UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Rule 14a-101)

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

VeriFone Systems, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

88 West Plumeria Drive

San Jose, CA 95134

May 21, 2018

Dear Stockholder,

We cordially invite you to attend a special meeting of the holders of our common stock, par value $0.01, which we refer to as common stock, of VeriFone Systems, Inc. a Delaware corporation, which we refer to as the Company, we or us, to be held on June 19, 2018 at 8:00 a.m., California Time, at the Company’s executive offices, located at 88 W. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, which we refer to as the special meeting.

On April 9, 2018, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, which we refer to as the merger agreement, by and among the Company, Vertex Holdco LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Vertex Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Vertex Holdco LLC. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Vertex Merger Sub LLC will be merged with and into the Company, which transaction we refer to as the merger, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Vertex Holdco LLC. Vertex Holdco LLC and Vertex Merger Sub LLC are owned by an investor group led by the private equity investment firm Francisco Partners, which we refer to as the investor group. At the special meeting you will be asked, among other things, to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

If the merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive $23.04 in cash, without interest, for each share of common stock owned by you, which represents a premium of approximately 54% to the closing price of common stock as of April 9, 2018, the last trading day prior to the public announcement of the execution of the merger agreement.

Our board of directors, which we refer to as the Board, has unanimously (i) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders, (ii) authorized, approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (iii) resolved to submit the merger agreement to the stockholders for consideration and (iv) recommended that the stockholders approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and the other proposals being submitted for stockholder approval as described below and in the accompanying proxy statement. The Board made its determination after consultation with its legal and financial advisors and consideration of a number of factors. Approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote on the proposal. Our Board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

The proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote at the special meeting. Our Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger.

The approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by

proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum at the special meeting requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote at the special meeting. Our Board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum at the special meeting.

Your vote is very important. The merger cannot be completed unless the merger agreement is adopted by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the common stock entitled to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please complete, date, sign and return, as promptly as possible, the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying prepaid reply envelope, or submit your proxy by telephone or the Internet. If you attend the special meeting and vote in person, your vote by ballot will revoke any proxy previously submitted. The failure to return your proxy or vote at the special meeting in person will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

If your shares of common stock are held in “street name” by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee will be unable to vote your shares of common stock without instructions from you. You should instruct your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to vote your shares of common stock in accordance with the procedures provided by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee. The failure to instruct your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to vote your shares of common stock “FOR” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

The accompanying proxy statement provides you with detailed information about the special meeting and the merger agreement. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement, and is incorporated by reference therein. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement and its annexes, including the merger agreement, carefully. You may also obtain additional information about the Company from documents we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares of common stock, please contact MacKenzie Partners, Inc., our proxy solicitor, by calling toll-free at 1-800-322-2885 or collect at 212-929-5500.

The Board has approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, “FOR” the proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger and “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum at the special meeting.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and continued support.

This proxy statement and a proxy card are first being mailed on or about May 21, 2018 to stockholders who owned shares of the common stock as of the close of business on May 17, 2018.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE MERGER, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, INCLUDING THE MERGER, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

88 West Plumeria Drive

San Jose, CA 95134

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on June 19, 2018

To the Stockholders of VeriFone Systems, Inc.:

Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the holders of our common stock, $0.01 par value, which we refer to as common stock, of VeriFone Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which we refer to as the Company, will be held at 8:00 a.m., California Time, on June 19, 2018, at the Company’s executive offices, located at 88 W. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, which we refer to as the special meeting, for the following purposes:

The merger agreement and the merger, along with the other transactions that would be effected in connection with the merger, are described more fully in the attached proxy statement, and we urge you to read it carefully and in its entirety.

Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Approval of (i) certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger by non-binding, advisory vote and (ii) any proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum, each requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote at the special meeting.

The Company’s board of directors, which we refer to as the Board, has unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders and has unanimously authorized, adopted and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The Board made its determination after consultation with its legal and financial advisors and consideration of a number of factors. The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, “FOR” approval of the proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger and “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including if there are not holders of a

sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum at the special meeting.

Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares of common stock of the Company you own. The merger cannot be completed unless the merger agreement is adopted by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote. Even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person, we request that you complete, sign, date and return, as promptly as possible, the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying prepaid reply envelope or submit your proxy by telephone or the Internet prior to the special meeting to ensure that your shares of common stock will be represented at the special meeting if you are unable to attend. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to submit your proxy by phone or the Internet, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. If you are a stockholder of record, voting in person at the special meeting will revoke any proxy previously submitted. If you hold your shares of common stock through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you should follow the procedures provided by your banker, brokerage firm or other nominee in order to vote.

The Board has fixed the close of business on May 17, 2018, as the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote (in person or by proxy) at, the special meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. You will be entitled to one (1) vote for each share of common stock that you owned on the record date. A complete list of our stockholders of record entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available for inspection at our principal executive offices during the ten days prior to the special meeting, during ordinary business hours. The list will also be available at the special meeting for inspection by any stockholder present at the special meeting.

Only stockholders of record, their duly authorized proxy holders, beneficial stockholders with proof of ownership and our guests may attend the special meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, please bring valid photo identification to the special meeting. If your shares of common stock are held through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, please bring to the special meeting valid photo identification and proof of your beneficial ownership of common stock. Acceptable proof could include an account statement showing that you owned shares of common stock on the record date. If you are the representative of a corporate or institutional stockholder, you must present valid photo identification along with proof that you are the representative of such stockholder. Please note that cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the special meeting.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN, AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE, THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING PREPAID REPLY ENVELOPE, OR SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET. IF YOU WILL ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON, YOUR VOTE BY BALLOT WILL REVOKE ANY PROXY PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK THROUGH A BANK, BROKERAGE FIRM OR OTHER NOMINEE, YOU SHOULD FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES PROVIDED BY YOUR BANK, BROKERAGE FIRM OR OTHER NOMINEE IN ORDER TO VOTE.

San Jose, California

Dated: May 21, 2018

Table of Contents

-i-

-ii-

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

-8-

-9-

-10-

-11-

-12-

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND THE MERGER

The following questions and answers are intended to briefly address some commonly asked questions regarding the merger, the merger agreement and the special meeting. These questions and answers may not address all questions that may be important to you as a Company stockholder. Please refer to the “Summary” beginning on page 1 and the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement and the documents referred to in this proxy statement, which you should read carefully and in their entirety. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference in this proxy statement without charge by following the instructions under “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 100.

-13-

Additionally, if the merger is not completed, the merger agreement will be terminated. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the termination, it is possible that the Company may be required to pay Holdco a termination fee of either $33.3 million or $86.6 million depending on the time period during which the merger agreement is terminated. It is also possible, if the agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, that Holdco would be required to pay the Company a fee of $186.6 million. Moreover, in the event that Holdco terminates the merger agreement due to a breach by the Company of any of its representations and warranties, the Company is required to reimburse Holdco for up to $4 million in documented third-party fees and expenses. Any such payment will reduce the termination fee payable to Holdco, if any, by a corresponding amount.

-14-

-15-

Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” approval of the proposal, and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

If your shares of common stock are held by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, or their intermediary, is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. Your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee should send you, as the beneficial owner, a package describing the procedure for voting your shares of common stock. You should follow the instructions provided by them to vote your shares of common stock. You are invited to attend the special meeting; however, you may not vote these shares of common stock in person at the special meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee that holds your shares of common stock, giving you the right to vote the shares of common stock at the special meeting.

-16-

-17-

Beneficial Owner.    If you are a beneficial owner, please refer to the instructions provided by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to see which of the above choices are available to you. Please note that if you are a beneficial owner and wish to vote in person at the special meeting, you must provide a legal proxy from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee at the special meeting. To attend the special meeting in person (regardless of whether you intend to vote your shares in person at the special meeting), you must bring with you to the special meeting a valid photo identification and proof of your beneficial ownership. For more information, see the instructions under “The Special Meeting—Attendance” beginning on page 24 of this proxy statement.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU PROMPTLY VOTE YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN, AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE, THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING PREPAID REPLY ENVELOPE, OR SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET. STOCKHOLDERS WHO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING MAY REVOKE THEIR PROXIES BY VOTING IN PERSON.

If you hold shares in street name, you should contact the intermediary for instructions on how to change your vote.

If you own shares that are registered in your own name and return a signed proxy card or grant a proxy via the Internet or by telephone, but do not indicate how you wish your shares to be voted, the shares represented by your properly signed proxy will be voted “FOR” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, “FOR” approval of the proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger and “FOR” any proposal to adjourn the meeting.

-18-

For the proposals to approve the merger-related compensation and to adjourn the meeting, if necessary or appropriate, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” approval of these proposals and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

-19-

-20-

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created thereby under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These statements are based on management’s current expectations or beliefs and on currently available competitive, financial and economic data and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements herein due to changes in economic, business, competitive, technological, and/or regulatory factors, and other risks and uncertainties affecting the operation of the business of the Company, including many factors beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those associated with:

The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date such statements are made. The Company is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise, except as required by law.

For a discussion of the various factors that may cause actual plans implemented and actual results achieved to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the risk factors and other disclosures contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, filed with the SEC, on December 18, 2017, Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 9, 2018, and other filings made with the SEC after the date thereof. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” for additional information.

The cautionary statements referred to above also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by the Company or persons

-21-

acting on the Company’s behalf. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any facts, events, or circumstances after the date hereof that may bear upon forward-looking statements except as required by law. Furthermore, the Company cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document or, in the case of documents referred to or incorporated by reference, the dates of those documents.

-22-

PARTIES TO THE MERGER

VeriFone Systems, Inc.

The Company is a global leader in payments and commerce solutions. We’re connecting payment devices to the cloud—merging the online and in-store shopping experience and creating the next generation of digital engagement between merchants and consumers. We are built on a 35-year history of security with approximately 30 million devices and terminals deployed worldwide. Our people are trusted experts who work with our clients and partners, helping to solve their most complex payments challenges. We have clients and partners in more than 150 countries, including some of the world’s best-known retail brands, financial institutions and payment providers.

For more information about the Company and its subsidiaries, visit the Company’s website at https://www.verifone.com. Our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. The information contained on our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document on file with or furnished to the SEC. See also “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 100.

The Company’s common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “PAY.” The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 88 Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134 and its telephone number is (408) 232-7800.

Vertex Holdco LLC

Holdco is a Delaware limited liability company. Holdco was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the merger and other related transactions. Holdco has not engaged in any business other than in connection with the merger and other related transactions.

The principal executive offices of Holdco are located at One Letterman Drive, Building C – Suite 410, San Francisco, CA 94129 and its telephone number is (415) 418-2900.

Vertex Merger Sub LLC

Merger Sub is a Delaware limited liability company. Merger Sub is a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco and was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the merger and other related transactions. Merger Sub has not engaged in any business other than in connection with the merger and other related transactions. Upon the completion of the merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist and the Company will continue as the surviving corporation.

The principal executive offices of Merger Sub are located at One Letterman Drive, Building C – Suite 410, San Francisco, CA 94129 and its telephone number is (415) 418-2900.

-23-

THE SPECIAL MEETING

Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting

This proxy statement is being furnished to stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by the Board for use at the special meeting to be held on June 19, 2018 at 8:00 a.m., California Time, at the Company’s executive offices, located at 88 W. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Purpose of the Special Meeting

At the special meeting, stockholders will be asked to:

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the above proposals.

Our stockholders must approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement in order for the merger to occur. If our stockholders fail to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the merger will not occur. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement, and incorporated herein by reference, which we encourage you to read carefully and in its entirety.

Record Date and Quorum

You are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting if you own shares of common stock at the close of business on May 17, 2018, the record date for the special meeting. You will be entitled to one (1) vote for each share of common stock that you owned on the record date. As of the close of business on the record date, there were 110,739,583 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, held by 66 holders of record.

A majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of common stock outstanding at the close of business on the record date and entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, at the special meeting constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.

Attendance

Only stockholders of record, their duly authorized proxy holders, beneficial stockholders with proof of ownership and our guests may attend the special meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, please bring a valid photo identification to the special meeting. If your shares of common stock are held through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, please bring to the special meeting valid photo identification and proof of your beneficial ownership of common stock. Acceptable proof could include an account statement showing that you owned shares of common stock on the record date, May 17, 2018. If you are the representative of a corporate or institutional stockholder, you must present valid photo identification along with proof that you are the representative of such stockholder.

-24-

Vote Required

Approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the outstanding shares of common stock. For the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, but will count for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. If you fail to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting, or abstain, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

If your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are considered, with respect to those shares of common stock, the “stockholder of record.” This proxy statement and proxy card have been sent directly to you by the Company.

If your shares of common stock are held through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares of common stock held in street name. In that case, this proxy statement has been forwarded to you by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares of common stock, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting.

Banks, brokerage firms or other nominees who hold shares in street name for customers generally have the authority to vote on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, banks, brokerage firms and other nominees are precluded from exercising their voting discretion with respect to approving non-routine matters such as the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and, as a result, absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares of common stock, banks, brokerage firms or other nominees are not empowered to vote those shares of common stock on non-routine matters. These broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining a quorum, and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

The proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger will be adopted if approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of common stock, present in person or represented by proxy, at the special meeting and entitled to vote thereon. For the proposal to approve the merger-related compensation, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” approval of the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Any proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum will be adopted if approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of common stock, present in person or represented by proxy, at the special meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal, and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

If you are a stockholder of record, you may have your shares of common stock voted on matters presented at the special meeting in any of the following ways:

-25-

If you are a beneficial owner, you should receive instructions from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee that you must follow in order to have your shares of common stock voted. Those instructions will identify which of the above choices are available to you in order to have your shares voted. Please note that if you are a beneficial owner and wish to vote in person at the special meeting, you must provide a legal proxy from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee at the special meeting.

Please refer to the instructions on your proxy or voting instruction card to determine the deadlines for voting over the Internet or by telephone. If you choose to submit a proxy by mailing a proxy card, your proxy card should be mailed in the accompanying prepaid reply envelope, and your proxy card must be filed with our Corporate Secretary by the time the special meeting begins. Please do not send in your stock certificates with your proxy card. When the merger is completed, a separate letter of transmittal will be mailed to you that will enable you to receive the per share merger consideration in exchange for your stock certificates.

If you vote by proxy, regardless of the method you choose to vote, the individuals named on the enclosed proxy card, and each of them, with full power of substitution, will vote your shares of common stock in the way that you indicate. When completing the Internet or telephone processes or the proxy card, you may specify whether your shares of common stock should be voted for or against or to abstain from voting on all, some or none of the specific items of business to come before the special meeting.

If you properly sign your proxy card but do not mark the boxes showing how your shares of common stock should be voted on a matter, the shares of common stock represented by your properly signed proxy will be voted “FOR” approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, “FOR” approval of the proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger and “FOR” any proposal to adjourn the special meeting.

If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares, please contact MacKenzie Partners, Inc., our proxy solicitor, by calling toll-free at 1-800-322-2885 or collect at 212-929-5500.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU PROMPTLY VOTE YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN, AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE, THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING PREPAID REPLY ENVELOPE, OR SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET. STOCKHOLDERS WHO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING MAY REVOKE THEIR PROXIES BY VOTING IN PERSON.

As of the record date, the directors and executive officers of the Company beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 594,412 shares of common stock (not including any shares of common stock deliverable upon exercise or conversion of any options, restricted stock units or deferred stock units), representing approximately 0.54 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date.

-26-

Proxies and Revocation

Any stockholder of record entitled to vote at the special meeting may submit a proxy by telephone, over the Internet or by returning the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying prepaid reply envelope, or may vote in person by appearing at the special meeting. If your shares of common stock are held in “street name” through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you should instruct your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee on how to vote your shares of common stock using the instructions provided by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee. If you fail to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting, or do not provide your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee with instructions, as applicable, your shares of common stock will not be voted on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, which will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, and your shares of common stock will not be counted in respect of, and will not have an effect on, the proposal to approve the merger-related compensation or any proposal to adjourn the special meeting.

A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted by (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary at c/o VeriFone Systems, Inc., 88 W. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, (ii) subsequently submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date than that of the previously submitted proxy (including by submission over the Internet), or (iii) attending the special meeting and voting in person. Attending the special meeting without voting will not revoke your previously submitted proxy.

Adjournments

Pursuant to the merger agreement, we may not postpone or adjourn the special meeting except (A) if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum, (B) if the Company is required to postpone or adjourn the special meeting by applicable law, order of a governmental entity or a request from the SEC or its staff or (C) if there has been a change of recommendation and the Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that it is necessary or appropriate to postpone or adjourn the special meeting in order to give the stockholders sufficient time to evaluate any information or disclosure that the Company has made available to such stockholders, in which case the Company may postpone or adjourn the special meeting one (1) time, but only for such period as the Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is necessary or appropriate to give the stockholders sufficient time to evaluate such information or disclosure, which in any event may not exceed five (5) business days.

Anticipated Date of Completion of the Merger

We are working towards completing the merger as soon as possible. Assuming receipt of required regulatory approvals and timely satisfaction or waiver of other closing conditions, including the approval by our stockholders of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, we anticipate that the merger will be completed during the third calendar quarter of 2018. If our stockholders vote to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the merger will become effective as promptly as practicable following the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions to the merger, subject to the terms of the merger agreement. See “The Merger—Closing and Effective Time of the Merger” beginning on page 50.

Rights of Stockholders Who Seek Appraisal

Stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL in connection with the merger. This means that you are entitled to have the fair value of your shares of common stock

-27-

determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment based on that valuation in lieu of the per share merger consideration if you follow exactly the procedures specified under Section 262 of the DGCL. The ultimate amount you receive in an appraisal proceeding may be less than, equal to or more than the amount you would have received under the merger agreement.

To exercise your appraisal rights, you must submit a written demand for appraisal to the Company before the vote is taken on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and you must not vote (either in person or by proxy) in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Your failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Section 262 of the DGCL may result in the loss of your appraisal rights. See “Appraisal Rights” and the text of the Delaware appraisal rights statute reproduced in its entirety as Annex C to this proxy statement. If you hold your shares of common stock through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee. In view of the complexity of Section 262 of the DGCL, stockholders who may wish to pursue appraisal rights should consult their legal and financial advisors promptly.

Solicitation of Proxies; Payment of Solicitation Expenses

The Board is soliciting your proxy, and the Company will bear the cost of this solicitation of proxies. This includes the charges and expenses of brokerage firms and others for forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners of the outstanding common stock.

The Company has engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the special meeting. The Company estimates that it will pay MacKenzie Partners, Inc. a fee of $20,000 and telephone charges. The Company has agreed to reimburse MacKenzie Partners, Inc. for certain fees and expenses and will also indemnify MacKenzie Partners, Inc., its subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents against certain claims, liabilities, losses, damages and expenses. The Company may also reimburse banks, brokerage firms or other nominees for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock. The Board is soliciting your proxy, and our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies by telephone, by facsimile, by mail, on the Internet or in person. They will not be paid any additional amounts for soliciting proxies.

Questions and Additional Information

If you have more questions about the merger or how to submit your proxy, or if you need additional copies of this proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card or voting instructions, please contact MacKenzie Partners, Inc., our proxy solicitor, by calling toll-free at 1-800-322-2885 or collect at 212-929-5500.

-28-

THE MERGER (PROPOSAL 1)

This discussion of the merger is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A and incorporated herein by reference. You should read the entire merger agreement carefully as it is the legal document that governs the merger.

The merger agreement provides that Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company. The Company will be the surviving corporation in the merger and will continue to do business following the consummation of the merger. As a result of the merger, the Company will cease to be a publicly traded company and will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco. Holdco and Merger Sub are owned by the investor group.

Merger Consideration

In the merger, each eligible share will automatically be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $23.04, without interest.

Background of the Merger

The market for electronic payment and commerce solutions has been characterized in recent years by rapid technological advancements, frequent product introductions and enhancements, evolving industry and government performance and security standards and regulatory requirements and rapidly changing customer and end user preferences or requirements. With the highly competitive and rapidly evolving markets for our systems and services, the Company has been subject to significant and increasing competition from existing and new competitors and a variety of technologies. In connection with the challenges of being part of a rapidly evolving industry and other factors causing substantial fluctuations in our stock price, the Board and management regularly discuss and evaluate strategic initiatives and opportunities for the Company.

As part of the Company’s regular process of evaluating long-term strategies and strategic opportunities, the Board and senior management have regularly reviewed and assessed the Company’s competitive position and business strategies. Those assessments have included review of potential investments and acquisitions considered potentially necessary or appropriate in furthering the Company’s strategic practices, as well as alternatives for financing such initiatives in the public and private capital markets, as well as consideration of other strategic opportunities including possible business combination transactions.

In pursuing potential opportunities, senior management from time to time has engaged in discussions with a number of financial sponsors that are either owners of businesses that the Company considered to be potentially attractive business partners, acquisition targets or business combination opportunities or potential sources of capital to help finance the Company’s pursuit of its business planning objectives, including its efforts to transition from a terminal sales business model to a payments and commerce services business model.

At various times in 2015, 2016 and 2017, management of the Company had discussions with financial sponsors including the private equity investment firm Francisco Partners regarding such opportunities. In November 2016, senior management met with Francisco Partners and discussed a number of opportunities and senior management presented information regarding the Company’s business operations and financial performance.

In February 2017, Francisco Partners sent the Company an unsolicited non-binding proposal letter to acquire all of the outstanding common stock for an offer price of $22.00 to $23.00 per share in cash.

-29-

According to the proposal, the midpoint of the offer range represented a premium of 20% to the Company’s closing price per share on the day the proposal was made. The Board discussed the 2017 proposal at a regularly scheduled Board meeting in February 2017 and determined not to engage at that time in further discussions regarding a possible transaction for a number of reasons, including the Company’s planned execution of its short term business plan, the valuation of the Company contemplated by the proposal (including the limited premium over the then-current trading price of the common stock), as well as limitations on the capital available to Francisco Partners at that time.

In November 2017, Francisco Partners announced the closing of a new investment fund with approximately $4 billion of additional committed capital. Subsequently, representatives of the Company’s senior management met with representatives of Francisco Partners. The representatives of management presented information on the business and operations of the Company. In December 2017, representatives of management of the Company met with a private equity firm, which we refer to as Party 1, and gave a similar presentation. Following the meeting, representatives of Party 1 indicated to management that they would come back with specific questions in certain areas.

On December 1, 2017, Francisco Partners and the Company amended the terms of the mutual non-disclosure agreement between Francisco Partners IV, L.P. and VeriFone, Inc., dated as of September 29, 2015, which, as amended, we refer to as the FP MNDA, which had expired as of September 29, 2017, to extend the termination date.

On January 10, 2018, representatives of the Company’s senior management met again with representatives of Francisco Partners to further discuss the Company’s business and operations.

On February 2, 2018, Francisco Partners sent a non-binding proposal letter, which we refer to as the February 2018 Proposal, to the Board offering to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of the Company for a price of $22.00 to $23.00 per share in cash, subject to the completion of confirmatory diligence, to be financed with a combination of debt and equity financing. According to the proposal, the offer range represented a premium of 27.4%-33.2% to the Company’s closing price per share on the day the proposal was made. Francisco Partners also requested a 30-day exclusivity period.

On February 4, 2018, the Board held a telephonic meeting to discuss the February 2018 Proposal. At the meeting, the Board approved the engagement of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, which we refer to as Sullivan & Cromwell, as its legal advisor in connection with the potential business combination involving the Company. At the meeting, a representative of Sullivan & Cromwell discussed with the directors their fiduciary duties under applicable law with respect to evaluating the February 2018 Proposal. The Board discussed an appropriate substantive response to the February 2018 Proposal and considered a list of potential financial advisors who could assist in the evaluation of next steps. In light of the potential time required to engage a financial advisor, the Board decided that the chairman of the Company should respond to Francisco Partners to acknowledge receipt of the February 2018 Proposal and inform Francisco Partners that the Board would respond in due course after being advised by its financial and legal advisors. At the meeting, the Board also designated Mr. Robert B. Henske, Mr. Robert W. Alspaugh, Mr. Ronald Black and Ms. Jane J. Thompson, all of whom were independent directors, to a committee of the Board, which we refer to as the Transaction Committee, tasked with overseeing the process of responding to the February 2018 Proposal and addressing related issues. The Transaction Committee was formed to assist the Board in coordinating the process of responding to the February 2018 Proposal and other potential proposals. The Board reserved ultimate authority to approve any transaction. Mr. Henske was appointed the chair of the Transaction Committee.

On February 6, 2018, Mr. Alex (Pete) Hart, the Company’s Chairman, and Mr. Henske spoke with representatives of Francisco Partners to advise them that the Board was in the process of engaging

-30-

advisors to assist it with the evaluation of the February 2018 Proposal and would respond to the proposal in due course. Mr. Hart and Mr. Henske also asked questions of Francisco Partners, particularly about its ability to fund the equity and obtain debt financing for a transaction of the size and complexity contemplated.

Beginning February 7, 2018, the Transaction Committee held twice weekly telephonic conference calls to coordinate activities related to the February 2018 Proposal and other potential transactions.

The Board engaged Qatalyst Partners as the Company’s financial advisor on February 9, 2018 in connection with the Board’s consideration of strategic alternatives, including the merger, due to Qatalyst Partners’ qualifications, expertise, reputation and knowledge of the Company’s business and the industry in which the Company operates.

On February 13, 2018, representatives of Qatalyst Partners discussed on a call with representatives of management the status of the business and the proposed process with respect to Francisco Partners and the February 2018 Proposal as well as other potential bidders.

On February 14, 2018, representatives of management and Qatalyst Partners had an introductory phone call with representatives of Francisco Partners. During the conversation, representatives of Francisco Partners requested that they be allowed to share information with certain of their limited partners as potential co-investors.

On February 15, 2018, the Company and Francisco Partners executed Amendment No. 2 to the FP MNDA in connection with providing Francisco Partners with additional confidential material for diligence purposes relating to the February 2018 Proposal, further extending the term of the FP MNDA and limiting the ability of Francisco Partners to enter into discussions with any potential co-investors or financing sources without the Company’s prior written consent. The Company did not agree to enter into any exclusivity arrangement with Francisco Partners.

On February 18, 2018, the Board participated in a conference call to receive an update from the Transaction Committee on activities subsequent to the February 4, 2018 telephonic meeting of the Board.

On February 19, 2018, representatives of Qatalyst Partners and Francisco Partners discussed Francisco Partners’ request to share information with certain of their limited partners as potential co-investors.

On February 20, 2018, at the Company’s request, Francisco Partners provided a list of potential co-investors for the Company’s approval. On its regular telephonic conference on February 20, 2018, the Transaction Committee discussed the list of proposed co-investors and directed representatives of Qatalyst Partners to communicate to Francisco Partners that the Transaction Committee had approved its request to provide information to the proposed co-investors with the exception of one party with which the Company had held other discussions. On February 22, 2018, British Columbia Investment Management Corporation, which we refer to as BCI, executed a joinder to the FP MNDA. We refer to Francisco Partners and BCI together as the FP Group. On February 22 and 23, 2018, other potential co-investors executed joinders to the FP MNDA.

On February 21, 2018, at the direction of the Transaction Committee, representatives of management contacted representatives of Party 1, with whom the Company had engaged in preliminary discussions, to renew a recently expired non-disclosure agreement.

On February 22, 2018, at the direction of the Transaction Committee, representatives of Qatalyst Partners had an introductory phone call with representatives of Party 1 to inquire whether Party 1

-31-

would be interested in making a proposal to acquire the Company. Party 1 indicated that it would be interested in evaluating a potential transaction between the parties, and would follow up soon with a list of due diligence questions and seek to provide a formal non-binding indication of interest promptly. That same day, representatives of Qatalyst Partners sent Party 1 a form of amendment to its existing non-disclosure agreement with the Company to extend the term and otherwise amend certain terms in a manner consistent with those contained in the FP MNDA. On February 25, 2018, Party 1 requested permission to reach out to a private equity firm, which we refer to as Party 2, as a potential co-investor, indicating that it would be unlikely to make a proposal without joint participation with Party 2.

On February 24, 2018, the Company provided access to an electronic dataroom to Francisco Partners to facilitate its due diligence review.

On February 26, 2018, the Company and Party 1 amended their previously existing non-disclosure agreement, dated as of July 16, 2016, to extend the term thereof in connection with Party 1’s interest in evaluating a potential transaction between the parties and to require the Company’s prior written consent before approaching any potential co-investor or other provider of debt or equity financing.

On March 1, 2018, the Company and Party 2 entered into a customary non-disclosure agreement in connection with the evaluation of a potential transaction between the parties. Party 1 and Party 2 determined that they would work together to evaluate whether to make a joint proposal to acquire the Company. We refer to Party 1 and Party 2 together as the Joint Bidder Group. That same day, the Company provided access to an electronic dataroom to Joint Bidder Group to facilitate their due diligence review.

On March 1, 2018, representatives of management and Qatalyst Partners met with representatives of Francisco Partners for a due diligence session at the offices of Sullivan & Cromwell in Palo Alto.

On March 5, 2018, representatives of management and Qatalyst Partners held a diligence call with representatives of the Joint Bidder Group.

On March 7, 2018, the Joint Bidder Group submitted a non-binding indication of interest proposing an indicative offer to acquire the Company at an initial price per share of between $22.00 and $22.50 in cash, to be financed with a combination of equity capital and debt financing. According to the proposal, the offer range represented a premium of 27%-30% to the 30-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock as of the day before the proposal was made. The indication of interest noted that the Joint Bidder Group anticipated customary diligence and that it anticipated it would substantially complete its commercial due diligence by March 22, 2018.

On March 8, 2018, the Company published its financial results for the three months ended January 31, 2018, noting, among other things, that the Company’s non-GAAP net revenue and earnings per share results for the quarter were ahead of guidance previously issued by the Company.

On March 9, 12 and 13, 2018, representatives of management and Qatalyst Partners met with representatives of Francisco Partners for due diligence sessions at the offices of Sullivan & Cromwell in Palo Alto. Over the next week, representatives of management and Qatalyst Partners had additional calls with Francisco Partners to answer diligence questions.

On March 12, 2018, representatives of management and Qatalyst Partners met with representatives of the Joint Bidder Group for a due diligence session.

On March 14, 2018, the Company, through Qatalyst Partners, sent process letters to the FP Group and the Joint Bidder Group, requesting that both parties submit to the Company by March 21,

-32-

2018, their non-binding firm proposals with respect to a potential acquisition of the Company, specifying, among other things, a proposed per share cash price, financing plans and anticipated timing to close the proposed transaction.

On March 16, 2018, a representative of Joint Bidder Group indicated in a telephone call to a representative of Qatalyst Partners that it would not submit a bid to acquire the Company. The Joint Bidder Group later confirmed by email that it would not submit a bid.

On March 21, 2018, the FP Group submitted a non-binding firm proposal, which we refer to as the March 21 Proposal, with a per share price of $22.55 in cash to be financed with a combination of debt and equity, and noted that it did not see any material risk to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. The March 21 Proposal also included a 30-day go-shop period to allow the Company to seek superior proposals with a Company termination fee of 3.75% of the equity value of the Company, and also contemplated a customary reverse termination fee. In addition, the FP Group requested a two-week exclusivity arrangement to negotiate with the Company. The Joint Bidder Group did not submit a proposal to acquire the Company.

On March 22, 2018, the Board held a meeting at the Company’s principal executive offices in San Jose with members of management and representatives of Qatalyst Partners and Sullivan & Cromwell present to discuss the March 21 Proposal. Representatives of Qatalyst Partners discussed with the Board the financial aspects of the March 21 Proposal and deal process considerations, and a representative of Sullivan & Cromwell discussed with the Board its fiduciary obligations in the context of a potential transaction of the type being proposed by Francisco Partners. The Board also considered the Company’s prospects as a stand-alone public company. The Board authorized the Transaction Committee to work with management and Qatalyst Partners to improve and finalize the FP Group’s proposal, subject to the Board’s ultimate approval of the final terms.

On March 23, 2018, consistent with the Board’s authorization, representatives of Qatalyst Partners discussed certain aspects of the FP Group’s proposal with representatives of Francisco Partners, including the terms of the go-shop period and the price, indicated that the Company would not agree to exclusivity and encouraged Francisco Partners to prepare and submit an improved proposal.

On March 24, 2018, Mr. Henske spoke with a representative of Francisco Partners to encourage Francisco Partners to revise its proposal and increase its proposed purchase price.

On March 26, 2018, the FP Group sent the Company a revised non-binding firm proposal, which we refer to as the March 26 Proposal, with an increased purchase price of $23.04 per share and a longer go-shop period of 35 days. The March 26 Proposal also contemplated a lower Company termination fee of 1.5% of the equity value of the Company for a termination by the Company during the go-shop period and 3.5% for a termination outside of the go-shop period, along with a proposed Holdco termination fee of 6.0% of the equity value of the Company. The March 26 Proposal removed the request for an exclusivity period for negotiations with the Company. After discussions between members of the Transaction Committee and representatives of Qatalyst Partners and following further negotiations later that day, the FP Group updated the March 26 Proposal to include a 45-day go-shop period with a Company termination fee of 1.25% of the equity value of the Company for a termination by the Company during the go-shop period and 3.25% for a termination outside of the go-shop period, along with a Holdco termination fee of 7.0% of the equity value of the Company. The Company agreed to negotiate a definitive agreement with the FP Group based on these updated terms to the March 26 Proposal. The FP Group requested permission to reach out to certain debt financing sources.

On the same day, the Transaction Committee, through Qatalyst Partners, authorized the FP Group to reach out to six potential debt financing sources. The FP Group requested that they be able

-33-

to enter into exclusivity provisions with the proposed debt financing sources and after discussion, the Transaction Committee authorized that the FP Group could enter exclusive arrangements with three of the proposed debt financing sources.

On March 27, 2018, at the direction of the Transaction Committee, representatives of Qatalyst Partners sent initial drafts of the merger agreement to the FP Group and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell sent the Company disclosure letter to the FP Group. That same day, the Company granted access to due diligence materials to certain potential debt financing sources of the FP Group.

On March 30, 2018, a potential financing source for the FP Group that had been from time to time a financial advisor to the Company sought consent from the Company to participate in the debt financing for the FP Group’s proposal. On March 31, 2018, the Company provided written consent to such participation, and the participation of individuals who had provided financial services to the Company, subject to confidentiality obligations in respect of confidential information of the Company other than information that had been provided to the FP Group.

On March 30, 2018, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which we refer to as Kirkland & Ellis, legal advisor to Francisco Partners, sent to Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the merger agreement and initial drafts of the equity commitment letter and limited guarantee. Over the course of negotiations of the definitive agreement, the key points of discussion and negotiation in the merger agreement related to (i) the level of efforts required to be taken by the parties with respect to, and the closing conditionality around, regulatory approvals; (ii) the triggers for the payment of the Company termination fee and Holdco termination fee and whether to provide for the reimbursement of Holdco expenses in certain termination scenarios; (iii) the parameters of the go-shop period and the non-solicitation obligations following the expiration of the go-shop period; and (iv) the scope of various representations and warranties and related required disclosures as well as the scope of interim operating covenants and the flexibility required by the Company to operate its business in the period between signing and closing. On April 1, 2018, the Board participated in a conference call to receive an update from the Transaction Committee on activities subsequent to the March 22 Board meeting and discussed issues arising from the initial discussions with the FP Group on the merger agreement.

From April 2 to April 8, 2018, Sullivan & Cromwell and Kirkland & Ellis negotiated the merger agreement, equity commitment letter and limited guarantee.

On April 7, 2018, Kirkland & Ellis sent drafts of the debt commitment letter and related documentation to Sullivan & Cromwell. On April 8, 2018, Sullivan & Cromwell provided certain comments to Kirkland & Ellis on the debt commitment letter and related documentation.

On the evening of April 7, 2018, Mr. Henske, representatives of Qatalyst and the FP Group held a telephone call along with representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell and Kirkland & Ellis to discuss the remaining open points of the merger agreement. Over the course of April 7 and April 8, 2018, the Company and the FP Group, together with Sullivan & Cromwell and Kirkland & Ellis, worked to negotiate the remaining open points and finalized the merger agreement, equity commitment letter, limited guarantee and debt commitment letter.

On the evening of April 8, 2018, the Transaction Committee held its regular twice-weekly meeting with representatives of Qatalyst Partners and Sullivan & Cromwell to discuss the terms of the transaction documents.

On April 9, 2018, the Board held a telephonic meeting at which representatives of management, Qatalyst Partners and Sullivan & Cromwell were present. At the meeting, Qatalyst Partners reviewed with the Board Qatalyst Partners’ financial analysis of the per share merger consideration of $23.04 per

-34-

share in cash, and rendered to the Board its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of April 9, 2018, and based upon and subject to the various assumptions, qualifications, limitations and other matters set forth therein, the per share merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash to be received pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of the merger agreement by the holders of shares of common stock (other than Holdco or any affiliates of Holdco), was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders, as more fully described below in the section captioned “The Merger—Opinion of Qatalyst Partners LP.” Sullivan & Cromwell provided a summary of the key terms of the merger agreement. The Board engaged in a discussion with management and its advisors regarding the transaction, after which the Board unanimously (i) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the equity commitment letter and the limited guarantee are fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders, (ii) authorized, approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, (iii) resolved that the merger agreement be submitted for consideration by the stockholders and (iv) recommended that the stockholders vote to adopt the merger agreement. The Board also unanimously authorized and approved the Company’s entry into the limited guarantee. Also at the meeting, the Board discussed and considered a proposed amendment to the Company’s bylaws to adopt an exclusive forum bylaw, which would provide that the Delaware Court of Chancery (or in some cases, other state or federal courts in Delaware) be the sole and exclusive forum for certain actions brought against the Company or any director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of the Company. The Board unanimously approved the adoption of the exclusive forum bylaw.

Later on April 9, 2018, the Company, Holdco and Merger Sub executed the merger agreement and the Company executed the limited guarantee, together with the guarantors party thereto. Also on April 9, 2018, Holdco executed the equity commitment letter with the equity financing sources party thereto and the debt commitment letter with the committed lenders party thereto. Following the close of the market on April 9, 2018, the Company and Francisco Partners issued a joint press release announcing the execution of the merger agreement, with the per share cash merger consideration representing a 54% premium to the $15.00 closing stock price of the Company on that day.

The merger agreement provides that during the go-shop period, which began on April 9, 2018 and continues until 11:59 p.m. (California time) on May 24, 2018, the Company and its subsidiaries and their respective representatives are permitted to initiate, solicit, facilitate, propose, encourage, or take any action to facilitate any inquiry or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, an acquisition proposal.

Since the commencement of the go-shop period, representatives of Qatalyst Partners, on behalf of the Company, have been in contact with approximately 42 potential purchasers. The Company has entered into non-disclosure agreements with four (4) such potential purchasers, including a private equity firm which we refer to as Party 3 and a strategic counterparty which we refer to as Party 4, and has provided those four (4) potential purchasers with access to an electronic dataroom to facilitate due diligence. On May 4, 2018, representatives of management met with representatives of Party 3 to discuss the Company’s business and related due diligence matters and on May 10, 2018, representatives of management held a telephone conference call with representatives of Party 4 to discuss the Company’s business and related due diligence matters. As of the date of this proxy statement, none of the parties contacted during the go-shop period have submitted an acquisition proposal.

Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Company’s Board of Directors

The Board has unanimously (1) determined that the merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders; (2) authorized, approved and declared advisable the

-35-

merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; and (3) resolved to recommend that the stockholders of the Company vote to adopt the merger agreement.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote (1) “FOR” the adoption the merger agreement; (2) “FOR” the non-binding, advisory proposal to approve compensation that will or may become payable to the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger; and (3) “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum.

In the course of reaching its determination and recommendation, the Board consulted with and received the advice and assistance of its legal and financial advisors. In recommending that stockholders vote in favor of adoption of the merger agreement, the Board considered a number of factors, including the following (which factors are not necessarily presented in order of relative importance):

-36-

-37-

-38-

In the course of reaching its recommendation, the Board also considered a variety of risks and potentially negative factors concerning the merger and the merger agreement, including the following:

-39-

The above discussion of the information and factors considered by the Board is not intended to be exhaustive, but indicates the material matters considered. In reaching its determination and recommendation, the Board did not quantify, rank or assign any relative or specific weight to any of the foregoing factors, and individual members of the Board may have considered various factors differently. The Board did not undertake to make any specific determination as to whether any specific factor, or any particular aspect of any factor, supported or did not support its ultimate recommendation. Moreover, in considering the information and factors described above, individual members of the Board each applied his or her own personal business judgment to the process and may have given differing weights to differing factors. The Board based its unanimous recommendation on the totality of the information presented. The explanation of the factors and reasoning set forth above contain forward-looking statements that should be read in conjunction with the section of this proxy statement entitled “Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information.”

Certain Unaudited Company Forecasts

The Company does not as a matter of course publicly disclose long-term forecasts or projections, due to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying assumptions and estimates. However, the Company is including in this proxy statement certain unaudited prospective financial information, which we refer to as the Management Projections, that was made available to the Board for purposes of evaluating the merger and to the representatives of Qatalyst Partners for purposes of rendering its fairness opinion to the Board and performing its related financial analysis. The Management Projections were reasonably prepared by management in good faith based on management’s best available estimates, judgments and assumptions with respect to the Company’s future financial performance at the time they were prepared and speak only as of that time. The Management Projections were authorized by management for use by Qatalyst Partners in connection with the rendering of its fairness opinion to the Board and performing its related financial analyses, as described in “The Merger—Opinion of Qatalyst Partners LP.”

The summaries of the Management Projections are not included in this proxy statement to induce any stockholder of the Company to vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement or any other proposals to be voted on at the special meeting, but solely because the Management Projections were

-40-

made available to the Board and Qatalyst Partners. The inclusion of the Management Projections should not be regarded as an indication that the Company, the Board or Qatalyst Partners considered, or now considers, the Management Projections to be a reliable prediction of future results or to support or fail to support your decision whether to vote for or against the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. No person has made or makes any representation or warranty to any person, including any stockholder of the Company, regarding the information included in the Management Projections.

The Management Projections were prepared by the Company’s management in March 2018 based on certain assumptions that management then believed to be potentially achievable. While the Management Projections were prepared in good faith by management, no assurance can be made regarding future events. The Management Projections also reflect assumptions as of the time of their respective preparation as to certain business decisions that are subject to change. Although presented with numerical specificity, the Management Projections are based upon a variety of estimates and numerous assumptions made by management with respect to, among other matters, incremental sales growth, operational cost savings, industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions and other matters, including the factors described in “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” many of which are difficult to predict, are subject to significant economic and competitive uncertainties, and are beyond the Company’s control. The Management Projections also assume that the Company would continue to operate as a standalone company and do not reflect any impact of the merger. Furthermore, the Management Projections do not take into account any failure of the merger to be completed and should not be viewed as reflective of management’s expectations under those circumstances. In addition, because the Management Projections cover multiple years, such information by its nature becomes less reliable with each successive year. As a result, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made in preparing the Management Projections will prove accurate, that the projected results will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower than projected results. The Management Projections cannot, therefore, be considered a guaranty of future operating results, and this information should not be relied on as such.

The Management Projections were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure, soliciting proxies or complying with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which we refer to as GAAP, the published guidelines of the SEC regarding financial projections and forecasts or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of financial projections and forecasts. Neither the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent registered public accounting firm has examined, compiled or otherwise performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained in the Management Projections and, accordingly, neither the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent registered public accounting firm has expressed any opinion or given any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assumes no responsibility for, and disclaims any association with, the prospective financial information.

The Management Projections include “non-GAAP financial measures,” which are financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. Furthermore, there are limitations inherent in non-GAAP financial measures because they exclude items, including charges and credits, that are required to be included in a GAAP presentation.

-41-

The following table summarizes the Management Projections.

Opinion of Qatalyst Partners LP

The Company retained Qatalyst Partners to act as financial advisor to the Board in connection with a potential transaction such as the merger and to evaluate whether the merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash to be received pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of the merger agreement by the holders of shares of common stock (other than Holdco or any affiliates of Holdco), was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. The Company selected Qatalyst Partners to act as its financial advisor based on Qatalyst Partners’ qualifications, expertise, reputation and knowledge of the Company’s business and the industry in which the Company operates. Qatalyst Partners provided its written consent to the reproduction of its opinion in this proxy statement. At the meeting of the Board on April 9, 2018, Qatalyst Partners rendered to the Board its oral opinion to the effect that,

-42-

as of April 9, 2018, and based upon and subject to the various assumptions, qualifications, limitations and other matters set forth therein, the merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash to be received pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of the merger agreement by the holders of shares of common stock (other than Holdco or any affiliates of Holdco), was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. Following the meeting, Qatalyst Partners delivered its written opinion, dated April 9, 2018, to the Board.

The full text of the opinion of Qatalyst Partners, dated as of April 9, 2018, is attached to this proxy statement as Annex B and is incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. The opinion sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations and qualifications of the review undertaken by Qatalyst Partners in rendering its opinion. You should read the opinion carefully in its entirety. Qatalyst Partners’ opinion was provided to the Board and addresses only, as of the date of the opinion, the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash to be received pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of the merger agreement by the holders of shares of common stock (other than Holdco or any affiliates of Holdco), to such holders, and it does not address any other aspect of the merger. It does not constitute a recommendation to any Company stockholder as to how to vote with respect to the merger or any other matter and does not in any manner address the price at which the common stock will trade at any time. The summary of Qatalyst Partners’ opinion set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion, which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex B.

For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, Qatalyst Partners reviewed the merger agreement, certain related documents and certain publicly available financial statements and other business and financial information of the Company. Qatalyst Partners also reviewed certain forward-looking information relating to the Company prepared by the management of the Company, including the Management Projections. Additionally, Qatalyst Partners discussed the past and current operations and financial condition and the prospects of the Company with senior management of the Company. Qatalyst Partners also reviewed the historical market prices and trading activity for the common stock and compared the financial performance of the Company and the prices and trading activity of the common stock with that of certain other selected publicly-traded companies and their securities. In addition, Qatalyst Partners reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of selected acquisition transactions and performed such other analyses, reviewed such other information and considered such other factors as Qatalyst Partners deemed appropriate.

In arriving at its opinion, Qatalyst Partners assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the information that was publicly available or supplied or otherwise made available to, or discussed with, it by the Company. With respect to the Management Projections, Qatalyst Partners was advised by the management of the Company, and assumed, that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company of the future financial performance of the Company and other matters covered thereby. Qatalyst Partners assumed that the merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in the merger agreement, without any modification, waiver or delay. In addition, Qatalyst Partners assumed that in connection with the receipt of all the necessary approvals of the proposed merger, no delays, limitations, conditions or restrictions will be imposed that could have an adverse effect on the Company or the contemplated benefits expected to be derived in the proposed merger. Qatalyst Partners did not make any independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company or its affiliates nor was it furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. In addition, Qatalyst Partners relied, without independent verification, upon the assessment of the management of the Company as to the existing and future technology and products of the Company and the risks associated with such technology and products. Qatalyst Partners’ opinion has been approved by its opinion committee in accordance with its customary

-43-

practice. Qatalyst Partners’ opinion does not constitute a recommendation as to how to vote with respect to the merger or any other matter and does not in any manner address the price at which the common stock will trade at any time.

Qatalyst Partners’ opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to it as of, the date of its opinion. Events occurring after the date of its opinion may affect its opinion and the assumptions used in preparing it, and Qatalyst Partners did not assume any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. Qatalyst Partners’ opinion did not address the underlying business decision of the Company to engage in the merger, or the relative merits of the merger as compared to any strategic alternatives that may be available to the Company. Qatalyst Partners’ opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash to be received pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of the merger agreement by the holders of shares of common stock (other than Holdco or any affiliates of Holdco), and Qatalyst Partners expressed no opinion with respect to the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation to any of the officers, directors or employees of the Company or any of its affiliates, or any class of such persons, relative to such consideration at any time.

The following is a brief summary of the material analyses performed by Qatalyst Partners in connection with its opinion dated as of April 9, 2018. The analyses and factors described below must be considered as a whole; considering any portion of such analyses or factors, without considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying Qatalyst Partners’ opinion. For purposes of its analyses, Qatalyst Partners utilized the Management Projections, described above in the section of this proxy statement captioned “Certain Unaudited Company Forecasts.” Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables are not intended to stand alone, and to more fully understand the financial analyses used by Qatalyst Partners, the tables must be read together with the full text of each summary. Considering the data set forth below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Qatalyst Partners’ financial analyses.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Qatalyst Partners performed an illustrative discounted cash flow analysis, which is designed to imply a potential, present value of per share values for the Company common stock as of January 31, 2018 by:

-44-

Based on the calculations set forth above, this analysis implied a range of values for the common stock of approximately $17.45 to $25.16 per share.

Selected Companies Analysis

Qatalyst Partners compared selected financial information and public market multiples for the Company with publicly available financial information and public market multiples for selected companies. The companies used in this comparison included those companies listed below, which were selected by Qatalyst Partners, based on its professional judgment, from publicly traded companies in the Company’s industry, which included such factors as companies participating in similar lines of businesses to the Company, having similar financial performance, or having other relevant similar characteristics.

Based on Wall Street analyst consensus estimates as of April 6, 2018, which we refer to as the Street Case, and using the closing prices, as of April 6, 2018 (except as noted in the table below), for shares of the selected companies, Qatalyst Partners calculated, among other things, the price per share divided by estimated calendar year 2018 earnings, which we refer to as the CY2018E P/E Multiples, and the price per share divided by estimated calendar year 2019 earnings, which we refer to as the CY2019E P/E Multiples, for each of the selected companies, as shown below:

-45-

Based on an analysis of the multiples for the selected companies, Qatalyst Partners selected a representative multiple range for each of the multiples and applied this range to the Company’s estimated statistic (a) based on the Management Projections and (b) based on the Street Case.

Based on an analysis of the CY2018E P/E Multiples and the CY2019E P/E Multiples for the selected companies, Qatalyst Partners selected a representative multiple range of 10.0x to 14.0x and 9.0x to 12.0x for CY2018 and CY2019, respectively. Qatalyst Partners then applied these ranges to the Company’s estimated Non-GAAP Earnings per Share for each of CY2018 and CY2019, based on the Management Projections and the Street Case. Based on the calculations set forth above, this analysis implied a range of values for the Company common stock of (i) approximately $15.54 to $21.75 per share based on the Management Projections for CY2018, and $16.06 to $22.48 per share based on the Street Case for CY2018 and (ii) approximately $16.45 to $21.93 per share based on the Management Projections for CY2019, and $16.59 to $22.12 per share based on the Street Case for CY2019.

No company included in the selected companies analysis is identical to the Company. In evaluating the selected companies, Qatalyst Partners made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters. Many of these matters are beyond the control of the Company, such as the impact of competition on the Company’s business and the industry in general, industry growth and the absence of any material adverse change in the Company’s financial condition and prospects or the industry or in the financial markets in general. Mathematical analysis, such as determining the arithmetic mean, median, or the high or low, is not in itself a meaningful method of using selected company data.

Selected Transactions Analysis

Qatalyst Partners compared eleven selected transactions announced between November 2010 and March 2018 involving payments and other business hardware companies selected by Qatalyst Partners based on its professional judgment.

-46-

For each of the selected transactions listed below, Qatalyst Partners reviewed, among other things, the implied fully-diluted enterprise value of the target company as a multiple of (a) last-twelve-months earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which we refer to as EBITDA, of the target company, which we refer to as the EV/LTM EBITDA Multiple, and (b) analyst estimates of the next-twelve-months EBITDA of the target company, which we refer to as the EV/NTM EBITDA Multiple.

Note: Multiples that were not publicly available or not meaningful noted as dashes. Multiples greater than 50x or negative considered not meaningful.

Based on the analysis of the EV/LTM EBITDA Multiples for selected transactions, Qatalyst Partners selected a representative multiple range of 9.0x to 14.0x applied to the Company’s last-twelve-months EBITDA (calculated as the twelve-month period ended on January 31, 2018). This analysis implied a range of values for the Company common stock of approximately $15.49 to $27.41 per share.

Based on the analysis of the EV/NTM EBITDA Multiples for the selected transactions, Qatalyst Partners selected a representative multiple range of 8.0x to 12.0x applied to the Company’s estimated next-twelve-months EBITDA (calculated as the twelve-month period ending on January 1, 2019), based on the Street Case. This analysis implied a range of values for the Company common stock of approximately $15.36 to $26.02 per share.

No company or transaction utilized in the selected transactions analysis is identical to the Company or the merger. In evaluating the selected transactions, Qatalyst Partners made judgments and assumptions with regard to general business, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, such as the impact of competition on the Company’s business or the industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any material adverse change in the Company’s financial condition and prospects or the industry or in the financial markets in general, which could affect the public trading value of the companies and the aggregate

-47-

value of the transactions to which they are being compared. Because of the unique circumstances of each of these transactions and the merger, Qatalyst Partners cautioned against placing undue reliance on this information.

Miscellaneous

In connection with the review of the merger by the Board, Qatalyst Partners performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses for purposes of rendering its opinion. The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily amenable to a partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Qatalyst Partners considered the results of all of its analyses as a whole and did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor it considered. Qatalyst Partners believes that selecting any portion of its analyses, without considering all analyses as a whole, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and opinion. In addition, Qatalyst Partners may have given various analyses and factors more or less weight than other analyses and factors, and may have deemed various assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions. As a result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis described above should not be taken to be Qatalyst Partners’ view of the actual value of the Company. In performing its analyses, Qatalyst Partners made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Any estimates contained in Qatalyst Partners’ analyses are not necessarily indicative of future results or actual values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by such estimates.

Qatalyst Partners conducted the analyses described above solely as part of its analysis of the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash to be received pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of the merger agreement by the holders of shares of common stock (other than Holdco or any affiliates of Holdco), to such holders. This analysis does not purport to be an appraisal or to reflect the price at which the common stock might actually trade at any time.

Qatalyst Partners’ opinion and its presentation to the Board was one of many factors considered by the Board in deciding to approve the merger agreement. Consequently, the analyses as described above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of the Board with respect to the merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash to be received pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of the merger agreement by the holders of shares of common stock (other than Holdco or any affiliates of Holdco) or of whether the Board would have been willing to agree to different consideration. The merger consideration of $23.04 per share in cash payable in the merger was determined through arm’s-length negotiations between the Company and Holdco and was unanimously approved by the Board. Qatalyst Partners provided advice to the Company during these negotiations. Qatalyst Partners did not, however, recommend any specific consideration to the Company or that any specific consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for the merger.

Qatalyst Partners provides investment banking and other services to a wide range of corporations and individuals, domestically and offshore, from which conflicting interests or duties may arise. In the ordinary course of these activities, affiliates of Qatalyst Partners may at any time hold long or short positions, and may trade or otherwise effect transactions in debt or equity securities or loans of the Company, Holdco or certain of their respective affiliates. During the two-year period prior to the date of Qatalyst Partners’ opinion, no material relationship existed between Qatalyst Partners and its affiliates and the Company or Holdco pursuant to which compensation was received by Qatalyst Partners or its affiliates; however, Qatalyst Partners and its affiliates may in the future provide investment banking and other financial services to the Company or Holdco or any of their respective affiliates for which it would expect to receive compensation.

-48-

Pursuant to a letter agreement dated February 9, 2018, Qatalyst Partners provided the Company with financial advisory services in connection with the merger for which it will be paid approximately $31 million, $250,000 of which was payable upon the execution of such letter agreement and has been paid and $2 million of which was payable upon the delivery of its opinion (regardless of the conclusion reached therein) and the remaining portion of which will be paid upon, and subject to, the consummation of the merger. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Qatalyst Partners for its expenses incurred in performing its services. The Company has also agreed to indemnify Qatalyst Partners and its affiliates, their respective members, directors, officers, partners, agents and employees and any person controlling Qatalyst Partners or any of its affiliates against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, and expenses related to or arising out of Qatalyst Partners’ engagement.

Financing of the Merger

The merger agreement does not contain any condition to the obligations of Holdco or Merger Sub relating to the receipt of financing. Holdco and Merger Sub have obtained equity and debt financing commitments for the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the aggregate proceeds of which will be sufficient for Holdco to pay the aggregate merger consideration and all related fees and expenses of the investor group, and to refinance certain indebtedness of the Company. Pursuant to an equity commitment letter from Francisco Partners to Holdco dated as of April 9, 2018, Francisco Partners has agreed to make capital contributions of approximately $1,629 million, which we refer to as the equity commitment amount.

Credit Suisse AG (acting through such of its affiliates or branches as it deems appropriate), Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Barclays Bank PLC (acting through such of its affiliates or branches as it deems appropriate) and Royal Bank of Canada, whom we refer to collectively as the Lenders, have committed to provide the debt commitment amount, consisting of up to an aggregate $2,200 million in debt financing (not all of which is expected to be drawn at the closing of the merger), consisting of (i) a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1,950 million provided by the term Lenders and (ii) a senior secured revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of $250 million (not all of which is expected to be drawn at the closing of the merger) provided by the revolving Lenders, pursuant to the debt commitment letter dated as of April 9, 2018. The obligations of the Lenders to provide the debt commitment amount under the debt commitment letter are subject to a number of conditions, including the receipt of executed loan documentation, accuracy of representations and warranties, consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, contribution of the equity contemplated by the equity commitment letter, completion of the designated marketing period and other customary closing conditions for financings of this type.

The proceeds of the debt financing will be used (i) to finance, in part, the payment of the amounts payable under the merger agreement, including to repay existing indebtedness outstanding as of immediately prior to the closing of the merger and the payment of related fees and expenses, (ii) to provide ongoing working capital and (iii) for capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes.

The obligations of the Company under the debt financing will be (a) unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by the Company, Vertex IntermediateCo LLC, which we refer to as Intermediate Holdings, and each of Intermediate Holdings’ other subsidiaries (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the debt commitment letter) organized in (i) the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia and (ii) the Republic of Ireland, the United Kingdom, Germany and Bermuda (together with Intermediate Holdings and the Company, we refer to the foregoing entities as the loan parties) and (b) secured by a perfected first-priority security interest (subject to permitted liens and other exceptions to be set forth in the credit documentation, including without limitation, liens expressly permitted to exist on the closing date pursuant to the merger agreement) in substantially all of the loan parties’ tangible and intangible assets now owned or hereafter acquired.

-49-

The Lenders may invite other banks, financial institutions and institutional lenders to participate in the debt financing contemplated by the debt commitment letter and to undertake a portion of the commitments to provide such debt financing.

Closing and Effective Time of Merger

The closing of the merger is scheduled to occur at 7:00 a.m. California Time on the fifth (5th) business day following the day on which the last to be satisfied or waived of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied or waived at the closing) is satisfied or waived, or on such other date as the Company and Holdco may agree, but in no event will Holdco and Merger Sub be obligated to consummate the closing if the marketing period relating to Holdco’s debt financing for the merger has not ended prior to the time that the closing would otherwise have occurred, in which case the closing will not occur until the earlier to occur of (i) a date before or during the marketing period specified by Holdco, in its sole and absolute discretion, on three (3) business days’ written notice to the Company and (ii) three (3) business days following the expiration of the marketing period in accordance with its terms, subject, in each case, to the satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied or waived at the closing, but subject to the waiver or satisfaction of those conditions), which we refer to as the closing and which date we refer to as the closing date.

As soon as practicable following the closing, and on the closing date, the Company and Holdco will cause a certificate of merger relating to the merger to be executed, acknowledged and filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as provided in Section 251 of the DGCL. The merger will become effective at the effective time.

Payment of Merger Consideration and Surrender of Stock Certificates

As promptly as reasonably practicable, and in any event within three (3) business days, after the date of the effective time, each holder of record of a certificate representing shares of common stock (other than holders who solely hold excluded shares) will be sent a letter of transmittal and instructions describing how such record holder may surrender his, her or its shares of our common stock (or affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) in exchange for the per share merger consideration.

You should not return your stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card, and you should not forward your stock certificates to the paying agent without a letter of transmittal.

Any holder of book-entry shares will not be required to deliver a certificate or an executed letter of transmittal to the paying agent to receive the per share merger consideration that such holder is entitled to receive. In lieu thereof, each holder of record of one or more book-entry shares whose shares of common stock were converted into the right to receive the per share merger consideration will upon receipt by the paying agent of an “agent’s message” in customary form (or such other evidence, if any, as the paying agent may reasonably request), be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration in respect of each such share of common stock and the book-entry shares of such holder will forthwith be canceled.

No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash payable as the per share merger consideration upon your surrender of your book-entry shares or certificates.

The Company, Holdco, the surviving corporation and the paying agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold any applicable taxes from the per share merger consideration. Any sum that is withheld will be deemed to have been paid to the holder of shares with regard to whom such sum is withheld.

-50-

If you have lost a certificate, or if it has been stolen or destroyed, then before you will be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration, you will have to make an affidavit of the loss, theft or destruction of such certificate, and post a bond in such customary amount and upon such terms as may be reasonably required by Holdco as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it, Merger Sub or the surviving corporation with respect to such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate. These procedures will be described in the letter of transmittal and instructions that you will receive, which you should read carefully and in their entirety.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger

In considering the recommendation of the Board with respect to the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, you should be aware that executive officers and directors of the Company have certain interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of the Company’s stockholders generally. The Board was aware of these interests and considered them at the time it evaluated and approved the merger agreement and the merger, and in recommending that the merger agreement be adopted by the stockholders of the Company. Company stockholders should take these interests into account in deciding whether to adopt the merger agreement. Nothing in this proxy statement should be interpreted as providing any executive officer or director of the Company with an entitlement to any payments or other benefits in excess of the payments or other benefits to which he or she would otherwise be entitled in connection with the merger pursuant to the terms of these arrangements.

Treatment of Director Equity Awards

The Company’s non-employee directors hold unvested Company RSUs. In addition, certain Company directors hold vested Company options. Pursuant to the merger agreement and the applicable award agreements, in connection with the merger, the Company RSUs and vested Company options held by the Company’s non-employee directors will receive the treatment set forth below, as described in greater detail in the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Common Stock and Equity Awards” beginning on page 65.

Vested Director Stock Options.    At the effective time, each outstanding vested Company option (or vested portion thereof) held by a non-employee director (which we refer to as Vested Company Director options) will be canceled and will only entitle the holder to receive (without interest) an amount in cash, equal to the excess, if any, of the per share merger consideration over the exercise price per share of such Vested Company Director option, payable promptly following the effective time. Any Vested Company Director option which has an exercise price per share that is greater than or equal to the per share merger consideration will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

Director RSUs.    For purposes of Company RSUs subject to vesting that are held by the Company’s non-employee directors (which we refer to as a Director RSU), the director resignations contemplated by the merger agreement will constitute a termination without cause following a change in control under the form of Director RSU award agreement. As a result, at the effective time, all Director RSUs will become fully vested and will be promptly paid out in cash, based on the per share merger consideration.

In the aggregate, as of April 30, 2018, the Company’s non-employee directors held approximately 86,850 Director RSUs, which, in connection with the merger and the contemplated resignation of the non-employee directors, will be vested and paid out for an aggregate amount of approximately $2,001,024. In the aggregate, as of April 30, 2018, the Company’s non-employee directors held Director RSUs and Vested Company Director options that will be paid out in an aggregate amount of approximately $2,169,504.

-51-

Interests of the Company’s Executive Officers

The Company’s current executive officers are Paul Galant, Marc Rothman, Vin D’Agostino and Vikram Varma. The descriptions below, as well as the descriptions set forth in the section entitled “Advisory Vote on Merger-Related Compensation” beginning on page 86, are descriptions of the payments and benefits to which the executive officers of the Company may become entitled in connection with the merger pursuant to terms of the applicable award agreements and the Executive Severance Plan (and solely with respect to Mr. Galant, his employment agreement with the Company), based on certain assumptions as described herein.

Treatment of Company Equity Awards Held By Executive Officers Under the Merger Agreement

Under the terms of the merger agreement, Company options, Company RSUs and Company P-RSUs held by the Company’s executive officers immediately prior to the effective time will be converted into replacement cash awards in the same manner as those equity awards held by other employees of the Company, as described in greater detail in the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Common Stock and Equity Awards” beginning on page 65. The equity awards held by the executive officers will generally be subject to the following treatment under the merger agreement:

Vested Stock Options.    At the effective time, each outstanding vested Company option (or vested portion thereof) held by an executive officer will be canceled and will only entitle the holder to receive (without interest) an amount in cash equal to the excess, if any, of the per share merger consideration over the exercise price per share of such vested Company option payable promptly following the effective time. Any vested Company option which has an exercise price per share that is greater than or equal to the per share merger consideration will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

Unvested Stock Options.    At the effective time, each outstanding unvested Company option (or unvested portion thereof) held by an executive officer will be converted into a Company option replacement award, which will be payable in cash equal to the excess, if any, of the per share merger consideration over the exercise price per share of such Company option and otherwise subject to the same vesting schedule and other terms and conditions (other than with respect to exercise) applicable to the corresponding unvested Company option prior to the effective time. Any unvested Company option which has an exercise price per share that is greater than or equal to the per share merger consideration will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

Restricted Stock Units.    At the effective time, each outstanding Company RSU will be converted into a Company RSU replacement award, which will be payable in cash based upon the per share merger consideration and otherwise subject to the same vesting schedule and other terms and conditions applicable to the Company RSUs immediately prior to the effective time.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units.    At the effective time, each outstanding Company P-RSU will be converted into a time-vesting Company P-RSU replacement award based on the actual performance through the effective time. If the actual performance with respect to an outstanding Company P-RSU as of the effective time would result in delivery of no shares, such outstanding Company P-RSU will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

In addition, the Company’s executive officers have certain additional rights with respect to their equity awards under the terms of their severance arrangements (which are described in greater detail under “Executive Officer Change-in-Control Arrangements” below).

-52-

Executive Officer Change-in-Control Arrangements

Executive Officers Other Than Mr. Galant; Executive Severance Plan

Effective September 19, 2016, our compensation committee approved, and the Board adopted, the VeriFone Executive Severance Plan, which we refer to as the Executive Severance Plan. The Executive Severance Plan of 2016 superseded the Executive Severance Policy of 2013, and provides for change-in-control severance payments and benefits similar to those provided under the Executive Severance Policy, except that, as described in greater detail below, the Executive Severance Plan (i) provides for a change-in-control severance payment that includes a component based on a participant’s target annual cash bonus and (ii) clarifies the treatment of Company P-RSUs and other performance-based equity awards held by plan participants in connection with a change in control. The Executive Severance Plan provides for enhanced severance payments and benefits to employees designated as participants by our compensation committee upon certain qualifying terminations of employment which occur in connection with or following a change in control of the Company and also specifies the treatment of performance-based equity awards granted after September 19, 2016 upon a change in control of the Company. As of April 30, 2018, there are a total of 16 participants in the Executive Severance Plan who are entitled to receive change-in-control severance payments as described herein. All payments and other benefits under the Executive Severance Plan are subject to the participant’s execution of a general release of claims against the Company and compliance with 12-month non-competition and non-solicitation covenants and perpetual confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants. Each of our executive officers, other than Mr. Galant, is eligible to receive severance payments and other benefits under the Executive Severance Plan. In addition, Mr. Galant participates in the Executive Severance Plan solely for purposes of determining the treatment of Mr. Galant’s outstanding Company P-RSUs upon a change in control on the treatment of Mr. Galant’s outstanding Company P-RSUs.

Under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan, in the event that the Company terminates the employment of one of its executive officers (other than Mr. Galant) without cause or if such individual resigns for good reason (each of which we refer to as a qualifying termination of employment), in each case within the period beginning three months prior to and extending 12 months after, a change in control of the Company (which we refer to as a CIC protection period), such executive officer will be entitled to receive:

The proposed merger will constitute a change in control for purposes of the Executive Severance Plan.

For purposes of the Executive Severance Plan, “cause” generally means the occurrence of any of the following circumstances with respect to the executive officer: (i) the conviction of a felony or other offense involving dishonesty, disloyalty or fraud with respect to the Company or any related entity or their respective properties or assets; (ii) gross negligence or willful misconduct causing demonstrable and serious injury to the Company or a related entity; (iii) willful refusal to perform or substantial disregard of properly assigned duties; (iv) breach of duty of loyalty to the Company or a related entity or any act of fraud or dishonesty; (v) insider trading; (vi) breach of the Company’s ethics policy; (vii) engagement in accounting improprieties; (viii) failure or refusal to cooperate with governmental or regulatory investigations; or (ix) disqualification or bar by any governmental or self-regulatory authority from serving as an officer.

-53-

For purposes of the Executive Severance Plan, “good reason” generally means the occurrence of any of the following circumstances with respect to an executive officer, in each case without his or her express written consent and subject to notice and cure periods: (i) assignment of substantial duties materially inconsistent with his or her titles, position, authority, duties, work location or responsibilities or any other action by the Company which results in a material diminution or material adverse change in his or her title, position, authority, duties, work location or responsibilities; (ii) a material reduction by the Company in the rate of base salary or target annual bonus opportunity (including any material and adverse change in the formula for such targets); or (iii) failure to obtain the assumption of the Company’s obligations from any successor. The proposed merger will constitute good reason for purposes of the Executive Severance Plan for Mr. Rothman and Mr. Varma.

The Executive Severance Plan also provides for full vesting of all outstanding and unvested Company equity awards (including unvested Company Options, Company RSUs and Company P-RSUs, with Company P-RSUs being earned based on actual performance as of the effective time and, if actual performance with respect to any Company P-RSU is below the applicable threshold level at such time, such outstanding Company P-RSU will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment) in the event of a qualifying termination of employment during a CIC protection period.

In addition to the treatment of Company P-RSUs prescribed by the merger agreement and described above under “Treatment of Company Equity Awards Held by Executive Officers”, the terms of the applicable award agreements, provide for additional vesting and payment treatment with respect to the Company P-RSUs that will occur as a result of the merger. Specifically, these arrangements provide that, following the effective time, (i) each outstanding Company P-RSU held by Mr. D’Agostino, Mr. Rothman and Mr. Varma will be deemed earned at the actual performance level as of the effective time (taking into account the per share merger consideration) with respect to all open performance periods; (ii) a pro rata portion of each such earned award, equal to the product of the earned award and a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the performance period through the effective time and the denominator of which is the total number of days in such performance period, will become immediately vested and payable in cash; (iii) the remainder of each such award will continue to be subject to time-based cliff vesting following the effective time in accordance with the original performance period; and (iv) pursuant to the terms of the Executive Severance Plan each such remaining unvested portion of each such earned award held by Mr. D’Agostino, Mr. Rothman and Mr. Varma will be subject to double-trigger vesting and will vest in full (subject to the level of earn-out described in clause (i)) upon a qualifying termination of employment during a CIC protection period. If the actual performance with respect to an outstanding Company P-RSU is below the applicable threshold level as of the effective time, such outstanding Company P-RSU will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

Mr. Galant

Our employment agreement with Mr. Galant provides certain payments and benefits to him in the event of a termination of employment, including a qualifying termination of employment in connection with or following a change in control of the Company. The proposed merger will constitute a change in control for purposes of our employment agreement with Mr. Galant. If we terminate Mr. Galant’s employment without cause or if he terminates his employment for good reason within three months prior to (in the event that his employment is terminated at the request of a third party acquirer) or within 24 months following a change in control of the Company, which we refer to as the CIC protection period with respect to Mr. Galant), Mr. Galant will be entitled to the following:

-54-

In addition, Mr. Galant’s employment agreement provides for full vesting of all outstanding and unvested Company equity awards held by Mr. Galant (including unvested Company Options, Company RSUs and Company P-RSUs, with Company P-RSUs being earned based on actual performance as of the effective time and, if actual performance with respect to any Company P-RSU is below the applicable threshold level at such time, such outstanding Company P-RSU will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment) in the event of a qualifying termination of employment during a CIC protection period.

Under our employment agreement with Mr. Galant, “Cause” generally means (i) a conviction of, or plea of nolo contendre to, a felony or any crime or offense lesser than a felony involving dishonesty, disloyalty or fraud with respect to the Company or any related entity or any of their respective properties or assets; (ii) gross negligence or willful misconduct that has caused demonstrable and serious injury to the Company or a related entity, monetary or otherwise; (iii) willful refusal to perform or substantial disregard of duties properly assigned; (iv) breach of duty of loyalty to the Company or a related entity or any act of fraud or dishonesty with respect to the Company or a related entity; (v) the engagement in insider trading; (vi) breach of the Company’s ethics policy; (vii) engagement in accounting improprieties as determined by the Board in its discretion; (viii) failure or refusal to cooperate with governmental or regulatory investigations involving the Company; or (ix) the disqualification or bar by any governmental or self-regulatory authority from serving as an officer or director of the Company or any related entity.

Under our employment agreement with Mr. Galant, “good reason” generally means the occurrence of one or more of the following, without Mr. Galant’s written consent, and which circumstances are not remedied by the Company within 30 days of receipt of notice: (i) the assignment to Mr. Galant of substantial duties that are materially inconsistent with his title, position, authority, duties work location or responsibilities or any other action which results in a material diminution or material adverse change in his title, position, authority, duties, work location or responsibilities; (ii) a material reduction in Mr. Galant’s aggregate rate of annual base salary or target annual bonus; or (iii) the failure to obtain the assumption of the Company’s obligations under the severance arrangements by any successor. The proposed merger will constitute good reason for purposes of our employment agreement with Mr. Galant.

The obligations to provide the severance payments and benefits under our employment agreement with Mr. Galant (other than Accrued Compensation) are subject to Mr. Galant executing a release in favor of us and compliance with 12-month non-competition and non-solicitation covenants and perpetual confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants. Additional information regarding the quantification of Mr. Galant’s change in control severance entitlements is set forth in the section entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger—Golden Parachute Compensation” beginning on page 57.

In addition to the treatment of Company P-RSUs prescribed by the merger agreement and described in the preceding paragraph, the terms of Mr. Galant’s amended and restated employment agreement with the Company, as well as the applicable award agreements, provide for additional vesting and payment treatment with respect to the Company P-RSUs held by Mr. Galant that will occur

-55-

as a result of the merger. Specifically, these arrangements provide that, following the effective time, (i) each outstanding Company P-RSU held by Mr. Galant will be deemed earned at the actual performance level as of the effective time (taking into account the per share merger consideration) with respect to all open performance periods; (ii) a pro rata portion of each such earned award, equal to the product of the earned award and a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the performance period through the effective time and the denominator of which is the total number of days in such performance period, will become immediately vested and payable in cash; (iii) the remainder of each such award will continue to be subject to time-based cliff vesting following the effective time in accordance with the original performance period; and (iv) each such remaining unvested portion of each such earned award held by Mr. Galant will be subject to double-trigger vesting and will vest in full (subject to the level of earn-out described in clause (i)) upon a qualifying termination of employment during a CIC protection period. If the actual performance with respect to an outstanding Company P-RSU is below the applicable threshold level as of the effective time, such outstanding Company P-RSU will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

Aggregate Quantification of Executive Officers’ Interests in the Merger pursuant to Change-in-Control Arrangements

Based upon our executive officers’ compensation levels as of the date of this proxy statement and assuming that the merger closes on April 30, 2018 and that each executive officer experienced a qualifying termination of employment in connection therewith, the estimated aggregate amount of cash severance and continued employee benefits that would be payable is $6,743,586. Additional information regarding the payments and benefits to which each of our executive officers may become entitled if he or she experiences a qualifying termination of employment in connection with the merger is set forth in the section entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger—Golden Parachute Compensation” beginning on page 57.

In the aggregate, as of April 30, 2018, the Company’s executive officers held approximately (i) 80,000 unvested Company options (which will be converted to replacement awards with an aggregate value of approximately $428,800), (ii) 468,685 unvested Company RSUs (which will be converted to replacement awards with an aggregate value of approximately $10,798,502) and (iii) 559,398 Company P-RSUs (which will be converted to replacement awards with an aggregate value of approximately $12,888,530 (assuming performance at the “target” level as of the effective time, although the actual aggregate value of such replacement awards will depend on the actual level of achievement of the corresponding Company P-RSUs as of the effective time), of which approximately $5,221,693 will be subject to pro rata vesting upon the merger and payment immediately following the effective time). Additional information regarding the payments to which each of our executive officers may become entitled in respect of their respective unvested equity awards in connection with the merger are set forth in the section entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger—Golden Parachute Compensation” beginning on page 57.

Depending on when the merger occurs, certain equity awards that are now unvested may vest pursuant to the terms of the equity awards based on the completion of continued service with the Company (and satisfaction of performance conditions, in the case of Company P-RSUs), independent of the merger.

Other Employee-Related Interests

In addition to the other rights and interests in the merger described in this section, the Company’s executive officers would receive the same benefits and would be covered by the same protections under the merger agreement as other employees of the Company, which include double trigger vesting for all 2018 bonuses and, for the purpose of calculating the performance-based vesting conditions of all

-56-

cash or equity-based awards, the Company may exclude transaction expenses or non-recurring charges in connection with the merger. See the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Employee Benefits Matters” beginning on page 79 for a description of the benefits to be provided to Company employees pursuant to the merger agreement.

The parties have agreed that the Company may grant employee retention awards to Company employees, including executive officers. Awards would be payable in connection with service following the closing of the merger. As of the date of this proxy statement, no determinations have been made as to any executive officer who will receive awards or the amounts of such awards.

As of the date of this proxy statement, none of the Company’s executive officers have entered into any agreement with Francisco Partners or its affiliates regarding employment with, or the provision of services to, Francisco Partners or any of its affiliates. Prior to or following the closing, however, some or all of the Company’s executive officers may discuss or enter into employment or other arrangements with Francisco Partners or its affiliates regarding employment with, or the provision of other services to, Francisco Partners or its affiliates.

Golden Parachute Compensation

This section sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation for each named executive officer of the Company that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger and that will or may become payable to each such named executive officer at the effective time or on a qualifying termination of employment in connection with the merger. The “named executive officers” are the individuals listed as such in the Company’s most recent annual proxy statement.

The information contained in this section does not include information about any named executive officer who is no longer employed by the Company. Such named executive officers will not receive any payments or other benefits in connection with the merger other than as a stockholder of the Company (which payments will be made on the same basis as to all other stockholders of the Company).

The estimated potential payments in the table below are based on (i) per share merger consideration of $23.04; (ii) salary, target bonus levels and equity award holdings as of April 9, 2018; (iii) a merger closing on April 30, 2018 (the assumed date of the closing of the merger solely for purposes of this golden parachute compensation disclosure); (iv) a termination of each named executive officer by the Company without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” on the closing date; and (v) achievement of all performance goals with respect to the Company P-RSUs at target. Depending on when the merger occurs, certain equity awards that are now unvested and included in the table below may vest pursuant to the terms of the equity awards based on the completion of continued service with the Company, independent of the merger. In addition, the amounts indicated below are estimates based on multiple assumptions that may or may not actually occur, including assumptions described in this proxy statement, and do not reflect certain compensation actions that may occur before completion of the merger. As a result, the actual amounts, if any, to be received by a named executive officer may materially differ from the amounts set forth below. All dollar amounts have been rounded to the nearest whole dollar.

-57-

Golden Parachute Compensation

The amounts payable above (as well as the amounts described in each of notes (2) and (3) below) are, in each case, subject to the executive officer’s delivery of a general release of all claims in favor of the Company. These amounts are also subject to the executive officer’s ongoing compliance with non-solicitation and non-competition restrictions for the twelve months after termination, as well as compliance with perpetual non-disparagement and confidentiality requirements. The applicable terms of our employment agreement with Mr. Galant and the Executive Severance Plan are described in greater detail in the section entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” beginning on page 51.

-58-

-59-

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

The following is a summary of the material U.S. Federal income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. holders (as defined below) whose shares of our common stock are converted into the right to receive cash in the merger. This summary does not purport to consider all aspects of U.S. Federal income taxation that might be relevant to our stockholders. For purposes of this discussion, we use the term “U.S. holder” to mean a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes:

-60-

If a partnership (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. Federal income tax purposes) holds our common stock, the U.S. Federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partner and the tax treatment of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding our common stock should consult the partner’s tax advisor regarding the U.S. Federal income tax consequences of the merger to such partner.

This discussion is based on the Code, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations under the Code, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect. These laws are subject to change or differing interpretation, possibly on a retroactive basis. The discussion applies only to beneficial owners who hold shares of our common stock as capital assets, and does not apply to shares of our common stock received in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, stockholders who hold an equity interest, actually or constructively, in Holdco or the surviving corporation after the merger, or to certain types of beneficial owners who may be subject to special rules (such as insurance companies, banks, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, broker-dealers, partnerships, S corporations or other pass-through entities, mutual funds, traders in securities who elect the mark-to-market method of accounting, stockholders subject to the alternative minimum tax, stockholders that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar or stockholders who hold our common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, wash sale, constructive sale or conversion transaction). This discussion also does not address the U.S. tax consequences to any stockholder who, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, is a non-resident alien individual, foreign corporation, foreign partnership or foreign estate or trust, and does not address the receipt of cash in connection with the treatment of restricted stock units, performance stock units, company awards or any other matters relating to equity compensation or benefit plans (including the stock plans). This discussion does not address any aspect of state, local or foreign tax laws. Holders of common stock should consult their own tax advisors to determine the particular tax consequences to them of the merger, including the applicability and effect of any state, local, foreign or other tax laws.

Exchange of Shares of Common Stock for Cash Pursuant to the Merger Agreement

The exchange of shares of our common stock for cash in the merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In general, a U.S. holder whose shares of our common stock are converted into the right to receive cash in the merger will recognize capital gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax purposes equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash received with respect to such shares (determined before the deduction of any applicable withholding taxes, as described below in the section titled “Backup Withholding and Information Reporting”) and the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in such shares. A U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis will generally equal the price the U.S. holder paid for such shares. Gain or loss will be determined separately for each block of shares of our common stock (i.e., shares of common stock acquired at the same cost in a single transaction). Such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss where the U.S. holder’s holding period for such shares of common stock is more than one (1) year at the effective time. Long-term capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. holder is generally taxed at preferential rates. There are limitations on the deductibility of capital losses. In addition, a 3.8% tax is imposed on all or a portion of the “net investment income” (within the meaning of the Code) of certain individuals and on the undistributed net investment income of certain estates and trusts. The 3.8% tax generally is imposed on the lesser of (1) the U.S. holder’s “net investment income” for the relevant taxable year and (2) the excess of the U.S. holder’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a certain

-61-

threshold (which in the case of individuals is between $125,000 and $250,000, depending on the individual’s circumstances). For these purposes, “net investment income” generally will include any gain recognized on the receipt of cash for shares pursuant to the merger.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

A U.S. holder may be subject to information reporting. In addition, backup withholding of tax will apply at the statutory rate to cash payments to which a non-corporate U.S. holder is entitled under the merger agreement, unless the U.S. holder or other payee provides a taxpayer identification number, certifies that such number is correct, and otherwise complies with the backup withholding rules. Each of our U.S. holders should complete and sign, under penalty of perjury, the Form W-9 (or appropriate successor form) to be included as part of the letter of transmittal and return it to the paying agent, in order to provide the information and certification necessary to avoid backup withholding, unless an exemption applies and is established in a manner satisfactory to the paying agent.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld from cash payments to a U.S. holder pursuant to the merger under the backup withholding rules will generally be allowable as a refund or a credit against such U.S. holder’s U.S. Federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service. U.S. holders are urged to consult their independent tax advisors as to qualifications for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining the exemption.

The U.S. Federal income tax consequences described above are not intended to constitute a complete description of all tax consequences relating to the merger. Because individual circumstances may differ, each stockholder should consult the stockholder’s tax advisor regarding the applicability of the rules discussed above to the stockholder and the particular tax effects to the stockholder of the merger in light of such stockholder’s particular circumstances, the application of state, local and foreign tax laws, and, if applicable, the treatment of restricted stock units, performance stock units, company awards or any other matters relating to equity compensation or benefit plans (including the stock plans).

Regulatory Approvals

HSR Clearance.    Under the HSR Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, certain transactions, including the merger, may not be completed until notifications have been given and information furnished to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, which we refer to as the Antitrust Division, and the Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the FTC, and all statutory waiting period requirements have been satisfied. Completion of the merger is subject to the expiration or earlier termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act. The merger may not be completed until the expiration of a thirty (30) calendar day waiting period, which begins when the Company and Holdco file Premerger Notification and Report Forms under the HSR Act with the Antitrust Division and the FTC, unless such waiting period is earlier terminated by the Antitrust Division and the FTC. The Company and Holdco filed their Premerger Notification and Report Forms on April 23, 2018, in connection with the merger. On May 4, 2018, the FTC granted early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act.

Completion of the merger is further subject to notification or receipt of certain other regulatory approvals, including notification, clearance and/or approval from (1) the European Commission under the EU Merger Regulations, (2) the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority, (3) the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, or Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, of Germany, (4) the Israeli Antitrust Authority, (5) the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation, (6) the Competition Commission of South Africa and (7) the Turkish Competition Authority. In accordance with the merger agreement, filings in draft or final form have been made to each of these authorities.

-62-

There can be no assurance that all of the regulatory approvals described above, or any other regulatory approvals that might be required to consummate the merger, will be obtained and, if obtained, there can be no assurance as to the timing of any approvals, ability to obtain the approvals on satisfactory terms or the absence of any litigation challenging such approvals. There can also be no assurance that the Department of Justice, the FTC or any other governmental entity or any private party will not attempt to challenge the merger on antitrust grounds with respect to the approval of the merger, or the denial of the merger, and, in each case, if any such challenge is made, there can be no assurance as to the result. For a description of the parties’ obligations with respect to regulatory approvals related to the merger, see “The Merger Agreement—Cooperation; Efforts to Consummate.”

Litigation Related to the Merger

On May 17, 2018, putative class action lawsuits, Scarantino v. VeriFone Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00752-UNA, and Byrne v. VeriFone Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-02926, were filed against the Company and its directors in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, respectively. Each complaint alleges that the preliminary proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2018 in connection with the merger misrepresents and/or omits certain purportedly material information. The allegations relate to the Company’s financial projections, the valuation analyses performed by Qatalyst Partners, the background of the merger, and any potential conflicts of interest of the Company’s management or directors with respect to the merger. The complaints allege that such misrepresentations and/or omissions render the proxy statement false and misleading and accordingly allege violations of Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as Rule 14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The complaints seek, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the merger, costs of the action, including plaintiffs’ attorneys’ and experts’ fees, declaratory relief, and any other relief the court may deem just and proper. The defendants have not yet answered or otherwise responded to either complaint.

-63-

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

This section describes the material terms of the merger agreement. The description of the merger agreement in this section and elsewhere in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A and is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. This summary does not purport to be complete and may not contain all of the information about the merger agreement that is important to you. We encourage you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its entirety.

Explanatory Note Regarding the Merger Agreement

The merger agreement and this summary are included to provide you with information regarding its material terms. Factual disclosures about the Company contained in this proxy statement or in the Company’s public reports filed with the SEC may supplement, update or modify the factual disclosures about the Company contained in the merger agreement. The representations, warranties and covenants made in the merger agreement by the Company, Holdco and Merger Sub were made solely to the parties to, and solely for the purposes of, the merger agreement and as of specific dates and were qualified by and subject to important limitations agreed to by the Company, Holdco and Merger Sub in connection with negotiating the terms of the merger agreement. In particular, in your review of the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement and described in this summary, it is important to bear in mind that the representations and warranties were negotiated with the principal purposes of establishing the circumstances in which a party to the merger agreement may have the right not to consummate the merger if the representations and warranties of the other party prove to be untrue due to a change in circumstance or otherwise, and allocating risk between the parties to the merger agreement, rather than establishing matters as facts. The representations and warranties may also be subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from those generally applicable to stockholders and reports and documents filed with the SEC and in some cases were qualified by the matters contained in the disclosure letter that the Company delivered in connection with the merger agreement, which disclosures were not reflected in the merger agreement. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may have changed since the date of the merger agreement. Investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any description thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts of the Company, Holdco, Merger Sub or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates.

Effects of the Merger; Directors and Officers; Certificate of Incorporation; By-laws

The merger agreement provides that Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation in the merger. Following the merger, the Company will cease to be a publicly traded company and, as a result of the merger, will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco. Holdco and Merger Sub are owned by an investor group led by the private equity investment firm Francisco Partners and including British Columbia Investment Management Corporation. The merger will have the effects specified in the DGCL.

The members of the board of directors of Merger Sub immediately prior to the effective time will, from and after the effective time, be the members of the board of directors of the surviving corporation until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of the surviving corporation. The officers of the Company immediately prior to the effective time will, from and after the effective time, be the officers of the surviving corporation until their successors have been duly appointed or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of the surviving corporation.

-64-

At the effective time, the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation will be amended in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit A of the merger agreement, and will be the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation. The by-laws of Merger Sub, in effect immediately prior to the effective time, will be the by-laws of the surviving corporation, until changed or amended as provided therein or by applicable law.

Following the completion of the merger, the common stock will be delisted from the NYSE, deregistered under the Exchange Act and cease to be publicly traded.

Treatment of Common Stock and Equity Awards

Common Stock

At the effective time, by virtue of the merger and without any action on the part of the parties or any holder of any capital stock of the Company, each eligible share will be converted into the right to receive cash in the amount of $23.04 per share, without interest. At the effective time, the eligible shares will be canceled and will cease to exist, and each excluded share will also be canceled and will cease to exist, and no consideration will be payable for such excluded shares.

Vested Company Options

At the effective time, each vested Company option, other than any rollover equity awards will, automatically and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be canceled and will only entitle the holder of such vested Company option to receive (without interest), as soon as reasonably practicable after the effective time, an amount in cash equal to the product of the total number of shares subject to such vested Company option immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by the excess, if any, of the per share merger consideration over the exercise price per share of such vested Company option, less any tax withholdings. Any vested Company option which has an exercise price per share that is greater than or equal to the per share merger consideration will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

Unvested Company Options

At the effective time, each outstanding unvested option will be canceled and will only entitle the holder of such unvested Company option to receive the Company option replacement award. Each such Company option replacement award will be subject to the same vesting schedule and other terms and conditions (other than with respect to exercise) applicable to the corresponding unvested Company option immediately prior to the effective time. Any unvested Company option which has an exercise price per share that is greater than or equal to the per share merger consideration will be canceled at the effective time for no consideration or payment.

Rollover Equity Awards

At the effective time, holders of vested Company options or shares of common stock who are employed by the Company at or above the level of vice president and who have previously elected and agreed for such vested Company options or share of common stock will have their vested Company options or shares of common stock, as applicable, converted into common stock of Holdco. With respect to vested Company options, this conversion will be based on the in-the-money value of such options at the effective time.

Company Restricted Stock Units

At the effective time, each outstanding Company RSU will be canceled and converted into the right to receive a Company RSU replacement award. Each such Company RSU replacement award

-65-

will be subject to the same vesting schedule and other terms and conditions applicable to the corresponding Company RSUs immediately prior to the effective time.

Company Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

At the effective time, each Company P-RSU will be canceled and will only entitle the holder of such Company P-RSU to receive a Company P-RSU replacement award based on the actual performance through the Effective Time as determined by the Board’s compensation committee. Each such Company P-RSU replacement award will be subject to the same vesting schedule and other terms and conditions applicable to the corresponding Company P-RSU immediately prior to the effective time.

Company Deferred Stock Units

At the effective time, each outstanding Company DSU will be canceled and will only entitle the holder of such Company DSU to receive (without interest), as soon as reasonably practicable after the effective time (or such later time as required by Section 409A), an amount in cash equal to the number of shares subject to such Company DSU multiplied by the per share merger consideration, less any tax withholdings.

Exchange and Payment Procedures

At the effective time, or as promptly as possible thereafter, Holdco will deposit, or will cause to be deposited, with the paying agent cash in immediately available funds in the amount necessary to make payment of the aggregate per share merger consideration payable to the holders of eligible shares.

Promptly, and in any event within three (3) business days, after the effective time, each record holder of certificated eligible shares will be sent a letter of transmittal and instructions describing how such record holder may surrender his, her or its shares of common stock (or affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) in exchange for the applicable amount of per share merger consideration (less any tax withholdings).

You should not return your stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card, and you should not forward your stock certificates to the paying agent without a letter of transmittal.

Holders of book-entry eligible shares will not be required to deliver a certificate or an executed letter of transmittal to the paying agent to receive the per share merger consideration that such holder is entitled to receive as a result of the merger. With respect to any book-entry eligible shares of common stock not held through The Depository Trust Company, which we refer to as DTC, promptly, and in any event within three (3) business days after the effective time, the surviving corporation will cause the paying agent to provide or make available to each holder of record of such shares (i) a notice advising such holder of the effectiveness of the merger and (ii) a check in the amount of the applicable per share merger consideration payable to such holder in respect of such eligible shares (less any tax withholdings). With respect to any book-entry eligible shares held through DTC, the paying agent will transmit to DTC or its nominees on the closing date (or if the closing occurs after 8:30 a.m. (California Time) on the closing date, on the next business day), upon surrender of eligible shares held of record by DTC or its nominees in accordance with DTC’s customary surrender procedures, the aggregate per share merger consideration payable in respect of such eligible shares.

If you are a record holder of certificated shares of common stock, you will not be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration until you deliver a letter of transmittal that is duly executed and in proper form to the paying agent, and you must also surrender your stock certificate or certificates (or

-66-

affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) to the paying agent. In the event of a transfer of ownership of shares of common stock that is not registered in the transfer records of the Company, payment may be made to a transferee if the certificate formerly representing such shares is presented to the paying agent, accompanied by all documents reasonably required to evidence and effect such transfer and to evidence that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid or are not applicable.

No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash payable as the per share merger consideration upon your surrender of your book-entry shares or certificates.

Holdco, the surviving corporation and the paying agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold any applicable taxes from the per share merger consideration. Any sum that is withheld will be deemed to have been paid to the holder of shares with regard to whom it is withheld.

If you have lost a certificate, or if it has been stolen or destroyed, then before you will be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration, you will have to make an affidavit of the loss, theft or destruction, and, if required by Holdco, post a bond in such customary amount and upon such terms as may be required as indemnity against any claim that may be made with respect to such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate. These procedures will be described in the letter of transmittal and instructions that you will receive, which you should read carefully and in their entirety.

From and after the effective time, there will be no transfers on the stock transfer books of the Company of the shares of common stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the effective time. If, after the effective time, any certificate is presented to the surviving corporation, Holdco or the paying agent for transfer, it will be canceled and exchanged for the cash amount in immediately available funds to which the holder of the certificate is entitled pursuant to the merger agreement.

Any portion of the per share merger consideration deposited with the paying agent that remains unclaimed by stockholders one (1) year after the effective time will be delivered to Holdco. Holders of eligible shares who have not complied with the above-described exchange and payment procedures may thereafter only look to Holdco for payment of the per share merger consideration (less tax withholding) upon due surrender of certificates representing certificated shares of common stock (or affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) or book-entry shares, without any interest thereon.

None of Holdco, the surviving corporation, the paying agent or any other person will be liable to any former holder of common stock for any amount properly delivered to a public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law.

Representations and Warranties

Representations and Warranties of the Company

We made customary representations and warranties in the merger agreement with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications contained in the merger agreement, in the disclosure letter that the Company delivered in connection with the merger agreement or in certain reports filed with the SEC. These representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

-67-

Material Adverse Effect

Many of our representations and warranties are qualified by, among other things, exceptions relating to the absence of a “material adverse effect,” which means any effect, event, development, change, state of facts, condition, circumstance or occurrence, which we refer to collectively as effects,

-68-

that, individually or in the aggregate, is, or would reasonably be expected to be, materially adverse to the business, results of operations or financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided that, none of the following, and no change, event or occurrence arising out of, resulting from or attributable to any of the following, will be deemed to constitute a material adverse effect or be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred or would reasonably be expected to occur:

-69-

With respect to clauses (1), (2), (4) and (6) above, any such effect will be taken into account in determining whether a “material adverse effect” has occurred if it disproportionately adversely affects the Company and its subsidiaries compared to other companies of similar size operating in the industries in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate.

Representations and Warranties of Holdco and Merger Sub

The merger agreement also contains customary representations and warranties made by Holdco and Merger Sub that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications contained in the merger agreement and in the disclosure letter that Holdco and Merger Sub delivered to the Company in connection with the merger agreement. The representations and warranties of Holdco and Merger Sub relate to, among other things:

The representations and warranties in the merger agreement of each of the Company, Holdco and Merger Sub will not survive the consummation of the merger or the termination of the merger agreement pursuant to its terms.

Conduct of Our Business Pending the Merger

Under the merger agreement, we have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions in the merger agreement and the disclosure letter we delivered in connection with the merger agreement or as

-70-

required by a governmental entity or applicable law, between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time, unless Holdco gives its prior written approval (which cannot be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), our business and the business of our subsidiaries will be conducted in all material respects in the ordinary course, and we and our subsidiaries will use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause our businesses to preserve our business organizations substantially intact and maintain existing relations and goodwill with governmental entities, customers, suppliers, distributors, creditors, lessors, employees and business associates and keep available the services of our and our subsidiaries’ respective present officers, employees and agents.

Except as required by a governmental entity or applicable law, or pursuant to certain exceptions set forth in the merger agreement and the disclosure letter that we delivered in connection with the merger agreement, we will not, and we will not permit our subsidiaries to, take any of the following actions without Holdco’s written approval (which cannot be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed):

-71-

-72-

The merger agreement is not intended to give Holdco or Merger Sub, directly or indirectly, the right to control or direct our or our subsidiaries’ operations prior to the effective time. Prior to the effective time, each of Holdco and the Company will exercise, consistent with the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, control and supervision over their respective businesses.

Go-Shop; Acquisition Proposals; Change in Recommendation

During the period beginning on the date of the merger agreement and continuing until 11:59 p.m. (California Time) on May 24, 2018, which we refer to as the go-shop period, the Company and its subsidiaries and their representatives have the right to:

Beginning at 12:00 a.m. (California Time) on May 25, 2018 until the earlier of the effective time and the termination of the merger agreement, the Company must cease and may not engage in any of the actions permitted during the go-shop period. However, prior to obtaining stockholder approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, in response to an unsolicited written acquisition proposal that the Board believes in good faith is bona fide and which the Board, after consulting with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, has determined (A) constitutes a superior proposal or would reasonably be expected to constitute a superior proposal and (B) that the failure to take action would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, the Company may:

-73-

Except as permitted by the terms of the merger agreement described below, we have agreed that the Board and each committee of the Board will not:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to obtaining stockholder approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the Board may:

However, a change of recommendation in response to a superior proposal or intervening event or action to terminate the merger agreement may not be made until the Company has given Holdco

-74-

written notice of such action, which we refer to as the initial notice, five (5) business days in advance, setting forth in writing that the Board intends to consider whether to take such action and a description of the superior proposal or intervening event, as applicable. During such five (5) business day period, the Company and its representatives must negotiate with Holdco (to the extent Holdco wishes to negotiate) to make any revisions to the terms of the merger agreement as would permit the Board to not effect a change of recommendation or terminate the merger agreement. Any material amendment to any acquisition proposal will be deemed to be a new acquisition proposal, except that the obligation to give advance written notice and negotiate with respect to the amendment is reduced to three (3) business days. Only if following such negotiations the Board determines in good faith that (a) in the case of a superior proposal, the superior proposal would continue to constitute a superior proposal, and (b) in the case of an intervening event, the failure to effect a change of recommendation in response to such intervening event would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, in each case, is the Board permitted to effect such change of recommendation or terminate the merger agreement, as applicable.

An “acquisition proposal” means (a) any proposal, offer, inquiry or indication of interest relating to a merger, joint venture, partnership, consolidation, dissolution, liquidation, tender offer, recapitalization, reorganization, spin-off, share exchange, business combination or similar transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to which the stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction hold less than 80% of each class of outstanding voting and equity interests of the resulting or surviving entity or (b) any acquisition by any person or group resulting in, or any proposal, offer, inquiry or indication of interest that if consummated would result in, any person or group becoming the beneficial owner of, directly or indirectly, in one or a series of related transactions, more than 20% or more of the total voting power or of any class of equity securities of the Company, or more than 20% of the consolidated net revenues, net income or total assets of the Company, in each case other than the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

An “intervening event” means any effect occurring after the date of the merger agreement that was not known to, or reasonably foreseeable by, the Board prior to execution of the merger agreement, that becomes known to the Board after execution of the merger agreement and prior to approval by the stockholders; provided, that none of the following will constitute an intervening event: (i) the receipt, existence or terms of an acquisition proposal or any matter relating thereto or (ii) changes in the stock price of the common stock (it being understood that any underlying cause of such changes may be taken into account for purposes of determining whether an intervening event has occurred).

A “superior proposal” means a bona fide written acquisition proposal that would result in a person or group, other than Holdco or any of its subsidiaries or controlled affiliates, becoming the beneficial owner of, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the total voting power of the equity securities of the Company (or of the surviving entity in a merger involving the Company, as applicable) or more than 50% of the consolidated net revenues, net income or total assets of the Company that the Board has determined in good faith after consultation with outside legal counsel and its financial advisor that is reasonably likely to be consummated in accordance with its terms, taking into account all legal, regulatory and financial aspects of the proposal, the identity of the person(s) making the proposal, the sources of and terms of any financing, financing market conditions, and the timing of such consummation, and if consummated, would result in a transaction more favorable to the stockholders from a financial point of view, than the merger after taking into account any revisions to the terms of the merger agreement.

Stockholders Meeting

We are required to take all action necessary to convene and hold a meeting of our stockholders as promptly as reasonably practicable after the execution of the merger agreement, and in any event no

-75-

later than thirty (30) days after the filing of the definitive proxy statement to consider and vote upon the approval of adoption of the merger agreement (but in no event will such meeting be required to be held prior to five (5) business days following the expiration of the go-shop period). We may not postpone or adjourn the special meeting except (A) if there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum, (B) if the Company is required to postpone or adjourn the special meeting by applicable law, order of a governmental entity or a request from the SEC or its staff or (C) if there has been a change of recommendation and the Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that it is necessary or appropriate to postpone or adjourn the special meeting in order to give the stockholders sufficient time to evaluate any information or disclosure that the Company has made available to such stockholders, in which case the Company may postpone or adjourn the special meeting one (1) time, but only for such period as the Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is necessary or appropriate to give the stockholders sufficient time to evaluate such information or disclosure, which in any event may not exceed five (5) business days. Unless the Board has made a change of recommendation as specifically permitted by the merger agreement (described under “The Merger Agreement—Go-Shop; Acquisition Proposals; Change in Recommendation” beginning on page 73), the Board will recommend the adoption of the merger agreement and take all lawful action to solicit the adoption of the merger agreement.

Cooperation; Efforts to Consummate

We and Holdco will cooperate with each other and use (and cause our respective subsidiaries to use) our respective reasonable best efforts to take or cause to be taken all actions, and do or cause to be done all things, reasonably necessary, proper or advisable to satisfy the conditions to closing described under “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Merger” beginning on page 80 and to consummate and make effective the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement as soon as practicable, including preparing and filing as promptly as reasonably practicable all documentation to effect all necessary applications, notices, reports and other filings and to obtain as promptly as practicable all consents, registrations, approvals, permits and authorizations necessary or advisable to be obtained from any third party or any governmental entity in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. However, the Company is not required to proffer or agree to incur any liabilities or make any sale, divestiture, license disposition or holding separate of, or any other limitation with respect to existing relationships, contracts, assets, product lines or businesses or interests therein of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, unless the effectiveness of such action is conditioned upon the closing.

Subject to applicable laws and the terms and conditions set forth in the merger agreement, we and Holdco:

-76-

Holdco is primarily responsible for directing the process by which the parties will seek to avoid or eliminate impediments under any applicable antitrust or competition laws in the United States and will take the lead in and control all communications with federal, state, local or foreign judiciary or governmental entities with jurisdiction over enforcement of any applicable antitrust law, which we refer to as governmental antitrust entities, subject to good faith consultations with the Company. We and Holdco have also agreed to keep each other apprised of the status of matters relating to completion of the merger.

In addition, each of the Company (with respect to (i) and (iv) below) and Holdco agrees to take or cause to be taken the following actions:

-77-

Financing and Financing Cooperation

Holdco must take (or cause to be taken) all actions and do (or cause to be done) all things necessary, proper or advisable to obtain the equity financing on the terms and conditions as set forth in the equity commitment letter and must use its reasonable best efforts to arrange the debt financing and obtain the financing contemplated thereby as promptly as reasonably practicable on the terms and conditions set forth in the debt commitment letter. Holdco and Merger Sub will fully pay, or cause to be fully paid, all commitment or other fees arising pursuant to the debt commitment letter as and when they become due. In the event any portion of the debt financing becomes unavailable on the terms and conditions set forth in the debt commitment letter Holdco will obtain alternative financing on terms no less favorable than those set forth in the debt commitment letter. Holdco and Merger Sub may not permit any amendment or modification to, or any waiver of any provision or remedy pursuant to, the equity commitment letter or debt commitment letter if such action would or could reasonably be expected to (i) reduce (A) the aggregate amount of or the net proceeds to Holdco from the debt financing (unless the equity financing is increased by an equivalent amount or certain equity financing representations in the merger agreement remain true and correct after taking into account such reduction) or (B) the aggregate amount of the equity financing; (ii) impose new or additional conditions precedent (except in connection with any “flex” provisions contained in the debt commitment letter) to the funding of the debt or equity financing, in a manner that would or could reasonably be expected to (A) delay or prevent the consummation of the merger, or (B) make the timely funding of the debt or equity financing less likely to occur in any respect; or (iii) adversely impact the ability of Holdco, Merger Sub or the Company (solely with respect to the equity commitment letter), to enforce its rights against the other parties to the equity commitment letter or debt commitment letter or the definitive agreements with respect thereto.

Prior to the closing, the Company will use its reasonable best efforts to provide to Holdco and Merger Sub, and will cause each of its subsidiaries to use their reasonable best efforts to provide, and will use reasonable best efforts to cause its representatives to provide, all cooperation reasonably requested by Holdco that is customary in connection with the arrangement of the debt financing, subject to certain exceptions.

The Company has also agreed to deliver to Holdco at least one (1) business day prior to the anticipated closing date, a customary payoff letter or letters with respect to the repayment at the effective time to satisfy in full all indebtedness outstanding under the Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2018, by and among VeriFone, Inc., VeriFone Intermediate

-78-

Holdings, Inc., the other loan parties party thereto, the lender parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (including the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement that is a part thereof) and, if any, all prepayment penalties, premiums and breakage costs that become payable upon such repayment and any other fees or expenses outstanding thereunder.

Holdco has agreed to reimburse the Company for all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred by the Company or its subsidiaries or their respective representatives, and to indemnify them from and against all losses incurred by them, in connection with their cooperation in the arrangement of any debt financing or the termination of existing indebtedness.

The obtaining of any debt financing is not a condition to closing.

Employee Benefits Matters

Holdco agrees that, during the period commencing at the effective time and ending one (1) year thereafter, Holdco must provide, or cause to be provided, to each employee of the Company and its subsidiaries who continues to remain employed with the Company or its subsidiaries immediately following the effective time (whom we refer to as the continuing employees) (i) base salary or base wage that is no less favorable than the base salary or base wage provided by the Company and its subsidiaries to such continuing employee immediately prior to the effective time, (ii) target annual cash incentive opportunities (excluding equity-based compensation) that are no less favorable than those provided by the Company and its subsidiaries to such continuing employee immediately prior to the effective time, (iii) employee benefits (other than defined benefit pension, deferred compensation, severance, equity based, post-termination or retiree welfare benefits) that are substantially comparable in the aggregate to those provided by the Company to the continuing employees immediately prior to the effective time, and (iv) severance benefits that are no less favorable than the severance benefits provided by the Company to such continuing employee immediately prior to the effective time. Holdco will cause the surviving corporation to maintain the existing Company benefit plans that are health and welfare or retirement plans or cause such employees to become eligible for comparable benefit plans that are not Company benefit plans.

With respect to any new benefit plans in which the continuing employees become eligible to participate, Holdco will use commercially reasonable efforts to (i) cause any pre-existing conditions or limitations and eligibility waiting periods under any new Company benefit plans providing health benefits in the plan year in which the effective time occurs to be waived with respect to the continuing employees and their eligible dependents to the extent waived or satisfied under the analogous Company benefit plan, (ii) give each continuing employee credit for the plan year in which the effective time occurs towards applicable deductibles and annual out-of-pocket limits for medical expenses incurred prior to the effective time for which payment has been made and (iii) give each continuing employee service credit for such continuing employee’s employment with the Company and its subsidiaries for purposes of vesting, benefit accrual (for purposes of vacation benefits only) and eligibility to participate under each applicable Holdco benefit plan, as if such service had been performed with surviving corporation, Holdco or their relevant affiliate, as applicable, except for benefit accrual under defined benefit pension plans or any purpose under any equity-based plan or arrangement entered into after the effective time other than the replacement awards or to the extent it would result in a duplication of benefits.

If the effective time occurs prior to the time when bonuses are paid with respect to the Company’s 2018 fiscal year, the compensation committee of the Board will in its discretion determine allocations in respect of the Company’s annual incentive cash bonus plans for the 2018 performance year, which we refer to as the 2018 annual bonus plan. Following the effective time, Holdco will (or will cause the surviving corporation to) cause such bonuses under the 2018 bonus plan to be paid in accordance with

-79-

the determinations of the compensation committee of the Board. Such payments will be made in a manner consistent with the Company’s historical timing for making bonus payments under its annual bonus plans, but no later than December 31, 2018. Payment of bonuses will be conditioned upon each continuing employee’s continued employment with the Company or one of its subsidiaries through the payment date, or if the employee experiences a qualifying termination prior to the payment date.

The Company will take all actions necessary to ensure that from and after the effective time, neither Holdco nor the surviving corporation will be required to deliver shares of common stock or other capital stock of the Company to any person pursuant to or in settlement of Company equity awards.

Delisting and Deregistration

The Company will cooperate with Holdco and use reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and do or cause to be done all things, reasonably necessary, proper or advisable on its part under applicable laws and rules and policies of the NYSE to enable the termination by the surviving corporation of the listing of common stock on the NYSE and the deregistration of the common stock under the Exchange Act as promptly as practicable after the effective time.

Conditions to the Merger

The respective obligations of the Company, Holdco and Merger Sub to consummate the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver at or prior to closing of the following conditions:

The obligations of Holdco and Merger Sub to effect the merger are also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by Holdco at or prior to closing of the following conditions:

-80-

Our obligation to effect the merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by us at or prior to the closing of the following conditions:

The conditions to each of the parties’ obligations to complete the merger are for the sole benefit of each such party and may be waived by each such party in whole or in part (to the extent permitted by applicable law).

Termination

We and Holdco may, by mutual written consent, terminate the merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to the effective time, notwithstanding any adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders.

The merger agreement may also be terminated and the merger abandoned at any time prior to the effective time as follows:

-81-

provided that the termination rights set forth above will not be available to either the Company or Holdco, respectively, if such party has breached any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements under the merger agreement and such breach proximately contributed to the failure of a condition to the consummation of the merger;

-82-

Termination Fees

Termination Fees Payable by the Company

If the merger agreement is terminated in connection with a superior proposal termination event during the go-shop period, we will be required to pay Holdco a termination fee of $33.3 million. A termination fee of $86.6 million would be payable by us:

Holdco Termination Fee Payable

In the event that the Company terminates the merger agreement due to a Holdco breach termination event, a failure to close termination event or a termination date termination event, if the Company would have been entitled to terminate the merger agreement for a Holdco breach termination event, Holdco must pay the Company a termination fee of $186.6 million.

-83-

Fees and Expenses

If Holdco terminates the merger agreement for a Company breach termination event and prior to such time, a bona fide acquisition proposal has been made to the Company or any person has publicly announced and not publicly withdrawn an intention to make an acquisition proposal with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries, then the Company must pay to Holdco up to $4 million of its reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred by Holdco, Merger Sub, the guarantors or their respective affiliates in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Any payment of Holdco’s expenses will be credited against any termination fee that may become payable under the terms of the merger agreement.

Remedies

Except with respect to liability or damage resulting from a willful and material breach of the merger agreement, if the merger agreement is terminated as set forth above and the Holdco termination fee is paid to us, the Holdco termination fee will be our sole and exclusive remedy for monetary damages against Holdco or Merger Sub pursuant to the merger agreement.

The parties are entitled to injunctions to prevent breaches of the merger agreement and to enforce specifically the terms of the merger agreement in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. We are a third-party beneficiary to the investor group’s equity commitment letter which entitles us to cause the investor group’s investors to fund their equity commitments pursuant to the terms and conditions of the equity commitment letter. In addition, the investor group has provided the Company with a limited guarantee in favor of the Company, which guarantees the payment of the Holdco termination fee and certain reimbursement obligations that may be owed by Holdco to the Company pursuant to the merger agreement.

Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance

Director and Officer Liability

For a period of six (6) years after the effective time, Holdco and the surviving corporation will indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law and the Company’s organizational documents in effect on the date of the merger agreement, each of the Company’s present and former directors and officers against liabilities (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, arising out of or related to such director’s or officer’s service as a director or officer of the Company or its subsidiaries (or services performed at our or our subsidiaries’ request) at or prior to the effective time (including in connection with the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and actions to enforce such indemnification or advancement rights).

Prior to the effective time, the Company will (or if the Company is unable to, Holdco will cause the surviving corporation to) obtain and fully pay the premium for “tail” insurance policies for the extension of (i) the directors’ and officers’ liability coverage of the Company’s existing directors’ and officers’ insurance policies, and (ii) the Company’s existing fiduciary liability insurance policies, in each case for a claims reporting or discovery period of six (6) years from and after the effective time. Any such policies must have terms, conditions, retentions and limits of liability that are at least as favorable to the insureds as provided in the Company’s existing policies as of the date of the merger agreement. The annual premium of the policies is subject to a cap of 300% of the last annual premium paid by the Company. The present and former directors and officers of the Company will have the right to enforce the provisions of the merger agreement relating to their indemnification.

-84-

Modification or Amendment; Waiver

Subject to applicable law and the terms of the merger agreement, at any time prior to the effective time, the parties to the merger agreement may amend, modify or waive provisions of the merger agreement in writing and signed, in the case of an amendment or modification, by a written instrument signed by Holdco, Merger Sub and the Company, or in the case of a waiver, by the party against whom it is to be effective. Holdco, Merger Sub and the Company must obtain the written consent of any of the debt financing parties prior to entering into any amendment, supplement or waiver to any provision of the merger agreement that would be materially adverse to the debt financing parties.

-85-

ADVISORY VOTE ON MERGER-RELATED COMPENSATION FOR THE COMPANY’S NAMED

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (PROPOSAL 2)

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the applicable SEC rules issued thereunder, which were enacted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which we refer to as the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company is required to submit a proposal to the Company’s stockholders for a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation that the Company’s named executive officers may be entitled to receive from the Company that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger.

The compensation that the Company’s named executive officers may be entitled to receive from the Company that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger is summarized and included under the heading “The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger—Golden Parachute Compensation” beginning on page 57 of this proxy statement. That summary includes all compensation and benefits that may be paid or become payable to the Company’s named executive officers by the Company that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger.

The Board encourages you to review carefully the named executive officer merger-related compensation information disclosed in this proxy statement.

The Board recommends that our stockholders approve the following resolution, on a non-binding, advisory basis:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company’s named executive officers, in connection with the merger, and the agreements or understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid or become payable, in each case as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K in “The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger—Golden Parachute Compensation” are hereby APPROVED.”

The approval of the proposal to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the merger requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote at the special meeting. The vote on the advisory proposal concerning merger-related compensation arrangements for our named executive officers is a vote separate and apart from the vote to adopt the merger agreement. Accordingly, you may vote not to approve the advisory proposal concerning merger-related compensation arrangements for our named executive officers and vote to adopt the merger agreement. Because the vote on the advisory proposal concerning merger-related compensation arrangements for our named executive officers is advisory only, it will not be binding on either the Company or Holdco. Accordingly, if the merger agreement is adopted and the merger is completed, the compensation will be payable, subject only to the conditions applicable thereto, regardless of the outcome of the non-binding, advisory vote of our stockholders.

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the named executive officer merger-related compensation proposal.

-86-

VOTE ON ADJOURNMENT (PROPOSAL 3)

The stockholders are being asked to approve a proposal that will give the Board the authority to adjourn the special meeting if (A) there are not holders of a sufficient number of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy at the special meeting to constitute a quorum, (B) the Company is required to postpone or adjourn the special meeting by applicable law, order of a governmental entity or a request from the SEC or its staff or (C) if there has been a change of recommendation and the Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that it is necessary or appropriate to postpone or adjourn the special meeting in order to give the stockholders sufficient time to evaluate any information or disclosure that the Company has made available to such stockholders, in which case the Company may postpone or adjourn the special meeting one (1) time, but only for such period as the Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is necessary or appropriate to give the stockholders sufficient time to evaluate such information or disclosure, which in any event may not exceed five (5) business days.

If you sign and return a proxy and do not indicate how you wish to vote on any proposal, or if you sign and return a proxy and you indicate that you wish to vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement but do not indicate a choice on the adjournment proposal, your shares of common stock will be voted in favor of the adjournment proposal.

The Company does not anticipate calling a vote on this proposal if Proposal 1 is adopted by the requisite number of shares of common stock at the special meeting.

The vote on the adjournment proposal is a vote separate and apart from the vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Accordingly, you may vote to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and vote not to approve the adjournment proposal or vice versa.

Approval of the adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast with respect to this proposal.

The Board unanimously recommends that the shareowners of the Company vote “FOR” the adjournment proposal, if a vote on the adjournment proposal is called.

-87-

MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK

Our common stock is listed for trading on the NYSE under the symbol “PAY.” The table below shows the high and low sales price of common stock, for the periods indicated, as reported on the NYSE.

The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on April 9, 2018, the last trading day immediately prior to the announcement of the merger, was $15.00 per share. On May 18, 2018, the most recent practicable trading day before this proxy statement was mailed to our stockholders, the closing price for our common stock on the NYSE was $22.83 per share. You are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for our common stock in connection with voting your shares of common stock.

-88-

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The table below presents certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock as of May 17, 2018, by (i) each entity we know to own 5% or more of shares of common stock; (ii) each of our directors and named executive officers; and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power over securities. Except in cases where community property laws apply or as indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe that each stockholder identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power over all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by the stockholder. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 110,739,583 shares of common stock outstanding as of May 17, 2018. Shares of common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 17, 2018, and shares of RSUs which are scheduled to be released within 60 days of May 17, 2018 are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options or RSUs for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The information contained in this section does not include information about any named executive officer who is no longer employed by the Company because the Company does not have access to information relating to any such person’s holdings as of May 17, 2018. Unless indicated below, the address of each individual listed below is c/o VeriFone Systems, Inc., 88 W. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, California 95134.

-89-

-90-

-91-

APPRAISAL RIGHTS

If the merger is completed, stockholders who do not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and who properly demand appraisal for their shares of common stock will be entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL, provided that they comply with the conditions established therein.

Under the DGCL, if you do not wish to accept the per share merger consideration provided for in the merger agreement, you have the right to seek appraisal of your shares of common stock and to receive payment in cash for the fair value of your shares of common stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be fair value. The “fair value” of your shares of common stock as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery may be more or less than, or the same as, the per share merger consideration that you are otherwise entitled to receive under the terms of the merger agreement. These rights are known as appraisal rights. Stockholders who do not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and who properly demand and perfect appraisal for their shares of common stock in compliance with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL will be entitled to appraisal rights. Strict compliance with the statutory procedures in Section 262 of the DGCL is required. Failure to follow precisely any of the statutory requirements will result in the loss of your appraisal rights.

This section is intended only as a brief summary of certain provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL procedures that a stockholder must follow in order to demand and perfect appraisal rights. This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all applicable requirements and the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 262 of the DGCL, the full text of which as of the date hereof appears in Annex C to this proxy statement. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice, nor does it constitute a recommendation that stockholders exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL.

Under Section 262 of the DGCL, where a merger agreement is to be submitted for adoption at a meeting of stockholders, the Company must notify the stockholders who were stockholders of record on the record date for notice of such meeting with respect to shares of common stock for which appraisal rights are available, not less than 20 days before the meeting to vote on the merger, that appraisal rights will be available. A copy of Section 262 of the DGCL must be included with such notice. This proxy statement constitutes our notice to stockholders that appraisal rights are available in connection with the merger and the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL as of the date hereof is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C, in compliance with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL. If you wish to consider exercising your appraisal rights, you should carefully review the text of Section 262 of the DGCL. Failure to comply timely and properly with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of your appraisal rights under the DGCL. Moreover, because of the complexity of the procedures for exercising the right to seek appraisal of shares of common stock, we believe that if a stockholder is considering exercising such rights, such stockholder should seek the advice of legal counsel.

If you wish to demand appraisal of your shares of common stock, you must satisfy each of the following conditions. You must deliver to the Company a written demand for appraisal of your shares of common stock before the vote is taken to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting, which written demand must reasonably inform us of the identity of the holder of record of shares of common stock who intends to demand appraisal of his, her or its shares of common stock; and you must not vote or submit a proxy in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

If you fail to comply with either of these conditions and the merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive payment for your shares of common stock as provided for in the merger agreement,

-92-

but you will have no appraisal rights with respect to your shares of common stock. A holder of shares of common stock wishing to exercise appraisal rights must hold of record the shares of common stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to hold the shares of common stock of record through the effective time. A proxy that is submitted and does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, and it will result in the loss of the stockholder’s right of appraisal and will nullify any previously delivered written demand for appraisal. Therefore, a stockholder who submits a proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must either submit a proxy containing instructions to vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement or abstain from voting on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Voting against or failing to vote for the proposal to adopt the merger agreement by itself does not constitute a demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262 of the DGCL. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.

All demands for appraisal should be addressed to our Secretary at c/o VeriFone Systems, Inc., 88 W. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, must be delivered to the Company before the vote is taken to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting, and must be executed by, or on behalf of, the record holder of the shares of common stock. The demand must reasonably inform the Company of the identity of the stockholder and the intention of the stockholder to demand appraisal of the “fair value” of his, her or its shares of common stock. A stockholder’s failure to deliver to the Company the written demand for appraisal prior to the taking of the vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting will result in the loss of appraisal rights.

Only a holder of record of shares of common stock is entitled to demand an appraisal of the shares of common stock registered in that holder’s name. Accordingly, to be effective, a demand for appraisal by a stockholder of shares of common stock must be made by, or on behalf of, the record stockholder. The demand should set forth, fully and correctly, the record stockholder’s name as it appears on the stockholder’s stock certificate(s) or in the transfer agent’s records and, in the case of uncertificated shares of common stock, should specify the stockholder’s mailing address and the number of shares of common stock registered in the stockholder’s name. The demand must state that the person intends thereby to demand appraisal of the stockholder’s shares of common stock in connection with the merger. The demand cannot be made by the beneficial owner if he or she does not also hold the shares of common stock of record. The beneficial holder must, in such cases, have the registered owner, such as a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, submit the required demand in respect of those shares of common stock. If you hold your shares of common stock through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by the nominee and obtaining notice of the effective date of the merger.

If shares of common stock are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of a demand for appraisal must be made in that capacity. If shares of common stock are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand must be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, he or she is acting as agent for the record owner or owners. A record owner, such as a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, who holds shares of common stock as a nominee for others, may exercise his or her right of appraisal with respect to the shares of common stock held for one or more beneficial owners, while not exercising this right for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written demand should state the number of shares of common stock as to which appraisal is sought. Where no number of shares of common stock is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares of common stock held in the name of the record owner. If a

-93-

stockholder holds shares of common stock through a broker who in turn holds the shares through a central securities depository nominee such as Cede & Co., a demand for appraisal of such shares of common stock must be made by or on behalf of the depository nominee and must identify the depository nominee as record owner.

Within ten days after the effective time, the surviving corporation must give notice of the date that the merger became effective to each of the Company’s record stockholders who has complied with Section 262 of the DGCL and who did not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. At any time within sixty (60) days after the effective time, any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined a proceeding as a named party may withdraw the stockholder’s demand and accept the consideration specified by the merger agreement for that stockholder’s shares of common stock by delivering to the surviving corporation a written withdrawal of the demand for appraisal. However, any such attempt to withdraw the demand made more than sixty (60) days after the effective time will require written approval of the surviving corporation. No appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, with such approval conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just; provided, however, that any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined such a proceeding as a named party may withdraw such stockholder’s demand for appraisal and accept the per share merger consideration offered in the merger within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the merger. If the surviving corporation does not approve a request to withdraw a demand for appraisal when that approval is required, or, except with respect to any stockholder who withdraws such stockholder’s right to appraisal in accordance with the proviso in the immediately preceding sentence, if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not approve the dismissal of an appraisal proceeding, the stockholder will be entitled to receive only the appraised value of his, her or its shares of common stock determined in any such appraisal proceeding, which value could be less than, equal to or more than the consideration offered pursuant to the merger agreement.

Within 120 days after the effective time, but not thereafter, either the surviving corporation or any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL and is entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares of common stock held by all such stockholders. Upon the filing of the petition by a stockholder, service of a copy of such petition will be made upon the surviving corporation. The surviving corporation has no obligation to file such a petition, has no present intention to file a petition and holders should not assume that the surviving corporation will file a petition. Accordingly, it is the obligation of the stockholder to initiate all necessary petitions to perfect their appraisal rights in respect of shares of common stock within the time prescribed in Section 262 of the DGCL and the failure of a stockholder to file such a petition within the period specified in Section 262 of the DGCL could nullify the stockholder’s previous written demand for appraisal. In addition, within 120 days after the effective time, any stockholder who has properly complied with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL and who did not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will be entitled to receive from the surviving corporation, upon written request, a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares of common stock not voted in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares of common stock. The statement must be mailed within ten days after such written request has been received by the surviving corporation or within ten days after the expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later. A person who is the beneficial owner of shares of common stock held either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person’s own name, file a petition for appraisal or request from the surviving corporation such statement.

If a petition for appraisal is duly filed by a stockholder and a copy of the petition is delivered to the surviving corporation, then the surviving corporation will be obligated, within twenty (20) days after

-94-

receiving service of a copy of the petition, to file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of their shares of common stock and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares of common stock have not been reached. After notice to stockholders who have demanded appraisal from the Register in Chancery, if such notice is ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Court of Chancery will conduct a hearing upon the petition and determine those stockholders who have complied with Section 262 of the DGCL and who have become entitled to the appraisal rights provided by Section 262 of the DGCL. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares of common stock to submit their stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with that direction, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to that stockholder.

After determination of the stockholders entitled to appraisal of their shares of common stock, the Delaware Court of Chancery will appraise the shares of common stock, determining their fair value as of the effective time after taking into account all relevant factors exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. When the fair value has been determined, the Delaware Court of Chancery will direct the payment of such value upon surrender by those stockholders of the certificates representing their shares of common stock. Unless the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective time and the date of payment of the judgment.

You should be aware that an investment banking opinion as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received in a sale transaction, such as the merger, is not an opinion as to fair value under Section 262 of the DGCL. Although we believe that the per share merger consideration is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and stockholders should recognize that such an appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the per share merger consideration. Moreover, we do not anticipate offering more than the per share merger consideration to any stockholder exercising appraisal rights and reserve the right to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that, for purposes of Section 262 of the DGCL, the “fair value” of a share of common stock is less than the per share merger consideration. In determining “fair value,” the Court is required to take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered and that “[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.” The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts which could be ascertained as of the date of the merger which throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 of the DGCL provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court also stated that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.” In addition, the Delaware courts have decided that the statutory appraisal remedy, depending on the factual circumstances, may or may not be a dissenting stockholder’s exclusive remedy.

-95-

Costs of the appraisal proceeding (which do not include attorneys’ fees or the fees and expenses of experts) may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and imposed upon the surviving corporation and the stockholders participating in the appraisal proceeding by the Delaware Court of Chancery, as it deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon the application of a stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and the fees and expenses of experts used in the appraisal proceeding, to be charged pro rata against the value of all shares of common stock entitled to appraisal. Any stockholder who demanded appraisal rights will not, after the effective time, be entitled to vote shares of common stock subject to that demand for any purpose or to receive payments of dividends or any other distribution with respect to those shares of common stock, other than with respect to payment as of a record date prior to the effective time. If no petition for appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective time, or if the stockholder has otherwise not validly made or has effectively withdrawn a demand for appraisal rights, then the right of that stockholder to appraisal will cease and that stockholder will be entitled to receive the $23.04 per share in cash, without interest thereon, for his, her or its shares of common stock pursuant to the merger agreement. Inasmuch as the Company has no obligation to file such a petition, and the Company has no present intention to do so, any holder of shares of common stock who desires such a petition to be filed is advised to file it on a timely basis. A stockholder will fail to perfect, or effectively lose, the holder’s right to appraisal if no petition for appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective date of the merger. In addition, as indicated above, a stockholder may withdraw his, her or its demand for appraisal in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL and accept the per share merger consideration offered pursuant to the merger agreement.

Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of a stockholder’s statutory appraisal rights.

In view of the complexity of Section 262 of the DGCL, stockholders who may wish to pursue appraisal rights should consult their legal and financial advisors.

-96-

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials addressed to those stockholders. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce the volume of duplicate information and reduce printing and postage costs.

If you and others who share your mailing address own common stock in street name, meaning through bank or brokerage accounts, you may have received a notice that your household will receive only one annual report and proxy statement or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials from each company whose stock is held in such accounts. Unless you responded that you did not want to participate in householding, you were deemed to have consented to it and a single copy of our proxy statement and annual report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials has been sent to your address.

We will promptly deliver separate copies of our proxy statement and annual report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials at the request of any stockholder who is in a household that participates in the householding of our proxy materials. You may send your request by mail to our Investor Relations department at VeriFone Systems, Inc., 88 W. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134 or by telephone at (408) 232-7800. If you currently receive multiple copies of the Company’s proxy materials and would like to participate in householding, please contact our Investor Relations department at the address or phone number described above.

-97-