Edgar Filing: EATON VANCE CORP

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x	Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013
or
¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period from _____________ to ____________

Commission File Number 1-8100

EATON VANCE CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		04-2718215
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(617) 482-8260

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Non-Voting Common Stock ($0.00390625 par value per share)		New York Stock Exchange
(Title of each class)		(Name of each exchange on
		which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No¨

Indicate by check whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes¨ Nox

Aggregate market value of Non-Voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of $39.88 on April 30, 2013 on the New York Stock Exchange was $4,659,905,087. Calculation of holdings by non-affiliates is based upon the assumption, for these purposes only, that executive officers, directors, and persons holding 5 percent or more of the registrant’s Non-Voting Common Stock are affiliates.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the close of the latest practicable date.

Class:	Outstanding at October 31, 2013
Non-Voting Common Stock, $0.00390625 par value	121,232,506
Voting Common Stock, $0.00390625 par value	399,240

Eaton Vance Corp.

Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2013

Index

Required Information		Page Number Reference

Part I
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	17
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	22
Item 2.	Properties	22
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	22
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	22

Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	23
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	26
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	63
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	66
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	131
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	131
Item 9B.	Other Information	131

Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	133
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	139
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	165
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	170
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	171

Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	172
Signatures		173

PART I

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes statements that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding our expectations, intentions or strategies regarding the future. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-K regarding our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations are forward-looking statements. The terms “ may,” “will,” “could,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue,” “project,” “intend,” “estimate,” “believe,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words. Although we believe that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that they will prove to have been correct or that we will take any actions that may now be planned. Certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” All subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by such factors. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 1. Business

General

Our principal business is managing investment funds and providing investment management and advisory services to institutions and high-net-worth individuals. Our core strategy is to develop and sustain management expertise across a range of investment disciplines and to offer leading investment products and services through multiple distribution channels. In executing this strategy, we have developed broadly diversified investment management capabilities and a powerful marketing, distribution and customer service organization. Although we manage and distribute a wide range of investment products and services, we operate in one business segment, namely as an investment adviser to funds and separate accounts.

Through our subsidiaries Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”) and Atlanta Capital Management, LLC (“Atlanta Capital”) and other affiliates we manage active equity, income and alternative strategies across a range of investment styles and asset classes, including U.S. and global equities, floating-rate bank loans, municipal bonds, global income, high-yield and investment grade bonds. Through our subsidiary Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC (“Parametric”) we manage a range of engineered alpha strategies, including systematic equity, systematic alternatives and managed options strategies, and provide portfolio implementation services, including tax-managed core and specialty index strategies, futures- and options-based portfolio overlay, and centralized portfolio management of multi-manager portfolios. We also oversee the management of investment funds sub-advised by third-party managers, including global, regional and sector equity, commodity and asset allocation strategies. Our breadth of investment capabilities supports a wide range of products and services offered to fund shareholders, retail managed account investors, institutional investors and high-net-worth clients. As of October 31, 2013, we had $280.7 billion in assets under management.

Our principal retail marketing strategy is to distribute funds and separately managed accounts through financial intermediaries in the advisory channel. We have a broad reach in this marketplace, with distribution partners including national and regional broker-dealers, independent broker-dealers, independent advisory firms, banks and insurance companies. We support these distribution partners with a team of approximately 135 sales professionals covering U.S. and international markets.

We also commit significant resources to serving institutional and high-net-worth clients who access investment management services on a direct basis and through investment consultants. Through our wholly owned affiliates and consolidated subsidiaries we manage investments for a broad range of clients in the institutional and high-net-worth global marketplace, including corporations, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, foundations, family offices and public and private employee retirement plans.

Company History and Development

We have been in the investment management business for eighty-nine years, tracing our history to two Boston-based investment managers: Eaton & Howard, formed in 1924, and Vance, Sanders & Company, organized in 1934. Eaton & Howard, Vance Sanders, Inc. (renamed Eaton Vance Management, Inc. in June 1984 and reorganized as Eaton Vance Management in October 1990) was formed upon the acquisition of Eaton & Howard, Incorporated by Vance, Sanders & Company, Inc. on April 30, 1979. Following the 1979 merger of these predecessor organizations to form Eaton Vance, our managed assets consisted primarily of open-end mutual funds marketed to U.S. retail investors under the Eaton Vance brand and investment counsel services offered directly to high-net-worth and institutional investors. In recent years we have expanded our product and distribution focus to include closed-end, private and offshore funds, as well as retail managed accounts and a broad array of products and services for U.S. and international institutional and high-net-worth investors.

We have augmented our investment capabilities and expanded our business through a series of acquisitions, including the purchase of controlling interests in Atlanta Capital, and Fox Asset Management LLC (“Fox Asset Management”) in fiscal 2001, Parametric in fiscal 2003, Parametric Risk Advisors LLC (“Parametric Risk Advisors”) in fiscal 2007, the Tax Advantaged Bond Strategies (“TABS”) business of M.D. Sass Investors Services in fiscal 2009, The Clifton Group Investment Management Company (“Clifton”) in fiscal 2013 and a 49 percent equity interest in Hexavest Inc. (“Hexavest”) in fiscal 2012.

Investment Managers and Distributors

We conduct our investment management business through direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries Boston Management and Research (“BMR”), Eaton Vance Investment Counsel (“EVIC”), Eaton Vance (Ireland) Limited (“EVAI”), Eaton Vance Trust Company (“EVTC”) and Fox Asset Management, and three other consolidated subsidiaries, Atlanta Capital, Parametric and Parametric Risk Advisors, each with a range of investment capabilities and one or more distinctive investment styles. EVM, BMR, EVIC, Fox Asset Management, Atlanta Capital, Parametric and Parametric Risk Advisors are all registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”). EVAI, registered under the Central Bank of Ireland, provides management services to the Eaton Vance International (Ireland) Funds. EVTC, a trust company, is exempt from registration under the Advisers Act. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (“EVD”), a wholly owned broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), markets and sells the Eaton Vance funds and retail managed accounts. Eaton Vance Management (International) Limited (“EVMI”), a wholly owned financial services company registered under the Financial Services and Market Act in the United Kingdom, markets and sells our investment products in Europe and certain other international markets. Eaton Vance Management International (Asia) Private Limited, (“EVMIA”), a wholly owned financial services company registered under the Singapore Companies Act by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority in Singapore, markets and sells our products in Asia Pacific. Eaton Vance Australia Pty. Ltd., a wholly owned company, registered as an Australian propriety company with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, markets our investment services to investors in Australia.

We are headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts and also maintain offices in Atlanta, Georgia; Minneapolis, Minnesota; New York, New York; Seattle, Washington; Shrewsbury, New Jersey; Westport, Connecticut; London,

England; Singapore; and Sydney, Australia. Our sales representatives operate throughout the United States and in Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America. We are represented in the Middle East through an agreement with a third-party distributor.

Recent Developments

Our growth strategy focuses on developing and sustaining market-leading areas of investment expertise and expanding our product distribution reach into new channels and geographic markets. Efforts to develop leading investment franchises may include strategic acquisitions. In fiscal 2012, we purchased a 49 percent interest in Hexavest, a Montreal-based investment advisor, to expand our global and emerging market equity capabilities. In conjunction with our investment, we assumed primary responsibility for Hexavest’s new business development outside of Canada and have the option to acquire an additional 26 percent interest in Hexavest in fiscal 2017. Hexavest’s assets under management have grown from $11.0 billion at deal inception in August 2012 to $16.9 billion on October 31, 2013.

In December 2012, Parametric acquired Clifton. Based in Minneapolis, Clifton specializes in providing futures- and options-based overlay services and custom risk management solutions to institutional investors. Clifton’s overlay services enable clients to add, remove or hedge market exposures in a transparent and efficient manner without disrupting underlying holdings. Through this acquisition, we gained a market-leading position in futures- and options-based portfolio implementation services and positioned Parametric to assume direct responsibility for its distribution and client service in the U.S. institutional market. Operating as a division of Parametric, Clifton’s assets under management have grown from $34.8 billion on December 31, 2012 to $45.6 billion on October 31, 2013.

In fiscal 2013, we introduced twelve new funds to take advantage of our expanding investment capabilities and to support future business growth. We believe Eaton Vance Bond Fund, launched in January, and the companion multi-sector income strategy for institutional clients have a particular opportunity to develop into a significant new investment franchise for our Company.

We continued to advance development of exchange-traded managed funds (“ETMFs”) in fiscal 2013. ETMFs are a proposed new type of open-end investment fund that seek to provide the performance and tax advantages of exchange-traded funds to investors in active fund strategies, while maintaining the confidentiality of current portfolio trading information. We acquired the intellectual property supporting development of ETMFs in November 2010 and formed a subsidiary, Navigate Fund Solutions LLC (“Navigate”), to commercialize ETMFs in September 2011.

The Company filed initial and amended applications with the SEC in fiscal 2013, seeking exemptive relief to permit the offering of ETMFs. If approved, Navigate intends to pursue a two-part commercialization strategy: first, launching a family of Eaton Vance-sponsored ETMFs that mirror certain of our existing mutual funds, and second, licensing the associated intellectual property and providing related services to other fund groups. The launch of ETMFs is conditional upon regulatory approval, the likelihood and timing of which cannot be predicted. Commercial success also requires completion of enabling implementation technology and acceptance by market participants, which cannot be assured.

Investment Management Capabilities

We provide investment advisory services to retail clients through funds and retail managed accounts and to institutional and high-net-worth investors through private funds and separate accounts across a broad range of equity, fixed and floating-rate income, alternative and implementation services investment mandates. The following table sets forth consolidated assets under management by investment mandate for the dates indicated:

Consolidated Assets under Management by Investment Mandate⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

	October 31,
(in millions)	2013		2012		2011

Equity ⁽³⁾	$	93,585	$	80,782	$	84,281
Fixed income		44,211		49,003		43,708
Floating-rate income		41,821		26,388		24,322
Alternative		15,212		12,864		10,650
Implementation services⁽⁴⁾		85,637		30,302		24,574
Cash management		203		169		669
Total	$	280,669	$	199,508	$	188,204

⁽¹⁾

Consolidated Eaton Vance Corp. See table on page 35 for managed assets and flows of 49 percent-owned Hexavest Inc.

⁽²⁾

Assets under management for which we estimate fair value using significant unobservable inputs are not material to the total value of the assets we manage.

⁽³⁾

Balances include assets in balanced accounts holding income securities.

⁽⁴⁾

Balances include amounts reclassified from equity for the prior year period.

Our principal investment affiliates Eaton Vance Management, Parametric, Atlanta Capital and Hexavest offer a range of distinctive strategies. Investment approaches include bottom-up and top-down fundamental active management, rules-based systematic alpha investing and implementation of passive strategies. This broad diversification provides us the opportunity to address a wide range of investor needs and to offer products and services suited for various market environments.

The following table sets forth the strategies of our investment affiliates and their respective offerings within each of our investment mandates as of October 31, 2013:

Eaton Vance Management	Parametric	Atlanta Capital	Hexavest
Equity, income and alternative strategies based on in-depth fundamental analysis	Rules-based alpha-seeking equity, alternative and options strategies and implementation services	Actively managed high- quality U.S. stock and bond portfolios constructed using bottom- up fundamental analysis	Global equity and tactical allocation strategies combining fundamental research and proprietary quantitative methods
Equity:
Dividend/Global Dividend	Emerging Markets	Large-Cap Growth	Canadian
Large-Cap Core Research	Global	Mid-Cap Growth	Emerging Markets
Large-Cap Growth	Global Small-Cap	Mid-Large Cap Core	European
Large-Cap Value	Global ex-U.S.	Small-Cap Core	Global - All Country
Multi-Cap Growth	U.S.	SMID-Cap Core	Global - Developed
Equity Option	Managed Options		Global ex.-U.S.
Real Estate			U.S.
Small-Cap
Small-Cap Value
SMID-Cap
Tax-Managed
Asset Allocation
Fixed Income:
Core Bond/Core Plus		Core Bond
Emerging Market Local		Intermediate Duration
Debt		Short Duration
High Yield
Inflation-Linked
Investment-Grade
Corporate
Laddered Corporate
Mortgage-Backed Securities
Multi-Sector
Preferred Securities
Cash Management
Taxable Municipal
Laddered Municipal
Municipal Income
Opportunistic Municipal
Tax-Advantaged Bond
Floating-Rate Income:
Floating-Rate Loans

Eaton Vance Management	Parametric	Atlanta Capital	Hexavest
Equity, income and alternative strategies based on in-depth fundamental analysis	Rules-based alpha-seeking equity, alternative and options strategies and implementation services	Actively managed high- quality U.S. stock and bond portfolios constructed using bottom- up fundamental analysis	Global equity and tactical allocation strategies combining fundamental research and proprietary quantitative methods
Alternative:
Currency	Commodity		Global Macro
Global Macro Absolute	Currency		Global Tactical Asset
Return	Market Neutral		Allocation
Hedged Equity	Risk Parity
Multi-Strategy Absolute	Option Absolute Return
Return
Implementation Services:
	Portfolio Overlay
	Tax-Managed Core
	Centralized Portfolio
	Management
	Specialty Index
	Exposure Management

Investment Vehicles

The following table sets forth our assets under management by investment vehicle as of the dates identified:

Consolidated Assets Under Management by Vehicle⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

	October 31,
(in millions)	2013		2012		2011
Fund assets:
Open-end funds	$	86,990	$	72,189	$	72,221
Closed-end funds		24,911		23,217		22,749
Private funds		21,500		18,012		17,404
Total fund assets		133,401		113,418		112,374
Separate account assets:
Institutional account assets		95,724		43,338		38,003
High-net-worth account assets		19,699		15,036		13,256
Retail managed account assets		31,845		27,716		24,571
Total separate account assets		147,268		86,090		75,830
Total	$	280,669	$	199,508	$	188,204

⁽¹⁾

Consolidated Eaton Vance Corp. See table on page 35 for managed assets and flows of 49 percent-owned Hexavest Inc.

⁽²⁾

Assets under management for which we estimate fair value using significant unobservable inputs are not material to the total value of the assets we manage.

Our consolidated assets under management are broadly diversified by investment channel and vehicle. Open-end funds represented 31 percent of our total assets under management on October 31, 2013, while closed-end and private funds represented 9 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Institutional, high-net-worth and retail managed account assets represented 34 percent, 7 percent and 11 percent of total assets under management, respectively, on October 31, 2013.

Open-end Funds

As of October 31, 2013, we managed 113 open-end funds, including 10 tax-managed equity funds, 39 non-tax-managed equity funds, 32 state and national municipal income funds, 16 taxable fixed income and cash management funds, five floating-rate bank loan funds and 11 alternative funds sold to U.S. and non-U.S. investors.

We are a leading manager of equity funds designed to minimize the impact of taxes on investment returns, with $7.6 billion in open-end tax-managed equity fund assets under management on October 31, 2013. We began building our tax-managed equity fund family in fiscal 1996 with the introduction of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Growth Fund 1.1, and have since expanded offerings to include a variety of equity styles and market caps, including large-cap value, multi-cap growth, small-cap, small-cap value, equity asset allocation, equity option and global dividend income.

Our non-tax-managed equity fund offerings include large-cap, multi-cap and small-cap funds in value, core and growth styles, dividend and global dividend income funds, international, global, emerging markets, real estate and sector-specific funds. Also included in the category are 4 hybrid funds that generally hold both equities and income securities. Assets under management in open-end non-tax-managed equity funds totaled $24.0 billion on October 31, 2013.

Our family of municipal income mutual funds is one of the broadest in the industry, with nine national and 23 state-specific funds in 20 different states. As of October 31, 2013, we managed $11.9 billion in open-end municipal income fund assets.

Our taxable fixed income and cash management funds utilize our investment management capabilities in a broad range of fixed income mandates, including mortgage-backed securities, high-grade bond, high-yield bond, multi-sector bond and cash instruments. Assets under management in open-end taxable income funds totaled $9.8 billion on October 31, 2013.

We introduced our first bank loan fund in 1989 and have consistently ranked as one of the largest managers of retail bank loan funds. Assets under management in open-end floating-rate bank loan funds totaled $26.3 billion on October 31, 2013.

The alternative category includes a range of absolute return strategies, as well as commodity- and currency-linked investments. We currently offer five absolute return funds in the U.S. and a version of the global macro strategy that we sell to fund investors outside of the United States. Assets under management in open-end alternative funds totaled $9.8 billion on October 31, 2013.

In fiscal 2000, we introduced The U.S. Charitable Gift Trust (“Trust”) and its Pooled Income Funds, which are designed to simplify the process of donating to qualified charities and to provide professional management of pools of donated assets. The Trust was one of the first charities to use professional investment advisers to assist individuals with their philanthropic, estate and tax planning needs. The Pooled Income Funds sponsored by the Trust provide donors with income during their lifetimes and leave principal to the Trust and designated charities upon their deaths. Assets under management in the Trust and its Pooled Income Funds, which are included in the fund assets described above, totaled $430 million at October 31, 2013.

Over the past several years, we have launched a number of Ireland and Cayman Island-domiciled open-end funds, which offer a range of our investment strategies to non-U.S. investors. At October 31, 2013, managed assets in our twelve funds sold outside the U.S. totaled $3.6 billion.

As of October 31, 2013, 35 of our open-end funds were rated 4 or 5 stars by Morningstar^TM for at least one class of shares, including six equity and 29 income funds. A good source of performance-related information for our funds is the Company’s website, www.eatonvance.com. On the Company’s website, investors can also obtain other current information about our product offerings, including investment objective and principal investment policies, portfolio characteristics, expenses and Morningstar^TM ratings.

Closed-end Funds

Our family of closed-end funds includes 22 municipal bond funds, 13 domestic and global equity funds, four bank loan funds and two multi-sector income funds. As of October 31, 2013, we managed $24.9 billion in closed-end fund assets and ranked as the third largest manager of exchange-listed closed-end funds in the U.S. according to Strategic Insight, a fund industry data provider.

In fiscal 2008, consistent with broad market experience, our closed-end funds with outstanding auction preferred shares (“APS”) began experiencing unsuccessful auctions. This meant that the normal means for providing liquidity to APS holders was no longer functioning. Since then, we have taken action to restore liquidity to APS holders and to provide alternative sources of leverage to our closed-end funds. We were the first closed-end fund family to complete redemption of equity fund APS, the first to redeem taxable income fund APS and the first to redeem municipal income fund APS. Replacement financing has been provided by bank and commercial paper facility borrowings, through creation of tender option bonds by certain municipal funds and the issuance of variable rate term preferred stock. As of October 31, 2013, our closed-end funds had $1.1 billion of outstanding APS compared to $5.0 billion of outstanding APS when the crisis broke. We continue to work to develop and implement replacement financing solutions to our funds’ remaining APS.

Private Funds

The private fund category includes privately offered equity funds designed to meet the diversification and tax-management needs of qualifying high-net-worth investors. We are recognized as a market leader for these types of privately offered equity funds, with $9.8 billion in assets under management as of October 31, 2013. We also offer equity, floating-rate bank loan and fixed income funds to institutional investors. Assets under management in institutional equity, bank loan and fixed income funds, which include cash instrument collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) entities, collective trusts and leveraged and unleveraged loan funds, totaled $9.0 billion as of October 31, 2013, including $2.1 billion of assets in CLO entities.

Institutional Separate Accounts

We serve a broad range of clients in the institutional marketplace, both in the U.S. and internationally, including government, corporate and union retirement plans, endowments and foundations, nuclear decommissioning trusts and asbestos litigation trusts, sovereign wealth funds and investment funds sponsored by others for which we serve as a sub-advisor. Our diversity of capabilities allows us to offer domestic and international institutional investors a broad spectrum of equity, fixed and floating-rate income, and alternative strategies and implementation services. Our broad expertise provides us the opportunity to customize solutions to help meet our clients’ complex investment needs.

In fiscal 2005, we chartered EVTC as a non-depository trust company. We have used EVTC as a platform to launch a series of commingled funds tailored to meet the needs of smaller institutional clients. The trust company also enables us to participate in qualified plan commingled investment platforms offered in the broker-dealer channel. In addition to management services, EVTC provides certain custody services and has obtained regulatory approval to provide institutional trustee services.

Institutional separate account assets under management totaled $95.7 billion at October 31, 2013.

High-net-worth Separate Accounts

We offer high-net-worth and family office clients personalized investment counseling services through EVIC. At EVIC, investment counselors work directly with clients to establish long-term financial programs and implement strategies designed for achieving their objectives.

Also included in high-net worth separate accounts are tax-efficient core equity portfolios managed by Parametric for family offices and high-net worth individuals. Parametric’s objective in managing these accounts is to match the returns of a client-specified equity benchmark and add incremental returns on an after-tax basis. In fiscal 2007, Parametric formed Parametric Risk Advisors to extend Parametric’s offerings for the high-net-worth and family office market to include investment programs that utilize option overlay strategies to help clients customize their risk and return profiles through the use of disciplined options strategies.

High-net-worth separate account assets under management totaled $19.7 billion at October 31, 2013, $4.5 billion of which are managed by EVIC and $15.2 billion of which are managed by Parametric and Parametric Risk Advisors.

Retail Managed Accounts

We have developed our retail managed accounts business by capitalizing on the management capabilities of EVM, Atlanta Capital, Fox Asset Management, Parametric, Parametric Risk Advisors and TABS and leveraging the strengths of our retail marketing organization and our relationships with major distributors. We now participate in over 50 retail managed account broker-dealer programs. According to Cerrulli Associates, an investment research firm, as of September 30, 2013 Eaton Vance ranked as the fifth largest manager of retail managed account assets. Our retail managed account assets totaled $31.8 billion at October 31, 2013.

Investment Management and Related Services

Our direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries EVM and BMR are investment advisers to all but one of the Eaton Vance-sponsored funds. Although the specifics of our fund advisory agreements vary, the basic terms are similar. Pursuant to the advisory agreements, EVM or BMR provides overall investment management services to each internally advised fund, subject, in the case of funds that are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) (“Registered Funds”), to the supervision of the fund’s board of trustees or directors (together, “trustees”) in accordance with the fund’s investment objectives and policies. Our investment advisory agreements with the funds provide for fees ranging from eight to 125 basis points of average assets annually. Atlanta Capital, Fox Asset Management, Parametric, Parametric Risk Advisors or an unaffiliated advisory firm acts as a sub-adviser to EVM and BMR for certain funds. OrbiMed Advisors LLC (“OrbiMed”), an independent investment management company based in New York, is the investment adviser to Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund.

EVM provides administrative services, including personnel and facilities, necessary for the operation of all Eaton Vance funds, subject to the oversight of the each fund’s board of trustees. These services are provided under comprehensive management agreements with certain funds that also include investment advisory services and through separate administrative services agreements with other funds as discussed below. Administrative services include recordkeeping, preparing and filing documents required to comply with federal and state securities laws, legal, fund administration and compliance services, supervising the activities of the funds’ custodians and transfer agents, providing assistance in connection with the funds’ shareholder meetings and other administrative services, including providing office space and office facilities, equipment and personnel that may be necessary for managing and administering the business affairs of the funds. For the services provided under the agreements, certain funds pay EVM a monthly fee calculated at an annual rate of up to 50 basis points of average daily net assets. Each agreement remains in effect indefinitely, subject, in the case of Registered Funds, to annual approval by the fund’s board of trustees. The funds generally bear all expenses associated with their operation and the issuance

and redemption or repurchase of their securities, except for the compensation of trustees and officers of the fund who are employed by us. Under some circumstances, particularly in connection with the introduction of new funds, EVM or BMR may waive a portion of its management fee and/or pay some expenses of the fund.

For Registered Funds, a majority of the independent trustees (i.e., those unaffiliated with us or any adviser controlled by us and deemed “non-interested” under the 1940 Act) must review and approve the investment advisory and administrative agreements annually. The fund trustees generally may terminate these agreements upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty. Shareholders of Registered Funds must approve any amendments to the investment advisory agreements.

EVM has entered into an investment advisory and administrative agreement with The Trust. In addition, the Trust and its Pooled Income Funds have entered into distribution agreements with EVD that provide for reimbursement of the costs of fundraising and servicing donor accounts.

Either EVM, BMR, EVIC, Atlanta Capital, Fox Asset Management, Parametric or Parametric Risk Advisors has entered into an investment advisory agreement for each separately managed account and retail managed account program, which sets forth the account’s investment objectives and fee schedule, and provides for management of assets in the account in accordance with the stated investment objectives. Our separate account portfolio managers may assist clients in formulating investment strategies.

EVTC is the trustee for each collective investment trust and is responsible for designing and implementing the trust’s investment program or overseeing sub-advisors managing the trust’s investment portfolios. As trustee, EVTC also provides certain administrative and accounting services to the trust. For services provided under each trust’s declaration of trust, EVTC receives a monthly fee calculated at an annual rate of up to 105 basis points of average daily net assets of the trust.

Investment counselors and separate account portfolio managers employed by our wholly owned and other controlled subsidiaries make investment decisions for the separate accounts we manage. Investment counselors and separate account portfolio managers generally use the same research information as fund portfolio managers, but tailor investment decisions to the needs of particular clients. We generally receive investment advisory fees for separate accounts quarterly, based on the value of the assets managed on a particular date, such as the first or last calendar day of a quarter, or, in some instances, on the average assets for the period. These fees generally range from ten to 100 basis points annually of assets under management and the associated advisory contracts are generally terminable upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty.

The following table shows investment advisory and administrative fees earned for the three years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 as follows:

	Investment Advisory and Administrative Fees
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011

Investment advisory fees –
Funds	$	769,864	$	698,016	$	720,509
Separate accounts		306,886		243,706		227,792
Administrative fees – funds		58,577		46,336		47,921
Total	$	1,135,327	$	988,058	$	996,222

Marketing and Distribution of Fund Shares

We market and distribute shares of Eaton Vance funds domestically through EVD. EVD sells fund shares through a network of financial intermediaries, including national and regional broker-dealers, banks, registered investment advisors, insurance companies and financial planning firms. The Eaton Vance International (Ireland) Funds are Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (“UCITS”) funds domiciled in Ireland and sold by EVMI through certain intermediaries to investors who are citizens of member nations of the European Union and other countries outside the United States. The Eaton Vance International (Cayman Islands) Funds are Cayman Island-domiciled funds sold by EVMI and EVD through intermediaries to non-U.S. investors.

Although the firms in our domestic retail distribution network have each entered into selling agreements with EVD, these agreements (which generally are terminable by either party) do not legally obligate the firms to sell any specific amount of our investment products. EVD currently maintains a sales force of approximately 135 external and internal wholesalers who work closely with financial advisers in the retail distribution network to assist in placing Eaton Vance funds.

Certain funds have adopted distribution plans as permitted by the 1940 Act, which provide for payment of ongoing distribution fees (so-called “12b-1 fees”) for the sale and distribution of shares, and service fees for personal and/or shareholder account services. Distribution fees reimburse us for sales commissions paid to financial intermediaries and for distribution services provided. Each distribution plan and distribution agreement with EVD for the Registered Funds is initially approved and its subsequent continuance must be approved annually by the board of trustees of the respective funds, including a majority of the independent trustees.

EVD currently sells Eaton Vance mutual funds under five primary pricing structures: front-end load commission (“Class A”); level-load commission (“Class C”); institutional no-load (“Class I, also referred to as “Institutional Class”); retail no-load (“Class N,” referred to as “Investor Class” or “Advisers Class”); and retirement plan no-load (“Class R”). In the first quarter of 2012, we stopped offering spread-load commission (“Class B”) shares to new investors.

For Class A shares, the shareholder may be required to pay a sales charge to the selling broker-dealer of up to five percent and an underwriting commission to EVD of up to 75 basis points of the dollar value of the shares sold. Under certain conditions, we waive the sales load on Class A shares and the shares are sold at net asset value. EVD generally receives (and then pays to authorized firms after one year) distribution and service fees of up to 30 basis points of average net assets annually on Class A shares. In recent years, a growing percentage of the Company’s sales of Class A shares have been made on a load-waived basis through various fee-based programs. EVD does not receive underwriting commissions on such sales. Unless specified otherwise, references herein to “service fees” include combined distribution and service fees paid by Class A shares and Class N shares (described below).

For Class C shares, the shareholder pays no front-end commissions and no contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions after the first year. EVD pays a commission and the projected first year’s service fees to the dealer at the time of sale. The fund makes monthly distribution plan and service fee payments to EVD at an annual rate of up to 75 basis points and 25 basis points, respectively, of average net assets of the Class. EVD retains the distribution and service fee paid to EVD for the first twelve months and pays the distribution and service fee to the dealer after one year. Redemptions of Class C shares within twelve months of purchase are generally subject to deferred sales charges of one percent.

Class I and Institutional Class shares are offered at net asset value and are not subject to any sales charges, underwriter commissions, distribution fees or service fees. For designated Class I shares, a minimum investment of $250,000 or higher is normally required. Designated Institutional Class shares are normally subject to a minimum investment of $50,000.

Class N shares are offered at net asset value and are not subject to any sales charges or underwriter commissions. EVD generally receives (and then pays to authorized firms after one year) distribution and service fees of 25 basis points of average net assets annually.

Class R shares are offered at net asset value with no front-end sales charge. Class R shares pay distribution fees of up to 25 basis points and service fees of up to 25 basis points of average net assets of the Class annually.

From time to time we sponsor unregistered equity funds that are privately placed by EVD, as placement agent, and by various sub-agents to whom EVD and the subscribing shareholders make sales commission payments to the intermediaries. The privately placed equity funds are managed by EVM and BMR.

Reference is made to Note 24 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the major customers that provided over 10 percent of our total revenue.

Regulation

EVM, BMR, EVIC, Atlanta Capital, Fox Asset Management, Parametric and Parametric Risk Advisors are each registered with the SEC under the Advisers Act. The Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers, including fiduciary duties, recordkeeping requirements, operational requirements and disclosure obligations. Most Eaton Vance funds are registered with the SEC under the 1940 Act. Except for privately offered funds exempt from registration, each U.S. fund is also required to make notice filings with all states where it is offered for sale. Virtually all aspects of our investment management business in the U.S. are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to benefit shareholders of the funds and separate account clients and generally grant supervisory agencies and bodies broad administrative powers, including the power to limit or restrict us from carrying on our investment management business in the event we fail to comply with such laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on EVM, BMR, EVIC, Atlanta Capital, Fox Asset Management, Parametric or Parametric Risk Advisors engaging in the investment management business for specified periods of time, the revocation of any such company’s registration as an investment adviser, and other censures or fines.

In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act established enhanced regulatory requirements for non-bank financial institutions designated as “systemically important” by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”). Under this new systemic risk regulation regime, the Company could be designated a systemically important financial institution (“SIFI”). If the Company were designated a SIFI, it would be subject to enhanced prudential measures, which could include capital and liquidity requirements, leverage limits, enhanced public disclosures and risk management requirements, annual stress testing by the Federal Reserve, credit exposure and concentration limits, supervisory and other requirements. These heightened regulatory obligations could, individually or in the aggregate, adversely impact the Company’s business and operations. In April 2012, the FSOC issued a final rule and interpretive guidance regarding the process by which it will designate nonbank financial companies as systemically important. Although it is not known whether the Company would be designated as systemically important under the process outlined therein, a report issued by the FSOC in September 2013 suggests a greater likelihood that large asset management companies will be designated as SIFIs.

In February 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted certain amendments to existing rules that required additional registration for our mutual funds and certain other products we sponsor to use futures, swaps or other derivatives. EVM and BMR are registered as Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors with the CFTC. On August 13, 2013, the CFTC adopted rules for operators of registered mutual funds that are subject to registration as Commodity Pool Operators generally allowing such

commodity pools to comply with SEC disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping rules in lieu of complying with CFTC’s related requirements. These CFTC rules do not, however, relieve registered Commodity Pool Operators from compliance with certain performance reporting and recordkeeping requirements. The Company may incur ongoing costs associated with monitoring compliance with the CFTC registration and exemption obligations and complying with the periodic reporting requirements of Commodity Pool Operators.

EVM and BMR are each registered with the CFTC as a Commodity Pool Operator and Commodity Trading Advisor and subject to regulation by the CFTC and National Futures Association. The Eaton Vance mutual funds and privately offered funds that trade commodity interests are also regulated by the CFTC. In the event that EVM or BMR fails to comply with applicable requirements, the CFTC may suspend or revoke its registration, prohibit it from trading or doing business with registered entities, impose civil money penalties, require restitution and seek fines or imprisonment for criminal violations.

EVTC is registered as a non-depository Maine Trust Company and is subject to regulation by the State of Maine Bureau of Financial Institutions (“Bureau of Financial Institutions”). EVTC is subject to certain capital requirements, as determined by the Examination Division of the Bureau of Financial Institutions. At periodic intervals, regulators from the Bureau of Financial Institutions examine the Company’s financial condition as part of their legally prescribed oversight function. There were no violations by EVTC of these capital requirements in fiscal 2013 or prior years.

EVD is registered as a broker-dealer under the Exchange Act and is subject to regulation by the Financial Industry Reporting Authority (“FINRA”), the SEC and other federal and state agencies. EVD is subject to the SEC’s net capital rule designed to enforce minimum standards regarding the general financial condition and liquidity of broker-dealers. Under certain circumstances, this rule may limit our ability to make withdrawals of capital and receive dividends from EVD. EVD’s regulatory net capital consistently exceeded minimum net capital requirements during fiscal 2013. The securities industry is one of the most highly regulated in the United States, and failure to comply with related laws and regulations can result in the revocation of broker-dealer licenses, the imposition of censures or fines and the suspension or expulsion from the securities business of a firm, its officers or employees.

EVMI has the permission of the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) to conduct a regulated business in the United Kingdom. EVMI's primary business purpose is to distribute our investment products in Europe and certain other international markets. Under the Financial Services and Markets Act of the United Kingdom, EVMI is subject to certain liquidity and capital requirements. Such requirements may limit our ability to make withdrawals of capital from EVMI. In addition, failure to comply with such requirements could jeopardize EVMI's approval to conduct business in the United Kingdom. There were no violations by EVMI of the liquidity and capital requirements in fiscal 2013 or prior years.

EVAI has the permission of the Central Bank of Ireland to conduct its business of providing management services to the Eaton Vance International (Ireland) Funds. EVAI is subject to certain liquidity and capital requirements. Such requirements may limit our ability to make withdrawals of capital from EVAI. There were no violations by EVAI of the liquidity and capital requirements in fiscal 2013 or prior years.

EVMIA has the permission of the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (“ACRA”) to conduct a regulated business in Singapore. Under the Monetary Authority of Singapore, EVMIA is subject to certain liquidity and capital requirements. Such requirements may limit our ability to make withdrawals of capital from EVMIA. There were no violations by EVMIA of the liquidity and capital requirements in fiscal 2013 or prior years.

Our officers, directors and employees may from time to time own securities that are held by one or more of the funds and separate accounts we manage. Our internal policies with respect to individual investments by investment professionals and other employees with access to investment information require prior clearance of most types of transactions and reporting of all securities transactions, and restrict certain transactions to avoid the possibility of

conflicts of interest. All employees are required to comply with all prospectus restrictions and limitations on purchases, sales or exchanges of our mutual fund shares and to pre-clear purchases and sales of shares of our closed-end funds.

Competition

The investment management business is a highly competitive global industry and we are subject to substantial competition in each of our principal product categories and distribution channels. There are few barriers to entry for new firms and consolidation within the industry continues to alter the competitive landscape. According to the Investment Company Institute, there were more than 770 investment managers at the end of calendar 2012 that competed in the U.S. mutual fund market. We compete with these firms, many of which have substantially greater resources, on the basis of investment performance, diversity of products, distribution capability, scope and quality of service, fees charged, reputation and the ability to develop new investment strategies and products to meet the changing needs of investors.

In the retail fund channel, we compete with other mutual fund management, distribution and service companies that distribute investment products through affiliated and unaffiliated sales forces, broker-dealers and direct sales to the public. According to the Investment Company Institute, at the end of calendar 2012 there were almost 8,800 open-end investment companies of varying sizes and investment objectives whose shares were being offered to the public in the United States. We rely primarily on intermediaries to distribute our products and pursue sales relationships with all types of intermediaries to broaden our distribution network. A failure to maintain strong relationships with intermediaries that distribute our products in the retail fund channel could adversely affect our gross and net sales, assets under management, revenue and financial condition.

We are also subject to substantial competition in the retail managed account channel from other investment management firms. Sponsors of retail managed account programs limit the number of approved managers within their programs and firms compete based on investment performance and other considerations to win and maintain positions in these programs.

In the high-net-worth and institutional separate account channels, we compete with other investment management firms based on the breadth of product offerings, investment performance, strength of reputation and the scope and quality of client service.

Employees

On October 31, 2013, we and our controlled subsidiaries had 1,330 full-time and part-time employees. On October 31, 2012, the comparable number was 1,197.

Available Information

We make available free of charge our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such filing has been made with the SEC. Reports may be viewed and obtained on our website at www.eatonvance.com, or by calling Investor Relations at 617-482-8260. We have included our website address in this report as inactive textual reference only. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

The public may read and copy any of the materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxies and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are subject to substantial competition in all aspects of our investment management business. Our funds and separate accounts compete against a large number of investment products and services sold to the public by investment management companies, investment dealers, banks, insurance companies and others. Many institutions we compete with have greater financial resources than us and there are few barriers to entry. We compete with these firms on the basis of investment performance, diversity of products, distribution capability, scope and quality of services, reputation and the ability to develop new investment strategies and products to meet the changing needs of investors. To the extent that current or potential customers decide to invest in products sponsored by our competitors, the sales of our products as well as our market share, revenue and net income could decline.

The investment management industry is highly competitive and investment management customers are increasingly fee sensitive. In the event that competitors charge lower fees for substantially similar products, we may be forced to compete on the basis of price in order to attract and retain customers. Rules and regulations applicable to investment companies provide, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser continues in effect from year to year only if its continuation is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees. Periodic review of fund advisory agreements could result in a reduction in the Company’s advisory fee revenues from funds. Fee reductions on existing or future business and/or the impact of evolving industry fee structures could have an adverse impact on our future revenue and profitability.

The inability to access clients through intermediaries could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our ability to market investment products is highly dependent on access to the various distribution systems of national and regional securities dealer firms, which generally offer competing products that could limit the distribution of our investment products. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain access to these channels. The inability to have such access could have a material adverse effect on our business. To the extent that existing or potential customers, including securities broker-dealers, decide to invest in or broaden distribution relationships with our competitors, the sales of our products as well as our market share, revenue and net income could decline. Certain intermediaries with which we conduct business charge the Company fees to maintain access to their distribution networks. If we choose not to pay such fees, our ability to distribution through those intermediaries would be limited.

Our investment advisory agreements are subject to termination or non-renewal. We derive almost all of our revenue from investment advisory and administrative fees, distribution income and service fees received from the managed funds and separate accounts. As a result, we are dependent upon management contracts, administrative contracts, distribution contracts, underwriting contracts or service contracts under which these fees are paid. Generally, these contracts are terminable upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty. If any of these contracts are terminated, not renewed, or amended to reduce fees, our financial results could be adversely affected.

Our assets under management, which impact revenue, are subject to significant fluctuations. Our major sources of revenue, including investment advisory, administrative, distribution and service fees, are generally calculated as percentages of assets under management. Fee rates for our investment products generally vary by investment mandate (e.g., equity, fixed income, floating-rate income, alternative or implementation services) and vehicle (e.g., fund or separate account). An adverse change in asset mix by mandate or vehicle, independent of our level of assets under management, may result in a decrease in our overall effective fee rate, thereby reducing our revenue and net income. Any decrease in the level of our assets under management generally would also reduce our revenue and net income. Assets under management could decrease due to a decline in securities prices, a decline in the sales of our investment products, an increase in open-end fund redemptions or client withdrawals, repurchases of or other reductions in closed-end fund shares outstanding, or reductions in leverage used by investment vehicles. Adverse market conditions and/or lack of investor confidence could result

in investors withdrawing from the markets or decreasing their rate of investment, either of which could adversely affect our revenue, earnings and growth prospects.

Poor investment performance of our products could affect our sales or reduce the amount of assets under management, negatively impacting revenue and net income. Investment performance is critical to our success. Poor investment performance on an absolute basis or as compared to third-party benchmarks or competitor products could lead to a decrease in sales and stimulate higher redemptions, thereby lowering the amount of assets under management and reducing the investment advisory fees we earn. A decline in investment performance of any investment franchise could have a material adverse effect on the level of assets under management, revenue and net income of that franchise. Past or present performance in the investment products we manage is not indicative of future performance.

Our clients can withdraw the assets we manage on short notice, making our future client and revenue base unpredictable. Our open-end fund clients generally may redeem their investments in these funds each business day without prior notice. While not subject to daily redemption, closed-end funds that we manage may shrink in size due to repurchases of shares in open-market transactions or pursuant to tender offers, or in connection with distributions in excess of realized returns. Institutional and individual separate account clients can terminate their relationships with us for any number of reasons. In a declining stock market, the pace of open-end fund redemptions could accelerate. Poor performance relative to other asset management firms can result in decreased purchases of open-end fund shares, increased redemptions of open-end fund shares, and the loss of institutional or individual separate accounts. The decrease in revenue that could result from any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success depends on key personnel and our financial performance could be negatively affected by the loss of their services. Our success depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified portfolio managers, analysts, investment counselors, sales and management personnel and other key professionals, including our executive officers. Our key employees generally do not have employment contracts and may voluntarily terminate their employment at any time. Certain senior executives and the non-employee members of our Board of Directors are subject to our mandatory retirement policy at age 65 and age 72, respectively. The loss of the services of key personnel or our failure to attract replacement or additional qualified personnel could negatively affect our financial performance. An increase in compensation to attract or retain personnel could result in a decrease in net income.

Our expenses are subject to fluctuations that could materially affect our operating results. Our results of operations are dependent on the level of expenses, which can vary significantly from period to period. Our expenses may fluctuate as a result of variations in the level of compensation, expenses incurred to support distribution of our investment products, expenses incurred to enhance our infrastructure (including technology and compliance) and impairments of intangible assets or goodwill. Increases in our level of expenses, or our inability to reduce our level of expenses when necessary, could materially affect our operating results.

Our business is subject to operational risk. In the management and administration of funds and client accounts, we are subject to the risk that we commit errors that cause the Company to incur financial losses and damage our reputation. Because they involve large numbers of accounts and operate at generally low fee rates, our implementation services businesses may be particularly susceptible to losses from operational or trading errors.

Our reputation could be damaged. We have built a reputation of high integrity, prudent investment management and superior client service. Our reputation is extremely important to our success. Any damage to our reputation could result in client withdrawals from funds or separate accounts that are advised by us and ultimately impede our ability to attract and retain key personnel. The loss of either client relationships or key personnel due to damage to our reputation could reduce the amount of assets under management and cause us to suffer a loss in revenue or a reduction in net income.

Success of our exchange-traded managed funds initiative is highly uncertain. In recent years the Company has devoted substantial resources to the development of exchange-traded managed funds (“ETMFs”), a proposed new type of open-end investment fund that seeks to provide the performance and tax advantages of exchange-traded funds to investors in active fund strategies, while maintaining the confidentiality of current portfolio trading information. The launch of ETMFs is conditional upon regulatory approval, the likelihood and timing of which cannot be predicted. Commercial success also requires completion of enabling implementation technology and acceptance by market participants, which cannot be assured.

Support provided to new products may reduce fee income, increase expenses and expose us to potential loss on invested capital. We may support the development of new investment products by waiving all or a portion of the fees we receive for managing such products, by subsidizing expenses or by making seed capital investments. Seed investments in new products utilize Company capital that would otherwise be available for general corporate purposes and expose us to capital losses to the extent that realized investment losses are not offset by hedging gains. The risk of loss may be greater for seed capital investments that are not hedged, or if an intended hedge does not perform as expected. Failure to have or devote sufficient capital to support new products could have an adverse impact on our future growth.

We may need to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt in the future, and resources may not be available to us in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms. Our ability to access capital markets efficiently depends on a number of factors, including the state of global credit and equity markets, interest rates, credit spreads and our credit ratings. If we are unable to access capital markets to issue new debt, refinance existing debt or sell shares of our Non-Voting Common Stock as needed, or if we are unable to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, our business could be adversely impacted.

We could be subject to losses and reputational harm if we, or our agents, fail to properly safeguard sensitive and confidential information and fail to implement effective cyber security policies. We are dependent on the effectiveness of our information and cyber security policies, procedures and capabilities to protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the data that reside in or are transmitted through them. As part of our normal operations, we maintain and transmit confidential information about our clients as well as proprietary information relating to our business operations. We maintain a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that fraudulent activity, including misappropriation of assets, fraudulent financial reporting, and unauthorized access to sensitive or confidential data is either prevented or timely detected. Our technology systems may still be vulnerable to unauthorized access or may be corrupted by cyber attacks, computer viruses or other malicious software code, or authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release confidential or proprietary information. Although we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our mobile electronic hardware, if such hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, it may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions by us. Breach of our technology systems could result in the loss of valuable information, liability for stolen assets or information, remediation costs to repair damage caused by the breach, additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents and litigation costs resulting from the incident. Moreover, loss of confidential customer identification information could harm our reputation, result in the termination of contracts by our existing customers and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenues.

Failure to maintain adequate infrastructure could impede our productivity and ability to support business growth. Our infrastructure, including our technological capacity, data centers and office space, is vital to the competitiveness of our business. The failure to maintain an infrastructure commensurate with the size and scope of our business, including any expansion, could impede our productivity and growth, which could result in a decline in our earnings.

Failure to maintain adequate business continuity plans could have a material adverse impact on us and our products. Significant portions of our business operations and those of our critical third-party service providers are concentrated in a few geographic areas, including Boston, Massachusetts and Seattle, Washington. Critical operations that are geographically concentrated in Boston and/or Seattle include trading operations, information technology, fund administration, and custody and portfolio accounting services for the Company’s products. Should we, or our critical service providers, experience a significant local or regional disaster or other business continuity problem, our continued success will depend, in part, on the safety and availability of our personnel, our office facilities, and the proper functioning of our computer, telecommunication and other related systems and operations. The failure by us, or our critical service providers, to maintain updated adequate business continuity plans, including backup facilities, could impede our ability to operate in the event of a disruption, which could cause our earnings to decline. We have developed various backup systems and contingency plans but we cannot be assured that they will be adequate in all circumstances that could arise or that material interruptions and disruptions will not occur. In addition, we rely to varying degrees on outside vendors for disaster contingency support, and we cannot be assured that these vendors will be able to perform in an adequate and timely manner. If we, or our critical service providers, are unable to respond adequately to such an event in a timely manner, we may be unable to continue our business operations, which could lead to a damaged reputation and loss of customers that results in a decrease in assets under management, lower revenues and reduced net income.

We pursue growth in the United States and abroad in part through acquisitions, which exposes us to risks inherent in assimilating new operations, expanding into new jurisdictions and executing on new development opportunities. Our growth strategy is based in part on the selective development or acquisition of asset management or related businesses that we believe will add value to our business and generate positive net returns. This strategy may not be effective, and failure to successfully develop and implement such a strategy may decrease earnings and harm the Company's competitive position in the investment management industry. We cannot assure that we will identify and consummate any such transactions on acceptable terms or have sufficient resources to accomplish such a strategy. In addition, any strategic transaction can involve a number of risks, including additional demands on our staff; unanticipated problems regarding integration of operating facilities, technologies and new employees; and the existence of liabilities or contingencies not disclosed to or otherwise known by us prior to closing a transaction. As a result, the Company may not be able to realize all of the benefits that it hoped to achieve from such transactions. In addition, we may be required to spend additional time or money on integration that would otherwise be spent on the development and expansion of our business and services.

Expansion into international markets and new products and services increases our operational, regulatory and other risks. We continue to increase our product offerings and international business activities. As a result of such expansion, we face increased operational, regulatory, compliance, reputational and foreign exchange rate risks. The failure of our compliance and internal control systems to properly mitigate such additional risks, or of our operating infrastructure to support such expansion, could result in operational failures and regulatory fines or sanctions. The Company’s operations in the European Economic Area are subject to increased compliance, disclosure and other obligations as a result of recent changes to European fund regulation. The Company may incur additional costs to satisfy the requirements of the European Union Directive on Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive. These Directives may also limit the Company’s operating flexibility and impact its ability to expand in European markets.

Legal and regulatory developments in the mutual fund and investment advisory industry could increase our regulatory burden, cause a loss of mutual fund investors, and reduce our revenues. In recent years, regulators in both the United States and abroad have increased oversight of the financial sector of the economy. Some of the newly adopted and proposed regulations are focused directly on the investment management industry, while others are more broadly focused, but impact our industry.

In February 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted certain amendments to existing rules that required additional registration for our mutual funds and certain other products we sponsor to use futures, swaps or other derivatives. EVM and BMR are registered as Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors with the CFTC. The Company may incur ongoing costs associated with monitoring compliance with the CFTC registration and exemption obligations and complying with the periodic reporting requirements of Commodity Pool Operators.

Pursuant to the mandate of the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFTC and the SEC have promulgated rules that increase the regulation of over-the-counter derivatives markets. The implementing regulations require many types of derivatives that were previously traded over-the-counter to be executed in regulated markets and submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses. Complying with the new regulations may significantly increase the costs of derivatives trading on behalf of the Company’s clients.

Certain subsidiaries of the Company recently began filing quarterly reports on Form PF for private funds they manage, pursuant to systemic risk reporting requirements adopted by the SEC. These filings have required, and will continue to require, significant investments in people and systems to ensure timely and accurate reporting.

These new laws and regulations will likely result in greater compliance and administrative burdens on us, increasing our expenses.

Our business is subject to risk from regulatory investigation, potential securities laws, liability and litigation. We are subject to federal securities laws, state laws regarding securities fraud, other federal and state laws and rules, and regulations of certain regulatory, self-regulatory and other organizations, including, among others, the SEC, FINRA, the CFTC, the National Futures Association (“NFA”), the FCA and the New York Stock Exchange. While we have focused significant attention and resources on the development and implementation of compliance policies, procedures and practices, non-compliance with applicable laws, rules or regulations, either in the United States or abroad, or our inability to adapt to a complex and ever-changing regulatory environment could result in sanctions against us, which could adversely affect our reputation, business, revenue and earnings. From time to time, various claims against us arise in the ordinary course of business, including employment related claims. We carry insurance in amounts and under terms that we believe are appropriate. We cannot assure that our insurance will cover most liabilities and losses to which we may be exposed, or that our insurance policies will continue to be available at acceptable terms and fees. Certain insurance coverage may not be available or may be prohibitively expensive in future periods. As our insurance policies come up for renewal, we may need to assume higher deductibles or pay higher premiums, which would increase our expenses and reduce our net income.

Changes in corporate tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes of these audits could have a material impact on our net income or financial condition. We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions including several states. Changes in tax laws or tax rulings could materially impact our effective tax rate.

We could be impacted by changes in tax policy. Changes in U.S. tax policy may affect us to a greater degree than many of our competitors because we manage significant assets in funds and separate accounts with an after-tax return objective. We believe an increase in overall tax rates would likely have a positive impact on our municipal income and tax-managed equity businesses. An increase in the tax rate on qualified dividends could have a negative impact on our tax-advantaged equity income business. Changes in tax policy could also negatively affect our privately offered equity funds.

Our Non-Voting Common Stock lacks voting rights. Non-Voting Common Stock has no voting rights under any circumstances. All voting power resides with the Company’s Voting Common Stock, all shares of which are held by officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and deposited in a voting trust (the “Voting Trust”) in exchange for Voting Trust Receipts. As of October 31, 2013, there were 19 holders of Voting Trust Receipts representing Voting Common Stock, each holder of which is a Voting Trustee of the Voting Trust. Holders of Non-Voting Common Stock should understand that such ownership interests have no ability to vote in the election of the Company’s Board of Directors or otherwise to influence the Company’s management and strategic direction.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We conduct our principal operations through leased offices located in Boston, Massachusetts; Atlanta, Georgia; Minneapolis, Minnesota; New York, New York; Seattle, Washington; Shrewsbury, New Jersey; Westport, Connecticut; London, England; Singapore; and Sydney, Australia. For more information see Note 21 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are party to various legal proceedings that are incidental to our business. We believe these legal proceedings will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Price Range of Non-Voting Common Stock, Dividend History and Policy

Our Voting Common Stock, $0.00390625 par value, is not publicly traded, and was held as of October 31, 2013 by 19 Voting Trustees pursuant to the Voting Trust described in Item 12 hereof, which Item is incorporated herein by reference. Dividends on our Voting Common Stock are paid quarterly and are equal to the dividends paid on our Non-Voting Common Stock (see below).

Our Non-Voting Common Stock, $0.00390625 par value, is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol EV. The approximate number of registered holders of record of our Non-Voting Common Stock at October 31, 2013 was 1,789. The high and low common stock prices and dividends declared per share were as follows for the periods indicated:

	Fiscal 2013							Fiscal 2012
	High Price		Low Price		Dividends Per Share			High Price		Low Price		Dividend Per Share
Quarter Ended:
January 31	$	36.48	$	28.03	$	1.20	⁽¹⁾	$	26.95	$	21.55	$	0.19
April 30	$	42.18	$	36.12	$	0.20		$	29.64	$	25.72	$	0.19
July 31	$	44.58	$	36.07	$	0.20		$	27.56	$	22.97	$	0.19
October 31	$	42.65	$	36.59	$	0.22		$	30.19	$	25.68	$	0.20

⁽¹⁾ The Company declared and paid a special $1.00 dividend per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

We currently expect to declare and pay quarterly dividends per share on our Voting and Non-Voting Common Stock that are comparable to those declared in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank)

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our Non-Voting Common Stock for the period from November 1, 2008 through October 31, 2013 to that of the Morningstar Financial Services Sector Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (“S&P 500 Index”) over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on October 31, 2008 in our Non-Voting Common Stock and the compared indices at the closing price on that day and assumes reinvestments of all dividends paid over the period.

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The table below sets forth information regarding purchases by the Company of our Non-Voting Common Stock on a monthly basis during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013:

(c)⁽¹⁾

(d)

Total Number of

Maximum

Number of

Purchased as

Shares that

(a)

Part of

May Yet Be

Total

(b)

Publicly

Purchased

Number of

Average

Announced

under the

Price Paid

Plans or

Period

Purchased

Per Share

Programs

August 1, 2013 through August 31, 2013

65,193

39.44

65,193

2,533,827

September 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013

274,903

39.58

274,903

2,258,924

October 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013

317,390

38.84

317,390

1,941,534

Total

657,486

39.21

657,486

1,941,534

⁽¹⁾

We announced a share repurchase program on October 26, 2011, which authorized the repurchase of up to 8,000,000 shares of our Non-Voting Common Stock in the open market and in private transactions in accordance with applicable securities laws. This repurchase program is not subject to an expiration date.

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank)

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table contains selected financial data for the last five years. This data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Financial Highlights

	For the Years Ended October 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2013		2012		2011		2010		2009

Income Statement Data:
Total revenue	$	1,357,503	$	1,209,036	$	1,248,606	$	1,115,960	$	889,064
Net income		230,426		264,768		227,574		201,225		135,525
Net income attributable to non- controlling and other beneficial interests⁽¹⁾		36,585		61,303		12,672		26,927		5,418
Net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders		193,841		203,465		214,902		174,298		130,107
Adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders⁽²⁾		262,942		223,331		245,118		194,269		131,869

Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets⁽³⁾	$	2,407,249	$	1,979,491	$	1,831,300	$	1,258,540	$	1,059,487
Debt⁽⁴⁾		573,499		500,000		500,000		500,000		500,000
Redeemable non-controlling interests (temporary equity)		74,856		98,765		100,824		67,019		43,871
Total Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders' equity		669,784		612,072		460,415		410,285		306,969
Non-redeemable non-controlling interests		1,755		1,513		889		570		91
Total permanent equity		671,539		613,585		461,304		410,855		307,060

Per Share Data:
Earnings per share:
Basic earnings	$	1.60	$	1.76	$	1.82	$	1.47	$	1.11
Diluted earnings		1.53		1.72		1.75		1.40		1.07
Adjusted diluted earnings ⁽²⁾		2.08		1.89		2.00		1.56		1.08
Cash dividends declared		1.820		0.770		0.730		0.660		0.625

₍₁₎

Net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests of $36.6 million, $61.3 million, $12.7 million and $26.9 million in fiscal 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, reflects an increase of $24.3 million, $19.9 million, $30.2 million and $18.4 million in the estimated redemption value of redeemable non-controlling interests in our majority-owned subsidiaries in fiscal 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests also includes $8.5 million of net losses in fiscal 2013, $22.6 million of net income in fiscal 2012 and $34.5 million of net losses in fiscal 2011 substantially borne by other beneficial interest holders of consolidated collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) entities.

₍₂₎

The Company defines adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per diluted share as net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per diluted share, respectively, adjusted to exclude changes in the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests redeemable at other than fair value (“non-controlling interest value adjustments”), closed-end fund structuring fees and other items management deems non-recurring (such as special dividends, costs associated with the extinguishment of debt and tax settlements) or non-

operating in nature. Adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per diluted share should not be construed to be a substitute for, or superior to, net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per diluted share computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our use of these adjusted numbers, including reconciliations of net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders to adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per diluted share to adjusted earnings per diluted share, is discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7.

₍₃₎

Total assets on October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 include $728.1 million, $468.4 million and $481.8 million of assets held by consolidated CLO entities, respectively.

₍₄₎

In fiscal 2013, the Company tendered $250 million of its 6.5 percent Senior Notes due 2017 and offered $325 million of 3.625 percent Senior Notes due 2023. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt totaling $53.0 million in conjunction with the tender in fiscal 2013.

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank)

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

Our principal business is managing investment funds and providing investment management and advisory services to high-net-worth individuals and institutions. Our core strategy is to develop and sustain management expertise across a range of investment disciplines and to offer leading investment products and services through multiple distribution channels. In executing this strategy, we have developed broadly diversified investment management capabilities and a powerful marketing, distribution and customer service organization. Although we manage and distribute a wide range of investment products and services, we operate in one business segment, namely as an investment adviser to funds and separate accounts.

Through our subsidiaries Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”) and Atlanta Capital Management, LLC (“Atlanta Capital”) and other affiliates we manage active equity, income and alternative strategies across a range of investment styles and asset classes, including U.S. and global equities, floating-rate bank loans, municipal bonds, global income, high-yield and investment grade bonds. Through our subsidiary Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC (“Parametric”), we manage a range of engineered alpha strategies, including systematic equity, systematic alternatives and managed options strategies, and provide portfolio implementation services, including tax-managed core and specialty index strategies, futures- and options-based portfolio overlay, and centralized portfolio management of multi-manager portfolios. We also oversee the management of investment funds sub-advised by third-party managers, including global, regional and sector equity, commodity and asset allocation strategies. Our breadth of investment management capabilities supports a wide range of products and services offered to fund shareholders, retail managed account investors, institutional investors and high-net-worth clients. Our equity strategies encompass a diversity of investment objectives, risk profiles, income levels and geographic representation. Our income investment strategies cover a broad duration and credit quality range and encompass both taxable and tax-free investments. We also offer a range of alternative investment strategies, including commodity-based investments and a spectrum of absolute return strategies. As of October 31, 2013, we had $280.7 billion in assets under management.

Our principal retail marketing strategy is to distribute funds and separately managed accounts through financial intermediaries in the advice channel. We have a broad reach in this marketplace, with distribution partners including national and regional broker-dealers, independent broker-dealers, independent financial advisory firms, banks and insurance companies. We support these distribution partners with a team of approximately 135 sales professionals covering U.S. and international markets.

We also commit significant resources to serving institutional and high-net-worth clients who access investment management services on a direct basis. Through our wholly owned affiliates and consolidated subsidiaries we manage investments for a broad range of clients in the institutional and high-net-worth marketplace in the U.S. and internationally, including corporations, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, foundations, family offices and public and private employee retirement plans.

Our revenue is derived primarily from investment advisory, administrative, distribution and service fees received from Eaton Vance funds and investment advisory fees received from separate accounts. Our fees are based primarily on the value of the investment portfolios we manage and fluctuate with changes in the total value and mix of assets under management. As a matter of course, investors in our sponsored open-end funds and separate accounts have the ability to redeem their investments at any time, without prior notice, and there are no material restrictions that would prevent them from doing so. Our major expenses are employee compensation, distribution-related expenses, facilities expense and information technology expense.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in

the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes, investments and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under current circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Business Developments

Prevailing market conditions affect our managed asset levels, operating results and the recoverability of our investments. Fiscal 2013 was a period of favorable market action, as reflected by the 27 percent increase in the total return of the S&P 500 Index.

The Company’s ending consolidated assets under management increased by $81.2 billion, or 41 percent, in fiscal 2013 to $280.7 billion on October 31, 2013, reflecting the acquisition of The Clifton Group Investment Management Company (“Clifton”) on December 31, 2012, a 12 percent organic growth rate and favorable equity markets. Average consolidated assets under management increased by $58.4 billion, or 30 percent, to $251.3 billion in fiscal 2013. Fiscal 2013 was a year of significant growth for our floating-rate bank loan franchise, which had $14.9 billion of net inflows and ended the year with $41.8 billion of managed assets, an increase of 58 percent. Fiscal 2013 was also a landmark year for our Seattle-based subsidiary Parametric, which successfully absorbed Clifton as a new division and generated net inflows of $16.5 billion across its various franchises, most notably in its emerging market equity and implementation services franchises. Net outflows from EVM large-cap value funds and separate accounts slowed significantly in fiscal 2013 from levels experienced in fiscal 2012, with net outflows totaling $3.6 billion in fiscal 2013 compared to $11.9 billion in fiscal 2012.

The Clifton acquisition had a significant impact on our average effective fee rate in fiscal 2013, both overall and considering only investment advisory and administrative fees. Upon acquisition, the Clifton business had an average effective fee rate of approximately 7 basis points. The acquisition contributed to a lowering of our overall average effective fee rate to 54 basis points in fiscal 2013 from 62 basis points in fiscal 2012. Our average effective investment advisory and administrative fee rate similarly decreased to 45 basis points in fiscal 2013 from 51 basis points in fiscal 2012. The primary driver of our overall average effective fee rate continues to be the mix of assets by distribution channel and mandate.

Consolidated Assets under Management

Consolidated assets under management of $280.7 billion on October 31, 2013 increased $81.2 billion, or 41 percent over the $199.5 billion reported a year earlier. Consolidated assets under management on October 31, 2013 included $133.2 billion in long-term funds, $95.7 billion in institutional separate accounts, $19.7 billion in high-net-worth separate accounts, $31.8 billion in retail managed accounts and $0.2 billion in cash management fund assets. Long-term fund net inflows of $13.6 billion during the twelve-month period ended October 31, 2013 reflect gross inflows of $43.6 billion offset by outflows of $30.0 billion. Institutional separate account net inflows were $9.6 billion, high-net-worth separate account net inflows were $1.1 billion and retail managed account net inflows were $0.5 billion during the twelve-month period ended October 31, 2013. Clifton assets under management acquired totaled $34.8 billion and net price appreciation increased assets under management by $21.7 billion. The $24.7 billion of net inflows into long-term funds and separate accounts in fiscal 2013 equates to a 12 percent internal growth rate.

We report managed assets and flow data by investment mandate. The “Alternative” category includes a range of absolute return strategies, as well as commodity- and currency-linked investments. In fiscal 2013, we added a

new category, “Implementation Services,” to reflect the growing importance to our business and distinctive attributes of Parametric’s tax-managed core, centralized portfolio management and specialty index business lines and the futures- and options-based overlay and exposure management services added in the Clifton acquisition.

Consolidated Assets under Management by Investment Mandate^(1)
(2)

	October 31,															2013			2012
			% of					% of					% of			vs.			vs.
(in millions)	2013		Total			2012		Total			2011		Total			2012			2011
Equity ⁽³⁾	$	93,585		33	%	$	80,782		41	%	$	84,281		45	%		16	%		-4	%
Fixed income		44,211		16	%		49,003		25	%		43,708		23	%		-10	%		12	%
Floating-rate income		41,821		15	%		26,388		13	%		24,322		13	%		58	%		8	%
Alternative		15,212		5	%		12,864		6	%		10,650		6	%		18	%		21	%
Implementation services⁽⁴⁾		85,637		31	%		30,302		15	%		24,574		13	%		183	%		23	%
Cash management		203		0	%		169		0	%		669		0	%		20	%		-75	%
Total	$	280,669		100	%	$	199,508		100	%	$	188,204		100	%		41	%		6	%

⁽¹⁾

Consolidated Eaton Vance Corp. See table on page 35 for managed assets and flows of 49 percent-owned Hexavest Inc.

⁽²⁾

Assets under management for which we estimate fair value using significant unobservable inputs are not material to the total value of the assets we manage.

⁽³⁾

Balances include assets in balanced accounts holding income securities.

⁽⁴⁾

Balances include amounts reclassified from equity for the prior year period.

Equity and implementation services assets under management included $59.1 billion, $51.4 billion and $48.1 billion of assets managed for after-tax returns on October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Fixed income assets included $25.8 billion, $29.5 billion and $25.6 billion of tax-exempt municipal bond assets on October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Net inflows totaled $24.7 billion in fiscal 2013, compared to $0.2 billion in fiscal 2012 and $3.9 billion in fiscal 2011. Long-term fund net inflows totaled $13.6 billion in fiscal 2013, compared to net outflows of $3.8 billion in fiscal 2012 and net inflows of $0.5 billion in fiscal 2011. Long-term fund gross inflows increased to $43.6 billion in fiscal 2013, from $27.1 billion in fiscal 2012 and $33.0 billion in fiscal 2011, reflecting primarily an increase in inflows into funds with floating-rate mandates, while long-term fund gross outflows decreased to $30.0 billion in fiscal 2013, from $30.9 billion in fiscal 2012 and $32.5 billion in fiscal 2011, reflecting a decline in outflows from Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund. Fund net inflows and outflows reflect an increase in fund leverage of $1.3 billion in fiscal 2013 and a decrease in leverage of $0.9 billion and $0.9 billion in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Separate account net inflows totaled $11.1 billion in fiscal 2013, compared to $4.0 billion in fiscal 2012 and $3.3 billion in fiscal 2011. Institutional separate account net inflows increased to $9.6 billion in fiscal 2013, from $2.0 billion and $2.5 billion in 2012 and 2011, respectively. High-net-worth account net inflows totaled $1.1 billion, $1.3 billion and $0.4 billion in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, while retail managed account net inflows totaled $0.5 billion, $0.7 billion and $0.4 billion in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

As of October 31, 2013, the Clifton division of Parametric managed $45.6 billion of client assets, an increase of 31 percent from the $34.8 billion of assets managed by Clifton on December 31, 2012, the date of acquisition. Net inflows into Clifton-managed funds and accounts were $8.9 billion from the time of acquisition. The

managed assets and flows of Clifton subsequent to the acquisition are included in Eaton Vance consolidated totals and are reflected as assets and flows of Parametric.

The following tables summarize our consolidated assets under management and asset flows by investment mandate and investment vehicle for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

Consolidated Net Flows by Investment Mandate⁽¹⁾

										2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,									vs.			vs.
(in millions)	2013			2012			2011			2012			2011
Equity assets - beginning of period⁽²⁾	$	80,782		$	84,281		$	85,912			-4	%		-2	%
Sales and other inflows		16,989			16,572			23,202			3	%		-29	%
Redemptions/outflows		(19,459	)		(26,033	)		(24,282	)		-25	%		7	%
Net flows		(2,470	)		(9,461	)		(1,080	)		-74	%		776	%
Assets acquired⁽⁴⁾		1,572			-			352			NM	⁽³⁾		NM
Exchanges		328			15			35			NM			-57	%
Market value change		13,373			5,947			(938	)		125	%		NM
Equity assets - end of period	$	93,585		$	80,782		$	84,281			16	%		-4	%
Fixed income assets - beginning of period		49,003			43,708			46,119			12	%		-5	%
Sales and other inflows		10,881			12,278			10,336			-11	%		19	%
Redemptions/outflows		(14,015	)		(9,455	)		(11,827	)		48	%		-20	%
Net flows		(3,134	)		2,823			(1,491	)		NM			NM
Assets acquired⁽⁴⁾		472			-			-			NM			NM
Exchanges		(510	)		84			(180	)		NM			NM
Market value change		(1,620	)		2,388			(740	)		NM			NM
Fixed income assets - end of period	$	44,211		$	49,003		$	43,708			-10	%		12	%
Floating-rate income assets - beginning of period		26,388			24,322			20,003			8	%		22	%
Sales and other inflows		21,729			7,401			9,331			194	%		-21	%
Redemptions/outflows		(6,871	)		(5,662	)		(5,220	)		21	%		8	%
Net flows		14,858			1,739			4,111			754	%		-58	%
Exchanges		397			45			53			782	%		-15	%
Market value change		178			282			155			-37	%		82	%
Floating-rate income assets - end of period	$	41,821		$	26,388		$	24,322			58	%		8	%
Alternative assets - beginning of period		12,864			10,650			10,482			21	%		2	%
Sales and other inflows		8,195			6,736			5,250			22	%		28	%
Redemptions/outflows		(5,688	)		(4,348	)		(4,784	)		31	%		-9	%
Net flows		2,507			2,388			466			5	%		412	%
Assets acquired⁽⁴⁾		650			-			-			NM			NM
Exchanges		(184	)		(94	)		(79	)		96	%		19	%
Market value change		(625	)		(80	)		(219	)		681	%		-63	%
Alternative assets - end of period	$	15,212		$	12,864		$	10,650			18	%		21	%
Implementation services assets - beginning of period⁽⁵⁾		30,302			24,574			21,588			23	%		14	%
Sales and other inflows		39,841			7,096			6,771			461	%		5	%
Redemptions/outflows		(26,887	)		(4,411	)		(4,886	)		510	%		-10	%
Net flows		12,954			2,685			1,885			382	%		42	%
Assets acquired⁽⁴⁾		32,064			-			-			NM			NM
Exchanges		(118	)		(1	)		-			NM			NM
Market value change		10,435			3,044			1,101			243	%		176	%
Implementation services assets - end of period	$	85,637		$	30,302		$	24,574			183	%		23	%
Long-term assets - beginning of period		199,339			187,535			184,104			6	%		2	%
Sales and other inflows		97,635			50,083			54,890			95	%		-9	%
Redemptions/outflows		(72,920	)		(49,909	)		(50,999	)		46	%		-2	%
Net flows		24,715			174			3,891			NM			-96	%
Assets acquired⁽⁴⁾		34,758			-			352			NM			NM
Exchanges		(87	)		49			(171	)		NM			NM
Market value change		21,741			11,581			(641	)		88	%		NM
Total long-term assets - end of period	$	280,466		$	199,339		$	187,535			41	%		6	%
Cash management fund assets - end of period		203			169			669			20	%		-75	%
Total assets under management - end of period	$	280,669		$	199,508		$	188,204			41	%		6	%

⁽¹⁾

Consolidated Eaton Vance Corp. See table on page 35 for managed assets and flows of 49 percent-owned Hexavest Inc.

⁽²⁾

Balances include assets in balanced accounts holding income securities.

⁽³⁾

Not meaningful ("NM")

⁽⁴⁾

Balances represent Clifton assets acquired on December 31, 2012.

⁽⁵⁾

Balances include amounts reclassified from equity for fiscal 2012.

Consolidated Net Flows by Investment Vehicle⁽¹⁾

										2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,									vs.			vs.
(in millions)	2013			2012			2011			2012			2011
Long-term fund assets - beginning of period	$	113,249		$	111,705		$	113,978			1	%		-2	%
Sales and other inflows		43,606			27,080			33,035			61	%		-18	%
Redemptions/outflows		(29,970	)		(30,895	)		(32,486	)		-3	%		-5	%
Net flows		13,636			(3,815	)		549			NM			NM
Assets acquired⁽²⁾		638			-			-			NM			NM
Exchanges		(279	)		(13	)		(175	)		NM			-93	%
Market value change		5,954			5,372			(2,647	)		11	%		NM
Long-term fund assets - end of period	$	133,198		$	113,249		$	111,705			18	%		1	%
Institutional separate account assets - beginning of period		43,338			38,003			34,593			14	%		10	%
Sales and other inflows		41,108			12,496			12,350			229	%		1	%
Redemptions/outflows		(31,548	)		(10,514	)		(9,832	)		200	%		7	%
Net flows		9,560			1,982			2,518			382	%		-21	%
Assets acquired⁽²⁾		34,120			-			-			NM			NM
Exchanges		183			38			(18	)		382	%		NM
Market value change		8,523			3,315			910			157	%		264	%
Institutional separate account assets - end of period	$	95,724		$	43,338		$	38,003			121	%		14	%
High-net-worth separate account assets - beginning of period		15,036			13,256			11,883			13	%		12	%
Sales and other inflows		4,763			3,609			2,848			32	%		27	%
Redemptions/outflows		(3,699	)		(2,283	)		(2,419	)		62	%		-6	%
Net flows		1,064			1,326			429			-20	%		209	%
Assets acquired		-			-			352			NM			NM
Exchanges		(16	)		(990	)		(8	)		-98	%		NM
Market value change		3,615			1,444			600			150	%		141	%
High-net-worth separate account assets - end of period	$	19,699		$	15,036		$	13,256			31	%		13	%
Retail managed account assets - beginning of period		27,716			24,571			23,650			13	%		4	%
Sales and other inflows		8,158			6,898			6,657			18	%		4	%
Redemptions/outflows		(7,703	)		(6,217	)		(6,262	)		24	%		-1	%
Net flows		455			681			395			-33	%		72	%
Exchanges		25			1,014			30			-98	%		NM
Market value change		3,649			1,450			496			152	%		192	%
Retail managed account assets - end of period	$	31,845		$	27,716		$	24,571			15	%		13	%
Total long-term assets - beginning of period		199,339			187,535			184,104			6	%		2	%
Sales and other inflows		97,635			50,083			54,890			95	%		-9	%
Redemptions/outflows		(72,920	)		(49,909	)		(50,999	)		46	%		-2	%
Net flows		24,715			174			3,891			NM			-96	%
Assets acquired⁽²⁾		34,758			-			352			NM			NM
Exchanges		(87	)		49			(171	)		NM			NM
Market value change		21,741			11,581			(641	)		88	%		NM
Total long-term assets - end of period	$	280,466		$	199,339		$	187,535			41	%		6	%
Cash management fund assets - end of period		203			169			669			20	%		-75	%
Total assets under management - end of period	$	280,669		$	199,508		$	188,204			41	%		6	%

⁽¹⁾

Consolidated Eaton Vance Corp. See page 35 for managed assets and flows of 49 percent-owned Hexavest Inc.

⁽²⁾

Balances represent Clifton assets acquired on December 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes our assets under management by investment affiliate as of October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

Consolidated Assets under Management by Investment Affiliate⁽¹⁾

	Years Ended October 31,						2013			2012
							vs.			vs.
(in millions)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011
Eaton Vance Management ⁽²⁾	$	144,693	$	131,004	$	133,128		10	%		-2	%
Parametric		117,044		53,332		41,983		119	%		27	%
Atlanta Capital		18,932		15,172		13,093		25	%		16	%
Total	$	280,669	$	199,508	$	188,204		41	%		6	%

⁽¹⁾

Consolidated Eaton Vance Corp. See page 35 for managed assets and flows of 49 percent-owned Hexavest Inc.

⁽²⁾

Includes managed assets of wholly owned subsidiaries Eaton Vance Investment Counsel and Fox Asset Management LLC, as well as certain Eaton Vance-sponsored funds and accounts managed by Hexavest and unaffiliated third-party advisors under Eaton Vance supervision.

As of October 31, 2013, 49 percent-owned affiliate Hexavest Inc. (“Hexavest”) managed $16.9 billion of client assets, an increase of 40 percent from $12.1 billion of managed assets on October 31, 2012. Net inflows into Hexavest-managed funds and separate accounts were $2.3 billion in fiscal 2013 and $0.8 billion in fiscal 2012. Other than Eaton Vance-sponsored funds for which Hexavest is advisor or sub-advisor, the managed assets of Hexavest are not included in Eaton Vance consolidated totals. The following table summarizes assets under management and asset flow information for Hexavest for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012:

Hexavest Assets under Management and Net Flows

							2013
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.
(in millions)	2013			2012 ⁽²⁾			2012
Eaton Vance distributed:
Eaton Vance sponsored funds - beginning of period⁽¹⁾	$	37		$	-			NM
Sales and other inflows		162			36			350	%
Redemptions/outflows		(15	)		-			NM
Net flows		147			36			308	%
Market value change		27			1			NM
Eaton Vance sponsored funds - end of period	$	211		$	37			470	%
Eaton Vance distributed separate accounts - beginning of period⁽³⁾	$	-		$	-			NM
Sales and other inflows		1,381			-			NM
Redemptions/outflows		(33	)		-			NM
Net flows		1,348			-			NM
Market value change		226			-			NM
Eaton Vance distributed separate accounts - end of period	$	1,574		$	-			NM
Total Eaton Vance distributed - beginning of period	$	37		$	-			NM
Sales and other inflows		1,543			36			NM
Redemptions/outflows		(48	)		-			NM
Net flows		1,495			36			NM
Market value change		253			1			NM
Total Eaton Vance distributed - end of period	$	1,785		$	37			NM
Hexavest directly distributed - beginning of period⁽⁴⁾	$	12,073		$	10,956			10	%
Sales and other inflows		2,703			1,047			158	%
Redemptions/outflows		(1,853	)		(318	)		483	%
Net flows		850			729			17	%
Market value change		2,213			388			470	%
Hexavest directly distributed - end of period	$	15,136		$	12,073			25	%
Total Hexavest assets - beginning of period	$	12,110		$	10,956			11	%
Sales and other inflows		4,246			1,083			292	%
Redemptions/outflows		(1,901	)		(318	)		498	%
Net flows		2,345			765			207	%
Market value change		2,466			389			534	%
Total Hexavest assets - end of period	$	16,921		$	12,110			40	%

⁽¹⁾

Managed assets and flows of Eaton Vance-sponsored pooled investment vehicles for which Hexavest is advisor or sub-advisor. Eaton Vance receives management and/or distribution revenue on these assets, which are included in the Eaton Vance consolidated results.

⁽²⁾

Reflects activity from August 6, 2012, the date that Eaton Vance acquired its 49 percent equity interest in Hexavest, through October 31, 2012.

⁽³⁾

Managed assets and flows of Eaton Vance-distributed separate accounts managed by Hexavest. Eaton Vance receives distribution revenue, but not investment advisory fees, on these assets, which are not included in the Eaton Vance consolidated results.

⁽⁴⁾

Managed assets and flows of pre-transaction Hexavest clients and post-transaction Hexavest clients in Canada. Eaton Vance receives no investment advisory or distribution revenue on these assets, which are not included in the Eaton Vance consolidated results.

Consolidated Ending Assets under Management by Asset Class⁽¹⁾

	October 31,															2013			2012
			% of					% of					% of			vs.			vs.
(in millions)	2013		Total			2012		Total			2011		Total			2012			2011
Open-end funds:
Class A	$	29,776		11	%	$	28,862		14	%	$	32,127		17	%		3	%		-10	%
Class B		662		0	%		959		1	%		1,294		1	%		-31	%		-26	%
Class C		9,800		4	%		9,662		5	%		9,693		5	%		1	%		0	%
Class I		42,544		15	%		30,288		15	%		26,830		14	%		40	%		13	%
Class N		2,311		1	%		1,566		1	%		1,287		1	%		48	%		22	%
Class R		373		0	%		312		0	%		372		0	%		20	%		-16	%
Other⁽²⁾		1,524		1	%		540		0	%		618		1	%		183	%		-13	%
Total open-end funds		86,990		31	%		72,189		36	%		72,221		39	%		21	%		0	%
Private funds⁽³⁾		21,500		8	%		18,012		9	%		17,404		9	%		19	%		3	%
Closed-end funds		24,911		9	%		23,217		12	%		22,749		12	%		7	%		2	%
Total fund assets		133,401		48	%		113,418		57	%		112,374		60	%		18	%		1	%
Institutional account
assets		95,724		34	%		43,338		22	%		38,003		20	%		121	%		14	%
High-net-worth
account assets		19,699		7	%		15,036		7	%		13,256		7	%		31	%		13	%
Retail managed
account assets		31,845		11	%		27,716		14	%		24,571		13	%		15	%		13	%
Total separate account
assets		147,268		52	%		86,090		43	%		75,830		40	%		71	%		14	%
Total	$	280,669		100	%	$	199,508		100	%	$	188,204		100	%		41	%		6	%

⁽¹⁾

Consolidated Eaton Vance Corp. See Table on page 35 for managed assets and flows of 49 percent-owned Hexavest Inc.

⁽²⁾

Includes other classes of Eaton Vance open-end funds.

⁽³⁾

Includes privately offered equity, fixed income and floating-rate income funds and CLO entities.

We currently sell open-end mutual funds under the Eaton Vance and Parametric brands in five primary pricing structures: front-end load commission (“Class A”); level-load commission (“Class C”); institutional no-load (“Class I, also referred to as “Institutional Class”); retail no-load (“Class N,” referred to as “Investor Class” or “Advisors Class”); and retirement plan no-load (“Class R”). We waive the front-end sales load on Class A shares under certain circumstances and sell such shares at net asset value. Class A shares are offered at net asset value (without a sales charge) to tax-deferred retirement plans and deferred compensation plans, and to clients of financial intermediaries who charge an ongoing fee for advisory, investment, consulting or similar services. Class A shares are also offered at net asset value to clients of financial intermediaries that have entered into an agreement with Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (“EVD”) to offer Class A shares through a no-load network or platform to certain separate account clients of Eaton Vance and its affiliates, and to certain persons affiliated with Eaton Vance.

Fund assets represented 48 percent of total consolidated assets under management on October 31, 2013, down from 57 percent and 60 percent on October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, while separate account assets,

which include institutional, high-net-worth and retail managed account assets, increased to 52 percent of consolidated assets under management on October 31, 2013, from 43 percent and 40 percent on October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, reflecting the impact of the Clifton acquisition as well as changes in product mix. Fund assets under management increased $20.0 billion, or 18 percent, to $133.4 billion on October 31, 2013, reflecting 11 percent organic growth, market appreciation of $6.0 billion and $0.6 billion of managed assets acquired in the Clifton acquisition. Separate account assets under management increased $61.2 billion, or 71 percent, to $147.3 billion on October 31, 2013, reflecting 13 percent organic growth, market appreciation of $15.8 billion and $34.1 billion of managed assets acquired in the Clifton acquisition.

Average assets under management presented in the following table represent a monthly average by asset class. This table is intended to provide information useful in the analysis of our asset-based revenue and distribution expenses. Separate account investment advisory fees are generally calculated as a percentage of either beginning, average or ending quarterly assets. Fund investment advisory, administrative, distribution and service fees, as well as certain expenses, are generally calculated as a percentage of average daily assets.

Consolidated Average Assets under Management by Asset Class⁽¹⁾

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in millions)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011
Open-end funds:
Class A	$	29,429	$	30,049	$	35,403		-2	%		-15	%
Class B		813		1,118		1,583		-27	%		-29	%
Class C		9,814		9,628		10,248		2	%		-6	%
Class I		37,107		28,296		26,996		31	%		5	%
Class N		1,885		1,339		1,337		41	%		0	%
Class R		329		340		412		-3	%		-17	%
Other⁽²⁾		923		604		608		53	%		0	%
Total open-end funds		80,300		71,374		76,587		13	%		-7	%
Private funds⁽³⁾		19,756		17,870		17,372		11	%		3	%
Closed-end funds		23,945		23,086		23,521		4	%		-2	%
Total fund assets		124,001		112,330		117,480		10	%		-4	%
Institutional account assets		80,028		39,733		36,962		101	%		7	%
High-net-worth account assets		17,521		14,005		13,091		25	%		7	%
Retail managed account assets		29,701		26,829		24,890		11	%		8	%
Total separate account assets		127,250		80,567		74,943		58	%		8	%
Total	$	251,251	$	192,897	$	192,423		30	%		0	%

⁽¹⁾

Assets under management attributable to acquisitions that closed during the relevant periods are included on a weighted average basis for the period from their respective closing dates.

⁽²⁾

Includes other classes of Eaton Vance open-end funds.

⁽³⁾

Includes privately offered equity, fixed income and floating-rate income funds and CLO entities.

Results of Operations

In evaluating operating performance we consider net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per diluted share, which are calculated on a basis consistent with U.S. GAAP, as well as adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per diluted share, both of which are internally derived non-U.S. GAAP performance measures.

We define adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per diluted share as net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per diluted share, respectively, adjusted to exclude changes in the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests redeemable at other than fair value (“non-controlling interest value adjustments”), closed-end fund structuring fees and other items management deems non-recurring (such as special dividends, costs associated with the extinguishment of debt and tax settlements) or non-operating in nature. Adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per diluted share should not be construed to be a substitute for, or superior to, net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per diluted share computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We provide disclosures of adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per diluted share to reflect the fact that our management and Board of Directors consider these adjusted numbers a measure of the Company’s underlying operating performance.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per diluted share to adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per diluted share, respectively, for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in thousands, except per share data)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011

Net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders	$	193,841	$	203,465	$	214,902		-5	%		-5	%
Non-controlling interest value adjustments⁽¹⁾		24,320		19,866		30,216		22	%		-34	%
Closed-end fund structuring fees, net of tax⁽²⁾		2,851		-		-		NM			NM
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax⁽³⁾		35,239		-		-		NM			NM
Settlement of state tax audit⁽⁴⁾		6,691		-		-		NM			NM

Adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders	$	262,942	$	223,331	$	245,118		18	%		-9	%

Earnings per diluted share	$	1.53	$	1.72	$	1.75		-11	%		-2	%
Non-controlling interest value adjustments		0.19		0.17		0.25		12	%		-32	%
Closed-end fund structuring fees, net of tax		0.02		-		-		NM			NM
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax		0.28		-		-		NM			NM
Settlement of state tax audit		0.05		-		-		NM			NM
Special dividend adjustment⁽⁵⁾		0.01		-		-		NM			NM
Adjusted earnings per diluted share	$	2.08	$	1.89	$	2.00		10	%		-6	%

⁽¹⁾

Please see page 49, "Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling and Other Beneficial Interests," for a further discussion of the non-controlling interest value adjustments referenced above.

⁽²⁾

Closed-end fund structuring fees, net of tax, associated with the initial public offering of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Plus Fund in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 and Eaton Vance Municipal Income Term Trust in the second quarter of fiscal 2013.

⁽³⁾

Reflects the loss on the Company's retirement of $250 million of its outstanding Senior Notes due in 2017. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax, consists of the tender premium paid, acceleration of deferred financing costs and discounts tied to the original issuance, transaction costs associated with the tender offer, the loss recognized on a reverse treasury lock entered into in conjunction with the tender and accelerated amortization of a treasury rate lock tied to the original debt.

⁽⁴⁾

Please see page 49, "Income Taxes" for further discussion of the tax settlement adjustment referenced above.

⁽⁵⁾

Reflects the impact of the special dividend paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 due to the disproportionate allocation of distributions in excess of earnings to common shareholders under the two-class method.

We reported net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $193.8 million, or $1.53 per diluted share, in fiscal 2013 compared to net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $203.5 million, or $1.72 per diluted share, in fiscal 2012. We reported adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $262.9 million, or $2.08 per diluted share, in fiscal 2013 compared to adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $223.3 million, or $1.89 per diluted share, in fiscal 2012. The change in net income and, with certain exceptions, adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders can be primarily attributed to the following:

An increase in revenue of $148.5 million, or 12 percent, primarily due to a 30 percent increase in consolidated average assets under management offset by a decrease in our annualized effective fee rate

to 54 basis points in fiscal 2013 from 62 basis points in fiscal 2012 largely as a result of the Clifton acquisition.

An increase in expenses of $88.5 million, or 11 percent, reflecting increases in compensation, distribution and service fees, fund-related expenses, and other expenses offset by reduced amortization of deferred sales commissions.

A decrease of $20.9 million in gains (losses) and other investment income, net, reflecting a $3.1 million loss on the reverse treasury lock entered into in conjunction with the retirement of $250 million of our 6.5 percent Senior Notes due in October 2017 (the “2017 Senior Notes”) and a decline in investment gains and income recognized on our seed capital investments.

A $53.0 million loss on extinguishment of debt related to the retirement of $250 million of our 2017 Senior Notes as referenced above.

A $30.6 million decline in other expenses of the Company’s consolidated CLO entities, reflecting a decrease in investment gains recognized by those entities in fiscal 2013.

An increase in income taxes of $1.5 million, or 1 percent, reflecting a $6.7 million tax adjustment related to the settlement of a state tax audit offset by a decrease in taxable income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders. Consolidated CLO entity income that is allocated to other beneficial interest holders is not subject to tax in the Company’s provision.

An increase in equity in net income of affiliates, net of tax, of $11.5 million, reflecting an increase in our proportionate net interest in Hexavest’s earnings and an increase in our net interest in the earnings of sponsored funds accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

A decrease in net income attributable to non-controlling interests of $24.7 million, primarily reflecting a decrease in the net gains recognized by the Company’s consolidated CLO entities that are borne by other beneficial interest holders, partially offset by an increase in the annual adjustments made to the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests in the Company’s majority-owned subsidiaries and an increase in net income attributable to non-controlling interest holders in the Company’s majority-owned subsidiaries.

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding increased by 7.3 million shares, or 6 percent in fiscal 2013 over fiscal 2012. The change reflects an increase in the total number of shares outstanding due to the exercise of employee stock options, an increase in the dilutive effect of in-the-money options resulting from a 44 percent increase in the average share price of the Company’s Non-Voting Common Stock during the period, and the impact of annual vesting of restricted stock, offset by share repurchases.

We reported net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $203.5 million, or $1.72 per diluted share, in fiscal 2012 compared to net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $214.9 million, or $1.75 per diluted share, in fiscal 2011. We reported adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $223.3 million, or $1.89 per diluted share, in fiscal 2012 compared to adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders of $245.1 million, or $2.00 per diluted share, in fiscal 2011. The change in net income and adjusted net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders can be primarily attributed to the following:

A decrease in revenue of $39.6 million, or 3 percent, reflecting substantially unchanged average assets under management and a decrease in our annualized effective fee rate to 62 basis points in fiscal 2012 from 65 basis points in fiscal 2011. The decrease in our effective fee rate can be primarily attributed to the decline in average fund assets under management that are subject to distribution and service fees and the increase in average separate account assets under management as a percentage of total average assets under management.

A decrease in expenses of $6.3 million, or 1 percent, reflecting declines in certain distribution and service fee expenses and reduced amortization of deferred sales commissions offset by increases in compensation, fund-related and other expenses.

A decrease of $1.0 million, or 5 percent, in gains and other investment income primarily due to a decrease in investment gains recognized on our seed capital portfolio.

A $56.9 million increase in other income (expense) of the Company’s consolidated CLO entity, reflecting an improvement in the performance of the consolidated CLO entity.

A decrease in income taxes of $14.5 million, or 9 percent, reflecting the decrease in taxable income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders. Consolidated CLO entity income that is allocated to other beneficial interest holders is not subject to tax in the Company’s provision.

An increase in net income attributable to non-controlling interests of $48.6 million, primarily reflecting net gains recognized by the Company’s consolidated CLO entity that are attributed to other beneficial interest holders and an increase in net income attributable to non-controlling interest holders in the Company’s majority-owned subsidiaries, partially offset by decreases in the annual adjustments made to the estimated redemption values of non-controlling interests in the Company’s majority-owned subsidiaries.

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding decreased by 4.8 million shares, or 4 percent, primarily reflecting shares repurchased in fiscal 2012 and a decrease in the number of in-the-money share options included in the calculation of weighted average diluted shares outstanding, offset by the impact of annual vesting of restricted stock.

Revenue

Our overall average effective fee rate (total revenue, excluding other revenue, as a percentage of average assets under management) was 54 basis points in fiscal 2013 compared to 62 basis points in fiscal 2012 and 65 basis points in fiscal 2011. As noted above, the decrease in our average overall effective fee rate in fiscal 2013 can be primarily attributed to the acquisition of Clifton, whose business operates at a significantly lower average effective fee rate. The decrease in our average overall effective fee rate in fiscal 2012 can be primarily attributed to the decline in average fund assets under management subject to distribution and service fees and the increase in average separate account assets under management as a percentage of total average assets under management.

The following table shows our investment advisory and administrative fees, distribution and underwriter fees, services fees and other revenues for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011

Investment advisory and administrative fees	$	1,135,327	$	988,058	$	996,222		15	%		-1	%
Distribution and underwriter fees		89,234		89,410		102,979		0	%		-13	%
Service fees		126,560		126,345		144,530		0	%		-13	%
Other revenue		6,382		5,223		4,875		22	%		7	%
Total revenue	$	1,357,503	$	1,209,036	$	1,248,606		12	%		-3	%

Investment advisory and administrative fees

Investment advisory and administrative fees are determined by contractual agreements with our sponsored funds and separate accounts and are generally based upon a percentage of the market value of assets under management. Net asset flows and changes in the market value of managed assets affect the amount of managed assets on which investment advisory and administrative fees are earned, while changes in asset mix among different investment mandates and products affect our average effective fee rate. Investment advisory and

administrative fees represented 84 percent of total revenue in fiscal 2013 compared to 82 percent in fiscal 2012 and 80 percent in fiscal 2011.

The increase in investment advisory and administrative fees of 15 percent, or $147.3 million, in fiscal 2013 from fiscal 2012 can be primarily attributed to the 30 percent increase in average assets under management, offset by lower effective fee rates due primarily to a shift in product mix resulting from the Clifton acquisition. Fund assets, which had an average effective fee rate of 67 basis points in fiscal 2013 and 66 basis points in fiscal 2012, decreased to 48 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2013 from 57 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2012, while separately managed account assets, which had an average effective fee rate of 24 basis points in fiscal 2013 and 30 basis points in fiscal 2012, increased to 52 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2013 from 43 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2012.

The decrease in investment advisory and administrative fees of 1 percent, or $8.2 million, in fiscal 2012 from fiscal 2011 can be primarily attributed to a shift in product mix. Fund assets, which had an average effective fee rate of 66 basis points in fiscal 2012 and 65 basis points in fiscal 2011, decreased to 57 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2012 from 60 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2011, while separately managed account assets, which had an average effective fee rate of 30 basis points in both fiscal 2012 and 2011, increased to 43 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2012 from 40 percent of total assets under management on October 31, 2011.

Distribution and underwriter fees

Distribution plan payments, which are made under contractual agreements with certain share classes of our sponsored funds and private funds, are calculated as a percentage of average assets under management. These fees fluctuate with both the level of average assets under management and the relative mix of assets. Underwriter commissions are earned on the sale of shares of our sponsored mutual funds on which investors pay a sales charge at the time of purchase (Class A share sales). Sales charges and underwriter commissions are waived or reduced on shareholder purchases that exceed specified minimum amounts and on certain categories of investors. Underwriter commissions fluctuate with the level of Class A share sales and the mix of Class A shares offered with and without sales charges.

Distribution plan payments decreased 1 percent, or $0.8 million, to $80.1 million in fiscal 2013 from fiscal 2012, reflecting decreases in average Class B, Class R and private fund distribution fees offset by increases in average Class A and Class C distribution fees.

Distribution plan payments decreased 13 percent, or $11.9 million, to $80.9 million in fiscal 2012 from fiscal 2011, reflecting decreases in average Class A, Class B, Class C, Class R and certain private equity fund assets subject to distribution fees.

The following table shows the total distribution payments with respect to our Class A, Class B, Class C, Class R and private equity funds for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011

Class A	$	1,105	$	671	$	762		65	%		-12	%
Class B		5,298		7,459		13,555		-29	%		-45	%
Class C		69,223		67,978		72,810		2	%		-7	%
Class R		821		844		1,029		-3	%		-18	%
Private funds		3,626		3,967		4,614		-9	%		-14	%
Total distribution plan payments	$	80,073	$	80,919	$	92,770		-1	%		-13	%

Underwriter fees and other distribution income increased 8 percent, or $0.7 million, to $9.2 million in fiscal 2013, reflecting an increase of $0.7 million in contingent deferred sales charges received on certain Class A redemptions.

Underwriter fees and other distribution income decreased 17 percent, or $1.7 million, to $8.5 million in fiscal 2012, reflecting a decrease of $0.4 million in underwriter fees received on sales of Class A shares and a decrease of $1.3 million in contingent deferred sales charges received on certain Class A redemptions.

Service fees

Service fees, which are paid to EVD pursuant to distribution or service plans adopted by our sponsored mutual funds, are calculated as a percent of average assets under management in specific mutual fund share classes (principally Classes A, B, C, N and R). Certain private funds also make service fee payments to EVD. Service fees are paid to EVD as principal underwriter or placement agent to the funds for service and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts.

Service fee revenue was $126.6 million in both fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, reflecting substantially unchanged average assets under management in funds and classes of funds subject to service fees.

Service fee revenue decreased 13 percent, or $18.2 million, to $126.3 million in fiscal 2012 from fiscal 2011, primarily reflecting a 12 percent decrease in average assets under management in funds and classes of funds subject to service fees.

Other revenue

Other revenue, which consists primarily of sub-transfer agent fees, miscellaneous dealer income, custody fees, Hexavest-related distribution and service revenue, and sub-lease income, increased by $1.2 million in fiscal 2013, primarily reflecting an increase in Hexavest-related revenue. Other revenue increased by $0.3 million in fiscal 2012, primarily reflecting increases in sub-transfer agent fees received.

Expenses

Operating expenses increased by 11 percent, or $88.5 million, in fiscal 2013 from fiscal 2012, reflecting increases in compensation, distribution and service fees, fund-related and other expenses, offset by reduced amortization of deferred sales commissions as more fully described below.

The following table shows our operating expenses for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011
Compensation and related costs:
Cash compensation	$	387,343	$	329,088	$	317,633		18	%		4	%
Stock-based compensation		59,791		56,307		52,294		6	%		8	%
Total compensation and related costs		447,134		385,395		369,927		16	%		4	%
Distribution expense		139,618		130,914		132,664		7	%		-1	%
Service fee expense		115,149		113,485		124,517		1	%		-9	%
Amortization of deferred sales commissions		19,581		20,441		35,773		-4	%		-43	%
Fund-related expenses		34,230		27,375		25,295		25	%		8	%
Other expenses		148,784		138,434		134,198		7	%		3	%
Total expenses	$	904,496	$	816,044	$	822,374		11	%		-1	%

Compensation and related costs

Compensation expense increased by 16 percent, or $61.7 million, in fiscal 2013 from fiscal 2012, reflecting increases in base salaries and employee benefits, stock-based compensation, operating-income based incentives and sales-based incentives, partially offset by a decrease in other compensation.

Compensation expense increased by 4 percent, or $15.5 million, in fiscal 2012 from fiscal 2011, reflecting increases in base salaries and employee benefits, operating income-based incentives, stock-based compensation and other compensation, partially offset by a decrease in sales-based incentives.

The following table shows our compensation and related costs for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011

Base salaries and employee benefits	$	187,734	$	167,085	$	157,919		12	%		6	%
Stock-based compensation		59,791		56,307		52,294		6	%		8	%
Operating income-based incentives		130,359		111,754		104,681		17	%		7	%
Sales incentives		64,730		45,591		52,522		42	%		-13	%
Other compensation expense		4,520		4,658		2,511		-3	%		86	%
Total	$	447,134	$	385,395	$	369,927		16	%		4	%

Base salaries and employee benefits increased by 12 percent, or $20.7 million, in fiscal 2013, primarily reflecting the Clifton acquisition, an increase in base compensation driven by the increase in headcount, annual merit increases and an increase in payroll taxes associated with the increase in base salaries and incentives. Stock-based compensation increased by 6 percent, or $3.5 million, in fiscal 2013, also reflecting the increase in headcount. Operating income-based incentives increased by 17 percent, or $18.6 million, in fiscal 2013, primarily reflecting the increase in pre-bonus adjusted operating income and the impact of the Clifton

acquisition. Sales incentives increased by 42 percent, or $19.1 million, in fiscal 2013 reflecting a 55 percent increase in long-term fund and retail managed account gross sales and a modest decrease in our average retail incentive rate. Other compensation expense, which was down slightly year over year, primarily reflects a reduction in severance costs and signing bonuses paid.

Base salaries and employee benefits increased by 6 percent, or $9.2 million, in fiscal 2012, primarily reflecting increases in base salaries associated with a 5 percent increase in headcount, annual merit increases and an increase in payroll taxes associated with the increase in base salaries and operating income-based incentives. Operating income-based incentives increased by 7 percent, or $7.1 million, reflecting higher pre-bonus adjusted operating income and an increase in the rate at which operating income-based incentives were accrued in fiscal 2012. Stock-based compensation increased by 8 percent, or $4.0 million, in fiscal 2012, primarily reflecting increases in restricted stock grants. Other compensation expense increased by $2.1 million in fiscal 2012, reflecting an increase in severance costs. Sales-based incentives decreased by 13 percent, or $6.9 million, primarily reflecting a decrease in long-term fund sales.

Distribution expense

Distribution expense consists primarily of commissions paid to broker-dealers on the sale of Class A shares at net asset value, ongoing asset-based payments made to distribution partners pursuant to third-party distribution arrangements for certain Class C share and closed-end funds, marketing support arrangements to distribution partners and other discretionary marketing expenses.

The following table shows our distribution expense for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011

Class A share commissions	$	6,507	$	5,492	$	5,835		18	%		-6	%
Class C share distribution fees		54,631		55,528		51,905		-2	%		7	%
Closed-end fund structuring fees		4,614		-		-		NM			NM
Closed-end fund dealer compensation payments		17,701		16,977		17,199		4	%		-1	%
Intermediary marketing support payments		40,442		36,332		41,568		11	%		-13	%
Discretionary marketing expenses		15,723		16,585		16,157		-5	%		3	%
Total	$	139,618	$	130,914	$	132,664		7	%		-1	%

Class A share commissions increased by 18 percent, or $1.0 million, in fiscal 2013 and decreased by 6 percent, or $0.3 million, in fiscal 2012, in both cases reflecting changes in Class A sales on which we pay a commission. Class C share distribution fees decreased by 2 percent, or $0.9 million, in fiscal 2013 and increased by 7 percent, or $3.6 million, in fiscal 2012, in both cases reflecting changes in Class C share assets held more than one year on which these fees are based. The $4.6 million in closed-end fund structuring fees recognized in fiscal 2013 were associated with the initial public offerings of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Plus Fund and Eaton Vance Municipal Income Term Trust during the year. Closed-end fund dealer compensation payments increased by 4 percent, or $0.7 million, in fiscal 2013 and decreased by 1 percent, or $0.2 million, in fiscal 2012, in both cases reflecting changes in average assets subject to those arrangements. Marketing expenses associated with intermediary marketing support payments to our distribution partners increased by 11 percent, or $4.1 million, in fiscal 2013 and decreased by 13 percent, or $5.2 million, in fiscal 2012, in both cases reflecting changes in average assets subject to those arrangements. Discretionary marketing expenses decreased by 5 percent, or $0.9 million, in fiscal 2013, primarily reflecting a decrease in the use of outside agencies and increased by 3 percent, or $0.4 million, in fiscal 2012, primarily reflecting expansion of the Company’s marketing programs.

Service fee expense

Service fees we receive from sponsored funds are generally retained in the first year and paid to broker-dealers thereafter pursuant to third-party service arrangements. These fees are calculated as a percent of average assets under management in certain share classes of our mutual funds (principally Classes A, B, C, N and R), as well as certain private funds. Service fee expense increased by 1 percent, or $1.7 million, in fiscal 2013, reflecting a modest increase in average assets retained more than one year in funds and share classes that are subject to service fees. Service fee expense decreased by 9 percent, or $11.0 million, in fiscal 2012, reflecting a decrease in average fund assets retained more than one year in funds and share classes that are subject to service fees.

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

Amortization expense is affected by ongoing sales and redemptions of mutual fund Class C shares and certain private funds and redemptions of Class B shares. Amortization expense decreased 4 percent in fiscal 2013, reflecting a decrease in average Class B shares, and privately offered funds, deferred sales commissions partially offset by an increase in average Class C share deferred sales commissions. In fiscal 2013, 19 percent of total amortization related to Class B shares, 76 percent to Class C shares and 5 percent to privately offered equity funds.

Amortization expense decreased 43 percent in fiscal 2012, reflecting a decrease in average Class B shares, Class C shares and privately offered funds, deferred sales commissions. In fiscal 2012, 26 percent of total amortization related to Class B shares, 62 percent to Class C shares and 12 percent to privately offered equity funds.

Fund-related expenses

Fund-related expenses consist primarily of fees paid to sub-advisors, compliance costs and other fund-related expenses we incur. Fund-related expenses increased 25 percent, or $6.9 million, in fiscal 2013, primarily reflecting an increase in sub-advisory expenses associated with the use of unaffiliated sub-advisors on certain funds, an increase in other fund-related expenses and the recognition of $0.6 million of fund-related costs incurred in conjunction with the launch of closed-end funds during the year.

Fund-related expenses increased 8 percent, or $2.1 million, in fiscal 2012, reflecting an increase in non-advisory expenses borne by us on certain funds for which we are paid an all-in management fee and higher subsidies we provide to startup and other small funds to enhance their cost competitiveness, partially offset by decreases in sub-advisory fees.

Other expenses

Other expenses consist primarily of travel, professional services, information technology, facilities, communications and other miscellaneous corporate expenses, including the amortization of intangible assets.

The following table shows our other expense for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

							2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,						vs.			vs.
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011		2012			2011
Travel	$	14,739	$	13,176	$	12,312		12	%		7	%
Communications		5,273		5,307		5,625		-1	%		-6	%
Information technology		57,040		46,839		45,926		22	%		2	%
Professional services		12,415		11,544		10,696		8	%		8	%
Facilities-related		39,536		43,816		42,461		-10	%		3	%
Other corporate expense		19,781		17,752		17,178		11	%		3	%
Total	$	148,784	$	138,434	$	134,198		7	%		3	%

Other expenses increased by 7 percent, or $10.4 million, in fiscal 2013 from fiscal 2012, primarily reflecting increases in information technology expense of $10.2 million, other corporate expenses of $2.0 million, travel expense of $1.6 million and professional services expense of $0.9 million, offset by a decrease in facilities-related expenses of $4.3 million. The increase in information technology expense can be attributed to increases in outside custody and other back office services, other information technology consulting expense and software licenses and maintenance associated with budgeted technology projects. The increase in other corporate expenses reflects the amortization of intangible assets related to the Clifton acquisition and increases in charitable giving and other corporate taxes. The increase in travel expense relates to an overall increase in travel activity in fiscal 2013. The increase in professional services expense can be primarily attributed to an increase in external legal costs. The decrease in facilities-related expenses can be primarily attributed to lower depreciation expense, offset by a modest increase in consolidated rent expense.

Other expenses increased by 3 percent, or $4.2 million, in fiscal 2012 from fiscal 2011, primarily reflecting increases in facilities-related expenses of $1.4 million, information technology expense of $0.9 million, travel expense of $0.9 million, professional services expense of $0.8 million and other corporate expenses of $0.6 million, offset by a decrease in communications expense of $0.3 million. The increase in facilities-related expenses can be attributed to an increase in general building and depreciation expenses. The increase in information technology expense can be attributed to increases in system maintenance and repairs offset by a decrease in other information technology consulting expenses. The increase in travel expense can be attributed to an increase in hotel and air travel costs. The increase in professional services expense can be attributed to an increase in recruiting expenses and various corporate consulting engagements offset by a decrease in external legal costs. The increase in other corporate expenses reflects increases in corporate memberships and general corporate banking fees. The decrease in communications expense can be attributed to a decrease in telephone and cable expense.

Non-operating Income (Expense)

										2013			2012
	Years Ended October 31,									vs.			vs.
(in thousands)	2013			2012			2011			2012			2011
Gains (losses) and other investment income, net	$	(2,513	)	$	18,417		$	19,408			NM			-5	%
Interest expense		(33,708	)		(33,930	)		(33,652	)		-1	%		1	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(52,996	)		-			-			NM			NM
Other income (expense) of consolidated CLO entities:
Gains (losses) and other investment income, net		14,815			44,706			(17,037	)		-67	%		NM
Interest expense		(19,152	)		(18,447	)		(13,575	)		4	%		36	%
Total non-operating (expense) income	$	(93,554	)	$	10,746		$	(44,856	)		NM			NM

Gains (losses) and other investment income, net, declined $20.9 million in fiscal 2013, reflecting a loss of $3.1 million recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 on a reverse treasury lock entered into in conjunction with the retirement of the 2017 Senior Notes and a decline in investment gains and income recognized on our seed capital investments, including hedges associated with those investments. Gains (losses) and other investment income, net, declined $1.0 million in fiscal 2012, reflecting a decrease in gains recognized on our seed capital investments, partially offset by an increase in investment income earned by our consolidated funds. In fiscal 2012, we recognized $2.4 million of investment gains related to the fiscal 2011 sale of our equity interest in Lloyd George Management, representing additional settlement payments received. In fiscal 2011, we recognized a $5.5 million gain upon the sale of the Company’s equity investment in Lloyd George Management and $1.9 million gain on the sale of the Company’s equity investment in a non-consolidated CLO entity managed by the Company.

Interest expense decreased modestly in fiscal 2013, reflecting lower interest accrued on our 2017 Senior Notes and 3.625 percent senior notes due 2023 (the “2023 Senior Notes”), largely offset by accelerated amortization on a treasury lock tied to the retired portion of the 2017 Senior Notes.

Loss on extinguishment of debt of $53.0 million in fiscal 2013 consists of the tender premium associated with the retirement of $250 million of the 2017 Senior Notes, acceleration of certain deferred financing costs and discounts tied to the retired portion of the 2017 Senior Notes and transaction costs associated with the tender.

Net losses of consolidated CLO entities totaled $4.7 million in fiscal 2013, representing $4.3 million of other loss and $0.4 million of other operating expenses. Approximately $8.5 million of consolidated CLO entity net losses were included in net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests, reflecting third-party note holders’ proportionate interests in the net loss of each entity. Net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders included $3.8 million of income associated with the consolidated CLO entities in fiscal 2013, representing management fees earned by the Company offset by the Company’s proportionate interest in the net losses of the entities.

Consolidated CLO entity net income totaled $25.9 million in fiscal 2012, representing $26.3 million of other income and $0.4 million of other operating expenses. Approximately $22.6 million of the consolidated CLO entity net income was included in net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests, reflecting third-party note holders’ proportionate interests in consolidated CLO entity net income. The

remaining $3.3 million in fiscal 2012 was included in net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders, representing the Company’s proportionate interest in entity net income and management fees earned.

Consolidated CLO entity net loss totaled $31.0 million in fiscal 2011, representing $30.6 million of other loss and $0.4 million of other operating expenses. Approximately $34.5 million of the consolidated CLO entity net loss was included in net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests, reflecting third-party note holders’ proportionate interests in the consolidated CLO entity net loss. Net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders included $3.5 million of consolidated CLO entity net income in fiscal 2011, representing management fees earned by the Company, offset by the Company’s proportionate interest in the entity’s net losses.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate calculated as income taxes as a percentage of income before income taxes and equity in net income of affiliates was 40.0 percent, 35.3 percent and 41.1 percent in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During fiscal 2013, we reached a settlement with one state to resolve all matters relating to such state’s audit of our fiscal years 2004 through 2009 for a lump sum payment of $19.6 million. The $19.6 million payment resulted in a net increase to income tax expense of $6.7 million, equal to the amount of the payment less previously recorded reserves of $9.3 million and a federal tax benefit on the increased state tax of $3.6 million. Excluding the effect of the consolidated CLO entities, net income (loss) allocated to other beneficial interest holders and the impact of the tax settlement, our effective tax rate would have been 37.3 percent, 37.2 percent and 38.0 percent in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Our policy for accounting for income taxes includes monitoring our business activities and tax policies for compliance with federal, state and foreign tax laws. In the ordinary course of business, various taxing authorities may not agree with certain tax positions we have taken, or applicable law may not be clear. We periodically review these tax positions and provide for and adjust as necessary estimated liabilities relating to such positions as part of our overall tax provision.

Equity in Net Income of Affiliates, Net of Tax

Equity in net income of affiliates, net of tax, for fiscal 2013 primarily reflects our 49 percent equity interest in Hexavest, our 7 percent minority equity interest in a private equity partnership and equity interests in certain funds we sponsor or manage, most notably Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund, Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund, Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund, Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Select Equity Fund, Eaton Vance Real Estate Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long-Term Fund and Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund. Equity in net income of affiliates, net of tax, increased by $11.5 million in fiscal 2013, primarily due to the inclusion of our 49 percent equity interest in Hexavest and an increase in the Company’s proportionate net interest in the earnings of sponsored funds, offset by a decrease in the net income of the private equity partnership. Equity in net income of affiliates, net of tax, increased by $0.4 million in fiscal 2012, primarily due to the inclusion of our 49 percent equity interest in Hexavest, partially offset by a decrease in the net income of the private equity partnership in which we hold an investment.

Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling and Other Beneficial Interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests decreased by $24.7 million in fiscal 2013, reflecting a decrease of $31.0 million in gains attributable to other beneficial interest holders of the consolidated CLO entities offset by a $4.5 million increase in the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests in our majority-owned subsidiaries and a $2.1 million increase in net income attributable to non-controlling interests in those subsidiaries. In fiscal 2013, the increases in the estimated redemption value of non-

controlling interests in Parametric, Parametric Risk Advisors and Atlanta Capital were $10.9 million, $0.5 million and $12.9 million, respectively. In fiscal 2012, increases in the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests in Parametric, Parametric Risk Advisors and Atlanta Capital were $8.1 million, $1.4 million and $10.4 million, respectively.

Net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests increased by $48.6 million in fiscal 2012, reflecting an increase of $57.1 million in gains attributable to other beneficial interest holders of the consolidated CLO entity and a $1.9 million increase in net income attributable to non-controlling interest holders in the Company’s consolidated funds and majority-owned subsidiaries, offset by a $10.3 million reduction in increases in the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests in those subsidiaries. In fiscal 2011, the adjustments made to the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests in Parametric, Parametric Risk Advisors and Atlanta Capital were $20.0 million, $1.9 million and $8.3 million, respectively.

Net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests is not adjusted for taxes due to the underlying tax status of our consolidated subsidiaries. Parametric, Parametric Risk Advisors and Atlanta Capital are limited liability companies that are treated as partnerships for tax purposes. Funds and the CLO entities we consolidate are registered investment companies or private funds that are treated as pass-through entities for tax purposes.

Changes in Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

The assets and liabilities of consolidated CLO entities do not affect our liquidity or capital resources. The collateral assets of consolidated CLO entities are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the entities, and we have no right to these assets beyond our direct investment in and management fees generated from the entities, both of which are eliminated in consolidation. The note holders of the CLO entities have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. As a result, the assets and liabilities of consolidated CLO entities are excluded from the discussion of liquidity and capital resources below.

The following table summarizes certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources on October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and uses of cash for the years then ended:

Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Data

	October 31,
(in thousands)	2013		2012		2011
Balance sheet data:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	461,906	$	462,076	$	510,913
Investment advisory fees and other receivables		170,220		133,589		130,525
Total liquid assets	$	632,126	$	595,665	$	641,438

Investments	$	536,323	$	486,933	$	287,735

Liabilities:
Debt	$	573,499	$	500,000	$	500,000

	Years Ended October 31,
(in thousands)	2013			2012			2011
Cash flow data:
Operating cash flows	$	116,367		$	178,778		$	172,312
Investing cash flows		177,028			(90,905	)		133,520
Financing cash flows		(293,018	)		(136,748	)		(103,047	)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquid assets consist of cash and cash equivalents and investment advisory fees and other receivables. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash. Investment advisory fees and other receivables primarily represent receivables due from sponsored funds and separately managed accounts for investment advisory and distribution services provided. Liquid assets represented 38 percent and 39 percent of total assets on October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, excluding those assets identified as assets of consolidated CLO entities. The Company’s seed investments in consolidated funds and separate accounts are not treated as liquid assets because they may be longer term in nature.

The $36.5 million increase in liquid assets in fiscal 2013 primarily reflects $116.4 million of net cash provided by operating activities, net proceeds of $17.5 million from the debt transactions described below, net inflows into consolidated funds from non-controlling interest holders of $57.0 million, proceeds from the issuance of Non-Voting Common Stock of $119.3 million, net proceeds of $99.9 million from the sale of available-for-sale securities, excess tax benefits of $20.6 million associated with stock option exercises and the $8.9 million impact of consolidated CLO entity operating, investing and financing activities, offset by the repurchase of $73.9 million of Non-Voting Common Stock, the payment of $215.5 million of dividends to shareholders, the payment of $43.5 million to acquire additional interests in Parametric, contingent payments of $14.1 million to the sellers of the former Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies (“TABS”) business of M.D. Sass Investors Services and the $72.3 million net cash paid to acquire Clifton.

The $45.8 million decrease in liquid assets in fiscal 2012 primarily reflects $178.8 million of net cash provided by operating activities, net inflows into consolidated funds from non-controlling interest holders of $42.0 million, proceeds from the issuance of Non-Voting Common Stock of $55.7 million, $8.6 million of excess tax

benefits associated with stock option exercises and the $22.1 million impact of consolidated CLO entity operating, investing and financing activities, offset by net cash used for the purchase of available-for-sale securities and investments in equity method investees of $127.4 million, the repurchase of $106.5 million of Non-Voting Common Stock, the payment of $87.8 million of dividends to shareholders, $12.3 million in contingent payments made to the former TABS business owners and the payment of $19.9 million to acquire additional interests in our majority-owned subsidiaries. The $127.4 million net cash used for the purchase of available-for-sale securities and investments in equity method investees primarily reflects our acquisition of a 49 percent interest in Hexavest. The increase in investment advisory fees and other receivables can be attributed to the increase in our revenue run rate at the end of fiscal 2012 compared to the end of fiscal 2011.

On June 25, 2013, we issued $325 million in 2023 Senior Notes. The proceeds of the issuance were used primarily to purchase $250 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2017 Senior Notes. The Company paid $305.4 million to retire the 2017 Senior Notes, which included an early tender premium and accrued and unpaid interest. Executing these transactions enabled us to stagger the maturity of our debt, with $250 million now due in 2017 and $325 million due in 2023.

On October 31, 2013, our debt consisted of $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 2017 Senior Notes and $325 million in aggregate principal amount of 2023 Senior Notes. We also maintain a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with several banks that expires on June 4, 2015. The facility provides that we may borrow at LIBOR-based rates of interest that vary depending on the level of usage of the facility and our credit ratings. The agreement contains financial covenants with respect to leverage and interest coverage and requires us to pay an annual commitment fee on any unused portion. We had no borrowings under our revolving credit facility at October 31, 2013 or at any point during the fiscal year. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of October 31, 2013.

We continue to monitor our liquidity daily. We remain committed to growing our business and expect that our main uses of cash will be seed investments in new products, acquire shares of our Non-Voting Common Stock, pay dividends, make strategic acquisitions, enhance technology infrastructure and pay the operating expenses of the business, which are largely variable in nature and fluctuate with revenue and assets under management. We believe that our existing liquid assets, cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity under our existing credit facility are sufficient to meet our current and forecasted operating cash needs for the next twelve months and to satisfy our future commitments as more fully described in Contractual Obligations below. The risk exists, however, that if we need to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt in the future, resources may not be available to us in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms. Our ability to enter the capital markets in a timely manner depends on a number of factors, including the state of global credit and equity markets, interest rates, credit spreads and our credit ratings. If we are unable to access capital markets to issue new debt, refinance existing debt or sell shares of our Non-Voting Common Stock as needed, or if we are unable to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, our business could be adversely impacted.

We have a “well-known seasoned issuer” shelf registration statement on Form S-3 on file with the SEC that registers an unspecified amount of Non-Voting Common Stock, debt securities, depositary shares, warrants, stock purchase contracts and stock purchase units for future issuance. On June 25, 2013, we used this shelf registration statement to complete the underwritten public offering of the 2023 Senior Notes. We would expect to use the net proceeds of future securities sales under the shelf registration for general corporate purposes.

Recoverability of our Investments

Our $536.3 million of investments as of October 31, 2013 consisted of our 49 percent equity interest in Hexavest, positions in Company-managed funds and separate accounts entered into for investment and business development purposes, and certain other investments held directly by the Company. Investments in Company-managed funds and separate accounts and direct investments by the Company are generally in liquid debt or

equity securities and are carried at fair market value. We test our investments, other than equity method investments, for impairment on a quarterly basis. We evaluate our investments in non-consolidated CLO entities and investments classified as available-for-sale for impairment using quantitative factors, including how long the investment has been in a net unrealized loss position, and qualitative factors, including the credit quality of the underlying issuer and our ability and intent to continue holding the investment. If markets deteriorate in the quarters ahead, our assessment of impairment on a quantitative basis may lead us to impair investments in future quarters that were in an unrealized loss position at October 31, 2013.

We test our investments in equity method investees, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or as facts and circumstances indicate that additional analysis is warranted. There have been no significant changes in financial condition in fiscal 2013 that would indicate that an impairment loss exists at October 31, 2013.

We periodically review our deferred sales commissions and identifiable intangible assets for impairment as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. There have been no significant changes in financial condition in fiscal 2013 that would indicate that an impairment loss exists at October 31, 2013.

Operating Cash Flows

Our operating cash flows are calculated by adjusting net income to reflect other significant sources and uses of cash, certain significant non-cash items and timing differences in the cash settlement of other assets and liabilities. Significant sources and uses of cash that are not reflected in either revenue or operating expenses include net cash flows associated with our deferred sales commission assets (capitalized sales commissions paid net of contingent deferred sales charges received) as well as net cash flows associated with the purchase and sale of investments within the portfolios of our consolidated funds and separate accounts (proceeds received from the sale of trading investments net of cash outflows associated with the purchase of trading investments). Significant non-cash items include the amortization of deferred sales commissions and intangible assets, depreciation, stock-based compensation and net change in deferred income taxes.

Cash provided by operating activities totaled $116.4 million in fiscal 2013, a decrease of $62.4 million from $178.8 million in fiscal 2012. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities primarily reflects an increase in the net purchase of trading securities and net losses on seed capital investments in fiscal 2013 compared to net gains in fiscal 2012, partially offset by adjustments to reflect classification of the loss on extinguishment of debt as a financing activity and consolidated CLO entity net losses compared to net gains in fiscal 2012. Cash used for operating activities in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 reflects the impact of a $19.6 million payment made to resolve matters relating to a state tax audit.

Cash provided by operating activities totaled $178.8 million in fiscal 2012, an increase of $6.5 million from $172.3 million in fiscal 2011. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities primarily reflects a net increase in operating cash flows related to timing differences in the cash settlement of other assets and liabilities, partially offset by consolidated CLO entity net gains compared to net losses in fiscal 2011 and an increase in our net deferred income tax asset.

Investing Cash Flows

Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of the purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements, cash paid in acquisitions and the purchase and sale of available-for-sale investments in sponsored funds that we do not consolidate.

Cash provided by investing activities totaled $177.0 million in fiscal 2013 compared to cash used for investing activities of $90.9 million in fiscal 2012. The increase in cash provided by investing activities can be primarily attributed to an increase of $227.4 million in net proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities and a $116.9 million increase in the net proceeds from the sale and maturities of consolidated CLO entity investments, offset by the $72.3 million net cash paid in the Clifton acquisition. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company made contingent payments of $14.1 million and $12.3 million, respectively, to the sellers of TABS under the terms of the 2009 acquisition agreement.

Cash used for investing activities totaled $90.9 million in fiscal 2012 compared to cash provided by investing activities of $133.5 million in fiscal 2011. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities can be primarily attributed to our acquisition of a 49 percent equity interest in Hexavest, which is included in purchase of investments. In fiscal 2012 and 2011, the Company made contingent payments of $12.3 million and $11.6 million, respectively, to the sellers of TABS under the terms of the 2009 acquisition agreement.

Financing Cash Flows

Financing cash flows primarily reflect distributions to non-controlling interest holders of our majority-owned subsidiaries and consolidated funds, the purchase of additional non-controlling interests in our majority-owned subsidiaries, the issuance and repurchase of our Non-Voting Common Stock, excess tax benefits associated with stock option exercises, the payment of dividends to our shareholders and the proceeds and payments associated with the Company’s debt. Financing cash flows also include proceeds from the issuance of capital stock by consolidated investment companies and cash paid to meet redemptions by non-controlling interest holders of these funds.

Cash used for financing activities totaled $293.0 million, $136.7 million and $103.0 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In fiscal 2013, we paid $43.5 million to acquire additional interests in Parametric, repurchased and retired approximately 2.0 million shares of our Non-Voting Common Stock for $73.9 million under our authorized repurchase program and issued 7.4 million shares of our Non-Voting Common Stock in connection with the grant of restricted share awards, the exercise of stock options and other employee stock purchases for total proceeds of $119.3 million. As of October 31, 2013, we have authorization to purchase an additional 1.9 million shares under our current share repurchase authorization and anticipate that future repurchases will continue to be an ongoing use of cash. Our dividends declared per share were $1.82 in fiscal 2013, including a one-time special dividend of $1.00 per share declared and paid in December 2012, compared to $0.77 in fiscal 2012 and $0.73 in fiscal 2011. We currently expect to declare and pay quarterly dividends on our Voting and Non-Voting Common Stock comparable to the dividend declared in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

In June 2013, we issued $325 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.625 percent Senior Notes due 2023. In conjunction with the offering we paid approximately $3.0 million in debt offering costs that will be amortized over the life of the notes and recognized as a component of interest expense.

In June 2013, we retired $250 million principal amount of our outstanding 6.5 percent Senior Notes due 2017, paying a tender premium of $51.5 million.

In fiscal 2013, cash used for financing activities also included $177.5 million in principal payments made on senior notes of consolidated CLO entities.

Contractual Obligations

The following table details our contractual obligations as of October 31, 2013:

	Payments due by period
			Less
			than 1		1-3		4-5		After 5
(in millions)	Total		Year		Years		Years		Years
Operating leases – facilities and equipment⁽¹⁾	$	376	$	21	$	40	$	38	$	277
Senior notes		575		-		-		250		325
Interest payment on senior notes		183		28		56		40		59
Payments to non-controlling interest holders of majority-owned subsidiaries		35		35		-		-		-
Investment in private equity partnership		1		-		1		-		-
Investment in CLO entity		8		8		-		-		-
Unrecognized tax benefits⁽²⁾		2		1		1		-		-
Total	$	1,180	$	93	$	98	$	328	$	661

Contractual obligations of consolidated CLO entities:
Senior and subordinated note obligations,line of credit and preferred shares	$	602	$	308	$	-	$	-	$	294
Interest payments on senior and subordinatednote obligations and line of credit		17		9		4		4		-
Total contractual obligations of consolidated CLO entities	$	619	$	317	$	4	$	4	$	294

⁽¹⁾

Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $2.3 million to be received in the future under non-cancelablesubleases.

⁽²⁾

This amount includes unrecognized tax benefits along with accrued interest and penalties.

In July 2006, we committed to invest up to $15.0 million in a private equity partnership that invests in companies in the financial services industry. We had invested $13.9 million of the maximum $15.0 million as of October 31, 2013. The remaining commitment is included in the table above.

In fiscal 2013, we committed to an approximately $8.1 million investment in a CLO entity that had not closed as of October 31, 2013. The commitment is included in the table above and was satisfied in November 2013.

Interests held by non-controlling interest holders of Parametric Risk Advisors and Atlanta Capital are not subject to mandatory redemption. The purchase of non-controlling interests is predicated, for each of them, on the exercise of a series of puts held by non-controlling interest holders and calls held by us. Neither the exercise of the puts nor the exercise of the calls is contingent upon the non-controlling interest holders remaining employed by the affiliated entity. The puts provide the non-controlling interest holders the right to require us to purchase these retained interests at specified intervals over time, while the calls provide us with the right to require the non-controlling interest holders to sell their retained equity interests to us at specified intervals over time, as well as upon the occurrence of certain events such as death or permanent disability. As a result, there is significant uncertainty as to the timing of any non-controlling interest purchase in the future. The value assigned to the purchase of an originating non-controlling interest is based, in each case, on a multiple of earnings before interest and taxes of the subsidiary, which is a measure that is intended to represent fair market value. There is

no discrete floor or ceiling on any non-controlling interest purchase. As a result, there is significant uncertainty as to the amount of any non-controlling interest purchase in the future. Accordingly, future payments to be made to purchase non-controlling interests have been excluded from the above table, unless a put or call option has been exercised and a mandatory firm commitment exists for us to purchase such non-controlling interests. Although the timing and amounts of these purchases cannot be predicted with certainty, we anticipate that the purchase of non-controlling interests in our consolidated subsidiaries may be a significant use of cash in future years.

We have presented all redeemable non-controlling interests at redemption value on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2013. We have recorded the current year change in the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests redeemable at fair value as a component of additional paid-in capital and have recorded the current year change in the estimated redemption value of non-controlling interests redeemable at other than fair value as a component of net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests. Based on our calculations, the estimated redemption value of our non-controlling interests, redeemable at either fair value or other than fair value, totaled $74.9 million on October 31, 2013 compared to $98.8 million on October 31, 2012.

Redeemable non-controlling interests as of October 31, 2013 consist of third-party investors’ ownership in consolidated investment funds of $4.0 million, non-controlling interests in Parametric Risk Advisors and Atlanta Capital redeemable at other than fair value of $6.1 million and $13.6 million, respectively, non-controlling interests in Parametric issued in conjunction with the Clifton acquisition and redeemable at fair value of $13.9 million and profit interests granted under the long-term incentive plans of Parametric and Atlanta Capital redeemable at fair value of $24.9 million and $12.3 million, respectively. Redeemable non-controlling interests as of October 31, 2012 consist of third-party investors’ ownership in consolidated investment funds of $20.1 million, non-controlling interests in Parametric, Parametric Risk Advisors and Atlanta Capital redeemable at other than fair value of $33.7 million, $8.7 million and $32.1 million, respectively, and redeemable interests in profit interests granted under the long-term incentive plans of Parametric and Atlanta Capital of $2.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

Related to its acquisition of the TABS business in December 2008, the Company is obligated to make three additional annual contingent payments based on prescribed multiples of TABS’s revenue for the twelve months ending December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. There is no defined floor or ceiling on such payments, resulting in significant uncertainty as to the amount of any payment in the future. Accordingly, future payments to be made have been excluded from the above table. The Company made a contingent payment of $14.1 million with respect to the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 in fiscal 2013.

In December 2012, certain non-controlling interest holders of Parametric exercised their final put option pursuant to the terms of the original acquisition agreement requiring the Company to purchase an additional 3.4 percent capital and 5.7 percent profit interest in the entity. The $43.5 million exercise price of the put option was based on a multiple of estimated earnings before taxes for the calendar year ended December 31, 2012. The payment was treated as an equity transaction and reduced redeemable non-controlling interests at closing on December 20, 2012. Indirect profit interests granted to Parametric’s employees under a long-term equity incentive plan of that entity increased to 4.9 percent at October 31, 2013, reflecting a 0.8 percent profit interest granted on November 1, 2012 under the plan. Indirect capital and profit interests in Parametric held by the principals of Clifton totaled 1.9 percent on October 31, 2013, reflecting indirect interests issued in conjunction with the Clifton acquisition on December 31, 2012. Capital and profit interests in Parametric held by the Company increased to 98.1 percent and 93.3 percent, respectively, on October 31, 2013, reflecting the transactions described above.

The Company will be obligated to make an additional payment in respect of the acquired interest in Hexavest in fiscal 2014 if Hexavest exceeds defined annual revenue thresholds in the second twelve-month period following

the closing. The Company made a contingent payment of $1.3 million with respect to the first twelve-month period ended August 31, 2013. We have the option to acquire an additional 26 percent interest in Hexavest in 2017. There is no defined floor or ceiling on any payment, resulting in significant uncertainty as to the amount of any payment in the future. Accordingly, future payments to be made have been excluded from the above table until such time as the uncertainty has been resolved. Although the amounts of these payments cannot be predicted with certainty, we anticipate they may be a significant use of cash in future years.

In June 2013, Parametric exercised a call option requiring the non-controlling interest holders of Parametric Risk Advisors to sell a 10 percent interest in Parametric Risk Advisors for $3.1 million, payable in cash or securities in Parametric Portfolio LP (“PP LP”), whose sole asset is ownership units in Parametric. The transaction increased Parametric’s ownership interest from 70 percent to 80 percent when the transaction closed on November 1, 2013. Upon execution of the call, redeemable non-controlling interests were reduced and a liability was established within other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

On November 1, 2013, the non-controlling interest holders of Parametric Risk Advisors entered into a Unit Acquisition Agreement with Parametric to exchange their remaining ownership interests in Parametric Risk Advisors, including the 10 percent interest subject to the June 2013 call referenced above, for indirect ownership interests in Parametric. The indirect Parametric ownership interests issued in this exchange contain put and call features that are exercisable over a four year period beginning in 2018. As a result of this exchange, Parametric became the sole owner of Parametric Risk Advisors effective November 1, 2013.

In September 2013, the Company exercised a call option requiring the non-controlling interest holders of Atlanta Capital to sell a 3.4 percent profit interest and a 0.2 percent capital interest in Atlanta Capital to the Company for $12.8 million. In addition, the non-controlling interest holders of Atlanta Capital exercised a put option requiring the Company to purchase an additional 3.8 percent profit interest and a 0.3 percent capital interest in Atlanta Capital for $14.1 million. The purchase price of the call and put options is based on a multiple of earnings before taxes based on the financial results of Atlanta Capital for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013. Upon the execution of the call and put options, the Company reduced redeemable non-controlling interests and recorded a liability within other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The transactions are anticipated to settle in December 2013 and will increase the Company’s capital ownership interest in Atlanta Capital from 99.4 percent to 99.9 percent, and will increase the Company’s profit ownership interest from 80.3 percent to 87.5 percent.

Non-controlling interest holders of Atlanta Capital have the right to sell a 3.1 percent profit interest and their remaining 0.1 percent capital interest in Atlanta Capital to the Company at a multiple of earnings before taxes based on the financial results of Atlanta Capital for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 and each year thereafter subject to certain restrictions. The Company has the right to purchase the remaining non-controlling interest at a multiple of earnings before taxes based on Atlanta Capital’s financial results for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2014 and each year thereafter through October 31, 2017. Neither the exercise of the puts nor the exercise of the calls is contingent upon the non-controlling interest holders of Atlanta Capital remaining employees.

Indirect profit interests in Atlanta Capital held by its employees, including profit interests granted under a long-term equity incentive plan, were 19.7 percent prior to the put and call transactions described above, reflecting the 1.6 percent profit interest granted on November 1, 2012 under the plan. Capital and profit interests in Atlanta Capital held by the Company increased to 99.9 percent and 87.5 percent, respectively, after reflecting the put and call transactions described above.

Foreign Subsidiaries

We consider the undistributed earnings of our Canadian subsidiary as of October 31, 2013 to be indefinitely re-invested in foreign operations. Accordingly, no U.S. income taxes have been provided thereon. As of October 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $11.9 million of undistributed earnings in our Canadian subsidiary that is not available to fund domestic operations or to distribute to shareholders unless repatriated. Repatriation would require the Company to accrue and pay U.S. corporate income taxes. The Company does not have a current plan to repatriate these funds.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not invest in any off-balance sheet vehicles that provide financing, liquidity, market or credit risk support or engage in any leasing activities that expose us to any liability that is not reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our accounting policies that require significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

Accounting guidance provides a framework for determining whether an entity should be considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and, if so, whether our involvement with the entity results in a variable interest in the entity. If we determine that we do have a variable interest in the entity, we must then perform an analysis to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If we determine that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE, we are required to consolidate the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the VIE into the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

A company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A company is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in a VIE if it has both (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb the losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Our evaluation of whether we qualify as the primary beneficiary of a VIE is highly complex. In our analysis, we must make significant estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows of the VIE. These estimates and assumptions relate primarily to market interest rates, credit default rates, pre-payment rates, discount rates, the marketability of certain securities and the probability of certain outcomes. There is also judgment involved in assessing whether we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the entity.

While we believe that our evaluation is appropriate, future changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions in the case of an evaluation triggered by a reconsideration event as defined in the accounting standards may affect the determination of the primary beneficiary status and the resulting consolidation, or deconsolidation, of the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement

date. The fair value hierarchy established in these standards prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

Assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories based on the nature of the inputs that are significant to the fair value measurements in their entirety. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value measurement hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s classification within the fair value measurement hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Level 1

Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the reporting date.

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 unadjusted quoted market prices, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of our investment in the net assets of acquired companies over the fair value of the underlying identifiable net assets at the dates of acquisition. We attribute all goodwill associated with the acquisitions of Atlanta Capital, Parametric and Clifton, which share similar economic characteristics, to a single reporting unit. Management believes that the inclusion of these entities in a single reporting unit for the purposes of goodwill impairment testing most accurately reflects the synergies achieved in acquiring these entities, namely centralized distribution of similar products and services to similar clients. We attribute all goodwill associated with the acquisition of TABS and Fox Asset Management to a second reporting unit.

Goodwill is not amortized but is tested annually for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year by comparing the fair value of the reporting units to the carrying amounts, including goodwill. We establish fair value for the purpose of impairment testing by averaging fair value established using an income approach and fair value established using a market approach for each reporting unit.

The income approach employs a discounted cash flow model that takes into account (1) assumptions that marketplace participants would use in their estimates of fair value, (2) current period actual results, and (3) budgeted results for future periods that have been vetted by senior management at the reporting unit level. Budgeted results for future periods are most significantly impacted by assumptions made as to the growth in assets under management, future revenue run rates and future operating margins. The discounted cash flow model incorporates the same fundamental pricing concepts used to calculate fair value in the acquisition due diligence process and a discount rate that takes into consideration our estimated cost of capital adjusted for the uncertainty inherent in the acquisition.

The market approach employs market multiples for comparable transactions in the financial services industry obtained from industry sources, taking into consideration the nature, scope and size of the acquired reporting unit. Estimates of fair value are established using a multiple of assets under management and current and forward multiples of both revenue and earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) adjusted for size and performance level relative to peer companies. A weighted average calculation is then performed, giving greater weight to fair value calculated based on multiples of revenue and EBITDA and lesser weight to fair value calculated as a multiple of assets under management. Fair values calculated using one year, two year and trailing twelve-month revenue multiples and one year, two year and trailing twelve-month

EBITDA multiples are each weighted 15 percent, while fair value calculated based on a multiple of assets under management is weighted 10 percent. We believe that fair value calculated based on multiples of revenue and EBITDA is a better indicator of fair value in that these fair values provide information as to both scale and profitability.

To evaluate the sensitivity of the goodwill impairment testing to the calculation of fair value, we apply a hypothetical 10 percent and 20 percent decrease to the fair value of each reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its calculated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test will be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any.

Intangible Assets

Amortized identifiable intangible assets generally represent the cost of client relationships and management contracts acquired. In valuing these assets, we make assumptions regarding useful lives and projected growth rates, and significant judgment is required. We periodically review identifiable intangibles for impairment as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. If the carrying amounts of the assets exceed their respective fair values, additional impairment tests are performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any.

Non-amortizing intangible assets generally represent the cost of mutual fund management contracts acquired. Non-amortizing intangible assets are tested for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year by comparing the fair value of the management contracts acquired to their carrying values. The Company establishes fair value for purposes of impairment testing using the income approach. If the carrying value of a management contract acquired exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess.

Accounting for Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates of the many jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions. In the ordinary course of business, many transactions occur for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain, and we adjust our income tax provision in the period in which we determine that actual outcomes will likely be different from our estimates. Accounting standards require that the tax effects of a position be recognized only if it is more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each reporting period to support continued recognition of a benefit. Unrecognized tax benefits, as well as the related interest, are adjusted regularly to reflect changing facts and circumstances. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing tax planning in assessing our taxes, changes in tax laws may result in a change to our tax position and effective tax rate. We classify any interest or penalties incurred as a component of income tax expense.

Management is required to estimate the timing of the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities and to make assumptions about the future deductibility of deferred tax assets. We assess whether a valuation allowance should be established against our deferred tax assets based on consideration of all available evidence, using a more-likely-than-not standard. This assessment takes into account our forecast of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry back and carry forward periods, our experience with the tax attributes expiring unused, tax planning alternatives and other tax considerations.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense reflects the fair value of stock-based awards measured at grant date, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the relevant service period (generally five years), and is adjusted each period for anticipated forfeitures.

The fair value of option awards granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model incorporates assumptions as to dividend yield, volatility, an appropriate risk-free interest rate and the expected life of the option. Many of these assumptions require management’s judgment but are not subject to significant variability. Management must also apply judgment in developing an expectation of awards that may be forfeited. If actual experience differs significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially affected.

The fair value of profit interests granted under subsidiary long-term equity plans is estimated on the date of grant by averaging fair value established using an income approach and fair value established using a market approach for each subsidiary.

The income approach employs a discounted cash flow model that takes into account (1) assumptions that marketplace participants would use in their estimates of fair value, including the discount rate and the terminal growth rate, (2) current period results and (3) budgeted results for future periods that have been vetted by the subsidiary’s senior management. Budgeted results for future periods are most significantly impacted by assumptions made as to the growth in assets under management, future revenue run rates and future operating margins. The discounted cash flow model incorporates the same fundamental pricing concepts used to calculate fair value in the acquisition due diligence process and a discount rate that takes into consideration our estimated cost of capital adjusted for the uncertainty inherent in the acquisition.

The market approach employs market multiples for comparable transactions in the financial services industry obtained from industry sources, taking into consideration the nature, scope and size of the subsidiary’s operations. Estimates of fair value are established using a multiple of assets under management and current and forward multiples of revenue and EBITDA adjusted for size and performance level relative to peer companies. A weighted average calculation is then performed, giving greater weight to fair value calculated based on multiples of revenue and EBITDA and lesser weight to fair value calculated as a multiple of assets under management. Fair values calculated using one year, two year and trailing twelve-month revenue multiples and one year, two year and trailing twelve-month EBITDA multiples are each weighted 15 percent, while fair value calculated based on a multiple of assets under management is weighted 10 percent. We believe that fair value calculated based on multiples of revenue and EBITDA is a better indicator of fair value in that these fair values provide information as to both scale and profitability.

Non-controlling interests

Certain interests in our majority-owned subsidiaries are puttable at established multiples of earnings before interest and taxes and, as such, are considered redeemable at other than fair value. The Company’s non-controlling interests redeemable at other than fair value are recorded in temporary equity at estimated redemption value and changes in estimated redemption value are recorded in earnings. As a result, net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders and earnings per basic and diluted share are impacted by changes in the estimated redemption values of such redeemable non-controlling interests.

Accounting Developments

Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance requiring an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for any net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward unless such tax loss or credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes resulting from the disallowance of a tax

position. In the event that the tax position is disallowed or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit shall be presented in the financial statements as a liability and shall not be combined with deferred tax assets. The new guidance will be effective for the Company on November 1, 2014. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of the new guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Investment Companies

In June 2013, the FASB issued a final standard amending the current criteria for an entity to qualify as an investment company, creating new disclosure requirements and amending the measurement criteria for certain interests in other investment companies. The Company is evaluating the impact of this amendment and will adopt the new guidance on November 1, 2015.

Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity

In March 2013, the FASB issued new guidance on reporting a cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) with respect to foreign currency. The new guidance addresses the accounting for a CTA when a parent either sells a part of or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The Company will adopt the new guidance on November 1, 2014.

Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance on reporting amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). The new guidance does not change the requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements, but requires new footnote disclosures regarding the reclassification of AOCI by component into net income. The Company will implement the new disclosure requirements in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, our financial position is subject to different types of risk, including market risk. Market risk is the risk that we will incur losses due to adverse changes in equity and bond prices, interest rates, credit events or currency exchange rates. Management is responsible for identifying, assessing and managing market and other risks.

In evaluating market risk, it is important to note that most of our revenue is based on the market value of assets under management. As noted in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, declines of financial market values negatively impact our revenue and net income.

Our primary direct exposure to equity price risk arises from investments in equity securities made by consolidated sponsored funds, investments in equity securities held in separately managed accounts seeded for new product development purposes, our investments in sponsored equity funds that are not consolidated and our investments in equity method investees. Equity price risk as it relates to these investments represents the potential future loss of value that would result from a decline in the fair values of the fund shares or underlying equity securities.

The following is a summary of the effect that a 10 percent increase or decrease in equity prices would have on our investments subject to equity price fluctuation at October 31, 2013:

(in thousands)	Carrying Value		Carrying Value Assuming a 10% Increase		Carrying Value Assuming a 10% Decrease

Investment securities, trading:
Equity securities	$	117,758	$	129,534	$	105,982
Investment securities, available-for-sale:
Sponsored funds		16,384		18,022		14,746
Investment in equity method investees:
Sponsored funds		73,315		80,647		65,984
Total	$	207,457	$	228,203	$	186,712

Currently we have a corporate hedging program in place to hedge currency risk and market price exposures on certain investments in consolidated sponsored funds and separately managed accounts seeded for new product development purposes. As part of this program, we enter into futures and forward contracts to hedge certain exposures held within the portfolios of these separately managed accounts and consolidated sponsored funds. The contracts negotiated are short term in nature. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

At October 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts, stock index futures contracts and commodity futures contracts with aggregate notional values of approximately $59.1 million, $200.7 million and $12.9 million, respectively. The Company estimates that a 10 percent adverse change in market prices would result in a decrease of approximately $5.9 million, $20.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in the fair value of open currency, equity and commodity derivative contracts held at October 31, 2013.

In addition to utilizing forwards and futures contracts, the Company has also entered into transactions in which securities not yet purchased have been sold. In its short sales, the Company has sold securities that have been borrowed from third-party brokers with the intention of buying back identical assets at a later date to return to the

lender, thereby incurring a liability. As of October 31, 2013, the Company had $0.7 million included in other liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet related to securities sold, not yet purchased. The Company estimates that a 10 percent adverse change in market prices would result in a decrease of approximately $0.1 million in the value of these securities.

We are required to maintain cash collateral for margin accounts established to support certain derivative positions and securities sold short, not yet purchased. Our initial margin requirements are currently equal to five percent of the initial underlying value of the stock index futures and commodity futures contracts. Additional margin requirements include daily posting of variation margin equal to the daily change in the position value and 150 percent of the underlying value of securities sold, not yet purchased. We do not have a collateral requirement related to foreign currency forward contracts. Cash collateral supporting margin requirements is classified as restricted cash and is included as a component of other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

At October 31, 2013, the Company was exposed to interest rate risk and credit spread risk as a result of approximately $117.8 million in investments in fixed and floating-rate income funds sponsored or managed by us, debt securities held by sponsored funds we consolidate, debt securities held in separately managed accounts seeded for new product development purposes and debt securities held directly by us. Management considered a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates and determined that an increase of such magnitude would result in a decrease of approximately $3.6 million in the carrying amount of the Company’s debt investments and that a decrease of 100 basis points would increase the carrying amount of such investments by approximately $3.6 million.

From time to time, we seek to offset our exposure to changing interest rates associated with our debt financing. In June 2013, we announced a tender offer to purchase for cash up to $250 million in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 2017 Senior Notes and ultimately accepted for purchase $250 million of the 2017 Senior Notes (“Tendered Notes”) on June 28, 2013. In conjunction with that transaction, we entered into a reverse treasury lock, which effectively locked in the benchmark interest rate to be used in determining the premium above par to be paid to holders of the Tendered Notes. The reference U.S. Treasury rate increased during the time the reverse treasury lock was outstanding, resulting in a $3.1 million loss recognized upon termination in June 2013. The loss was included in gains (losses) and other investment income, net in our Consolidated Statement of Income.

In June 2013, we also issued $325 million in aggregate principal amount of 2023 Senior Notes. In anticipation of the offering, we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap intended to hedge changes in the benchmark interest rate between the time at which the decision was made to issue the debt and the pricing of the securities. The benchmark interest rate increased during this time and we received payment to settle the hedge for a gain of $2.0 million. At termination, the hedge was determined to be an effective cash flow hedge and the $2.0 million gain was recorded in other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax in our Consolidated Statement of Income.

There can be no assurance that our hedge instruments will meet their overall objective of reducing our interest expense or that we will be successful in obtaining hedging contracts on any future debt offerings.

Direct exposure from credit risk arises from our interest in non-consolidated CLO entities that are included in investments in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as well as our interests in consolidated CLO entities that are eliminated in consolidation. As an investor in a CLO entity, we are entitled to only a residual interest in the CLO entity, making these investments highly sensitive to the default and recovery experiences of the underlying instruments held by the CLO entity. Our investments are subject to an impairment loss in the event that the cash flows generated by the collateral securities are not sufficient to allow equity holders to recover their investments. If there is deterioration in the credit quality of collateral and reference securities and a corresponding increase in defaults, CLO entity cash flows may be adversely impacted and we may be unable to recover our investment. Our total investments in the non-consolidated and consolidated CLO entities were valued at $5.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2013, representing our total value at risk with respect to such entities as of October 31, 2013.

We are subject to foreign currency exchange risk through our international operations. While we operate primarily in the United States and, accordingly, most of our consolidated revenue and associated expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, we do provide services and earn revenue outside of the United States. Revenue and expenses denominated in foreign currencies may be impacted by movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk in our Consolidated Balance Sheet relates primarily to an equity method investment and cash and cash equivalents that are denominated in foreign currencies, principally Canadian dollars. This risk will likely increase as our business outside of the United States grows. We generally do not use derivative financial instruments to manage the foreign currency exchange risk exposure we assume in connection with investments in international operations. As a result, both positive and negative currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar may affect our results of operations and accumulated other comprehensive income. We do not enter into foreign currency transactions for speculative purposes.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

For the Fiscal Years Ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

Contents		Page number reference

Consolidated Financial Statements of Eaton Vance Corp.:
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013		67
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013		68
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2013 and 2012		69
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013		70
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013		73
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		75
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		130

All schedules have been omitted because they are not required, are not applicable or the information is otherwise shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

Consolidated Statements of Income

	Years Ended October 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2013			2012			2011
Revenue:
Investment advisory and administrative fees	$	1,135,327		$	988,058		$	996,222
Distribution and underwriter fees		89,234			89,410			102,979
Service fees		126,560			126,345			144,530
Other revenue		6,382			5,223			4,875
Total revenue		1,357,503			1,209,036			1,248,606
Expenses:
Compensation and related costs		447,134			385,395			369,927
Distribution expense		139,618			130,914			132,664
Service fee expense		115,149			113,485			124,517
Amortization of deferred sales commissions		19,581			20,441			35,773
Fund-related expenses		34,230			27,375			25,295
Other expenses		148,784			138,434			134,198
Total expenses		904,496			816,044			822,374
Operating income		453,007			392,992			426,232
Non-operating income (expense):
Gains (losses) and other investment income, net		(2,513	)		18,417			19,408
Interest expense		(33,708	)		(33,930	)		(33,652	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(52,996	)		-			-
Other income (expense) of consolidated collateralized loan obligation ("CLO") entities:
Gains (losses) and other investment income, net		14,815			44,706			(17,037	)
Interest expense		(19,152	)		(18,447	)		(13,575	)
Total non-operating (expense) income		(93,554	)		10,746			(44,856	)
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of affiliates		359,453			403,738			381,376
Income taxes		(143,896	)		(142,385	)		(156,844	)
Equity in net income of affiliates, net of tax		14,869			3,415			3,042
Net income		230,426			264,768			227,574
Net income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests		(36,585	)		(61,303	)		(12,672	)
Net income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders	$	193,841		$	203,465		$	214,902
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.60		$	1.76		$	1.82
Diluted	$	1.53		$	1.72		$	1.75
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		116,597			112,359			115,326
Diluted		122,444			115,126			119,975

Dividends declared per share	$	1.82		$	0.77		$	0.73

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

	Years Ended October 31,
(in thousands)	2013			2012			2011

Net income	$	230,426		$	264,768		$	227,574

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments, net of income taxes of $788, $0 and $0, respectively		1,227			-			-
Amortization of net losses (gains) on derivatives, net of income taxes of $401, $157 and $158, respectively		845			290			289
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale investments, net of income taxes of $592, $(1,269), and $(850), respectively		(957	)		2,075			1,345
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income taxes of $3,213, $(161), and $(56), respectively		(5,215	)		218			141
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax		(4,100	)		2,583			1,775

Total comprehensive income		226,326			267,351			229,349
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests		(36,585	)		(61,303	)		(12,672	)

Total comprehensive income attributable to Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders	$	189,741		$	206,048		$	216,677

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	October 31,
(in thousands, except share data)	2013			2012

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents	$	461,906		$	462,076
Investment advisory fees and other receivables		170,220			133,589
Investments		536,323			486,933
Assets of consolidated CLO entities:
Cash and cash equivalents		36,641			36,758
Bank loans and other investments		685,681			430,583
Other assets		5,814			1,107
Deferred sales commissions		17,923			19,336
Deferred income taxes		61,139			51,234
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net		48,746			54,889
Intangible assets, net		74,534			59,228
Goodwill		228,876			154,636
Other assets		79,446			89,122
Total assets	$	2,407,249		$	1,979,491

Liabilities, Temporary Equity and Permanent Equity
Liabilities:
Accrued compensation	$	169,953		$	145,338
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		58,529			59,397
Dividend payable		26,740			23,250
Debt		573,499			500,000
Liabilities of consolidated CLO entities:
Senior and subordinated note obligations		279,127			446,605
Line of credit		247,789			-
Redeemable preferred shares		64,952			-
Other liabilities		124,305			766
Other liabilities		115,960			91,785
Total liabilities		1,660,854			1,267,141
Commitments and contingencies
Temporary Equity:
Redeemable non-controlling interests		74,856			98,765
Permanent Equity:
Voting Common Stock, par value $0.00390625 per share:
Authorized, 1,280,000 shares
Issued and outstanding, 399,240 and 413,167 shares, respectively		2			2
Non-Voting Common Stock, par value $0.00390625 per share:
Authorized, 190,720,000 shares
Issued and outstanding, 121,232,506 and 115,878,384 shares, respectively		474			453
Additional paid-in capital		124,837			26,730
Notes receivable from stock option exercises		(7,122	)		(4,155	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(177	)		3,923
Appropriated retained earnings		10,249			18,699
Retained earnings		541,521			566,420
Total Eaton Vance Corp. shareholders' equity		669,784			612,072
Non-redeemable non-controlling interests		1,755			1,513
Total permanent equity		671,539			613,585
Total liabilities, temporary equity and permanent equity	$	2,407,249		$	1,979,491

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

	Permanent Equity																													Temporary Equity
(in thousands)	Voting and Non- Voting Common Shares			Voting Common Stock		Non- Voting Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Notes Receivable from Stock Option Exercises			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Appropriated Deficit			Retained Earnings			Non- Redeemable Non- Controlling Interests			Total Permanent Equity			Redeemable Non- Controlling Interests
Balance, November 1, 2010		118,326		$	2	$	461		$	50,225		$	(3,158	)	$	(435	)	$	-		$	363,190		$	570		$	410,855		$	67,019
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting principle		-			-		-			-			-			-			30,666			1,665			-			32,331			-
Net income		-			-		-			-			-			-			(34,533	)		214,902			2,524			182,893			44,681
Other comprehensive income		-			-		-			-			-			1,775			-			-			-			1,775			-
Dividends declared		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			(85,805	)		-			(85,805	)		-
Issuance of Non-Voting Common Stock:
On exercise of stock options		3,341			-		13			55,726			(2,224	)		-			-			-			-			53,515			-
Under employee stock purchase plan		144			-		1			3,766			-			-			-			-			-			3,767			-
Under employee incentive plan		132			-		-			3,655			-			-			-			-			-			3,655			-
Under restricted stock plan, net of forfeitures		980			-		4			-			-			-			-			-			-			4			-
Stock-based compensation		-			-		-			52,030			-			-			-			-			-			52,030			-
Tax benefit of stock option exercises		-			-		-			7,022			-			-			-			-			-			7,022			-
Repurchase of Non-Voting Common Stock		(7,300	)		-		(29	)		(171,577	)		-			-			-			(27,021	)		-			(198,627	)		-
Principal repayments on notes receivable from stock option exercises		-			-		-			-			941			-			-			-			-			941			-
Net subscriptions (redemptions/distributions) of non-controlling interest holders		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			(2,139	)		(2,139	)		120,666
Deconsolidation		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(125,844	)
Reclass to temporary equity		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			(66	)		(66	)		66
Purchase of non-controlling interests		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(6,611	)
Other changes in non-controlling interests		-			-		-			(847	)		-			-			-			-			-			(847	)		847
Balance, October 31, 2011		115,623		$	2	$	450		$	-		$	(4,441	)	$	1,340		$	(3,867	)	$	466,931		$	889		$	461,304		$	100,824

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (continued)

	Permanent Equity																								Temporary Equity
(in thousands)	Voting and Non- Voting Common Shares		Voting Common Stock		Non-Voting Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Notes Receivable from Stock Option Exercises			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Appropriated (Deficit) Retained Earnings			Retained Earnings			Non- Redeemable Non- Controlling Interests		Total Permanent Equity			Redeemable Non- Controlling Interests
Balance, November 1, 2011		115,623	$	2	$	450	$	-	$	(4,441	)	$	1,340	$	(3,867	)	$	466,931		$	889	$	461,304		$	100,824
Net income		-		-		-		-		-			-		22,566			203,465			3,994		230,025			34,743
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-		-			2,583		-			-			-		2,583			-
Dividends declared		-		-		-		-		-			-		-			(88,948	)		-		(88,948	)		-
Issuance of Voting Common Stock		14		-		-		56		-			-		-			-			-		56			-
Issuance of Non-Voting Common Stock:
On exercise of stock options		3,208		-		13		50,506		(535	)		-		-			-			-		49,984			-
Under employee stock purchase plan		158		-		1		3,653		-			-		-			-			-		3,654			-
Under employee incentive plan		95		-		-		2,068		-			-		-			-			-		2,068