U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
|
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
Commission File Number 000-30833
Bruker BioSciences Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
04-3110160 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification Number) |
40
Manning Park
Billerica, MA 01821
(Address of principal executive offices)
(978) 663-3660
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No x
As of August 4, 2006, there were 101,961,522 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding.
Bruker BioSciences Corporation
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006
Index
2
Bruker BioSciences Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
96,596 |
|
$ |
53,159 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
46,419 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
61,709 |
|
53,744 |
|
||
Due from affiliated companies |
|
2,678 |
|
4,860 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
103,174 |
|
96,333 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
11,879 |
|
11,094 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total current assets |
|
276,036 |
|
265,609 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
74,864 |
|
72,336 |
|
||
Intangibles and other assets |
|
28,826 |
|
22,942 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
379,726 |
|
$ |
360,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
9,613 |
|
$ |
8,002 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
12,340 |
|
14,118 |
|
||
Due to affiliated companies |
|
3,472 |
|
3,857 |
|
||
Customer advances |
|
28,762 |
|
29,232 |
|
||
Other current liabilities |
|
62,203 |
|
56,319 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
116,390 |
|
111,528 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
21,969 |
|
21,423 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
23,293 |
|
20,134 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding at June 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 and 150,000,000 shares authorized, 90,086,241 and 89,803,836 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively |
|
901 |
|
898 |
|
||
Other stockholders equity |
|
217,173 |
|
206,904 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
218,074 |
|
207,802 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
379,726 |
|
$ |
360,887 |
|
See the accompanying notes to financial statements.
3
Bruker BioSciences Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Product revenue |
|
$ |
67,373 |
|
$ |
60,723 |
|
$ |
132,330 |
|
$ |
127,547 |
|
Service revenue |
|
10,234 |
|
9,977 |
|
19,043 |
|
17,732 |
|
||||
Other revenue |
|
233 |
|
668 |
|
877 |
|
1,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total revenue |
|
77,840 |
|
71,368 |
|
152,250 |
|
146,279 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cost of product revenue |
|
38,599 |
|
34,275 |
|
74,841 |
|
72,540 |
|
||||
Cost of service revenue |
|
5,279 |
|
6,548 |
|
10,500 |
|
11,815 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total cost of revenue |
|
43,878 |
|
40,823 |
|
85,341 |
|
84,355 |
|
||||
Gross profit |
|
33,962 |
|
30,545 |
|
66,909 |
|
61,924 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sales and marketing |
|
15,426 |
|
13,385 |
|
29,398 |
|
25,537 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
5,532 |
|
5,287 |
|
11,148 |
|
10,955 |
|
||||
Research and development |
|
10,619 |
|
10,962 |
|
20,993 |
|
21,982 |
|
||||
Acquisition related charges |
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
32,769 |
|
29,634 |
|
63,907 |
|
58,474 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
1,193 |
|
911 |
|
3,002 |
|
3,450 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest and other income, net |
|
459 |
|
554 |
|
1,122 |
|
424 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before income tax provision and minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
1,652 |
|
1,465 |
|
4,124 |
|
3,874 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income tax provision |
|
1,127 |
|
1,145 |
|
2,775 |
|
3,070 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
525 |
|
320 |
|
1,349 |
|
804 |
|
||||
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
45 |
|
36 |
|
93 |
|
103 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
480 |
|
$ |
284 |
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share - basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
90,080 |
|
89,472 |
|
90,054 |
|
89,471 |
|
||||
Diluted |
|
90,493 |
|
89,599 |
|
90,403 |
|
89,591 |
|
See the accompanying notes to financial statements.
4
Bruker BioSciences Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
21,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(1,858 |
) |
(1,249 |
) |
||
Redemption of short-term investments |
|
46,460 |
|
464 |
|
||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
(3,970 |
) |
110 |
|
||
Changes in restricted cash |
|
(107 |
) |
(153 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
40,525 |
|
(828 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from short-term borrowings, net |
|
1,559 |
|
(1,874 |
) |
||
Repayments of long-term debt, net |
|
(923 |
) |
(1,079 |
) |
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
49 |
|
11 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
685 |
|
(2,942 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
1,967 |
|
(3,079 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
43,437 |
|
14,811 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
53,159 |
|
32,547 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
96,596 |
|
$ |
47,358 |
|
See the accompanying notes to financial statements.
5
Bruker BioSciences Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Bruker BioSciences Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company) design, manufacture, service and market proprietary life science and materials research systems based on mass spectrometry core technology platforms and X-ray technologies. The Company also sells a broad range of field analytical systems for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) detection. The Company maintains major technical centers in Europe, North America and Japan and sales offices throughout the world. The Companys diverse customer base includes pharmaceutical, biotechnology and proteomics companies, academic institutions, advanced materials and semiconductor industries and government agencies.
The financial statements represent the consolidated accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries prior to its acquisition of Bruker Optics Inc. on July 1, 2006. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The December 31, 2005 balance sheet is the balance sheet included in the audited financial statements as presented in the Companys 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, the financial information presented herein does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
On July 1, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of Bruker Optics. Both the Company and Bruker Optics were majority owned by five affiliated stockholders prior to the acquisition. As a result, the acquisition of Bruker Optics by the Company is considered a business combination of companies under common control, and is being accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests. Accordingly, the acquisition of Bruker Optics, as it relates to the portion under common ownership (approximately 96%), is being accounted for at historical carrying values. The portion not under the common ownership of the five affiliated stockholders (approximately 4%) is being accounted for using the purchase method of accounting (at fair value) on a pro rata basis. Any excess purchase price of the interest not under common control over the fair value of the related net assets acquired is being accounted for as goodwill and intangible assets. Because this acquisition will be essentially considered a pooling of interests, all one-time transaction costs will be expensed as incurred rather than being added to goodwill. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred and expensed acquisition related charges totaling $2.4 million, which consisted of investment banking, legal and accounting fees, compensation earned by the special committee of the Companys Board of Directors and antitrust regulation filing fees. The consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of cash flows and notes to the financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q exclude Bruker Optics since the acquisition was completed on July 1, 2006. See footnote 16 for selected pro forma information including the results of Bruker Optics.
The Company reports financial results on the basis of the following two business segments:
1 Bruker Daltonics is a leading developer and provider of innovative life science tools based on mass spectrometry and also develops and provides a broad range of field analytical systems for CBRN detection.
2. Bruker AXS is a leading developer and provider of life science and advanced materials research tools for advanced X-ray instrumentation used in non-destructive molecular and elemental analysis in academic, research and industrial applications.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
2. Acquisition
On January 17, 2006, the Company acquired Socabim SAS, a privately-held company focused on advanced X-ray analysis software for materials research based in Paris, France. The initial aggregate purchase price of approximately $8.8 million was paid through the issuance of 267,302 restricted shares of common stock of the Company to Socabims two largest shareholders, which had an aggregate value of approximately $1.3 million as of the date of issuance, and an aggregate of $7.5 million was paid to all of the Socabim selling shareholders from cash on hand. Additional cash consideration, in the amount of approximately $1.5 million in total, may be paid through 2009 based on the future performance of Socabim. Prior to the acquisition, the Company licensed from Socabim software that is used in various Bruker AXS systems. Bruker AXS was
6
Socabims principal customer before the acquisition which required the Company to evaluate the preexisting relationship with Socabim in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 04-1, Accounting for Preexisting Relationships between the Parties to a Business Combination. EITF 04-1 requires an analysis to be performed to determine whether there has been an effective settlement of a preexisting executory contract that was either favorable or unfavorable to the acquirer. To the extent there was an executory contract that was either favorable or unfavorable to the acquirer, a gain or loss is recognized. Management determined there was no settlement of a preexisting executory contract in the acquisition of Socabim and, accordingly, no gain or loss was recognized. The results of Socabim have been included in the Bruker AXS segment from the date of acquisition. Pro forma information to reflect the Socabim acquisition has not been presented as the impact on revenues and net income and net income per common share would not have been material.
3. Equity-Based Compensation
In 2000, the Board of Directors adopted and the stockholders approved the 2000 Stock Option Plan. The 2000 Stock Option Plan provided for the issuance of up to 2,200,000 shares of common stock in connection with awards under the Plan. The 2000 Stock Option Plan allows a committee of the Board of Directors to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights and stock awards (including the use of restricted stock and phantom shares). The committee has the authority to determine which employees will receive the awards, the amount of the awards and other terms and conditions of the award. Awards granted by the committee typically vest over a period of three-to-five years.
On July 1, 2003, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2000 Stock Option Plan to change the plan name and increase the number of shares available for issuance. The name of the amended plan is the Bruker BioSciences Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan. The amendment authorized 4,132,000 additional shares of common stock of the Company issuable pursuant to the plan. On June 29, 2006, the Companys stockholders approved an increase in the number of shares available for issuance under the plan from 6,320,000 shares to 8,000,000 shares, an increase of 1,680,000 shares.
The total number of shares issuable under the plan is 8,000,000, of which 6,320,000 have been registered on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-47836 and 333-107924).
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This standard revised the measurement, valuation and recognition of financial accounting and reporting standards for equity-based compensation plans contained in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. The new standard requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar equity-based compensation awards based on fair value recognition provisions determined on the date of grant.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which required the application of the accounting standard on January 1, 2006, the effective date of the standard for the Company. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Companys consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R). The Company will continue to include tabular, pro forma disclosures in accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, for all periods prior to January 1, 2006.
As of June 30, 2006, the Companys primary types of share-based compensation were stock options and restricted stock. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as follows (in thousands):
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|||
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stock options |
|
$ |
242 |
|
$ |
459 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
37 |
|
74 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total stock-based compensation, pre-tax |
|
279 |
|
533 |
|
||
Tax benefit |
|
145 |
|
145 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax |
|
$ |
134 |
|
$ |
388 |
|
7
Restricted Stock
Restricted shares of the Companys common stock are periodically awarded to executive officers and certain key employees of the Company subject to a service restriction which expires ratably over a period of five years. The restricted shares of common stock may not be sold or transferred during the restriction period. Stock compensation for restricted stock is recorded based on the stock price on the grant date and charged to expense ratably through the restriction period. The following table summarizes information about restricted stock activity during the six months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Subject to |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
Restriction |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
130,550 |
|
5.00 |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(1,500 |
) |
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
129,050 |
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
Unrecognized pretax expense of $0.7 million related to restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining service period of 4.5 years for awards outstanding at June 30, 2006.
Stock Options
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Assumptions regarding volatility, expected term, dividend yield and risk-free interest rate are required for the Black-Scholes model. Volatility and expected term assumptions are based on the Companys historical experience. The risk-free interest rate is based on a U.S. treasury note with a maturity similar to the option awards expected life. The assumptions for volatility, expected life, dividend yield and risk-free interest rate are presented in the table below:
|
2006 |
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.80 |
% |
Expected life |
|
5 years |
|
Volatility |
|
105.0 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
0 |
% |
All stock options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
||
|
|
Subject to |
|
Option |
|
Contractual |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Term (Yrs) |
|
($s in 000s) |
|
||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
3,576,868 |
|
$ |
6.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
335,250 |
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
(15,103 |
) |
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Forfeited |
|
(180,165 |
) |
7.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
3,716,850 |
|
$ |
6.27 |
|
5.4 |
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
3,084,997 |
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
5.1 |
|
$ |
1,751 |
|
8
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2006:
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic |
|
||||
Range of |
|
Number |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
Value |
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
|
Value |
|
||||
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
Term (Yrs) |
|
Price |
|
($s in 000s) |
|
Exercisable |
|
Price |
|
($s in 000s) |
|
||||
$2.12 to $4.00 |
|
888,191 |
|
5.2 |
|
$ |
3.20 |
|
$ |
1,919 |
|
614,099 |
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
$4.01 to $6.00 |
|
1,698,595 |
|
5.7 |
|
5.07 |
|
538 |
|
1,340,834 |
|
5.11 |
|
378 |
|
||||
$6.01 to $10.00 |
|
531,715 |
|
4.7 |
|
6.69 |
|
|
|
531,715 |
|
6.69 |
|
|
|
||||
$10.01 to $13.00 |
|
230,099 |
|
5.7 |
|
11.05 |
|
|
|
230,099 |
|
11.05 |
|
|
|
||||
$13.01 and above |
|
368,250 |
|
4.8 |
|
15.64 |
|
|
|
368,250 |
|
15.64 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
3,716,850 |
|
5.4 |
|
$ |
6.27 |
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
3,084,997 |
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
$ |
1,751 |
|
The intrinsic values above are based on the Companys closing stock price of $5.36 on June 30, 2006. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $3.34. Unrecognized pretax expense of $2.0 million related to stock options is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining service period of 1.6 years for awards outstanding at June 30, 2006.
Prior Year Equity Compensation Expense
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company applied the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for stock options. The exercise price of each option issued under the Plan equaled the closing market price of the Companys stock on the date of grant and, therefore, the Company took no charges to the statement of operations with respect to stock options prior to January 1, 2006. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, to equity-based compensation (in thousands, except per-share data):
|
Three months |
|
Six months |
|
|||
|
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
||
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
284 |
|
$ |
701 |
|
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total stock-based compensation expense determined using fair value based method for all awards, net of taxes |
|
(638 |
) |
(1,276 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss, pro forma |
|
$ |
(354 |
) |
$ |
(575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Basic and diluted, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
The fair value of each stock option included in the preceding pro forma amounts was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.83 |
% |
Expected life |
|
5 years |
|
Volatility |
|
69.7 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
0 |
% |
4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
9
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
25,854 |
|
$ |
26,270 |
|
Work-in process |
|
35,327 |
|
29,508 |
|
||
Demonstration units |
|
12,753 |
|
16,768 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
29,240 |
|
23,787 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total inventories |
|
$ |
103,174 |
|
$ |
96,333 |
|
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of other intangible assets subject to amortization as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Useful |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Net |
|
||||||
|
|
Lives |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
||||||
|
|
in Years |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
||||||
Existing technology and related patents |
|
4-5 |
|
$ |
2,719 |
|
$ |
(1,140 |
) |
$ |
1,579 |
|
$ |
2,095 |
|
$ |
(950 |
) |
$ |
1,145 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
5 |
|
310 |
|
(187 |
) |
123 |
|
310 |
|
(156 |
) |
154 |
|
||||||
Trade names |
|
10 |
|
310 |
|
(92 |
) |
218 |
|
310 |
|
(76 |
) |
234 |
|
||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
$ |
(1,419 |
) |
$ |
1,920 |
|
$ |
2,715 |
|
$ |
(1,182 |
) |
$ |
1,533 |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded amortization expense of approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to other amortizable intangible assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded amortization expense of approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to other amortizable intangible assets.
The estimated future amortization expense related to other amortizable intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):
For the year ending December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
2006 (a) |
|
$ |
485 |
|
2007 |
|
543 |
|
|
2008 |
|
325 |
|
|
2009 |
|
293 |
|
|
2010 |
|
182 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
(a) Amount represents estimated amortization expense for the remaining six months ending December 31, 2006.
The carrying amount of goodwill as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was $21.5 million and $17.5 million, respectively, and is included in the Bruker AXS segment. The Company performs its annual test for indications of impairment as of December 31st each year. The Company completed its annual test for impairment as of December 31, 2005 and determined that goodwill was not impaired at that time.
6. Warranty Costs
The Company typically provides a one-year parts and labor warranty with the purchase of equipment. The anticipated cost for this one-year warranty is accrued upon recognition of the sale and is included as a current liability on the balance sheet. The Company also offers to its customers warranty and service agreements extending beyond the initial year of warranty for a fee. These fees are recorded as deferred revenue and amortized into income over the life of the extended warranty contract.
Changes in the Companys accrued warranty liability during the six months ended June 30, 2006 were as follows (in thousands):
10
Warranty accrual at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
7,489 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
|
4,334 |
|
|
Settlements of warranty claims |
|
(3,982 |
) |
|
Foreign currency impact |
|
484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
8,325 |
|
7. Provision for Income Taxes
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $1.1 million compared with an income tax provision of $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $2.8 million compared with an income tax provision of $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. In the United States, any income tax provision or benefit is currently recorded as an adjustment to the valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of a full valuation allowance.
8. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has a defined benefit retirement plan that covers substantially all employees of the Bruker AXS German subsidiary who were employed as of September 30, 1997. The plan provides pension benefits based upon final average salary and years of service.
The net periodic pension benefit cost includes the following components during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
180 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
$ |
345 |
|
$ |
325 |
|
Interest cost |
|
100 |
|
96 |
|
192 |
|
196 |
|
||||
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
||||
Amortization |
|
(5 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(19 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
$ |
529 |
|
$ |
702 |
|
To date, the Company has not funded the defined benefit plan and is not required to make contributions during the remainder of 2006.
9. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Except where the result would be antidilutive, the diluted earnings per share computation includes the effect of shares which would be issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, reduced by the number of shares which are assumed to be purchased by the Company from the resulting proceeds at the average market price during the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted average shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
11
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
480 |
|
$ |
284 |
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic |
|
90,080 |
|
89,472 |
|
90,054 |
|
89,471 |
|
||||
Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on treasury stock method |
|
413 |
|
127 |
|
349 |
|
120 |
|
||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted |
|
90,493 |
|
89,599 |
|
90,403 |
|
89,591 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per share - basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
10. Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
The components of interest and other income (expense), net, were as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
$ |
811 |
|
$ |
798 |
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
$ |
1,465 |
|
Interest expense |
|
(291 |
) |
(425 |
) |
(544 |
) |
(787 |
) |
||||
Exchange (losses) gains on foreign currency transactions |
|
(254 |
) |
226 |
|
(303 |
) |
(220 |
) |
||||
Appreciation of the fair value of derivative financial instruments |
|
22 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
||||
Other expense |
|
171 |
|
(45 |
) |
373 |
|
(34 |
) |
||||
Interest and other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
459 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
$ |
1,122 |
|
$ |
424 |
|
11. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America are included in other comprehensive income (loss), but excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders equity, net of tax. The following is a summary of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
480 |
|
$ |
284 |
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
$ |
701 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
4,900 |
|
(6,463 |
) |
7,138 |
|
(11,735 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,380 |
|
$ |
(6,179 |
) |
$ |
8,394 |
|
$ |
(11,034 |
) |
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Lawsuits, claims and proceedings of a nature considered normal to its businesses may be pending from time to time against the Company. The Company believes the outcome of these proceedings, if any, will not have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
13. Letters of Credit and Guarantees
As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had bank guarantees of $7.2 million and $8.3 million, respectively, for its customer advances. These bank guarantees affect the availability of the Companys lines of credit.
12
14. Business Segment Information
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, (SFAS 131) establishes standards for reporting information about reportable segments in financial statements of public business enterprises. SFAS 131 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company reports financial results on the basis of two reportable segments: Bruker Daltonics and Bruker AXS. Bruker Daltonics manufactures and distributes mass spectrometry instruments that can be integrated and used along with other analytical instruments. Bruker AXS manufactures and distributes advanced X-ray instrumentation used in non-destructive molecular and elemental analysis in academic, research and industrial applications. Bruker BioSciences Corporation, the parent company of Bruker Daltonics and Bruker AXS, is the corporate entity that principally incurs certain public company costs.
Selected reportable segment financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is presented below (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
39,830 |
|
$ |
37,362 |
|
$ |
77,359 |
|
$ |
80,005 |
|
Bruker AXS |
|
39,113 |
|
34,068 |
|
76,970 |
|
66,582 |
|
||||
Eliminations (a) |
|
(1,103 |
) |
(62 |
) |
(2,079 |
) |
(308 |
) |
||||
Total |
|
$ |
77,840 |
|
$ |
71,368 |
|
$ |
152,250 |
|
$ |
146,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
$ |
973 |
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
$ |
3,948 |
|
Bruker AXS |
|
1,599 |
|
420 |
|
2,660 |
|
1,241 |
|
||||
Eliminations (a) |
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
||||
Corporate |
|
(1,651 |
) |
(482 |
) |
(3,468 |
) |
(1,739 |
) |
||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,193 |
|
$ |
911 |
|
$ |
3,002 |
|
$ |
3,450 |
|
(a) represents transactions between segments which are eliminated in consolidation.
15. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This Interpretation sets forth a recognition threshold and valuation method to recognize and measure an income tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. The evaluation is based on a two-step approach. The first step requires an entity to evaluate whether the tax position would more likely than not, based upon its technical merits, be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. The second step requires the tax position to be measured at the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. In addition, previously recognized benefits from tax positions that no longer meet the new criteria would no longer be recognized. The application of this Interpretation will be considered a change in accounting principle with the cumulative effect of the change recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. This Interpretation will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the Interpretation and the impact it may have on its results of operations and financial condition.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs. This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this Statement are effective for the Company beginning with its fiscal year ending 2006. The adoption of the provisions of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
13
16. Subsequent Events and Disclosures Related to the Acquisition of Bruker Optics
On April 17, 2006, the Company and Bruker Optics entered into a definitive acquisition agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Bruker Optics. The acquisition agreement was signed following its unanimous approval by a Special Committee of independent directors of the Company, as well as by all independent directors of the Board of Directors of the Company, with the non-independent directors recusing themselves from the Board vote. The agreement was also unanimously approved by the Board of Bruker Optics.
On June 29, 2006, the acquisition was approved by the stockholders of the Company, and the closing of the acquisition occurred on July 1, 2006. The total purchase value of the acquisition was $135 million and was paid with approximately 59% cash, or approximately $80 million, and 41% in the Companys common stock resulting in the issuance of an additional 11,375,344 shares of the Companys common stock.
Both the Company and Bruker Optics were majority owned by five affiliated stockholders prior to the acquisition. As a result, the acquisition of Bruker Optics by the Company is considered a business combination of companies under common control, and is being accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests. Accordingly, the acquisition of Bruker Optics, as it relates to the portion under common ownership (approximately 96%), is being accounted for at historical carrying values. The portion not under the common ownership of the five affiliated stockholders (approximately 4%) is being accounted for using the purchase method of accounting (at fair value) on a pro rata basis. Any excess purchase price of the interest not under common control over the fair value of the related net assets acquired is being accounted for as goodwill and intangible assets.
The following unaudited summary financial information presents the consolidated results of operations of the Company and Bruker Optics, had they been combined for all periods presented. The combined results presented below are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in the future (dollars in thousands).
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Revenue |
|
$ |
100,483 |
|
$ |
89,316 |
|
$ |
195,339 |
|
$ |
179,677 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,524 |
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
$ |
5,784 |
|
$ |
2,675 |
|
Basic and dilutednet income per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
101,456 |
|
100,847 |
|
101,430 |
|
100,847 |
|
||||
Diluted |
|
101,869 |
|
100,974 |
|
101,779 |
|
100,966 |
|
Included in net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are $2.8 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of acquisition related charges.
On July 5, 2006, the Company entered into a line of a credit with the ability to draw down funds of up to $40 million. Outstanding balances on the line of credit are due on demand, and no financial covenants exist on the line of credit. In connection with the acquisition of Bruker Optics described above, the Company utilized $20 million under the line of credit to finance a portion of the cash purchase price.
On July 18, 2006, the Company acquired KeyMaster Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of handheld X-ray analysis products. KeyMaster is located in Kennewick, Washington. The aggregate purchase price for KeyMaster was $10.0 million and was funded by utilizing an additional $10 million of the Companys line of credit, which was entered into on July 5, 2006. The results of KeyMaster will be included in the Bruker AXS segment from the date of acquisition.
14
ITEM 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Statements contained in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations which express that we believe, anticipate, expect or plan to, as well as other statements which are not historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Actual events or results may differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in Factors Affecting Our Business, Operating Results and Financial Condition set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
OVERVIEW
The following managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A) describes the principal factors affecting the results of our operations, financial condition, and changes in financial condition, as well as our critical accounting policies and estimates. MD&A is organized as follows:
· Executive overview. This section provides a general description and history of our business, a brief discussion of our reportable segments and significant recent developments in our business.
· Critical accounting policies and estimates. This section discusses the accounting estimates that are considered important to our financial condition and results of operations and require us to exercise subjective or complex judgments in their application.
· Results of operations. This section provides our analysis of the significant line items in our consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.
· Liquidity and capital resources. This section provides an analysis of our liquidity and cash flow and a discussion of our outstanding debt and commitments.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Bruker BioSciences and its wholly-owned subsidiaries design, manufacture, market and service proprietary life science and materials research systems based on mass spectrometry core technology platforms and X-ray technologies. We also manufacture and distribute a broad range of field analytical systems for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) detection. We currently report financial results on the basis of two reportable segments: Bruker Daltonics and Bruker AXS. Management is currently reevaluating the internal reporting structure due to the Bruker Optics acquisition, which may require a change to our segment reporting. This evaluation is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2006. Bruker Daltonics is a leading manufacturer of innovative mass spectrometry-based instruments and accessories used by pharmaceutical, biotechnology, proteomics and molecular diagnostics companies, academic institutions, and government agencies in their research that can also be integrated and used along with other analytical instruments. Bruker Daltonics also manufactures and distributes a broad range of field analytical systems for CBRN detection. Bruker AXS primarily engages in the business of manufacturing and distributing advanced instrumentation and automated solutions based on X-ray technology with the purpose of addressing the needs of our customers in the discovery of new drugs, drug targets and advanced materials, as well as industrial QA/QC applications. Typical customers of Bruker AXS products and solutions include biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, semiconductor industries, chemical, cement and petroleum companies, raw material manufacturers, and academic and government research institutions.
We maintain major technical centers in Europe, North America and Japan, have sales offices located throughout the world and our corporate headquarters is located in Billerica, Massachusetts. Our business strategy is to capitalize on our proven ability to innovate and generate rapid revenue growth, both organically and through acquisitions. Our revenue growth strategy, combined with continued improvements to our gross profit margins and increased leverage on our research and development, sales and marketing and distribution investments and general and administrative expenses, are expected to enhance our operating margins and improve our earnings in the future.
15
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, our revenues grew by 8.3% to $77.8 million. Of this revenue growth, 3.5% was related to acquisitions and the remainder was organic. We continue to focus on improving our profitability, and our gross profit margins for product and service revenues improved from 41.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2005 to 43.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2006, reflecting improvements realized from ongoing gross profit margin improvement programs and contributions from our recent acquisitions. We continue to invest in sales and marketing initiatives, primarily headcount increases, which has resulted in our sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of product and service revenue to increase year-over-year. We expect these investments to result in increased revenues in future periods. Our ongoing cost control initiatives resulted in decreases in both general and administrative and research and development expenses as a percentage of product and service revenue during the first half of 2006 compared to the first half of 2005.
On April 17, 2006, we announced that we planned to acquire Bruker Optics. On June 29, 2006 the shareholders of the Company approved the acquisition of Bruker Optics, and on July 1, 2006 the acquisition was completed. With the addition of Bruker Optics, the Company increases and diversifies its market presence, technology base, product line, global distribution and customer support capabilities. We believe this acquisition will increase our critical mass in many of the markets we serve, create revenue synergies, diversify our customer and revenue base and expand our product and service offerings, all of which should provide us with revenue growth opportunities and accelerate our drive to improve our margins, net income and operating cash flow. The acquisition of Bruker Optics also provides us access to new market segments and applications, particularly in pharmaceutical process analytical technologies and pharma-forensics, as well as in food and beverage and feed and agricultural analysis.
On July 18, 2006, we acquired KeyMaster Technologies which will provide us with access to the fast growing handheld and portable X-ray analysis market. We believe the technologies KeyMaster has developed, and the markets it serves, are highly complimentary to our core businesses.
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This standard revised the measurement, valuation and recognition of financial accounting and reporting standards for equity-based compensation plans contained in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. The new standard required companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar equity-based compensation awards based on fair value recognition provisions determined on the date of grant.
We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which required the application of the accounting standard on January 1, 2006, the effective date of the standard for us. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, our consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R). The effect of implementing SFAS No. 123 (R) was not typically material to the overall results of operations or specific line items within the consolidated statement of operations, and as a result was not referenced often within the discussions on results of operations in the accompanying MD&A. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the $0.4 million, net of tax, in stock-based compensation expense was allocated as follows (in thousands):
|
Six months ended |
|
||
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing |
|
$ |
184 |
|
General and Administrative |
|
144 |
|
|
Research and Development |
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
388 |
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, goodwill, long-lived assets, warranty costs, income taxes, contingencies, and restructuring. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, current market and economic conditions, our observance of industry trends and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable and form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
16
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies to be both those most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and those that require the most subjective judgment.
· Revenue recognition. We recognize revenue from system sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of loss has been transferred to the customer and collectibility of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss is generally transferred to the customer upon receipt of a signed customer acceptance form for a system that has been shipped, installed, and for which the customer has been trained. As a result, the timing of customer acceptance or readiness could cause our reported revenues to differ materially from expectations. When products are sold through an independent distributor, a strategic distribution partner or an unconsolidated affiliated distributor, which assumes responsibility for installation, we recognize the system sale when the product has been shipped and title and risk of loss has been transferred. Our distributors do not have price protection rights or rights to return; however, our products are warranted to be free from defect for a period of one year. Revenue is deferred until cash is received when a significant portion of the fee is due over one year after delivery, installation and acceptance of a system. For arrangements with multiple elements, we recognize revenue for each element based on the fair value of the element provided all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. The fair value for each element provided in multiple element arrangements is typically determined by referencing historical pricing policies when the element is sold separately. Changes in our ability to establish the fair value for each element in multiple element arrangements could affect the timing of revenue recognition. Revenue from accessories and parts is recognized upon shipment and service revenue is recognized as the services are performed.
· Warranty costs. We normally provide a one-year parts and labor warranty with the purchase of equipment. The anticipated cost for this one-year warranty is accrued upon recognition of the sale and is included as a current liability on the balance sheet. Although our facilities undergo quality assurance and testing procedures throughout the production process, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Although our actual warranty costs have historically been consistent with expectations, to the extent warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those claims differ from our estimates, revisions to the warranty accrual may be required.
· Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by the first-in, first-out method. We maintain an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory to reflect the expected un-saleable or un-refundable inventory based on an evaluation of slow moving products. If ultimate usage or demand varies significantly from expected usage or demand, additional write-downs may be required, resulting in a charge to operations.
· Goodwill, other intangible assets, investments in other companies, and other long-lived assets. We perform an evaluation of whether goodwill is impaired annually or when events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Fair value is determined using market comparables for similar businesses or forecasts of discounted future cash flows. We also review other intangible assets, investments in other companies, and other long-lived assets when indication of potential impairment exists, such as a significant reduction in cash flows associated with the assets. Should the fair value of our long-lived assets decline because of reduced operating performance, market declines, or other indicators of impairment, a charge to operations for impairment may be necessary.
· Allowance for doubtful accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to pay amounts due. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, reducing their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required, resulting in a charge to operations.
· Income taxes. We estimate the degree to which tax assets and loss carryforwards will result in a benefit based on expected profitability by tax jurisdiction, and provide a valuation allowance for tax assets and loss carryforwards that we believe will more likely than not go unused. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset or loss carryforward will be used for which a reserve has been provided, we reverse the related valuation allowance. If our actual future taxable income by tax jurisdiction differ from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
17
Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005
Revenue
The following table presents revenue, change in revenue and revenue growth by reportable segment for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
|||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
39,830 |
|
$ |
37,362 |
|
$ |
2,468 |
|
6.6 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
39,113 |
|
34,068 |
|
5,045 |
|
14.8 |
% |
|||
Eliminations (a) |
|
(1,103 |
) |
(62 |
) |
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|||
Total Revenue |
|
$ |
77,840 |
|
$ |
71,368 |
|
$ |
6,472 |
|
9.1 |
% |
(a) represents revenue recorded on transactions between segments which is eliminated in consolidation.
Bruker Daltonics revenue increased by $2.5 million, or 6.6%, to $39.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $37.4 million for the comparable period in 2005. Included in this change in revenue is approximately $0.2 million from the impact of foreign exchange. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, revenue increased by 7.1%. The increase in revenue excluding the effect of foreign exchange is a result of an increase in life science systems units accepted in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005 and improved aftermarket sales, partially offset by reduced CBRN detection systems revenue year-over-year and continued pricing pressures from increased competition, particularly in the life science systems sales. Aftermarket revenues include accessory sales, consumables, training and services. Included in other revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are grant revenues from various projects for early-stage research and development projects funded by the German and United States governments. Life science systems, CBRN detection systems and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of Bruker Daltonics product and service revenue were as follows during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
Life Science Systems |
|
$ |
30,651 |
|
77.4 |
% |
$ |
25,690 |
|
70.0 |
% |
CBRN Detection Systems |
|
2,045 |
|
5.2 |
% |
4,358 |
|
11.9 |
% |
||
Bruker Daltonics Aftermarket |
|
6,901 |
|
17.4 |
% |
6,646 |
|
18.1 |
% |
||
Product and Service Revenue |
|
39,597 |
|
100 |
% |
36,694 |
|
100 |
% |
||
Grant Revenue |
|
233 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
||
Total Revenue |
|
$ |
39,830 |
|
|
|
$ |
37,362 |
|
|
|
Bruker AXS revenue increased by $5.0 million, or 14.8%, to $39.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $34.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. Included in this change in revenue is approximately $0.2 million from the impact of foreign exchange. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, revenue increased by 15.3%. The increase in revenue is attributable to two acquisitions which were completed in the fourth quarter of 2005, which represented approximately 8% of the revenue growth, and an increase in materials research system sales, other systems and aftermarket revenue. Other system revenue relates primarily to the distribution of products not manufactured by Bruker AXS. X-ray systems, other systems and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of Bruker AXS product and service revenue were as follows during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
18
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
X-Ray Systems |
|
$ |
25,587 |
|
65.4 |
% |
$ |
22,486 |
|
66.0 |
% |
Other System Revenue |
|
1,931 |
|
5.0 |
% |
997 |
|
2.9 |
% |
||
Bruker AXS Aftermarket |
|
11,595 |
|
29.6 |
% |
10,585 |
|
31.1 |
% |
||
Total Product and Service Revenue |
|
$ |
39,113 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
34,068 |
|
100 |
% |
Cost of Revenue
The following table presents cost of product and service revenue and gross profit margins on product and service revenue by reportable segment for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
Cost of |
|
Gross Profit |
|
Cost of |
|
Gross Profit |
|
||
|
|
Revenue |
|
Margin |
|
Revenue |
|
Margin |
|
||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
23,161 |
|
41.5 |
% |
$ |
20,952 |
|
42.9 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
21,865 |
|
44.1 |
% |
19,933 |
|
41.5 |
% |
||
Eliminations (a) |
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
||
Total Cost of Revenue |
|
$ |
43,878 |
|
43.5 |
% |
$ |
40,823 |
|
42.3 |
% |
(a) represents the cost of revenues between segments which is eliminated in consolidation.
Bruker Daltonics cost of product and service revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $23.2 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 41.5%, compared to cost of product and service revenue of $21.0 million, or a gross profit margin of 42.9% for the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in gross profit margin is primarily attributable to lower CBRN detection system revenues year-over-year and pricing pressures due to increased competition, primarily in our life science system sales.
Bruker AXS cost of product and service revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $21.9 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 44.1%, compared to cost of product and service revenue of $19.9 million, or a gross profit margin of 41.5% for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in gross profit margin is primarily attributable to the higher margin businesses acquired in the fourth quarter of 2005, the realization of benefits from various ongoing gross profit margin improvement programs and better capacity utilization as a result of increased revenues year-over-year, partially offset by lower gross profit margins realized on other system revenue.
Sales and Marketing
The following table presents sales and marketing expense and sales and marketing expense as a percentage of product and service revenue by reportable segment for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
Sales and |
|
Segment Product |
|
Sales and |
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Marketing |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Marketing |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
7,137 |
|
18.0 |
% |
$ |
6,003 |
|
16.4 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
8,289 |
|
21.2 |
% |
7,382 |
|
21.7 |
% |
||
Total Sales and Marketing |
|
$ |
15,426 |
|
19.9 |
% |
$ |
13,385 |
|
18.9 |
% |
Bruker Daltonics sales and marketing expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $7.1 million, or 18.0% of product and service revenue, from $6.0 million, or 16.4% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in sales and marketing expense as a percentage of product and service revenue is attributable to
19
incremental investments in various sales and marketing initiatives, primarily headcount related.
Bruker AXS sales and marketing expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $8.3 million, or 21.2% of product and service revenue, from $7.4 million, or 21.7% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in sales and marketing expense is primarily attributable to increased headcount related to the acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2005.
General and Administrative
The following table presents general and administrative expense and general and administrative expense as a percentage of product and service revenue by reportable segment for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
General and |
|
Segment Product |
|
General and |
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Administrative |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Administrative |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
4.1 |
% |
$ |
2,388 |
|
6.5 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
3,181 |
|
8.1 |
% |
2,417 |
|
7.1 |
% |
||
Corporate |
|
731 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
||
Total General and Administrative |
|
$ |
5,532 |
|
7.1 |
% |
$ |
5,287 |
|
7.5 |
% |
Bruker Daltonics general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 decreased to $1.6 million, or 4.1% of product and service revenue, from $2.4 million, or 6.5% of product and service revenue for the comparable period of 2005. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to lower bad debt expense year-over-year and benefits from ongoing cost reduction initiatives.
Bruker AXS general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $3.2 million, or 8.1% of product and service revenue, from $2.4 million, or 7.1% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increased headcount and intangible asset amortization associated with the acquisitions completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 and first quarter of 2006.
Corporate general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $0.7 million from $0.5 million for the comparable period in 2005. Corporate general and administrative expenses represent expenses associated with being a public company not allocated to our reportable segments, including legal fees, audit and consulting fees, salaries and filing fees. The increase in expenses is primarily attributable to stock-based compensation charges in the second quarter of 2006 not recorded in the second quarter of 2005, and increased headcount year-over-year.
Research and Development
The following table presents research and development expense and research and development expense as a percentage of product and service revenue by reportable segment for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
Research and |
|
Segment Product |
|
Research and |
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Development |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Development |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
BrukerDaltonics |
|
$ |
6,394 |
|
16.1 |
% |
$ |
7,045 |
|
19.2 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
4,225 |
|
10.8 |
% |
3,917 |
|
11.5 |
% |
||
Total Research and Development |
|
$ |
10,619 |
|
13.7 |
% |
$ |
10,962 |
|
15.5 |
% |
Bruker Daltonics research and development expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 decreased to $6.4 million, or 16.1% of product and service revenue, from $7.0 million, or 19.2% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in research and development expense is primarily attributable to a decrease in material purchases during the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005 and to a reduction in headcount
20
year-over-year.
Bruker AXS research and development expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $4.2 million, or 10.8% of product and service revenue, from $3.9 million, or 11.5% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in research and development expense is primarily attributable to an increase in headcount resulting from the acquisitions completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 and first quarter of 2006.
Acquisition Related Charges
On April 17, 2006, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the stock of molecular spectroscopy company Bruker Optics. The acquisition of Bruker Optics was approved by the Companys shareholders on June 29, 2006 and was subsequently completed on July 1, 2006. Since this acquisition represents a business combination of companies under common control due to a majority ownership by individuals in both the Company and Bruker Optics, this acquisition is being accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interest. As a result, transaction costs are being expensed as incurred rather than being included in a purchase price allocation. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company incurred acquisition related charges totaling $1.2 million, which consisted of investment banking, legal and accounting fees.
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income (expense), net, during the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.5 million, compared to $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the major component within interest and other income (expense), net, was net interest income of $0.5 million and losses on foreign currency transactions of $(0.3) million. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the major components within interest and other income (expense), net, were net interest income of $0.4 million and gains on foreign currency transactions of $0.2 million.
Provision for Income Taxes
The income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $1.1 million, representing effective tax rates of 68% and 78%, respectively. Our effective tax rate reflects our tax provision for non-U.S. entities only, since no benefit was recognized for losses incurred in the U.S. We will maintain a full valuation allowance for our U.S. net operating losses until such evidence exists that it is more likely than not that the loss carry forward amounts will be utilized to offset U.S. taxable income. Our tax rate may change over time as the amount or mix of income and taxes outside the U.S. changes. Our effective tax rate is calculated using our projected annual pre-tax income or loss and is affected by research and development tax credits, the expected level of other tax benefits, the impact of changes to the valuation allowance as well as changes in the mix of our pre-tax income and losses among jurisdictions with varying statutory tax rates and credits.
Minority Interest in Consolidated Subsidiaries
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $45,000 compared to $36,000 in the comparable period of 2005. The minority interest in subsidiaries represents the minority shareholders proportionate share of net income of those subsidiaries for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the minority interest relates to our two majority-owned subsidiaries, Incoatec GmbH and Baltic Scientific Instruments Ltd.
Six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005
Revenue
The following table presents revenue, change in revenue and revenue growth by reportable segment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
|||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
77,359 |
|
$ |
80,005 |
|
$ |
(2,646 |
) |
-3.3 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
76,970 |
|
66,582 |
|
10,388 |
|
15.6 |
% |
|||
Eliminations (a) |
|
(2,079 |
) |
(308 |
) |
(1,771 |
) |
|
|
|||
Total Revenue |
|
$ |
152,250 |
|
$ |
146,279 |
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
4.1 |
% |
(a) represents revenue recorded on transactions between segments which is eliminated in consolidation.
Bruker Daltonics revenue decreased by $2.6 million, or 3.3%, to $77.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $80.0 million for the comparable period in 2005. Included in this change in revenue is approximately $3.2 million from the impact of foreign exchange. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, revenue increased by 0.6%. The increase in revenue excluding the effect of foreign exchange is a result of higher life science system revenues year-over-year, partially offset by lower aftermarket revenues, which includes accessory sales, consumables, training and services, by lower sales of CBRN systems during the first half of 2006 compared to the fist half of 2005 and by continued pricing pressures from increased competition. Included in other revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are grant revenues from various projects for early-stage research and development projects funded by the German and United States governments. Life science systems, CBRN detection systems and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of Bruker Daltonics product and service revenue were as follows during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
Life Science Systems |
|
$ |
59,601 |
|
77.9 |
% |
$ |
54,663 |
|
69.2 |
% |
CBRN Detection Systems |
|
3,416 |
|
4.5 |
% |
8,675 |
|
11.0 |
% |
||
Bruker Daltonics Aftermarket |
|
13,465 |
|
17.6 |
% |
15,667 |
|
19.8 |
% |
||
Product and Service Revenue |
|
76,482 |
|
100 |
% |
79,005 |
|
100 |
% |
||
Grant Revenue |
|
877 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
||
Total Revenue |
|
$ |
77,359 |
|
|
|
$ |
80,005 |
|
|
|
Bruker AXS revenue increased by $10.4 million, or 15.6%, to $77.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $66.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. Included in this change in revenue is approximately $2.6 million from the impact of foreign exchange. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, revenue increased by 19.5%. The increase in revenue is attributable to two acquisitions which were completed in the fourth quarter of 2005, which represented approximately 8% of the revenue growth, and an increase in materials research system sales, other systems and aftermarket revenue. Other system revenue relates primarily to the distribution of products not manufactured by Bruker AXS. X-ray systems, other systems and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of Bruker AXS product and service revenue were as follows during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
|
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
X-Ray Systems |
|
$ |
51,276 |
|
66.6 |
% |
$ |
46,083 |
|
69.2 |
% |
Other System Revenue |
|
2,687 |
|
3.5 |
% |
2,125 |
|
3.2 |
% |
||
Bruker AXS Aftermarket |
|
23,007 |
|
29.9 |
% |
18,374 |
|
27.6 |
% |
||
Total Product and Service Revenue |
|
$ |
76,970 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
66,582 |
|
100 |
% |
22
Cost of Revenue
The following table presents cost of product and service revenue and gross profit margins on product and service revenue by reportable segment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
Cost of |
|
Gross Profit |
|
Cost of |
|
Gross Profit |
|
||
|
|
Revenue |
|
Margin |
|
Revenue |
|
Margin |
|
||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
44,354 |
|
42.0 |
% |
$ |
45,518 |
|
42.4 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
43,156 |
|
43.9 |
% |
39,145 |
|
41.2 |
% |
||
Eliminations (a) |
|
(2,169 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
||
Total Cost of Revenue |
|
$ |
85,341 |
|
43.6 |
% |
$ |
84,355 |
|
41.9 |
% |
(a) represents the cost of revenues between segments which is eliminated in consolidation.
Bruker Daltonics cost of product and service revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $44.4 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 42.0%, compared to cost of product and service revenue of $45.5 million, or a gross profit margin of 42.4% for the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in gross profit margin is primarily attributable to lower CBRN detection system revenues year-over-year and pricing pressures due to increased competition, primarily in our life science system sales.
Bruker AXS cost of product and service revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $43.2 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 43.9%, compared to cost of product and service revenue of $39.1 million, or a gross profit margin of 41.2% for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in gross profit margin is primarily attributable to the higher margin businesses acquired in the fourth quarter of 2005, the realization of benefits from various ongoing gross profit margin improvement programs and better capacity utilization as a result of increased revenue period-over-period, partially offset by lower gross profit margins realized on other system revenue.
Sales and Marketing
The following table presents sales and marketing expense and sales and marketing expense as a percentage of product and service revenue by reportable segment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
Sales and |
|
Segment Product |
|
Sales and |
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Marketing |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Marketing |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
12,907 |
|
16.9 |
% |
$ |
11,823 |
|
15.0 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
16,491 |
|
21.4 |
% |
13,714 |
|
20.6 |
% |
||
Total Sales and Marketing |
|
$ |
29,398 |
|
19.4 |
% |
$ |
25,537 |
|
17.6 |
% |
Bruker Daltonics sales and marketing expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $12.9 million, or 16.9% of product and service revenue, from $11.8 million, or 15.0% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in sales and marketing expense as a percentage of product and service revenue is attributable to incremental investments in various sales and marketing initiatives, primarily headcount related.
Bruker AXS sales and marketing expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $16.5 million, or 21.4% of product and service revenue, from $13.7 million, or 20.6% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in sales and marketing expense is primarily attributable to increased headcount related to the acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2005 and incremental investments in various sales and marketing initiatives during the first half of 2006.
23
General and Administrative
The following table presents general and administrative expense and general and administrative expense as a percentage of product and service revenue by reportable segment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
General and |
|
Segment Product |
|
General and |
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Administrative |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Administrative |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
3,540 |
|
4.6 |
% |
$ |
4,318 |
|
5.5 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
6,205 |
|
8.1 |
% |
4,897 |
|
7.4 |
% |
||
Corporate |
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
||
Total General and Administrative |
|
$ |
11,148 |
|
7.4 |
% |
$ |
10,955 |
|
7.5 |
% |
Bruker Daltonics general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased to $3.5 million, or 4.6% of product and service revenue, from $4.3 million, or 5.5% of product and service revenue for the comparable period of 2005. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to lower bad debt expenses year-over-year and benefits from ongoing cost reduction initiatives.
Bruker AXS general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $6.2 million, or 8.1% of product and service revenue, from $4.9 million, or 7.4% of product and service revenue for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increased headcount and intangible asset amortization related to the acquisitions completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2006.
Corporate general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased to $1.4 million from $1.7 million for the comparable period in 2005. Corporate general and administrative expenses represent expenses associated with being a public company not allocated to our reportable segments, including legal fees, audit and consulting fees, salaries and filing fees. The decrease in expenses is primarily attributable to ongoing cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by stock-based compensation charges in 2006 not recorded in 2005, and increased headcount year-over-year.
Research and Development
The following table presents research and development expense and research and development expense as a percentage of product and service revenue by reportable segment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||
|
|
Research and |
|
Segment Product |
|
Research and |
|
Segment Product |
|
||
|
|
Development |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
Development |
|
and Service Revenue |
|
||
Bruker Daltonics |
|
$ |
12,366 |
|
16.2 |
% |
$ |
14,398 |
|
18.2 |
% |
Bruker AXS |
|
8,627 |
|
11.2 |
% |
7,584 |
|
11.4 |
% |
||
Total Research and Development |
|
$ |
20,993 |
|
13.9 |
% |
$ |