March 13,
2009
TO OUR
STOCKHOLDERS:
I am
pleased to invite you to attend the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders of
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to be held on Thursday, April 23, 2009 at
1:30 p.m., local time, at The Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel and Convention
Center, 1601 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas.
Your vote
is important, regardless of the number of shares that you
hold. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, I hope
you will vote as soon as possible, either electronically on the Internet, by
telephone or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card. Your
proxy will not be used if you are present at the annual meeting and prefer to
vote in person or if you revoke your proxy.
Thank you
for your ongoing support of and continued interest in Lexicon
Pharmaceuticals. We look forward to seeing you at the annual
meeting.
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
/s/ Arthur T.
Sands |
|
|
|
Arthur
T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D. |
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer |
LEXICON
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
8800
Technology Forest Place
The
Woodlands, Texas 77381
(281)
863-3000
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO
BE HELD APRIL 23, 2009
TO OUR
STOCKHOLDERS:
The
annual meeting of stockholders of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. will be held on
Thursday, April 23, 2009 at 1:30 p.m., local time, at The Marriott
Woodlands Waterway Hotel and Convention Center, 1601 Lake Robbins Drive, The
Woodlands, Texas, to:
|
·
|
elect
three Class III directors;
|
|
·
|
approve
our Equity Incentive Plan, amending and restating our existing 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan;
|
|
·
|
approve
our Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, amending and restating our
existing 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option
Plan;
|
|
·
|
ratify
and approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009;
and
|
|
·
|
act
on any other business that properly comes before the annual
meeting.
|
You are
entitled to vote at the annual meeting only if you are the record owner of
shares of our common stock at the close of business on February 23,
2009.
It is
important that your shares be represented at the annual meeting whether or not
you plan to attend. Please cast
your vote electronically on the Internet, by telephone or by signing and
returning the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible. If
you are present at the annual meeting, and wish to do so, you may revoke the
proxy and vote in person.
|
By
order of the board of directors, |
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey L.
Wade |
|
|
|
Jeffrey L.
Wade |
|
Secretary |
The
Woodlands, Texas
March 13,
2009
LEXICON
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
8800
Technology Forest Place
The
Woodlands, Texas 77381
(281)
863-3000
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To
Be Held April 23, 2009
GENERAL
INFORMATION
Purpose
of this Proxy Statement
We have
prepared this proxy statement to solicit proxies on behalf of our board of
directors for use at our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and any adjournment
or postponement of such meeting.
Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
As
permitted by rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are
providing access to our proxy materials over the
Internet. Accordingly, on or about March 13, 2009, we are
mailing to our stockholders a notice containing instructions on how to access
our proxy materials, including our proxy statement and annual report, and vote
electronically over the Internet. The notice also provides
instructions on how stockholders may request a paper copy of our proxy materials
free of charge. Our proxy materials may be accessed by stockholders
at any time after the date of mailing of the notice.
Time
and Place of Annual Meeting
The
annual meeting will be held on Thursday, April 23, 2009 at 1:30 p.m., local
time, at The Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel and Convention Center, 1601 Lake
Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas.
Matters
to Be Considered at the Annual Meeting
At the
annual meeting, our stockholders will be asked to consider and act upon the
following matters:
|
·
|
the
election of three Class III
directors;
|
|
·
|
a
proposal to approve our Equity Incentive Plan, amending and restating our
existing 2000 Equity Compensation
Plan;
|
|
·
|
a
proposal to approve our Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan,
amending and restating our existing 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock
Option Plan; and
|
|
·
|
a
proposal to ratify and approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.
|
Our board
of directors does not intend to bring any other matters before the annual
meeting and has not been informed that any other matters are to be presented by
others. Our bylaws contain several requirements that must be
satisfied in order for any of our stockholders to bring a proposal before one of
our annual meetings, including a requirement of delivering proper advance notice
to us. Stockholders are advised to review our bylaws if they intend
to present a proposal at any of our annual meetings.
Record
Date for Determining Entitlement to Vote
You are
entitled to vote at the annual meeting if you were the record owner of shares of
our common stock as of the close of business on February 23, 2009, the record
date for the annual meeting established by our board of directors.
How
to Vote Your Shares
You may
vote in person at the annual meeting or by proxy. To ensure that your
shares are represented at the annual meeting, we recommend you vote by proxy
even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person. Even if you
vote by proxy, if you wish, you can revoke your proxy and vote in person at the
annual meeting. If you want to vote at the annual meeting but your
shares are held by an intermediary, such as a broker or bank, you will need to
obtain from the intermediary either proof of your ownership of such shares as of
February 23, 2009 or a proxy from such intermediary authorizing you to vote
your shares at the meeting.
You may
receive more than one proxy depending on how you hold your shares. If
you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a broker or bank, you may
receive materials from them asking you how you want your shares to be voted at
the annual meeting.
Voting
by Proxy
By Internet or
Telephone. You may vote electronically on the Internet or by
telephone by following the instructions contained on the notice of Internet
availability of our proxy materials. If you hold your shares through
an intermediary, such as a broker or bank, please follow the voting instructions
contained on the voting card used by the intermediary.
By Mail. If you
request a paper copy of our proxy materials, you may vote by mail by completing,
dating and signing the proxy card provided and mailing it in the pre-addressed
envelope enclosed with the paper copy of our proxy materials.
Quorum
We must
have a quorum to conduct any business at the annual meeting. This means that at
least a majority of our outstanding shares eligible to vote at the annual
meeting must be represented at the annual meeting, either in person or by
proxy. Abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a
quorum is present. In addition, shares of our common stock held by
intermediaries that are voted for at least one matter at the annual meeting will
be counted as being present for purposes of determining a quorum for all
matters, even if the beneficial owner’s discretion has been withheld for voting
on some or all other matters (commonly referred to as a “broker
non-vote”).
Outstanding
Shares
On the
record date, we had 137,330,254 shares of our common stock
outstanding. If you were the record owner of shares of our common
stock on the record date, you will be entitled to one vote for each share of
stock that you own on each matter that is called to vote at the annual
meeting.
Vote
Needed to Approve Proposals
Our Class
III directors will be elected by a plurality vote. As a result, if a
quorum is present at the annual meeting, the three persons receiving the
greatest number of votes will be elected to serve as our Class III directors.
Withholding authority to vote for a director nominee will not affect the outcome
of the election of directors.
The
approval of our Equity Incentive Plan and Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option
Plan and the ratification and approval of the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2009 will
require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to
such matters. Any other business that may properly come before the
annual meeting for a vote will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast with respect to such matter unless a greater vote is required by law
or our charter or bylaws. On any such matter, any abstention from
voting or broker non-vote will not count as a vote for or against these
proposals and will not be considered in calculating the number of votes
necessary for their approval.
How
Your Proxy Will Be Voted
Giving us
your proxy means that you are authorizing us to vote your shares at the annual
meeting in the manner you direct. You may vote for our nominees for election as
Class III directors or withhold your vote for any one or more of those
nominees. You may vote for or against the proposals to approve our
Equity Incentive Plan and Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan and ratify
and approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors
for the year ending December 31, 2009 or abstain from voting on those
proposals.
If you
vote by proxy and do not withhold authority to vote for the election of our
nominees for election as Class III directors, all of your shares will be voted
for the election of those nominees. If you withhold authority to vote
for one or more of our nominees for election as Class III directors, none of
your shares will be voted for those nominees.
If any of
our nominees for election as Class III directors become unavailable for any
reason before the election, we may reduce the number of directors serving on our
board of directors, or our board of directors may designate substitute nominees,
as necessary. We have no reason to believe that any of our nominees
for election as Class III directors will be unavailable. If our board
of directors designates any substitute nominees, the persons receiving your
proxy will vote your shares for such substitute(s) if they are instructed to do
so by our board of directors or, in the absence of any such instructions, in
accordance with their own best judgment.
If you
vote by proxy but do not specify how you want your shares voted, your shares
will be voted in favor of our nominees for election as Class III directors and
in favor of the approval of our Equity Incentive Plan and our Non-Employee
Directors’ Stock Option Plan and the ratification and approval of the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the year
ending December 31, 2009.
If you
vote by proxy and any additional business properly comes before the annual
meeting, the persons receiving your proxy will vote your shares on those matters
as instructed by our board of directors or, in the absence of any such
instructions, in accordance with their own best judgment. As of the
date of this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other matter to be raised
at the annual meeting.
How
to Revoke Your Proxy
You may
revoke your proxy at any time before your shares are voted by providing our
corporate secretary with either a new proxy with a later date or a written
notice of your desire to revoke your proxy at the following
address:
Lexicon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
8800
Technology Forest Place
The
Woodlands, Texas 77381
Attention:
Corporate Secretary
You may
also revoke your proxy at any time prior to your shares having been voted by
attending the annual meeting in person and notifying the inspector of election
of your desire to revoke your proxy. Your proxy will not
automatically be revoked merely because you attend the annual
meeting.
Inspector
of Election
Broadridge
Financial Solutions, Inc. will count votes and provide a representative who will
serve as an inspector of election for the annual meeting.
List
of Stockholders Entitled to Vote
A list of
our stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for
inspection at the annual meeting. The stockholder list will also be
available for inspection for ten days prior to the annual meeting at our
corporate offices located at 8800 Technology Forest Place, The Woodlands,
Texas. Any inspection of this list at our offices will need to be
conducted during ordinary business hours. If you wish to conduct an
inspection of the stockholder list, we request that you please contact our
corporate secretary before coming to our offices.
Solicitation
of Proxies and Expenses
We are
asking for your proxy on behalf of our board of directors. We will
bear the entire cost of preparing, printing and soliciting
proxies. We will send notices of Internet availability of proxy
materials and, if requested, paper copies of our proxy materials to all of our
stockholders of record as of the record date and to all intermediaries, such as
brokers and banks, that held any of our shares on that date on behalf of
others. These intermediaries will then forward the notices and, if
requested, paper copies of our proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our
shares, and we will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
for forwarding such materials. Our directors, officers and employees
may solicit proxies by mail, in person or by telephone or other electronic
communication. Our directors, officers and employees will not receive
additional compensation for their solicitation efforts, but they will be
reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses they incur.
Householding
As
permitted by rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are
delivering a single notice of Internet availability of proxy materials, annual
report and proxy statement, as applicable, to any household at which two or more
stockholders reside if we believe the stockholders are members of the same
family, unless otherwise instructed by one or more of the
stockholders. We will promptly deliver separate copies of these
documents upon the written or oral request of any stockholder at a shared
address to which a single copy of the documents were delivered.
If your
household received a single set of any of these documents, but you would prefer
to receive your own copy, or if you share an address with another stockholder
and together both of you would like to receive only a single set of these
documents, please follow these instructions:
|
·
|
If
your shares are registered in your own name, please contact our transfer
agent, BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, and inform them of your request by
calling them at (800) 635-9270 or writing them at 480 Washington
Boulevard., Jersey City, New Jersey
07310.
|
|
·
|
If
an intermediary, such as a broker or bank, holds your shares, please
contact Broadridge and inform them of your request by calling them at
(800) 542-1061 or writing them at Householding Department,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Be sure to
include your name, the name of your brokerage firm and your account
number.
|
PROPOSAL
NUMBER 1:
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Our board
of directors, which currently has ten members, is divided or “classified” into
three classes. Directors in each class are elected to hold office for
a term ending on the date of the third annual meeting following the annual
meeting at which they were elected. The current term of our Class III
directors will expire at this annual meeting. The current terms of
our Class I and Class II directors will expire at our 2010 and 2011 annual
meetings of stockholders, respectively.
The board
of directors has nominated and urges you to vote for the election of the
individuals identified below, who have been nominated to serve as Class III
directors until our 2012 annual meeting of stockholders or until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. Each of these individuals
is a member of our present board of directors. Your signed proxy will
be voted for the nominees named below unless you specifically indicate on the
proxy that you are withholding your vote.
Nominees
for Class III Directors
The
following individuals are nominated for election as Class III
directors:
Name
|
Age
|
Position with the Company
|
Year
First
Became a Director
|
Arthur
T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.
|
47
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Class III)
|
1995
|
Philippe
J. Amouyal
|
50
|
Director
(Class III)
|
2007
|
Frank
P. Palantoni
|
51
|
Director
(Class III)
|
2004
|
Arthur T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.
co-founded our company and has been our president and chief executive officer
and a director since September 1995. At Lexicon, Dr. Sands pioneered the
development of large-scale gene knockout technology for use in drug
discovery. Before founding Lexicon, Dr. Sands served as an American
Cancer Society postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Human and Molecular
Genetics at Baylor College of Medicine. Dr. Sands is a member of the
board of directors of the Texas Institute for Genomic Medicine. He
received his B.A. in economics and political science from Yale University and
his M.D. and Ph.D. from Baylor College of Medicine.
Philippe J. Amouyal has
been a director since August 2007 and is a managing director of The Invus Group,
LLC, a position he has held since 1999. Previously, Mr. Amouyal was a vice
president and director of The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. in Boston,
Massachusetts, where he coordinated the global technology and electronics
practice through most of the 1990s. Mr. Amouyal is a director of Weight
Watchers International, Inc., as well as a number of private companies in which
Invus has invested. He holds an M.S. in engineering and a DEA in management
from Ecole Centrale de Paris and was a research fellow at the Center for Policy
Alternatives of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mr.
Amouyal is a designee of Invus, L.P. pursuant to our stockholders’ agreement
with Invus described under the heading “Transactions with Related Persons —
Arrangements with Invus.”
Frank P. Palantoni has been a
director since November 2004. Mr. Palantoni served as chief executive officer of
Prestige Brands Holding, Inc. from April to June 2006 and as a director from
January to June 2006. From 1998 to 2004, Mr. Palantoni held a variety
of senior management positions with Novartis AG, most recently as president and
chief executive officer, worldwide of its Gerber Products Company, Novartis
Infant and Baby Division. Mr. Palantoni also served as president and chief
executive officer for North American operations of Novartis Consumer Health
Division from 2000 to 2001. Prior to joining Novartis, he held a series of
senior management positions with The Danone Group. He holds a B.S. from Tufts
University and an M.B.A. from Columbia University.
The
Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the foregoing
nominees for election as Class III directors.
Current
and Continuing Directors
The
current directors of the Company are identified below:
Name
|
Age
|
Position with the
Company
|
Arthur
T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.
|
47
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Class III)
|
Samuel
L. Barker, Ph.D.
(1)
|
66
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors (Class II)
|
Philippe
J. Amouyal (2)
|
50
|
Director
(Class III)
|
Raymond
Debbane (3)
|
54
|
Director
(Class I)
|
Robert
J. Lefkowitz, M.D. (3)
|
65
|
Director
(Class I)
|
Alan
S. Nies, M.D. (2)
|
71
|
Director
(Class I)
|
Frank
P. Palantoni (1)
(2)
|
51
|
Director
(Class III)
|
Christopher
J. Sobecki
|
50
|
Director
(Class II)
|
Judith
L. Swain, M.D. (3)
|
60
|
Director
(Class II)
|
Kathleen
M. Wiltsey (1)
|
53
|
Director
(Class II)
|
|
(1)
|
Member
of the Audit Committee
|
|
(2)
|
Member
of the Compensation Committee
|
|
(3)
|
Member
of the Corporate Governance
Committee
|
Information
regarding the business experience of Dr. Sands, Mr. Amouyal and Mr. Palantoni is
set forth above under the heading “— Nominees for Class III
Directors.”
Samuel L. Barker, Ph.D. has
been a director since March 2000 and became chairman of our board of directors
in March 2005. In March 2001, Dr. Barker co-founded Clearview Projects, Inc., a
provider of partnering and transaction services to biopharmaceutical companies,
and served as its president and chief executive officer from July 2003 until
November 2004. Dr. Barker served in a series of leadership positions at
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company until his retirement in 1999. His positions at
Bristol-Myers Squibb included service as executive vice president, Worldwide
Franchise Management and Strategy during 1998; president, United States
Pharmaceuticals from 1992 to 1997; and president, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Intercontinental Commercial Operations from 1990 to 1992. Prior to
1990, Dr. Barker held executive positions in research and development,
manufacturing, finance, business development and sales and marketing at Squibb
Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Barker currently serves as a director of
AtheroGenics, Inc. and Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Barker
received his B.S. from Henderson State College, his M.S. from the University of
Arkansas and his Ph.D. from Purdue University.
Raymond Debbane has been
a director since August 2007. Mr. Debbane is president and chief
executive officer of The Invus Group, LLC, which he founded in New York in 1985
as the exclusive investment advisor of Benelux-based Artal Group S.A. In
1999, Artal became the controlling shareholder of Weight Watchers International,
Inc., for which Mr. Debbane serves as chairman of the board of
directors. He also serves as chairman or director of a number of
private companies in which Invus and Artal Group S.A. have
invested. Before founding The Invus Group, Mr. Debbane was a
manager in the Paris office of The Boston Consulting Group, Inc., where he did
consulting work for a number of major European and international
companies. Mr. Debbane holds an
M.B.A. from Stanford University, an M.S. in food science and
technology from the University of California at Davis, and a B.S in agricultural
sciences and agricultural engineering from American University of
Beirut. Mr. Debbane is a designee of Invus, L.P. pursuant to our
stockholders’ agreement with Invus described under the heading “Transactions
with Related Persons — Arrangements with Invus.”
Robert J. Lefkowitz, M.D. has
been a director since February 2001 and a consultant to our company since March
2003. Dr. Lefkowitz is the James B. Duke Professor of Medicine,
professor of biochemistry and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at
Duke University Medical Center, where he has served on the faculty since 1973.
He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Lefkowitz received his
B.A. from Columbia University and his M.D. from Columbia University College of
Physicians and Surgeons.
Alan S. Nies, M.D. has been a
director since November 2003 and chairman of our medical advisory board since
March 2003. From 1992 through September 2002, Dr. Nies served in a
series of senior management positions at Merck & Co. Inc., most
recently as senior vice president, clinical sciences from 1999 to 2002. Prior to
joining Merck, Dr. Nies spent fifteen years as professor of medicine and
pharmacology and head of the Division of Clinical Pharmacology at the University
of Colorado Health Sciences Center. Dr. Nies holds a B.S. from
Stanford University and an M.D. from Harvard Medical School.
Christopher J.
Sobecki has been a director since August 2007 and is a managing
director of The Invus Group, LLC, which he joined in 1989. Mr.
Sobecki is currently a director of Weight Watchers International, Inc. and
NitroMed, Inc., as well as a number of private companies in which Invus has
invested. He holds a B.S. in industrial engineering from Purdue University
and an M.B.A. from Harvard University. Mr. Sobecki is a designee
of Invus, L.P. pursuant to our stockholders’ agreement with Invus described
under the heading “Transactions with Related Persons — Arrangements with
Invus.”
Judith L. Swain, M.D. has
been a director since September 2007. Dr. Swain is the executive
director of the Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences within A*STAR, and the
Lien Chow Professor of Medicine at the National University of
Singapore. From 2005 to 2006, she was the dean for translational
medicine at the University of California, San Diego, where she continues to
maintain an appointment as an adjunct professor of medicine. Dr.
Swain served as chair of the Department of Medicine at Stanford University from
1997 to 2005, and previously served on the medical faculties of the University
of Pennsylvania and Duke University. Dr. Swain is currently a
director of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, a member of the Academic Research
Council in Singapore and on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Doris Duke
Charitable Foundation. She has served in a number of national and
international leadership roles and as a director or member of the scientific
advisory boards for a number of biomedical technology companies and is
co-founder of Synecor, LLC. Dr. Swain received her B.S. from the
University of California, Los Angeles and her M.D. from the University of
California, San Diego.
Kathleen M. Wiltsey has been
a director since February 2007. From 1984 through 1998, Ms. Wiltsey served in a
series of senior marketing and business development positions at Amgen Inc.,
including as co-product development team leader and marketing director for
EPOGEN ® and as vice president with responsibility for Amgen’s product licensing
function. From May to October 2006, Ms. Wiltsey served the X Prize Foundation as
executive director for the development and launch of the Archon X PRIZE for
Genomics, a global technology competition to dramatically reduce the cost of
sequencing human genomes and accelerate personalized medicine. Ms. Wiltsey has
served in a variety of business and corporate development advisory roles for
numerous biotechnology companies and is currently a director of Sequenom, Inc.
and past president of the board of The Associates of the California Institute of
Technology. She holds a B.S. from the Colorado School of Mines and an M.B.A.
from Harvard University.
PROPOSAL
NUMBER 2:
APPROVAL
OF EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
We use
stock option awards as a part of our overall compensation program in order to
align the long-term interests of our employees with those of our
stockholders. These awards are made principally under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan, the purpose of which is to secure and retain the services of
employees, directors and consultants, and to provide them with incentives to
exert maximum efforts for the company’s success, by giving them the opportunity
through the granting of stock awards to benefit from increases in the value of
our common stock.
The 2000
Equity Incentive Plan will terminate in accordance with its terms on February 2,
2010. As a result, we are asking that stockholders ratify and approve
an amendment and restatement of the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan that, among other
things, (1) extends the term of the plan until the day before the tenth (10th)
anniversary of the date the amended and restated plan is adopted by our board of
directors or approved by our stockholders, whichever is earlier, (2) eliminates
the “evergreen share reserve” provisions of the existing plan under which the
number of reserved shares increases on an annual basis in accordance with a
pre-set formula (subject to the ability of our board of directors to provide for
lesser increases and a current overall cap of 30,000,000 shares), and instead
reserves a fixed number of 35,000,000 shares, (3) expands the types of potential
awards under the plan to include phantom stock awards and stock appreciation
rights, with the objective of providing our board of directors greater
flexibility, if desired, in its choice of future equity incentive awards, and
(4) renames the plan the Equity Incentive Plan.
The terms
of the Equity Incentive Plan are summarized below and the complete text of the
plan is set forth in Appendix A to this proxy statement.
The
Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” approval of the
Equity Incentive Plan, amending and restating the existing 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan.
Administration
of the Plan
The
Equity Incentive Plan is administered by our board of directors, or a committee
appointed by the board, which determines recipients and types of options and
other awards to be granted, including number of shares under the option or other
award and when options may be exercised. The compensation committee
of the board of directors presently administers the plan.
Awards
under the Plan
The
Equity Incentive Plan permits the following types of awards:
|
·
|
incentive
stock options;
|
|
·
|
nonstatutory
stock options;
|
|
·
|
restricted
stock awards;
|
|
·
|
phantom
stock awards; and
|
|
·
|
stock
appreciation rights.
|
Stock
options and other awards granted under the plan are evidenced by agreements that
specify the terms and conditions under which they are granted. All
stock options and other awards granted under the plan are subject to the terms
and conditions contained in the applicable agreement and the plan.
Eligibility
Awards
other than incentive stock options may be granted to employees, directors and
consultants. Incentive stock options may be granted only to
employees. As of March 2, 2009, approximately 400 persons were
eligible to participate in the plan, including approximately 347 employees, nine
non-employee directors and 44 consultants.
Shares
Subject to the Plan
The total
number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to stock awards
under the Equity Incentive Plan shall not exceed in the aggregate 35,000,000
shares. No more than 3,500,000 shares may be issued pursuant to
awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights.
If any
award expires, lapses, or is terminated or forfeited for any reason, the shares
subject to that award will continue to be available for the grant of awards
under the plan, provided that shares that are not delivered to the holder of an
award because (1) the right to receive such shares is surrendered in a “net
exercise” of an option or (2) such shares are withheld in satisfaction of the
withholding of taxes incurred in connection with the exercise of an option or
stock appreciation right or the issuance of shares under a stock bonus award,
restricted stock award or phantom stock award, the surrendered or withheld
shares will not be available for subsequent issuance under the
plan. Common stock issued as or on the exercise of awards under the
plan may be either authorized and unissued shares or reacquired
shares.
As of
March 2, 2009, there were outstanding under the plan (1) options to purchase a
total of 20,009,507 shares of our common stock, (2) stock bonus awards for
534,100 shares subject to continuing vesting requirements, (3) restricted stock
awards for 17,973 shares, (4) no phantom stock awards and (5) no stock
appreciation rights. On a pro forma basis to reflect the increase in
the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan,
10,248,791 shares remained available for issuance of new options or awards under
the plan at that date. Since the founding of our company in 1995, a total of
4,741,702 shares of our common stock have been issued under the plan and its
predecessors upon the exercise or grant of options and other
awards.
Stock
Options
The stock
options granted under the Equity Incentive Plan are evidenced by agreements that
specify the number of shares of our common stock which may be purchased at a
certain specified price and contain other terms and conditions, such as vesting
and termination provisions. All stock options granted under the plan
are subject to the terms and conditions contained in the applicable stock option
agreement and the plan.
Expiration
and Termination
The term
of each stock option is stated in the applicable stock option
agreement. In no event, however, may a stock option be exercised more
than ten years after the date the option is granted. In the case of
an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, the maximum term is
five years from the date the option is granted.
Option
Exercise Price
The
exercise price of stock options awarded under the Equity Incentive Plan is
determined by the plan administrator at the time the stock option is
awarded. Stock options must have an exercise price that is no less
than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant.
The fair
market value of a share of common stock on a particular date is equal to the
previous day’s closing sales price (or the closing bid price, if no sales were
reported) of the common stock if the common stock is listed on any established
stock exchange or traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market. If there is no
regular public trading market for the common stock, the fair market value of the
common stock is determined by the board of directors.
Consideration
for Exercise of Options
The
consideration to be paid for shares to be issued upon exercise of a stock
option, including the method of payment, shall be determined by the
administrator (and, in the case of an incentive stock option, shall be
determined at the time of grant) and may consist entirely of (1) cash or
(2), at the discretion of the board of directors, (a) by delivery of other
common stock, (b) according to a deferred payment or other similar
arrangement, (c) by means of a “net exercise” of the option, or (d) in any other
form of legal consideration acceptable to the board.
Stock
Bonus Awards and Restricted Stock Awards
The terms
and provisions of stock bonus awards and restricted stock awards shall be as set
forth in the grant instrument. A stock bonus may be awarded in
consideration for past services actually rendered to the company. The
purchase price for a restricted stock award shall be as the administrator shall
determine, but not less than 85% of the fair market value on the date the award
is granted or the date the purchase is consummated. Shares awarded
under a stock bonus or restricted stock award may, but need not be subject to a
repurchase or forfeiture right on behalf of the company in accordance with a
vesting schedule in the event the participant’s employment is
terminated.
Phantom
Stock Awards and Stock Appreciation Rights
The terms
and provisions of phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights shall be as
set forth in the grant instrument. The price of a common stock
equivalent used as the basis from which appreciation is determined for purposes
of a stock appreciation right shall be as the administrator shall determine, but
not less than 100% of the fair market value on the date the stock appreciation
right is granted. Phantom stock awards and the exercise value of a
stock appreciation right may be paid in shares of common stock, cash, a
combination of common stock and cash, or other consideration, as determined by
the administrator and set forth in the grant instrument.
Other
Provisions
Limits
on Transfer of Awards
In
general, plan participants may not sell, pledge, assign, transfer or otherwise
dispose of any stock options or other awards other than by will or the laws of
descent or distribution and the plan participant alone may exercise his stock
options or other awards during his lifetime. Awards other than
incentive stock options may be transferred only if permitted under the agreement
that evidences the terms of the award.
Adjustments
on Changes in Capital Structure or on Change of Control
If we
effect a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, redemption,
combination, reclassification or other similar change affecting our capital
stock, adjustments reflecting the change will be made in (1) the aggregate
number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan;
(2) the number of shares underlying each outstanding award; and (3) if
applicable, the price per share of each award.
If a
change in control transaction shall occur, the surviving or acquiring
corporation shall assume all awards or provide a substitute similar
award. If the surviving or acquiring corporation fails to so provide
such assumption or substitution, then awards held by those participants whose
employment has not been terminated will be accelerated in full and the awards
will subsequently terminate if not exercised. Any other awards
outstanding under the plan will terminate if not exercised (if applicable) prior
to the event.
Amendment
or Termination of the Plan
The board
may at any time amend, alter, suspend or discontinue the Equity Incentive Plan
but no amendment, alteration, suspension or discontinuation which would impair
your rights under any previous grant may be made without the consent of the
participant.
Term
of the Plan
No stock
options or other awards may be granted under the Equity Incentive Plan after the
day before the tenth (10th)
anniversary of the date the plan is adopted by our board of directors or
approved by our stockholders, whichever is earlier.
United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The
following is a brief summary of certain of the federal income tax consequences
of certain transactions under the Equity Incentive Plan based on current federal
income tax laws. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and
does not describe state or local tax consequences. Additional or
different federal tax consequences to the employee, director or consultant or to
our company may result depending on considerations other than those described
below.
Nonstatutory
Stock Options
In
general, optionholders will not recognize any taxable income at the time they
are granted nonstatutory stock options. When an optionholder
exercises a nonstatutory stock option, he or she will recognize ordinary income
measured by the excess of the then fair market value of the shares over the
exercise price and we will be entitled to a deduction for a corresponding
amount. Different rules apply to options that have a “readily
ascertainable fair market value,” as that phrase is defined in regulations
promulgated under Section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.
When an
optionholder sells or otherwise disposes of shares that were acquired by
exercising nonstatutory stock options, any amount that the optionholder receives
in excess of the sum of (1) the exercise price of the shares as of the date
of exercise and (2) the amount includable in income with respect to such
option, if any, such sum being the optionholder’s “basis” in the shares, will,
in general, be treated as a long-term or short-term capital gain, depending on
the holding period of the shares. We are not entitled to any tax
deduction in connection with an optionholder’s sale or disposition of the
shares. If an optionholder receives less than his or her basis in the
shares, the loss will, in general, be treated as a long-term or short-term
capital loss, depending on the holding period of the shares.
Incentive
Stock Options
Optionholders
will not be taxed on the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option that
qualifies under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, unless an
alternative minimum tax liability is triggered. When an optionholder
sells or otherwise makes a taxable disposition of shares that he or she acquired
by exercising an incentive stock option, the optionholder will recognize a
capital gain on the excess of the amount realized on disposition over the
exercise price of the incentive stock option, provided that the optionholder has
not disposed of the shares until at least two years after the date the option
was granted and one year after the date the optionholder exercised the
option. Failure to comply with these holding requirements will result
in ordinary income treatment for the gain. Unless the optionholder
disposes of shares received on exercise of the incentive stock option before
meeting the applicable holding period requirements, we will not be entitled to a
deduction with respect to the grant or exercise of the incentive stock
option.
In the
event an optionholder makes a “disposition” of the shares received on exercise
of an incentive stock option before meeting the two-year or one-year holding
period requirements, the gain on the disposition, to the extent of the lesser of
(1) the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of
exercise over the exercise price or (2) the excess of the amount realized
on disposition over the exercise price, will be treated as ordinary income to
the optionholder, and we will generally be entitled to a corresponding
deduction. The balance of the gain, if any, realized on such a
disposition will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain, depending
on the holding period of the shares. To the extent that an
optionholder is entitled to capital gains treatment, we will not be entitled to
a corresponding deduction for such gain. If the amount realized at
the time of the disposition is less than the exercise price, the optionholder
will not be required to treat any amount as ordinary income, provided the
disposition is of a type that would give rise to a recognizable
loss. In such event, the loss will be treated as a long-term or
short-term capital loss depending on the holding period of the
shares.
Stock
Bonus Awards
In
general, if an individual receives a stock bonus award, he or she will be taxed
on the fair market value of the shares on the date the shares are
issued. We will be generally entitled to a deduction for a
corresponding amount. When a stock bonus award is subject to
forfeiture restrictions, an individual will not recognize any taxable income at
the time he or she is granted the award, but upon the lapse of the restrictions
applicable to such award, that person will recognize ordinary income equal to
the fair market value of the shares on the date the restrictions on the award
lapsed, and we will be entitled to a deduction for a corresponding
amount. If, upon a taxable disposition of the shares, the stockholder
receives more or less than his or her basis in the shares, the gain or loss will
be a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holding
period of the shares, measured from the date that the receipt of the shares was
taxable to the stockholder.
Restricted
Stock Awards
In
general, an individual will not recognize any taxable income at the time he or
she is granted an award of restricted stock, but upon the lapse of the
restrictions applicable to such award, that person will recognize ordinary
income equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the restrictions
on the award lapsed less the purchase price for such shares, and we will be
entitled to a deduction for a corresponding amount. If the
stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of such shares in a taxable disposition,
the sale or disposition will be subject to the same treatment described above
for a taxable disposition of shares acquired upon an exercise of a nonstatutory
stock option.
Phantom
Stock Awards
In
general, an individual will not recognize any taxable income at the time he or
she is granted an award of phantom stock. Upon settlement of a
phantom stock award, the individual will recognize ordinary income equal to the
fair market value of the cash or shares actually received by the
individual. We will be generally entitled to a deduction for the
corresponding amount.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
In
general, an individual will not recognize any taxable income at the time he or
she is granted stock appreciation rights. Upon exercise of a stock
appreciation right, the individual will recognize ordinary income equal to the
fair market value of the cash or shares received by the individual upon
exercise. We will be generally entitled to a deduction for the
corresponding amount.
The
foregoing summary does not constitute a definitive statement of the federal
income tax effects of awards granted under the Plan.
PROPOSAL
NUMBER 3:
APPROVAL
OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN
We use
stock option awards as a part of our overall compensation program in order to
align the long-term interests of the non-employee members of our board of
directors with those of our stockholders. These awards are made under
our 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the purpose of which is to
secure and retain the services of non-employee directors, and to provide them
with incentives to exert maximum efforts for the company’s success by giving
them the opportunity through the granting of nonstatutory stock options to
benefit from increases in the value of our common stock.
The 2000
Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan will terminate in accordance with its
terms on February 2, 2010. As a result, we are asking that
stockholders approve an amendment and restatement of the 2000 Non-Employee
Directors’ Stock Option Plan that, among other things, (a) extends the term of
the plan until the day before the tenth (10th)
anniversary of the date the amended and restated plan is adopted by our board of
directors or approved by our stockholders, whichever is earlier, (b) eliminates
the “evergreen share reserve” provisions of the existing plan under which the
number of reserved shares increases on an annual basis in accordance with a
pre-set formula (subject to the ability of our board of directors to provide for
lesser increases), and instead reserves a fixed number of 1,200,000 shares , (c)
increases the number of shares underlying the annual option grant to the
non-employee chairman of our board of directors from 10,000 shares to 20,000
shares (bringing within the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan our
historical practice, previously effected by making grants of options for the
additional 10,000 shares to the non-employee chairman of our board of directors
under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan), and (d) renames the plan the Non-Employee
Directors’ Stock Option Plan.
The terms
of the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan are summarized below and the
complete text of the plan is set forth in Appendix B to this proxy
statement.
The
Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” approval of the
Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, amending and restating the existing
2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan.
Administration
of the Plan
The plan
is administered by our board of directors, which oversees the grant of options
under the plan and determines the provisions of each option granted, to the
extent not specified in the plan.
Awards
under the Plan
The plan
only permits the award of nonstatutory stock options. Stock options
granted under the plan are evidenced by agreements that specify the terms and
conditions under which they are granted. All stock options granted
under the plan are subject to the terms and conditions contained in the
applicable agreement and the plan.
Eligibility
Stock
options are granted to non-employee directors under the plan. Upon
the date of his or her initial election or appointment to the board of
directors, each non-employee director is granted an option to purchase 30,000
shares of our common stock. Further, on the day following each annual
meeting of stockholders, each person who is then a non-employee director and has
been a non-employee director for at least six months is granted an option to
purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock (or 20,000 shares, in the case of the
non-employee chairman of our board of directors). Nine of the ten
members of our board of directors are currently eligible to participate in the
plan.
Shares
Subject to the Plan
The total
number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to stock awards
under the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan shall not exceed in the
aggregate 1,200,000 shares.
If any
stock option expires, lapses, or is terminated or forfeited for any reason, the
shares subject to that stock option will continue to be available for the grant
of stock options under the plan. Common stock issued on the exercise
of stock options under the plan may be either authorized and unissued shares or
reacquired shares.
As of
March 2, 2009, there were options outstanding under the plan to purchase a total
of 504,000 shares of our common stock. On a pro forma basis to
reflect the increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance under the
Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, 696,000 shares remained available for
issuance of new options or awards under the plan at that date. To
date, no shares have been issued upon the exercise of options granted under the
plan.
Stock
Options
The stock
options granted under the plan are evidenced by agreements that specify the
number of shares of our common stock which may be purchased at a certain
specified price and contain other terms and conditions, such as vesting and
termination provisions. All stock options granted under the plan are
subject to the terms and conditions contained in the applicable stock option
agreement and the plan.
Vesting
and Exercisability
Stock
options granted under the plan “vest,” or become exercisable, as
follows:
|
·
|
Initial
grants of options to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock provide
for vesting of 1/60th of the shares subject to the option each month after
grant for five years after the date of
grant.
|
|
·
|
Annual
grants of options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock (or 20,000
shares, in the case of the non-employee chairman of our board of
directors) provide for vesting of 1/12th of the shares subject to the
option each month after grant for twelve months after the date of the
grant.
|
Expiration
and Termination
Stock
options granted under the plan have a term of ten years from the date of grant,
subject to earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain
events. In no event, however, may a stock option be exercised more
than ten years after the date the option is granted.
Option
Exercise Price
Stock
options awarded under the plan have an exercise price of 100% of the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair market value
of a share of common stock on a particular date is equal to the previous day’s
closing sales price (or the closing bid price, if no sales were reported) of the
common stock if the common stock is listed on any established stock exchange or
traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market. If there is no regular public
trading market for the common stock, the fair market value of the common stock
is determined by our board of directors.
Consideration
for Exercise of Options
The
consideration to be paid for shares to be issued upon exercise of a stock
option, including the method of payment, may be paid, to the extent permitted by
law, in any combination of (1) cash, (2) delivery of other shares of our common
stock, or (3) by “net exercise” of the stock option.
Other
Provisions
Limits
on Transfer of Stock Options
In
general, non-employee directors may not sell, pledge, assign, transfer or
otherwise dispose of any stock options other than (i) by will or the laws of
descent or distribution, (ii) in certain circumstances, by instrument to an
inter vivos or testamentary trust and (iii) by gift to a member of such
non-employee director’s immediate family.
Adjustments
on Changes in Capital Structure or on Change of Control
If we
effect a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, redemption,
combination, reclassification or other similar change affecting our capital
stock, adjustments reflecting the change will be made in (1) the aggregate
number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan; (2) the
number of shares underlying each outstanding stock option; and (3) the exercise
price per share subject to each outstanding stock option.
If a
change in control transaction shall occur, the surviving or acquiring
corporation shall assume all stock options or provide or substitute similar
stock options. If the surviving or acquiring corporation refuses to
so provide such assumption or substitution, then the vesting of stock options
granted under the plan will be accelerated in full and the stock options will
subsequently terminate if not exercised.
If a
change in control transaction shall occur and the surviving or acquiring
corporation assumes the stock options granted under the plan, but any
non-employee director is not elected or appointed to the board of directors of
the surviving or acquiring corporation, then the vesting of that non-employee
director’s stock options shall be accelerated by 18 months.
Amendment
or Termination of the Plan
The board
of directors may at any time amend, alter, suspend or discontinue the plan but
no amendment, alteration, suspension or discontinuation which would impair the
rights of a non-employee director under any previous grant may be made without
such non-employee director’s consent.
Term
of the Plan
No stock
options may be granted under the plan after the day before the tenth (10th)
anniversary of the date the plan is adopted by the board of directors or
approved by our stockholders, whichever is earlier.
United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The
following is a brief summary of certain of the federal income tax consequences
of certain transactions under the plan based on current federal income tax
laws. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not
describe state or local tax consequences. Additional or different
federal tax consequences to the non-employee director or to us may result
depending on considerations other than those described below.
In
general, optionholders will not recognize any taxable income at the time they
are granted a nonstatutory stock option. When an optionholder
exercises a nonstatutory stock option, he or she will recognize ordinary income
measured by the excess of the then fair market value of the shares over the
exercise price and we will be entitled to a deduction for a corresponding
amount. Different rules apply to options that have a “readily
ascertainable fair market value,” as that phrase is defined in regulations
promulgated under Section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
When an
optionholder sells or otherwise disposes of shares that were acquired by
exercising a nonstatutory stock option, any amount the optionholder receives in
excess of the sum of (1) the exercise price of the shares as of the date of
exercise and (2) the amount includable in income with respect to such option, if
any, such sum being the optionholder’s “basis” in the shares, will, in general,
be treated as a long term or short term capital gain, depending on the holding
period of the shares. We are not entitled to any tax deduction in
connection with an optionholder’s sale or disposition of the
shares. If an optionholder receives less than his or her basis in the
shares, the loss will, in general, be treated as a long term or short term
capital loss, depending on the holding period of the shares.
The
foregoing summary does not constitute a definitive statement of the federal
income tax effects of stock options granted under the plan.
PROPOSAL
NUMBER 4:
RATIFICATION
AND APPROVAL OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The board
of directors has appointed the firm of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent
auditors to make an examination of our accounts for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009, subject to ratification by our
stockholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP, are expected
to be present at the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make a
statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
The
Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” ratification and
approval of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
Compensation
of Independent Auditors
The
following table presents the estimated aggregate fees billed and to be billed by
Ernst & Young LLP for services performed during our last two fiscal
years.
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Audit
fees(1)
|
|
$ |
336,500 |
|
|
$ |
446,000 |
|
|
Audit-related
fees(2)
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
Tax
fees
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
All
other
fees
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
$ |
360,500 |
|
|
$ |
468,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
“Audit
fees” include professional services rendered for (i) the audit of our
internal control over financial reporting, as required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007
and 2008, (ii) the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, (iii) the reviews of the financial
statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for such years
and (iv) the issuance of consents and other matters relating to
registration statements filed by
us.
|
|
(2)
|
“Audit-related
fees” include assurance or related services reasonably related to our
audit for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and
2008. These fees related to the audit of the financial
statements of our 401(k) plan and consultation concerning financial
accounting and reporting standards.
|
The audit
committee reviewed and approved all the fees described above. As part
of its duties, the audit committee has determined that the provision by Ernst
& Young LLP of the non-audit services described above is compatible with
maintaining the auditors’ independence.
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The audit
committee has adopted policies and procedures requiring the pre-approval of all
audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent auditors, either as
part of the audit committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of the
independent auditors or on a case-by-case basis before the independent auditors
are engaged to provide each service. The audit committee’s
pre-approval authority may be delegated to one or more of its members, but any
pre-approval decision must be reported to the full audit committee at its next
regularly scheduled meeting.
Audit
Committee Report
The role
of the audit committee is to assist the board of directors in its oversight of
our financial reporting process. The audit committee reviews our
internal accounting procedures and consults with, and reviews the services
provided by, our independent auditors.
The
management of our company is responsible for the preparation, presentation and
integrity of our financial statements, our accounting and financial reporting
principles and internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance
with the accounting standards and applicable laws and
regulations. Our independent auditors are responsible for auditing
our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
In the
performance of its oversight function, the audit committee has reviewed and
discussed the audited financial statements with management. The
committee has also discussed with our independent auditors the matters required
to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit
Committees, as currently in effect. Finally, the committee has
received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors
required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board regarding our independent auditors’ communications with the
audit committee concerning independence, as currently in effect, and
has discussed with our independent auditors their independence.
Based
upon the review and discussions described in this report, and subject to the
limitations on the role and responsibilities of the audit committee referred to
in the audit committee charter, the audit committee recommended to the board of
directors that the audited financial statements be included in our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Audit
Committee
Samuel L.
Barker, Ph.D. (Chairman)
Frank P.
Palantoni
Kathleen
M. Wiltsey
The
foregoing audit committee report shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference by
any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this compensation
committee report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under
such acts.
STOCK
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of our
common stock as of February 23, 2009 by:
|
·
|
each
of the individuals listed in “Executive and Director Compensation —
Summary Compensation Table”;
|
|
·
|
each
person, or group of affiliated persons, who is known by us to own
beneficially five percent or more of our common stock;
and
|
|
·
|
all
current directors and executive officers as a
group.
|
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a
person and the percentage ownership of that person. Shares of common
stock under options held by that person that are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of February 23, 2009 are considered
outstanding. These shares, however, are not considered outstanding
when computing the percentage ownership of each other person.
Except as
indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to state community
property laws, each stockholder named in the table has sole voting and
investment power for the shares shown as beneficially owned by them. Percentage
of ownership is based on 137,330,254 shares of common stock outstanding on
February 23, 2009. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, the
address of each of the individuals named below is: c/o Lexicon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 8800 Technology Forest Place, The Woodlands, Texas
77381.
|
|
Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
|
|
Number
of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Shares
Issuable Pursuant to Options Exercisable within 60 Days of
February 23, 2009
|
|
|
Percentage
Ownership
|
|
Invus,
L.P., Invus Public Equities, L.P. and related
parties (1)
|
|
|
55,385,146 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
40.3 |
% |
Royce
& Associates, LLC
(2)
|
|
|
9,205,777 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Arthur
T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D. (3)
|
|
|
1,663,562 |
|
|
|
1,912,813 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Alan
J. Main, Ph.D.
|
|
|
44,800 |
|
|
|
681,982 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey
L. Wade, J.D.
|
|
|
47,800 |
|
|
|
642,367 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Brian
P. Zambrowicz, Ph.D.
|
|
|
156,800 |
|
|
|
890,344 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James
F. Tessmer
|
|
|
25,800 |
|
|
|
98,486 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Julia
P. Gregory (4)
|
|
|
51,983 |
|
|
|
982,112 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Samuel
L. Barker, Ph.D. (5)
|
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
|
134,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Philippe
J. Amouyal
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Raymond
Debbane (6)
|
|
|
55,385,146 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
% |
Robert
J. Lefkowitz, M.D.
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Alan
S. Nies, M.D.
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
78,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Frank
P. Palantoni
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
56,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Christopher
J. Sobecki
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Judith
L. Swain, M.D.
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kathleen
M. Wiltsey
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All
directors and executive officers as
a group (3)(5)(6)
(15 persons)
|
|
|
57,414,408 |
|
|
|
4,851,421 |
|
|
|
43.8 |
% |
*
Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1 percent.
(1)
|
Based upon a Schedule
13D filed with the SEC on June 27, 2007, and amended on August 24 and
August 29, 2007, and certain representations made to us by Invus,
L.P. Reflects the beneficial ownership of (a) 51,494,038 shares
of our common stock by Invus, L.P., Invus Advisors, L.L.C., Ulys, L.L.C.
and Raymond Debbane, each of which may be deemed to have sole voting and
investment power with respect to such shares, and (b) 3,891,108 shares of
our common stock by Invus Public Equities, L.P., Invus Public Equities
Advisors, LLC, Ulys, L.L.C. and Mr. Debbane, each of which may be deemed
to have sole voting and investment power with respect to such
shares. Such shares are subject to certain voting restrictions
pursuant to our stockholders’ agreement with Invus, L.P. described under
the heading “Transactions with Related Persons — Arrangements with
Invus.” The address for Invus, L.P., Invus Advisors, L.L.C.,
Invus Public Equities, L.P., Invus Public Equities Advisors, LLC, Ulys,
L.L.C. is 750 Lexington Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, New York
10022. The address for Mr. Debbane is c/o Ulys, L.L.C., 750
Lexington Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, New York
10022.
|
(2)
|
Based
upon a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009,
reflecting the beneficial ownership of our common stock by Royce &
Associates, LLC. The address for Royce & Associates, LLC is
1414 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York
10019.
|
(3)
|
The
number of shares beneficially owned by Dr. Sands includes 60,000 shares
held in the name of minor children and 817,500 shares owned by Sands
Associates LP. The general partners of Sands Associates LP are
ATS Associates, L.L.C., owned by Dr. Sands, and MES Associates, L.L.C.,
owned by Dr. Sands’ wife.
|
(4)
|
Based
on certain representations made to us by Ms. Gregory. The
number of shares beneficially owned by Ms. Gregory includes 4,847 shares
held in trusts for the benefit of her children, of which she serves as
trustee.
|
(5)
|
The
number of shares beneficially owned by Dr. Barker includes 35,000 shares
held in grantor retained annuity trusts for the benefit of his children,
of which he serves as trustee.
|
(6)
|
Based
upon a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on June 27, 2007, and amended on
August 24 and August 29, 2007, and certain representations made to us by
Mr. Debbane. Mr. Debbane disclaims beneficial ownership of
these shares. The address for Mr. Debbane is c/o Ulys, L.L.C.,
750 Lexington Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, New York
10022.
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and
persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file initial reports of
ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Directors, executive officers and
greater than 10% stockholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission
regulations to furnish us with copies of all such forms that they
file.
To our
knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports received by
us and on written representations by certain reporting persons that no reports
on Form 5 were required, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive
officers, directors and 10% stockholders were complied with in a timely
manner.
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The
following table presents aggregate summary information as of December 31, 2008
regarding the common stock that may be issued upon exercise of options, warrants
and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans, including our
2000 Equity Incentive Plan, 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan and
Coelacanth Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
Plan
Category
|
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
|
Weighted
average exercise price per share of outstanding options, warrants and
rights
|
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
|
Equity
compensation plans approved
by security holders (1)
|
|
16,840,404
|
|
$ |
5.1398
|
|
5,601,994
(3)(4)(5)
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved
by security holders (2)
|
|
57,760
|
|
2.2631
|
|
— |
|
Total
|
|
16,898,164
|
|
$ |
5.1300
|
|
5,601,994 |
|
(1)
|
Consists
of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options
granted under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and 2000 Non-Employee
Directors’ Stock Option Plan or remaining available for issuance under
those plans.
|
(2)
|
Consists
of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options
granted under the Coelacanth Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan, which we
assumed in connection with our July 2001 acquisition of Coelacanth
Corporation, but does not include warrants to purchase 16,483 shares of
common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $11.93 per share,
which we also assumed in connection with our acquisition of
Coelacanth.
|
(3)
|
Includes
5,473,967 shares available for future issuance under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan, some or all of which may be awarded as stock
bonuses.
|
(4)
|
Our
2000 Equity Incentive Plan provides that on each January 1, the number of
shares available for issuance under the plan will be automatically
increased by the greater of (i) five percent of our outstanding shares on
a fully-diluted basis or (ii) the number of shares that could be issued
under awards granted under the plan during the prior year. Our
board of directors may provide for a lesser increase in the number of
shares available for issuance under the
plan.
|
(5)
|
Our
2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan provides that on the day
following each annual meeting of stockholders, the number of shares
available for issuance under the plan will be automatically increased by
the greater of (i) 0.3% of our outstanding shares on a fully-diluted basis
or (ii) the number of shares that could be issued under options granted
under the plan during the prior year. Our board of directors
may provide for a lesser increase in the number of shares available for
issuance under the plan.
|
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Independence
of the Board of Directors
After
reviewing all relevant transactions and relationships involving each member of
the board of directors (and his or her family), the board of directors has
affirmatively determined that Samuel L. Barker, Ph.D., Philippe J. Amouyal,
Raymond Debbane, Robert J. Lefkowitz, M.D., Alan S. Nies, M.D., Frank P.
Palantoni, Christopher J. Sobecki, Judith L. Swain, M.D. and Kathleen M.
Wiltsey, which members constitute a majority of the board of directors, are
“independent” in accordance with the applicable listing standards of The Nasdaq
Stock Market, Inc.
In making
such determinations, the board of directors considered our consulting agreements
with Robert J. Lefkowitz, M.D., under which Dr. Lefkowitz serves as a consultant
to us on matters relating to our drug discovery and development efforts, and
with Alan S. Nies, M.D., under which Dr. Nies serves as chairman of our medical
advisory board.
Board
Committees
Audit
Committee. Our audit committee has been established in
accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
monitors the integrity of our financial statements, reviews our internal
accounting procedures and oversees the qualifications, independence and
performance of our independent auditors. The audit committee operates
pursuant to a charter that was last amended and restated by the board of
directors on October 26, 2005, a copy of which appears on our website at www.lexpharma.com under the
caption “Investors — Corporate Governance.”
The
current members of our audit committee are Samuel L. Barker, Ph.D. (chair),
Frank P. Palantoni and Kathleen M. Wiltsey. The board of directors,
in its business judgment, has determined that Dr. Barker, Mr. Palantoni and Ms.
Wiltsey are “independent” in accordance with the applicable listing standards of
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. The board of directors, in its business
judgment, has also determined that Samuel L. Barker, Ph.D. is an “audit
committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation
S-K.
Compensation
Committee. Our compensation committee evaluates the
performance of management, determines the compensation of our executive officers
and reviews general policy relating to compensation and benefits of our
employees. The compensation committee also administers the issuance
of stock options and other awards under our 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan. The compensation committee operates pursuant to a charter that
was approved by the board of directors on February 11, 2004, a copy of which
appears on our website at www.lexpharma.com under the
caption “Investors — Corporate Governance.”
The
compensation committee may delegate any of its authority to subcommittees
consisting of one or more compensation committee members, with all subcommittee
decisions being presented to the full compensation committee at its next
scheduled meeting. The compensation committee did not delegate any
such authority with respect to 2008 compensation matters. The
compensation committee may retain compensation consultants or other advisors to
assist in its evaluation of executive compensation. Although the
compensation committee has engaged consultants to advise the committee on
matters relating to executive compensation in prior years, the compensation
committee did not engage any consultants with respect to 2008 compensation
matters.
The
compensation committee meets in connection with most regularly scheduled
meetings of the board of directors, and on at least two occasions after the
commencement of each year specifically devoted to making compensation decisions
regarding the year just ended. In preparation for such decisions, our
president and chief executive officer reviews the performance of executive
officers other than himself and, in consultation with the compensation committee
and at its direction, makes certain recommendations to the compensation
committee relating to their compensation. The compensation committee
reviews such recommendations and makes changes to such recommendations as it
deems appropriate. All executive compensation determinations are made
by the compensation committee in the absence of management.
The
current members of our compensation committee are Mr. Palantoni (chair),
Philippe J. Amouyal and Alan S. Nies, M.D. The board of directors, in
its business judgment, has determined that Mr. Palantoni, Mr. Amouyal and Dr.
Nies are “independent” in accordance with the applicable listing standards of
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. In making such determinations, the
board of directors considered our consulting agreement with Dr. Nies described
under the heading “Corporate Governance — Independence of the Board of
Directors.”
Corporate Governance
Committee. Our corporate governance committee identifies
individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors, selects
candidates or nominees for director positions to be filled by the board of
directors or our stockholders and develops appropriate corporate governance
principles. The corporate governance committee operates pursuant to a
charter that was approved by the board of directors on February 11, 2004, a copy
of which appears on our website at www.lexpharma.com under the
caption “Investors — Corporate Governance.”
The
corporate governance committee has not established any specific minimum
qualifications for membership on our board of directors. Rather, the
committee will generally consider all relevant factors, which may include
independence, experience, diversity, leadership qualities and strength of
character. The corporate governance committee uses its available
network of contacts when compiling a list of potential director candidates and
may also engage outside consultants when appropriate. The committee
also considers potential director candidates recommended by stockholders and
other parties and all potential director candidates are evaluated based on the
above criteria. Because the corporate governance committee makes no
distinction in its evaluation of candidates based on whether such candidates are
recommended by stockholders or other parties, no formal policy or procedure has
been established for the consideration of director candidates recommended by
stockholders.
Any
stockholder wishing to propose a potential director candidate may submit a
recommendation in writing within the time frame specified in our
bylaws. All such communications should be sent to 8800 Technology
Forest Place, The Woodlands, Texas 77381, Attn: Corporate Governance
Committee. Submissions should include the full name of the proposed
candidate and a detailed description of the candidate’s qualifications, business
experience and other relevant biographical information.
The
current members of our corporate governance committee are Raymond Debbane
(chair), Robert J. Lefkowitz, M.D. and Judith L. Swain, M.D. The
board of directors, in its business judgment, has determined that Mr. Debbane,
Dr. Lefkowitz and Dr. Swain are “independent” in accordance with the
applicable listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. In
making such determinations, the board of directors considered our consulting
agreement with Dr. Lefkowitz described under the heading “Corporate Governance —
Independence of the Board of Directors.”
Board
and Committee Meetings and Attendance in 2008
The board
of directors met six times in 2008 and took certain additional actions by
unanimous written consent. The audit committee met seven times in
2008. The compensation committee met six times in 2008 and took
certain additional actions by unanimous written consent. The
corporate governance committee met two times in 2008. During 2008,
none of our directors attended fewer than 75 percent of the aggregate number of
meetings of the board of directors and committees during the period
served.
It is our
policy to encourage the members of our board of directors to attend all annual
meetings of stockholders. Nine members of our board of directors
attended our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have
adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our
directors, officers and employees, the text of which appears on our website at
www.lexpharma.com under
the caption “Investors — Corporate Governance.” We intend to
disclose on our website the nature of any amendment to or waiver from our code
of business conduct and ethics that applies to our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or
persons performing similar functions within four business days following the
date of such amendment or waiver. In the case of any such waiver,
including an implicit waiver, we also intend to disclose the name of the person
to whom the waiver was granted and the date of the waiver. To date,
we have not granted any waivers under our code of business conduct and
ethics.
Corporate
Governance Guidelines
We have
adopted corporate governance guidelines, including, among other things,
guidelines with respect to the structure of our board of directors, director
selection and qualifications, and non-employee director
compensation. The text of our corporate governance guidelines appears
on our website at www.lexpharma.com under the
caption “Investors — Corporate Governance.”
Stockholder
Communications with the Board of Directors
We
believe that our stockholders are currently provided a reasonable means to
communicate with our board of directors and individual directors. As
a result, our board of directors has not established a formal process for
stockholders to send communications to the board of directors or individual
directors. However, the corporate governance committee will consider,
from time to time, whether adoption of a formal process for such stockholder
communications has become necessary or appropriate. Stockholders may
send communications to the board of directors or individual directors by mail at
8800 Technology Forest Place, The Woodlands, Texas 77381, Attn: Board of
Directors or any individual director.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During
2008, Frank P. Palantoni, Philippe J. Amouyal and Alan S. Nies, M.D. served as
members of the compensation committee of our board of directors. Mr.
Amouyal is a designee of Invus, L.P. pursuant to our stockholders’ agreement
with Invus described under the heading “Transactions with Related Persons —
Arrangements with Invus.” During 2008, none of our executive officers
served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of
another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of our board
of directors or compensation committee.
TRANSACTIONS
WITH RELATED PERSONS
Arrangements
with Invus
In June
2007, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Invus, L.P., pursuant
to which Invus purchased 50,824,986 shares of our common stock for approximately
$205.4 million in August 2007. This purchase resulted in Invus’
ownership of 40% of the post-transaction outstanding shares of our common
stock. Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, Invus also has
the right to require us to initiate up to two pro rata rights offerings to our
stockholders, which would provide all stockholders with non-transferable rights
to acquire shares of our common stock, in an aggregate amount of up to
$344.5 million, less the proceeds of any “qualified offerings” that we may
complete in the interim involving the sale of our common stock at prices above
$4.50 per share. Invus may exercise its right to require us to
conduct the first rights offering by giving us notice within a period of 90 days
beginning on November 28, 2009 (which we refer to as the first rights offering
trigger date), although we and Invus may agree to change the first rights
offering trigger date to as early as August 28, 2009 with the approval of the
members of our board of directors who are not affiliated with
Invus. Invus may exercise its right to require us to conduct the
second rights offering by giving us notice within a period of 90 days beginning
on the date that is 12 months after Invus’ exercise of its right to require us
to conduct the first rights offering or, if Invus does not exercise its right to
require us to conduct the first rights offering, within a period of 90 days
beginning on the first anniversary of the first rights offering trigger
date. The initial investment and subsequent rights offerings,
combined with any qualified offerings, were designed to achieve up to
$550 million in proceeds to us. Invus would participate in each
rights offering for up to its pro rata portion of the offering, and would commit
to purchase the entire portion of the offering not subscribed for by other
stockholders.
Board of
Directors. Concurrently with the execution of the securities
purchase agreement, we entered into a stockholders’ agreement with Invus under
which Invus has the right to designate the greater of three members or 30% (or
the percentage of all the outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus
and its affiliates, if less than 30%) of all members of our board of directors,
rounded up to the nearest whole number of directors, and pursuant to which Invus
has designated Philippe J. Amouyal, Raymond Debbane and Christopher J.
Sobecki. Mr. Debbane is president and chief executive officer of The
Invus Group, LLC, an affiliate of Invus, and Mr. Amouyal and Mr. Sobecki are
each managing directors of The Invus Group, LLC.
In the
event that the number of shares of our common stock owned by Invus and its
affiliates ever exceeds 50% of the total number of shares of our common stock
then outstanding (not counting for such purpose any shares acquired by Invus
from third parties in excess of 40% (or, if higher, its then pro rata amount) of
the total number of outstanding shares of common stock, as permitted by the
standstill provisions of the stockholders’ agreement), from and after that time,
Invus will have the right to designate a number of directors equal to the
percentage of all the outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus and
its affiliates (not counting for such purpose any shares acquired by Invus from
third parties in excess of 40% (or, if higher, its then pro rata amount) of the
total number of outstanding shares of common stock, as permitted by the
standstill provisions of the stockholders’ agreement), rounded up to the nearest
whole number of directors. The directors appointed by Invus have
proportionate representation on the compensation committee and corporate
governance committee of our board of directors.
Invus’
rights with respect to the designation of members of our board of directors and
its compensation and corporate governance committees will terminate if the
percentage of all the outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus and
its affiliates falls below 10%. Invus will also have the right to
terminate these provisions at any time following the date on which the
percentage of all the outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus and
its affiliates exceeds 50% (not counting for such purpose any shares acquired by
Invus and its affiliates from third parties in excess of 40% (or, if higher, its
then pro rata amount) of the total number of outstanding shares of our common
stock, as permitted by the standstill provisions of the stockholders’
agreement).
The
provisions of the stockholders’ agreement relating to preemptive rights will
terminate on the earlier to occur of August 28, 2017 and the date on which the
percentage of all the outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus and
its affiliates falls below 10%.
Standstill
Provisions. Invus is subject to standstill provisions
restricting its ability to purchase or otherwise acquire additional shares of
common stock from third parties to an amount that would result in its ownership
of our common stock not exceeding 49% of the total number of shares
outstanding. These standstill provisions will not apply to the
acquisitions of securities by way of stock splits, stock dividends,
reclassifications, recapitalizations, or other distributions by us, acquisitions
contemplated by the securities purchase agreement and the stockholders’
agreement, including in the rights offerings and upon Invus’ exercise of
preemptive rights under the stockholders’ agreement.
Except
for acquisitions pursuant to the provisions described above, and subject to
certain exceptions, Invus has agreed that it will not, and will cause its
affiliates not to, without the approval of our unaffiliated board, directly or
indirectly:
|
·
|
solicit
proxies to vote any of our voting securities or any voting securities of
our subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
submit
to our board of directors a written proposal for any merger,
recapitalization, reorganization, business combination or other
extraordinary transaction involving an acquisition of us or any of our
subsidiaries or any of our or our subsidiaries’ securities or assets by
Invus and its affiliates;
|
|
·
|
enter
into discussions, negotiations, arrangements or understandings with any
third party with respect to any of the foregoing;
or
|
|
·
|
request
us or any of our representatives, directly or indirectly, to amend or
waive any of these standstill
provisions.
|
The
standstill provisions of the stockholders’ agreement will terminate on the
earliest to occur of (a) August 28, 2017, (b) the date on which the percentage
of all the outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus and its
affiliates falls below 10%, (c) the date on which the percentage of all of the
outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus and its affiliates exceeds
50% (not counting for such purpose any shares acquired by Invus from third
parties in excess of 40% (or, if higher, its then pro rata amount) of the total
number of outstanding shares of common stock, as permitted by the standstill
provisions of the stockholders’ agreement), (d) the date on which any third
party makes a public proposal to acquire (by purchase, exchange, merger or
otherwise) assets or business constituting 50% or more of our revenues, net
income or assets or 50% of any class of our equity securities or our board of
directors recommends or approves, or proposes to recommend or approve, any such
transaction or (e) the date on which any third party acquires beneficial
ownership (by purchase, exchange, merger or otherwise) of assets or business
constituting 20% or more of our revenues, net income or assets or 20% of any
class of our equity securities or our board of directors recommends or approves,
or proposes to recommend or approve, any such transaction.
Sales to Third
Parties. Subject to certain exceptions, Invus has agreed that
neither it nor its affiliates will sell any shares of common stock to third
parties that are not affiliated with Invus if, to Invus’ knowledge, such
transfer would result in any such third party (or any person or group
including such third party) owning more than 14.9% of the total number of
outstanding shares of our common stock.
The
provisions of the stockholders’ agreement relating to sales to third parties
will terminate on the earliest to occur of (a) August 28, 2017,
(b) the date on which the percentage of all the outstanding shares of our
common stock owned by Invus and its affiliates falls below 10%, and (c) the
date on which the percentage of all the outstanding shares of our common stock
owned by Invus and its affiliates exceeds 50% (not counting for such purpose any
shares acquired by Invus and its affiliates from third parties in excess of 40%
(or, if higher, its then pro rata amount) of the total number of outstanding
shares of our common stock, as permitted by the standstill provisions of the
stockholders’ agreement).
Voting of
Shares. In any election of persons to serve on our board of
directors, Invus will be obligated to vote all of the shares of common stock
held by it and its affiliates in favor of the directors nominated by our board
of directors, as long as we have complied with our obligation with respect to
the designation of members of our board of directors described above and the
individuals designated by Invus for election to our board of directors have been
nominated, and, if applicable, are serving on our board of
directors. With respect to all other matters submitted to a vote of
the holders of our common stock, Invus will be obligated to vote any shares that
it acquired from third parties in excess of 40% (or, if higher, its then pro
rata amount) of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock, as
permitted by the standstill provisions of the stockholders’ agreement, in the
same proportion as all the votes cast by other holders of our common stock,
unless Invus and we (acting with the approval of the unaffiliated board) agree
otherwise. Invus may vote all other shares of our common stock held
by it in its sole discretion.
The
provisions of the stockholders’ agreement relating to voting will terminate on
the earliest to occur of (a) August 28, 2017, (b) the date on which
the percentage of all the outstanding shares of our common stock held by Invus
and its affiliates falls below 10%, (c) the date on which the percentage of
all outstanding shares of our common stock owned by Invus and its affiliates
exceeds 50% (not counting for such purpose any shares acquired by Invus from
third parties in excess of 40% (or, if higher, its then pro rata amount) of the
total number of outstanding shares of our common stock, as permitted by the
provisions of the stockholders’ agreement), and (d) the termination of the
standstill provisions in accordance with the stockholders’
agreement.
Minority
Protections. Invus is entitled to certain minority
protections, including consent rights over (a) the creation or issuance of any
new class or series of shares of our capital stock (or securities convertible
into or exercisable for shares of our capital stock) having rights, preferences
or privileges senior to or on parity with our common stock, (b) any amendment to
our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or amendment to the certificate of
incorporation or bylaws of any of our subsidiaries, in a manner adversely
affecting Invus’ rights under the securities purchase agreement and the related
agreements, (c) the repurchase, retirement, redemption or other acquisition of
our or our subsidiaries’ capital stock (or securities convertible into or
exercisable for shares of our or our subsidiaries’ capital stock), (d) any
increase in the size of our board of directors to more than 12 members and (e)
the adoption or proposed adoption of any stockholders’ rights plan, “poison
pill” or other similar plan or agreement, unless Invus is exempt from the
provisions of such plan or agreement.
The
provisions of the stockholders’ agreement relating to minority protections will
terminate on the earlier to occur of August 28, 2017 and the date on which Invus
and its affiliates hold less than 15% of the total number of outstanding shares
of our common stock.
Registration
Rights. Concurrently with the execution of the securities
purchase agreement, we entered into a registration rights agreement with Invus,
pursuant to which Invus has certain demand and piggyback registration rights
with respect to shares of our common stock acquired by Invus under the
securities purchase agreement.
Related
Party Transaction Policies
We have
adopted written policies and procedures for the review, approval and
ratification of interested transactions with related parties. Subject
to certain exceptions provided in Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, an “interested
transaction” means any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we are
a participant and the amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000
in any calendar year, and in which any related party has or will have a direct
or indirect material interest. A “related party” means (a) any
executive officer, director, nominee for election as a director or any person
beneficially owning five percent or more of our common stock and (b) any
immediate family member of such parties.
All
interested transactions are subject to the review and approval of our audit
committee and if advance audit committee approval is not feasible, then the
interested transaction will be considered for ratification at the audit
committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting. In determining whether
to approve or ratify any interested transaction, the audit committee will
consider, among other factors it may deem appropriate, whether the interested
transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an
unaffiliated third party under similar circumstances and the extent of the
related party’s interest in the transaction. No director participates
in any discussion or approval of an interested transaction for which he or she
is a related party. On at least an annual basis, the audit committee
reviews and assesses any ongoing interested transactions to ensure that the
transaction remains appropriate.
EXECUTIVE
AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
We have
developed a compensation policy that is designed to attract and retain key
executives responsible for our success and motivate management to enhance
long-term stockholder value. The annual compensation package for
executive and other officers typically consists primarily of three
elements:
|
·
|
a
base salary, which reflects the responsibilities relating to the position
and individual performance;
|
|
·
|
variable
annual cash bonus awards tied to the achievement of specified corporate
and individual goals and milestones, relative to pre-established bonus
targets expressed as a percentage of base salary;
and
|
|
·
|
long-term
stock-based incentive awards, historically in the form of stock
options.
|
We
generally seek to set targeted total cash compensation, consisting of base
salaries and annual cash bonus award targets, and total direct compensation,
consisting of targeted total cash compensation and long-term stock-based
incentive awards, at or near the median of a peer group of biopharmaceutical
companies if such compensation level is justified by company performance,
individual performance and prevailing financial conditions.
In
determining peer group compensation, we use available survey data from several
sources, relying principally on data from a comprehensive survey of the
compensation practices of several hundred companies in the biopharmaceutical
industry. We expand on this survey data with reviews of the
publicly-disclosed compensation practices of a group of biopharmaceutical
companies selected for comparison purposes based on one or more factors,
including number of employees, revenues, stage of development, and market
capitalization. In general, we have included companies in this
comparison group only if they have internal discovery capabilities and
efforts. In 2006, this group of companies consisted of Curagen
Corporation, deCODE genetics, Inc., Exelixis, Inc., Encysive Pharmaceuticals
Inc., Human Genome Sciences, Inc., Incyte Corporation, Medarex, Inc., Millennium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Myriad Genetics, Inc., PDL Biopharma, Inc., Vertex
Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and ZymoGenetics, Inc. In 2007, this
group of companies consisted of Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Array Biopharma
Inc., Curagen, deCODE, Exelixis, Human Genome Sciences, Incyte, Medarex,
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Vertex and ZymoGenetics. In 2008, this
group of companies consisted of Affymax, Inc., Arena, Array, Exelixis, Human
Genome Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medarex, Rigel
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ZymoGenetics. The peer group of
biopharmaceutical companies for which we obtained survey data and the additional
groups of companies listed above do not necessarily coincide with the companies
comprising the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. In general, the
compensation committee has employed the 50th and
60th
percentile of the broad survey data, along with medians and averages reported by
the selected group of biopharmaceutical companies, in evaluating base salaries
and bonus targets. Although we acknowledge the inherent limitations
in comparing our compensation practices with the compensation practices of these
companies, we believe that these comparisons are useful and important points of
reference in making compensation determinations.
All
compensation decisions are made by our compensation committee pursuant to
authority delegated by our board of directors. In making compensation
determinations and reviewing comparative data, the compensation committee
reviews total direct compensation in its totality, assigning dollar values to
each of the elements of such compensation, including base salary, annual cash
bonus award targets and long-term stock-based incentive awards. The
committee generally allocates a greater percentage of total direct compensation
to long-term stock-based incentive awards in acknowledgment of the unique
challenges present in the biopharmaceutical industry and in order to reinforce
the alignment of interests between our executive and other officers and our
stockholders.
In
determining the level and composition of compensation of each of our executive
and other officers, we take into account various qualitative and quantitative
indicators of corporate and individual performance. Among the
challenges faced by us and other companies in the biopharmaceutical industry is
the unique combination of the relatively long time period typically necessary to
discover, develop and commercialize drugs and the historically low success rate
in doing so. As a result, in evaluating the performance of
management, the compensation committee takes into consideration such factors as
the progress exhibited by our drug candidates in human clinical trials, the
number and quality of drug candidates in clinical trials, the pipeline of
potential drug candidates for which the required regulatory filings for the
initiation of clinical trials may be filed, the value and scope of strategic
collaborations and alliances with leading pharmaceutical companies, and the
ability to otherwise finance our operations from external sources. In
addition, the compensation committee recognizes performance and achievements
that are more difficult to quantify, such as the successful supervision of major
corporate projects and demonstrated leadership ability.
The
compensation committee may also retain compensation consultants or other
advisors when it deems appropriate to assist in its evaluation of executive
compensation. The compensation committee did not engage any
consultants with respect to 2006, 2007 or 2008 compensation
matters.
Company
Performance Criteria
We
generally make executive compensation determinations in February of each year,
taking into account company and individual performance over the preceding year,
as well as prevailing financial conditions. The compensation
committee typically meets to discuss considerations relating to executive
compensation determinations several times in advance of the meeting in which
such determinations are actually made.
In
February 2007, the compensation committee made determinations regarding 2006
bonus awards and annual stock option grants and 2007 base salaries and bonus
targets, taking into account the following factors in its evaluation of
corporate performance in 2006:
|
·
|
the
submission of the required regulatory filings and initiation of Phase 1
clinical trials for our most advanced drug candidate,
LX6171;
|
|
·
|
the
submission of the required regulatory filings for the initiation of
clinical trials for another drug candidate,
LX1031;
|
|
·
|
our
progress relative to our objectives in advancing our other drug discovery
and development programs;
|
|
·
|
our
performance relative to our objectives for our net use of cash in
operations and for capital expenditures;
and
|
|
·
|
our
cash and investments at the end of
2006.
|
The
committee’s compensation determinations in February 2007 reflected its
assessment that we largely achieved our objectives relating to our drug
discovery and development programs, collectively representing what the committee
considered to be our most important objectives, fell short of our objectives
relating to net use of cash in operations and for capital expenditures, and
achieved our objectives relating to cash and investments at the end of the
year.
In
February 2008, the compensation committee made determinations regarding 2007
bonus awards and annual stock option grants and 2008 base salaries and bonus
targets, taking into account the following factors in its evaluation of
corporate performance in 2007:
|
·
|
the
completion of Phase 1 clinical trials and initiation of a Phase 2 clinical
trial of our most advanced drug candidate,
LX6171;
|
|
·
|
the
completion of a Phase 1a and initial Phase 1b clinical trial of another
drug candidate, LX1031, with an additional Phase 1b clinical trial to be
conducted in 2008;
|
|
·
|
the
submission of the required regulatory filings for the initiation of
clinical trials for two of our other drug candidates, LX2931 and LX1032,
with the initiation of a Phase 1 clinical trial of
LX2931;
|
|
·
|
our
progress relative to our objectives in advancing our other drug discovery
and development programs;
|
|
·
|
our
performance relative to our objectives for our net use of cash in
operations and for capital expenditures;
and
|
|
·
|
our
cash and investments relative to our objectives at the end of 2007,
reflecting the completion of our financing arrangement with Invus, L.P.
described under the heading “Transactions with Related Persons —
Arrangements with Invus” and the establishment of our financing
arrangement with Symphony Icon Holdings LLC and Symphony Icon, Inc. for
the clinical development of LX6171, LX1031 and
LX1032.
|
The
committee’s compensation determinations in February 2008 reflected its
assessment that we achieved our objectives relating to our drug discovery and
development programs, collectively representing what the committee considered to
be our most important objectives, fell short of our objectives relating to net
use of cash in operations and for capital expenditures and exceeded our
objectives relating to cash and investments at the end of the
year. Taking into account the balance of factors described above, it
was the committee’s assessment that our overall corporate objectives were
achieved.
In
February 2009, the compensation committee made determinations regarding 2008
bonus awards and annual stock option grants and 2009 base salaries and bonus
targets, taking into account the following factors in its evaluation of
corporate performance in 2008:
|
·
|
the
completion of a Phase 2a clinical trial of our LX6171 drug candidate in
subjects with age-associated memory impairment, but without demonstrating
significant effects on the parameters of attention or memory that were
evaluated;
|
|
·
|
the
completion of Phase 1 clinical trials of another drug candidate, LX1031,
and commencement of dosing in a Phase 2a clinical trial in patients with
irritable bowel syndrome;
|
|
·
|
the
completion of Phase 1a and Phase 1b clinical trials of a third drug
candidate, LX2931, with an additional clinical trial to be conducted in
early 2009 to evaluate its interaction with methotrexate in patients with
rheumatoid arthritis in preparation for a potential Phase 2a clinical
trial;
|
|
·
|
the
completion of Phase 1a and Phase 1b clinical trials of a fourth drug
candidate, LX1032, with a Phase 2 clinical trial to be commenced in
2009 in patients with carcinoid
syndrome;
|
|
·
|
the
submission of an investigational new drug application for one of our other
drug candidates, LX4211, with the initiation of a Phase 1 clinical trial
in early 2009;
|
|
·
|
our
progress relative to our objectives in advancing our other drug discovery
and development programs; and
|
|
·
|
our
performance relative to our objectives for our net use of cash in
operations, capital expenditures and year-end cash and
investments.
|
The
committee’s compensation determinations in February 2009 reflected its
assessment that we partially achieved our objectives relating to our drug
discovery and development programs, collectively representing what the committee
considered to be our most important objectives, and achieved our objectives
relating to net use of cash in operations, capital expenditures and year-end
cash and investments. Taking into account the balance of factors
described above, it was the committee’s assessment that our overall corporate
objectives were partially achieved.
Base
Salary
Base
salary of executive and other officers is established through negotiation
between the company and the officer at the time he or she is hired, and then
subsequently adjusted when the officer’s base compensation is subject to review
or reconsideration. While we have entered into employment agreements
with certain of our executive officers, these agreements provide that base
salaries after the initial year will be reviewed and determined by the
compensation committee. When establishing base salary levels for
executive and other officers, the compensation committee, in accordance with its
general compensation policy, considers numerous factors, including the
responsibilities relating to the position, the qualifications of the executive
and the relevant experience the individual brings to the company, strategic
goals for which the executive has responsibility, and compensation levels of
companies at a comparable stage of development who compete with us for business,
scientific and executive talents. When considering increases to base
salary levels for officers, which typically occurs each February, we consider
individual and company performance in addition to the foregoing factors. No
pre-determined weights are given to any one of these factors.
We left
2006 base salaries of each of our executive officers unchanged from the rates
established in February 2005. We increased the base salaries of each
of our executive officers in February 2007 and 2008. We left 2009
base salaries of each of our executive officers unchanged from the rates
established in February 2008. The base salaries of our executive
officers are generally competitive with those paid by our peer group companies,
with most falling near the median for such peer group companies. In
establishing base salaries for 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, we considered the
competitiveness of our cash compensation arrangements for executive officers and
our cash position and needs for the applicable year.
Incentive
Compensation
Cash
Bonus Awards
In
addition to base salary, we may award variable annual cash bonus awards to
executive and other officers depending on the extent to which certain predefined
corporate and personal performance goals are achieved. These
performance goals include those discussed generally above, as well as strategic
and operational goals for the company as a whole. We typically
consider the award of cash bonuses each February relating to performance for the
preceding year. For each of our officers, the compensation committee
establishes a bonus target, expressed as a percentage of base salary, which is
used to determine the cash bonus amount, assuming that corporate and individual
goals are fully achieved. The compensation committee retains broad
discretion over the amount and payment of such awards.
In
determining the cash bonus awards paid in February 2007 with respect to 2006
performance, the compensation committee included the relevant factors described
above under “— Company Performance Criteria” in its evaluation of corporate
performance. After taking into account these factors, the
compensation committee determined that our objectives for the year had been
largely but not fully achieved, and awarded bonuses for 2006 performance to
executive officers other than our president and chief executive officer in
amounts reflecting such partial achievement. In determining the bonus
payable to Dr. Sands, our president and chief executive officer, the
compensation committee also took into account the competitiveness of his overall
level of compensation and his contributions to the company, and awarded a bonus
for 2006 performance above his bonus target for the year.
In
determining the cash bonus awards paid in February 2008 with respect to 2007
performance, the compensation committee included the relevant factors described
above under “— Company Performance Criteria” in its evaluation of corporate
performance. After taking into account these factors, the
compensation committee determined that our objectives for the year had been
achieved, and awarded a bonus for 2007 performance to Dr. Sands, our president
and chief executive officer, in an amount reflecting such
achievement. In determining the bonus payable to executive officers
other than Dr. Sands, the compensation committee also took into account their
contributions to the company, and awarded bonuses for 2007 performance above
their bonus targets for the year.
The
compensation committee determined not to award cash bonuses to our officers in
February 2009 with respect to 2008 performance in light of prevailing economic
conditions, the state of the financial markets, and a desire to conserve the
company’s cash and investment resources. Instead, the compensation
committee approved the grant to our officers of restricted stock bonus awards
under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, as described below under “— Stock-Based
Awards.”
Stock-Based
Awards
All of
our employees, including our executive and other officers, are eligible to
receive long-term stock-based incentive awards under our 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan as a means of providing such individuals with a continuing proprietary
interest in our success. These grants are typically awarded each
February and align the interests of our employees and our stockholders by
providing significant incentives for our employees to achieve and maintain high
levels of performance. Our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan enhances our
ability to attract and retain the services of qualified individuals. Factors
considered in determining whether and in what amounts such awards are granted to
an officer include the executive’s position, his or her performance and
responsibilities, the amount of stock options currently held by the officer, the
vesting schedules of any such options and the officer’s other
compensation. While we do not adhere to any firmly established
formulas or schedules for the issuance of awards such as options or restricted
stock, we take into account, in making award decisions, the total direct
compensation objectives described above. In addition, we will
generally tailor the terms of any such grant to achieve its goal as a long-term
incentive award by providing for a vesting schedule encompassing several
years.
In
February 2007, 2008 and 2009, the compensation committee approved annual stock
option grants to executive officers and other employees who satisfied
eligibility requirements, including time of service. In making such
grants, the compensation committee considered corporate and individual
performance in the prior year, total direct compensation objectives for
individual officers, and information regarding stock option grants made by other
companies in the biotechnology industry.
As
described above under “— Cash Bonus Awards,” the compensation committee
determined not to award cash bonuses to our officers in February 2009 with
respect to 2008 performance in light of prevailing economic conditions, the
state of the financial markets, and a desire to conserve the company’s cash and
investment resources. Instead, the compensation committee approved
the grant to our officers of restricted stock bonus awards under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan. The amounts of such awards were determined by the
compensation committee based on its assessment of the achievement of the
corporate and individual goals originally established for purposes of
determining 2008 cash bonuses, including the relevant factors described above
under “— Company Performance Criteria” in its evaluation of corporate
performance. The awarded amounts reflected the compensation
committee’s determination that our corporate objectives for the year had been
partially achieved. Taking into account both the background and
nature of the awards and a desire to achieve retention and incentive objectives,
the shares subject to the awards were made subject to vesting in two
installments over the one-year period following the date of grant.
Summary
Compensation Table for 2008
The
following table presents summary information regarding the compensation of each
of Arthur T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D., our principal executive officer, James F.
Tessmer, our principal financial officer, and our three other most highly
compensated executive officers for the year ended December 31,
2008. The table also includes summary information regarding the
compensation of Julia P. Gregory, our principal financial officer until the
termination of her employment on April 29, 2008. We have entered into
employment agreements with certain of the named executive officers and a
consulting agreement with Ms. Gregory, the material terms of which are described
below.
Based on
the summary compensation information provided below, “Salary” accounted for
approximately 36%, 37% and 41% of the total compensation paid to the named
executive officers in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and “Bonus” accounted
for approximately 14%, 16% and 0% of the total compensation paid to the named
executive officers for 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Name
and Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock Awards (1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards (2)
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation (3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Arthur
T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
557,500 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
70,555 |
|
|
$ |
900,284 |
|
|
$ |
6,470 |
|
|
$ |
1,534,809 |
|
President,
Chief Executive
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
522,875 |
|
|
$ |
265,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
908,842 |
|
|
$ |
6,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,703,056 |
|
Officer
and Director
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
473,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
792,267 |
|
|
$ |
373,466 |
(4)
|
|
$ |
1,938,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan
J. Main, Ph.D.
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
338,750 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
30,569 |
|
|
$ |
244,943 |
|
|
$ |
6,236 |
|
|
$ |
620,498 |
|
Executive
Vice President of
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
323,375 |
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
244,633 |
|
|
$ |
6,090 |
|
|
$ |
704,098 |
|
Pharmaceutical
Research
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
312,000 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
220,103 |
|
|
$ |
5,949 |
|
|
$ |
628,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
L. Wade, J.D.
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
338,333 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
30,569 |
|
|
$ |
315,287 |
|
|
$ |
6,235 |
|
|
$ |
690,424 |
|
Executive
Vice President and
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
316,500 |
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
326,967 |
|
|
$ |
6,079 |
|
|
$ |
779,546 |
|
General
Counsel
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
292,000 |
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
290,675 |
|
|
$ |
5,920 |
|
|
$ |
668,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
P. Zambrowicz, Ph.D.
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
363,333 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
37,666 |
|
|
$ |
479,148 |
|
|
$ |
6,271 |
|
|
$ |
886,418 |
|
Executive
Vice President and
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
340,875 |
|
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
449,001 |
|
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
$ |
935,990 |
|
Chief
Scientific Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
312,000 |
|
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
362,435 |
|
|
$ |
5,949 |
|
|
$ |
800,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
F. Tessmer
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
224,583 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
16,445 |
|
|
$ |
43,730 |
|
|
$ |
6,073 |
|
|
$ |
290,831 |
|
Vice
President, Finance and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julia
P. Gregory
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
115,417 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
283,500 |
|
|
$ |
350,461 |
(5)
|
|
$ |
749,378 |
|
Former
Executive Vice President
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
334,250 |
|
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
344,121 |
|
|
$ |
6,106 |
|
|
$ |
804,477 |
|
and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
329,000 |
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
332,168 |
|
|
$ |
5,974 |
|
|
$ |
747,142 |
|
(1)
|
Reflects
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes
for the year ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with FAS 123(R) (but
disregarding forfeiture estimates related to service-based vesting
conditions) and, accordingly, includes amounts from restricted stock bonus
awards granted in 2009, at our compensation committee’s election, in lieu
of 2008 cash bonuses.
|
(2)
|
Reflects
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 in accordance with
FAS 123(R) (but disregarding forfeiture estimates related to service-based
vesting conditions) and, accordingly, includes amounts from options
granted prior to 2006. See the information appearing under the
heading entitled “Stock-Based Compensation” in footnote 2 to our
consolidated financial statements included as part of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for certain assumptions
made in the valuation of options granted in the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006. See the information appearing under the
heading entitled “Stock-Based Compensation” in footnote 12 to our
consolidated financial statements included as part of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for certain assumptions
made in the valuation of options granted in the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003.
|
(3)
|
Includes
the following amounts in respect of company matching contributions under
our 401(k) plan and company-paid premiums for group term life
insurance. The company-paid life insurance premiums reflect
payments for group term life policies maintained for the benefit of all
employees.
|
|
Year
|
|
Company
401(k)
Matching
Contribution
|
|
|
Company-Paid
Group
Term
Life
Insurance Premiums
|
|
Arthur
T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.
|
2008
|
|
$ |
5,750 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
5,625 |
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan
J. Main, Ph.D.
|
2008
|
|
$ |
5,750 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
5,625 |
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
L. Wade, J.D.
|
2008
|
|
$ |
5,750 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
5,625 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
P. Zambrowicz, Ph.D.
|
2008
|
|
$ |
5,750 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
5,625 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
F. Tessmer
|
2008
|
|
$ |
5,750 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julia
P. Gregory
|
2008
|
|
$ |
5,388 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
5,625 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
(4)
|
Includes
reimbursable amounts foregone and payments made pursuant to a February
2006 agreement with Dr. Sands terminating our obligation under his
employment agreement to fund a split-dollar life insurance policy for his
benefit, pursuant to which we (a) agreed to forego our right under the
split-dollar agreement with the trust that owns the policy to the
reimbursement of $147,828 in premiums that we previously paid for such
policy prior to 2002 and (b) made a payment to Dr. Sands of $219,457
enabling him to pay, for his own account, the premiums under the policy
for 2004 and 2005 and the taxes associated with the termination of the
trust’s reimbursement obligations under the split-dollar
agreement. We entered into the employment agreement with Dr.
Sands in October 1999 and entered into the split-dollar agreement with the
trust that owns the policy in October
2000.
|
(5)
|
Includes
(a) $38,534 paid to Ms. Gregory as compensation for her unused paid time
off which had accrued at the time of her termination of employment, (b)
$25,000 paid to Ms. Gregory in consideration for her releasing us from any
potential claims relating to her termination of employment, (c) $233,333
in severance payments paid to Ms. Gregory pursuant to her employment
agreement and (d) $48,000 in consulting fees paid to Ms. Gregory pursuant
to her consulting agreement. The amount of the payment made to
Ms. Gregory as compensation for unused paid time off was calculated in
accordance with our policies applicable to all
employees.
|
Employment
Agreements
In
October 1999, we entered into an employment agreement with Arthur T. Sands,
M.D., Ph.D., our president and chief executive officer, which was subsequently
restated in February 2006. Under the agreement, Dr. Sands receives a base
salary, currently $560,000 a year, subject to adjustment, with an annual
discretionary bonus based upon specific objectives to be determined by the
compensation committee. The employment agreement is at-will and contains a
non-competition agreement. The agreement also provides for certain severance
payments upon the termination of Dr. Sands’ employment, as described below under
the heading “Executive and Director Compensation — Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change in Control.”
In July
2001, we entered into an employment agreement with Alan J. Main, Ph.D., then our
senior vice president, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. In February 2007, Dr. Main was
named executive vice president of pharmaceutical research. Under the agreement,
Dr. Main receives a base salary, currently $340,000 a year, subject to
adjustment, with an annual discretionary bonus based upon specific objectives to
be determined by the compensation committee. The employment agreement is at-will
and contains a non-competition agreement. The agreement also provides for
certain severance payments upon the termination of Dr. Main’s employment, as
described below under the heading “Executive and Director Compensation —
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
In
December 1998, we entered into an employment agreement with Jeffrey L. Wade,
J.D. to serve as our senior vice president and chief financial officer starting
in January 1999. In February 2000, Mr. Wade was named executive vice president
and general counsel. Under the agreement, Mr. Wade receives a base salary,
currently $340,000 a year, subject to adjustment, with an annual discretionary
bonus based upon specific objectives to be determined by the compensation
committee. The employment agreement is at-will and contains a
non-competition agreement. The agreement also provides for certain severance
payments upon the termination of Mr. Wade’s employment, as described below under
the heading “Executive and Director Compensation — Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change in Control.”
In
February 2000, we entered into an employment agreement with Brian P. Zambrowicz,
Ph.D., then our senior vice president of genomics. Dr. Zambrowicz was named
executive vice president of research in August 2002 and executive vice president
and chief scientific officer in February 2007. Under the agreement,
Dr. Zambrowicz receives a base salary, currently $365,000 a year, subject to
adjustment, with an annual discretionary bonus based upon specific objectives to
be determined by the compensation committee. The employment agreement
is at-will and contains a non-competition agreement. The agreement also provides
for certain severance payments upon the termination of Dr. Zambrowicz’s
employment, as described below under the heading “Executive and Director
Compensation — Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in
Control.”
In
February 2000, we entered into an employment agreement with Julia P. Gregory to
serve as our executive vice president and chief financial officer starting in
February 2000. Under the agreement, Ms. Gregory received a base
salary with an annual discretionary bonus based upon specific objectives to be
determined by the compensation committee. The employment agreement
was at-will and contained a non-competition agreement. The agreement
also contained certain severance provisions which were triggered by the
termination of Ms. Gregory’s employment in April 2008. Under the
agreement, we are obligated to pay Ms. Gregory her most recent salary of
$350,000 per year for twelve months following the termination of her employment
pursuant to our normal payroll procedures, plus an additional single sum payment
of $61,250, an amount equal to 50% of her target bonus for 2008.
Consulting
Agreements
In April
2008, we entered into a consulting agreement with Ms. Gregory pursuant to which
we agreed to pay Ms. Gregory $6,000 per month for up to two days of her
consulting services per month. The payments under the consulting
agreement are in addition to and separate from the severance payments to which
Ms. Gregory is entitled under her employment agreement. The
consulting agreement has a term of one year, subject to earlier termination in
certain circumstances.
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards in 2008
The
following table presents each grant of stock options in 2008 to the individuals
named in the summary compensation table.
Name |
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
of
Option Awards
|
|
|
Grant
Date Fair Value of Options
|
|
Arthur T.
Sands, M.D., Ph.D. |
|
2/2/2008
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
872,678 |
|
Alan J. Main,
Ph.D. |
|
2/7/2008
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
303,540 |
|
Jeffrey L.
Wade, J.D. |
|
2/7/2008
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
303,540 |
|
Brian P.
Zambrowicz, Ph.D. |
|
2/7/2008
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
569,138 |
|
James F.
Tessmer |
|
2/7/2008
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
60,708 |
|
Julia P.
Gregory |
|
2/7/2008
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
227,655 |
|
Each of
the options in the foregoing table was granted under our 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan and expires on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. Each
option vests with respect to 25% of the shares underlying the option on the
first anniversary of the grant date and 1/48th per
month for each month of service thereafter. Each option becomes fully
vested with respect to all remaining unvested shares upon a change in control of
our company. In accordance with the process for determination of fair
market value under the plan, the exercise price for each option is equal to the
closing price of our common stock, as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market, on the
last trading day prior to the grant date. The exercise price for each
option may be paid in cash or in shares of our common stock valued at fair
market value on the exercise date or through a cashless exercise procedure
involving a same-day sale of the purchased shares.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2008
The
following table presents information about unexercised options that were held by
each of the individuals listed in the summary compensation table as of
December 31, 2008.