ENSG 3.31.13 10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013.
|
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 001-33757
__________________________
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 33-0861263 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) |
27101 Puerta Real, Suite 450
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)
(949) 487-9500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
_____________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
| | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
As of April 29, 2013, 21,846,245 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Exhibit 31.1 |
Exhibit 31.2 |
Exhibit 32.1 |
Exhibit 32.2 |
Exhibit 101 |
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par values)
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Assets | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 42,536 |
| | $ | 40,685 |
|
Accounts receivable—less allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,285 and $13,811 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 98,285 |
| | 94,187 |
|
Investments—current | 3,371 |
| | 5,195 |
|
Prepaid income taxes | 8,400 |
| | 3,787 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 8,424 |
| | 8,606 |
|
Deferred tax asset—current | 13,370 |
| | 14,871 |
|
Assets held for sale—current (Note 3) | 422 |
| | 268 |
|
Total current assets | 174,808 |
| | 167,599 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 450,695 |
| | 447,855 |
|
Insurance subsidiary deposits and investments | 18,943 |
| | 17,315 |
|
Escrow deposits | 7,843 |
| | 4,635 |
|
Deferred tax asset | 3,753 |
| | 2,234 |
|
Restricted and other assets | 9,687 |
| | 8,640 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 6,037 |
| | 6,115 |
|
Long-term assets held for sale (Note 3) | 8,471 |
| | 11,324 |
|
Goodwill | 23,523 |
| | 21,557 |
|
Other indefinite-lived intangibles | 7,740 |
| | 3,588 |
|
Total assets | $ | 711,500 |
| | $ | 690,862 |
|
Liabilities and equity | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 23,206 |
| | $ | 26,069 |
|
Accrued charge related to U.S. Government inquiry (Note 16) | 48,000 |
| | 15,000 |
|
Accrued wages and related liabilities | 33,942 |
| | 35,847 |
|
Accrued self-insurance liabilities—current | 16,769 |
| | 16,034 |
|
Liabilities held for sale—current (Note 3) | 875 |
| | 339 |
|
Other accrued liabilities | 23,932 |
| | 20,871 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt | 7,242 |
| | 7,187 |
|
Total current liabilities | 153,966 |
| | 121,347 |
|
Long-term debt—less current maturities | 198,687 |
| | 200,505 |
|
Accrued self-insurance liabilities—less current portion | 36,121 |
| | 34,849 |
|
Fair value of interest rate swap | 2,597 |
| | 2,866 |
|
Long-term liabilties held for sale (Note 3) | — |
| | 130 |
|
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities | 3,213 |
| | 3,281 |
|
Total liabilities | 394,584 |
| | 362,978 |
|
| | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
| |
|
Equity: | | | |
Ensign Group, Inc. stockholders' equity: | | | |
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 75,000 shares authorized; 22,374 and 21,830 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013, respectively, and 22,244 and 21,719 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, respectively | 22 |
| | 22 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 93,730 |
| | 90,949 |
|
Retained earnings | 225,760 |
| | 239,344 |
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 296 and 301 shares at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | (2,065 | ) | | (2,099 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,580 | ) | | (1,745 | ) |
Total Ensign Group, Inc. stockholders' equity | 315,867 |
| | 326,471 |
|
Non-controlling interest | 1,049 |
| | 1,413 |
|
Total equity | 316,916 |
| | 327,884 |
|
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 711,500 |
| | $ | 690,862 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Revenue | $ | 218,201 |
| | $ | 202,040 |
|
Expense: | | | |
Cost of services (exclusive of facility rent, general and administrative and depreciation and amortization expenses shown separately below) | 176,061 |
| | 160,627 |
|
U.S. Government inquiry settlement (Note 16) | 33,000 |
| | — |
|
Facility rent—cost of services | 3,314 |
| | 3,320 |
|
General and administrative expense | 8,848 |
| | 7,697 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 7,732 |
| | 6,914 |
|
Total expenses | 228,955 |
| | 178,558 |
|
(Loss) income from operations | (10,754 | ) | | 23,482 |
|
Other income (expense): | | | |
Interest expense | (3,115 | ) | | (2,925 | ) |
Interest income | 93 |
| | 51 |
|
Other expense, net | (3,022 | ) | | (2,874 | ) |
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes | (13,776 | ) | | 20,608 |
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | (3,013 | ) | | 7,714 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations | (10,763 | ) | | 12,894 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit of $1,112 and $27 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (Note 3) | (1,748 | ) | | (66 | ) |
Net (loss) income | (12,511 | ) | | 12,828 |
|
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (364 | ) | | (76 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (12,147 | ) | | $ | 12,904 |
|
Amounts attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc.: | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | (10,399 | ) | | 12,970 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit | (1,748 | ) | | (66 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | (12,147 | ) | | 12,904 |
|
Net (loss) income per share: | | | |
Basic: |
|
| |
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.48 | ) | | $ | 0.61 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.56 | ) | | $ | 0.61 |
|
Diluted: |
|
| |
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.48 | ) | | $ | 0.60 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.56 | ) | | $ | 0.59 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | |
Basic | 21,768 |
| | 21,251 |
|
Diluted | 21,768 |
| | 21,796 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Net (loss) income | $ | (12,511 | ) | | $ | 12,828 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: | | | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap, net of income tax (benefit) expense of ($104) and $2 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 165 |
| | (5 | ) |
Comprehensive (loss) income | (12,346 | ) | | 12,823 |
|
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (364 | ) | | (76 | ) |
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (11,982 | ) | | $ | 12,899 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net (loss) income | $ | (12,511 | ) | | $ | 12,828 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Loss from sale of discontinued operations (Note 3) | 2,824 |
| | — |
|
U.S. Government inquiry settlement (Note 16) | 33,000 |
| | — |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 7,764 |
| | 6,924 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees and debt discount | 206 |
| | 203 |
|
Deferred income taxes | (121 | ) | | 1,653 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts | 2,973 |
| | 1,812 |
|
Share-based compensation | 991 |
| | 831 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation | (497 | ) | | (398 | ) |
Loss on disposition of property and equipment | 1,143 |
| | 9 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities | | | |
Accounts receivable | (7,071 | ) | | (9,532 | ) |
Prepaid income taxes | (4,613 | ) | | 5,636 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 25 |
| | 306 |
|
Insurance subsidiary deposits and investments | 196 |
| | (416 | ) |
Accounts payable | (4,860 | ) | | (6,395 | ) |
Accrued wages and related liabilities | (1,905 | ) | | (8,393 | ) |
Other accrued liabilities | 2,655 |
| | (1,583 | ) |
Accrued self-insurance | 1,681 |
| | 1,621 |
|
Deferred rent liability | (198 | ) | | 212 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | 21,682 |
| | 5,318 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | (5,216 | ) | | (7,025 | ) |
Cash payment for business acquisitions | (10,646 | ) | | (7,043 | ) |
Escrow deposits | (7,843 | ) | | (2,940 | ) |
Escrow deposits used to fund business acquisitions | 4,635 |
| | 175 |
|
Cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment | 102 |
| | 29 |
|
Restricted and other assets | (177 | ) | | (1,517 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (19,145 | ) | | (18,321 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of debt | — |
| | 21,525 |
|
Payments on long-term debt | (1,793 | ) | | (6,571 | ) |
Issuance of treasury stock upon exercise of options | 34 |
| | 120 |
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options | 1,294 |
| | 2,067 |
|
Dividends paid | — |
| | (1,283 | ) |
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation | 497 |
| | 398 |
|
Payments of deferred financing costs | (718 | ) | | (219 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (686 | ) | | 16,037 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,851 |
| | 3,034 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period | 40,685 |
| | 29,584 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period | $ | 42,536 |
| | $ | 32,618 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | |
Interest | $ | 3,094 |
| | $ | 3,096 |
|
Income taxes | $ | 160 |
| | $ | — |
|
Non-cash financing and investing activity: | | | |
|
Acquisition of redeemable noncontrolling interest | $ | — |
| | $ | 11,600 |
|
Accrued capital expenditures | $ | 1,997 |
| | $ | 1,829 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
The Company - The Ensign Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries (collectively, Ensign or the Company), provides skilled nursing and rehabilitative care services through the operation of 110 facilities, nine home health and seven hospice operations as of March 31, 2013, located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, Texas, Utah and Washington. The Company's operations, each of which strives to be the operation of choice in the community it serves, provide a broad spectrum of skilled nursing, assisted living, home health and hospice services, including physical, occupational and speech therapies, and other rehabilitative and healthcare services, for both long-term residents and short-stay rehabilitation patients. In the first quarter of 2012, the Company entered into a business to develop and operate urgent care centers. These walk-in clinics offer daily access to healthcare for minor injuries and illnesses, including x-ray and lab services, all from convenient neighborhood locations with no appointments. In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company acquired an 80% membership interest in a mobile x-ray and diagnostic company. The mobile x-ray and diagnostic company is a leader in providing mobile diagnostic services, including digital x-ray, ultrasound, electrocardiograms, ankle-brachial index, and phlebotomy services to people in their homes or at long-term care facilities. The Company's facilities have a collective capacity of approximately 12,000 operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds. As of March 31, 2013, the Company owned 87 of its 110 facilities and operated an additional 23 facilities through long-term lease arrangements, and had options to purchase two of those 23 facilities.
The Ensign Group, Inc. is a holding company with no direct operating assets, employees or revenue. All of the Company’s operations are operated by separate, independent subsidiaries, each of which has its own management, employees and assets. One of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, referred to as the Service Center, provides centralized accounting, payroll, human resources, information technology, legal, risk management and other centralized services to the other operating subsidiaries through contractual relationships with such subsidiaries. The Company also has a wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary (the Captive) that provides some claims-made coverage to the Company’s operating subsidiaries for general and professional liability, as well as coverage for certain workers’ compensation insurance liabilities.
Like the Company’s facilities, the Service Center and the Captive are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries that have their own management, employees and assets. References herein to the consolidated “Company” and “its” assets and activities, as well as the use of the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and similar verbiage in this quarterly report is not meant to imply that The Ensign Group, Inc. has direct operating assets, employees or revenue, or that any of the facilities, the Service Center or the Captive are operated by the same entity.
Other Information — The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 and for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (collectively, the Interim Financial Statements), are unaudited. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted, as permitted under applicable rules and regulations. Readers of the Interim Financial Statements should refer to the Company’s audited consolidated statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012 which are included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-33757 (the Annual Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Management believes that the Interim Financial Statements reflect all adjustments which are of a normal and recurring nature necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position and results of operations in all material respects. The results of operations presented in the Interim Financial Statements are not necessarily representative of operations for the entire year.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation - The accompanying Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company is the sole member or shareholder of various consolidated limited liability companies and corporations; each established to operate various acquired skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, home health and hospice operations, urgent care centers and related ancillary services. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company presents noncontrolling interest within the equity section of its consolidated balance sheets. The Company presents the amount of consolidated net income that is attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. and the noncontrolling interest in its consolidated statements of operations.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all entities controlled by the Company through its ownership of a majority voting interest and the accounts of any variable interest entities (VIEs) where the Company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE's activities, or entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns, or both. The Company assesses the requirements related to the consolidation of VIEs, including a qualitative assessment of power and economics that considers which entity has the power to direct the activities that "most significantly impact" the VIE's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to, the VIE. The Company's relationship with variable interest entities was not material at March 31, 2013.
On March 25, 2013, the Company agreed to terms to sell Doctors Express (DRX), a national urgent care franchise system. The asset sale was effective on April 15, 2013. The results of operations for DRX have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 3, Discontinued Operations) in the accompanying Interim Financial Statements. Certain asset and liabilities included in the sale of DRX have been presented as held for sale in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. In additions, the results of operations of DRX and the loss or impairment related to this divesture have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Estimates and Assumptions — The preparation of Interim Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. The most significant estimates in the Company’s Financial Statements relate to revenue, allowance for doubtful accounts, intangible assets and goodwill, impairment of long-lived assets, general and professional liability, worker’s compensation, and healthcare claims included in accrued self-insurance liabilities, other contingent liabilities, interest rate swaps, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Business Segments — The Company has a single reportable segment — long-term care services, which includes the operation of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, home health and hospice operations, urgent care centers and related ancillary services. The Company’s single reportable segment is made up of several individual operating segments grouped together principally based on their geographical locations within the United States. Based on the similar economic and other characteristics of each of the operating segments, management believes the Company meets the criteria for aggregating its operating segments into a single reportable segment.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, debt security investments, interest rate swap agreements, accounts receivable, insurance subsidiary deposits, accounts payable and borrowings. The Company believes all of the financial instruments’ recorded values approximate fair values because of their nature or respective short durations. The interest rate swap is carried at fair value on the balance sheet. The Company’s fixed-rate debt instruments do not actively trade in an established market. The fair values of this debt are estimated by discounting the principal and interest payments at rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and maturities. See further discussion of debt security investments in Note 5, Fair Value Measurements.
Revenue Recognition — The Company recognizes revenue when the following four conditions have been met: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered; (iii) the price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. The Company's revenue is derived primarily from providing healthcare services to residents and is recognized on the date services are provided at amounts billable to individual residents. For residents under reimbursement arrangements with third-party payors, including Medicaid, Medicare and private insurers, revenue is recorded based on contractually agreed-upon amounts on a per patient, daily basis.
Revenue from the Medicare and Medicaid programs accounted for 72.8% and 73.9% of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The Company records revenue from these governmental and managed care programs as services are performed at their expected net realizable amounts under these programs. The Company’s revenue from governmental and managed care programs is subject to audit and retroactive adjustment by governmental and third-party agencies. Consistent with healthcare industry accounting practices, any changes to these governmental revenue estimates are recorded in the period the change or adjustment becomes known based on final settlement. The Company recorded retroactive adjustments that increased revenue by $1,085 and $317 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. A majority of the retroactive adjustment increase for the three months ended March 31, 2013, noted above, was offset by retroactive increases in quality assurance fees at the Company's California and Arizona facilities.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company’s service specific revenue recognition policies are as follows:
Skilled Nursing Revenue
The Company’s revenue is derived primarily from providing long-term healthcare services to residents and is recognized on the date services are provided at amounts billable to individual residents. For residents under reimbursement arrangements with third-party payors, including Medicaid, Medicare and private insurers, revenue is recorded based on contractually agreed-upon amounts on a per patient, daily basis. The Company records revenue from private pay patients, at the agreed upon rate, as services are performed.
Home Health Revenue
Medicare Revenue
Net service revenue is recorded under the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) based on a 60-day episode payment rate that is subject to adjustment based on certain variables including, but not limited to: (a) an outlier payment if patient care was unusually costly; (b) a low utilization payment adjustment (LUPA) if the number of visits was fewer than five; (c) a partial payment if the patient transferred to another provider or the Company received a patient from another provider before completing the episode; (d) a payment adjustment based upon the level of therapy services required; (e) the number of episodes of care provided to a patient, regardless of whether the same home health provider provided care for the entire series of episodes; (f) changes in the base episode payments established by the Medicare Program; (g) adjustments to the base episode payments for case mix and geographic wages; and (h) recoveries of overpayments.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) added two regulations to PPS that became effective April 1, 2011: (1) a face-to-face encounter requirement and (2) changes to the therapy assessment schedule, which require additional patient evaluations and certifications. As a condition for Medicare payment, the first regulation mandates that prior to certifying a patient's eligibility for the home health benefit, the certifying physician must document that they have had a face-to-face encounter with the patient. The second regulation mandates that periodic assessments be made by a professional qualified therapist at designated intervals, including at least once every 30 days during a therapy patient's course of treatment. Management evaluates the potential for revenue adjustments as a result of these regulations.
We make adjustments to Medicare revenue on completed episodes to reflect differences between estimated and actual payment amounts, an inability to obtain appropriate billing documentation or authorizations acceptable to the payor and other reasons unrelated to credit risk. Therefore, we believe that our reported net service revenue and patient accounts receivable will be the net amounts to be realized from Medicare for services rendered.
In addition to revenue recognized on completed episodes, we also recognize a portion of revenue associated with episodes in progress. Episodes in progress are 60-day episodes of care that begin during the reporting period, but were not completed as of the end of the period.
Non-Medicare Revenue
Episodic Based Revenue — The Company recognizes revenue in a similar manner as we recognize Medicare revenue for episodic-based rates that are paid by other insurance carriers, including Medicare Advantage programs; however, these rates can vary based upon the negotiated terms.
Non-episodic Based Revenue — Revenue is recorded on an accrual basis based upon the date of service at amounts equal to our established or estimated per-visit rates, as applicable.
Hospice Revenue
Revenue is recorded on an accrual basis based upon the date of service at amounts equal to the estimated payment rates. The estimated payment rates are daily rates for each of the levels of care we deliver. The Company makes adjustments to revenue for an inability to obtain appropriate billing documentation or authorizations acceptable to the payor and other reasons unrelated to credit risk. Additionally, as Medicare hospice revenue is subject to an inpatient cap limit and an overall payment cap, the Company monitors its provider numbers and estimates amounts due back to Medicare if a cap has been exceeded. The Company records these adjustments as a reduction to revenue and increases other accrued liabilities.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due from Medicare and Medicaid programs, other government programs, managed care health plans and private payor sources. Estimated provisions for doubtful accounts are recorded to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular account will not be collected.
In evaluating the collectability of accounts receivable, the Company considers a number of factors, including the age of the accounts, changes in collection patterns, the composition of patient accounts by payor type and the status of ongoing disputes with third-party payors. On an annual basis, the historical collection percentages are reviewed by payor and by state and are updated to reflect the recent collection experience of the Company. In order to determine the appropriate reserve rate percentages which ultimately establish the allowance, the Company analyzes historical cash collection patterns by payor and by state. The percentages applied to the aged receivable balances are based on the Company’s historical experience and time limits, if any, for managed care, Medicare, Medicaid and other payors. The Company periodically refines its estimates of the allowance for doubtful accounts based on experience with the estimation process and changes in circumstances.
Equity Investment — One of the Company's subsidiaries has a non-marketable equity investment which is accounted for under the equity method. The investment is initially recorded at cost and the Company adjusts the carrying amount for its share of the earnings or losses of the investee after the date of investment. The investment is evaluated periodically for impairment. If it is determined that a decline of the investment is other than temporary, then the carrying amount would be written down to fair value and the write-down would be included in earnings as a loss.
Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are initially recorded at their historical cost. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets (generally ranging from three to 30 years). Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the remaining lease term.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets that are held and used in the Company’s operations for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is determined based upon expected undiscounted future net cash flows from the operations to which the assets relate, utilizing management’s best estimate, appropriate assumptions, and projections at the time. If the carrying value is determined to be unrecoverable from future operating cash flows, the asset is deemed impaired and an impairment loss would be recognized to the extent the carrying value exceeded the estimated fair value of the asset. The Company estimates the fair value of assets based on the estimated future discounted cash flows of the asset. Management has evaluated its long-lived assets and has not identified any asset impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill — Definite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of favorable leases, lease acquisition costs, patient base, facility trade names and customer relationships. Favorable leases and lease acquisition costs are amortized over the life of the lease of the facility, typically ranging from ten to 20 years. Patient base is amortized over a period of four to eight months, depending on the classification of the patients and the level of occupancy in a new acquisition on the acquisition date. Trade names at facilities are amortized over 30 years and customer relationships are amortized over 20 years.
The Company's indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trade names and home health and hospice Medicare licenses. The Company tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible asset may not be recoverable.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is subject to annual testing for impairment. In addition, goodwill is tested for impairment if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company defines reporting units as the individual operations. The Company performs its annual test for impairment during the fourth quarter of each year. See further discussion at Note 10, Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets.
Self-Insurance — The Company is partially self-insured for general and professional liability up to a base amount per claim (the self-insured retention) with an aggregate, one-time deductible above this limit. Losses beyond these amounts are insured through third-party policies with coverage limits per occurrence, per location and on an aggregate basis for the Company. For claims made after April 1, 2013, the combined self-insured retention was $500 per claim with an aggregate $1,750 deductible limit. For all facilities, except those located in Colorado, the third-party coverage above these limits was $1,000 per occurrence, $3,000 per facility, with a $10,000 blanket aggregate and an additional state-specific aggregate where required by state law. In Colorado, the third-party coverage above these limits was $1,000 per occurrence and $3,000 per facility, which is independent of the $10,000 blanket aggregate applicable to our other 104 facilities.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The self-insured retention and deductible limits for general and professional liability and workers' compensation are self-insured through the Captive, the related assets and liabilities which are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Captive is subject to certain statutory requirements as an insurance provider. These requirements include, but are not limited to, maintaining statutory capital. The Company’s policy is to accrue amounts equal to the actuarially estimated costs to settle open claims of insureds, as well as an estimate of the cost of insured claims that have been incurred but not reported. The Company develops information about the size of the ultimate claims based on historical experience, current industry information and actuarial analysis, and evaluates the estimates for claim loss exposure on a quarterly basis. Accrued general liability and professional malpractice liabilities recorded on an undiscounted basis, net of anticipated insurance recoveries, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets were $33,495 and $33,215 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries are self-insured for workers’ compensation liability in California. To protect itself against loss exposure in California with this policy, the Company has purchased individual stop-loss insurance coverage that insures individual claims that exceed $500 for each claim. In Texas, the operating subsidiaries have elected non-subscriber status for workers’ compensation claims and, effective February 1, 2011, the Company has purchased individual stop-loss coverage that insures individual claims that exceed $750 for each claim. The Company’s operating subsidiaries in other states have third party guaranteed cost coverage. In California and Texas, the Company accrues amounts equal to the estimated costs to settle open claims, as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported. The Company uses actuarial valuations to estimate the liability based on historical experience and industry information. Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and were $13,263 and $11,983 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
In addition, the Company has recorded an asset and equal liability of $3,545 and $3,219 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, in order to present the ultimate costs of malpractice and workers' compensation claims and the anticipated insurance recoveries on a gross basis.
The Company provides self-insured medical (including prescription drugs) and dental healthcare benefits to the majority of its employees. The Company is fully liable for all financial and legal aspects of these benefit plans. To protect itself against loss exposure with this policy, the Company has purchased individual stop-loss insurance coverage that insures individual claims that exceed $250 for each covered person with an aggregate individual stop loss deductible of $75. The Company’s accrued liability under these plans recorded on an undiscounted basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets was $2,587 and $2,467 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The Company believes that adequate provision has been made in the Financial Statements for liabilities that may arise out of patient care, workers’ compensation, healthcare benefits and related services provided to date. The amount of the Company’s reserves was determined based on an estimation process that uses information obtained from both company-specific and industry data. This estimation process requires the Company to continuously monitor and evaluate the life cycle of the claims. Using data obtained from this monitoring and the Company’s assumptions about emerging trends, the Company, with the assistance of an independent actuary, develops information about the size of ultimate claims based on the Company’s historical experience and other available industry information. The most significant assumptions used in the estimation process include determining the trend in costs, the expected cost of claims incurred but not reported and the expected costs to settle or pay damage awards with respect to unpaid claims. The self-insured liabilities are based upon estimates, and while management believes that the estimates of loss are reasonable, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the recorded amounts. Due to the inherent volatility of actuarially determined loss estimates, it is reasonably possible that the Company could experience changes in estimated losses that could be material to net income. If the Company’s actual liability exceeds its estimates of loss, its future earnings, cash flows and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Income Taxes —Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at tax rates in effect when such temporary differences are expected to reverse. The Company generally expects to fully utilize its deferred tax assets; however, when necessary, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
For interim reporting purposes, the provision for income taxes is determined based on the estimated annual effective income tax rate applied to pre-tax income, adjusted for certain discrete items occurring during the period. In determining the effective income tax rate for interim financial statements, the Company must consider expected annual income, permanent differences between financial reporting and tax recognition of income or expense and other factors. When the Company takes uncertain income tax positions that do not meet the recognition criteria, it records a liability for underpayment of income taxes and related interest and penalties, if any. In considering the need for and magnitude of a liability for such positions, the Company must consider the potential outcomes from a review of the positions by the taxing authorities.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In determining the need for a valuation allowance, the annual income tax rate for interim periods, or the need for and magnitude of liabilities for uncertain tax positions, the Company makes certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are based on, among other things, knowledge of operations, markets, historical trends and likely future changes and, when appropriate, the opinions of advisors with knowledge and expertise in certain fields. Due to certain risks associated with the Company’s estimates and assumptions, actual results could differ.
Noncontrolling Interest — The noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is initially recognized at estimated fair value on the acquisition date and is presented within total equity in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company presents the noncontrolling interest and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. in its condensed consolidated statements of operations and net income (loss) per share is calculated based on net income (loss) attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc.'s stockholders. The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is adjusted based on an allocation of subsidiary earnings based on ownership interest.
Stock-Based Compensation — The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options based on estimated fair values, ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Net income has been reduced as a result of the recognition of the fair value of all stock options and restricted stock awards issued, the amount of which is contingent upon the number of future grants and other variables.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities — The Company evaluates variable and fixed interest rate risk exposure on a routine basis and to the extent the Company believes that it is appropriate, it will offset most of its variable risk exposure by entering into interest rate swap agreements. It is the Company's policy to only utilize derivative instruments for hedging purposes (i.e. not for speculation). The Company formally designates its interest rate swap agreements as hedges and documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items. The Company formally assesses effectiveness of its hedging relationships, both at the hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, then measures and records ineffectiveness. The Company would discontinue hedge accounting prospectively (i) if it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting change in the cash flows of a hedged item, (ii) when the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, (iii) if it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur, or (iv) if management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate. The Company’s derivative is recorded on the balance sheet at its fair value.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) — Accumulated other comprehensive loss refers to revenue, expenses, gains, and losses that are recorded as an element of stockholders’ equity but are excluded from net income. The Company’s other comprehensive loss consists of net deferred gains and losses on certain derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges. As of March 31, 2013, accumulated other comprehensive losses were $2,597, recorded net of tax of $1,017 or $1,580, in stockholders' equity. As of December 31, 2012, accumulated other comprehensive losses were $2,866, net of tax of $1,121 or $1,745.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements — In February 2013, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which requires entities to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component in both the statement in which net income is presented and the statement in which other comprehensive income (loss) is presented. The update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012, however, early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this provision during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The adoption of this provision did not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
In July 2012, the FASB clarified that an advance fee from a continuing care retirement community resident should be classified as deferred revenue if (1) the contract stipulates that this advance fee must be repaid when a room is reoccupied by a future resident and (2) the refundable amount is "limited to the proceeds from reoccupancy." If the refundable amount is not limited to the proceeds from reoccupancy, the advance fee must be reported as a liability. The above clarification is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012, however early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this clarification during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The adoption of this clarification did not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On March 25, 2013, the Company agreed to terms to sell DRX, a national urgent care franchise system for approximately $8,000, adjusted for certain assets and liabilities. The asset sale was effective on April 15, 2013. The sale resulted in a pre-tax loss of $2,824 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The assets acquired at the initial purchase of DRX, including noncontrolling interest, were recorded at fair value. The initial fair value was greater than total cash paid to acquire all interests in DRX and the subsequent sale price. The sale of DRX has been accounted for as discontinued operations. Accordingly, the results of operations of this business for all periods presented and the loss related to this divesture have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As the sale was effective April 15, 2013, all assets and liabilities included in the sale were recorded as held for sale on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
A summary of discontinued operations follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2013 | | 2012 |
Revenue | | 624 |
| | 120 |
|
Cost of services (exclusive of facility rent, general and administrative and depreciation and amortization expenses shown separately below) | | (621 | ) | | (202 | ) |
Charges to discontinued operations for the excess carrying amount of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets | | (2,824 | ) | | — |
|
Facility rent—cost of services | | (7 | ) | | (1 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | (32 | ) | | (10 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | (2,860 | ) | | (93 | ) |
Benefit from income taxes | | (1,112 | ) | | (27 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit | | (1,748 | ) | | (66 | ) |
A summary of the net assets held for sale are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Current assets | | 422 |
| | 268 |
|
Long-term assets: | | | | |
Goodwill, net | | — |
| | 1,099 |
|
Other identifiable intangible assets, net | | 8,446 |
| | 10,200 |
|
Other long-term assets, net | | 25 |
| | 25 |
|
Total assets held for sale | | 8,893 |
| | 11,592 |
|
| | | | |
Current liabilities | | (875 | ) | | (339 | ) |
Long-term liabilities | | — |
| | (130 | ) |
Total liabilities held for sale | | (875 | ) | | (469 | ) |
Net assets held for sale | | 8,018 |
| | 11,123 |
|
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
4. COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing (loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Ensign Group, Inc. stockholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares for the period. The computation of diluted net income per share is similar to the computation of basic net income per share except that the denominator is increased to include contingently returnable shares and the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued.
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic net income per common share follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Numerator: | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | $ | (10,763 | ) | | $ | 12,894 |
|
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (364 | ) | | (76 | ) |
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | (10,399 | ) | | 12,970 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit | (1,748 | ) | | (66 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | (12,147 | ) | | 12,904 |
|
| | | |
Denominator: | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic net income per share | 21,768 |
| | 21,251 |
|
| | | |
Basic net (loss) income per common share: | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.48 | ) | | $ | 0.61 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.56 | ) | | $ | 0.61 |
|
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of diluted net income per common share follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Numerator: | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | $ | (10,763 | ) | | $ | 12,894 |
|
Less: net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests | (364 | ) | | (76 | ) |
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | (10,399 | ) | | 12,970 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit | (1,748 | ) | | (66 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | (12,147 | ) | | 12,904 |
|
Denominator: | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 21,768 |
| | 21,251 |
|
Plus: incremental shares from assumed conversion (1) | — |
| | 545 |
|
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding | 21,768 |
| | 21,796 |
|
Diluted net (loss) income per common share: | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.48 | ) | | $ | 0.60 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | $ | (0.56 | ) | | $ | 0.59 |
|
(1) Options outstanding which are anti-dilutive and therefore not factored into the weighted average common shares amount above were 417 and 138 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company had 400 options and 42 unvested restricted awards outstanding that were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive based on the application of the treasury stock method.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3, defined as observable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 42,536 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 40,685 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Fair value of interest rate swap | | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,597 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,866 |
| | $ | — |
|
Our non-financial assets, which include long-lived assets, including goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment, are reported at carrying value and are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, on a periodic basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable, we assess our long-lived assets for impairment. When impairment has occurred, such long-lived assets are written down to fair value. See Note 2 for further discussion of our significant accounting policies.
Debt Security Investments - Held to Maturity
At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had approximately $22,314 and $22,510, respectively, in debt security investments which were held to maturity and carried at amortized cost. The carrying value of the debt securities approximates fair value. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these debt securities to maturity. Further, at March 31, 2013, $6,246 is held in AA-rated debt securities backed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, and $16,068 is held in A-rated debt securities.
Interest Rate Swap Agreement
In connection with the Senior Credit Facility with a six-bank lending consortium arranged by SunTrust and Wells Fargo (the Senior Credit Facility), in July 2011, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in accordance with Company policy to reduce risk from volatility in the income statement due to changes in the LIBOR interest rate. The swap agreement, with a notional amount of $75,000, amortizing concurrently with the related term loan portion of the Facility, was five years in length and set to mature on July 15, 2016. The interest rate swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge and, as such, changes in fair value are reported in other comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with hedge accounting. Under the terms of this swap agreement, the net effect of the hedge was to record swap interest expense at a fixed rate of approximately 4.3%, exclusive of fees. Net interest paid under the swap was $252 and $226 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In addition, based on the March 31, 2013 interest rate swap valuation, the Company expects to record swap interest expense of approximately $1,000 during the year ended December 31, 2013.
The Company assesses hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis by performing a regression analysis. The regression analysis compares to the historical monthly changes in fair value of the interest rate swap to the historical monthly changes in the fair value of a hypothetically perfect interest rate swap over the trailing 30 months. The change in fair value of the hypothetical derivative is regarded as a proxy for the present value of the cumulative change in the expected future cash flows on the hedged transaction. The regression analysis serves as the Company's prospective and retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness. Assuming the hedging relationship qualifies as highly effective, the actual swap will be recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be adjusted to reflect the lesser of either the cumulative change in the fair value of the actual swap or the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetical derivative.
The interest rate swap agreement is recorded at fair value based upon valuation models which utilize relevant factors such as the contractual terms of the interest rate swap agreements, credit spreads for the contracting parties and interest rate curves. Based on this valuation method, the Company categorized the interest rate swap as Level 2 and recorded accumulated other comprehensive losses as of March 31, 2013 of $2,597, net of tax of $1,017, or $1,580, in stockholders' equity, compared to $2,866 net of tax of $1,121, or $1,745 as of December 31, 2012. There are no amounts attributable to hedge ineffectiveness that were required to be recognized in earnings.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
6. REVENUE AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is summarized in the following table: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| Revenue | | % of Revenue | | Revenue | | % of Revenue |
Medicaid | $ | 76,510 |
|
| 35.0 | % |
| $ | 73,583 |
| | 36.4 | % |
Medicare | 73,928 |
|
| 33.9 |
|
| 69,794 |
| | 34.6 |
|
Medicaid — skilled | 8,472 |
|
| 3.9 |
|
| 5,861 |
| | 2.9 |
|
Total Medicaid and Medicare | 158,910 |
|
| 72.8 |
|
| 149,238 |
| | 73.9 |
|
Managed care | 29,186 |
|
| 13.4 |
|
| 25,692 |
| | 12.7 |
|
Private and other payors | 30,105 |
|
| 13.8 |
|
| 27,110 |
| | 13.4 |
|
Revenue | $ | 218,201 |
|
| 100.0 | % |
| $ | 202,040 |
| | 100.0 | % |
Accounts receivable as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is summarized in the following table: |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
|
Medicaid | $ | 36,077 |
| | $ | 28,534 |
|
Managed care | 28,515 |
| | 26,707 |
|
Medicare | 33,241 |
| | 32,168 |
|
Private and other payors | 14,737 |
| | 20,589 |
|
| 112,570 |
| | 107,998 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts | (14,285 | ) | | (13,811 | ) |
Accounts receivable | $ | 98,285 |
| | $ | 94,187 |
|
7. ACQUISITIONS
The Company’s acquisition policy is generally to purchase or lease operations to complement the Company’s existing portfolio. The results of all the Company’s operations are included in the accompanying Interim Financial Statements subsequent to the date of acquisition. Acquisitions are typically paid for in cash and are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Where the Company enters into facility lease agreements, the Company typically does not pay any material amount to the prior facility operator nor does the Company acquire any assets or assume any liabilities, other than rights and obligations under the lease and operations transfer agreement, as part of the transaction. Some leases include options to purchase the facilities. As a result, from time to time, the Company will acquire facilities that the Company has been operating under third-party leases.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company acquired one stand-alone skilled nursing facility, three home health operations and three hospice operations. The aggregate purchase price of the seven business acquisitions was approximately $10,646, which was paid in cash. The Company also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of each transaction. The operations acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2013 are as follows:
| |
• | On January 1, 2013, the Company acquired a home health operation in Washington for approximately $2,801, which was paid in cash. The acquisition did not have an impact on the Company's operational bed count. The Company recognized $1,966 and $815 in goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, respectively, as part of this transaction. |
| |
• | On January 1, 2013, the Company acquired two hospice operations in Arizona and California, respectively, for approximately $1,825, which was paid in cash. The acquisition did not have an impact on the Company's operational bed count. The Company recognized $1,825 in other indefinite-lived intangible assets as part of these transactions. |
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| |
• | On February 16, 2013, the Company acquired a home health operation in Texas for approximately $375, which was paid in cash. This acquisition did not have an impact on the Company's operational bed count. The Company recognized $375 in other indefinite-lived intangible assets as part of this transaction. |
| |
• | On March 1, 2013, the Company acquired a home health and hospice operation in Washington for approximately $1,137, which was paid in cash. This acquisition did not have an impact on the Company's operational bed count. The Company recognized $1,137 in other indefinite-lived intangible assets as part of this transaction. |
| |
• | On March 1, 2013, the Company purchased an skilled nursing facility in Texas for approximately $4,508, which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 150 operational skilled nursing beds to the Company's operations. |
The table below presents the allocation of the purchase price for the operations acquired in business combinations during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Land | $ | 340 |
| | $ | 547 |
|
Building and improvements | 3,925 |
| | 4,114 |
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures | 188 |
| | 114 |
|
Assembled occupancy | 75 |
| | 116 |
|
Goodwill | 1,966 |
| | — |
|
Other indefinite-lived intangible assets | 4,152 |
| | 530 |
|
| $ | 10,646 |
| | $ | 5,421 |
|
On April 1, 2013, the Company acquired three skilled nursing facilities in Texas for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7,100, which was paid in cash. These acquisitions added 337 operational skilled nursing beds to the Company's operations. The Company also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction. As of the date of this filing, the preliminary allocation of the purchase price was not completed as necessary valuation information was not yet available.
In addition, on May 1, 2013, the Company acquired two skilled nursing facilities and one assisted living facility in two separate transactions, for and aggregate purchase price of approximately $14,250, which was paid in cash. These acquisitions added 180 operational skilled nursing beds and 90 operational assisted living units to the Company's operations. The Company also entered into separate operations transfer agreements with the prior tenants as a part of each transaction. As of the date of this filing, the preliminary allocation of the purchase price was not completed for either transaction as necessary valuation information was not yet available.
The Company’s acquisition strategy has been focused on identifying both opportunistic and strategic acquisitions within its target markets that offer strong opportunities for return on invested capital. The operations acquired by the Company are frequently underperforming financially and can have regulatory and clinical challenges to overcome. Financial information, especially with underperforming operations, is often inadequate, inaccurate or unavailable. Consequently, the Company believes that prior operating results are not meaningful, representative of the Company’s current operating results or indicative of the integration potential of its newly acquired operations. The businesses acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2013 were not material acquisitions to the Company individually or in the aggregate. Accordingly, pro forma financial information is not presented. These acquisitions have been included in the March 31, 2013 condensed consolidated balance sheet of the Company, and the operating results have been included in the condensed consolidated statement of income of the Company since the dates the Company gained effective control.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
8. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
|
Land | $ | 70,826 |
| | $ | 70,487 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 348,059 |
| | 341,096 |
|
Equipment | 87,201 |
| | 80,860 |
|
Furniture and fixtures | 8,810 |
| | 8,790 |
|
Leasehold improvements | 42,515 |
| | 32,570 |
|
Construction in progress | 979 |
| | 14,185 |
|
| 558,390 |
| | 547,988 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation | (107,695 | ) | | (100,133 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 450,695 |
| | $ | 447,855 |
|
9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS — Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Weighted Average Life (Years) | | March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | |
Intangible Assets | | | | | Net | | | | Net |
Lease acquisition costs | | 15.5 |
| | $ | 684 |
| | $ | (556 | ) | | $ | 128 |
| | $ | 684 |
| | $ | (545 | ) | | $ | 139 |
|
Favorable lease | | 15.0 |
| | 1,596 |
| | (452 | ) | | 1,144 |
| | 1,596 |
| | (426 | ) | | 1,170 |
|
Assembled occupancy | | 0.5 |
| | 2,329 |
| | (2,267 | ) | | 62 |
| | 2,255 |
| | (2,211 | ) | | 44 |
|
Facility trade name | | 30.0 |
| | 733 |
| | (177 | ) | | 556 |
| | 733 |
| | (171 | ) | | 562 |
|
Customer relationships | | 20.0 |
| | 4,200 |
| | (53 | ) | | 4,147 |
| | 4,200 |
| | — |
| | 4,200 |
|
Total | | | | $ | 9,542 |
| | $ | (3,505 | ) | | $ | 6,037 |
| | $ | 9,468 |
| | $ | (3,353 | ) | | $ | 6,115 |
|
Amortization expense was $182 and $239 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Of the $182 in amortization expense incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013, approximately $56 related to the amortization of patient base intangible assets at recently acquired facilities, which is typically amortized over a period of four to eight months, depending on the classification of the patients and the level of occupancy in a new acquisition on the acquisition date.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the years ending December 31 is as follows: |
| | | |
Year | Amount |
2013 (remainder) | $ | 351 |
|
2014 | 385 |
|
2015 | 365 |
|
2016 | 345 |
|
2017 | 345 |
|
2018 | 345 |
|
Thereafter | 3,901 |
|
| $ | 6,037 |
|
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
10. GOODWILL AND OTHER INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of each year for each reporting unit that constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is produced and reviewed by operating segment management and provides services that are distinct from the other components of the operating segment. The Company tests for impairment by comparing the net assets of each reporting unit to their respective fair values. The Company determines the estimated fair value of each reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis. In the event a unit's net assets exceed its fair value, an implied fair value of goodwill must be determined by assigning the unit's fair value to each asset and liability of the unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss is measured by the difference between the goodwill carrying value and the implied fair value.
On March 25, 2013, the Company agreed to terms to sell DRX, a national urgent care franchise system for approximately $8,000, adjusted for certain assets and liabilities. The asset sale was effective on April 15, 2013. The sale resulted in a pre-tax loss of $2,824 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The Company recognized charges to discontinued operations for the excess carrying amount of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $1,099 and $1,725, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2013 as part of this transaction.
The following table represents activity in goodwill as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2013:
|
| | | |
| Goodwill |
December 31, 2012 | $ | 22,656 |
|
Less: charges to discontinued operations for the excess carrying amount of goodwill | (1,099 | ) |
Additions | 1,966 |
|
March 31, 2013 | $ | 23,523 |
|
As of March 31, 2013, the Company anticipates that total goodwill recognized will be fully deductible for tax purposes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded $4,109 and $43 in home health and hospice Medicare license and trade name indefinite-lived intangible assets, respectively, as part of its acquisition of three home health and three hospice operations.
Other indefinite-lived intangible assets consists of the following: |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Trade name | $ | 1,033 |
| | $ | 990 |
|
Home health and hospice Medicare license | 6,707 |
| | 2,598 |
|
| $ | 7,740 |
| | $ | 3,588 |
|
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
11. RESTRICTED AND OTHER ASSETS
Restricted and other assets consist primarily of capital reserves and capitalized debt issuance costs. Capital reserves are maintained as part of the mortgage agreements of the Company and certain of its landlords with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. These capital reserves are restricted for capital improvements and repairs to the related facilities.
Restricted and other assets consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
|
Deposits with landlords | $ | 767 |
| | $ | 749 |
|
Capital improvement reserves with landlords and lenders | 841 |
| | 683 |
|
Debt issuance costs, net | 3,314 |
| | 2,769 |
|
Long-term insurance losses recoverable asset | 3,545 |
| | 3,219 |
|
Equity method investment | 1,220 |
| | 1,220 |
|
Restricted and other assets | $ | 9,687 |
| | $ | 8,640 |
|
Included in other assets, as of March 31, 2013, are anticipated insurance recoveries related to the Company's general and professional liability claims that are recorded on a gross rather than net basis in accordance with an Accounting Standards Update issued by the FASB and a non-marketable equity investment accounted for under the equity method. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the investment was recorded at cost and evaluated periodically for impairment. On April 23, 2013, the Company entered into a common unit redemption agreement with the investee where the non-marketable equity investment will be repurchased for $1,600. The Company will recognize a gain on the sale of its non-marketable equity investment of $380 in the second quarter of 2013.
12. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Other accrued liabilities consist of the following: |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
|
Quality assurance fee | $ | 5,905 |
| | $ | 2,010 |
|
Resident refunds payable | 4,594 |
| | 4,564 |
|
Deferred revenue | 3,275 |
| | 5,661 |
|
Cash held in trust for residents | 1,449 |
| | 1,520 |
|
Resident deposits | 1,669 |
| | 1,666 |
|
Dividends payable | 1,438 |
| | — |
|
Property taxes | 1,955 |
| | 2,264 |
|
Other | 3,647 |
| | 3,186 |
|
Other accrued liabilities | $ | 23,932 |
| | $ | 20,871 |
|
Quality assurance fee represents amounts payable to California, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Washington, Colorado, Iowa, and Nebraska in respect of a mandated fee based on resident days. Resident refunds payable includes amounts due to residents for overpayments and duplicate payments. Deferred revenue occurs when the Company receives payments in advance of services provided. Cash held in trust for residents reflects monies received from, or on behalf of, residents. Maintaining a trust account for residents is a regulatory requirement and, while the trust assets offset the liability, the Company assumes a fiduciary responsibility for these funds. The cash balance related to this liability is included in other current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
13. INCOME TAXES
During the first quarter of 2012, the State of California initiated an examination of the Company's income tax returns for the 2008 and 2009 income tax years. The examination is primarily focused on the Captive and the treatment of related insurance matters. California has not proposed any adjustments. The Company is not currently under examination by any other major income tax jurisdiction. During 2013, the statutes of limitations will lapse on the Company's 2009 Federal tax year and certain 2008 and 2009 state tax years. The Company does not believe these lapses, the California examination, or any other event will significantly impact the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months. The net balance of unrecognized tax benefits was not material to the Interim Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.
The Company recorded total pre-tax charges related to the pending settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and related expenses of $33,000 and $15,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, for a total charge of $48,000. The Company recorded estimated tax benefits of $10,373 and $5,865 during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. See Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies.
14. DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following: |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
|
Promissory note with RBS, principal and interest payable monthly and continuing through March 2019, interest at a fixed rate, collateralized by real property, assignment of rents and Company guaranty. | $ | 20,864 |
| | $ | 21,032 |
|
Senior Credit Facility with SunTrust and Wells Fargo, principal and interest payable quarterly, balance due at February 1, 2018, secured by substantially all of the Company’s personal property. | 88,438 |
| | 89,375 |
|
Ten Project Note with GECC, principal and interest payable monthly; interest is fixed, balance due June 2016, collateralized by deeds of trust on real property, assignment of rents, security agreements and fixture financing statements. | 49,766 |
| | 50,072 |
|
Promissory note with RBS, principal and interest payable monthly and continuing through January 2018, interest at a fixed rate, collateralized by real property, assignment of rents and Company guaranty. | 32,911 |
| | 33,167 |
|
Promissory notes, principal, and interest payable monthly and continuing through October 2019, interest at fixed rate, collateralized by deed of trust on real property, assignment of rents and security agreement. | 9,134 |
| | 9,203 |
|
Mortgage note, principal, and interest payable monthly and continuing through February 2027, interest at fixed rate, collateralized by deed of trust on real property, assignment of rents and security agreement. | 5,608 |
| | 5,665 |
|
| 206,721 |
| | 208,514 |
|
Less current maturities | (7,242 | ) | | (7,187 | ) |
Less debt discount | (792 | ) | | (822 | ) |
| $ | 198,687 |
| | $ | 200,505 |
|
Senior Credit Facility with Six-Bank Lending Consortium Arranged by SunTrust and Wells Fargo (the Senior Credit Facility)
On April 22, 2013, the Company entered into the fourth amendment to the Senior Credit Facility (the Fourth Amendment), which amends the Company's existing Senior Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2011, to amend certain covenants, representations and other key provisions in the credit agreement to, among other things, (i) allow for the settlement relating to the previously disclosed federal civil investigation that has been conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and related federal agencies in an amount up to $50,000 and (ii) permit the Company to enter into a corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General-HHS. Except as set forth in the Fourth Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Senior Credit Facility remain in full force.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
On February 1, 2013, the Company entered into the third amendment to the Senior Credit Facility (the Third Amendment), which amends the Company's existing Senior Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2011. The Third Amendment revises the Senior Credit Facility Agreement to, among other things, (i) increase the revolving credit portion of the Senior Credit Facility by $75,000 to an aggregate principal amount of $150,000, of which $20,000 was drawn as of March 31, 2013, and (ii) extend the maturity date of the Senior Credit Facility from July 15, 2016 to February 1, 2018. Except as set forth in the Third Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Senior Credit Facility remain in full force and effect as described below.
On July 15, 2011, the Company entered into the Senior Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150,000 comprised of a $75,000 revolving credit facility and a $75,000 term loan advanced in one drawing on July 15, 2011. Borrowings under the term loan portion of the Senior Credit Facility amortize in equal quarterly installments commencing on September 30, 2011, in an aggregate annual amount equal to 5% per annum of the original principal amount. Interest rates per annum applicable to the Senior Credit Facility will be, at the option of the Company, (i) LIBOR plus an initial margin of 2.5% or (ii) the Base Rate (as defined by the agreement) plus an initial margin of 1.5%. Under the terms of the Senior Credit Facility, the applicable margin adjusts based on the Company’s leverage ratio as set forth in further detail in the Senior Credit Facility agreement. Amounts borrowed pursuant to the Senior Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of their personal property. To reduce the risk related to interest rate fluctuations, the Company, on behalf of the subsidiaries, entered into an interest rate swap agreement to effectively fix the interest rate on the term loan portion of the Senior Credit Facility. See further details of the interest rate swap at Note 4, Fair Value Measurements.
Among other things, under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company must maintain compliance with specified financial covenants measured on a quarterly basis, including a maximum net leverage ratio, minimum interest coverage ratio and minimum asset coverage ratio. The loan documents also include certain additional reporting, affirmative and negative covenants including limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, investments in other businesses, dividends declared in excess of 20% of consolidated net income and repurchases and capital expenditures. As of March 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all loan covenants.
15. OPTIONS AND AWARDS
Stock-based compensation expense consists of share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and restricted stock awards, based on estimated fair values. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and, if necessary, revises the estimate in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ.
The Company has three option plans, the 2001 Stock Option, Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (2001 Plan), the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (2005 Plan) and the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2007 Plan), all of which have been approved by the stockholders. The total number of shares available under all of the Company’s stock incentive plans was 1,911 as of March 31, 2013.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to recognize the value of stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards. Determining the appropriate fair-value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, expected option life and forfeiture rates. The Company develops estimates based on historical data and market information, which can change significantly over time. The Company granted 103 options and 46 restricted stock awards from the 2007 Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
The Company used the following assumptions for stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grant Year | | Options Granted | | Weighted Average Risk-Free Rate | | Expected Life | | Weighted Average Volatility | | Weighted Average Dividend Yield |
2013 | | 103 |
| | 1.23 | % | | 6.5 years | | 55 | % | | 0.93 | % |
2012 | | 43 |
| | 1.18 | % | | 6.5 years | | 55 | % | | 0.93 | % |
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the following represents the exercise price and fair value displayed at grant date for stock option grants:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Grant Year | | Granted | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Fair Value of Options |
2013 | | 103 |
| | $ | 30.12 |
| | $ | 14.77 |
|
2012 | | 43 |
| | $ | 27.05 |
| | $ | 13.26 |
|
The weighted average exercise price equaled the weighted average fair value of common stock on the grant date for all options granted during the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and therefore, the intrinsic value was $0 at date of grant.
The following table represents the employee stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Options Outstanding | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Number of Options Vested | | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Options Vested |
January 1, 2013 | 1,387 |
| | $ | 16.06 |
| | 739 |
| | $ | 11.88 |
|
Granted | 103 |
| | 30.12 |
| | | | |
Forfeited | (15 | ) | | 19.77 |
| | | | |
Exercised | (85 | ) | | 11.08 |
| | | | |
March 31, 2013 | 1,390 |
| | $ | 17.37 |
| | 749 |
| | $ | 12.39 |
|
The following summary information reflects stock options outstanding, vested and related details as of March 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Stock Options Vested |
| | Stock Options Outstanding | |
| | | | Number Outstanding | | Black-Scholes Fair Value | | Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | | Vested and Exercisable |
Year of Grant | | Exercise Price | | | | |
2003 | | $0.67 | - | 0.81 | | 4 |
| | * |
| | 1 | | 4 |
|
2004 | | 1.96 | - | 2.46 | | 3 |
| | * |
| | 1 | | 3 |
|
2005 | | 4.99 | - | 5.75 | | 41 |
| | * |
| | 2 | | 41 |
|
2006 | | 7.05 | - | 7.50 | | 161 |
| | 1,552 |
| | 3 | | 161 |
|
2008 | | 9.38 | - | 14.87 | | 351 |
| | 1,935 |
| | 5 | | 288 |
|
2009 | | 14.88 | - | 16.70 | | 313 |
| | 2,482 |
| | 6 | | 185 |
|
2010 | | 17.47 | - | 18.16 | | 87 |
| | 771 |
| | 7 | | 41 |
|
2011 | | 21.61 | - | 29.30 | | 90 |
| | 1,112 |
| | 8 | | 18 |
|
2012 | | 24.04 | - | 29.16 | | 237 |
| | 3,204 |
| | 9 | | 8 |
|
2013 | | 29.25 | - | 32.85 | | 103 |
| | 1,521 | | 10 | | — |
|
Total | | | | | | 1,390 |
| | $ | 12,577 |
| | |
| 749 |
|
* The Company will not recognize the Black-Scholes fair value for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 unless such awards are modified.In addition to the above, during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company granted 46 and 63 restricted stock awards, respectively. All awards were granted at an exercise price of $0 and vest over five years.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
A summary of the status of the Company's nonvested restricted stock awards as of March 31, 2013, and changes during the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 is presented below: |
| | | | | | |
| Nonvested Restricted Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Nonvested at January 1, 2013 | 224 |
| | $ | 23.04 |
|
Granted | 46 |
| | 31.20 |
|
Vested | (11 | ) | | 24.91 |
|
Forfeited | (11 | ) | | 22.20 |
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2013 | 248 |
| | $ | 25.52 |
|
Total share-based compensation expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Share-based compensation expense related to stock options | $ | 574 |
| | $ | 499 |
|
Share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards | 315 |
| | 332 |
|
Share-based compensation expense related to stock awards | 487 |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 1,376 |
| | $ | 831 |
|
In future periods, the Company expects to recognize approximately $6,491 and $5,777 in share-based compensation expense for unvested options and unvested restricted stock awards, respectively, that were outstanding as of March 31, 2013. Future share-based compensation expense will be recognized over 3.7 and 3.8 weighted average years for unvested options and restricted stock awards, respectively. There were 641 unvested and outstanding options at March 31, 2013, of which 599 are expected to vest. The weighted average contractual life for options vested at March 31, 2013 was 6.3 years.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, vested, expected to vest and exercised as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Options | | March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Outstanding | | $ | 22,284 |
| | $ | 15,703 |
|
Vested | | 15,725 |
| | 11,285 |
|
Expected to vest | | 5,860 |
| | 4,088 |
|
Exercised | | 1,718 |
| | 7,123 |
|
The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value of the underlying common stock and the exercise price of the options.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases — The Company leases certain facilities and its administrative offices under non-cancelable operating leases, most of which have initial lease terms ranging from five to 20 years. The Company also leases certain of its equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms ranging from three to five years. Most of these leases contain renewal options, certain of which involve rent increases. Total rent expense, inclusive of straight-line rent adjustments, was $3,436 for both periods during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Six of the Company’s facilities are operated under two separate three-facility master lease arrangements. Under these master leases, a breach at a single facility could subject one or more of the other facilities covered by the same master lease to the same default risk. Failure to comply with Medicare and Medicaid provider requirements is a default under several of the Company’s leases, master lease agreements and debt financing instruments. In addition, other potential defaults related to an individual facility may cause a default of an entire master lease portfolio and could trigger cross-default provisions in the Company’s outstanding debt arrangements and other leases. With an indivisible lease, it is difficult to restructure the composition of the portfolio or economic terms of the lease without the consent of the landlord.
In addition, a number of the Company’s individual facility leases are held by the same or related landlords, and some of these leases include cross-default provisions that could cause a default at one facility to trigger a technical default with respect to others, potentially subjecting certain leases and facilities to the various remedies available to the landlords under separate but cross-defaulted leases. The Company is not aware of any defaults as of March 31, 2013.
Regulatory Matters — Laws and regulations governing Medicare and Medicaid programs are complex and subject to interpretation. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future governmental review and interpretation, as well as significant regulatory action including fines, penalties, and exclusion from certain governmental programs. The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations.
A significant portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from Medicaid and Medicare, for which reimbursement rates are subject to regulatory changes and government funding restrictions. Any significant future change to reimbursement rates or regulation on how services are provided could have a material effect on the Company’s operations.
Cost-Containment Measures — Both government and private pay sources have instituted cost-containment measures designed to limit payments made to providers of healthcare services, and there can be no assurance that future measures designed to limit payments made to providers will not adversely affect the Company.
Income Tax Examinations — During the first quarter of 2012, the State of California initiated an examination of the Company's income tax returns for the 2008 and 2009 income tax years. The examination is primarily focused on the Captive and the treatment of related insurance matters. California has not proposed any adjustments. The Company is not currently under examination by any other major income tax jurisdiction. During 2013, the statutes of limitations will lapse on the Company's 2009 Federal tax year and certain 2008 and 2009 state tax years. The Company does not believe these lapses, the California examination, or any other event will significantly impact the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months. See Note 13, Income Taxes.
Indemnities — From time to time, the Company enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require the Company to indemnify parties against third-party claims. These contracts primarily include (i) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners or prior facility operators for post-transfer environmental or other liabilities and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises, (ii) operations transfer agreements, in which the Company agrees to indemnify past operators of facilities the Company acquires against certain liabilities arising from the transfer of the operation and/or the operation thereof after the transfer, (iii) certain lending agreements, under which the Company may be required to indemnify the lender against various claims and liabilities, (iv) agreements with certain lenders under which the Company may be required to indemnify such lenders against various claims and liabilities, and (v) certain agreements with the Company’s officers, directors and employees, under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationships. The terms of such obligations vary by contract and, in most instances, a specific or maximum dollar amount is not explicitly stated therein. Generally, amounts under these contracts cannot be reasonably estimated until a specific claim is asserted. Consequently, because no claims have been asserted, no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on the Company’s balance sheets for any of the periods presented.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Litigation — The skilled nursing business involves a significant risk of liability given the age and health of the Company’s patients and residents and the services the Company provides. The Company and others in the industry are subject to an increasing number of claims and lawsuits, including professional liability claims, alleging that services have resulted in personal injury, elder abuse, wrongful death or other related claims. The defense of these lawsuits may result in significant legal costs, regardless of the outcome, and can result in large settlement amounts or damage awards.
In addition to the potential lawsuits and claims described above, the Company is also subject to potential lawsuits under the Federal False Claims Act and comparable state laws alleging submission of fraudulent claims for services to any healthcare program (such as Medicare) or payor. A violation may provide the basis for exclusion from federally-funded healthcare programs. Such exclusions could have a correlative negative impact on the Company’s financial performance. Some states, including California, Arizona and Texas, have enacted similar whistleblower and false claims laws and regulations. In addition, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 created incentives for states to enact anti-fraud legislation modeled on the Federal False Claims Act. As such, the Company could face increased scrutiny, potential liability and legal expenses and costs based on claims under state false claims acts in markets in which it does business.
In May 2009, Congress passed the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (FERA) of 2009 which made significant changes to the Federal False Claims Act (FCA), expanding the types of activities subject to prosecution and whistleblower liability. Following changes by FERA, health care providers face significant penalties for the knowing retention of government overpayments, even if no false claim was involved. Health care providers can now be liable for knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay money or property to the government. This includes the retention of any government overpayment. The government can argue, therefore, that a FCA violation can occur without any affirmative fraudulent action or statement, as long as it is knowingly improper. In addition, FERA extended protections against retaliation for whistleblowers, including protections not only for employees, but also contractors and agents. Thus, there is generally no need for an employment relationship in order to qualify for protection against retaliation for whistleblowing.
In July 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). The Dodd-Frank Act establishes rigorous standards and supervision to protect the economy and American consumers, investors and businesses. Included under Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will be required to pay a reward to individuals who provide original information to the SEC resulting in monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000 in civil or criminal proceedings. The award will range from 10 to 30 percent of the amount recouped and the amount of the award shall be at the discretion of the SEC. The purpose of this reward program is to “motivate those with inside knowledge to come forward and assist the Government to identify and prosecute persons who have violated securities laws and recover money for victims of financial fraud.”
Other companies in the Company's industry have been the subject of lawsuits alleging negligence, abuses and other causes of action which have, in some cases, resulted in large demand awards and settlements. In addition, there has been an increase in the number of class-action suits filed against the Company and other companies in its industry, which also have the potential to result in large damage awards and settlements. For example, a class action suit was previously filed against the Company in the State of California, alleging, among other things, violations of certain Health and Safety Code provisions and a violation of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act at certain of the Company’s California facilities. In 2007, the Company settled this class action suit, and the settlement was approved by the affected class and the Court.
Healthcare litigation is common and is filed based upon a wide variety of claims and theories, and we are routinely subjected to varying types of claims. One particular type of suit arises from alleged violations of state-established minimum staffing requirements for skilled nursing facilities. Failure to meet these requirements can, among other things, jeopardize a facility's compliance with conditions of participation under certain state and federal healthcare programs; it may also subject the facility to a notice of deficiency, a citation, civil money penalty, or litigation. These "staffing" suits have become more prevalent in the wake of a previous substantial jury award against one of the Company's competitors, and the Company expects the plaintiff's bar to become increasingly aggressive in their pursuit of these staffing and similar claims. The Company is currently defending one such staffing class-action claim filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, and has reached a tentative settlement with class counsel that is awaiting court approval. The total costs associated with the settlement, including attorney's fees, estimated class payout, and related costs and expenses, are projected to be $5,000, of which, $2,596 of this amount was recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2012, with the balance having been expensed in prior periods. The Final Approval Order relative to the subject settlement was signed by the Court on or about March 20, 2013; the settlement will not have a material ongoing adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Other claims and suits, including class actions, continue to be filed against us and other companies in our industry. If there were a significant increase in the number of these claims or an increase in amounts owing should plaintiffs be successful in their prosecution of these claims, this could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company has been, and continues to be, subject to claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business, including potential claims related to care and treatment provided at its facilities as well as employment related claims. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, cash flows, financial condition or results of operations. A significant increase in the number of these claims or an increase in amounts owing should plaintiffs be successful in their prosecution of these claims, could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company cannot predict or provide any assurance as to the possible outcome of any litigation. If any litigation were to proceed, and the Company is subjected to, alleged to be liable for, or agrees to a settlement of, claims or obligations under federal Medicare statutes, the federal False Claims Act, or similar state and federal statutes and related regulations, its business, financial condition and results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected and its stock price could be adversely impacted. Among other things, any settlement or litigation could involve the payment of substantial sums to settle any alleged civil violations, and may also include the Company's assumption of specific procedural and financial obligations going forward under a corporate integrity agreement and/or other arrangement with the government.
Medicare Revenue Recoupments — The Company is subject to reviews relating to Medicare services, billings and potential overpayments. The Company had one operation subject to probe review during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The Company anticipates that these probe reviews will increase in frequency in the future. Further, the Company currently has no facilities on prepayment review; however, others may be placed on prepayment review in the future. If a facility fails prepayment review, the facility could then be subject to undergo targeted review, which is a review that targets perceived claims deficiencies. The Company has no facilities that are currently undergoing targeted review.
U.S. Government Inquiry — In late 2006, the Company learned that it might be the subject of an on-going criminal and civil investigation by the DOJ and this was confirmed in March 2007. The investigation relates to claims submitted to the Medicare program for rehabilitation services provided at skilled nursing facilities in Southern California, that the Company believes is tied to a pending whistleblower complaint. The Company, through its outside counsel and a special committee of independent directors established by its board, has worked cooperatively with the U.S. Attorney's office to produce information requested by the government as part of an ongoing dialogue designed to try to resolve the issue.
In December 2011, the DOJ notified the Company that it had elected to close its criminal investigation without action although, as is typical, it reserved the right to reopen the criminal case if new facts came to light, leaving only the civil investigation to resolve. In furtherance of the remaining civil investigation, certain additional information was requested and supplied to the DOJ and the Office of the Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) by the Company, including specific patient records and documents from 2007 to 2011 from six Southern California skilled nursing facilities that had been the subject of previous requests.
In early 2013, discussions between government representatives and the Company's special committee, its outside counsel and their experts had advanced sufficiently that the Company recorded an initial estimated liability in the amount of $15,000 in the fourth quarter of 2012 for the resolution of claims connected to the investigation.
In April 2013, the Company and government representatives reached an agreement in principle to resolve the allegations and close the investigation. Based on these discussions, the Company recorded and announced an additional charge in the amount of $33,000 in the first quarter of 2013, increasing the total reserve to resolve the matter to $48,000 (the Reserve Amount). In addition, the Company has commenced discussions regarding the scope of a potential corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General-HHS as part of the resolution, the specific terms and conditions of which remain under discussion. The Company expects to finalize and execute the corporate integrity agreement and remit the full Reserve Amount to the government in the second or third quarter of 2013, once the agreement has been fully documented.
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company has agreed to the settlement in principle, without any admission of wrongdoing, in order to resolve the allegations underlying the investigation and to avoid the uncertainty and expense of protracted litigation. If the ongoing settlement discussions are successfully concluded, the Company expects that the tentative settlement will resolve the DOJ investigation which has been previously described in the Company's periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The tentative settlement is subject to completion and execution of all required documentation and the final approval of the DOJ, the Office of Inspector General-HHS, and the Court; until the proposed settlement becomes final, there can be no guarantee that these matters will be resolved by the agreement in principle, the outcome remains uncertain and the amount related to the resolution of any claims connected to this pending investigation could differ materially from the Company's estimates.
Concentrations
Credit Risk — The Company has significant accounts receivable balances, the collectability of which is dependent on the availability of funds from certain governmental programs, primarily Medicare and Medicaid. These receivables represent the only significant concentration of credit risk for the Company. The Company does not believe there are significant credit risks associated with these governmental programs. The Company believes that an appropriate allowance has been recorded for the possibility of these receivables proving uncollectible, and continually monitors and adjusts these allowances as necessary. The Company’s receivables from Medicare and Medicaid payor programs accounted for approximately 61.6% and 56.2% of its total accounts receivable as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Revenue from reimbursement under the Medicare and Medicaid programs accounted for 72.8% and 73.9% of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Cash in Excess of FDIC Limits — The Company currently has bank deposits with financial institutions in the U.S. that exceed FDIC insurance limits. FDIC insurance provides protection for bank deposits up to $250. In addition, the Company has uninsured bank deposits with a financial institution outside the U.S. As of May 1, 2013, the Company had approximately $1,001 in uninsured cash deposits. All uninsured bank deposits are held at high quality credit institutions.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report), which discusses our business and related risks in greater detail, as well as subsequent reports we may file from time to time on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, for additional information. The section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in Part II, Item 1A of this Report, and similar discussions in our other SEC filings, also describe some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the other information in this Report and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock.
This Report contains "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which include, but are not limited to the Company’s expected future financial position, results of operations, cash flows, financing plans, business strategy, budgets, capital expenditures, competitive positions, growth opportunities and plans and objectives of management. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “potential,” “continue,” “ongoing,” similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, some of which are listed under the section “Risk Factors” contained in Part II, Item 1A of this Report. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report, and are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry and business, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us, all of which are subject to change. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statement for any reason, except as otherwise required by law. As used in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the words, “we,” “our” and “us” refer to The Ensign Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All of our operations, the Service Center and the Captive are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries that have their own management, employees and assets. The use of “we,” “us,” “our” and similar verbiage in this quarterly report is not meant to imply that any of our facilities, the Service Center or the Captive are operated by the same entity. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Annual Report.
Overview
We are a provider of skilled nursing and rehabilitative care services through the operation of 110 facilities, nine home health and seven hospice operations as of March 31, 2013, located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, Texas, Utah and Washington. Our operations, each of which strives to be the service of choice in the community it serves, provide a broad spectrum of skilled nursing, assisted living, home health and hospice services, including physical, occupational and speech therapies, and other rehabilitative and healthcare services, for both long-term residents and short-stay rehabilitation patients. During the first quarter of 2012, we entered into a business to develop and operate urgent care facilities and related businesses. These walk-in clinics will offer daily access to healthcare for minor injuries and illnesses, including x-ray and lab services, all from convenient neighborhood locations with no appointments. In the fourth quarter of 2012, we acquired an 80% membership interest in a mobile x-ray and diagnostic company. The mobile x-ray and diagnostic company is a leader in providing mobile diagnostic services, including digital x-ray, ultrasound, electrocardiograms, ankle-brachial index, and phlebotomy services to people in their homes or at long-term care facilities. As of March 31, 2013, we owned 87 of our 110 facilities and operated an additional 23 facilities under long-term lease arrangements, and had options to purchase two of those 23 facilities.
The following table summarizes our facilities and operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds by ownership status as of March 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Owned | | Leased (with a Purchase Option) | | Leased (without a Purchase Option) | | Total |
Number of facilities | 87 |
| | 2 |
| | 21 |
| | 110 |
|
Percent of total | 79.1 | % | | 1.8 | % | | 19.1 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds | 9,629 |
| | 414 |
| | 2,347 |
| | 12,390 |
|
Percent of total | 77.7 | % | | 3.4 | % | | 18.9 | % | | 100.0 | % |
The Ensign Group, Inc. is a holding company with no direct operating assets, employees or revenues. All of our skilled nursing, assisted living and home health and hospice operations are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries, which have their own management, employees and assets. In addition, one of our wholly-owned independent subsidiaries, which we call our Service Center, provides centralized accounting, payroll, human resources, information technology, legal, risk management and other services to each operating subsidiary through contractual relationships between such subsidiaries. In addition, we have the Captive that provides some claims-made coverage to our operating subsidiaries for general and professional liability, as well as for certain workers’ compensation insurance liabilities. References herein to the consolidated “Company” and “its” assets and activities, as well as the use of the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and similar verbiage in this quarterly report is not meant to imply that The Ensign Group, Inc. has direct operating assets, employees or revenue, or that any of the facilities, the Service Center or the Captive are operated by the same entity.
Facility Acquisition History |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | March 31, |
| 2005 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 |
Cumulative number of facilities | 46 |
| | 57 |
| | 61 |
| | 63 |
| | 77 |
| | 82 |
| | 102 |
| | 108 |
| | 110 |
|
Cumulative number of operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds | 5,585 |
| | 6,667 |
| | 7,105 |
| | 7,324 |
| | 8,948 |
| | 9,539 |
| | 11,702 |
| | 12,198 |
| | 12,390 |
|
The following table sets forth the location of our facilities and the number of operational beds located at our facilities as of March 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CA | | AZ | | TX | | UT | | CO | | WA | | ID | | NV | | NE | | IA | | Total |
Number of facilities | 35 |
| | 13 |
| | 24 |
| | 11 |
| | 6 |
| | 3 |
| | 6 |
| | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | 5 |
| | 110 |
|
Operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds | 3,864 |
| | 1,902 |
| | 3,068 |
| | 1,344 |
| | 505 |
| | 274 |
| | 477 |
| | 304 |
| | 296 |
| | 356 |
| | 12,390 |
|
On January 1, 2013, we acquired a home health operation in Washington and two hospice operations in Arizona and California, respectively, in two separate transactions, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $4.6 million, which was paid in cash. These acquisitions did not have an impact on our operational bed count. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreements with the prior tenant as part of each transaction.
On February 16, 2013, we acquired a home health operation in Texas for approximately $0.4 million, which was paid in cash. This acquisition did not have an impact on our operational bed count. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of such transaction.
On March 1, 2013, we acquired a home health and hospice operation in Washington for approximately $1.1 million, which was paid in cash. This acquisition did not have an impact on our operational bed count. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of such transaction.
On March 1, 2013, we purchased a skilled nursing facility in Texas for approximately $4.5 million, which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 150 operational skilled nursing beds to our operations. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of such transaction.
On April 1, 2013, we acquired three skilled nursing facilities in Texas for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7.1 million, which was paid in cash. These acquisitions added 337 operational skilled nursing beds to our operations. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction.
In addition, on May 1, 2013, we acquired two skilled nursing facilities and one assisted living facility in two separate transactions, for and aggregate purchase price of approximately $14.3 million, which was paid in cash. These acquisitions added 180 operational skilled nursing beds and 90 operational assisted living units to our operations. We also entered into separate operations transfer agreements with the prior tenant as a part of each transaction.
See further discussion of facility acquisitions in Note 7 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Developments
U.S. Government Inquiry Settlement — In April 2013, we and government representatives reached an agreement in principle to resolve the allegations and close the investigation. Based on these discussions, we recorded and announced an additional charge in the amount of $33.0 million in the first quarter of 2013, increasing the total reserve to resolve the matter to $48.0 million (the Reserve Amount). In addition, we have commenced discussions regarding the scope of a potential corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General-HHS as part of the resolution, the specific terms and conditions of which remain under discussion. We expect to finalize and execute the corporate integrity agreement and remit the full Reserve Amount to the government in the second or third quarter of 2013, once the agreement has been fully documented.
Urgent Care Franchising — On March 25, 2013 we announced that our urgent care subsidiary, Immediate Clinic Healthcare, Inc., agreed to terms to sell Doctors Express, a national urgent care franchise system. The sale of specific assets and liabilities of Doctors Express was finalized on April 15, 2013. In accordance with the authoritative guidance for the disposal of long-lived asset, the sale of Doctors Express has been accounted for as discontinued operations. Accordingly, the results of operations of this business for all periods presented and the loss or impairment related to this divesture have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As the sale was effective April 15, 2013, all assets and liabilities included in the sale were recorded as held for sale on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Board of Directors — Mr. Thomas A. Maloof has determined to retire from our Board of Directors at the end of his current term at our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in order to pursue other interests. Mr. Maloof has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2000 and is currently serving on our audit committee, our nomination and corporate governance committee and our special committee. Our Board of Directors, on the recommendation of the nomination and corporate governance committee, has determined to nominate a replacement for the vacancy created by Mr. Maloof's departure for election in Class III at the annual meeting of the stockholders.
Key Performance Indicators
We manage our skilled nursing business by monitoring key performance indicators that affect our financial performance. These indicators and their definitions include the following:
| |
• | Routine revenue: Routine revenue is generated by the contracted daily rate charged for all contractually inclusive skilled nursing services. The inclusion of therapy and other ancillary treatments varies by payor source and by contract. Services provided outside of the routine contractual agreement are recorded separately as ancillary revenue, including Medicare Part B therapy services, and are not included in the routine revenue definition. |
| |
• | Skilled revenue: The amount of routine revenue generated from patients in our skilled nursing facilities who are receiving higher levels of care under Medicare, managed care, Medicaid, or other skilled reimbursement programs. The other skilled residents that are included in this population represent very high acuity residents who are receiving high levels of nursing and ancillary services which are reimbursed by payors other than Medicare or managed care. Skilled revenue excludes any revenue generated from our assisted living services. |
| |
• | Skilled mix: The amount of our skilled revenue as a percentage of our total routine revenue. Skilled mix (in days) represents the number of days our Medicare, managed care, or other skilled patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of days patients (less days from assisted living services) from all payor sources are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities for any given period (less days from assisted living services). |
| |
• | Quality mix: The amount of routine non-Medicaid revenue as a percentage of our total routine revenue. Quality mix (in days) represents the number of days our non-Medicaid patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of days patients from all payor sources are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities for any given period (less days from assisted living services). |
| |
• | Average daily rates: The routine revenue by payor source for a period at our skilled nursing facilities divided by actual patient days for that revenue source for that given period. |
| |
• | Occupancy percentage (operational beds): The total number of residents occupying a bed in a skilled nursing, assisted living or independent living facility as a percentage of the beds in a facility which are available for occupancy during the measurement period. |
| |
• | Number of facilities and operational beds: The total number of skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities that we own or operate and the total number of operational beds associated with these facilities. |
Skilled and Quality Mix. Like most skilled nursing providers, we measure both patient days and revenue by payor. Medicare, managed care and other skilled patients, whom we refer to as high acuity patients, typically require a higher level of skilled nursing and rehabilitative care. Accordingly, Medicare and managed care reimbursement rates are typically higher than from other payors. In most states, Medicaid reimbursement rates are generally the lowest of all payor types. Changes in the payor mix can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.
The following table summarizes our overall skilled mix and quality mix for the periods indicated as a percentage of our total routine revenue (less revenue from assisted living services) and as a percentage of total patient days (less days from assisted living services):
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Skilled Mix: | | | |
Days | 27.7 | % | | 26.3 | % |
Revenue | 51.5 | % | | 50.5 | % |
Quality Mix: | | | |
Days | 40.7 | % | | 39.3 | % |
Revenue | 60.6 | % | | 60.0 | % |
Occupancy. We define occupancy as the ratio of actual patient days (one patient day equals one resident occupying one bed for one day) during any measurement period to the number of beds in facilities which are available for occupancy during the measurement period. The number of licensed and independent living beds in a skilled nursing, assisted living or independent living facility that are actually operational and available for occupancy may be less than the total official licensed bed capacity. This sometimes occurs due to the permanent dedication of bed space to alternative purposes, such as enhanced therapy treatment space or other desirable uses calculated to improve service offerings and/or operational efficiencies in a facility. In some cases, three- and four-bed wards have been reduced to two-bed rooms for resident comfort, and larger wards have been reduced to conform to changes in Medicare requirements. These beds are seldom expected to be placed back into service. We define occupancy in operational beds as the ratio of actual patient days during any measurement period to the number of available patient days for that period. We believe that reporting occupancy based on operational beds is consistent with industry practices and provides a more useful measure of actual occupancy performance from period to period.
The following table summarizes our overall occupancy statistics for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Occupancy: | | | |
Operational beds at end of period | 12,390 |
| | 11,823 |
|
Available patient days | 1,105,326 |
| | 1,067,162 |
|
Actual patient days | 860,265 |
| | 851,511 |
|
Occupancy percentage (based on operational beds) | 77.8 | % | | 79.8 | % |
Revenue Sources
Our total revenue represents revenue derived primarily from providing services to patients and residents of skilled nursing facilities, and to a lesser extent from assisted living facilities and ancillary services. We receive service revenue from Medicaid, Medicare, private payors and other third-party payors, and managed care sources. The sources and amounts of our revenue are determined by a number of factors, including bed capacity and occupancy rates of our healthcare facilities, the mix of patients at our facilities and the rates of reimbursement among payors. Payment for ancillary services varies based upon the service provided and the type of payor.
The following table sets forth our total revenue by payor source and as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2013 | | 2012 |
| | $ | | % | | $ | | % |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | |
Medicaid | | $ | 76,510 |
| | 35.0 | % | | $ | 73,583 |
| | 36.4 | % |
Medicare | | 73,928 |
| | 33.9 |
| | 69,794 |
| | 34.6 |
|
Medicaid-skilled | | 8,472 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 5,861 |
| | 2.9 |
|
Total | | 158,910 |
| | 72.8 |
| | 149,238 |
| | 73.9 |
|
Managed Care | | 29,186 |
| | 13.4 |
| | 25,692 |
| | 12.7 |
|
Private and Other(1) | | 30,105 |
| | 13.8 |
| | 27,110 |
| | 13.4 |
|
Total revenue | | $ | 218,201 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 202,040 |
| | 100.0 | % |
(1) Private and other payors includes revenue from urgent care centers and other ancillary businesses. |
Critical Accounting Policies Update
There have been no significant changes during the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Industry Trends
The skilled nursing industry has evolved to meet the growing demand for post-acute and custodial healthcare services generated by an aging population, increasing life expectancies and the trend toward shifting of patient care to lower cost settings. The skilled nursing industry has evolved in recent years, which we believe has led to a number of favorable improvements in the industry, as described below:
| |
• | Shift of Patient Care to Lower Cost Alternatives. The growth of the senior population in the United States continues to increase healthcare costs, often faster than the available funding from government-sponsored healthcare programs. In response, federal and state governments have adopted cost-containment measures that encourage the treatment of patients in more cost-effective settings such as skilled nursing facilities, for which the staffing requirements and associated costs are often significantly lower than acute care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and other post-acute care settings. As a result, skilled nursing facilities are generally serving a larger population of higher-acuity patients than in the past. |
| |
• | Significant Acquisition and Consolidation Opportunities. The skilled nursing industry is large and highly fragmented, characterized predominantly by numerous local and regional providers. We believe this fragmentation provides significant acquisition and consolidation opportunities for us. |
| |
• | Improving Supply and Demand Balance. The number of skilled nursing facilities has declined modestly over the past several years. We expect that the supply and demand balance in the skilled nursing industry will continue to improve due to the shift of patient care to lower cost settings, an aging population and increasing life expectancies. |
| |
• | Increased Demand Driven by Aging Populations and Increased Life Expectancy. As life expectancy continues to increase in the United States and seniors account for a higher percentage of the total U.S. population, we believe the overall demand for skilled nursing services will increase. At present, the primary market demographic for skilled nursing services is primarily individuals age 75 and older. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, there were over 40 million people in the United States in 2010 that are over 65 years old. The 2010 U.S. Census estimates this group is one of the fastest growing segments of the United States population and is expected to more than double between 2000 and 2030. |
We believe the skilled nursing industry has been and will continue to be impacted by several other trends. The use of long-term care insurance is increasing among seniors as a means of planning for the costs of skilled nursing services. In addition, as a result of increased mobility in society, reduction of average family size, and the increased number of two-wage earner couples, more seniors are looking for alternatives outside the family for their care.
Effects of Changing Prices — Medicare reimbursement rates and procedures are subject to change from time to time, which could materially impact our revenue. Medicare reimburses our skilled nursing facilities under a prospective payment system (PPS) for certain inpatient covered services. Under the PPS, facilities are paid a predetermined amount per patient, per day, based on the anticipated costs of treating patients. The amount to be paid is determined by classifying each patient into a resource utilization group (RUG) category that is based upon each patient’s acuity level. As of October 1, 2010, the RUG categories were expanded from 53 to 66 with the introduction of minimum data set (MDS) 3.0. Should future changes in skilled nursing facility payments reduce rates or increase the standards for reaching certain reimbursement levels, our Medicare revenues could be reduced, with a corresponding adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Rulings — On July 27, 2012, the CMS announced a final rule updating Medicare skilled nursing facility PPS payments in fiscal year 2013. The update, a 1.8% or $670 million increase, reflects a 2.5% market basket increase, reduced by a 0.7% MFP adjustment mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). This increase was offset by the 2% sequestration reduction, discussed below, which became effective April 1, 2013.
In November 2012, CMS issued final regulations regarding Medicare payment rates for home health agencies effective January 1, 2013. These final regulations implement a net market basket increase of 1.3% consisting of a 2.3% market basket inflation increase, less a 1.0% adjustment mandated by the PPACA. In addition, CMS implemented a 1.3% reduction in case mix. CMS has projected the impact of these changes will result in a less than 0.1% decrease in payments to home health agencies.
Additionally, there is further uncertainty on how Medicare will reimburse for home health services when rebasing of rates becomes effective in 2014; when Medicare will reset the rates and change how CMS reimburses for home health services. The methodology for rebasing has yet to be determined, but we expect it will result in further reimbursement reductions.
In July 2012, CMS issued its final rule for hospice services for its 2013 fiscal year. These final regulations implement a net market basket increase of 1.6% consisting of a 2.6% market basket inflation increase, less offsets to the standard payment conversion factor mandated by the PPACA of 0.7% to account for the effect of a productivity adjustment, and 0.3% as required by statute. CMS has projected the impact of these changes will result in a 0.9% increase in payments to hospice providers.
Should future changes in PPS include further reduced rates or increased standards for reaching certain reimbursement levels, our Medicare revenues derived from our skilled nursing facilities (including rehabilitation therapy services provided at our skilled nursing facilities) could be reduced, with a corresponding adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Medicare Part B Therapy Cap — Some of our rehabilitation therapy revenue is paid by the Medicare Part B program under a fee schedule. Congress has established annual caps that limit the amounts that can be paid (including deductible and coinsurance amounts) for rehabilitation therapy services rendered to any Medicare beneficiary under Medicare Part B. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) added Sec. 1833(g)(5) of the Social Security Act and directed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to develop a process that allows exceptions for Medicare beneficiaries to therapy caps when continued therapy is deemed medically necessary.
The therapy cap exception was reauthorized in a number of subsequent laws, most recently in the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 which extends the exceptions process through December 31, 2013. The statutory Medicare Part B outpatient therapy cap for occupational therapy and the combined cap for physical therapy and speech-language pathology services are $1,880, respectively, for 2012. These amounts represent annual per beneficiary therapy caps determined for each calendar year. These cap amounts will increase to $1,900 in 2013. Similar to the therapy cap, Congress established a threshold of $3,700 for physical therapy and speech-language pathology services combined and a separate threshold of $3,700 for occupational therapy services. All therapy services rendered above this limit are subject to medical review and beginning October 1, 2012, CMS rolled out a pilot program requiring some therapy providers to submit pre-approval requests for exceptions. Prior to October 1, 2012 there was no requirement for an exception request to be pre-approved when the threshold was exceeded. The pilot program was rolled out to our facilities in groups beginning in October 2012 and ended in December 2012.
In addition, the Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) will be increased to 50% and applied to therapy by reducing payments for practice expense of the second and subsequent therapies when therapies are provided on the same day, instead of the existing 25% discount. The change from 25% of the practice expense to a 50% reduction is expected to take effect on April 1, 2013.
The application of annual caps, or the discontinuation of exceptions to the annual caps, could have an adverse effect on our rehabilitation therapy revenue. Additionally, the exceptions to these caps may not be extended beyond December 31, 2013, which could also have an adverse effect on our revenue after that date.
Medicare Coverage Settlement Agreement — A proposed federal class action settlement was filed in federal district court on October 16, 2012 that would end the Medicare coverage standard for skilled nursing, home health and outpatient therapy services that a beneficiary's condition must be expected to improve. The settlement was approved on January 24, 2013, which tasked CMS with revising its Medicare Benefit Manual and numerous other policies, guidelines and instructions to ensure that Medicare coverage is available for skilled maintenance services in the home health, skilled nursing and outpatient settings. CMS must also develop and implement a nationwide education campaign for all who make Medicare determinations to ensure that beneficiaries with chronic conditions are not denied coverage for critical services because their underlying conditions will not improve. At the conclusion of the CMS education campaign, the members of the class will have the opportunity for re-review of their claims, and a two- or three-year monitoring period will commence. Implementation of the provisions of this settlement agreement could favorably impact reimbursement for our services.
Historically, adjustments to reimbursement under Medicare have had a significant effect on our revenue. For a discussion of historic adjustments and recent changes to the Medicare program and related reimbursement rates see Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business and Industry - “Our revenue could be impacted by federal and state changes to reimbursement and other aspects of Medicaid and Medicare,” “Our future revenue, financial condition and results of operations could be impacted by continued cost containment pressures on Medicaid spending,” “We may not be fully reimbursed for all services for which each facility bills through consolidated billing, which could adversely affect our revenue, financial condition and results of operations” and “Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system will impose new requirements upon us and may lower our reimbursements." The federal government and state governments continue to focus on efforts to curb spending on healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are not able to predict the outcome of the legislative process. We also cannot predict the extent to which proposals will be adopted or, if adopted and implemented, what effect, if any, such proposals and existing new legislation will have on us. Efforts to impose reduced allowances, greater discounts and more stringent cost controls by government and other payors are expected to continue and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
State Regulations — On March 24, 2011, the governor of California signed Assembly Bill 97 (AB 97), the budget trailer bill on health, into law. AB 97 outlines significant cuts to state health and human services programs. Specifically, the law reduced provider payments by 10% for physicians, pharmacies, clinics, medical transportation, certain hospitals, home health, and nursing facilities. AB X1 19 Long Term Care was subsequently approved by the governor on June 28, 2011. Federal approval was obtained on October 27, 2011. AB X1 19 limited the 10% payment reduction to skilled-nursing providers to 14 months for the services provided on June 1, 2011 through July 31, 2012. The 10% reduction in provider payments was repaid by December 31, 2012.
Federal Health Care Reform — On August 2, 2011, the President signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Budget Control Act), which raised the debt ceiling and put into effect a series of actions for deficit reduction. The Budget Control Act creates a Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (the Committee) that was tasked with proposing additional deficit reduction of at least $1.5 trillion over ten years. As the Committee was unable to achieve its targeted savings, this regulation triggered automatic reductions in discretionary and mandatory spending starting in 2013, including reductions of not more than 2% to payments to Medicare providers. The Budget Control Act also requires Congress to vote on an amendment to the Constitution that would require a balanced budget.
On January 2, 2013 the President signed the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 into law. This statute delays significant cuts in Medicare rates for physician services until December 31, 2013. The statute also creates a Commission on Long Term Care, the goal of which is to develop a plan for the establishment, implementation, and financing of a comprehensive, coordinated, and high-quality system that ensures the availability of long-term care services and supports for individuals in need of such services and supports. Any implementation of recommendations from this commission may have an impact on coverage and payment for our services.
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed PPACA into law, which contained several sweeping changes to America’s health insurance system. Among other reforms contained in PPACA, many Medicare providers received reductions in their market basket updates. Unlike for some other Medicare providers, PPACA made no reduction to the market basket update for skilled nursing facilities in fiscal years 2010 or 2011. However, under PPACA, the skilled nursing facility market basket update became subject to a full productivity adjustment beginning in fiscal year 2012. In addition, PPACA enacted several reforms with respect to skilled nursing facilities and hospice organizations, including payment measures to realize significant savings of federal and state funds by deterring and prosecuting fraud and abuse in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
While many of the provisions of PPACA have not taken effect, or are subject to further refinement through the promulgation of regulations, some key provisions of PPACA are:
| |
• | Enhanced CMPs and Escrow Provisions — PPACA included expanded civil monetary penalty (CMP) provisions applicable to all Medicare and Medicaid providers. PPACA provided for the imposition of CMPs of up to $50,000 and, in some cases, treble damages, for actions relating to alleged false statements to the federal government. |
| |
• | Nursing Home Transparency Requirements — In addition to expanded CMP provisions, PPACA imposed substantial new transparency requirements for Medicare-participating nursing facilities. Existing law required Medicare providers to disclose to CMS: (1) any person or entity that owns directly or indirectly an ownership interest of five percent or more in a provider; (2) officers and directors (if a corporation) and partners (if a partnership); and (3) holders of a mortgage, deed of trust, note or other obligation secured by the entity or the property of the entity. PPACA expanded the information required to be disclosed to include: (4) the facility’s organizational structure; (5) additional information on officers, directors, trustees, and “managing employees” of the facility (including their names, titles, and start dates of services); and (6) information on any “additional disclosable party” of the facility. CMS has not yet promulgated final regulations to implement these provisions. |
| |
• | Face-to-Face Encounter Requirements — PPACA imposed new patient face-to-face encounter requirements on home health agencies and hospices to establish a patient's ongoing eligibility for Medicare home health services or hospice services, as applicable. Effective for patients with home health starts of care on or after January 1, 2011 and for hospice patients with a third or later benefit period on or after January 1, 2011, a certifying physician or other designated health care professional must conduct and properly document the face-to-face encounters with the Medicare beneficiary within a specified timeframe, and failure of the face-to-face encounter to occur and be properly documented during the applicable timeframe could render the patient's care ineligible for reimbursement under Medicare. |
| |
• | Suspension of Payments During Pending Fraud Investigations — PPACA also provided the federal government with expanded authority to suspend payment if a provider is investigated for allegations or issues of fraud. Section 6402 of the PPACA provides that Medicare and Medicaid payments may be suspended pending a “credible investigation of fraud,” unless the Secretary of Health and Human Services determined that good cause exists not to suspend payments. “Credible investigation of fraud” is undefined, although the Secretary must consult with the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in determining whether a credible investigation of fraud exists. This suspension authority created a new mechanism for the federal government to suspend both Medicare and Medicaid payments for allegations of fraud, independent of whether a state exercised its authority to suspend Medicaid payments pending a fraud investigation. To the extent the Secretary applied this suspension of payments provision to one or more of our facilities for allegations of fraud, such a suspension could adversely affect our revenue, cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. OIG promulgated regulations making these provisions effective as of March 25, 2011. |
| |
• | Overpayment Reporting and Repayment; Expanded False Claims Act Liability — PPACA also enacted several important changes that expand potential liability under the federal False Claims Act. PPACA provided that overpayments related to services provided to both Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries must be reported and returned to the applicable payor within the later of sixty days of identification of the overpayment, or the date the corresponding cost report (if applicable) is due. Any overpayment retained after the deadline is considered an “obligation” for purposes of the federal False Claims Act. |
| |
• | Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing Program — PPACA required the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to develop a plan to implement a value-based purchasing program for Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities. HHS delivered a report to Congress outlining its plans for implementing this value-based purchasing program. The value-based purchasing program would provide payment incentives for Medicare-participating skilled nursing facilities to improve the quality of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Among the most relevant factors in HHS' plans to implement value-based purchasing for skilled nursing facilities is the current Nursing Home Value-Based Purchasing Demonstration Project, which concluded in December 2012. HHS indicates it will complete an evaluation of the demonstration program in the autumn of 2013, and any permanent value-based purchasing program for skilled nursing facilities will be implemented after that evaluation. |
| |
• | Voluntary Pilot Program — Bundled Payments — To support the policies of making all providers responsible during an episode of care and rewarding value over volume, HHS will establish, test and evaluate alternative payment methodologies for Medicare services through a five-year, national, voluntary pilot program starting in 2013. This program will provide incentives for providers to coordinate patient care across the continuum and to be jointly accountable for an entire episode of care centered around a hospitalization. HHS will develop qualifying provider payment methods that may include bundled payments and bids from entities for episodes of care that begins three days prior to hospitalization and spans 30 days following discharge. The bundled payment will cover the costs of acute care inpatient services; physicians’ services delivered in and outside of an acute care hospital; outpatient hospital services including emergency department services; post-acute care services, including home health services, skilled nursing services, inpatient rehabilitation services; and inpatient hospital services. The payment methodology will include payment for services, such as care coordination, medication reconciliation, discharge planning and transitional care services, and other patient-centered activities. Payments for items and services cannot result in spending more than would otherwise be expended for such entities if the pilot program were not implemented. As with Medicare’s shared savings program discussed above, payment arrangements among providers on the backside of the bundled payment must take into account significant hurdles under the Anti-kickback Law, the Stark Law and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. This pilot program may expand in 2016 if expansion would reduce Medicare spending without also reducing quality of care. |
| |
• | Accountable Care Organizations — PPACA authorized CMS to enter into contracts with Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). ACOs are entities of providers and suppliers organized to deliver services to Medicare beneficiaries and eligible to receive a share of any cost savings the entity can achieve by delivering services to those beneficiaries at a cost below a set baseline and with sufficient quality of care. CMS recently finalized regulations to implement the ACO initiative. The widespread adoption of ACO payment methodologies in the Medicare program, and in other programs and payors, could impact our operations and reimbursement for our services. |
On June 28, 2012 the United States Supreme Court ruled that the enactment of PPACA did not violate the Constitution of the United States. This ruling permits the implementation of most of the provisions of PPACA to proceed. The provisions of PPACA discussed above are only examples of federal health reform provisions that we believe may have a material impact on the long-term care industry and on our business. However, the foregoing discussion is not intended to constitute, nor does it constitute, an exhaustive review and discussion of PPACA. It is possible that these and other provisions of PPACA may be interpreted, clarified, or applied to our facilities or operations in a way that could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations.
Historically, adjustments to reimbursement under Medicare have had a significant effect on our revenue. For a discussion of historic adjustments and recent changes to the Medicare program and related reimbursement rates see Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business and Industry - “Our revenue could be impacted by federal and state changes to reimbursement and other aspects of Medicaid and Medicare,” “Our future revenue, financial condition and results of operations could be impacted by continued cost containment pressures on Medicaid spending,” “We may not be fully reimbursed for all services for which each facility bills through consolidated billing, which could adversely affect our revenue, financial condition and results of operations” and “Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system will impose new requirements upon us and may lower our reimbursements." The federal government and state governments continue to focus on efforts to curb spending on healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are not able to predict the outcome of the legislative process. We also cannot predict the extent to which proposals will be adopted or, if adopted and implemented, what effect, if any, such proposals and existing new legislation will have on us. Efforts to impose reduced allowances, greater discounts and more stringent cost controls by government and other payors are expected to continue and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth details of our revenue, expenses and earnings as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Revenue | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Expenses: | | | |
Cost of services (exclusive of facility rent, general and administrative expense and depreciation and amortization shown separately below) | 80.7 |
| | 79.5 |
|
U.S. Government inquiry settlement | 15.1 |
| | — |
|
Facility rent—cost of services | 1.5 |
| | 1.6 |
|
General and administrative expense | 4.1 |
| | 3.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 3.5 |
| | 3.5 |
|
Total expenses | 104.9 |
| | 88.4 |
|
(Loss) income from operations | (4.9 | ) | | 11.6 |
|
Other income (expense): | | | |
Interest expense | (1.4 | ) | | (1.4 | ) |
Interest income | — |
| | — |
|
Other expense, net | (1.4 | ) | | (1.4 | ) |
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes | (6.3 | ) | | 10.2 |
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | (1.4 | ) | | 3.8 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations | (4.9 | ) | | 6.4 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | (0.8 | ) | | — |
|
Net (loss) income | (5.7 | ) | | 6.4 |
|
Less: net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests | (0.1 | ) | | — |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. | (5.6 | )% | | 6.4 | % |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| (In thousands) |
Other Non-GAAP Financial Data: | |
| | |
EBITDA(1) | $ | (2,658 | ) | | $ | 30,472 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)(2) | 33,912 |
| | 31,214 |
|
EBITDAR(1) | 656 |
| | 33,792 |
|
Adjusted EBITDAR(1)(2) | 36,971 |
| | 34,363 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | EBITDA, EBITDAR, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. Regulation G, Conditions for Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures, and other provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, define and prescribe the conditions for use of certain non-GAAP financial information. We calculate EBITDA as net income from continuing operations, adjusted for net losses attributable to noncontrolling interest, before (a) interest expense, net, (b) provision for income taxes, and (c) depreciation and amortization. We calculate EBITDAR by adjusting EBITDA to exclude facility rent—cost of services. These non-GAAP financial measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. |
We believe EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR are useful to investors and other external users of our financial statements in evaluating our operating performance because:
| |
• | they are widely used by investors and analysts in our industry as a supplemental measure to evaluate the overall operating performance of companies in our industry without regard to items such as interest expense, net and depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending on the book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired; and |
| |
• | they help investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure and asset base from our operating results. |
We use EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR:
| |
• | as measurements of our operating performance to assist us in comparing our operating performance on a consistent basis; |
| |
• | to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business; |
| |
• | to evaluate the effectiveness of our operational strategies; and |
| |
• | to compare our operating performance to that of our competitors. |
We typically use EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR to compare the operating performance of each operation. EBITDA and EBITDAR are useful in this regard because they do not include such costs as net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, and, with respect to EBITDAR, facility rent — cost of services, which may vary from period-to-period depending upon various factors, including the method used to finance facilities, the amount of debt that we have incurred, whether a facility is owned or leased, the date of acquisition of a facility or business, and the tax law of the state in which a business unit operates. As a result, we believe that the use of EBITDA and EBITDAR provide a meaningful and consistent comparison of our business between periods by eliminating certain items required by GAAP.
We also establish compensation programs and bonuses for our leaders that are partially based upon the achievement of Adjusted EBITDAR targets.
Despite the importance of these measures in analyzing our underlying business, designing incentive compensation and for our goal setting, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR are non-GAAP financial measures that have no standardized meaning defined by GAAP. Therefore, our EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR measures have limitations as analytical tools, and they should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
| |
• | they do not reflect our current or future cash requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
| |
• | they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
| |
• | they do not reflect the net interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt; |
| |
• | they do not reflect any income tax payments we may be required to make; |
| |
• | although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and EBITDAR do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and |
| |
• | other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than we do, which may limit their usefulness as comparative measures. |
We compensate for these limitations by using them only to supplement net income on a basis prepared in accordance with GAAP in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business.
Management strongly encourages investors to review our consolidated financial statements in their entirety and to not rely on any single financial measure. Because these non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies’ non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. For information about our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP, see our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.
| |
(2) | Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA adjusted for non-core business items, which for the reported periods includes, to the extent applicable: |
| |
• | Charge related to the U.S. Government inquiry. |
| |
• | Legal costs incurred in connection with the U.S. Government inquiry. |
| |
• | Losses incurred by our newly opened urgent care centers |
| |
• | Losses incurred by one newly constructed skilled nursing facility |
| |
• | Acquisition-related costs |
| |
• | Costs incurred to recognize income tax credits |
Adjusted EBITDAR is EBITDAR adjusted for the above noted non-core business items.
The table below reconciles net income to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR for the periods presented: |
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| (In thousands) |
Consolidated statements of operations Data: | | | |
Net (loss) income | $ | (12,511 | ) | | $ | 12,828 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | 364 |
| | 76 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | 1,748 |
| | 66 |
|
Interest expense, net | 3,022 |
| | 2,874 |
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | (3,013 | ) | | |