golform20f_2015.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing

 

 

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2016

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________

FORM 20-F

_______________

 

¨            REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

x           ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

OR

¨            TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

¨            SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-32221

Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Gol Intelligent Airlines Inc.

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

_________________

The Federative Republic of Brazil

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Edmar Prado Lopes Neto
+55 11 5098-7872
Fax: +55 11 5098-2341
E-mail: ri@golnaweb.com.br
Praça Comandante Linneu Gomes, S/N Portaria 3,
Jardim Aeroporto
04626-020 São Paulo, São Paulo
Federative Republic of Brazil
(+55 11 2128-4700)


(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

___________________________________________

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Preferred Shares, without par value
American Depositary Shares (as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts), each representing one share of Preferred Stock

New York Stock Exchange*
New York Stock Exchange

 

* Not for trading purposes, but only in connection with the trading on the New York Stock Exchange of American Depositary Shares representing those preferred shares.

___________________________________________

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

___________________________________________

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
7.50% Senior Notes Due 2017

___________________________________________

 


 

 

The number of outstanding shares of each class of stock of Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A. as of December 31, 2015:

5,035,037,140                                                      Shares of Common Stock

 203,383,968                                                        Shares of Preferred Stock

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

If this is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated Filer ¨

Accelerated Filer x

Non-accelerated Filer ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the Registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP ¨

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board x

Other ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

 

 


 

 

 

     
Table of Contents
 
Presentation of Financial and Other Data 1
Cautionary Statements about Forward-Looking Statements 2
ITEM 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers 3
ITEM 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable 3
ITEM 3. Key Information 3
A. Selected Financial Data 3
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness 7
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds 7
D. Risk Factors 7
ITEM 4. Information on the Company 16
A. History and Development of the Company 16
B. Business Overview 17
C. Organizational Structure 43
D. Property, Plant and Equipment 43
ITEM 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments 43
ITEM 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 43
A. Operating Results 43
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources 65
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. 71
D. Trend Information 71
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements 71
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations 72
ITEM 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees 72
A. Directors and Senior Management 72
B. Compensation 77
C. Board Practices 78
D. Employees 80
E. Share Ownership 81
ITEM 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions 81
A. Major Shareholders 81
B. Related Party Transactions 82
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel 86
ITEM 8. Financial Information 86
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information 86
B. Significant Changes 91
ITEM 9. The Offer and Listing 91
A. Offer and Listing Details 91
B. Plan of Distribution 93
C. Markets 93
D. Selling Shareholders 98
E. Dilution 98
F. Expenses of the Issue 98
ITEM 10. Additional Information 98
A. Share Capital 98

 

 

 

 

 

     
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association 98
C. Material Contracts 107
D. Exchange Controls 108
E. Taxation 108
F. Dividends and Paying Agents 117
G. Statement by Experts 117
H. Documents on Display 117
I. Subsidiary Information 117
ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 117
ITEM 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities 118
A. American Depositary Shares 118
ITEM 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies 120
ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds 120
ITEM 15. Controls and Procedures 120
ITEM 16. Reserved 121
ITEM 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert 121
ITEM 16B. Code of Ethics 121
ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 121
ITEM 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees 122
ITEM 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers 122
ITEM 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant 122
ITEM 16G. Corporate Governance 122
ITEM 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure 124
ITEM 17. Financial Statements 125
ITEM 18. Financial Statements 125
ITEM 19. Exhibits 125
Signature   128

ii


 

 

Presentation of Financial and Other Data

The consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), in reais.

We have translated some of the real amounts contained in this annual report into U.S. dollars. The rate used to translate such amounts in respect of the year ended December 31, 2015 was R$3.9048 to US$1.00, which was the commercial rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars in effect on December 31, 2015, as reported by the Central Bank. The U.S. dollar equivalent information presented in this annual report is provided solely for the convenience of investors and should not be construed as implying that the real amounts represent, or could have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at the above rate. See “Exchange Rates” for more detailed information regarding the Brazilian foreign exchange system and historical data on the exchange rate of the real against the U.S. dollar.

In this annual report, we use the terms “the Registrant” to refer to Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A., and “Gol”, “Company”, “we,” “us” and “our” to refer to the Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries together, except where the context requires otherwise. The term VRG refers to VRG Linhas Aéreas S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant. References to “preferred shares” and “ADSs” refer to non-voting preferred shares of the Registrant and American depositary shares representing those preferred shares, respectively, except where the context requires otherwise.

The phrase “Brazilian government” refers to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil, and the term “Central Bank” refers to the Banco Central do Brasil, or the Central Bank. The term “Brazil” refers to the Federative Republic of Brazil. The terms “U.S. dollar” and “U.S. dollars” and the symbol “US$” refer to the legal currency of the United States. The terms “real” and “reais” and the symbol “R$” refer to the legal currency of Brazil. “IFRS” refers to the international financial reporting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB. We make statements in this annual report about our competitive position and market share in, and the market size of, the Brazilian and international airline industry. We have made these statements on the basis of statistics and other information from third party sources, governmental agencies or industry or general publications that we believe are reliable. Although we have no reason to believe any of this information or these reports are inaccurate in any material respect, we have not verified the competitive position, market share and market size or market growth data provided by third parties or by industry or general publications. All industry and market data contained in this annual report is based upon the latest publicly available information as of the date of this annual report.

Certain figures included in this annual report have been rounded. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic sum of the figures that precede them.

This annual report contains terms relating to operating performance in the airline industry that are defined as follows:

·         “Aircraft utilization” represents the average number of block-hours operated per day per aircraft for the total aircraft fleet.

·         “Available seat kilometers” or “ASK” represents the aircraft seating capacity multiplied by the number of kilometers flown.

·         “Average stage length” represents the average number of kilometers flown per flight.

·         “Block-hours” refers to the elapsed time between an aircraft’s leaving an airport gate and arriving at an airport gate.

·         “Breakeven load factor” is the passenger load factor that will result in passenger revenues being equal to operating expenses.

·         “Load factor” represents the percentage of aircraft seating capacity that is actually utilized (calculated by dividing revenue passenger kilometers by available seat kilometers).

·         “Operating expense per available seat kilometer” or “CASK” represents operating expenses divided by available seat kilometers.

 

1


 

 

·         “Operating expense excluding fuel expense per available seat kilometer” or “CASK - ex fuel” represents operating expenses less fuel expense divided by available seat kilometers.

·         “Operating revenue per available seat kilometer” or “RASK” represents operating revenue divided by available seat kilometers.

·         “Passenger revenue per available seat kilometer” or “PRASK” represents passenger revenue divided by available seat kilometers.

·         “Revenue passengers” represents the total number of paying passengers flown on all flight segments.

·         “Revenue passenger kilometers” or “RPK” represents the numbers of kilometers flown by revenue passengers.

·         “Yield per passenger kilometer” or “yield” represents the average amount one passenger pays to fly one kilometer.

Cautionary Statements about Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report includes forward-looking statements, principally under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Business Overview.” We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current beliefs, expectations and projections about future events and financial trends affecting us. Many important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this annual report, could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

·         general economic, political and business conditions in Brazil and in other South American and Caribbean markets we serve;

·         the effects of global financial markets and economic crises;

·         management’s expectations and estimates concerning our future financial performance and financing plans and programs;

·         our level of fixed obligations;

·         our capital expenditure plans;

·         our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms;

·         inflation and fluctuations in the exchange rate of the real;

·         existing and future governmental regulations, including air traffic capacity controls;

·         increases in fuel costs, maintenance costs and insurance premiums;

·         changes in market prices, customer demand and preferences, and competitive conditions;

·         cyclical and seasonal fluctuations in our operating results;

·         defects or mechanical problems with our aircraft;

·         our ability to successfully implement our strategy;

·         developments in the Brazilian civil aviation infrastructure, including air traffic control, airspace and airport infrastructure, and

·         the risk factors discussed under “Risk Factors.”

The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “aim,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, and the effects of future regulation and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly or to revise any forward-looking statements after we distribute this annual report because of new information, future events or other factors. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this annual report might not occur and are not guarantees of future performance.

 

2


 

 

PART I

ITEM 1.       Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.       Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.       Key Information

A.      Selected Financial Data

We present in this section the following summary financial data:

·         Summary financial information derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included herein as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013; and

·         Summary financial information derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included herein as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

The following tables present summary historical consolidated financial and operating data for us for each of the periods indicated. Solely for the convenience of the reader, real amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been translated into U.S. dollars at the commercial market rate in effect on December 31, 2015 as reported by the Central Bank of R$3.9048 to US$1.00.

Summary Financial Information

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2015

Statements of Operations

(in thousands of R$, except per share/ADS information)

(in thousands of US$)

Operating revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Passenger

6,713,029

7,159,987

8,122,161

9,045,831

8,583,388

2,198,163

Cargo and other

826,279

943,572

834,051

1,020,383

1,194,619

305,936

Total operating revenue

7,539,308

8,103,559

8,956,212

10,066,214

9,778,007

2,504,099

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries

(1,560,436)

(1,569,670)

(1,333,462)

(1,374,096)

(1,580,531)

(404,766)

Aircraft fuel

(3,060,665)

(3,742,219)

(3,610,822)

(3,842,276)

(3,301,368)

(845,464)

Aircraft rent 

(505,058)

(644,031)

(699,193)

(844,571)

(1,100,086)

(281,726)

Sales and marketing

(402,568)

(426,582)

(516,059)

(667,372)

(617,403)

(158,114)

Landing fees

(395,249)

(559,421)

(566,541)

(613,153)

(681,378)

(174,498)

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing

(484,642)

(528,737)

(599,479)

(747,447)

(1,019,833)

(261,174)

Maintenance, materials and repairs

(434,181)

(417,990)

(460,805)

(511,045)

(603,925)

(154,662)

Depreciation and amortization

(395,807)

(519,631)

(560,966)

(463,296)

(419,691)

(107,481)

Other operating expenses

(633,634)

(600,891)

(342,896)

(495,526)

(633,628)

(162,269)

Gain on bargain purchase

88,428

-

-

-

-

-

Total operating expenses

(7,783,812)

(9,009,172)

(8,690,223)

(9,558,782)

(9,957,843)

(2,550,154)

             

 

3


 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2015

Statements of Operations

(in thousands of R$, except per share/ADS information)

(in thousands of US$)

Equity results

-

-

-

(2,490)

(3,941)

(1,009)

Income (loss) before financial expense, net and income taxes

(244,504)

(905,613)

265,989

504,942

(183,777)

(47,064)

Financial expense, net

(755,914)

(679,209)

(919,216)

(1,457,622)

(3,263,323)

(835,721)

Loss before income taxes

(1,000,418)

(1,584,822)

(653,227)

(952,680)

(3,447,100)

(882,785)

Income taxes

248,880

71,907

(71,363)

(164,601)

(844,140)

(216,180)

Net loss

(751,538)

(1,512,915)

(724,590)

(1,117,281)

(4,291,240)

(1,098,965)

Attributable to non-controlling interests

-

-

71,957

128,888

169,643

43,445

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

(751,538)

(1,512,915)

(796,547)

(1,246,169)

(4,460,883)

(1,142,410)

Basic loss per preferred share (1)

(2.78)

(5.52)

(2.88)

(4.48)

(14.76)

(3.78)

Basic loss per common share (1)

(0.08)

(0.16)

(0.08)

(0.13)

(0.42)

(0.11)

Basic loss per ADS (1)(2)

(27.80)

(55.20)

(28.80)

(44.80)

(147.60)

(37.80)

Diluted loss per preferred share (1)

(2.78)

(5.52)

(2.88)

(4.48)

(14.76)

(3.78)

Diluted loss per common share (1)

(0.08)

(0.16)

(0.08)

(0.13)

(0.42)

(0.11)

Diluted loss per ADS(1)(2)

(27.80)

(55.20)

(28.80)

(44.80)

(147.60)

(37.80)

Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to basic earnings (loss) per preferred share (in thousands)(1)

133,342

134,298

132,780

134,151

158,285

158,285

Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to basic loss per common share (in thousands)(1)

4,796,146

4,900,915

5,035,037

5,035,037

5,035,037

5,035,037

Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to diluted loss per preferred share (in thousands)(1)

133,342

134,298

132,780

134,151

158,285

158,285

Weighted average number of outstanding shares in relation to diluted loss per common share (in thousands)(1)

4,796,146

4,900,915

5,035,037

5,035,037

5,035,037

5,035,037

Dividends declared per preferred share (net of withheld income taxes)

-

-

-

-

-

-

             

 

 

 

 

 

 

4


 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2015

Balance Sheet Data:

(in thousands of R$)

(in thousands of US$)

Cash and cash equivalents

1,230,287

775,551

1,635,647

1,898,773

1,072,332

274,619

Short-term investments

1,009,068

585,028

1,155,617

296,824

491,720

125,927

Trade receivables

354,134

325,665

324,821

352,284

462,620

118,475

Deposits

630,599

657,196

847,708

793,508

1,020,074

261,236

Total assets

10,655,141

9,027,098

10,638,448

9,976,647

10,368,397

2,655,295

Short-term debt

1,552,440

1,719,625

440,834

1,110,734

1,396,623

357,668

Long-term debt

3,439,008

3,471,550

5,148,551

5,124,505

7,908,303

2,025,277

Total equity

2,205,911

732,828

1,218,500

(332,974)

(4,322,440)

(1,106,955)

Capital stock

2,316,500

2,499,689

2,501,574

2,618,748

3,080,110

788,801

             

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2015

Other Financial Data:

(in thousands of R$ except percentages)

(in thousands of US$)

Operating margin(3)

(3.2)%

(11.2)%

3.0%

5.0%

(1.9)%

(1.9)%

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

(602,520)

133,293

403,881

1,129,192

(599,467)

(153,521)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(469,168)

(590,443)

(318,936)

(431,610)

(1,259,157)

(322,464)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

354,547

(4,381)

807,162

(309,584)

750,190

192,120

 

Summary Operational Data

 

Year Ended December 31

 

2011(4)

2012

2013

2014

2015

Operating Data:

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue passengers (in thousands)

36,220

39,164

36,306

39,749

38,868

Revenue passenger kilometers (in millions)(5)

34,461

36,410

34,684

38,085

38,410

Available seat kilometers (in millions) (5)

50,373

51,867

49,633

49,503

49,744

Load-factor 

68.4%

70.2%

69.9%

76.9%

77.2%

Break-even load-factor 

70.6%

78.0%

67.8%

73.1%

78.1%

Aircraft utilization (block hours per day)

13.0

12.1

11.2

11.5

11.1

Average fare (R$)

185

183

224

228

243

Yield per passenger kilometer (R$ cents)

19.5

19.7

23.4

23.8

23.3

Passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (R$ cents)

13.4

13.8

16.4

18.3

17.3

Operating revenue per available seat kilometer (R$ cents)

15.0

15.6

18.0

20.3

19.7

Operating expense per available seat kilometer (R$ cents)

15.5

17.4

17.5

19.3

20.0

Operating expense less fuel expense per available seat kilometer (R$ cents)

9.4

10.2

10.2

11.6

13.4

Departures

314,190

348,578

316,466

317,594

315,902

Departures per day

861

955

867

870

866

Destinations served

63

65

65

71

68

Average stage length (kilometers)

908

877

897

912

933

Full-time equivalent employees at period end 

20,525

17,726

16,319

16,875

16.472

Fuel liters consumed (in thousands)

1,591,917

1,655,421

1,511,869

1,538,202

1,551,137

Percentage of sales through website during period(6)

88.4%

88.8%

87.6%

83.1%

80.7%

Percentage of sales through website and call center during period

94.5%

94.5%

92.5%

87.3%

84.5%

_________

(1)   Adjusted to reflect that the one to 35 stock split of our common shares on March 23, 2015 and that since that date our preferred shares are entitled to receive dividends per share in an amount 35 times the amount of dividends per share paid to holders of our common shares in order to account for the split of our common shares. Our preferred shares are not entitled to any fixed dividend preferences. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing–C. Markets–Corporate Governance Practices” for further details.

 

5


 

 

(2)   Adjusted to reflect the change of the ratio of our ADSs to preferred shares in February 2016 from one ADS to one preferred share to one ADS to ten preferred shares. See “Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities–A. American Depositary Shares–ADR Ratio Change.”

(3)   Operating margin represents operating income (loss) before financial results and income taxes divided by operating revenue.

(4)   Information regarding revenue passengers, aircraft utilization, average fare, departures, departures per day, average stage length, average number of operating aircraft, fuel liters consumed, percentage of sales through website and percentage of sales through website and call center include data for Webjet as from October 1, 2011.

(5)   Source: National Civil Aviation Agency (Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil), or ANAC.

(6)   Considering sales through our website and API (application programming interface) systems.

Exchange Rates

Brazil’s foreign exchange system allows the purchase and sale of currency and the international transfer of reais by any person or legal entity, regardless of amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures.

The Brazilian currency has during the last decades experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies. The exchange rate of the real was R$1.566 per US$1.00 in August 2008. Primarily as a result of the crisis in the global financial markets, the real depreciated 31.9% against the U.S. dollar and reached R$2.337 per US$1.00 at year end 2008. In 2009 and 2010, the real appreciated against the U.S. dollar and reached R$1.666 per US$1.00 at year end 2010. During 2011 the real depreciated and, on December 31, 2011, the exchange rate was R$1.876 per US$1.00. From 2012 through 2015, the real continued to depreciate and on December 31, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, the exchange rate was R$2.044, R$2.343, R$2.656 and R$3.905 per US$1.00.

The Central Bank has intervened occasionally to combat instability in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to allow the real to float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through a currency band system or otherwise.

The following tables present the selling rate, expressed in reais to the U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods indicated:

 

Period-End

Average for Period (1)

Low

High

 

(R$ per US$)

Year

 

 

 

 

2011

1.876

1.675

1.535

1.902

2012

2.044

1.955

1.702

2.112

2013

2.343

2.161

1.953

2.446

2014

2.656

2.353

2.197

2.740

2015

3.905

3.339

2.575

4.195

2016 (through April 26, 2016)

3.530

3.579

3.513

4.156

 

 

Month-End

Average for Month (2)

Low

High

 

(R$ per US$)

Month

 

 

 

 

October 2015

3.859

3.880

3.739

4.001

November 2015

3.851

3.777

3.701

3.851

December 2015

3.905

3.871

3.748

3.983

January 2016

4.043

4.052

3.986

4.156

February 2016

3.980

3.974

3.865

4.049

March 2016

3.559

3.704

3.559

3.991

April 2016 (through April 26)

3.530

3.832

3.513

3.692

_________

Source: Central Bank

(1) Represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.

 

6


 

 

(2) Average of the lowest and highest rates in the month.

B.      Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C.      Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D.      Risk Factors

An investment in the ADSs or our preferred shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of the ADSs could decline due to any of these risks or other factors, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect us.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely affect us and the trading price of our ADSs and our preferred shares.

The Brazilian federal government has frequently intervened in the Brazilian economy and occasionally has made drastic changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian federal government’s actions to control inflation and affect other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of the preferred shares and the ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in policy or regulations at the federal, state or municipal level involving or affecting factors such as:

·         interest rates;

·         currency fluctuations;

·         monetary policies;

·         inflation;

·         liquidity of capital and lending markets;

·         tax policies;

·         labor regulations;

·         energy and water shortages and rationing;

·         exchange rates and exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad, such as those that were briefly imposed in 1989 and early 1990; and

·         other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian federal government will implement changes in policy or regulation affecting these or other factors in the future may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies. These and other future developments in the Brazilian economy and governmental policies may adversely affect us and our business and results of operations and may adversely affect the trading price of our preferred shares and ADSs.

In addition and as a consequence to the above mentioned, since 2011, Brazil has been experiencing an economic slowdown. The Gross Domestic Product, or GDP, growth (contraction) rates were (3.8)% in 2015, 0.1% in 2014, 2.7% in 2013, 1.8% in 2012 and 3.9% in 2011, compared to a GDP growth of 7.5% in 2010. In 2016, analysts project that the Brazilian GDP will contract 3.7%, according to the Focus Report published by the Brazilian Central Bank on April 1, 2016.

 

7


 

 

Our results of operations and financial condition have been, and will continue to be, affected by the growth rate of the Brazilian GDP. We cannot assure you that the GDP will increase or remain stable. Developments in the Brazilian economy may affect Brazil’s growth rates and, consequently, the use of our products and services.

Political instability may adversely affect our business and results of operations and the price of our preferred shares.

Brazil’s political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political crises have affected and continue to affect investor confidence and of the general public, which resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued by Brazilian companies.

Currently, Brazilian markets are experiencing heightened volatility due to the uncertainties derived from the ongoing Lava Jato investigation, being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, and its impact on the Brazilian economy and political environment. Members of the Brazilian federal government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of large state-owned companies have faced allegations of corruption. These senior officials allegedly accepted bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies. The profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties of the current federal government coalition that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, as well as served to personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery scheme.

As a result, a number of senior politicians, including congressman and officers of the major state-owned companies in Brazil resigned or have been arrested. Currently, senior elected officials and other public officials in Brazil are being investigated for allegations of unethical and illegal conduct identified during the Lava Jato investigation.

The potential outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of the Brazilian economy. We cannot predict whether such allegations will lead to further political and economic instability or whether new allegations against government officials will arise in the future. In addition, we cannot predict the outcome of any such allegations nor their effect on the Brazilian economy.

The development of such unethical conduct cases could adversely affect the Brazilian economy and, consequently, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Developments and the perception of risk in other countries, including the United States and emerging market countries, may adversely affect the market price of Brazilian securities, including the ADSs and our preferred shares.

The market value of securities of Brazilian issuers is affected by economic and market conditions in other countries, including the United States, the European Union and emerging market countries. Although economic conditions in those countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investor’s reactions to developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Crisis in the United States, the European Union or emerging market countries may diminish investor interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours. This could adversely affect the trading price of the ADSs or our preferred shares, and could also make it more difficult for us to gain access to the capital markets and finance our operations on acceptable terms, or at all.

Government efforts to combat inflation may hinder the growth of the Brazilian economy and could harm us.

Historically, Brazil has experienced high inflation rates. Inflation and certain actions taken by the Central Bank to curb it have had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy. After the implementation of the Plano Real in 1994, the annual rate of inflation in Brazil decreased significantly, as measured by the National Broad Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo), or IPCA. Inflation measured by the IPCA index was 5.9%, 6.4%, and 10.7% in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively and the tendency is increasing inflation for 2016. The inflation rate for the General Market Prices Index (Índice Geral de Preços de Mercado), or IGP-M, was 5.5%, 3.7% and 10.5% in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

 

8


 

 

Between 2004 and 2010, the Central Bank’s Special System for Settlement and Custody (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia) rate, or SELIC rate, which is the base interest rate for the Brazilian banking system, varied between 19.8% and 8.6%. On December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, the SELIC rate was 10.0%, 11.75% and 14.25%, respectively.

Inflation and the Brazilian government’s measures to fight it, principally through the Central Bank, have had and may have significant effects on the Brazilian economy and us. Tight monetary policies with high interest rates have restricted and may restrict Brazil’s growth and the availability of credit. Conversely, more lenient government and Central Bank policies and interest rate decreases have triggered and may trigger increases in inflation, and, consequently, growth volatility and the need for sudden and significant interest rate increases, which could negatively affect us and increase our indebtedness. In addition, we may not be able to adjust the fares we charge our customers to offset the effects of inflation on our cost structure.

Risks Relating to Us and the Brazilian Airline Industry

Exchange rate instability may materially and adversely affect us and the market price of the ADSs and our preferred shares.

The Brazilian currency has, during the last decades, experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies. For example, the real was valued at R$1.67 per US$1.00 in August 2008. Following the onset of the crisis in the global financial markets, the real depreciated 31.9% against the U.S. dollar and reached R$2.34 per US$1.00 at the end of 2008. In 2010, the real appreciated against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$1.661 per US$1.00 at the end of 2010. Since 2011, the real depreciated against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$3.905 per US$1.00 at the end of 2015 with a 47.0% devaluation in 2015. As of April 26, 2016, the real reached R$3.530 per US$1.00. There can be no assurance that the real would not depreciate further against the U.S. dollar.

Depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar creates inflationary pressures in Brazil and causes increases in interest rates, which negatively affects the growth of the Brazilian economy as a whole, curtails access to foreign financial markets and may prompt government intervention, including recessionary governmental policies. Depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar has also, as in the context of an economic slowdown, led to decreased consumer spending, deflationary pressures and reduced growth of the economy as a whole. On the other hand, appreciation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies could lead to a deterioration of the Brazilian foreign exchange current accounts, as well as dampen export-driven growth. Depending on the circumstances, either depreciation or appreciation of the real could materially and adversely affect us.

Nearly 88.5% of our passenger revenue and other revenue are denominated in reais and a significant part of our operating expenses, such as fuel, aircraft and engine maintenance services, aircraft rent payments and aircraft insurance, are denominated in, or linked to, U.S. dollars. For the year ended December 31, 2015, 50.3% of our operating expenses were either denominated in or linked to the U.S. dollar. For the year ended December 31, 2015 our aircraft rent increased in reais 30.3%, to R$1,100.1 million in 2015 from R$844.6 million in 2014, principally driven by the 41.6% average depreciation of the real as compared to the U.S. dollar in 2015. In addition, the purchase price of the Boeing 737 aircraft is denominated in U.S. dollars. At December 31, 2015, R$8,028.0 million (or 86.3% of our indebtedness) was denominated in U.S. dollars, an increase of 71.9% in reais as compared to R$4,670.0 million at December 31, 2014, principally driven by the 47.0% depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar. At the same date, we had a total of R$7,749.0 million in U.S. dollar-denominated future operating lease payment obligations, an increase of 61.6% in reais as compared to R$4,794.8 million at December 31, 2014, due to the same reason. In 2015, exchange rate variation in our financial expenses had a net increase of 419.7%, to R$2,267.0 million, when compared with 2014.

We are also required to maintain U.S. dollar-denominated deposits and maintenance reserve deposits under the terms of some of our aircraft operating leases. We may incur substantial additional amounts of U.S. dollar-denominated operating leases or financial obligations and U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and be subject to fuel cost increases linked to the U.S. dollar. While in the past we have generally adjusted our fares in response to, and to alleviate the effect of, depreciation of the real and increases in the price of jet fuel (which is priced in U.S. dollars) and have entered into hedging arrangements to protect us against the short-term effects of such developments, there can be no assurance we will be able to continue to do so. In addition, there is no economically viable hedging alternative for medium- and long-term depreciation of the real.

 

9


 

 

Depreciation of the real also reduces the U.S. dollar value of distributions and dividends on the ADSs and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market price of our preferred shares and, as a result, the ADSs.

We may not be able to maintain adequate liquidity and our cash flows from operations and financings may not be sufficient to meet our current obligations unless we are able to successfully restructure certain of our contractual obligations and commitments.

While our cash flows from operations and financings have been sufficient to meet our current operating expenses, lease obligations and debt service requirements to date, our liquidity, cash flows from operations and financings may be negatively impacted by the exchange rate environment and the effects of continued negative economic conditions in Brazil on demand for air travel. These factors have materially and adversely impacted our liquidity and we expect this trend to continue. Recent cost cutting measures, such as capacity reduction, may not be sufficient to offset these effects or improve our liquidity.

We have recently announced our intention to restructure (i) our existing indebtedness from the issuance of notes and bank loans and (ii) certain of our aircraft lease obligations and key suppliers. If we are unable to successfully restructure these contractual obligations and commitments, we may not be able to maintain adequate liquidity and our cash flows from operations and financings may not be sufficient to meet these obligations.

     There can be no assurance that we will be successful in effecting all or any of the measures outlined above. Unfavorable events arising with respect to negotiations with creditors, key lessors and vendors could give rise to covenant and payment defaults, including the failure to maintain specified financial ratios, under the terms of our material operating and finance leases and indebtedness. In the absence of obtaining additional capital through asset sales, consensual restructuring of debt and lease terms and/or similar measures, we may be unable to remedy such defaults and may experience additional defaults in the future, including as a result of cross-defaults. Our operating and finance leases are subject to termination in the event of default, and our indebtedness may be accelerated in the event of continuing default. Certain lenders could foreclose on our assets securing their indebtedness, including certain of our aircraft and shares in Smiles.

As a result of significant losses since 2011 our financial condition has been materially weakened. Consequently, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing has been materially weakened

Significant losses since 2011 have materially weakened our financial condition. We had net losses of R$751.5 million in 2011, R$1,513 million in 2012, R$724.6 million in 2013, R$1,117.3 million in 2014 and R$4,291.2 million in 2015. These losses were mainly a factor of items that we do not control, such as the depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar, which affects a significant part of our operating expenses and our debt that is significantly denominated in U.S. dollars, and losses in fuel hedge due to volatility in international fuel prices. As a result of these losses, as of December 31, 2015, we had a negative equity of R$4,322.4 million, compared to R$333.0 million as of December 31, 2014.

The significant losses since 2011 and our substantial indebtedness have further increased our leverage, which resulted in decreases in our credit ratings. Since the end of 2012, Fitch Ratings, Moody’s and S&P have decreased our credit ratings from B, B3 and B, respectively, to CCC-, Caa1 and CCC-, respectively, as of the date of this annual report. Credit ratings affect the cost and other terms upon which we are able to obtain funding. Credit rating agencies regularly evaluate us and their ratings of our long-term debt are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength. We cannot assure you that credit rating agencies will not downgrade our credit ratings any further, even absent new losses.

In light of our current credit ratings, negative shareholders’ equity and leverage ratio, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing has been materially weakened, which makes us more vulnerable to unexpected events or to the deterioration of the operating environment (such as a significant increase in operating expenses).

 

10


 

 

The airline industry is particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions and continued negative economic conditions would likely continue to adversely affect us and our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms.

Our operations and the airline industry in general are particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. Unfavorable economic conditions in Brazil, as demonstrated by a low or negative GDP growth since 2012, a constrained credit market and increased business operating costs have reduced spending on both leisure and business travel as well as cargo transportation. The slowdown in Brazilian economy and political instability has adversely affected industries with significant spending in travel, including government, oil and gas, mining and construction. In addition to decreases in load factors, reduced spending on business travel also affects the quality of demand, as we are able to sell less higher yield tickets, which negatively affected our results of operation in 2015, a trend that has continued in the first months of 2016.  Unfavorable economic conditions can also affect our ability to raise fares to counteract increased fuel, labor and other costs. Any of these factors may negatively affect us.

Unfavorable economic conditions, a significant decline in demand for air travel or continued instability of the credit and capital markets could also result in pressure on our debt costs, operating results and financial condition and would affect our growth and investment plans. These factors could also negatively affect our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and our liquidity generally.

Substantial fluctuations in fuel costs or the unavailability of fuel would harm us.

Historically, international and local fuel prices have been subject to wide price fluctuations based on geopolitical issues and supply and demand. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil, a benchmark widely used for crude oil prices that is measured in barrels and quoted in U.S. dollars, which at times in 2007 and 2008 were at historically high levels, affects our fuel costs, which constitute a significant portion of our total operating expenses, accounting for 40.2% and 33.2% of our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Fuel availability is also subject to periods of market surplus and shortage and is affected by demand for both home heating oil and gasoline. In the event of an international or local fuel supply shortage, our fuel prices would likely increase. Although we enter into hedging arrangements to reduce our exposure to fuel price fluctuations and have historically passed on the majority of fuel price increases by adjusting our fare structure, the price and availability of fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. Our hedging activities and fares adjustments may not be sufficient to protect us fully from fuel price increases.

Substantially all of our fuel is supplied by one source, Petrobras Distribuidora S.A., or Petrobras Distribuidora. If Petrobras Distribuidora is unable or unwilling to continue to supply fuel to us at the times and in the quantities that we require we may not be able to find a suitable replacement or to purchase fuel at the same cost, in which case we would be adversely affected. See “Item 4. Information on the Company–B. Business Overview–Airline Business–Fuel and Hedge.”

Changes to the Brazilian civil aviation regulatory framework, including rules regarding slots distribution, fare restrictions and fees associated with civil aviation, may adversely affect us.

Brazilian aviation authorities monitor and influence the developments in Brazil’s airline market. For example, in airports regulated by the Brazilian Airport Infrastructure Company (Empresa Brasileira de Infraestrutura Aeroportuária), or INFRAERO, INFRAERO addressed overcapacity by establishing strict criteria that must be met before new routes or additional flight frequencies are awarded. INFRAERO’s policies as well as those of other aviation supervisory authorities have in the past, and may continue to, negatively affect our operations.

For example, in July 2014, ANAC published new rules governing the allocation of slots at the main Brazilian airports, which consider operational efficiency (on-time performance and regularity) as the main criteria for the allocation of slots. Under these rules on-time performance and regularity are assessed in two annual seasons, following the IATA summer and winter calendars, between April and September and between October and March.

The minimum on-time performance and regularity targets for each series of slots in a season are 80% and 90%, respectively, at Congonhas airport (São Paulo) and 75% and 80%, respectively, for all other main airports. Airlines will forfeit any series of slots that operate below the minimum criteria in a season. Forfeited slots are redistributed 50% to new entrants, which includes airlines that operate fewer than 5 slots in the relevant airport in the given weekday, and 50% to all airlines operating in the relevant airport based on their share of slots. For the first allocation period at Congonhas, from November 2014 to March 2015, new entrants includes all airlines with less than 12% of the slots.

 

11


 

 

In October 2014, ANAC distributed new slots at Congonhas airport, in light of increased runway capacity, exclusively to airlines with less than 12% of the slots. Azul and Avianca were awarded 26 and 17 slots, respectively.

With the new allocation of slots at Congonhas airport as a result of the October 2014 distribution and the 2015 on-time performance redistributions, we and LATAM each have 43% and 44%, respectively, of the slots in terms of takeoffs and landings at Congonhas airport, after having held 47% and 48%, respectively, before October 2014, while Avianca’s slots increased from 5% to 8% and Azul’s increased from 0% to 5%.

Another example, in January 2015 Brazil approved a law allowing the government to grant subsidies for flights departing from or arriving at regional airports. Regional airports include any airports with fewer than 600,000 passengers per year, increased to 800,000 passengers per year in the Amazon region. The subsidy is still subject to further regulation before it may be implemented and is limited to certain airport fees and transportation costs for the lesser of 60 passengers per flight or 50% of the seats in a given flight, except in the Amazon region where the only limit is up to 60 passengers.

These and other changes to the Brazilian civil aviation regulatory framework could increase our costs and change the competitive dynamics of our industry and may adversely affect our operations, see “−We operate in a highly competitive industry.

Technical and operational problems in the Brazilian civil aviation infrastructure, including air traffic control systems, airspace and airport infrastructure may have a material adverse effect on us.

We are dependent on improvements in the coordination and development of Brazilian airspace control and airport infrastructure, which, mainly due to the large growth in civil aviation in Brazil in recent years, require substantial improvements and government investments. This dependence was underlined by the need for additional infrastructure investments for the World Cup in 2014 and for the upcoming Summer Olympics in 2016 in Brazil.

If the measures taken and investments made by the Brazilian government and regulatory authorities do not prove sufficient or effective, air traffic control, airspace management and sector coordination-related difficulties might reoccur or worsen, which might have a material adverse effect on us.

Slots at Congonhas Airport in São Paulo, the most important airport for our operations, are fully utilized. The Santos-Dumont airport in Rio de Janeiro, a highly utilized airport with half-hourly shuttle flights between São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, has certain slot restrictions. Several other Brazilian airports, for example the Brasília, Campinas, Salvador, Confins and São Paulo (Guarulhos) international airports, have limited the number of slots per day due to infrastructural limitations at these airports. Any condition that would prevent or delay our access to airports or routes that are vital to our strategy or our inability to maintain our existing slots, and obtain additional slots, could materially adversely affect our operations. In addition, we cannot assure that any investments will be made by the Brazilian government in the Brazilian aviation infrastructure to permit a capacity increase at busy airports and consequently additional concessions for new slots to airlines.

We have significant recurring aircraft lease costs, and we will incur significantly more fixed costs that could hinder our ability to meet our strategic goals.

We have significant costs, relating primarily to leases for our aircraft and engines. As of December 31, 2015, we had commitments of R$58,886.5 million to purchase additional Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft, based on aircraft list prices, although the actual price payable by us for the aircraft should be lower due to supplier discounts. We expect that we will incur additional fixed obligations and debt as we take delivery of the new aircraft and other equipment to implement our strategy.

Having significant fixed payment obligations could:

·         limit our ability to obtain additional financing to support expansion plans and for working capital and other purposes;

 

12


 

 

·         divert substantial cash flow from our operations to service our fixed obligations under aircraft operating leases and aircraft purchase commitments;

·         if interest rates increase, require us to incur significantly more lease or interest expense than we currently do; and

·         limit our ability to react to changes in our business, the airline industry and general economic conditions.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on our fixed obligations, will depend on our operating performance and cash flow, which will in turn depend on prevailing economic and political conditions and financial, competitive, regulatory, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, our ability to raise our fares to compensate for an increase in our fixed costs may be limited by competition and regulatory factors.

We operate in a highly competitive industry.

We face intense competition on domestic routes in Brazil from existing scheduled airlines, charter airlines and potential new entrants in our market. Competition from other airlines has a relatively greater impact on us when compared to our competitors because we have a greater proportion of flights connecting Brazil’s busiest airports, where competition is more intense. In contrast, some of our competitors have a greater percentage of flights connecting less busy airports, where there is no or only reduced competition.

In addition to competition among scheduled airlines and charter operators, the Brazilian airline industry faces competition from ground transportation alternatives, such as interstate buses. We may also face competition from international airlines as they introduce and expand flights between Brazil, other South American and Caribbean destinations. In addition, the Brazilian government and regulators could give preference to new entrants when granting new and current slots in Brazilian airports, for example, as recently occurred with respect to the new slots in the Congonhas airport.

Existing and potential new competitors may be stronger than us. They have in the past and may again undercut our fares or increase capacity on their routes in an effort to increase their market share of business traffic (high value-added customers). In any such event, we cannot assure you that our level of fares or passenger traffic would not be adversely affected.

Further consolidation in the Brazilian and global airline industry framework may adversely affect us.

As a result of the competitive environment there may be further consolidation in the Brazilian and global airline industry, whether by means of acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships or strategic alliances. We cannot predict the effects of further consolidation on the industry. To the extent we act as consolidators, we may not be able to successfully integrate the business and operations of companies acquired, governmental approvals may be delayed, costs of integration and fleet renovation may be greater than anticipated, synergies may not meet our expectations, our costs may increase and our operational efficiency may be reduced, all of which would negatively affect us.

If we do not act as a consolidator, our competitors may increase their scale, diversity and financial strength, which would negatively affect us. Consolidation in the airline industry and changes in international alliances will continue to affect the competitive landscape in the industry and may result in the formation of airlines and alliances with increased financial resources, more extensive global networks and reduced cost structures.

We rely on one supplier for our aircraft and engines.

One of the key elements of our current business strategy is to save costs by operating a standardized aircraft fleet. After extensive research and analysis, we chose the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft and CFM 56-7B engines from CFM International. We expect to continue to rely on Boeing and CFM International into the foreseeable future and have made a purchase order for 60 Boeing 737 Max-7/8 aircraft (the newest generation of our current aircraft and still under development), to be delivered starting 2018. If either Boeing or CFM International were unable to perform its contractual obligations, we would have to find another supplier for a similar type of aircraft or engines.

 

13


 

 

If we had to lease or purchase aircraft from another supplier, we could lose the benefits we derive from our current fleet composition. We cannot assure you that any replacement aircraft would have the same operating advantages as the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or that we could lease or purchase engines that would be as reliable and efficient as the CFM engines. This may be the case for instance with the Boeing 737 Max-7/8 aircraft. We will also incur substantial transition costs, including costs associated with retraining our employees, replacing our manuals and adapting our facilities. Our operations could also be disrupted by the failure or inability of Boeing or CFM International to provide sufficient parts or related support services on a timely basis.

We would also be significantly harmed if a design defect or mechanical problem with the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or the CFM engines used on our aircraft was discovered, causing our aircraft to be grounded while any such defect or problem is being corrected, assuming it could be corrected at all. The use of our aircraft could be suspended or restricted by ANAC in the event of any actual or perceived mechanical, design or other problems while ANAC conducts an investigation. Our business would also be significantly harmed if the public avoids flying on our aircraft due to an adverse perception of the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or the CFM engines because of safety concerns or other problems, whether real or perceived, or in the event of an accident involving Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or the CFM engines.

We have made purchase orders for new aircraft that is still being developed, any project delays or operational difficulties would adversely affect our operational costs and results of operations.

In 2012, Boeing and CFM released new aircraft and engines, the Boeing 737 Max-7/8 and LEAP-1B, to replace the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation. Any project delays or operational difficulties with this new aircraft and engines could create an adverse perception about our fleet, cancelations and decrease in the number of orders, therefore adversely affecting us.

In addition, when these aircraft and engines are delivered and operational, it could cause the market value of our other aircraft and engines to decrease, which would negatively affect the value of our assets and could result in us recording impairment charges.

We rely heavily on automated systems to operate our business, and any failure of these systems could harm us.

We depend on automated systems to operate our business, including our computerized airline ticket sales system, our telecommunication systems, our scheduling system and our website. Our website and ticket sales system must accommodate a high volume of traffic and deliver important flight information. Substantial or repeated website, ticket sales, scheduling or telecommunication systems failures could reduce the attractiveness of our services and could cause our customers to purchase tickets from another airline. Any disruption in these systems or their underlying infrastructure could result in the loss of important data, increase our expenses and generally harm us.

We rely on maintaining a high daily aircraft utilization rate to increase our revenues and reduce our costs.

One of the key elements of our business strategy is to maintain a high daily aircraft utilization rate. High daily aircraft utilization allows us to generate more revenue from our aircraft and dilute our fixed costs, and is achieved in part by operating with quick turnaround times at airports so we can fly more hours on average in a day. Our rate of aircraft utilization could be adversely affected by a number of different factors that are beyond our control, including, among others, air traffic and airport congestion, adverse weather conditions and delays by third-party service providers relating to matters such as fueling and ground handling.

Our reputation, operations and financial results could be harmed by events out of our control.

Accidents or incidents involving our aircraft could involve significant claims by injured passengers and others, as well as significant costs related to the repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its temporary or permanent loss from service. We are required by ANAC and lessors of our aircraft under our operating lease agreements to carry liability insurance. Although we believe we currently maintain liability insurance in amounts and of the type generally consistent with industry practice, the amount of such coverage may not be adequate and we may be forced to bear substantial losses in the event of an accident. Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of our related insurance coverage would harm us. Moreover, any accident or incident involving our aircraft, even if fully insured, or an accident or incident involving Boeing 737 Next Generation aircraft or the aircraft of any major airline could cause negative public perceptions about us or the air transport system, which would harm us.

 

14


 

 

We may also be affected by other events that affect travel behavior, such as the potential of epidemics or acts of terrorism. These events are out of our control and may affect us even if occurring in markets where we do not operate and/or in connection with other airlines. For example, in the second quarter of 2009 an outbreak of the H1N1 virus had an adverse impact on global air travel and on our operations to and from Argentina. Any outbreak of a disease that affects travel behavior, such as the recent outbreak of the zika virus in Brazil and other Latin American countries, could have a material adverse impact on us and the worldwide airline industry. Outbreaks of disease could also result in quarantines of our personnel or an inability to access facilities or our aircraft, which could adversely affect our operations.

Natural disasters may affect and disrupt our operations. For example, in 2011, a volcanic eruption in Chile had a prolonged adverse effect on air travel, halting flights in Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and the southern part of Brazil for several days. As a result, our operations to and from these regions were temporarily disrupted. Any natural disaster that affects air travel in the regions in which we operate could have a material adverse impact on us.

Our controlling shareholder has the ability to direct our business and affairs and its interests could conflict with yours.

Our controlling shareholder has the power to, among other things, elect a majority of our directors and determine the outcome of any action requiring shareholder approval, including transactions with related parties, corporate reorganizations, dispositions, and the timing and payment of any future dividends, subject to minimum dividend payment requirements imposed under Law No. 6,404 of December 15, 1976, as amended, or the Brazilian corporation law. Although you are entitled to tag-along rights in connection with a change of control of our company and you will have specific protections in connection with transactions between our controlling shareholder and related parties, our controlling shareholder may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, dispositions, financings or similar transactions that could conflict with your interests as a holder of the ADSs or our preferred shares. After the amendments to our by-laws on March 23, 2015, our controlling shareholder may continue to direct our business and affairs even after significantly reducing its ownership interest, which is currently equivalent to 61.3% of the economic interests in us. A difference in economic exposure may intensify conflicts of interests between our controlling shareholder and you. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing–C. Markets–Corporate Governance Practices.”

Risks Relating to the ADSs and Our Preferred Shares

The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets, and securities issued by airlines in particular, may substantially limit your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time you desire. Recent decreases in our market capitalization have increased volatility in the trading price of our preferred shares and ADSs.

Investing in securities that trade in emerging markets, such as Brazil, often involves greater risk than investing in securities of issuers in the United States, and such investments are generally considered to be more speculative in nature. The Brazilian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and can be more volatile than major securities markets in the United States. Accordingly, although you are entitled to withdraw the preferred shares underlying the ADSs from the depositary at any time, your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying the ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so may be substantially limited. There is also significantly greater concentration in the Brazilian securities market than in major securities markets in the United States. The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented 51.5% of the aggregate market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA S.A. Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias & Futuros (“BM&FBOVESPA”) as of December 31, 2015.

Furthermore, in recent years our market capitalization has decreased and as a result it has increased volatility in the trading price of our preferred shares and ADSs. Any further decreases in our market capitalization may further increase volatility. As a result of the decrease in the trading price of our ADSs and in order to comply with the continued listing standards of the NYSE, since February 26, 2016 our ADSs represent 10 preferred shares, as opposed to one preferred share per ADS prior to such date, which may further reduce the liquidity of our ADSs.

 

15


 

 

In addition, the trading price of shares of companies in the worldwide airline industry are relatively volatile and investors’ perception of the market value of these shares, including our ADSs and preferred shares, may also be negatively impacted with additional volatility and decreases in the price of our ADSs and preferred shares.

Holders of the ADSs and our preferred shares may not receive any dividends.

According to our by-laws, we must pay our shareholders at least 25.0% of our annual net income as dividends, as determined and adjusted under Brazilian corporation law. The adjusted net income may be capitalized, used to absorb losses or otherwise appropriated as allowed under the Brazilian corporation law and may not be available to be paid as dividends. We may not pay dividends to our shareholders in any particular fiscal year if our board of directors determines that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition.

If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw preferred shares, you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.

As an ADS holder, you benefit from the electronic foreign capital registration obtained by the custodian for our preferred shares underlying the ADSs in Brazil, which permits the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the preferred shares into non-Brazilian currency and remit the proceeds abroad. If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw preferred shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s electronic foreign capital registration for only five business days from the date of withdrawal. Thereafter, upon the disposition of or distributions relating to the preferred shares, you will not be able to remit abroad non-Brazilian currency unless you obtain your own electronic foreign capital registration.

If you attempt to obtain your own electronic foreign capital registration, you may incur expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to our preferred shares or the return of your capital in a timely manner. The depositary’s electronic foreign capital registration may also be adversely affected by future legislative changes.

Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our preferred shares.

We may not be able to offer our preferred shares to “U.S. Holders” of ADSs pursuant to preemptive rights granted to holders of our preferred shares in connection with any future issuance of our preferred shares unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to such preferred shares and preemptive rights, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not obligated to file a registration statement relating to preemptive rights with respect to our preferred shares, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement. If such a registration statement is not filed and an exemption from registration does not exist, Citibank, N.A., as depositary, will attempt to sell the preemptive rights, and you will be entitled to receive the proceeds of such sale. However, these preemptive rights will expire if the depositary does not sell them, and U.S. Holders of ADSs will not realize any value from the granting of such preemptive rights.

ITEM 4.       Information on the Company

A.      History and Development of the Company

General

We were formed on March 12, 2004 as a sociedade por ações, a stock corporation, duly incorporated under the laws of Brazil for an unlimited term. Our material assets consist of shares of VRG, shares of Smiles, four offshore subsidiaries, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Our principal executive offices are located at Praça Comandante Linneu Gomes, S/N, Portaria 3, Jardim Aeroporto, CEP: 04626-020, São Paulo, SP, Brazil and the telephone number of our investor relations department is +55 11 2128-4700. Our website is www.voegol.com.br and investor information may be found on our website under www.voegol.com.br/ir. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference herein, and will not be considered a part of this annual report.

 

16


 

 

Capital Expenditures

For a description of our capital expenditures, see below “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

B.      Business Overview

We are one of the largest low-cost carriers in the world, according to the International Air Transport Association, or IATA, in terms of passengers transported in 2015, and the largest low-cost carrier in Latin America. We provide frequent service on routes connecting all of Brazil’s major cities and from Brazil to major cities in South America and selected tourist destinations in the Caribbean.

Since the beginning of our operations in 2001, our affordable, reliable and simple service, and our focus on markets that were either underserved or did not have a lower-fare alternative, have led to a strong awareness of our brand and a rapid increase in our market share. We were the first company to successfully introduce low-cost carrier industry practices and technologies in Latin America. We have a young and standardized operating fleet of 7.7 years Boeing 737-700/800s, or Boeing 737 aircraft and our convenient flight routes offer the highest number of daily departures among airlines in Latin America. We have also since 2001 offered our air cargo services, Gollog.

 Beginning in 2012, we increased our focus on business passengers (high value-added customers), diversifying our revenue base from leisure passengers. Our strategy is to increase our share in this market while at the same time consolidating our leadership in flight routes. We also intend to expand the Smiles loyalty program, one of the largest loyalty programs in Latin America with over 11 million members as of December 31, 2015, and a number of attractive ancillary businesses, such as our air cargo services, or Gollog. Passenger transportation revenues represented 87.8% and ancillary revenues represented 12.2% of our net revenue of R$9,778.0 million in 2015.

As of March 31, 2016, we offered approximately 860 daily flights to 65 frequent destinations connecting the most important cities in Brazil as well as key destinations in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay, and the Caribbean. We strategically focus on the Brazilian and South American markets.

Our Competitive Strengths

We Have a Leading Market Position Based on Slots at the Most Important Airports in Brazil. Since 2007, we have been the carrier with the most flights connecting the busiest airports in Brazil: Congonhas and Guarulhos (São Paulo), Santos Dumont and Galeão (Rio de Janeiro), Juscelino Kubitschek (Brasília), Confins (Belo Horizonte), Magalhães (Salvador), Salgado Filho (Porto Alegre), Gilberto Freyre (Recife) and Afonso Pena (Curitiba). Routes between these airports are among the most profitable routes in our markets, with strong yields achieved mostly from business travelers.

We Keep Our Operating Costs Low. Our operating expense per available seat kilometer (CASK), ex-fuel, for 2015 was R$13.38 cents. We believe that our CASK for 2015, adjusted for the average number of kilometers flown per flight, or adjusted by stage length, was one of the lowest among global peers, based upon our analysis of data collected from publicly available information. Our business model is based on innovation and best practices adopted to improve our operating efficiency, including:

·         Operation of a young and standardized fleet. At December 31, 2015, our operating fleet of 142 Boeing 737 aircraft was one of Latin America’s largest and youngest fleets, with an average age of 7.7 years. Advanced technology present or installed in our newer aircraft has reduced fuel consumption and helped improve our operating margins. We plan to keep our operating fleet of Boeing 737 aircraft, until the arrival of our newly ordered Boeing 737 Max-7/8 aircraft (the newest generation of our current aircraft), which we expect will be delivered beginning in 2018. A standardized fleet reduces inventory costs, as it requires fewer spare parts, and eliminates the need to train our pilots to operate different aircraft types. It also simplifies our maintenance and operations processes.

·         State of the art maintenance. We carry out heavy maintenance on our Boeing 737 aircraft internally at our IOSA (IATA Operational Safety Audit) certified Aircraft Maintenance Center at the Tancredo Neves International Airport located in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. Since April 2012, our Aircraft Maintenance Center has also been certified by ANAC to provide conventional and electrostatic painting, weighing and recalibration services for aircraft owned or operated by other airlines.

 

17


 

 

·         We have one of the largest e-commerce platforms in Brazil. Our effective use of technology helps to keep our costs low and our operations highly scalable and efficient. Our distribution channels are streamlined and convenient, allowing our customers to interact with us via the internet. In 2015, we booked 80.8% of our ticket sales through a combination of our website and application programming interface, or API, 3.7% through our call center and 15.5% through Global Distribution Systems, or GDS.

We Are Majority Shareholders of Smiles, an Operator of One of the Largest Loyalty Programs in Latin America. With the acquisition of VRG in April 2007, we also acquired the Smiles loyalty program, which is available to all our passengers and which we consider a strong relationship-building tool that represents a sustainable competitive advantage. The Smiles loyalty program has partnerships, including hotel chains, car rental companies, restaurants, insurance companies, publishers and schools and also forms the basis for partnerships with some of Brazil and South America’s largest banks and credit card companies. The Smiles loyalty program had over 11 million members at December 31, 2015. See “Smiles Loyalty Program.”

We Have Strong Brand Recognition. We believe that the Gol brand has become synonymous with innovation and value in the airline industry. Our customers identify Gol as being safe, accessible, friendly, fair, intelligent and reliable and distinguish Gol in Brazil’s domestic airline industry on the basis of its modern and simplified approach to air travel services. Brand and product diversification from Smiles, Gollog and Gol+Conforto products enhance our brand recognition across a diverse set of customers in various businesses and represent an important tool for us.

We Have High Corporate Governance Standards and Proven Management. We have three independent board members, one of whom is nominated by Delta Air Lines Inc., or Delta, pursuant to our partnership agreement. Our top managers have broad experience in many sectors of the Brazilian economy, including air and ground transportation, telecommunications and consumer products. This experience has helped us to develop the most effective elements of our low-cost model; and we expect these competitive advantages will help us further penetrate the Brazilian middle-class market, as well as the business passenger market, and generate ancillary revenues. On March 23, 2015, our shareholders approved certain amendments to our by-laws to improve corporate governance and strengthen the alignment of interest among common and preferred shareholders. Please see “Item 9. The Offer and Listing–C. Markets–Corporate Governance Practices” for further details.  

Our Strategies

Our strategy is based on four main strategic pillars: increase passenger revenue, expand ancillary revenues, further reduce costs and improve our financial resilience. In order to implement our strategies we intend to:

Capitalize on Our Strong Market Position in Brazil and Latin America. We intend to increase penetration across all traveler segments by capitalizing on our strong market position, our widespread brand recognition, the greatest number of business routes and highest frequencies between the most important airports in Brazil, our consolidated flight network and the Smiles loyalty program. We will focus on Brazilian operations and selected South American destinations. In addition, we believe that the airline industry may experience further consolidation and therefore believe that establishing partnerships and alliances with other airlines will be a key factor to our success. In this environment we intend to play a leading role in the Latin American airline industry and to strengthen our position as a long-term player in the industry.

Improve Operating Efficiency. Reducing our operating expense per available seat kilometer (CASK) and adjusting capacity are key to improving our profitability. We aim to maintain our position as one of the lowest cost airlines in the world. We intend to adjust our strategy to focus on more profitable routes and to maintain the young and fuel-efficient fleet while maintaining high utilization rates. Our aircraft utilization rate was 11.3 block-hours per day in 2015, as compared to 11.5 block-hours per day in 2014 and to 11.2 block-hours per day in 2013.

We seek to reduce our CASK by utilizing our aircraft efficiently, concentrating on minimizing our turnaround times at airports and maintaining a high number of daily flights per aircraft. We will continue to utilize technological innovations wherever possible to reduce our distribution costs and improve our operating efficiency.

 

18


 

 

Maintain an Adequate Cash Position. We currently seek to maintain an adequate cash position and to lengthen the maturity profile of our financial liabilities, avoiding the concentration of significant debt maturities over the next two years.

Increased Focus on Business Travelers. We intend to maintain our high on-time performance, 93% and 95% in 2014 and 2015, respectively, and regularity, 93% and 91.9% in 2014 and 2015, respectively, both key elements in impacting business traveler airline choice. We offer higher-rate fares that allow flexibility to reschedule or cancel tickets with little advance notice and no additional costs, higher mileage multiplier in the Smiles loyalty program, and our new and exclusive Gol+ Gol+Conforto on São Paulo-Rio de Janeiro shuttle flights. Gol+ seats offer additional legroom and Gol+Conforto seats, which include additional legroom and recline, are located in first rows where the middle seat is not sold and are found in aircraft specifically configured for this specific route, with a higher share of business travelers. Between 2014 and 2015 the number of business travelers on our flights decreased by 7.2% and in 2015 we were the leader in tickets sold to business travelers in domestic flights.

Strengthen the Smiles Loyalty Program. We intend to further strengthen the Smiles loyalty program by increasing interaction with members and adding perceived value to its members through the following initiatives:

·         Separate entity. In 2013, we segregated the Smiles loyalty program activities into a distinct company, Smiles, with a management team fully dedicated to pursuing all business opportunities arising from the growth of this market in Brazil. In May 2013, Smiles concluded its R$1.1 billion initial public offering. Smiles had 94 full time employees as of December 31, 2015, compared to 91 as of December 31, 2014.

·         New Products. Since 2013, we have continuously launched products that are now within the Smiles loyalty program structure. In 2013, we launched (i) Clube Smiles, a benefits club, whereby, for a R$30.00 monthly fee, members receive 1,000 miles a month plus a one-year extension of their mileage expiration date as well as other benefits, such as early access to Smiles promotions; (ii) option to purchase and reactivate miles; and (iii) the option to transfer miles. In 2014, we launched (i) the loyalty partnership with Localiza, Brazil’s largest car rental company; (ii) a website specifically designed for mobile devices, the first in Brazil, which allows customers to redeem airline tickets; (iii) ticket reservations for three days, free of charge for Clube Smiles customers; and (iv) new frequent flyer program agreements with Aerolíneas Argentinas, Aeromexico, Etihad, TAP Airlines and Alitalia. In 2015, we launched (i) new Clube Smiles categories, which allow customers to earn up to 5,000 miles monthly; (ii) a partnership with Connexions Loyalty which allows customers to redeem miles for hotel stays in more than 140,000 locations worldwide; (iii) redemption of airport fees with miles, (iv) a redemption partnership with Royal Caribbean; and (v) frequent flyer agreements with Air Canada, Copa Airlines and Korean Air.

·         Partnerships. Existing and new partnerships with large international airlines, in the form of frequent flyer program arrangements, financial institutions, retail chain-stores, car rental and insurance companies, among others, are offered to Smiles loyalty program members with more opportunities to earn and redeem miles.

Expand Our Industry Partnerships. We believe we have the best platform to expand our customer base in the markets in which we operate through partnerships. We intend to strengthen our existing industry partnerships and enter into new ones, including with large international airlines in the form of codeshare arrangements to further increase our international feeder network, load factor and profitability.

As of December 31, 2015, we had eleven codeshare agreements with: Delta, Air France-KLM, Aeromexico, Aerolíneas Argentinas, Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, TAP, Alitalia, Korean Air, Copa Airlines, Air Canada and 77 interline agreements.

Further Innovate, Establish and Increase Our Ancillary Revenue Businesses. Our ancillary revenues are derived from Gollog, ticket change fees, excess baggage charges and other services. We expect further growth in these businesses, which will provide us with additional revenue at low incremental cost by:

·         Focusing on express delivery services. Through Gollog, our cargo transportation service, we make efficient use of extra capacity in our aircraft by carrying cargo. On April 15, 2015, we opened a new cargo terminal at Congonhas airport. The new terminal is part of our strategy to expand Gollog’s service network, providing more efficiency and convenience to our customers.

 

19


 

 

·         Continuously innovating and introducing new products to the Brazilian market. We have a strong track record of innovation and introduction of new business practices in Brazil. For example, in June 2009, we were the first airline to introduce the sale of beverages and food on board (buy on board) in Brazil, generating ancillary revenue without increasing our cost structure or fare price. As of December 31, 2014, we offered buy on board service on all of our flights. More recently in 2013, we introduced the sale of the new Gol+Conforto seats, which are available free of charge for Smiles Diamond and Delta Air Lines Elite customers, and to customers for an additional fee, as part of our Gol+ product. Gol+Conforto seats are currently available on all our flights. Expanding Gol+ from our shuttle routes to our entire flight network is part of our standardization process, which generates revenue and increases efficiency gains.

Recent Developments

We have in recent years faced a challenging scenario, which has negatively affected our results, liquidity and capital structure. This scenario included: slowdown of the Brazilian economy, sharp devaluation of the real, decrease in demand, industry overcapacity, operating cost increases, ratings decline and accumulative losses.

Repeated efforts over the last years to address certain effects of this scenario were not sufficient, so we embarked in the past year on a series of initiatives to comprehensively address our liquidity and capital structure concerns.

The initiatives in the second half of 2015 and first months of 2016 include:

·         Equity infusion. In September  2015, Volluto, our controlling shareholder, made an equity investment in us of R$283.9 million. Concurrently, Delta purchased additional capital stock for R$177.3 million;

·         Delta financing support. Working closely with Delta, in August 2015, we entered into an unsecured term loan of US$300 million, fully guaranteed by Delta. Being able to offer this guarantee allowed us to secure this financing on amounts and on terms that most likely would not have been available to us otherwise. Our obligation to reimburse Delta if its guarantee is called upon is secured by a pledge to Delta of our shares in Smiles;

·         Fleet reduction. In early 2016, we returned five aircraft under finance leases, two of them outright and the other three under sale and leaseback agreements, and sold our rights to three aircraft deliveries from Boeing in 2016, which originally would have replaced outgoing fleet  aircraft; and

·         Operating cost reductions. We implemented various operating cost-saving initiatives, including overhead reductions, introduction of part-time employees to offset reduced demand during low seasons and renegotiations with suppliers.

In the last several months we embarked on additional initiatives:

·         Advance ticket sales. On February 26, 2016 VRG entered into a miles and tickets purchase agreement with Smiles, totaling up to R$1.0 billion, providing for advance ticket sales to Smiles in various tranches through June 30, 2017. The first tranche, of R$376.0 million, was disbursed by Smiles in February 2016 and the remaining tranches are conditioned upon certain other additional cost-savings;

·         Route network changes. In March 2016, we changed our route network to focus on more profitable routes; we expect to reduce by year-end the number of take-offs and seats by 15% to 18% and the number of ASKs by 5% to 8%. As a result of this change, we suspended flights to eight destinations and expect to reduce our fleet by approximately 15% by year-end;

·         Supplier negotiations. We began discussions with key suppliers to reduce our costs and adjust to the new network and fleet profiles. For example, in the first quarter of 2016 we revised our delivery schedule with Boeing so that we will not receive any new aircraft until mid-2018; and

·     Capital structure improvements. We engaged PJT Partners to advise us in connection with measures to strengthen our capital structure and liquidity and to improve the profile of our debt. Additionally, PJT is advising us in connection with our U.S. dollar denominated unsecured bonds.

These initiatives are part of our new business plan. However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in implementing any or all of the initiatives above or that these will be sufficient to address our current financial condition.

Airline Business

Routes and Schedules

Our operating model is a highly integrated, multiple-hub route network that is different from the point-to-point model used by other low-cost carriers worldwide. The high level of integration of flights at selected airports permits us to offer frequent, non-stop flights at low fares between Brazil’s most important economic centers and ample interconnections through our network linking city pairs through a combination of two or more flights with little connecting or stop-over time. Our network also allows us to increase our load factor on our strongest city pair routes by using the airports in those cities to connect our customers to their final destinations. This strategy increases our load factor by attracting customers traveling to secondary markets who prefer to pay lower fares even if this means making one or more stops before reaching their final destination. Our operating model allows us to build our flight routes to add destinations to cities that would not, individually, be economically viable to serve in the traditional point-to-point model, but that are feasible to serve when simply added as additional points on our multiple-stop route network. We do this by offering low-fare, off-peak, minimum stay or night (red-eye) flights to lower-traffic destinations, which can be the first or last stops on our routes, allowing us to increase our aircraft utilization and generate additional revenues. By offering international flights to destinations in South America and the Caribbean (using our current Boeing 737 aircraft), with stops integrated in our network, we create opportunities for incremental traffic, feeding our network and increasing our overall load factor and our competitive advantage and supporting our strategy of expanding our network and stimulating demand for our services. For further information see “Item 4. Information on the Company–B. Business Overview–Recent Developments.”

We have been adding more routes to Caribbean destinations, which we expect will give us additional growth opportunities in the Brazilian and international markets. In addition, we consider expanding to potential new destinations in Latin America in regions with medium density, represented by airports with a population of up to one million within a 200 km radius.

As of March 31, 2016, we offered over 860 daily flights to 65 destinations connecting the most important cities in Brazil as well as the main destinations in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay and the Caribbean region.

Services

Passenger Transportation

We recognize that we must offer excellent services to our corporate and leisure customers. We pay particular attention to the details that help to make for a pleasant, complication-free flying experience, including:

·         ticketless travel;

·         convenient online sales, check-in, seat assignment and flight change and cancellation services;

·         high frequency of flights between Brazil’s most important airports;

·         low cancellation and high on time performance rates of our flights;

 

20


 

 

·         high on-time performance rates on our flights;

·         online flight status service;

·         web-enabled cell phone ticket sales and check-in;

·         self-check-in at kiosks at designated airports;

·         designated female lavatories;

·         friendly and efficient in-flight service;

·         modern aircraft interiors;

·         quick turnaround times at airport gates;

·         free or discounted shuttle services between airports and drop-off zones on certain routes;

·         buy on board services on certain flights;

·         mobile check-in and boarding pass (100% paperless boarding);

·         smartphone application for check-in, electronic boarding pass and Smiles account management;

·         More space between seats and greater comfort (GOL+ Comforto in the domestic flights and GOL Premium Class in the international flights); and

·         in-flight entertainment and wi-fi access (available from May 2016).

In general, flight revenues, passenger demand and profitability reach peak levels during the January and July vacation periods and in the final two weeks of December, during the Christmas holiday season. Conversely, we often witness a decrease in load factor during the week in which annual carnival celebrations take place in Brazil. Given our high proportion of fixed costs, this seasonality is likely to cause our results of operations to vary from quarter to quarter.

Ancillary Revenues and Gollog Cargo Transportation

Ancillary revenues include revenues from our Gollog services as well as baggage excess and ticket change fees. Buy on board and travel insurance fees are also becoming an increasingly important part of this revenue. Further development and growth of our Gollog services is a key part of our strategy to increase ancillary revenue and serves 3,192 cities in Brazil and more than 47 countries and 90 foreign destinations through international partnerships.

We are constantly evaluating opportunities to generate additional ancillary revenue such as sales of travel insurance, marketing activities and other services which may help us to better capitalize on the large number of passengers on our flights and the high volumes of customers using our website.

We have an integrated Smiles and Gollog platform in our air travel portal for the convenience of our customers.

We make efficient use of extra capacity in our aircraft by carrying cargo, through Gollog. Gollog’s success is the result of the unique service we offer to the market: the Electronic Air Waybill that can be completed online. The Gollog system provides online access to air waybills and allows customers to track their shipment from any computer with Internet access. Our 65 destinations throughout Brazil, South America and the Caribbean provide access to multiple locations in each region. With our capacity of approximately 860 daily flights, operated by 142 Boeing 737-700/800 aircraft, in addition to a fleet of approximately 400 vehicles, we can guarantee quick and reliable delivery.

Our express delivery products – Gollog VOO CERTO, Gollog EXPRESS, Gollog ECOMMERCE and Gollog DOC – were developed to meet the growing demand for door-to-door deliveries, defined deadlines and additional optional services. We intend to intensify our efforts in the express delivery services by further strengthening our logistics capability, mainly by expanding our ground distribution network and further intensifying our commercial efforts.

 

21


 

 

Aircraft Fleet

On December 31, 2015, we had an operational fleet of 142 aircraft, of which two were in redelivery process, and a total fleet of 144 aircraft.

The following table sets forth the composition of our fleet at the dates indicated:

 

At December 31,

Operating Fleet

Seats

2013

2014

2015

B737-700 NG

144

36

35

36

B737-800 NG

177

17

9

5

B737-800 NG Short-Field Performance

177

88

97

103

Sub total

 

141

141

144(1)

 

Non-Operating Fleet

 

B737-300(2)

141

8

3

-

B767-300/200

218

1

0

-

Sub total

 

9

3

-

Total

 

150

144

144

______________

(1) Two aircraft are not operational as they are in the process of being returned under their respective leases.

(2) All B737-300 aircraft result from the acquisition of Webjet. See “—Non-operating Fleet” below.

As of December 31, 2015, of our total 144 aircraft: 98 were under operating leases and 46 were under finance leases.

As of December 31, 2015, our operating leases had an average remaining term of 71.8 months and original total terms of up to 142.8  months from the date of delivery of the relevant aircraft.

As of December 31, 2015, our finance leases had an average remaining term of 60.7 months and we had purchase options for 40 of our aircraft under finance leases.

We believe that leasing our aircraft fleet provides us with flexibility to adjust our fleet size. We make monthly rental payments, some of which are based on floating rates, but we are not required to make termination payments at the end of our leases. Under our operating lease agreements, we do not have purchase options and for some of our lease agreements we are required to maintain maintenance reserve deposits and to return the aircraft and engine in the agreed condition at the end of the lease term. Title to the aircraft remains with the lessor. We are responsible for the maintenance, servicing, insurance, repair and overhaul of the aircraft during the term of the lease.

In 2015, we received eight aircraft based on operating lease contracts. We returned five aircraft under operating leases and one aircraft under finance lease contracts.

Operating Fleet

The average age of our operating fleet of 144 Boeing 737-700/800 aircraft as of December 31, 2015, was 7.7 years. The average daily utilization rate of our operating fleet in 2015 was 11.3 block hours as compared to 11.5 block hours in 2014.

Each Boeing 737 aircraft in our fleet is powered by two CFM International Model CFM 56-7B22 engines or two CFM International Model CFM 56-7B24 engines. All Boeing 737-800 NG Short-Field Performance are equipped with an upgrade thrust plug in each engine, which allows it to operate as a CFM 56-7B27/B3 engine with 27,000 lbs.

The Boeing 737-700 Next Generation and Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft currently comprising our fleet are fuel-efficient and very reliable. They suit our cost efficient operations well for the following reasons:

·         they have comparatively standardized maintenance routines;

·         they require just one type of standardized training for our crews;

 

22


 

 

·         they use an average of 7% less fuel than other aircraft of comparable size, according to Boeing; and

·         they have one of the lowest operating costs in their class.

In addition to being cost-efficient, the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft are equipped with advanced technology that promotes flight stability, providing a more comfortable flying experience for our customers. We use a single type of aircraft to preserve the simplicity of our operations and the introduction of any new aircraft type to our fleet will only be done if, after careful consideration, we determine that such a step will reduce our operating costs. As such, we plan to continue keeping our operating fleet of Boeing 737-700/800 aircraft, until the arrival of our newly ordered Boeing 737 Max-7/8 aircraft (the newest generation of our current aircraft) which we expect will be delivered starting 2018.

Most of our Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft are equipped with blended winglets and all Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft from our purchase order will be equipped with winglets, which reduce our fuel and maintenance costs. Our experience with the new winglets has shown operating fuel consumption reductions from 3% to 5%. In addition, the winglets improve airplane performance during take-off and landing on short runways. The new Boeing 737-800 NG aircraft will be delivered with short-field performance (SFP) with technical modifications that we expect to significantly improve flight performance, the ability to operate non-stop flights, reduce noise during take-off and enable us to fly with our Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft to the airport of Santos Dumont in Rio de Janeiro, an important link to the most important routes in Brazil.

All of our new aircraft are equipped with the new Sky Interior standard.

Non-operating Fleet

As of December 31, 2015, we had a non-operating fleet composed of two aircraft from our operating fleet were in redelivery process.

Fleet Plan

The following table sets forth our year-end projected operating fleet through 2020:

Projected Operating Fleet Plan

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

B737-700/800 NG*

125

125

128

131

130

* Includes SFP aircraft (Short Field Performance)

The fleet plan includes the arrival of new Boeing 737-MAX aircraft, which are expected to arrive in 2018. We will revise this fleet plan according to our expectations for the growth potential in the markets in which we operate.

Sales and Distribution

Our customers can purchase tickets directly from us through a number of different channels, such as our website including our Booking Web Services (BWS), our call center, at airport ticket counters and, to a lesser extent, GDS.

Our low-cost low-fare business model utilizes website ticket sales as its main distribution channel, especially in the local market. For the year ended December 31, 2015, 80.8% of our passenger revenue, whether directly from the customer or through travel agents, were booked online, making us a global leader in this area. In the same period, 3,7% of our passenger revenue were booked through call centers, airport sales counters, and our BWS and 15.5% of our total sales were made through the GDS.

Our customers can purchase tickets indirectly through travel agents, who are a widely-used travel service resource in Brazil and South America, Europe, North America and other regions. For the year ended December 31, 2015, travel agents provide us with approximately 11,000 distribution outlets throughout these regions.

GDS allows us access to a large number of tourism professionals who are able to sell our tickets to customers throughout the globe and enables us to enter into interline agreements with other airlines to offer more flights and connection options to our passengers and add incremental international passenger traffic, especially to our international network.

 

23


 

 

In December 2013, we reformulated our sales website in order to make online purchases easier and faster. Our customers can now filter searches by price, check flight status and register travel companions as favorites. Additionally, customers who purchase their flights online with fewer than 7 days before departure will have their check-in done automatically.

Partnerships and Alliances

General

Our strong market positioning enables us to successfully negotiate a number of arranged partnerships with supplementary major carriers worldwide, mostly in the form of codeshare agreements and interline agreements. Additional passenger inflows generated by these strategic partnerships help improve revenues at low incremental costs.

As of December 31, 2015, we had eleven codeshare agreements with: Delta, Air France-KLM, Aeromexico, Aerolíneas Argentinas, Alitalia, Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, TAP, Korean Air, Copa Airlines, Air Canada and 77 interline agreements. In addition, we celebrated a frequent flyer program agreement with Aerolíneas Argentinas in 2014.

An interline agreement is a commercial agreement between individual airlines to handle passengers traveling on itineraries that require multiple airlines. This type of agreement allows passengers to utilize a single ticket and to check their baggage through to the passengers’ final destination. Interline agreements differ from codeshare agreements in that codeshare agreements usually refer to numbering a flight with the airline’s code (abbreviation) even though the flight is operated by another airline. These agreements provide for better marketing and customer recognition of the links between the airlines.

Delta Investment and Commercial Agreements

On December 7, 2011 our controlling shareholder and Delta entered into an investment agreement providing for the sale of 8,300,455 preferred shares in the form of ADSs owned by our controlling shareholder to Delta at a price per share equivalent to R$22.00, or the Delta Investment. Our controlling shareholder used the entire net proceeds from the sale of preferred shares to Delta to subscribe for new common and preferred shares in a rights offering issued by us at the same price per share paid by Delta.

Our controlling shareholder further agreed to elect a Delta representative to our board of directors as long as Delta holds at least 50% of the ADSs acquired in the investment, among other conditions.

In the context of the Delta Investment, we entered into a long-term commercial agreement with Delta that included exclusivity provisions designed to strengthen the operational cooperation and synergies between the two companies, including:

·         an increase in the scope of the codeshare agreement (flight sharing). We have our own code in all Delta flights between Brazil and the United States. In addition, Delta continues to increase the use of codeshare in our flights in Brazil, South America, the United States and the Caribbean. This increases the number of flight options for passengers of both airlines, expanding our geographical reach;

·         optimization of flight connections and cargo and passenger transport services through the operations working group among the nearly 400 destinations in over 62 countries served by Gol and Delta;

·         the increase in passenger comfort by aligning services and benefits for members of both the Smiles and SkyMiles mileage programs, for example, making it possible to earn and redeem miles and get free access to GOL+Conforto seats, among other advantages;

·         joint commercial and promotional activities, encouraging both airlines’ sales forces to cooperate in Brazil, the United States and other countries, including joint sponsorship of events such as Rock in Rio; and

·         the exploration of synergies in passenger services, maintenance, VIP lounges and logistical support, including Delta task force in revenue management and maintenance, the use of Smiles lounge by Delta Elite passengers and the use of the SkyClub by Smiles Diamond passengers.

 

24


 

 

We, our controlling shareholder, Fundo de Investimentos em Participações Volluto (“Volluto”), and Delta in 2015 entered into the following transactions:

·         equity investments in Gol of approximately R$283.9 million and approximately R$177.3 million by Volluto and Delta, respectively (collectively, the “Equity Investment”),

·         an unsecured term loan of US$300 million borrowed by Gol LuxCo and guaranteed by Delta, and

·         an extension and expansion of Gol’s commercial cooperation arrangements with Delta.

The transactions above are intended to allow Gol and Delta to continue to benefit from their strategic partnership and to significantly enhance Gol’s financial position and liquidity.

Equity Investment

On September 4, 2015, Gol’s board of directors approved a capital increase in the amount of R$461.3 million, at a subscription price of R$7.20 reais per share.

Pursuant to an Investment Agreement entered into among Volluto, Gol and Delta with respect to the capital increase:

·         Volluto (1) invested R$283.9 and subscribed for approximately 62% of the new shares of Gol in the capital increase, and (2) assigned to Delta its preemptive rights to subscribe for any shares not subscribed for by other Gol shareholders in the capital increase.

·         Delta (1) exercised its preemptive rights to subscribe for approximately 2.9% of the new shares in the capital increase and (2) exercised the preemptive rights assigned to it by Volluto, for an aggregate investment of R$177.3 million.

All holders of Gol’s preferred shares, except for holders of preferred shares in the form of American Depositary Receipts, were entitled to exercise their preemptive rights to subscribe for a portion of the newly issued shares proportionate to their existing shareholdings, pursuant to our by-laws.

Term Loan Guaranteed by Delta

On August 31, 2015, Delta guaranteed a US$300 million Term Loan borrowed by Gol LuxCo from third party lenders. The Term Loan was made under a credit and guaranty agreement (the “Credit and Guaranty Agreement”) among Gol LuxCo, as borrower, Gol, the Lessee and the other guarantors thereunder (collectively, the “Term Loan Guarantors”) and the lenders party thereto (the “Third Party Lenders”).

Under the terms of the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, Gol LuxCo’s obligations thereunder are guaranteed by the Term Loan Guarantors. Pursuant to a separate guaranty agreement, Delta provided to the administrative agent under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, and the lenders under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, a backstop guarantee of Gol LuxCo’s and the Term Loan Guarantors’ respective obligations under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Delta Guaranty”). The reimbursement obligations to Delta in connection with the Delta Guaranty, which are guaranteed by Gol and VRG, are secured by a first priority security interest in favor of Delta in a portion of the shares of Smiles held by Gol.

The Term Loan bears interest at a rate of 6.50% per annum, payable semi-annually. The Term Loan matures at August 31, 2020 and is not secured by any property of Gol LuxCo or the Term Loan Guarantors.

Extension of Commercial Arrangements with Delta

Gol and Delta also agreed to extend the term of their existing strategic, long-term commercial cooperation agreements with exclusivity provisions designed to strengthen the cooperation and synergies between the two companies, and to extend their commercial arrangements relating to aircraft maintenance services.

 

25


 

 

In addition, we have also entered into an strategic MRO partnership agreement with Delta TechOps, This agreement also provides for our rendering of maintenance services to Delta aircraft with extended ground time in Brazil. See “–Maintenance.”

Air France-KLM

On February 19, 2014, we entered into an exclusive long term strategic partnership for commercial cooperation with Air France-KLM. Under this agreement, Air France-KLM made payments of US$33 million and has committed to make additional payments of US$15 million for the purpose of enhancing our codesharing, connectivity and joint sale activities as well as other benefits for our customers, including the integration and improvement of products and services for our frequent flyer programs. As part of this agreement, Air France-KLM also invested US$52 million in the acquisition of a number of our newly issued preferred shares, equivalent to 1.5% of our capital stock, at an issuance price equivalent to US$12.23 per share.

The agreement further provides for the creation of an alliance committee, comprised of at least one representative of Air France-KLM, at least two members of our board of directors and at least one representative of Delta.

Pricing

Brazilian airlines are permitted to establish their own domestic fares without previous government approval. Airlines are free to offer price discounts or follow other promotion activities. Airlines must submit, 30 days after the end of each month, a file containing fares sold and quantity of passengers for each fare amount, for all markets. This file lists regular fares and excludes all contracted, corporate and private fares. The objective is to monitor the average market prices. The same procedure applies for international fares. The only difference is that all fares sold for interline itineraries are also excluded from the file sent to ANAC.

Yield Management

Yield management involves the use of historical data and statistical forecasting models to produce knowledge about our markets and guidance on how to compete to maximize our operating revenue. Yield management forms the backbone of our revenue generation strategy and is strongly linked to our route and schedule planning and our sales and distribution methods. Our yield management practices enable us to react quickly in response to market changes. For example, our yield management systems are instrumental in helping us to identify the flight times and routes for which we offer promotions. By offering lower fares for seats that our yield management indicates would otherwise remain unsold, we capture additional revenue and also stimulate customer demand.

Maintenance

According to ANAC regulation, we are directly responsible for the execution and control of all maintenance services performed on our aircraft. The maintenance performed on our aircraft can be divided into two general categories: line and heavy maintenance. Line maintenance consists of routine, scheduled maintenance checks on our aircraft, including pre-flight, daily and overnight checks and any diagnostics and routine repairs. All of our line maintenance is performed by our own highly experienced technicians at our line maintenance service bases throughout Brazil and South America. We believe that our practice of performing daily preventative maintenance helps to maintain a high aircraft utilization rate and reduces maintenance costs. Heavy maintenance consists of more complex inspections and servicing of the aircraft that cannot be accomplished overnight. Heavy maintenance checks are performed following a pre-scheduled agenda of major overhauls defined by the aircraft’s manufacturer, based on the number of hours and flights flown by the aircraft. In addition, engine maintenance services are rendered in different MRO facilities. We do not believe that our high aircraft utilization rate will necessarily result in the need to make more frequent repairs to our aircraft, given the durability of the aircraft type in our fleet. Our aircraft are covered by warranties that have an average term of 48 months for products and parts and 12 years for structural components. The warranties on the aircraft we received in 2014 and 2015 under our firm purchase order with Boeing will start expiring in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

We internalized heavy maintenance on our Boeing 737 aircraft in our Aircraft Maintenance Center at the Tancredo Neves International Airport in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. We use this facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. We have three hangars at our Aircraft Maintenance Center, with a capacity to perform maintenance on 6 aircraft simultaneously and painting services on one additional aircraft. We also have room to build another hangar, if needed.

 

26


 

 

We have entered into two strategic MRO partnership agreements in order to provide overhaul service for our CFM 56-7 engines, maintenance for parts and components on our fleet of Boeing 737 NG aircraft and also, consulting services related to maintenance workflow planning, materials and facility optimization and tooling support:

·         with Delta TechOps, the maintenance division of Delta, for maintenance of 50% CFM 56-7 engines. Delta TechOps will also assist us with our efforts to secure FAA certification. This agreement also provides for our rendering of maintenance services to Delta aircraft with extended ground time in Brazil.

·         with MTU in order to provide MRO services to the remaining 50% of our CFM 56-7 engines as well as maintenance of engine parts and components of our Boeing 737 NG aircraft.

We have been certified by ANAC under Brazilian Aeronautical Certification Regulations to perform heavy maintenance services for third parties. We have used this certification as a source for ancillary revenues, since our construction of an additional maintenance facility was completed.

Fuel and Hedging

Our fuel costs totaled R$3,301.4 million in 2015, representing 33.2% of our operating costs and expenses for the year. In 2015, we purchased substantially all of our fuel from Petrobras Distribuidora, a retail subsidiary of Petrobras, principally under an into-plane contract under which the supplier supplies fuel and also fills our aircraft tanks. In addition to Petrobras, there are two other large fuel suppliers in Brazil. In 2015, fuel prices under our contracts were re-set every 30 days and were composed of a variable and a fixed component. The variable component is defined by the refinery and follows international crude oil price fluctuations and the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate. The fixed component is a spread charged by the supplier and is usually a fixed cost per liter during the term of the contract. We currently operate a tankering program under which we fill the fuel tanks of our aircraft in regions where fuel prices are lower. We also provide our pilots with training in fuel management techniques, such as carefully selecting flight altitudes to optimize fuel efficiency.

The following chart summarizes our fuel consumption and costs for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

2015

Liters consumed (in thousands)

1,538,202

1,551,137

Total fuel cost (in millions)

R$3,842.3

R$3,301.4

Average price per liter

R$2.50

R$2.13

% change in price per liter

4.6%

(14.8)%

Percent of operating expenses

40.2%

33.2%

 

We continuously invest in initiatives to reduce fuel consumption. We started using Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, or ACARS, in 2010. ACARS is a system that permits real-time digital transmission, via satellite, of important flight data between aircraft and our bases, allowing routes and flight times to be automatically updated. We decided to increase ACARS coverage and create the CCD (Digital Communications Center) within the Operational Control area, which started operating in May 2011. We had installed ACARS in 135 aircraft by the end of 2015. The Center is responsible for monitoring aircraft in real time, as well as streamlining operations and managing various flight data. We also started using GPS Landing System in January 2010 and we fully implemented the system in all our fleet at the end of 2014. This system reduces fuel consumption during take-off and landing, increases precision and safety.

Fuel costs are extremely volatile, as they are subject to many global economic and geopolitical factors that we can neither control nor accurately predict. Because international prices for jet fuel are denominated in U.S. dollars, our fuel costs, though payable in reais, are subject not only to price fluctuations but also to exchange rate fluctuations. We maintain a fuel hedging program, based upon policies which define volume, price targets and instruments, under which we enter into fuel and currency hedging agreements with various counterparties providing for price protection in connection with the purchase of fuel. Our hedging positions cover short and long-term periods, and are adjusted weekly or more frequently as conditions require. Our hedging practices are executed by our internal risk management committee and overseen by the risk policies committee of our board of directors. The risk policies committee, which may be comprised of members of our board of directors, external consultants, and senior management, meets monthly or more often, if called, and its main responsibilities are to assess the effectiveness of our hedging policies, recommend amendments when and where appropriate and establish its views regarding fuel price trends. We use risk management instruments that have a high correlation with the underlying assets so as to reduce our exposure. We require that all of our risk management instruments be liquid so as to allow us to make position adjustments and have prices that are widely disclosed. We also avoid concentration of credit and product risk. We have not otherwise entered into arrangements to guarantee our supply of fuel and we cannot provide assurance that our hedging program is sufficient to protect us against significant increases in the price of fuel. We also use non-derivative instruments as alternative hedge conferring an additional average protection through fixed price fuel transactions for future delivery negotiated with our main fuel supplier. 

 

27


 

 

We have adopted a financial instruments policy in order to protect us against market price fluctuations of fuel, foreign exchange and interest rates that can adversely affect our operations. We use Brent and heating oil zero cost collar derivative contracts as protection instruments for our fuel hedge operations. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2014, we opted to settle all our contracted put options in order to limit the downside risk given the substantial decrease in oil prices at the end of the period, only maintaining our exposure to call options.

As of December 31, 2015, we had hedged 31.7% of our fuel exposure in the next three months, which was composed of non-derivative instruments. A total of 17.1% of the next six months and 8.5% for the year were hedged by non-derivative instruments.

Safety and Security

Our most important priority is the safety of our passengers and employees. We maintain our aircraft in strict accordance with manufacturer specifications and all applicable safety regulations, and perform routine line maintenance every day. Our pilots have extensive experience, with flight captains having more than 10,000 hours of career flight time, and we conduct ongoing courses, extensive flight simulation training and seminars addressing the latest developments in safety and security issues. We closely follow the standards established by ANAC’s Air Accident Prevention Program and we have installed the Flight Operations Quality Assurance System, which maximizes proactive prevention of incidents through the systematic analysis of the flight data recorder system. All of our aircraft are also equipped with Maintenance Operations Quality Assurance, a troubleshooting program that monitors performance and aircraft engine trends. The Brazilian civil aviation market follows the highest recognized safety standards in the world. We are also an active member of the Flight Safety Foundation, a foundation for the exchange of information about flight safety.

Environmental Sustainability

Since 2010, we prepare Annual Sustainability Reports based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, an international standard for reporting economic, social and environmental performance. By adopting these parameters, we are reinforcing our accountability with various stakeholders through added transparency and credibility.

We also constantly invest in becoming more environmentally sustainable and have recently implemented the following actions:

·         Expansion of our Aircraft Maintenance Center at the Tancredo Neves International Airport located in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais: we have reduced costs by decreasing the necessity of flying our aircraft overseas to be serviced. We also treat all of the effluents generated in our facilities and are committed to the reuse of water. The Maintenance Center was designed to comply with environmental responsibility requirements and all of the conditions imposed by the environmental licenses and current legislation.

 

28


 

 

·         We were the first Brazilian airline selected to join the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users Group (SAFUG), an international aviation biofuel research group, and we participate in biofuel feasibility tests. On October 23, 2013, we flew the first commercial flight with biofuel in Brazil, from Congonhas to Brasília, which emitted approximately 0.5 tons less CO2.

·         We have a partnership agreement with the Fuel and Carbon Services Division of GE Aviation, which envisages the creation of studies and systems to reduce fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Insurance

We maintain passenger liability insurance in an amount consistent with industry practice and we insure our aircraft against losses and damages on an “all risks” basis. We have obtained all insurance coverage required by the terms of our leasing agreements. We believe our insurance coverage is consistent with airline industry standards in Brazil and is appropriate to protect us from material loss in light of the activities we conduct. No assurance can be given, however, that the amount of insurance we carry will be sufficient to protect us from material loss.

Competition

Domestic

Airlines in Brazil compete primarily on the basis of routes, fare levels, frequency of flights, capacity, airport operating rights and presence, reliability of services, brand recognition, frequent flyer programs and customer service.

Our main competitors in Brazil are LATAM Airlines Group, or LATAM, Azul Linhas Aéreas, or Azul, and Avianca Brasil, or Avianca. LATAM is the result of a June 2012 merger between TAM Airlines of Brazil and LAN Airlines of Chile, and is a full-service scheduled carrier offering flights on domestic routes and international routes. Azul is a low-cost regional domestic carrier, which acquired another regional carrier, Trip, in 2012. Avianca was founded in Colombia, and licensed its brand in Brazil in 2010. We also face domestic competition from other domestic scheduled carriers, regional airlines and charter airlines, which mainly have regional networks.

As the growth in the Brazilian airline sector evolves, we may face increased competition from our primary competitors and charter airlines as well as other entrants into the market that reduce their fares to attract new passengers in some of our markets.

The following table sets forth the historical market shares on domestic routes, based on revenue passenger kilometers, of the significant airlines in Brazil for each of the periods indicated:

Domestic Market Share— Scheduled Airlines

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Gol

37.4%

38.7%

35.4%

36.1%

35.9%

Webjet(1)

5.5%

-

-

-

-

LATAM(2)

41.1%

40.8%

39.9%

38.1%

36.7%

Azul(3)

8.6%

10.1%

17.0%

16.7%

17.0%

Trip(3)

3.2%

4.5%

-

-

-

Avianca

3.1%

5.4%

7.1%

8.4%

9.4%

Others

0.9%

0.7%

0.6%

0.7%

1.0%

_______________

Source: ANAC

(1)     On October 3, 2011, we acquired Webjet.

(2)     Known as TAM Airlines prior to its June 2012 merger with LAN Airlines of Chile.

(3)     In May 2012, Azul acquired Trip.

Since February 2012, the Brazilian government increased parking fees at the busiest airports, as compared to less busy airports, and at peak hours, which benefitted secondary hubs and off-peak flights in light of the differences in fees for the airlines that chose to operate in these airports or at these times. Currently, landing fees are fixed, based on the category of the airport and whether the flight is domestic or international. Navigation fees are also fixed, but consider the area overflown and whether the flight is domestic or international.

 

29


 

 

Domestically, we also face competition from ground transportation alternatives, primarily interstate bus companies. Given the absence of meaningful passenger rail services in Brazil, travel by bus has traditionally been the only low-cost option for long-distance travel for a significant portion of Brazil’s population. We believe that our low-cost business model has given us flexibility in setting our fares to stimulate demand for air travel among passengers who in the past have traveled long distances primarily by bus. In particular, the highly competitive fares we have offered for travel on our night flights, which have often been comparable to bus fares for the same destinations, have had the effect of providing direct competition for interstate bus companies on these routes.

In January 2015 Brazil approved a law allowing the government to grant subsidies for flights departing from or arriving at regional airports. Regional airports include any airports with fewer than 600,000 passengers per year, increased to 800,000 passengers per year in the Amazon region. The subsidy is still subject to further regulation before it may be implemented and is limited to certain airport fees and transportation costs for the lesser of 60 passengers per flight or 50% of the seats in a given flight, except in the Amazon region where the only limit is up to 60 passengers.

International

As we expand our international services in South America and the Caribbean, our pool of competitors will increase and we will face competition from Brazilian and South American airlines that are already established in the international market and that participate in strategic alliances and codeshare arrangements. In addition, non-Brazilian airlines may decide to enter or increase their schedules in the market for routes between Brazil and other South American and Caribbean destinations. Also, we resumed flights to Santiago, Chile, in July 2014.

In 2010, ANAC approved the deregulation of international airfares for flights departing from Brazil to the United States and Europe, gradually removing the prior minimum fares. In addition, in 2010, CONAC approved the continuity of bilateral agreements providing for open skies policies with other South American countries and a new open skies policy with the United States. The agreement with the United States was signed by the parties, however is necessary to be ratified by the Brazilian Congress, to be ready to operate. A similar agreement with Europe is still in its early stages. These new regulations should increase the number of passengers in South America and grow our market. To the extent that our presence and/or the presence of our partner, Delta, increase in the South American market, this will contribute to our business. On the other hand, to the extent competition increases in the expanded South American market and we and/or Delta loose significant market share, we may be adversely affected.

Smiles Loyalty Program

Segregation of the Smiles Loyalty Program

On December 21, 2012, we approved the segregation of the activities related to the Smiles loyalty program, or the Smiles loyalty program, previously managed by us, and which began to be conducted by Smiles. On May 2, 2013, Smiles concluded its IPO in which it issued a number of common shares equivalent to 43% of its total capital for R$1.1 billion. The proceeds of this IPO were used for the purchase by Smiles of advanced tickets from us at a conditional discount rate equivalent to between 140% and 150% of the Interbank Deposit Certificate (Certificados de Depósito Interbancário), or CDI rate, which corresponded to a 12.49% per year discount.

General Atlantic Investment Agreement

On April 5, 2013, we entered into an investment agreement with General Atlantic Service Company LLC., or General Atlantic, providing for an investment by General Atlantic in Smiles. Under this agreement, G.A. Smiles Participações S.A., or G.A. Smiles, an affiliate of General Atlantic, purchased in the IPO a number of Smiles common shares equivalent to R$400.0 million, or 15.8% of Smiles total capital.

In connection with G.A. Smiles’ investment, on April 23, 2013, we entered into a shareholders agreement granting G.A. Smiles the right to appoint one member of Smiles’ board of directors and certain veto rights regarding: amendments to the Operational Agreement or the Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement, which set the terms and conditions for our relationship with Smiles, certain related party transactions in excess of R$2.0 million, and certain advance ticket purchases.

 

30


 

 

In April 2013, we granted G.A. Smiles an option, exercisable within 12 months of the IPO (as of May 2, 2013), to purchase from us an additional number of Smiles common shares equivalent to 20% of G.A. Smiles’ initial investment, at the same price per share set in the IPO as adjusted by the CDI rate. On February 27, 2014, General Atlantic exercised this option and purchased a total amount of 3,443,476 common shares, or 2.8% of Smiles’ total capital stock, for R$80 million.

In April 2015, we executed an amendment to the shareholders’ agreement with General Atlantic, modifying the duration and conditions for its termination. One hypothesis of termination of the agreement was General Atlantic coming to hold an equity interest of less than 7.5%. This threshold has been modified to 2.5%, with the added specification that the agreement shall only be terminated 12 months after the date on which General Atlantic comes to hold an equity interest of less than 2.5%.

On May 26, 2015, G.A. announced that they had fully divested from Smiles and initiated the 12 months term for the termination of the shareholders’ agreement. From May 26, 2016, the shareholders’ agreement will no longer be valid.

Merger of G.A. Smiles Participações S.A. into Smiles

On December 31, 2013, G.A. Smiles Participações S.A., or G.A. Smiles, merged into Smiles. The equity interest previously held by G.A. Smiles on Smiles was transferred to G.A. Smiles’ sole shareholder, G.A. Brasil Fundo do Investimento em Participações.

Overview

Smiles is one of the largest coalition loyalty programs in Brazil, with over 11 million members as of December 31, 2015. Its business model is based on developing a pure coalition loyalty program consisting of a single platform for accumulating and redeeming miles through a broad network of commercial and financial partners.

The Smiles loyalty program was originally launched by Varig in 1994 as a frequent flyer program and was acquired by us in 2007, together with other assets of the Varig business. Beginning in 2008, the Smiles loyalty program, which had been essentially inactive for years, underwent a complete restructuring and revitalization and, since then, the program has gained significant market share. The Smiles loyalty program has been transformed from a stand-alone program into an independent coalition loyalty program.

Currently, Smiles loyalty program allows members to accumulate miles through: (1) flights with Gol and our international partners, (2) all the significant Brazilian commercial banks that issue credit cards, including through co-branded cards issued by Bradesco and Banco do Brasil, (3) a broad network of  retail partners, including Localiza, the largest car rental agency in Brazil, Accor Hotels (Le Club), a global hotel chain, among others, (4) direct purchases of miles by customers and (5) purchase of miles and benefits through Clube Smiles (or Smiles Club). We are Smiles’ primary redemption partner but members may also redeem miles for products and services from commercial partners.

The agreements that govern our commercial relationship with Smiles allow unrestricted access to seats on our flights.

Products and Services

Smiles’ main business is the sale of miles. Its commercial partners purchase miles to distribute to Smiles members when members purchase products or services from these partners. Members accumulate miles, which are redeemed in exchange for rewards, which in turn are acquired from Gol and other commercial partners.

Smiles earns revenue mainly by (1) selling miles to its commercial partners and (2) providing loyalty program management services to commercial partners, including our loyalty program.

To become eligible to earn miles, individuals enroll in the Smiles loyalty program through its website. Members have a single account for accumulating and redeeming miles, and are not currently required to transfer miles or pay additional redemption fees.

 

31


 

 

A Smiles loyalty program account permits members to accumulate miles by purchasing products or using services offered by its commercial partners. Members may redeem and convert their miles into travel or non-travel rewards. Our current policy is to cancel all miles in member accounts when they expire, which varies from three to five years, with promotional miles that can expire in shorter periods.

Miles Redemption

Travel rewards represented the majority of redemptions as of December 31, 2015. However, with the option of redeeming miles through Smiles Shopping, a platform through which redemption commercial partners offer a variety of reward products, we expect that the proportion of redemptions for products other than airline travel may increase.

Miles Sales to Members, Smiles Club and Smiles and Money

Smiles was the first Brazilian loyalty program to sell miles directly to members to allow them to add miles to their account balances in order to facilitate redemption of higher value rewards. Currently, members may purchase miles through its website. Miles purchases are automatically credited to member accounts and can later be used for reward tickets or reward products through Smiles Shopping.

Smiles and Money allows members to redeem rewards using a combination of miles and money. We believe that Smiles and Money and miles sales encourage member engagement, as it expands access to rewards.

Smiles Club is a benefit club eligible for all members, through which customers receive a typical amount of 1,000 miles with access to promotions in advance, compared to non-club members. Customers who join the club pay a monthly fee for the miles received.

Commercial Partners

As of the date of this annual report, the Smiles network of commercial partners is composed of airlines, financial institutions, travel agencies, hotels, car rental agencies, gas stations, bookstores, media companies, drugstores, restaurants and parking lot operators, among others.

 

32


 

 

Competition

Smiles faces the following types of competition in Brazil: (i) frequent flyer programs, (ii) the loyalty programs of financial institutions and similar entities and (iii) other loyalty programs in general. The first group includes Multiplus, the current market leader, and other players such as the Tudo Azul program and Avianca’s Programa Amigo. The second group includes a variety of large financial institutions and similar entities that have their own loyalty programs, such as the SuperBônus Program of Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A., the Bradesco Loyalty Card Program of Banco Bradesco S.A., the Sempre Presente Program of Banco Itaú Unibanco S.A., the American Express Membership Rewards Program and Livelo, a joint venture program between Banco do Brasil and Banco Bradesco. The majority of these programs allow members to transfer accumulated reward points to programs like the Smiles loyalty program. The third group of competitors includes companies such as Dotz and Netpoints, among others.

If foreign loyalty programs such as Aeroplan or Air Miles enter the Brazilian market, Smiles may face additional competition. However, entry of foreign loyalty programs would also present new opportunities for commercial partnerships.

Agreements with Smiles

Operating Agreement

On December 28, 2012, we entered into an operating agreement with Smiles, or the Operating Agreement, that establishes the terms and conditions of our relationship. This agreement went into effect on January 1, 2013, when Smiles began to manage and operate the Smiles loyalty program.

The Operating Agreement established the terms of the transfer of Smiles loyalty program management to Smiles. In the context of the transfer, we divided reward costs as follows: the cost of rewards redeemed with legacy miles (i.e., those earned through December 31, 2012) is supported by us, while the cost of rewards redeemed with new miles (i.e., those earned beginning January 1, 2013) is supported by Smiles.

Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, the Smiles program will be our sole loyalty program. We are currently Smiles’ sole partner in the air transportation industry in Brazil, but Smiles is free to establish new partnerships in this industry with our prior authorization. We may require Smiles to enter into a partnership agreement with new partners in the air transportation industry or with a global alliance of airlines in the event we become a party to one.

We have a preference to enter into partnerships in certain segments, such as travel agencies (including on-line travel agencies), rental cars and travel insurance. However, Smiles may establish partnerships in these industries with our prior authorization.

Outside of the air transportation industry and certain segments in the travel industry, Smiles does not need to inform or request our authorization to establish partnerships. We may establish partnerships outside the air transportation industry as long as such partnerships do not involve miles or benefits accumulation in a frequent flyer program other than the Smiles loyalty program.

The 20-year Operating Agreement will be automatically renewed for successive five-year periods if neither party objects at least two years prior to its expiration. If a party is given notice of non-renewal, it may terminate the Operating Agreement early by providing written notification to the other party six months prior to the termination date.

We pay Smiles a monthly fee for managing our frequent flyer program. This fee will be adjusted on each anniversary of the Operating Agreement in accordance with our gross monthly miles purchases. For 2014 and 2015, the management fee was 6.0% of gross miles sales. From 2016 on, this fee may range between 3.5% and 6.0%, depending on our gross miles purchases.

 

33


 

 

2012 Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement

On December 28, 2012, we entered into a miles and tickets purchase agreement with Smiles, or the Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement, that establishes the terms and conditions of our purchases of miles and our sales of tickets.

In order to govern pricing and availability of reward tickets and satisfy customer demand, the agreement establishes three seating classes: standard, commercial and promotional for ticketing purposes.

The price that we pay for miles will be calculated based on the economic cost specified above, minus a portion of the breakage rate, which is the expected percentage of miles that will expire without being redeemed.

Pursuant to the Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement, any material change to our miles accumulation policy must be discussed in advance by a loyalty committee whose members will be appointed by Smiles and us, proportionally. Smiles must notify us of material changes to miles redemption policy relating to reward tickets and hold discussions of such changes in the loyalty committee. The loyalty committee will be an advisory committee with no decision-making power.

Smiles may sell miles directly to its customers, subject to certain limits on miles sold per client and per period, minimum prices and the length of redemption periods.

The 20-year Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement will be automatically renewed for successive five-year periods if neither party objects at least two years prior to its expiration. If a party is given notice of non-renewal, it may terminate the agreement early by providing written notification to the other party six months prior to the termination date.

The parties will annually review the contract’s compliance conditions according to certain parameters established in the agreement, and may amend these conditions in order to reestablish the originally agreed-upon economic balance. In extraordinary circumstances, the parties may also amend the agreement in the event of significant changes to (i) the economic cost of flights (including changes in the average occupancy rate of our flights or ticket prices); (ii) our destinations; or (iii) applicable law or regulation.

On December 30, 2015, we, along with Smiles and VRG, made adjustments in the prices of standard airline tickets and miles sold for VRG, representing an increase of 3.0% and 3.2%, respectively, based on the composition of the airline tickets issued in the preceding period.

2016 Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement

On February 26, 2016, VRG entered into an advance air ticket sale agreement with Smiles, totaling up to R$1.0 billion in advance ticket sales.

 

34


 

 

This advance purchase will consist of various tranches through June 30, 2017. The first tranche was disbursed by Smiles in February 2016 in the amount of R$376.0 million.

The remaining tranches are conditioned upon certain measures to strengthen VRG’s liquidity, including the ones described below, but not limited to:

The payments made by Smiles will be governed by the agreements already existing between VRG and Smiles, with certain changes. The advances by Smiles will be remunerated at a minimum rate of 132% of the CDI, which may be increased according to market conditions at each payment date. In addition, Smiles will benefit from some measures to strengthen its competitiveness. 

We cannot ensure that we will be able to take all the measures to fulfill the conditions to the disbursements under this advance purchase, which, to some extent, depend on third parties. In addition, we cannot ensure the exact timing for the remaining tranches.

Back Office Services Agreement

On December 28, 2012, we entered into a back office services agreement with Smiles, or the Back Office Services Agreement, that contains the terms, conditions and levels of certain services to be provided to Smiles by us. These services will be provided in connection with certain back office activities including controllership, accounting, internal controls and auditing, finance, information technology, call center, human resources, inventory and legal matters. The amount recognized by Smiles as expenses in 2015 and 2014 totaled R$24.3 million and R$19.8 million, respectively.

The three-year Back Office Services Agreement will be automatically renewed for successive three-year periods if neither party objects 12 months prior to its expiration. Smiles may terminate portions of the Back Office Services Agreement at any time by providing prior written notice to us.

Corporate Governance

On June 10, 2013, Smiles’ by-laws were amended to provide that certain related party transactions will require the approval of an independent committee or all members of its board of directors. These related party transactions include: amendments to the Operational Agreement or the Miles and Tickets Purchase Agreement and certain advance ticket purchases, among other transactions.

Industry Overview

According to the International Air Transport Association, or IATA, Brazil is the fourth largest domestic aviation market in the world and, according to ANAC, there were 96 million domestic enplanements and 8 million international enplanements on Brazilian carriers in Brazil (which excludes international carriers) in 2015, out of a total population of over 204 million, according to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), or IBGE. In contrast, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the United States had 700 million domestic enplanements and 105 million international enplanements in 2015, out of a total population of over 323 million, based on the latest United States census estimates.

The business travel segment is the largest component of Brazilian air transportation demand and the most profitable in the market. According to company data, business travel represented around 58% of the total demand for domestic air travel in 2015, which we believe is significantly higher than the business travel portion of domestic air travel in the global aviation sector. According to the latest data collected by ANAC, flights between Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo accounted for 4% of all domestic passengers in 2014. The ten busiest routes accounted for 61.7% of all domestic air passengers in 2014, while the ten busiest airports accounted for 69.1% in 2014

 

35


 

 

In light of economic growth, the consumer domestic market (A, B and C classes) has significantly increased in the last years. According to ANAC, there were 96 million passengers in 2015 in line with 2014. Due to increased passenger volume, in addition to the World Cup in 2014 and the upcoming Summer Olympic Games (2016) in Brazil, domestic airport infrastructure has required substantial improvements.

In 2009, CONAC proposed to the Brazilian government a change to the regulatory limit of foreign ownership in Brazilian airline companies from 20% to 49% or higher. In March 2016 the Brazilian government issued a Provisional Measure increasing this limit to 49%. Although the reduced limit is current valid, if the Provisional Measure is not converted into law by July 2016, the prior limit will be reinstated.

In August 2011, the Brazilian government privatized the Natal airport, which construction was completed in mid-2014. In February 2012, the Brazilian government privatized the Guarulhos, Brasília and Campinas international airports, which will be operated by the winners of the privatization auction for periods of 20 to 30 years. In November 2013, the Brazilian government privatized Galeão (Rio de Janeiro) and Confins (Belo Horizonte) airports. Other airports are also expected to be privatized.

Brazilian Civil Aviation Market Evolution

Since 1970, Brazil has for the most part experienced stable growth in revenue passenger kilometers. From 1970 to 2009, domestic revenue passenger kilometers grew at a compound annual rate of 8.9%. In the past 40 years, the domestic market generally experienced year-over-year growth in revenue passenger kilometers except in times of significant economic or political distress, such as the petroleum crisis in the 1970s, the Brazilian sovereign debt crisis in the early 1980s and the economic and political distress in Brazil in the early 1990s.

From 2011 to 2015, the compound annual growth rate in industry passenger traffic, in terms of domestic revenue passenger kilometers, was 3.75%, versus a compound annual growth rate in available industry domestic capacity, in terms of available seat kilometers, of 0.46%. Domestic industry load factor, calculated as revenue passenger kilometers divided by available seat kilometers, averaged 79.8% over the same period. In 2015, Brazil was the fourth largest market in domestic revenue passenger kilometers. The table below shows the figures of domestic industry passenger traffic and available capacity for the periods indicated:

 

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

 

(in millions, except percentages)

Available Seat Kilometers

116,080

119,337

115,886

117,001

118,230

Available Seat Kilometers Growth

13.1%

2.8%

(2.9)%

0.9%

1.0%

Revenue Passenger Kilometers

81,452

87,047

88,226

93,367

94,381

Revenue Passenger Kilometers Growth

16.0%

6.9%

1.4%

5.8%

1.1%

Load Factor

70.2%

72.9%

76.1%

79.8%

79.8%

________________

Source: ANAC, Dados Comparativos Avançados.

The 2015 traffic figures reflect the industry’s current trend of controlling domestic supply through the main airlines, in response to the new cost level, as well as the sluggish growth of Brazil’s economy.

Regulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation Market

The Brazilian Aviation Authorities and Regulation Overview

Air transportation services are considered a public service and are subject to extensive regulation and monitoring by CONAC and ANAC. Air transportation services are also regulated by the Brazilian Federal Constitution and the Brazilian Aeronautical Code. The Brazilian civil air transportation system is controlled by several authorities. ANAC is responsible for the regulation of the airlines; and the Department of Air Space Control (Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo), or DECEA, is responsible for airspace control.

 

36


 

 

The following chart illustrates the main regulatory bodies, their responsibilities and reporting lines within the Brazilian governmental structure.

 


 

In March 2011, the Civil Aviation Secretary (Secretaria de Aviação Civil), or SAC, was created to supervise civil aviation in Brazil. SAC oversees ANAC and INFRAERO and reports directly to the Brazilian President. SAC is also responsible for implementation of the airport infrastructure concession plan and the development of strategic planning for civil aviation.

In August 2011, the National Commission of Airport Authorities (Comissão Nacional de Autoridades Aeroportuárias), or CONAERO, was created as a commission of SAC to coordinate the different entities and public agencies related to airports. This commission shall have a normative role in the search for efficiency and security in airports operations.

CONAERO is composed by the following individuals and representatives of entities: (i) SAC, which chairs the commission; (ii) the Brazilian president’s chief of staff; (iii) Agriculture, Livestock and Supplies Ministry; (iv) Defense Ministry; (v) Finance Ministry; (vi) Justice Ministry; (vii) Planning, Budget and Administration Ministry; (viii) Health Ministry; and (ix) ANAC.

ANAC is currently responsible for guiding, planning, stimulating and supporting the activities of public and private civil aviation companies in Brazil. ANAC also regulates flying operations and economic issues affecting air transportation, including matters relating to air safety, certification and fitness, insurance, consumer protection and competitive practices.

The DECEA reports indirectly to the Brazilian Minister of Defense which is responsible for planning, administrating and controlling activities related to airspace, aeronautical telecommunications and technology. This includes approving and overseeing the implementation of equipment as well as of navigation, meteorological and radar systems. The DECEA also controls and supervises the Brazilian Airspace Control System.

With respect to non-privatized airports, INFRAERO, a state-controlled corporation reporting to SAC, is in charge of managing, operating and controlling federal airports, including some control towers and airport safety operations. With respect to the recently privatized airports (Natal, Galeão, Confins, Guarulhos, Viracopos and Brasília), although INFRAERO still holds a minority stake in each of them, INFRAERO is no longer in charge of operations, which are now handled by their respective private operators. See “Regulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation Market–Airport Infrastructure” below.

 

37


 

 

CONAC is an advisory body of the President of Brazil and its upper level advisory board is composed of the Minister of Defense, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Treasury, the Minister of Development, Industry and International Trade, the Minister of Tourism, the Brazilian president’s chief of staff, the Minister of Planning, Budget and Management, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Transportation and the Commandant of the Air Force. CONAC has the authority to establish national civil aviation policies that may be adopted and enforced by the High Command of Aeronautics and by ANAC. CONAC establishes guidelines relating to the proper representation of Brazil in conventions, treaties and other actions related to international air transportation, airport infrastructure, the granting of supplemental funds to be used for the benefit of airlines and airports based on strategic, economic or tourism-related aspects, the coordination of civil aviation, air safety, the granting of air routes and concessions, as well as permission for the provision of commercial air transportation services.

The Brazilian Aeronautical Code sets forth the main rules and regulations relating to airport infrastructure and operation, flight safety and protection, airline certification, lease structuring, burdening, disposal, registration and licensing of aircraft; crew training, concessions, inspection and control of airlines, public and private air carrier services, civil liability of airlines and penalties in case of infringements.

In February 2009, the Brazilian government approved the new Civil Aviation National Policy (Política Nacional de Aviação Civil), or PNAC. Although the PNAC does not establish any immediate measure, it contains the main guidelines for the national civil aviation system. It encourages the Ministry of Defense, CONAC and ANAC to issue regulations on strategic matters such as safety, competition, environmental and consumer issues, as well as to inspect, review and evaluate the activities of all operating companies.

The Brazilian government recognized and ratified, and must comply with, the Warsaw Convention of 1929, the Chicago Convention of 1944 and the Geneva Convention of 1948, the three leading international conventions relating to worldwide commercial air transportation activities.

Route Rights

Domestic routes. For the granting of new routes and changes to existing ones, ANAC evaluates the actual capacity of the airport infrastructure where such route is or would be operated. In addition, route frequencies are granted subject to the condition that they are operated on a frequent basis. Any airline’s route frequency rights may be terminated if the airline (a) fails to begin operation of a given route for a period exceeding 15 days, (b) fails to maintain at least 75% of flights provided for in its air transportation schedule (Horário de Transporte Aéreo), or HOTRAN, for any 90-day period or (c) suspends its operation for a period exceeding 30 days. ANAC approval of new routes or changes to existing routes is given in the course of an administrative procedure and requires no changes to existing concession agreements.

Once routes are granted, they must be immediately reflected in the HOTRAN, which is the official schedule report of all routes that an airline can operate. The HOTRAN provides not only for the routes but also the times of arrival at and departure from certain airports, none of which may be changed without the prior consent of ANAC. According to Brazilian laws and regulations, an airline cannot sell, assign or transfer its routes to another airline.

International routes. In general, requests for new international routes, or changes to existing routes, must be filed by each interested Brazilian airline that has been previously qualified by ANAC to provide international services, with the International Relations Superintendence of ANAC, or SRI, which, based on the provisions of the applicable bilateral agreement and general policies of the Brazilian aviation authorities, will submit a non-binding recommendation to ANAC’s president, who will decide on approval of the request. International route rights for all countries, as well as the corresponding transit rights, derive from bilateral air transport agreements negotiated between Brazil and foreign governments. Under such agreements, each government grants to the other the right to designate one or more of its domestic airlines to operate scheduled service between certain destinations in each country. Airlines are only entitled to apply for new international routes when they are made available under these agreements. For the granting of new routes and changes to existing ones, ANAC has the authority to approve Brazilian airlines to operate new routes, subject to the airline having filed studies satisfactory to ANAC demonstrating the technical and financial viability of such routes and fulfilling certain conditions in respect of the concession for such routes. Any airline’s international route frequency rights may be terminated if the airline fails to maintain at least 80% of flights provided for in its air transportation schedule HOTRAN for any 180-day period or suspends its operation for a period exceeding 180 days.

 

38


 

 

In 2010, ANAC approved the deregulation of international airfares for flights departing from Brazil to the United States and Europe, gradually removing the prior minimum fares. In addition, in 2010, CONAC approved the continuity of bilateral agreements providing for open skies policies with other South American countries and a new open skies policy with the United States. The agreement with the United States was signed by the parties, however is necessary to be ratified by the Brazilian Congress, to be ready to operate. A similar agreement with Europe is still in its early stages. These new regulations should increase the number of passengers in South America and grow our market. To the extent that our presence and/or the presence of our partner, Delta, increase in the South American market, this will contribute to our business. On the other hand, to the extent competition increases in the expanded South American market and we and/or Delta loose significant market share, we may be adversely affected.

Slots Policy

Domestic. Under Brazilian law, a domestic slot concession derives from a flight concession by ANAC, which is reflected in the airline’s HOTRAN. Each HOTRAN represents the authorization for an airline to depart from and arrive at specific airports within a predetermined timeframe. Such period of time is known as an “airport slot” and provides that an airline can operate at the specific airport at the times established in the HOTRAN. An airline must request an additional slot from ANAC with a minimum of two months’ prior notice.

Congonhas airport in the city of São Paulo is a “coordinated” airport, where slots must be allocated to an airline company before it may begin operations there. Although it is difficult to obtain a slot in Congonhas airport, on March 8, 2010, ANAC reallocated 202 idle Congonhas’ slots. The Santos-Dumont airport in Rio de Janeiro, a highly utilized airport with half-hourly shuttle flights between São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, also presents certain slot restrictions. ANAC has imposed schedule restrictions on several Brazilian airports from which we operate. Operating restrictions, including the prohibition of international flights’ operations and the prohibition of civil aircraft’s operation after 11:00 p.m. and before 6:00 a.m., were imposed for Congonhas airport (São Paulo), one of the busiest Brazilian airports and the most important airport for our operations. No assurance can be given that these or other government measures will not have a material adverse effect on us.

CONAC has taken certain measures to minimize recent technical and operational problems at São Paulo’s airports, including the redistribution of air traffic from Congonhas airport (São Paulo) to the international airport in Guarulhos. CONAC has also mentioned its intention to adjust tariffs for the use of busy airport hubs to encourage further redistribution of air traffic.

In July 2014, ANAC published new rules governing the allocation of slots at the main Brazilian airports, which consider operational efficiency (on-time performance and regularity) as the main criteria for the allocation of slots. Under these rules on-time performance and regularity are assessed in two annual seasons, following the IATA summer and winter calendars, between April and September and between October and March.

The minimum on-time performance and regularity targets for each series of slots in a season are 80% and 90%, respectively, at Congonhas airport (São Paulo) and 75% and 80%, respectively, for all other main airports. Airlines will forfeit any series of slots that operate below the minimum criteria in a season. Forfeited slots are redistributed 50% to new entrants, which includes airlines that operate fewer than 5 slots in the relevant airport in the given weekday, and 50% to all airlines operating in the relevant airport based on their share of slots. For the first allocation period at Congonhas, from November 2014 to March 2015, new entrants includes all airlines with less than 12% of the slots.

In addition, in October 2014, ANAC distributed new slots at Congonhas airport, in light of increased runway capacity, exclusively to airlines with less than 12% of the slots. Azul and Avianca were awarded 26 and 14 slots, respectively. With this new allocation of slots, we have 43% and LATAM 44% of the slots in terms of takeoffs and landings at Congonhas airport, after having held 47% and 48%, respectively, before the capacity increase, while Avianca’s slots increased from 5% to 8% and Azul’s increased from 0% to 5%.

Airport Infrastructure

INFRAERO, a state-controlled corporation, is in charge of managing, operating and controlling federal airports, including some control towers and airport safety operations.

 

39


 

 

Smaller, regional airports may belong to states or municipalities within Brazil and, in such cases, are often managed by local governmental entities. At most important Brazilian airports, INFRAERO performs safety and security activities, including passenger and baggage screening, cargo security measures and airport security.

The use of areas within federal airports, such as hangars and check-in counters, is subject to a concession by INFRAERO. If there is more than one applicant for the use of a specific airport area, INFRAERO may conduct a public bidding process for the granting of the concession. For recently privatized airports (Natal, Galeão, Confins, Guarulhos, Viracopos and Brasília), operators may freely negotiate all commercial areas according to their own criteria; there is no requirement that a public bidding must be held in the event there is more than one applicant for the use of a specific airport area.

We have renewable concessions with terms varying from one to five years from INFRAERO to use and operate all of our facilities at each of the major airports that we serve. Our concession agreements for our terminals’ passenger service facilities, which include check-in counters and ticket offices, operations support areas and baggage service offices, contain provisions for periodic adjustments of the lease rates and the extension of the concession term.

All of the 60 Brazilian airports managed by INFRAERO at the end of 2015 are scheduled to receive some infrastructure investments and upgrades within the next three years. In addition, under the regional aviation development program, 270 current or new regional airports may receive investments in the next few years. These airport upgrade plans do not require contributions or investments by the Brazilian airlines and are not expected to be accompanied by increases in landing fees or passenger taxes on air travel.

Until 2010, parking, landing and navigation fees charged in Brazilian airports were similar in all airports independent of whether they were busy or not. From 2011 until February 2012, the Brazilian government increased parking fees at the busiest airports, as compared to less busy airports, and at peak hours, which benefitted secondary hubs and off-peak flights in light of the differences in fees for the airlines that chose to operate in these airports or at these times. Currently, landing fees are fixed, based on the category of the airport and whether the flight is domestic or international. Navigation fees are also fixed, but consider the area overflown and whether the flight is domestic or international.

In August 2011, the Brazilian government privatized the Natal airport, which construction was completed in mid-2014. In February 2012, the Brazilian government privatized the Guarulhos, Brasília and Campinas international airports, which will be operated by the winners of the privatization auction for periods of 20 to 30 years. In November 2013, the Brazilian government privatized Galeão (Rio de Janeiro) and Confins (Belo Horizonte) airports.  Other airports are also expected to be privatized in this year, for example, in Fortaleza, Salvador, Florianópolis and Porto Alegre International Airports.

The airports auctioned were:

 

Cumbica
(Guarulhos)

Viracopos
(Campinas)

Juscelino Kubitschek
(Brasília)

Galeão

(Rio de Janeiro)

Confins

(Belo Horizonte)

State

São Paulo

São Paulo

Distrito Federal

Rio de Janeiro

Minas Gerais

Grant

R$ 16.2 billion

R$ 3.8 billion

R$ 4.5 billion

R$ 19 billion

R$1.8 billion

Concession term

20 Years

30 Years

25 Years

25 Years

30 Years

Minimum investment

R$ 4.7 billion

R$ 8.7 billion

R$ 4.7 billion

R$4.8 billion

R$1.1 billion

Additional fee

10% of Annual Gross Revenue

5% of Annual Gross Revenue

2% of Annual Gross Revenue

5% of Annual Gross Revenue

5% of Annual Gross Revenue

________________________

Source: SAC

Concession for Air Transportation Services

According to the Brazilian Federal Constitution, the Brazilian government is responsible for public services related to airspace, as well as airport infrastructure, and may provide these services directly or through third parties under concessions or authorizations. According to the Brazilian Aeronautical Code and regulations issued by CONAC, the application for a concession to operate regular air transportation services is subject to a license granted by ANAC to operate an airline and to explore regular air transportation services. The applicant is required by ANAC to have met certain economic, financial, technical, operational and administrative requirements in order to be granted such license. Additionally, a concession applicant must be an entity incorporated in Brazil, duly registered with the Brazilian Aeronautical Registry (Registro Aeronáutico Brasileiro), or RAB, must have a valid airline operating certificate (Certificado de Homologação de Empresa de Transporte Aéreo), or CHETA, and must also comply with certain ownership restrictions. See “—Restrictions to the Ownership of Shares Issued by Concessionaires of Air Transportation Services.” ANAC has the authority to revoke a concession for failure by the airline to comply with the terms of the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, the complementary laws and regulations and the terms of the concession agreement.

 

40


 

 

Our concession was granted on January 2, 2001 by the High Command of Aeronautics of the Ministry of Defense. The concession agreement can be terminated if, among other things, we fail to meet specified service levels, cease operations or declare bankruptcy.

The Brazilian Aeronautical Code and the regulations issued by CONAC and ANAC do not expressly provide for public bidding processes and currently it is not necessary to conduct public bidding processes prior to granting of concessions for the operation of air transportation services. Due to the intense growth of the civil aviation sector, this rule may be changed by the government, in order to allow more competition or to achieve other political purposes.

Import of Aircraft into Brazil

The import of civil or commercial aircraft into Brazil is subject to prior certification of the aircraft by ANAC. Import authorizations usually follow the general procedures for import of goods into Brazil, after which the importer must request the registration of the aircraft with the RAB.

Registration of Aircraft

The registration of aircraft in Brazil is governed by the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, under which no aircraft is allowed to fly in Brazilian airspace, or land in or take off from Brazilian territory, without having been properly registered. In order to be registered and continue to be registered in Brazil, an aircraft must have a certificate of registration (certificado de matrícula) and a certificate of airworthiness (certificado de aeronavegabilidade), both of which are issued by the RAB after technical inspection of the aircraft by ANAC. A certificate of registration attributes Brazilian nationality to the aircraft and is evidence of its enrollment with the competent aviation authority. A certificate of airworthiness is generally valid for six years from the date of ANAC’s inspection and authorizes the aircraft to fly in Brazilian airspace, subject to continuing compliance with certain technical requirements and conditions. The registration of any aircraft may be cancelled if it is found that the aircraft is not in compliance with the requirements for registration and, in particular, if the aircraft has failed to comply with any applicable safety requirements specified by ANAC or the Brazilian Aeronautical Code.

All information relating to the contractual status of an aircraft, including purchase and sale agreements, operating leases and mortgages, must be filed with the RAB in order to provide the public with an updated record of any amendments made to the aircraft certificate of registration.

Restrictions on the Ownership of Shares Issued by Concessionaires of Air Transportation Services

According to the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, in order to be eligible for a concession for operation of regular services, the entity operating the concession must have at least 80% of its voting stock held directly or indirectly by Brazilian citizens and must have certain management positions entrusted to Brazilian citizens. In March 2016 the Brazilian government issued a Provisional Measure decreasing this limit to 51%. Although the reduced limit is current valid, if the Provisional Measure is not converted into law by July 2016, the prior limit will be reinstated.

The Brazilian Aeronautical Code also imposes certain restrictions on the transfer of capital stock of concessionaires of air transportation services, such as VRG, including the following:

·         the voting shares have to be nominative and non-voting shares cannot be converted into voting shares;

 

41


 

 

·         prior approval of the Brazilian aviation authorities is required for any transfer of shares, regardless of the nationality of the investor, which results in the change of the company’s corporate control, causes the assignee to hold more than 10% of the company’s capital stock or represents more than 2% of the company’s capital stock;

·         the airline must file with ANAC, in the first month of each semester, a detailed shareholder chart, including a list of shareholders, as well as a list of all share transfers effected in the preceding semester; and

·         based on its review of the airline’s shareholder chart, ANAC has the authority to subject any further transfer of shares to its prior approval.

We hold substantially all of the shares of VRG, which are public concessionaires of air transportation services in Brazil. Under the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, the restrictions on the transfer of shares described above apply only to companies that hold concessions to provide regular air transportation services. Therefore, the restrictions do not apply to us.

Environmental Regulation

Brazilian airlines are subject to various federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including the disposal of materials and chemical substances and aircraft noise. These laws and regulations are enforced by various governmental authorities. Non-compliance with such laws and regulations may subject the violator to administrative and criminal sanctions, in addition to the obligation to repair or to pay damages caused to the environment and third parties. As far as civil liabilities are concerned, Brazilian environmental laws adopt the strict and joint liability regime. In this regard we may be liable for violations by third parties hired to dispose of our waste. Moreover, pursuant to Brazilian environmental laws and regulations, the piercing of the corporate veil of a company may occur in order to ensure enough financial resources to the recovery of damages caused against the environment.

We adopted several Environmental Management System, or EMS, procedures with our suppliers and use technical audits to enforce compliance. We exercise caution, and may reject goods and services from companies that do not meet our environmental protection parameters unless confirmation of compliance is received.

We are monitoring and analyzing the developments regarding amendments to Kyoto protocol and emissions regulations in the United States and Europe and may be obliged to acquire carbon credits for the operation of our business. No legislation on this matter has yet been enacted in Brazil.

Pending Legislation

The Brazilian congress is currently discussing a draft bill that would replace the current Brazilian Aeronautical Code (Código Brasileiro de Aeronáutica). In general, this draft bill deals with matters related to civil aviation, including airport concessions, consumer protection, limitation of airlines’ civil liability, compulsory insurance, fines and the increase of limits to foreign ownership in voting stock of Brazilian airlines. This draft bill is still under discussion in the House of Representatives and, if approved, must be submitted for approval to the Senate, before being sent for presidential approval. If the Brazilian civil aviation framework changes, or ANAC implements increased restrictions, the Brazilian airline industry could be negatively affected.

In January 2015 Brazil approved a law allowing the government to grant subsidies for flights departing from or arriving at regional airports. Regional airports include any airports with fewer than 600,000 passengers per year, increased to 800,000 passengers per year in the Amazon region. The subsidy is still subject to further regulation before it may be implemented and is limited to certain airport fees and transportation costs for the lesser of 60 passengers per flight or 50% of the seats in a given flight, except in the Amazon region where the only limit is up to 60 passengers.

Aircraft Financing by Export Credit Agencies

In 2010, the U.S. Ex-Im Bank agreed on a common approach with European export-credit agencies on offering export credits for U.S. commercial aircraft. Among other things, the new Sector Understanding on Export Credits for Civil Aircraft, or the ASU, sets forth minimum guarantee premium rates applicable to aircraft delivered on or after January 1, 2013, or under firm contracts entered into after December 31, 2010 and also changes the maximum amount that may be financed.

 

42


 

 

In light of our current credit ratings and the introduction of the ASU, our minimum guaranty premium rate applicable to aircraft delivered on or after January 1, 2013 increased substantially. As a consequence, finance leases have become significantly more expensive and we have therefore entered nearly exclusively into operating leases since 2012.

Aircraft Repossession

The Cape Town treaty is an international treaty intended to standardize transactions involving movable property. The treaty creates international standards for registration of ownership, security interests (liens), leases and conditional sales contracts and various legal remedies for default in financing agreements, including repossession and the effect of particular states’ bankruptcy laws. As of December 31, 2015, the convention had been ratified by more than 81 countries, including Brazil.

C.      Organizational Structure

We are a holding company that directly or indirectly own shares of seven subsidiaries: VRG; Webjet; Smiles; four offshore subsidiaries: Gol Finance Inc., or Gol Finance; GAC Inc., or GAC; Gol LuxCo S.A.; and Gol Dominicana Lineas Aereas Sas., or GOLD. VRG is our operating subsidiary, under which we conduct our air transportation business. Webjet was acquired in 2011 and we announced the winding up its activities at the end of 2012. We are the majority shareholder of Smiles, which conducts the Smiles loyalty program. Gol Finance, GAC and Gol LuxCo are off-shore companies established for the purpose of facilitating cross-border general and aircraft financing transactions. GOLD is a company incorporated in the Dominican Republic and is currently pre-operational.

D.      Property, Plant and Equipment

Our primary corporate offices are located in São Paulo. Our commercial, operations, technology, finance and administrative staff is based primarily at our headquarters. We have concessions to use other airport buildings and hangars throughout Brazil, including a part of a hangar at Congonhas airport where we perform aircraft maintenance. As of December 31, 2015, we had finance lease agreements for 46 Boeing 737s, 40 of which had a purchase option at the end of the contract term. We own a state-of-the-art Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. The certification of our aircraft maintenance center authorizes airframe maintenance services for Boeing 737-300s and Boeing Next Generation 737-700 and 800s. We have three hangars at our Aircraft Maintenance Center, with a capacity to perform maintenance on six aircraft simultaneously and painting services on one additional aircraft. We also have room to build more hangars, if needed. We use the new facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. See also “Item 4—Business Overview—Aircraft” and Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

ITEM 4A.     Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

ITEM 5.       Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

You should read this discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.

A.      Operating Results

Revenues

We derive our revenues primarily from transporting passengers on our aircraft. In 2015, 87.8% of our net revenues came from passenger transportation revenues, and the remaining 12.2% came from ancillary revenues, principally from our cargo business, which utilizes cargo space on our passenger flights. Nearly all of our revenue is denominated in reais. Passenger revenue, including the part of the revenue of the Smiles loyalty program which relates to the redemption of miles for GOL flight tickets, is recognized either when transportation is provided or when the unused ticket expires. Cargo revenue is recognized when transportation is provided. Other ancillary revenue consists primarily of ticket change fees, excess baggage charges and interest on installment sales. Passenger revenues are based upon our capacity, load factor and yield. Our capacity is measured in terms of available seat kilometers (ASK), which represents the number of seats we make available on our aircraft multiplied by the number of kilometers the seats are flown. Load factor, or the percentage of our capacity that is actually used by paying customers, is calculated by dividing revenue passenger kilometers by available seat kilometers. Yield is the average amount that one passenger pays to fly one kilometer.

 

43


 

 

The following table demonstrates our main operating performance indicators in 2013, 2014 and 2015:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

2014

2015

Operating Data:

 

 

 

Load-factor

69.9%

76.9%

77.2%

Break-even load-factor

67.8%

73.1%

78.1%

Aircraft utilization (block hours per day)

11.2

11.5

11.1

Yield per passenger kilometer (cents)

23.4

23.8

22.3

Passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (cents)

16.4

18.3

17.3

Operating revenue per available seat kilometer (cents)

18.0

20.3

19.7

Number of departures 

316,466

317,594

315,902

Average number of operating aircraft

121

126

129

 

Our revenues are net of ICMS and federal social contribution taxes, including Programa de Integração Social, or PIS, and the Contribuição Social para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social, or COFINS. ICMS does not apply to passenger revenues. The average rate of ICMS on cargo revenues varies by state from 0% to 19%. As a general rule, PIS and COFINS combined are imposed at rates of 3.65% of passenger revenues.

We have one of the largest e-commerce platforms in Brazil and we generate most of our revenue from ticket sales through our website.

ANAC and the aviation authorities of other countries in which we operate may influence our ability to generate revenues. In Brazil, ANAC approves the concession of flights, and consequently slots, entry of new companies, launch of new routes, increases in route frequencies and lease or acquisition of new aircraft. Our ability to grow and increase revenues is dependent on receiving approval from ANAC for new routes, increased frequencies and additional aircraft.

Operating Expenses

We seek to lower our operating expenses by operating a young and standardized fleet, having one of the newest fleets in the industry, utilizing our aircraft efficiently, using and encouraging low-cost ticket sales and distribution processes. The main components of our operating expenses include aircraft fuel, aircraft rent, aircraft maintenance, sales and marketing, and salaries including provisions for our profit sharing plan.

Our aircraft fuel expenses are higher than those of low-cost airlines in the United States and Europe because production, transportation and storage of fuel in Brazil depends on expensive and underdeveloped infrastructure, especially in the north and northeast regions of the country. In addition, taxes on jet fuel are high and are passed along to us. Our aircraft fuel expenses are variable and fluctuate based on global oil prices. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil, a benchmark widely used for crude oil prices that is measured in barrels and quoted in U.S. dollars, varies significantly. The price per barrel was US$98.83, US$91.82 and US$98.42 at year-end of 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. In the second half of 2014, fuel prices dropped significantly due to a slowdown in demand and global economic growth, particularly in China, coupled with an increase in supply and production, principally in the United States. The price per barrel at December 31, 2015 was US$48.8 and at April 26, 2016 was US$35.2 Since global oil prices are U.S. dollar-based, our aircraft fuel costs are also linked to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the real versus the U.S. dollar. In 2015, fuel costs represented 33.2% of our total operating costs and expenses, as compared to 40.2% in 2014. We currently enter into short-term arrangements to partially hedge against increases in oil prices and foreign exchange fluctuations.

 

44


 

 

Our aircraft rent expenses are in U.S. dollars and we use short-term arrangements to hedge against exchange rate exposure related to our lease payment obligations. In addition, leases for seven of our aircraft are subject to floating-rate payment obligations that are based on fluctuations in international interest rates. We currently have hedging policies in place to manage our interest rate exposure.

Our maintenance, material and repair expenses consist of light (line) and scheduled heavy (structural) maintenance of our aircraft. Line maintenance and repair expenses are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Structural maintenance for aircraft leased under finance leases is capitalized and amortized over the life of the maintenance cycle. Since the average age of our operating fleet was 7.7 years for 144 operating Boeing 737-700/800 aircraft at December 31, 2015, and most of the parts on our aircraft are under multi-year warranties, our aircraft have required a low level of maintenance and therefore we have incurred low maintenance expenses. Our aircraft are covered by warranties that have an average term of 48 months for products and parts and 12 years for structural components. The warranties on the aircraft we received in 2015 under our firm purchase order with Boeing will start expiring in 2019. Thus, with regard to the accounting for aircraft maintenance and repair costs, our current and past results of operations may not be indicative of future results. Our Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais, is certificated for the maintenance services for Boeing 737-300s and Boeing Next Generation 737-700 and 800s. We currently use this facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. We believe that we have an advantage compared to industry peers in maintenance, materials and repairs expenses due to our in-house maintenance. We believe that this advantage will continue in the foreseeable future.

Our sales and marketing expenses include commissions paid to travel agents, fees paid for our own and third-party reservation systems and agents, fees paid to credit card companies and advertising. Our distribution costs are lower than those of other airlines in Brazil on a per available seat kilometer (ASK) basis because a higher proportion of our customers purchase tickets from us directly through our website instead of through traditional distribution channels, such as ticket offices, and we have comparatively fewer sales made through higher cost global distribution systems. We generated 80.7% of our consolidated sales through our website and API systems in 2015 and 83.1% in 2014, including internet sales through travel agents. For these reasons, we believe that we have an advantage compared to industry peers in sales and marketing expenses and expect this advantage will continue in the foreseeable future.

Salaries paid to our employees include annual cost of living adjustments and provisions made for our profit sharing plan.

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing expenses include ground handling and the cost of airport facilities. Other operating expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, purchased services, equipment rentals, passenger refreshments, communication costs, supplies and professional fees.

Operating Segments

We have two operating segments:

·                     flight transportation; and

·                     Smiles loyalty program.

Our two segments have a number of transactions between each other in light of the nature of the agreements between VRG and Smiles and because the vast majority of miles redeemed are exchanged for tickets in flights operated by VRG. These transactions are more relevant in connection with net revenue, costs and finance result for each segment, as follows:

Net revenue: a significant portion of the miles redeemed revenue is eliminated when we consolidate VRG and Smiles, as they relate to tickets purchased by Smiles from VRG and revenue is ultimately recognized as passenger transportation in our flight transportation segment.

Costs: a significant portion of redemption costs in the Smiles loyalty program segment is eliminated when we consolidate VRG and Smiles as they relate to tickets purchased by Smiles from VRG and ultimately recorded as flight transportation costs in our flight transportation segment.

 

45


 

 

Finance result: under the agreements between VRG and Smiles, Smiles makes certain advance ticket purchases at a discount. This discount is recognized as a financial expense in our flight transportation segment and as a financial income in our Smiles loyalty program segment, both of which are eliminated when we consolidate VRG and Smiles.

See “–Results of Operations– Segment Results of Operations” for more information on our operating segments.

Brazilian Economic Environment

As most of our operations are domestic, we are affected by Brazilian general economic conditions. While our growth since 2001 has been primarily driven by our expansion into new markets and increased flight frequencies, we have also been affected by macroeconomic conditions in Brazil. We believe the rate of growth in Brazil is important in determining our future growth capacity and our results of operations. Our revenue passenger kilometer in the domestic market increased by 0.5% in 2015 against an increase of 8.0% in 2014. This increase was primarily due to a higher load factor in 2015 as compared to 2014, even in light of a domestic capacity stable in the same period in response to Brazil’s economic slowdown starting in 2012 and to a new industry-wide cost environment in place since 2011, caused by new exchange rate levels much higher than those of previous periods and additional airport fees. Compared to 2014, our passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (PRASK) decreased by 5.6%, due to a combination of lower yields in 5.9% and a 0.3 percentage point increase in load factor.

We are materially affected by currency fluctuations. The vast majority of our revenues are denominated in reais while a significant part of our operating expenses are either payable in or affected by the U.S. dollar, such as our aircraft operating lease payments, related maintenance reserves and deposits, and jet fuel expenses. In 2015, 50.3% of our operating expenses (including aircraft fuel) were denominated in, or linked to, U.S. dollars and therefore varied with the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate within the year. We believe that our foreign exchange and fuel hedging programs partially protect us against short-term swings in the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate and jet fuel prices. See “Item 3. Risk Factors— Risks Relating to Us and the Brazilian Airline Industry.”

Inflation has also affected us and will likely continue to do so. In 2015, 49.3% of our operating expenses (excluding aircraft fuel, operating leases and maintenance) were denominated in reais, and the suppliers and service providers of these expense items generally attempt to increase their prices to reflect Brazilian inflation.

The following table shows data for real GDP growth (contraction), inflation, interest rates, the U.S. dollar exchange rate and crude oil prices for and as of the periods indicated.

 

December 31,

 

2013

2014

2015

Real growth (contraction) in gross domestic product

2.3%

0.1%

(3.8)%

Inflation (IGP-M)(1)

5.5%

3.7%

10.5%

Inflation (IPCA)(2)

5.9%

6.4%

10.7%

CDI rate(3)

9.8%

11.6%

14.1%

LIBOR rate(4)

0.3%

0.3%

0.6%

Depreciation of the real vs. U.S. dollar

10.5%

9.1%

41.6%

Period-end exchange rate—US$1.00

R$2.343

R$ 2.656

R$ 3.905

Average exchange rate—US$1.00(5)

R$2.161

R$ 2.353

R$ 3.338

Period-end West Texas intermediate crude (per barrel)

US$98.42

US$53.27

US$37.04

Period-end Increase (decrease) in West Texas intermediate crude (per barrel)

7.2%

(45.9)%

(30.5)%

Average period West Texas Intermediate crude (per barrel)

US$97.97

US$93.04

US$48.80

Average period increase (decrease) in West Texas Intermediate crude (per barrel)

3.9%

(4.7)%

(44.0)%

_________

Sources: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, the Central Bank and Bloomberg

(1)   Inflation (IGP-M) is the general market price index measured by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

(2)   Inflation (IPCA) is a broad consumer price index measured by the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.

(3)   The CDI rate is average of inter-bank overnight rates in Brazil (as of the last date of the respective period).

(4)   Three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR rate as of the last date of the period. The LIBOR rate is the London inter-bank offer rate.

(5)   Represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.

 

46


 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires our management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and judgments to develop amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. We strive to maintain a process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the estimates that are required to prepare our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our estimates and judgments are reasonable; however, actual results and the timing of recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates. In addition, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information.

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different outcomes under different assumptions and conditions. For a discussion of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment, including reusable parts, are recorded at cost and are depreciated to estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Each component of property, plant and equipment that has a cost that is significant in relation to the overall cost of the item is depreciated separately. Aircraft and engine spares acquired on the introduction or expansion of a fleet, as well as reusable spares purchased separately, are carried as fixed assets and generally depreciated in line with the fleet to which they relate. Pre-delivery deposits refer to prepayments under the agreements with Boeing for the purchase of Boeing 737-800 Next Generation and 737-800 MAX aircraft and include interest and finance charges incurred during the manufacture of aircraft and the leasehold improvements.

Under IAS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment,” major engine overhauls including replacement spares and labor costs, are treated as a separate asset component with the cost capitalized and depreciated over the period to the next major overhaul. All other replacement spares and costs relating to maintenance of fleet assets are charged to the income statement on consumption or as incurred. Interest costs incurred on debts that fund progress payments on assets under construction, including pre-delivery deposits to acquire new aircraft, are capitalized and included as part of the cost of the assets through the earlier of the date of completion or aircraft delivery.

In estimating the useful life and expected residual values of our aircraft, we have primarily relied upon actual experience with the same or similar types of aircraft and recommendations from Boeing. Aircraft estimated useful life is based on the number of “cycles” flown (one-take-off and landing). We have made a conversion of cycles into years based on both our historical and anticipated future utilization of the aircraft. Subsequent revisions to these estimates, which can be significant, could be caused by changes to our maintenance program, changes in utilization of the aircraft (actual cycles during a given period of time), governmental regulations related to aging aircraft and changing market prices of new and used aircraft of the same or similar types. We evaluate estimates and assumptions each reporting period and, when warranted, adjust these estimates and assumptions. These adjustments are accounted for on a prospective basis through depreciation and amortization expense, as required by IFRS.

We evaluate annually whether there is any indicator that our property, plant and equipment may be impaired. Factors that would indicate potential impairment may include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived asset(s), a significant change in the long-lived asset(s) physical condition and operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of our long-lived asset(s). As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we have recorded an impairment on property, plant and equipment assets of R$28.9 million and R$33.4 million, respectively, mainly related to replacement and spare parts. In 2015, we evaluated the impairment of our aircraft and no impairment or write-off was required to be recorded.

Lease Accounting. Aircraft lease agreements are accounted for as either operating or capital leases (finance leases). When the risks and rewards of the lease are transferred to us, as lessee, the lease is classified as a capital lease. Capital leases are accounted for as an acquisition of the asset through a financing, with the aircraft recorded as a fixed asset and a corresponding liability recorded as a debt. Capital leases are recorded based on the lesser of the fair value of the aircraft or the present value of the minimum lease payments, discounted at an implicit interest rate, when it is clearly identified in the lease agreement, or market interest rate. The aircraft is depreciated through the lesser of its useful life or the lease term. Interest expense is recognized through the effective interest rate method, based on the implicit interest rate of the lease. Lease agreements that do not transfer the risks and rewards to us are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are accounted for as rent and lease expense is recognized using the straight line method through the lease term.

 

47


 

 

Sale-lease back transactions that result in a subsequent operating lease have different accounting treatments depending on the fair value of the asset, the price and the cost of the sale. If the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the difference is immediately recognized as a loss. When the sale gives rise to a gain it is recognized up to the fair value, with the excess deferred and amortized throughout the term of the lease. When the sale results in a loss and the carrying amount is not greater than fair value, the loss is deferred if compensated by future lease payments. If the carrying amount is greater than fair value, it is written down to fair value and if there is still a loss it is deferred if compensated by future lease payments.

Lease accounting is critical for us because it requires an extensive analysis of the lease agreements in order to classify and measure the transactions in our financial statements. Changes in the terms of our outstanding lease agreements and the terms of future lease agreements may affect how we account for our lease transactions and our future financial position and results of operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We have allocated goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives acquired through business combinations, for the purposes of impairment testing, to the cash-generating units, the operating subsidiaries VRG and Smiles, since segregation of their operations. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually by comparing the carrying amount to the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit, that has been measured on the basis of its value-in-use, by applying cash flow projections in the functional currency based on our approved business plan covering a five-year period followed by the long-term growth rate of 3.5%. The pre-tax discount rate applied to the cash flow projections was 17.21 % for the VRG’s cash-generating unit and 19.84% for the Smiles’ cash-generating unit, at December 31, 2015. Considerable judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and macroeconomic changes to estimate future cash flows and to measure the recoverable amount. Assumptions in our impairment evaluations are consistent with internal projections and operating plans. Airport operating rights acquired as part of the acquisition of VRG and Webjet were capitalized at fair value at that date and are not amortized. Those rights are considered to have an indefinite useful life due to several factors and considerations, including requirements for necessary permits to operate within Brazil and limited slot availability in the most important airports in terms of traffic volume. The carrying values of the airport operating rights are reviewed for impairment at each reporting date and are subject to impairment testing when events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying values may not be recoverable. Costs related to the purchase or development of computer software that is separable from an item of related hardware is capitalized separately and amortized over a period not exceeding five years on a straight-line basis. The carrying value of these intangibles is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We assess at each balance sheet date whether intangibles with indefinite useful lives are impaired using discounted cash flow analyses, which considers the creditworthiness of the issuer of the security. In 2015, no impairment or write-off was recognized for intangible assets. We believe none of our cash-generating units was at risk of having its value in use being less than its carrying value at the date of your most recent impairment analysis.

Derivative Financial Instruments. We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with IAS 39. In executing our risk management program, management uses a variety of financial instruments to protect against sharp changes in market prices and to mitigate the volatility of its expenditures related to these prices. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently the change in fair value is recorded in profit or loss, unless the derivative meets the strict criteria for cash flow hedge accounting.

For hedge accounting purposes, according to IAS 39, the hedge instrument is classified as: (i) a cash flow hedge when it protects against exposure to fluctuations in cash flows that are attributable to a particular risk associated with an asset or liability recognized regarding an operation that is highly likely to occur or to an exchange rate risk for an unrecognized firm commitment, and (ii) a fair value hedge when it protects from the results of a change in the fair value of a recognized liability, or a part thereof, that could be attributed to exchange risk.

At the beginning of a hedge transaction, we designate and formally document the item covered by the hedge, as well as the objective of the hedge and the risk policies strategy. Documentation includes identification of the hedge instrument, the item or transaction to be protected, the nature of the risk to be hedged and how the entity will determine the effectiveness of the hedge instrument in offsetting exposure to variations in the fair value of the item covered or the cash flows attributable to the risk covered. The foregoing is performed with a view to ensuring that such hedge instruments will be effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows, and these are quarterly appraised to determine if they really have been effective throughout the entire period for which they have been designated.

 

48


 

 

Amounts classified in equity are transferred to profit or loss each period in which the hedged transaction affects profit or loss. If the hedged item is the cost of non-financial asset, the amounts classified in equity are transferred to the initial carrying amount of the non-financial asset.

If the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, amounts previously recognized in equity are transferred to profit or loss. If the designation as a hedge is revoked, amounts previously recognized in equity are recognized in profit or loss.

We measure quarterly the effectiveness of the hedge instruments in offsetting changes in prices. Derivative financial instruments are effective if they offset between 80% and 125% of the changes in price of the item for which the hedge has been contracted. Any gain or loss resulting from changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments during the quarter in which they are not qualified for hedge accounting, as well as the ineffective portion of the instruments designated for hedge accounting, are recognized as other finance income (expenses).

Aircraft maintenance and repair costs. Our aircraft lease agreements specifically provide that we, as lessee, are responsible for maintenance of the leased aircraft and engines, and we must meet specified airframe and engine return conditions upon lease expiration. Under certain of our existing lease agreements, we pay maintenance deposits to aircraft and engine lessors that are to be applied to future maintenance events. These deposits are calculated based on a performance measure, such as flight hours or cycles, and are available for reimbursement to us upon the completion of the maintenance of the leased aircraft. If there are sufficient funds on deposit to reimburse us for our maintenance costs, such funds are returned to us. The maintenance deposits paid under our lease agreements do not transfer either the obligation to maintain the aircraft or the cost risk associated with the maintenance activities to the aircraft lessor. In addition, we maintain the right to select any third-party maintenance provider or to perform such services in-house. Therefore, we record these amounts as a deposit on our balance sheet and recognize maintenance expense when the underlying maintenance is performed, in accordance with our maintenance accounting policy. Certain of our lease agreements provide that excess deposits at the end of the lease term are not refundable to us. Such excess could occur if the amounts ultimately expended for the maintenance events were less than the amounts on deposit. Any excess amounts held by the lessor or retained by the lessor upon the expiration of the lease, which are not expected to be significant, would be recognized as additional aircraft rental expense at the time it is no longer probable that such amounts will be used for maintenance for which they were deposited. The amount of aircraft and engine maintenance deposits expected to be utilized in the next twelve months is classified in current assets.

We follow IAS 16 – “Property, Plant and Equipment” and perform the capitalization of the costs relating to engine overhauls. This practice establishes that costs on major maintenance (including replacement parts and labor) should be capitalized only when there is an extension of the estimated useful life of the engine. Such costs are capitalized and depreciated until the next stop for major maintenance. The expense recognized directly in the income statement refers to maintenance costs of other aircraft components or even maintenance of engines that do not extend their useful life.

In addition, certain of our lease agreements do not require maintenance deposits; instead letters of credit are issued on behalf of the lessor, which can be claimed if the aircraft maintenance does not occur as established in the review schedule. As of December 31, 2015, no letters of credit had been executed.

Our initial estimates of the maintenance expenses regarding the leases are equal to or in excess of the amounts required to be deposited. This demonstrates it is probable the amounts will be utilized for the maintenance for which they are to be deposited and the likelihood of an impairment of the balance is remote. There has been no impairment of our maintenance deposits.

 

49


 

 

A summary of activity in the Aircraft and Engine Maintenance Deposits is as follows:

 

2014

2015

 

(in millions of reais)

Beginning of year

412.5

343.7

Amounts paid in

100.9

37.2

Reimbursement of expense incurred

(219.6)

(252.1)

Exchange variation

49.9

132.3

End of year

343.7

261.1

 

Revenue Recognition. Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is provided. Tickets sold but not yet used are recorded as advance ticket sales that represent primarily deferred revenue for tickets sold for future travel dates. We recognize a portion of advance ticket sales as revenue based on historical data relating to the percentage of tickets sold that are not going to be used prior to the expiration date (“breakage”). The balance of deferred revenue is then reviewed on a monthly basis based on actual tickets that have expired and adjusted when necessary.

Mileage Program. The obligation created by the issuance of miles is measured based on the price that the miles were sold to its airline and non-airline partners, classified by us as the fair value of the transaction. The revenue recognition on the consolidated income or loss occurs when the Smiles Program participant, after redeeming the miles and exchanging it for flight tickets, is transported.

Our policy is to cancel miles outstanding in the accounts of customers for longer than 3 years and 11 months. The associated value for mileage credits estimated to be cancelled is recognized as revenue. We calculate the expiration estimate and non-use based on historical data. Future opportunities can significantly alter customer profile and the historical patterns. Such changes may result in material changes to the deferred revenue balance, as well as revenues recognized from that program.

Share-Based Payments. We measure the fair value of equity-settled transactions with employees at the grant date using the Black & Scholes valuation model. The resulting amount, as adjusted for forfeitures, is charged to income over the period in which the options vest. At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated; representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The change in cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognized in the income statement prospectively over the remaining vesting period of the instrument.

Provisions. Provisions are recognized when we have a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Where we expect some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in profit or loss net of any reimbursement. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as a finance cost.

Aircraft and engines return provision: in aircraft operating leases, we are contractually required to return the equipment with a predefined level of operational capability; as a result we recognize a provision based on the aircraft return costs as set forth in the agreement. The aircraft’s return provisions costs are estimated based on expenditures incurred in aircraft reconfiguration (interior and exterior), license and technical certification, painting, and other costs, according to the return agreement. Engine return provisions are estimated based on an evaluation and minimum contractual conditions that the equipment should be returned to the lessor, considering not only the historical costs incurred, but also the equipment conditions at the time of the evaluation.

Deferred taxes. Deferred taxes are calculated based on tax losses, temporary differences arising on differences between tax bases and carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes of our assets and liabilities.

Even though unused tax losses and temporary differences have no expiration date in Brazil, deferred tax assets are recorded when there is evidence that future taxable profit will be available to use such tax credits. We record our deferred tax assets based on projections for future taxable profits, which considers a number of assumptions for revenue increases, for operating costs such as jet fuel prices, leasing expenses, etc. Our business plan is revised annually in order to reevaluate the amounts to be recorded as deferred tax assets.

 

50


 

 

The use of deferred taxes is a critical accounting policy for us because it requires a number of assumptions and is based on our best estimate of our projections related to future taxable profit. In addition, because the preparation of our business plan is subject to a variety of market conditions, the results of our operations may vary significantly from our projections and as such, the amounts recorded as deferred tax assets may be impacted significantly.

As of December 31, 2015, we had R$4.2 billion of tax loss carryforwards and negative basis of social contribution mainly as a result of the acquisition of VRG in 2007 and Webjet in 2011 and accumulated losses. Under Brazilian tax laws we may only use our tax loss carryforwards to offset taxes payable up to 30% of the taxable income for each year. Thus, despite having a balance of tax loss carryforwards, we will have to pay income taxes on any taxable income in excess of this 30% compensation limit.

In 2015, as a result of an increase in our net losses, fluctuations of the U.S. dollar exchange rate, and the instability of the political and economic environment in Brazil, we reassessed the recognition of tax credits on net operating losses carryforward and other temporary differences, and Gol  and VRG wrote-off R$52.7 million and R$385.6 million, respectively, of deferred tax assets from net operating losses carryforward and VRG also limited the recognition of tax credits on other temporary differences based on the expected realization of the deferred tax liabilities. Accordingly, Gol and VRG have not recognized the net amount of R$52.7 million and R$732.4 million of deferred tax assets, respectively, and Webjet has not recognized tax credits of R$296.0 million.

Results of Operations

Consolidated Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Demand in the Brazilian airline market, as measured in revenue passenger kilometers (RPK), increased by 1.1% in 2015 as compared to 2014, while capacity in Brazil, as measured by available seat kilometers (ASK), increased by 1.0% in the same period. These figures reflect the capacity rationalization that have been in place in the Brazilian market since 2013.

During the course of 2014 and 2015, we concentrated on tailoring our operations to the current economic environment, becoming a more efficient airline by maintaining domestic capacity and focusing on established, profitable routes. In 2015, as compared to 2014, our passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (PRASK) decreased by 5.6%, reflecting a more challenging demand environment.

In 2015, our total available seat kilometers (ASK) decreased by 0.5% while our total revenue passenger kilometers (RPK) increased by 0.9%, when compared to 2014, reflecting our capacity management flexibility, which allowed us to adjust our capacity in line with market seasonality.

In 2015, our domestic seat supply remained stable, increasing 0.2% as compared to 2014, while domestic demand increased by 0.5%, leading to a load factor of 77.2%, 0.3 percentage points higher than in 2014. Also in 2015, our international market demand and capacity increased by 3.6% and 2.7%, respectively, as compared to 2014, as a result of several new flights and routes established during 2014, however in the last months of 2015 we suspended several destinations, such as Caracas (Venezuela), Miami and Orlando (U.S.) and Aruba (Caribbean), due to a more competitive landscape and a devaluation of the real against the US dollar, which impacted tourism from Brazil to these destinations.

 

51


 

 

The table below presents certain data from our results of operations for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

2015

 

(in millions of reais)

Operating revenue

 

 

Passenger

9,045.8

8,583.4

Cargo and other

1,020.4

1,194.6

Total operating revenue

10,066.2

9,778.0

Operating expenses

 

 

Salaries

(1,374.1)

(1,580.5)

Aircraft fuel

(3,842.3)

(3,301.4)

Aircraft rent

(844.6)

(1,100.1)

Sales and marketing

(667.4)

(617.4)

Landing fees

(613.2)

(681.4)

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing

(747.4)

(1,019.8)

Maintenance, materials and repairs

(511.0)

(603.9)

Depreciation and amortization

(463.3)

(419.7)

Other operating expenses

(495.5)

(633.6)

Total operating expenses

(9,558.8)

(9,957.8)

Equity results

(2.5)

(3.9)

Income (loss) before financial expense, net and income taxes

504.9

(183.8)

Financial expense, net

(1,457.6)

(3,263.3)

Loss before income taxes

(952.7)

(3,447.1)

Income taxes

(164.6)

(844.1)

Net loss

(1,117.3)

(4,291.2)

 

Operating Revenue

Operating revenue decreased by 2.9%, from R$10,066.2 million in 2014 to R$9,778.0 million in 2015. On a unit basis, revenue per available seat kilometer (RASK) decreased by 3.3%, from R$20.3 cents in 2014 to R$19.7 cents in 2015. This was primarily due to a combination of lower yields in 5.9% and a 0.3 percentage point increase in load factor.

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

2015

Change %

 

(in millions of reais, except percentages)

Operating revenue

10,066.2

9,778.0

(2.9)%

Passenger

9,045.8

8,583.4

(5.1)%

Cargo and other

1,020.4

1,194.6

17.1%

 

Passenger operating revenue decreased by 5.1%, from R$9,045.8 million in 2014 to R$8,583.4 million in 2015. This variation was primarily due to the reduced economic activity and consequent lower volume of passengers as well as a 5.9% decrease in yield, mainly due to softer demand from business travelers.

Cargo and other revenue (flight booking, excess baggage, on board sales, etc.), or ancillary revenue, which accounted for 12.2% of our operating revenue in 2015, increased by 17.1%, from R$1,020.4 million in 2014 to R$1,194.6 million in 2015. This increase was primarily due to revenues generated by the “GOL+ Conforto” product in the domestic market and was also a reflection of our increased focus on cargo services.

Operating Expenses

 Operating expenses increased by 4.2%, from R$9,558.8 million in 2014 to R$9,957.8 million in 2015, as discussed below.

 

52


 

 

The following table sets forth our total operating expenses for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

2015

Change %

 

(in millions of reais, except percentages)

Salaries

(1,374.1)

(1,580.5)

15.0%

Aircraft fuel

(3,842.3)

(3,301.4)

(14.1)%

Aircraft rent

(844.6)

(1,100.1)

30.3%

Sales and marketing

(667.4)

(617.4)

(7.5)%

Landing fees

(613.2)

(681.4)

11.1%

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing

(747.4)

(1,019.8)

36.4%

Maintenance, materials and repairs

(511.0)

(603.9)

18.2%

Depreciation and amortization

(463.3)

(419.7)

(9.4)%

Other operating expenses

(495.5)

(633.6)

27.9%

Total operating expenses

(9,558.8)

(9,957.8)

4.2%

 

On a per unit basis, our operating expense per available seat kilometer (CASK) increased by 3.7%, from R$19.31 cents in 2014 to R$20.02 cents in 2015, mainly due the increase in expenses as discussed below.

The following table sets forth certain of our CASK components as a percentage of total operating expenses for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

Operating Expenses per Available Seat Kilometer Breakdown

2014

2015

Change %

Fuel

40.2%

33.2%

(17.5)%

Salaries

14.4%

15.9%

10.4%

Rent

8.8%

11.0%

25.0%

Maintenance

5.3%

6.1%

13.4%

Other

31.3%

27.9%

22.7%

 

The following table sets forth certain of our CASK components for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

Operating Expenses per Available Seat Kilometer

2014

2015

Change %

 

(in cents of reais, except percentages)

Salaries

(2.78)

(3.18)

14.5%

Aircraft fuel

(7.76)

(6.64)

(14.5)%

Aircraft rent

(1.71)

(2.21)

29.6%

Sales and marketing

(1.35)

(1.24)

(7.9)%

Landing fees

(1.24)

(1.37)

10.6%

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing

(1.51)

(2.05)

35.8%

Maintenance, materials and repairs

(1.03)

(1.21)

17.6%

Depreciation and amortization

(0.94)

(0.84)

(9.8)%

Other operating expenses

(1.00)

(1.27)

27.3%

Operating expenses per available seat kilometer (CASK)

(19.31)

(16.84)

1.9%

CASK excluding fuel expenses

(11.55)

(10.20)

16.3%

 

Aircraft fuel expenses decreased by 14.1%, from R$3,842.3 million in 2014 to R$3,301.4 million in 2015, largely due to the 44.0% decrease in international fuel prices, partially offset by the 41.6% depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar. In per available seat kilometer terms, aircraft fuel decreased by 14.5%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

 

53


 

 

Salaries increased by 15.0%, from R$1,374.1 million in 2014 to R$1,580.5 million in 2015, mainly due to customary annual pay raises and benefits paid to the employees. In per available seat kilometer terms, salaries increased by 14.5%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

Aircraft rent increased by 30.3%, from R$844.6 million in 2014 to R$1,100.1 million in 2015, due to the 41.6% average period depreciation of the real. However, this was partially offset by renegotiations of lease contracts that took place at the end of 2014. In per available seat kilometer terms, aircraft rent increased by 29.6%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 7.5%, from R$667.4 million to R$617.4 million in 2015, mainly due to the reduction in losses from our direct sales channel, which was partially offset by the increase in advertising and marketing expenses. In per available seat kilometer terms, sales and marketing expenses decreased by 7.9%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

Landing fees increased by 11.1%, from R$613.2 million in 2014 to R$681.4 million in 2015. This increase was largely due to the new calculation methodology for Infraero airport fees. In per available seat kilometer terms, landing fees expenses increased by 10.6%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing expenses increased by 36.4%, from R$747.4 million in 2014 to R$1,019.8 million in 2015, mainly due to (i) an increase in IT services in the domestic and international bases, (ii) the implementation of a government mandated risk premium for employees from third party companies providing handling services, (iii) purchase costs of Smiles products and (iv) an increase in the number of tickets purchased through peer airlines that will be reversed in future revenue. In per available seat kilometer terms, aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing expenses increased by 35.8%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

Maintenance, materials and repairs increased by 18.2%, from R$511.0 million in 2014 to R$603.9 million in 2015, due to the 41.6% depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar. This increase was partially offset by the lower number of engines in maintenance. In per available seat kilometer terms, maintenance, materials and repairs increased by 17.6%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by 9.4%, from R$463.3 million in 2014 to R$419.7 million in 2015, mainly due to (i) the lower number of engines maintenance capitalized in the period, in line with our maintenance schedule and (ii) the expiration of the depreciation period of certain existing engines throughout 2015 without the need for a new maintenance cycle yet. In per available seat kilometer terms, depreciation and amortization decreased by 9.8%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%.

Other operating expense (mainly crew travel and accommodation expenses, direct passenger expenses, equipment leasing and general and administrative expenses) increased by 27.9%, from R$495.5 million in 2014 to R$633.6 million in 2015. This increase was mainly due to reduced revenues from sale leaseback operations; and, to a lesser extent, to (i) higher expenses with travel and accommodation (ii) increased expenses with on-board service. In per available seat kilometer terms, other operating expense increased by 27.3%, due to the reasons discussed above in light of our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which increased by 0.5%. 

Financial expense, net

Our net financial expense increased by 123.9%, from R$1,457.6 million in 2014 to R$3,263.3 million in 2015, primarily as a result of losses from (i) the net exchange rate variation of R$2,267.0 million in 2015 due to the devaluation of the real against the U.S. dollar, (ii) higher interest rates in the local debt due to the increase of 2.57 p.p. in the interest rate (DI), which is the reference rate for most of our indebtedness denominated in reais and (iii) 41.6% devaluation of the real against the US dollar, which impacted our liabilities and expenses denominated in US dollar.

 

 

54


 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

2015

Change %

 

(in millions of reais)

Interest on short and long-term debt

(592.4)

(885.6)

49.5%

Exchange rate variation, net

(436.2)

(2,267.0)

419.7%

Derivative net results

(459.2)

50.2

N/A

Income from short-term investments

148.6

178.1

(19.9)%

Other financial expenses

(118.4)

(338.7)

186.1%

Financial expense, net

(1,457.6)

(3,263.3)

123.9%

 

Interest on short and long-term debt increased by 49.5% from 2014 to 2015 principally due to the depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the interest rate on our indebtedness denominated in reais.

Exchange rate variation, net expenses had an increase of 419.7% mainly due to an increase in our net liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars and to the 47.0% depreciation of the real against of the U.S. dollar. In addition to this variation, we also recorded a foreign exchange loss of R$469.6 million in the cash held in Venezuela.

In 2015, we recognized a derivative gain of R$50.2 million compared to loss of R$459.2 million in 2014, as a result of a R$102.7 million gain in foreign exchange hedge transactions due to the depreciation of the real, which was partially offset by (i) R$30.0 million losses in fuel hedge transactions and (ii) R$22.5 million losses in interest rate swap transactions.

Income from short-term investments decreased by 19.9% from 2014 to 2015. The variation is explained by our strategy to keep a portion of our cash in U.S. dollars, in order to mitigate the impact of exchange rate variations on our financial liabilities and create a natural hedge for the expenses in foreign currency.

Other financial expenses increased by 186.1%, from R$118.4 million in 2014 to R$338.7 million in 2015, mainly due to the increase in bank fees occurred by new funding, Term Loan and Debentures VI issuances.

Income Taxes

Income taxes expenses increased from R$164.6 million in 2014 to R$844.1 million in 2015, mainly impacted by the write-off of deferred tax credits from net operating losses carryforward during 2015.

Net Loss

As a result of the foregoing, we had a net loss of R$4,291.2 million in 2015 as compared to a net loss of R$1,117.3 million in 2014.

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Demand in the Brazilian airline market, as measured in revenue passenger kilometers (RPK), increased by 5.6% in 2014 as compared to 2013, while capacity in Brazil, as measured by available seat kilometers (ASK), increased by 0.4% in the same period. These figures reflect the capacity rationalization that have been put in place in the Brazilian market since 2012.

During the course of 2013 and 2014, we concentrated on tailoring our operations to the current economic environment, becoming a more efficient airline by expanding domestic capacity and focusing on established, profitable routes. In 2014, as compared to 2013, our passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (PRASK) increased by 11.7%.

In 2014, our ASK decreased by 0.3% while our RPK increased by 9.8%, when compared to 2013, reflecting our capacity management flexibility, which allowed us to adjust our capacity in line with market seasonality.

In 2014, our domestic seat supply decreased by 1.7% as compared to 2013, while domestic demand increased by 8.0%, leading to a load factor of 76.9%, 7.0 percentage points higher than in 2013. Also in 2014, our international market demand and capacity increased by 25.7% and 11%, respectively, as compared to 2013, as a result of several new flights during the year, including São Paulo to Santiago (Chile), Fortaleza (Ceará) to Buenos Aires (Argentina) and Campinas to Miami (Florida), as well as to Punta Cana (Dominican Republic) from São Paulo, Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais) and Brasília.

 

55


 

 

The table below presents certain data from our results of operations for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

2014

 

(in millions of reais)

Operating revenues

 

 

Passenger

8,122.2

9,045.8

Cargo and other

834.1

1,020.4

Total operating revenue

8,956.3

10,066.2

Operating expenses

 

 

Salaries

(1,333.5)

(1,374.1)

Aircraft fuel

(3,610.8)

(3,842.3)

Aircraft rent

(699.2)

(844.6)

Sales and marketing

(516.1)

(667.4)

Landing fees

(566.5)

(613.2)

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing

(599.5)

(747.4)

Maintenance, materials and repairs

(460.8)

(511.0)

Depreciation and amortization

(561.0)

(463.3)

Other operating expenses

(342.9)

(495.5)

Total operating expenses

(8,690.3)

(9,558.8)

Equity results

-

(2.5)

Income before financial expense, net and income taxes

266.0

504.9

Financial expense, net

(919.2)

(1,457.6)

Loss before income taxes

(653.2)

(952.7)

Income taxes

(71.4)

(164.6)

Net loss

(724.6)

(1,117.3)

 

Operating Revenue

Operating revenue increased by 12.4%, from R$8,956.3 million in 2013 to R$10,066.2 million in 2014. On a unit basis, revenue per available seat kilometer (RASK) increased by 12.7%, from R$18.0 cents in 2013 to R$20.3 cents in 2014. This was primarily due to the higher load factor levels in light of increased market demand even in light of our stable total supply.

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

2014

Change %

 

(in millions of reais, except percentages)

Operating revenue

8,956.3

10,066.2

12.4%

Passenger

8,122.2

9,045.8

11.4%

Cargo and other

834.1

1,020.4

22.3%

 

Passenger operating revenue increased by 11.4%, from R$8,122.2 million in 2013 to R$9,045.8 million in 2014. This variation was primarily due to the increase in load factor, as described above. Passenger revenue per ASK increased by 11.7% year-over-year.

Cargo and other revenue, which accounted for 10.1% of our operating revenue in 2014, increased by 22.3%, from R$834.1 million in 2013 to R$1,020.4 million in 2014. This increase was primarily due to revenues generated by the “GOL+ Conforto” product in the domestic market and also a reflection of increased focus on the cargo services.

 

56


 

 

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses increased by 10.0%, from R$8,690.3 million in 2013 to R$9,558.8 million in 2014, as discussed below.

The following table sets forth our total operating expenses for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

2014

Change %

 

(in millions of reais, except percentages)

Salaries

(1,333.5)

(1,374.1)

3.0%

Aircraft fuel

(3,610.8)

(3,842.3)

6.4%

Aircraft rent

(699.2)

(844.6)

20.8%

Sales and marketing

(516.1)

(667.4)

29.3%

Landing fees

(566.5)

(613.2)

8.2%

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing

(599.5)

(747.4)

24.7%

Maintenance, materials and repairs

(460.8)

(511.0)

10.9%

Depreciation and amortization

(561.0)

(463.3)

(17.4)%

Other operating expenses

(342.9)

(495.5)

44.5%

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

(8,690.3)

(9,558.8)

10.0%

 

On a per unit basis, our operating expense per available seat kilometer (CASK), likewise, increased by 10.3%, from R$17.51 cents in 2013 to R$19.31 cents in 2014, mainly due to a 0.3% reduction in the supply and the increase in expenses as discussed below.

The following table sets forth certain of our CASK components as a percentage of total operating expenses for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

Operating Expenses per Available Seat Kilometer Breakdown

2013

2014

Change %

Fuel

41.6%

40.2%

(3.4)%

Salaries

15.3%

14.4%

(5.9)%

Rent

8.0%

8.8%

10.0%

Maintenance

5.3%

5.3%

0.0%

Other

29.8%

31.3%

5.0%

 

The following table sets forth certain of our CASK components for the periods indicated:

 

Year Ended December 31,

Operating Expenses per Available Seat Kilometer

2013

2014

Change %

 

(in cents of reais, except percentages)

Salaries

(2.69)

(2.78)

3.3%

Aircraft fuel

(7.28)

(7.76)

6.7%

Aircraft rent

(1.41)

(1.71)

21.1%

Sales and marketing

(1.04)

(1.35)

29.7%

Landing fees

(1.14)

(1.24)

8.5%

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing

(1.21)

(1.51)

25.0%

Maintenance, materials and repairs

(0.93)

(1.03)

11.2%

Depreciation and amortization

(1.13)

(0.94)

(17.2)%

Other operating expenses

(0.69)

(1.00)

44.9%

Operating expenses per available seat kilometer (CASK)

(17.51)

(19.31)

10.3%

CASK excluding fuel expenses

(10.24)

(11.55)

12.8%

 

 

57


 

 

Salaries increased by 3.0%, from R$1,333.5 million in 2013 to R$1,374.1 million in 2014, mainly due to customary annual pay raises. In per available seat kilometer terms, salaries increased by 3.3%, due to the reason discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Aircraft fuel expenses increased by 6.4%, from R$3,610.8 million in 2013 to R$3,842.3 million in 2014, largely due to the 4.6% period upturn in the average per-liter fuel price and the increase in consumption as a result of the 7.0 percentage point improvement in the load factor over the previous year. In per available seat kilometer terms, aircraft fuel increased by 6.7%, due to the same reasons discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Aircraft rent increased by 20.8%, from R$699.2 million in 2013 to R$844.6 million in 2014, due evenly to (i) the increase in the average leasing price in U.S. dollars over the previous year due to the return of certain Boeing 737-700 aircraft in our fleet and the introduction of additional Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft which have a higher leasing price and (ii) the 9.1% appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the real in 2014 compared to 2013.  In per available seat kilometer terms, aircraft rent increased by 21.1%, due to the same reasons discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Sales and marketing expenses increased by 29.3%, from R$516.1 million to R$667.4 million in 2014, due to higher expenses with marketing and advertising and losses from direct sales channels. In per available seat kilometer terms, sales and marketing expenses increased by 29.7%, due to the same reasons discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Landing fees increased by 8.2%, from R$566.5 million in 2013 to R$613.2 million in 2014. This increase was largely due to new international routes and a new governmental passenger connection fee (fully implemented as of July 2013) in all airports in which we operate in Brazil. In per available seat kilometer terms, landing fees expenses increased by 8.5%, due to the same reasons discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing expenses increased by 24.7%, from R$599.5 million in 2013 to R$747.4 million in 2014, mainly due to (i) the addition of a government mandated risk premium to employees from third party companies providing handling services; (ii) IT services in the domestic and international bases; and (iii) the increase in the number of tickets purchased from partner airlines. In per available seat kilometer terms, aircraft, traffic and mileage servicing expenses increased by 25.0%, due to the same reasons discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Maintenance, materials and repairs increased by 10.9%, from R$460.8 million in 2013 to R$511.0 million in 2014, primarily due to the 9.1% average period appreciation of the U.S. dollar. In per available seat kilometer terms, maintenance, materials and repairs increased by 11.2%, due to the same reasons discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by 17.4%, from R$561.0 million in 2013 to R$463.3 million in 2014, mainly due to (i) the lower number of engines capitalized in the period in line with our maintenance schedule and (ii) by the expiration of the depreciation period of certain existing engines throughout 2014. In per available seat kilometer terms, depreciation and amortization decreased by 17.2%, due to the same reasons discussed above partially offset by our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

Other operating expense (mainly crew travel and accommodation expenses, direct passenger expenses, equipment leasing and general and administrative expenses) increased by 44.5%, from R$342.9 million in 2013 to R$495.5 million in 2014. This increase was mainly due to reduced gains from sale leaseback operations (nine aircraft in 2014 versus 13 in 2013); and, to a lesser extent, due to (i) higher expenses with travel and accommodation due to additional costs during the World Cup; (ii) introduction of new international frequencies; and (iii) increased expenses with on-board service. In per available seat kilometer terms, other operating expense increased by 44.9%, due to the same reasons discussed above combined with our stable total supply of available seat kilometer, which decreased by 0.3%.

 

58


 

 

Financial expense, net

Our net financial expense increased by 58.6%, from R$919.2 million in 2013 to R$1,457.6 million in 2014, primarily as a result of losses from oil derivatives totaling R$370.2 million due to (i) the substantial slide in oil prices in the fourth quarter of 2014, and (ii) the net exchange rate variation of R$436.2 million due to the devaluation of the real against the U.S. dollar, which had no immediate cash effect on our long-term debt.

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

2014

Change %

 

(in millions of reais)

Interest on short and long-term debt

(532.1)

(592.4)

11.3%

Exchange rate variation, net

(490.1)

(436.2)

(11.0)%

Derivative net results

49.6

(459.2)

NA

Income from short-term investments

149.5

148.6

(0.6)%

Other financial expenses

(96.1)

(118.4)

23.2%

Financial expense, net

(919.2)

(1,457.6)

58.6%

 

Interest on short and long-term debt increased by 11.3% from 2013 to 2014 largely due to the depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar and the interest expenses on the R$600 million debentures issued by Smiles in July 2014 to finance part of its R$1 billion capital reduction in the third quarter of 2014.

Exchange rate variation, net decreased by 11.0% mainly due to a decrease in our net liabilities denominated in U.S. dollar, which was partially offset by the 13.4% appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the real.

In 2014, we recognized derivative net loss of R$459.2 million compared to a net gain of R$49.6 million in 2013, mainly as a result of:

·         fuel consumption hedge transactions, which are effected through derivative contracts related to crude oil and its by-products (WTI, Brent and heating oil), generated losses of R$370.2 million in 2014 driven by the sudden and significant decrease in oil prices in the last quarter of 2014;

·         foreign exchange hedge transactions generated