UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


(Mark One)

x                              ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006

or

o                                 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                               to                              

Commission File Number 1-13045


IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

 

23-2588479

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

745 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts

 

02111

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

617-535-4766

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

 

 

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

 

Common Stock, $.01 par value per share

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes o   No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes o   No x

As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $4,377,632,337 based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.

Number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock at February 15, 2007: 199,153,514

 




IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
2006 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

Table of Contents

 

 

 

Page

PART I

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Business

 

1

 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

14

 

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

18

 

Item 2.

 

Properties

 

19

 

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

19

 

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

19

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

20

 

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

21

 

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

24

 

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

49

 

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

50

 

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

51

 

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

51

 

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

 

52

 

PART III

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

53

 

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

53

 

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

53

 

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

53

 

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

53

 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

53

 

 

i




References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” include Iron Mountain Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information required in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about May 24, 2007.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have made statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements concern our operations, economic performance, financial condition, goals, beliefs, future growth strategies, investments objectives, plans and current expectations. The forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. When we use words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our expected results may not be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, among others:

·       changes in customer preferences and demand for our services;

·       changes in the price for our services relative to the cost of providing such services;

·       in the various digital businesses in which we are engaged, capital and technical requirements will be beyond our means, markets for our services will be less robust than anticipated, or competition will be more intense than anticipated;

·       the cost to comply with current and future legislation or regulation relating to privacy issues;

·       the impact of litigation that may arise in connection with incidents of inadvertent disclosures of customers’ confidential information;

·       our ability or inability to complete acquisitions on satisfactory terms and to integrate acquired companies efficiently;

·       the cost and availability of financing for contemplated growth;

·       business partners upon whom we depend for technical assistance or management and acquisition expertise outside the U.S. will not perform as anticipated;

·       changes in the political and economic environments in the countries in which our international subsidiaries operate; and

·       other trends in competitive or economic conditions affecting our financial condition or results of operations not presently contemplated.

Other risks may adversely impact us, as described more fully under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements except as statements of our present intentions and of our present expectations, which may or may not occur. You should read these cautionary statements as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to release publicly the result of any revision to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we have made in this document, as well as our other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or “SEC”).

ii




PART I

Item 1. Business.

A. Development of Business.

We believe we are the global leader in information protection and storage services. We help organizations around the world reduce the costs and risks associated with information protection and storage. We offer comprehensive records management and data protection solutions, along with the expertise and experience to address complex information challenges such as rising storage costs, litigation, regulatory compliance and disaster recovery. Founded in 1951, Iron Mountain is a trusted partner to more than 90,000 corporate clients throughout North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. We have a diversified customer base comprised of commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government organizations, including more than 90% of the Fortune 1000 and more than 85% of the FTSE 100.

Our information protection and storage services can be broadly divided into three major service categories:  records management, data protection & recovery, and information destruction. We offer both physical services and technology solutions in each of these categories, and we continue to expand our geographic footprint in order to protect and store our customers’ information without regard to media format or geographic location.

Our physical records management services include: records management program development and implementation based on best-practices to help customers comply with specific regulatory requirements, implementation of policy-based programs that feature secure, cost-effective storage for all major media, including paper (which is the dominant form of records storage), flexible retrieval access and retention management. Our technology-based records management services are comprised primarily of digital archiving and related services for secure, legally compliant and cost-effective long-term archiving of electronic records. Within the records management services category, we have developed specialized services for vital records and regulated industries such as healthcare, energy and financial services.

Our physical data protection & recovery services include disaster preparedness, planning, support and secure, off-site vaulting of data backup media for fast and efficient data recovery in the event of a disaster, human error or virus. Our technology-based data protection & recovery services include online backup and recovery solutions (also known as electronic vaulting) for desktop and laptop computers and remote servers. Additionally, we serve as a trusted, neutral third party and offer technology escrow services to protect and manage source code and other proprietary information.

Our information destruction services are comprised almost exclusively of secure shredding services. Secure shredding services complete the life cycle of a record and involve the shredding of sensitive documents in a way that ensures privacy and a secure chain of record custody. These services typically include the scheduled pick-up of loose office records which customers accumulate in specially designed secure containers we provide. Our technology-based information destruction services include DataDefense, which provides automatic, intelligent encryption of sensitive PC data and, when behaviors that are inconsistent with authorized use are detected, that data is automatically eliminated and the PC is disabled—this is designed to render the data useless to unauthorized users.

In addition to our core records management, data protection & recovery, and information destruction services, we sell storage materials, including cardboard boxes and magnetic media, and provide consulting, facilities management, fulfillment and other outsourcing services.

Our vision is to protect and store the world’s information and to that end we have organized our business into a geographic model with separate management teams for each of the following major geographic regions:  North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. The one exception to this

1




model is our Digital Services business unit. Digital services, by their nature, are deployed in a virtual fashion leveraging a common set of intellectual property and a global technology infrastructure. Our largest segment, the North American Physical Business, offers all of our physical records management services, data protection & recovery services, and information destruction services. We expect that over time all of these products and services will be available on a global basis throughout all of our geographic segments.

Iron Mountain was founded in 1951 in an underground facility near Hudson, New York. Now in our 56th year, we have experienced tremendous growth and organizational change, particularly since successfully completing the initial public offering of our common stock in February 1996. Since then, we have grown from a regional business with limited product offerings and annual revenues of $104 million in 1995 into a global enterprise providing a broad range of information protection and storage services to customers in markets around the world. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we had total revenues of $2.4 billion.

Our growth since 1995 has been accomplished primarily through the acquisition of U.S. and international information protection and storage services companies. The goals of our current acquisition program are:  to supplement internal growth in our physical businesses by continuing to establish a footprint in targeted international markets and adding fold-in acquisitions both in the U.S. and internationally; and to accelerate our strategy, leadership and time to market in our digital businesses. We expect our digital acquisitions will be of two primary types, those that bring us new or improved technologies to enhance our existing technology portfolio and those that increase our market position through technology and established revenue streams. To date, we completed two significant technology acquisitions:  Connected Corporation (“Connected”) in November 2004 and LiveVault Corporation (“LiveVault”) in December 2005.

Having substantially completed our North American geographic expansion by the end of 2000, we shifted our focus from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. In 2001, as a result of this shift, internal revenue growth exceeded growth through acquisitions for the first time since we began our acquisition program in 1996.This has been the case in each year since 2001 with the exception of 2004, when revenue growth from acquisitions exceeded internal revenue growth due primarily to the acquisition of the records management operations of Hays plc (“Hays IMS”) in July 2003. In the absence of unusual acquisition activity, we expect to achieve most of our revenue growth internally in 2007 and beyond.

We expect to achieve our internal revenue growth objectives primarily through a sophisticated sales and account management coverage model designed to drive incremental revenues by acquiring new customer relationships and increasing business with new and existing customers by selling them our products and services in new geographies and selling additional products and services such as secure shredding and digital data protection. These selling efforts will be augmented and supported by an expanded marketing program, which includes product management as a core discipline. We are also developing an extensive worldwide network of channel partners through which we are selling a wide array of technology solutions, primarily our digital data protection and recovery products and services.

As of December 31, 2006, we provided services to over 90,000 corporate clients in 85 markets in the U.S. and 86 markets outside of the U.S., employed over 18,600 people and operated over 900 records management facilities in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific.

2




B. Description of Business.

The Information Protection and Storage Services Industry

Overview

Companies in the information protection and storage services industry store and manage information in a variety of media formats, which can broadly be divided into physical and electronic records, and provide a wide range of services related to the records stored. We define physical records to include paper documents, as well as all other non-electronic media such as microfilm and microfiche, master audio and videotapes, film, X-rays and blueprints. Electronic records include various forms of magnetic media such as computer tapes and hard drives and optical disks.

Physical Records

Physical records may be broadly divided into two categories: active and inactive. Active records relate to ongoing and recently completed activities or contain information that is frequently referenced. Active records are usually stored and managed on-site by the organization that originated them to ensure ready availability. Inactive physical records are the principal focus of the information protection and storage services industry. Inactive records consist of those records that are not needed for immediate access but which must be retained for legal, regulatory and compliance reasons or for occasional reference in support of ongoing business operations. A large and growing specialty subset of the physical records market is medical records. These are active and semi-active records that are often stored off-site with and serviced by an information protection and storage services vendor. Special regulatory requirements often apply to medical records.

Electronic Records

Electronic records management focuses on the storage of, and related services for, computer media that is either a backup copy of recently processed data or archival in nature. Customer needs for data backup and recovery and archiving are distinctively different. Backup data exists because of the need of many businesses to maintain backup copies of their data in order to be able to recover the data in the event of a system failure, casualty loss or other disaster. It is customary (and a best practice) for data processing groups to rotate backup tapes to off-site locations on a regular basis and to require multiple copies of such information at multiple sites.

In addition to the physical rotation and storage of backup data that our physical business segments provide, our Worldwide Digital Business segment offers electronic vaulting services as an alternative way for businesses to transfer data to us, and to access the data they have stored with us. Electronic vaulting is a Web-based service that automatically backs up computer data from servers or directly from desktop and laptop computers over the Internet and stores it in one of our secure data centers. In early 2003, we announced an expansion of the electronic vaulting service to include backup and recovery for personal computer data, answering customers’ needs to protect critical business data, which is often unprotected on employee laptop and desktop personal computers. In November 2004, we acquired Connected, a market leader in the backup and recovery of this distributed data, and in December 2005, we acquired LiveVault, a market leader in the backup and recovery of server data.

There is a growing need for better ways of archiving electronic records for legal, regulatory and compliance reasons and for occasional reference in support of ongoing business operations. Historically, businesses have relied on backup tapes for storing archived data in electronic format, but this process can be costly and ineffective when attempting to search and retrieve the data for litigation or other needs. In addition, many industries, such as healthcare and financial services, are facing increased governmental regulation mandating the way in which electronic records are stored and managed. To help customers

3




meet these growing storage challenges, we introduced digital archiving services. We have experienced increasing market adoption of these services, especially for e-mail archiving, which enables businesses to identify and retrieve electronic records quickly and cost-effectively, while maintaining regulatory compliance.

We believe the issues encountered by customers trying to manage their electronic records are similar to the ones they face in their physical records management programs and consist primarily of: (1) storage capacity and the preservation of data; (2) access to and control over the data in a secure environment; and (3) the need to retain electronic records due to regulatory compliance or for litigation support. Our digital services offerings are representative of our commitment to address evolving records management needs and expand the array of services we offer.

Growth of Market

We believe that the volume of stored physical and electronic records will continue to increase for a number of reasons, including: (1) inexpensive document producing technologies such as facsimile, desktop publishing software and desktop printing; (2) the continued proliferation of data processing technologies such as personal computers and networks; (3) regulatory requirements; (4) concerns over possible future litigation and the resulting increases in volume and holding periods of records; (5) the high cost of reviewing records and deciding whether to retain or destroy them; (6) the failure of many entities to adopt or follow policies on records destruction; and (7) audit requirements to keep backup copies of certain records in off-site locations.

We believe that paper-based information will continue to grow, not in spite of, but because of, new “paperless” technologies such as e-mail and the Internet. These technologies have prompted the creation of hard copies of such electronic information and have also led to increased demand for electronic records services, such as the storage and off-site rotation of backup copies of magnetic media. In addition, we believe that the proliferation of digital information technologies and distributed data networks has created a growing need for efficient, cost-effective, high quality technology solutions for electronic data protection, digital archiving and the management of electronic documents.

Consolidation of a Highly Fragmented Industry

There was significant consolidation within the highly fragmented information protection and storage services industry in North America from 1995 to 2000 and at a slower but continuing pace in recent years. Most information protection and storage services companies serve a single local market, and are often either owner-operated or ancillary to another business, such as a moving and storage company. We believe that the consolidation trend, both in North America and other regions, will continue because of the industry’s capital requirements for growth, opportunities for large information protection and storage services providers to achieve economies of scale and customer demands for more sophisticated technology-based solutions.

We believe that the consolidation trend in the industry is also due to, and will continue as a result of, the preference of certain large organizations to contract with one vendor in multiple cities and countries for multiple services. In particular, customers increasingly demand a single, large, sophisticated company to handle all of their important physical and electronic records needs. Large national and multinational companies are better able to satisfy these demands than smaller competitors. We have made, and intend to continue to make, acquisitions of our competitors, many of whom are small, single-city operators.

Description of Our Business

We generate our revenues by providing storage for both physical and electronic records in a variety of information media formats, core records management, data protection & recovery, and information

4




destruction services and an expanding menu of complementary products and services to a large and diverse customer base. Providing outsourced information protection and storage services is the mainstay of our customer relationships and provides the foundation for our revenue growth. Core services, which are a vital part of a comprehensive records management program, consist primarily of the handling and transportation of stored records and information. In our secure shredding operations, core services consist primarily of the scheduled collection and handling of sensitive records.  As is the case with storage revenues, core service revenues are highly recurring in nature and therefore very predictable. In 2006, our storage and core service revenues represented approximately 87% of our total consolidated revenues. In addition to our core services, we offer a wide array of complementary products and services such as performing special project work, selling records management services related products, providing fulfillment services and consulting on records management issues. These services address more specific needs and are designed to enhance our customers’ overall records management programs. These services complement our core services; however, they are more episodic and discretionary in nature. Revenue generated by all of our operating segments includes both core and complementary components.

Our various operating segments offer the products and services discussed below. In general, our North American Physical Business segment offers physical records management services, including business records management, healthcare information services, vital records services, physical data protection & recovery services, service and courier operations, secure shredding, fulfillment and consulting services, in the U.S. and Canada. Our International Physical Business segment offers elements of our physical product and services lines outside the U.S. and Canada. Our Worldwide Digital Business segment includes our online backup and recovery solutions for server data and personal computers, digital archiving services, intellectual property management services and electronic information destruction services. Some of our complementary services and products are offered within all of our segments. The amount of revenues derived from our North American Physical Business, International Physical Business and Worldwide Digital Business operating segments and other relevant data, including financial information about geographic areas and product and service lines, for fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006 are set forth in Note 9 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Business Records Management

The hard copy business records stored by our customers with us by their nature are not very active. These types of records are stored in cartons packed by the customer. We use a proprietary order processing and inventory management system known as the SafekeeperPLUS ® system to efficiently store and later retrieve a customer’s cartons. Storage charges are generally billed monthly on a per storage unit basis, usually either per carton or per cubic foot of records, and include the provision of space, racking, computerized inventory and activity tracking and physical security.

Healthcare Information Services

Healthcare information services principally include the handling, storage, filing, processing and retrieval of medical records used by hospitals, private practitioners and other medical institutions. Medical records tend to be more active in nature and are typically stored on specialized open shelving systems that provide easier access to individual files. Healthcare information services also include recurring project work and ancillary services. Recurring project work involves the on-site removal of aged patient files and related computerized file indexing. Ancillary healthcare information services include release of information (medical record copying), temporary staffing, contract coding, facilities management and imaging.

5




Vital Records Services

Vital records contain critical or irreplaceable data such as master audio and video recordings, film and other highly proprietary information. Vital records may require special facilities or services, either because of the data they contain or the media on which they are recorded. Our charges for providing enhanced security and special climate-controlled environments for vital records are higher than for typical storage services. We provide the same ancillary services for vital records as we provide for our other storage operations.

Physical Data Protection & Recovery Services

Physical data protection & recovery services consist of the storage and rotation of backup computer media as part of corporate disaster recovery and business continuity plans. Computer tapes, cartridges and disk packs are transported off-site by our courier operations on a scheduled basis to secure, climate-controlled facilities, where they are available to customers 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to facilitate data recovery in the event of a disaster. We use various proprietary information technology systems such as MediaLink™ and SecureBase™ software to manage this process. We also manage tape library relocations and support disaster recovery testing and execution.

Service and Courier Operations

Service and courier operations are an integral part of a comprehensive records management program for all physical media including paper and certain electronic records. They include adding records to storage, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, permanent withdrawals from storage, destruction of records and the rotation of back-up computer media. Service charges are generally assessed for each procedure on a per unit basis. The SafekeeperPLUS® system controls the service processes from order entry through transportation and invoicing for business records management while the MediaLink™ and SecureBase™ systems manage the process for the physical data protection services business.

Courier operations consist primarily of the pick-up and delivery of records upon customer request. Charges for courier services are based on urgency of delivery, volume and location and are billed monthly. As of December 31, 2006, we were utilizing a fleet of approximately 3,000 owned or leased vehicles.

Secure Shredding

Secure shredding is a natural extension of our records management services, completing the life cycle of a record, and involves the shredding of sensitive documents for corporate customers that, in many cases, also use our services for management of less sensitive archival records. These services typically include the scheduled pick-up of loose office records which customers accumulate in specially designed secure containers we provide. We believe that customers are motivated by increased privacy regulations, such as the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (“FACTA”) and the desire to protect their proprietary trade secrets and personal information. Regulations issued pursuant to FACTA list secure shredding as a preferred method of destroying personal data that exists in many hard copy records. Complementary to our shredding operations is the sale of the resultant waste paper to third-party recyclers. Through a combination of plant-based shredding operations and mobile shredding units comprised of custom built trucks, we are able to offer secure shredding services to our customers in all of our existing markets throughout the U.S. and Canada. In December 2005, we acquired Secure Destruction Limited, the largest provider of secure shredding services in the U.K.

We seek to expand our presence in this business through acquisitions and internal start-ups that leverage our existing records management infrastructure.

6




Electronic Vaulting Services

Electronic vaulting is our Web-based service that automatically backs up computer data from servers or directly from desktop or laptop computers over the Internet and stores it in one of our secure data centers. Customers using electronic vaulting for the online backup of desktop or laptop computer and server data can choose our off-site hosted Software as a Service solution or they can license the software from us as part of a customer on-site solution.

Digital Archiving Services

Our digital archiving services focus on archiving digital information with long-term preservation requirements. These services represent the digital analogy to our physical records management services. Because of increased litigation risks and regulatory mandates, companies are increasingly aware of the need to apply the same records management policies and retention schedules to electronic data as they do physical records. Typical digital records include e-mail, e-statements, images, electronic documents retained for legal or compliance purposes and other data documenting business transactions.

The growth rate of mission-critical digital information is accelerating, driven in part by the use of the Internet as a distribution and transaction medium. The rising cost and increasing importance of digital information management, coupled with the increasing availability of telecommunications bandwidth at lower costs, may create meaningful opportunities for us. We continue to cultivate marketing and technology partnerships to support this anticipated growth.

Intellectual Property Management Services

Our intellectual property management services specialize in third party technology escrow services that protect intellectual property assets such as software source code. In addition, we assist in securing intellectual property as collateral for lending, investments and joint ventures, in managing domain name registrations and transfers, and in providing expertise and assistance to brokers and dealers in complying with electronic records regulations of the SEC.

Complementary Services and Products

We offer a variety of additional services which customers may request or contract for on an individual basis. These services include conducting records inventories, packing records into cartons or other containers, and creating computerized indices of files and individual documents. We also provide services for the management of active records programs. We can provide these services, which generally include document and file processing and storage, both off-site at our own facilities and by supplying our own personnel to perform management functions on-site at the customer’s premises.

Other complementary lines of business that we operate include fulfillment services and professional consulting services. Fulfillment services are performed by our wholly-owned subsidiary, COMAC, Inc. (“COMAC”). COMAC stores customer marketing literature and delivers this material to sales offices, trade shows and prospective customers’ sites based on current and prospective customer orders. In addition, COMAC assembles custom marketing packages and orders, and manages and provides detailed reporting on customer marketing literature inventories.

We provide professional consulting services to customers, enabling them to develop and implement comprehensive records and information management programs. Our consulting business draws on our experience in information protection and storage services to analyze the practices of companies and assist them in creating more effective programs of records and information management. Our consultants work with these customers to develop policies and schedules for document retention and destruction.

7




We sell software licenses to our electronic vaulting customers who prefer an on-site solution for the online backup and recovery of server and personal computer data. We also sell: (1) a full line of specially designed corrugated cardboard, metal and plastic storage containers; (2) magnetic media products including computer tapes, cartridges and drives, tape cleaners and supplies and CDs; and (3) computer room equipment and supplies such as racking systems and furniture.

Financial Characteristics of Our Business

Our financial model is based on the recurring nature of our various revenue streams. The historical predictability of our revenues and the resulting operating income before depreciation and amortization (“OIBDA”)1 allow us to operate with a high degree of financial leverage. Our primary financial goal has always been, and continues to be, to increase consolidated OIBDA in relation to capital invested, even as our focus has shifted from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. Our business has the following financial characteristics:

·       Recurring Revenues. We derive a majority of our consolidated revenues from fixed periodic, usually monthly, fees charged to customers based on the volume of records stored. Once a customer places physical records in storage with us and until those records are destroyed or permanently removed, for which we typically receive a service fee, we receive recurring payments for storage fees without incurring additional labor or marketing expenses or significant capital costs. Similarly, contracts for the storage of electronic backup media consist primarily of fixed monthly payments. Our quarterly revenues from these fixed periodic storage fees have grown for 72 consecutive quarters.  For each of the five years 2002 through 2006, storage revenues, which are stable and recurring, have accounted for over 56% of our total consolidated revenues. This stable and growing storage revenue base also provides the foundation for increases in service revenues and OIBDA.

·       Historically Non-Cyclical Storage Business. We have not experienced any significant reductions in our storage business as a result of past economic downturns, although we can give no assurance that this would be the case in the future. We believe that companies that have outsourced records management services are less likely during economic downturns to incur the move-out costs and other expenses associated with switching vendors or moving their records management services programs in-house. However, during a recent economic slowdown, the rate at which some customers added new cartons to their inventory was below historical levels. The net effect of these factors has been the continued growth of our storage revenue base, albeit at a lower rate. For each of the five years 2002 through 2006, total net volume growth in North America has ranged between 6% and 7%.

·       Inherent Growth from Existing Physical Records Customers. Our physical records customers have on average generated additional cartons at a faster rate than stored cartons have been destroyed or permanently removed. We estimate that inherent growth from existing customers represents approximately half of our total net volume growth in North America. We believe the consistent growth of our physical records storage revenues is the result of a number of factors, including: (1) the trend toward increased records retention; (2) customer satisfaction with our services; and (3) the costs and inconvenience of moving storage operations in-house or to another provider of information protection and storage services.


1                    For a more detailed definition and reconciliation of OIBDA and a discussion of why we believe this measure provides relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures.”

8




·       Diversified and Stable Customer Base. As of December 31, 2006, we had over 90,000 corporate clients in a variety of industries. We currently provide services to commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government organizations, including more than 90% of the Fortune 1000 and 85% of the FTSE 100. No customer accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006. For each of the three years 2004 through 2006, the average volume reduction due to customers terminating their relationship with us was less than 2%.

·       Capital Expenditures Related Primarily to Growth. Our information protection and storage business requires limited annual capital expenditures made in order to maintain our current revenue stream. For the years 2004 through 2006, over 85% of our aggregate capital expenditures were growth-related investments, primarily in storage systems, which include racking, building and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and buildings. These growth-related capital expenditures are primarily discretionary and create additional capacity for increases in revenues and OIBDA. In addition, since shifting our focus from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth, our capital expenditures, made primarily to support our internal revenue growth, have exceeded the aggregate acquisition consideration we conveyed in both 2001 and 2002. Although this was not the case in 2003 due to the acquisition of Hays IMS and in 2004 due to the acquisition of Connected and the 49.9% equity interest held by Mentmore plc (“Mentmore”) in Iron Mountain Europe Limited (“IME”), it was the case in both 2005 and 2006 and we expect this trend to continue in the future absent unusual acquisition activity.

Growth Strategy

Our objective is to maintain a leadership position in the information protection and storage services industry around the world, protecting and storing our customers’ information without regard to media format or geographic location. In the U.S. and Canada, we seek to be one of the largest information protection and storage services providers in each of our markets. Internationally, our objectives are to continue to capitalize on our expertise in the information protection and storage services industry and to make additional acquisitions and investments in selected international markets. Our primary avenues of growth are: (1) increased business with existing customers; (2) the addition of new customers; (3) the introduction of new products and services such as secure shredding and electronic vaulting; and (4) selective acquisitions in new and existing markets.

Growth from Existing Customers

Our existing customers storing physical records contribute to storage and storage-related service revenues growth because on average they generate additional cartons at a faster rate than old cartons are destroyed or permanently removed. In order to maximize growth opportunities from existing customers, we seek to maintain high levels of customer retention by providing premium customer service through our local account management staff.

Our sales coverage model is designed to identify and capitalize on incremental revenue opportunities by allocating our sales resources based on a sophisticated segmentation of our customer base and selling additional records management, data protection & recovery and information destruction services, in new and existing markets, within our existing customer relationships. We also seek to leverage existing business relationships with our customers by selling complementary services and products. Services include records tracking, indexing, customized reporting, vital records management and consulting services.

9




Addition of New Customers

Our sales forces are dedicated to three primary objectives: (1) establishing new customer account relationships; (2) generating additional revenue from existing customers; and (3) expanding new and existing customer relationships by effectively selling a wide array of complementary services and products. In order to accomplish these objectives, our sales forces draw on our U.S. and international marketing organizations and senior management.

Introduction of New Products and Services

We continue to expand our menu of products and services. We have established a national presence in the secure shredding industry in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. and offer our electronic vaulting management services worldwide. These new products and services allow us to further penetrate our existing customer accounts and attract new customers in previously untapped markets.

Growth through Acquisitions

Our acquisition strategy includes expanding geographically, as necessary, and increasing our presence and scale within existing markets through “fold-in” acquisitions. We have a successful record of acquiring and integrating information protection and storage services companies. Between January 1, 1996, when we began our acquisition program, and December 31, 2006, we completed 187 acquisitions in North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific for total consideration of approximately $3.1 billion, including approximately $1 billion associated with our merger with Pierce Leahy Corp. (“Pierce Leahy”) in February 2000. During that period, we substantially completed our geographic expansion in North America, Europe and Latin America and began our expansion into Asia Pacific.

Acquisitions in the U.S. and Canada

We intend to continue our acquisition program in the U.S. and Canada focusing primarily on the secure shredding industry, expanding geographically, as necessary and building scale in some of our smaller markets through “fold-in” acquisitions. However, given the small number of large acquisition prospects and our increased revenue base, future acquisitions are expected to be less significant to overall U.S. and Canadian revenue growth.

International Acquisition Strategy

We also intend to continue to make acquisitions and investments in information protection and storage services businesses outside the U.S. and Canada. We have acquired and invested in, and seek to acquire and invest in, information protection and storage services companies in countries, and, more specifically, markets within such countries, where we believe there is sufficient demand from existing multinational customers or the potential for significant growth. Since beginning our international expansion program in January 1999, we have directly and through joint ventures, expanded our operations into 26 countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. These transactions have taken, and may continue to take, the form of acquisitions of the entire business or controlling or minority investments, with a long-term goal of full ownership. In addition to the criteria we use to evaluate U.S. and Canadian acquisition candidates, we also evaluate the presence in the potential market of our existing customers as well as the risks uniquely associated with an international investment, including those risks described below.

The experience, depth and strength of local management are particularly important in our international acquisition strategy. As a result, we have formed joint ventures with, or acquired significant interests in, target businesses throughout Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. We began our international expansion by acquiring a 50.1% controlling interest in each of our IME, Iron Mountain

10




South America, Ltd. (“IMSA”) and Sistemas de Archivo Corporativo (a Mexican limited liability company) subsidiaries.

In 2006, we established a majority-owned joint venture serving four major markets in India, completed minority investments in information protection and storage businesses with operations in Poland and Russia, and signed a definitive agreement to establish a majority-owned joint venture in Asia Pacific. The Asia Pacific transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2007 for consideration of approximately $2 million and gives us an initial presence in Singapore, Hong Kong-SAR, China, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan and Malaysia.

We believe this strategy, rather than an outright acquisition, may, in certain markets, better position us to expand the existing business. The local partner benefits from our expertise in the information protection and storage services industry, our multinational customer relationships, our access to capital and our technology, and we benefit from our local partner’s knowledge of the market, relationships with local customers and their presence in the community.

Our long-term goal is to acquire full ownership of each such business. To that end, in February 2004, we acquired the remaining 49.9% minority equity interest in IME, in January 2005, we acquired the remaining 49.9% minority equity interest in IMSA and in April 2006, we acquired the remaining minority equity ownership in our Mexican operations. In addition, we have bought out partnership interests, in whole or in part, in Chile, Eastern Europe and the Netherlands. As a result of these transactions we own more than 98% of our international operations, measured as a percentage of consolidated revenues.

Our international investments are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to the indigenous political, social, regulatory, tax and economic structures of other countries, as well as fluctuations in currency valuation, exchange controls, expropriation and governmental policies limiting returns to foreign investors.

The amount of our revenues derived from international operations and other relevant financial data for fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006 are set forth in Note 9 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, we derived approximately 27%, 28% and 30%, respectively, of our total revenues from outside of the U.S. As of December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, we have long-lived assets of approximately 31%, 31% and 33%, respectively, from outside of the U.S.

Digital Growth and Technology Innovation Strategy

Similar to our physical businesses, we seek to grow revenues in our Worldwide Digital Segment by selling our products and services to existing and new customers. Our focus on technology innovation allows us to bring leading products and services to market designed to solve customer problems in the areas of data protection and e-records management. Our approach to innovation has three major components: build, buy and partner. We will build or develop our own technology in areas core to our strategy in order to protect and extend our lead in the market. Examples include, back up and archiving Software as a Service and data reduction technologies. Our technology acquisition strategy is designed to accelerate our product strategy, leadership and time to market and past examples include the Connected and LiveVault acquisitions. Finally, we are developing global technology partnerships that complement our product and service offerings, allow us to offer a complete solution to the marketplace and keep us in contact with emerging technology companies.

11




Customers

Our customer base is diversified in terms of revenues and industry concentration. As of December 31, 2006, we had over 90,000 corporate clients in a variety of industries. We currently provide services to commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government organizations, including more than 90% of the Fortune 1000 and more than 85% of the FTSE 100. No customer accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006.

Competition

We compete with our current and potential customers’ internal information protection and storage services capabilities. We can provide no assurance that these organizations will begin or continue to use an outside company such as Iron Mountain for their future information protection and storage services.

We compete with multiple information protection and storage services providers in all geographic areas where we operate. We believe that competition for customers is based on price, reputation for reliability, quality of service and scope and scale of technology and that we generally compete effectively based on these factors.

We also compete with other information protection and storage services providers for companies to acquire. Some of our competitors may possess substantial financial and other resources. If any such competitor were to devote additional resources to the information protection and storage services business and such acquisition candidates or focus their strategy on our markets, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Alternative Technologies

We derive most of our revenues from the storage of paper documents and storage-related services. This storage requires significant physical space. Alternative storage technologies exist, many of which require significantly less space than paper documents. These technologies include computer media, microform, CD-ROM and optical disk. To date, none of these technologies has replaced paper documents as the principal means for storing information. However, we can provide no assurance that our customers will continue to store most of their records in paper documents format. We continue to invest in additional services such as electronic vaulting and e-records management, designed to address our customers’ need for efficient, cost-effective, high quality solutions for electronic records and information management.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, we employed over 10,400 employees in the U.S. and over 8,200 employees outside of the U.S. At December 31, 2006, an aggregate of 600 employees were represented by unions in California, Georgia and two cities in Canada.

All non-union employees are generally eligible to participate in our benefit programs, which include medical, dental, life, short and long-term disability, retirement/401(k) and accidental death and dismemberment plans. Unionized employees receive these types of benefits through their unions. In addition to base compensation and other usual benefits, all full-time employees participate in some form of incentive-based compensation program that provides payments based on revenues, profits, collections or attainment of specified objectives for the unit in which they work. Management believes that we have good relationships with our employees and unions. However, as of December 31 2006, certain of our labor contracts had expired, and we were operating under the expired contracts while attempting to negotiate replacement agreements.

12




Insurance

For strategic risk transfer purposes, we maintain a comprehensive insurance program with insurers that we believe to be reputable and that have adequate capitalization in amounts that we believe to be appropriate. Property insurance is purchased on an all-risk basis, including flood and earthquake, subject to certain policy conditions, sublimits and deductibles, and inclusive of the replacement cost of real and personal property, including leasehold improvements, business income loss and extra expense. Separate excess policies for insurer defined Critical Earthquake Zone exposures are maintained at what we believe to be appropriate limits and deductibles for that exposure. Included among other types of insurance that we carry, subject to certain policy conditions, sublimits and deductibles, are: workers compensation, general liability, umbrella, automobile, professional, warehouse legal and directors and officers liability policies. In 2002, we established a wholly-owned Vermont domiciled captive insurance company as a subsidiary; through the subsidiary we retain and reinsure a portion of our property loss exposure.

Our standard form of storage contract in the U.S. sets forth an agreed maximum valuation for each carton or other storage unit held by us, which serves as a limitation of liability for loss or damage, as permitted under the Uniform Commercial Code. In contracts containing such limits, such values are nominal, and we believe that in typical circumstances our liability would be so limited in the event of loss or damage to stored items for which we may be held liable. Outside the U.S., most of our contracts have similar limited valuation and liability provisions that we believe are in accordance with local business customs and statutes. However, some of our agreements with large volume accounts and some of the contracts assumed in our acquisitions contain no such limits or contain higher limits or supplemental insurance arrangements.

Environmental Matters

Some of our current and formerly owned or leased properties were previously used by entities other than us for industrial or other purposes that involved the use, storage, generation and/or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, including petroleum products. In some instances these properties included the operation of underground storage tanks or the presence of asbestos-containing materials. Although we have from time to time conducted limited environmental investigations and remedial activities at some of our former and current facilities, we have not undertaken an in-depth environmental review of all of our properties. We therefore may be potentially liable for environmental costs and may be unable to sell, rent, mortgage or use contaminated real estate owned or leased by us. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, we may be potentially liable for environmental compliance and remediation costs to address contamination, if any, located at owned and leased properties as well as damages arising from such contamination, whether or not we know of, or were responsible for, the contamination, or the contamination occurred while we owned or leased the property. Environmental conditions for which we might be liable may also exist at properties that we may acquire in the future. In addition, future regulatory action and environmental laws may impose costs for environmental compliance that do not exist today.

We transfer a portion of our risk of financial loss due to currently undetected environmental matters by purchasing an environmental impairment liability insurance policy, which covers all owned and leased locations. Coverage is provided for both liability and remediation costs.

Reincorporation

On May 27, 2005, Iron Mountain Incorporated, a Pennsylvania corporation (“Iron Mountain PA”), reincorporated as a Delaware corporation. The reincorporation was effected by means of a statutory merger (the “Merger”) of Iron Mountain PA with and into Iron Mountain Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Iron Mountain DE”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Iron Mountain PA. In connection with

13




the Merger, Iron Mountain DE succeeded to and assumed all of the assets and liabilities of Iron Mountain PA. Apart from the change in its state of incorporation, the Merger had no effect on Iron Mountain PA’s business, board composition, management, employees, fiscal year, assets or liabilities, or location of its facilities, and did not result in any relocation of management or other employees. The Merger was approved at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 26, 2005. Upon consummation of the Merger, Iron Mountain DE succeeded to Iron Mountain PA’s reporting obligations and continued to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “IRM.”

Internet Website

Our Internet address is www.ironmountain.com. Under the “Investor Relations” category on our Internet website, we make available through a hyperlink to a third party website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such forms are filed with or furnished to the SEC. We are not including the information contained on or available through our website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of our corporate governance guidelines, code of ethics and the charters of our audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees may be obtained free of charge by writing to our Secretary, Iron Mountain Incorporated, 745 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111 and are available on our website www.ironmountain.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.”

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our business faces many risks. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer and the trading price of our debt or equity securities could decline. Our investors and prospective investors should consider the following risks and the information contained under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” before deciding to invest in our securities.

Operational Risks

We face competition for customers.

We compete with our current and potential customers’ internal information protection and storage services capabilities. These organizations may not begin or continue to use an outside company, such as our company, for their future information protection and storage services needs or may not use us to provide these services. We also compete with multiple information protection and storage services providers in all geographic areas where we operate.

Governmental focus on data security could increase our costs of operations. In addition, our failure to protect our customers’ confidential information against security breaches could damage our reputation, harm our business and adversely impact our results of operations.

Many new state and federal laws and regulations are being contemplated and enacted relative to privacy issues in general and the care and handling of personal information in particular. In reaction to publicized incidents in which electronically stored information has been lost, illegally accessed or stolen, many states have adopted breach of data security statutes and regulations that require notification to consumers if the security of their personal information, such as social security numbers, is breached. In addition, the United States Congress is considering several bills that are intended to address data security, including by requiring notification to affected persons of breaches of data security. We have cooperated with a U.S. federal agency in a non-public inquiry regarding our information security practices, and we may

14




be subject to additional inquiries in the future. We have experienced incidents in which customers’ backup tapes or other records have been lost, and we have been informed by customers in some incidents that the lost media or records contained personal information. The increased focus on data security may lead to governmental action and/or changes in customer demand as a result of which we may modify our operations with the goal of further improving data security or accept increased liabilities or obligations if breaches of data security occur with respect to data in our custody. However, we may be unable to increase our rates sufficiently to counter our increased expenses due to such modifications in operations or such acceptance of increased liabilities and obligations, and that would adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, any compromise of security, accidental loss or theft of customer data in our possession could damage our reputation and expose us to risk of liability, which could harm our business and adversely impact our results of operations.

We may not be able to effectively expand our digital businesses.

We are implementing our planned expansion into various digital businesses. Our entrance into these markets poses certain unique risks. For example, we may be unable to:

·       raise the amount of capital necessary to effectively participate in these businesses;

·       develop, hire or otherwise obtain the necessary technical expertise;

·       accurately predict the size of the markets for any of these services; or

·       compete effectively against other companies that possess greater technical expertise, capital or other necessary resources.

In addition, the digital solutions we offer may not gain or retain market acceptance, or business partners upon whom we depend for technical and management expertise, as well as the hardware and software products we need to complement our services, may not perform as expected.

Our customers may shift from paper storage to alternative technologies that require less physical space.

We derive most of our revenues from the storage of paper documents and storage related services. This storage requires significant physical space. Alternative storage technologies exist, many of which require significantly less space than paper documents. These technologies include computer media, microform, CD-ROM and optical disk. We can provide no assurance that our customers will continue to store most of their records in paper documents format. A significant shift by our customers to storage of data through non-paper based technologies, whether now existing or developed in the future, could adversely affect our business.

We may be subject to certain costs and potential liabilities associated with the real estate required for our businesses.

Because our businesses are heavily dependent on real estate, we face special risks attributable to the real estate we own or lease. Such risks include:

·       variable occupancy costs and difficulty locating suitable sites due to fluctuations in the real estate market;

·       uninsured losses or damage to our storage facilities due to an inability to obtain full coverage on a cost-effective basis for some casualties, such as earthquakes, or any coverage for certain losses, such as losses from riots or terrorist activities;

·       loss of our investment in, and anticipated profits and cash flow from, damaged property that is uninsured; and

15




·       liability under environmental laws for the costs of investigation and cleanup of contaminated real estate owned or leased by us, whether or not we know of, or were responsible for, the contamination, or the contamination occurred while we owned or leased the property.

Some of our current and formerly owned or leased properties were previously used by entities other than us for industrial or other purposes that involved the use, storage, generation and/or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, including petroleum products. In some instances these properties included the operation of underground storage tanks or the presence of asbestos-containing materials. Although we have from time to time conducted limited environmental investigations and remedial activities at some of our former and current facilities, we have not undertaken an in-depth environmental review of all of our properties. We therefore may be potentially liable for environmental costs like those discussed above and may be unable to sell, rent, mortgage or use contaminated real estate owned or leased by us. Environmental conditions for which we might be liable may also exist at properties that we may acquire in the future. In addition, future regulatory action and environmental laws may impose costs for environmental compliance that do not exist today.

International operations may pose unique risks.

As of December 31, 2006, we provided services in 86 markets outside the U.S. As part of our growth strategy, we expect to continue to acquire information protection and storage services businesses in foreign markets. International operations are subject to numerous risks, including:

·       the impact of foreign government regulations;

·       the volatility of certain foreign economies in which we operate;

·       political uncertainties;

·       the risk that the business partners upon whom we depend for technical assistance or management and acquisition expertise outside of the U.S. will not perform as expected;

·       differences in business practices; and

·       foreign currency fluctuations.

In particular, our net income can be significantly affected by fluctuations in currencies associated with certain intercompany balances among our U.S. entities and our foreign subsidiaries and our U.K. entity and subsidiaries on the European continent.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

No Intention to Pay Dividends

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We intend to retain future earnings for use in our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on shares of common stock in the foreseeable future. The terms of our credit agreement and our indentures contain provisions permitting the payment of cash dividends and stock repurchases subject to certain limitations.

16




Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our various indebtedness.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. The following table shows important credit statistics as of December 31, 2006:

 

 

At December 31, 2006

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Total long-term debt

 

 

$

2,668.8

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

$

1,553.3

 

 

Debt to equity ratio

 

 

1.72

x

 

 

Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to you. Our indebtedness may increase as we continue to borrow under existing and future credit arrangements in order to finance future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, which would increase the associated risks. These risks include:

·       inability to satisfy our obligations with respect to our various indebtedness;

·       inability to adjust to adverse economic conditions;

·       inability to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements, including possible required repurchases of our various indebtedness;

·       limits on our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the information protection and storage services industry;

·       limits on future borrowings under our existing or future credit arrangements, which could affect our ability to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs;

·       inability to generate sufficient funds to cover required interest payments; and

·       restrictions on our ability to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms.

Restrictive loan covenants may limit our ability to pursue our growth strategy.

Our credit facility and our indentures contain covenants restricting or limiting our ability to, among other things:

·       incur additional indebtedness;

·       pay dividends or make other restricted payments;

·       make asset dispositions;

·       create or permit liens; and

·       make capital expenditures and other investments.

These restrictions may adversely affect our ability to pursue our acquisition and other growth strategies.

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance the repurchase of outstanding senior subordinated indebtedness upon a change of control event as required by our indentures.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, we will be required to offer to repurchase all outstanding senior subordinated indebtedness. However, it is possible that we will not have sufficient funds at the time

17




of the change of control to make the required repurchase of the notes or that restrictions in our revolving credit facility will not allow such repurchases. In addition, certain important corporate events, such as leveraged recapitalizations that would increase the level of our indebtedness, would not constitute a ‘‘change of control’’ under our indentures.

Since Iron Mountain is a holding company, our ability to make payments on our various indebtedness depends in part on the operations of our subsidiaries.

Iron Mountain is a holding company, and substantially all of our assets consist of the stock of our subsidiaries and substantially all of our operations are conducted by our direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to make payments on our various indebtedness will be dependent upon the receipt of sufficient funds from our subsidiaries. However, our various indebtedness is guaranteed, on a joint and several and full and unconditional basis, by most, but not all, of our direct and indirect wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries.

Acquisition and International Expansion Risks

Failure to successfully integrate acquired operations could reduce our future results of operations.

The success of any acquisition depends in part on our ability to integrate the acquired company. The process of integrating acquired businesses may involve unforeseen difficulties and may require a disproportionate amount of our management’s attention and our financial and other resources. We can give no assurance that we will ultimately be able to effectively integrate and manage the operations of any acquired business. Nor can we assure you that we will be able to maintain or improve the historical financial performance of Iron Mountain or our acquisitions. The failure to successfully integrate these cultures, operating systems, procedures and information technologies could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may be unable to continue our international expansion.

Our growth strategy involves expanding operations into international markets, and we expect to continue this expansion. Europe and Latin America have been our primary areas of focus for international expansion and we recently began our expansion into the Asia Pacific region. We have entered into joint ventures and have acquired all or a majority of the equity in information protection and storage services businesses operating in these areas and are actively pursuing additional opportunities. This growth strategy involves risks. We may be unable to pursue this strategy in the future. For example, we may be unable to:

·       identify suitable companies to acquire;

·       complete acquisitions on satisfactory terms;

·       incur additional debt necessary to acquire suitable companies if we are unable to pay the purchase price out of working capital, common stock or other equity securities; or

·       enter into successful business arrangements for technical assistance or management and acquisition expertise outside of the U.S.

We also compete with other information protection and storage services providers for companies to acquire. Some of our competitors may possess substantial financial and other resources. If any such competitor were to devote additional resources to such acquisition candidates or focus its strategy on our international markets, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

18




Item 2. Properties.

As of December 31, 2006, we conducted operations through 739 leased facilities and 214 facilities that we own. Our facilities are divided among our reportable segments as follows: North American Physical Business (644), International Physical Business (301) and Worldwide Digital Business (8). These facilities contain a total of 59.2 million square feet of space. Facility rent expense was $153.1 million and $169.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. The leased facilities typically have initial lease terms of ten to fifteen years with one or more five year options to extend. In addition, some of the leases contain either a purchase option or a right of first refusal upon the sale of the property. Our facilities are located throughout North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific, with the largest number of facilities in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, Texas, Canada and the U.K. We believe that the space available in our facilities is adequate to meet our current needs, although future growth may require that we acquire additional real property either by leasing or purchasing. See Note 10 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our minimum annual rental commitments.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business with a portion of the defense and/or settlement costs being covered by various commercial liability insurance policies purchased by us. In the opinion of management, no material legal proceedings are pending to which we, or any of our properties, are subject.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders of Iron Mountain during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

19




PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol “IRM.” On December 7, 2006, our board authorized and approved a three-for-two stock split effected in the form of a dividend on our common stock. We issued the additional shares of common stock resulting from this stock dividend on December 29, 2006 to all stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 18, 2006.

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the NYSE, for the years 2005 and 2006, giving effect to such stock split:

 

 

Sale Prices

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

21.33

 

$

17.77

 

Second Quarter

 

20.81

 

18.17

 

Third Quarter

 

25.17

 

20.13

 

Fourth Quarter

 

30.06

 

22.80

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

29.91

 

$

26.29

 

Second Quarter

 

27.24

 

22.91

 

Third Quarter

 

29.48

 

22.64

 

Fourth Quarter

 

29.72

 

27.03

 

 

The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 15, 2007 was $28.51. As of February 15, 2007, there were 526 holders of record of our common stock. We believe that there are more than 77,000 beneficial owners of our common stock.

The only dividends we have paid on our common stock during the last two years was the stock dividend paid in connection with the stock split referenced above. Our Board currently intends to retain future earnings, if any, for the development of our business and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any determinations by our Board to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be based primarily upon our financial condition, results of operations and business requirements. Our Credit Facility permits the payment of cash dividends and stock repurchases subject to certain limitations.

There was no common stock repurchased or sales of unregistered securities for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2006.

20




Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected consolidated statements of operations, balance sheet and other data have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected consolidated financial and operating information set forth below, giving effect to stock splits, should be read in conjunction with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2002(1)

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage

 

$

759,536

 

$

875,035

 

$

1,043,366

 

$

1,181,551

 

$

1,327,169

 

Service and Storage Material Sales

 

558,961

 

626,294

 

774,223

 

896,604

 

1,023,173

 

Total Revenues

 

1,318,497

 

1,501,329

 

1,817,589

 

2,078,155

 

2,350,342

 

Operating Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation and amortization)(2)

 

622,299

 

680,747

 

823,899

 

938,239

 

1,074,268

 

Selling, General and Administrative(2)

 

333,050

 

383,641

 

486,246

 

569,695

 

670,074

 

Depreciation and
Amortization

 

108,992

 

130,918

 

163,629

 

186,922

 

208,373

 

Merger-related Expenses

 

796

 

 

 

 

 

Loss (Gain) on Disposal/Writedown of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

 

774

 

1,130

 

(681

)

(3,485

)

(9,560

)

Total Operating Expenses

 

1,065,911

 

1,196,436

 

1,473,093

 

1,691,371

 

1,943,155

 

Operating Income

 

252,586

 

304,893

 

344,496

 

386,784

 

407,187

 

Interest Expense, Net

 

136,632

 

150,468

 

185,749

 

183,584

 

194,958

 

Other Expense (Income), Net

 

1,435

 

(2,564

)

(7,988

)

6,182

 

(11,989

)

Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest

 

114,519

 

156,989

 

166,735

 

197,018

 

224,218

 

Provision for Income Taxes

 

47,318

 

66,730

 

69,574

 

81,484

 

93,795

 

Minority Interests in Earnings of Subsidiaries, Net

 

3,629

 

5,622

 

2,970

 

1,684

 

1,560

 

Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

 

63,572

 

84,637

 

94,191

 

113,850

 

128,863

 

Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)

 

1,116

(4)

 

 

 

 

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest and tax benefit)

 

(6,396

)(5)

 

 

(2,751

)(6)

 

Net Income

 

$

58,292

 

$

84,637

 

$

94,191

 

$

111,099

 

$

128,863

 

21




 

Net Income per Common
Share—Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations

 

$

0.33

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.49

 

$

0.58

 

$

0.65

 

Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest and tax benefit)

 

(0.03

)

 

 

(0.01

)

 

Net Income—Basic

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.49

 

$

0.57

 

$

0.65

 

Net Income per Common
Share—Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations

 

$

0.33

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.48

 

$

0.57

 

$

0.64

 

Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest and tax benefit)

 

(0.03

)

 

 

(0.01

)

 

Net Income—Diluted

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.48

 

$

0.56

 

$

0.64

 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding—Basic

 

190,464

 

191,851

 

193,625

 

195,988

 

198,116

 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding—
Diluted

 

193,660

 

195,116

 

196,764

 

198,104

 

200,463

 

 

(footnotes follow)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2002(1)

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OIBDA(2)(3)

 

$

361,578

 

$

435,811

 

$

508,125

 

$

573,706

 

$

615,560

 

OIBDA Margin(2)(3)

 

27.4

%

29.0

%

28.0

%

27.6

%

26.2

%

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

 

1.6

x

1.8

x

1.7

x

1.8

x

1.8

x

 

22




 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2002

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

$

56,292

 

$

74,683

 

$

31,942

 

$

53,413

 

$

45,369

 

Total Assets

 

3,230,655

 

3,892,099

 

4,442,387

 

4,766,140

 

5,209,521

 

Total Long-Term Debt (including Current Portion of Long-Term Debt)

 

1,732,097

 

2,089,928

 

2,478,022

 

2,529,431

 

2,668,816

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

944,861

 

1,066,114

 

1,218,568

 

1,370,129

 

1,553,273

 

 

Reconciliation of OIBDA to Operating Income and Net (Loss) Income:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2002(1)

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

OIBDA(2)(3)

 

$

361,578

 

$

435,811

 

$

508,125

 

$

573,706

 

$

615,560

 

Less: Depreciation and Amortization

 

108,992

 

130,918

 

163,629

 

186,922

 

208,373

 

Operating Income

 

252,586

 

304,893

 

344,496

 

386,784

 

407,187

 

Less: Interest Expense, Net

 

136,632

 

150,468

 

185,749

 

183,584

 

194,958

 

Other Expense (Income), Net

 

1,435

 

(2,564

)

(7,988

)

6,182

 

(11,989

)

Provision for Income Taxes

 

47,318

 

66,730

 

69,574

 

81,484

 

93,795

 

Minority Interests in Earnings of Subsidiaries

 

3,629

 

5,622

 

2,970

 

1,684

 

1,560

 

Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)

 

(1,116

)(4)

 

 

 

 

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest and tax benefit)

 

6,396

(5)

 

 

2,751

(6)

 

Net Income

 

$

58,292

 

$

84,637

 

$

94,191

 

$

111,099

 

$

128,863

 

 

(footnotes follow)


(1)          We recorded specific charges associated with the integration of the operations of Pierce Leahy in 2002 within merger related expenses as a result of the Pierce Leahy acquisition in 2000.

(2)          Effective January 1, 2003, we began using the fair value method of accounting in our financial statements using the prospective method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure.” As a result, we recorded $1,664, $3,857, $6,189 and $12,387 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, associated with such stock compensation expenses. We adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” effective January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method, as permitted under SFAS No. 123R. We record stock-based compensation expense for the cost of stock options, restricted stock and shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123R beginning January 1, 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the incremental stock-based compensation expense due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R caused income before provision for income taxes and minority interest to decrease by $894, and net income to decrease by $539, and had no impact on basic and diluted earnings per share.

(3)          OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization expenses. OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing OIBDA by total revenues. For a more detailed definition and

23




reconciliation of OIBDA and a discussion of why we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures.”

(4)          In connection with the sale of Arcus Staffing Resources, Inc., which was accounted for as a discontinued operation, we recorded income from discontinued operations of $1,116 (net of tax of $768) in 2002 related to the reversal of remaining liabilities associated with certain contingencies which have been resolved.

(5)          Effective January 1, 2002, we reviewed goodwill for impairment consistent with the guidelines of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and other Intangible Assets,” using a discounted future cash flow approach to approximate fair value. The result of testing our goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, as of January 1, 2002, was a non-cash charge of $6,396 (net of minority interest of $8,487) related to the impairment of goodwill associated with our investment in South America due primarily to the deterioration of the economy and the devaluation of the currency in Argentina.

(6)          Effective December 31, 2005, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.” As a result, a non-cash charge of $2,751 net of tax benefit was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005 as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See Note 2(f) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 7.         Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with “Item 6. Selected Financial Data” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and the other financial and operating information included elsewhere in this filing.

This discussion contains “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and in other federal securities laws. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” on page ii of this filing and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” beginning on page 14 of this filing.

Overview

Our revenues consist of storage revenues as well as service and storage material sales revenues. Storage revenues, both physical and digital, which are considered a key performance indicator for the information protection and storage services industry, consist of largely recurring periodic charges related to the storage of materials or data (generally on a per unit or per cubic foot of records basis), which are typically retained by customers for many years, and have accounted for over 56% of total consolidated revenues in each of the last five years. Our quarterly revenues from these fixed periodic storage fees have grown for 72 consecutive quarters. Service and storage material sales revenues are comprised of charges for related service activities and courier operations and the sale of software licenses and storage materials. Included in service and storage materials sales are related core service revenues arising from: (1) the handling of records including the addition of new records, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, destruction of records, and permanent withdrawals from storage; (2) courier operations, consisting primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request; (3) secure shredding of sensitive documents; and (4) other recurring services including maintenance and support contracts. Our complementary services revenues arise from special project work, including data restoration, providing fulfillment services, consulting services and product sales, including software licenses, specially designed storage containers, magnetic media (including computer tapes) and related supplies. Our consolidated revenues are subject to variations caused by the net effect of foreign currency

24




translation on revenue derived from outside the U.S. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, we derived approximately 27%, 28% and 30%, respectively, of our total revenues from outside the U.S.

We recognize revenue when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Storage and service revenues are recognized in the month the respective storage or service is provided and customers are generally billed on a monthly basis on contractually agreed-upon terms. Amounts related to future storage or prepaid service contracts, including maintenance and support contracts, for customers where storage fees or services are billed in advance are accounted for as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the applicable storage or service period or when the service is performed. Storage material sales are recognized when shipped to the customer and include software license sales (less than 1% of consolidated revenues in 2006). Sales of software licenses to distributors are recognized at the time a distributor reports that the software has been licensed to an end-user and all revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) consists primarily of wages and benefits for field personnel, facility occupancy costs (including rent and utilities), transportation expenses (including vehicle leases and fuel), other product cost of sales and other equipment costs and supplies. Of these, wages and benefits and facility occupancy costs are the most significant. Trends in total wages and benefits dollars and as a percentage of total consolidated revenue are influenced by changes in headcount and compensation levels, achievement of incentive compensation targets, workforce productivity and variability in costs associated with medical insurance and workers compensation. Trends in facility occupancy costs are similarly impacted by the total number of facilities we occupy, the mix of properties we own versus properties we occupy under operating leases, fluctuations in per square foot occupancy costs, and the levels of utilization of these properties.

The expansion of our European, secure shredding and digital services businesses has impacted the major cost of sales components. Our European and secure shredding operations are more labor intensive than our core physical businesses and therefore increase our labor costs as a percent of consolidated revenues. This trend is partially offset by our digital services businesses, which require significantly less direct labor. Our secure shredding operations incur less facility costs and higher transportation costs as a percent of revenues compared to our core physical businesses.

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits for management, administrative, information technology, sales, account management and marketing personnel, as well as expenses related to communications and data processing, travel, professional fees, bad debts, training, office equipment and supplies. Trends in total wages and benefits dollars and as a percentage of total consolidated revenue are influenced by changes in headcount and compensation levels, achievement of incentive compensation targets, workforce productivity and variability in costs associated with medical insurance. The overhead structure of our expanding European operations, as compared to our North American operations, is more labor intensive and has not achieved the same level of overhead leverage, which may result in an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenue, as our European operations become a more meaningful percentage of our consolidated results. Similarly, our digital services business requires a higher level of overhead, particularly in the area of information technology, than our core physical businesses.

25




Our adoption of the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148 has resulted in increasing amounts of selling, general and administrative expenses. We began using the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation in our financial statements beginning January 1, 2003 using the prospective method. The prospective method involves recognizing expense for the fair value for all awards granted or modified in the year of adoption and thereafter with no expense recognition for previous awards. We adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” effective January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method, as permitted under SFAS No. 123R. We record stock-based compensation expense for the cost of stock options, restricted stock and shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123R beginning January 1, 2006. We recorded approximately $0.9 million of additional stock compensation expense in 2006 associated with unvested stock option grants issued prior to January 1, 2003 associated with adopting SFAS No. 123R.

Our depreciation and amortization charges result primarily from the capital-intensive nature of our business. The principal components of depreciation relate to storage systems, which include racking, building and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and buildings. Amortization relates primarily to customer relationships and acquisition costs and core technology and is impacted by the nature and timing of acquisitions.

Our consolidated revenues and expenses are subject to variations caused by the net effect of foreign currency translation on revenues and expenses incurred by our entities outside the U.S. During 2006, we have seen increases in both revenues and expenses as a result of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar, and decreases in both revenues and expenses as a result of the weakening of the British pound sterling and the Euro, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods. It is difficult to predict how much foreign currency exchange rates will fluctuate in the future and how those fluctuations will impact individual balances reported in our consolidated statement of operations. Given the relative increase in our international operations, these fluctuations may become material on individual balances. However, because both the revenues and expenses are denominated in the local currency of the country in which they are derived or incurred, the impact of currency fluctuations on our operating income, operating margin and net income is mitigated.

Non-GAAP Measures

Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or OIBDA

OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization expenses. OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing OIBDA by total revenues. We use these measures to evaluate the operating performance of our consolidated business. As such, we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors. We use OIBDA for planning purposes and multiples of current or projected OIBDA-based calculations in conjunction with our discounted cash flow models to determine our overall enterprise valuation and to evaluate acquisition targets. We believe OIBDA and OIBDA Margin are useful measures to evaluate our ability to grow our revenues faster than our operating expenses and they are an integral part of the internal reporting system we use to assess and evaluate the operating performance of our business. OIBDA does not include certain items, specifically (1) minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries, net; (2) other (income) expense, net; (3) income from discontinued operations and loss on sale of discontinued operations; and (4) cumulative effect of change in accounting principle that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results. OIBDA also does not include interest expense, net and the provision for income taxes. These expenses are associated with our capitalization and tax structures, which we do not consider when evaluating the operating profitability of our core operations. Finally, OIBDA does not include depreciation and amortization expenses, in order to eliminate the impact of capital investments, which we evaluate by comparing capital expenditures to incremental revenue generated and as a percentage of total revenues. OIBDA and OIBDA Margin should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial

26




performance reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America, or GAAP, such as operating or net income or cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with GAAP).

Reconciliation of OIBDA to Operating Income and Net Income (In Thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

OIBDA

 

$

508,125

 

$

573,706

 

$

615,560

 

Less: Depreciation and Amortization

 

163,629

 

186,922

 

208,373

 

Operating Income

 

344,496

 

386,784

 

407,187

 

Less: Interest Expense, Net

 

185,749

 

183,584

 

194,958

 

Other (Income) Expense, Net

 

(7,988

)

6,182

 

(11,989

)

Provision for Income Taxes

 

69,574

 

81,484

 

93,795

 

Minority Interests in Earnings of Subsidiaries

 

2,970

 

1,684

 

1,560

 

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of tax benefit)

 

 

2,751

 

 

Net Income

 

$

94,191

 

$

111,099

 

$

128,863

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used, including those related to accounting for acquisitions, allowance for doubtful accounts and credit memos, impairment of tangible and intangible assets, income taxes, stock-based compensation and self-insured liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following, which are listed in no particular order:

Accounting for Acquisitions

Part of our growth strategy has included the acquisition of numerous businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined after due diligence of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results and expected synergies are subject to revisions as we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.

Each acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting as defined under the applicable accounting standards at the date of each acquisition, including, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16, “Accounting for Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Accounting for these acquisitions has resulted in the capitalization of the cost in excess of fair value of the net assets acquired in each of these acquisitions as goodwill. We estimated the fair values of the assets acquired in each acquisition as of the date of acquisition and these estimates are subject to adjustment. These estimates are subject to final assessments of the fair value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, operating leases and deferred income taxes. We complete these assessments within one year of the date of acquisition. We are not aware of any information that would indicate that the final

27




purchase price allocations for acquisitions completed in 2006 would differ meaningfully from preliminary estimates. See Note 6 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In connection with each of our acquisitions, we have undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired businesses to realize efficiencies and potential cost savings. Our restructuring activities include the elimination of duplicate facilities, reductions in staffing levels, and other costs associated with exiting certain activities of the businesses we acquire. The estimated cost of these restructuring activities are included as costs of the acquisition and are recorded as goodwill consistent with the guidance of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” While we finalize our plans to restructure the businesses we acquire within one year of the date of acquisition, it may take more than one year to complete all activities related to the restructuring of an acquired business.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credit Memos

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts and credit memos for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments and disputes regarding billing and service issues. When calculating the allowance, we consider our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables and credit memo activity, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances of individual receivable balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to significantly change, resulting in a significant improvement or impairment of their ability to make payments, an adjustment of the allowance may be required. As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, our allowance for doubtful accounts and credit memos balance totaled $14.5 million and $15.2 million, respectively.

Impairment of Tangible and Intangible Assets

Assets subject to amortization: In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we review long-lived assets and all amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows of the operation to which the assets relate to their carrying amount. The operations are generally distinguished by the business segment and geographic region in which they operate. If the operation is determined to be unable to recover the carrying amount of its assets, then intangible assets are written down first, followed by the other long-lived assets of the operation, to fair value. Fair value is based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending upon the nature of the assets.

Goodwill—Assets not subject to amortization: We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 142 to goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives which are not amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives are amortized over their useful lives. We have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill impairment review date. We performed our annual goodwill impairment review as of October 1, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and noted no impairment of goodwill. In making this assessment, we rely on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, and transactions and market place data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and our judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment. As of December 31, 2006, no factors were identified that would alter this assessment. When changes occur in the composition of one or more reporting units, the goodwill is reassigned to the reporting units affected based on their relative fair values. Our reporting units at which level we performed our goodwill impairment analysis as of October 31, 2006 were as follows: North America excluding Fulfillment; Fulfillment; U.K.; Continental Europe; Worldwide Digital Business excluding Iron Mountain Intellectual Property Management, Inc. (“IPM”); IPM; South America; Mexico and Asia Pacific. Goodwill valuations have been calculated using an income

28




approach based on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting unit. This approach incorporates many assumptions including future growth rates, discount factors, expected capital expenditures and income tax cash flows. Changes in economic and operating conditions impacting these assumptions could result in a goodwill impairment in future periods.

Accounting for Internal Use Software

We develop various software applications for internal use. We account for those costs in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position (“SOP”) 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” SOP 98-1 requires computer software costs associated with internal use software to be expensed as incurred until certain capitalization criteria are met. SOP 98-1 also defines which types of costs should be capitalized and which should be expensed. Payroll and related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time to, the development of internal use computer software projects, to the extent time is spent directly on the project, are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the software. Capitalization begins when the design stage of the application has been completed and it is probable that the project will be completed and used to perform the function intended. Depreciation begins when the software is placed in service. Computer software costs that are capitalized are evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS No.144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

It may be necessary for us to write-off amounts associated with the development of internal use software if the project cannot be completed as intended. Our expansion into new technology-based service offerings requires the development of internal use software that will be susceptible to rapid and significant changes in technology. We may be required to write-off unamortized costs or shorten the estimated useful life if an internal use software program is replaced with an alternative tool prior to the end of the software’s estimated useful life. General uncertainties related to expansion into digital businesses, including the timing of introduction and market acceptance of our services, may adversely impact the recoverability of these assets. See Note 2(f) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we wrote-off $6.3 million of previously deferred costs, primarily internal labor costs, associated with internal use software development projects that were discontinued, and such costs are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we replaced internal use software programs, which resulted in the write-off to loss on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net of the remaining net book value of $1.1 million. We did not have any such write-offs during 2004.

Income Taxes

We have recorded a valuation allowance, amounting to $27.3 million as of December 31, 2006, to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. If actual results differ unfavorably from certain of our estimates used, we may not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred income tax assets and additional valuation allowances may be required. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that our estimates reflected in the tax provisions and accruals will equal our actual results. These differences could have a material impact on our income tax provision and operating results in the period in which such determination is made.

We are subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we have significant business operations. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional assessments by tax authorities and provide for these matters as appropriate. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately $62 million of reserves related to uncertain tax positions. Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final

29




determination of tax audits and any related litigation could result in favorable or unfavorable changes in our estimates.

We have not provided deferred taxes on book basis differences related to certain foreign subsidiaries because such basis differences are not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future and we intend to reinvest indefinitely outside the U.S. These basis differences arose primarily through the undistributed book earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. The basis differences could be reversed through a sale of the subsidiaries, the receipt of dividends from subsidiaries as well as certain other events or actions on our part, which would result in an increase in our provision for income taxes.

Stock-Based Compensation

As of January 1, 2003, we adopted the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148. As a result we began using the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation in our financial statements beginning January 1, 2003 using the prospective method. The prospective method involves recognizing expense for the fair value for all awards granted or modified in the year of adoption and thereafter with no expense recognition for previous awards. We have applied the fair value recognition provisions to all stock based awards granted, modified or settled on or after January 1, 2003 and provided the required pro forma information for all awards previously granted, modified or settled before January 1, 2003 in our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123 and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. We adopted SFAS No. 123R effective January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method, as permitted under SFAS No. 123R. We record stock-based compensation expense for the cost of stock options, restricted stock and shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123R beginning January 1, 2006. Stock-based compensation expense, included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $12.4 million ($9.2 million after tax or $0.05 per basic and diluted share). For the year ended December 31, 2006, the incremental stock-based compensation expense due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R caused income before provision for income taxes and minority interest to decrease by $0.9 million, and net income to decrease by $0.5 million, and had no impact on basic and diluted earnings per share.

SFAS No. 123R also requires that the benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow, reducing net operating cash flows and increasing net financing cash flows in future periods.

The fair values of option, employee stock purchase and restricted stock grants are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility and the expected term are the input factors to that model which require the most significant management judgment. Expected volatility is calculated utilizing daily historical volatility over a period that equates to the expected life of the option. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) is estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees.

Self-Insured Liabilities

We are self-insured up to certain limits for costs associated with workers’ compensation claims, vehicle accidents, property and general business liabilities, and benefits paid under employee healthcare and long-term disability programs. At December 31, 2005 and 2006 there were approximately $30.4 million and $28.2 million, respectively, of self-insurance accruals reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. The measurement of these costs requires the consideration of historical cost experience and judgments about the present and expected levels of cost per claim. We account for these costs primarily through actuarial

30




methods, which develop estimates of the undiscounted liability for claims incurred, including those claims incurred but not reported. These methods provide estimates of future ultimate claim costs based on claims incurred as of the balance sheet date.

We believe the use of actuarial methods to account for these liabilities provides a consistent and effective way to measure these highly judgmental accruals. However, the use of any estimation technique in this area is inherently sensitive given the magnitude of claims involved and the length of time until the ultimate cost is known. We believe our recorded obligations for these expenses are appropriate. Nevertheless, changes in healthcare costs, accident frequency and severity, and other factors can materially affect the estimates for these liabilities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.

The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two-step process. The first step is a recognition process whereby the company determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The second step is a measurement process whereby a tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is calculated to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

The provisions of FIN 48 are effective January 1, 2007. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized upon adoption of FIN 48. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 should be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for that fiscal year. We are in the process of evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB 108”), “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements,” which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. We have completed our analysis related to the implementation of SAB 108 and have concluded it has no effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair

31




value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are in the process of evaluating the effect of SFAS No. 159 on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2006 to Year Ended December 31, 2005 and Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2005 to Year Ended December 31, 2004:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Dollar

 

Percent

 

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

Change

 

Change

 

Revenues

 

$

2,078,155

 

$

2,350,342

 

$

272,187

 

 

13.1

%

 

Operating Expenses

 

1,691,371

 

1,943,155

 

251,784

 

 

14.9

%

 

Operating Income

 

386,784

 

407,187

 

20,403

 

 

5.3

%

 

Other Expenses, Net

 

275,685

 

278,324

 

2,639

 

 

1.0

%

 

Net Income

 

$

111,099

 

$

128,863

 

$

17,764

 

 

16.0

%

 

OIBDA(1)

 

$

573,706

 

$

615,560

 

$

41,854

 

 

7.3

%

 

OIBDA Margin(1)

 

27.6

%

26.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Dollar

 

Percent

 

 

 

2004

 

2005

 

Change

 

Change

 

Revenues

 

$

1,817,589

 

$

2,078,155

 

$

260,566

 

 

14.3

%

 

Operating Expenses

 

1,473,093

 

1,691,371

 

218,278

 

 

14.8

%

 

Operating Income

 

344,496

 

386,784

 

42,288

 

 

12.3

%

 

Other Expenses, Net

 

250,305

 

275,685

 

25,380

 

 

10.1

%

 

Net Income

 

$

94,191

 

$

111,099

 

$

16,908

 

 

18.0

%

 

OIBDA(1)

 

$

508,125

 

$

573,706

 

$

65,581

 

 

12.9

%

 

OIBDA Margin(1)

 

28.0

%

27.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)          See “Non-GAAP Measures—Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or OIBDA” for definition, reconciliation and a discussion of why we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors.

Revenue

Our consolidated storage revenues increased $145.6 million, or 12.3%, to $1,327.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $138.2 million, or 13.2%, to $1,181.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, in comparison to the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase is attributable to internal revenue growth (10% during 2006 and 9% during 2005) resulting from net increases in records and other media stored by existing customers, sales to new customers and the net result of pricing actions, acquisitions (2% during 2006 and 3% during 2005), and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (0% during 2006 and 1% during 2005).

Consolidated service and storage material sales revenues increased $126.6 million, or 14.1%, to $1,023.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $122.4 million, or 15.8%, to $896.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, in comparison to the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase is attributable to acquisitions (7% during 2006 and 7% during 2005), internal revenue growth (7% during 2006 and 7% during 2005) resulting from net increases in service and storage material sales to existing customers and sales to new customers, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (0% during 2006 and 1% during 2005).

32




For the reasons stated above, our consolidated revenues increased $272.2 million, or 13.1%, to $2,350.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $260.6 million, or 14.3%, to $2,078.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, in comparison to the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2005, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations that impacted our revenues were primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Euro against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods. For the year ended December 31, 2006, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations that impacted our revenues were primarily due to the weakening of the British pound sterling and Euro, net of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar, against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods. Internal revenue growth was 8%, 8% and 9% for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. We calculate internal revenue growth in local currency for our international operations.

Internal Growth—Eight-Quarter Trend

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

 

 

First
Quarter

 

Second
Quarter

 

Third
Quarter

 

Fourth
Quarter

 

First
Quarter

 

Second
Quarter

 

Third
Quarter

 

Fourth
Quarter

 

Storage Revenue

 

 

8

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

10

%

 

 

10

%

 

 

11

%

 

 

11

%

 

 

10

%

 

Service and Storage Material Sales Revenue

 

 

3

%

 

 

6

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

8

%

 

 

8

%

 

 

3

%

 

 

10

%

 

Total Revenue

 

 

6

%

 

 

8

%

 

 

10

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

10

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

7

%

 

 

10

%

 

 

Our internal revenue growth rate represents the weighted average year over year growth rate of our revenues after removing the effects of acquisitions, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and the impact of the fire in our London, England facility. Over the past eight quarters, the internal growth rate of our storage revenues has increased from a range of 8% to 9% to a range of 10% to 11%. In our North American Physical Business, net carton volume growth remained stable and we benefited from an increasingly positive pricing environment in 2005 and 2006. Strong growth rates in our digital services business more than offset the impact of reduced growth rates in Europe in 2005 resulting from the inclusion of the slower growing Hays IMS business in our base revenues for internal growth calculation purposes. In 2006, our European business posted improved storage internal revenue growth rates. Net carton volume growth is a function of the rate new cartons are added by existing and new customers offset by the rate of carton destructions and other permanent removals.

The internal growth rate for service and storage material sales revenue is inherently more volatile than the storage revenue internal growth rate due to the more discretionary nature of the services we offer such as large special projects or data products and carton sales, as well as the price of recycled paper. These revenues are often event driven and impacted to a greater extent by economic downturns as customers defer or cancel the purchase of these services as a way to reduce their short-term costs. As a commodity, recycled paper prices are subject to the volatility of that market.

The internal growth rate for service and storage material sales revenues reflects the following: (1) stronger data product sales in 2005; (2) a large data restoration project completed by our digital services business in the third quarter of 2005; (3) improved growth rates in our data protection and fulfillment businesses; (4) continued growth in our secure shredding operations; and (5) growth in North American storage related service revenues. These positive factors were partially offset by lower special project revenues related to the public sector business in the U.K. in 2005.

33




Cost of Sales

Consolidated cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) is comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Consolidated
Revenues

 

Percent
Change

 

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

Dollar
Change

 

Percent
Change

 

  2005  

 

  2006  

 

(Favorable)/
Unfavorable

 

Labor

 

$

447,600

 

$

523,401

 

$

75,801

 

 

16.9

%

 

 

21.5

%

 

 

22.3

%

 

 

0.8

%

 

Facilities

 

275,987

 

321,268

 

45,281

 

 

16.4

%

 

 

13.3

%

 

 

13.7

%

 

 

0.4

%

 

Transportation

 

97,997

 

111,086

 

13,089

 

 

13.4

%

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

Product Cost of Sales

 

51,254

 

49,853

 

(1,401

)

 

(2.7

)%

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

2.1

%

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

Other

 

65,401

 

68,660

 

3,259

 

 

5.0

%

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

2.9

%

 

 

(0.2

)%

 

 

 

$

938,239

 

$

1,074,268

 

$

136,029

 

 

14.5

%

 

 

45.1

%

 

 

45.7

%

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Consolidated
Revenues

 

Percent
Change

 

 

 

2004

 

2005

 

Dollar
Change

 

Percent
Change

 

  2004  

 

  2005  

 

(Favorable)/
Unfavorable

 

Labor

 

$

419,345

 

$

447,600

 

$

28,255

 

 

6.7

%

 

 

23.1

%

 

 

21.5

%

 

 

(1.6

)%

 

Facilities

 

246,325

 

275,987

 

29,662

 

 

12.0

%

 

 

13.6

%

 

 

13.3

%

 

 

(0.3

)%

 

Transportation

 

81,976

 

97,997

 

16,021

 

 

19.5

%

 

 

4.5

%

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

0.2

%

 

Product Cost of Sales

 

35,908

 

51,254

 

15,346

 

 

42.7

%

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

Other

 

40,345

 

65,401

 

25,056

 

 

62.1

%

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

 

$

823,899

 

$

938,239

 

$

114,340

 

 

13.9

%

 

 

45.3

%

 

 

45.1

%

 

 

(0.2

)%

 

 

Labor

For the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, labor expense as a percentage of consolidated revenue increased as a result of higher labor costs resulting from our Australia/New Zealand acquisition and our recent shredding acquisitions in Europe, which have a higher service revenue component and are therefore more labor intensive. Our digital business had higher costs of labor associated with internal information technology personnel and consultants dedicated to revenue producing projects.

For the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2004, labor expense as a percentage of consolidated revenue decreased as a result of strong revenue growth, an increasing proportion of revenue from less labor intensive digital services and product sales. We also experienced improvement in our ratio of labor costs to revenues in our European operations as a result of completing the integration of Hays IMS in 2004.

Facilities

Facilities costs as a percentage of consolidated revenues increased to 13.7% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 13.3% for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in facilities costs as a percentage of consolidated revenues was primarily a result of increases in utilities and maintenance costs, as well as, increased insurance deductibles and security costs associated with protecting our assets, as a response to the fires in Ottawa, Canada and London, England. Rent expense decreased slightly as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 as a result of a decrease in overall base rent per square foot in our North American operations when comparing 2005 to 2006. The largest component of our facilities cost is rent expense, which increased in dollar terms by $17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. Given current property insurance market conditions, especially in relation

34




to catastrophe exposures of earthquake, flood and wind, we expect our insurance costs associated with our real estate portfolio to rise in 2007 when compared to 2006.

Facilities costs as a percentage of consolidated revenues decreased to 13.3% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 13.6% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease in facilities costs as a percentage of consolidated revenues was primarily a result of maintaining approximately the same overall base rent per square foot in our North American operations during 2004 and 2005 while consolidated revenues increased. The largest component of our facilities cost is rent expense, which increased $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 primarily as a result of properties under lease acquired through acquisitions in both Europe and North America. The expansion of our secure shredding business, which incurs lower facilities costs than our core physical businesses, also helped lower our facilities costs as a percentage of consolidated revenues.

Transportation

Our transportation expenses, which remained consistent as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, are influenced by several variables including total number of vehicles, owned versus leased vehicles, use of subcontracted couriers, fuel expenses and maintenance. Higher fuel costs, increased maintenance expenses resulting from the accelerated implementation of a fleet-wide maintenance program in North America and vehicle leasing expenses were primarily responsible for the dollar increase in transportation expenses.

Our transportation expenses, which increased 0.2% as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004, are influenced by several variables including total number of vehicles, owned versus leased vehicles, use of subcontracted couriers, fuel expenses and maintenance. Higher fuel expenses during the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 were primarily responsible for the increase in transportation expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues.

Product and Other Cost of Sales

Product and other cost of sales are highly correlated to complementary revenue streams. Product cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 decreased due to a corresponding reduction in product sales in the comparable periods. Product and other cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 were higher than the year ended December 31, 2004 as a percentage of consolidated revenues due to increased sales of data products at lower margins in North America, increased royalty payments associated with our electronic vaulting revenues and increases in technology costs associated with these revenue producing activities.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Consolidated
Revenues

 

Percent
Change

 

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

Dollar
Change

 

Percent
Change

 

  2005  

 

  2006  

 

(Favorable)/
Unfavorable

 

General and Administrative

 

$

285,558

 

$

331,021

 

$

45,463

 

 

15.9

%

 

 

13.7

%

 

 

14.1

%

 

 

0.4

%

 

Sales, Marketing & Account Management

 

180,558

 

214,007

 

33,449

 

 

18.5

%

 

 

8.7

%

 

 

9.1

%

 

 

0.4

%

 

Information Technology

 

99,177

 

122,211

 

23,034

 

 

23.2

%

 

 

4.8

%

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

0.4

%

 

Bad Debt Expense

 

4,402

 

2,835

 

(1,567

)

 

(35.6

)%

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

 

$

569,695

 

$

670,074

 

$

100,379

 

 

17.6

%

 

 

27.4

%

 

 

28.5

%

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

35




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Consolidated
Revenues

 

Percent
Change

 

 

 

2004

 

2005

 

Dollar
Change

 

Percent
Change

 

  2004  

 

  2005  

 

(Favorable)/
Unfavorable

 

General and Administrative

 

$

259,209

 

$

285,558

 

$

26,349

 

 

10.2

%

 

 

14.3

%

 

 

13.7

%

 

 

(0.6

)%

 

Sales, Marketing & Account Management

 

150,419

 

180,558

 

30,139

 

 

20.0

%

 

 

8.3

%

 

 

8.7

%

 

 

0.4

%

 

Information Technology

 

81,187

 

99,177

 

17,990

 

 

22.2

%

 

 

4.5

%

 

 

4.8

%

 

 

0.3

%

 

Bad Debt Expense

 

(4,569

)

4,402

 

8,971

 

 

196.3

%

 

 

(0.3

)%

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

 

$

486,246

 

$

569,695

 

$

83,449

 

 

17.2

%

 

 

26.8

%

 

 

27.4

%

 

 

0.6.

%

 

 

General and Administrative

The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 is mainly attributable to (a) increased compensation expense due to expansion through acquisitions, (b) costs associated with our North American reorganization which added a new level of field management, and (c) costs associated with a North American field operations meeting held in 2006 that was not held in 2005.

The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 is attributable to strong revenue growth and controls over overhead spending implemented in late 2004. These decreases were partially offset by increased incentive compensation expense and growth of our North American and European operations due to expansion and acquisitions.

Sales, Marketing & Account Management

The majority of our sales, marketing and account management costs are labor related and are primarily driven by the headcount in each of these departments. Increased headcount and related compensation and commissions are the most significant contributors to the increase in sales, marketing expenses and account management for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Throughout the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and into 2006, we invested in the expansion and improvement of our sales, marketing and account management functions.

During 2006 in North America, while our sales force headcount increased at a slower rate than revenue growth, the shift to higher end resources drove an increase in the level of spending due to higher costs per sales person and the additional support required. We have significantly increased the size of our digital sales force through our acquisition of LiveVault and the hiring of new sales employees, particularly in Europe. Additionally, costs associated with an enterprise-wide sales meeting held in 2006 and not held in 2005 also contributed to this increase. Our larger North American sales force generated a $6.3 million increase in sales commissions and an increase of $13.6 million of compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005.

Our North American sales force generated a $3.0 million increase in sales commissions and an increase of $14.8 million of compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. Marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased $3.3 million due to the introduction of several new marketing and promotional efforts to continue to develop awareness in the marketplace of our entire portfolio of services, especially our digital services.

Information Technology

Information technology expenses increased as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 due to increases in technology

36




development activities within our digital services business, including the acquisition of LiveVault and associated research and development activities and increased spending to support our growing digital archiving business. Additionally, during 2006, we wrote-off $5.9 million of previously deferred costs, primarily internal labor costs, associated with internal use software development projects that were discontinued. Higher utilization of existing information technology resources to revenue producing projects, which are charged to costs of goods sold and decreased information technology spending in our European operations, partially offset this increase.

Information technology expenses increased as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 due to increases in internal software development projects within our digital services business, the acquisitions of Connected and LiveVault and associated research and development activities, and increased information technology spending in our European operations. Higher utilization of existing information technology resources to revenue producing projects, which are charged to cost of goods sold, partially offset this increase.

Bad Debt Expense

Consolidated bad debt expense for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 reflects what we believe to be more normal levels of bad debt expense compared to 2004. The decrease in consolidated bad debt expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 is primarily attributable to the success of our centralized collection efforts within the U.S. and Canada, which resulted in improved cash collections and an improved accounts receivable aging that allowed us to reduce our allowance for doubtful accounts.

Depreciation, Amortization, and (Gain) and Loss on Disposal/Writedown of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense increased $21.5 million to $208.4 million (8.9% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $187.0 million (9.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005. Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense increased $23.3 million to $187.0 million (9.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $163.6 million (9.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2004. Depreciation expense increased $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 and increased $18.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily due to the additional depreciation expense related to recent capital expenditures and acquisitions, including storage systems, which include racking, building and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and buildings.

Amortization expense increased $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 and increased $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily due to amortization of intangible assets, such as customer relationship intangible assets and intellectual property acquired through business combinations. We expect that amortization expense will continue to increase as we acquire new businesses and reflect the full year impact of our 2006 acquisitions.

Consolidated gains on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net of $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, consisted primarily of a gain on the sale of a property in the U.K. of $10.5 million offset by disposals and writedowns. Consolidated gains on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, consisted primarily of a gain on the sale of a property in the U.K. of $4.5 million offset primarily by software asset writedowns of $1.1 million. Consolidated gains on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net of

37




$0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, consisted primarily of a $1.2 million gain on the sale of a property in Florida during the second quarter of 2004 offset by disposals and asset writedowns.

Operating Income

As a result of all the foregoing factors, consolidated operating income increased $20.4 million, or 5.3%, to $407.2 million (17.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $386.8 million (18.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Consolidated operating income increased $42.3 million, or 12.3%, to $386.8 million (18.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $344.5 million (19.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

OIBDA

As a result of all the foregoing factors, consolidated OIBDA increased $41.9 million, or 7.3%, to $615.6 million (26.2% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $573.7 million (27.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Consolidated OIBDA increased $65.6 million, or 12.9%, to $573.7 million (27.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $508.1 million (28.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Interest Expense, Net

Consolidated interest expense, net increased $11.4 million to $195.0 million (8.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $183.6 million (8.8% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005. The change is primarily due to increased borrowings to fund our 2005 and 2006 acquisitions, particularly LiveVault and Pickfords Records Management (“Pickfords”).

Consolidated interest expense, net decreased $2.2 million to $183.6 million (8.8% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $185.7 million (10.2% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2004. The dollar decrease in interest expense, net was primarily due to the recording of interest expense totaling $21.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2004 compared to interest expense totaling $2.3 million for the year ending December 31, 2005 related to the net impact of mark-to-market adjustments and cash payments on all of our interest rate swap contracts. This was offset by increased borrowings, primarily an additional $150.0 million of term loans borrowed in November 2004 as permitted under our IMI Credit Agreement and the full year effect of the March 2004 IME Credit Agreement.

Other (Income) Expense, Net (in thousands)

 

2005

 

2006

 

Change

 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses, net

 

$

7,201

 

$

(12,534

)

$

(19,735

)

Debt extinguishment expense

 

 

2,972

 

2,972

 

Other, net

 

(1,019

)

(2,427

)

(1,408

)

 

 

$

6,182

 

$

(11,989

)

$

(18,171

)

 

 

2004

 

2005

 

Change

 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses, net

 

$

(8,915

)

$

7,201

 

$

16,116

 

Debt extinguishment expense

 

2,454

 

 

(2,454

)

Other, net

 

(1,527

)

(1,019

)

508

 

 

 

$

(7,988

)

$

6,182

 

$

14,170

 

 

38




Foreign currency gains of $12.5 million based on period-end exchange rates were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2006 primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound sterling and Canadian dollar, and the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar as these currencies relate to our intercompany balances with and between our Canadian, U.K., and European subsidiaries, borrowings denominated in certain foreign currencies under our revolving credit facility and British pounds sterling denominated debt held by our U.S. parent company.

Foreign currency losses of $7.2 million based on period-end exchange rates were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily due to the weakening of the British pound sterling, and Euro, net of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar as these currencies relate to our inter-company balances with and between our Canadian, U.K. and European subsidiaries, borrowings denominated in foreign currencies under our revolving credit facility and British pounds sterling denominated debt held by our U.S. parent company.

Foreign currency gains $8.9 million based on period-end exchange rates were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound sterling, Euro, and the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar as these currencies relate to our inter-company balances with and between our Canadian, U.K., and European subsidiaries, U.S. dollar denominated debt held by our Canadian subsidiary, borrowings denominated in foreign currencies under our revolving credit facility, British pounds sterling denominated debt held by our U.S. parent company, British pounds sterling currency held in the U.S. and our British pound sterling denominated cross currency swap, which was terminated in March 2004.

During 2006, we redeemed or purchased a portion of our outstanding 81¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 and 85¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 resulting in a charge of $2.8 million, which consists of tender premiums and transaction costs, deferred financing costs, as well as original issue discounts and premiums. During 2004, we redeemed the remaining outstanding principal amount of the 81¤8% Senior Notes due 2008 of our Canadian subsidiary, resulting in a charge of $2.0 million, and we repaid a portion of our real estate term loans, which resulted in a charge of $0.4 million. The charges consisted primarily of the call and tender premiums associated with the extinguished debt and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing cost and discounts.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006 were 41.7%, 41.4% and 41.8%, respectively. The primary reconciling items between the statutory rate of 35% and our effective rate are state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and differences in the rates of tax at which our foreign earnings are subject. During  2006, we recorded a reduction in income tax expense as a result of a new Texas law changing the way state income tax is calculated in that state. As a result of this change, we have reversed a deferred tax liability of $1.7 million, net of federal tax benefit, related to our Texas state taxes. We are subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We are subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we have significant business operations. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional assessments by tax authorities and provide for these matters as appropriate. Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could result in changes in our estimates.

39




Minority Interest

Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries, net resulted in a charge to income of $3.0 million (0.2% of consolidated revenues), $1.7 million (0.1% of consolidated revenues) and  $1.6 million (0.1% of consolidated revenues) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively. This represents our minority partners’ share of earnings in our majority-owned international subsidiaries that are consolidated in our operating results. The decrease during 2005 is the result of our acquisition of various Latin American minority partner interests.

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”), an interpretation of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS No. 143”). FIN 47 clarifies that conditional asset retirement obligations meet the definition of liabilities and should be recognized when incurred if their fair values can be reasonably estimated. Uncertainty surrounding the timing and method of settlement that may be conditional on events occurring in the future are factored into the measurement of the liability rather than the existence of the liability. SFAS No. 143 established accounting and reporting standards for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets legally required by law, regulatory rule or contractual agreement and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset, which is then depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. The liability is increased over time through income as a component of depreciation expense, such that the liability will equate to the future cost to retire the long-lived asset at the expected retirement date.  Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. Our obligations are primarily the result of requirements under our facility lease agreements which generally have “return to original condition” clauses which would require us to remove or restore items such as shred pits, vaults, demising walls and office build-outs, among others. As of December 31, 2005, we have recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying FIN 47 as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle as prescribed in FIN 47, which resulted in a gross charge of $4.4 million ($2.8 million, net of tax).

Net Income

As a result of all the foregoing factors, for the year ended December 31, 2006, consolidated net income increased $17.8 million, or 16.0%, to $128.9 million (5.5% of consolidated revenues) from net income of $111.1 million (5.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

As a result of all the foregoing factors, for the year ended December 31, 2005, consolidated net income increased $16.9 million, or 18.0%, to $111.1 million (5.3% of consolidated revenues) from net income of $94.2 million (5.2% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Segment Analysis (in thousands)

The results of our various operating segments are discussed below. Beginning January 1, 2006, we changed our reportable segments as a result of certain management and organizational changes within our North American business. Therefore, the presentation of all historical segment reporting has been changed to conform to our new management reporting. Our reportable segments are now North American Physical Business, International Physical Business and Worldwide Digital Business. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our North American Physical Business, which consists of the United States and Canada, offers the storage of paper documents, as well as all other non-electronic media such as microfilm and microfiche, master audio and videotapes, film, X-rays and blueprints, including healthcare

40




information services, vital records services, service and courier operations, and the collection, handling and disposal of sensitive documents for corporate customers (“Hard Copy”); the storage and rotation of backup computer media as part of corporate disaster recovery plans, including service and courier operations (“Data Protection”); secure shredding services (“Shredding”); and the storage, assembly, and detailed reporting of customer marketing literature and delivery to sales offices, trade shows and prospective customers’ sites based on current and prospective customer orders, which we refer to as the “Fulfillment” business. Our International Physical Business segment offers information protection and storage services throughout Europe, South America, Mexico and Asia Pacific, including Hard Copy, Data Protection and Shredding. Our Worldwide Digital Business offers information protection and storage services for electronic records conveyed via telecommunication lines and the Internet, including online backup and recovery solutions for server data and personal computers, as well as email archiving and third party technology escrow services that protect intellectual property assets such as software source code.

North American Physical Business

Segment Revenue

 

Increase in Revenues

 

Percentage Increase in Revenues

 

For Years Ended

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$1,387,977

 

$1,529,612

 

$1,671,009

 

$141,635

 

$141,397

 

10.2%

 

9.2%

 

 

Segment Contribution(1)

 

Segment Contribution(1) as a Percentage of Segment Revenue

 

For Years Ended

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$427,579

 

$444,343

 

$478,653

 

30.8%

 

29.0%

 

28.6%

 

 

Items Excluded from the Calculation of Segment Contribution(1)

Depreciation and Amortization

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$115,975

 

 

$

118,493

 

 

 

$

127,562

 

 


(1)          See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for definition of Contribution and for the basis on which allocations are made and a reconciliation of Contribution to income before provision for income taxes and minority interest on a consolidated basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, revenue in our North American Physical Business segment increased 9.2% primarily due to increasing storage internal growth rates resulting from stable net volume growth and an increasingly positive pricing environment, increasing service revenue growth rates particularly in data protection and fulfillment, growth of our secure shredding operations, and acquisitions. In addition, favorable currency fluctuations during the year ended December 31, 2006 in Canada increased revenue, as measured in U.S. dollars, by $9.8 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. Contribution as a percent of segment revenue decreased in the year ended December 31, 2006 due mainly to (a) higher transportation costs, primarily fuel and rental costs associated with a larger fleet of leased vehicles, and the accelerated implementation of a fleet-wide maintenance program in North America, (b) increased facility costs, primarily utilities, maintenance and insurance, (c) increased investment in sales, marketing and account management primarily related to a shift in hiring more experienced personnel at a higher cost, (d) costs associated with the North American reorganization, including a new level of field management, and (e) costs associated with our enterprise-wide sales meeting and a field operations meeting, both held in 2006 but not in 2005.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, revenue in our North American Physical Business segment increased 10.2% primarily due to increasing storage internal growth rates resulting from higher net volume growth and a more positive pricing environment, increasing service revenue growth rates, growth of our secure shredding operations, higher internal growth rates from product sales and acquisitions. In addition,

41




favorable currency fluctuations during the year ended December 31, 2005 in Canada increased revenue, as measured in U.S. dollars, by $8.7 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. Contribution as a percent of segment revenue decreased in the year ended December 31, 2005 due to our (a) increased investment in sales, marketing and account management, including higher sales commissions and compensation due to increased headcount, (b) increased bad debt expense, (c) increased incentive compensation expense, (d) higher transportation costs, primarily fuel, and (e) product sales at lower margins, offset by strong revenue growth, reduced facility expenses and the effectiveness of recent labor and cost management initiatives, including controls over overhead spending implemented in late 2004. The expansion of our secure shredding business, which incurs lower facilities costs than our core physical business, also lowers our facilities costs as a percentage of revenues.

Included in our North American Physical Business segment are certain costs related to staff functions, including finance, human resources and information technology, which benefit the enterprise as a whole. These costs are primarily related to the general management of these functions on a corporate level and the design and development of programs, policies and procedures that are then implemented in the individual segments, with each segment bearing its own cost of implementation. Management has decided to allocate these costs to the North American segment as further allocation is impracticable.

International Physical Business

Segment Revenue

 

Increase in Revenues

 

Percentage Increase in Revenues

 

For Years Ended

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$380,033

 

$435,106

 

$539,335

 

$55,073

 

$104,229

 

14.5%

 

24.0%

 

 

Segment Contribution(1)

 

Segment Contribution(1) as a Percentage of Segment Revenue

 

For Years Ended

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$89,751

 

$113,417

 

$117,568

 

23.6%

 

26.1%

 

21.8%

 

 

Items Excluded from the Calculation of Segment Contribution(1)

Depreciation and Amortization

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$33,234

 

$43,285

 

$54,803

 


(1)          See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for definition of Contribution and for the basis on which allocations are made and a reconciliation of Contribution to income before provision for income taxes and minority interest on a consolidated basis.

Revenue in our International Physical Business segment increased 24.0% during the year ended December 31, 2006 primarily due to acquisitions, which contributed $92.0 million or 18.6%. This was partially offset by net unfavorable currency fluctuations in Europe and Latin America of $6.3 million or 1.5% during the year ended December 31, 2006. The balance of the increase in revenue represents internal growth. Contribution as a percent of segment revenue decreased primarily due to the acquisition of two shredding businesses in the U.K. that operate at lower margins, the acquisition of Pickfords, which is in the process of rationalizing its real estate portfolio, and costs associated with the facility fire in London, England.

Revenue in our International Physical Business segment increased 14.5% during the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily due to acquisitions completed in Europe and in South America and strong internal growth in Latin America, offset by lower revenue in our U.K. public sector business. Favorable currency fluctuations during the year ended December 31, 2005 in Europe, Mexico and South America increased revenue, as measured in U.S. dollars, by $13.8 million compared to the year ended December 31,

42




2004. Contribution as a percent of segment revenue increased primarily due to improvements in both cost of sales and overhead labor ratios as a result of completing the integration of Hays IMS in the second half of 2004 offset by increased compensation associated with additional sales, marketing, and account management personnel, several new marketing and promotional efforts, and increased bad debt expense.

Worldwide Digital Business

Segment Revenue

 

Increase in Revenues

 

Percentage Increase in Revenues

 

For Years Ended

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$49,579

 

$113,437

 

$139,998

 

$63,858

 

$26,561

 

128.8%

 

23.4%

 

 

Segment Contribution(1)

 

Segment Contribution(1) as a Percentage of Segment Revenue

 

For Years Ended

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$(9,886)

 

$12,461

 

$9,779

 

(19.9)%

 

11.0%

 

7.0%

 

 

Items Excluded from the Calculation of Segment Contribution(1)

Depreciation and Amortization

 

December 31, 2004

 

December 31, 2005

 

December 31, 2006

 

$14,420

 

$25,144

 

$ 26,008

 


(1)          See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for definition of Contribution and for the basis on which allocations are made and a reconciliation of Contribution to income before provision for income taxes and minority interest on a consolidated basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, revenue in our Worldwide Digital Business segment increased 23.4% primarily due to internal growth of 16%, primarily attributable to growth in digital storage revenue and our online backup service offerings for both personal computer and server data. The internal growth rate of our digital business was offset by a large data restoration project in the third quarter of 2005, which was not repeated in 2006 but drove the increase in the digital storage growth rate beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005. The acquisition of LiveVault in December 2005 contributed approximately $12 million in revenue during the year ended December 31, 2006. Contribution as a percent of segment revenue decreased primarily due to the acquisition of LiveVault, increased investment in the European sales force, increases in information technology costs, including the write-off of $5.9 million of previously deferred costs, primarily internal labor costs, associated with internal use software development projects that were discontinued, and the benefit of a large data restoration project in the third quarter of 2005. This decrease was offset by higher absorption of fixed costs as a result of increased revenues and a reduction in royalty payments.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, revenue in our Worldwide Digital Business segment increased 128.8% primarily due to the acquisition of Connected in November 2004, which represents an increase of $33.7 million over the partial year of revenue recorded in 2004 and strong internal growth of 41%, including the impact of a large data restoration project completed in 2005. Contribution as a percent of segment revenue increased primarily due to strong revenue growth and improved overhead leverage, partially offset by increases in information technology costs, the acquisitions of Connected and LiveVault and associated research and development activities and the growth of our sales and account management force, including higher sales commissions.

43




Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following is a summary of our cash balances and cash flows for the years ended 2004, 2005 and 2006 (in thousands).

 

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

 

$

305,364

 

$

377,176

 

$

374,282

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

(626,523

)

(436,175

)

(466,714

)

Cash flows provided by financing activities

 

276,569

 

81,449

 

82,734

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year

 

31,942

 

53,413

 

45,369

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $377.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $374.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease resulted primarily from an increase in operating income and non-cash items, such as depreciation offset by gain on foreign currency, and further offset by the net change in working capital. The net change in working capital is primarily associated with the timing of accounts payable payments.

Due to the nature of our businesses, we make significant capital expenditures and additions to customer acquisition costs. Our capital expenditures are primarily related to growth and include investments in storage systems, information systems and discretionary investments in real estate. Cash paid for our capital expenditures and additions to customer acquisition costs during the year ended December 31, 2006 amounted to $382.0 million and $14.3 million, respectively. From time to time and in the normal course of business we sell certain fixed assets, primarily real estate. In the year ended December 31, 2006, we received $17.8 million of net proceeds from the sales of assets. For the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, capital expenditures, net and additions to customer acquisition costs were funded primarily with cash flows provided by operating activities. Excluding acquisitions, we expect our capital expenditures to be between $390 million and $420 million in the year ending December 31, 2007. Included in our estimated capital expenditures for 2007 is $50 million to $60 million of opportunity driven real estate purchases.

In the year ended December 31, 2006, we paid net cash consideration of $81.2 million for acquisitions, primarily related to the acquisition of two shredding businesses in the U.K., the buyout of minority partners in France and Mexico and contingent payments associated with a shredding acquisition in the U.S. and another acquisition in Europe. Cash flows provided from operating activities, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, the proceeds from the sale of senior subordinated notes, and cash equivalents on-hand funded these acquisitions.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $82.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we had gross borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and term loan facilities of $543.9 million, $282.0 million of net proceeds from the sale of Senior Subordinated Notes and $22.2 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan. We used the proceeds from these financing transactions to repay debt and term loans ($655.0 million), repurchase $78.1 million of our 81¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 and repurchase $33.0 million of our 85¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013, repay debt financing from minority stockholders, net ($1.8 million) and to fund acquisitions.

44




We are highly leveraged and expect to continue to be highly leveraged for the foreseeable future. Our consolidated debt as of December 31, 2006 was comprised of the following (in thousands):

IMI Revolving Credit Facility(1)

 

$

170,472

 

IMI Term Loan Facility(1)

 

312,000

 

IME Revolving Credit Facility(2)

 

77,819

 

IME Term Loan Facility(2)

 

189,005

 

81¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011(3)

 

71,789

 

85¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013(3)

 

448,001

 

71¤4% GBP Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014(3)

 

293,865

 

73¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015(3)

 

438,594

 

65¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016(3)

 

315,553

 

83¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018(3)

 

200,000

 

8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018(3)

 

49,663

 

63¤4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018(3)

 

39,429

 

Real Estate Mortgages

 

4,081

 

Seller Notes

 

8,757

 

Other

 

49,788

 

Long-term Debt

 

2,668,816

 

Less Current Portion

 

(63,105

)

Long-term Debt, Net of Current Portion

 

$

2,605,711

 


(1)          All intercompany notes and the capital stock of most of our U.S. subsidiaries are pledged to secure these debt instruments.

(2)          Most of IME’s non-dormant subsidiaries have either guaranteed this indebtedness or their shares of capital stock and intercompany indebtedness have been pledged to secure this indebtedness. Iron Mountain has not guaranteed or otherwise provided security for this indebtedness nor have any of Iron Mountain’s U.S., Canadian, Asia Pacific, Mexican or South American subsidiaries.

(3)          These debt instruments are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior subordinated basis, by substantially all of our direct and indirect wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”). These guarantees are joint and several obligations of the Guarantors. The remainder of our subsidiaries do not guarantee these debt instruments.

Our indentures use OIBDA-based calculations as primary measures of financial performance, including leverage ratios. Our key bond leverage ratio, as calculated per our bond indentures, was 5.0 as of December 31, 2005 and 4.6 as of December 31, 2006. Noncompliance with this leverage ratio would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity. Our target for this ratio is generally in the range of 4.5 to 5.5 while the maximum ratio allowable under the bond indentures is 6.5.

Our ability to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, working capital levels and capital structure, which are subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors which may be beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that future financings will be available on acceptable terms or in amounts sufficient to enable us to service or refinance our indebtedness, or to make necessary capital expenditures.

45




In March 2004, IME and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “IME Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of European lenders. The IME Credit Agreement provides for maximum borrowing availability in the principal amount of 200 million British pounds sterling, including a 100 million British pounds sterling revolving credit facility (the “IME revolving credit facility”), which includes the ability to borrow in certain other foreign currencies and a 100 million British pounds sterling term loan (the “IME term loan facility”). The IME revolving credit facility matures on March 5, 2009. The IME term loan facility is payable in three installments; two installments of 20 million British pounds sterling on March 5, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and the final payment of the remaining balance on March 5, 2009. The interest rate on borrowings under the IME Credit Agreement varies depending on IME’s choice of currency options and interest rate period, plus an applicable margin. The IME Credit Agreement includes various financial covenants applicable to the results of IME, which may restrict IME’s ability to incur indebtedness under the IME Credit Agreement and from third parties, as well as limit IME’s ability to pay dividends to us. Most of IME’s non-dormant subsidiaries have either guaranteed the obligations or have their shares pledged to secure IME’s obligations under the IME Credit Agreement. We have not guaranteed or otherwise provided security for the IME Credit Agreement nor have any of our U.S., Canadian, Asia Pacific, Mexican or South American subsidiaries. Our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 includes 77 million British pounds sterling and 94.7 million Euro of borrowings (totaling $266.8 million) under the IME Credit Agreement; we also had various outstanding letters of credit totaling 1.7 million British pounds sterling ($3.2 million). The remaining availability, based on IME’s current leverage ratio which is calculated based on current earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and current external debt, under the IME revolving credit facility on October 31, 2006, was approximately 59.0 million British pounds sterling ($112.1 million). The interest rate in effect under the IME revolving credit facility ranged from 4.4% to 6.2% as of October 31, 2006.

On April 2, 2004 and subsequently on July 8, 2004, we entered into a new amended and restated revolving credit facility and term loan facility (the “IMI Credit Agreement”) to replace our prior credit agreement and to reflect more favorable pricing of our term loans. The IMI Credit Agreement had an aggregate principal amount of $550 million and was comprised of a $350 million revolving credit facility (the “IMI revolving credit facility”), which included the ability to borrow in certain foreign currencies, and a $200 million term loan facility (the “IMI term loan facility”). The IMI revolving credit facility matures on April 2, 2009. With respect to the IMI term loan facility, quarterly loan payments of $0.5 million began in the third quarter of 2004 and will continue through maturity on April 2, 2011, at which time the remaining outstanding principal balance of the IMI term loan facility is due. In November 2004, we entered into an additional $150 million of term loans as permitted under our IMI Credit Agreement. The new term loans will mature at the same time as our current IMI term loan facility with quarterly loan payments of $0.4 million that began in the first quarter of 2005 and are priced at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.75%. On October 31, 2005, we entered into the second amendment to the IMI Credit Agreement, increasing availability under the revolving credit facility from $350 million to $400 million. As a result, the IMI Credit Agreement had an aggregate maximum principal amount of $750 million as of December 31, 2006. The interest rate on borrowings under the IMI Credit Agreement varies depending on our choice of interest rate and currency options, plus an applicable margin. All intercompany notes and the capital stock of most of our U.S. subsidiaries are pledged to secure the IMI Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2006, we had $170.5 million of borrowings under our IMI revolving credit facility, of which $4 million was denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining balance was denominated in Canadian dollars (“CAD”) (CAD 194 million); we also had various outstanding letters of credit totaling $27.0 million. The remaining availability, based on Iron Mountain’s current leverage ratio which is calculated based on current EBITDA and current external debt, under the IMI revolving credit facility on December 31, 2006, was $113.8 million. The interest rate in effect under the IMI revolving credit facility and IMI term loan facility ranged from 6.0% to 9.0% and 7.0% to 7.2%, respectively, as of December 31, 2006.

46




In July 2006, we completed an underwritten public offering of $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 83¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018, which were issued at par. Our net proceeds of $196.6 million, after paying the underwriters’ discounts, commissions and transaction fees, were used to (a) fund our offer to purchase and consent solicitation of $78.1 million in aggregate principle amount of our outstanding 81¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011, (b) fund our purchase in the open market of $33.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 85¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 and (c) repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As a result, we recorded a charge to other expense (income), net of $2.8 million in the third quarter of 2006 related to the early extinguishment of the 81¤4% and 85¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes, which consists of tender premiums and transaction costs, deferred financing costs, as well as, original issue discounts and premiums related to the 81¤4% and 85¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes.

In July 2006, we experienced a significant fire in a records and information management facility in London, England that resulted in the complete destruction of the leased facility. London fire authorities recently issued a report in which it was concluded that the fire resulted from a deliberate act of arson; the report also stated that the actions of a guard employed by a third-party security service contractor resulted in the disabling of the automatic sprinkler system in the building. We believe we carry adequate property and liability insurance and are in the process of assessing the cause of, and other circumstances involved with, the fire. We do not expect that this event will have a material impact to our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. Revenues from this facility represent less than 1% of our consolidated enterprise revenues. As of December 31, 2006, we have approximately $9.6 million recorded as an insurance receivable which is included in prepaid expenses and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet which primarily represents the net book value of the property, plant and equipment associated with this facility at the time of the incident, net of $1.8 million of property insurance proceeds received through IME’s October 31, 2006 fiscal year-end. Subsequent to IME’s October 31, 2006 fiscal year-end, IME received payment from our insurance carrier of approximately 8.6 million British pounds sterling ($16.9 million). We expect to utilize cash received from our insurance carriers to fund capital expenditures and for general working capital needs. Such amount represents a portion of our business personal property, business interruption, and expense claims with our insurance carrier. We will record approximately $8.8 million to other (income) expense, net in the first quarter of 2007 related to recoveries associated with our business interruption portion of our insurance claim to date. We expect to settle the remaining property portion of our insurance claim with our insurance carriers within the next twelve months and have, therefore, classified the remaining insurance receivable as a current asset. We expect to receive recoveries related to our property claim with our insurance carriers that will exceed the carrying value of such assets. We, therefore, expect to record gains on the disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net in our statement of operations in future periods when the cash received to date exceeds the remaining carrying value of the related property, plant and equipment, net. Recoveries from the insurance carriers related to business personal property claims are reflected in our statement of cash flows under proceeds from sales of property and equipment and other, net included in investing activities section when received. Recoveries from the insurance carriers related to business interruption claims are reflected in our statement of cash flows as a component of net income included in the operating activities section when received.

In October 2006, we issued, in a private placement, $50 million in aggregate principal amount of our 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018, which were issued at a price of 99.3% of par; and 30 million Euro in aggregate principal amount of our 63¤4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018, which were issued at a price of 99.5% of par. Our net proceeds of $85.5 million, after sales commission, were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under the IMI term loan and IME revolving credit facilities.

The IME Credit Agreement, IMI Credit Agreement, our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that

47




restrict our ability to complete acquisitions, pay cash dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets and take certain other corporate actions. The covenants do not contain a rating trigger. Therefore, a change in our debt rating would not trigger a default under the IME Credit Agreement, IMI Credit Agreement and our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness. We were in compliance with all debt covenants in material agreements as of December 31, 2006.

In January 2007, we completed an offering of 225.0 million Euro in aggregate principal amount of our 63¤4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018, which were issued at a price of 98.99% of par and priced to yield 6.875%. Our net proceeds of 219.2 million Euro ($283.8 million), after paying the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and estimated expenses (excluding accrued interest payable by purchasers of the notes from October 17, 2006). These net proceeds were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under the IMI term loan and revolving credit facilities. We recorded a charge to other (income) expense, net of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2007 related to the early retirement of the IMI term loans, representing the write-off of a portion of our deferred financing costs. In addition, in January 2007, we entered into forward contracts to exchange U.S. dollars for 96 million Euros and 194 million CAD for 127.5 million Euros to hedge our intercompany exposures with Canada and our subsidiaries whose functional currency is the Euro. These forward contracts settle on a monthly basis, at which time we enter into new forward contracts for the same underlying amounts, to continue to hedge movements in CAD and Euros against the U.S. dollar. At the time of settlement, we either pay or receive the net settlement amount from the forward contract.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006 and the anticipated effect of these obligations on our liquidity in future years (in thousands):

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

Total

 

Less than 1 Year

 

1-3 Years

 

3-5 Years

 

More than
5 Years

 

Capital Lease Obligations

 

$

41,384

 

 

$

8,829

 

 

$

6,622

 

$

2,157

 

$

23,776

 

Long-Term Debt Obligations (excluding Capital Lease Obligations)

 

2,625,023

 

 

54,276

 

 

412,232

 

374,350

 

1,784,165

 

Interest Payments(1)

 

1,567,691

 

 

212,794

 

 

401,893

 

342,429

 

610,575

 

Operating Lease Obligations

 

2,871,269

 

 

176,842

 

 

322,327

 

302,457

 

2,069,643

 

Purchase and Asset Retirement Obligations(2)

 

62,881

 

 

26,555

 

 

22,407

 

6,620

 

7,299

 

Total

 

$

7,168,248

 

 

$

479,296

 

 

$

1,165,481

 

$

1,028,013

 

$

4,495,458

 


(1)          Amounts include variable rate interest payments, which are calculated utilizing the applicable interest rates as of December 31, 2006; see Note 4 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)          In addition, in connection with some of our acquisitions, we have potential earn-out obligations that may be payable in the event businesses we acquired meet certain operational objectives. These payments are based on the future results of these operations, and our estimate of the maximum contingent earn-out payments we may be required to make under all such agreements as of December 31, 2006 is approximately $6.6 million.

We expect to meet our cash flow requirements for the next twelve months from cash generated from operations, existing cash, cash equivalents, borrowings under the IMI and IME revolving credit facilities and other financings, which may include secured credit facilities, securitizations and mortgage or capital lease financings. We expect to meet our long-term cash flow requirements using the same means described

48




above, as well as the potential issuance of debt or equity securities as we deem appropriate. See Notes 4, 7 and 10 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Regulation S-K Item 303(a)(4)(ii).

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards

We have federal net operating loss carryforwards which begin to expire in 2018 through 2021 of $172.7 million at December 31, 2006 to reduce future federal taxable income, if any. We also have an asset for state net operating loss of $18.2 million (net of federal tax benefit), which begins to expire in 2007 through 2024, subject to a valuation allowance of approximately 98%. As a result of these loss carryforwards, we do not expect to pay any significant U.S. federal and state income taxes in 2007.

Inflation

Certain of our expenses, such as wages and benefits, insurance, occupancy costs and equipment repair and replacement, are subject to normal inflationary pressures. Although to date we have been able to offset inflationary cost increases through increased operating efficiencies and the negotiation of favorable long-term real estate leases, we can give no assurance that we will be able to offset any future inflationary cost increases through similar efficiencies, leases or increased storage or service charges.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Given the recurring nature of our revenues and the long term nature of our asset base, we have the ability and the preference to use long term, fixed interest rate debt to finance our business, thereby helping to preserve our long term returns on invested capital. We target a range 80% to 85% of our debt portfolio to be fixed with respect to interest rates. Occasionally, we will use floating to fixed interest rate swaps as a tool to maintain our targeted level of fixed rate debt. As part of this strategy, in May 2001 and June 2006 we and IME entered into a total of two derivative financial contracts, which are variable-for-fixed interest rate swaps consisting of (a)  one contract based on interest payments previously payable on our real estate term loans of an aggregate principal amount of $97.0 million that have been subsequently repaid, and (b) one contract for interest payments payable on IME’s term loan facility of an aggregate principal amount of 75.0 million British pounds sterling. See Note 3 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

After consideration of the swap contracts mentioned above, as of December 31, 2006, we had $517.9 million of variable rate debt outstanding with a weighted average variable interest rate of 6.4%, and $2,150.9 million of fixed rate debt outstanding. As of December 31, 2006, 80.6% of our total debt outstanding was fixed. If the weighted average variable interest rate on our variable rate debt had increased by 1%, our net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 would have been reduced by $2.9 million. See Note 4 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K for a discussion of our long-term indebtedness, including the fair values of such indebtedness as of December 31, 2006.

Currency Risk

Our investments in IME, Iron Mountain Canada Corporation (“IM Canada”), Iron Mountain Mexico, SA de RL de CV, IMSA and other international investments may be subject to risks and uncertainties related to fluctuations in currency valuation. Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, our international revenues and expenses are generated in the currencies of the countries in which we operate,

49




primarily the Euro, Canadian dollar and British pound sterling. The currencies of many Latin American countries, particularly the Argentine peso, have experienced substantial volatility and depreciation. Declines in the value of the local currencies in which we are paid relative to the U.S. dollar will cause revenues in U.S. dollar terms to decrease and dollar-denominated liabilities to increase in local currency.

The impact on our earnings is mitigated somewhat by the fact that most operating and other expenses are also incurred and paid in the local currency. We also have several intercompany obligations between our foreign subsidiaries and Iron Mountain and our U.S.-based subsidiaries and our foreign subsidiaries and IME. These intercompany obligations are primarily denominated in the local currency of the foreign subsidiary.

We have adopted and implemented a number of strategies to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuations in currency valuations. One strategy is to finance our largest international subsidiaries with local debt that is denominated in local currencies, thereby providing a natural hedge. In determining the amount of any such financing, we take into account local tax strategies among other factors. Another strategy we utilize is to borrow in foreign currencies at the U.S. parent level to hedge our intercompany financing activities. Finally, on occasion, we enter into currency swaps to temporarily or permanently hedge an overseas investment, such as a major acquisition to lock in certain transaction economics. We have implemented these strategies for our three foreign investments in the U.K., Canada and Asia Pacific. Specifically, through IME borrowing under the IME Credit Agreement and our 150 million British pounds sterling denominated 71¤4% Senior Subordinated Notes, we effectively hedge most of our outstanding intercompany loan with IME. IM Canada has financed their capital needs through direct borrowings in Canadian dollars under the IMI revolving credit facility. This creates a tax efficient natural currency hedge. To fund the acquisition of Pickfords in Australia and New Zealand, Iron Mountain borrowed Australian and New Zealand dollars under its multi-currency revolving credit facility. These borrowings provided a tax efficient natural hedge against the intercompany loans created at the time of the acquisition. Subsequently, we repaid such borrowings under our multi-currency revolving credit facility and contemporaneously in September 2006, we entered into forward contracts to exchange U.S. dollars for 55 million in Australian dollars (“AUD”) and 20.2 million in New Zealand dollars (“NZD”) to hedge our intercompany exposure in these countries. In addition, in January, 2007 we entered into forward contracts to exchange U.S. dollars for 96 million Euros and 194 million CAD for 127.5 million Euros to hedge our intercompany exposures with Canada and our subsidiaries whose functional currency is the Euro. These forward contracts settle on a monthly basis, at which time we enter into new forward contracts for the same underlying amounts, to continue to hedge movements in AUD, NZD, CAD and Euros against the U.S. dollar. At the time of settlement, we either pay or receive the net settlement amount from the forward contract. As of December 31, 2006, except as noted above, our currency exposures to intercompany balances are unhedged.

The impact of devaluation or depreciating currency on an entity depends on the residual effect on the local economy and the ability of an entity to raise prices and/or reduce expenses. Due to our constantly changing currency exposure and the potential substantial volatility of currency exchange rates, we cannot predict the effect of exchange fluctuations on our business. The effect of a change in foreign exchange rates on our net investment in foreign subsidiaries is reflected in the “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Items, net” component of stockholders’ equity. A 10% depreciation in year-end 2006 functional currencies, relative to the U.S. dollar, would result in a reduction in our stockholders’ equity of approximately $41.1 million.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The information required by this item is included in Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

50




Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information is recorded, processed, summarized and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding what is required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act. As of December 31, 2006 (the “Evaluation Date”), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006. Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears below.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Iron Mountain Incorporated:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Iron Mountain Incorporated and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating

51




effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company and our report dated March 1, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 1, 2007

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

52




PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about May 24, 2007.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about May 24, 2007.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about May 24, 2007.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about May 24, 2007.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about May 24, 2007.

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)          Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules filed as part of this report:

 

Page

 

A. Iron Mountain Incorporated

 

 

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

54

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 2005 and 2006

 

 

55

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations, Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006

 

 

56

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income, Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006

 

 

57