|
|
|
Recognizing your needs. Realizing your vision. |
|
|
Carmel Container Systems Ltd.
(Carmel)
Opinion for Purchase Price Allocation (PPA)
Prepared for
Hadera Paper Ltd.
To:
Hadera Paper Ltd.
(Hereinafter: Hadera Paper)
Dear Sir,
As per your request, we have
conducted a review and valuation of assets and liabilities (both tangible and intangible)
of Carmel Container Systems Ltd. (hereinafter Carmel and/or The
Company), as of August 31st, 2008 (valuation date and/or
transaction date) as a result of the increase in Carmels shares.
The objective of this valuation is to
provide our opinion of the purchase price allocation (hereinafter PPA and/or
economical value) of the intangible assets, tangible assets and tangible
liabilities of Carmel at the valuation date. It should be noted that valuating the
companys intangible asset goodwill (if such exists) is not the objective of
this valuation but rather a byproduct of this opinion and other purchase information
(purchase price, accounting owners equity at purchase date and more).
We understand that our findings will
serve to aid your management in allocating the purchase price determined in the
transaction to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities being purchased, for the
purpose of financial reporting in conjunction with generally accepted accounting
practices. This valuation report is intended solely for information and use by Hadera
Paper management, its independent auditors and legal counsel of company involved. This
opinion should not be used, distributed, quoted or referred to in any manner for any other
purpose, including for listing, purchase or sale of securities and it may not be submitted
or referred to, in whole or in part, in any registration report or any other document;
however, it may be referred to in documents submitted to stock exchange authorities,
subject to our explicit written consent. With regard to this matter, we are aware that
findings in our opinion will be used for public reports submitted to the Securities
Authority.
The fair value estimate must take
into consideration the price of similar assets and the result of valuation method, if they
were available in this case. The method selected to set the fair value must be at par with
the definition of fair value, as defined in the GAAP. The method must include assumptions
that the market participants will use their own estimates for fair value, future revenues,
future expenses and discount rates (if applicable).
2
For the purpose of financial
reporting, the fair value of an asset is defined as the amount at which the asset may be
purchased or sold in a transaction between willing buyer(s) and willing seller(s), as
opposed to the case of forced sale or company dissolution. Market prices bid on active
markets are the best testimony to fair value, and will be used as basis for measuring, if
available. If no market price is available, the fair value estimate should be close to the
price at which we expect the asset to be purchased or sold in a current transaction
between willing buyer(s) and willing seller(s), and the price will be based on the best
available information under these circumstances.
The fair value estimate must take
into consideration the price of similar assets and the result of valuation method, if they
were available in this case. The method selected to set the fair value must be at par with
the definition of fair value, as defined in the GAAP. The method must include assumptions
that the market participants will use their own estimates for fair value, future revenues,
future expenses and discount rates (if applicable).
For the purpose of this work, the
company has given us historical audited financial statements, unaudited financial
information, valuation conducted by Brenfeld International Appraisers Ltd. and other
documents and information.
In formulating its opinion,
Giza-Singer-Even Ltd. (Giza-Singer-Even) assumed and relied on the accuracy,
completeness and currency of information obtained from the company, including financial
data and forward-looking information. Giza-Singer-Even is not responsible for independent
examination of the information it has obtained, and therefore has not conducted
independent examination of said information, other than general, prima facie
reasonability tests.
In this opinion we have made
reference to forward-looking information provided to us by Company management.
Forward-looking information is uncertain, future-oriented information based on information
available to the Company as of the valuation date, including expectations or intentions by
Company management as of the valuation date. Should these estimations by company
management fail to materialize, actual results may materially differ from results
estimated or inferred from this information, in as much as it has been used in the
valuation.
3
Furthermore, the opinion itself
contains forward-looking information, which reflects our estimates for various parameters
based on information available to us. Should these estimates not materialize, actual
results may materially differ.
Financial opinion is not an exact
science, and is supposed to reflect, in a reasonable and fair manner, the situation as of
a given time, based on known data, assumptions and estimates made. Changes to major
variables and/or to information may change the basis for these assumptions and, therefore,
may also change the conclusions accordingly.
This valuation is not a due diligence
and it does not purport to include all information, tests or any other information
included in a due diligence, including checking of company contracts and agreements. Note
that this opinion does not constitute legal advice or opinion. We have interpreted various
documents reviewed solely for the purpose of this opinion.
The information in this opinion does
not presume to include the complete information required by a potential investor, and is
not intended to determine the value of the Company or its assets for an individual
investor. Different investors may have different goals, considerations and testing methods
based on other assumptions, and accordingly the price they would be willing to pay for the
Company and/or its assets will vary.
This opinion does not constitute an
overall valuation of Carmel.
We confirm that we have no personal interest
in the Company, nor do we have any personal interest in the transaction described herein,
except for the commission paid to us for preparation of this opinion. We should note that
we were not party to negotiations in conjunction with the transaction described herein.
From time to time we conduct various
paid financial work for Hadera Paper and for shareholders and/or companies held by
shareholders and/or affiliated there with. We have no personal interest in shares, and our
fee for this work is not contingent on the results of this valuation.
4
In conjunction with this opinion, the
Company has committed to Giza-Singer-Even as follows: Should a lawsuit be filed against
Giza-Singer-Even, demanding payment of any amount to a third party by a legal proceeding
with regard to a cause which may arise, directly or indirectly, from this opinion
the Company shall indemnify Giza-Singer-Even for any reasonable expenses incurred by
Giza-Singer-Even for legal representation, legal counsel, professional consulting, defense
against legal proceedings, negotiations etc. The Company shall also indemnify
Giza-Singer-Even for any amount it would be required, under legal proceedings, to pay to
any third party. The commitment to indemnify shall not apply if Giza-Singer-Even acted
with gross negligence and/or malice aforethought with regard to provision of services in
conjunction with this opinion.
Details of valuator
Valuating company:
Giza-Singer-Even Ltd. is a private business consulting firm, established in 2004. It is
the result of the merger of Giza Financial Consulting, founded in 1985, and of
Singer-Even, established in 1992. It is one of the largest, leading, independent financial
consulting companies in Israel. Giza-Singer-Even provides consulting for its customers on:
Business valuation and analysis, complex economic and financial models, financing strategy
for companies and projects, development and implementation of innovative financing
instruments (such as securitization), assistance in business and financing negotiations,
business plan preparation, expert opinions and more.
Sincerely yours,
|
|
Giza Singer Even Ltd.
Valuation date: November 9th, 2008 |
5
Restriction of
Liability
Our work is intended for the use of
Hadera Papers management. Under no circumstances should we bare any liability to a
third party that will receive our opinion with our consent, as mentioned before.
In the process of our work we have
received information, explanations and presentations from the company and/or its
representatives. The responsibility for this information, representations and explanations
lies with the supplier of that information. Our work framework did not include checking
and/or confirming that information. Taking that under consideration, our work will not be
considered and will not be a confirmation as to the validity, integrity or correction of
the information given to us. Under no circumstances shall we be held liable to any loss,
damage, cost or expense that will be caused directly or indirectly thru fraud, miss
representation, deception, false and incomplete information or withheld information by
Hadera Paper and/or any of its representatives, or any reliance on that information, under
the aforementioned.
As a rule, predictions and forecasts
relate to future events and are based on reasonable assumptions as of the valuation date.
These assumptions may vary during the forecasted/prediction period differentiating the
forecasted/predicted result from the actual financial result and future
forecasts/prediction. As a result, forecasts and predictions should not be viewed at the
same level of certainty as the audited financial reports. We do not form an opinion as to
the actual financial results of predictions and forecasts, made by the company and/or its
representatives.
Valuation is not an exact science and
as such the result depends in many cases on the appraisers subjective
considerations. Therefore, there is no sol agreed upon fair value and we usually set a
reasonable range for the fair value. Since this opinion requires a sol value, the value
was determined is a value representing the midrange of the reasonable range. Although we
believe that the value set by ass is reasonable based on the information we received, a
different appraiser might reach a different value.
Our work does not constitute a due
diligent work and should not be relied upon as a due diligent report. In addition, our
work should not be used as a replacement to any process Hadera Paper is required to
conduct in relation to the transaction agreement.
6
7
|
The
objective of this valuation is the supply a fairness opinion on the fair value of the
intangible assets, the tangible assets and liabilities of the company as of 31.8.08 and
based on the financial reports for that date. It should be noted that our fairness
opinion is not to directly valuate the companys intangible asset value of goodwill
(if such exists), such value is a residual value of this fairness opinion and other
information derived from the purchase agreement (such as: proceeds for acquisition and
accounting owners equity at purchasing date) |
1.1 |
Methodology
of valuation |
|
The
method used for valuation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities is in conformance with guidelines of the following publications: |
|
1. |
IFRS
3 Business combination. |
|
2. |
IAS
38 Intangible assets. |
|
3. |
AICPA
Practice Aid Series: Assets Acquired in a Business Combination to Be
Used in Research and Development Activities: A Focus on Software,
Electronic Devices, and Pharmaceutical Industries. |
1.2 |
Major
information sources and work procedures |
|
In
the preparation of this work we have talked to the following management representatives: |
|
|
Mr.
Shaul Gliksberg, CFO of Hadera Paper Ltd. |
|
|
Mr.
Shmuel Molad, controller of Hadera Paper Ltd. |
|
|
Mr.
Jacob Konkol, CFO of Carmel Container Systems Ltd. |
8
|
The
major information sources used in preparation of this opinion are: |
|
n |
The
transactions immediate report dating 13.7.08. |
|
n |
Valuation
conducted by Brenfeld International Appraisers Ltd. |
|
n |
Internal
operating and financial reports. |
|
n |
Clarifications
and data provided to us by Carmel, as mentioned in this document. |
|
n |
Public
information, including general background material on the sector. |
9
Chapter 2 Company description |
1 |
Description
of the transaction |
|
On
July 10th, 2008, Hadera Paper signed an agreement with Carmels primary
share holder, Mr. Robert Kraft (hereinafter: Kraft), and several other share
holders. As part of the agreement, Hadera Paper purchased all of Krafts shares and
other shares from other shareholders for the total price of about 74.7 million NIS. As a
result of the transaction, Hadera Papers voting rights in Carmel have increased
from about 36.2% to about 89.3%. Hadera Paper has attributed about 4 million NIS of the
agreement price to the increase in the voting rights in Frenkel. The purchase price
allocation for the increase in Frenkels voting shares is detailed in a separate PPA
work. |
|
Carmel
formed a private corporation in the year 1983 and in the year 1986 registered its stocks
to be traded on the AMEX stock exchange and so becoming a public company. In July 2005,
Carmels stocks were deleted from trade in the AMEX stock exchange (detailed below).
Accordingly, at the transaction date, Carmel is a public company as defined in the
Corporate law but is not a reporting corporation according to the Securities law. |
|
In
July 1992, Hadera Paper purchase 25% of Carmels stock. During the second quarter on
the year 2007, Carmel purchased some of its own stocks from Ampal Ltd. and an additional
stock holder (Dr. Eyal Shenhav) in a way that increased Hadera Papers voting rights
in Carmel to about 36.21% (as of December 31st 2007). On the eve of the
transaction, the subject of this work, Hadera Paper holds about 36.21% of the voting
rights in Carmel. The rest of the Carmel stock holders at the eve of the transaction are
the Kraft group (foreign stock holders), which hold together about 49.7% of the voting
rights in Carmel, and the public, which holds about 14.1% of the voting rights in Carmel. |
10
|
In
the year 1986, Carmel registered its stock to the public in the AMEX. In July 2005, Carmels
stock was deleted from trade in the U.S.A stock exchange. Carmel initiated the deletion
on its own accord because, among others: a small minority of Carmel stock holders in the
U.S.A, low trade volumes, high administrative expenses and the consideration that Carmel
did not have any plans to raise equity thru the stock exchange. |
3 |
Carmel
has two subsidiaries |
|
a. |
Frenkel-C.D.
Ltd. a company which Carmel holds about 27.85% of.
Additional Frenkel shareholders are Hadera Paper (directly holds
about 27.85% of Frenkels stocks) and Frenkel and Sons Ltd.
(hereinafter: Frenkel and Sons) (which holds about 44.3%
of Frenkels stock). |
|
In
January 2006, C.D. Packaging Systems Ltd. (held directly at that time 50% by Hadera Paper
and 50% by Carmel) completed a transaction to purchase Frenkel and Sons operations
in return for a 44.3% stock allocation in the merged company Frenkel. The objective of
the merged company to join together the operations in the field and to produce a more
significant factor in the competitive market using a combination of the strengths of both
companies, as well as to realize the potential in decreasing expenses as a result of the
synergy between the operations. |
|
Frenkel
is one of the leading companies in planning, producing and marketing of consumer product
packages and operates in the field of cardboard shelf packaging. Frenkel offers its
many customers from the fields of industry, agriculture, food and beverages industry and
knowledge enriched industries unique packaging solutions adjusted to their individual
needs. |
|
b. |
Triwall
Containers (Israel) Ltd. (hereinafter: Triwall) a
subsidiary company held 100% by Carmel. Triwall was purchased in the
year 1988 from Koor Food Ltd.. Triwall plans, produces and markets
special containers composed of corrugated cardboard (produced by
Carmel) mixed with other materials. The containers are used to
package and deliver products mainly for the Hi-Tech market,
deliveries in accumulator and more. Triwall also produces wood
pallets for the local market and for exports. |
11
4 |
The
economical environment and the effect of external factors on Carmels operations |
|
The
total estimated annual volume of the corrugated cardboard industry in Israel, which is
Carmels primary field of operation, is 350 thousand tons. The total scope of the
revenues of the corrugated cardboard industry in Israel for the year 2007 is estimated at
about 1,450 million NIS. |
|
The
corrugated industry is directly affected by any change in the GDP. Any improvement in the
GDP leads to an additional demand for packaging products and corrugated cardboard, the
opposite also applies. In addition, a growth in exports supports an increase in demand
for packaging and cardboard products. |
|
The
industrys raw materials are virgin paper rolls and recycled paper rolls. The
recycled paper in the industry is mostly produced and purchased from Hadera Paper and the
virgin paper is mostly imported from Europe and the U.S.A. |
|
The
excess demand for paper, mainly in China, and increase in demands in Europe lead to a
steep paper price incline. |
|
In
addition, the strong affect of the exchange rate should be mentioned. Any change in the
exchange rate directly causes a steep effect on the cost structure. |
|
The
time delay for ordering imported raw materials is especially long, about 4 months, and
requires holding an exceptional large inventory. Also, the large variety of packages with
different characteristics requires a large variety of different papers. |
|
The
corrugated cardboard industry is characterized by a dynamic balance between different
packaging types, for example: change from cardboard to shrink on one hand and from wood
to cardboard on the other hand. |
|
In
addition, the cardboard industry is characterized by a decreasing over capacity. The
competition in the industry is intensive. On the other hand, the entrance bar is high and
requires a substantial capital investment to raise the factory foundations and to train
the work force. The fixed cost structure is high and the overcapacity in the industry
dictates an aggressive price competition and especially long customer credit line of over
120 days. |
12
|
Importing
cardboard packaging products is no real threat on the cardboard packaging industry. The
market share of imported cardboard packaging products is about 2%. Local manufacturers
have a substantial advantage as a result of production flexibility, low transportation
costs as well as the costs of holding inventories. |
|
The
Israeli cardboard packaging market is mainly divided between four companies: Carmel,
Cargal Ltd. (hereinafter: Cargal) a company held by a controlling
share holder, I.M.A 1990 Itzur Mutzarei Ariza Ltd. (hereinafter: IMA)
and Best Carton Lcd.(hereinafter: Best Carton); and in addition, a large
number of small cardboard manufacturers. |
|
Carmels
products are divided into the following main categories: |
|
1) |
Corrugated
cardboard products: |
|
The
corrugated cardboard products are produced and processed to meet specific demands by the
customers. The characteristics of the demands are defined by the type of goods to be
stored, package type, the expected weight load on the package while in transportation,
temperature and moist conditions while stored and while in transportation, graphical
design on the package and more. The produced and processed corrugated cardboard products
include: (1) standard corrugated cardboard packaging containers boxes
produced in different sizes that close by gluing the edges and the bottom of the box; (2)
containers and boxes in different geometric shapes that can be erected by
manually folding the cardboard sheets without gluing or mechanical folding using hot
glue. These products are sold especially to highly mechanized industries that work in
high pace, like the soft drink industry; (3) Boxes to the agriculture, trays that are
erected only by erecting machines with matching patterns. |
|
2) |
Corrugated
cardboard sheets: |
|
Corrugated
cardboard sheets are used as raw materials and are marketed to corrugated cardboard
processors that use them as raw materials to produce packages. Cardboard processors are
small processing factories that sell their product to medium and small customers. Carmel
has the unique ability to produce triple wall sheets that are used to produce special
packages by the Triwall, mainly for the Hi-Tech industry. |
13
|
Frenkels
products include the following products: |
|
Frenkel
plans, produces and market shelf packages and stands for displays. Frenkels
products use mainly duplex cardboard and a little corrugated cardboard as raw materials.
The duplex cardboard is mainly imported directly from Europe and the U.S.A and partially
from local agents (indirect import). Corrugated cardboard supply from Carmel composes
about 20% of Frenkels raw materials. |
|
Triwalls
products include the following products: |
|
1. |
Packages
made of triple wall cardboard that are used mainly to export heavy and
volumetric products such as chemicals, electronic equipment, Hi-Tech
equipment, Medical equipment, security equipment and more. |
|
2. |
Erected
packages mainly for the export of Hi-Tech products. The packages are
made of wood, plywood, triple wall cardboard, padding materials,
metals and more. |
|
3. |
Regular
and unique wooden pallets used at a base to these packages. |
|
The
bulk of Carmels production is directed to the domestic market to customers from
industry and agriculture, as specified below, while 2%-3% of the production is directed
to exports, primarily agricultural. A large percentage of the industrial customers export
their products in corrugated cardboard containers, so that a considerable portion of
sales is also directed to indirect exports. The products are supplied in line with orders
that customers submit through salespersons or directly to the customer service
department. The orders are made in line with the price proposals to the customers and in
accordance with the commercial arrangements between the parties. A small portion of the
products is manufactured for inventory, at the customers request. |
|
Carmel
has a wide range of customers that include leading companies, which operate in different
activitys, among which are: (a) the industrial activity, which includes food and soft
beverages companies, dairies, textile companies and others; (b) the agricultural
activity, which comprises customers that are farmers, packaging houses and marketing
organization, and where the produce is directed both to the domestic market and to
exports; (c) Cardboard processors small plants for processing corrugated
cardboards in small production series; (d) digital printing customers which
primarily include advertising agencies; (e) others cellular operators, government
offices and banks. |
14
7 |
Marketing
and Distribution |
|
Carmel
distributes its products various ways, including direct sales to end customers and sales
through agents. |
|
Most
of the demand for cardboard packaging products is in winter months, primarily November
and March, due to the seasonal export of citrus and pepper crops. During the winter, the
production capacity of the activity is fully exhausted. |
|
Carmels
corrugated cardboard are manufactured in two plants located in Caesarea (the plant
operates 24 hours a day, except for weekends) and in Carmiel (operates in one shift
only), while most of the production is carried out in Caesarea. The entire corrugation
activity and most of the processing are carried out in Caesarea. The bulk of the
processing is performed by 12 processing machines. Carmel has another forming center in
Ein-Yahav, which serves customers in the Arava region. |
10 |
Fixed
Assets and Facilities |
|
Carmel
owns real estate in Netivot and leases from a company owned by a control owner of the
Company property and buildings in the industrial areas of Caesarea, Carmiel, Hadera,
Ashkelon and Netanya. A per clarifications by the company, the rental agreements are at
market value. |
15
|
Carmels
fixed assets primarily include machinery and manufacture equipment for paper corrugation
and processing machines, which perform cut, print, glue and fold, to complete the final
product. Carmels corrugated cardboards are manufactured in Carmiel and Caesarea.
The entire corrugation activity and most of the processing, using 12 processing machines,
are performed in the Caesarean plant. |
|
Carmel
also owns a digital printing machine that prints on corrugated cardboard and other rigid
panels at a high quality. There is a wide range of applications in sales promotion,
display stands and billboards |
11 |
Raw
Materials and Suppliers |
|
Pursuant
to an agreement between the shareholders of Carmel from 1992, raw materials are acquired
from the shareholders of Carmel at competitive prices that are acceptable in the
activity. |
|
Additional
auxiliary materials that are used by Carmel Container Systems in the manufacture of
corrugated cardboard are starch and fuel oil. Starch constitutes the main component in
the adhesive that glues the paper sheets. The Companys starch supplier is Galam.
Additional raw materials used by Carmel are printing blocks and embossing machines which
are acquired from several local suppliers, and wooden pallets that are manufactured by
Triwall. |
|
The
main raw materials used by Triwall for the manufacture of containers (in its Netanya
plant) are Triwall sheets manufactured by Carmel as well as varied packaging materials
such as plywood, padding materials and metal parts which are acquired from several local
suppliers. |
|
(a) |
Macro-economic
factors |
|
(1) |
The economic situation |
|
A
slowdown in Israels economy could have an negative effect on Carmels
financial situation. |
16
|
(2) |
Political
and security situation |
|
A
deterioration in the political and security situation in Israel and globally could reduce
the demand for Carmels products and as a result hurt Carmels sales, financial
results and profitability. |
|
(3) |
Exchange
rate fluctuations |
|
Carmel
imports paper using the US dollar. As a result there is a risk that stems from
fluctuations in the dollars exchange rate, which affects the shekel prices of
inputs and rate differences that stems from dollar liabilities. Changes in the dollars
exchange rate against the shekel could erode Carmels profitability and cash flows. |
|
(b) |
Field-related
factors |
|
The
major risk factor is the price of raw materials, primarily paper, which forms the
essential component of Carmels costs. A rise in raw material prices could hurt
Carmels profitability. Additional risks originate from the need for additional
inputs for the production process such as energy, electricity, transport and starch. A
rise in the above inputs prices could hurt Carmels profitability. |
|
(2) |
Shutting
down the ports |
|
Carmel
imports numerous raw materials used for the manufacture of its products. Shutting down
the ports in Israel will harm the imports of raw materials and directly impact the companys
activity. However, since Carmel maintains an inventory of raw materials, only a prolonged
closing of the ports will have a medium impact on Carmels activity. |
13 |
The
business environment |
|
Carmel
plans, manufactures and markets cardboard packaging products. |
17
|
The
corrugated cardboard industry is capital-intensive, which constitutes a natural entry and
exit barrier of competitors. The main substitute for corrugated board products is shrink
wrap for beverages. |
|
To
the best of Carmels knowledge and based on its internal information and
estimations, there are four major companies that operate in the cardboard packaging
market in Israel: Carmel, Cargal., IMA (a partnership between Kibbutz Ein Hamifratz and
Kibbutz Gaaton) and Best Carton |
|
The
factors that could affect Carmels market position vis-à-vis its rivals
include: the advantage of a major market player, efficiency in production and supply, the
quality of service to the customer and competitive prices. |
18
Chapter 3 Analysis of business results |
|
1 |
Statement
of operations: |
|
Below
are details from Carmels statement of operations for the years 2005-2007 (audited),
in thousands of NIS: |
|
2005
|
2006
|
*2007
|
|
Amount
|
% of
revenues
|
Amount
|
% of
revenues
|
Amount
|
% of
revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
| 415,335 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| 419,906 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| 471,428 |
|
| 100.00 |
% |
| | |
Cost of revenues | | |
| 368,173 |
|
| 88.6 |
% |
| 368,804 |
|
| 87.8 |
% |
| 416,951 |
|
| 88.4 |
% |
| | |
Gross Profit | | |
| 47,162 |
|
| 11.4 |
% |
| 51,102 |
|
| 12.2 |
% |
| 54,477 |
|
| 11.6 |
% |
| | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | |
| 21,344 |
|
| 5.1 |
% |
| 23,360 |
|
| 5.6 |
% |
| 24,185 |
|
| 5.1 |
% |
| | |
General and administrative expenses | | |
| 17,676 |
|
| 4.3 |
% |
| 16,449 |
|
| 3.9 |
% |
| 16,621 |
|
| 3.5 |
% |
| | |
Other Income | | |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| 102 |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| | |
Operating Income | | |
| 8,142 |
|
| 2.0 |
% |
| 11,293 |
|
| 2.7 |
% |
| 14,005 |
|
| 2.9 |
% |
| | |
Capital gain from sale of fixes assets | | |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| 235 |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| | |
Financial expenses, net | | |
| 7,370 |
|
| 1.8 |
% |
| 1,862 |
|
| 0.4 |
% |
| 4,329 |
|
| 0.9 |
% |
| | |
Other expenses (income) | | |
| (272 |
) |
| (0.1 |
)% |
| (5,307 |
) |
| (1.3 |
)% |
| 324 |
|
| (0.1 |
)% |
| | |
Income before taxes on income | | |
| 1,044 |
|
| 0.3 |
% |
| 14,738 |
|
| 3.5 |
% |
| 9,587 |
|
| 2.1 |
% |
| | |
Taxes on income (tax benefit) | | |
| (1,389 |
) |
| (0.3 |
)% |
| 2,755 |
|
| 0.7 |
% |
| 1,931 |
|
| 0.4 |
% |
| | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliated company | | |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| (545 |
) |
| (0.1 |
)% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| | |
Minority interest in losses of subsidiary | | |
| 14 |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| | |
Net Income | | |
| 2,447 |
|
| 0.6 |
% |
| 11,438 |
|
| 2.7 |
% |
| 7,656 |
|
| 1.6 |
% |
|
*
In accordance with the IFRS GAAP, as stated in the company's 30.6.08 unaudited financial
reports. |
19
|
Below
are details from Carmels balance sheets as of 31.12.06 (audited), 31.12.07
(audited) and 30.6.08 (unaudited), in thousands of NIS: |
|
31.12.06
|
31.12.07*
|
30.6.08*
|
|
Amount
|
% of
total
assets
|
Amount
|
% of
total
assets
|
Amount
|
% of total
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
| 1,820 |
|
| 0.5 |
% |
| 2,522 |
|
| 0.8 |
% |
| 1,318 |
|
| 0.4 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Trade receivables, net | | |
| 163,276 |
|
| 48.5 |
% |
| 185,153 |
|
| 56.2 |
% |
| 164,994 |
|
| 53.5 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other account receivable and | | |
prepaid expenses | | |
| 3,574 |
|
| 1.1 |
% |
| 2,546 |
|
| 0.8 |
% |
| 3,105 |
|
| 1.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Inventories | | |
| 71,925 |
|
| 21.4 |
% |
| 55,149 |
|
| 16.7 |
% |
| 61,871 |
|
| 20.1 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | |
| 240,595 |
|
| 71.5 |
% |
| 245,370 |
|
| 74.5 |
% |
| 231,288 |
|
| 75.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other account receivable | | |
| 311 |
|
| 0.1 |
% |
| 141 |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| 1,754 |
|
| 0.6 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Severance pay found, net | | |
| 133 |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| 623 |
|
| 0.2 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Investment in affiliated company | | |
| 8,368 |
|
| 2.5 |
% |
| 8,651 |
|
| 2.6 |
% |
| 8,402 |
|
| 2.7 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total long term assets | | |
| 8,812 |
|
| 2.6 |
% |
| 9,415 |
|
| 2.9 |
% |
| 10,156 |
|
| 3.3 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Property and equipment, net | | |
| 84,916 |
|
| 25.2 |
% |
| 72,454 |
|
| 22.0 |
% |
| 67,020 |
|
| 21.7 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Intangible assets | | |
| 1,997 |
|
| 0.6 |
% |
| 2,127 |
|
| 0.6 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | |
| 336,320 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| 329,366 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| 308,464 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term credit from banks | | |
| 7,645 |
|
| 2.3 |
% |
| 16,903 |
|
| 5.1 |
% |
| 25,482 |
|
| 8.3 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Current maturities of long term | | |
loans | | |
| 24,211 |
|
| 7.2 |
% |
| 25,602 |
|
| 7.8 |
% |
| 23,053 |
|
| 7.5 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Trade payable | | |
| 93,544 |
|
| 27.8 |
% |
| 87,423 |
|
| 26.5 |
% |
| 71,482 |
|
| 23.2 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| 537 |
|
| 0.2 |
% |
| 12,090 |
|
| 3.9 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Provision for tax | | |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| 3,993 |
|
| 1.2 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other accounts payable and | | |
accrued expenses | | |
| 17,395 |
|
| 5.2 |
% |
| 17,190 |
|
| 5.2 |
% |
| 17,463 |
|
| 5.7 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | |
| 142,795 |
|
| 42.5 |
% |
| 151,648 |
|
| 46.0 |
% |
| 149,570 |
|
| 48.5 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long term loans from banks less | | |
current maturities | | |
| 48,170 |
|
| 14.3 |
% |
| 49,376 |
|
| 15.0 |
% |
| 39,313 |
|
| 12.7 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Accrued severance pay, net | | |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| - |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| 454 |
|
| 0.1 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred income taxes | | |
| 9,336 |
|
| 2.8 |
% |
| 6,959 |
|
| 2.1 |
% |
| 7,053 |
|
| 2.3 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total long term liabilities | | |
| 57,506 |
|
| 17.1 |
% |
| 56,335 |
|
| 17.1 |
% |
| 46,820 |
|
| 15.2 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Share holder's equity | | |
| 136,019 |
|
| 40.4 |
% |
| 121,383 |
|
| 36.9 |
% |
| 112,074 |
|
| 36.3 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities and | | |
shareholders' equity | | |
| 336,320 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| 329,366 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| 308,464 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
In accordance with the IFRS GAAP, as stated in the company's 30.6.08 unaudited financial
reports. |
20
Chapter 4 Valuation Methodology |
|
In
general, accounting standards regarding business combinations provide
examples for assets which meet requirements for recognition as intangible assets separate
from goodwill, as follows: |
|
1. |
Base
(or core) technologies and process technologies. |
|
2. |
Intangible
assets associated with customers (usually, customer base). |
|
3. |
Brand,
trademarks, trade names and intellectual property associated there with. |
|
4. |
Commercial
agreements which are not at normal market conditions. |
|
5. |
Non-compete
agreements. |
|
In
determining the fair value for each intangible asset, valuations must account for
specific asset factors, including: |
|
1. |
The
economic benefit arising from the asset. |
|
2. |
The
assets remaining economic life. |
|
3. |
The
assets risk profile (relative to the companys overall operation
risk). |
2. |
Summary
of intangible assets valuated |
|
The
designated assets were valuated based on their fair value, as defined in the introduction
to this report. Before determining our opinion of the fair value of intangible assets,
the following had been considered, along with other relevant factors: |
|
1. |
Scope,
nature and usefulness of the intangible assets. |
|
2. |
Revenue
generation or cost reduction attributes of the intangible assets. |
|
3. |
Nature
and timing of functional or economic obsolescence for each intangible asset. |
|
4. |
The
relative risk and uncertainty associated with investment in intangible assets. |
21
|
In
selecting the proper method for valuation of the intangible assets, we have accounted for
the three traditional methods for such valuation: The market approach, revenue approach
and cost approach (for farther explanation see the following section). |
|
In
regards to the company, all of the intangible assets that might have existed at the
valuation date where taken under consideration in valuation analysis. Potential
intangible assets were identified thru an economical analysis of the transaction, a
review of all the supporting documents and materials and deliberations with the
managements of Hadera Paper and Carmel. |
|
As
a result of our review, we identified two categories of intangible assets which meet the
criteria for separate recognition (as required by applicable accounting standards), other
than goodwill: |
|
|
Customer
base as per clarifications received from the company, the company has regular
returning customers that meet the criteria for customer base in both operating segments. |
|
|
Backlog as
per clarifications received from the company, the company has an existing backlog. |
|
Other
potential categories of intangible assets that where reviewed but did not meet
substantial or accounting criteria in order to form an asset were: |
|
|
Brand the
products made by the company are not branded and are more of shelf products,
which are more affected by prices than branding. Therefore, the company does not have an
intangible asset defined as brand. |
|
|
Technology from
our talks with the company, we have come to the conclusion that no unique technology
exists in the company (core technology, technology in R&D processes and existing
technology). |
|
|
Commercial
agreements as per the companys clarifications, there are no commercial
agreements that are not at market conditions; and therefore, no intangible asset exists. |
22
|
|
Non
competition agreement the agreement includes a standard non competition
clause, which the company values to be of no significant value. The company believes that
the lack of a non competition clause would not have brought a possible decrease in future
revenues. |
3. |
Methodology
of valuation |
|
The
method used for valuation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities is in conformance with guidelines of the following publications: |
|
1. |
IFRS
3 Business combination. |
|
2. |
IAS
38 Intangible assets. |
|
3. |
AICPA
Practice Aid Series: Assets Acquired in a Business Combination to Be
Used in Research and Development Activities: A Focus on Software,
Electronic Devices, and Pharmaceutical Industries. |
|
The
original difference created in the acquisition is to be attributed to the intangible
assets, tangible assets and liabilities in accordance with these accounting publications.
The original difference is derived from deducting the purchasing companys
proportionate part in the equity value of the purchased company from the proceeds from
acquisition. |
|
In
short, the original difference would be attributed to the following components: |
|
1. |
The
difference between the fair value and book value of the tangible assets and
liabilities, as of the purchase date. |
|
2. |
The
fair value of the intangible assets of the purchased company. |
|
3. |
The
residual original difference that can not be attribution to the previous
components will be attributed to goodwill. |
|
In accordance with the accounting publications and the USA accounting guide, there are three
principal methodological approaches to valuating the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. |
|
The
characteristics of the asset must be carefully considered, in order to choose which of
the following approaches fits best the evaluated asset: |
|
1. |
The
market approach in accordance with this
approach, the fair value is best valued by the prices recently paid
for similar assets. Adjustments to the quoted market prices are made
in order to reflect the differences in condition and use period
between the evaluated asset and the similar assets. |
23
|
2. |
The
revenue approach in accordance with this
approach, the fair value is dependent on the current value of the
future economical usefulness derived from ownership of the asset. In
the center of this approach lies the analysis of the potential
profits represented by the asset and the basic risks involved in
receiving these profits. The economical value of this futuristic
economical usefulness is valuating the net DCF using the acceptable
return rates for similar assets in the market. |
|
3. |
The
cost approach in accordance with this method,
the fair value is evaluated using the replacement costs of the asset
net of the depreciation, which expresses the functional, economical
or technological depreciation of the current asset in comparison to
the new asset. The valuation results from the cost method can be
considered as the upper boundary of the value in the cases where the
asset can easily be replaced or renewed, since no careful investor
will purchase an existing asset for more then the price it costs to
produce a new equivalent asset. |
4. |
Tangible
assets and liabilities |
|
In
general, tangible assets and liabilities include the following: |
|
|
Current
assets, excluding inventory (cash, negotiable securities, trade receivables, other
receivables etc.); |
|
|
Investments
in affiliated companies; |
|
|
Buildings
for rent (rental real estate); |
|
|
Current
liabilities (credit from banks, suppliers, payables etc.); |
24
|
|
Long-term
liabilities (debentures, long-term loans, convertible debentures). |
In setting the fair value for all
tangible assets and liabilities, any valuation should account for asset-specific factors,
including its economic benefit and remaining economic life.
|
Under
the methodology for individual valuation of the companys non-tangible assets, one
should account for the fact that these assets are not fully stand-alone, since they
require various services from other company assets which have an economic cost not
expressed by cash flows, but which should be reflected in the valuation of the asset
under assumption that as a stand-alone asset (this is the base assumption in its
valuation as a non-tangible asset) it would pay for such services. These costs are
calculated by including contributory charges for use of these contributing assets by the
non-tangible asset. In general, contributory assets are usually fixed assets, work force,
brand (if any) and others. |
|
After
valuation of the economic value of the asset (using any of the valuation approaches), the
economic value determined for the asset should be adjusted to reflect the actual, or
theoretical, tax benefit (based on whether the asset is tax deductible or not) resulting
from asset amortization for tax purposes. |
|
When
a business combination is considered to be an acquisition of shares for tax purposes,
there is usually no parallel change in the tax base of acquired assets. That is, the tax
base for non-tangible assets is usually passed on from the acquired company to the
acquirer. Previously, accepted procedures claimed that no tax benefit should be included
in valuation of non-tangible assets, since the buyer would not be able to amortize the
acquired non-tangible assets for tax reporting purposes, and hence would not gain any tax
savings associated with asset amortization. |
25
|
However,
on the other hand, when the objective of the valuation is to assess the fair value as
defined in accounting standards, the value of tax-reduction benefits associated with
non-tangible assets should also be included in transactions in which the buyer may not
amortize the value of non-tangible assets acquired for tax purposes (i.e. tax-free
business combinations in lieu of asset acquisitions). |
|
Pursuant
to section 5.3.102 of the US Board of Public Accountancy guide, the fair value of
non-tangible assets includes the value of tax benefits arising from amortization of such
assets. The tax benefit (actual or theoretical) arising from amortization of the
non-tangible assets valuated by us is added to the net economic value of the
assets, and they are presented as a single figure. |
|
We
have assumed that amortization of acquired non-tangible assets will be recognized for tax
reporting purposes. It should be noted, that tax authorities have yet to express an
opinion on this matter. In the absence of a ruling by tax authorities, either way, our
assumption is based on instructions of the US Board guide and accepted practice, as
expressed in acquisition cost allocation work published over the past year. The position
of tax authorities may differ from the basic assumption in this work; therefore we have
indicated for each non-tangible asset the tax shield component included there in.
Calculation of the tax shield is iterative, and includes two simultaneous calculations:
(1) Calculation of tax shield value as the cash flow resulting from amortization of the
non-tangible asset multiplied by the tax rate; (2) calculation of the amortized asset
value, including the tax shield value. |
26
Chapter 5 Customer base |
|
The
companys customer base was calculated for the companys revenues in the
corrugated cardboard segment and in the Tri-wall segment. As per clarifications received
from the company, in these segments there is a certain consistency among the companys
returning customers along the years. |
|
The
economic value of the companys customer base was valuated using discounted net cash
flow (DCF) expected to be derived from it over the forecast period determined by us. This
is an implementation of the revenue approach to asset valuation. |
|
The
DCF method explicitly recognizes that the current value of an asset is derived based on
different assumptions with regard to future economic benefits expected to be derived from
it, such as periodic revenues and/or cost savings. The assets economic value is
determined by discounting the net cash flows expected from it, using a discount rate
which reflects both the cost of capital of each companys operations as well as the
risk inherent in the specific asset. |
2. |
Summary
of customer base valuation |
|
2.1. |
Below
is a summary of the valuation for the corrugated cardboard segment's customer base: |
|
Total economic valuation
(thousand NIS)
|
Amortization period (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer base before tax shield |
|
|
| 20,856 |
|
| 6 |
|
Tax shield | | |
| 3,869 |
|
| 10 |
|
Customer base after tax shield | | |
| 24,725 |
|
| |
|
27
|
2.2. |
Below
is a summary of the valuation for the Tri-wall segments customer base: |
|
Total economic valuation
(thousand NIS)
|
Amortization period (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer base before tax shield |
|
|
| 3,686 |
|
| 6 |
|
Tax shield | | |
| 684 |
|
| 10 |
|
Customer base after tax shield | | |
| 4,370 |
|
| |
|
3. |
Basic
assumptions for cash flow forecast |
|
3.1. |
Revenues By
reviewing the company and its revenues from customers over its years of
operation, we have found that the company has an intangible asset its
customer base due to a group of repeat customers with which the company
has long standing relationships both in the corrugated cardboard segment and in
the Tri-wall segment. As set forth above, the revenue base for valuation of the
customer base was determined using data provided to us by the companys
management, which estimate the companys future revenues from repeat
customers over coming years. |
|
3.2. |
Growth
and abandonment rates In accordance with the company estimates, we
assumed an annual 1.4% growth rate in the companys revenues in both
operating segments. The growth rate is the annual population growth rate. |
|
The
abandonment rate is the annual decrease in revenues from existing customers in each of
the operating segments. As per clarifications by the company, we assumed a conservative
annual abandonment rate of 20%. |
|
3.3. |
Operation
cash flow We have determined the operating cash flow associated with
revenues from the customer base over the forecast period, in each of the two
segments, using the companys EBITDA for the year 2007. We assumed the
EBITDA profit margin will continue to be constant during the DCF model, except
for the year 2008. In the year 2008, for conservative purposes we assumed for
both operating segments that the EBITDA profit margin will be half of the
companys year 2007 EBITDA profit margin. |
28
|
3.4. |
Contributory
charges By reviewing company operations, we have included
contributory charges in the cash flow from the customer base for 3 contributory
assets: |
|
a. |
Fixed
assets We have included an expense at 8% pre-tax (our estimation of
the appropriate economic return required from fixed assets) of the remaining
fair value of fixed assets, of which we have deducted the appropriate taxes. |
|
b. |
Work
force although, according to our review, work force is not a
tangible asset which may be separately valuated a contributory charge
for it should be included. This charge should reflect the cost of hiring and
training company staff from a stage where the company has no staff at all.
According to data and estimates provided to us by company management, and based
on our experience, the average cost for such a task is equivalent to 2 months.
The rate of return we used in calculation the contributory charge for work
force is the WACC rate (detailed bellow), of which we have deducted the
appropriate taxes. |
|
c. |
Working
capital the companys working capital represents the funds
needed by the firm to finance its current business and to bridge the time gap
between the time funds are expended in the production process and the time
payment is received for sale of products. We have determined the contributory
charge based on the reported working capital in 31.12.07. The rate of return we
used in calculation the contributory charge for work force is 7% pre-tax
return, of which we have deducted the appropriate taxes. |
|
3.5. |
Taxes
on income we used the statutory tax rate. |
|
3.6. |
Forecast
period as per the companys clarifications in regards to growth
and abandonment rates, the forecast period of the customer base was 6 years. |
|
3.7. |
Inclusion
of tax benefit in asset value as we explained in the methodology
section, we assumed that asset amortization will be tax-deductible over a 10
year period. The tax shield was calculated using the statutory tax rate for
each of the years used in the DCF model. |
29
|
The
companys backlog was calculated for the companys revenues in the corrugated
cardboard segment and in the Tri-wall segment. As per clarifications received from the
company, in these segments there is a certain consistency among the companys
returning customers along the years. |
|
The
economic value of the companys backlog, in both the Corrugated cardboard and
Tri-wall operation segments, was valuated using discounted net cash flow (DCF) expected
to be derived from it over the forecast period determined by us. This is an
implementation of the revenue approach to asset valuation. |
|
The
DCF method explicitly recognizes that the current value of an asset is derived based on
different assumptions with regard to future economic benefits expected to be derived from
it, such as periodic revenues and/or cost savings. The assets economic value is
determined by discounting the net cash flows expected from it, using a discount rate
which reflects both the cost of capital of each companys operations as well as the
risk inherent in the specific asset. |
2. |
Summary of backlog valuation |
|
2.1. |
Below
is a summary of backlog valuation for the Corrugated cardboard segment: |
|
Total economic valuation
(thousand NIS)
|
Amortization period (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog before tax shield |
|
|
| 1,351 |
|
Until the end of 2008 |
|
|
Tax shield | | |
| 489 |
|
Until the end of 2008 | | |
Backlog after tax shield | | |
| 1,840 |
|
| | |
30
2.2.
Below is a summary of backlog valuation for the Tri-wall segment:
|
Total economic valuation
(thousand NIS)
|
Amortization period (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog before tax shield |
|
|
| 720 |
|
Until the end of 2008 |
|
|
Tax shield | | |
| 261 |
|
Until the end of 2008 | | |
Backlog after tax shield | | |
| 981 |
|
| | |
3. |
Basic
assumptions for cash flow forecast |
|
3.1. |
Revenues by
viewing the company and the revenue characteristics from customers during the
companys years of activities, we found that the company has a backlog
intangible asset in the corrugated cardboard operating segment and in the
Tri-wall operating segment. |
|
The
revenue base used to value the backlog was determined by the information given to ass by
the companys management and predicts the future companys revenues from
backlog existing at transaction date. |
|
3.2. |
Operation
cash flow We have determined the backlog for the company , in
each of the two segments, using the data received from the company that
estimates the EBITDA profit margin for the year 2007 with the addition of
the representative expense rate for sales and marketing (since the
realization of the backlog requires none of these expenses). |
|
3.3. |
Contributory
charges By reviewing company operations, we have included
contributory charges in the cash flow from the customer base for 3
contributory assets: |
|
a. |
Fixed
assets We have included an expense at 8% pre-tax (our
estimation of the appropriate economic return required from fixed assets)
of the remaining fair value of fixed assets, of which we have deducted the
appropriate taxes. |
|
b. |
Work
force although, according to our review, work force is not a
tangible asset which may be separately valuated a contributory
charge for it should be included. This charge should reflect the cost of
hiring and training company staff from a stage where the company has no
staff at all. |
31
|
According
to data and estimates provided to us by company management, and based on
our experience, the average cost for such a task is equivalent to 2 months. |
|
The
rate of return we used in calculation the contributory charge for work force is the WACC
rate (detailed bellow), of which we have deducted the appropriate taxes. |
|
c. |
Working
capital the companys working capital represents the funds
needed by the firm to finance its current business and to bridge the time gap
between the time funds are expended in the production process and the time
payment is received for sale of products. We have determined the contributory
charge based on the reported working capital in 31.12.07. The rate of return we
used in calculation the contributory charge for work force is 7% pre-tax
return, of which we have deducted the appropriate taxes. |
|
3.4. |
Taxes
on income we used the statutory tax rate. |
|
3.5. |
Inclusion
of tax benefit in asset value as we explained in the methodology
section, we assumed that asset amortization will be tax-deductible in the year
2008. The tax shield was calculated using is the statutory tax rate for the
year 2008. |
32
Chapter 7 Cost of capital and discount rate |
The valuation model assumes a
weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 11%.
The cost of capital reflects, among
others, the business-operating risk of the companys operations. The risk is partly
the market risk and partly the risk derived from the companys activities.
The normative market cost of capital
for various markets (based on professional literature and other publicly available
information, including other valuations of public companies, as well as Giza Singer
Evens professional experience in the field) usually range from about 6% for the net
cash flow of yielding real estate assets, to about 8%-10% for companies with an expected
relatively low business-operational volatility (Osem and Shufersal for example), to about
11%-15% cost of capital for relatively well founded Hi-Tech companies and companies with a
relative high business-operational volatility. The cost of capital of over 15% is usually
a characteristic of a Hi-Tech company in its early development stages and companies
operating in high risk markets. To the normative market cost of capital, we add a premium
for the specific risk associated with the company.
Carmels cost of capital was
derived using our experience and professional expertise as well as the customary discount
rates used by our company for business-operational systematic risk for operational cash
flow in similar markets in addition to the business-operational specific risk associated
with the company and its market, taking to consideration that the company operates in a
very competitive market.
Using our experience and professional
expertise, with the adjustments derived from our knowledge of the company and the
companys exposure to market and macro economical risks, we estimated the
companys WACC to be about 11%.
33
As an additional check, In
order to estimate the cost of capital for Carmels operations, we have estimated the
companys WACC (using the CAPM model to calculate the cost of equity) by comparing to
similar public companies and other assumptions concerning the appropriate debt cost and
structure for the company. The weighted cost of capital obtained by this estimate came out
to about 11%.
34
Chapter 8
Additional adjustments to tangible assets |
We have valuated the companys
following assets, as of the purchase date:
1. |
Property,
plant and equipment |
|
The
fair value of the companys PPE was based on an independent valuation conducted by
Brenfeld International Appraisers Ltd. (in thousands of NIS): |
|
Carmel, solo
|
Tri-wall
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value (based on appraiser's |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
valuation) | | |
| 95,996 |
|
| 7,493 |
|
| 103,489 |
|
Book value | | |
| 57,704 |
|
| 6,923 |
|
| 64,627 |
|
Fair value over book value | | |
| 38,292 |
|
| 570 |
|
| 38,862 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
According
to the company, all of the companys rental agreements are at market value. |
|
The
company has holding in a subsidiary company, Frenkel. As previously explained, the PPA
allocation as well as the purchase price associated with the increase in Hadera Papers
holding in Frenkel is detailed in a separate PPA work. |
|
In
accordance with the companys clarifications, the companys inventory is
composed mainly of raw materials, aiding materials and finished goods. The book value of
the raw material and aiding materials inventory represents their fair value. According to
the accounting principles, the inventory in processs fair value is the expected
revenues net of completion costs and the profit margin associated with completion costs.
It should be mentioned that according to the company, the completion costs are not
significant. In accordance with these, we calculated the inventorys fair value over
book value to be about 743 thousand NIS. |
35
5. |
Operating
working capital |
|
The
value of the working capital which includes: trade receivable, trade payable and other
account receivables account payables was valuated on the bases of its book value on the
purchasing date. According to the company, the book value of operating working capital
value on the purchase date does not significantly vary from the fair value. |
6. |
Long
and short term Liabilities |
|
In
accordance with the companys clarifications, the loans taken from financial
institution and/or from others and bare an interest at market prices and therefore the
book value reflects the loans fair value. |
7. |
Contingent
liabilities |
|
In
accordance with the companys clarifications, the amount a third independent party
will be willing to pay in order to take on itself the liabilities, in addition to the
provisions made by the company in accordance with GAAP, is negligible and therefore we
did not allocate any amount to them. |
|
The
liquidation of guarantees made by the company is estimated by the company at a very low
probability and as such does not bare the significance required to allocate an amount to
them. |
8. |
Agreement
with Hadera Paper |
|
In
accordance with the companys clarifications, the agreement in which a Hadera Paper
acts a supplier for the company in done at market value. The agreement predates the
purchase agreement and was done in the period that Hadera Paper was as a minority share
holder in the company. |
36
|
Below
is a summary of the purchase price allocation to tangible and intangible assets (in
thousand NIS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed % purchase of Carmel |
|
|
| 100 |
% |
| 53.09 |
% |
| | |
Purchase price1 | | |
| 133,172 |
|
| 70,701 |
|
| | |
Acquired owner's equity2 | | |
| 107,234 |
|
| 56,931 |
|
| | |
Excess purchase price to be allocated | | |
| 25,938 |
|
| 13,770 |
|
| | |
Excess purchase price allocated to customer base | | |
| 29,095 |
|
| 15,446 |
|
| | |
Tax provision for customer base* | | |
| (7,274 |
) |
| (3,862 |
) |
| | |
Excess purchase price allocated to backlog | | |
| 2,822 |
|
| 1,498 |
|
| | |
Tax provision for backlog* | | |
| (762 |
) |
| (404 |
) |
| | |
Excess purchase price allocated to PPE | | |
| 38,862 |
|
| 20,632 |
|
| | |
Tax provision for PPE* | | |
| (9,716 |
) |
| (5,158 |
) |
| | |
Excess purchase price allocated to inventory | | |
| 743 |
|
| 394 |
|
| | |
Tax provision for inventory* | | |
| (201 |
) |
| (106 |
) |
| | |
Excess purchase price allocated | | |
| 53,570 |
|
| 28,440 |
|
| | |
Goodwill 3 | | |
| (27,632 |
) |
| (14,670 |
) |
|
*
The tax provision was calculated using the assumption of a 25% long term tax rate, with
the exclusion of inventory and backlog which were calculated using a 27% short term tax
rate. |
|
Since
the PPA yielded a negative goodwill value, we have conducted a reexamination of all the
assumptions and calculation, as dictated in IFRS 3 Business combination. |
|
|
|
1 The purchase price does not include about 4 million NIS that where associated by
Hadera paper with the increase in Frenkels holdings. |
|
2 The owners equity does not include holding in the subsidiary Frenkel. |
|
3 Before purchase allocation associated with Frenkel. |
37
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
November 9th, 2008
810751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To: |
|
Mr. Yaakov Konkol - Finance Manager |
Tel: 046239360 |
Carmel Container Systems Ltd. |
M: 0523605760 |
2 Halamish st. |
Jacobk@carmelccs.com |
Caesarea Industrial Park 38900 |
Dear Sir,
RE: Valuation of Equipment and
Machinery
Fair Market Value as of 31.08.08
and Life cycle valuation
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
1. |
Introduction:
Purpose and Disclosure |
|
1.1 |
Purpose
and Deciding Date for Appraisement: |
|
I,
Nachman Berenfeld (Engineer), the undersigned, was requested by the general management of
Carmel Container Systems (Hereafter the company) to express my professional
expertise with regards to the fair value estimation (the sum for which
property may be exchanged in a deal between a voluntary purchaser and a voluntary seller)
and the life cycle valuation of equipment and machinery of the company as of 31.08.08
(hereafter: the deciding date for appraisement) for the purpose of including these data in
the companys financial statements in accordance with the equities regulations and
accounting regulation number 27 (international regulation 16). |
|
1.2 |
Orderer
and Disclosure |
|
This
document was requested by Carmel Container Systems Ltd on Sept. 16th 2008
(hereafter: date of engagement). Between the date of engagement and the
deciding date no substantial changes have occurred to the fair value estimation of the
properties subject to valuation. I hereby express my expertise for the purpose of the
implementation of accounting regulation number 27 (international regulation number 16). I
agree that the views expressed here are to be included in the companys financial
reports. I hereby declare I have never been convicted with a felony included in section
222 (a) of the firm legislative act (1999) nor with a felony included in the stock market
act (1968). |
|
Address:
3 Ha-Hilazon Street, Ramat Gan |
|
Education:
Bachelor degree in mechanical engineering (1974). License number 18929, the Tel
Aviv University. |
|
Graduate
of the following courses: |
|
|
Non-destructive
examination, the Technion. |
|
|
Industrial
hazard assessment, the Tel Aviv University |
|
|
Advanced
profit loss, the London College of Insurance |
|
|
Computer
system and database damage specialization, the TELA insurance company, Germany |
|
|
Senior
corporate director course, the Lahav school of management, the Tel Aviv university |
|
|
Member
of the academic property appraisers union |
|
|
Member
of the conflagration examiners union in Israel. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
Professional Background:
Owner of a private engineering and
appraisers agency since 1980. Specialized in industrial appraisement for insurance
companies, banks, foreclosure attorneys, private companies, accountants, lawyers, courts
of law etc. A licensed appraiser of governmental agencies and ministries such as: The
investment center, the national social security, Bank Hapoalim, the Israeli Electricity
Company and more.
Appointed as arbitrator by the
court of law on numerous occasions. A senior teacher at the Insurance College, for the
subjects of appraisement, profit loss and risk management,
1979-1980: The Israeli Aviation
Industry mechanical engineer design, production and costs examiner for
aviation and transportation projects.
1976-1979: The Ministry of Defense
mechanical engineer and aerial and land weapon system designer.
|
I
hereby declare I have no interest in any of the subjects properties and no pendency
relationship exists between the company, the orderer and myself. The fees to be paid are
not dependant in any way on the result of this appraisement, including the conditioning of
payment and the results of this appraisement. |
|
1.5 |
Experts
and Consultants: |
|
This
appraisement report was not performed with the external assistance of any experts or
consultants. |
|
1.6 |
Visitation
to the company and physical verification of the assets: |
|
Performed
by the undersigned on 16.9.08, 21.9.08, 23.9.08, 24.9.08. During these visits we have
identified the equipment and conducted an equipment specification log. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
|
As
per your request dated 15.9.08 we have performed an estimation of your companys
equipment, from a voluntary purchaser to a voluntary seller inclusive in a productive and
active factories (going-concern), fair value. |
2. |
Deciding
Date for this Valuation: |
3. |
General
Description of the companies: |
|
3.1 |
Carmel
Container Systems Ltd. Caesarea |
|
3.1.1 |
The
company is one of Israels producers of cardboard packaging for industrial and
agricultural purposes. |
|
3.1.2 |
The
Carmel Container Systems company integrates equipment in advanced processes in which raw
materials are used, in addition to efficient management, in order to produce a wide
variety of products and maintaining competitive pricing. |
|
3.1.3 |
Amongst
the companys clients are some of the leading food and drinks and agricultural
export companies. |
|
3.1.4 |
The
companys products include ripple cardboard boxes, trays, single and double rippled
products. These are used for the purpose of shipping and storing of fresh food,
vegetables, flowers, dairy products, industrial products and commodities. |
|
3.2. |
Multicarton
Ltd Carmiel A one layer cardboard packaging factory. |
|
3.3 |
Tri-wall
Ltd. Netivot |
|
3.3.1 |
A
factory producing wooden platforms of various kinds. |
|
3.3.2 |
The
factory is located in two industrial structures; both are one storey high in the Sderot
Industrial Zone. The total area is approx 8,000 sq m. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
|
3.4 |
Tri-wall
Ltd. Netanya |
|
3.4.1 |
A
factory producing advanced cardboard packaging systems for the hi -tech industry. |
|
3.4.2 |
The
main products are triple ripple cardboard packages and wooden platforms. |
|
3.4.3 |
The
factory is located in a one storey (and a gallery level) industrial structure in the
Netanya old industrial zone. The total are is approx 6200 sq m. |
4. |
Description
of the Carmel Container Systems factory ם Caesarea |
|
4.1 |
The Factory began production in 1997. It is a modern factory on an area of 42.5 K sq m, in
the Caesarea industrial zone, a strategic location between Tel Aviv and Haifa. |
|
4.2 |
The
factory employs 320 workers in two shifts. |
|
4.3 |
The products include agricultural, industrial and raw cardboard boxes and products
distributed to customers of cardboard boxes. |
|
4.4 |
The company produces ripple cardboard from raw material, paper rolls and processing,
gluing, cutting, patterning to printing and assembly of cardboard boxes. |
|
4.5 |
There are two cardboard production machines in the factory, printing machines, conveying
utilities, production equipment etc. |
|
4.6 |
The factory has an automatic conveying machines which drives the products across the
production floor . the machines are fully automated. |
|
4.7 |
The
Machinery array includes: |
|
4.7.1 |
Carton
production line Cardboard (2500 m wide, 130 m long) |
|
4.7.2 |
Carton
production line Cardboard (2500 m wide, 130 m long) |
|
4.7.3 |
Automated
conveying equipment, cardboard conveying cart, packaging and wrapping machines, printing
lines and cardboard production. |
|
4.7.4 |
Industrial
Services Glue production and preparation sites, steam systems, compressed air
systems etc. |
|
4.7.5 |
Collection,
shredding and processing of cardboard waste products. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
|
4.8 |
Packaging equipment machinery The company has some 87 packaging production
machines nationwide. The details and data re these machines were provided to us and these
machines were not surveyed by us. |
|
4.9 |
Patterns The details and quantities of patterns were provided to us by your
representative. The valuation determined their value to be 50% of their production costs. |
5. |
Replacement
Parts The value of replacement parts was determined in accordance
with the stocktaking numbers as were provided to us. |
6. |
Principles
and Methods of Valuation |
|
6.1 |
During
the month of September we have visited your factories in Caserea, Carmiel, Netanya and
Netivot and identified the equipment and facilities in the presence of the companys
delegate. |
|
6.2 |
The
estimation was based on a base value as part of a productive and active factory. In
addition, the current value was measured as of the date of estimation, considering
depreciation rate on one hand and development and improvement on the other, installation
costs, connection to auxiliary and operation systems. |
|
6.3 |
The
working life of the equipment was determined in a conservative manner and considered the
replacement of assets on the basis of investment and technological upgrading (control
systems). In the mechanical aspects the equipment may be restored and maintained in
proper activity form for many years. |
|
6.4 |
To
determine the value of machinery and equipment we were provided with invoices, technical
specifications, equipment blueprints and a number 11 form. |
|
6.5 |
To
determine the value of equipment we have examined comparative data from various factories
which we have appraised recently. |
|
6.6 |
Forklifts
The forklifts specifications was determined in accordance with the
licenses provided to us. The prices were determined based on standard market values. |
|
6.7 |
Equipment
in the Agricultural Warehouses Your company posses some 87 production machines
nationwide. The specifications and locations were provided to us by your representative. |
|
6.8 |
The
determination of values considered the type of equipment, the date pf purchase, make,
investment in maintenance, restoration, operational depreciation etc. |
|
6.9 |
The
working life expresses the reasonable period of usage pf equipment in proper maintenance
conditions as is the standard in cardboard production factories. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
|
The
costs of equipment listed hereafter express our opinion regarding their purchase value to
the voluntary purchaser and the voluntary seller. They express the value considering the
active and productive nature of the factories, fair value, and their freedom of any
subjection or debt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1. Carmel Container Systems Ltd. - Caesarea |
|
|
$ | 24,852,000 |
|
| | |
| | |
7.2. Multicarton Ltd. - Carmiel | | |
$ | 1,872,000 |
|
| | |
| | |
7.3. Tri-wall Ltd. - Netivot (Structure and land excluded) | | |
$ | 921,000 |
|
| | |
| | |
7.4. Tri-wall Ltd. - Netanya | | |
$ | 1,165,000 |
|
|
|
| |
| | |
Total | | |
$ | 28,810,000 |
|
|
|
| |
|
(Twenty
eight million, eight hundred and ten thousand) |
Sincerely Yours,
Nachman Berenfeld
Engineer
Berenfeld International Loss Adjusters and Risk Management Ltd.
Attached herewith:
Details of equipment and value
Photos
Commission fees
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
Appendix Details re
regulation 8b (d) and the third amendment to the equities regulatory act (immediate and
periodic reports) (1970) relating to value estimates
1. |
Identification
of valuation subject |
|
1.1. |
Subject
of valuation specified in the above document |
2. |
Details
of business relations |
|
2.1 |
The
orderer is the management of Karmel Container Systems Ltd. |
|
2.2 |
The
date of engagement is 16.9.08 |
|
2.3 |
The
purposes of the work ordered are detailed above. |
|
2.4 |
The
name of the appraiser, signature and date are detailed above. |
|
2.5 |
Details
of the appraiser's education are mentioned above. |
|
2.6 |
The
agreement of the appraiser to the inclusion of this report is detailed above. |
|
2.7 |
Commission
fees are free of pendency or conditions. There is no agreement whatsoever re
the values stated. |
|
3.1 |
The
values determined are mentioned above. The valuation is based on financial reports as
of 30.6.08. |
|
3.2 |
In
light of the conclusions of the report sensitivity analyses are not required. |
|
3.3 |
The
valuated company's capital is irrelevant. |
|
3.4 |
The
price of the company's stock is irrelevant. |
|
3.5 |
To
the best of my knowledge no similar contracts have been signed re the production arrays
of Karmel Container Systems Ltd. |
|
3.6 |
Details
of the average price of the company's stock in the past six months are
irrelevant. |
|
4.1 |
The
description of the subjected company is detailed above. The analyses re the relevant
markets and the business environment are included in the valuation. |
|
4.2 |
The
facts, assumptions and calculation on which this report is based are included in this
valuation. |
|
4.3 |
As
specified in this valuation Karmel Container Systems has provided the appraiser with the
magnitude of the investment as of 30.06.08. |
|
4.4 |
The
method and grounds for selection are detailed in the valuation. |
|
4.5 |
The
sources of information used for this valuation are detailed, I was not denied any other
valuable sources. |
|
5.1 |
This
valuation was not based on substantially significant valuations of external experts. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
|
|
|
Recognizing your needs. Realizing your vision. |
|
|
Frenkel-C.D Ltd.
(Frenkel)
Opinion for Purchase
Price
Allocation (PPA)
Prepared for
Hadera Paper Ltd.
To:
Hadera Paper Ltd.
(Hereinafter: Hadera Paper)
Dear Sir,
As per your request, we have
conducted a review and valuation of assets and liabilities (both tangible and intangible)
of Frenkel-C.D. Ltd. (hereinafter Frenkel and/or The Company), as
of August 31st, 2008 (valuation date and/or transaction
date) as a result of the increase in Carmel Container Systems Ltd.s
(hereinafter: Carmel) shares.
The objective of this valuation is to
provide our opinion of the purchase price allocation (hereinafter PPA and/or
economical value) of the intangible assets, tangible assets and tangible
liabilities of Carmel at the valuation date. It should be noted that valuating the
companys intangible asset goodwill (if such exists) is not the objective of
this valuation but rather a byproduct of this opinion and other purchase information
(purchase price, accounting owners equity at purchase date and more).
We understand that our findings will
serve to aid your management in allocating the purchase price determined in the
transaction to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities being purchased, for the
purpose of financial reporting in conjunction with generally accepted accounting
practices. This valuation report is intended solely for information and use by Hadera
Paper management, its independent auditors and legal counsel of company involved. This
opinion should not be used, distributed, quoted or referred to in any manner for any other
purpose, including for listing, purchase or sale of securities and it may not be submitted
or referred to, in whole or in part, in any registration report or any other document;
however, it may be referred to in documents submitted to stock exchange authorities,
subject to our explicit written consent. With regard to this matter, we are aware that
findings in our opinion will be used for public reports submitted to the Securities
Authority.
2
For the purpose of financial
reporting, the fair value of an asset is defined as the amount at which the asset may be
purchased or sold in a transaction between willing buyer(s) and willing seller(s), as
opposed to the case of forced sale or company dissolution. Market prices bid on active
markets are the best testimony to fair value, and will be used as basis for measuring, if
available. If no market price is available, the fair value estimate should be close to the
price at which we expect the asset to be purchased or sold in a current transaction
between willing buyer(s) and willing seller(s), and the price will be based on the best
available information under these circumstances.
The fair value estimate must take
into consideration the price of similar assets and the result of valuation method, if they
were available in this case. The method selected to set the fair value must be at par with
the definition of fair value, as defined in the GAAP. The method must include assumptions
that the market participants will use their own estimates for fair value, future revenues,
future expenses and discount rates (if applicable).
For the purpose of this work, the
company has given us historical audited financial statements, unaudited financial
information, valuation conducted by Brenfeld International Appraisers Ltd. and other
documents and information.
In formulating its opinion,
Giza-Singer-Even Ltd. (Giza-Singer-Even) assumed and relied on the accuracy,
completeness and currency of information obtained from the company, including financial
data and forward-looking information. Giza-Singer-Even is not responsible for independent
examination of the information it has obtained, and therefore has not conducted
independent examination of said information, other than general, prima facie
reasonability tests.
In this opinion we have made
reference to forward-looking information provided to us by Company management.
Forward-looking information is uncertain, future-oriented information based on information
available to the Company as of the valuation date, including expectations or intentions by
Company management as of the valuation date. Should these estimations by company
management fail to materialize, actual results may materially differ from results
estimated or inferred from this information, in as much as it has been used in the
valuation.
Furthermore, the opinion itself
contains forward-looking information, which reflects our estimates for various parameters
based on information available to us. Should these estimates not materialize, actual
results may materially differ.
3
Financial opinion is not an exact
science, and is supposed to reflect, in a reasonable and fair manner, the situation as of
a given time, based on known data, assumptions and estimates made. Changes to major
variables and/or to information may change the basis for these assumptions and, therefore,
may also change the conclusions accordingly.
This valuation is not a due diligence
and it does not purport to include all information, tests or any other information
included in a due diligence, including checking of company contracts and agreements. Note
that this opinion does not constitute legal advice or opinion. We have interpreted various
documents reviewed solely for the purpose of this opinion.
The information in this opinion does
not presume to include the complete information required by a potential investor, and is
not intended to determine the value of the Company or its assets for an individual
investor. Different investors may have different goals, considerations and testing methods
based on other assumptions, and accordingly the price they would be willing to pay for the
Company and/or its assets will vary.
This opinion does not constitute an
overall valuation of Frenkel.
We confirm that we have no personal interest
in the Company, nor do we have any personal interest in the transaction described herein,
except for the commission paid to us for preparation of this opinion. We should note that
we were not party to negotiations in conjunction with the transaction described herein.
From time to time we conduct various
paid financial work for Hadera Paper and for shareholders and/or companies held by
shareholders and/or affiliated there with. We have no personal interest in shares, and our
fee for this work is not contingent on the results of this valuation.
4
In conjunction with this opinion, the
Company has committed to Giza-Singer-Even as follows: Should a lawsuit be filed against
Giza-Singer-Even, demanding payment of any amount to a third party by a legal proceeding
with regard to a cause which may arise, directly or indirectly, from this opinion
the Company shall indemnify Giza-Singer-Even for any reasonable expenses incurred by
Giza-Singer-Even for legal representation, legal counsel, professional consulting, defense
against legal proceedings, negotiations etc. The Company shall also indemnify
Giza-Singer-Even for any amount it would be required, under legal proceedings, to pay to
any third party. The commitment to indemnify shall not apply if Giza-Singer-Even acted
with gross negligence and/or malice aforethought with regard to provision of services in
conjunction with this opinion.
Details of valuator
Valuating company:
Giza-Singer-Even Ltd. is a private business consulting firm, established in 2004. It is
the result of the merger of Giza Financial Consulting, founded in 1985, and of
Singer-Even, established in 1992. It is one of the largest, leading, independent financial
consulting companies in Israel. Giza-Singer-Even provides consulting for its customers on:
Business valuation and analysis, complex economic and financial models, financing strategy
for companies and projects, development and implementation of innovative financing
instruments (such as securitization), assistance in business and financing negotiations,
business plan preparation, expert opinions and more.
Sincerely yours,
|
__________________ Giza
Singer Even Ltd.
Valuation date:
November 9th, 2008 |
5
Restriction of
Liability
Our work is intended for the use of
Hadera Papers management. Under no circumstances should we bare any liability to a
third party that will receive our opinion with our consent, as mentioned before.
In the process of our work we have
received information, explanations and presentations from the company and/or its
representatives. The responsibility for this information, representations and explanations
lies with the supplier of that information. Our work framework did not include checking
and/or confirming that information. Taking that under consideration, our work will not be
considered and will not be a confirmation as to the validity, integrity or correction of
the information given to us. Under no circumstances shall we be held liable to any loss,
damage, cost or expense that will be caused directly or indirectly thru fraud, miss
representation, deception, false and incomplete information or withheld information by
Hadera Paper and/or any of its representatives, or any reliance on that information, under
the aforementioned.
As a rule, predictions and forecasts
relate to future events and are based on reasonable assumptions as of the valuation date.
These assumptions may vary during the forecasted/prediction period differentiating the
forecasted/predicted result from the actual financial result and future
forecasts/prediction. As a result, forecasts and predictions should not be viewed at the
same level of certainty as the audited financial reports. We do not form an opinion as to
the actual financial results of predictions and forecasts, made by the company and/or its
representatives.
Valuation is not an exact science and
as such the result depends in many cases on the Valuators subjective considerations.
Therefore, there is no one determinant fair value and we usually set a reasonable range
for the fair value. Since this opinion requires a sole value, the value was determined is
a value representing the midrange of the reasonable range. Although we believe that the
value set by us is reasonable based on the information we received, a different valuator
might reach a different value.
Our work does not constitute a due
diligent work and should not be relied upon as a due diligent report. In addition, our
work should not be used as a replacement to any process Hadera Paper is required to
conduct in relation to the transaction agreement.
6
7
|
The
objective of this valuation is the supply a fairness opinion on the fair value of the
intangible assets, the tangible assets and liabilities of the company as of 31.8.08 and
based on the financial reports for that date. It should be noted that our fairness opinion
is not to directly valuate the companys intangible asset value of goodwill (if such
exists), such value is a residual outcome of this fairness opinion and other information
derived from the purchase agreement (such as: proceeds for acquisition and accounting
owners equity at purchasing date) |
1.1 |
Methodology
of valuation |
|
The
method used for valuation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities is in conformance with guidelines of the following publications: |
|
1. |
IFRS
3 Business combination. |
|
2. |
IAS
38 Intangible assets. |
|
3. |
AICPA
Practice Aid Series: Assets Acquired in a Business Combination to Be
Used in Research and Development Activities: A Focus on Software,
Electronic Devices, and Pharmaceutical Industries. |
1.2 |
Major
information sources and work procedures |
|
In
the preparation of this work we have talked to the following management representatives: |
|
|
Mr.
Shaul Gliksberg, CFO of Hadera Paper Ltd. |
|
|
Mr.
Shmuel Molad, controller of Hadera Paper Ltd. |
|
|
Mr.
Moti Antebi, CFO of Frenkel-C.D. Ltd. |
8
|
The
major information sources used in preparation of this opinion were: |
|
n |
The
transactions immediate report dating 13.7.08. |
|
n |
Valuation
conducted by Brenfeld International Appraisers Ltd. |
|
n |
Internal
operating and financial reports. |
|
n |
Clarifications
and data provided to us by Frenkel, as mentioned in this document. |
|
n |
Public
information, including general background material on the sector. |
9
Chapter 2
Company description |
1 |
Description
of the transaction |
|
On
July 10th, 2008, Hadera Paper signed an agreement with Carmels primary
share holder, Mr. Robert Kraft (hereinafter: Kraft), and several other share
holders. As part of the agreement, Hadera Paper purchased all of Krafts shares in
Carmel and other shares of Carmel from other shareholders for the total price of about
74.7 million NIS. As a result of the transaction, Hadera Papers voting rights in
Carmel have increased from about 36.2% to about 89.3%. Another result of the transaction
was an increase in the voting rights held directly and indirectly by Hadera Papers in
Frenkel-C.D. Ltd. from about 37.93% to about 52.72%. Hadera Paper has attributed about 4
million NIS of the agreement price to the increase in the voting rights in Frenkel. The
purchase price allocation for the increase in Carmels voting shares is detailed in a
separate PPA work. |
|
In
January 2006, C.D. Packaging Systems Ltd. (held directly at that time 50% by Hadera Paper
and 50% by Carmel) completed a transaction to purchase Frenkel and Sons Ltd.s
operations in return for a 44.3% stock allocation in the merged company Frenkel. After the
completion of the transaction, Hadera Paper held directly about 27.85% of the merged
company Frenkel. In addition, thru holdings in Carmel which holds about 27.85% of Frenkel,
Hadera Paper indirectly held an additional about 10.1% of Frenkel. To the best of Hadera
Papers knowledge, the other stock holder in Frenkel is Frenkel and Sons Ltd., an
independent non stakeholder third party. As a result of completing the merger between the
operations of Frenkel and Sons Ltd. and C.D. Packaging Systems Ltd., starting from the
year 2006, the financial results of Frenkel has been included in Hadera Papers
financial reports using the equity method. |
10
|
Frenkel
is one of the leading companies in planning, producing and marketing of consumer product
packages and operates in the field of cardboard shelf packaging. Frenkel offers its
many customers from the fields of industry, agriculture, food and beverages industry and
knowledge enriched industries unique packaging solutions adjusted to their individual
needs. |
|
Frenkel
plans, produces and market shelf packages and stands for displays. Frenkels products
use mainly duplex cardboard and a little corrugated cardboard as raw materials. The duplex
cardboard is mainly imported directly from Europe and the U.S.A and partially from local
agents (indirect import). Corrugated cardboard supply from Carmel composes about 20% of
Frenkels raw materials. |
11
Chapter 3
Analysis of business results |
1 |
Statement
of operations: |
|
Below
are details from Frenkels statement of operations for the year 2007 and for the
first eight months of the year 2008 (in thousands of NIS): |
|
2007
|
1-8/2008
|
|
Amount
|
% of revenues
|
Amount
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
| 122,746 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| 81,485 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
| | |
Cost of revenues | | |
| 105,264 |
|
| 85.8 |
% |
| 71,772 |
|
| 88.1 |
% |
| | |
Gross profit | | |
| 17,482 |
|
| 14.2 |
% |
| 9,713 |
|
| 11.9 |
% |
| | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | |
| 9,339 |
|
| 7.6 |
% |
| 3,655 |
|
| 4.5 |
% |
| | |
General and administrative expenses | | |
| 5,442 |
|
| 4.4 |
% |
| 4,428 |
|
| 5.4 |
% |
| | |
Operating profit | | |
| 2,701 |
|
| 2.2 |
% |
| 1,630 |
|
| 2.0 |
% |
| | |
Financial income (expenses) | | |
| (2,638 |
) |
| (2.1 |
)% |
| (3,276 |
) |
| (4.0 |
)% |
| | |
Income (loss) after financial expenses | | |
| 63 |
|
| 0.1 |
% |
| (1,646 |
) |
| (2.0 |
)% |
| | |
Taxes on income | | |
| (35 |
) |
| 0.0 |
% |
| 417 |
|
| 0.5 |
% |
| | |
Net income (loss) | | |
| 28 |
|
| 0.0 |
% |
| (1,229 |
) |
| (1.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Below
are details from Frenkels balance sheets as of 31.8.08 (in thousands NIS): |
|
Amount
|
% of total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| 100 |
|
| 0.1 |
% |
Trade receivables | | |
| 41,406 |
|
| 33.1 |
% |
Deposits held by a related party | | |
| 2,299 |
|
| 1.8 |
% |
Other assets | | |
| 2,486 |
|
| 2.0 |
% |
Inventory | | |
| 24,201 |
|
| 19.3 |
% |
| | |
| 70,492 |
|
| 56.4 |
% |
| | |
Fixed assets | | |
Cost of fixed assets | | |
| 87,678 |
|
| 70.1 |
% |
Less - accumulated depreciation | | |
| 42,273 |
|
| 33.8 |
% |
| | |
| 45,405 |
|
| 36.3 |
% |
| | |
Intangible assets | | |
| 9,194 |
|
| 7.3 |
% |
| | |
| | |
| 125,091 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
% of total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Short term credit from banks | | |
| 35,467 |
|
| 28.4 |
% |
Trade payable | | |
| 30,993 |
|
| 24.8 |
% |
Other liabilities | | |
| 8,566 |
|
| 6.8 |
% |
| | |
| 75,026 |
|
| 60.0 |
% |
| | |
Long term Liabilities | | |
Provision for tax | | |
| 3,473 |
|
| 2.8 |
% |
Long term loans from banks | | |
| 16,338 |
|
| 13.1 |
% |
Accrued severance pay, net | | |
| 1,656 |
|
| 1.3 |
% |
| | |
| 21,467 |
|
| 17.2 |
% |
| | |
Owner's equity | | |
| 28,598 |
|
| 22.9 |
% |
| | |
| | |
| 125,091 |
|
| 100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
13
Chapter 4
Valuation Methodology |
|
In
general, accounting standards regarding business combinations provide examples
for assets which meet requirements for recognition as intangible assets separate from
goodwill, as follows: |
|
1. |
Base
(or core) technologies and process technologies. |
|
2. |
Intangible
assets associated with customers (usually, customer base). |
|
3. |
Brand,
trademarks, trade names and intellectual property associated there with. |
|
4. |
Commercial
agreements which are not at normal market conditions. |
|
5. |
Non-compete
agreements. |
|
In
determining the fair value for each intangible asset, valuations must account for specific
asset factors, including: |
|
1. |
The
economic benefit arising from the asset. |
|
2. |
The
assets remaining economic life. |
|
3. |
The
assets risk profile (relative to the companys overall operation
risk). |
2. |
Summary
of intangible assets valuated |
|
The
designated assets were valuated based on their fair value, as defined in the introduction
to this report. Before determining our opinion of the fair value of intangible assets, the
following had been considered, along with other relevant factors: |
|
1. |
Scope,
nature and usefulness of the intangible assets. |
|
2. |
Revenue
generation or cost reduction attributes of the intangible assets. |
|
3. |
Nature
and timing of functional or economic obsolescence for each intangible asset. |
|
4. |
The
relative risk and uncertainty associated with investment in intangible assets. |
14
|
In
selecting the proper method for valuation of the intangible assets, we have accounted for
the three traditional methods for such valuation: The market approach, revenue approach
and cost approach (for farther explanation see the following section). |
|
In
regards to the company, all of the intangible assets that might have existed at the
valuation date where taken under consideration in valuation analysis. Potential intangible
assets were identified thru an economical analysis of the transaction, a review of all the
supporting documents and materials and deliberations with the managements of Hadera Paper
and Frenkel. |
|
As
a result of our review, we identified one category of intangible assets which meet the
criteria for separate recognition (as required by applicable accounting standards), other
than goodwill: |
|
|
Backlog as
per clarifications received from the company, the company has an existing backlog. |
|
Other
potential categories of intangible assets that where reviewed but did not meet substantial
or accounting criteria in order to form an asset were: |
|
|
Brand the
products made by the company are not branded and are more of shelf products,
which are more affected by prices than branding. Therefore, the company does not have an
intangible asset defined as brand. |
|
|
Customer
base as per clarifications received from the company, the company has regular
returning customers that meet the criteria for customer base; but, since the total
expected DCF from customer base is negative, no purchase price was allocated to customer
base. |
|
|
Technology from our talks with the company, we have come to the conclusion
that no unique technology exists in the company (core technology, technology in R&D
processes and existing technology). |
|
|
Commercial agreements as per the companys clarifications, there are no
commercial agreements that are not at market conditions; and therefore, no intangible
asset exists. |
|
|
Non
competition agreement the agreement includes a standard non competition
clause, which the company values to be of no significant value. The company believes that
the lack of a non competition clause would not have brought a possible decrease in future
revenues. |
15
3. |
Methodology
of valuation |
|
The
method used for valuation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities is in conformance with guidelines of the following publications: |
|
1. |
IFRS
3 Business combination. |
|
2. |
IAS
38 Intangible assets. |
|
3. |
AICPA
Practice Aid Series: Assets Acquired in a Business Combination to Be
Used in Research and Development Activities: A Focus on Software,
Electronic Devices, and Pharmaceutical Industries. |
|
The
original difference created in the acquisition is to be attributed to the intangible
assets, tangible assets and liabilities in accordance with these accounting publications.
The original difference is derived from deducting the purchasing companys
proportionate part in the equity value of the purchased company from the proceeds from
acquisition. |
|
In
short, the original difference would be attributed to the following components: |
|
1. |
The
difference between the fair value and book value of the tangible assets and
liabilities, as of the purchase date. |
|
2. |
The
fair value of the intangible assets of the purchased company. |
|
3. |
The
residual original difference that can not be attribution to the previous
components will be attributed to goodwill. |
|
In
accordance with the accounting publications and the USA accounting guide, there are three
principal methodological approaches to valuating the tangible and intangible
assets and liabilities. |
|
The
characteristics of the asset must be carefully considered, in order to choose which of
the following approaches fits best the evaluated asset: |
16
|
1. |
The
market approach in accordance with this approach,
the fair value is best valued by the prices recently paid for similar
assets. Adjustments to the quoted market prices are made in order to
reflect the differences in condition and use period between the evaluated
asset and the similar assets. |
|
2. |
The revenue approach in accordance with this
approach, the fair value is dependent on the current value of the future
economical usefulness derived from ownership of the asset. In the center of this
approach lies the analysis of the potential profits represented by the asset and
the basic risks involved in receiving these profits. The economical value of
this futuristic economical usefulness is valuating the net DCF using the
acceptable return rates for similar assets in the market. |
|
3. |
The cost approach in accordance with this method,
the fair value is evaluated using the replacement costs of the asset net of the
depreciation, which expresses the functional, economical or technological
depreciation of the current asset in comparison to the new asset. The valuation
results from the cost method can be considered as the upper boundary of the
value in the cases where the asset can easily be replaced or renewed, since no
careful investor will purchase an existing asset for more then the price it
costs to produce a new equivalent asset. |
4. |
Tangible
assets and liabilities |
|
In
general, tangible assets and liabilities include the following: |
|
|
Current
assets, excluding inventory (cash, negotiable securities, trade receivables, other
receivables etc.); |
|
|
Investments
in affiliated companies; |
|
|
Buildings
for rent (rental real estate); |
|
|
Current
liabilities (credit from banks, suppliers, payables etc.); |
|
|
Long-term
liabilities (debentures, long-term loans, convertible debentures). |
In setting the fair value for all
tangible assets and liabilities, any valuation should account for asset-specific factors,
including its economic benefit and remaining economic life.
17
|
Under
the methodology for individual valuation of the companys non-tangible assets, one
should account for the fact that these assets are not fully stand-alone, since they
require various services from other company assets which have an economic cost not
expressed by cash flows, but which should be reflected in the valuation of the asset under
assumption that as a stand-alone asset (this is the base assumption in its valuation as a
non-tangible asset) it would pay for such services. These costs are calculated by
including contributory charges for use of these contributing assets by the non-tangible
asset. In general, contributory assets are usually fixed assets, work force, brand (if
any) and others. |
|
After
valuation of the economic value of the asset (using any of the valuation approaches), the
economic value determined for the asset should be adjusted to reflect the actual, or
theoretical, tax benefit (based on whether the asset is tax deductible or not) resulting
from asset amortization for tax purposes. |
|
When
a business combination is considered to be an acquisition of shares for tax purposes,
there is usually no parallel change in the tax base of acquired assets. That is, the tax
base for non-tangible assets is usually passed on from the acquired company to the
acquirer. Previously, accepted procedures claimed that no tax benefit should be included
in valuation of non-tangible assets, since the buyer would not be able to amortize the
acquired non-tangible assets for tax reporting purposes, and hence would not gain any tax
savings associated with asset amortization. |
18
|
However,
on the other hand, when the objective of the valuation is to assess the fair value as
defined in accounting standards, the value of tax-reduction benefits associated with
non-tangible assets should also be included in transactions in which the buyer may not
amortize the value of non-tangible assets acquired for tax purposes (i.e. tax-free
business combinations in lieu of asset acquisitions). |
|
Pursuant
to section 5.3.102 of the US Board of Public Accountancy guide, the fair value of
non-tangible assets includes the value of tax benefits arising from amortization of such
assets. The tax benefit (actual or theoretical) arising from amortization of the
non-tangible assets valuated by us is added to the net economic value of the
assets, and they are presented as a single figure. |
|
We
have assumed that amortization of acquired non-tangible assets will be recognized for tax
reporting purposes. It should be noted, that tax authorities have yet to express an
opinion on this matter. In the absence of a ruling by tax authorities, either way, our
assumption is based on instructions of the US Board guide and accepted practice, as
expressed in acquisition cost allocation work published over the past year. The position
of tax authorities may differ from the basic assumption in this work; therefore we have
indicated for each non-tangible asset the tax shield component included there in. |
|
Calculation
of the tax shield is iterative, and includes two simultaneous calculations: (1)
Calculation of tax shield value as the cash flow resulting from amortization of the
non-tangible asset multiplied by the tax rate; (2) calculation of the amortized asset
value, including the tax shield value. |
19
|
The
companys backlog was calculated for the companys revenues. As per
clarifications received from the company, there is a certain consistency among the companys
returning customers along the years. |
|
The
economic value of the companys backlog was valuated using discounted net cash flow
(DCF) expected to be derived from it over the forecast period determined by us. This is
an implementation of the revenue approach to asset valuation. |
|
The
DCF method explicitly recognizes that the current value of an asset is derived based on
different assumptions with regard to future economic benefits expected to be derived from
it, such as periodic revenues and/or cost savings. The assets economic value is
determined by discounting the net cash flows expected from it, using a discount rate which
reflects both the cost of capital of each companys operations as well as the risk
inherent in the specific asset. |
2. |
Summary
of backlog valuation |
|
Below
is a summary of valuation of the companys backlog: |
|
Total economic valuation
(thousand NIS)
|
Amortization period (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog before tax shield |
191 |
Until the end of 2008 |
|
Tax shield |
69 |
Until the end of 2008 |
|
Backlog after tax shield |
260 |
|
3. |
Basic
assumptions for cash flow forecast |
|
3.1. |
Revenues by
viewing the company and the revenue characteristics from customers
during the companys years of activities, we found that the
company has a backlog intangible asset. |
|
The
revenue base used to value the backlog was determined by the
information given to ass by the companys management and
predicts the future companys revenues from backlog existing at
transaction date. |
20
|
3.2. |
Operation
cash flow We have determined the backlog for the company
using the data received from the company that estimates the EBITDA
profit margin for the first eight months of the year 2008 with the
addition of the representative expense rate for sales and marketing
(since the realization of the backlog requires none of these
expenses). |
|
3.3. |
Contributory
charges By reviewing company operations, we have included
contributory charges in the cash flow from the customer base for 3
contributory assets: |
|
a. |
Fixed
assets We have included an expense at 8% pre-tax (our
estimation of the appropriate economic return required from fixed
assets) of the remaining fair value of fixed assets, of which we have
deducted the appropriate taxes. |
|
b. |
Work
force although, according to our review, work force is not a
tangible asset which may be separately valuated a contributory
charge for it should be included. This charge should reflect the cost
of hiring and training company staff from a stage where the company
has no staff at all. According to data and estimates provided to us
by company management, and based on our experience, the average cost
for such a task is equivalent to 2 months. |
|
The
rate of return we used in calculation the contributory charge for work force is the WACC
rate (detailed bellow), of which we have deducted the appropriate taxes. |
|
c. |
Working
capital the companys working capital represents the
funds needed by the firm to finance its current business and to
bridge the time gap between the time funds are expended in the
production process and the time payment is received for sale of
products. We have determined the contributory charge based on the
working capital for 31.8.08, given to us by the company. The rate of
return we used in calculation the contributory charge for work force is
7% pre-tax return, of which we have deducted the appropriate taxes. |
21
|
3.4. |
Taxes
on income The income tax rate used is the statutory income
tax rate. |
|
3.5. |
Inclusion
of tax benefit in asset value as we explained in the
methodology section, we assumed that asset amortization will be
tax-deductible in the year 2008. The tax rate used is the statutory
tax rate for the year 2008.the tax shield was calculated using the
statutory tax rate for the year 2008. |
22
Chapter 6 Cost
of capital and discount rate |
The valuation model assumes a
weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 11%.
The cost of capital reflects, among
others, the business-operating risk of the companys operations. The risk is partly
the market risk and partly the risk derived from the companys activities.
The normative market cost of capita
for various markets (based on professional literature and other publicly available
information, including other valuations of public companies, as well as Giza Singer
Evens professional experience in the field) usually range from about 6% for the net
cash flow of yielding real estate assets, to about 8%-10% for companies with an expected
relatively low business-operational volatility (Osem and Shufersal for example), to about
11%-15% cost of capital for relatively well founded Hi-Tech companies and companies with a
relative high business-operational volatility. The cost of capital of over 15% is usually
a characteristic of a Hi-Tech company in its early development stages and companies
operating in high risk markets. To the normative market cost of capital, we add a premium
for the specific risk associated with the company.
Frenkels cost of capital was
derived using our experience and professional expertise as well as the customary discount
rates used by our company for business-operational systematic risk for operational cash
flow in similar markets in addition to the business-operational specific risk associated
with the company and its market, taking to consideration that the company operates in a
very competitive market.
Using our experience and professional
expertise, with the adjustments derived from our knowledge of the company and the
companys exposure to market and macro economical risks, we estimated the
companys WACC to be about 11%.
23
As an additional check, In
order to estimate the cost of capital for Frenkels operations, we have estimated the
companys WACC (using the CAPM model to calculate the cost of equity) by comparing to
similar public companies and other assumptions concerning the appropriate debt cost and
structure for the company. The weighted cost of capital obtained by this estimate came out
to about 11%.
24
Chapter 7
Additional adjustments to tangible assets |
We have valuated the companys
following assets, as of the purchase date:
1. |
Property,
plant and equipment |
|
The
fair value of the companys PPE was based on an independent valuation conducted by
Brenfeld International Appraisers Ltd. (in thousands of NIS): |
|
|
31.8.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value (based on appraiser's valuation) |
|
|
49,553 |
|
|
| | |
| | |
Book value of fixed assets | | |
45,405 | | |
| | |
| | |
Book value of intangible assets* | | |
451 | | |
| | |
| | |
Fair value over book value | | |
3,697 | | |
|
|
|
|
*
In his valuation, the appraiser valued the books fixed assets as well as the
intangible books fixed assets (such as software and ERP systems). |
|
According
to the company, all of the companys rental agreements are at market value as such do
not have excess purchase price allocation. |
|
In
accordance with the companys clarifications, the companys inventory is
composed mainly of raw materials, aiding materials and finished goods. The book value of
the raw material and aiding materials inventory represents their fair value. According to
the accounting principles, the inventory in process and finished goods fair value is
the expected revenues net of completion costs and the profit margin associated with
completion costs. It should be mentioned that according to the company, the completion
costs are not significant. In accordance with these, we calculated the inventorys
fair value over book value to be about 258 thousand NIS. |
25
4. |
Operating
working capital |
|
The
value of the working capital include: trade receivable, trade payable and other account
receivables account payables was valuated on the bases of its book value on the purchasing
date. According to the company, the book value of operating working capital value on the
purchase date does not significantly vary from the fair value. |
5. |
Long
and short term Liabilities |
|
In
accordance with the companys clarifications, the loans taken from financial
institution and/or from others and bare an interest at market prices and therefore the
book value reflects the loans fair value. |
6. |
Contingent
liabilities |
|
In
accordance with the companys clarifications, the amount a third independent party
will be willing to pay in order to take on itself the liabilities, in addition to the
provisions made by the company in accordance with GAAP, is negligible and therefore we did
not allocate any amount to them. |
|
The
liquidation of guarantees made by the company is estimated by the company at a very low
probability and as such does not bare the significance required to allocate an amount to
them. |
26
Below is a summary of the purchase
price allocation to tangible and intangible assets, assuming a 100% purchase of Frenkel
(in thousand NIS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
|
| 27,053 |
|
|
| | |
|
Acquired owner's equity | | |
| 28,598 |
|
|
| | |
|
Excess purchase price to be allocated | | |
| (1,544 |
) |
|
| | |
|
Excess purchase price allocated to backlog | | |
| 260 |
|
|
| | |
|
Tax provision for backlog* | | |
| (70 |
) |
|
| | |
|
Excess purchase price allocated to PPE | | |
| 3,697 |
|
|
| | |
|
Tax provision for PPE* | | |
| (924 |
) |
|
| | |
|
Excess purchase price allocated to inventory | | |
| 258 |
|
|
| | |
|
Tax provision for inventory* | | |
| (70 |
) |
|
| | |
|
purchase price allocated for existing goodwill | | |
| (8,742 |
) |
|
| | |
|
Excess purchase price allocated | | |
| (5,591 |
) |
|
| | |
|
Goodwill | | |
| 4,047 |
|
|
|
|
* The tax provision was calculated
using the assumption of a 25% long term tax rate, with the exclusion of inventory and
backlog which were calculated using a 27% short term tax rate.
27
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
November 9th,
2008
810782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To: |
|
Mr. Motti Antebi |
Tel: 046179174 |
Frenkel CD Ltd. |
M: 0523605074 |
4 Granit st. |
motia@frenkel-cd.co.il |
Caesarea Industrial Park 38900 |
Dear Sir,
RE: Valuation of Equipment and Machinery
Fair Market Value as of 31.08.08
and Life cycle valuation
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
1. |
Introduction:
Purpose and Disclosure |
|
1.1 |
Purpose
and Deciding Date for Appraisement: |
|
I,
Nachman Berenfeld (Engineer), the undersigned, was requested by the general management of
Frenkel CD Ltd. (Hereafter the company) to express my professional expertise
with regards to the fair value estimation (the sum for which property may be
exchanged in a deal between a voluntary purchaser and a voluntary seller) and the life
cycle valuation of equipment and machinery of the company as of 31.08.08 (hereafter: the
deciding date for appraisement) for the purpose of including these data in the companys
financial statements in accordance with the equities regulations and accounting
regulation number 27 (international regulation 16). |
|
1.2 |
Orderer
and Disclosure |
|
This
document was requested by Frenkel CD Ltd on Sept. 28th 2008 (hereafter: date
of engagement). Between the date of engagement and the deciding date no substantial
changes have occurred to the fair value estimation of the properties subject to
valuation. I hereby express my expertise for the purpose of the implementation of
accounting regulation number 27 (international regulation number 16). I agree that the
views expressed here are to be included in the companys financial reports. I hereby
declare I have never been convicted with a felony included in section 222 (a) of the firm
legislative act (1999) nor with a felony included in the stock market act (1968). |
|
Address: 3 Ha-Hilazon Street, Ramat Gan |
|
Education: Bachelor
degree in mechanical engineering (1974). License number 18929, the Tel Aviv University.
Graduate of the following courses: |
|
|
Non-destructive
examination, the Technion. |
|
|
Industrial
hazard assessment, the Tel Aviv University |
|
|
Advanced
profit loss, the London College of Insurance |
|
|
Computer
system and database damage specialization, the TELA insurance company, Germany |
|
|
Senior
corporate director course, the Lahav school of management, the Tel Aviv university |
|
|
Member
of the academic property appraisers union |
|
|
Member
of the conflagration examiners union in Israel. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
Professional Background:
Owner of a private engineering and
appraisers agency since 1980. Specialized in industrial appraisement for insurance
companies, banks, foreclosure attorneys, private companies, accountants, lawyers, courts
of law etc. A licensed appraiser of governmental agencies and ministries such as: The
investment center, the national social security, Bank Hapoalim, the Israeli Electricity
Company and more.
Appointed as arbitrator by the
court of law on numerous occasions. A senior teacher at the Insurance College, for the
subjects of appraisement, profit loss and risk management,
1979-1980: The Israeli Aviation
Industry mechanical engineer design, production and costs examiner for
aviation and transportation projects.
1976-1979: The Ministry of Defense
mechanical engineer and aerial and land weapon system designer.
|
I
hereby declare I have no interest in any of the subjects properties and no pendency
relationship exists between the company, the orderer and myself. The fees to be paid are
not dependant in any way on the result of this appraisement, including the conditioning
of payment and the results of this appraisement. |
|
1.5 |
Experts
and Consultants: |
|
This
appraisement report was not performed with the external assistance of any experts or
consultants. |
|
1.6 |
Visitation
to the company and physical verification of the assets: |
|
Performed
by the undersigned on 2.10.08. During this visit I have identified the equipment and
conducted an equipment specification log. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
|
As
per your request dated 28.9.08 we have performed an estimation of your companys
equipment, from a voluntary purchaser to a voluntary seller inclusive in a productive and
active factories (going-concern), fair value. |
2 |
Deciding
Date for this Valuation: |
3 |
General
Description of the companies: |
|
3.1 |
Frenkel
CD Ltd. Caesarea |
|
3.1.1 |
The
company is one of Israels producers of cardboard packaging for industrial and
agricultural purposes. |
|
3.1.2 |
The
Frenkel CD company integrates equipment in advanced processes in which raw materials are
used, in addition to efficient management, in order to produce a wide variety of products
and maintaining competitive pricing. |
|
3.1.3 |
Amongst
the companys clients are some of the leading food and drinks and agricultural
export companies. |
|
3.1.4 |
The
companys products include ripple cardboard boxes, trays, single and double rippled
products. These are used for the purpose of shipping and storing of fresh food,
vegetables, flowers, dairy products, industrial products and commodities. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
4. |
Description
of the Frenkel CD factory- Caesarea |
|
4.1 |
The
Factory is a modern factory on an area of 20 K sq.m, in the Caesarea industrial zone, a
strategic location between Tel Aviv and Haifa. |
|
4.2 |
The
factory employs 290 workers in two shifts. |
|
4.3 |
The
products include agricultural, commercial and commodities boxes. |
|
4.4 |
The
company produces ripple cardboard from raw material, paper rolls and processing, gluing,
cutting, patterning to printing and assembly of cardboard boxes. |
|
4.5 |
The
Machinery array includes: |
|
4.5.1 |
Printing
machines 4 six color printing machines and 1 one color printing machine. |
|
4.5.2 |
Cutting
and folding machines- 11 cutting and folding machines. |
|
4.5.3 |
Industrial
Services Glue production and preparation sites, emergency generator, compressed
air systems etc. |
|
4.5.4 |
Collection,
shredding and processing of cardboard waste products. |
5. |
Principles
and Methods of Valuation |
|
5.1 |
During
the month of October I have visited your factory in Caserea, and identified the equipment
and facilities in the presence of the companys delegate. |
|
5.2 |
The
estimation was based on a base value as part of a productive and active factory. In
addition, the current value was measured as of the date of estimation, considering
depreciation rate on one hand and development and improvement on the other, installation
costs, connection to auxiliary and operation systems. |
|
5.3 |
To
determine the value of machinery and equipment we were provided with invoices, technical
specifications, equipment blueprints and a number 11 form. |
|
5.4 |
To
determine the value of equipment we have examined comparative data from various factories
which we have appraised recently. |
|
5.5 |
Forklifts
The forklifts specifications was determined in accordance with the
licenses provided to us. The prices were determined based on standard market values. |
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
|
5.6 |
The
determination of values considered the type of equipment, the date pf purchase, make,
investment in maintenance, restoration, operational depreciation etc. |
|
5.7 |
The
working life expresses the reasonable period of usage pf equipment in proper maintenance
conditions as is the standard in cardboard production factories. |
|
The
costs of equipment listed hereafter express our opinion regarding their purchase value to
the voluntary purchaser and the voluntary seller. They express the value considering the
active and productive nature of the factories, fair value, and their freedom of any
subjection or debt as of 31.8.08. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 Frenkel CD Ltd. - Caesarea |
|
|
$ | 13,795,500 |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total | | |
$ | 13,795,500 |
|
|
|
| |
|
(Thirteen
million, seven hundred ninety five thousand and five hundred) |
Sincerely Yours,
Nachman Berenfeld
Engineer
Berenfeld International Loss Adjusters and Risk Management Ltd.
Attached herewith:
Details of equipment and value
Photos
Commission fees
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
BERENFELD
INTERNATIONAL LOSS ADJUSTERS LTD.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INDUSTRY & HI-TECH
|
|
|
NACHMAN BERENFELD - ENGINEER
JAKOB WIENER - LOSS ADJUSTER
AMIR BERENFELD - ENGINEER
|
|
Appendix Details re
regulation 8b (d) and the third amendment to the equities regulatory act (immediate and
periodic reports) (1970) relating to value estimates
1. |
Identification
of valuation subject |
|
1.1. |
Subject
of valuation specified in the above document |
2. |
Details
of business relations |
|
2.1 |
The
orderer is the management of Frenkel CD Ltd. |
|
2.2 |
The
date of engagement is 28.9.08 |
|
2.3 |
The
purposes of the work ordered are detailed above. |
|
2.4 |
The
name of the appraiser, signature and date are detailed above. |
|
2.5 |
Details
of the appraiser's education are mentioned above. |
|
2.6 |
The
agreement of the appraiser to the inclusion of this report is detailed above. |
|
2.7 |
Commission
fees are free of pendency or conditions. There is no agreement whatsoever re the values
stated. |
|
3.1 |
The
values determined are mentioned above. The valuation is based on financial reports as of
30.6.08. |
|
3.2 |
In
light of the conclusions of the report sensitivity analyses are not required. |
|
3.3 |
The
valuated company's capital is irrelevant. |
|
3.4 |
The
price of the company's stock is irrelevant. |
|
3.5 |
To
the best of my knowledge no similar contracts have been signed re the production arrays
of Frenkel CD Ltd. |
|
3.6 |
Details
of the average price of the company's stock in the past six months are irrelevant. |
|
4.1 |
The
description of the subjected company is detailed above. The analyses re the relevant
markets and the business environment
are included in the valuation. |
|
4.2 |
The
facts, assumptions and calculation on which this report is based are included in this
valuation. |
|
4.3 |
As
specified in this valuation Frenkel CD has provided the appraiser with the magnitude of
the investment as of 30.06.08. |
|
4.4 |
The
method and grounds for selection are detailed in the valuation. |
|
4.5 |
The
sources of information used for this valuation are detailed, I was not denied any other
valuable sources. |
|
5.1 |
This
valuation was not based on substantially significant valuations of external experts. |
|
3 HACHILAZON ST.
RAMAN-GAN 52522 ISRAEL
TEL. 972-3-6123515
FAX. 972-3-6123516
E-mail: beren@beren.co.il
|
|
Enclosed please find the financial
reports of the following associated companies:
|
|
Mondi
Business Paper Hadera Ltd. |
Hadera-Paper LTD group
Meizer st' Industrial Zone,
P.O.B 142 Hadera 38101, Israel
Tel: 972-4-6349402
Fax: 972-4-6339740
hq@hadera-paper.co.il
www.hadera-paper.co.il
Exhibit 4
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Supervisory Board of
Mondi Hadera Paper Ltd.
Re: |
Review
of Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated |
|
Financial
Statements for the Nine and the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
Gentlemen:
At your request, we have reviewed the
condensed interim consolidated financial statements (interim financial
statements) of Mondi Hadera Paper Ltd. (the Company) and its
subsidiaries, as follows:
|
Balance
sheet as of September 30, 2008. |
|
Income
statements for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2008. |
|
Statements
of changes in shareholders equity for the nine and three months ended September 30,
2008. |
|
Statements
of cash flows for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2008. |
Our review was conducted in
accordance with procedures prescribed by the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in
Israel. The procedures included, inter alia, reading the aforementioned interim financial
statements, reading the minutes of the shareholders meetings and meetings of the
board of directors and its committees, and making inquiries with the persons responsible
for financial and accounting affairs.
Since the review that was performed
is limited in scope and does not constitute an audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, we do not express an opinion on the aforementioned interim financial
statements.
In performing our review, nothing
came to our attention, which indicates that material adjustments are required to the
aforementioned interim financial statements for them to be deemed financial statements
prepared in conformity with international accounting standard No. 34 Interim
Financial Reporting and in accordance with Section D of the Israeli Securities
Regulations (Periodic and Immediate Reports), 1970.
Brightman Almagor &
Co.
Certified Public
Accountants
A Member Firm of Deloitte
Touche Tohmatsu
November 4, 2008
M - 1
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(NIS in thousands; Reported Amounts)
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2007
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| 4,222 |
|
| 2,274 |
|
| 323 |
|
Trade receivables | | |
| 198,197 |
|
| 194,320 |
|
| 190,935 |
|
Other receivables | | |
| 2,402 |
|
| 4,739 |
|
| 2,395 |
|
Inventories | | |
| 114,731 |
|
| 145,620 |
|
| 143,366 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | |
| 319,552 |
|
| 346,953 |
|
| 337,019 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Non-current assets | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | |
| 153,522 |
|
| 157,565 |
|
| 156,493 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| 3,177 |
|
| 3,177 |
|
| 3,177 |
|
Other Assets | | |
| 140 |
|
| - |
|
| 440 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total non-current assets | | |
| 156,839 |
|
| 160,742 |
|
| 160,110 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | |
| 476,391 |
|
| 507,695 |
|
| 497,129 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Equity and liabilities | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities | | |
Short-term bank credit | | |
| 92,230 |
|
| 100,191 |
|
| 101,760 |
|
Current maturities of long-term bank loans | | |
| 15,454 |
|
| 12,481 |
|
| 14,387 |
|
Capital notes to shareholders | | |
| 5,016 |
|
| 5,153 |
|
| 5,514 |
|
Trade payables | | |
| 88,435 |
|
| 129,273 |
|
| 118,912 |
|
Hadera Paper Ltd. Group, net | | |
| 76,375 |
|
| 72,249 |
|
| 71,109 |
|
Current tax liabilities | | |
| 359 |
|
| 138 |
|
| 169 |
|
Other payables and accrued expenses | | |
| 16,547 |
|
(*) | 15,679 |
|
(*) | 14,786 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | |
| 294,416 |
|
| 335,164 |
|
| 326,637 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Non-current liabilities | | |
Long-term bank loans | | |
| 28,706 |
|
| 42,748 |
|
| 38,035 |
|
Capital notes to shareholders | | |
| - |
|
| 6,402 |
|
| - |
|
Deferred taxes | | |
| 23,860 |
|
| 16,349 |
|
| 18,677 |
|
Provision for pension and vacation | | |
| 6,286 |
|
(*) | 5,564 |
|
(*) | 6,453 |
|
Accrued severance pay, net | | |
| 46 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 46 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total non-current liabilities | | |
| 58,898 |
|
| 71,109 |
|
| 63,211 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Capital and reserves | | |
Share capital | | |
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
Premium | | |
| 43,352 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
Capital reserves | | |
| 929 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 929 |
|
Retained earnings | | |
| 78,795 |
|
| 57,140 |
|
| 62,999 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 123,077 |
|
| 101,422 |
|
| 107,281 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total equity and liabilities | | |
| 476,391 |
|
| 507,695 |
|
| 497,129 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Muhlgay |
A. Solel |
R. Starkov |
Financial Director |
General Manager |
Chairman of the Supervisory Board |
Approval date of the interim
financial statements November 4, 2008.
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
M - 2
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
(NIS in thousands)
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
2007
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
| 573,218 |
|
| 569,055 |
|
| 189,998 |
|
| 190,064 |
|
| 770,032 |
|
Cost of sales | | |
| 509,177 |
|
| 507,983 |
|
| 168,385 |
|
| 164,995 |
|
| 688,000 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | |
| 64,041 |
|
| 61,072 |
|
| 21,613 |
|
| 25,069 |
|
| 82,032 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating costs and expenses | | |
Selling expenses | | |
| 28,664 |
|
| 27,841 |
|
| 9,965 |
|
| 9,792 |
|
| 37,889 |
|
General and administrative expenses | | |
| 7,328 |
|
| 7,623 |
|
| 1,948 |
|
| 3,330 |
|
| 10,532 |
|
Other (income) expenses | | |
| 621 |
|
| (256 |
) |
| (77 |
) |
| (132 |
) |
| (313 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 36,613 |
|
| 35,208 |
|
| 11,836 |
|
| 12,990 |
|
| 48,108 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating profit | | |
| 27,428 |
|
| 25,864 |
|
| 9,777 |
|
| 12,079 |
|
| 33,924 |
|
| | |
Finance income | | |
| (4,821 |
) |
| (1,638 |
) |
| (257 |
) |
| (2,615 |
) |
| (5,408 |
) |
Finance costs | | |
| 10,942 |
|
| 10,242 |
|
| 4,528 |
|
| 3,510 |
|
| 13,822 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 6,121 |
|
| 8,604 |
|
| 4,271 |
|
| 895 |
|
| 8,414 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Profit before tax | | |
| 21,307 |
|
| 17,260 |
|
| 5,506 |
|
| 11,184 |
|
| 25,510 |
|
| | |
Income tax charge | | |
| 5,511 |
|
| 4,829 |
|
| 1,673 |
|
| 3,004 |
|
| 7,220 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Profit for the period | | |
| 15,796 |
|
| 12,431 |
|
| 3,833 |
|
| 8,180 |
|
| 18,290 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
M - 3
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERIM STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(NIS in thousands; Reported Amounts)
|
Share
capital
|
Premium
|
Capital
reserves
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
(Unaudited) | | |
Balance - January 1, 2008 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 62,999 |
|
| 107,281 |
|
Profit for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 15,796 |
|
| 15,796 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2008 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 78,795 |
|
| 123,077 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 | | |
(Unaudited) | | |
Balance - January 1, 2007 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 44,709 |
|
| 88,991 |
|
Profit for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 12,431 |
|
| 12,431 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2007 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 57,140 |
|
| 101,422 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Year ended December 31, 2007 | | |
Balance - January 1, 2007 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 44,709 |
|
| 88,991 |
|
Profit for the year | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 18,290 |
|
| 18,290 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - December 31, 2007 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 62,999 |
|
| 107,281 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Three months ended September 30, 2008 | | |
(Unaudited) | | |
Balance - July 1, 2008 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 74,962 |
|
| 119,244 |
|
Profit for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 3,833 |
|
| 3,833 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2008 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 78,795 |
|
| 123,077 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Three months ended September 30, 2007 | | |
(Unaudited) | | |
Balance - July 1, 2007 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 48,960 |
|
| 93,242 |
|
Profit for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 8,180 |
|
| 8,180 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2007 | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 57,140 |
|
| 101,422 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
M - 4
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(NIS in thousands; Reported Amounts)
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 7
|
|
Unaudited
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows - operating activities |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Operating profit for the period | | |
| 27,428 |
|
| 25,864 |
|
| 9,777 |
|
| 12,079 |
|
| 33,924 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile operating profit to net | | |
cash used in operating activities | | |
(Appendix A) | | |
| 9,592 |
|
| (18,188 |
) |
| (8,352 |
) |
| (6,735 |
) |
| (15,125 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash from operating activities | | |
| 37,020 |
|
| 7,676 |
|
| 1,425 |
|
| 5,344 |
|
| 18,799 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Cash flows - investing activities | | |
Acquisition of property plant and equipment | | |
| (5,965 |
) |
| (4,943 |
) |
| (1,486 |
) |
| (1,325 |
) |
| (8,458 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property plant and | | |
equipment | | |
| 251 |
|
| 256 |
|
| 77 |
|
| 81 |
|
| 376 |
|
Interest received | | |
| 324 |
|
| 277 |
|
| 118 |
|
| 100 |
|
| 393 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash used in investing activities | | |
| (5,390 |
) |
| (4,410 |
) |
| (1,291 |
) |
| (1,144 |
) |
| (7,689 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Cash flows - financing activities | | |
Short-term bank credit, net | | |
| (9,530 |
) |
| 3,451 |
|
| 540 |
|
| 3,185 |
|
| 5,020 |
|
Repayment of long-term bank loans | | |
| (9,185 |
) |
| (13,249 |
) |
| (2,733 |
) |
| (3,015 |
) |
| (15,927 |
) |
Proceeds of long-term bank loans | | |
| - |
|
| 18,000 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 18,000 |
|
Repayment of long-term capital | | |
notes to shareholders | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (5,676 |
) |
Interest paid | | |
| (9,016 |
) |
| (9,209 |
) |
| (2,859 |
) |
| (2,777 |
) |
| (12,219 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash from (used in) financing | | |
activities | | |
| (27,731 |
) |
| (1,007 |
) |
| (5,052 |
) |
| (2,607 |
) |
| (10,802 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | | |
| 3,899 |
|
| 2,259 |
|
| (4,918 |
) |
| 1,593 |
|
| 308 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the | | |
beginning of the financial period | | |
| 323 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 9,140 |
|
| 681 |
|
| 15 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents of the | | |
end of the financial period | | |
| 4,222 |
|
| 2,274 |
|
| 4,222 |
|
| 2,274 |
|
| 323 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
M - 5
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
APPENDICES TO STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(NIS in thousands; Reported Amounts)
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 7
|
|
Unaudited
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Adjustments to reconcile operating |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
profit (loss) to net cash provided by (used | | |
in) operating activities | | |
| | |
Finance income (expenses), net | | |
| 2,571 |
|
| 328 |
|
| (1,530 |
) |
| 1,782 |
|
| 3,412 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | |
| 8,729 |
|
| 7,917 |
|
| 2,901 |
|
| 3,007 |
|
| 10,701 |
|
Capital loss (gain) on disposal of property | | |
plant and equipment | | |
| 620 |
|
| (256 |
) |
| (78 |
) |
| (81 |
) |
| (313 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate and linkage | | |
differences of long-term bank loans | | |
| 923 |
|
| 1,366 |
|
| 343 |
|
| 523 |
|
| 1,237 |
|
Effect of exchange rate | | |
differences of long-term | | |
capital notes to shareholders | | |
| (500 |
) |
| (191 |
) |
| 96 |
|
| (410 |
) |
| (556 |
) |
| | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | |
Increase in trade receivables | | |
| (7,262 |
) |
| (21,146 |
) |
| (11,504 |
) |
| (1,936 |
) |
| (17,761 |
) |
Decrease (increase) | | |
in other receivables | | |
| (7 |
) |
| (505 |
) |
| 202 |
|
| (1,098 |
) |
| 1,915 |
|
Decrease (increase) | | |
in inventories | | |
| 28,635 |
|
| (36,504 |
) |
| 2,006 |
|
| (34,469 |
) |
| (34,250 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in trade payables | | |
| (31,140 |
) |
| 21,015 |
|
| (2,810 |
) |
| 24,994 |
|
| 12,394 |
|
Increase in Hadera Paper Ltd. Group, net | | |
| 5,266 |
|
| 9,442 |
|
| 1,574 |
|
| 2,416 |
|
| 8,302 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other Assets | | |
| 300 |
|
| - |
|
| (68 |
) |
| - |
|
| (440 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other | | |
payables and accrued expenses | | |
| 1,542 |
|
| 446 |
|
| 548 |
|
| (1,433 |
) |
| 355 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 9,677 |
|
| (18,088 |
) |
| (8,320 |
) |
| (6,705 |
) |
| (15,004 |
) |
Income tax paid | | |
| (85 |
) |
| (100 |
) |
| (32 |
) |
| (30 |
) |
| (121 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 9,592 |
|
| (18,188 |
) |
| (8,352 |
) |
| (6,735 |
) |
| (15,125 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
B. Non-cash activities | | |
Acquisition of property plant and | | |
equipment on credit | | |
| 663 |
|
| 251 |
|
| 491 |
|
| (109 |
) |
| (1,489 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
M - 6
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 1 |
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND GENERAL |
|
A. |
Description
of Business |
|
Mondi
Hadera Paper Ltd. (the Company) was incorporated and commenced operations on
January 1, 2000. The Company and its Subsidiaries are engaged in the production and
marketing of paper, mainly in Israel. |
|
The
Company is presently owned by Neusiedler Holdings BV. (NHBV or the Parent
Company) (50.1%) and Hadera Paper Ltd. (AIPM) (49.9%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company |
- |
Mondi Hadera Paper Ltd. |
|
|
|
The Group |
- |
the Company and its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
- |
companies in which the Company control, (as defined by IAS 27) directly or indirectly, and whose financial statements are fully consolidated with those of the Company. |
|
|
|
Related Parties |
- |
as defined by IAS 24. |
|
|
|
Interested Parties |
- |
as defined in the Israeli Securities Regulations (Presentation of Financial Statements), 1993. |
|
|
|
Controlling Shareholder |
- |
as defined in the Israeli Securities law and Regulations. 1968. |
|
|
|
NIS |
- |
New Israeli Shekel. |
|
|
|
CPI |
- |
the Israeli consumer price index. |
|
|
|
Dollar |
- |
the U.S. dollar. |
|
|
|
Euro |
- |
the United European currency. |
M - 7
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
A. |
Applying
international accounting standards (IFRS) |
|
The
condensed interim financial statements have been prepared using accounting policies
consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards and in accordance with
International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34 Interim Financial Reporting. |
|
The
principal accounting policies described in the following notes were applied in accordance
to the IFRS, in a consistent manner and to all previous reporting periods presented in
these condensed interim financial statements and to the opening balance sheet. |
|
The
unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2008
and for the nine and three months then ended (interim financial statements)
of the Company and subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007
and for the year then ended, including the notes thereto. |
|
(2) |
First
time IFRS standards adoption |
|
According
to standard No. 29 Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS
(standard No. 29), the Company applies International Financial Reporting
Standards and interpretations of the committee of the International Accounting Standard
Board (IASB) Starting January 1, 2008. |
|
In
compliance with the mentioned above, the condensed interim financial statements, as of
September 30, 2008 and for the nine and three months then ended, including all previous
reporting periods have been prepared under accounting policies consistent with
International Financial Reporting Standards and interpretations published by the
International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) and in accordance with International
Accounting Standard (IAS) 34 Interim Financial Reporting. |
|
In
these condensed interim financial statements the Company applied IFRS 1 First time
Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS No. 1),
which determines instructions for first time implementation of IFRS. |
|
According
to IFRS No. 1 the effective date for implementing IFRS standards is commencing January 1,
2007. |
M - 8
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
A. |
Applying
international accounting standards (IFRS) (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
First
time IFRS standards adoption (Cont.) |
|
The
Company has applied in a retroactive manner the IFRS standards for all reporting periods
presented in the condensed interim financial statements. The Company implemented the IFRS
standards which have been published as of the preparation date of the condensed interim
Financial Statements and expected to be affective as of December 31, 2008. While applying
the said transition instructions the Company chose to apply two reliefs allowed under
IFRS 1. See note 6f. |
|
Until
the adoption of IFRS the Company conducted the Financial Reporting in accordance with the
Israeli GAAP. The annual financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and for the periods
then ended were prepared under the Israeli GAAP standards. The comparative financial
statements were represented in the condensed interim financial statements in accordance
to the IFRS standards. See note 6 for the relevant material adjustments between the
Israeli GAAP and the IFRS. |
|
B. |
The
condensed Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with section D of
the Israeli Securities Regulations (Periodic and Immediate Reports), 1970. |
|
Until
December 31, 2003, Israel was considered a country in which hyper-inflation conditions
exist. Therefore, non-monetary balances in the balance sheet were presented on the
historical nominal amount and were adjusted to changes in the exchange rate of the U.S.
dollar. As of December 31, 2003 when the economy ceased to be hyper-inflationary and the
Company no longer adjusted its financial statements to the U.S. dollar, the adjusted
amounts as of this date were used as the historical costs. The financial statements were
edited on the basis of the historical cost, except for: |
|
n |
Assets
and liabilities measured by fair value: financial assets measured by fair value recorded
directly as profit or loss. |
|
n |
Non-current
assets, except for investment property measured by fair value classified as held for sale
are measured at the lower of their previous carrying amount and fair value less costs of
sale. |
|
n |
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. |
|
n |
Property,
plant and equipment and intangibles assets are presented at the lower of the cost less
accumulated amortizations and the recoverable amount. |
|
n |
Liabilities
to employees as described in note 2P. |
M - 9
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
D. |
Basis
of consolidation |
|
The
consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and
entities controlled by the Company (its subsidiaries). Control is achieved where the
Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as
to obtain benefits from its activities. |
|
The
results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the
consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the
effective date of disposal, as appropriate. |
|
Where
necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring
their accounting policies into line with those used by other members of the Group. |
|
All
intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated in full on
consolidation. |
|
For
the effect of the issuance of IAS 27 (revised) Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements see note 2R below. |
|
Goodwill
arising on the acquisition of a subsidiary represents the excess of the cost of
acquisition over the Groups interest in the net fair value of the identifiable
assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the subsidiary or jointly controlled
entity recognised at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is initially recognised as an
asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. |
|
For
the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Groups
cash-generating units expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
Cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated are tested for impairment
annually, or more frequently when there is an indication that the unit may be impaired.
If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount of
the unit, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any
goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the
basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. An impairment loss recognised for
goodwill is not reversed in a subsequent period. |
|
On
disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the
determination of the profit or loss on disposal. |
M - 10
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
F. |
Property,
plant and equipment |
|
Property,
plant and equipments are tangible items, which are held for use in the manufacture or
supply of goods or services, or leased to others, which are predicted to be used for more
than one period. The Company presents its property, plant and equipments items according
to the cost model. |
|
Under
the cost method a property, plant and equipment are presented at the balance sheet
at cost (net of any investment grants), less any accumulated depreciation and any
accumulated impairment losses. The cost includes the cost of the assets acquisition as
well as costs that can be directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and
condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by
management. |
|
Depreciation
is calculated using the straight-line method at rates considered adequate to depreciate
the assets over their estimated useful lives. Amortization of leasehold improvements is
computed over the shorter of the term of the lease, including any option period, where
the Company intends to exercise such option, or their useful life. |
|
The
annual depreciation and amortization rates are: |
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
10 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
5-20 (mainly 5%) |
|
Motor vehicles |
15-20 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
6-33 |
|
Scrap
value, depreciation method and the assets useful lives are being reviewed by management
at the end of every financial year. Changes are handled as a change of estimation and are
applied from here on. |
|
The
gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant and
equipment is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying
amount of the asset and is recognized in the income statement. |
M - 11
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
G. |
Impairment
of tangible and intangible assets excluding goodwill |
|
At
each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and
intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have
suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the
asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any).
Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the
Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset
belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified,
corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise
they are allocated to the smallest group of cash-generating units for which a reasonable
and consistent allocation basis can be identified. |
|
Intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are
tested for impairment annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be
impaired. |
|
Recoverable
amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using
a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows
have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit)
is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset
(cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is
recognised immediately in profit or loss. |
|
Where
an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset
(cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount,
but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would
have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset
(cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised
immediately in profit or loss. |
|
Inventories
are assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production
for such sale or in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production
process or in the rendering of services. |
|
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost of inventories includes
all the cost of purchase, direct labor, fixed and variable production over heads and
other cost that are incurred, in bringing the inventories to their present location and
condition. |
F - 12
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
Net
realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less
the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. |
|
Cost
determined as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products |
- |
Based on actual production cost. |
|
Raw, auxiliary materials and other |
- |
Based on moving-average basis. |
|
Provisions
are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a
result of a past event, it is probable that the Group will be required to settle the
obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. |
|
The
amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to
settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date, taking into account the risks
and uncertainties surrounding the obligation.
Where a provision is measured using the
cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present
value of those cash flows. |
|
When
some or all of the economic benefits to settle a provision are expected to be recovered
from a third party, the receivable is recognized as an asset if it is virtually certain
that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured
reliably. |
|
Investments
are recognised and derecognised on trade date where the purchase or sale of an investment
is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the investment within the timeframe
established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, plus
transaction costs, except for those financial assets classified as at fair value through
profit or loss, which are initially measured at fair value. |
|
Financial
assets are classified into the following specified categories: |
|
|
Financial
assets `at fair value through profit or loss' (FVTPL) |
M - 13
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
J. |
Financial
assets (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Financial
assets at FVTPL |
|
Financial
assets are classified as at FVTPL where the financial asset is either held for trading or
it is designated as at FVTPL. |
|
A
financial asset is classified as held for trading if: |
|
|
it
has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near
future; or |
|
|
it
is a part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Group manages
together and has a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking; or |
|
|
it
is a derivative that is not designated and effective as a hedging instrument. |
|
A
financial asset other than a financial asset held for trading may be designated as at
FVTPL upon initial recognition if: |
|
|
such
designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition
inconsistency that would otherwise arise; or |
|
|
the
financial asset forms part of a group of financial assets or financial liabilities or
both, which is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in
accordance with the Groups documented risk management or investment strategy, and
information about the grouping is provided internally on that basis; or |
|
|
it
forms part of a contract containing one or more embedded derivatives, and IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement permits the entire combined contract (asset
or liability) to be designated as at FVTPL. |
|
Financial
assets at FVTPL are stated at fair value, with any resultant gain or loss recognized in
profit or loss. The net gain or loss recognized in profit or loss incorporates any
dividend or interest earned on the financial asset. |
|
(3) |
Loans
and receivables |
|
Trade
receivables, loans, and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that
are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and
receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any
impairment. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate, except
for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial. |
|
(4) |
Impairment
of financial assets |
|
Financial
assets, other than those at FVTPL, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each
balance sheet date. |
|
Financial
assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more
events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated
future cash flows of the investment have been impacted. |
M - 14
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
J. |
Financial
assets (Cont.) |
|
(4) |
Impairment
of financial assets (Cont.) |
|
For
all other financial assets, including finance lease receivables and objective evidence of
impairment could include: |
|
|
significant
financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; or |
|
|
default
or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or |
|
|
it becoming
probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization. |
|
For
financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the
difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of estimated
future cash flows, discounted at the financial assets original effective interest
rate. |
|
The
carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced by the impairment loss directly for all
financial assets with the exception of trade receivables, where the carrying amount is
reduced through the use of an allowance account. When a trade receivable is considered
uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of
amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the
carrying amount of the allowance account are recognised in profit or loss. |
|
In
a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be
related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the
previously recognised impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss to the extent
that the carrying amount of the investment at the date the impairment is reversed does
not exceed what the amortized cost would have been had the impairment not been
recognised. |
|
K. |
Other
financial liabilities |
|
Other
financial liabilities, including borrowings, are initially measured at fair value, net of
transaction costs. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized
cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognized on an
effective yield basis. |
|
The
effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial
liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective
interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through
the expected life of the financial liability, or, where appropriate, a shorter period. |
M - 15
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
L. |
Derivative
financial instruments |
|
The Group enters into a variety of derivative
financial instruments to manage its exposure to foreign exchange rate risk, including
foreign exchange forward contracts. |
|
Derivatives
are initially recognized at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into
and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at each balance sheet date. The
resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately. |
|
Revenue
is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue is
reduced for estimated customer returns, rebates and other similar allowances. |
|
Revenue
from the sale of goods is recognised when all the following conditions are satisfied: |
|
|
The
Group has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership
of the goods; |
|
|
The
Group retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated
with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold |
|
|
The
amount of revenue can be measured reliably; |
|
|
It
is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow
to the entity; and |
|
|
The
costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. |
|
Interest
revenue is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the
effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated
future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that assets
net carrying amount. |
|
Operating
lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. |
|
Income
tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. |
|
The
tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs
from profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or
expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that
are never taxable or deductible. The Groups liability for current tax is calculated
using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. |
M - 16
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
Deferred
tax is recognised on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of
taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred
tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences, and
deferred tax assets are generally recognised for all deductible temporary differences to
the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those
deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not
recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial
recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a
transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit. |
|
The
carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced
to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be
available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. |
|
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in
the period in which the liability is settled or the asset realised, based on tax rates
(and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences that
would follow from the manner in which the Group expects, at the reporting date, to
recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities. |
|
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set
off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income
taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current
tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. |
|
(3) |
Current
and deferred tax for the period |
|
Current
and deferred tax are recognized as an expense or income in profit or loss, except when
they relate to items credited or debited directly to equity, in which case the tax is
also recognized directly in equity, or where they arise from the initial accounting for a
business combination. In the case of a business combination, the tax effect is taken into
account in calculating goodwill or in determining the excess of the acquirers
interest in the net fair value of the acquirers identifiable assets, liabilities
and contingent liabilities over the cost of the business combination. |
M - 17
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
P. |
Retirement
benefit costs |
|
Payments
to defined contribution retirement benefit schemes are charged as an expense as they fall
due and include early retirement pay, severance pay and pensioners gifts. |
|
For
defined benefit schemes, the cost of providing benefits is determined using the Projected
Unit Credit Method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at each balance sheet
date. |
|
Q. |
Exchange
Rates and Linkage Basis |
|
Following
are the change in the representative exchange rates of the Euro and the U.S. dollar vis-à-vis
the NIS and in the Israeli Consumer Price Index (CPI): |
|
As of:
|
Representative
exchange rate of
the Euro (NIS per
1)
|
Representative
exchange rate of
the dollar
(NIS per $1)
|
CPI
"in respect of"
(in points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
| 5.001 |
|
| 3.421 |
|
| 111.06 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 | | |
| 5.689 |
|
| 4.013 |
|
| 105.25 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 | | |
| 5.6592 |
|
| 3.846 |
|
| 106.40 |
|
|
| | |
|
Increase (decrease) during the:
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
| | |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | | |
| (11.6 |
) |
| (11.05 |
) |
| 4.39 |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 | | |
| 2.24 |
|
| (5.02 |
) |
| 2.29 |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 | | |
| 1.71 |
|
| (8.97 |
) |
| 3.39 |
|
|
R. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards and interpretations |
|
(1) |
Standards
and Interpretations which are effective and have been applied in these
financial statements as of September 30, 2008 and for the nine and three
months then ended. |
|
Three
Interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee
are effective for the current period, these are: |
|
|
IFRIC
11 |
IFRS 2: Group and Treasury Share Transactions
(effective 1 March 2007); |
|
|
IFRIC
12 |
Service Concession Arrangements (effective 1 January
2008); |
|
|
IFRIC
14 |
IAS 19 - The Limit on a Defined Benefit
Asset, Minimum Funding
Requirements and their
Interaction (effective 1 January
2008). |
|
The
adoption of the Interpretations has not led to any changes in the Groups accounting
policies. |
M - 18
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
R. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were
in issue but not yet effective |
|
At
the date of authorization of these interim financial statements, other than the Standards
and Interpretations adopted by the Group in advance of their effective dates the
following Interpretations were in issue but not yet effective: |
|
IAS
1 (Amended) Presentation of Financial Statements |
|
The
standard stipulates the presentation required in the financial statements, and itemizes a
general framework for the structure of the financial statements and the minimal contents
which must be included in the context of the report. Changes have been made to the
existing presentation format of the financial statements, and the presentation and
disclosure requirements for the financial statements have been broadened, including the
presentation of an additional report in the framework of the financial statements known
as the report of comprehensive income, and the addition of a balance sheet as
of the beginning of the earliest period that was presented in the financial statements,
in cases of changes in accounting policy by means of retroactive implementation, in cases
of restatement and in cases of reclassifications. |
|
The
standard will be effective for reporting periods beginning from January 1, 2009. The
standard permits earlier application. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the At this
stage, the management of the Group is examining the influence of this standard on the
Companys financial statements. |
|
IAS
23 (Amended) Borrowing Costs |
|
The
standard stipulates the accounting treatment of borrowing costs. In the context of the
amendment to this standard, the possibility of immediately recognizing borrowing costs
related to assets with an uncommon period of eligibility or construction in the statement
of operations was cancelled. The standard will apply to borrowing costs that relate to
eligible assets as to which the capitalization period began from January 1, 2009. The
standard permits earlier implementation. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
M - 19
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
R. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were
in issue but not yet effective (cont.) |
|
IAS
27 (Amended) Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements |
|
The
standard prescribes the rules for the accounting treatment of consolidated and separate
financial statements. Among other things, the standard stipulates that transactions with
minority shareholders, in the context of which the company holds control of the
subsidiary before and after the transaction, will be treated as capital transactions. In
the context of transactions, subsequent to which the company loses control in the
subsidiary, the remaining investment is to be measured as of the date that control is
lost, at fair value, with the difference as compared to book value to be recorded to the
statement of operations. The minority interest in the losses of a subsidiary, which
exceed its share in shareholders equity, will be allocated to it in every case,
while ignoring its obligations and ability to make additional investments in the
subsidiary. |
|
The
provisions of the standard apply to annual financial reporting periods which start on
January 1, 2010 and thereafter. Earlier adoption is permitted, on the condition that it
will be done simultaneous with early adoption of IFRS 3 (amended). The standard will be
implemented retrospectively, excluding a number of exceptions, as to which the provisions
of the standard will be implemented prospectively. At this stage, the management of the
Group estimated that the implementation of the standard is not expected to have any
influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
IFRS
3 (Amended) Business Combinations |
|
The
new standard stipulates the rules for the accounting treatment of business combinations.
Among other things, the standard determines measurement rules for contingent
consideration in business combinations which is to be measured as a derivative financial
instrument. The transaction costs directly connected with the business combination will
be recorded to the statement of operations when incurred. Minority interests will be
measured at the time of the business combination to the extent of their share in the fair
value of the assets, including goodwill, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the
acquired entity, or to the extent of their share in the fair value of the net assets, as
aforementioned, but excluding their share in goodwill. |
|
As
for business combinations where control is achieved after a number of acquisitions
(acquisition in stages), the earlier purchases of the acquired company will be measured
at the time that control is achieved at their fair value, while recording the difference
to the statement of operations. |
|
The
standard will apply to business combinations that take place from January 1, 2010 and
thereafter. Earlier adoption is possible, on the condition that it will be simultaneous
with early adoption of IAS 27 (amended). |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
M - 20
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
R. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were
in issue but not yet effective (cont.) |
|
IFRIC
13, Customer Loyalty Programs |
|
The
clarification stipulates that transactions for the sale of goods and services, for which
the company confers reward grants to its customers, will be treated as multiple component
transactions and the payment received from the customer will be allocated between the
different components, based upon the fair value of the reward grants. The consideration
attributed to the grant will be recognized as revenue when the reward grants are redeemed
and the company has made a commitment to provide the grants. |
|
The
directives of the clarification apply to annual reporting periods commencing on January
1, 2009. Earlier implementation is permissible. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any material influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
Amendment
to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, and IAS 1, Presentation of Financial
Statements |
|
The
amendment to IAS 32 changes the definition of a financial liability, financial asset and
capital instrument and determines that certain financial instruments, which are
exercisable by their holder, will be classified as capital instruments. |
|
The
provisions of the standard apply to annual financial reporting periods which start on
January 1, 2009 and thereafter. Earlier adoption is permitted. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
IFRS
1 "First Time Adoption of IFRS" and IAS 27 "Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements |
|
The
amendment states, among other things, the method in which the measurement of the
investments in subsidiaries, associated entities and joint control entities should be
applied at first time adopting IFRS, and the method in which income from dividends
received should be recognized. |
|
The
amendment is effective for annual periods commencing January 1, 2009.
At this stage, the
management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard is not expected
to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
M - 21
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
R. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were
in issue but not yet effective (cont.) |
|
Reclassification of
Financial Assets (Amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement and IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures)
|
|
An
amendment to the Standard, issued in October 2008, permits an entity to reclassify
non-derivative financial assets (other than those designated at fair value through profit
or loss by the entity upon initial recognition) out of the fair value through profit or
loss category in particular circumstances. The amendment also permits an entity to
transfer from the available-for-sale category to the loans and receivables category a
financial asset that would have met the definition of loans and receivables. The
amendment is effective commencing July 1, 2008. |
NOTE 3 |
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENT AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINLY |
|
In
the application of the Groups accounting policies, which are described in Note 2,
the management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. The estimates and associated assumptions are
based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant.
Actual results may differ from these estimates. |
|
The
estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to
accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the
revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if
the revision affects both current and future periods. |
|
B. |
Significant
judgments in applying accounting policies |
|
The
following are the significant judgments, apart from those involving estimations (see
below), that the management have made in the process of applying the entitys
accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized
in financial statements. |
|
Useful
lives of property, plant and equipment |
|
As
described at 2F above, the Group reviews the estimated useful lives of property, plant
and equipment at the end of each annual reporting period. |
M - 22
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 3 |
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENT AND KEY SOURCES OF ESRIMATION UNCERTAITY
(Cont.) |
|
B. |
Significant
judgments in applying accounting policies (Cont.) |
|
Determining
whether goodwill is impaired requires an estimation of the value in use of the
cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated. The value in use calculation
requires the management to estimate the future cash flows expected to arise from the
cash-generating unit and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value. |
|
The
carrying amount of goodwill at the balance sheet date was NIS 3,177 thousand. |
NOTE 4 |
|
RELATED
PARTIES AND INTERESTED PARTIES |
|
A. |
Balances
with Related Parties |
|
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables - Hadera Paper |
|
|
| 76,375 |
|
| 72,249 |
|
| 71,109 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Trade payables - related parties | | |
| 450 |
|
| 11,060 |
|
| 38,090 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Other payables and accrued | | |
|
expenses - related parties | | |
| - |
|
| 199 |
|
| 34 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Capital notes to shareholders | | |
| 5,016 |
|
| 11,555 |
|
| 5,514 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
B. |
Transactions
with Related Parties |
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to related parties |
|
|
| 10,864 |
|
| 17,242 |
|
| 3,784 |
|
| 4,742 |
|
| 26,602 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | |
|
Purchase from related parties | | |
| 65,076 |
|
| 69,080 |
|
| 19,858 |
|
| 25,067 |
|
| 84,122 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | |
|
Selling expenses, net | | |
|
(Participation in selling | | |
|
expenses, net) | | |
| - |
|
| 64 |
|
| - |
|
| 30 |
|
| 64 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | |
|
General and administrative | | |
|
Expenses | | |
| 1,035 |
|
| 1,217 |
|
| 303 |
|
| 418 |
|
| 1,998 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | |
|
Financing expenses, net | | |
| 2,498 |
|
| 2,160 |
|
| 730 |
|
| 499 |
|
| 2,880 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
M - 23
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 4 |
|
RELATED
PARTIES AND INTERESTED PARTIES (Cont.) |
|
C. |
(1) |
The Company leases its premises from AIPM and receives services (including
energy, water, maintenance and professional services) under agreements, which
are renewed every year. |
|
(2) |
The
Group pays commissions to NAG. |
NOTE 5 |
|
INCOME
TAXES (TAXES BENEFITS) |
|
(1) |
The
effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is 25%. |
|
(2) |
Under
the inflationary adjustments law, results for tax purposes are measured in real
terms, having regard to the changes in the Israeli CPI. The Company and its
subsidiaries are taxed under this law. |
|
On
February 26, 2008, the Israeli parliament ratified the third reading of the Income Tax
Law (Inflation Adjustments) (Amendment 20) (Limitation of Term of Validity)
2008 (hereinafter: The Amendment), pursuant to which the application of
the inflationary adjustment law will terminate in tax year 2007 and as of tax year 2008,
the law will no longer apply, other than transition regulations whose intention it is to
prevent distortions in tax calculations. |
|
According
to the amendment, in tax year 2008 and thereafter, the adjustment of revenues for tax
purposes will no longer be considered a real-term basis for measurement. Moreover, the
linkage to the CPI of the depreciated sums of fixed assets and carryover losses for tax
purposes will be discontinued, in a manner whereby these sums will be adjusted until the
CPI at the end of 2007 and their linkage to the CPI will end as of that date. |
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS |
|
Following
the publication of Accounting Standard No. 29, the Adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in July 2006, the Company adopted IFRS
starting January 1, 2008. |
|
Pursuant
to the provisions of IFRS1, which deals with the first-time adoption of IFRS, and
considering the date in which the Company elected to adopt these standards for the first
time, the financial statements which the Company must draw up in accordance with IFRS
rules, are the consolidated financial statement as of December 31, 2008, and for the year
ended on that date. The date of transition of the Company to reporting under IFRS, as it
is defined in IFRS 1, is January 1, 2007 (hereinafter: the transition date),
with an opening balance sheet as of January 1, 2007 (hereinafter: Opening Balance).
The Companys interim financial statements for 2008 are drawn up in accordance with
IFRS, and include comparative figures for the year. |
M - 24
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
Under
the opening balance sheet, the Company performed the following reconciliations: |
|
|
Recognition
of all assets and liabilities whose recognition is required by IFRS. |
|
|
De-recognition
of assets and liabilities if IFRS do not permit such recognition. |
|
|
Classification
of assets, liabilities and components of equity according to IFRS. |
|
|
Application
of IFRS in the measurement of all recognized assets and liabilities. |
|
IFRS
1 states that all IFRS shall be adopted retroactively for the opening balance sheet. At
the same time, IFRS 1 includes 14 reliefs, in respect of which the mandatory retroactive
implementation does not apply. The Company chose to implement two reliefs. See note 6f. |
|
Changes
in the accounting policy which the Company implemented retroactively in the opening
balance sheet under IFRS, compared to the accounting policy in accordance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles in Israel, were recognized directly under Retained
Earnings or another item of Shareholders Equity, as the case may be.
This note is
formulated on the basis of International Financial Reporting Standards and the notes
thereto as they stand today, that have been published and shall enter into force or that
may be adopted earlier as at the Groups first annual reporting date according to
IFRS, December 31, 2008. Pursuant to the above, the Companys management has made
assumptions regarding the anticipated financial reporting regulations that are expected
to be implemented when the first annual financial statements are prepared according to
IFRS, for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
The IFRS standards that will be in force or that may be adopted in the financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 are subject to changes and the
publication of additional clarifications. Consequently, the financial reporting
standards that shall be applied to the represented periods will be determined finally
only upon preparation of the first financial statements according to IFRS, as at December
31, 2008. |
|
Listed
below are the Companys consolidated balance sheets as of January 1, 2007, September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2007, the consolidated statement of income and the shareholders equity
for the year ended on December 31, 2007 and the nine and three months ended September 30,
2007 prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards. In addition, the
table presents the material reconciliations required for the transition from reporting
under Israeli GAAP to reporting under IFRS. |
M - 25
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
B. |
Reconciliation
of balance sheets from Israeli GAAP to IFRS |
|
December 31, 2007
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Israeli
GAAP
|
Effect of
Transition
to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
Israeli
GAAP
|
Effect of
Transition to
IFRS
|
IFRS
|
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current assets | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| 323 |
|
| - |
|
| 323 |
|
| 2,274 |
|
| - |
|
| 2,274 |
|
Trade receivables | | |
| 190,935 |
|
| - |
|
| 190,935 |
|
| 194,320 |
|
| - |
|
| 194,320 |
|
Other receivables | | |
| 13,652 |
|
| (11,257 |
) |
| 2,395 |
|
| 13,546 |
|
| (8,807 |
) |
| 4,739 |
|
Inventories | | |
| 143,366 |
|
| - |
|
| 143,366 |
|
| 145,620 |
|
| - |
|
| 145,620 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | |
| 348,276 |
|
| (11,257 |
) |
| 337,019 |
|
| 355,760 |
|
| (8,807 |
) |
| 346,953 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Non-current assets | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | |
| 156,493 |
|
| - |
|
| 156,493 |
|
| 157,565 |
|
| - |
|
| 157,565 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| 3,177 |
|
| - |
|
| 3,177 |
|
| 3,177 |
|
| - |
|
| 3,177 |
|
Long term trade receivables | | |
| 440 |
|
| - |
|
| 440 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total non-current assets | | |
| 160,110 |
|
| - |
|
| 160,110 |
|
| 160,742 |
|
| - |
|
| 160,742 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | |
| 508,386 |
|
| (11,257 |
) |
| 497,129 |
|
| 516,502 |
|
| (8,807 |
) |
| 507,695 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Equity and liabilities | | |
Current liabilities | | |
Short-term bank credit | | |
| 101,760 |
|
| - |
|
| 101,760 |
|
| 100,191 |
|
| - |
|
| 100,191 |
|
Current maturities of long-term | | |
bank loans | | |
| 14,387 |
|
| - |
|
| 14,387 |
|
| 12,481 |
|
| - |
|
| 12,481 |
|
Capital notes to shareholders | | |
| 5,514 |
|
| - |
|
| 5,514 |
|
| 5,153 |
|
| - |
|
| 5,153 |
|
Trade payables | | |
| 118,912 |
|
| - |
|
| 118,912 |
|
| 129,273 |
|
| - |
|
| 129,273 |
|
American Israeli Paper Mills | | |
Group, net | | |
| 71,109 |
|
| - |
|
| 71,109 |
|
| 72,249 |
|
| - |
|
| 72,249 |
|
Current tax liabilities | | |
| - |
|
| 169 |
|
| 169 |
|
| - |
|
| 138 |
|
| 138 |
|
Other payables and accrued | | |
Expenses | | |
(*) | 14,955 |
|
| (169 |
) |
(*) | 14,786 |
|
(*) | 15,817 |
|
| (138 |
) |
(*) | 15,679 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | |
| 326,637 |
|
| - |
|
| 326,637 |
|
| 335,164 |
|
| - |
|
| 335,164 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Non-current liabilities | | |
Long-term bank loans | | |
| 38,035 |
|
| - |
|
| 38,035 |
|
| 42,748 |
|
| - |
|
| 42,748 |
|
Capital notes to shareholders | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 6,402 |
|
| - |
|
| 6,402 |
|
Deferred taxes | | |
| 29,934 |
|
| (11,257 |
) |
| 18,677 |
|
| 25,156 |
|
| (8,807 |
) |
| 16,349 |
|
Provision for pension and vacation | | |
(*) | 6,453 |
|
| - |
|
(*) | 6,453 |
|
(*) | 5,564 |
|
| - |
|
(*) | 5,564 |
|
Accrued severance pay, net | | |
| 46 |
|
| - |
|
| 46 |
|
| 46 |
|
| - |
|
| 46 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total non-current liabilities | | |
| 74,468 |
|
| (11,257 |
) |
| 63,211 |
|
| 79,916 |
|
| (8,807 |
) |
| 71,109 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Capital and reserves | | |
Share capital | | |
| 1 |
|
| - |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| - |
|
| 1 |
|
Premium | | |
| 43,352 |
|
| - |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| - |
|
| 43,352 |
|
Capital reserves | | |
| 929 |
|
| - |
|
| 929 |
|
| 929 |
|
| - |
|
| 929 |
|
Retained earnings | | |
| 62,999 |
|
| - |
|
| 62,999 |
|
| 57,140 |
|
| - |
|
| 57,140 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 107,281 |
|
| - |
|
| 107,281 |
|
| 101,422 |
|
| - |
|
| 101,422 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total equity and liabilities | | |
| 508,386 |
|
| (11,257 |
) |
| 497,129 |
|
| 516,502 |
|
| (8,807 |
) |
| 507,695 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
M - 26
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
B. |
Reconciliation
of balance sheets from Israeli GAAP to IFRS: (Cont.) |
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of
Transition to
IFRS
|
IFRS
|
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current assets | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| 15 |
|
| - |
|
| 15 |
|
Trade receivables | | |
| 173,174 |
|
| - |
|
| 173,174 |
|
Other receivables | | |
| 6,686 |
|
| (2,376 |
) |
| 4,310 |
|
Inventories | | |
| 109,116 |
|
| - |
|
| 109,116 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | |
| 288,991 |
|
| (2,376 |
) |
| 286,615 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Non-current assets | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | |
| 160,288 |
|
| - |
|
| 160,288 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| 3,177 |
|
| - |
|
| 3,177 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total non-current assets | | |
| 163,465 |
|
| - |
|
| 163,465 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | |
| 452,456 |
|
| (2,376 |
) |
| 450,080 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Equity and liabilities | | |
Current liabilities | | |
Short-term bank credit | | |
| 96,740 |
|
| - |
|
| 96,740 |
|
Current maturities of long-term bank loans | | |
| 15,243 |
|
| - |
|
| 15,243 |
|
Capital notes to shareholders | | |
| 5,231 |
|
| - |
|
| 5,231 |
|
Trade payables | | |
| 108,007 |
|
| - |
|
| 108,007 |
|
American Israeli Paper Mills Group, net | | |
| 62,807 |
|
| - |
|
| 62,807 |
|
Current tax liabilities | | |
| - |
|
| 76 |
|
| 76 |
|
Other payables and accrued expenses | | |
| 20,960 |
|
| (76 |
) |
| 20,884 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | |
| 308,988 |
|
| - |
|
| 308,988 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Non-current liabilities | | |
Long-term bank loans | | |
| 33,869 |
|
| - |
|
| 33,869 |
|
Capital notes to shareholders | | |
| 6,515 |
|
| - |
|
| 6,515 |
|
Deferred taxes | | |
| 14,047 |
|
| (2,376 |
) |
| 11,671 |
|
Accrued severance pay, net | | |
| 46 |
|
| - |
|
| 46 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total non-current liabilities | | |
| 54,477 |
|
| (2,376 |
) |
| 52,101 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Capital and reserves | | |
Share capital | | |
| 1 |
|
| - |
|
| 1 |
|
Premium | | |
| 43,352 |
|
| - |
|
| 43,352 |
|
Capital reserves | | |
| 929 |
|
| - |
|
| 929 |
|
Retained earnings | | |
| 44,709 |
|
| - |
|
| 44,709 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 88,991 |
|
| - |
|
| 88,991 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total equity and liabilities | | |
| 452,456 |
|
| (2,376 |
) |
| 450,080 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
M - 27
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
C. |
Reconciliation
of Income Statements from Israeli GAAP to IFRS |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
| 569,055 |
|
| - |
|
| 569,055 |
|
| 190,064 |
|
| - |
|
| 190,064 |
|
| 770,032 |
|
| - |
|
| 770,032 |
|
Cost of sales | | |
| 507,983 |
|
| - |
|
| 507,983 |
|
| 164,995 |
|
| - |
|
| 164,995 |
|
| 688,000 |
|
| - |
|
| 688,000 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | |
| 61,072 |
|
| - |
|
| 61,072 |
|
| 25,069 |
|
| - |
|
| 25,069 |
|
| 82,032 |
|
| - |
|
| 82,032 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating costs and expenses | | |
Selling expenses | | |
| 27,841 |
|
| - |
|
| 27,841 |
|
| 9,792 |
|
| - |
|
| 9,792 |
|
| 37,889 |
|
| - |
|
| 37,889 |
|
General and administrative expenses | | |
| 7,623 |
|
| - |
|
| 7,623 |
|
| 3,330 |
|
| - |
|
| 3,330 |
|
| 10,532 |
|
| - |
|
| 10,532 |
|
Other income | | |
| (256 |
) |
| - |
|
| (256 |
) |
| (132 |
) |
| - |
|
| (132 |
) |
| (313 |
) |
| - |
|
| (313 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 35,208 |
|
| - |
|
| 35,208 |
|
| 12,990 |
|
| - |
|
| 12,990 |
|
| 48,108 |
|
| - |
|
| 48,108 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating profit | | |
| 25,864 |
|
| - |
|
| 25,864 |
|
| 12,079 |
|
| - |
|
| 12,079 |
|
| 33,924 |
|
| - |
|
| 33,924 |
|
| | |
Finance income | | |
| - |
|
| (1,638 |
) |
| (1,638 |
) |
| - |
|
| (2,615 |
) |
| (2,615 |
) |
| - |
|
| (5,408 |
) |
| (5,408 |
) |
Finance costs | | |
| 8,604 |
|
| 1,638 |
|
| 10,242 |
|
| 895 |
|
| 2,615 |
|
| 3,510 |
|
| 8,414 |
|
| 5,408 |
|
| 13,822 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Profit before tax | | |
| 17,260 |
|
| - |
|
| 17,260 |
|
| 11,184 |
|
| - |
|
| 11,184 |
|
| 25,510 |
|
| - |
|
| 25,510 |
|
Income tax charge | | |
| (4,829 |
) |
| - |
|
| (4,829 |
) |
| (3,004 |
) |
| - |
|
| (3,004 |
) |
| (7,220 |
) |
| - |
|
| (7,220 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Profit for the period | | |
| 12,431 |
|
| - |
|
| 12,431 |
|
| 8,180 |
|
| - |
|
| 8,180 |
|
| 18,290 |
|
| - |
|
| 18,290 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
M - 28
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
|
Share
capital
|
Premium
|
Capital
reserves
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
September 30, 2007 | | |
|
(Unaudited) | | |
|
Israeli GAAP | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 57,140 |
|
| 101,422 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
|
Under IFRS rules | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 57,140 |
|
| 101,422 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 | | |
|
Israeli GAAP | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 62,999 |
|
| 107,281 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
|
Under IFRS rules | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 62,999 |
|
| 107,281 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | |
|
Balance - January 1, 2007 | | |
|
Israeli GAAP | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| - |
|
| 44,709 |
|
| 88,062 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 929 |
|
| - |
|
| 929 |
|
|
Under IFRS rules | | |
| 1 |
|
| 43,352 |
|
| 929 |
|
| 44,709 |
|
| 88,991 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
E. |
Additional
information |
|
1. |
Classification
of Interest Received |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, Interest received was
classified as cash flows provided from operating activity. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 7, Interest received can be classified as cash flows provided from operating
activities or cash flows provided by investing activities. |
|
Consequently,
amounts in the sum of NIS 277 thousand, NIS 100 thousand were classified as cash flows
provided from investing activities for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2007
respectively. |
|
A
sum of NIS 393 thousand was classified as cash flow provided from investing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
|
2. |
Classification of Interest paid |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, Interest paid was
classified as cash flows used in operating activities. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 7, Interest paid can be classified as cash flows used in operating activities or
cash flows used in financing activities. |
M - 29
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
E. |
Additional
information (Cont.) |
|
2. |
Classification
of Interest paid (Cont.) |
|
Consequently,
amounts in the sum of NIS 9,209 thousand, NIS 2,777 thousand were classified as cash
flows used in financing activities for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2007
respectively. |
|
A
sum of NIS 12,219 thousand was classified as cash flow used in financing activities for
the year ended December 31, 2007. |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, deferred tax assets
or liabilities were classified as current assets or liabilities depending on the
classification of the assets in respect of which they were created. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 1, deferred tax assets or liabilities are classified as non-current assets or
liabilities, respectively. |
|
Consequently,
amounts of NIS 2,376 thousand, NIS 8,807 thousand and NIS 11,257 thousand which were
previously presented under accounts receivable were reclassified to deferred taxes under
non-current taxes as of January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007
respectively. |
|
4. |
Financial
Revenues and expenses |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, financing income and
expenses are presented in the income statement as a net amount. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 1, financing income and expenses should be presented separately. |
|
Consequently,
financing expenses in the amount of NIS 10,242 thousand and NIS 13,822 thousand and
financing income in the amount of NIS 1,638 thousand and NIS 5,408 thousand were
presented in the income statement for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the
year ended December 31, 2007 respectively. |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, current tax
liabilities were classified as other current liabilities. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 1, current tax liabilities are classified as separate balance in the balance sheet. |
|
Consequently,
amounts of NIS 76 thousand, NIS 138 thousand and NIS 169 thousand which were previously
presented under other current liabilities were reclassified to current tax liabilities as
of January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007 respectively. |
M - 30
MONDI HADERA PAPER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 6 |
|
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
F. |
Reliefs
with respect to the retroactive implementation of IFRS adopted by the Company |
|
IFRS
1 includes several reliefs, in respect of which the mandatory retroactive implementation
does not apply. The Company elected to adopt in its opening balance sheet under IFRS as
of January 1, 2007 (hereinafter: the opening balance sheet) the reliefs with
regards to: |
|
1. |
Business
Combinations, in accordance to the relief, the Company chose not to
retroactively implement the provisions of IFRS 3 regarding to business
combination which occurred before January 1, 2007. |
|
Consequently
goodwill and adjustments due to fair value of subsidiaries that where acquired before
January 1, 2007 are treated in accordance to generally accepted accounting principles in
Israel. |
|
2. |
IFRS
1 allows to measure fixed assets, as of the transition date, or before it,
based on revaluation that was carried out in accordance to prior accounting
principles, as deemed cost, on the time of the revaluation, if the revaluation
was comparable in general, to the cost or to the cost net of accumulated
depreciation according to the IFRS standards, adjusted to changes such as
changes in the CPI. |
|
Until
December 31, 2003 the Company adjusted its financial statements to the changes in foreign
rate of the U.S dollar, in accordance with opinion No. 36 of the institute of Certified
Accountancy in Israel. |
|
For
the purpose of adapting the IFRS standards, the Company chose to implement the above said
relief allowed under IFRS 1, and to measure fixed assets items that were purchased or
established up to December 31, 2003 according to the affective cost for that date, based
on their adjusted value to the foreign exchange rate of the U.S dollar up to that date. |
M - 31
Exhibit 5
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Brightman Almagor Zohar
Haifa Office
5 Ma'aleh Hashichrur Street
Haifa, 33284
P.O.B. 5648, Haifa 31055
Israel
Tel: +972 (4) 860 7373
Fax: +972 (4) 867 2528
Info-haifa@deloitte.co.il
www.deloitte.com
|
The Board of Directors of
Hogla-Kimberly Ltd.
Re: |
Review
of Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements for the Nine and Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
Gentlemen:
At your request, we have reviewed the
condensed interim consolidated financial statements (interim financial
statements) of Hogla-Kimberly Ltd. (the Company) and its subsidiaries,
as follows:
|
Balance
sheet as of September 30, 2008. |
|
Statements
of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2008. |
|
Statements
of changes in shareholders equity for the nine and three months ended September 30,
2008. |
|
Statements
of cash flows for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2008. |
Our review was conducted in
accordance with procedures prescribed by the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in
Israel. The procedures included, inter alia, reading the aforementioned interim financial
statements, reading the minutes of the shareholders meetings and meetings of the
board of directors and its committees, and making inquiries with the persons responsible
for financial and accounting affairs.
Since the review that was performed
is limited in scope and does not constitute an audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, we do not express an opinion on the aforementioned interim financial
statements.
In performing our review, nothing
came to our attention, which indicates that material adjustments are required to the
aforementioned interim financial statements for them to be deemed financial statements
prepared in conformity with international accounting standard No. 34 Interim
Financial Reporting and in accordance with Section D of the Israeli Securities
Regulations (Periodic and Immediate Reports), 1970.
Brightman Almagor &
Co.
Certified Public Accountants
A Member Firm of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Israel
29 October,
2008
H - 1
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(NIS in thousands)
|
As of
September 30,
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 7
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| 22,113 |
|
| 16,320 |
|
| 23,082 |
|
Trade receivables | | |
| 312,258 |
|
| 302,949 |
|
| 274,232 |
|
Inventories | | |
| 198,051 |
|
| 188,561 |
|
| 184,424 |
|
Current tax assets | | |
| - |
|
| 13,744 |
|
| 12,219 |
|
Capital note of shareholder | | |
| 32,380 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
Other current assets | | |
| 7,460 |
|
| 10,563 |
|
| 11,542 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 572,262 |
|
| 532,137 |
|
| 505,499 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Assets | | |
Capital note of shareholder | | |
| - |
|
| 32,380 |
|
| 31,210 |
|
VAT Receivable | | |
| 36,807 |
|
| 39,271 |
|
| 43,317 |
|
Property plant and equipment | | |
| 302,346 |
|
| 301,159 |
|
| 310,368 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| 20,282 |
|
| 24,821 |
|
| 24,495 |
|
Employee benefit asset | | |
| 765 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
Deferred tax assets | | |
| 8,468 |
|
| 11,910 |
|
| 11,245 |
|
Other non-current assets | | |
| 1,990 |
|
| 2,055 |
|
| 2,022 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 370,658 |
|
| 411,596 |
|
| 422,657 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 942,920 |
|
| 943,733 |
|
| 928,156 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Current Liabilities | | |
Borrowings | | |
| 43,946 |
|
| 174,059 |
|
| 155,302 |
|
Trade payables | | |
| 269,925 |
|
| 251,637 |
|
| 265,827 |
|
Current tax liabilities | | |
| 1,738 |
|
| 7,262 |
|
| 2,260 |
|
Other payables and accrued expenses | | |
| 81,395 |
|
| 62,631 |
|
| 49,877 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 397,004 |
|
| 495,589 |
|
| 473,266 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Liabilities | | |
Borrowings | | |
| 65,482 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
Employee benefit obligations | | |
| 14,666 |
|
| 12,503 |
|
| 14,224 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities | | |
| 38,856 |
|
| 36,818 |
|
| 39,730 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 119,004 |
|
| 49,321 |
|
| 53,954 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Capital and reserves | | |
Issued capital | | |
| 265,246 |
|
| 265,246 |
|
| 265,246 |
|
Reserves | | |
| (45,501 |
) |
| (4,230 |
) |
| (8,106 |
) |
Retained earnings | | |
| 207,167 |
|
| 137,807 |
|
| 143,796 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 426,912 |
|
| 398,823 |
|
| 400,936 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 942,920 |
|
| 943,733 |
|
| 928,156 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Davis |
O. Argov |
A. Schor |
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Chief Financial Officer |
Chief Executive Officer |
Approval date of the interim financial statements: 29 October, 2008.
..
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
H - 2
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(NIS in thousands)
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 7
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
| 1,217,869 |
|
| 1,010,849 |
|
| 418,738 |
|
| 366,800 |
|
| 1,375,674 |
|
| | |
Cost of sales | | |
| 832,624 |
|
| 705,653 |
|
| 290,263 |
|
| 255,893 |
|
| 968,594 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Gross profit | | |
| 385,245 |
|
| 305,196 |
|
| 128,475 |
|
| 110,907 |
|
| 407,080 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating costs and expenses | | |
| | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | |
| 235,880 |
|
| 215,621 |
|
| 77,873 |
|
| 76,191 |
|
| 279,901 |
|
| | |
General and administrative expenses | | |
| 52,197 |
|
| 49,827 |
|
| 17,071 |
|
| 16,485 |
|
| 65,729 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating profit | | |
| 97,168 |
|
| 39,748 |
|
| 33,531 |
|
| 18,231 |
|
| 61,450 |
|
| | |
Finance expenses | | |
| (13,341 |
) |
| (25,547 |
) |
| (3,685 |
) |
| (8,910 |
) |
| (29,327 |
) |
| | |
Finance income | | |
| 14,563 |
|
| 1,255 |
|
| 3,659 |
|
| 342 |
|
| 1,790 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Profit before tax | | |
| 98,390 |
|
| 15,456 |
|
| 33,505 |
|
| 9,663 |
|
| 33,913 |
|
| | |
Income taxes charge | | |
| (35,019 |
) |
| (53,637 |
) |
| (12,536 |
) |
| (23,052 |
) |
| (64,545 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Profit (loss) for the period | | |
| 63,371 |
|
| (38,181 |
) |
| 20,969 |
|
| (13,389 |
) |
| (30,632 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
H - 3
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD.
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(NIS in thousands)
|
Share
capital
|
Capital
reserves
|
Foreign currency
translation
reserve
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
September 30, 2008 (unaudited) | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - January 1, 2008 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (6,757 |
) |
| (1,349 |
) |
| 143,796 |
|
| 400,936 |
|
Exchange differences arising on | | |
translation of foreign operations | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (38,447 |
) |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (38,447 |
) |
Movement in capital reserve of | | |
Hedging transactions, net | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,052 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,052 |
|
Profit for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 63,371 |
|
| 63,371 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2008 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (45,204 |
) |
| (297 |
) |
| 207,167 |
|
| 426,912 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Nine months ended | | |
September 30, 2007 (unaudited) | | |
Balance - January 1, 2007 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 230,153 |
|
| (14,393 |
) |
| (76 |
) |
| 181,443 |
|
| 426,765 |
|
Exchange differences arising on | | |
translation of foreign operations | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 10,350 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 10,350 |
|
Capitalization of retained earnings | | |
From Approved Enterprise | | |
Earnings | | |
| - |
|
| 5,455 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (5,455 |
) |
| - |
|
Movement in capital reserve of | | |
Hedging transactions, net | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (111 |
) |
| - |
|
| (111 |
) |
Loss for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (38,181 |
) |
| (38,181 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2007 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (4,043 |
) |
| (187 |
) |
| 137,807 |
|
| 398,823 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Three months ended | | |
September 30, 2008 (unaudited) | | |
Balance - July 1, 2008 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (42,718 |
) |
| (1,146 |
) |
| 186,198 |
|
| 407,580 |
|
Exchange differences arising on | | |
translation of foreign operations | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (2,486 |
) |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (2,486 |
) |
Movement in capital reserve of | | |
Hedging transactions, net | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 849 |
|
| - |
|
| 849 |
|
Profit for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 20,969 |
|
| 20,969 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2008 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (45,204 |
) |
| (297 |
) |
| 207,167 |
|
| 426,912 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
H - 4
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD.
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(NIS in thousands)
|
Share
capital
|
Capital
reserves
|
Foreign currency
translation
reserve
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
September 30, 2007(unaudited) | | |
| | |
Balance - July 1, 2007 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (5,651 |
) |
| 472 |
|
| 151,196 |
|
| 411,263 |
|
Exchange differences arising on | | |
Translation of foreign operations | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,608 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,608 |
|
Capitalization of retained earnings | | |
From Approved Enterprise | | |
Earnings | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
Movement in capital reserve of | | |
Hedging transactions, net | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (659 |
) |
| - |
|
| (659 |
) |
Loss for the period | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (13,389 |
) |
| (13,389 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - September 30, 2007 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (4,043 |
) |
| (187 |
) |
| 137,807 |
|
| 398,823 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Year ended December 31, 2007 | | |
| | |
Balance - January 1, 2007 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 230,153 |
|
| (14,393 |
) |
| (76 |
) |
| 181,443 |
|
| 426,765 |
|
Exchange differences arising on | | |
Translation of foreign operations | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 7,636 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 7,636 |
|
Movement in capital reserve of | | |
hedging transactions, net | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,273 |
) |
| - |
|
| (1,273 |
) |
Capitalization of retained earnings | | |
From Approved Enterprise | | |
Earnings | | |
| - |
|
| 5,455 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (5,455 |
) |
| - |
|
Movement in capital note | | |
revaluation reserve | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,560 |
) |
| (1,560 |
) |
Loss for the year | | |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (30,632 |
) |
| (30,632 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance - December 31, 2007 | | |
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (6,757 |
) |
| (1,349 |
) |
| 143,796 |
|
| 400,936 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
H - 5
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
(NIS in thousands)
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 7
|
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows - operating activities |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Operating profit for the period | | |
| 97,168 |
|
| 39,748 |
|
| 33,531 |
|
| 18,231 |
|
| 61,450 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile operating | | |
profit to net cash provided by (used in) | | |
operating activities (Appendix A) | | |
| (16,985 |
) |
| 8,735 |
|
| 24,824 |
|
| 3,841 |
|
| 30,592 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash generated by | | |
(used in) operating activities | | |
| 80,183 |
|
| 48,483 |
|
| 58,355 |
|
| 22,072 |
|
| 92,042 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Cash flows - investing activities | | |
Acquisition of property plant and | | |
equipment | | |
| (28,179 |
) |
| (27,546 |
) |
| (8,118 |
) |
| (14,104 |
) |
| (43,013 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of Property | | |
plant and equipment | | |
| 335 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 115 |
|
| -- |
|
| 124 |
|
Interest received | | |
| 1,373 |
|
| 540 |
|
| 161 |
|
| 206 |
|
| 720 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash used in investing activities | | |
| (26,471 |
) |
| (26,978 |
) |
| (7,842 |
) |
| (13,898 |
) |
| (42,169 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Cash flows - financing activities | | |
Borrowings received | | |
| 88,713 |
|
| -- |
|
| (5,684 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Short-term bank credit | | |
| (132,436 |
) |
| 9,034 |
|
| (29,897 |
) |
| 11,784 |
|
| (7,368 |
) |
Interest paid | | |
| (8,261 |
) |
| (22,326 |
) |
| (3,630 |
) |
| (20,946 |
) |
| (27,291 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash generated by | | |
(used in) financing activities | | |
| (51,984 |
) |
| (13,292 |
) |
| (39,211 |
) |
| (9,162 |
) |
| (34,659 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Net increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | |
| 1,728 |
|
| 8,213 |
|
| 11,302 |
|
| (988 |
) |
| 15,214 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning | | |
of period | | |
| 23,082 |
|
| 7,190 |
|
| 11,399 |
|
| 17,000 |
|
| 7,190 |
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on the | | |
balance of cash held in foreign currencies | | |
| (2,697 |
) |
| 917 |
|
| (588 |
) |
| 308 |
|
| 678 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period | | |
| 22,113 |
|
| 16,320 |
|
| 22,113 |
|
| 16,320 |
|
| 23,082 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
H - 6
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
APPENDICES TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
(NIS in thousands)
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 7
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Adjustments to reconcile operating |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
profit to net cash provided by (used in) | | |
operating activities | | |
Finance income (expenses), net. | | |
| 8,110 |
|
| (2,506 |
) |
| 3,444 |
|
| 12,171 |
|
| (966 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization | | |
| 20,463 |
|
| 20,617 |
|
| 5,558 |
|
| 6,873 |
|
| 27,871 |
|
Capital loss on disposal of property, plant | | |
and equipment | | |
| 2,196 |
|
| 473 |
|
| 2,098 |
|
| 450 |
|
| 658 |
|
Effect of exchange rate differences, net | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (283 |
) |
| (1,110 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate differences | | |
of capital note to shareholder | | |
| (1,170 |
) |
| (1,170 |
) |
| (390 |
) |
| (390 |
) |
| (1,560 |
) |
| | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | |
Decrease (Increase) in trade | | |
receivables | | |
| (45,172 |
) |
| (17,159 |
) |
| (8,069 |
) |
| (5,200 |
) |
| 11,505 |
|
Decrease (Increase) in other current | | |
assets | | |
| 3,018 |
|
| 2,421 |
|
| (11 |
) |
| (4,501 |
) |
| (516 |
) |
Decrease (Increase) in inventories | | |
| (23,989 |
) |
| (9,600 |
) |
| 1,019 |
|
| 7,646 |
|
| (7,004 |
) |
Increase (Decrease) in trade payables | | |
| 9,335 |
|
| 34,222 |
|
| 8,052 |
|
| (1,367 |
) |
| 50,770 |
|
Net change in balances with | | |
related parties | | |
| (4,059 |
) |
| 9 |
|
| 1,384 |
|
| (13,020 |
) |
| (5,878 |
) |
Increase (Decrease) in other payables and | | |
accrued expenses | | |
| 35,459 |
|
| 21,976 |
|
| 16,659 |
|
| 19,335 |
|
| 9,147 |
|
Decrease in other long term asset | | |
| (992 |
) |
| (11,659 |
) |
| 2,614 |
|
| (3,070 |
) |
| (14,177 |
) |
Long term assets for employee | | |
benefit obligations | | |
| (45 |
) |
| -- |
|
| (45 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Long term liability for employee | | |
benefit obligations | | |
| 2,342 |
|
| 2,993 |
|
| (417 |
) |
| 272 |
|
| 4,822 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 5,496 |
|
| 40,617 |
|
| 31,896 |
|
| 18,916 |
|
| 73,562 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income taxes received | | |
| 7,065 |
|
| 5,226 |
|
| -- |
|
| (264 |
) |
| 6,030 |
|
Income taxes paid | | |
| (29,546 |
) |
| (37,108 |
) |
| (7,072 |
) |
| (14,811 |
) |
| (49,000 |
) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| (16,985 |
) |
| 8,735 |
|
| 24,824 |
|
| 3,841 |
|
| 30,592 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
H - 7
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 1 |
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND GENERAL |
|
A. |
Description
Of Business |
|
Hogla
Kimberly Ltd. (the Company) and its Subsidiaries are engaged principally in
the production and marketing of paper and hygienic products. The Companys results
of operations are affected by transactions with shareholders and affiliated companies. |
|
The
Company is owned by Kimberly Clark Corp. ("KC" or the "Parent Company")
(50.1%) and American-Israeli Paper Mills Ltd. ("AIPM") (49.9%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company |
- |
Hogla-Kimberly Ltd. |
|
|
|
The Group |
- |
the Company and its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
- |
companies in which the Company control, (as defined by IAS 27) directly |
|
|
|
or indirectly, and whose financial statements are fully consolidated |
|
|
|
with those of the Company. |
|
|
|
Related Parties |
- |
as defined by IAS 24. |
|
|
|
Interested Parties |
- |
as defined in the Israeli Securities Regulations (Presentation of |
|
|
|
Financial Statements), 1993. |
|
|
|
Controlling Shareholder |
- |
as defined in the Israeli Securities law and Regulations 1968. |
|
|
|
NIS |
- |
New Israeli Shekel. |
|
|
|
CPI |
- |
the Israeli consumer price index. |
|
|
|
Dollar |
- |
the U.S. dollar. |
|
|
|
YTL |
- |
the Turkish New Lira. |
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
A. |
Applying
International Accounting Standards (IFRS) |
|
The
condensed interim financial statements have been prepared using accounting policies
consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards and in accordance with
International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34 Interim Financial Reporting. |
|
The
principal accounting policies described in the following notes were applied in accordance
to the IFRS, in a manner consistent with previous reporting periods presented in these
condensed interim financial statements and in accordance to the opening balance sheet. |
H - 8
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
A. |
Applying
International Accounting Standards (IFRS) (Cont.) |
|
(1) |
Basis
of preparation (Cont.) |
|
The
unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2008
and for the nine and three months then ended (interim financial statements)
of the Company and subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007
and for the year then ended, including the notes thereto. |
|
(2) |
First
term IFRS standards adoption |
|
According
to standard No. 29 Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS
(standard No. 29), the Company applies International Financial Reporting
Standards and interpretations of the committee of the International Accounting Standard
Board (IASB) Starting January 1, 2008. |
|
In
compliance with the mentioned above, the condensed interim financial statements, as of
September 30, 2008 and for the nine and three months then ended, including all previous
reporting periods have been prepared under accounting policies consistent with
International Financial Reporting Standards and interpretations published by the
International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) and in accordance with International
Accounting Standard (IAS) 34 Interim Financial Reporting. |
|
In
these condensed interim financial statements the Company applied IFRS 1 First
time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS No. 1),
which determines instructions for first time implementation of IFRS. |
|
According
to IFRS No. 1 the effective date for implementing IFRS standards is commencing January 1,
2007. |
|
The
Company has applied in a retroactive manner the IFRS standards for all reporting periods
presented in the condensed interim financial statements. The Company implemented the IFRS
standards which have been published as of the preparation date of the condensed interim
Financial Statements and expected to be affective as of December 31, 2008 while applying
the said transition instructions the Company chose to apply two reliefs allowed
under IFRS No. 1, see Note 7G. |
|
Until
the adoption of IFRS the Company conducted the Financial Reporting in accordance with the
Israeli GAAP. The annual financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and for the periods
then ended were prepared under the Israeli GAAP standards. The comparative financial
statements were represented in the condensed interim financial statements in accordance
to the IFRS standards. See note 7 for the relevant material adjustments between the
Israeli GAAP and the IFRS. |
|
B. |
The
condensed Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with section D of
the Israeli Securities Regulations (Periodic and Immediate Reports), 1970. |
H - 9
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
Until
December 31, 2003, Israel was considered a country in which hyper-inflation conditions
exist. Therefore, non-monetary balances in the balance sheet were presented on the
historical nominal amount and were adjusted to changes in the exchange rate of the U.S.
dollar. As of December 31, 2003 when the economy ceases to be hyper-inflationary and the
Company no longer adjusted its financial statements to the U.S. dollar, the adjusted
amounts as of this date were used as the historical costs. The financial statements were
edited on the basis of the historical cost, except for: |
|
|
Assets
and liabilities measured by fair value and derivative financial instruments. |
|
|
Non-current
assets, except for investment property measured by fair value classified as held for sale
are measured at the lower of their previous carrying amount and fair value less costs of
sale. |
|
|
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. |
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment and intangibles assets are presented at the lower of the cost less
accumulated amortizations and the recoverable amount. |
|
|
Liabilities
to employees as described in note 2Q. |
|
The
individual financial statements of each group entity are presented in the currency of the
primary economic environment in which the entity operates (its functional currency). For
the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position
of each entity are expressed in the New Israeli Shekel (NIS), which is the
functional currency of the Company and the presentation currency for the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
In
preparing the financial statements of the individual entities, transactions in currencies
other than the entitys functional currency (foreign currencies) are recorded at the
rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet
date, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates
prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary items carried at fair value that are
denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at the date
when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of
historical cost in a foreign currency are not retranslated. |
H - 10
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
D. |
Foreign
currencies (Cont.) |
|
Exchange
differences are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they except for: |
|
|
Exchange
differences on transactions entered into in order to hedge certain foreign currency risks. |
|
|
Exchange
differences on monetary items receivable from or payable to a foreign operation for which
settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur, which form part of the net investment
in a foreign operation, and which are recognized in the foreign currency translation
reserve and recognized in profit or loss on disposal of the net investment. |
|
For
the purpose of presenting consolidated financial statements, the assets and liabilities
of the Groups foreign operations are expressed in NIS using exchange rates
prevailing at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the
average exchange rates for the period, unless exchange rates fluctuated significantly
during that period, in which case the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions are
used. |
|
Goodwill
and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign operation are treated
as assets and liabilities of the foreign operation and translated at the closing rate. |
|
E. |
Basis
of consolidation |
|
The
consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and
entities controlled by the Company (its subsidiaries). Control is achieved where the
Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as
to obtain benefits from its activities. |
|
The
results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the
consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the
effective date of disposal, as appropriate. |
|
Where
necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring
their accounting policies into line with those used by other members of the Group. |
|
All
intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated in full on
consolidation. |
|
For
the effect of the issuance of IAS 27 (revised) Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements see note 2S below. |
|
Goodwill
arising on the acquisition of a subsidiary represents the excess of the cost of
acquisition over the Groups interest in the net fair value of the identifiable
assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the subsidiary or jointly controlled
entity recognised at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is initially recognised as an
asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. |
H - 11
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
For
the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Groups
cash-generating units expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
Cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated are tested for impairment
annually, or more frequently when there is an indication that the unit may be impaired.
If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount of
the unit, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any
goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the
basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. An impairment loss recognised for
goodwill is not reversed in a subsequent period. |
|
On
disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the
determination of the profit or loss on disposal. |
|
G. |
Property,
plant and equipment |
|
Property,
plant and equipments are tangible items, which are held for use in the manufacture or
supply of goods or services, or leased to others, which are predicted to be used for more
than one period. The Company presents its property, plant and equipments items according
to the cost model. |
|
Under
the cost method a property, plant and equipment are presented at the balance sheet
at cost (net of any investment grants), less any accumulated depreciation and any
accumulated impairment losses. The cost includes the cost of the assets acquisition
as well as costs that can be directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location
and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by
management. |
|
Depreciation
is calculated using the straight-line method at rates considered adequate to depreciate
the assets over their estimated useful lives. Amortization of leasehold improvements is
computed over the shorter of the term of the lease, including any option period, where
the Company intends to exercise such option, or their useful life. |
|
The
annual depreciation and amortization rates are: |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
2-4 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
10-25 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
5-10 |
|
Motor vehicles |
15-20 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
6-33 |
|
Scrap
value, depreciation method and the assets useful lives are being reviewed by management
in the end of every financial year. Changes are handled as a change of estimation and are
applied from here on. |
|
The
gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant and
equipment is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying
amount of the asset and is recognized in income statement. |
H - 12
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
H. |
Impairment
of tangible and intangible assets excluding goodwill |
|
At
each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and
intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have
suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the
asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any).
Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the
Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset
belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified,
corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise
they are allocated to the smallest group of cash-generating units for which a reasonable
and consistent allocation basis can be identified. |
|
Intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are
tested for impairment annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be
impaired. |
|
Recoverable
amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using
a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows
have not been adjusted. |
|
If
the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than
its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced
to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or
loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the
impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. |
|
Inventories
are assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production
for such sale or in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production
process or in the rendering of services. |
|
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost and net releasable value. Cost of inventories includes
all the cost of purchase, direct labor, fixed and variable production over heads and
other cost that are incurred, in bringing the inventories to their present location and
condition. |
|
Net
releasable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less
the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost determined as follows: |
|
|
|
Manufactured finished products |
Based on standard cost method |
|
|
Purchased finished goods raw, auxiliary materials and other |
Based on moving-average basis. |
|
|
|
H - 13
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
Inventories
that are purchase on differed settlement terms, which contains a financing element, are
stated in purchase price for normal credit terms. The difference between the purchase
price for normal credit terms and the amount paid is recognized as interest expense over
the period of the financing. |
|
Investments
are recognised and derecognised on trade date where the purchase or sale of an investment
is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the investment within the timeframe
established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, plus
transaction costs, except for those financial assets classified as at fair value through
profit or loss, which are initially measured at fair value. |
|
Financial
assets are classified into Loans and receivables. |
|
(2) |
Loans
and receivables |
|
Trade
receivables, loans, and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that
are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and
receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any
impairment. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate, except
for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial. |
|
(3) |
Impairment
of financial assets |
|
Financial
assets, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each balance sheet date. |
|
Financial
assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more
events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated
future cash flows of the investment have been impacted. |
|
For
all other financial assets, objective evidence of impairment could include: |
|
|
Significant
financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; or |
|
|
Default
or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or |
|
|
It
becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization. |
|
For
financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the
difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of estimated
future cash flows, discounted at the financial assets original effective interest
rate. |
H - 14
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
J. |
Financial
assets (Cont.) |
|
(3) |
Impairment
of financial assets (Cont.) |
|
The
carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced by the impairment loss directly for all
financial assets with the exception of trade receivables, where the carrying amount is
reduced through the use of an allowance account. |
|
When
a trade receivable is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance
account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the
allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized
in profit or loss. |
|
If,
in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can
be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the
previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss to the extent
that the carrying amount of the investment at the date the impairment is reversed does
not exceed what the amortized cost would have been had the impairment not been recognized. |
|
K. |
Other
financial liabilities |
|
Other
financial liabilities, including borrowings, are initially measured at fair value, net of
transaction costs. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized
cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognized on an
effective yield basis. |
|
The
effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial
liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective
interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash
payments through the expected life of the financial liability, or, where appropriate, a
shorter period. |
|
Provisions
are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a
result of a past event, it is probable that the Group will be required to settle the
obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The
amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to
settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date, taking into account the risks
and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. |
|
Where
a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation,
its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows. |
|
When
some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be
recovered from a third party, the receivable is recognized as an asset if it is virtually
certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be
measured reliably. |
H - 15
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
M. |
Derivative
financial instruments |
|
The
Group enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to
foreign exchange rate risk, including foreign exchange forward contracts. |
|
Derivatives
are initially recognized at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into
and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at each balance sheet date. The
resulting gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss immediately unless the derivative
is designated and effective as a hedging instrument, in which event the timing of the
recognition in profit or loss depends on the nature of the hedge relationship. The Group
designates certain derivatives as hedges of highly probable forecast transactions or
hedges of foreign currency risk of firm commitments (cash flow hedges), |
|
A
derivative is presented as a non-current asset or a non-current liability if the
remaining maturity of the instrument is more than 12 months and it is not expected to be
realised or settled within 12 months. Other derivatives are presented as current assets
or current liabilities. |
|
The
Group designates certain hedging instruments, which include derivatives, and
non-derivatives in respect of foreign currency risk, as cash flow hedges. |
|
At
the inception of the hedge relationship, the entity documents the relationship between
the hedging instrument and the hedged item, along with its risk management objectives and
its strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of
the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Group documents whether the hedging instrument
that is used in a hedging relationship is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair
values or cash flows of the hedged item. |
|
The
effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and
qualify as cash flow hedges are deferred in equity. The gain or loss relating to the
ineffective portion is recognised immediately in profit or loss, and is included in the
finance income or finance expenses lines of the income statement.
Amounts deferred in equity are recycled in profit or loss in the periods when the hedged
item is recognised in profit or loss, in the same line of the income statement as the
recognised hedged item. However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in
the recognition of a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, the gains and
losses previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the
initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability. |
|
Hedge
accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes the hedging relationship, the hedging
instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge
accounting. Any cumulative gain or loss deferred in equity at that time remains in equity
and is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in profit or
loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or
loss that was deferred in equity is recognised immediately in profit or loss. |
H - 16
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
Revenue
is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue is
reduced for estimated customer returns, rebates and other similar allowances. |
|
Revenue
from the sale of goods is recognised when all the following conditions are satisfied: |
|
|
The
Group has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the
goods; |
|
|
The
Group retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated
with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold |
|
|
The
amount of revenue can be measured reliably; |
|
|
It
is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the
entity; and |
|
|
The
costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. |
|
Interest
revenue is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the
effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated
future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that assets
net carrying amount. |
|
Income
tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. |
|
The
tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs
from profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or
expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that
are never taxable or deductible. The Groups liability for current tax is calculated
using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. |
H - 17
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
Deferred
tax is recognised on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of
taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred
tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences, and
deferred tax assets are generally recognised for all deductible temporary differences to
the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those
deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not
recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial
recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a
transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit. |
|
The
carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced
to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be
available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. |
|
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in
the period in which the liability is settled or the asset realised, based on tax rates
(and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences that
would follow from the manner in which the Group expects, at the reporting date, to
recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities. |
|
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set
off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income
taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current
tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. |
|
(3) |
Current
and deferred tax for the period |
|
Current
and deferred tax are recognized as an expense or income in profit or loss, except when
they relate to items credited or debited directly to equity, in which case the tax is
also recognized directly in equity, or where they arise from the initial accounting for a
business combination. In the case of a business combination, the tax effect is taken into
account in calculating goodwill or in determining the excess of the acquirers
interest in the net fair value of the acquirees identifiable assets, liabilities
and contingent liabilities over the cost of the business combination. |
|
Operating
lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
the Companys lands in Afula which were leased from the Israel Land Administration,
shall be presented in the Companys balance sheet as lease receivables in respect of
lease, and amortized over the remaining period of the lease. |
H - 18
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
Q. |
Retirement
benefit costs |
|
Payments
to defined contribution retirement benefit schemes are charged as an expense as they fall
due and include early retirement pay, severance pay and pensioners gifts. |
|
For
defined benefit schemes, the cost of providing benefits is determined using the Projected
Unit Credit Method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at each balance sheet
date. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in full in the period in which they occur
in the income statement. |
|
Past
service cost is recognised immediately to the extent that the benefits are already
vested, and otherwise is amortised on a straight-line basis over the average period until
the benefits become vested. |
|
The
retirement benefit obligation recognised in the balance sheet represents the present
value of the defined benefit obligation as adjusted for unrecognised past service cost,
and as reduced by the fair value of scheme assets. Any asset resulting from this
calculation is limited to past service cost, plus the present value of available refunds
and reductions in future contributions to the scheme.
With regards to the publication of
IFRIC 14 see note 2S below. |
|
R. |
Exchange
Rates and Linkage Basis |
|
Following
are the changes in the representative exchange rates of the U.S. dollar vis-a-vis the NIS
and the Turkish Lira and in the Israeli Consumer Price Index (CPI): |
|
As of:
|
Turkish Lira
exchange rate
vis-a-vis the
U.S. dollar (TL'000 per $1)
|
Representative
exchange rate of
the dollar (NIS per $1)
|
CPI
"in respect of"
(in points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
| 1,263 |
|
| 3.421 |
|
| 111.06 |
|
| | |
September 30, 2007 | | |
| 1,210 |
|
| 4.013 |
|
| 105.25 |
|
| | |
December 31, 2007 | | |
| 1,176 |
|
| 3.846 |
|
| 106.40 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) during the:
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
| 7.4 |
|
| (11.05 |
) |
| 4.39 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 | | |
| 3.19 |
|
| 2.06 |
|
| 2.01 |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 | | |
| (14.55 |
) |
| (5.02 |
) |
| 2.29 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007 | | |
| (7.84 |
) |
| (5.55 |
) |
| 1.3 |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 | | |
| (16.95 |
) |
| (8.97 |
) |
| 3.4 |
|
H - 19
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
S. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards and interpretations |
|
(1) |
Standards
and Interpretations which are effective and have been applied in these
financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and for the six and three months then
ended. |
|
Interpretations
issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee are effective
for the current period. These are: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 11 |
IFRS 2: Group and Treasury Share Transactions (effective 1 March 2007); |
|
|
|
IFRIC 12 |
Service Concession Arrangements (effective 1 January 2008); |
|
|
|
IFRIC 14 |
IAS 19 - The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction (effective 1 January 2008). |
|
The
adoption of IFRIC 11 will effect the Groups accounting policies with regards to the
stock options granted by AIPM to senior management of the Company (see Note 3). |
|
Except
for the above, the adoption of the Interpretations has not led to any changes in the Groups
accounting policies. |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements
were in issue but not yet effective |
|
At
the date of authorization of these interim financial statements, other than the Standards
and Interpretations adopted by the Group in advance of their effective dates the
following Interpretations were in issue but not yet effective: |
|
IAS
1 (Amended) Presentation of Financial Statements |
|
The
standard stipulates the presentation required in the financial statements, and itemizes a
general framework for the structure of the financial statements and the minimal contents
which must be included in the context of the report. Changes have been made to the
existing presentation format of the financial statements, and the presentation and
disclosure requirements for the financial statements have been broadened, including the
presentation of an additional report in the framework of the financial statements known
as the report of comprehensive income, and the addition of a balance sheet as
of the beginning of the earliest period that was presented in the financial statements,
in cases of changes in accounting policy by means of retroactive implementation, in cases
of restatement and in cases of reclassifications. |
|
The
standard will be effective for reporting periods beginning from January 1, 2009. The
standard permits earlier application. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group is examining the influence of this standard on
the Companys financial statements. |
H - 20
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
S. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial
statements were in issue but not yet effective (Cont.) |
|
IAS
23 (Amended) Borrowing Costs |
|
The
standard stipulates the accounting treatment of borrowing costs. In the context of the
amendment to this standard, the possibility of immediately recognizing borrowing costs
related to assets with an uncommon period of eligibility or construction in the statement
of operations was cancelled. The standard will apply to borrowing costs that relate to
eligible assets as to which the capitalization period began from January 1, 2009. The
standard permits earlier implementation. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
IAS
27 (Amended) Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements |
|
The
standard prescribes the rules for the accounting treatment of consolidated and separate
financial statements. Among other things, the standard stipulates that transactions with
minority shareholders, in the context of which the Company holds control of the
subsidiary before and after the transaction, will be treated as capital transactions. In
the context of transactions, subsequent to which the Company loses control in the
subsidiary, the remaining investment is to be measured as of the date that control is
lost, at fair value, with the difference as compared to book value to be recorded to the
statement of operations. The minority interest in the losses of a subsidiary, which
exceed its share in shareholders equity, will be allocated to it in every case,
while ignoring its obligations and ability to make additional investments in the
subsidiary. |
|
The
provisions of the standard apply to annual financial reporting periods which start on
January 1, 2010 and thereafter. Earlier adoption is permitted, on the condition that it
will be done simultaneous with early adoption of IFRS 3 (amended). The standard will be
implemented retrospectively, excluding a number of exceptions, as to which the provisions
of the standard will be implemented prospectively. At this stage, the management of the
Group estimated that the implementation of the standard is not expected to have any
influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
H - 21
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
S. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial
statements were in issue but not yet effective (Cont.) |
|
IFRS
3 (Amended) Business Combinations |
|
The
new standard stipulates the rules for the accounting treatment of business combinations.
Among other things, the standard determines measurement rules for contingent
consideration in business combinations which is to be measured as a derivative financial
instrument. The transaction costs directly connected with the business combination will
be recorded to the statement of operations when incurred. Minority interests will be
measured at the time of the business combination to the extent of their share in the fair
value of the assets, including goodwill, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the
acquired entity, or to the extent of their share in the fair value of the net assets, as
aforementioned, but excluding their share in goodwill. |
|
As
for business combinations where control is achieved after a number of acquisitions
(acquisition in stages), the earlier purchases of the acquired company will
be measured at the time that control is achieved at their fair value, while recording the
difference to the statement of operations. |
|
The
standard will apply to business combinations that take place from January 1, 2010 and
thereafter. Earlier adoption is possible, on the condition that it will be simultaneous
with early adoption of IAS 27 (amended). |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
IFRIC
13, Customer Loyalty Programs |
|
The
clarification stipulates that transactions for the sale of goods and services, for which
the Company confers reward grants to its customers, will be treated as multiple component
transactions and the payment received from the customer will be allocated between the
different components, based upon the fair value of the reward grants. The consideration
attributed to the grant will be recognized as revenue when the reward grants are redeemed
and the Company has made a commitment to provide the grants. |
|
The
directives of the clarification apply to annual reporting periods commencing on January
1, 2009. Earlier implementation is permissible. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
H - 22
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
S. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial
statements were in issue but not yet effective (Cont.) |
|
Amendment
to IFRS 2, Share Based Payment- Vesting and Revocation Conditions |
|
The
amendment to the standard stipulates the conditions under which the measurement of fair
value must be considered on the date of the grant of a share based payment and explains
the accounting treatment of instruments without terms of vesting and revocation. The
provisions of the standard apply to annual financial reporting periods which start on
January 1, 2009 and thereafter. Earlier adoption is permitted. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
Amendment
to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, and IAS 1, Presentation of Financial
Statements |
|
The
amendment to IAS 32 changes the definition of a financial liability, financial asset and
capital instrument and determines that certain financial instruments, which are
exercisable by their holder, will be classified as capital instruments. |
|
The
provisions of the standard apply to annual financial reporting periods which start on
January 1, 2009 and thereafter. Earlier adoption is permitted. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
IFRS
1 First Time Adoption of IFRS and IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements |
|
The
amendment states, among other things, the method in which the measurement of the
investments in subsidiaries, associated entities and joint control entities should be
applied at firs time adopting IFRS, and the method in which income from dividends
received should be recognized. |
|
The
amendment is effective for annual periods commencing January 1, 2009. |
|
At
this stage, the management of the Group estimated that the implementation of the standard
is not expected to have any material influence on the financial statements of the Group. |
|
Reclassification
of Financial Assets (Amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognitionand
Measurement and IFRS 7 FinancialInstruments: Disclosures) |
H - 23
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 2 |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
|
S. |
Adoption
of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.) |
|
(2) |
Standards
and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial
statements were in issue but not yet effective (Cont.) |
|
An
amendment to the Standard, issued in October 2008, permits an entity to reclassify
non-derivative financial assets (other than those designated at fair value through profit
or loss by the entity upon initial recognition) out of the fair value through profit or
loss category in particular circumstances. The amendment also permits an entity to
transfer from the
available-for-sale category to the loans and receivables category a financial asset that
would have met the definition of loans and receivables. The amendment is effective
commencing July 1, 2008. |
|
At
this stage the company believes that implementation of the amendment is not expected to
have any influence on the financial statements of the company. |
NOTE 3 |
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY |
|
In
the application of the Groups accounting policies, which are described in Note 2,
management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The
estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors
that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates. |
|
The
estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to
accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the
revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if
the revision affects both current and future periods. |
|
(B) |
Critical
judgments in applying accounting policies |
|
The
following are the critical judgments, apart from those involving estimations (see below),
that the management have made in the process of applying the entitys accounting
policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in financial
statements. |
|
In
making their judgment, the management considered the detailed criteria for the
recognition of revenue from the sale of goods set out in IAS 18 Revenue and, in
particular, whether the Group had transferred to the buyer the significant risks and
rewards of ownership of the goods. Following the detailed quantification of the Groups
liability in respect of rectification work, and the agreed limitation on the customers
ability to require further work or to require replacement of the goods, the management is
satisfied that the significant risks and rewards have been transferred and that
recognition of the revenue in the current year is appropriate, in conjunction with the
recognition of an appropriate provision for the rectification costs. |
|
Determining
whether goodwill is impaired requires an estimation of the value in use of the
cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated. The value in use calculation
requires the management to estimate the future cash flows expected to arise from the
cash-generating unit and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value. |
|
The
carrying amount of goodwill at the balance sheet date was NIS 20 million. |
|
Useful
lives of property, plant and equipment |
|
As
described at 2G above, the Group reviews the estimated useful lives of property, plant
and equipment at the end of each annual reporting period. |
H - 24
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 3 |
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY (Cont.) |
|
(C) |
Key
sources of estimation uncertainty |
|
The
following are the key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of
estimation uncertainty at the balance sheet date, that have a significant risk of causing
a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next
financial year. |
|
Employee
retirement benefits |
|
The
present value of the employee retirement benefits is based on an actuarial valuation
using many assumptions inter alia the capitalization rate. Changes in the assumptions may
influence the book value of the liabilities for retirement benefits. The Company
determines the capitalization rate once a year based on the basis of the capitalization
rate of government bonds. Other key assumptions are based on the current prevailing terms
in the market and the past experience of the Company (see also note 2Q above). |
NOTE 4 |
|
SEGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS AND EVENTS |
|
A. |
On
January 2008, the Company made an agreement with an Israeli bank for an prime
linked interest loan in the amount of NIS 100 million which will be repaid
during 4 year period. As part of the agreement the Company agreed to the
following covenants: |
|
1. |
Its
shareholders equity will not be less than NIS 250 million and not less
than 25% of the total consolidated assets. |
|
2. |
Both
the Companys shareholders Kimberly Clark and AIPM separately or
together, will not hold less than 51% of the Companys share capital. |
|
B. |
On
May 20, 2008 the Company received from the Israeli tax authority a
compensation in the amount of about NIS 4.5 millions. The compensation is
due to loss of earnings during a security situation that occurred in July
2006 in northern Israel and caused the Company to partially stop its
manufacturing activity in its Naharia plant. |
NOTE 5 |
|
RELATED PARTIES AND INTERESTED PARTIES |
|
A. |
Balances
with Related Parties |
|
|
As of September 30,
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
| 27,673 |
|
| 15,287 |
|
| 22,678 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Capital note - shareholder | | |
| 32,380 |
|
| 32,380 |
|
| 32,770 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Trade payables | | |
| 56,718 |
|
| 54,263 |
|
| 55,099 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
H - 25
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 5 |
|
RELATED PARTIES AND INTERESTED PARTIES |
|
B. |
Transactions
with Related Parties |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited |
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to related parties |
|
|
| 148,445 |
|
| 41,624 |
|
| 57,146 |
|
| 28,674 |
|
| 82,217 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Cost of sales | | |
| 137,179 |
|
| 141,501 |
|
| 63,971 |
|
| 53,189 |
|
| 188,252 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Royalties to the shareholders | | |
| 22,603 |
|
| 21,968 |
|
| 7,552 |
|
| 7,452 |
|
| 28,069 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
General and administrative | | |
|
expenses | | |
| 9,043 |
|
| 7,974 |
|
| 4,337 |
|
| 3,236 |
|
| 10,944 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
NOTE 6 |
|
INCOME TAX CHARGE |
|
(A) |
The
effective tax rate for the nine and three months period ended September 30,
2008 is 35.6% and 37.41% respectively and is mainly due to unrecorded
deferred taxes in connection with tax loss carry foreword in KCTR, income
in reduced tax rate and non deductible expenses. |
|
(B) |
Under
the inflationary adjustments law, results for tax purposes are measured in
real terms, having regard to the changes in the Israeli CPI. The Company
and its subsidiaries in Israel are taxed under this law. |
|
On
February 26, 2008, the Knesset ratified the third reading of the Income Tax Law (Inflation
Adjustments) (Amendment 20) (Limitation of Term of Validity) 2008
(hereinafter: The Amendment), pursuant to which the application of the
inflationary adjustment law will terminate in tax year 2007 and as of tax year 2008, the
law will no longer apply, other than transition regulations whose intention it is to
prevent distortions in tax calculations. |
|
According
to the amendment, in tax year 2008 and thereafter, the adjustment of revenues for tax
purposes will no longer be considered a real-term basis for measurement. Moreover, the
linkage to the CPI of the depreciated sums of fixed assets and carryover losses for tax
purposes will be discontinued, in a manner whereby these sums will be adjusted until the
CPI at the end of 2007 and their linkage to the CPI will end as of that date. |
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS |
|
Following
the publication of Accounting Standard No. 29, the Adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in July 2006, the Company adopted IFRS
starting January 1, 2008. |
H - 26
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
Pursuant
to the provisions of IFRS1, which deals with the first-time adoption of IFRS, and
considering the date in which the Company elected to adopt these standards for the first
time, the financial statements which the Company must draw up in accordance with IFRS
rules, are the consolidated financial statement as of December 31, 2008, and for the year
ended on that date. The date of transition of the Company to reporting under IFRS, as it
is defined in IFRS 1, is January 1, 2007 (hereinafter: the transition date),
with an opening balance sheet as of January 1, 2007 (hereinafter: Opening Balance).
The Companys interim financial statements for 2008 will also be drawn up in
accordance with IFRS, and shall include comparative figures for the year. |
|
Under
the opening balance sheet, the Company performed the following reconciliations: |
|
|
Recognition
of all assets and liabilities whose recognition is required by IFRS. |
|
|
De-recognition
of assets and liabilities if IFRS do not permit such recognition. |
|
|
Classification
of assets, liabilities and components of equity according to IFRS. |
|
|
Application
of IFRS in the measurement of all recognized assets and liabilities. |
|
IFRS
1 states that all IFRS shall be adopted retroactively for the opening balance sheet. At
the same time, IFRS 1 includes 14 reliefs, in respect of which the mandatory retroactive
implementation does not apply. As to the reliefs implemented by the Company, see section
F below. |
|
Changes
in the accounting policy which the Company implemented retroactively in the opening
balance sheet under IFRS, compared to the accounting policy in accordance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles in Israel, were recognized directly under Retained
Earnings or another item of Shareholders Equity, as the case may be. |
|
This
note is formulated on the basis of International Financial Reporting Standards and the
notes thereto as they stand today, that have been published and shall enter into force or
that may be adopted earlier as at the Groups first annual reporting date according
to IFRS, December 31, 2008. Pursuant to the above, the Companys management has made
assumptions regarding the anticipated financial reporting regulations that are expected
to be implemented when the first annual financial statements are prepared according to
IFRS, for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
The
IFRS standards that will be in force or that may be adopted in the financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 are subject to changes and the
publication of additional clarifications. Consequently, the financial reporting
standards that shall be applied to the represented periods will be determined finally
only upon preparation of the first financial statements according to IFRS, as at December
31, 2008. |
|
Listed
below are the Companys consolidated balance sheets as of January 1, 2007, September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2007, the consolidated statement of income for the year ended
on December 31, 2007 and the nine and three months ended September 30, 2007 and the
shareholders equity as of January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007
prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards. In addition, the table
presents the material reconciliations required for the transition from reporting under
Israeli GAAP to reporting under IFRS. |
H - 27
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
B. |
Reconciliation
of balance sheets from Israeli GAAP to IFRS |
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
|
Note
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| |
|
| 16,320 |
|
| - |
|
| 16,320 |
|
Trade receivables | | |
| |
|
| 302,949 |
|
| - |
|
| 302,949 |
|
Inventories | | |
| |
|
| 188,561 |
|
| - |
|
| 188,561 |
|
Current tax assets | | |
| F2 |
|
| - |
|
| 13,744 |
|
| 13,744 |
|
Other current assets | | |
| F1, F2 |
|
| 68,976 |
|
| (58,413 |
) |
| 10,563 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 576,806 |
|
| (44,669 |
) |
| 532,137 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Assets | | |
Capital note of shareholder | | |
| F7 |
|
| 32,770 |
|
| (390 |
) |
| 32,380 |
|
VAT Receivable | | |
| |
|
| - |
|
| 39,271 |
|
| 39,271 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | | |
| F3 |
|
| 305,644 |
|
| (4,485 |
) |
| 301,159 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| |
|
| 24,821 |
|
| - |
|
| 24,821 |
|
Other non current assets - land leases | | |
| F3 |
|
| - |
|
| 2,055 |
|
| 2,055 |
|
Deferred tax assets | | |
| F1, F4 |
|
| 6,333 |
|
| 5,577 |
|
| 11,910 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 369,568 |
|
| 42,028 |
|
| 411,596 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 946,374 |
|
| (2,641 |
) |
| 943,733 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Current Liabilities | | |
Borrowings | | |
| |
|
| 174,059 |
|
| - |
|
| 174,059 |
|
Trade payables | | |
| |
|
| 251,637 |
|
| - |
|
| 251,637 |
|
Current tax liabilities | | |
| F2 |
|
| - |
|
| 7,262 |
|
| 7,262 |
|
Other payables and accrued expenses | | |
| F2, F4 |
|
| 79,394 |
|
| (16,763 |
) |
| 62,631 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 505,090 |
|
| (9,501 |
) |
| 495,589 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Liabilities | | |
Employee benefit obligations | | |
| F4 |
|
| 2,126 |
|
| 10,377 |
|
| 12,503 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities | | |
| F3 |
|
| 37,413 |
|
| (595 |
) |
| 36,818 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 39,539 |
|
| 9,782 |
|
| 49,321 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Capital and reserves | | |
Issued capital | | |
| |
|
| 265,246 |
|
| - |
|
| 265,246 |
|
Reserves | | |
| |
|
| (4,230 |
) |
| - |
|
| (4,230 |
) |
Retained earnings | | |
| |
|
| 140,729 |
|
| (2,922 |
) |
| 137,807 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 401,745 |
|
| (2,922 |
) |
| 398,823 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 946,374 |
|
| (2,641 |
) |
| 943,733 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
H - 28
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
B. |
Reconciliation
of balance sheets from Israeli GAAP to IFRS (Cont.) |
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of
Transition to
IFRS
|
IFRS
|
|
Note
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| |
|
| 23,082 |
|
| - |
|
| 23,082 |
|
Trade receivables | | |
| |
|
| 274,232 |
|
| - |
|
| 274,232 |
|
Inventories | | |
| |
|
| 184,424 |
|
| - |
|
| 184,424 |
|
Current tax assets | | |
| F2 |
|
| - |
|
| 12,219 |
|
| 12,219 |
|
Other current assets | | |
| F1, F2 |
|
| 39,098 |
|
| (27,556 |
) |
| 11,542 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 520,836 |
|
| (15,337 |
) |
| 505,499 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Assets | | |
Capital note of shareholder | | |
| F7 |
|
| 32,770 |
|
| (1,560 |
) |
| 31,210 |
|
VAT Receivable | | |
| |
|
| 43,317 |
|
| - |
|
| 43,317 |
|
Property plant and equipment | | |
| F3 |
|
| 314,853 |
|
| (4,485 |
) |
| 310,368 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| |
|
| 24,495 |
|
| - |
|
| 24,495 |
|
Lease receivables | | |
| F3 |
|
| - |
|
| 2,022 |
|
| 2,022 |
|
Deferred tax assets | | |
| F1, F4 |
|
| 5,261 |
|
| 5,984 |
|
| 11,245 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 420,696 |
|
| 1,961 |
|
| 422,657 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 941,532 |
|
| (13,376 |
) |
| 928,156 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Current Liabilities | | |
Borrowings | | |
| |
|
| 155,302 |
|
| - |
|
| 155,302 |
|
Trade payables | | |
| |
|
| 265,827 |
|
| - |
|
| 265,827 |
|
Current tax liabilities | | |
| |
|
| - |
|
| 2,260 |
|
| 2,260 |
|
Other payables and accrued expenses | | |
| F2, F4 |
|
| 71,525 |
|
| (21,648 |
) |
| 49,877 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 492,654 |
|
| (19,388 |
) |
| 473,266 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Liabilities | | |
Employee benefit obligations | | |
| F4 |
|
| 3,402 |
|
| 10,822 |
|
| 14,224 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities | | |
| F3 |
|
| 40,333 |
|
| (603 |
) |
| 39,730 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 43,735 |
|
| 10,219 |
|
| 53,954 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Capital and reserves | | |
Issued capital | | |
| |
|
| 265,246 |
|
| - |
|
| 265,246 |
|
Reserves | | |
| |
|
| (8,106 |
) |
| - |
|
| (8,106 |
) |
Retained earnings | | |
| |
|
| 148,003 |
|
| (4,207 |
) |
| 143,796 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 405,143 |
|
| (4,207 |
) |
| 400,936 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 941,532 |
|
| (13,376 |
) |
| 928,156 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
H - 29
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
B. |
Reconciliation
of balance sheets from Israeli GAAP to IFRS (Cont.) |
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of
Transition to
IFRS
|
IFRS
|
|
Note
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
| |
|
| 7,190 |
|
| - |
|
| 7,190 |
|
Trade receivables | | |
| |
|
| 263,126 |
|
| - |
|
| 263,126 |
|
Inventories | | |
| |
|
| 172,709 |
|
| - |
|
| 172,709 |
|
Current tax assets | | |
| F2 |
|
| - |
|
| 10,471 |
|
| 10,471 |
|
Other current assets | | |
| F1, F2 |
|
| 27,576 |
|
| (17,112 |
) |
| 10,464 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 470,601 |
|
| (6,641 |
) |
| 463,960 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Assets | | |
Capital note of shareholder | | |
| F7 |
|
| 32,770 |
|
| (1,560 |
) |
| 31,210 |
|
VAT Receivable | | |
| |
|
| 26,170 |
|
| - |
|
| 26,170 |
|
Property plant and equipment | | |
| F3 |
|
| 299,294 |
|
| (4,485 |
) |
| 294,809 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| |
|
| 22,338 |
|
| - |
|
| 22,338 |
|
Lease receivables | | |
| F3 |
|
| - |
|
| 2,151 |
|
| 2,151 |
|
Deferred tax assets | | |
| F1, F4 |
|
| 30,788 |
|
| 6,816 |
|
| 37,604 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 411,360 |
|
| 2,922 |
|
| 414,282 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 881,961 |
|
| (3,719 |
) |
| 878,242 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Current Liabilities | | |
Borrowings | | |
| |
|
| 152,856 |
|
| - |
|
| 152,856 |
|
Trade payables | | |
| |
|
| 204,936 |
|
| - |
|
| 204,936 |
|
Current tax liabilities | | |
| F2 |
|
| - |
|
| 11,303 |
|
| 11,303 |
|
Other payables and accrued expenses | | |
| F2, F4 |
|
| 58,040 |
|
| (12,249 |
) |
| 45,791 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 415,832 |
|
| (946 |
) |
| 414,886 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Non-Current Liabilities | | |
Employee benefit obligations | | |
| F4 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,799 |
|
| 1,799 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities | | |
| F3 |
|
| 35,364 |
|
| (572 |
) |
| 34,792 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 35,364 |
|
| 1,227 |
|
| 36,591 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Capital and reserves | | |
Issued capital | | |
| |
|
| 259,791 |
|
| - |
|
| 259,791 |
|
Reserves | | |
| |
|
| (14,469 |
) |
| - |
|
| (14,469 |
) |
Retained earnings | | |
| |
|
| 185,443 |
|
| (4,000 |
) |
| 181,443 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 430,765 |
|
| (4,000 |
) |
| 426,765 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
|
| 881,961 |
|
| (3,719 |
) |
| 878,242 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
H - 30
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
C. |
Reconciliation
of Income Statements from Israeli GAAP to IFRS |
|
|
Nine months ended
|
Three months ended
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
Israeli GAAP
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS
|
IFRS
|
|
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
Note
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
| |
|
| 1,010,849 |
|
| |
|
| 1,010,849 |
|
| 366,800 |
|
| - |
|
| 366,800 |
|
| 1,375,674 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,375,674 |
|
Cost of sales | | |
| F3, F4, F6 |
|
| 705,581 |
|
| 72 |
|
| 705,653 |
|
| 255,844 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 255,893 |
|
| 968,374 |
|
| 220 |
|
| 968,594 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | |
| |
|
| 305,268 |
|
| (72 |
) |
| 305,196 |
|
| 110,956 |
|
| (49 |
) |
| 110,907 |
|
| 407,300 |
|
| (220 |
) |
| 407,080 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating costs and expenses | | |
Selling expenses | | |
| F4 |
|
| 215,621 |
|
| |
|
| 215,621 |
|
| 76,069 |
|
| 122 |
|
| 76,191 |
|
| 279,868 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 279,901 |
|
General and Administrative | | |
expenses | | |
| F4 |
|
| 49,804 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 49,827 |
|
| 16,420 |
|
| 65 |
|
| 16,485 |
|
| 65,710 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 65,729 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Operating profit | | |
| |
|
| 39,843 |
|
| (95 |
) |
| 39,748 |
|
| 18,467 |
|
| (236 |
) |
| 18,231 |
|
| 61,722 |
|
| (272 |
) |
| 61,450 |
|
Finance expenses | | |
| F5 |
|
| (25,462 |
) |
| (85 |
) |
| (25,547 |
) |
| (8,958 |
) |
| 48 |
|
| (8,910 |
) |
| (29,097 |
) |
| (230 |
) |
| (29,327 |
) |
Finance income | | |
| F5, F7 |
|
| |
|
| 1,255 |
|
| 1,255 |
|
| - |
|
| 342 |
|
| 342 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,790 |
|
| 1,790 |
|
| | |
Other income (expenses), net | | |
| F6 |
|
| 24 |
|
| (24 |
) |
| - |
|
| 1 |
|
| (1 |
) |
| - |
|
| 5 |
|
| (5 |
) |
| - |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Profit before tax | | |
| |
|
| 14,405 |
|
| 1,051 |
|
| 15,456 |
|
| 9,510 |
|
| 153 |
|
| 9,663 |
|
| 32,630 |
|
| 1,283 |
|
| 33,913 |
|
Income tax charge | | |
| |
|
| (53,664 |
) |
| 27 |
|
| (53,637 |
) |
| (23,180 |
) |
| 128 |
|
| (23,052 |
) |
| (64,615 |
) |
| 70 |
|
| (64,545 |
) |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Profit (loss) for the period | | |
| |
|
| (39,259 |
) |
| 1,078 |
|
| (38,181 |
) |
| (13,670 |
) |
| 281 |
|
| (13,389 |
) |
| (31,985 |
) |
| 1,353 |
|
| (30,632 |
) |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
H - 31
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
D. |
Capital
and Reserves Reconciliation |
|
|
Share capital
|
Capital
reserves
|
Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive
income
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|
Note
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007 (unaudited) |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |
Israeli GAAP | | |
| |
|
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (4,043 |
) |
| (187 |
) |
| 140,729 |
|
| 401,745 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Effect of Transition to IFRS: | | |
Employee benefits net of tax effects | | |
| F4 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (697 |
) |
| (697 |
) |
Amortization of pre-paid expenses in respect of lease of land | | |
| F3 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,835 |
) |
| (1,835 |
) |
Movement in capital note revaluation reserve | | |
| F7 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (390 |
) |
| (390 |
) |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Under IFRS rules | | |
| |
|
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (4,043 |
) |
| (187 |
) |
| 137,807 |
|
| 398,823 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
H - 32
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
D. |
Capital
and Reserves Reconciliation |
|
|
Share capital
|
Capital
reserves
|
Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive
income
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|
Note
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |
Israeli GAAP | | |
| |
|
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (6,757 |
) |
| (1,349 |
) |
| 148,003 |
|
| 405,143 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Effect of Transition to IFRS: | | |
Employee benefits net of tax effects | | |
| F4 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (787 |
) |
| (787 |
) |
Amortization of pre-paid expenses | | |
in respect of lease of land | | |
| F3 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,860 |
) |
| (1,860 |
) |
Movement in capital note revaluation reserve | | |
| F7 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,560 |
) |
| (1,560 |
) |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Under IFRS rules | | |
| |
|
| 29,638 |
|
| 235,608 |
|
| (6,757 |
) |
| (1,349 |
) |
| 143,796 |
|
| 400,936 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
H - 33
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
D. |
Capital
and Reserves Reconciliation (Cont.) |
|
|
Share capital
|
Capital
reserves
|
Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive
income
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|
Note
|
NIS in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |
Israeli GAAP | | |
| |
|
| 29,638 |
|
| 230,153 |
|
| (14,393 |
) |
| (76 |
) |
| 185,443 |
|
| 430,765 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Effect of Transition to IFRS: | | |
Employee benefits net of tax effects | | |
| F4 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (678 |
) |
| (678 |
) |
Amortization of pre-paid expenses in | | |
respect of lease of land | | |
| F3 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,762 |
) |
| (1,762 |
) |
Movement in capital note revaluation reserve | | |
| F7 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,560 |
) |
| (1,560 |
) |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Under IFRS rules | | |
| |
|
| 29,638 |
|
| 230,153 |
|
| (14,393 |
) |
| (76 |
) |
| 181,443 |
|
| 426,765 |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
H - 34
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
E. |
Statement
of cash flows reconciliation |
|
(1) |
Classification
of Interest Received |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, Interest received
were classified as cash flows provided from operating activity. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 7, Interest received can be classified as cash flows provided from operating
activities or cash flows provided by investing activities. |
|
Consequently,
amounts in the sum of NIS 540 thousand, NIS 206 thousand were classified as cash flows
provided from investing activities for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2007
respectively. |
|
A
sum of NIS 720 thousand was classified as cash flow provided by investing activities for
the year ended December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
Classification
of Interest paid |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, Interest paid were
classified as cash flows used for operating activities. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 7, Interest paid can be classified as cash flows provided from operating
activities or cash flows provided by investing activities. |
|
Consequently,
amounts in the sum of NIS 2,261 thousand, NIS 881 thousand were classified as cash flows
used for financing activities for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2007
respectively. |
|
A
sum of NIS 27,291 thousand was classified as cash flow used for financing activities for
the year ended December 31, 2007. |
|
(3) |
Classification
of Foreign currency translation |
|
In
accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, the effect of
exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents held in foreign currency are
presented as cash flow from operating activities, and the effect of exchange rate
differences due to cash balances in foreign autonomous Subsidiary are presented
separately in the statement of cash flow. |
|
In
accordance with the IFRS, the effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash
equivalents held in foreign currency are presented as an adjustment to beginning cash
balance and ending cash balance. |
|
As
a result, amounts of NIS 917 and 308 thousands were classified as Effects of
exchange rate differences on the balance of cash held in foreign currencies for the
nine and three months ended on September 30, 2007 respectively. |
|
A
sum of NIS 678 thousand was classified as Effects of exchange rate differences on
the balance of cash held in foreign currencies for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
H - 35
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
F. |
Additional
information |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, deferred tax assets
or liabilities were classified as current assets or liabilities depending on the
classification of the assets in respect of which they were created. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 1, deferred tax assets or liabilities are classified as non-current assets or
liabilities, respectively. |
|
Consequently,
amounts of NIS 6,641 thousand, NIS 5,398 thousand and NIS 5,770 thousand which were
previously presented under accounts receivable were reclassified to deferred taxes under
non-current taxes as of January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007
respectively. |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, current tax assets or
liabilities were classified as other current assets or liabilities. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 1, current tax assets or liabilities are classified as separate balance in the
balance sheet. |
|
Consequently,
amounts of NIS 10,471 thousand, NIS 13,744 thousand and NIS 21,786 thousand which were
previously presented under other current assets were reclassified to current tax assets
as of January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007 respectively. And amounts
of NIS 11,303 thousand, NIS 7,262 thousand and NIS 11,827 thousand which were previously
presented under other current liabilities were reclassified to current tax liabilities as
of January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007 respectively. |
|
(3) |
Land
leased from the Israel Land Administration |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, land leased from the
Israel Land Administration, was classified as property, plant and equipment and included
in the amount of the capitalized leasing fees that were paid. The amount paid was not
depreciated. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 17, Lease, land lease arrangements, whereunder at the end of the
leasing period, the land is not transferred to the lessor, are classified as operating
lease arrangements. As a result, the Companys lands in Afula which were leased from
the Israel Land Administration, shall be presented in the Companys balance sheet as
lease receivables in respect of lease, and amortized over the remaining period of the
lease. |
|
Consequently,
the lease receivables balance in respect of an operating lease increased by NIS 2,151
thousand, NIS 2,055 thousand and by NIS 2,022 thousand and the balance of property, plant
and equipment decreased by NIS 4,485 thousand. The change was partly carried to retained
earnings in the amounts of NIS 1,762 thousand, NIS 1,835 thousand and NIS 1,860 thousand
and partly against deferred taxes in the amounts of NIS 572 thousand, NIS 595 thousand
and NIS 603 thousand on January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and on December 31, 2007,
respectively. |
H - 36
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
F. |
Additional
information (Cont.) |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, the Companys
liability for severance pay is calculated based on the recent salary of the employee
multiplied by the number of years of employment. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 19, the provision for severance pay is calculated according to an actuarial basis
taking into account the anticipated duration of employment, the value of time, the
expected salary increases until retirement and the possible retirement under conditions
not entitling severance pay. |
|
In
addition, under Israeli GAAP, deposits made with regular policies or directorsinsurance
policies which are not in the employees name, but in the name of the employer, were
also deducted from the Companys liability. |
|
Under
IFRS, regular policies or directors insurance policies as aforesaid, which do not
meet the definition of plan assets under IAS 19, will be presented in the balance sheet
under a separate item and will not be deducted from the employers liability. |
|
Most
of the Groups employees are covered according to Section 14 of the Compensation
Law. Employee deposits are not reflected in the Companys financial statements and
accordingly, no provision is necessary in the books. |
|
However,
the Company is required to pay employees differences from entitlement to severance pay
and unutilized vacation pay. These liabilities are computed in accordance with the actuarys
assessment based on an estimate of their utilization and redemption. |
|
In
addition, net liabilities in respect of benefits to employees after retirement, which
relate to defined benefit plans, are measured based on actuarial estimates and discounted
amounts. |
|
The
impact of the aforesaid on the balance sheet is decrease in other payables and accrued
expenses due to unutilized vacation pay in the amounts of NIS 946 thousand, NIS 790
thousand and NIS 898 thousand and an increase in respect of employee benefit obligation
in the amounts of NIS 1,799 thousand, NIS 1,666 thousand and NIS 1,899 thousand as of
January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
|
The
change was partly carried to retained earnings in the amounts of NIS 678 thousand, NIS
697 thousand and NIS 787 thousand and partly against deferred taxes in the amounts of NIS
175 thousand, NIS 179 thousand and NIS 214 thousand on January 1, 2007, September 30,
2007 and on December 31, 2007, respectively. |
H - 37
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
F. |
Additional
information (Cont.) |
|
(5) |
Financial
Income and Expenses |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, financing income and
expenses are presented under the statement of income in one amount. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 1, financing income and expenses should be presented separately. |
|
Consequently,
financing expenses in the amounts of NIS 25,547 thousand and financing income in the
amount of NIS 1,225 thousand were presented in the income statements for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. |
|
Financing
expenses in the amount of NIS 8,910 thousands and financing income in the amount of NIS
342 thousands were presented in the income statements for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. |
|
Financing
expenses in the amount of NIS 29,327 thousand and financing income in the amount of NIS
1,790 thousand were presented in the income statement for the year ended December 31,
2007. |
|
(6) |
Other
Income and Expenses |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, other income and
expenses are presented in the income statements after the Operating profit.
Pursuant to
IAS 1, other income and expenses should be presented as a part of Gross profit or / and
as a part of Operating costs and expenses. |
|
Consequently,
other income in the amounts of NIS 24 thousand and NIS 1 thousand were classified as cost
of sales in the income statements for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2007
respectively. |
|
Other
income in the amount of NIS 5 thousand were classified as cost of sales in the income
statements for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
|
(7) |
Capital
note of shareholder |
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Israel, the capital note to
AIPM was stated at nominal value and not capitalized. |
|
Pursuant
to IAS 32 and IAS 39 the capital note to AIPM is considered financial asset and need to
be measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. |
|
Consequently,
the capital note balance decreased by NIS 1,560 thousand, NIS 390 thousand and NIS 1,560
thousand as of January 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The retained earnings decreased in the same amounts respectively. Finance income was
increased in the amounts of NIS 1,560 thousand, NIS 1,170 thousand and NIS 390 thousand
for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31,
2007 respectively. |
H - 38
HOGLA-KIMBERLY LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
NOTE 7 |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS (Cont.) |
|
G. |
Reliefs
with respect to the retroactive implementation of IFRS adopted by the Company |
|
IFRS
1 includes several reliefs, in respect of which the mandatory retroactive implementation
does not apply. The Company elected to adopt in its opening balance sheet under IFRS as
of January 1, 2007 (hereinafter: the opening balance sheet) the reliefs with
regards to: |
|
(1) |
Business
Combinations, in accordance to the relief, the Company chose not to
retroactively implement the provisions of IFRS 3 regarding to business
combination which occurred before January 1, 2007. |
|
Consequently
goodwill and adjustments due to fair value of subsidiaries that where acquired before
January 1, 2007 is treated in accordance to generally accepted accounting principles in
Israel. |
|
(2) |
IFRS
1 allows to measure fixed assets, as of the transition date, or before it,
based on revaluation that was carried out in accordance to prior accounting
principles, as deemed cost, on the time of the revaluation, if the revaluation
was comparable in general, to the cost or to the cost net of accumulated
depreciation according to the IFRS standards, adjusted to changes such as
changes in the CPI. |
|
Until
December 31, 2003 the Company adjusted its financial statements to the changes in foreign
rate of the U.S dollar, in accordance with opinion No. 36 of the institute of Certified
Accountancy in Israel. |
|
For
the purpose of adapting the IFRS standards, the Company chose to implement the above said
relief allowed under IFRS 1, and to measure fixed assets items that were purchased or
established up to December 31, 2003 according to the affective cost for that date, based
on their adjusted value to the foreign exchange rate of the U.S dollar up to that date. |
NOTE 8 |
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENT |
|
After
balance sheet date the Turkish Lira devalued by 10.6% vs. the NIS. This causes additional
negative foreign translation reserve after balance sheet date in the amount of
approximately NIS 23 million. |
H - 39