form10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________to _________
Commission file number 001-13106
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Maryland
|
|
77-0369576
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
925 East Meadow Drive
Palo Alto, California 94303
(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)
(650) 494-3700
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” ”accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 36,414,318 shares of Common Stock as of August 2, 2012.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
FORM 10-Q
|
|
Page No.
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item 6
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
Part I -- Financial Information
"Essex" or the "Company" means Essex Property Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust incorporated in the State of Maryland, or where the context otherwise requires, Essex Portfolio, L.P., a limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership") in which Essex Property Trust, Inc. is the sole general partner.
The information furnished in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows of the Company reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the aforementioned condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods and are normal and recurring in nature, except as otherwise noted.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to such unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations herein. Additionally, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Assets
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$ |
901,942 |
|
|
$ |
860,661 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3,702,631 |
|
|
|
3,452,403 |
|
|
|
|
4,604,573 |
|
|
|
4,313,064 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(995,311 |
) |
|
|
(920,026 |
) |
|
|
|
3,609,262 |
|
|
|
3,393,038 |
|
Real estate under development
|
|
|
55,343 |
|
|
|
44,280 |
|
Co-investments
|
|
|
436,230 |
|
|
|
383,412 |
|
|
|
|
4,100,835 |
|
|
|
3,820,730 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents-unrestricted
|
|
|
4,132 |
|
|
|
12,889 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents-restricted
|
|
|
23,678 |
|
|
|
22,574 |
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
114,166 |
|
|
|
74,275 |
|
Notes and other receivables
|
|
|
50,895 |
|
|
|
66,369 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
26,859 |
|
|
|
22,682 |
|
Deferred charges, net
|
|
|
18,551 |
|
|
|
17,445 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,339,116 |
|
|
$ |
4,036,964 |
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
$ |
1,615,645 |
|
|
$ |
1,745,858 |
|
Unsecured debt
|
|
|
615,000 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
Lines of credit
|
|
|
257,102 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
62,636 |
|
|
|
48,324 |
|
Construction payable
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
6,505 |
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
43,708 |
|
|
|
39,611 |
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
20,724 |
|
|
|
20,528 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,624,412 |
|
|
|
2,478,887 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative convertible Series G preferred stock
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative redeemable Series H preferred stock at liquidation value
|
|
|
73,750 |
|
|
|
73,750 |
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 656,020,000 shares authorized 35,070,620 and 33,888,082 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,017,445 |
|
|
|
1,844,611 |
|
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings
|
|
|
(425,058 |
) |
|
|
(408,066 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
|
|
|
(72,915 |
) |
|
|
(72,771 |
) |
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
1,593,225 |
|
|
|
1,437,527 |
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
117,130 |
|
|
|
116,201 |
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,710,355 |
|
|
|
1,553,728 |
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
4,339,116 |
|
|
$ |
4,036,964 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARES
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property
|
|
$ |
129,765 |
|
|
$ |
114,906 |
|
|
$ |
255,238 |
|
|
$ |
226,114 |
|
Management and other fees
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
|
132,561 |
|
|
|
116,326 |
|
|
|
260,478 |
|
|
|
228,759 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating, excluding real estate taxes
|
|
|
30,718 |
|
|
|
28,946 |
|
|
|
59,470 |
|
|
|
56,783 |
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
11,699 |
|
|
|
10,825 |
|
|
|
23,112 |
|
|
|
21,412 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
41,801 |
|
|
|
37,250 |
|
|
|
82,535 |
|
|
|
73,908 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,764 |
|
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
10,659 |
|
Cost of management and other fees
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
3,251 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
|
91,593 |
|
|
|
83,479 |
|
|
|
179,532 |
|
|
|
164,759 |
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
40,968 |
|
|
|
32,847 |
|
|
|
80,946 |
|
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense before amortization
|
|
|
(24,659 |
) |
|
|
(22,710 |
) |
|
|
(49,316 |
) |
|
|
(44,518 |
) |
Amortization expense
|
|
|
(2,882 |
) |
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(5,754 |
) |
|
|
(5,590 |
) |
Interest and other income
|
|
|
5,455 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
7,868 |
|
|
|
9,616 |
|
Equity income (loss) in co-investments
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
(647 |
) |
Gain on remeasurement of co-investment
|
|
|
21,947 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,947 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Loss on early retirement of debt
|
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
42,490 |
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
59,692 |
|
|
|
22,608 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
10,037 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
42,490 |
|
|
|
16,053 |
|
|
|
69,729 |
|
|
|
28,560 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(4,044 |
) |
|
|
(2,304 |
) |
|
|
(7,193 |
) |
|
|
(5,851 |
) |
Net income attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
38,446 |
|
|
|
13,749 |
|
|
|
62,536 |
|
|
|
22,709 |
|
Dividends to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(2,017 |
) |
Excess of cash paid to redeem preferred stock and units over the carrying value
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
37,078 |
|
|
$ |
10,325 |
|
|
$ |
59,800 |
|
|
$ |
18,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
39,983 |
|
|
$ |
19,122 |
|
|
$ |
69,575 |
|
|
$ |
31,020 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(3,887 |
) |
|
|
(2,506 |
) |
|
|
(7,183 |
) |
|
|
(6,011 |
) |
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$ |
36,096 |
|
|
$ |
16,616 |
|
|
$ |
62,392 |
|
|
$ |
25,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period
|
|
|
34,570,772 |
|
|
|
32,040,904 |
|
|
|
34,299,331 |
|
|
|
31,754,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period
|
|
|
34,708,420 |
|
|
|
32,135,064 |
|
|
|
34,430,571 |
|
|
|
31,844,002 |
|
Dividend per common share
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars and shares in thousands)
|
|
Series H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Distributions
in excess of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
accumulated
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
loss, net
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
$ |
73,750 |
|
|
|
33,888 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,844,611 |
|
|
$ |
(408,066 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,771 |
) |
|
$ |
116,201 |
|
|
$ |
1,553,728 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
62,536 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,193 |
|
|
|
69,729 |
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges and amortization of swap settlements
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
Issuance of common stock under:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and restricted stock plans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
Sale of common stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
170,944 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
170,944 |
|
Equity based compensation costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(9,134 |
) |
|
|
(9,134 |
) |
Redemptions of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
Common and preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(79,528 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(79,528 |
) |
Balances at June 30, 2012
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
$ |
73,750 |
|
|
|
35,071 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2,017,445 |
|
|
$ |
(425,058 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,915 |
) |
|
$ |
117,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,710,355 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
69,729 |
|
|
$ |
28,560 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
(4,543 |
) |
Gain on remeasurement of co-investment
|
|
|
(21,947 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Loss on early retirement of debt
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Co-investments
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
5,754 |
|
|
|
5,590 |
|
Amortization of discount on notes receivables
|
|
|
(917 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
Amortization of discount on marketable securities
|
|
|
(2,518 |
) |
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
Gain on the sales of real estate
|
|
|
(10,870 |
) |
|
|
(5,853 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
|
82,629 |
|
|
|
74,541 |
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(4,420 |
) |
|
|
(697 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
5,133 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
129,392 |
|
|
|
104,351 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of real estate
|
|
|
(80,502 |
) |
|
|
(38,958 |
) |
Improvements to recent acquisitions
|
|
|
(3,569 |
) |
|
|
(11,804 |
) |
Redevelopment
|
|
|
(17,223 |
) |
|
|
(16,296 |
) |
Revenue generating capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1,638 |
) |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
Non-revenue generating capital expenditures
|
|
|
(7,040 |
) |
|
|
(7,711 |
) |
Acquisitons of and additions to real estate under development
|
|
|
(17,166 |
) |
|
|
(65,695 |
) |
Acquisition of membership interest in co-investment
|
|
|
(85,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Dispositions of real estate
|
|
|
27,800 |
|
|
|
15,972 |
|
Changes in restricted cash and refundable deposits
|
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(34,363 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
Sales and maturities marketable securities
|
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
27,997 |
|
Collections of notes and other receivables
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Contributions to co-investments
|
|
|
(114,746 |
) |
|
|
(43,207 |
) |
Distributions from co-investments
|
|
|
7,430 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(316,178 |
) |
|
|
(150,119 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under debt agreements
|
|
|
762,580 |
|
|
|
645,419 |
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(671,153 |
) |
|
|
(661,193 |
) |
Additions to deferred charges
|
|
|
(2,622 |
) |
|
|
(1,441 |
) |
Payment to settle derivative instruments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,395 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of Preferred stock, Series H
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
71,427 |
|
Retirement of Series B preferred units
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(78,800 |
) |
Redemption of Series F preferred stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
Equity related issuance cost
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
Net proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
5,983 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
170,944 |
|
|
|
168,592 |
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(9,134 |
) |
|
|
(9,667 |
) |
Redemption of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(4,019 |
) |
Common and preferred stock dividends paid
|
|
|
(75,431 |
) |
|
|
(67,491 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
178,029 |
|
|
|
40,824 |
|
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,757 |
) |
|
|
(4,944 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
12,889 |
|
|
|
13,753 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
4,132 |
|
|
$ |
8,809 |
|
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of $3.9 million, and $4.5 million capitalized in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
|
$ |
47,575 |
|
|
$ |
43,594 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from real estate under development to rental properties
|
|
$ |
4,294 |
|
|
$ |
40,784 |
|
Transfer from real estate under development to co-investments
|
|
$ |
148,053 |
|
|
$ |
48,886 |
|
Mortgage notes assumed in connection with purchases of real estate including the loan premiums recorded
|
|
$ |
30,298 |
|
|
$ |
10,500 |
|
Contribution of note receivable to co-investment
|
|
$ |
12,325 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Change in accrual of dividends
|
|
$ |
4,097 |
|
|
$ |
1,570 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
$ |
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
1,836 |
|
Purchase of marketable securities pending settlement
|
|
$ |
8,340 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities
|
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
Change in construction payable
|
|
$ |
2,930 |
|
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
Non-cash contribution from noncontrolling interest
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
(1) Organization and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements present the accounts of Essex Property Trust, Inc. (the “Company”), which include the accounts of the Company and Essex Portfolio, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership,” which holds the operating assets of the Company) and are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been included and are normal and recurring in nature. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 include the accounts of the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner in the Operating Partnership, with a 94.0% general partnership interest as of June 30, 2012. Total Operating Partnership units outstanding were 2,238,571 and 2,229,230 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and the redemption value of the units, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock totaled $344.6 million and $313.2 million, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned or had ownership interests in 160 apartment communities, aggregating 33,015 units, excluding the Company’s ownership in preferred interest co-investments, (collectively, the “Communities”, and individually, a “Community”), five commercial buildings and nine active development projects (collectively, the “Portfolio”). The Communities are located in Southern California (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and Ventura counties), Northern California (the San Francisco Bay Area) and the Seattle metropolitan area.
Marketable Securities
The Company reports its available for sale securities at fair value, based on quoted market prices (Level 2 for the unsecured bonds and Level 1 for the common stock and investment funds, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) standard for fair value measurements as discussed later in Note 1), and any unrealized gain or loss is recorded as other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses, interest and dividend income, and amortization of purchase discounts are included in interest and other income on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, marketable securities consisted primarily of investment-grade unsecured bonds, common stock, investments in mortgage backed securities and investment funds that invest in U.S. treasury or agency securities. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company classified its investments in mortgage backed securities, which mature in November 2019 and September 2020, as held to maturity, and accordingly, these securities are stated at their amortized cost. The estimated fair values of the mortgage backed securities (Level 2 securities) are approximately equal to the carrying values.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 marketable securities consist of the following ($ in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
Cost/
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain(Loss)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade unsecured bonds
|
|
$ |
5,227 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
5,205 |
|
Investment funds - US treasuries
|
|
|
15,383 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
42,970 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
43,691 |
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
49,294 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
49,294 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
112,874 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
|
$ |
114,166 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Cost/
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade unsecured bonds
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
4,014 |
|
Investment funds - US treasuries
|
|
|
11,783 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
11,904 |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
10,067 |
|
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
11,619 |
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
46,738 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
46,738 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
72,203 |
|
|
$ |
2,072 |
|
|
$ |
74,275 |
|
The Company uses the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of a security sold and to reclassify amounts from accumulated other comprehensive income for securities sold. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the proceeds from sales of available for sales securities totaled $5.1 million which resulted in a $0.5 million gain. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the proceeds from sales of available for sale securities totaled $5.1 million and $28.0 million, respectively, which resulted in gains of $0.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
Variable Interest Entities
The Company evaluates its investments in entities to determine whether such entities may be a variable interest entity, or VIE, and, if a VIE, whether it is the primary beneficiary and therefore should consolidate the VIE. Generally, an entity is determined to be a VIE when either: (1) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) the equity holders, as a group, lack any of the following three characteristics: (i) the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.
The Company consolidates 19 DownREIT limited partnerships (comprising twelve communities) since the Company is the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Total DownREIT units outstanding were 1,061,848 and 1,063,848 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and the redemption value of the units, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock totaled $163.4 million and $149.5 million, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The consolidated total assets and liabilities related to these VIEs, net of intercompany eliminations, were approximately $201.4 million and $174.0 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2012 and $199.8 million and $171.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. Interest holders in VIEs consolidated by the Company are allocated income equal to the cash payments made to those interest holders. The remaining results of operations are generally allocated to the Company. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company did not have any other VIEs of which it was deemed to be the primary beneficiary.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Equity Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity based compensation using the fair value method of accounting. The estimated fair value of stock options granted by the Company is being amortized over the vesting period of the stock options. The estimated grant date fair values of the long term incentive plan units (discussed in Note 13, “Equity Based Compensation Plans,” in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011) are being amortized over the expected service periods.
Stock-based compensation expense for options and restricted stock totaled $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The intrinsic value of the stock options exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 totaled $0.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively and $1.8 million and $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, the intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding totaled $16.3 million. As of June 30, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation granted under the stock option and restricted stock plans totaled $4.9 million. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1 to 6 years for the stock option plans and is expected to be recognized straight-line over 7 years for the restricted stock awards.
The Company has adopted an incentive program involving the issuance of Series Z-1 Incentive Units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. Stock-based compensation expense for Z-1 Units totaled $0.5 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and $1.1 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Stock-based compensation for Z-1 units capitalized totaled $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively and $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, the intrinsic value of the Z-1 Units subject to future vesting totaled $22.8 million. As of June 30, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost related to Z-1 Units subject to future vesting totaled $9.2 million. The unamortized cost is expected to be recognized over the next fourteen years subject to the achievement of the stated performance criteria.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company values its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques described in the FASB's accounting standard for fair value measurements. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices observable for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. The Company uses Level 1 inputs for the fair values of its cash equivalents and its marketable securities except for unsecured bonds and mortgage backed securities. The Company uses Level 2 inputs for its investments in unsecured bonds, mortgage backed securities, notes receivable, notes payable, and derivative liabilities. These inputs include interest rates for similar financial instruments. The Company’s valuation methodology for the swap related to the multifamily revenue refunding bonds for the 101 San Fernando apartment community, is described in more detail in Note 8. The Company does not use Level 3 inputs to estimate fair values of any of its financial instruments. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Management believes that the carrying amounts of its amounts outstanding under lines of credit, notes receivable and notes and other receivables approximate fair value as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, because interest rates, yields and other terms for these instruments are consistent with yields and other terms currently available for similar instruments. Management has estimated that the fair value of the Company’s $1.79 billion of fixed rate debt, including unsecured bonds, at June 30, 2012 is approximately $1.90 billion and the fair value of the Company’s $439.0 million of variable rate debt, excluding borrowings under the lines of credit, at June 30, 2012 is $417.7 million based on the terms of existing mortgage notes payable, unsecured bonds and variable rate demand notes compared to those available in the marketplace. Management believes that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, construction payables, other liabilities and dividends payable approximate fair value as of June 30, 2012 due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair values of the Company’s investments in mortgage backed securities are approximately equal to the amortized cost carrying value of these securities. Marketable securities and both the note payable and the swap related to multifamily revenue refunding bonds for the 101 San Fernando apartment community, are carried at fair value as of June 30, 2012, as discussed above and in Note 8.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Capitalization Policy
The Company capitalizes all direct and certain indirect costs, including interest and real estate taxes, incurred during development and redevelopment activities. Interest is capitalized on real estate assets that require a period of time to get them ready for their intended use. The amount of interest capitalized is based upon the average amount of accumulated development expenditures during the reporting period. Included in capitalized costs are management’s accounting estimates of the direct and incremental personnel costs and indirect project costs associated with the Company's development and redevelopment activities. Indirect project costs consist primarily of personnel costs associated with construction administration and development, including accounting, legal fees, and various office costs that clearly relate to projects under development. The Company’s capitalized internal costs related to development and redevelopment projects totaled $1.1 million during each of the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $2.2 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, most of which relates to development projects. These totals include capitalized salaries of $0.6 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $1.3 million and $1.1 million for six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Co-investments
The Company owns investments in joint ventures (“co-investments”) in which it has significant influence, but its ownership interest does not meet the criteria for consolidation in accordance with the accounting standards. Therefore, the Company accounts for these investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is carried at the cost of assets contributed, plus the Company’s equity in earnings less distributions received and the Company’s share of losses. The significant accounting policies of the Company’s co-investments entities are consistent with those of the Company in all material respects. For preferred equity investments the Company recognizes its preferred interest as equity in earnings.
Upon the acquisition of a controlling interest of a co-investment, the co-investment entity is consolidated and a gain or loss is recognized upon the remeasurement of co-investments in the consolidated statement of operations equal to the amount by which the fair-value of the co-investment interest the Company previously owned exceeds its carrying value.
A majority of the co-investments, excluding the preferred equity investments, compensate the Company for its asset management services and may provide promote distributions if certain financial return benchmarks are achieved. Asset management fees are recognized when earned, and promote fees are recognized when the earnings events have occurred and the amount is determinable and collectible.
Accounting Estimates and Reclassifications
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate portfolio, its investments in and advances to joint ventures and affiliates, its notes receivables and its qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”). The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may vary from those estimates and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions.
Reclassifications for discontinued operations have been made to prior year statements of operations balances in order to conform to current year presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on reported earnings, cash flows, total assets or total liabilities.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
(2) Significant Transactions During the Second Quarter of 2012 and Subsequent Events
Acquisitions
In April, the Company purchased the joint venture partner’s membership interest in the co-investment Essex Skyline at MacArthur Place, a 349-unit premier high-rise apartment community containing luxury amenities located in Santa Ana, California, for a total purchase price of $85.0 million. During the second quarter, the Company recorded promote income of $2.3 million included in interest and other income on the condensed consolidated statements of operations, earned as a result of achieving certain performance hurdles as defined in the joint venture agreement. Upon the acquisition of partner’s membership interest, the property was consolidated and a gain on remeasurement of the Company’s co-investment interest of $21.9 million was recorded equal to the amount by which the fair value of the Company’s previously owned noncontrolling interest exceeded its carrying value. The secured $80.0 million loan was repaid early as part of this transaction, and the property is now an unencumbered asset.
In June, the Company purchased Park Catalina, a 90-unit property located in the Koreatown submarket of Los Angeles, California containing a mix of studio, one and two bedrooms apartments, for a total purchase price of $23.7 million. Also, at the end of June, the Company purchased The Huntington, a 276-unit property located in Huntington Beach, California containing a pool, spa, fitness center and clubhouse, for a purchase price of $48.3 million. The Company assumed a $30.3 million loan secured by the property at a fixed rate of 5.7% for seven years. The interest rate on the loan was unfavorable compared to currently available market rates for mortgage loans, and thus in conjunction with the purchase price allocation, the Company recorded a $4.3 million loan premium to reflect the debt at fair value. This resulted in an effective interest rate for this loan of 3.3%.
In July, the Company purchased Montebello, a 248-unit property located in Kirkland, Washington, containing a mix of one, two and three bedroom units and townhomes, for a purchase price of $52.0 million from a related party entity. The Company assumed a $26.5 million mortgage loan secured by the property at a fixed rate of 5.6% for eight years. The interest rate on the loan was unfavorable compared to currently available market rates for mortgage loans, and thus in conjunction with the purchase price allocation, the Company is expected to record a $4.1 million loan premium to reflect the debt at fair value. This results in an effective interest rate for this loan of 3.1%.
Development
In April, the Company acquired an entity that owns a land parcel in Emeryville, California for the development of a 190-unit apartment and total estimated costs of $58.2 million. Initial occupancy is expected in the third quarter of 2014.
In June, the Company in a co-investment partnership with the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (“CPPIB”), acquired two adjacent land parcels in San Francisco, California for the development of two nine story apartment communities containing a total of 463 units and approximately 9,300 square feet of retail space. The Company expects initial occupancy in the second quarter of 2014 for a total estimated cost of $250 million. The Company holds a 55% noncontrolling interest in the venture and will earn customary management fees and may earn a promoted interest if certain performance hurdles as defined in the joint venture agreement are achieved.
In July, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase a 121-unit community under construction in Valley Village a district of Los Angeles, California. The Company made a $1.0 million deposit and will take ownership of the property upon receipt of a temporary certificate of occupancy for total estimated costs of $37.6 million, which is expected in the first quarter of 2014.
Co-investments
In early July, the Company made a $14.0 million preferred equity investment in a related party entity that owns an apartment community located in Cupertino, California. The investment has a preferred return of 9.5% and matures in May 2016. The Company will invest an additional $4.0 million in preferred equity to fund renovation costs.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Common Stock
During the second quarter, the Company sold 920,281 shares of common stock for $139.4 million, net of commissions, at an average per share price of $152.94. Year to date through July, the Company has sold 1,769,989 shares of common stock for $268.2 million, net of commissions, at an average price of $153.01.
Mortgage Notes Payable
During late June, the Company repaid $137.7 million in secured mortgage loans with a weighted average interest rate of 5.6% related to eight communities with the net proceeds from the unsecured note offering announced in March 2012. Also, the $80.0 million Essex Skyline secured loan was repaid in April. The Company incurred $1.5 million in losses from early retirement of debt, and these nine communities are now unencumbered assets.
Unsecured Term Loan
In July, the Company increased the capacity of its five-year, $200 million unsecured term loan to $350 million, and the tiered pricing structure was reduced from LIBOR + 142.5 basis points to LIBOR + 130 basis points. The $150 million of additional funds can be drawn between August and December 31, 2012.
Unsecured Line of Credit
In May, the Company amended its $425 million unsecured revolving credit facility by increasing the borrowing capacity to $500 million. The amended facility, which matures in December 2015, contains two one-year extension options and an accordion feature that allows the Company to borrow up to $600 million. Based on the Company's current BBB credit rating, the facility carries an interest rate of LIBOR + 120 basis points and a facility fee of 20 basis points.
Interest Rate Swaps
During the second quarter, the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $125 million. The first $50 million notional amount effectively converted the interest rate on the remaining $50 million of the $200 million term loan originated in the fourth quarter of 2011 to a fixed rate of 2.46%. The remaining $75 million notional amount effectively fixed $75 million of the Company’s unsecured line of credit at 2.2%.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
(3) Co-investments
The Company has co-investments, which are accounted for under the equity method. The co-investments own, operate and develop apartment communities.
The following table details the Company's co-investments (dollars in thousands):
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Investments in joint ventures accounted for under the equity method of accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership interest in Wesco I
|
|
$ |
83,919 |
|
|
$ |
75,588 |
|
Partnership interest in Fund II
|
|
|
61,560 |
|
|
|
64,294 |
|
Membership interest in a limited liability company that owns Essex Skyline at MacArthur Place
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
24,063 |
|
Total operating co-investments
|
|
|
145,479 |
|
|
|
163,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership interests in limited liability companies that own and are developing Epic, Lync, Elkhorn, and Folsom and Fifth
|
|
|
130,870 |
|
|
|
62,897 |
|
Membership interest in a limited liability company that owns and is developing Expo
|
|
|
18,518 |
|
|
|
17,981 |
|
Membership interests in limited liability companies that own and are developing Fountain at La Brea and Santa Monica at La Brea
|
|
|
15,830 |
|
|
|
15,194 |
|
Total development co-investments
|
|
|
165,218 |
|
|
|
96,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership interest in Wesco II that owns a preferred equity interest in Parkmerced with a perferred return of 10.1%
|
|
|
89,986 |
|
|
|
88,075 |
|
Preferred interests in limited liability companies that own apartment communities in downtown Los Angeles with preferred returns of 9% and 10%
|
|
|
22,792 |
|
|
|
22,792 |
|
Preferred interest in a related party limited liability company that owns Madison Park at Anaheim with a preferred return of 13%
|
|
|
12,755 |
|
|
|
12,528 |
|
Total preferred interest investments
|
|
|
125,533 |
|
|
|
123,395 |
|
Total co-investments
|
|
$ |
436,230 |
|
|
$ |
383,412 |
|
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
The combined summarized balance sheet and statements of operations for co-investments, which are accounted for under the equity method, are as follows (dollars in thousands).
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental properties and real estate under development
|
|
$ |
1,625,272 |
|
|
$ |
1,659,078 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
77,879 |
|
|
|
63,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,703,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$ |
838,003 |
|
|
$ |
900,095 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
59,915 |
|
|
|
48,518 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
805,233 |
|
|
|
774,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
1,703,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's share of equity
|
|
$ |
436,230 |
|
|
$ |
383,412 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues
|
|
$ |
28,233 |
|
|
$ |
24,084 |
|
|
$ |
62,556 |
|
|
$ |
42,596 |
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
(10,029 |
) |
|
|
(9,719 |
) |
|
|
(23,166 |
) |
|
|
(17,695 |
) |
Net property operating income
|
|
|
18,204 |
|
|
|
14,365 |
|
|
|
39,390 |
|
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7,792 |
) |
|
|
(10,549 |
) |
|
|
(16,337 |
) |
|
|
(15,410 |
) |
General and administrative
|
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,876 |
) |
|
|
(9,943 |
) |
|
|
(22,772 |
) |
|
|
(18,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
$ |
(6,165 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,435 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's share of net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
3,111 |
|
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
5,451 |
|
|
$ |
(647 |
) |
(4) Notes and Other Receivables
Notes receivable secured by real estate, and other receivables consist of the following as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable, secured, bearing interest at 9.8%, paid in full January 2012
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,331 |
|
Note receivable, secured, bearing interest at 5.0%, due November 2012 (1)
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
12,428 |
|
Note receivable, secured, bearing interest at 8.8%, due December 2012
|
|
|
10,924 |
|
|
|
10,928 |
|
Note receivable, secured, bearing interest at LIBOR + 8.0%, due December 2012
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
Note receivable, secured, bearing interest at 8.0%, due November 2013
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
Note receivable, secured, effective interest at 9.6%, due February 2014
|
|
|
18,075 |
|
|
|
17,646 |
|
Note receivable, secured, bearing interest at 4.0%, due December 2014 (2)
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
3,221 |
|
Note and other receivables from affiliates
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
5,783 |
|
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
|
$ |
50,895 |
|
|
$ |
66,369 |
|
(1) $12.4 million note receivable was contributed to the Elkhorn co-investment during the first quarter of 2012. An additional $0.9 million note was funded in the second quarter of 2012 which was contributed to the co-investment in the third quarter.
(2) During the first quarter 2012, the Company amended the loan secured by Vacationer RV Park to extend the maturity date to December 2014. Beginning January 1, 2012 the note which has a carrying value of $3.2 million, bears interest at a rate of 4%, and the borrower will fund an impound account for capital replacement.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
(5) Related Party Transactions
Management and other fees from affiliates include management, development and redevelopment fees from co-investments of $2.8 million and $1.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $5.2 million and $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. All of these fees are net of intercompany amounts eliminated by the Company.
The Company’s Chairman and founder, Mr. George Marcus, is the Chairman of The Marcus & Millichap Company, which is a holding company for certain real estate brokerage services and other subsidiary companies including Pacific Urban Residential (“PUR”). During July 2012, the Company invested $14.0 million as a preferred equity interest investment in an entity affiliated with PUR that owns an apartment community in Cupertino, California. The investment has a preferred return of 9.5% and matures in May 2016. The Company will invest an additional $4.0 million in preferred equity to fund renovation costs. Independent directors on the Company’s Board of Directors approved the investment in this entity.
Also during July 2012, the Company acquired Montebello, a 248 unit apartment community in Kirkland, Washington for $52.0 million from an entity affiliated with PUR. The Company assumed a $26.5 million mortgage loan secured by the property at a fixed rate of 5.6% for eight years. Independent directors on the Company’s Board of Directors approved the acquisition of this apartment community.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
(6) Segment Information
The Company defines its reportable operating segments as the three geographical regions in which its apartment communities are located: Southern California, Northern California and Seattle Metro. Excluded from segment revenues are properties classified in discontinued operations, management and other fees from affiliates, and interest and other income. Non-segment revenues and net operating income included in the following schedule also consist of revenue generated from commercial properties. Other non-segment assets include co-investments, real estate under development, cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, notes receivable, other assets and deferred charges.
The revenues, net operating income, and assets for each of the reportable operating segments are summarized as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
$ |
61,356 |
|
|
$ |
55,330 |
|
|
$ |
119,916 |
|
|
$ |
109,193 |
|
Northern California
|
|
|
42,570 |
|
|
|
36,550 |
|
|
|
84,192 |
|
|
|
71,867 |
|
Seattle Metro
|
|
|
22,668 |
|
|
|
20,210 |
|
|
|
44,977 |
|
|
|
39,966 |
|
Other real estate assets
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
2,816 |
|
|
|
6,153 |
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
Total property revenues
|
|
$ |
129,765 |
|
|
$ |
114,906 |
|
|
$ |
255,238 |
|
|
$ |
226,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
$ |
41,107 |
|
|
$ |
36,173 |
|
|
$ |
80,937 |
|
|
$ |
71,559 |
|
Northern California
|
|
|
29,225 |
|
|
|
24,099 |
|
|
|
58,168 |
|
|
|
47,438 |
|
Seattle Metro
|
|
|
14,841 |
|
|
|
12,774 |
|
|
|
29,673 |
|
|
|
25,331 |
|
Other real estate assets
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
Total net operating income
|
|
|
87,348 |
|
|
|
75,135 |
|
|
|
172,656 |
|
|
|
147,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and other fees from affiliates
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(41,801 |
) |
|
|
(37,250 |
) |
|
|
(82,535 |
) |
|
|
(73,908 |
) |
General and administrative
|
|
|
(5,764 |
) |
|
|
(5,385 |
) |
|
|
(11,164 |
) |
|
|
(10,659 |
) |
Cost of management and other fees
|
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
(3,251 |
) |
|
|
(1,997 |
) |
Interest expense before amortization
|
|
|
(24,659 |
) |
|
|
(22,710 |
) |
|
|
(49,316 |
) |
|
|
(44,518 |
) |
Amortization expense
|
|
|
(2,882 |
) |
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(5,754 |
) |
|
|
(5,590 |
) |
Interest and other income
|
|
|
5,455 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
7,868 |
|
|
|
9,616 |
|
Equity income (loss) from co-investments
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
(647 |
) |
Gain on remeasurement of co-investment
|
|
|
21,947 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,947 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Loss on early retirement of debt
|
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
42,490 |
|
|
$ |
10,502 |
|
|
$ |
59,692 |
|
|
$ |
22,608 |
|
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Total assets for each of the reportable operating segments are summarized as follows as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
$ |
1,682,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,018 |
|
Northern California
|
|
|
1,247,579 |
|
|
|
1,241,320 |
|
Seattle Metro
|
|
|
589,653 |
|
|
|
579,612 |
|
Other real estate assets
|
|
|
89,577 |
|
|
|
94,088 |
|
Net reportable operating segment - real estate assets
|
|
|
3,609,262 |
|
|
|
3,393,038 |
|
Real estate under development
|
|
|
55,343 |
|
|
|
44,280 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
27,810 |
|
|
|
35,463 |
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
114,166 |
|
|
|
74,275 |
|
Co-investments
|
|
|
436,230 |
|
|
|
383,412 |
|
Notes and other receivables
|
|
|
50,895 |
|
|
|
66,369 |
|
Other non-segment assets
|
|
|
45,410 |
|
|
|
40,127 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,339,116 |
|
|
$ |
4,036,964 |
|
(7) Net Income Per Common Share
(Amounts in thousands, except per share and unit data)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
37,078 |
|
|
|
34,571 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
5,135 |
|
|
|
32,041 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
34,571 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
32,041 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
37,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
|
10,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities (1)
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
|
|
|
37,132 |
|
|
|
34,708 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
32,135 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
34,708 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
32,135 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
$ |
37,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
10,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
50,379 |
|
|
|
34,299 |
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
13,183 |
|
|
|
31,755 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
|
34,299 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
31,755 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
59,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
|
18,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities (1)
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders (1)
|
|
|
50,487 |
|
|
|
34,431 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
13,183 |
|
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
|
34,431 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
$ |
59,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
18,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
(1)
|
Weighted average convertible limited partnership units of 2,239,057 and 2,230,354, which includes vested Series Z incentive units, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and 2,242,112 and 2,230,354 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were not included in the determination of diluted EPS because they were anti-dilutive. Income allocated to convertible limited partnership units, which includes vested Series Z units, aggregating $2.5 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $4.1 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, have been excluded from income available to common stock holders for the calculation of diluted income per common share since these units are excluded from the diluted weighted average common shares for the period as the effect was anti-dilutive. The Company has the ability to redeem DownREIT limited partnership units for cash and does not consider them to be potentially dilutive securities.
|
|
Stock options of 29,500 and 41,250 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation because the effects on earnings per share were anti-dilutive.
|
|
All shares of Series G cumulative convertible preferred stock have been excluded in diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, as the effect was anti-dilutive.
|
(8) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses interest rate swaps and interest rate cap contracts to manage certain interest rate risks. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company entered into four interest rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $150 million that effectively fixed the interest rate on $150 million of the $200 million unsecured term loan at 2.66% through November 2016. During the second quarter, the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $125 million. The first $50 million notional amount effectively converted the interest rate on the remaining $50 million of the $200 million term loan originated in fourth quarter of 2011 to a fixed rate of 2.46%. The remaining $75 million notional amount effectively fixed $75 million of the Company’s unsecured line of credit at 2.2%. These derivatives qualify for hedge accounting.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
As of June 30, 2012 the Company also had twelve interest rate cap contracts totaling a notional amount of $187.8 million that qualify for hedge accounting as they effectively limit the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk by providing a ceiling on the underlying variable interest rate for $202.3 million of the Company’s tax exempt variable rate debt. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the aggregate carrying value of the interest rate swap contracts was a liability of $5.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and the aggregate carrying value of the interest rate cap contracts was an asset of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
During July 2010, the Company entered into a swap transaction (the “Swap”) with respect to $38.0 million of tax-exempt bonds for the 101 San Fernando apartment community (the “Bonds”) with Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”). This swap is not designated as a hedge; accordingly the change in fair value of the swap is recorded as a gain or loss in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. Under the terms of the Swap, the Company pays a variable amount equal to the SIFMA Index plus a fixed spread on a notional amount that starts at $35.2 million and over the three-year term of the Swap increases ratably to $38.0 million. In return, Citibank pays an amount equal to the coupon on the Bonds multiplied by the outstanding par value of the Bonds, $38.0 million. The Swap has a termination date of July 12, 2013 and may be terminated by the Company at anytime commencing in July 2011 and by Citibank if certain events occur. Upon termination of the Swap, whether early or on the stated termination date, a payment based on the change in value of the Bonds will occur. Should the Bonds decline in value from the $35.2 million value of the Bonds at the inception of the Swap, the Company will be obligated to make a payment equal to 100% of the price depreciation. Should the Bonds increase in value, Citibank will be obligated to make a payment equal to approximately 85% of the price appreciation. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the fair value of the Swap was a liability of $1.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
(9) Discontinued Operations
The Company classifies real estate as "held for sale" when the sale is considered to be probable.
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company sold Tierra Del Sol/Norte, a 156 unit community located in the San Diego, California for $17.2 million for a gain of $7.0 million. Also in the first quarter, the Company sold Alpine Country, a 108 unit community located in San Diego metropolitan area, for $11.1 million for a gain of $3.9 million.
The components of discontinued operations are outlined below and include the results of operations for the respective periods that the Company owned such assets, as described above (dollars in thousands).
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
608 |
|
|
$ |
2,347 |
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
Income from real estate sold
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Gain on sale
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
10,870 |
|
|
|
5,854 |
|
Internal dispositon costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(1,087 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,551 |
|
|
$ |
10,037 |
|
|
$ |
5,952 |
|
(10) Commitments and Contingencies
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had six non-cancelable ground leases for certain apartment communities and buildings that expire between 2027 and 2080. Land lease payments are typically the greater of a stated minimum or a percentage of gross rents generated by these apartment communities. Total minimum lease commitments, under land leases and operating leases, are approximately $1.6 million per year for the next five years.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
To the extent that an environmental matter arises or is identified in the future that has other than a remote risk of having a material impact on the financial statements, the Company will disclose the estimated range of possible outcomes, and, if an outcome is probable, accrue an appropriate liability for remediation and other potential liability. The Company will consider whether such occurrence results in an impairment of value on the affected property and, if so, impairment will be recognized.
Except with respect to three communities, the Company has no indemnification agreements from third parties for potential environmental clean-up costs at its communities. The Company has no way of determining at this time the magnitude of any potential liability to which it may be the subject, arising out of unknown environmental conditions or violations with respect to the communities formerly owned by the Company. No assurance can be given that existing environmental studies with respect to any of the communities reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of a Property did not create any material environmental condition not known to the Company, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of the communities. The Company has limited insurance coverage for the types of environmental liabilities described above.
The Company may enter into transactions that may require the Company to pay the tax liabilities of the partners in the Operating Partnership or in the DownREIT entities. These transactions are within the Company’s control. Although the Company plans to hold the contributed assets or defer recognition of gain on their sale pursuant to like-kind exchange rules under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company can provide no assurance that it will be able to do so and if such tax liabilities are incurred they may have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
There have been a number of lawsuits in recent years against owners and managers of apartment communities alleging personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold in residential real estate. Some of these lawsuits have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. The Company has been sued for mold related matters and has settled some, but not all, of such matters. Insurance carriers have reacted to mold related liability awards by excluding mold related claims from standard policies and pricing mold endorsements at prohibitively high rates. The Company has, however, purchased pollution liability insurance, which includes some coverage for mold. The Company has adopted policies for promptly addressing and resolving reports of mold when it is detected, and to minimize any impact mold might have on residents of the property. The Company believes its mold policies and proactive response to address any known existence, reduces its risk of loss from these cases. There can be no assurances that the Company has identified and responded to all mold occurrences, but the company promptly addresses all known reports of mold. Liabilities resulting from such mold related matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. As of June 30, 2012, potential liabilities for mold and other environmental liabilities are not considered probable or the loss cannot be quantified or estimated.
The Company carries comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance for each of the communities. Insured risks for comprehensive liabilities covers claims in excess of $100,000 per incident, and property casualty insurance covers losses in excess of a $1.0 million deductible per incident. There are, however, certain types of extraordinary losses, such as, for example, losses from terrorism and earthquake, for which the Company does not have insurance. Substantially all of the communities are located in areas that are subject to earthquakes.
The Company provides loan and construction completion guarantees in order to fulfill the lenders’ standard financing requirements related to the construction of the Company’s co-investment developments. The Company provided a payment guarantee to the counterparties in relation to the total return swaps entered into by the joint venture responsible for the development of the Fountain at La Brea and Santa Monica at La Brea communities. Further the Company has guaranteed completion of development and made certain debt service guarantees for Fountain at La Brea and Santa Monica at La Brea. The outstanding balance for the loans is included in the debt line item in the balance sheet of the co-investments included in Note 3. The payment guarantee is for the payment of the amounts due to the counterparty related total return swaps which are scheduled to mature in September and December 2016. The maximum exposure of the guarantee as of June 30, 2012 was $38.7 million based on the aggregate outstanding debt amount.
The outstanding balance for the construction loan is included in the debt line item in the balance sheet of the co-investments included in Note 3. The construction completion guarantee is for the life of the loan, which is scheduled to mature on July 1, 2014, with two, one-year extension options at the Expo joint venture’s option. As of June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all terms of the construction loan and the construction of the community is expected to be completed on time and within budget. The maximum exposure of the guarantee as of June 30, 2012 was $76.0 million based on the construction costs that were budgeted to be incurred to complete the construction.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
The Company is subject to various other lawsuits in the normal course of its business operations. Such lawsuits are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes thereto included elsewhere herein and with the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The Company is a fully integrated Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), and its property revenues are generated primarily from apartment community operations. The Company’s investment strategy has two components: constant monitoring of existing markets, and evaluation of new markets in the Company’s current three geographical regions to identify areas with the characteristics that underlie rental growth. The Company’s strong financial condition supports its investment strategy by enhancing its ability to quickly shift the Company’s acquisition, development, and disposition activities to markets that will optimize the performance of the portfolio.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had ownership interests in 160 apartment communities, comprising 33,015 apartment units, excluding the Company’s ownership in preferred interest co-investments. The Company’s apartment communities are located in the following major West Coast regions:
Southern California (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and Ventura counties)
Northern California (the San Francisco Bay Area)
Seattle Metro (Seattle metropolitan area)
As of June 30, 2012, the Company also had ownership interests in five commercial buildings with approximately 315,900 square feet.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company’s development pipeline was comprised of two consolidated projects under development, seven unconsolidated joint venture projects under development, one unconsolidated joint venture predevelopment project and three consolidated land parcels held for future development or sale aggregating 2,985 units, with total incurred costs of $403.2 million, and estimated remaining project costs of approximately $595.5 million for total estimated project costs of $998.7 million.
The Company’s consolidated apartment communities are as follows:
|
|
As of June 30, 2012
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Apartment Units
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Apartment Units
|
|
|
%
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
13,656 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
13,068 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
Northern California
|
|
|
8,206 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
7,817 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Seattle Metro
|
|
|
6,168 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
28,030 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
26,864 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Co-investments including Fund II and Wesco I communities, and preferred equity co-investment communities are not included in the table presented above for both periods.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
The Company’s average financial occupancies for the Company’s stabilized apartment communities or “Quarterly Same-Property” (stabilized properties consolidated by the Company for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011) decreased 60 basis points to 96.2% as of June 30, 2012 from 96.8% as of June 30, 2011. Financial occupancy is defined as the percentage resulting from dividing actual rental revenue by total possible rental revenue. Actual rental revenue represents contractual rental revenue pursuant to leases without considering delinquency and concessions. Total possible rental revenue represents the value of all apartment units, with occupied units valued at contractual rental rates pursuant to leases and vacant units valued at estimated market rents. We believe that financial occupancy is a meaningful measure of occupancy because it considers the value of each vacant unit at its estimated market rate.
Market rates are determined using a variety of factors such as effective rental rates at the property based on recently signed leases and asking rates for comparable properties in the market. The recently signed effective rates at the property are used as the starting point in the determination of the market rates of vacant units. The Company then increases or decreases these rates based on the supply and demand in the apartment community’s market. The Company will check the reasonableness of these rents based on its position within the market and compare the rents against the asking rents by comparable properties in the market. Financial occupancy may not completely reflect short-term trends in physical occupancy and financial occupancy rates as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to the Company’s calculation of financial occupancy.
The Company does not take into account delinquency and concessions to calculate actual rent for occupied units and market rents for vacant units. The calculation of financial occupancy compares contractual rates for occupied units to estimated market rents for unoccupied units, thus the calculation compares the gross value of all apartment units excluding delinquency and concessions. For apartment communities that are development properties in lease-up without stabilized occupancy figures, the Company believes the physical occupancy rate is the appropriate performance metric. While an apartment community is in the lease-up phase, the Company’s primary motivation is to stabilize the property which may entail the use of rent concessions and other incentives, and thus financial occupancy which is based on contractual revenue is not considered the best metric to quantify occupancy.
The regional breakdown of the Company’s Quarterly Same-Property portfolio for financial occupancy for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
96.6 |
% |
Northern California
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
97.2 |
% |
Seattle Metro
|
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
96.7 |
% |
The following table provides a breakdown of revenue amounts, including revenues attributable to the Quarterly Same-Property portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Property Revenues (dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Same-Property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
$ |
56,437 |
|
|
$ |
54,542 |
|
|
$ |
1,895 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Northern California
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
39,420 |
|
|
|
35,956 |
|
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Seattle Metro
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
21,060 |
|
|
|
19,510 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Total Quarterly Same-Property revenues
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
116,917 |
|
|
|
110,008 |
|
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Quarterly Non-Same Property Revenues (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
7,950 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
Total property revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,765 |
|
|
$ |
114,906 |
|
|
$ |
14,859 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
(1)
|
Includes seven communities acquired after January 1, 2011, one redevelopment community, five development communities, and three commercial buildings.
|
Quarterly Same-Property Revenues increased by $6.9 million or 6.3% to $116.9 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $110.0 million in the second quarter of 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in scheduled rents of $7.2 million as reflected in an increase of 6.8% in average rental rates from $1,371 per unit in the second quarter of 2011 to $1,464 per unit in the second quarter of 2012. Scheduled rents increased by 3.9%, 10.1%, and 8.9% in Southern California, Northern California, and Seattle Metro, respectively. Income from utility billings and other income also increased $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, compared to the second quarter of 2011. Quarterly Same-Property financial occupancy decreased 60 basis points which contributed to a decrease of $1.2 million in revenues. On a sequential basis the Company experienced quarterly same-property revenue growth from the first quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2012 of 1.0%, resulting from sequential revenue growth in all three regions mainly driven by a 1.8% increase in scheduled rent offset by a 70 basis point decrease in occupancy compared to the first quarter of 2012.
Quarterly Non-Same Property Revenues increased by $8.0 million or 162% to $12.8 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $4.9 million in the second quarter of 2011. The increase was primarily due to revenue generated from five development communities (Via, Allegro, Bellerive, Muse, and Santee Village) seven communities acquired or consolidated since January 1, 2011 (Bernard, 1000 Kiely, Delano/Bon Terra, Reed Square, Park Catalina, The Huntington, and Essex Skyline at MacArthur Place).
Management and Other Fees increased by $1.4 million in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2011. The increase is primarily due to the asset and property management fees earned from Wesco I and II co-investments formed during 2011, and development fees earned from the joint ventures formed in 2011 and 2012 to develop Epic, Expo, Lync, Elkhorn, Folsom and Fifth, Fountain at La Brea, and Santa Monica at La Brea development projects.
Property operating expenses, excluding real estate taxes increased $1.8 million or 6.1% to $30.7 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $28.9 million in the second quarter of 2011, primarily due to the acquisition of seven communities and the lease-up of five development properties. Quarterly Same-Property operating expenses excluding real estate taxes, were consistent with the prior year and only increased by $0.1 million or 0.4% for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011.
Real Estate taxes increased by $0.9 million or 8.1% for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011, due primarily to the acquisition of seven communities and expensing property taxes instead of capitalizing the cost for communities that were previously under development. Quarterly Same-Property real estate taxes increased by $0.2 million or 1.8% for second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 due to an increase of 2% in property taxes for the majority of the properties located in California regulated by Prop. 13 as offset by a reduction in assessed property valuations for select communities located in California.
Depreciation expense increased by $4.6 million or 12.2% for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011, due to the acquisition of seven communities and the lease-up of five development properties. Also, the increase is due to the capitalization of approximately $17.3 million in additions to rental properties in the second quarter of 2012, including $9.0 million spent on redevelopment, $1.0 million spent on revenue generating capital and $1.1 million spent on recent acquisitions, and the capitalization of approximately $95.3 million in additions to rental properties for 2011, including $45.1 million spent on redevelopment, $16.4 million spent on improvements to recent acquisitions, and $7.6 million spent on revenue generating capital.
Cost of management and other fees increased $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to an increase in administrative costs due to hiring of additional staff to assist with the management of the Company’s co-investments including Wesco I and II and the development joint ventures formed in 2011 and 2012.
Interest expense before amortization increased by $1.9 million or 8.6% for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011, primarily due to the payoff of the $250 million secured line of credit in the fourth quarter of 2011 which had an average interest rate of 1.3%. The Company replaced the secured line with debt at an average interest rate of 2.6%. Also, on March 31, 2011, the Company sold $150 million of unsecured bonds with an interest rate of 4.4%, and thus the increase in interest expense is also due to an increase in average outstanding debt in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the second quarter of 2011. Finally, there was a decrease of $0.1 million in capitalized interest in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011.
Interest and other income increased by $2.8 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 due to $2.3 million of promote income earned from achieving certain performance hurdles related to the Essex Skyline co-investment and the sale of marketable securities for a gain of $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2012.
Equity income (loss) in co-investments increased $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2012 to income of $3.1 million compared to $0.7 million in the second quarter of 2012 primarily due to the income of $3.2 million related to the Company’s preferred equity investments made in 2011 including the Wesco II preferred equity investment made in the fourth quarter of 2011 which earned $2.2 million in the second quarter of 2012.
Gain on remeasurement of co-investment of $21.9 million recorded in the second quarter of 2012 relates to the acquisition of the joint venture partner’s membership interest of the Essex Skyline co-investment and consolidation of the property. A gain of $21.9 million was recorded due to the remeasurement of the Company’s co-investment interest which was equal to the amount by which the fair value of the Company’s previously owned noncontrolling interest exceeds its carrying value.
Income from discontinued operations for the second quarter of 2012 was $0 as compared to $5.5 million for the second quarter of 2011 due to the sale of Woodlawn Colonial for $16.0 million at a gain of $5.2 million, net of internal disposition costs.
Excess of the carrying amount of preferred stock redeemed over the cash paid to redeem preferred stock for the second quarter of 2011 was $1.9 million due to the redemption of all of the Series B preferred units, which resulted in excess of cash paid of $1.0 million over the carrying value of Series B preferred units and the redemption of Series F preferred stock which resulted in excess of cash paid of $0.9 million over the carrying value of Series F preferred stock due to deferred offering costs and original issuance discounts.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Our average financial occupancies for the Company’s stabilized apartment communities or “2012/2011 Same-Properties” (stabilized properties consolidated by the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011) decreased 20 basis points to 96.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from 96.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The regional breakdown of the Company’s 2012/2011 Same-Property portfolio for financial occupancy for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
The regional breakdown of the Company’s Quarterly Same-Property portfolio for financial occupancy for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
Southern California
|
|
|
96.3%
|
|
96.4%
|
Northern California
|
|
|
97.0%
|
|
97.1%
|
Seattle Metro
|
|
|
96.4%
|
|
96.7%
|
The following table provides a breakdown of revenue amounts, including revenues attributable to the 2012/2011 Same-Property portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|