UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

ý

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

o

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 


Notice of
Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
and Proxy
Statement
May 14, 2014

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
Naples, FL 34108

April [•], 2014

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend our annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 10:30 a.m. (Naples time) on Wednesday, May 14, 2014, at The Ritz Carlton, Naples, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Naples, Florida 34108.

Your vote is important. Please vote as promptly as possible. Whether you plan to attend the annual meeting or not, you may vote by following the instructions set forth in the this proxy statement or as set forth in the proxy card. If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person.

Registration and seating will begin at 10:00 a.m. (Naples time). In order to be admitted to the annual meeting, a stockholder must present proof of stock ownership as of the close of business on the record date, March 21, 2014, which can be a proxy card or a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of March 21, 2014. Stockholders will be asked to sign an admittance card and must also present a form of photo identification such as a driver's license. Cameras and recording devices will not be permitted at the annual meeting.

    Sincerely,

 

 


GRAPHIC

 

 

Mark P. Frissora
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

GRAPHIC



NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Time and Date:

  10:30 a.m. (Naples time), Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Place:

 

The Ritz Carlton, Naples, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Naples, Florida 34108

Proposals:

 

1.

 

Election of the three nominees identified in the accompanying proxy statement to serve as directors for three-year terms;

 

2.

 

Approval, by a non-binding advisory vote, of the named executive officers' compensation;

 

3.

 

Approval of an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to provide for the annual election of directors;

 

4.

 

Approval of a potential amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect a reverse stock split and authorize our board of directors to select the ratio of the reverse stock split as set forth in the amendment;

 

5.

 

Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2014; and

 

6.

 

Transaction of any other business that may properly be brought before the annual meeting.


The Board of Directors of the Corporation recommends a vote FOR each of Proposals 1-5.

Who Can Vote:   Only holders of record of the Corporation's common shares at the close of business on March 21, 2014 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. You may vote with respect to the matters described in the proxy statement by following the instructions set forth in this proxy statement or as set forth in the proxy card.

Date of Mailing:

 

This proxy statement and accompanying materials were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April [•], 2014, and we expect to first send the proxy statement and annual report to stockholders on April [•], 2014.


 

 


GRAPHIC

J. Jeffrey Zimmerman
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Naples, Florida
April [•], 2014
   

GRAPHIC



Table of Contents


Section/Proposal
  Page

Proxy Procedures, Corporate Governance and Information About Our Directors

   

Important Information about Annual Meeting and Proxy Procedures

  1

Corporate Governance and General Information Concerning the Board and its Committees

  4

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

  12

Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Compensation Tables and Compensation Committee Report

 
 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  19

Executive Summary: Our Performance, Our Pay in 2013

  19

Compensation Committee Report

  43

2013 Summary Compensation Table

  44

Annual Meeting Proposals: Say on Pay, Board Declassification, Potential Reverse Stock Split and Auditor Approval

 
 

Proposal 2: Approval by a Non-Binding Advisory Vote, of the Named Executive Officers' Compensation

  62

Proposal 3: Approval of an Amendment to Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Provide for the Annual Election of Directors

  63

Proposal 4: Approval of a Potential Amendment to Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Effect a Reverse Stock Split and Authorize to Our Board of Directors to Select the Ratio of the Reverse Stock Split as Set Forth in the Amendment

  64

Proposal 5: Ratification of the Selection of the Corporation's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  68

Auditor Information

 
 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

  69

Audit Committee Report

  70

Other Matters

 
 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Officers

  71

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

  73

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

  73

Other Business

  75

Table of Contents


PROXY PROCEDURES AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING



IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANNUAL
MEETING AND PROXY PROCEDURES

The Board of Directors of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. is soliciting proxies to be used at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday, May 14, 2014, beginning at 10:30 a.m. (Naples time) at The Ritz Carlton, Naples, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Naples, Florida 34108. This proxy statement and accompanying materials were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on April [•], 2014, and we expect to first send the proxy statement and annual report to stockholders on April [•], 2014.

Unless the context otherwise requires, in this proxy statement (i) the "Corporation" means Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., (ii) "Hertz" means The Hertz Corporation, our primary operating company and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Hertz Investors, Inc., which is wholly owned by the Corporation, (iii) "we," "us" and "our" mean the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, (iv) "our Board" or "the Board" means the Board of Directors of the Corporation and (v) "our common stock" means the common stock of the Corporation.

Purpose of the Annual Meeting

At the annual meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters set forth below, including:

The Corporation's senior management will also present information about the Corporation's performance during 2013 and will answer questions from stockholders.

Stockholders Entitled to Vote at the Annual Meeting

Our Board has established the record date for the annual meeting as March 21, 2014. Only holders of record of the Corporation's common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On March 21, 2014, the Corporation had 447,693,207 shares of common stock outstanding.

Voting Procedures

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote as follows:

Voting by Internet: Follow the instructions on www.investorvote.com/HTZ

Voting by Telephone: Call 1-800-652-8683 and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Voting by Mail: Complete, sign and date the proxy card included in the printed proxy materials

Voting in Person: See the procedures for voting in person below

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    1


Table of Contents


PROXY PROCEDURES AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING


Procedures for Attending and Voting at the Annual Meeting

For those stockholders who wish to attend the annual meeting, you will need the following:

Admission ticket in your proxy materials

Photo Identification

Proof of stock ownership

Please note that no cameras or recording devices are allowed at the annual meeting. Seating for the annual meeting starts at 10:00 a.m. (Naples time) and the annual meeting will start at 10:30 a.m. (Naples time).

Voting Options; Quorum

The Board recommends a vote "For" each proposal presented below. Below is a summary of the vote required for adoption of each proposal and the respective effect of abstentions and broker non-votes. For more detailed information, see each respective proposal.

                     

 

 



Proposal



 



Vote Required for Adoption



 


Effect of
Abstentions



 

Effect of
Broker
Non-Votes



 

&zwsp;
    
&zwsp;   Election of Directors   Majority of shares cast   No effect   No effect   &zwsp;

 

 

Advisory vote on executive compensation

 

Majority of shares present

 

Vote "Against"

 

No effect

 

 

 

 

Amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to provide for the annual election of directors

 

Two-thirds of outstanding shares

 

Vote "Against"

 

Vote "Against"

 

&zwsp;

 

 

Potential amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect a reverse stock split

 

Majority of outstanding shares

 

Vote "Against"

 

Vote "Against"

 

 

 

 

Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Majority of shares present

 

Vote "Against"

 

No effect

 

&zwsp;
                     

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee, such as a broker holding shares in "street name" for a beneficial owner, does not vote on a proposal because that nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to a proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

If you are a holder of shares held in street name, and you would like to instruct your broker how to vote your shares, you should follow the directions provided by your broker. Under New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules, your broker is permitted to vote on proposal 5 even if it does not receive instructions from you. However, under NYSE rules, your broker does not have discretion to vote on any other proposal if it does not receive instructions from you.

Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote and stockholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes for the election of directors or any other matter. Unless a stockholder gives instructions to the contrary, proxies will be voted in accordance with the Board's recommendations.

Revocation of Proxies

Even if you voted by telephone or on the Internet, or if you requested paper proxy materials and signed

GRAPHIC

2    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


PROXY PROCEDURES AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING


the proxy card, you may revoke your proxy before it is voted at the annual meeting by delivering a signed revocation letter to J. Jeffrey Zimmerman, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. You may also revoke your proxy by submitting a new proxy, dated later than your first proxy, or by a later-dated vote by telephone or on the Internet. If you are attending in person and have previously mailed your proxy card, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person at the annual meeting. Your attendance at the annual meeting will not by itself revoke your proxy. If you are a holder of shares held in street name by your broker and you have previously directed your broker to vote your shares, you should instruct your broker to change or revoke your vote if you wish to do so. If you are a holder of shares held in street name by your broker and wish to cast your vote in person at the annual meeting, you should obtain a proxy to vote your shares from your broker.

Solicitation of Proxies

Proxies may be solicited on behalf of our Board by mail or telephone, on the Internet or in person, and Hertz will pay the solicitation costs on behalf of the Corporation. Georgeson Inc. has been retained by Hertz to facilitate the distribution of proxy materials at a fee of approximately $[•] plus distribution costs and other costs and expenses.

Additional Information

The Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 is filed with the SEC and may also be obtained via a link posted on the "Investor Relations" portion of our website, www.hertz.com. Copies of the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, or any exhibits thereto, will be sent within a reasonable time without charge upon written request to Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., 999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Naples, Florida, 34108 Attention: Corporate Secretary.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    3


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING
THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES

Corporate Governance

Our business is managed under the direction of our Board. Our Board is committed to good corporate governance and promoting the long-term interests of our stockholders by adopting structures, policies and practices which we believe promote responsible oversight of management.

Board Independence

Our Board has determined that all of our directors, other than Mr. Frissora, are "independent" as defined in the federal securities laws and applicable NYSE rules for service on our Board. The standards for determining director independence are specified in Annex A to our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

In recommending to the Board that each of the independent directors be classified as independent, the Nominating and Governance Committee also considered whether there were any facts or circumstances that might impair the independence of each of those directors. In particular, the Nominating and Governance Committee considered that the Corporation in the ordinary course of business provides products and services to and purchases products and services from companies at which some of our directors serve. In each case: (i) the relevant products and services were provided on terms and conditions determined on an arms-length basis and consistent with those provided by or to similarly situated customers and suppliers; (ii) the relevant director did not initiate or negotiate the relevant transaction, each of which was in the ordinary course of business of both companies; and (iii) the aggregate amounts of such purchases and sales were less than 2% of the consolidated gross revenues of each of the Corporation and the other company in each of the years 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Board Meetings and Annual Meeting Attendance

Our Board held 8 meetings in 2013. Each of our directors attended 75% or more of the total number of meetings of our Board held during the period in which he or she was a director and the total number of meetings held by all Board committees on which he or she served. We do not have a policy with regard to directors' attendance at our annual meeting. All of our directors, except for one former director, attended the 2013 annual meeting.

Board Committees

Our Board has four standing committees—the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Executive and Finance Committee (the "Finance Committee"). In 2013, we revised our committee structure by assigning (i) the nominating and governance functions held by our former Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee ("CN&G Committee") to the Nominating and Governance Committee and (ii) the compensation functions held by our former CN&G Committee to the Compensation Committee. We revised our committee structure as a result of the sale of our common stock by certain investment funds associated with Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, The Carlyle Group and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (the "Sponsors"), our Board's desire for specialized compensation and governance oversight functions and to align our governance structure with similar companies of our size and complexity. In addition to the creation of the separate a separate Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, our Board assigned certain financial oversight matters to our Finance Committee.

GRAPHIC

4    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Each committee has a written charter and each charter is available without charge on the "Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Overview" portion of our website, www.hertz.com. Each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee meets the independence and eligibility standards necessary for service on such committee pursuant to relevant securities laws, NYSE rules and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Board has designated each of the four members of our Audit Committee "audit committee financial experts" and each has been determined to be "financially literate" under NYSE rules.

Membership, Meetings and Roles and Responsibilities of the Board Committees

Audit Committee

Members 

 Roles and Responsibilities of the Audit Committee 
Berquist (Chair)
Durham
Koehler
Wolf


Number of 2013
Meetings

                                    
8









Oversees our accounting, financial and external reporting policies and practices as well as the integrity of our financial statements.

Monitors the independence, qualifications and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Oversees the performance of our internal audit function, the management information system and operational policies and practices that affect our internal controls.

Monitors our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Reviews our guidelines and policies and the commitment of internal audit resources, in each case as they relate to risk management and the preparation of our Audit Committee's report included in our proxy statements.

Compensation Committee

Members 

 Roles and Responsibilities of the Compensation Committee 
Beracha (Chair)
Berquist
Everson
Fayne Levinson
Tamke


Number of 2013
Meetings

                                    
5










Oversees our compensation and benefit policies generally.

Evaluates the performance of our CEO as related to all elements of compensation, as well as the performance of our senior executives.

Approves and recommends to our Board all compensation plans for our senior executives.

Approves the short-term compensation and grants to our senior executives under our incentive plans (both subject, in the case of our CEO, if so directed by the Board, to the final approval of a majority of independent directors of our Board).

Prepares reports on executive compensation required for inclusion in our proxy statements.

Reviews our management succession plan.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    5


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Nominating and Governance Committee

Members 

 Roles and Responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee 
Fayne Levinson
(Chair)
Durham
Kelly-Ennis
Koehler


Number of 2013
Meetings

                                    
5










Assists our Board in determining the skills, qualities and eligibility of individuals recommended for membership on our Board.

Reviews the composition of our Board and its committees to determine whether it may be appropriate to add or remove individuals.

Reviews and evaluates directors for re-nomination and re-appointment to committees.

Reviews and assesses the adequacy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Standards of Business Conduct and Directors' Code of Conduct.

Reviews and recommends to the Board the form and amount of compensation paid to directors.

Finance Committee

Members 

 Roles and Responsibilities of the Finance Committee 
Tamke (Chair)
Beracha
Frissora
Laffont
Wolf


Number of 2013
Meetings

                                    
2










Reviews and provides guidance to the Board and the Corporation's management concerning the Corporation's strategies, plans, policies and actions related to corporate finance.

Reviews the Corporation's acquisition and divesture strategy.

Oversees the financial aspects of the Corporation's insurance and risk management processes.

Subject to certain restrictions and subsequent reporting requirements to the entire Board, may exercise the powers of the Board to act on any matters.

Risk Oversight

Risk Oversight—Our Board and Committees

Our Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management. This approach is designed to improve our long-term performance and enhance stockholder value. A fundamental part of risk management is understanding the risks we face. Also important is management's role in addressing those risks and understanding what level of risk is appropriate for us. Our Board's involvement in setting our business strategy is a key part of its assessment of management's risk threshold and also helps determine an appropriate level of risk for us. The Board participates in an annual enterprise risk management assessment, which is led by the Corporation's Internal Audit Department. The Board assesses enterprise risk management with the input of the report of the Compensation Committee and advisors and members of management. To further assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities, we appointed Don Serup, our Internal Auditor, as our Chief Risk Officer and J. Jeffrey Zimmerman, our General Counsel, as our Chief Compliance Officer, to oversee risks related to our audit and legal functions, respectively, and provide information to management, the Board and our committees, as necessary.

Various committees of the Board also have responsibility for risk management. The Audit Committee focuses on financial risk, including internal controls, and annually receives a risk assessment and risk management report from the Corporation's Internal Audit Department. The Audit Committee also annually reviews with management our guidelines and policies and the commitment of internal audit resources as they relate to risk management. In addition, the Finance Committee reviews the financial aspects of the Corporation's insurance and risk management policies, and the use of derivatives to hedge risk. As described below, the Compensation Committee strives to create

GRAPHIC

6    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


compensation incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking behavior consistent with the Corporation's business strategy.

Risk Considerations in our Compensation Program

In 2013, our Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of the risk profile of the Corporation's compensation policies and practices. In connection with this review, the Compensation Committee engaged its independent consultant, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC ("Semler Brossy"), to assist it in analyzing the Corporation's compensation policies and practices and associated compensation risks. Semler Brossy, with the assistance of management, prepared a risk profile assessment of the Corporation's executive compensation policies and practices for executive officers. After its review of these assessments, the Compensation Committee presented the results to the Board in connection with the Board's annual enterprise risk assessment. In addition, the Corporation's management reviewed its compensation plans and practices in 2013 for all employees and presented the findings to the Compensation Committee. Based in part on such reports, the Compensation Committee determined that, for all employees, the Corporation's enterprise-wide compensation policies and practices, in conjunction with the Corporation's existing processes and controls, do not incentivize employees to take unnecessary risks, or pose a material risk to the Corporation, particularly in light of the following factors:

our use of different types of compensation programs, such as equity- and cash-based plans, that provide a balance of long- and short-term incentives;

our claw-back policies, which allow us in certain circumstances in the event of a financial restatement, to seek the recovery of annual incentive awards, long-term incentive awards, equity-based awards and other performance-based compensation awarded to many of our employees, including all of our senior executives;

our use of a variety of financial and strategic performance objectives to help ensure that the Corporation's overall business strategy is properly promoted;

our structuring of our compensation programs to include features such as caps on payments, exclusion of certain extraordinary items and institutional approval of amounts paid; and

our Corporation's various policies and procedures and Internal Audit Department, all of which provide checks and balances that help us monitor risk and identify when an individual is taking excessive or inappropriate risks.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to contact our directors may send written correspondence to: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., 999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Naples, Florida 34108 Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Communications addressed to directors that discuss business or other matters relevant to the activities of our Board will be preliminarily reviewed by the office of the Corporate Secretary and then distributed either in summary form or by delivering a copy of the communication to the director, or group of directors, to whom they are addressed. With respect to other correspondence received by the Corporation that is addressed to one or more directors, the Board has requested that the following items not be distributed to directors, because they generally fall into the purview of management, rather than the Board: junk mail and mass mailings, product and services complaints, product and services inquiries, résumés and other forms of job inquiries, solicitations for charitable donations, surveys, business solicitations and advertisements.

Director Nominations

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director nominees recommended by stockholders. To recommend a qualified person to serve on the Board, a stockholder should write to: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., 999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Naples, Florida 34108, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The written recommendation must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary in accordance with the Corporation's By-laws. This generally means the recommendation must be delivered not fewer

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    7


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting. The written recommendation must contain any applicable information set forth in the Corporation's By-laws and the Corporation may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as it may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider and evaluate persons recommended by stockholders in the same manner as it considers and evaluates other potential directors.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines containing standards for the Nominating and Governance Committee to determine director qualifications. The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Nominating and Governance Committee, in making recommendations about nominees to the Board, will:

review candidates' qualifications for membership on the Board based on the criteria approved by the Board and taking into account the enhanced independence, financial literacy and financial expertise standards that may be required under law or NYSE rules for committee membership purposes;

in evaluating current directors for re-nomination to the Board, assess the performance and independence of such directors; and

periodically review the composition of the Board in light of the current challenges and needs of the Board and the Corporation, and determine whether it may be appropriate to add or remove individuals after considering issues of judgment, diversity, age, skills, background, experience and independence.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines also contain policies regarding director independence, the mandatory retirement age of directors, simultaneous service on other boards and substantial changes relating to a director's affiliation or position of principal employment. Among other things, the guidelines establish responsibilities for meeting preparation and participation, the evaluation of our financial performance and strategic planning. Copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as our written Directors' Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Directors' Code of Conduct") applicable to our Board are available without charge on the "Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Overview" portion of our website, www.hertz.com.

Director Election Standards

The Corporation maintains a "majority" voting standard for uncontested elections. For a nominee to be elected to our Board, the nominee must receive more "for" than "against" votes. In accordance with our By-laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director has submitted, or upon his or her nomination will submit, a contingent resignation to the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The resignation will become effective only if the director fails to receive a sufficient number of votes for re-election and the Board accepts the resignation. In the event of a contested director election, a plurality standard will apply.

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Independent Lead Director Positions

As indicated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board believes it is important to retain its flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of the offices of the Chairman and CEO in a manner that is in the best interests of our Corporation. The Board believes that the decision as to who should serve as Chairman and CEO, and whether the offices should be combined or separate, should be assessed periodically by the Board, and that the Board should not be constrained by a rigid policy mandating the structure of such positions. The Board currently believes that the most effective and efficient leadership structure for our Corporation is for Mr. Frissora to serve as both Chairman and CEO. The Board believes that Mr. Frissora possesses the requisite experience, leadership capabilities and judgment to guide both our Corporation and the Board and to manage the particular opportunities and challenges that face us. In addition, the Board considers the terms of Mr. Frissora's employment agreement that provide he will serve as a member of the Board and as Chairman of the Board.

GRAPHIC

8    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


In order to help ensure strong corporate governance and oversight of our management, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board may select a non-management director to serve as a Lead Director. Mr. Tamke, an independent director with substantial business and oversight experience at several different public and private companies, was selected by our Board as our Independent Lead Director. The Independent Lead Director, in consultation with the Chairman and CEO, has responsibility for determining the length and frequency of Board meetings and setting the agenda for such meetings. The Independent Lead Director also sets the agenda for, and chairs, the Board's regularly-scheduled executive sessions in which management (other than Mr. Frissora) does not participate. In addition to the regularly-scheduled executive sessions of the Board that are held once per fiscal quarter without the presence of management (other than Mr. Frissora), our directors held 1 executive session in 2013 where only our independent directors attended. The Independent Lead Director presided to facilitate the discussion. Among other things, the Independent Lead Director coordinates meetings or other communications that a director wishes to initiate with management or employees. The Independent Lead Director, as a current member of the Compensation Committee, also significantly assists in setting our CEO's compensation by conferring with other independent members of the Board regarding our CEO's performance, providing perspective and facilitating our CEO's self-assessment.

Policy on Diversity

The Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nominating and Governance Committee charter specify that the Nominating and Governance Committee consider a number of factors, including diversity, when evaluating or conducting searches for directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee interprets diversity broadly to mean a variety of opinions, perspectives, personal and professional experiences and backgrounds, such as international and multicultural experience and understanding, as well as other differentiating characteristics, including race, ethnicity and gender.

Implementation and Assessment of Policies Regarding Director Attributes

The Nominating and Governance Committee, when making recommendations to the Board regarding director nominations, assesses the overall performance of the Board, and when re-nominating incumbent Board members or nominating new Board members, evaluates the potential candidate's ability to make a positive contribution to the Board's overall function. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers the actual performance of incumbent Board members over the previous year, as well as whether the Board has an appropriately diverse membership to support our role as one of the world's leading car and equipment rental companies. The particular experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of the potential candidate are assessed by the Nominating and Governance Committee to determine whether the potential candidate possesses the professional and personal experiences and expertise necessary to enhance the Board's mission. After conducting the foregoing analysis the Nominating and Governance Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding director nominees. In its annual assessment of director nominees, the Nominating and Governance Committee does not take a formulaic approach, but rather considers each prospective nominee's diversity in perspectives, personal and professional experiences and background and ability. In making director nominations, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account the overall diversity of the Board and evaluated the Board in light of, among other things, the attributes discussed in "—Policy on Diversity" mentioned above.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    9


Table of Contents


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


Director Compensation

The Board believes that a significant portion of non-employee director compensation should align director interests with the interests of our stockholders. As a result, our Board has approved the Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Directors Compensation Policy (the "Director Compensation Policy"), pursuant to which our non-employee directors were entitled to the following compensation:

                         

 

 

Board/Committee



Non-Employee Director Compensation



&zwsp;
    
    Board  

Annual Cash Retainer:

  $85,000  

Restricted Stock Unit Grant:

  $125,000    
    Audit  

Annual Chair Fee:

  $35,000  

Annual Member Fee:

  $17,500    
    Compensation  

Annual Chair Fee:

  $30,000  

Annual Member Fee:

  $15,000    
    Nominating  

Annual Chair Fee:

  $25,000  

Annual Member Fee:

  $12,500    
    Finance  

Annual Chair Fee:

  $17,500  

Annual Member Fee:

  $17,500    
                         
The Independent Lead Director receives a $100,000 annual cash retainer. The Corporation does not pay additional fees to directors for attending Board or committee meetings.

Cash fees for Board and committee service are payable quarterly in arrears. A director may elect, annually in advance, to receive shares of our common stock having the same fair market value in lieu of such cash fees. A director may elect to receive shares of phantom stock rather than receiving cash fees if the requirements for such deferral are satisfied under applicable tax law. Any director electing to receive phantom shares will receive actual shares of our common stock on the earlier of when the director no longer serves on our Board or a change in control of the Corporation. Any fee that a director elected to defer is credited to the director's stock account and is deemed to be invested in a number of phantom shares equal to the number of shares of common stock that would otherwise have been delivered.

The restricted stock units are granted to directors after our annual stockholder meeting and have an equivalent fair market value to such dollar amount on the date of grant. Provided the director is still serving on our Board, these restricted stock units vest on the business day immediately preceding the next annual meeting of stockholders.

We also reimburse our directors for reasonable and necessary expenses they incur in performing their duties as directors, and our directors are entitled to free worldwide car rentals. Any non-employee director who serves for at least five years will, after retirement from such service as a director, be eligible for Hertz #1 Club Platinum Card status and free worldwide car rentals up to a maximum of 90 days each year for fifteen years after his or her retirement.

GRAPHIC

10    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


For services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2013, our non-employee directors received the following compensation:


2013 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

                           

 

Name


 




Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash(1)
($)





 


Stock
Awards(2)(3)
($)



 

Total
($)


 
    

 

 

Barry H. Beracha

    130,625     124,988     255,613    

&zwsp;  

Brian Bernasek(4)

    68,125     124,988     193,113   &zwsp;

 

 

Carl T. Berquist(4)

    136,250     124,988     261,238    

&zwsp;  

 

Michael J. Durham

    108,750     124,988     233,738   &zwsp;

 

 

Carolyn N. Everson(4)

    50,000     124,988     174,988    

&zwsp;  

 

Debra J. Kelly-Ennis(4)

    48,750     124,988     173,738   &zwsp;

 

 

Michael F. Koehler

    108,750     124,988     233,738    

&zwsp;  

 

Philippe P. Laffont(4)

        61,634     61,634   &zwsp;

 

 

Linda Fayne Levinson

    113,750     124,988     238,738    

&zwsp;  

 

Angel Morales(5)

    42,500         42,500   &zwsp;

 

 

George W. Tamke(5)

    201,250     124,988     326,238    

&zwsp;  

 

David Wasserman(5)

    68,125     124,988     193,113   &zwsp;

 

 

Henry C. Wolf

    111,250     124,988     236,238    
                           

(1)
All compensation is for services rendered as directors, including annual retainer fees and committee and chair fees as set forth above. For those directors who joined our Board or resigned from our Board in 2013, the cash retainer fees were pro-rated for their service.

(2)
The value disclosed is the aggregate grant date fair value of 4,950 restricted stock units granted to each director, except for Mr. Laffont, based on a grant date of May 15, 2013 and computed pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. Mr. Laffont was granted 2,581 restricted stock units on November 14, 2013. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the note entitled "Stock-Based Compensation" in the notes to the Corporation's consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Due to their resignation from our Board in 2013, Messrs. Bernasek and Wasserman forfeited their grants of restricted stock units made in 2013 and Mr. Morales did not receive a grant.

(3)
In addition to the restricted stock units reported above in footnote 2, Messrs. Beracha, Berquist, Durham and Wolf each own 23,350 options. As of December 31, 2013, Mr. Berquist owns 49,534 phantom shares, Ms. Everson owns 2,066 phantom shares and Ms. Kelly-Ennis owns 2,015 phantom shares.

(4)
Elected to receives fees that would otherwise be payable in cash in the form of phantom shares.

(5)
Elected to receive fees that would otherwise be payable in cash in the form of shares of common stock.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    11


Table of Contents


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS



PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Structure

The Corporation currently has eleven directors divided into three classes: four in Class I, three in Class II and four in Class III. The terms of office of the three Class II directors expire at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. The eight directors whose terms will continue after the 2014 annual meeting and will expire at the 2015 annual meeting (Class III) or 2016 annual meeting (Class I) are listed after the Class II directors.

Class II Election

The three nominees for election as Class II directors are listed below. If elected, the nominees for election as Class II directors will serve for a term of three years and until their successors are elected and qualify. If for any reason any nominee cannot or will not serve as a director, proxies may be voted for the election of a substitute nominee designated by our Board. The Class II Nominees are as follows:

Michael J. Durham
(Class II)
  Mr. Durham has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since November 2006. Mr. Durham is 63 years old.

Business Experience

 

Mr. Durham served as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sabre, Inc. ("Sabre"), then a NYSE-listed company providing information technology services to the travel industry, from October 1996, the date of Sabre's initial public offering, to October 1999. From March 1995 to July 1996, when Sabre was a subsidiary of AMR Corporation, he served as Sabre's President. Prior to joining Sabre, Mr. Durham spent 16 years with American Airlines, serving as the Senior Vice President and Treasurer of AMR Corporation and Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of American Airlines from October 1989 until he assumed the position of President of Sabre in March 1995.

Directorships and
Other Experience

 

Mr. Durham also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Travora Media, Inc., a privately-held corporation. During the preceding five years, Mr. Durham has served on the Boards of Directors of Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (where he served as the non-executive Chairman of the Board), Acxiom Corporation, NWA Corp. (the parent company of Northwest Airlines), Sabre (as noted above) and AGL Resources, Inc. Mr. Durham also served on the Board of Directors of Bombardier, Inc., a publicly-traded Canadian corporation.

Broad Industry Experience

 

Mr. Durham has extensive business experience in the automotive, travel and transportation industries, which provides our Board with leadership skills and a breadth of knowledge about the challenges and issues facing companies such as ours.

Public Company and Executive Officer Experience

 

Mr. Durham's tenure both as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of large multinational public companies allows him to add strategic value and management experience to the Board.

Corporate Governance and Financial Expertise

 

Mr. Durham's experience as a director, and frequently a member of the audit committee, on a number of different company boards also gives him a valuable perspective to share with the Corporation.


 

 

 

GRAPHIC

12    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Mark P. Frissora
(Class II)
  Mr. Frissora has served as the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation and Hertz since January 1, 2007, and as Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Corporation and Hertz since July 2006. Mr. Frissora is 58 years old. Mr. Frissora's employment agreement provides that he will serve as a member of the Board and as Chairman of the Board.

Business Experience

 

Prior to joining the Corporation and Hertz, Mr. Frissora served as Chief Executive Officer of Tenneco Inc. ("Tenneco") from November 1999 to July 2006 and as President of the automotive operations of Tenneco from April 1999 to July 2006. He also served as the Chairman of Tenneco from March 2000 to July 2006. From 1996 to April 1999, he held various positions within Tenneco's automotive operations, including Senior Vice President and General Manager of the worldwide original equipment business. Previously Mr. Frissora served as a Vice President of Aeroquip Vickers Corporation from 1991 to 1996. In the 15 years prior to joining Aeroquip Vickers Corporation, he served for 10 years with General Electric and five years with Philips Lighting Company in management roles focusing on product development and marketing.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Mr. Frissora served as a director of NCR Corporation ("NCR") from 2002 to 2009. He is a director of Walgreen Co., where he serves as the Chairman of the Finance Committee and is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Frissora is also a director of Delphi Automotive PLC, where he is a member of their Finance Committee and a member of their Nominating and Governance Committee.

Extensive Knowledge of the Corporation's Business and Industry

 

As our Chairman since 2007 and CEO since 2006, Mr. Frissora has demonstrated a deep knowledge and understanding of the Corporation and our business as we have expanded worldwide and acquired Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.

Leadership and Management Experience

 

Mr. Frissora, through his experiences as our Chairman and CEO, as well as through his other directorships, has demonstrated excellent leadership abilities, financial and operational expertise, commitment, good judgment and management skills.

Executive Officer Experience

 

Mr. Frissora's experience as a Chief Executive Officer and President of Tenneco, as well as our CEO, allows him to add strategic value to the Board.


 

 

 

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    13


Table of Contents


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Henry C. Wolf
(Class II)
  Mr. Wolf has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since November 2006. Mr. Wolf is 71 years old.

Business Experience

 

Mr. Wolf served as Chief Financial Officer for Norfolk Southern Corporation ("Norfolk Southern") from 1993 until his retirement from Norfolk Southern in July 2007. Mr. Wolf held the title of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Norfolk Southern from 1998 until his retirement. From 1993 to 1998, he served as Executive Vice President of Finance of Norfolk Southern. He served as Norfolk Southern's Vice President of Taxation from 1991 to 1993, Assistant Vice President—Tax Counsel from 1984 to 1990, Senior Tax Counsel from 1983 to 1984, General Tax Attorney from 1976 to 1983 and Senior Tax Attorney from 1973 to 1976.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Mr. Wolf is a director of AGL Resources, Inc. ("AGL"), a NYSE-listed company in the natural gas industry, as well as the Chairman of its Audit Committee and a member of its Executive and Compensation and Management Development Committees. Mr. Wolf served as a director of MModal Inc., a Nasdaq-listed company in the medical information technology industry from February 2012 to August 2012, where he was a member of its Compensation Committee. He also served as Member of the Board of Directors of Shenandoah Life Insurance Company (1995-2009). In addition, Mr. Wolf serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation and as a director of the Colonial Williamsburg Company.

Accounting, Finance and Legal Experience

 

Mr. Wolf's unique professional background with over forty years of experience with legal, financial, tax and accounting matters makes him an important advisor to the Board on many of the issues which face our Corporation.

Financial Oversight and Risk Management Experience

 

Mr. Wolf's skills that he gained from his service as the Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer for Norfolk Southern and his service as a director and audit committee chairman of AGL make him a valuable resource to the Board on matters of financial oversight and risk management, particularly for asset-intensive industries such as ours.

Transportation Industry Expertise

 

Mr. Wolf's significant experience in the in the transportation industry, including for Norfolk Southern, provides a valuable insight for the Corporation in overseeing our long-term strategy.


The Board recommends a vote FOR
all of the Class II nominees

GRAPHIC

14    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


CONTINUING DIRECTORS


Continuing Directors

Carl T. Berquist
(Class III)

 

Mr. Berquist has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since November 2006. Mr. Berquist is 63 years old.

Business Experience

 

Mr. Berquist joined Marriott International, Inc. ("Marriott") in December 2002 as Executive Vice President, Financial Information and Enterprise Risk Management and served as Chief Accounting Officer of Marriott. In 2009, Mr. Berquist became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marriott. Prior to joining Marriott, Mr. Berquist was a partner at Arthur Andersen LLP. During his 28-year career with Arthur Andersen LLP, Mr. Berquist held numerous leadership positions, including managing partner of the worldwide real-estate and hospitality practice. His last position was managing partner of the mid-Atlantic region which included five offices from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to Richmond, Virginia.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Mr. Berquist is a member of the Board of Advisors of the Business School at Penn State University.

Financial Oversight and Risk Management Experience

 

Mr. Berquist's years of leadership in management and operational positions as a chief financial officer, enterprise risk management executive and major audit company partner, provides our Board with in-depth knowledge in financial, accounting and risk management issues.

Travel Industry Knowledge

 

Mr. Berquist's knowledge of the travel industry gained while at Marriott also makes him an important asset to the Board in recognizing hospitality and overseeing strategic trends.

International Financial Expertise

 

Mr. Berquist's experiences in managing the worldwide expansion of one of the most recognized hotel brands offers our Board specialized expertise in a variety of areas.


    

 

 
     

Debra J. Kelly-Ennis
(Class III)

 

Ms. Kelly-Ennis has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since May 2013. Ms. Kelly-Ennis is 57 years old.

Business Experience

 

Ms. Kelly-Ennis served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Diageo Canada, Inc., a subsidiary of Diageo plc, a global spirits, wine and beer company, from 2008 to June 2012. From 2005 to 2008, she was Chief Marketing Officer for Diageo North America Inc., a U.S.-based subsidiary of Diageo plc. Previous to her positions at Diageo plc, Ms. Kelly-Ennis served in various management roles at General Motors Corporation ("GM"), including serving as President and COO of Saab Cars USA from 2002 to 2005, General Manager of Oldsmobile from 2000 to 2002 and a Chevrolet Brand Manager from 1999 to 2000. Previous to GM, she held marketing and management roles of increasing responsibility with leading companies such as RJR/Nabisco, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company and Grand Metropolitan PLC.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Ms. Kelly-Ennis has been a director of PulteGroup, Inc. since 1997, where she serves on the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, Altria Group, Inc. since February 2013, where she serves on the Innovation and Nominating Committee as well as the Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee, and Carnival plc and Carnival Corporation since April 2012, where she serves on the Health, Environmental, Safety and Security Committee.

Automotive Industry Experience

 

Ms. Kelly-Ennis has extensive experience in the automotive industry, including her various senior roles with GM managing several high profile national GM brands.

Executive Officer Experience

 

Ms. Kelly-Ennis offers our Board significant experience in managing international operations from her experience as the former President and Chief Executive Officer of Diageo Canada, Inc.

Branded Marketing and Management Experience

 

Ms. Kelly-Ennis also provides the Board with critical branded marketing and management experience from her role at Diageo and from her membership on the boards of directors at other companies with major brand portfolios similar to ours.


 

 

 

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    15


Table of Contents


CONTINUING DIRECTORS


Michael F. Koehler
(Class III)
  Mr. Koehler has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since March 2012. Mr. Koehler is 61 years old.

Business Experience

 

Mr. Koehler is President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Teradata Corporation ("Teradata"), a publicly-traded provider of enterprise data warehousing and integrated marketing software, where he also serves on the Executive Committee. Prior to the separation of Teradata from NCR, Mr. Koehler served as Senior Vice President of the Teradata Division of NCR from 2003 to 2007. From September 2002 to March 2003, he was the Interim Leader of the Teradata Division. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Koehler was Vice President, Global Field Operations of the Teradata Division and he held management positions of increasingly greater responsibility at NCR prior to that time.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Mr. Koehler is a director at Teradata.

Executive Officer Experience

 

Mr. Koehler has significant management and leadership skills gained as Chief Executive Officer of Teradata, a global information technology provider.

International Oversight Expertise

 

Mr. Koehler's role as Chief Executive Officer of a information technology provider with global operations provides the Board with critical experience regarding our domestic and international operations.

Strategy and Technology Experience

 

Mr. Koehler brings to our Board a deep knowledge of strategic operations and business development as well as valuable insights on how to incorporate technology into our ongoing operations.


    

 

 
     

Linda Fayne Levinson
(Class III)

 

Ms. Fayne Levinson has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since March 2012. Ms. Fayne Levinson is 72 years old.

Business Experience

 

Ms. Fayne Levinson was a partner at GRP Partners, a venture capital investment fund investing in start-up and early-stage retail and electronic commerce companies, from 1997 to December 2004. Prior to that, she was a partner in Wings Partners, a private equity firm that took Northwest Airlines private, an executive at American Express running its leisure travel and tour business and a partner at McKinsey & Co.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Ms. Fayne Levinson was Chair of the Board of Directors of Connexus Corporation, an online marketing company, from July 2006 to May 2010 when it was merged into Epic Advertising. Ms. Fayne Levinson is also a director of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Ingram Micro Inc., The Western Union Company and NCR, where she has served as a director since 1997 and Lead Independent Director from 2007 to 2013. Ms. Fayne Levinson was formerly a director at DemandTec, Inc. from 2005 to 2012, until it was acquired by IBM.

Risk Management and Oversight

 

Ms. Fayne Levinson has demonstrated her expertise in risk management and oversight as a director of several public companies, including her experience as Lead Independent Director of NCR.

Travel Industry Knowledge

 

Ms. Fayne Levinson's experience at Wings Partners and American Express provide her with extensive knowledge about the operating and financial issues that face the travel and transportation industry.

Leadership and Operating Experience

 

Ms. Fayne Levinson gained general management experience at American Express, strategic experience at McKinsey & Co. and investment experience at GRP Partners and Wings Partners. In addition, the Board believes that Ms. Fayne Levinson's extensive management and leadership experience, her in-depth knowledge of corporate governance issues and her diversity of perspective provide us with valuable insight with regard to our global operations.


 

 

 

GRAPHIC

16    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


CONTINUING DIRECTORS


Barry H. Beracha
(Class I)
  Mr. Beracha has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since November 2006. Mr. Beracha is 72 years old.

Business Experience

 

Mr. Beracha most recently served as Executive Vice President of Sara Lee Corp. ("Sara Lee") and Chief Executive Officer of the Sara Lee Bakery Group, which was created when Sara Lee acquired The Earthgrains Company in 2001. Mr. Beracha retired from Sara Lee in June 2003. He also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Earthgrains Company, which was spun off from Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. ("Anheuser-Busch") in 1996. In 1967, Mr. Beracha joined Anheuser-Busch, and held various management positions of increasing responsibility until the spin-off of The Earthgrains Company in 1996, prior to which he held the title of Vice President and Group Executive of Anheuser-Busch.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

From February 2012 to January 2013, Mr. Beracha served on the Board of Directors of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., a NYSE-listed food manufacturer and distributor, where he served on the Compensation and Governance Committee. Mr. Beracha served on the Board of Directors of Pepsi Bottling Group ("Pepsi") from 1999 to 2010, where he served as the non-executive Chairman of the Board from March 2007 to October 2008 and was a member of the Compensation Committee and of the Audit and Affiliated Transactions Committee. Mr. Beracha retired from the Board of Directors of McCormick & Co., where he served as Chairman of the Compensation Committee, in March 2007. He served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Saint Louis University from December 2005 to May 2009. Mr. Beracha has served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the St. Louis Symphony since November 2013.

Executive Officer Experience

 

Mr. Beracha provides our board with significant management and strategic experience gained in the roles of chairman and chief executive officer of leading consumer industry companies.

Leadership, Operating and Corporate Governance Experience

 

Mr. Beracha's service as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Pepsi as well as various other director roles, provides our Board extensive leadership, governance, financial expertise, management and business development skills.

Branded Marketing Experience

 

Mr. Beracha's experience at Sara Lee and Anheuser-Busch offers our Board specialized knowledge of managing the development, integration and expansion of consumer brands.


    

 

 
     

Carolyn N. Everson
(Class I)

 

Ms. Everson has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since May 2013. Ms. Everson is 42 years old.

Business Experience

 

Ms. Everson serves as Vice President of Global Marketing Solutions for Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook"), where she manages the global marketing solutions team focused on expanding advertising revenue and managing significant, strategic accounts. Before Facebook, Ms. Everson served as Corporate Vice President of Global Ad Sales and Strategy of Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") from 2010 to 2011. Previous to Microsoft, Ms. Everson held various advertising management positions at MTV Networks Company ("MTV") from 2004 to 2010, including serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Ad Sales from 2008 to 2010. Prior to MTV, she served in roles of increasing responsibility with respect to business development and advertising at Primedia, Inc., Zagat Surveys LLC and Walt Disney Imagineering.

Marketing and Strategy Experience

 

Ms. Everson provides the Board with extensive experience and understanding of marketing and innovation strategies in her roles at Microsoft and Facebook, which are key areas for our Corporation's growth.

Media and Technology Expertise

 

Ms. Everson brings her special expertise in media and technology developed from her roles two of the world's largest technology companies to support our continued efforts to develop and communicate our brand and product offerings.

International Business and Leadership Experience

 

Ms. Everson's experience in managing global advertising efforts for technology companies and her leadership experience provide our Board with specialized perspective and knowledge.


 

 

 

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    17


Table of Contents


CONTINUING DIRECTORS


Philippe P. Laffont
(Class I)
  Mr. Laffont has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since October 2013. Mr. Laffont is 46 years old.

Business Experience

 

Mr. Laffont is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Coatue Management ("Coatue"), an investment management firm founded in 1999. Prior to founding Coatue, Mr. Laffont worked at Tiger Management ("Tiger") as a research analyst from 1996 to 1999. Mr. Laffont began his career as an analyst in management consulting for McKinsey & Co. in Madrid, Spain, where he worked from 1992 to 1994, and then worked as an independent consultant until starting at Tiger.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Mr. Laffont serves on the Advisory Board of the Robin Hood X Prize and is a Trustee of the New York Presbyterian Hospital. He is a founder and member of the Executive Board of the Dreamland Theater in Nantucket.

Finance and Management Experience

 

Mr. Laffont provides the Board with financial and management skills demonstrated as the Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Coatue and his role at Tiger.

Strategic and Risk Management Knowledge

 

Mr. Laffont provides the Board significant experience in the evaluation of strategic opportunities for both public and private companies and offers our Board perspectives on risk management with respect to our operations.

Global Technology Expertise

 

Mr. Laffont provides the Board with specialized expertise on matters related to the development and oversight of technology functions to help support our continued global expansion.


    

 

 
     

George W. Tamke
(Class I)

 

Mr. Tamke has served as a director of the Corporation and Hertz since July 2006. Mr. Tamke served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and Hertz from December 2005 until July 2006 and currently serves as our Independent Lead Director. Mr. Tamke is 66 years old.

Business Experience

 

Mr. Tamke joined Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC ("CD&R") in 2000, and was eventually the Senior Operating Partner at CD&R through 2013. Prior to joining CD&R in 2000, he served as Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Emerson Electric Co. ("Emerson"), a manufacturer of electrical and electronic equipment, where he managed the global expansion and diversification into non-traditional, higher-growth market segments. He played an active role in CD&R's investments in Kinko's, Inc. ("Kinko's"), where he was responsible for driving Kinko's transformation and growth into the corporate market, as well as holding the role of Kinko's Interim President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2001 to August 2001. He also served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Cullinet Software, Inc., and spent seventeen years at the IBM Corporation.

Directorships and Other Experience

 

Mr. Tamke has served as a director and Chairman of Culligan Ltd. since October 2004, where he focused the business overseas from both a marketing and sourcing perspective. Mr. Tamke was a director of Target Corporation from June 1999 to March 2010 and a director of Kinko's from January 2001 to February 2004, and its Chairman from August 2001 to February 2004. Mr. Tamke was a director and Chairman of ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. from March 2007 to January 2010.

Executive Officer and Leadership Experience

 

Mr. Tamke provides the Board with leadership skills, significant management, strategic and operational experience through his roles of Co-Chief Executive Officer of Emerson and Chief Executive Officer of Kinko's, and as a director of multiple public and private companies.

Corporate Governance Experience

 

Mr. Tamke's experience as a director of Target Corporation, Culligan Ltd. and ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. gives Mr. Tamke a deep understanding of our Board responsibilities, and positions him well to serve as the Independent Lead Director of the Corporation and Hertz.

Extensive Knowledge of the Corporation's Business and Industry

 

Mr. Tamke has demonstrated a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the Corporation and our business through his leadership positions on our Board since 2006.

GRAPHIC

18    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary: Our Performance, Our Pay in 2013

2013 Financial Performance Highlights

For 2013, we reported financial results which improved on our outstanding 2012 results.

Record Revenues:  Worldwide revenues for fiscal 2013 were $10.8 billion, an increase of approximately 19.4% over the prior year's revenues.

EPS Increases 43.4%:  Full year 2013 net income was $346.2 million or $0.76 per share on a diluted basis, compared with a net income of $238.6 million or $0.53 per share on a diluted basis for 2012.

Common Stock Up 76%:  The price of our common stock increased approximately 76% during 2013, closing at $28.62 on December 31, 2013, up from the closing price of $16.27 on December 31, 2012.

2013 Business, Operational and Governance Highlights

Integrated Dollar Thrifty to Drive Synergies:  We continued our integration of the operations of Dollar Thrifty into our sourcing, operations and information technology infrastructure to drive overall synergies.

Expanded Firefly to Reach Value Consumers:  We expanded our Firefly brand, a deep value brand, in Europe and in the United States to complement our existing Hertz, Dollar and Thrifty brands.

Repurchased our Common Stock:  Our Board authorized the repurchase of $300 million of our common stock in November 2013.

Recruited New Directors with Diverse Skill Sets:  We added Debra J. Kelly-Ennis, Carolyn N. Everson and Philippe P. Laffont to our Board.

Eliminated Pledging and Hedging:  We eliminated pledging and hedging of our common stock by our officers and directors.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    19


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Our Compensation Philosophy and Design: How We "Pay For Performance"

Our Compensation Committee believes that:

awarding annual cash bonuses to our senior executives using a variety of annual financial and operational performance metrics drives short-term performance and enhances accountability without promoting undue risk;

our senior executives should focus on goals which promote our Corporation's overall performance and awarding equity on our overall financial performance helps us increase long-term stockholder value and retain executives;

salaries should reward and retain our senior executives, but not form a majority of their overall compensation; and

offering pension benefits and business-related perquisites helps retain and focus our senior executives.

Our Compensation Philosophy in Action: What We Paid in 2013

Annual Cash Bonus:  Due to our operating and financial performance in 2013, EICP awards were earned by our named executive officers in an amount that generally approximated the targets established by the Compensation Committee.

2012-2013 Corporate EBITDA Performance Stock Units:  As a result of our financial performance in 2012 and 2013 combined, our named executive officers increased the number of performance stock units earned from 95.1% to 98.4% for performance stock grants granted in 2012.

2013-2014 Corporate EBITDA Performance Stock Units:  As a result of our financial performance in 2013, our named executive officers earned 66.0% of performance stock units granted in 2013.

2013 Corporate EBITDA Margin Performance Stock Units:  In addition to growth in Corporate EBITDA, our senior executives maintained Corporate EBITDA margins that were significantly higher than our 2012 Corporate EBITDA margins, which allowed our named executive officers to earn performance stock units based on this increase.

Salaries:  As part of our annual performance evaluations, we determined it was appropriate to increase all of our named executive officers' salaries (other than Mr. Kennedy, who was not an employee in 2012).

GRAPHIC

20    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



Hertz's Commitment to Good Corporate Governance and Pay Practices:
What We Do and What We Don't Do


GRAPHIC
 
We pay for our Corporation's financial and operating performance
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't have a high percentage of fixed compensation

GRAPHIC
 
We evaluate risk in light of our compensation programs
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't grant time-vested stock to our senior executives without performance conditions

GRAPHIC
 
We use a variety of financial and operational metrics for our annual cash bonus program
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't have employment contracts for our non-CEO officers

GRAPHIC
 
We use double-trigger provisions for our change in control agreements
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't use the same performance metrics for short-term and long-term compensation

GRAPHIC
 
We prohibit pledging and hedging of our stock by our officers and directors
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't use a peer group composed of companies significantly larger than ours

GRAPHIC
 
We use an independent compensation consultant
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't re-price underwater options

GRAPHIC
 
We have a robust stock ownership policy
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't use short-term vesting for stock awards

GRAPHIC
 
We maintain claw-back policies
 
GRAPHIC
 
We don't pay spot bonuses or guarantee bonuses to existing executives

Named Executive Officers

We refer to the following individuals as our "named executive officers":

Mark P. Frissora, who is our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and the Chairman of our Board;

Elyse Douglas, who was our former Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") until her resignation on October 1, 2013;

David J. Rosenberg, who was our interim CFO from October 1, 2013 to December 9, 2013;

Thomas C. Kennedy, who became our CFO on December 9, 2013 and is our CFO and Senior Executive Vice President;

Scott P. Sider, who is our Group President, Rent-A-Car Americas;

Michel Taride, who is our Group President, Rent-A-Car International; and

J. Jeffrey Zimmerman, who is our General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    21


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Our Performance and Our Pay for the Chief Executive Officer in 2013

The following tables illustrate the general relationship between the performance of our Corporation, based on three of our performance metrics and the compensation of our CEO from 2011 to 2013. Corporate EBITDA is the central component of our long-term equity incentive program and adjusted pre-tax income and revenue are components of our EICP and impact the price of our common stock and ability to return capital to stockholders.

Financial Performance and CEO Pay

GRAPHIC


Note: CEO pay excludes Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings as reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The components of CEO pay reflect the figures in the Summary Compensation Table and may not reflect realized compensation.

GRAPHIC

22    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Determining What We Pay—Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews and establishes the compensation program for our senior executives. To assist it in doing so, the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain outside advisors as it deems appropriate. Since July 2008, the Compensation Committee has engaged Semler Brossy as its compensation consultant to provide advice and information. Semler Brossy's responsibilities include:

providing recommendations and criteria regarding our Survey Group (as defined below);

reviewing and advising on total executive compensation, including salaries, short- and long-term incentive programs and relevant performance goals;

advising on industry trends, important legislation and best practices in executive compensation;

advising on how to best align pay with performance and with our business needs; and

assisting the Compensation Committee with any other matters related to executive compensation arrangements, including senior executive employment agreements.

The Compensation Committee reviews our compensation programs in light of Semler Brossy's recommendations and adjusts compensation as the Compensation Committee sees fit. However, the decisions made by the Compensation Committee are the responsibility of the Compensation Committee, and may reflect factors other than the recommendations and information provided by Semler Brossy. Semler Brossy does not perform any services for the Corporation other than its role as advisor to the Compensation Committee. After taking into account Semler Brossy's (i) absence of significant relationships with management of the Corporation and the members of the Compensation Committee, (ii) internal policies and (iii) other relevant information provided, the Compensation Committee believes that Semler Brossy's work did not raise any conflicts of interest and Semler Brossy is independent.

In determining the appropriate levels of our compensation programs, our CEO provides input to the Compensation Committee on topics that he believes are important, such as the appropriate salary for senior executives (other than himself), performance criteria, numerical performance goals and appropriate target performance levels. As part of this process, our CEO obtains data from and has discussions with our Chief Human Resources Officer. Our CEO conducts performance reviews with respect to the other senior executives of the Corporation, the results of which may affect our senior executives' salaries and annual bonus levels. In addition, the Independent Lead Director, who is a member of the Compensation Committee, regularly discusses with the Chair of the Compensation Committee various aspects of the CEO's performance and his compensation. The Independent Lead Director also confers with other independent members of the Board and members of the Compensation Committee as part of the process of setting our CEO's compensation. Our Compensation Committee may give weight to our CEO's input in its discretion, but in all cases, the final determinations over compensation reside with the Compensation Committee or, if requested by the Board, in the case of our CEO, with the independent members of our Board.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    23


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Determining What We Pay—Elements of our Compensation Programs

                 
    Element

Type

How and Why We Pay It

&zwsp;
    
    Salary   Fixed Cash  

Paid throughout the year to attract and retain senior executives

   
           

Sets the baseline for bonus and retirement programs

   
&zwsp;   Annual Cash Bonus   Performance-Based
Cash

 

Paid annually in cash under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan to reward performance of the Corporation, business unit and individual

  &zwsp;
&zwsp;            

Aligns senior executives' interests with stockholders' interests, reinforces key strategic initiatives and encourages superior individual performance

  &zwsp;
    Long-Term Equity   Performance-Based
Equity
 

Granted annually, with vesting occurring in subsequent years based on meeting performance conditions

Aligns senior executives' interests with stockholders' interests and drives key performance goals

   
&zwsp;     Retirement Benefits
and Perquisites

 
Variable Other  

Paid at retirement based on senior executives' salary, bonus and years of service to the Corporation

  &zwsp;
&zwsp;              

Limited perquisites for business purposes, including relocation expenses due to the relocation of our headquarters to Florida

  &zwsp;
&zwsp;              

Limited perquisites also designed to retain talent and improve efficiency

  &zwsp;

Compensation Elements—Pay Mix

We designed our compensation programs so that a significant portion of our senior executives' pay is in the form of performance-based cash and equity compensation. The charts below illustrate that, for our CEO, 80.9% of his total compensation is directly influenced by our Corporation's financial and operating performance and for the average of the other named executive officers, 70.1% of their compensation is directly influenced by our Corporation's financial and operating performance.

GRAPHIC

24    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


GRAPHIC


Note: CEO and NEO pay excludes Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings as reported in the Summary Compensation Table. Only NEOs who were employed for the entire 2013 fiscal year are contained in the above chart.

Determining What We Pay—Survey Group

When determining our compensation programs, we compare the compensation for our senior executives to the compensation of comparable positions at a group of companies (the "Survey Group"). The Compensation Committee selected the Survey Group in consultation with Semler Brossy. Because the number of our direct industry competitors in the global market is limited, we do not limit the Survey Group to our direct competitors, but also include similarly-sized companies that are in the consumer discretionary (excluding media companies), consumer staples and industrials (excluding capital goods companies) sectors. These industries were selected because successful companies within these industries frequently bear substantial similarities to the Corporation's business model, insofar as they (i) are asset-intensive, (ii) require frequent customer contact and (iii) involve the need to maintain favorable brand recognition. The companies in the Survey Group had annual revenues of approximately $5 to $20 billion, as compared to the Corporation's 2013 revenue of $10.8 billion. We include a relatively large number (45) of companies in the Survey Group, in part because we believe that

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    25


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


doing so helps to reduce the influence of outliers. Of the 45 companies in the Survey Group, 43 were in the 2012 Survey Group. The following are the companies that comprised our Survey Group in 2013:

Avis Budget Group, Inc.
Big Lots, Inc.
BorgWarner Inc.
Carnival Corp.
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
CSX Corp.
Dana Holding Corp.
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Dean Foods Co.
Dollar Tree, Inc.
Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Federal-Mogul Corp.
Gap Inc.















General Mills, Inc.
Hershey Co.
Hormel Foods Corp.
J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
J. M. Smucker Co.
Kellogg Co.
Kelly Services, Inc.
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Kohl's Corp.
L Brands, Inc.
Marriott International, Inc.
Mattel, Inc.
Nordstrom, Inc.
Norfolk Southern Corp.
Office Depot, Inc.















PetSmart, Inc.
Pitney Bowes Inc.
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Ryder System, Inc.
Starbucks Corp.
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Union Pacific Corp.
V. F. Corp
Visteon Corp.
Waste Management, Inc.
Whirlpool Corp.
Whole Foods Market, Inc.
YUM! Brands, Inc.

When making compensation decisions for our senior executives, our management and our Compensation Committee consider the compensation levels of the Survey Group, as well as industry factors, general business developments, corporate, business unit and individual performance and our overall "pay for performance" compensation philosophy. We typically review the salaries, annual bonus levels and long-term equity awards of our named executive officers and other senior executives every 12 months, and we periodically (but not on a set schedule) review the other elements of their compensation.

Determining What We Pay—Response to Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

In 2013, our advisory vote on executive compensation was approved by the following vote:

                     

 

 

For



Against



Abstain



Broker Non-Votes



 
    
    289,054,380   65,150,151   959,764   17,201,438    
                     

This represented an 81% level of approval.

After reviewing the results of the 2013 vote, our Compensation Committee believes that the structure and features of our compensation program were consistent with our business strategy and pay for performance philosophy and elected to retain the features of the current program used to compensate our named executive officers.

Annual Cash Compensation

Salary

For the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee determines salary and any increases after reviewing individual performance, conducting internal compensation comparisons and reviewing compensation in the Survey Group. We also take into account other factors such as an individual's prior experience, total mix of job responsibilities versus market comparables and internal equity when setting base salaries for our senior executives. The Compensation Committee consults with our CEO (except as to his own compensation)

GRAPHIC

26    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


regarding salary decisions for senior executives. We review salaries upon promotion or other changes in job responsibility.

As the result of our regular, cyclical review of salaries, the annual base salaries for our named executive officers were established for 2013 as set forth below.

                         
  Name    
2012 Salary

 
2013 Salary

What We Took Into Consideration in Setting 2013 Salaries

&zwsp;
    
&zwsp;   Mr. Frissora   $ 1,345,000   $ 1,450,000  

Our 2012 overall strong operating results

  &zwsp;
&zwsp;                    

Mr. Frissora's performance in managing the worldwide expansion of our car and equipment rental operations, including the acquisition and integration of Dollar Thrifty

  &zwsp;
    Ms. Douglas   $ 590,000   $ 608,000  

Our 2012 overall strong operating results

   
                   

Ms. Douglas' performance in managing our financial standing in 2012

   
&zwsp;     Mr. Rosenberg   $ 306,010   $ 316,730  

Mr. Rosenberg's performance in his duties associated with Hertz International Ltd.

  &zwsp;
    Mr. Kennedy(1)     N/A   $ 660,000  

Mr. Kennedy's appointment as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President of our Corporation

   
&zwsp;     Mr. Sider   $ 600,000   $ 660,000  

The overall performance and growth of our Rent-A-Car Americas business unit in 2012

  &zwsp;
&zwsp;                    

Mr. Sider's performance in managing our rental and leasing operations in the Americas and integrating Dollar Thrifty into our existing Hertz operations

  &zwsp;
    Mr. Taride(2)   $ 574,105   $ 592,280  

The overall performance of our Rent-A-Car International business unit, in light of challenging European business conditions in 2012

   
                   

Mr. Taride's performance in managing our worldwide expansion of car and rental operations

   
&zwsp;     Mr. Zimmerman   $ 500,000   $ 520,000  

Mr. Zimmerman's exceptional performance in handling the acquisition and integration of Dollar Thrifty

  &zwsp;
&zwsp;                    

Mr. Zimmerman's additional duties as Chief Compliance Officer and increased oversight of internal legal staff after the acquisition of Dollar Thrifty

  &zwsp;
                         

(1)
Mr. Kennedy's salary paid during 2013 was pro-rated based on his December 9 start date.

(2)
For Mr. Taride, these amounts have been converted to U.S. dollars from pounds sterling at the 12-month average rate of 1.56323.

Senior Executive Bonus Plan

Our named executive officers' compensation includes an annual cash bonus payable pursuant to the Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Senior Executive Bonus Plan ("Senior Executive Bonus Plan"), which was approved by our stockholders at the 2010 annual meeting. Payments under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"). Under the terms of the Senior Executive Bonus Plan, the maximum amount of a payment is limited to 1% of

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    27


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") for a performance period for our CEO and 0.5% of our EBITDA for a performance period for other participants. Although our Compensation Committee exercises discretion to reduce annual incentives under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan, it may not increase the payments. When using its discretion to appropriately size annual incentives for 2013, our Compensation Committee took into account each named executive officer's performance under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan ("EICP").

Annual Cash Incentive Program (EICP)

To determine the EICP awards, our Compensation Committee reviewed our performance against the established performance criteria, reviewed individual performance and approved the EICP award payments for the named executive officers (other than the CEO), and recommended to the Board for approval the CEO's award payment. To arrive at the annual award, the Target Award was multiplied by modifiers noted in the table below:

LOGO


(1)
The Corporate Performance Modifier is designed to reward our Corporation's overall financial performance and is based on the weighted average of our Corporation's Adjusted Pre-Tax Income, EVA® (a registered trademark of Stern Stewart and Co.) and Revenue.

(2)
The Business Unit Modifier is designed to reward the performance of individual business units and for corporate employees, the weighted average of each individual business unit's performance.

(3)
The Individual Performance Modifier is designed to reward the individual performance of our senior executives.

The Target Award for 2013 was a percentage of the named executive officer's 2013 salary. In general, the Compensation Committee considers the experience, responsibilities, title and historical performance of each particular senior executive when determining Target Awards.

GRAPHIC

28    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Each named executive officer's 2013 Target Award as a percentage of base salary as of December 31, 2013 were as follows:

                     

 

 

Named Executive Officer

 

Target Award as a
% of Salary




Salary as of
December 31, 2013




Target Award



&zwsp;
    
    Mr. Frissora   160%   $1,450,000   $2,320,000    
&zwsp;   Ms. Douglas     80%   $   608,000   $   486,400   &zwsp;
    Mr. Rosenberg     45%   $   316,730   $   142,529    
&zwsp;     Mr. Kennedy(1)     85%   $   660,000   $     46,750   &zwsp;
    Mr. Sider     85%   $   660,000   $   561,000    
&zwsp;     Mr. Taride(2)     80%   $   592,280   $   473,824   &zwsp;
    Mr. Zimmerman     75%   $   520,000   $   390,000    
                     

(1)
For Mr. Kennedy, the Compensation Committee pro-rated his Target Award at 1/12th of his Target Award as a percentage of salary as of December 31, 2013 due to his December date of hire.

(2)
For Mr. Taride, these amounts have been converted to U.S. dollars from pounds sterling at the 12-month average rate of 1.56323.

The chart below summarizes the financial performance elements of the 2013 Corporate Performance Modifier. The financial performance elements are the same as those used in the 2012 Corporate Performance Modifier.

&zwsp;     Corporate Performance Modifier—Financial Performance Element Summary

&zwsp;
    Criteria   &zwsp;   Weight   &zwsp;   GAAP?   &zwsp;   What It Is   &zwsp;   Why We Use It   &zwsp;

 

 

Adjusted Pre-Tax Income (API)

 

&zwsp;

 

40%

 

&zwsp;

 

No(1)

 

&zwsp;

 

Equal to our income before purchase accounting charges, non-cash interest items, income taxes, minority interest, restructuring expenses, significant one-time items and non-cash "mark-to-market" income and expense

 

&zwsp;

 

Adjusted pre-tax income allows management to assess the operational performance of our business, exclusive of the items previously mentioned that do not reflect our operating performance

 

&zwsp;
    EVA®

&zwsp;   40%   &zwsp;   No   &zwsp;   Net operating profit after taxes less a capital charge   &zwsp;   EVA® and EVA® improvement represent the value created after all costs, including cost of capital, are met and is correlated with strong stockholder returns   &zwsp;
&zwsp;     Revenue

&zwsp;   20%   &zwsp;   Yes   &zwsp;   Our Corporation's revenue   &zwsp;   Revenue is a strong indicator of how our Corporation is performing overall   &zwsp;
                                         
(1)
We disclosed our adjusted pre-tax income, as well as detailed reconciliations of this non-GAAP measure, in our quarterly earnings releases.

The Compensation Committee set goals for each of adjusted pre-tax income, EVA® and revenue. The Compensation Committee then measured our Corporation's performance against each of the goals to determine a modifier for each financial performance element and an overall Corporate Performance Modifier. The target level was based upon our business plan, in the case of adjusted pre-tax income and revenue, and expected economic growth in the case of EVA®.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    29


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The following were the fiscal 2013 financial performance criteria targets set by the Compensation Committee and our disclosed actual performance as compared to such targets (dollars in millions):

                           

 

 

2013 Corporate Performance Modifier

 

&zwsp;

    

 

   

API
(40% Weight)


 

Revenue
(20% Weight)


 

EVA®(1)
(40% Weight)


&zwsp;
    

 

 

Threshold(2)

  $   1,076.3   $     10,205.0   $ (108.5 )  

&zwsp;  

Target = 100% Multiplier

  $   1,195.9   $     10,742.1   $    76.5    

 

 

High Performance Level(3)

  $   1,375.3   $     11,547.8   $  261.5    

&zwsp;  

 

Actual Results

  $ 1,153.2   $ 10,771.9   $ 51.0   &zwsp;

 

 

Payout Factor

    85.8 %   102.2 %   86.2 %  

&zwsp;  

 

Corporate Performance Modifier

          89.2 &zwsp; %        
                           

(1)
The EVA® figures in the above table represent, for threshold a decrease of EVA® by $108.5 million, for target an improvement of EVA® by $76.5 million and for the high performance level an improvement of EVA® by $261.5 million.

(2)
Any adjusted pre-tax income or revenue results that equal the threshold receive a 60% multiplier. Any EVA® results that equal the threshold receive a 0% multiplier.

(3)
Any adjusted pre-tax income or revenue results that equal the high performance level receive a 160% multiplier. Any EVA® results that equal the high performance level receive a 200% multiplier.

For financial performance criteria, linear interpolation was used to determine the multiplier for results that were between the threshold and target and target and high performance level. However, for adjusted pre-tax income and revenue, if our performance had exceeded the high performance level, then the slope of the payout curve above the high performance level would have been half of the slope of the payout curve between the threshold and high performance level, and for EVA®, if our performance level had exceeded the high performance level, the slope of the payout curve above the high performance level would have been equal to the slope of the curve between the threshold and high performance level.

We disclosed our actual adjusted pre-tax income, as well as detailed reconciliations of this non-GAAP measure, in our quarterly earnings releases.

We calculate EVA® as follows:

EVA®=    Net operating profit after taxes(1)

  less   A capital charge (the product of our cost of capital and the amount of capital employed in our business)(2)

(1)
We determine net operating profit after taxes as adjusted pre-tax income plus purchase accounting, but we exclude non-fleet interest and the finance portion of our pension expense. In order to account for taxes, we multiply this amount by .65, which is 1 minus the marginal tax rate of 35%.

(2)
In order to determine the capital charge, we multiply our cost of capital by an amount equal to (i) average equity, plus (ii) average non-fleet debt, plus (iii) average deferred taxes, plus (iv) the adjustments set forth in the following paragraph.

GRAPHIC

30    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


For 2013, when calculating the capital charge figure:

our cost of capital was 10.2%;

non-fleet debt equaled our average "Corporate Debt" as defined in our periodic reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K less 73.5% of the net book value of Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation rental fleet (this figure we deemed to be covered by fleet debt for our EVA® calculation); and

we took the following special adjustments into account:

    adjustments between pre-tax income and adjusted pre-tax income with the exception of non-cash interest and purchase accounting were capitalized and multiplied by 1 minus our marginal tax rate of 35%;

    any difference between cash operating taxes (taxes paid plus the tax benefit from the interest expense associated with corporate debt plus taxes saved (paid) due to non-recurring losses (gains)) and economic taxes (adjusted pre-tax income, plus purchase accounting, excluding non-fleet interest and the finance portion of our pension expense plus purchase accounting, multiplied by our marginal tax rate of 35%); and

    adjustments to normalize short-term fluctuations in capital related to acquisitions and divestitures.

Based upon management's recommendation, our Compensation Committee determined that it was important to continue to incentivize our senior executives to achieve strategic initiatives for our Hertz Rent-A-Car Americas, Hertz Rent-A-Car International and Hertz Equipment Rental business units for 2013. The business units used in the EICP differ slightly from the reporting segments the Corporation uses for its financial statements because (i) the accounting guidance used for segment reporting purposes does not preclude the Corporation from defining its business units for executive compensation matters and (ii) the Compensation Committee desires to use business units which reflect the overall geographic and functional roles the relevant executive officers are responsible for. Senior executives reporting to a specific business unit had their EICP awards adjusted by the Business Unit Modifier relating to that business unit. Senior executives in our corporate centers had their EICP awards adjusted by a weighted average of the Business Unit Modifiers, as follows: Hertz Rent-A-Car Americas: 50%, Hertz Rent-A-Car International: 25% and Hertz Equipment Rental: 25%. For 2013, the Compensation Committee determined a target for each strategic objective and then measured the 2013 results against the target to determine an overall performance figure. The Compensation Committee then used its discretion to adjust the final payout relative to the target in order to adjust for uncertainties following the acquisition and subsequent integration of Dollar Thrifty.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    31


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


For 2013, the Compensation Committee determined the Business Unit Modifiers using the strategic goals set forth below, each of which was weighted at 100% of the overall respective business unit score.

                     

  Hertz Rent-A-Car Americas  

 


Strategic Goal

 

Target

 

Result

 
Total
Modifier

 
&zwsp;
    

 

 

Dollar Thrifty Integration

  $80 Million of Cost Synergies   $141.4 Million   125%(1)    
                     

(1)
The actual achievement of $141.4 million is 177% of the target. The Compensation Committee considered the performance relative to the target and set the modifier at 125%.

                     

  Hertz Rent-A-Car International  

 


Strategic Goal

 

Target

 

Result

 
Total
Modifier

 
&zwsp;
    

 

 

Dollar Thrifty Integration

  $20 Million of Revenue Synergies   $21.0 Million   102.5%(1)    
                     

(1)
The actual achievement of $21.0 million is 105% of the target. The Compensation Committee considered the performance relative to the target and set the modifier at 102.5%.

For the Hertz Equipment Rental business unit, the strategic goals approved by our Compensation Committee were: dollar utilization, fleet efficiencies and employee satisfaction. Each strategic goal was weighted at 331/3% of the overall score.

For 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that, pursuant to the payout guidelines described above, the Business Unit Modifier for Hertz Equipment Rental was as follows:

                     

  Hertz Equipment Rental  

 

Strategic Goal   Target   Result   Modifier    
    

&zwsp;  

Dollar Utilization(1)

  38.0%   36.85%   77.9%   &zwsp;

 

 

Fleet Efficiencies(2)

  +5.0%   +12.3%   125%    

&zwsp;  

 

Employee Satisfaction(3)

  +0.05       +0.21       125%   &zwsp;

 

 

Total Modifier

      109.3%        
                     

(1)
Dollar utilization was measured as our annualized rental revenue divided by the original equipment cost of our equipment rental fleet relative to our business plan.

(2)
Fleet efficiencies was measured as the improvement in fleet unavailable for rent, which is determined by comparing the fleet that cannot be rented due to factors under our general control to our total equipment fleet. This metric is improved by reducing amount of time that our fleet is unavailable for rent.

(3)
Employee satisfaction was measured through an employee pulse survey score.

GRAPHIC

32    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The Corporate-weighted Business Unit Modifier used for our senior executives who do not report to a specific business unit was determined as follows:

                   

 

 

Business Unit


 

Business Unit
Modifier


Weight for
Corporate Business
Unit Modifier




&zwsp;

    

 

 

Hertz Rent-A-Car Americas

    125%   50%    

&zwsp;  

Hertz Rent-A-Car International

    102.5%   25%   &zwsp;

 

 

Hertz Equipment Rental

    109.3%   25%    

&zwsp;  

 

Corporate (Weighted Average)

    115.5%   N/A   &zwsp;
                   

Below is a chart that indicates, for each named executive officer, (i) the specific business unit to which each named executive officer reports, or in the case of the corporate center executives, the Corporate- weighted average of all of the business units, and (ii) the Business Unit Modifier for the business unit or Corporate-weighted average as set forth above.

                   

 

 

Named Executive Officer



Business Unit



 


Business
Unit Modifier




&zwsp;
    
    Mr. Frissora   Corporate-weighted average of business units     115.5 %  
&zwsp;   Ms. Douglas   Corporate-weighted average of business units     115.5 % &zwsp;
    Mr. Rosenberg(1)   Corporate-weighted average of business units     104.1 %  
&zwsp;     Mr. Kennedy   Corporate-weighted average of business units     115.5 % &zwsp;
    Mr. Sider   Hertz Rent-A-Car Americas     125 %  
&zwsp;     Mr. Taride   Hertz Rent-A-Car International     102.5 % &zwsp;
    Mr. Zimmerman   Corporate-weighted average of business units     115.5 %  
                   

(1)
Mr. Rosenberg's Business Unit Modifier was adjusted for his position at, and for the period he worked for Hertz International Ltd., which is part of our Hertz Rent-A-Car International business unit.

Annually, each named executive officer's performance (other than Mr. Frissora) is subjectively evaluated by Mr. Frissora using performance factors established earlier in the year by Mr. Frissora in consultation with each named executive officer. In early 2014, Mr. Frissora recommended to the Compensation Committee for its approval an Individual Performance Modifier for each of our named executive officers based on this evaluation. Our Board provided the Compensation Committee with a subjective evaluation of Mr. Frissora's performance after reviewing Mr. Frissora's self-assessment (facilitated by our Independent Lead Director) and the Compensation Committee approved his Individual Performance Modifier and reported its findings to the Board. The Compensation Committee used its discretion in approving the Individual Performance Modifier, placing primary emphasis on Mr. Frissora's individual review of our named executive officers and the Board's review of Mr. Frissora.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    33


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The chart below shows how each named executive officer's 2013 Senior Executive Bonus Plan award was calculated:

                                                       
    Named Executive Officer

 



Target
Award







 
 


Corporate
Performance
Modifier







 
 



Business Unit
Modifier







 
 


Individual
Performance
Modifier







 
 




Payout



&zwsp;
    
    Mr. Frissora   $ 2,320,000         89.2 %       115.5 %       115 %     $ 2,748,734    
&zwsp;   Ms. Douglas   $ 486,400         89.2 %       115.5 %       100 %     $ 501,118   &zwsp;
    Mr. Rosenberg   $ 142,529         89.2 %       104.1 %       100 %     $ 132,306    
&zwsp;     Mr. Kennedy(1)   $ 46,750   X     89.2 % X     115.5 % X     100 % =   $ 48,165   &zwsp;
    Mr. Sider   $ 561,000         89.2 %       125 %       70 %     $ 437,861    
&zwsp;     Mr. Taride(2)   $ 473,824         89.2 %       102.5 %       115 %     $ 498,200   &zwsp;
    Mr. Zimmerman   $ 390,000         89.2 %       115.5 %       115 %     $ 462,072    
                                                       

(1)
For Mr. Kennedy, the Compensation Committee pro-rated his Target Award at 1/12th of his Target Award as a percentage of salary as of December 31, 2013 due to his December date of hire.

(2)
For Mr. Taride, these amounts have been converted to U.S. dollars from pounds sterling at the 12-month average rate of 1.56323.

During 2013, our Compensation Committee evaluated our EICP for potential improvements. Based on management's evaluation and recommendations, and Semler Brossy's subsequent input, our Compensation Committee determined that performance targets for 2014 should continue to emphasize our Corporation's financial and operating results to ensure strong alignment of management's interests with stockholders' interests. For 2014, the EICP will use the same general structure as in 2013, with (i) adjusted pre-tax income, return on invested capital and revenue as the Corporate Performance Modifier elements, (ii) Business Unit Modifiers which reflect the goals of each particular business unit for 2013 and (iii) an individual component to encourage superior individual performance.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

Long-term equity incentive compensation comprises a significant part of our total compensation for senior executives and in 2013 was awarded under the 2008 Omnibus Plan. Under the 2008 Omnibus Plan, the Compensation Committee has the flexibility to make equity awards, including time- and performance-based awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units and deferred stock units. The plan also permits us to settle awards in shares or cash. [•] shares of stock are available for awards under the 2008 Omnibus Plan as of April [•], 2014.

In 2013, the Compensation Committee reassessed the structure of equity grants used in the Corporation's Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan ("LTIP"). Specifically, the Compensation Committee reviewed the use and mix of performance stock units as well as the performance factors used in the performance stock units, and considered whether any changes were required, including as a result of the acquisition of Dollar Thrifty. After

GRAPHIC

34    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


considering award alternatives and in consultation with Semler Brossy, the Compensation Committee made the following changes, summarized below.

                                 

  Summary of Changes to 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentives  

 


2012 LTIP Structure

 

&zwsp;

 

 

 

&zwsp;

 

2013 LTIP Structure

 

&zwsp;

 

Why We Made Changes

 

 
                                 
    
    60% Corporate EBITDA Performance Stock Units      
GRAPHIC
      70% Corporate EBITDA Performance Stock Units       After reviewing the Corporation's experience with the percentage of awards based on Corporate EBITDA in 2012, the Compensation Committee believed increasing the weighting of such units from 60% to 70% would result in appropriate focus on stockholder returns relative to compensation paid    

 


40% Price-Vested Stock Units

 

&zwsp;

 


GRAPHIC




&zwsp;

 

30% Corporate EBITDA Margin Performance Stock Units

 

&zwsp;

 

The Compensation Committee largely replaced price-vested stock units with performance stock units which would vest based on the Corporation's Corporate EBITDA margin. The Compensation Committee believes they would provide, along with the 70% allocation of performance stock units discussed above, appropriate focus on the efficiency of our Corporate EBITDA goals

 

 
                                 

In general, the Compensation Committee considers the experience, responsibilities, title and historical performance of each particular senior executive as well as internal equity considerations when determining grants of long-term equity awards.

In March 2013, we granted performance stock units to our named executive officers as part of their annual long-term equity incentive award. Performance stock units represent the right to receive a share of our common stock if certain performance goals are achieved and time periods have passed. The Compensation Committee determined that awarding long-term equity incentive awards comprised of 70% performance stock units based on Corporate EBITDA and 30% based on Corporate EBITDA margin was appropriate because performance stock units directly encourage our senior executives to improve and enhance our financial performance, while helping retain their services through the vesting period. In general, earning performance stock units requires continued employment.

The Compensation Committee selected Corporate EBITDA as the performance goal for 70% of the performance stock units granted in 2013. The Compensation Committee chose Corporate EBITDA as a performance metric because it is one of the primary metrics we use to facilitate our analysis of investment decisions, profitability and performance trends. Corporate EBITDA means "EBITDA" as that term is defined under Hertz's senior credit facilities, which is generally consolidated net income before net interest expense (other than interest expense relating to certain car rental fleet financing), consolidated income taxes, consolidated depreciation (other than depreciation related to the car rental fleet) and amortization and before certain other items, in each case as more fully defined in the agreements governing Hertz's senior credit facilities. We disclosed our Corporate EBITDA, as well as detailed reconciliations of this non-GAAP measure, in our quarterly earnings releases.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    35


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


In 2013, the Compensation Committee reaffirmed its long-term equity incentive award design by continuing to use performance goals based on Corporate EBITDA over a multi-year period. For purposes of the performance stock awards, management recommended, and the Compensation Committee approved, two goals. The first goal has baseline business targets for 2013 and combined 2013-2014 (the "Strategic Plan"). The second goal is a stretch plan with more difficult business targets for 2013 and combined 2013-2014 (the "Stretch Plan") to drive increased performance with a corresponding higher payout factor.

2013 Performance Period—Heightened Goals with Lock-In Feature:    To earn target (100%) or maximum (150%) awards for 2013, the senior executives need to meet Corporate EBITDA targets that exceed the 2013 Strategic Plan. Achieving 100% of the Strategic Plan will only result in a 80% payout. Based on 2013 results, the senior executives will be eligible to earn, or "lock-in" the 2013 payout factor, but would have a chance to improve upon their payout factor through meeting 2013-2014 Corporate EBITDA performance goals.

2013-2014 Performance Period—Driving Two-Year Performance:    To account for the heightened difficulty in achieving the 2013 targets, the plan uses combined 2013-2014 Corporate EBITDA goals to encourage our senior executives to increase our financial performance and therefore the amount of performance stock units earned. For 2013-2014, to earn target (100%) awards, the senior executives must achieve 100% of the combined 2013-2014 Strategic Plan. To earn the maximum awards, the senior executives must achieve 100% of the combined 2013-2014 Stretch Plan. Accordingly, if the senior executives did not reach the maximum Corporate EBITDA goals in 2013, they would still have the opportunity to earn additional awards by achieving results in 2014 that provide for combined 2013 and 2014 performance in excess of the 2013 results, subject to the maximum awards. As a result, the senior executives are incentivized to drive both the 2013 Corporate EBITDA results and the combined 2013-2014 Corporate EBITDA results. The below chart summarizes the structure.

&zwsp;     Performance Stock Awards Structure

&zwsp;
    Performance
Period


&zwsp;   Threshold
(50% Payout)


&zwsp;   Intermediate
(80% Payout)


&zwsp;   Target
(100% Payout)


&zwsp;   Maximum
(150% payout)


&zwsp;   How Design Reflects
Performance


&zwsp;

 

 

2013

 

&zwsp;

 

90% of the 2013 Strategic Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

100% of the 2013 Strategic Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

100% of the 2013 Stretch Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

125% of the 2013 Strategic Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

Goals in 2013 reflect higher performance targets set forth in the Strategic Plan, promoting superior performance

 

&zwsp;

 

 

2013-2014 Combined

 

&zwsp;

 

90% of the 2013-2014 Strategic Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

96% of the 2013-2014 Strategic Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

100% of the 2013-2014 Strategic Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

100% of the 2013-2014 Stretch Plan

 

&zwsp;

 

Combined goals are derived from our Strategic Plan and promote combined performance above 2013 levels

 

&zwsp;
                                                 

The amount of performance stock units eligible to vest varies based upon actual performance as follows:

                     

 

 

Performance vs. Payout Matrix—PSUs


&zwsp;

    

 

  2013 Corporate EBITDA

2013-2014 Corporate EBITDA

Payout

&zwsp;
    

 

 

Threshold

  $1,929.4 million   $4,048.9 million   50% payout (no payout below threshold)    

&zwsp;  

Intermediate

  $2,143.8 million   $4,318.8 million   80% payout   &zwsp;

 

 

Target

  $2,259.0 million   $4,498.8 million   100% payout    

&zwsp;  

 

Maximum

  $2,679.8 million   $4,724.0 million   150% payout    

GRAPHIC

36    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


With respect to each of 2013 results and combined 2013-2014 results, straight line interpolation is used to determine the payout for Corporate EBITDA results that are between the various levels.

Actual Corporate EBITDA for 2013 was $2,043.7 million, resulting in the named executive officers becoming eligible to receive 66.0% of the performance stock units eligible to be earned for 2013. Unless the senior executives improve upon 66.0% Corporate EBITDA performance for the 2013-2014 performance period, they will only be eligible to earn this payout.

Of this 66.0% payout, 331/3% of the performance stock units earned in 2013 vested when the Compensation Committee certified 2013 performance for the named executive officers. An additional 331/3% of the performance stock unit award (subject to increase if combined 2013-2014 performance exceeds the 2013 performance) are scheduled to vest on the second and third anniversary of the grant date if the named executive officer is still an employee on each of these dates. Each senior executive may earn more than the 66.0% award level if Corporate EBIDTA achieves a performance level exceeding 66.0% as measured under the 2013-2014 performance plan.

Corporate EBITDA Margin Performance Stock Units

In 2013, the Compensation Committee, as part of its assessment of the Corporation's long-term equity compensation programs, replaced price-vested stock units, which were granted in 2012, with performance stock units based on Corporate EBITDA margin. As noted in "—Long-Term Equity Incentives", the Compensation Committee assessed the overall mix of equity awards and believed that (i) awarding 30% of the total performance stock units to be based on Corporate EBITDA would provide appropriate incentives to promote our Corporation's performance and enhance retention of our senior executives and (ii) the use of Corporate EBITDA margin would provide incentives to our senior executives to increase the Corporation's Corporate EBITDA (which forms the other 70% portion of our Corporation's equity awards) in a responsible and sustainable way.

To earn Corporate EBITDA margin performance stock units, the senior executives must achieve a Corporate EBITDA margin level which is at least 75% of the Corporate EBITDA margin level in 2012. Corporate EBITDA margin is calculated as the ratio of Corporate EBITDA to total revenues. The Compensation Committee selected this goal in order to preserve a minimum level of financial performance while encouraging the overall increase in Corporate EBITDA.

Based on the Corporate EBITDA margins in 2012, the senior executives must achieve a Corporate EBITDA margin equal to or exceeding 13.6% in 2013 to earn these performance stock units. If Corporate EBITDA margin for 2013 equals or exceeds 13.6%, then the senior executives are eligible to earn the entire award. If the Corporate EBITDA margin for 2013 does not equal or exceed 13.6%, then the senior executives will not earn any of the award. The Compensation Committee believes that this "all or nothing" framework reinforces our pay for performance compensation philosophy and provides appropriate incentives in light of the form and amount of the other equity awards granted in 2013.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    37


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


In the Spring of 2013, the Compensation Committee granted all of our senior executives Corporate EBITDA margin performance stock units which vest 331/3% each year in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The performance conditions and vesting schedule is further summarized in the table below.

                 

 

 

Corporate EBITDA Margin Performance Stock Unit Payout Matrix—3-Year Awards



&zwsp;
    
  Corporate EBITDA Margin

Percentage of Award Earned

Vesting Schedule

&zwsp;
    
    13.6% or More   100% of Award   331/3% in 2014, 2015 and 2016    
&zwsp;   Less than 13.6%   0% of Award   N/A   &zwsp;
                 

In addition, in the Spring of 2013, the Compensation Committee granted a select number of our senior executives, including several of our named executive officers, additional performance stock units based on Corporate EBITDA margin in order to reward such senior executives for their roles in consummating the Dollar Thrifty transaction. These Corporate EBITDA margin performance stock units are identical in every respect to the awards described above, except that these awards vest 50% in 2014 and 50% in 2015. The performance conditions and vesting schedule is further summarized in the table below.

                 

 

 

Corporate EBITDA Margin Performance Stock Unit Payout Matrix—Dollar Thrifty Awards



&zwsp;
    
  Corporate EBITDA Margin

Percentage of Award Earned

Vesting Schedule

&zwsp;
    
    13.6% or More   100% of Award   50% in 2014 and 50% in 2015    
&zwsp;   Less than 13.6%   0% of Award   N/A   &zwsp;
                 

All of these awards are summarized in the "2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards" table.

Actual Corporate EBITDA margin for 2013 was 19.0%, resulting in the named executive officers earning the entire amount of Corporate EBITDA margin performance stock units.

In 2012, the former CN&G Committee made grants of performance stock units which would be awarded based on 2012 Corporate EBITDA results and combined 2012-2013 Corporate EBITDA results. Actual Corporate EBITDA for 2012 was $1,635.6 million, resulting in the named executive officers becoming eligible to receive 95.1% of the performance stock units eligible to be earned for 2012. However, depending on combined 2012-2013 Corporate EBITDA, our senior executives were eligible to earn more than the 95.1% award level if combined Corporate EBITDA exceeded the 95.1% level for 2012-2013 combined.

For combined 2012-2013 Corporate EBITDA, as a result of the acquisition of Dollar Thrifty and divestiture of Advantage, the Compensation Committee was required to modify the performance targets and results. After consideration of the impact of the business combinations, in February of 2013, the Compensation Committee used its discretion to increase the targets for the combined 2012-2013 Corporate EBITDA targets. The Compensation Committee added the results for Dollar Thrifty from the date of the acquisition (November 19, 2012) and did not include the results from the divestiture of Advantage.

GRAPHIC

38    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The amount of performance stock units eligible to vest would vary based upon actual performance, as adjusted for the acquisition of Dollar Thrifty and divestiture of Advantage, as follows:

                 

 

 

Performance vs. Payout Matrix—PSUs


&zwsp;

    

 

  2012-2013 Corporate EBITDA

Payout

&zwsp;
    

 

 

Threshold

  $3,313.7 million   50% payout (no payout below threshold)    

&zwsp;  

Intermediate

  $3,534.6 million   80% payout   &zwsp;

 

 

Target

  $3,681.9 million   100% payout    

&zwsp;  

 

Maximum

  $3,911.1 million   150% payout    

With respect to combined 2012-2013 results, straight line interpolation is used to determine the payout for Corporate EBITDA results that are between the various levels.

Actual Corporate EBITDA for 2012-2013 was $3,670.2 million, resulting in the named executive officers becoming eligible to receive 98.4% of the performance stock units eligible to be earned for combined 2012-2013.

Of this amount, 331/3% of the award earned in 2012 vested on the first anniversary of the grant date. On the second anniversary of the grant date, because the named executive officers' performance exceeded 95.1% for the combined 2012-2013 performance period, additional shares vested to reflect the improved performance in addition to the 331/3% of award that was due to vest. The additional shares vested 2/3 on the second anniversary of the grant and 1/3 on the third anniversary of grant. The remaining shares will vest on the third anniversary of grant.

In November 2013, the Compensation Committee reviewed the structure and balance of equity grants used in the Corporation's Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. After consideration of various award alternatives and in consultation with Semler Brossy, the Compensation Committee determined to continue the same award structure in 2014 as in 2013.

Policies On Timing of Equity Awards

It is our general practice not to issue equity awards with a grant date that occurs during regularly scheduled blackout periods. It is also our policy not to determine the exercise price or the number of equity awards to be granted based on market conditions prior to the date on which such equity awards were granted.

Other Compensation Elements

Retirement Benefits

We maintain retirement and savings plans for our employees. Two of these plans are tax-qualified and are broadly available to all of our employees. In addition, we maintain three non-qualified, unfunded pension plans for certain of our U.S.-based senior executives, including our named executive officers. These three plans are the Hertz Corporation Supplemental Retirement and Savings Plan, or "SERP" (which no named executive officer participates in), the Hertz Corporation Benefit Equalization Plan, or "BEP," and the Hertz Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or "SERP II." We believe these plans promote retention of our key senior executives and other participants by providing a reasonable level of retirement income reflecting their careers with us. We believe such plans are customary in the industries in which we operate, although we did not in 2013 conduct a formal review of the comparability of the terms of these plans with our Survey Group. We

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    39


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


generally have not considered these benefits when setting base salary and annual bonus amounts. The material terms of these plans are summarized below under "—Pension Benefits."

We also maintain a post-retirement assigned car benefit plan under which we provide certain senior executives who, at the time of retirement, are at least 58 years old and have been an employee of the Corporation for at least 20 years, with a car from our fleet and insurance on the car for the participant's benefit. The assigned car benefit is available for 15 years post-retirement or until the participant reaches the age of 80, whichever occurs last. As of December 31, 2013, Mr. Frissora had satisfied the minimum age, but not the minimum service requirement, Messrs. Taride and Sider had satisfied the minimum service, but not the minimum age, requirement and Messrs. Kennedy and Zimmerman had satisfied neither the minimum service nor the minimum age requirement. Ms. Douglas did not qualify for this benefit at the time of her separation.

Perquisite Policy

We provide perquisites and other personal benefits to our named executive officers that we and our Compensation Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The named executive officers are provided use of company- or third party manufacturer-provided cars, financial planning and tax preparation assistance, annual physicals and, in the case of Mr. Frissora, a country club membership. In addition, our CEO, for security purposes, uses corporate aircraft for personal and business related air travel and is provided with the services of a driver employed by us. Attributed costs of these personal benefits for the named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 are included in the "All Other Compensation" column of the Summary Compensation Table. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews our perquisite policies as required. We generally have not considered these perquisites when setting base salary and annual bonus amounts.

We also maintain a relocation policy that provides for the payment of relocation expenses in certain instances, including the relocation of our senior executives to Florida as part of the relocation of our global headquarters from New Jersey to Florida.

We use corporate aircraft for the purpose of encouraging and facilitating business travel by our senior executives (primarily our CEO) and directors, generally for travel in the United States and, less frequently, internationally. Under our aircraft policy, our CEO uses our aircraft for travel. We believe that this policy provides several business benefits to us. Our policy is intended to facilitate our CEO's access to our locations around the world and maximize his time available for our business. In addition, our policy is intended to ensure the personal safety of our CEO, who maintains a significant public role as the leader of our Corporation. Our Compensation Committee regularly reviews aircraft usage by the named executive officers and the expenses associated with such usage.

Corporate Headquarters Relocation

In 2013, we announced that we planned to move our corporate headquarters from Park Ridge, New Jersey to Estero, Florida over a two-year period. In furtherance of our goal of retaining our experienced employees, we adopted a relocation program for all of our employees agreeing to relocate to Florida from New Jersey.

The relocation program, which we developed with an experienced, third-party provider of relocation services, provides logistical, financial and administrative support for our employees and their family members during this transition period. We believe that the relocation program is consistent with other programs at similarly-situated companies and includes relocation expense allowances, home/rental finding trips and moving and storage fees for all employees. In addition, we are providing career assistance and counseling for employees who decide not to relocate to Florida. The relocation program includes, with respect to senior executives, renter/home sale

GRAPHIC

40    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


assistance, financial assistance for home sale losses, reasonable and customary expense reimbursement on new home closing costs and reimbursement for the final move to Florida. To alleviate the tax burden to our employees, we are providing tax assistance to affected employees participating in the relocation program. The relocation program provides that all employees must reimburse us for 100% of all of the assistance described above if the employee voluntarily departs within one year after relocation. In addition, for members of our management, they must reimburse us for 50% of the assistance under the relocation program if they voluntarily depart between one and two years after relocation.

We believe that the relocation program is critical to our goal of maintaining our role as of one of the world's leading car and equipment rental companies. For more information about the relocation policy for our named executive officers, see "2013 Summary Compensation Table—All Other Compensation" and "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" below.

Employment and Severance Arrangements

We have entered into change in control agreements ("Change in Control Agreements") and a severance plan covering all of our named executive officers, other than Mr. Frissora, whose employment agreement covers these issues. When we entered into these arrangements, we received advice from its compensation consultant at that time, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., as to market practices for these arrangements. In adopting these arrangements, it was our intention to provide our senior executives with severance arrangements that they would view as appropriate in light of their existing arrangements, while at the same time considering the terms of arrangements provided by our peer companies.

These arrangements consist of (i) individual Change in Control Agreements with Messrs. Kennedy, Sider, Taride and Zimmerman and Ms. Douglas, and (ii) a severance plan (the "Severance Plan for Senior Executives"). Prior to entering into these arrangements, Mr. Taride had been party to change in control agreements with Hertz and Ford. The purpose of the individual Change in Control Agreements is to provide payments and benefits to the covered executives in the event of certain qualifying terminations of their employment following a change in control of us, and the purpose of the Severance Plan for Senior Executives is to provide payments and benefits to the covered executives in the event of certain other qualifying terminations of their employment. The terms of the Change in Control Agreements and Severance Plan for Senior Executives are described in "Employment and Change in Control Agreements."

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Hedging Policy

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In May 2010, our Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for our senior executives and non-employee directors. The guidelines establish the following target ownership levels:

Equity equal to five times base salary for our CEO;

Equity equal to three times base salary for our CFO and business unit heads;

Equity equal to one times base salary for our other senior executives; and

Equity equal to three times annual cash retainer for non-employee directors.

Senior executives and non-employee directors have five years to reach the target ownership levels. Senior executives subject to the guidelines are permitted to count towards the target ownership levels shares owned outright or in trust, shares owned through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the approximate after-tax value of unvested restricted stock units (i.e., 50% of unvested restricted stock units) and the approximate after-tax value of performance stock units if the performance criteria has been met, even if the service requirement has

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    41


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


not been met (i.e., 50% of performance stock units if performance criteria is met). Non-employee directors subject to the guidelines are permitted to count towards the target ownership levels shares owned outright or in trust and the approximate after-tax value of phantom shares (i.e., 50% of phantom shares). Each of our named executive officers serving as a senior executive as of January 1, 2014 met the stock ownership guidelines other than Mr. Kennedy, who was hired in December of 2013. Mr. Kennedy purchased 41,000 shares (approximately $1 million at the time of purchase) of our common stock in December of 2013 in part to align his interests with the interests of the Corporation's stockholders.

Hedging Policy

In February of 2013, the Corporation modified its policy regarding trading in the Corporation's securities to prohibit employees from entering into any type of arrangement, contract or transaction which has the effect of pledging shares or hedging the value of our common stock.

Policy on Recovering Bonuses in the Event of a Restatement

Our "claw-back" policy applies to all of our employees who are at the director level and above, including our named executive officers, and covers:

all annual incentives,

long-term incentives,

equity-based awards, and

other performance-based compensation arrangements.

The policy provides that a repayment obligation is triggered if the Compensation Committee determines that the employee's gross negligence, fraud or misconduct caused or contributed to the need for a restatement of our financial statements within three years of the issuance of such financial statements. Our "claw-back" policy will be revised, to the extent necessary, to comply with any rules promulgated by the SEC pursuant to Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

GRAPHIC

42    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT


Tax and Accounting Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Code operates to disallow public companies from taking a federal tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain of its executive officers, excluding performance-based compensation that meets requirements mandated by the statute. As part of its role, our Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Our stockholders approved our 2008 Omnibus Plan so that awards granted under the plan may qualify as performance-based compensation. In addition, EICP payments for 2013 were generally paid to executive officers under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at the 2010 annual meeting and is designed to qualify as tax-deductible to us under Section 162(m) of the Code. When appropriate, our Compensation Committee intends to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code of compensation paid to our named executive officers. However, in certain situations, our Compensation Committee may approve compensation that will not meet these requirements in order to ensure the total compensation for our executive officers is consistent with the policies described above, particularly with regard to our CEO's salary. Accordingly, our Compensation Committee approved a base salary above $1 million for our CEO in 2013, some portion of which may not qualify as performance-based compensation, based on the determination that the benefit of providing compensation to our CEO at a level that we believe necessary to retain and reward his talents outweighs the cost of any lost tax deductibility.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with members of management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the proxy statement.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    43


Table of Contents


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE



2013 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table, or the "Summary Compensation Table," summarizes the compensation earned in 2013 by our named executive officers.

                                                         

 

 

Name and Principal Position



 

Year



 


Salary
($)




 



Stock
Awards(1)
($)





 



Option
Awards(1)
($)





 




Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
($)






 








Change in
Pension Value
and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
($)










 



All Other
Compensation(4)
($)





 


Total
($)




&zwsp;
    
    Mark P. Frissora     2013     1,423,750     8,174,233         2,748,734     2,835,800     1,156,043     16,338,560    
        Chief Executive Officer     2012     1,308,750     6,452,426         4,211,096     1,952,200     592,796     14,517,268    
          2011     1,187,500     4,945,727     2,955,619     3,520,517     1,082,200     496,730     14,188,293    

 


Elyse Douglas

 

 

2013

 

 

603,500

 

 

1,704,129

 

 


 

 

501,118

 

 

252,800

 

 

3,763,627

 

 

6,825,174

 

&zwsp;

&zwsp;  

      Former Chief Financial Officer     2012     585,000     1,447,070         681,626     578,200     17,646     3,309,542   &zwsp;

&zwsp;  

        2011     563,750     712,086     708,410     844,086     316,400     17,194     3,161,926   &zwsp;

 

 

David J. Rosenberg

 

 

2013

 

 

387,865

 

 

209,355

 

 


 

 

132,306

 

 

8,800

 

 

540,913

 

 

1,279,239

 

 
        Interim Chief Financial Officer                                                    
        and Senior Vice President                                                    

 

 

Thomas C. Kennedy

 

 

2013

 

 

38,077

 

 

341,576

 

 


 

 

48,165

 

 


 

 


 

 

427,818

 

&zwsp;

&zwsp;  

      Chief Financial Officer and                                                   &zwsp;

&zwsp;  

      Senior Executive Vice President                                                   &zwsp;

 

 

Scott P. Sider

 

 

2013

 

 

645,000

 

 

2,200,844

 

 


 

 

437,861

 

 

1,414,200

 

 

184,373

 

 

4,882,278

 

 

 

      Group President, Rent-A-Car     2012     587,500     1,576,449         775,609     1,754,900     24,904     4,719,362    

 

      Americas     2011     537,500     660,212     656,801     791,970     782,000     25,803     3,454,286    

 

 

Michel Taride(5)

 

 

2013

 

 

587,735

 

 

1,266,586

 

 


 

 

498,200

 

 

210,381

 

 

89,940

 

 

2,652,842

 

&zwsp;

&zwsp;  

      Group President, Rent-A-Car     2012     579,431     1,058,954         498,873     323,591     360,253     2,821,102   &zwsp;

&zwsp;  

      International     2011     561,185     514,022     511,368     846,711         284,418     2,717,704   &zwsp;

 

 

 Jeffrey Zimmerman

 

 

2013

 

 

515,000

 

 

1,308,461

 

 


 

 

462,072

 

 

314,500

 

 

611,632

 

 

3,211,665

 

 

 

      General Counsel, Executive     2012     487,625     939,158         643,096     359,600     22,486     2,451,965    

 

      Vice President and Secretary     2011     444,125     452,717     450,378     542,039     183,700     19,844     2,092,803    

(1)
The value for each of the years in this Summary Compensation Table reflects the full grant date fair value. These amounts were computed pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the note entitled "Stock-Based Compensation" in the notes to the Corporation's consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.


Vesting of the Corporate EBITDA performance stock units granted in 2013 were subject to the Corporation's achievement of certain pre-determined financial performance goals during 2013 and subject to upward adjustment based on financial performance goals for combined 2013-2014. The "Stock Awards" column above reflects the grant date fair values of the target number of performance stock units that were eligible to vest based on the Corporation's financial performance goals for 2013, which for accounting purposes is the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based condition applicable to the grant. This column also reflects the grant date fair value of the Corporate EBITDA margin-based performance stock units also granted in 2013. The following table below presents the aggregate grant date fair value of the Corporate EBITDA performance stock units grants assuming that (i) the actual outcome occurred, a 66.0% payout, and the awards were not subject to increase based on combined 2013-2014 financial performance and (ii) the highest level of performance condition would be achieved, resulting in a 150% payout.

GRAPHIC

44    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


                     

 

 

  2013 Performance Stock Unit Awards Based on
Corporate EBITDA
 



 

 

 

Name:


 




Aggregate Grant Date
Fair Value
(Based on
Actual Outcome)
($)





 




Aggregate Grant Date
Fair Value
(Based on
Maximum Performance)
($)






&zwsp;
    

 

 

Frissora

    3,256,133     7,400,303    

&zwsp;  

Douglas

    730,242     1,659,641   &zwsp;

 

 

Rosenberg

    96,725     219,829    

&zwsp;  

 

Kennedy

    N/A     N/A   &zwsp;

 

 

Sider

    955,134     2,170,760    

&zwsp;  

 

Taride

    585,168     1,329,927   &zwsp;

 

 

Zimmerman

    519,886     1,181,559    
                     
(2)
2013 amounts reflect amounts under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan for 2013 performance that were paid in 2014.

(3)
Amounts include annual changes in the actuarial present value of accumulated pension benefits. The present value was determined using the same assumptions applicable for valuing pension benefits for purposes of our financial statements. See the note entitled "Employee Retirement Benefits" in the notes to the Corporation's consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Due to a freeze of the Hertz UK 1972 Pension Plan and the Hertz UK Supplementary Unapproved Pension Scheme in 2011, Mr. Taride did not report an increase in pension value in 2011. The change in his pension value was $(249,332) (translated in accordance with footnote 5 of this table) for 2011.

(4)
Includes the following for 2013:

                                                                           

 

 

 

 

 




Personal
Use of
Aircraft
(a)






 





Personal
Use of
Car and
Driver
(b)







 



Financial
Planning
Assistance





 



Housing
and
Other





 


Perquisites
Subtotal




 



Life
Insurance
Premiums





 




Company
Match on
401(k)
Plan






 


Relocation
(c)




 



Tax
Assistance
(d)





 



Severance
and Other
(e)





 




Total
Perquisites
and Other
Compensation






&zwsp;
    
    Frissora     286,518     46,701     4,000     32,632 (f)   369,851     4,243     7,650     389,768     384,530         1,156,043    
&zwsp;   Douglas         5,540             5,540     1,818     7,650             3,748,619     3,763,627   &zwsp;
    Rosenberg         13,463         154,236 (g)   167,699     312     7,650     13,500     351,752         540,913    
&zwsp;     Kennedy                                               &zwsp;
    Sider         4,902     2,225         7,127     1,104     7,650     113,173     55,319         184,373    
&zwsp;     Taride(h)         5,707     11,129     1,124     17,960     1,571                 70,409 &zwsp; (i)   89,940   &zwsp;
    Zimmerman         9,616     1,030         10,646     893     7,650     305,873     286,570         611,632    

(5)
Amounts for Mr. Taride have been translated from pounds sterling to U.S. dollars at the 12-month average rate of 1.56323 for 2013, 1.58942 for 2012 and 1.604068 for 2011.

GRAPHIC

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Proxy Statement    45


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth, for each named executive officer, possible payouts under all non-equity incentive plan awards granted in 2013, all grants of performance stock units in 2013 and the grant date fair value of all such awards.

                                                               
                        
Estimated
future payouts
under non-equity
incentive plan
awards(1)
 







            
Estimated
future payouts
under equity
incentive plan
awards
 







             

 

 

Name



 


Grant
Date




 


Threshold
($)




 


Target
($)




 


Max
($)




 


Threshold
(#)




 


Target
(#)




 


Max
(#)




 



All Other
Stock
Awards(#)





 






Grant
Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards(5)
($)








&zwsp;
    
    Mark P. Frissora             2,320,000                            
        Performance Stock Units(2)     2/28/2013                 123,648     247,295     370,943         4,933,535    
        Performance Stock Units(3)     2/28/2013                     105,984     105,984         2,114,381    
        Performance Stock Units(4)     2/28/2013                     56,457     56,547         1,126,317    

 


Elyse Douglas

 

 


 

 


 

 

486,400

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

&zwsp;
&zwsp;         Performance Stock Units(2)     2/28/2013                 27,730     55,460     83,190         1,106,427   &zwsp;
&zwsp;         Performance Stock Units(3)     2/28/2013                     23,769     23,769         474,192   &zwsp;
&zwsp;         Performance Stock Units(4)     2/28/2013                     6,191     6,191         123,510   &zwsp;

 

 

David J. Rosenberg

 

 


 

 


 

 

142,529

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 
        Performance Stock Units(2)     2/28/2013                 3,673     7,346     11,019         146,553    
        Performance Stock Units(3)     2/28/2013                     3,148     3,148         62,803    

 

 

Thomas C. Kennedy

 

 


 

 


 

 

46,750

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

&zwsp;
&zwsp;         Performance Stock Units(6)     12/9/2013                             13,740     341,576   &zwsp;

 

 

Scott P. Sider

 

 


 

 


 

 

561,000

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 
        Performance Stock Units(2)     2/28/2013                 36,270     72,540     108,810         1,447,173    
        Performance Stock Units(3)     2/28/2013                     31,088     31,088         620,206    
        Performance Stock Units(4)     2/28/2013                     6,690     6,690         133,466    

 

 

Michel Taride

 

 


 

 


 

 

473,824

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

&zwsp;
&zwsp;         Performance Stock Units(2)     2/28/2013                 22,221     44,442     66,663         886,618   &zwsp;
&zwsp;         Performance Stock Units(3)     2/28/2013                     19,046     19,046         379,968   &zwsp;

 

 

J. Jeffrey Zimmerman

 

 


 

 


 

 

390,000