents the average amount one passenger pays to fly one kilometer.
This annual report includes forward-looking statements, principally under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Business Overview.” We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current beliefs, expectations and projections about future events and financial trends affecting us. Many important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this annual report, could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among others:
· general economic, political and business conditions in Brazil, South America and the Caribbean;
· the effects of global financial markets and economic crises;
· management’s expectations and estimates concerning our financial performance and financing plans and programs;
· our level of fixed obligations;
· our capital expenditure plans;
· our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms;
· our ability to service our debt;
· inflation and fluctuations in the exchange rate of the real;
· changes to existing and future governmental regulations, including air traffic capacity controls;
· fluctuations in crude oil prices and its effect on fuel costs;
· increases in fuel costs, maintenance costs and insurance premiums;
· changes in market prices, customer demand and preferences, and competitive conditions;
· cyclical and seasonal fluctuations in our operating results;
· defects or mechanical problems with our aircraft;
· our ability to successfully implement our strategy;
2
· developments in the Brazilian civil aviation infrastructure, including air traffic control, airspace and airport infrastructure; and
· future terrorism incidents, cyber-security threats or related activities affecting the airline industry.
The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “aim,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities and the effects of regulation and of competition. Forward-looking statements are valid only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly or to revise any forward-looking statements after we distribute this annual report because of new information, events or other factors. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this annual report might not occur and are not guarantees of future performance.
PART I
ITEM 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
3
ITEM 3. Key Information
We present in this section the following summary financial data:
· Summary financial information derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included herein as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; and
· Summary financial information derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included herein as of December 31, 2015 and as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
The following tables present summary consolidated financial and operating data for us for each of the periods indicated:
Summary Financial Information
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2017(1) |
Statements of Operations |
(in thousands of R$, except per share/ADS information) |
(in thousands of US$) | ||||
Operating revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger |
8,122,161 |
9,045,831 |
8,583,388 |
8,671,442 |
9,185,805 |
2,776,846 |
Cargo and other |
834,051 |
1,020,383 |
1,194,619 |
1,195,893 |
1,390,217 |
420,259 |
Total operating revenue |
8,956,212 |
10,066,214 |
9,778,007 |
9,867,335 |
10,576,022 |
3,197,105 |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
(1,333,462) |
(1,374,096) |
(1,580,531) |
(1,656,785) |
(1,708,111) |
(516,358) |
Aircraft fuel |
(3,610,822) |
(3,842,276) |
(3,301,368) |
(2,695,390) |
(2,887,737) |
(872,956) |
Aircraft rent |
(699,193) |
(844,571) |
(1,100,086) |
(996,945) |
(939,744) |
(284,082) |
Landing fees |
(566,541) |
(613,153) |
(681,378) |
(687,366) |
(664,170) |
(200,777) |
Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing |
(354,730) |
(431,974) |
(678,075) |
(753,497) |
(874,736) |
(264,430) |
Passenger service expenses |
(330,776) |
(414,518) |
(481,765) |
(461,837) |
(437,045) |
(132,118) |
Sales and marketing |
(516,059) |
(667,372) |
(617,403) |
(555,984) |
(590,814) |
(178,601) |
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
(460,805) |
(511,045) |
(603,925) |
(593,090) |
(368,719) |
(111,463) |
Depreciation and amortization |
(560,966) |
(463,296) |
(419,691) |
(447,668) |
(505,425) |
(152,789) |
Other operating expenses |
(256,869) |
(396,481) |
(493,621) |
(320,948) |
(610,310) |
(184,495) |
Total operating expenses |
(8,690,223) |
(9,558,782) |
(9,957,843) |
(9,169,510) |
(9,586,811) |
(2,898,069) |
Equity results |
- |
(2,490) |
(3,941) |
(1,280) |
544 |
164 |
Income (loss) before financial expense, net and income taxes |
265,989 |
504,942 |
(183,777) |
696,545 |
989,755 |
299,200 |
Financial income (expense), net |
(919,216) |
(1,457,622) |
(3,263,323) |
664,877 |
(918,759) |
(277,739) |
Profit (loss) before income taxes |
(653,227) |
(952,680) |
(3,447,100) |
1,361,422 |
70,996 |
21,462 |
Income taxes |
(71,363) |
(164,601) |
(844,140) |
(259,058) |
307,213 |
92,870 |
Net income (loss) |
(724,590) |
(1,117,281) |
(4,291,240) |
1,102,364 |
378,209 |
114,332 |
Attributable to non-controlling interests |
71,957 |
128,888 |
169,643 |
252,745 |
359,025 |
108,532 |
Attributable to equity holders of Gol |
(796,547) |
(1,246,169) |
(4,460,883) |
849,619 |
19,184 |
5,799 |
4
|
As of December 31, | |||||
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2017(1) |
Balance Sheet Data: |
(in thousands of R$) |
(in thousands of US$) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,635,647 |
1,898,773 |
1,072,332 |
562,207 |
1,026,862 |
310,418 |
Restricted cash |
254,456 |
331,550 |
735,404 |
168,769 |
268,047 |
81,030 |
Short-term investments |
1,155,617 |
296,824 |
491,720 |
431,233 |
955,589 |
288,872 |
Trade receivables |
324,821 |
352,284 |
462,620 |
760,237 |
936,478 |
283,095 |
Sub-total |
3,370,541 |
2,879,431 |
2,762,077 |
1,922,446 |
3,186,976 |
963,415 |
Deposits |
847,708 |
793,508 |
1,020,074 |
1,188,992 |
1,163,759 |
351,801 |
Total assets |
10,638,448 |
9,976,647 |
10,368,397 |
8,404,355 |
10,004,748 |
3,024,410 |
Short-term debt |
440,834 |
1,110,734 |
1,396,623 |
835,290 |
1,162,872 |
351,533 |
Long-term debt |
5,148,551 |
5,124,505 |
7,908,303 |
5,543,930 |
5,942,795 |
1,796,492 |
Total equity |
1,218,500 |
(332,974) |
(4,322,440) |
(3,356,751) |
(3,068,946) |
(927,735) |
Capital stock |
2,501,574 |
2,618,748 |
3,080,110 |
3,080,110 |
3,082,802 |
931,923 |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2017(1) |
Earnings per Share and Other Information: |
(in R$) |
(in US$) | ||||
Basic income (loss) per preferred share(2) |
(2.88) |
(4.48) |
(14.76) |
2.46 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
Basic income (loss) per common share(2) |
(0.08) |
(0.13) |
(0.42) |
0.07 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Basic income (loss) per share(3) |
(2.88) |
(4.48) |
(14.76) |
2.45 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
Basic income (loss) per ADS (2)(4) |
(5.76) |
(8.96) |
(29.53) |
4.91 |
0.11 |
0.03 |
Diluted income (loss) per preferred share(2) |
(2.88) |
(4.48) |
(14.76) |
2.45 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
Diluted income (loss) per common share(2) |
(0.08) |
(0.13) |
(0.42) |
0.07 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Diluted income (loss) per share(3) |
(2.88) |
(4.48) |
(14.76) |
2.45 |
0.05 |
0.02 |
Diluted income (loss) per ADS(2)(4) |
(5.76) |
(8.96) |
(29.53) |
4.90 |
0.11 |
0.03 |
Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to basic income (loss) per preferred share (in thousands) |
132,780 |
134,151 |
158,285 |
202,261 |
204,664 |
204,664 |
Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to basic income (loss) per common share (in thousands) |
5,035,037 |
5,035,037 |
5,035,037 |
5,035,037 |
4,981,350 |
4,981,350 |
Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to basic income (loss) per share (in thousands)(3) |
276,638 |
278,009 |
302,143 |
346,119 |
346,988 |
346,988 |
Weighted average number of outstanding ADSs in relation to basic income (loss) per share (in thousands)(3)(4) |
138,319 |
139,005 |
151,072 |
173,060 |
173,494 |
173,494 |
Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to diluted income (loss) per preferred share (in thousands) |
132,780 |
134,151 |
158,285 |
202,608 |
207,278 |
207,278 |
Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to diluted income (loss) per common share (in thousands) |
5,035,037 |
5,035,037 |
5,035,037 |
5,035,037 |
4,981,350 |
4,981,350 |
Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to diluted income (loss) per share (in thousands)(3) |
276,638 |
278,009 |
302,143 |
346,465 |
349,602 |
349,602 |
Weighted average number of outstanding ADSs in relation to diluted income (loss) per share (in thousands)(3)(4) |
138,319 |
139,005 |
151,072 |
173,233 |
174,801 |
174,801 |
Dividends declared per preferred share (net of withheld income taxes) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5
|
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2017(1) | |
Other Financial Data: |
(in thousands of R$ except percentages) |
(in thousands of US$) | |||||
EBITDA(5) |
826,955 |
968,238 |
235,914 |
1,144,213 |
1,495,180 |
451,989 | |
EBITDA margin(6) |
9.2% |
9.6% |
2.4% |
11.6% |
14.1% |
14.1% | |
Operating margin(7) |
3.0% |
5.0% |
(1.9)% |
7.1% |
9.4% |
9.4% | |
Total liquidity(8) |
3,370,541 |
2,879,431 |
2,762,077 |
1,922,446 |
3,186,976 |
963,415 |
|
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities |
403,881 |
1,129,192 |
(599,467) |
(21,067) |
672,753 |
203,372 | |
Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities |
(318,936) |
(431,610) |
(1,259,157) |
592,089 |
(559,805) |
(169,228) | |
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities |
807,162 |
(309,584) |
750,190 |
(1,062,783) |
359,673 |
108,728 |
Summary Operational Data
|
Year Ended December 31 | ||||
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating aircraft at period end |
141 |
139 |
142 |
121 |
119 |
Total aircraft at period end |
150 |
144 |
144 |
130 |
119 |
Revenue passengers carried (in thousands)(9) |
36,306 |
39,749 |
38,868 |
32,623 |
32,380 |
Revenue passenger kilometers (RPKs) (in millions)(9) |
34,684 |
38,085 |
38,410 |
35,928 |
37,230 |
Available seat kilometers (ASKs) (in millions) (9) |
49,633 |
49,503 |
49,744 |
46,329 |
46,694 |
Load-factor(9) |
69.9% |
76.9% |
77.2% |
77.5% |
79.7% |
Break-even load-factor |
67.8% |
73.1% |
78.1% |
72.1% |
72.3% |
Aircraft utilization (block hours per day) |
11.2 |
11.5 |
11.3 |
11.2 |
12.1 |
Average fare (R$) |
224 |
228 |
221 |
265 |
284 |
Passenger revenue yield per RPK (R$ cents) |
23.4 |
23.8 |
22.4 |
24.1 |
24.7 |
Passenger revenue per ASK (R$ cents) |
16.4 |
18.3 |
17.3 |
18.7 |
19.7 |
Operating revenue per ASK (R$ cents) |
18.0 |
20.3 |
19.7 |
21.3 |
22.7 |
Operating expense per ASK (R$ cents) |
17.5 |
19.3 |
20.0 |
19.8 |
20.5 |
Operating expense less fuel expense per ASK (R$ cents) |
10.2 |
11.6 |
13.4 |
14.0 |
14.4 |
Departures |
316,466 |
317,594 |
315,902 |
261,514 |
250,654 |
Departures per day |
867 |
870 |
866 |
717 |
687 |
Destinations served |
65 |
71 |
68 |
63 |
64 |
Average stage length (kilometers) |
897 |
912 |
933 |
1,043 |
1,094 |
Active full-time equivalent employees at period end |
16,319 |
16,875 |
16.472 |
15,261 |
14,532 |
Fuel liters consumed (in millions) |
1,512 |
1,538 |
1,551 |
1,392 |
1,379 |
Average fuel expense per liter |
2.39 |
2.50 |
2.13 |
1.94 |
2.09 |
____________
(1) Translated for convenience using the U.S. dollar selling rate as reported by the Central Bank of R$3.308 to US$1.00 as of December 31, 2017.
(2) Adjusted to reflect the one to 35 stock split of our common shares on March 23, 2015 and that since that date our preferred shares are entitled to receive dividends per share in an amount 35 times the amount of dividends per share paid to holders of our common shares in order to account for the split of our common shares. Our preferred shares are not entitled to any fixed dividend preferences. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—C. Markets—Corporate Governance Practices” for further details.
(3) Common shares divided by 35 to calculate weighted average number of shares, to reflect the ratio of 35 common shares for each preferred share. This is not a measure of financial performance recognized under Brazilian GAAP or IFRS, nor should it be considered an alternative to numbers calculated per preferred share and per common share. We believe that calculations per share provide useful information as they equalize the common share economic rights and number of shares to those of our preferred shares.
(4) Adjusted to reflect the November 2017 ratio change of one ADS to two preferred shares. See “Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities—A. American Depositary Shares.”
(5) We calculate EBITDA as net income (loss) plus financial income (expense), net, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance recognized under Brazilian GAAP or IFRS, nor should it be considered an alternative to net income (loss) as a measure of operating performance, or an alternative to operating cash flows, or as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA is not calculated using a standard methodology and may not be comparable to the definition of EBITDA or similarly titled measures used by other companies. As financial income (expense), net, income taxes and depreciation and amortization are not considered in the calculation of EBITDA, we believe that our EBITDA provides an indication of our general economic performance, without giving effect to interest rate or exchange rate fluctuations, changes in income and social contribution tax rates or depreciation and amortization.
(6) EBITDA divided by net revenue.
(7) Operating margin represents operating income (loss) before financial results and income taxes divided by operating revenue.
(8) Total liquidity is the sum of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments and trade receivables.
(9) Source: National Civil Aviation Agency (Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil), or ANAC.
6
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and EBITDAR |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2017(1) |
|
(in thousands of R$ except as otherwise indicated) |
(in thousands of US$) | ||||
Net income (loss) |
(724,590) |
(1,117,281) |
(4,291,240) |
1,102,364 |
378,209 |
114,332 |
(+) Income taxes |
71,363 |
164,601 |
844,140 |
259,058 |
(307,213) |
(92,870) |
(+) Financial income (expense), net |
919,216 |
1,457,622 |
3,263,323 |
(664,877) |
918,759 |
277,739 |
(+) Depreciation and amortization |
560,966 |
463,296 |
419,691 |
447,668 |
505,425 |
152,789 |
EBITDA(2) |
826,955 |
968,238 |
235,914 |
1,144,213 |
1,495,180 |
451,989 |
(+) Aircraft rent |
699,193 |
844,571 |
1,100,086 |
996,945 |
939,744 |
284,082 |
EBITDAR(2) |
1,526,148 |
1,812,809 |
1,336,000 |
2,141,158 |
2,434,924 |
736,071 |
EBITDA/Aircraft Rent |
1.2x |
1.1x |
0.2x |
1.1x |
1.6x |
1.6x |
_________
(1) Translated for convenience using the U.S. dollar selling rate as reported by the Central Bank of R$3.308 to US$1.00 as of December 31, 2017.
(2) We calculate EBITDA as net income (loss) plus financial income (expense), net, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. EBITDAR is calculated as net income (loss) plus financial income (expense), net, income taxes, depreciation and amortization and aircraft rent expenses. EBITDA and EBITDAR are not measures of financial performance recognized under Brazilian GAAP or IFRS, nor should they be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) as measures of operating performance, or as alternatives to operating cash flows or as measures of liquidity. EBITDA and EBITDAR are not calculated using a standard methodology and may not be comparable to the definition of EBITDA or EBITDAR or similarly titled measures used by other companies. As financial income (expense), net, income taxes and depreciation and amortization are not considered in the calculation of EBITDA and EBITDAR, we believe that our EBITDA and EBITDAR provide an indication of our general economic performance, without giving effect to interest rate or exchange rate fluctuations, changes in income and social contribution tax rates or depreciation and amortization.
Exchange Rates
Brazil’s foreign exchange system allows the purchase and sale of foreign currency and the international transfer of reais by any person or legal entity, regardless of amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures.
During the last decade, the Brazilian currency has experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies.
The Central Bank has intervened occasionally to mitigate volatility in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to allow the real to float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through a currency band system or otherwise.
The following tables present the U.S. dollar selling rate, expressed in reais (R$/US$), for the periods indicated:
|
Period-End |
Average(1) |
Low |
High |
|
(R$ per US$) | |||
Year |
|
|
|
|
2013 |
2.343 |
2.161 |
1.953 |
2.446 |
2014 |
2.656 |
2.353 |
2.197 |
2.740 |
2015 |
3.905 |
3.339 |
2.575 |
4.195 |
2016 |
3.259 |
3.483 |
3.119 |
4.156 |
2017 |
3.308 |
3.193 |
3.051 |
3.381 |
2018 (through April 25, 2018) |
3.504 |
3.278 |
3.139 |
3.504 |
7
|
Month-End |
Average(1) |
Low |
High |
|
(R$ per US$) | |||
Month |
|
|
|
|
October 2017 |
3.276 |
3.191 |
3.131 |
3.280 |
November 2017 |
3.262 |
3.259 |
3.214 |
3.292 |
December 2017 |
3.308 |
3.291 |
3.232 |
3.333 |
January 2018 |
3.162 |
3.211 |
3.139 |
3.270 |
February 2018 |
3.245 |
3.242 |
3.173 |
3.282 |
March 2018 |
3.324 |
3.279 |
3.225 |
3.338 |
April 2018 (through April 25, 2018) |
3.504 |
3.395 |
3.310 |
3.504 |
____________
Source: Central Bank
(1) Represents the average of the exchange rates during the period.
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Investment in the ADSs or our preferred shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the other information in this annual report, before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of the ADSs could decline due to any of these risks or other factors, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to Brazil
The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy, and such involvement, along with general political and economic conditions, could adversely affect us and the trading price of our ADSs, our preferred shares and our debt instruments.
The Brazilian government has frequently intervened in the Brazilian economy and has occasionally made drastic changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and affect other policies and regulations have involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax and social security policies, price controls, currency exchange and remittance controls, devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of the preferred shares and the ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in policy or regulations at the federal, state or municipal level involving or affecting factors such as:
· interest rates;
· currency fluctuations;
· monetary policies;
· inflation;
· liquidity of capital and lending markets;
· tax and social security policies;
· labor regulations;
· energy and water shortages and rationing; and
· other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.
8
Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian government will implement changes in policy or regulation affecting these or other factors may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies.
After two years of economic contraction, Brazil’s gross domestic product, or GDP, grew by 1.0% in 2017, as compared to (3.5)% in 2016, (3.5)% in 2015, 0.5% in 2014 and 3.0% in 2013.
Our results of operations and financial condition have been, and will continue to be, affected by the weakness of the Brazilian GDP. Developments in the Brazilian economy may affect Brazil’s growth rates and, consequently, the use of our products and services.
Political instability may adversely affect our business and results of operations and the price of our preferred shares and our debt instruments.
Brazilian markets have been experiencing heightened volatility due to uncertainties derived from the ongoing Lava Jato investigation, which is being conducted by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office, and its impact on the Brazilian economy and political environment. Numerous members of the Brazilian government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of large state-owned and private companies have been convicted of political corruption of officials accepting bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies. Profits from these kickbacks financed the political campaigns of political parties that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, and served to further the personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery scheme. As a result, a number of senior politicians, including congressmen and officers of the major state-owned and private companies in Brazil, resigned or have been arrested.
The ultimate outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of the Brazilian economy. The development of those unethical conduct cases has and may continue to adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our preferred shares and ADSs.
In addition, the Brazilian economy continues to be subject to the effects of the impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff on August 31, 2016. Vice President Michel Temer was sworn in as the new President of Brazil until the next presidential election in October 2018, but political uncertainty has remained. We cannot predict the effects of these recent developments and the current ongoing political uncertainties on the Brazilian economy.
Developments and the perception of risk in other countries may adversely affect the market price of Brazilian securities, including our ADSs, our preferred shares and our debt instruments.
The market value of securities of Brazilian issuers is affected by economic and market conditions in other countries. Although economic conditions in those countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investors’ reactions to developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Crises in the United States, the European Union or emerging market countries may diminish investor interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours. This could adversely affect the trading price of our securities, and could also make it more difficult for us to gain access to the capital markets and finance our operations on acceptable terms, or at all.
Recently, the Brazilian market experienced heightened volatility due to, among other factors, uncertainty regarding U.S. monetary policy and Great Britain’s exit from the European Union, increased aversion to risk in emerging countries, and uncertainties regarding macroeconomic and political conditions.
Government efforts to combat inflation may hinder the growth of the Brazilian economy and could harm us.
Historically, Brazil has experienced high inflation rates. Inflation and certain actions taken by the Central Bank to curb it have had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy. After the implementation of the Plano Real in 1994, the annual rate of inflation in Brazil decreased significantly, as measured by the National Broad Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo), or IPCA. Inflation measured by the IPCA index was 10.7%, 6.3% and 3.0% in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
9
The base interest rate for the Brazilian banking system is the Central Bank’s Special System for Settlement and Custody (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia) rate, or SELIC rate. On December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, the SELIC rate was 14.25%, 13.65% and 7.00% respectively.
Inflation and the Brazilian government’s measures to fight it, principally the Central Bank’s monetary policy, have had and may have significant effects on the Brazilian economy and us. Tight monetary policies with high interest rates have restricted and may restrict Brazil’s growth and the availability of credit. Conversely, more lenient government and Central Bank policies and interest rate decreases have triggered and may trigger increases in inflation, and, consequently, growth volatility and the need for sudden and significant interest rate increases, which could negatively affect us and increase the payments on our indebtedness. In addition, we may not be able to adjust the fares we charge our customers to offset the effects of inflation on our cost structure.
Any further downgrading of Brazil’s credit rating could adversely affect the trading price of our preferred shares, ADSs and notes.
Credit ratings affect investors’ perceptions of risk and, as a result, the yields required on debt issuances in the financial markets. Rating agencies regularly evaluate Brazil and its sovereign ratings, taking into account a number of factors including macroeconomic trends, fiscal and budgetary conditions, indebtedness and the prospect of change in these factors.
Standard & Poor’s downgraded Brazil’s credit rating in February 2016, from BB-plus to BB with a negative outlook, citing a worsening credit situation. In January 2018, Standard & Poor’s lowered its rating to BB-minus with a stable outlook in light of doubts regarding this year’s presidential election and pension reform efforts. In February 2016, Moody’s downgraded Brazil’s ratings to below investment grade, to Ba2 with a negative outlook, citing the prospect for further deterioration in Brazil’s debt service in a negative or low growth environment, in addition to challenging political dynamics. Fitch downgraded Brazil’s credit rating in May 2016 to BB with a negative outlook, which it maintained in 2017 and downgraded to BB- in February 2018. As a result of these credit rating downgrades, the trading prices of debt and equity securities of Brazilian issuers were negatively affected. Continuation of current Brazilian fiscal policies and political and economic uncertainty could lead to further ratings downgrades, which could heighten investors’ perception of risk and, as a result, increase the cost of debt issuances and adversely affect the trading price of our securities.
Risks Relating to Us and the Brazilian Airline Industry
Exchange rate instability may materially and adversely affect us and the market price of the ADSs, our preferred shares and our debt instruments.
The Brazilian currency has, during the last decades, experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies. In 2015, the real depreciated 47.0% against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$3.905 per US$1.00 by the end of 2015. In 2016, the real appreciated against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$3.259 per US$1.00 by the end of 2016. As of December 31, 2017, the exchange rate was R$3.308 per US$1.00. There can be no assurance that the real will not depreciate further against the U.S. dollar.
Nearly 85% of our passenger revenue and other revenue are denominated in reais and a significant part of our operating expenses, such as fuel, aircraft and engine maintenance services, aircraft rent and aircraft insurance, are denominated in, or linked to, U.S. dollars. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 43.8% of our operating expenses were either denominated in or linked to the U.S. dollar. The majority of our operating assets are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a consequence, at December 31, 2017, R$6,069.3 million (or 85.4%) of our indebtedness was denominated in U.S. dollars and we had a total of R$5,304.7 million in non-cancelable U.S. dollar-denominated future operating lease payments.
We are also required to maintain U.S. dollar-denominated deposits and maintenance reserve deposits under the terms of some of our aircraft operating leases. We may incur substantial additional amounts of U.S. dollar-denominated operating leases or financial obligations and U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and be subject to fuel cost increases linked to the U.S. dollar. While in the past we have generally adjusted our fares in response to, and to alleviate the effect of, depreciation of the real and increases in the price of jet fuel (which is priced in U.S. dollars) and have entered into hedging arrangements to protect us against the short-term effects of such developments, there can be no assurance we will be able to continue to do so.
10
Depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar creates inflationary pressures in Brazil and causes increases in interest rates, which negatively affects the growth of the Brazilian economy as a whole, curtails access to foreign financial markets and may prompt government intervention, including recessionary governmental policies. Depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar has also, as in the context of an economic slowdown, led to decreased consumer spending, deflationary pressures and reduced growth of the economy as a whole. On the other hand, appreciation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies could lead to a deterioration of the Brazilian foreign exchange current accounts, as well as dampen export-driven growth. Depending on the circumstances, either depreciation or appreciation of the real could materially and adversely affect us.
Depreciation of the real also reduces the U.S. dollar value of distributions and dividends on the ADSs and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market price of our preferred shares and, as a result, the ADSs.
We may not be able to maintain adequate liquidity and our cash flows from operations and financings may not be sufficient to meet our current obligations.
Our liquidity, cash flows from operations and financings have been and may be negatively affected by the exchange rate environment, fuel prices and economic conditions in Brazil on the demand for air travel. Recent cost cutting measures, such as capacity reduction and the liquidity improving measures we adopted may not be sufficient to offset these effects. As of December 31, 2017, our total short and long term debt was R$7,105.7 million.
Certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that require the maintenance of specified financial ratios. Our ability to meet these financial ratios and other restrictive covenants may be affected by events beyond our control and we cannot assure that we will meet those ratios. Failure to comply with any of these covenants could result in an event of default under these agreements and others, as a result of cross default provisions. If we were unable to comply with our debt covenants, we would be forced to seek waivers. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in meeting our covenants, and if we are unable to meet our covenants, in obtaining or renewing any waivers.
The airline industry is particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions and continued negative economic conditions would likely continue to adversely affect us and our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms.
Our operations and the airline industry in general are particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. Unfavorable economic conditions in Brazil, a constrained credit market and increased business operating costs have reduced spending on both leisure and business travel as well as cargo transportation. The slowdown in Brazilian economy and political instability has adversely affected industries with significant spending in travel, including government, oil and gas, mining and construction. In addition, reduced spending on business travel also affects the quality of demand, reducing the number of higher yield tickets we can sell, which, for example, negatively affected our results of operations in 2015 and 2016. Unfavorable economic conditions can also affect our ability to raise fares to counteract increased fuel, labor and other costs. Any of these factors may negatively affect us.
Unfavorable economic conditions, a significant decline in demand for air travel or continued instability of the credit and capital markets could also result in pressure on our debt costs, operating results and financial condition and would affect our growth and investment plans. These factors could also negatively affect our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and liquidity generally.
Substantial fluctuations in fuel costs would harm us.
Historically, international and local fuel prices have been subject to wide price fluctuations based on geopolitical issues and supply and demand. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil, a benchmark widely used for crude oil prices that is measured in barrels and quoted in U.S. dollars, affects our fuel costs and constitutes a significant portion of our total operating expenses. In 2014, the average price per barrel of West Texas Intermediate crude oil was US$93.04 and fuel costs represented 40% of our operating expenses. Average prices decreased in 2015 to US$48.80 and in 2016 to US$43.31 and increased in 2017 to US$50.85. Fuel costs represented 33%, 29% and 30% of our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
11
Although we enter into hedging arrangements to reduce our exposure to fuel price fluctuations and have historically passed on the majority of fuel price increases by adjusting our fare structure, the price and availability of fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. Our hedging activities and fares adjustments may not be sufficient to protect us fully from fuel price increases.
Substantially all of our fuel is supplied by one source, Petrobras Distribuidora S.A., or Petrobras Distribuidora. If Petrobras Distribuidora is unable or unwilling to continue to supply fuel at the times and in the quantities that we require we may not be able to find a suitable replacement or to purchase fuel at the same cost, in which case we would be adversely affected. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Airline Business—Fuel.”
Changes to the Brazilian civil aviation regulatory framework, including rules regarding slot distribution, fare restrictions and fees associated with civil aviation, may adversely affect us.
Brazilian aviation authorities monitor and influence the developments in Brazil’s airline market. For example, airport services are regulated by ANAC and in many cases still managed by the Brazilian Airport Infrastructure Company (Empresa Brasileira de Infraestrutura Aeroportuária), or INFRAERO, a government-owned corporation. ANAC addressed overcapacity in the system in 2014 by establishing strict criteria that must be met before new routes or additional flight frequencies are awarded. ANAC policies as well as those of other aviation supervisory authorities have in the past negatively affected our operations and these effects may reoccur. In July 2014, ANAC published new rules governing the allocation of slots in coordinated/slotted airports, including Congonhas and Guarulhos, which are the two main airports for the city of São Paulo. In 2016, additional airports became subject to these rules, including Brasília in Distrito Federal and Galeão and Santos Dumont in Rio de Janeiro. ANAC considers operating history and efficiency (on-time performance and regularity) as the main criteria for the allocation of slots. Under these rules on-time performance and regularity are assessed twice per year, following the IATA summer and winter calendars, between April and September and between October and March. Minimum on-time performance and regularity targets for each series of slots in a season are 80% and 90%, respectively, at Congonhas airport (São Paulo) and 75% and 80%, respectively, for all other main airports. Airlines forfeit slots used below the minimum criteria in a season. Forfeited slots are redistributed first to new entrants, which includes airlines that operate fewer than five slots in the affected airport in the given weekday, and subsequently to all airlines operating in that airport based on their share of slots. We cannot foresee these and other changes to the Brazilian civil aviation regulatory framework, which could increase our costs and change the competitive dynamics of our industry and could adversely affect our operations, including as discussed in “—We operate in a highly competitive industry.”
Technical and operational problems in the Brazilian civil aviation infrastructure, including air traffic control systems, airspace and airport infrastructure may have a material adverse effect on us.
We are dependent on improvements in the coordination and development of Brazilian airspace control and airport infrastructure, which, mainly due to the large growth in civil aviation in Brazil in recent years, require substantial improvements and government investments.
If the measures taken and investments made by the Brazilian government and regulatory authorities do not prove sufficient or effective, air traffic control, airspace management and sector coordination-related difficulties might reoccur or worsen, which might have a material adverse effect on us.
Slots at Congonhas airport in São Paulo, the most important airport for our operations and busiest one in Brazil, are fully utilized on weekdays. The Santos-Dumont airport in Rio de Janeiro, a highly utilized airport with half-hourly shuttle flights between São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro also has certain slot restrictions. Several other Brazilian airports, for example, the Brasília, Campinas, Salvador, Confins and São Paulo (Guarulhos) international airports, have limited the number of slots per day due to infrastructural limitations at these airports. Any condition that would prevent or delay our access to airports or routes that are vital to our strategy or our inability to maintain our existing slots, and obtain additional slots, could materially adversely affect our operations. In addition, we cannot assure that any investments will be made by the Brazilian government in the Brazilian aviation infrastructure (by expanding additional or developing new airports) to permit our growth.
12
We have significant recurring aircraft rent expenses, and we will incur significantly more fixed costs that could hinder our ability to meet our strategic goals.
We have significant costs, relating primarily to leases for our aircraft and engines. As of December 31, 2017, we had commitments of R$45,090.4 million (US$13,630.7 million) to purchase additional 120 Boeing aircraft through 2028, based on aircraft list prices, although the actual price payable by us for the aircraft should be lower due to supplier discounts. We expect that we will incur additional fixed obligations and debt as we take delivery of the new aircraft and other equipment to implement our strategy.
These significant fixed payment obligations:
· could limit our ability to obtain additional financing to support expansion plans and for working capital and other purposes;
· divert substantial cash flows from our operations to service our fixed obligations under aircraft operating leases and aircraft purchase commitments;
· if interest rates increase, require us to incur significantly more lease or interest expense than we currently do; and
· could limit our ability to react to changes in our business, the airline industry and general economic conditions.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on our fixed obligations will depend on our operating performance and cash flow, which will in turn depend on prevailing economic and political conditions and financial, competitive, regulatory, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, our ability to raise our fares to compensate for an increase in our fixed costs may be limited by competition and regulatory factors.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
We face intense competition on all routes we operate from existing scheduled airlines, charter airlines and potential new entrants in our market. Competition from other airlines has a relatively greater impact on us when compared to our competitors because we have a greater proportion of flights connecting Brazil’s busiest airports, where competition is more intense. In contrast, some of our competitors have a greater percentage of flights connecting less busy airports, where there is no or only reduced competition.
The Brazilian airline industry also faces competition from ground transportation alternatives, such as interstate buses. In addition, the Brazilian government and regulators could give preference to new entrants and existing competitors when granting new and current slots in Brazilian airports, to promote competition.
Existing and potential new competitors have in the past and may again undercut our fares or increase capacity on their routes in an effort to increase their market share of business traffic (high value-added customers). In any such event, we cannot assure you that our level of fares or passenger traffic would not be adversely affected.
Further consolidation in the Brazilian and global airline industry framework may adversely affect us.
As a result of the competitive environment there may be further consolidation in the Brazilian and global airline industry, whether by means of acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships or strategic alliances. We cannot predict the effects of further consolidation on the industry. We may not be able to successfully integrate the business and operations of companies acquired, governmental approvals may be delayed, costs of integration and fleet renovation may be greater than anticipated, synergies may not meet our expectations, our costs may increase and our operational efficiency may be reduced, all of which would negatively affect us.
Under Brazilian law, the foreign ownership limit for Brazilian airlines is 20%, but there have been repeated discussions by the Brazilian government and Congress to lift this restriction fully or partially, including most recently an announcement that the government intends to issue a new measure, subject to Congress approval, completely removing the foreign ownership limit. We cannot foresee if and how these restrictions may be changed and how any such change would affect us and the competitive environment in Brazil.
13
Consolidation in the airline industry and changes in international alliances will continue to affect the competitive landscape in the industry and may result in the formation of airlines and alliances with greater financial resources, more extensive global networks and lower cost structures than we can obtain.
We rely on one manufacturer for our aircraft and engines.
One of the key elements of our business strategy and a key element of the low-cost carrier business model is to reduce costs by operating a standardized aircraft fleet. After extensive research and analysis, we chose the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft and CFM 56-7B engines from CFM International. We expect to continue to rely on Boeing and CFM International for the foreseeable future and have made a purchase order for 120 Boeing 737 Max-7/8 aircraft (the newest generation of our current aircraft and still under development), to be delivered starting in 2018. If either Boeing or CFM International were unable to perform its contractual obligations, our operations would be materially affected.
We derive benefits from a fleet comprised of a single type of aircraft while still having the flexibility to match the capacity and range of the aircraft to the demands of each route. If we had to lease or purchase aircraft of another manufacturer, we could lose these benefits. We cannot assure you that any such replacement aircraft would have the same operating advantages as the Boeing aircraft or that we could lease or purchase engines that would be as reliable and efficient as the CFM engines. Our operations could also be disrupted by the failure or inability of Boeing or CFM International to provide sufficient parts or related support services on a timely basis.
In 2012, Boeing and CFM released new aircraft and engines, the Boeing 737 Max-7/8 and LEAP-1B, to replace the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation. Any project delays or operational difficulties with this new aircraft and engines could create an adverse perception about our fleet, therefore adversely affecting us.
In addition, when these aircraft and engines are delivered and operational, it could cause the market value of our other aircraft and engines to decrease, which would lower the value of our assets and could result in us recording impairment charges.
We rely on complex systems and technology, and operational or security inadequacy or interruption could materially affect our ability to effectively operate our business.
In the ordinary course of business, our systems and technology will continue to require modification and refinements to address growth and changing business requirements. Modifications and refinements to our systems have been and are expected to continue to be expensive to implement and may divert management’s attention from other matters. In addition, our operations could be adversely affected, or we could face imposition of regulatory penalties, if we were unable to timely or effectively modify its systems as necessary.
We have occasionally experienced system interruptions and delays that make our websites and services unavailable or slow to respond, which could prevent us from efficiently processing customer transactions or providing services. This in turn could reduce our operating revenues and the attractiveness of our services. Our computer and communications systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes, power loss, computer and telecommunications failures, acts of war or terrorism, computer viruses, security breaches, and similar events or disruptions. Any of these events could cause system interruptions, delays, and loss of critical data, and could prevent us from processing customer transactions or providing services, which could make our business and services less attractive and subject us to liability. Any of these events could damage our reputation and be expensive to remedy.
We rely on maintaining a high daily aircraft utilization rate to increase our revenues and reduce our costs.
One of the key elements of our business strategy and an important element of the low-cost carrier business model is to maintain a high daily aircraft utilization rate. High daily aircraft utilization allows us to generate more revenue from our aircraft and dilute our fixed costs, and is achieved in part by operating with quick turnaround times at airports so we can fly more hours on average in a day. Our rate of aircraft utilization could be adversely affected by a number of different factors that are beyond our control, including, among others, air traffic and airport congestion, adverse weather conditions and delays by third-party service providers relating to matters such as fueling and ground handling.
14
Our reputation, operations and financial results could be harmed by events out of our control.
Accidents or incidents involving our aircraft could involve significant claims by injured passengers and others, as well as significant costs related to the repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its temporary or permanent loss from service. We are required by ANAC and lessors of our aircraft under our operating lease agreements to carry liability insurance. Although we believe we currently maintain liability insurance in amounts and of the type generally consistent with industry practice, the amount of such coverage may not be adequate and we may be forced to bear substantial losses in the event of an accident. Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of our related insurance coverage would harm us. Moreover, any accident or incident involving our aircraft, even if fully insured, or an accident or incident involving Boeing 737 Next Generation aircraft or the aircraft of any major airline could cause negative public perceptions about us or the air transport system, which would harm us.
In addition, we can be negatively affected by other factors, such as unpredictable economic conditions, fuel costs or the outbreak of diseases.
Our controlling shareholder has the ability to direct our business and affairs and its interests could conflict with yours.
Our controlling shareholder has the power to, among other things, elect a majority of our directors and determine the outcome of any action requiring shareholder approval, including transactions with related parties, corporate reorganizations, dispositions, and the timing and payment of any future dividends. Our controlling shareholder may continue to direct our business and affairs even after significantly reducing its ownership interest, which is currently equivalent to 61.2% of the economic interests in us. A difference in economic exposure may intensify conflicts of interests between our controlling shareholder and you. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—C. Markets—Corporate Governance Practices.”
Risks Relating to the ADSs and Our Preferred Shares
The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets, and securities issued by airlines in particular, may substantially limit your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time you desire.
Investing in securities that trade in emerging markets, such as Brazil, often involves greater risk than investing in securities of issuers in the United States, and such investments are generally considered to be more speculative in nature. The Brazilian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and can be more volatile than major securities markets in the United States. Accordingly, although you are entitled to withdraw the preferred shares underlying the ADSs from the depositary at any time, your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying the ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so may be substantially limited. There is also significantly greater concentration in the Brazilian securities market than in major securities markets in the United States. The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented 51.3% of the aggregate market capitalization of the B3 S.A. – Bolsa, Brasil, Balcão, or the B3, as of December 31, 2017.
In 2015 and early 2016, our market capitalization decreased and, as a result of the decrease in the trading price of our preferred shares and ADSs, we increased our ratio of preferred shares per ADS to 10:1 in February 2016. In 2017, our market capitalization increased and we reduced that ratio to 5:1 in April 2017 and to 2:1 in November 2017.
The trading prices of shares of companies in the worldwide airline industry are relatively volatile and investors’ perception of the market value of our ADSs and preferred shares may be adversely affected by volatility and decreases in the price of our ADSs and preferred shares.
15
Holders of the ADSs and our preferred shares may not receive any dividends.
According to our by-laws, we must pay our shareholders at least 25.0% of our annual net income as dividends, as determined and adjusted under Brazilian corporation law. The adjusted net income may be capitalized, used to absorb losses or otherwise appropriated as allowed under the Brazilian corporation law and may not be available to be paid as dividends. We may not pay dividends to our shareholders in any particular fiscal year if our board of directors determines that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition. In the past five fiscal years, we did not distribute dividends.
If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw preferred shares, you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.
As an ADS holder, you benefit from the electronic foreign capital registration obtained by the custodian for our preferred shares underlying the ADSs in Brazil, which permits the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the preferred shares into non-Brazilian currency and remit the proceeds abroad. If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw preferred shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s electronic foreign capital registration for only five business days from the date of withdrawal. Thereafter, upon the disposition of or distributions relating to the preferred shares, you will not be able to remit non-Brazilian currency abroad unless you obtain your own electronic foreign capital registration.
If you attempt to obtain your own electronic foreign capital registration, you will incur expenses and may suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to our preferred shares or the return of your capital in a timely manner.
Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our preferred shares.
We may not be able to offer our preferred shares to “U.S. Holders” of ADSs pursuant to preemptive rights granted to holders of our preferred shares in connection with any future issuance of our preferred shares unless a registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, is effective with respect to such preferred shares and preemptive rights, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not obligated to file a registration statement relating to preemptive rights with respect to our preferred shares, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement. If such a registration statement is not filed and an exemption from registration does not exist, the depositary bank will attempt to sell the preemptive rights, and you will be entitled to receive the proceeds of such sale. However, these preemptive rights will expire if the depositary does not sell them, and U.S. Holders of ADSs will not realize any value from the granting of such preemptive rights.
ITEM 4. Information on the Company
A. History and Development of the Company
General
We are Brazil’s leading airline based on our size, low operating costs, network reach, management team and customer experience. We are a low-cost carrier focused on offering low fares with high-quality customer experience to business and leisure passengers. We believe that we operate the only true low-cost carrier business model in Brazil. In 2017, we:
· had the lowest operating costs of any Brazilian airline, with a CASK ex-fuel of R$14.4 cents (US$4.4 cents), and one of the lowest among airlines globally;
· are among the five largest low-cost carriers globally based on annual revenue;
· were the largest Brazilian airline with over 32 million annual passengers transported and a domestic market share of 36%;
· operated the most flights at Brazil’s busiest airports;
· were the most on-time airline in Brazil;
16
· own the airline loyalty program in Brazil with the highest market valuation, Smiles, with 13.7 million members as of December 31, 2017; and
· had one of Brazil’s largest e-commerce platforms and were a leader in digital solutions for clients.
As of December 31, 2017, we operated a single fleet of 119 Boeing 737-NG aircraft to offer approximately 700 daily flights across 64 destinations in Brazil, South America and the Caribbean. In 2017, we generated net operating revenue of R$10.6 billion with an operating margin of 9.4%, the highest in the last 7 years.
Gol was founded in 2000, when entrepreneur Constantino de Oliveira Junior pioneered the low-cost carrier concept in Brazil. We believe that our superior value proposition for customers and our reliable and quality service offering have helped us create a premier brand and led to the rapid increase in our passenger market share. From Gol’s launch in 2001 until today, Gol has been a major driver behind passenger growth in Brazil. Between 2001 and 2017, Brazil’s domestic passenger market grew 2.9 times, from 30.8 million passengers in 2001 to 90.6 million in 2017. Brazil’s international passenger market increased from 3.8 million passengers in 2001 to 8.4 million passengers in 2017, excluding international carriers. At the same time, our passenger market share in the domestic air transportation market increased from 5% in 2001 to 36% in 2017. We refer to this growth of air transportation and passenger market share as the “Gol effect.” We have transported approximately 420 million passengers since we began our operations.
We have a unique business model that permits a flexible and versatile operation, avoiding over and under capacity as the Brazilian market evolves. In addition to our single fleet type, our focus on business traffic in key markets in Brazil, short-term sublease agreements, tailored crew scheduling and a flexible hub-based network have helped us ensure the versatility of our business model and drive our operating margins. To strengthen our global connectivity we began cooperation with international carriers in 2009 and currently have 74 interline agreements and 12 codeshare partnerships. In addition, we have two of the world’s biggest airlines, Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Air France – KLM, as our strategic shareholders, with combined ownership of 10.7% as of December 31, 2017.
We reward loyal customers through Smiles, our loyalty program. Smiles generates over R$1.8 billion in annual revenues, has 13.7 million members and is the most valuable loyalty program in Brazil in terms of market valuation with a market capitalization as of December 31, 2017 of R$9.4 billion. Smiles has over 30 partnerships including with some of Brazil and South America’s largest banks and credit card companies. Smiles plays an important role for Gol, as it brings consistency to our core business by means of the following: (i) miles usage increases load factor with low yield impacts, (ii) the Smiles brand strengthens value perception, (iii) Smiles presents strong potential for ancillary revenue growth through diversified products and services and (iv) Smiles is an important part of our cash generation capacity and liquidity.
We maintained the lowest operating costs (on a CASK basis) of any Brazilian airline in every year since we began operating in 2001. In 2017, our CASK (ex-fuel) was R$14.4 cents (US$4.4 cents), which is the lowest in Brazil and one of the lowest globally. We believe we are well-positioned to maintain our relatively low unit operating costs by operating a single fleet type of Boeing 737-700/800, which allows us to maximize aircraft utilization and dilute our fixed costs. We have been constantly renewing our fleet and expect the first delivery of six Boeing 737 Max aircraft in 2018, five of which are from our total order book of 120. These aircraft will deliver lower operating costs compared to prior generation aircraft.
In addition to low unit costs, Gol has established the premier airline brand in Brazil, most recently recognized by the “Top of Mind 2017” award and “Brands of Trust Award 2017” by the Datafolha institute, attracting business and leisure customers with low fares and garnering business customers by delivering a high-quality experience. We are the first airline in Brazil to provide wireless internet, or Wi-Fi, and other on-board entertainment, including live television, in the same platform. We provide a comfortable flight experience with the most seats with the largest legroom available. Lastly, we are the market leader in punctuality. In 2017, we had a punctuality rate of 94.6%, which is higher than that of our Brazilian competitors, according to INFRAERO, the entity in charge of managing and controlling airports in Brazil.
We are the leader in domestic air transportation of business and leisure passengers in Brazil. According to the Brazilian Association of Corporate Travel (Associação Brasileira de Agências de Viagens Corporativas), we had a 30.8% share of business travelers within Brazil in 2017 and have been the market leader since 2014. Business passengers are particularly attractive as they are less price sensitive, purchase tickets closer to the flight date at higher fares and often purchase other ancillary products that we offer. Our low-cost carrier business model permits effective segmentation, allowing us to attract a high share of the demand-inelastic but price sensitive Brazilian business passengers, while providing attractive fares to demand-elastic and very price sensitive leisure travelers.
17
We are the leading airline operating at Brazil’s busiest and most important airports, including Congonhas in São Paulo and Galeão and Santos Dumont in Rio de Janeiro, where we have a domestic market share measured by RPK of 53.4%, 53.4% and 40.1%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017. Considering this market share, we believe we are best-positioned to capitalize on Brazil’s economic growth as São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, collectively, represented over 40% of Brazil’s GDP.
Brazil is geographically similar in size to the continental United States and is currently the fifth largest domestic airline market in the world, after United States, China, India and Russia. International Air Transport Association estimates that the Brazilian market will continue to grow 5.4% per year over the next two decades. In addition, the Brazilian aviation market has significant untapped potential as flights per capita totaled approximately 0.5 per year in 2015, significantly below that of more established markets such as Australia (2.4) or the United States (2.1).
During the sharp economic slowdown of the Brazilian economy and the political turmoil that occurred in 2014 through 2016, with an aggregate GDP contraction of approximately 7%, high inflation, increased interest rates and a strong depreciation of the real, our management team embarked on a comprehensive operational and financial repositioning, including (i) fleet reduction from 141 operating aircraft at the beginning of 2014 to 121 operating aircraft at year-end 2016 and 119 at year-end 2017; (ii) a complete network redesign focusing on the most profitable routes and business traffic; and (iii) a significant reduction of our operating costs, which, combined with improved yields, have resulted in increased operating margins and operating cash flow. Since 2015, we have reduced our debt, achieving a total net debt (excluding perpetual notes) to EBITDA ratio of 3.0x and a total adjusted net debt (excluding perpetual notes) to EBITDAR ratio of 4.5x in the end of 2017, compared to 10.5x in 2015 and 5.5x in 2016. We also increased our operating margin from negative 1.9% in 2015 to positive 7.1% in 2016 and 9.4% in 2017. In 2017, we recorded an operating result of R$989.8 million, as compared to R$696.5 million in 2016.
We believe we are best-positioned to benefit from the expected growth cycle in the Brazilian economy based on our strong network of slots and flights between the most attractive Brazilian airports, our higher market share in the business segment and our highly efficient aircraft fleet of Boeing 737 aircraft. These competitive advantages are key to our strategy and we believe they cannot be replicated by any of our competitors.
Our Competitive Strengths
We Have the Lowest Operating Costs of Any Brazilian Airline and One of the Lowest Globally. Our operating expense per available seat kilometer (CASK), ex-fuel, has been the lowest of any Brazilian airline since we began our operations in 2001. For the year ended December 31, 2017, our CASK (ex-fuel) was R$14.4 cents (US$4.4 cents), which is 28.5% lower than that of Azul, our only publicly listed peer in Brazil. Our low-cost structure is mainly driven by the following factors:
· High Aircraft Utilization. We have the highest aircraft utilization in Brazil, which for the year ended December 31, 2017 was12.1 hours per day, against 10.5 hours per day for Azul.
· Modern Fleet and Attractive Order Book. We operate a modern fleet composed solely of Boeing 737 family aircraft, which are recognized as having high reliability and low operating costs. A standardized fleet reduces inventory costs, as it requires fewer spare parts, eliminates the need to train our pilots to operate different aircraft types, simplifies our maintenance and operations processes and provides enhanced flexibility in network planning. In addition, we have an attractive order book of 120 brand new, fuel-efficient Boeing 737 Max to partially replace and increase our fleet. As a result of our order book, we believe that the average age of our fleet will be reduced to approximately 7 years by 2022, leading to lower maintenance costs and fuel consumption. Gol is the main customer of 737 aircraft in Latin America and one of the five largest in the world.
· Fuel Efficient Fleet. We continue to reduce fuel consumption and improve efficiency through fleet modernization and other fuel initiatives. We have the lowest fuel consumption among airline carriers in Brazil. In 2017, we achieved a ratio of 33.9 available seat kilometers per liter of fuel consumed. Furthermore, the Boeing 737 Max aircraft that we will begin to place in service are estimated to deliver approximately 15% improved fuel efficiency compared to the prior generation of Boeing 737 aircraft.
18
· High Capacity Fleet. We have one of the highest seat densities in Brazil, with an average seat capacity of 168 per aircraft as of December 2017. With the delivery of the Boeing 737 Max, we expect to increase our average seat capacity to 178 per aircraft by 2020.
· Low Cost Distribution Model. We have a robust operating platform that features advanced technology. Our effective use of technology helps to keep our costs low and our operations highly scalable and efficient. Our distribution channels are streamlined and convenient, allowing our customers to interact with us online. In 2017, we booked approximately 80% of our ticket sales through a combination of our website and applications programming interface, or API, systems.
· Highly Productive Workforce. We have a highly productive workforce resulting in a ratio of 2.23 thousand passengers on board per fulltime equivalent employee for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is significantly higher than that of Azul at 2.02 passengers on board per fulltime equivalent employee and LATAM at 1.56 passengers on board per fulltime equivalent employee.
Our Route Network Focuses on the Busiest Airports by Passenger Traffic. We hold the leading position in Brazil’s primary cities and busiest airports, and our route network closely mirrors the country’s GDP income distribution. Several Brazilian airports have limited their number of slots due to capacity restrictions, especially the busiest airports in the country. Routes between these airports are among the most profitable routes in our markets, with high yields mostly derived from business travelers. Our leading position in Brazil’s main airports permits us to add connections, either through our own flights or through our partner airlines, to additional destinations with attractive demand characteristics. We are the market leader in Brazilian business travel and, according to ABRACORP, in 2017 maintained a 30.8% market share of the business traveler segment. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had a leading domestic market share by RPK of 36.2%, whereas our competitors had market shares of 32.6% for LATAM, 17.8% for Azul and 12.9% for Avianca. We are also the largest player in six of the ten busiest airports in Brazil, with an average market share in excess of 40%.
The following table presents our leading market share in the most economically important states and our market share in terms of number of flights and domestic passengers at the busiest airports in Brazil:
Main Brazilian Airports |
State |
State Share of Brazilian GDP(2) |
Gol’s Share of Airport’s Total Flights(3) |
Domestic Passengers(1) (in thousands) | ||
|
|
|
Total |
Gol |
Gol’s Share | |
São Paulo (CGH) |
São Paulo |
32.1% |
44.1% |
21,183 |
9,586 |
45.3% |
São Paulo (GRU) |
|
|
28.1% |
23,345 |
7,990 |
34.2% |
Campinas (VCP) |
|
|
1.8% |
8,317 |
221 |
2.7% |
Rio de Janeiro (GIG) |
Rio de Janeiro |
11.8% |
43.0% |
11,753 |
5,963 |
50.7% |
Rio de Janeiro (SDU) |
|
|
34.0% |
8,994 |
3,556 |
39.5% |
Belo Horizonte (CNF) |
Minas Gerais |
9.2% |
19.7% |
9,378 |
2,266 |
24.2% |
Porto Alegre (POA) |
Rio Grande do Sul |
6.2% |
30.5% |
7,346 |
2,599 |
35.4% |
Salvador (SSA) |
Bahia |
3.8% |
26.4% |
7,210 |
2,151 |
29.8% |
Brasília (BSB) |
Distrito Federal |
3.3% |
31.5% |
16,090 |
5,273 |
32.8% |
Recife (REC) |
Pernambuco |
2.7% |
22.1% |
7,194 |
1,869 |
26.0% |
Main Airports |
|
69.1% |
29.7% |
120,810 |
41,472 |
34.3% |
________________________
1. According to the National Civil Aviation Agency (Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil), or ANAC, for departures and arrivals data in 2017.
2. According to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), or IBGE, for 2013.
3. Our market share in total number of domestic and international flights (departures and arrivals).
We Have the Premier Airline Brand in Brazil with High-Quality Customer Experience. We believe we provide the best overall experience to our customers, and we provide them with (i) the best on-time performance among all Brazilian airline companies; (ii) the best customer service; (iii) the most seats with the largest legroom available; (iv) on-board Wi-Fi, entertainment and live television; and (v) ancillary products and services, among others. Our business model is based on innovation, best value proposition and application of low-cost carrier best practices. We had the highest on-time performance rate in the Brazilian market in 2017. Our market-leading on-time performance is critical to maintaining high customer satisfaction levels. We operate a customer-friendly digital platform that includes our website and mobile app, which makes booking and travel easy and more enjoyable for our customers. In 2017, we received the following awards for best customer service in the Brazilian airline industry: (i) first place among airlines in customer service according to Exame, a leading business magazine in Brazil; (ii) first place according to ANAC in lowest number of complaints; and (iii) the only airline to receive a rating of “ÓTIMO” (outstanding) from online agency reclameaqui.com.br.
19
These awards are an external validation of our investments in customer service. In terms of comfort, we provide our customers the most seats with the largest legroom available, according to ANAC. In October 2016, we became the first airline in South America to offer Wi-Fi on board and, as of the end of the 2017, we had industry leading technology installed in 82 aircraft, combining Wi-Fi, streaming entertainment and live television in the same platform. Gol is the global launch customer for television streaming over the 2KU antenna developed by Gogo. In order to further improve customers’ experience, we were the first company in the world to develop an online check-in with facial recognition (“selfie check-in”). Moreover, our customers also count with support of our proprietary Geolocation tool that informs customers how many hours (based on their location) it would take them to arrive at the airport, and also offers rebooking options. The geolocation tool has already helped 14 million passengers to not miss their flights. We believe this high-quality customer experience to be a key factor in our leadership with business clients, the most profitable client segment.
We believe that the Gol brand has become synonymous with innovation and value in the airline industry. We were the first low-cost carrier in Latin America and have since brought to market innovative services and solutions including kiosk usage in airports, food menus on board, inflight Wi-Fi and geolocation and “selfie check-ins” as mentioned above. Gol and Smiles are well-recognized brands that stand for best value proposition and consistent execution of industry best practices, as well as low cost and social media-focused innovative marketing and advertisement techniques. Additionally, brand and product diversification from Gollog and GOL+Conforto products enhance our brand recognition across a diverse set of customers in various business segments and provide important customer satisfaction. For the year ended December 31, 2017, ancillary products and services accounted for 13.1% of our operating revenue.
Strong Network Management and International Alliances. We have a disciplined and methodical approach to our route selection, which includes significant flexibility that allows us to quickly adjust to changing market conditions. Our operating model is based on an integrated hub and spoke network and strategic point-to-point markets. We believe the use of this hybrid model increases our adaptability to seasonal and macroeconomic changes while maintaining a low-cost structure and improving aircraft and crew scheduling efficiency. The high level of integration of flights at selected airports allows us to offer frequent, non-stop flights at competitive fares between Brazil’s most important cities. Our robust network also allows us to increase our load factors on our strongest city pair routes by using the airports in those cities to connect our customers to their final destinations. Lastly, our hub and spoke model allows us to build our flight routes to add destinations to cities that would not, individually, be feasible to serve in the traditional point-to-point model, but that can be served when simply added as additional points on our multiple-stop flights. In 2018, we will increase our operations in the Northeast of Brazil with our recently-launched hub in Fortaleza. Designed to connect the main cities of the Northeast and North of Brazil, our Fortaleza hub will serve as an origin of flights to Florida with the new 737 MAX8 and to Europe with Air France – KLM.
The 737 MAX8 will provide us increased range to reach new markets. Beginning in November 2018, we will offer daily direct flights to Florida from Brasília and Fortaleza, which will link more than 30 Brazilian cities to Florida in a highly competitive elapsed time, as compared to routes connecting in Panama City, Bogotá or Lima. Additionally, we will provide passengers with a superior flight experience with the Max aircraft. We are evaluating other potential destinations and expect to serve growing demand from Southern Cone countries for flights to Brazil and other international destinations.
We have a strategic partnership with Delta, which holds 9.5% of our share capital and has become a strong operational and financial partner for us as a maintenance provider and codeshare partner. We believe this important partnership will also help us grow our international revenues further by seamlessly providing additional connecting traffic. In addition, our international alliance reach is broad, with partner airlines offering flights covering America, Europe, Africa and Asia. We have partnership programs with some of the most important international carriers, such as Air France – KLM, which holds 1.2% of our share capital, as well as Aerolíneas Argentinas, AeroMexico, Air Canada, Alitalia, Copa Airlines, Emirates, Etihad Airways, Korean Air, Qatar Airways and TAP. As of December 31, 2017, our global network included 74 interlines agreements and 12 codeshare programs. These alliances allow us to serve more than 160 destinations throughout the globe through codeshare agreements. We will be able to increase our international revenue, which provides a natural hedge for us, without investing in wide-body aircraft, by benefiting from the codeshare and network these partners present. We count with incomparable sponsorship from several players in the industry. We are one of Boeing’s most important 737 customers and the only airline in Brazil supported by the Export-Import Bank of the United States. Additionally, our shareholders include one of the largest airlines in Europe (Air France – KLM) and one of the largest in the U.S. (Delta), as well as our founding family, which remains active on our board of directors.
20
Our Loyalty Program, Smiles, is the Most Valuable Loyalty Program in Brazil, with 13.7 Million Members. Our Smiles loyalty program continues to be the fastest growing loyalty program among its publicly traded peers and is a strong relationship-building tool that represents a significant competitive advantage for us. Smiles has partnerships with, among others, hotel chains, car rental companies, publishers and retailers. Additionally, Smiles maintains partnerships with some of Brazil and South America’s largest banks and credit card companies given its status as one of the leading frequent flyer programs in South America. We acquired Smiles in 2007 when we acquired VRG, a company formed from assets of the former Varig group. In 2013, we established Smiles S.A., which merged into Smiles Fidelidade S.A. in July 2017, as a separate subsidiary to create focus and innovation with a dedicated team. In 2013, we completed this subsidiary’s initial public offering to unlock value for us and to create greater focus. Since then, Smiles has become the most valuable airline loyalty program in Brazil in terms of market valuation, with a market capitalization of R$9.4 billion as of December 31, 2017. In addition to the substantial loyalty-building component of the program, Smiles also provides us with enhanced flexibility, including funding sources (including advanced ticket sales), increased load factors with low impact on yields and dilution of fixed costs and expenses.
Our Strategies
Our goal is to offer the most attractive option for air travel to our customers, with a compelling combination of value, product and service, and, in so doing, to grow profitably and maintain our position as the leading airline in Brazil. Through the key elements of our business strategy, we seek to achieve:
Low Unit Cost. We aim to maintain our cost advantage as the lowest cost airline in Brazil and one of the lowest globally, by:
· maintaining the high aircraft utilization levels we achieved in the year ended December 31, 2017 of 12.1 block hours per day;
· utilizing new generation, fuel-efficient aircraft that deliver lower operating costs compared to prior generation aircraft;
· increasing the average seat capacity of the aircraft in our fleet through the continued introduction and operation of the new Boeing 737 Max; and
· taking a disciplined approach to our operational performance in order to reduce disruption and maximize utilization and profitability.
Offer the Best Service and Value to Our Customers. We intend to further increase our focus on customer satisfaction and loyalty by providing competitive low fares with dependable, reliable and on-time customer service. Essential to achieving this goal is continuing to be the most on-time airline in Brazil, having the most seats with the largest legroom available and convenient schedules to attractive destinations. We are the first Latin American airline to offer onboard Wi-Fi access via satellite, as well as television channels, program streaming with movies, cartoons, games and flight maps. All online and offline content is conveniently and easily accessed through passengers’ mobile devices (cell phone, tablet or notebook). In addition, we will continue to use our Smiles loyalty program to increase our customer satisfaction by offering additional benefits, such as higher mileage multipliers for premium fares, upgrades and access to our recently remodeled airport lounges. We intend to further leverage our technological innovations and allow customers to perform more activities themselves by implementing our digital strategy.
21
Capitalize on Our Strong Market Position in Brazil and South America. We intend to increase penetration across all traveler segments by capitalizing on our competitive strengths. Since 2008, the number of domestic airline passengers carried in Brazil has increased by more than 80% to 90.6 million in 2017, according to ANAC. Brazilian domestic air passenger demand grew 3.2% in 2017 and Brazil is among the five largest domestic airline passenger markets worldwide. IATA estimates that it will grow 5.4% per year in the next two decades by 170 million, reaching a total market size of 272 million passengers. By 2034, according to IATA’s forecast, the five fastest-growing passenger markets in terms of additional passengers will be China (856 million new passengers), the United States (559 million), India (266 million), Indonesia (183 million) and Brazil (170 million).
While we will remain focused on Brazilian markets, we will explore the new opportunities provided by our MAX fleet, which will permit an approximate 15% increase in distance flown, to expand our international operations to selected countries in the Caribbean, South America, North America and others. We believe that the Brazilian airline industry may experience further consolidation and that strengthening our existing strategic partnerships will be a key factor in our success. In this environment, we intend to play a leading role in the South American airline industry and to strengthen our position as a leading player. We continuously revisit our viability studies to serve markets in regions that can be operated by 737 aircraft. In Brazil, we also seek to stimulate demand in markets that are currently only served by high-fare alternatives.
Our Boeing 737 aircraft provide us a significant strategic advantage in the form of low operating costs and high seat capacity. They have allowed us to build a leading market position by increasing the supply of low-cost seats in Brazil, serving the most relevant destinations in South America and allowing us to add attractive markets for Brazilians to travel internationally.
Improve Our Balance Sheet and Capital Structure. We continuously focus on strengthening our balance sheet and have significantly reduced our leverage and improved our balance sheet and capital structure since 2015. We intend to further strengthen our financial position through several initiatives, including strict discipline in our fleet planning, liquidity position, further reduction of our operating costs and the extension of the average maturity profile of our debt. Since 2015, we have decreased our total adjusted debt by approximately 20%, achieving a total net debt (excluding perpetual notes) to EBITDA ratio of 3.0x and total adjusted net debt (excluding perpetual notes) to EBITDAR ratio of 4.5x for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 5.5x as of December 31, 2016. We also increased our operating margin from 7.1% in 2016 to 9.4% in 2017. In 2017, we recorded an operating result of R$989.8 million, as compared to R$696.5 million in 2016.
Corporate Information
Our principal executive offices are located at Brazil’s largest domestic airport, the Congonhas airport, at Praça Comandante Linneu Gomes, S/N, Portaria 3, Jardim Aeroporto, 04626-020, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, and the telephone number of our investor relations department is +55 11 2128-4700. Our website is www.voegol.com.br and investor information may be found on our website under www.voegol.com.br/ir. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference herein and is not to be considered a part of this annual report.
Capital Expenditures
For a description of our capital expenditures, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Airline Business
Routes and Schedules
Our operating model is based on a highly integrated route network that is a combination of the point-to-point, hub and spoke and multiple-stop models. This combination increases the connectivity of the network, permitting travelers to fly from a given point of origin to more destinations, while maintaining a low-cost structure and improving aircraft and crew scheduling efficiency. The high level of integration of flights at selected airports allows us to offer frequent, non-stop flights at competitive fares between Brazil’s most important cities. Our network also allows us to increase our load factors on our strongest city pair routes by using the airports in those cities to connect our customers onwards to their final destinations.
22
Our operating model allows us to build our flight routes to add destinations to cities that would not, be feasible to serve in the traditional point-to-point model individually, but that are feasible to serve when simply added as additional points on our multiple-stop flight. We focus on the Brazilian and South American markets and carefully evaluate opportunities for continued growth. We look to increase the frequency of our flights to existing high-demand markets and add new routes to the network that can be reached with our current Boeing 737 Next Generation aircraft (for example, destinations in the Caribbean). With our new Boeing Max aircraft we will seek to offer reduced flight times to passengers that currently make connections in South American hubs en route to the U.S., Europe and Africa.
As a low-cost carrier operating a single fleet type, we work through alliances and codeshare arrangements with large international carriers (including Delta and Air France – KLM) and regional carriers in order to serve destinations that cannot be served by our Boeing 737 aircraft due to airport infrastructure or local market conditions.
We operate approximately 700 daily flights to 64 destinations. Our improved results in 2017 as compared to 2016 were primarily due to tactical changes to and the maturation of our network, specifically related to seasonality adjustments, improved schedules, reduction in minimum connection time, market substitutions, restructuring and improved management of our connections and procedural revisions.
In 2018, we will increase our operations in the Northeast of Brazil with our recently-launched hub in Fortaleza. Designed to connect the main cities of the Northeast and North of Brazil, our Fortaleza hub will serve as an origin of flights to Florida with the new 737 MAX8 and to Europe with Air France – KLM.
Despite the recent reduction in capacity, following the general trend in the domestic industry, we maintained our position as the leading company in number of passengers transported in Brazil, in 2017, with over 32 million passengers transported in the domestic market and a market share of 36%. The capacity reduction effort implemented by the company in 2016 generated PRASK recovery and is expected to have a meaningful impact in the coming years.
23
The following map shows the destinations we serve:
Services
Passenger Transportation
We recognize that we must offer high-quality and consistent value-proposition services to our corporate and leisure customers. We pay particular attention to the details that help to make for a pleasant, complication-free flying experience, including:
· convenient online sales, check-in, seat assignment and flight change and cancellation services;
· high frequency of flights between Brazil’s most important airports;
· low cancellation and high on-time performance rates of our flights;
· self-check-in at kiosks at designated airports;
· friendly and efficient in-flight service;
· free shuttle services between airports;
· buy on-board services on certain flights;
· free healthy snacks for all passengers, including options for kids;
· mobile check-in and boarding pass (100% paperless boarding);
· smartphone application for check-in, electronic boarding pass and Smiles account management;
24
· more legroom and greater comfort (GOL+Conforto in the domestic flights and GOL Premium Class in the international flights);
· complete platform of in-flight entertainment with Wi-Fi access, live television, movies and series;
· premium domestic and international lounges for business class and premium Smiles passengers in the Guarulhos and Galeão Airports; and
· expansion of Smiles’ programs to the accumulation of miles on promotional fares.
Because we understand that efficient and punctual operations are important to our customers, we strive to offer high rates of on-time performance and a high completion factor, as well as low rates of mishandled baggage, as set forth in the following table:
2015 |
2016 |
2017 | |
On-time departures |
95.4% |
94.8% |
94.6% |
Flight completion |
91.9% |
94.2% |
98.5% |
Lost baggage (per 1,000 passengers) |
2.64 |
2.23 |
2.06 |
In general, passenger demand and profitability reach peak levels during the January and July vacation periods and in the final two weeks of December, during the Christmas holiday season. Conversely, we often witness a decrease in load factor during the week in which annual carnival celebrations take place in Brazil. Given our high proportion of fixed costs, this seasonality is likely to cause our results of operations to vary from quarter to quarter.
Ancillary Revenues and Gollog Cargo Transportation
Ancillary revenues include revenues from our Gollog services as well as baggage excess and ticket change and cancellation fees. GOL+Conforto, fees for in-cabin pets, on-board purchases of food and beverages and fees from travel insurance, hotels and car rentals are also becoming an increasingly important contributor to our ancillary revenue. Further development and growth of these services are a key part of our strategy to increase ancillary revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had total ancillary revenues of R$1.4 billion.
We are constantly evaluating opportunities to generate additional ancillary revenue such as sales of travel insurance, marketing activities and other services which may help us to better capitalize on the large number of passengers on our flights and the high volumes of customers using our website. As of December 31, 2017, 82 of our 119 aircraft had Wi-Fi installed, which is an additional and increasing source of revenue. In 2017, ANAC approved new rules to allow airlines to charge for checked bags and in June 2017 we implemented a new class of tickets called “light fare,” which allows passengers traveling without luggage to pay a reduced fare.
We make efficient use of extra capacity in our aircraft by carrying cargo, through Gollog. The Gollog system provides online access to air waybills and allows customers to track their shipment from any computer with Internet access. Our 64 destinations throughout Brazil, South America and the Caribbean provide access to multiple locations in each region. With our capacity of approximately 700 daily flights, operated by 119 Boeing 737-700/800 aircraft, we can ensure quick and reliable delivery.
Our express delivery products – Gollog VOO CERTO, Gollog EXPRESS, Gollog ECOMMERCE and Gollog DOC – were developed to meet the growing demand for door-to-door deliveries, fixed deadlines and additional optional services. We intend to increase our efforts in the express delivery services by further strengthening our logistics capability, mainly by expanding our ground distribution network, increasing our commercial efforts and using innovation and technology to facilitate the boarding and tracking of cargo and to provide automatic updates to order status.
Aircraft Fleet
Our fleet is comprised entirely of Boeing 737 NG aircraft.
25
In 2017, we did not receive any aircraft and we will not receive any new aircraft until mid-2018. In addition, we reduced our operating fleet by 11 aircraft in 2017, which were under operating leases. As a result, on December 31, 2017, we had a total fleet of 119 aircraft, all of which are operating.
The following table sets forth the composition of our total and operating fleet at the dates indicated:
|
As of December 31, | |||
Seats |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 | |
B737-700 NG |
138 |
36 |
28 |
27 |
B737-800 NG |
177 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
B737-800 NG Short-Field Performance |
177 |
103 |
99 |
89 |
Total Fleet |
|
144 |
130 |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Fleet(1) |
|
142 |
121 |
119 |
_______________________
(1) Operating fleet excludes aircraft under sublease and redelivery process.
As of December 31, 2017, of our total of 119 aircraft, 88 were under operating leases and 31 were under finance leases.
As of December 31, 2017, our operating leases had an average remaining term of 64 months.
As of December 31, 2017, our finance leases had an average remaining term of 46 months and we had purchase options for 31 of the aircraft under finance leases.
Under our operating lease agreements, we do not have purchase options and for some of our lease agreements we are required to maintain maintenance reserve payments or pay maintenance deposits and to return the aircraft and engine in the agreed condition at the end of the lease term. Title to the aircraft remains with the lessor. We are responsible for the maintenance, servicing, insurance, repair and overhaul of the aircraft during the term of the lease.
The average age of our operating fleet of 119 Boeing 737-700/800 aircraft as of December 31, 2017, was 9.2 years. The average daily utilization rate of our fleet was 12.1 block hours in 2017, 11.2 block hours in 2016 and 11.3 block hours in 2015.
The Boeing 737-700 Next Generation and Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft currently comprising our fleet are fuel-efficient and very reliable. They suit our cost efficient operations well for the following reasons:
· they have comparatively standardized maintenance routines;
· they require just one type of standardized training for our crews;
· they use an average of 7% less fuel than other aircraft of comparable size, according to Boeing; and
· they have one of the lowest operating costs in their class.
In addition to being cost-efficient, the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft are equipped with advanced technology that promotes flight stability, provides a comfortable flying experience for our customers and has 13% lower CO2 emissions than other current aircraft models. We use a single type of aircraft to simplify our operations. We would only introduce a new type of aircraft to our fleet if, after careful consideration, we determine that such a step will reduce our operating costs. We expect that our fleet of Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft will be delivered starting in 2018. We expect that the new Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft will:
· reduce our fuel consumption by up to 15%, in relation to the Boeing 737-800 NG, and consume less fuel than other aircraft of comparable size;
· be equipped with the latest technology and provide improved operational performance;
· have an increased range and maximum take-off weight (MTOW) versus both the 737-800 NG and the A320neo;
26
· deliver flight autonomy of up to 6,500 km (increased from 5,500 km) and MTOW up to 82 tons (increased from 70 tons);
· have a significantly smaller noise footprint than today’s single-aisle airplanes; and
· be equipped with Wi-Fi antennas that will allow our customers to access to the internet during flights and enjoy our on-board entertainment platform.
With our configuration, the Boeing 737 MAX 8 will permit us to add up to nine additional seats to its configuration while maintaining its current pitch that provides the most comfort to passengers in Brazil.
We have an order of 120 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft through 2028 and are currently the main client of the 737 family in South America and one of the five largest in the world.
Fleet Plan
The following table sets forth our year-end projected operating fleet through 2022:
Projected Fleet Plan |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Boeing 737 (700/800 NG and 7/8 MAX) |
121 |
124 |
128 |
133 |
137 |
The fleet plan includes the arrival of new Boeing 737-MAX aircraft, which are expected to start in 2018. We will revise this fleet plan according to our expectations for the growth potential in the markets in which we operate.
Sales and Distribution
Our customers can purchase tickets directly from us through a number of different channels, such as our website, including our Booking Web Services (BWS), our call center, at airport ticket counters and, to a lesser extent, Global Distribution Systems (GDS).
Our low-cost business model utilizes internet ticket sales as its main distribution channel, especially in the local market. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 80% of our passenger revenue, whether directly from the customer or through travel agents, were booked online, making us a global leader in this area.
In addition, our customers can purchase tickets indirectly through travel agents, which are a widely-used travel service resource in Brazil, South America, Europe, North America and other regions. For the year ended December 31, 2017, travel agents provided us with approximately distribution outlets in 45 different countries. GDS allows us access to a large number of tourism professionals who are able to sell our tickets to customers around the world and enables us to enter into interline agreements with other airlines to offer more flights and connection options to our passengers, which adds incremental international passenger traffic.
Pricing
Brazilian airlines are permitted to establish their own domestic fares without previous government approval. Airlines are free to offer price discounts or follow other promotion activities. Airlines must submit, 30 days after the end of each month, a file containing fares sold and quantity of passengers for each fare amount, for all markets. This file lists regular fares and excludes all contracted, corporate and private fares. The objective is to monitor the average market prices. The same procedure applies for international fares. The only difference is that all fares sold for interline itineraries are also excluded from the data sent to ANAC.
Yield Management
Yield management involves the use of historical data and statistical forecasting models to produce knowledge about our markets and guidance on how to compete to maximize our operating revenue. Yield management forms the backbone of our revenue generation strategy and is strongly linked to our route and schedule planning and our sales and distribution methods. Our yield management practices enable us to react quickly in response to market changes. For example, our yield management systems are instrumental in helping us to identify the flight times and routes for which we offer promotions. By offering lower fares for seats that our yield management indicates would otherwise remain unsold, we capture additional revenue and also stimulate customer demand.
27
Maintenance
By ANAC regulation, we are directly responsible for the execution and control of all maintenance services performed on our aircraft. The maintenance performed on our aircraft can be divided into two general categories: line and heavy maintenance. Line maintenance consists of routine, scheduled maintenance checks on our aircraft, including pre-flight, daily and overnight checks and any diagnostics and routine repairs. All of our line maintenance is performed by our highly experienced technicians at our line maintenance service bases throughout Brazil and South America. At the Rio de Janeiro Galeão airport, we are the only company that holds the FAA certification for Delta’s line maintenance for the Boeing 767-300/400ER and the Airbus A330-200/300. We believe that our practice of performing daily preventative maintenance helps to maintain a high aircraft utilization rate and reduces maintenance costs. Heavy maintenance consists of more complex inspections and servicing of the aircraft that cannot be accomplished overnight. Heavy maintenance checks are performed following a pre-scheduled agenda of major overhauls defined by the aircraft’s manufacturer, based on the number of hours and flights flown by the aircraft. In addition, engine maintenance services are rendered in different MRO facilities.
We believe that our high aircraft utilization rate has not compromised our positioning in terms of performance and reliability when compared to other Boeing operators globally.
We have internalized heavy maintenance on our Boeing 737 aircraft in our Aircraft Maintenance Center at the Tancredo Neves International Airport in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. We use this facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. We have four maintenance hangars, one dedicated to paintings. Our hangars are strategically located in Confins (Belo Horizonte) and São Paulo with capacity to carry out as many as nine checks simultaneously. We also have room to build an additional hangar, if needed.
We have entered into two strategic MRO partnership agreements (with Delta and MTU, respectively) in order to provide overhaul service for our CFM 56-7 engines, maintenance for parts and components on our fleet of Boeing 737 NG aircraft and also, consulting services related to maintenance workflow planning, materials and facility optimization and tooling support. We have recently agreed with Delta and Air France – KLM to increase the maintenance services we provide them starting in 2018.
In 2016, we received the FAA 145 Repair Station certification from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration to perform C-checks at our maintenance center.
In 2017, we were certified by the European Aviation Safety Agency, or EASA, which is the European Union’s aeronautical authority.
To conduct maintenance on aircraft and aircraft components, we must be certified as a “maintenance organization,” which certification is granted by the country where the respective aircraft or components are operated. In Brazil, the certification is granted by ANAC and in the U.S. it is granted by the FAA. Therefore, in order to work on aircraft and aircraft components operating in the European Union, we would need a certification granted by EASA. However, in 2016 ANAC and EASA signed a bilateral agreement for the recognition of certifications granted by one another so that, after undergoing a validation process, Brazilian maintenance organizations can conduct maintenance on aircraft and aircraft components operating in the European Union and maintenance organization in the European Union can do the same with regards to aircraft and aircraft components operating in Brazil. Our Aircraft Maintenance Center underwent the validation process of its ANAC-granted certification for the EASA and is now authorized to conduct maintenance on aircraft and aircraft components operating in the European Union as if it were an entity directly certified by EASA. Some of the benefits of this validation are the recognition of the quality standards of our Aircraft Maintenance Center’s services and new maintenance opportunities, including servicing aircraft and aircraft components under redelivery or sub-leasing to E.U. countries, which servicing would have previously been outsources. This also implies possible cost reductions for us when we return or sub-lease aircraft. As we can also service the aircraft and aircraft components of European airlines, we may be able to generate additional revenues.
28
Our Engine Office, part of our Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, was certified in December 2017 by ANAC and EASA for low-complexity services and repairs on CFM56-7 engines, which are in the Boeing 737NG operated by us. The Engine Office holds the latest infrastructure and tools and aims to conduct maintenance services that, although of low complexity, used to require used to require sending the engines to external offices or hiring third parties. These services can now be provided in-house. Our technical team completed a process to increase its skills, which included trainings by the engine’s producer and by partner companies. Among the benefits of insourcing these services are reduced repair and logistics costs and reduced engine off-time and replacement time.
Fuel
Our fuel costs totaled R$2,888 million in 2017, representing 30.1% of our operating costs and expenses for the year. In 2017, we purchased a substantial part of our fuel from Petrobras Distribuidora, a retail subsidiary of Petrobras. In addition to Petrobras, there are two other large fuel suppliers in Brazil. In 2017, fuel prices under our contracts were re-set every 30 days and were composed of a variable and a fixed component. The variable component is defined by the refinery and follows international crude oil price fluctuations and the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate. The fixed component is a spread charged by the supplier and is usually a fixed cost per liter during the term of the contract. We operate a tankering program under which we fill the fuel tanks of our aircraft in regions where fuel prices are lower. We also provide our pilots with training in fuel management techniques, such as carefully selecting flight altitudes to optimize fuel efficiency.
The following chart summarizes our fuel consumption and costs for the periods indicated:
|
Year Ended December 31, | ||
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Liters consumed (in millions) |
1,551 |
1,391 |
1,379 |
Total fuel cost (in millions) |
R$3,301.4 |
R$2,695.4 |
R$2,887.7 |
Average price per liter |
R$2.13 |
R$1.94 |
2.09 |
% change in price per liter |
(14.8)% |
(8.9)% |
8.1% |
Percent of operating expenses |
33.2% |
29.4% |
30.1% |
ASK/liter consumed |
32.07 |
33.31 |
33.86 |
We continuously invest in initiatives to reduce fuel consumption, including the following:
· Installation of winglets: We installed an aerodynamic component on the wing tips of the majority of our aircrafts for better aerodynamics and, consequently, lower fuel consumption.
· Required Navigation Performance (RNP - AR): Precision approaches guided through a satellite navigation system that enables pilots to control aircraft in flight even in the case of low visibility, reducing dependence on air-to-ground navigation and shortening length of flight, which reduces fuel consumption and improves accessibility at airports such as Rio de Janeiro, Santos Dumont Airport - SDU.
· Auxiliary Power Unit (APU): This is an auxiliary aircraft engine used to generate power and air conditioning when the main engines are not in use, usually in cases of long stops at airports or overnight use by maintenance. The APU OFF project was based on the study of Consumption Reduction Opportunities which is aimed to allow aircrafts to be charged up with an external power source (GPU - Ground Power Unit and ACU – Air Conditioning Unit) instead of using the aircraft’s resources, in locations where this service is available. Whenever possible the APU OFF for aircrafts in transit is applied prior to selecting APU INOP aircrafts and flights with long ground time, reducing fuel consumption and preserving aircraft resources.
· Aircraft Communication Addressing Reporting System (ACARS): This is a satellite communication system that permits the exchange of data between aircraft and ground communication outlets during flights, and allows for more assertive communication and anticipated shared decision making processes, minimizing route deviations and ensuring operational efficiency.
Fuel costs are extremely volatile, as they are subject to many global economic and geopolitical factors that we can neither control nor accurately predict. Because international prices for jet fuel are denominated in U.S. dollars, our fuel costs, though payable in reais, are subject not only to price fluctuations but also to exchange rate fluctuations. We maintain a fuel hedging program, based upon policies which define volume, price targets and instruments, under which we enter into fuel and currency hedging agreements with counterparties providing for price protection in connection with the purchase of fuel. Our hedging practices are executed by our internal risk management committee and overseen by the risk policies committee of our board of directors. The risk policies committee, which may be comprised of members of our board of directors, external consultants, and senior management, meets monthly or more often, if called, and its main responsibilities are to assess the effectiveness of our hedging policies, recommend amendments when and where appropriate and establish its views regarding fuel price trends. We use risk management instruments that have a high correlation with the underlying assets so as to reduce our exposure. We require that all of our risk management instruments be liquid so as to allow us to make position adjustments and have prices that are widely disclosed. We also avoid concentration of credit and product risk. We have not otherwise entered into arrangements to guarantee our supply of fuel and we cannot provide assurance that our hedging program is sufficient to protect us against significant increases in the price of fuel. We also use non-derivative instruments as alternative hedge conferring an additional average protection through fixed price fuel transactions for future delivery negotiated with our main fuel supplier.
29
As of December 31, 2017, we had derivatives to protect approximately 27% of our expected fuel consumption in the first quarter of 2018.
Safety and Security
Our most important priority is the safety of our passengers and employees. We maintain our aircraft in strict accordance with manufacturer specifications and all applicable safety regulations, and perform routine line maintenance every day. Our pilots have extensive experience, with flight captains having more than 10,000 average hours of career flight time, and we conduct ongoing courses, extensive flight simulation training and seminars addressing the latest developments in safety and security issues. We promptly adopt best practices from the latest research regarding human fatigue risk management. We closely follow the standards established by ANAC’s Air Accident Prevention Program and we have implemented the Flight Operations Quality Assurance System, which maximizes proactive prevention of incidents through the systematic analysis of the flight data recorder system. All of our aircraft are also equipped with Maintenance Operations Quality Assurance, a troubleshooting program that monitors performance and aircraft engine trends. The Brazilian civil aviation market follows the highest recognized safety standards in the world. We are also an active member of the Flight Safety Foundation, a foundation for the exchange of information about flight safety.
We maintain the highest rating (seven stars) and are ranked among the world’s safest airlines, according to AirlineRatings.com, an independent plane safety and product rating website. The website’s star ratings take multiple factors into account, including whether an airline has been certified by the International Air Transport Association (IATA), if it is on the EU’s airline blacklist, its crash record and whether the fleet has been grounded over safety concerns. In June 2016, we carried out our fifth biennial IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) and the next one is expected to be carried in 2018.
Environmental Sustainability
Since 2010, we prepare Annual Sustainability Reports based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, an international standard for reporting economic, social and environmental performance. By adopting these parameters, we are reinforcing our accountability with various stakeholders through added transparency and credibility.
We also constantly invest in becoming more environmentally sustainable and have recently implemented the following actions:
· In 2017, we reopened our Office for Environmentally Sustainable Projects (Escritório de Projetos Sustentáveis de Meio Ambiente), which is responsible for the implementation and execution of Gol’s environmental management system and seeks to conform our processes and monitor the company’s environmental activities and initiatives.
· We received the FAA 145 Repair Station certification from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration to perform C-checks in 2016 and EASA in 2017 at our Aircraft Maintenance Center at the Tancredo Neves International Airport located in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais: we have reduced costs by decreasing the necessity of flying our aircraft overseas to be serviced. We also treat all of the effluents generated in our
30
facilities and are committed to the reuse of water. The Maintenance Center was designed to comply with environmental responsibility requirements and all of the conditions imposed by the environmental licenses and current legislation.
· We are pioneers in incentivizing the research and development of biofuel technology. In 2014, we operated more than 365 domestic flights using renewable fuel. In 2015, we made our first international flight using renewable fuel on our Orlando – São Paulo route.
· We were the first Brazilian airline to release our greenhouse gas inventory based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative, or GHG Protocol, and since 2011 we have been qualified with the gold stamp.
Insurance
We maintain passenger and third party liability insurance in amounts consistent with international industry practice and we insure our aircraft fleet against losses and damages on an “all risks” basis. We have obtained all insurance coverage required by the terms of our leasing agreements and in accordance with national and international insurance regulations and the requirements promulgated by the governmental and civil aviation authorities in each country in which we operate. We believe our insurance coverage is consistent with airline industry standards in Brazil and is appropriate to protect us from material loss in light of the activities we conduct.
Partnerships and Alliances
General
We count with incomparable sponsorship from several players in the industry. We are one of Boeing’s most important 737 customers and the only airline in Brazil supported by the Export-Import Bank of the United States. Additionally, our shareholders include one of the largest airlines in Europe (Air France – KLM) and one of the largest in the U.S. (Delta), as well as our founding family, which remains active on our board of directors.
Our strong market positioning enables us to successfully negotiate a number of partnerships with supplementary major carriers worldwide, mostly in the form of codeshare agreements and interline agreements. Additional passenger inflows generated by these strategic partnerships help improve revenues at low incremental costs.
As of December 31, 2017, we had 12 codeshare agreements with Aerolíneas Argentinas, AeroMexico, Air Canada, Air France – KLM, Alitalia, Copa Airlines, Delta, Emirates, Etihad Airways, Korean Air, Qatar Airways and TAP and 74 interline agreements.
Delta
Since 2011, we have developed a comprehensive partnership with Delta. As of December 31, 2017, Delta owned 9.5% of our economic interest. We also have entered into a long-term commercial agreement with Delta that has exclusivity provisions designed to strengthen the operational cooperation and synergies between the two companies, including services related to aircraft maintenance and codeshare agreements.
On August 31, 2015, Delta guaranteed a US$300 million Term Loan borrowed by Gol Finance (previously named Gol LuxCo S.A.) from third party lenders. The Term Loan was made under a credit and guaranty agreement (the “Credit and Guaranty Agreement”) among Gol Finance, as borrower, Gol, the Lessee and the other guarantors thereunder (collectively, the “Term Loan Guarantors”) and the lenders party thereto (the “Third Party Lenders”). Under the terms of the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, Gol Finance’s obligations thereunder are guaranteed by the Term Loan Guarantors. Pursuant to a separate guaranty agreement, Delta provided to the administrative agent under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, and the lenders under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, a backstop guarantee of Gol Finance’s and the Term Loan Guarantors’ respective obligations under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Delta Guaranty”). The reimbursement obligations to Delta in connection with the Delta Guaranty are secured by a first priority security interest in favor of Delta in a portion of the shares of Smiles held by Gol. The Term Loan bears an effective interest rate of 6.70% per annum, payable semi-annually. The Term Loan matures on August 31, 2020 and is not secured by any property of Gol Finance or the Term Loan Guarantors.
31
In 2016, Delta granted us (i) credit support in the form of a backstop guarantee for up to US$32.0 million in Gol obligations under an ISDA Master Agreement with Morgan Stanley and (ii) a credit line for the financing of maintenance payments of up to US$50.0 million, which we will begin amortizing in 2018.
Air France – KLM
We also have a long term strategic partnership for commercial cooperation with Air France – KLM, which currently holds 1.2% of our total capital stock. The agreement provides for an alliance committee, comprised of at least one representative of Air France – KLM, at least two members of our board of directors and at least one representative of Delta.
In 2017, we entered into an agreement with Air France – KLM to expand our strategic partnership by means of a credit line granted to us for the financing of maintenance payments of up to US$50.0 million.
In 2017, we confirmed our selection of Fortaleza as our new joint hub with Air France – KLM. From 2018 on, we expect to increase our seat offering for flights out of Fortaleza. This new hub enables Air France – KLM to pursue its development strategy in Brazil and simultaneously links Fortaleza to its two main hubs at Amsterdam – Schiphol and Paris – Charles de Gaulle.
Competition
Domestic
Airlines in Brazil compete primarily on the basis of routes, fare levels, frequency of flights, capacity, airport operating rights and presence, reliability of services, brand recognition, frequent flyer programs and customer service.
Our main competitors in Brazil are Latam Airlines Group, or Latam Brasil; Azul Linhas Aéreas Brasileiras, or Azul Brasil; and Ocean Air Linhas Aereas, doing business as Avianca, or Avianca Brasil. Latam Brasil is controlled by Latam S.A., a Chilean company. Latam is the result of a June 2012 merger between TAM Airlines of Brazil and LAN Airlines of Chile, and is a full-service scheduled carrier offering flights on domestic routes and international routes. Azul, which acquired regional carrier Trip in 2012, is controlled by Azul S.A. Azul S.A.’s voting stock is controlled by David Neeleman and its largest economic stake is controlled by the Chinese government-controlled airline Hainan Airlines. Avianca Brasil is controlled by Synergy Group. Avianca licensed its brand to Avianca Brasil in 2010. We also face domestic competition from other domestic scheduled carriers, regional airlines and charter airlines, which mainly have regional networks.
As the growth in the Brazilian airline sector evolves, we may face increased competition from our primary competitors and charter airlines as well as other entrants into the market with reduced fares to attract new passengers.
The following table sets forth the historical market shares on domestic routes, based on revenue passenger kilometers, of the significant airlines in Brazil for each of the periods indicated:
Domestic Market Share— Scheduled Airlines |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Gol |
35.4% |
36.1% |
35.9% |
36.0% |
36.2% |
Latam Brasil(1) |
39.9% |
38.1% |
36.7% |
34.7% |
32.6% |
Azul Brasil(2) |
17.0% |
16.7% |
17.0% |
17.0% |
17.8% |
Avianca Brasil |
7.1% |
8.4% |
9.4% |
11.2% |
12.9% |
Others |
0.6% |
0.7% |
1.0% |
1.1% |
0.5% |
____________
Source: ANAC
(1) Known as TAM Airlines prior to its June 2012 merger with LAN Airlines of Chile.
(2) In May 2012, Azul acquired Trip.
Domestically, we also face competition from ground transportation alternatives, primarily interstate bus companies. Given the absence of meaningful passenger rail services in Brazil, travel by bus has traditionally been the only low-cost option for long-distance travel for a significant portion of Brazil’s population. We believe that our low-cost business model has given us flexibility in setting our fares to stimulate demand for air travel among passengers who in the past have traveled long distances primarily by bus. In particular, the highly competitive fares we have offered for travel on our night flights, which have often been comparable to bus fares for the same destinations, have had the effect of providing direct competition for interstate bus companies on these routes.
32
International
In our international operations, we face competition from Brazilian and South American airlines that are already established in the international market and that participate in strategic alliances and codeshare arrangements. In addition, non-Brazilian airlines may decide to enter or increase their schedules in the market for routes between Brazil and other South American and Caribbean destinations.
The table below shows the 2017 market share of major airlines on South American routes to/from Brazil based on RPKs:
International Market Share - Airline |
RPK (mn) |
Market Share |
Latam Airlines Group(1) |
9,027 |
46.3% |
GOL |
3,610 |
18.5% |
Avianca Holdings(2) |
3,243 |
16.6% |
Avianca Brasil |
461 |
2.4% |
Aerolíneas Argentinas |
1,744 |
8.9% |
Azul Brasil |
324 |
1.7% |
Others |
1,082 |
5.5% |
Total |
19,490 |
100.0% |
____________
Source: ANAC
(1) Includes Latam Airlines Brasil, Lan Chile, Lan Peru, Lan Argentina and TAM MERCOSUR.
(2) Includes Avianca Holdings and TACA Peru.
Smiles Loyalty Program
Overview
Smiles is one of the largest coalition loyalty programs in Brazil, with 13.7 million members as of December 31, 2017. Its business model is based on a pure coalition loyalty program consisting of a single platform for accumulating and redeeming miles through a broad network of commercial and financial partners.
The Smiles loyalty program was originally launched by Varig in 1994 as a frequent flyer program and was acquired by us in 2007, together with other assets of the Varig business. Beginning in 2008, the Smiles loyalty program underwent a restructuring and revitalization and, since then, the Smiles loyalty program has been transformed from a stand-alone program into an independent coalition loyalty program and has gained significant market share. In 2013, we listed Smiles on the B3 and in July 2017 it merged with Webjet Participações S.A. to create Smiles Fidelidade S.A. On December 31, 2017, Smiles’ share of all miles issued in the domestic market was roughly 54%, up from 29% at the end of 2013.
Currently, Smiles loyalty program allows members to accumulate miles through: (1) flights with Gol and our international partners, (2) all the significant Brazilian commercial banks that issue credit cards, including through co-branded cards issued by Bradesco, Banco do Brasil and Santander, (3) a broad network of retail partners, including Localiza, the largest car rental agency in Brazil, Accor Hotels (Le Club), a global hotel chain, among others, (4) direct purchases of miles by customers and (5) purchase of miles and benefits through Clube Smiles (or Smiles Club). We are Smiles’ primary redemption partner but members may also redeem miles for products and services from commercial partners.
Commercial Partners
As of the date of this annual report, the Smiles network of commercial partners is composed of airlines, financial institutions, travel agencies, hotels, car rental agencies, gas stations, bookstores, media companies, drugstores, restaurants and parking lot operators, among others.
33
Competition
Smiles faces the following types of competition in Brazil: (i) frequent flyer programs, (ii) the loyalty programs of financial institutions and similar entities and (iii) other loyalty programs in general. The first group includes Multiplus, the current market leader, and other players such as the Tudo Azul program and Avianca’s Programa Amigo. The second group includes a variety of large financial institutions and similar entities that have their own loyalty programs, such as the SuperBônus Program of Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A., the Bradesco Loyalty Card Program of Banco Bradesco S.A., the Sempre Presente Program of Banco Itaú Unibanco S.A., the American Express Membership Rewards Program and Livelo, a joint venture program between Banco do Brasil and Banco Bradesco. The majority of these programs allow members to transfer accumulated reward points to programs like the Smiles loyalty program. The third group of competitors includes companies such as Dotz and Netpoints (of which Smiles is a minority shareholder), among others.
If foreign loyalty programs such as Aeroplan or Air Miles enter the Brazilian market, Smiles may face additional competition. However, entry of foreign loyalty programs would also present new opportunities for commercial partnerships.
Agreements with Smiles
Operating Agreement
On December 28, 2012, GLA entered into an operating agreement with Smiles, or the Operating Agreement, that establishes the terms and conditions of our relationship. This agreement went into effect on January 1, 2013, when Smiles began to manage and operate the Smiles loyalty program.
The 20-year Operating Agreement will be automatically renewed for successive five-year periods if neither party objects at least two years prior to its expiration. If a party is given notice of non-renewal, it may terminate the Operating Agreement early by providing written notification to the other party six months prior to the termination date.
GLA pays Smiles a monthly fee for managing our frequent flyer program. This fee is adjusted on each anniversary of the Operating Agreement in accordance with our gross monthly miles purchases.
34
Back Office Services Agreement
On December 28, 2012, GLA entered into a back office services agreement with Smiles, or the Back Office Services Agreement, that contains the terms, conditions and levels of certain services in connection with back office activities including controllership, accounting, internal controls and auditing, finance, information technology, call center, inventory and legal matters. The amount recognized by Smiles as expenses in 2017, 2016, and 2015 totaled R$23.5 million, R$23.4 million and R$24.3 million, respectively.
The three-year Back Office Services Agreement is automatically renewed for successive three-year periods if neither party objects 12 months prior to its expiration. Smiles may terminate portions of the Back Office Services Agreement at any time by providing prior written notice to GLA.
Main Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement
On December 28, 2012, GLA entered into a miles and tickets purchase agreement with Smiles, or the Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement, that establishes the terms and conditions of purchases of miles and sales of tickets.
In order to govern pricing and availability of reward tickets and satisfy customer demand, the agreement establishes three seating classes: standard, commercial and promotional for ticketing purposes.
The price that GLA pays for miles is calculated based on the economic cost specified above, minus a portion of the breakage rate, which is the expected percentage of miles that will expire without being redeemed.
The 20-year Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement will be automatically renewed for successive five-year periods if neither party objects at least two years prior to its expiration. If a party is given notice of non-renewal, it may terminate the agreement early by providing written notification to the other party six months prior to the termination date.
On December 27, 2017, GLA, along with Smiles, made adjustments in the prices of standard airline tickets and miles sold to GLA, representing a decrease of 0.6% and 1.5%, respectively, based on the composition of the airline tickets issued in the preceding period.
2016 Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement
In February 2016, GLA entered into a miles and tickets purchase agreement with Smiles, totaling up to R$1.0 billion, providing for advance ticket sales to Smiles in various tranches through June 30, 2017. On April 5, 2017 GLA and Smiles amended this agreement to extend its termination until July 31, 2018 and increase the total amount by R$480 million. In 2017, Smiles paid R$520 million in advance, of which R$240 million related to the agreement entered into in February 2016 and R$280 million related to the first amendment entered into in April 2017.
The advances by Smiles will be remunerated at a minimum rate of 132% of the CDI, which may be increased according to market conditions at each payment date. In addition, Smiles will benefit from some measures to strengthen its competitiveness.
35
Industry Overview
According to the International Air Transport Association, or IATA, Brazil is the fifth largest domestic aviation market in the world, after United States, China, India and Russia and should remain among the fourth largest over the next two decades with a total of 170 million passengers. Moreover, according to ANAC, there were 90.9 million domestic enplanements and 8.4 million international enplanements on Brazilian carriers in Brazil (which excludes international carriers) in 2017, out of a total population of over 207 million, according to IBGE. In contrast, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the United States had around 740 million domestic enplanements and 110 million international enplanements in 2017, out of a total population of over 320 million, based on the latest United States census estimates. Despite its size, the Brazilian market is still under-penetrated, with an estimated 0.45 flights per capita in 2016, way below levels of developed countries like Australia (2.4), United States (2.1) and Canada (1.3), reflecting a strong potential for growth in the mid-term. In the specific case of Gol, we are very well positioned to capture the growth of the Brazilian market, with 85.5% of revenues coming from the domestic market in 2017.
Brazilian air travel has historically been affordable for business passengers and or high-income individuals, resulting in low per capita penetration rates when compared to other emerging markets and developed countries. We believe that Brazil fundamentals over the long-term are still quite attractive which bodes well for the development and growth of air travel. Long-distance travel alternatives in Brazil are quite limited given that there is poor road infrastructure and no passenger rail or other alternative. Despite the significant growth in air travel in Brazil over the first decade after 2000 (CAGR of almost 12% over the 2000-2011), we believe that there is still significant upside potential for airlines in general and for low cost airlines specifically to gain market share of travelers who would ordinarily travel by bus. Moreover, Brazil’s “new middle class” consumers also allocated a greater portion of their family incomes into better vacation experiences. This explains the significant pick-up in demand for international air travel by Brazilians over the last 10 years. South American countries, the Caribbean and the United States feature among the top ten most popular tourist destinations for Brazilians traveling abroad on vacation according to industry data.
Brazil air travel is still very concentrated in a few city-pairs and business passengers account for the majority of the volume. According to industry data, business travel represents around 60% of the demand for domestic air travel in 2017. We believe this rate is significantly higher than the business travel portion of domestic air travel in the global aviation sector. According to the latest data collected by ANAC, flights between Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil’s busiest city-pair accounted for 7.6% of all domestic passengers in 2017. The top ten routes accounted for almost 25% of all domestic air passengers in 2017, while the ten busiest airports accounted for 67% in 2017.
The table below sets forth information about the ten busiest routes for air travel in Brazil during 2017.
City Pair(1) |
|
Passengers |
|
Route Market Share |
|
|
| ||
São Paulo – Rio de Janeiro(2) |
|
6,908,612 |
7.6% | |
São Paulo (Congonhas) – Rio de Janeiro (Santos Dumont) |
|
4,093,857 |
4.5% | |
São Paulo (Guarulhos) – Rio de Janeiro (Galeão) |
|
1,241,457 |
1.4% | |
São Paulo (Congonhas) – Rio de Janeiro (Galeão) |
|
837,446 |
0.9% | |
São Paulo (Guarulhos) – Rio de Janeiro (Santos Dumont) |
|
735,852 |
0.8% | |
São Paulo (Congonhas) – Brasília |
|
2,042,799 |
2.3% | |
São Paulo (Guarulhos) – Porto Alegre |
|
1,888,334 |
|
2.1% |
São Paulo (Congonhas) – Confins |
|
1,810,856 |
|
2.0% |
São Paulo (Guarulhos) – Recife |
|
1,806,151 |
2.0% | |
São Paulo (Guarulhos) – Salvador |
|
1,794,490 |
|
2.0% |
São Paulo (Congonhas) – Porto Alegre |
|
1,737,474 |
1.9% | |
São Paulo (Guarulhos) – Curitiba |
|
1,544,731 |
|
1.7% |
São Paulo (Congonhas) – Curitiba |
|
1,505,024 |
|
1.7% |
São Paulo (Guarulhos) – Fortaleza |
|
1,496,762 |
|
1.7% |
____________
Source: ANAC – 2017
(1) Considers flights originating in either city of the pair
(2) Includes flights between Congonhas and Guarulhos to either Santos Dumont or Galeão airports.
36
In light of Brazil’s economic growth between 2009-2013 and Government income distribution initiatives, the middle class segment (A, B and C classes) increased significantly in the last years and now accounts for roughly 50% of total consumer spending (or 42 million new consumers rose to middle class status). The Northeast region led the growth in middle class consumers, with three out of ten new middle class consumer from this region. According to ANAC, after a 7.8% reduction in the number of domestic passengers transported in 2016, there was a 2.1% increase in 2017, reaching 90.6 million domestic passengers, which is the same level as in 2013.
In addition, there are ongoing discussions in Brazil regarding the execution of open skies agreements, which remove restrictions on the number of flights and destinations between countries. In 2017, the Brazilian Congress ratified an open skies agreement with the United States dated 2011, which was approved by the Senate in March 2018 and must be ratified by the President of Brazil. For more information on the open skies agreement between Brazil and the United States, see “—Regulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation Market—Open Skies.”
Brazilian Civil Aviation Market Evolution
In the past 40 years, the domestic market generally experienced year-over-year growth in revenue passenger kilometers twice the growth rate of GDP, except in times of significant economic or political distress, such as the petroleum crisis in the 1970s, the Brazilian sovereign debt crisis in the early 1980s and the economic and political distress in Brazil in the early 1990s. From 1972 to 2000, domestic revenue passenger kilometers grew at a compound annual rate of 7.2%. However, in the ten years following the start of Gol’s operations, that is from 2000-2011 CAGR growth rate accelerated to an increase of almost 12%. During this period, Gol’s market share as measured by available seat kilometers increased from 4% to 38%.We believe that Gol positively impacted the market by more than 260% in terms of demand stimulation which we call the “Gol effect.”
From 2012 to 2016, the compound annual growth rate in industry passenger traffic, in terms of domestic revenue passenger kilometers, was 0.6%, versus a compound annual growth rate in available industry domestic capacity, in terms of available seat kilometers, of -1.7%. Domestic industry load factor, calculated as revenue passenger kilometers divided by available seat kilometers, averaged 77.7% over the same period.
After the 2016 capacity adjustment in the Brazilian airline industry, capacity increased in 2017 reaching 112.8 million ASKs, which remains below the capacity levels in 2013. Demand increased by 3.2% in 2017, leading to a record 81.5% load factor.
The table below shows the figures of domestic industry passenger traffic and available capacity for the periods indicated:
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Domestic enplanements (millions) |
90.2 |
95.9 |
96.2 |
88.7 |
90.6 |
Available Seat Kilometers (billions) |
115.9 |
117.0 |
118.2 |
111.2 |
112.8 |
Available Seat Kilometers Growth |
(2.9)% |
0.9% |
1.0% |
(5.9)% |
1.4% |
Revenue Passenger Kilometers (billions) |
88.2 |
93.3 |
94.4 |
89.0 |
91.9 |
Revenue Passenger Kilometers Growth |
1.4% |
5.8% |
1.1% |
(5.7)% |
3.2% |
Load Factor |
76.1% |
79.8% |
79.8% |
80.0% |
81.5% |
____________
Source: ANAC, Dados Comparativos Avançados
Regulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation Market
The Brazilian Aviation Authorities and Regulation Overview
Air transportation services are considered a public service and are subject to extensive regulation and monitoring in Brazil, including through the Brazilian Federal Constitution and the Brazilian Aeronautical Code. The Brazilian Aeronautical Code sets forth the main rules and regulations relating to airport infrastructure and operation, flight safety and protection, airline certification, lease structuring, burdening, disposal, registration and licensing of aircraft; crew training, concessions, inspection and control of airlines, public and private air carrier services, civil liability of airlines and penalties in case of infringements.
37
The Brazilian government recognized and ratified, and must comply with, the Warsaw Convention of 1929, the Chicago Convention of 1944 and the Geneva Convention of 1948, the three leading international conventions relating to worldwide commercial air transportation activities.
The Brazilian Civil Aviation National Policy (Política Nacional de Aviação Civil), or PNAC, corresponds to the guidelines and strategies that will lead the institutions responsible for the development of the Brazilian civil aviation sector, establishing strategic objectives and actions for the market.
The Ministry of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation, formerly the Civil Aviation Secretary, monitors the implementation of PNAC by the entities responsible for the management, regulation and inspection of civil aviation, civil airport infrastructure and civil air navigation infrastructure connected to the Ministry. In addition to the Ministry of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation, the bodies and entities of the National Civil Aviation Council (Conselho de Aviação Civil), or CONAC, monitor the implementation of PNAC.
The following chart illustrates the main regulatory bodies, their responsibilities and reporting lines within the Brazilian governmental structure:
The Ministry of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation oversees ANAC and INFRAERO and reports directly to the President of Brazil. The Ministry is also responsible for implementation of the airport infrastructure concession plan and the development of strategic planning for civil aviation.
The National Commission of Airport Authorities (Comissão Nacional de Autoridades Aeroportuárias), or CONAERO, is a commission that coordinates the different entities and public agencies related to airports. This has a rule-making role in the search for efficiency and security in airports operations.
CONAERO is composed by the following individuals and representatives of entities: (i) Ministry of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation, which chairs the commission; (ii) the President’s chief of staff; (iii) Agriculture, Livestock and Supplies Ministry; (iv) Defense Ministry; (v) Finance Ministry; (vi) Justice Ministry; (vii) Planning, Budget and Administration Ministry; (viii) Health Ministry; and (ix) ANAC.
ANAC is currently responsible for guiding, planning, stimulating and supporting the activities of public and private civil aviation companies in Brazil. ANAC also regulates flying operations and economic issues affecting air transportation, including matters relating to air safety, certification and fitness, insurance, consumer protection and competitive practices.
38
The Department of Air Space Control (Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo), or DECEA, controls and supervises the Brazilian Airspace Control System. The DECEA reports indirectly to the Brazilian Minister of Defense which, is responsible for planning, administrating and controlling activities related to airspace, aeronautical telecommunications and technology, including approving and overseeing the implementation of equipment as well as of navigation, meteorological and radar systems.
With respect to non-privatized airports, INFRAERO, a state-controlled corporation reporting to Ministry of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation, is in charge of managing, operating and controlling federal airports, including some control towers and airport safety operations. With respect to the recently privatized airports (Natal, Galeão, Confins, Guarulhos, Viracopos and Brasília), although INFRAERO still holds a minority stake in each of them, INFRAERO is no longer in charge of operations, which are now handled by their respective private operators. See “Regulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation Market—Airport Infrastructure” below.
CONAC is an advisory body of the President of Brazil and its upper level advisory board is composed of the Minister of Defense, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Treasury, the Minister of Development, Industry and International Trade, the Minister of Tourism, the President’s chief of staff, the Minister of Planning, Budget and Management, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation and the Commandant of the Air Force. CONAC has the authority to establish national civil aviation policies that may be adopted and enforced by the High Command of Aeronautics and by ANAC. CONAC establishes guidelines relating to the proper representation of Brazil in conventions, treaties and other actions related to international air transportation, airport infrastructure, the granting of supplemental funds to be used for the benefit of airlines and airports based on strategic, economic or tourism-related aspects, the coordination of civil aviation, air safety, the granting of air routes and concessions, as well as permission for the provision of commercial air transportation services.
Route Rights
Domestic routes. Until March 25, 2017, ANAC was the intermediary between airlines and airport operators regarding new routes, changes to existing routes and surveillance of allocated routes. After this date, pursuant to Resolution No. 440/2017, airlines negotiate the use of airport and aeronautical infrastructure directly with airport operators and providers of air navigation services prior to registering routes with ANAC. For airports defined by ANAC as “coordinated” or “of interest,” pursuant to Resolution No. 338/2014, airlines are still required to obtain slots. The implementation of Resolution No. 440/2017 is expected to permit more flexible and efficient networks to better serve demand for air services, principally in high and low seasons.
International routes. In general, requests for new international routes, or changes to existing routes, must be filed by each interested Brazilian airline that has been previously qualified by ANAC to provide international services, with the market access area (Gerência de Acesso ao Mercado), or GEAM, which, based on the provisions of the applicable bilateral agreement and general policies of the Brazilian aviation authorities, will submit a non-binding recommendation to ANAC’s president, who will decide on approval of the request. International route rights for all countries, as well as the corresponding transit rights, derive from bilateral air transport agreements negotiated between Brazil and foreign governments. Under such agreements, each government grants to the other the right to designate one or more of its domestic airlines to operate scheduled service between certain destinations in each country. Airlines are only entitled to apply for new international routes when they are made available under these agreements. For the granting of new routes and changes to existing ones, ANAC has the authority to approve Brazilian airlines to operate new routes, subject to the airline having filed studies satisfactory to ANAC demonstrating the technical and financial viability of such routes and fulfilling certain conditions in respect of the concession for such routes. Any airline’s international route frequency rights may be terminated if the airline fails to maintain at least 66% of flights provided for in its air transportation schedule for any 180-day period or suspends its operation for a period exceeding 180 days.
In 2010, ANAC approved the deregulation of international airfares for flights departing from Brazil to the United States and Europe, gradually removing the prior minimum fares. In addition, in 2010, CONAC approved the continuity of bilateral agreements providing for open skies policies with other South American countries and a new open skies policy with the United States, which was approved in 2017 by the Brazilian Congress and in March 2018 by the Senate and must be ratified by the President of Brazil. A similar agreement with Europe is still in its early stages. These new regulations should increase the number of passengers in South America and grow our market. To the extent that our presence and/or the presence of our partner, Delta, increase in the South American market, this will contribute to our business. On the other hand, to the extent competition increases in the expanded South American market and we and/or Delta lose significant market share, we may be adversely affected. For more information on the open skies agreement between Brazil and the United States, see “—Open Skies.”
39
Slots Policy
Domestic. Under Brazilian law, a domestic slot concession derives from a flight concession by ANAC, which is reflected in the airline’s registration. Such period of time is known as an “airport slot” and provides that an airline can operate at the specific airport at the intervals established.
Congonhas airport in the city of São Paulo is one of the slot constrained airports, where slots must be allocated to an airline before it may begin operations there. It is quite difficult to obtain and maintain a slot in Congonhas airport. The Santos-Dumont airport in Rio de Janeiro, is also a highly utilized airport with half-hourly shuttle flights between São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, and also presents certain slot restrictions. ANAC has imposed schedule restrictions on several Brazilian airports from which we operate. Operating restrictions, including the prohibition of international flights’ operations and the prohibition of civil aircraft’s operation after 11:00 p.m. and before 6:00 a.m., were imposed for Congonhas airport (São Paulo), one of the busiest Brazilian airports and the most important airport for our operations. No assurance can be given that these or other government measures will not have a material adverse effect on us.
CONAC has taken certain measures to minimize recent technical and operational problems at São Paulo’s airports, including the redistribution of air traffic from Congonhas airport (São Paulo) to the international airport in Guarulhos which is a “coordinated” airport in terms of slots. CONAC has also mentioned its intention to adjust tariffs for the use of busy airport hubs to encourage further redistribution of air traffic.
In July 2014, ANAC published new rules governing the allocation of slots at the main Brazilian airports, which consider operational efficiency (on-time performance and regularity) as the main criteria for the allocation of slots. Under these rules on-time performance and regularity are assessed in two annual seasons, following the IATA summer and winter calendars, between April and September and between October and March.
The minimum on-time performance and regularity targets for each series of slots in a season are 80% and 90%, respectively, at Congonhas airport (São Paulo) and 75% and 80%, respectively, for all other main airports. Airlines forfeit any series of slots that operate below the minimum criteria in a season. Forfeited slots are redistributed first to new entrants, which includes airlines that operate fewer than 5 slots in the relevant airport in the given weekday, and after to all airlines operating in the relevant airport based on their share of slots. In addition, in October 2014, ANAC distributed new slots at Congonhas airport, in light of increased runway capacity, exclusively to airlines with less than 12% of the slots.
Airport Infrastructure
INFRAERO, a state-controlled corporation, is in charge of managing, operating and controlling federal airports, including some control towers and airport safety operations.
Smaller, regional airports may belong to states or municipalities within Brazil and, in such cases, are often managed by local governmental entities. At most important Brazilian airports, INFRAERO performs safety and security activities, including passenger and baggage screening, cargo security measures and airport security.
The use of areas within federal airports, such as hangars and check-in counters, is subject to a concession by INFRAERO. If there is more than one applicant for the use of a specific airport area, INFRAERO may conduct a public bidding process for the granting of the concession. For recently privatized airports (Natal, Galeão, Confins, Guarulhos, Viracopos, Brasília, Fortaleza, Salvador, Florianópolis and Porto Alegre), operators may freely negotiate all commercial areas according to their own criteria; there is no requirement that a public bidding must be held in the event there is more than one applicant for the use of a specific airport area.
We have renewable concessions with terms varying from one to five years from INFRAERO to use and operate all of our facilities at each of the major airports that we serve. Our concession agreements for our terminals’ passenger service facilities, which include check-in counters and ticket offices, operations support areas and baggage service offices, contain provisions for periodic adjustments of the lease rates and the extension of the concession term.
40
All of the 60 Brazilian airports managed by INFRAERO at the end of 2017 are scheduled to receive some infrastructure investments and upgrades within the next three years. In addition, under the regional aviation development program, 270 current or new regional airports may receive investments in the next few years. These airport upgrade plans do not require contributions or investments by the Brazilian airlines and are not expected to be accompanied by increases in landing fees or passenger taxes on air travel.
The table below sets forth the number of passengers at the ten busiest airports in Brazil during 2017:
Airport |
Number of Passengers Inbound and Outbound(1) |
|
(in thousands) |
São Paulo – Guarulhos |
37,816 |
São Paulo – Congonhas |
21,859 |
Brasília |
16,913 |
Rio de Janeiro – Galeão |
16,243 |
Belo Horizonte – Confins |
10,164 |
Campinas – Viracopos |
9,333 |
Rio de Janeiro – Santos Dumont |
9,247 |
Porto Alegre |
8,012 |
Recife |
7,777 |
Salvador |
7,736 |
____________
Source: INFRAERO, DAESP and Guarulhos, Brasília, Rio de Janeiro Galeão, Confins and Viracopos airports
(1) Considers domestic and international departures and arrivals from main Brazilian airports.
Airport fees include airport charges for each landing and aircraft parking, connection fees as well as aeronautical and navigation fees. Most of these fees vary based on our level of operations and the rates are set by INFRAERO, DECEA and private airports. Since February 2012, the Brazilian government increased parking fees at the busiest airports, and at peak hours, which benefitted secondary hubs and off-peak flights in light of the differences in fees for the airlines that chose to operate in these airports or at these times. Currently, landing fees are fixed, based on the category of the airport and whether the flight is domestic or international. Navigation fees are also fixed, but consider the area overflown and whether the flight is domestic or international.
Airport Privatizations
In August 2011, the Brazilian government privatized the Natal airport, which construction was completed in mid-2014. In February 2012, the Brazilian government privatized the São Paulo (Guarulhos), Brasília and Campinas international airports, which will be operated by the winners of the privatization auction for periods of 20 to 30 years. In November 2013, the Brazilian government privatized Rio de Janeiro (Galeão) and Belo Horizonte (Confins) airports. Additionally, in March 2017, the Brazilian government privatized the international airports of Porto Alegre, Salvador, Florianópolis and Fortaleza. These ten airports combined account for 62.8% of Brazil’s total passenger volume.
41
The airports auctioned were:
Airport (Code) |
Grant |
Concession Term |
Minimum Investment |
Year of Concession |
Natal (NAT) |
R$170 million |
28 Years |
R$51.7 million |
2011 |
São Paulo (GRU) |
R$16.2 billion |
20 Years |
R$4.7 billion |
2012 |
Brasília (BSB) |
R$4.5 billion |
25 Years |
R$4.7 billion |
2012 |
Campinas (VCP) |
R$3.8 billion |
30 Years |
R$8.7 billion |
2012 |
Rio de Janeiro (GIG) |
R$19 billion |
25 Years |
R$4.8 billion |
2013 |
Belo Horizonte (CNF) |
R$1.8 billion |
30 Years |
R$1.1 billion |
2013 |
Salvador (SSA) |
R$1.59 billion |
30 Years |
R$1.24 billion |
2017 |
Fortaleza (FOR) |
R$1.51 billion |
30 Years |
R$1.44 billion |
2017 |
Porto Alegre (POA) |
R$382 million |
25 Years |
R$123 million |
2017 |
Florianópolis (FLN) |
R$241 million |
30 Years |
R$211 million |
2017 |
____________
Source: Civil Aviation Secretary (Secretaria de Aviação Civil)
Concession for Air Transportation Services
According to the Brazilian Federal Constitution, the Brazilian government is responsible for public services related to airspace, as well as airport infrastructure, and may provide these services directly or through third parties under concessions or authorizations. According to the Brazilian Aeronautical Code and regulations issued by CONAC, the application for a concession to operate regular air transportation services is subject to a license granted by ANAC to operate an airline and to explore regular air transportation services. The applicant is required by ANAC to have met certain economic, financial, technical, operational and administrative requirements in order to be granted such license. Additionally, a concession applicant must be an entity incorporated in Brazil, duly registered with the Brazilian Aeronautical Registry (Registro Aeronáutico Brasileiro), or RAB, must have a valid airline operating certificate (Certificado de Operador Aéreo), or COA, and must also comply with certain ownership restrictions. See “—Restrictions on the Ownership of Shares Issued by Concessionaires of Air Transportation Services.” ANAC has the authority to revoke a concession for failure by the airline to comply with the terms of the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, the complementary laws and regulations and the terms of the concession agreement.
Our concession was granted on January 2, 2001 by the High Command of Aeronautics of the Ministry of Defense and was renewed in 2009 for another ten years with an expiration date of December 14, 2019. The concession agreement can be terminated if, among other things, we fail to meet specified service levels, cease operations or declare bankruptcy.
The Brazilian Aeronautical Code and the regulations issued by CONAC and ANAC do not expressly provide for public bidding processes and currently it is not necessary to conduct public bidding processes prior to granting of concessions for the operation of air transportation services. Due to the intense growth of the civil aviation sector, this rule may be changed by the government, in order to allow more competition or to achieve other political purposes.
Import of Aircraft into Brazil
The import of civil or commercial aircraft into Brazil is subject to prior certification of the aircraft by ANAC. Import authorizations usually follow the general procedures for import of goods into Brazil, after which the importer must request the registration of the aircraft with the RAB.
Registration of Aircraft
The registration of aircraft in Brazil is governed by the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, under which no aircraft is allowed to fly in Brazilian airspace, or land in or take off from Brazilian territory, without having been properly registered. In order to be registered and continue to be registered in Brazil, an aircraft must have a certificate of registration (certificado de matrícula) and a certificate of airworthiness (certificado de aeronavegabilidade), both of which are issued by the RAB after technical inspection of the aircraft by ANAC. A certificate of registration attributes Brazilian nationality to the aircraft and is evidence of its enrollment with the competent aviation authority. A certificate of airworthiness is generally valid for six years from the date of ANAC’s inspection and authorizes the aircraft to fly in Brazilian airspace, subject to continuing compliance with certain technical requirements and conditions. The registration of any aircraft may be cancelled if it is found that the aircraft is not in compliance with the requirements for registration and, in particular, if the aircraft has failed to comply with any applicable safety requirements specified by ANAC or the Brazilian Aeronautical Code.
42
All information relating to the contractual status of an aircraft, including purchase and sale agreements, operating leases and mortgages, must be filed with the RAB in order to provide the public with an updated record of any amendments made to the aircraft certificate of registration.
Restrictions on the Ownership of Shares Issued by Concessionaires of Air Transportation Services
According to the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, in order to be eligible for a concession for operation of regular services, the entity operating the concession must have at least 80% of its voting stock held directly or indirectly by Brazilian citizens and must have certain management positions entrusted to Brazilian citizens. As of December 31, 2017, the foreign ownership limit for Brazilian airlines remained unchanged at 20%, although there have been repeated discussions by the Brazilian government and Congress to lift this restriction fully or partially, including most recently an announcement that the government intends to issue a new measure, subject to Congress approval, completely removing the foreign ownership limit.
The Brazilian Aeronautical Code also imposes certain restrictions on the transfer of capital stock of concessionaires of air transportation services, such as GLA, including the following:
· the voting shares have to be nominative and non-voting shares cannot be converted into voting shares;
· prior approval of the Brazilian aviation authorities is required for any transfer of shares, regardless of the nationality of the investor, which results in the change of the company’s corporate control, causes the assignee to hold more than 10% of the company’s capital stock or represents more than 2% of the company’s capital stock;
· the airline must file with ANAC, in the first month of each semester, a detailed shareholder chart, including a list of shareholders, as well as a list of all share transfers effected in the preceding semester; and
· based on its review of the airline’s shareholder chart, ANAC has the authority to subject any further transfer of shares to its prior approval.
We hold substantially all of the shares of GLA, a public concessionaire of air transportation services in Brazil. Under the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, the restrictions on the transfer of shares described above apply only to companies that hold concessions to provide regular air transportation services. Therefore, the restrictions do not apply to the Registrant.
Environmental Regulation
Brazilian airlines are subject to various federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including the disposal of materials and chemical substances and aircraft noise. These laws and regulations are enforced by various governmental authorities. Non-compliance with such laws and regulations may subject the violator to administrative and criminal sanctions, in addition to the obligation to repair or to pay damages caused to the environment and third parties. As far as civil liabilities are concerned, Brazilian environmental laws adopt the strict and joint liability regime. In this regard we may be liable for violations by third parties hired to dispose of our waste. Moreover, pursuant to Brazilian environmental laws and regulations, the piercing of the corporate veil of a company may occur in order to ensure enough financial resources to the recovery of damages caused against the environment.
We adopted several Environmental Management System, or EMS, procedures with our suppliers and use technical audits to enforce compliance. We exercise caution, and may reject goods and services from companies that do not meet our environmental protection parameters unless confirmation of compliance is received.
We are monitoring and analyzing the developments regarding amendments to Kyoto protocol and emissions regulations in the United States and Europe and may be obliged to acquire carbon credits for the operation of our business. No legislation on this matter has yet been enacted in Brazil.
43
Open Skies
In 2011, the United States and Brazil entered into an open skies agreement designed to provide airlines greater liberty in defining their routes, prices and capacity. The countries agreed on a transition period until 2015, by which time the open skies model was expected to be in force. The agreement was approved and thereby ratified by the Brazilian Congress in 2017 and approved by the Senate in March 2018 and is now awaiting ratification by the President of Brazil.
The open skies agreement’s principal purpose is to eliminate the limit on flight frequencies between the U.S. and Brazil, which had been set at 301 flights. The agreement also memorializes previously agreed terms, including free pricing, new itineraries and codeshare offers.
Among the important provisions of the open skies agreement are the rights to: (i) fly over a country without landing; (ii) make connections in another country for non-commercial purposes; and (iii) unlimited charter flight authorizations. The agreement also includes provisions regarding profit remittance, tax exemptions, airport tariffs and international agreements regarding civil aviation safety. The agreement does not, however, permit U.S. airlines to operate domestic flights within Brazil.
The open skies agreement is a significant commercial change for the airline industry as it will permit joint ventures among Brazilian and American airline companies.
Pending Legislation
The Brazilian congress is currently discussing a draft bill that would replace the current Brazilian Aeronautical Code (Código Brasileiro de Aeronáutica). In general, this draft bill deals with matters related to civil aviation, including airport concessions, consumer protection, limitation of airlines’ civil liability, compulsory insurance, fines and the increase of limits to foreign ownership in voting stock of Brazilian airlines. This draft bill is still under discussion in the House of Representatives and, if approved, must be submitted for approval to the Senate, before being sent for presidential approval. If the Brazilian civil aviation framework changes, or ANAC implements increased restrictions, the Brazilian airline industry could be negatively affected.
We are a holding company that directly or indirectly owns shares of seven subsidiaries: GLA; Smiles Fidelidade S.A., which was formed in July 2017 as a result of Smiles’ merger with Webjet Participações S.A.; Smiles Viagens e Turismo S.A., which is pre-operational; and four offshore subsidiaries: Gol Finance Inc.; GAC Inc., or GAC; Gol Finance (previously named Gol LuxCo S.A.); and Gol Dominicana Lineas Aereas Sas., which is non-operational. GLA is our operating subsidiary, under which we conduct our air transportation business. We are the majority shareholder of Smiles, which conducts the Smiles loyalty program. Gol Finance Inc., GAC and Gol Finance are offshore companies established for the purpose of facilitating cross-border general and aircraft financing transactions.
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
Our primary corporate offices are located in São Paulo, where our commercial, operations, technology, finance and administrative staff is primarily based. We have concessions to use other airport buildings and hangars throughout Brazil, including part of a hangar at Congonhas airport where we perform aircraft maintenance. As of December 31, 2017, we had finance lease agreements for 31 Boeing 737s, all of which had a purchase option at the end of the contract term. We own an Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. The certification of our Aircraft Maintenance Center authorizes airframe maintenance services for Boeing 737-300s, Boeing 767-200/300 and Boeing Next Generation 737-700 and 800s. We have three hangars at our Aircraft Maintenance Center, with a capacity to perform maintenance on six aircraft simultaneously and painting services on one additional aircraft. We also have room to build more hangars, if needed. For more information, see “Item 4B. Business Overview—Aircraft Fleet” and note 14 to our audited consolidated financial statements included herein.
44
ITEM 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
You should read this discussion in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.
Revenues
Our revenues derive primarily from transporting passengers on our aircraft. In 2017, 86.9% of our net revenues came from passenger transportation revenues, and the remaining 13.1% came from ancillary revenues, principally from: our cargo business, which utilizes cargo space on our passenger flights, fees and charges (including cancellation fees and other fees and taxes linked to air transportation services), as well as revenues from products and services, other than air tickets, sold for miles. In 2017, 85.5% of our revenues derived from our domestic operations and 14.5% from our international operations. We recognize passenger revenue, including revenue from Smiles’ loyalty program, which relates to the redemption of miles for Gol flight tickets, either when transportation is provided or when the unused ticket expires. We recognize cargo revenue when transportation is provided. Other ancillary revenue consists primarily of ticket change fees, excess baggage charges and interest on installment sales. Passenger revenues depend on capacity, load factor and yield. Our capacity is measured in terms of available seat kilometers (ASK), which represents the number of seats we make available on our aircraft multiplied by the number of kilometers the seats are flown. Load factor, or the percentage of our capacity that is actually used by paying customers, is calculated by dividing revenue passenger kilometers by available seat kilometers. Yield is the average amount that one passenger pays to fly one kilometer.
The following table presents our main operating performance indicators in 2015, 2016 and 2017:
|
Year Ended December 31, | ||
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
Load-factor |
77.2% |
77.5% |
79.7% |
Break-even load-factor |
78.1% |
72.1% |
72.3% |
Aircraft utilization (block hours per day) |
11.3 |
11.2 |
12.1 |
Yield per RPK (cents) |
22.4 |
24.1 |
24.7 |
Passenger revenue per ASK (cents) |
17.3 |
18.7 |
19.7 |
Operating revenue per ASK (cents) |
19.7 |
21.3 |
22.7 |
Number of departures |
315,902 |
261,514 |
260,654 |
Average number of operating aircraft |
129 |
117 |
109 |
Our revenues are net of ICMS and federal social contribution taxes, including social integration program (Programa de Integração Social), or PIS, and social contribution for financing social security (Contribuição Social para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social), or COFINS. ICMS does not apply to passenger revenues. The average rate of ICMS on cargo revenues varies by state from 0% to 20%. As a general rule, combined PIS and COFINS rates are 3.65% of passenger revenues and 9.25% of cargo revenues and Smiles revenues.
We have one of the largest e-commerce platforms in Brazil and we generate most of our revenues from ticket sales through our website.
ANAC and the aviation authorities of other countries in which we operate may influence our ability to generate revenues. In Brazil, ANAC approves the concession of flights, and consequently slots, entry of new companies, launch of new routes, increases in route frequencies and lease or acquisition of new aircraft. Our ability to grow and increase our revenues depends on approvals from ANAC for new routes, increased frequencies and additional aircraft.
45
Operating Expenses
We seek to lower our operating expenses by operating a young and standardized fleet, upgrading to Boeing 737 Max aircraft, utilizing our aircraft efficiently and improving their productivity, using and encouraging low-cost ticket sales and distribution processes. The main components of our operating expenses include aircraft fuel, rent and maintenance, sales and marketing expenses and salaries, including provisions for our profit sharing plan.
Our aircraft fuel expenses are higher than those of low-cost airlines in the United States and Europe because production, transportation and storage of fuel in Brazil depend on expensive and underdeveloped infrastructure, especially in the North and Northeast regions of the country. In addition, taxes on jet fuel are high and are passed along to us. Our aircraft fuel expenses are variable and fluctuate based on global oil prices. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil, a benchmark widely used for crude oil prices that is measured in barrels and quoted in U.S. dollars, varies significantly. The price per barrel at December 31, 2017 was US$60.42, as compared to US$53.77 at December 31, 2016. Since global oil prices are U.S. dollar-based, our aircraft fuel costs are also linked to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the real versus the U.S. dollar. Fuel costs represented 33% of our total operating costs and expenses in 2015, 29% in 2016 and 30% in 2017. In order to partially hedge against increases in oil prices, we enter into short to medium term arrangements to hedge our exposure. Our pricing and yield management strategy are also important components in hedging our exposure to fuel price fluctuations as we are able to pass a significant portion of these fluctuations to customers in the long-term, allowing us to recapture approximately two-thirds of this cost through our yield management.
Our aircraft rent expenses are in U.S. dollars and leases for 12 of our aircraft are subject to floating-rate payment obligations that are based on fluctuations in international interest rates. We currently have hedging policies in place to manage our interest rate, fuel price and foreign exchange rate exposure.
Our maintenance, material and repair expenses consist of light (line) and scheduled heavy (structural) maintenance of our aircraft. Line maintenance and repair expenses are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Structural maintenance for aircraft leased under finance leases is capitalized and amortized over the life of the maintenance cycle. Since the average age of our operating fleet was 9.2 years for 119 Boeing 737-700/800 aircraft at December 31, 2017, and most of the parts on our aircraft are under multi-year warranties, our aircraft require a low level of maintenance and we therefore incur low maintenance expenses. Our aircraft are covered by warranties that have an average term of 48 months for products and parts and 12 years for structural components. Thus, with regard to the accounting for aircraft maintenance and repair costs, our current and past results of operations may not be indicative of future results. Our Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais, is certified to provide maintenance for Boeing 737-300s, Boeing 767-200/300 and Boeing Next Generation 737-700 and 800s. We currently use this facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. We believe that we have an advantage compared to industry peers in maintenance, materials and repairs expenses due to our in-house maintenance. We believe that this advantage will continue in the foreseeable future.
Our passenger service expenses are expenses we incur directly related to our passengers, which include baggage handling, ramp services and expenses due to interrupted flights.
Our sales and marketing expenses include commissions paid to travel agents, fees paid for our own and third-party reservation systems and agents, fees paid to credit card companies and advertising. Our distribution costs are lower than those of other airlines in Brazil on a per available seat kilometer (ASK) basis because a higher proportion of our customers purchase tickets from us directly through our website instead of through traditional distribution channels, such as ticket offices, and we have comparatively fewer sales made through higher cost global distribution systems. We generate around 80% of our consolidated sales through our website and API systems, including internet sales through travel agents. For these reasons, we believe that we have an advantage compared to industry peers in sales and marketing expenses and expect this advantage will continue in the foreseeable future. Additionally, we have one of the lowest costs related to fraud and chargeback ratios in the industry on our e-commerce platform.
Salaries paid to our employees include annual cost of living adjustments and provisions made for our profit sharing plan.
Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing expenses include ground handling and the cost of airport facilities.
46
Other operating expenses comprise general and administrative expenses, purchased services, equipment rentals, passenger refreshments, communication costs, supplies, professional fees and gains or losses from early return of aircraft on finance leases.
Operating Segments
We have two operating segments:
· flight transportation; and
· Smiles loyalty program.
Our two segments have a number of transactions between each other, as the vast majority of miles redeemed are exchanged for tickets in flights operated by GLA. The most relevant aspects of intra-group transactions in this regard are:
Net revenue: a significant portion of the miles redeemed revenue is eliminated when we consolidate GLA and Smiles, as they relate to tickets purchased by Smiles from GLA and revenue is ultimately recognized as passenger transportation in our flight transportation segment.
Costs: a significant portion of redemption costs in the Smiles loyalty program segment is eliminated when we consolidate GLA and Smiles as they relate to tickets purchased by Smiles from GLA and ultimately recorded as flight transportation costs in our flight transportation segment.
Finance result: under the agreements between GLA and Smiles, Smiles makes certain advance ticket purchases at a discount. This discount is recognized as a financial expense in our flight transportation segment and as a financial income in our Smiles loyalty program segment, both of which are eliminated when we consolidate GLA and Smiles.
See “—Results of Operations—Segment Results of Operations” for more information on our operating segments.
Brazilian Macroeconomic Environment
As most of our operations are domestic, we are affected by Brazilian general economic conditions. While our growth since 2001 has been primarily driven by our expansion into new markets and increased flight frequencies, we have also been affected by macroeconomic conditions in Brazil. We believe the rate of growth in Brazil is important in determining our growth and our results of operations. Our revenue passenger kilometer in the domestic market increased by 3.8% in 2017, as compared to a 5.5% decrease in 2016 and a 0.5% increase in 2015. This increase was primarily due to Brazil’s recent economic recovery. After contractions in Brazil’s GDP in 2015 and 2016, Brazilian GDP increased by 1% in 2017.
Year |
Domestic Revenue Passenger Kilometers – RPK growth (contraction) |
Real growth GDP growth (contraction) |
2010 |
23.6% |
7.5% |
2011 |
15.9% |
4.0% |
2012 |
6.9% |
1.9% |
2013 |
1.4% |
3.0% |
2014 |
5.8% |
0.5% |
2015 |
1.1% |
(3.5)% |
2016 |
(5.7)% |
(3.5)% |
2017 |
3.2% |
1.0% |
Compared to 2016, our passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (PRASK) increased by 5.1% in 2017, due to a combination of an 2.2% yield increase and a 2.2 percentage point increase in load factor.
We are materially affected by currency fluctuations. In 2017, 43.8% of our operating expenses (including aircraft fuel, rent and maintenance, materials and repairs) were denominated in, or linked to, U.S. dollars and therefore varied with the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate within the year. We believe that our foreign exchange and fuel hedging programs partially protect us against short-term swings in the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate and jet fuel prices. See “Item 3. Risk Factors— Risks Relating to Us and the Brazilian Airline Industry.”
47
Inflation has also affected us and will likely continue to do so. In 2017, 56.2% of our operating expenses (excluding aircraft fuel, operating leases and maintenance) were denominated in reais, and the suppliers and service providers of these expense items generally attempt to increase their prices to reflect Brazilian inflation.
The following table shows data for real GDP growth (contraction), inflation, interest rates, the U.S. dollar selling rate and crude oil prices for and as of the periods indicated:
|
December 31, | ||
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Real GDP growth (contraction) |
(3.5)% |
(3.5)% |
1.0% |
Inflation (IGP-M)(1) |
10.5% |
7.2% |
(0.5)% |
Inflation (IPCA)(2) |
10.7% |
6.3% |
3.0% |
CDI rate(3) |
14.1% |
13.6% |
6.9% |
LIBOR rate(4) |
0.6% |
1.0% |
1.7% |
Appreciation (depreciation) of the real vs. U.S. dollar |
(41.6)% |
16.5% |
1.5% |
Period-end exchange rate—US$1.00 |
R$3.905 |
R$3.259 |
R$3.308 |
Average exchange rate—US$1.00(5) |
R$3.338 |
R$3.472 |
R$3.193 |
Period-end West Texas intermediate crude (per barrel) |
US$37.04 |
US$53.77 |
US$60.42 |
Period-end Increase (decrease) in West Texas intermediate crude (per barrel) |
(30.5)% |
45.2% |
12.4% |
Average period West Texas Intermediate crude (per barrel) |
US$48.80 |
US$43.31 |
US$50.85 |
Average period increase (decrease) in West Texas Intermediate crude (per barrel) |
(44.0)% |
(11.3)% |
17.4% |
_________
Sources: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, the Central Bank and Bloomberg
(1) Inflation (IGP-M) is the general market price index measured by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
(2) Inflation (IPCA) is a broad consumer price index measured by IBGE.
(3) The CDI rate is average of inter-bank overnight rates in Brazil (as of the last date of the respective period).
(4) Three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR rate as of the last date of the period. The LIBOR rate is the London inter-bank offer rate.
(5) Represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires our management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and judgments to develop amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. We strive to maintain a process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the estimates that are required to prepare our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our estimates and judgments are reasonable; however, actual results and the timing of recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates. In addition, estimates routinely require adjustments based on changing circumstances and new or better information.
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different outcomes under different assumptions and conditions. For a discussion of these and other accounting policies, see note 2.2(r) to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment, including reusable parts, are recorded at cost and are depreciated to estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Each component of property, plant and equipment that has a cost that is significant in relation to the overall cost of the item is depreciated separately. Aircraft and engine spares acquired on the introduction or expansion of a fleet, as well as reusable spares purchased separately, are carried as fixed assets and generally depreciated in line with the fleet to which they relate. Pre-delivery deposits refer to prepayments under the agreements with Boeing for the purchase of Boeing 737-800 Next Generation and 737-800 MAX aircraft and include interest and finance charges incurred during the manufacture of aircraft and leasehold improvements.
Under IAS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment,” major overhauls including replacement spares and labor costs are treated as a separate asset component with the cost capitalized and depreciated over the period to the next major overhaul. All other replacement spares and costs relating to maintenance of fleet assets are charged to the income statement on consumption or as incurred. Interest costs incurred on debts that fund progress payments on assets under construction, including pre-delivery deposits to acquire new aircraft, are capitalized and included as part of the cost of the assets through the earlier of the date of completion or aircraft delivery.
48
In estimating the useful life and expected residual values of our aircraft, we have primarily relied upon actual experience with the same or similar types of aircraft and recommendations from Boeing. Aircraft estimated useful life is based on the number of “cycles” flown (a cycle comprises one take-off and landing). We have made a conversion of cycles into years based on both our historical and anticipated future utilization of the aircraft. Subsequent revisions to these estimates, which can be significant, could be caused by changes to our maintenance program, changes in utilization of the aircraft (actual cycles during a given period of time), governmental regulations relating to aging aircraft and changing market prices of new and used aircraft of the same or similar types. We evaluate estimates and assumptions each reporting period and, when warranted, adjust these estimates and assumptions. These adjustments are accounted for on a prospective basis through depreciation and amortization expense, as required by IFRS.
We evaluate annually whether there is any indicator that our property, plant and equipment may be impaired. Factors that would indicate potential impairment may include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived asset, a significant change in the long-lived asset’s physical condition and operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the long-lived asset. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had recorded an impairment on property, plant and equipment of R$26.1 million and R$30.7 million, respectively, mainly related to replacement and spare parts. In 2017, we evaluated the impairment of our aircraft and no impairment or write-off was recorded.
Lease Accounting. Aircraft lease agreements are accounted for as either operating or capital leases (finance leases). When the risks and rewards of the lease are transferred to us, as lessee, the lease is classified as a capital lease. Capital leases are accounted for as an acquisition of the asset through a financing, with the aircraft recorded as a fixed asset and a corresponding liability recorded as a debt. Capital leases are recorded based on the lesser of the fair value of the aircraft or the present value of the minimum lease payments, discounted at an implicit interest rate, when it is clearly identified in the lease agreement, or market interest rate. The aircraft is depreciated through the lesser of its useful life or the lease term. Interest expense is recognized through the effective interest rate method, based on the implicit interest rate of the lease. Lease agreements that do not transfer the risks and rewards to us are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are accounted for as rent and we recognize rent expenses using the straight line method through the lease term.
Sale-leaseback transactions that result in a subsequent operating lease have different accounting treatments depending on the fair value of the asset, the price and the cost of the sale. If the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the difference is immediately recognized as a loss. When the sale gives rise to a gain it is recognized up to the fair value, with the excess deferred and amortized throughout the term of the lease. When the sale results in a loss and the carrying amount is not greater than fair value, the loss is deferred if compensated by future lease payments. If the carrying amount is greater than fair value, it is written down to fair value and if there is still a loss it is deferred if compensated by future lease payments.
Lease accounting is critical for us because it requires an extensive analysis of the lease agreements in order to classify and measure the transactions in our financial statements. Changes in the terms of our outstanding lease agreements and the terms of future lease agreements may affect how we account for our lease transactions and our future financial position and results of operations.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We have allocated goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives acquired through business combinations, for the purposes of impairment testing, to the cash-generating units, the operating subsidiaries GLA and Smiles, since segregation of their operations. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually by comparing the carrying amount to the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit, that has been measured on the basis of its value-in-use, by applying cash flow projections in the functional currency based on our approved business plan covering a five-year period followed by the long-term growth rate of 3.5%. The pre-tax discount rate applied to the cash flow projections was 15.5% for GLA’s cash-generating unit and 19.3% for the Smiles’ cash-generating unit, at December 31, 2017. Considerable judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and macroeconomic changes to estimate future cash flows and to measure the recoverable amount. Assumptions in our impairment evaluations are consistent with internal projections and operating plans.
49
Airport operating rights acquired as part of the acquisition of Varig and Webjet were capitalized at fair value at that date and are not amortized. Those rights are considered to have an indefinite useful life due to several factors and considerations, including requirements for necessary permits to operate within Brazil and limited slot availability in the most important airports in terms of traffic volume. The carrying values of the airport operating rights are reviewed for impairment at each reporting date and are subject to impairment testing when events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying values may not be recoverable. Costs related to the purchase or development of computer software that is separable from an item of related hardware is capitalized separately and amortized over a period not exceeding five years on a straight-line basis. The carrying value of these intangibles is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We assess at each balance sheet date whether intangibles with indefinite useful lives are impaired using discounted cash flow analyses. In 2017, no impairment or write-off was recognized for intangible assets. We believe none of our cash-generating units was at risk of having its value in use being less than its carrying value at the date of your most recent impairment analysis.
Derivative Financial Instruments. We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with IAS 39. In executing our risk management program, management uses a variety of financial instruments to protect against sharp changes in market prices and to mitigate the volatility of its expenditures related to these prices. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently the change in fair value is recorded in profit or loss, unless the derivative meets the strict criteria for cash flow hedge accounting.
For hedge accounting purposes, according to IAS 39, the hedge instrument is classified as: (i) a cash flow hedge when it protects against exposure to fluctuations in cash flows that are attributable to a particular risk associated with an asset or liability recognized regarding an operation that is highly likely to occur or to an exchange rate risk for an unrecognized firm commitment, and (ii) a fair value hedge when it protects from the results of a change in the fair value of a recognized liability, or a part thereof, that could be attributed to exchange risk.
At the beginning of a hedge transaction, we designate and formally document the item covered by the hedge, as well as the objective of the hedge and the risk policies strategy. Documentation includes identification of the hedge instrument, the item or transaction to be protected, the nature of the risk to be hedged and how the entity will determine the effectiveness of the hedge instrument in offsetting exposure to variations in the fair value of the item covered or the cash flows attributable to the risk covered. The foregoing is performed with a view to ensuring that such hedge instruments will be effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows, and these are quarterly appraised to determine if they really have been effective throughout the entire period for which they have been designated.
Amounts classified in equity are transferred to profit or loss each period in which the hedged transaction affects profit or loss. If the hedged item is the cost of non-financial asset, the amounts classified in equity are transferred to the initial carrying amount of the non-financial asset.
If the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, amounts previously recognized in equity are transferred to profit or loss. If the designation as a hedge is revoked, amounts previously recognized in equity are recognized in profit or loss.
We measure quarterly the effectiveness of the hedge instruments in offsetting changes in prices. Derivative financial instruments are effective if they offset between 80% and 125% of the changes in price of the item for which the hedge has been contracted. Any gain or loss resulting from changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments during the quarter in which they are not qualified for hedge accounting, as well as the ineffective portion of the instruments designated for hedge accounting, are recognized as other finance income (expenses).
Aircraft maintenance and repair costs. Our aircraft lease agreements specifically provide that we, as lessee, are responsible for maintenance of the leased aircraft and engines, and we must meet specified airframe and engine return conditions upon lease expiration. Under certain of our existing lease agreements, we pay maintenance deposits to aircraft and engine lessors that are to be applied to future maintenance events. These deposits are calculated based on a performance measure, such as flight hours or cycles, and are available for reimbursement to us upon the completion of the maintenance of the leased aircraft. If there are sufficient funds on deposit to reimburse us for our maintenance costs, such funds are returned to us. The maintenance deposits paid under our lease agreements do not transfer either the obligation to maintain the aircraft or the cost risk associated with the maintenance activities to the aircraft lessor. In addition, we maintain the right to select any third-party maintenance provider or to perform such services in-house. Therefore, we record these amounts as a deposit on our balance sheet and recognize maintenance expense when the underlying maintenance is performed, in accordance with our maintenance accounting policy. Certain of our lease agreements provide that excess deposits at the end of the lease term are not refundable to us. Such excess could occur if the amounts ultimately expended for the maintenance events were less than the amounts on deposit. Any excess amounts held by the lessor or retained by the lessor upon the expiration of the lease, which are not expected to be significant, would be recognized as additional aircraft rental expense at the time it is no longer probable that such amounts will be used for maintenance for which they were deposited.
50
We follow IAS 16 – “Property, Plant and Equipment” and perform the capitalization of the costs relating to engine overhauls. This practice establishes that costs on major maintenance (including replacement parts and labor) should be capitalized only when there is an extension of the estimated useful life of the engine. Such costs are capitalized and depreciated until the next stop for major maintenance. The expense recognized directly in the income statement refers to maintenance costs of other aircraft components or even maintenance of engines that do not extend their useful life.
In addition, certain of our lease agreements do not require maintenance deposits; instead letters of credit are issued on behalf of the lessor, which can be claimed if the aircraft maintenance does not occur as established in the review schedule. As of December 31, 2017, no letters of credit had been executed.
Our initial estimates of the maintenance expenses regarding the leases are equal to or in excess of the amounts required to be deposited. This demonstrates it is probable the amounts will be utilized for the maintenance for which they are to be deposited and the likelihood of an impairment of the balance is remote. There has been no impairment of our maintenance deposits.
A summary of activity in the Aircraft and Engine Maintenance Deposits is as follows:
|
2016 |
2017 |
|
(in millions of reais) | |
Beginning of year |
261.1 |
247.8 |
Amounts paid in |
291.8 |
110.5 |
Reimbursement and expense incurred |
(240.2) |
(98.0) |
Exchange variation |
(64.9) |
5.9 |
End of year |
247.8 |
266.2 |
Revenue Recognition. Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is provided. Tickets sold but not yet used are recorded as advance ticket sales that represent primarily deferred revenue for tickets sold for future travel dates. We recognize a portion of advance ticket sales as revenue based on historical data relating to the percentage of tickets sold that are not going to be used prior to the expiration date (“breakage”). The balance of deferred revenue is then reviewed on a monthly basis based on actual tickets that have expired and adjusted when necessary.
Mileage Program. The obligation created by the issuance of miles is measured based on the price that the miles were sold to its airline and non-airline partners, classified by us as the fair value of the transaction. The revenue recognition on the consolidated income or loss occurs when the Smiles Program participant, after redeeming the miles and exchanging it for flight tickets, is transported.
Miles accrued through Smiles last from three to ten years, depending on the member’s status. The associated value for mileage credits estimated to be cancelled is recognized as revenue. We calculate the expiration estimate and non-use based on historical data. Future opportunities can significantly alter customer profile and the historical patterns. Such changes may result in material changes to the deferred revenue balance, as well as revenues recognized from that program.
51
Share-Based Payments. We measure the fair value of equity-settled transactions with employees at the grant date using the Black & Scholes valuation model. The resulting amount, as adjusted for forfeitures, is charged to income over the period in which the options vest. At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated; representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The change in cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognized in the income statement prospectively over the remaining vesting period of the instrument.
Provisions. Provisions are recognized when we have a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Where we expect some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in profit or loss net of any reimbursement. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as a finance cost.
Aircraft and engines return provision: in aircraft operating leases, we are contractually required to return the equipment with a predefined level of operational capability; as a result we recognize a provision based on the aircraft return costs as set forth in the agreement. The aircraft’s return provisions costs are estimated based on expenditures incurred in aircraft reconfiguration (interior and exterior), license and technical certification, painting, and other costs, according to the return agreement. Engine return provisions are estimated based on an evaluation and minimum contractual conditions that the equipment should be returned to the lessor, considering not only the historical costs incurred, but also the equipment conditions at the time of the evaluation.
Deferred taxes. Deferred taxes are calculated based on tax losses, temporary differences arising on differences between tax bases and carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes of our assets and liabilities.
Even though unused tax losses and temporary differences have no expiration date in Brazil, deferred tax assets are recorded when there is evidence that future taxable profit will be available to use such tax credits. We record our deferred tax assets based on projections for future taxable profits, which considers a number of assumptions for revenue increases, for operating costs such as jet fuel prices, leasing expenses, etc. Our business plan is revised annually in order to reevaluate the amounts to be recorded as deferred tax assets.
The use of deferred taxes is a critical accounting policy for us because it requires a number of assumptions and is based on our best estimate of our projections related to future taxable profit. In addition, because the preparation of our business plan is subject to a variety of market conditions, the results of our operations may vary significantly from our projections and as such, the amounts recorded as deferred tax assets may be impacted significantly.
As of December 31, 2017, we had R$5.1 billion of tax loss carryforwards and negative basis of social contribution mainly from GLA and Webjet, which we acquired in 2011 and which merged with Smiles in July 2017 to form Smiles Fidelidade S.A. Under Brazilian tax laws we may only use our tax loss carryforwards to offset taxes payable up to 30% of the taxable income for each year. Thus, despite having a balance of tax loss carryforwards, we will have to pay income taxes on any taxable income in excess of this 30% compensation limit.
As a result of a history of net losses, fluctuations of the U.S. dollar exchange rate, and the instability of the political and economic environment in Brazil, we reassessed the recognition of tax credits on net operating losses carryforward and other temporary differences, and Gol and GLA have not recognized R$34.8 million and R$1,405.6 million, respectively, of deferred tax assets from net operating losses carryforward and GLA also limited the recognition of tax credits on other temporary differences based on the expected realization of the deferred tax liabilities. Additionally, GLA has not recognized the net amount of R$163.4 million of deferred tax assets.
52
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016
Demand in the Brazilian airline market, comprising domestic and international flights, as measured in revenue passenger kilometers (RPK), increased by 5.6% in 2017 as compared to 2016, while capacity in Brazil, as measured by available seat kilometers (ASK), increased by 3.8% in the same period.
The table below presents domestic and international industry capacity and demand for the periods indicated:
Industry Capacity and Demand(1) |
2016 |
2017 |
Change |
Available Seat Kilometers – ASK (billions) |
150.7 |
156.5 |
3.8% |
Domestic |
111.2 |
112.8 |
1.4% |
International |
39.5 |
43.7 |
10.6% |
Revenue Passenger Kilometers – RPK (billions) |
122.1 |
128.9 |
5.6% |
Domestic |
89.0 |
91.9 |
3.2% |
International |
33.1 |
37.0 |
12.0% |
Load Factor |
81.0% |
82.4% |
1.4 p.p. |
Domestic |
80.0% |
81.5% |
1.5 p.p. |
International |
83.7% |
84.8% |
1.1 p.p |
____________
Source: ANAC
(1) Considering only Brazilian companies.
During the course of 2017, our capacity increased 0.8% as a result of a 4.8% increase in stage length and a 4.2% reduction in the number of take-offs. Demand increased 3.6% as compared to 2016, resulting in a load factor of 79.7%, an increase of 2.2 percentage points when compared to 2016. Our passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (PRASK) increased by 5.1% in 2017 and our domestic market share was 36.2%, which represents an increase of 0.2 percentage points as compared to 2016.
In 2017, our domestic capacity increased 0.9% as compared to 2016, while domestic demand increased by 3.8%, leading to a domestic load factor of 80.2%, 2.3 percentage points higher than in 2016. Also in 2017, our international capacity increased by 0.2%, while our international demand increased 2.2%, leading to an international load factor of 76.1%, 1.5 percentage points higher than in 2016.
The table below presents our domestic and international capacity and demand for the periods indicated:
Gol Capacity and Demand |
2016 |
2017 |
Change |
Available Seat Kilometers – ASK (millions) |
46,329 |
46,694 |
0.8% |
Domestic |
41,104 |
41,459 |
0.9% |
International |
5,226 |
5,235 |
0.2% |
Revenue Passenger Kilometers – RPK (millions) |
35,928 |
37,230 |
3.6% |
Domestic |
32,031 |
33,246 |
3.8% |
International |
3,897 |
3,984 |
2.2% |
Load Factor |
77.5% |
79.7% |
2.2 p.p |
Domestic |
77.9% |
80.2% |
2.3 p.p |
International |
74.6% |
76.1% |
1.5 p.p |
____________
Source: ANAC
Our recent comprehensive operational and financial repositioning started to show its full impact in 2017. A combination of our ability to increase revenue through yield raise and ancillary revenues and cost control through operational productivity resulted in an operating margin of 9.4%, 2.3 percentage points higher than in 2016.
The table below presents certain data from our results of operations for the periods indicated:
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
2016 |
2017 |
|
(in millions of reais) | |
Operating revenue |
|
|
Passenger |
8,671.4 |
9,185.8 |
Cargo and other |
1,195.9 |
1,390.2 |
Total operating revenue |
9,867.3 |
10,576.0 |
Operating expenses |
|
|
Salaries |
(1,656.8) |
(1,708.1) |
Aircraft fuel |
(2,695.4) |
(2,887.7) |
Aircraft rent |
(996.9) |
(939.7) |
Sales and marketing |
(556.0) |
(590.8) |
Landing fees |
(687.4) |
(664.2) |
Passenger service expenses |
(461.8) |
(437.0) |
Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing |
(753.5) |
(874.7) |
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
(593.1) |
(368.7) |
Depreciation and amortization |
(447.7) |
(505.4) |
Other operating expenses |
(320.9) |
(610.3) |
Total operating expenses |
(9,169.5) |
(9,586.8) |
Equity results |
(1.3) |
0.5 |
Income before financial (expense), net and income taxes |
696.5 |
989.8 |
Financial income (expense), net |
664.9 |
(918.8) |
Income before income taxes |
1,361.4 |
71.0 |
Income taxes |
(259.1) |
307.2 |
Net income |
1,102.4 |
378.2 |
53
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased by 7.2%, from R$9,867.3 million in 2016 to R$10,576.0 million in 2017. On a unit basis, operating revenue per available seat kilometer (RASK) increased by 6.3%, from R$21.3 cents in 2016 to R$22.65 cents in 2017. This was due to the combination of: (i) a rational competitive environment resulting in higher yields (a 2.2% increase in 2017) and increased load factors (an increase of 2.2 percentage points in 2017) and (ii) an increase of 16.2% in revenue from cargo transportation and other ancillary revenues, such as rebooking, baggage and other fees.
The table below presents a breakdown of our operating revenue for the periods indicated:
|
Year Ended December 31, | ||
|
2016 |
2017 |
Change % |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
9,867.3 |
10,576.0 |
7.2% |
Passenger |
8,671.4 |
9,185.8 |
5.9% |
Cargo and other |
1,195.9 |
1,390.2 |
16.2% |
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased by 4.6%, from R$9,169.5 million in 2016 to R$9,586.8 million in 2017, mainly due to the higher price of jet fuel in 2017 and an increase in the products and services provided to Smiles customers.
The following table sets forth our total operating expenses for the periods indicated:
|
Year Ended December 31, | ||
|
2016 |
2017 |
Change % |
|
(in millions of reais, except percentages) | ||
Salaries |
(1,656.8) |
(1,708.1) |
3.1% |
Aircraft fuel |
(2,695.4) |
(2,887.7) |
7.1% |
Aircraft rent |
(996.9) |
(939.7) |
(5.7)% |
Sales and marketing |
(556.0) |
(590.8) |
6.3% |
Landing fees |
(687.4) |
(664.2) |
(3.4)% |
Passenger service expenses |
(461.8) |
(437.0) |
(5.4)% |
Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing |
(753.5) |
(874.7) |
16.1% |
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
(593.1) |
(368.7) |
(37.8)% |
Depreciation and amortization |
(447.7) |
(505.4) |
12.9% |
Other operating expenses |
(320.9) |
(610.3) |
90.2% |
Total operating expenses |
(9,169.5) |