Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

---

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number 1-13045

---

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

745 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA 02111
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(617) 535-4766
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

---

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a small reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

        Number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of July 23, 2012: 171,639,223

   

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

Index

2

---

Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.    Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

        

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(In Thousands, except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(In Thousands, except Share Data)

(Unaudited)

 

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

8

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(1) General

        The interim consolidated financial statements are presented herein and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Iron Mountain Incorporated ("IMI") is a global, full-service provider of information management and related services for all media in various locations throughout North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. We have a diversified customer base comprised of commercial, legal, banking, health care, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government organizations.

        The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, but we believe that the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2012.

        On June 2, 2011, we completed the sale (the "Digital Sale") of our online backup and recovery, digital archiving and eDiscovery solutions businesses of our digital business (the "Digital Business") to Autonomy Corporation plc, a corporation formed under the laws of England and Wales ("Autonomy"), pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement dated as of May 15, 2011 among IMI, certain subsidiaries of IMI and Autonomy (the "Digital Sale Agreement"). Additionally, on October 3, 2011, we sold our records management business in New Zealand (the "New Zealand Business"). Also, on April 27, 2012, we sold our records management business in Italy (the "Italian Business"). The financial position, operating results and cash flows of the Digital Business, New Zealand Business and the Italian Business, including the gain on the sale of the Digital Business and the New Zealand Business and the loss on the sale of the Italian Business, for all periods presented, have been reported as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes. See Note 10 for a further discussion of these events.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a.

Principles of Consolidation

        The accompanying financial statements reflect our financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows on a consolidated basis. All intercompany account balances have been eliminated.

b.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

        Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash invested in short-term securities, which have remaining maturities at the date of purchase of less than 90 days. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

9

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        We have restricted cash associated with a collateral trust agreement with our insurance carrier related to our worker's compensation self-insurance program. The restricted cash subject to this agreement was $35,110 and $36,612 as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, and is included in current assets on our consolidated balance sheets. Restricted cash consists primarily of U.S. Treasuries.

c.

Foreign Currency

        Local currencies are considered the functional currencies for our operations outside the U.S., with the exception of certain foreign holding companies and our financing center in Switzerland, whose functional currencies are the U.S. dollar. In those instances where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at period-end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the applicable period. Resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive items, net component of Iron Mountain Incorporated Stockholders' Equity and Noncontrolling Interests. The gain or loss on foreign currency transactions, calculated as the difference between the historical exchange rate and the exchange rate at the applicable measurement date, including those related to (1) our 7¹/4% GBP Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, (2) our 6³/4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018, (3) the borrowings in certain foreign currencies under our revolving credit agreement and (4) certain foreign currency denominated intercompany obligations of our foreign subsidiaries to us and between our foreign subsidiaries, which are not considered permanently invested, are included in other expense (income), net, on our consolidated statements of operations. The total gain or loss on foreign currency transactions amounted to a net loss of $1,853 and a net gain of $1,243 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The total gain or loss on foreign currency transactions amounted to a net loss of $11,761 and $9,186 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

d.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

        Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Other than goodwill, we currently have no intangible assets that have indefinite lives and which are not amortized. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives are amortized over their useful lives. We annually assess whether a change in the life over which our intangible assets are amortized is necessary or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant.

        We have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill impairment review date. We performed our most recent annual goodwill impairment review as of October 1, 2011 and noted no impairment of goodwill. However, as a result of an interim triggering event as discussed below, we recorded a provisional goodwill impairment charge in the third quarter of 2011 associated with our Western European operations that was finalized in the fourth quarter of 2011. As of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, no factors were identified that would alter our October 1, 2011 goodwill assessment. In making this assessment, we relied on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, anticipated future cash flows, transactions and marketplace data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and our judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment.

10

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

When changes occur in the composition of one or more reporting units, the goodwill is reassigned to the reporting units affected based on their relative fair values.

        In September 2011, as a result of certain changes we made in the manner in which our European operations are managed, we reorganized our reporting structure and reassigned goodwill among the revised reporting units. Previously, we tested goodwill impairment at the European level on a combined basis. As a result of the management and reporting changes, we concluded that we have three reporting units for our European operations: (1) United Kingdom, Ireland and Norway ("UKI"); (2) Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Spain ("Western Europe"); and (3) the remaining countries in Europe ("Central Europe"). Due to these changes, we will perform all future goodwill impairment analyses on the new reporting unit basis. As a result of the restructuring of our reporting units, we concluded that we had an interim triggering event, and, therefore, we performed an interim goodwill impairment test for UKI, Western Europe and Central Europe in the third quarter of 2011 as of August 31, 2011. As required by GAAP, prior to our goodwill impairment analysis, we performed an impairment assessment on the long-lived assets within our UKI, Western Europe and Central Europe reporting units and noted no impairment, except for the Italian Business, which was included in our Western Europe reporting unit, and which is now included in discontinued operations as discussed in Note 10. Based on our analysis, we concluded that the goodwill of our UKI and Central Europe reporting units was not impaired. Our UKI and Central Europe reporting units had fair values that exceeded their carrying values by 15.1% and 4.9%, respectively, as of August 31, 2011. Central Europe is still in the investment stage, and, accordingly, its fair value does not exceed its carrying value by a significant margin at this point in time. A deterioration of the UKI or Central Europe businesses or their failure to achieve the forecasted results could lead to impairments in future periods. Our Western Europe reporting unit's fair value was less than its carrying value, and, as a result, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $46,500 included as a component of intangible impairments from continuing operations in our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. See Note 10 for the portion of the charge allocated to the Italian Business based on a relative fair value basis.

        Our reporting units at which level we performed our goodwill impairment analysis as of October 1, 2011 were as follows: North America; UKI; Western Europe; Central Europe; Latin America; Australia; and Joint Ventures (which includes India, our various joint ventures in Southeast Asia and Russia (referred to as "Joint Ventures")). As of December 31, 2011, the carrying value of goodwill, net amounted to $1,748,879, $306,150, $46,439, $63,781, $27,322, and $61,697 for North America, UKI, Western Europe, Central Europe, Latin America and Australia, respectively. Our Joint Ventures reporting unit has no goodwill as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012. Our North America, Latin America and Australia reporting units had estimated fair values as of October 1, 2011 that exceeded their carrying values by greater than 40%. As of June 30, 2012, the carrying value of goodwill, net amounted to $1,755,104, $308,148, $44,157, $81,448, $71,066, and $61,887 for North America, UKI, Western Europe, Central Europe, Latin America and Australia, respectively.

        Reporting unit valuations have been calculated using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting unit or a combined approach based on the present value of future cash flows and market and transaction multiples of revenues and earnings. The income approach

11

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

incorporates many assumptions including future growth rates, discount factors, expected capital expenditures and income tax cash flows. Changes in economic and operating conditions impacting these assumptions could result in goodwill impairments in future periods.

        The changes in the carrying value of goodwill attributable to each reportable operating segment for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

        The components of our amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2012 are as follows:

        Amortization expense associated with amortizable intangible assets (including deferred financing costs) was $8,479 and $16,730 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.

12

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Amortization expense associated with amortizable intangible assets (including deferred financing costs) was $9,606 and $19,207 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

e.

Stock-Based Compensation

        We record stock-based compensation expense, utilizing the straight-line method, for the cost of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units and shares of stock issued under the employee stock purchase plan (together, "Employee Stock-Based Awards").

        Stock-based compensation expense for Employee Stock-Based Awards included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $3,266, including $(334) in discontinued operations, ($430 income after tax or $0.00 per basic and diluted share) and $8,299, including $260 in discontinued operations, ($2,734 after tax or $0.01 per basic and diluted share), respectively. Stock-based compensation expense for Employee Stock-Based Awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $6,317 ($5,061 after tax or $0.03 per basic and diluted share) and $16,117 ($11,908 after tax or $0.07 per basic and diluted share), respectively.

        Stock-based compensation expense for Employee Stock-Based Awards included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to continuing operations is as follows:

        The benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are required to be reported as a financing cash flow. This requirement reduces reported operating cash flows and increases reported financing cash flows. As a result, net financing cash flows from continuing operations included $57 and $254 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively, from the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost. The tax benefit of any resulting excess tax deduction increases the Additional Paid-in Capital ("APIC") pool. Any resulting tax deficiency is deducted from the APIC pool.

Stock Options

        Under our various stock option plans, options were granted with exercise prices equal to the market price of the stock on the date of grant. The majority of our options become exercisable ratably over a period of five years and generally have a contractual life of ten years, unless the holder's employment is sooner terminated. Certain of the options we issue become exercisable ratably over a period of ten years and have a contractual life of 12 years, unless the holder's employment is sooner

13

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

terminated. As of June 30, 2012, ten-year vesting options represent 7.5% of total outstanding options. Beginning in 2011, certain of the options we issue become exercisable ratably over a period of three years and have a contractual life of ten years, unless the holder's employment is sooner terminated. As of June 30, 2012, three-year vesting options represented 11.8% of total outstanding options. Our non-employee directors are considered employees for purposes of our stock option plans and stock option reporting. Options granted to our non-employee directors generally become exercisable after one year.

        The weighted average fair value of options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012 was $7.43 and $7.00 per share, respectively. These values were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table summarizes the weighted average assumptions used for grants in the respective period:

        Expected volatility is calculated utilizing daily historical volatility over a period that equates to the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury interest rates whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Expected dividend yield is considered in the option pricing model and represents our current annualized expected per share dividends over the current trade price of our common stock. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted is estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees.

        A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

14

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        The following table provides the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012:

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

        Under our various stock option plans, we may also issue grants of restricted stock or restricted stock units ("RSUs"). Our restricted stock and RSUs generally have a three to five year vesting period. Certain of our RSUs accrue dividend equivalents associated with the underlying stock as we declare dividends. Dividends will generally be paid to holders of RSUs in cash upon the vesting date of the associated RSU and will be forfeited if the RSU does not vest. We accrued approximately $34 of cash dividends on RSUs issued in June 2012. The fair value of restricted stock and RSUs is the excess of the market price of our common stock at the date of grant over the purchase price (which is typically zero).

        A summary of restricted stock and RSUs activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

        The total fair value of restricted stock vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $13. The total fair value of restricted stock vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1. The total fair value of RSUs vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $462. The total fair value of RSUs vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1,985 and $5,964, respectively.

Performance Units

        Under our various stock option plans, we may also issue grants of performance units ("PUs"). The number of PUs earned is determined based on our performance against predefined targets, which were calendar year revenue growth and return on invested capital ("ROIC") for grants of PUs made in 2011 and 2012. The range of payout is zero to 150% of the number of granted PUs. The number of PUs

15

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

earned is determined based on actual performance at the end of the one-year performance period, and the award will be settled in shares of our common stock, subject to cliff vesting, three years from the date of the original PU grant. Additionally, employees who are employed through the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and who reach both 55 years of age and 10 years of qualifying service (the "retirement criteria") shall immediately and completely vest in any PUs earned based on the actual achievement against the predefined targets as discussed above. As a result, PUs will be expensed over the shorter of (1) the vesting period, (2) achievement of the retirement criteria, which such achievement may occur as early as one year after the date of grant, or (3) a maximum of three years.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we issued 221,781 PUs. During the one-year performance period, we will forecast the likelihood of achieving the predefined annual revenue growth and ROIC targets in order to calculate the expected PUs to be earned. We will record a compensation charge based on either the forecasted PUs to be earned (during the one-year performance period) or the actual PUs earned (at the one-year anniversary date) over the vesting period for each individual grant as described above. The PU liability is remeasured at each fiscal quarter-end during the vesting period using the estimated percentage of units earned multiplied by the closing market price of our common stock on the current period-end date and is pro-rated based on the amount of time passed in the vesting period. The total fair value of earned PUs that vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1,233 and $4,058, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, we expected 100.6% achievement of the predefined revenue and ROIC targets associated with the grants made in 2012, and the closing market price of our common stock was $32.96.

        A summary of PU activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

        We offer an employee stock purchase plan (the "ESPP") in which participation is available to substantially all U.S. and Canadian employees who meet certain service eligibility requirements. The ESPP provides a way for our eligible employees to become stockholders on favorable terms. The ESPP provides for the purchase of our common stock by eligible employees through successive offering

16

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

periods. We generally have two six-month offering periods per year, the first of which begins June 1 and ends November 30 and the second of which begins December 1 and ends May 31. During each offering period, participating employees accumulate after-tax payroll contributions, up to a maximum of 15% of their compensation, to pay the exercise price of their options. Participating employees may withdraw from an offering period before the purchase date and obtain a refund of the amounts withheld as payroll deductions. At the end of the offering period, outstanding options are exercised, and each employee's accumulated contributions are used to purchase our common stock. The price for shares purchased under the ESPP is 95% of the fair market price at the end of the offering period, without a look-back feature. As a result, we do not recognize compensation cost for the ESPP shares purchased. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, there were 82,267 shares and 88,672 shares, respectively, purchased under the ESPP. The number of shares available for purchase under the ESPP at June 30, 2012 was 311,089.

---

        As of June 30, 2012, unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested portion of our Employee Stock-Based Awards was $52,757 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

        We generally issue shares for the exercises of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, PUs and shares under our ESPP from unissued reserved shares.

f.

Income (Loss) Per Share—Basic and Diluted

        Basic income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The calculation of diluted income (loss) per share is consistent with that of basic income (loss) per share but gives effect to all potential common shares (that is, securities such as options, warrants or convertible securities) that were outstanding during the period, unless the effect is antidilutive.

17

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share:

g.

Revenues

        Our revenues consist of storage rental revenues as well as service revenues and are reflected net of sales and value added taxes. Storage rental revenues, which are considered a key performance indicator for the information management services industry, consist primarily of recurring periodic charges related to the storage of materials or data (generally on a per unit basis). Service revenues are comprised of charges for related core service activities and a wide array of complementary products and services. Included in core service revenues are: (1) the handling of records, including the addition

18

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

of new records, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records and the destruction of records; (2) courier operations, consisting primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request; (3) secure shredding of sensitive documents; and (4) other recurring services, including hybrid services, which relate to physical and digital records, and recurring project revenues. Our complementary services revenues include special project work, customer termination and permanent withdrawal fees, data restoration projects, fulfillment services, consulting services, technology services and product sales (including specially designed storage containers and related supplies). Our secure shredding revenues include the sale of recycled paper (included in complementary services revenues), the price of which can fluctuate from period to period, adding to the volatility and reducing the predictability of that revenue stream.

        We recognize revenue when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Storage rental and service revenues are recognized in the month the respective storage rental or service is provided, and customers are generally billed on a monthly basis on contractually agreed-upon terms. Amounts related to future storage rental or prepaid service contracts for customers where storage rental fees or services are billed in advance are accounted for as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the applicable storage rental or service period or when the service is performed. Revenue from the sales of products, which is included as a component of service revenues, is recognized when products are shipped to the customer and title has passed to the customer. Revenues from the sales of products have historically not been significant.

h.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credit Memo Reserves

        We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts and credit memos for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments and potential disputes regarding billing and service issues. When calculating the allowance, we consider our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables and credit memo activity, current economic conditions and specific circumstances of individual receivable balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to significantly change, resulting in a significant improvement or impairment of their ability to make payments, an adjustment of the allowance may be required. We consider accounts receivable to be delinquent after such time as reasonable means of collection have been exhausted. We charge-off uncollectible balances as circumstances warrant, generally, no later than one year past due.

i.

Income Taxes

        Our effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were 31.0% and 24.0%, respectively. Our effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were 54.2% and 42.0%, respectively. The primary reconciling items between the federal statutory rate of 35% and our overall effective tax rate are state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and differences in the rates of tax at which our foreign earnings are subject, including foreign exchange gains and losses in different jurisdictions with different tax rates. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, foreign currency losses were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments while foreign currency gains were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions

19

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

associated with our marking-to-market of intercompany loan positions, which reduced our 2011 effective tax rate during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 by 2.2% and 7.0%, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, foreign currency gains were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments while foreign currency losses were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of intercompany loan positions, which increased our 2012 effective tax rate by 10.2% and 0.9%, respectively.

        We provide for income taxes during interim periods based on our estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. Discrete items and changes in our estimate of the annual effective tax rate are recorded in the period they occur. Our effective tax rate is subject to variability in the future due to, among other items: (1) changes in the mix of income from foreign jurisdictions; (2) tax law changes; (3) volatility in foreign exchange gains (losses); (4) the timing of the establishment and reversal of tax reserves; and (5) our ability to utilize foreign tax credits that we generate. We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We are subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we have significant business operations. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional assessments by tax authorities and provide for these matters as appropriate. Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could result in changes in our estimates.

        Accounting for income taxes requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and for loss and credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided when recovery of deferred tax assets is not considered more likely than not.

        We have elected to recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of the provision (benefit) for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We recorded a reduction of $647 and $1,256 for gross interest and penalties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. We recorded an increase of $247 and a reduction of $2 for gross interest and penalties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. We had $2,819 and $2,817 accrued for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively.

        We have not recorded deferred taxes on book over tax outside basis differences related to certain foreign subsidiaries because such basis differences are not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future and we intend to reinvest indefinitely outside the U.S. These basis differences arose primarily through the undistributed book earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. The basis differences could be reversed through a sale of the subsidiaries, each of which would result in an increase in our provision for income taxes. It is not practicable to calculate the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on the book over tax outside basis difference because of the complexities of the hypothetical calculation. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $36,000 of undistributed earnings within our foreign subsidiaries which approximates the book over tax outside basis difference. In the event that we receive a favorable indication from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service with regard to our real estate investment trust

20

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

("REIT") private letter ruling requests, we may record deferred taxes on book over tax outside basis differences related to certain foreign subsidiaries.

        As of June 30, 2012, we have reclassified approximately $44,000 of long-term deferred income tax liabilities against current deferred income taxes and prepaid and other assets included within current assets and against accrued expenses included within current liabilities of our consolidated balance sheet related to the depreciation recapture associated with our recharacterization of racking as real estate as opposed to personal property in conjunction with our potential REIT conversion.

j.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

        Financial instruments that potentially subject us to market risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents (including money market funds and time deposits), restricted cash (primarily U.S. Treasuries) and accounts receivable. The only significant concentrations of liquid investments as of both December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012 relate to cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash held on deposit with five global banks and one "Triple A" rated money market fund, and five global banks and two "Triple A" rated money market funds, respectively, which we consider to be large, highly-rated investment-grade institutions. As per our risk management investment policy, we limit exposure to concentration of credit risk by limiting the amount invested in any one mutual fund or financial institution to a maximum of $75,000. As of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash balance was $214,955 and $206,842, respectively, including money market funds and time deposits amounting to $181,823 and $170,409, respectively. A substantial portion of the money market funds is invested in U.S. Treasuries.

k.

Fair Value Measurements

        Entities are permitted under GAAP to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at either fair value or cost. We did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of our financial assets or liabilities.

        Our financial assets or liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability's classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

        The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

        Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.

        Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

21

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

        The following tables provide the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively:

 

        Disclosures are required in the financial statements for items measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. We did not have any material items that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

22

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

l.

New Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 allows, but does not require, entities to first assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative two-step impairment test is required; otherwise, no further testing is required. We adopted ASU 2011-08 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

m.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

n.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Items, Net

        Accumulated other comprehensive items, net consists of foreign currency translation adjustments as of December, 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively.

o.

Other Expense (Income), Net

        Other expense (income), net consists of the following:

23

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(3) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

        Every derivative instrument is required to be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. Periodically, we acquire derivative instruments that are intended to hedge either cash flows or values that are subject to foreign exchange or other market price risk and not for trading purposes. We have formally documented our hedging relationships, including identification of the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking each hedge transaction. Given the recurring nature of our revenues and the long-term nature of our asset base, we have the ability and the preference to use long-term, fixed interest rate debt to finance our business, thereby preserving our long-term returns on invested capital. We target approximately 75% of our debt portfolio to be fixed with respect to interest rates. Occasionally, we may use interest rate swaps as a tool to maintain our targeted level of fixed rate debt. In addition, we may use borrowings in foreign currencies, either obtained in the U.S. or by our foreign subsidiaries, to hedge foreign currency risk associated with our international investments. Sometimes we enter into currency swaps to temporarily hedge an overseas investment, such as a major acquisition, while we arrange permanent financing or to hedge our exposure due to foreign currency exchange movements related to our intercompany accounts with and between our foreign subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, none of our derivative instruments contained credit-risk related contingent features.

        We have entered into a number of separate forward contracts to hedge our exposures in British pounds sterling and Australian dollars. As of June 30, 2012, we had (1) an outstanding forward contract to purchase $197,987 U.S. dollars and sell 125,000 British pounds sterling to hedge our intercompany exposures with our European operations and (2) an outstanding forward contract to purchase $76,613 U.S. dollars and sell 75,000 Australian dollars to hedge our intercompany exposures with our Australian subsidiary. At the maturity of the forward contracts, we may enter into new forward contracts to hedge movements in the underlying currencies. At the time of settlement, we either pay or receive the net settlement amount from the forward contract and recognize this amount in other (income) expense, net in the accompanying statement of operations as a realized foreign exchange gain or loss. At the end of each month, we mark the outstanding forward contracts to market and record an unrealized foreign exchange gain or loss for the mark-to-market valuation. We have not designated these forward contracts as hedges. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, there were $5,559 and $9,184 in net cash disbursements, respectively, included in cash from operating activities from continuing operations related to settlements associated with these foreign currency forward contracts. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, there were $2,284 and $3,787 in net cash disbursements, respectively, included in cash from operating activities from continuing operations related to settlements associated with these foreign currency forward contracts. The following table

24

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(3) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Continued)

provides the fair value of our derivative instruments as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012 and their gains and losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012:

 

 

        We have designated a portion of our 6³/4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 issued by IMI (the "6³/4% Notes") as a hedge of net investment of certain of our Euro denominated subsidiaries. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, we designated on average 69,500 and 100,500 Euros, respectively, of the 6³/4% Notes as a hedge of net investment of certain of our Euro denominated subsidiaries. As a result, we recorded foreign exchange losses of $1,908 ($1,191, net of tax) and $8,208 ($5,129, net of tax) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, related to the change in fair value of such debt due to currency translation adjustments, which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive items, net included in stockholders' equity. We recorded foreign exchange gains of $5,120 ($3,211, net of tax) and $1,365 ($866, net of tax) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, related to the change in fair value of such debt due to currency translation adjustments, which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive items, net included in stockholders' equity. As of June 30, 2012, cumulative net gains of $14,256, net of tax are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive items, net associated with this net investment hedge.

25

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(4) Acquisitions

        We account for acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting, and, accordingly, the results of operations for each acquisition have been included in our consolidated results from their respective acquisition dates. Cash consideration for our various acquisitions was primarily provided through borrowings under our credit facilities and cash equivalents on-hand. The unaudited pro forma results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2012 are not presented due to the insignificant impact of the 2012 acquisitions on our consolidated results of operations.

        In April 2012, we acquired the stock of Grupo Store, a records management and data protection business in Brazil with locations in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre and Recife, for a purchase price of approximately $79,000 ($76,000, net of cash acquired), in order to enhance our existing operations in Brazil. Included in the purchase price is approximately $8,000 being held in escrow to secure a working capital adjustment and the indemnification obligations of the former owners of the business ("Sellers") to IMI. The amounts held in escrow for purposes of the working capital adjustment will be distributed either to IMI or the Sellers based on the final agreed upon working capital amount. Unless paid to us in accordance with the terms of the agreement, all amounts remaining in escrow after the final working capital adjustment and any indemnification payments are paid out will be released to the Sellers in four annual installments, commencing on the two-year anniversary of the closing date.

        In May 2012, we acquired a controlling interest of our joint venture in Switzerland (Sispace AG) in a stock transaction for a cash purchase price of approximately $21,600, which provides storage rental and records management services. The carrying value of the 15% interest that we previously held and accounted for under the equity method of accounting amounted to approximately $1,700 as of the date of acquisition, and the fair value of such interest on the date of the acquisition of the controlling interest was approximately $2,700. This resulted in a gain being recorded to other income (expense), net of approximately $1,000 in the second quarter of 2012. The fair value of our previously held equity interest was derived by reducing the total estimated consideration for the controlling interest purchased by 30%, which represents management's estimate of the control premium paid, in order to derive the fair value of $2,700 for the 15% noncontrolling equity interest which we previously held. We determined the 30% control premium was appropriate after considering the size and location of the business acquired, the potential future profits expected to be generated by the Swiss entity and other publicly available market data.

26

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(4) Acquisitions (Continued)

        A summary of the cumulative consideration paid and the preliminary allocation of the purchase price paid for acquisitions in 2012 through June 30, 2012 is as follows:

        Allocations of the purchase price for acquisitions in 2012 were based on estimates of the fair value of net assets acquired and are subject to adjustment. We are not aware of any information that would indicate that the final purchase price allocations will differ meaningfully from preliminary estimates. The purchase price allocations of the 2012 acquisitions are subject to finalization of the assessment of the fair value of intangible assets (primarily customer relationship assets), property, plant and equipment (primarily racking), leases, contingencies and income taxes (primarily deferred income taxes).

27

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(5) Debt

        Long-term debt consists of the following:

28

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(5) Debt (Continued)

        On June 27, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement that consists of (1) revolving credit facilities under which we can borrow, subject to certain limitations as defined in the credit agreement, up to an aggregate amount of $725,000 (including Canadian dollars, British pounds sterling and Euros, among other currencies) (the "Revolving Credit Facility") and (2) a $500,000 term loan facility (the "Term Loan Facility," and collectively with the Revolving Credit Facility, the "Credit Agreement"). We have the right to increase the aggregate amount available to be borrowed under the Credit Agreement up to a maximum of $1,800,000. The Revolving Credit Facility is supported by a group of 19 banks. IMI, Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc. ("IMIM"), Canada Company, Iron Mountain Europe (Group) Limited ("IME"), Iron Mountain Australia Pty Ltd., Iron Mountain Switzerland Gmbh and any other subsidiary of IMIM designated by IMIM (the "Other Subsidiaries") may, with the consent of the administrative agent, as defined in the Credit Agreement, borrow under certain of the following tranches of the Revolving Credit Facility: (1) tranche one in the amount of $400,000 is available to IMI and IMIM in U.S. dollars, British pounds sterling and Euros, (2) tranche two in the amount of $150,000 is available to IMI or IMIM in either U.S. dollars or Canadian dollars and available to Canada Company in Canadian dollars and (3) tranche three in the amount of $175,000 is available to IMI or IMIM and the Other Subsidiaries in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, British pounds sterling, Euros and Australian dollars, among others. The Revolving Credit Facility terminates on June 27, 2016, at which point all revolving credit loans under such facility become due. With respect to the Term Loan Facility, loan payments are required through maturity on June 27, 2016 in equal quarterly installments of the aggregate annual amounts based upon the following percentage of the original principal amount in the table below (except that each of the first three quarterly installments in the fifth year shall be 10% of the original principal amount and the final quarterly installment in the fifth year shall be 35% of the original principal):

29

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(5) Debt (Continued)

        The Term Loan Facility may be prepaid without penalty or premium, in whole or in part, at any time. IMI and IMIM guarantee the obligations of each of the subsidiary borrowers. The capital stock or other equity interests of most of the U.S. subsidiaries, and up to 66% of the capital stock or other equity interests of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries, are pledged to secure the Credit Agreement, together with all intercompany obligations of foreign subsidiaries owed to us or to one of our U.S. subsidiary guarantors. The interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Agreement varies depending on our choice of interest rate and currency options, plus an applicable margin, which varies based on certain financial ratios. Additionally, the Credit Agreement requires the payment of a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility, which fee ranges from between 0.3% to 0.5% based on certain financial ratios. There are also fees associated with any outstanding letters of credit. As of June 30, 2012, we had $268,000 of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, all of which was denominated in U.S. dollars; we also had various outstanding letters of credit totaling $2,291. The remaining availability under the Revolving Credit Facility on June 30, 2012, based on IMI's leverage ratio, which is calculated based on the last 12 months' earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") and other adjustments as defined in the Credit Agreement and current external debt, was $454,709. The interest rate in effect under the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility was 2.0% and 2.3%, respectively, as of June 30, 2012. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded commitment fees and letters of credit fees of $377 and $866, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded commitment fees and letters of credit fees of $449 and $1,049, respectively, based on the unused balances under our revolving credit facilities and outstanding letters of credit.

        The Credit Agreement, our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability to complete acquisitions, pay cash dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets and take certain other corporate actions. The covenants do not contain a rating trigger. Therefore, a change in our debt rating would not trigger a default under the Credit Agreement, our indentures or other agreements governing our indebtedness. The Credit Agreement, as well as our indentures, use EBITDA-based calculations as primary measures of financial performance, including leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios. IMI's revolving credit and term leverage ratio was 3.4 and 3.5 as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 5.5. Similarly, our bond leverage ratio, per the indentures, was 3.9 and 4.1 as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 6.5. IMI's revolving credit and term loan fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.5 and 1.4 as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to a minimum allowable ratio of 1.2. Noncompliance with these leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

30

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors

        The following data summarizes the consolidating results of IMI on the equity method of accounting as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012.

        The Parent Notes and the Subsidiary Notes are guaranteed by the subsidiaries referred to below as the "Guarantors." These subsidiaries are wholly owned by the Parent. The guarantees are full and unconditional, as well as joint and several.

31

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

        Additionally, IMI guarantees the Subsidiary Notes, which were issued by Canada Company. Canada Company does not guarantee the Parent Notes. The other subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Parent Notes or the Subsidiary Notes are referred to below as the "Non-Guarantors."

32

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

33

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

34

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

35

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

36

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

37

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

38

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

39

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)

40

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(7) Segment Information

        Our reportable operating segments and Corporate are described as follows:

•

North American Business—information management services throughout the United States and Canada, including the storage of paper documents, as well as other media such as microfilm and microfiche, master audio and videotapes, film, X-rays and blueprints, including healthcare information services, vital records services, service and courier operations, and the collection, handling and disposal of sensitive documents for corporate customers ("Hard Copy"); the storage and rotation of backup computer media as part of corporate disaster recovery plans, including service and courier operations ("Data Protection"); information destruction services ("Destruction"); the scanning, imaging and document conversion services of active and inactive records ("Hybrid Services"); the storage, assembly, and detailed reporting of customer marketing literature and delivery to sales offices, trade shows and prospective customers' sites based on current and prospective customer orders ("Fulfillment"); and technology escrow services that protect and manage source code.



•

International Business—information management services throughout Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific, including Hard Copy, Data Protection, Destruction and Hybrid Services. Our European operations provide Hard Copy, Data Protection and Hybrid Services throughout Europe and Destruction services are primarily provided in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Our Latin America operations provide Hard Copy, Data Protection, Destruction and Hybrid Services throughout Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Peru. Our Asia Pacific operations provide Hard Copy, Data Protection, Destruction and Hybrid Services throughout Australia, with Hard Copy and Data Protection services also provided in certain cities in India, Singapore, Hong Kong-SAR and China.



•

Corporate—consists of costs related to executive and staff functions, including finance, human resources and information technology, which benefit the enterprise as a whole. These costs are primarily related to the general management of these functions on a corporate level and the design and development of programs, policies and procedures that are then implemented in the individual segments, with each segment bearing its own cost of implementation. Corporate also includes stock-based employee compensation expense associated with all Employee Stock-Based Awards.

41

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(7) Segment Information (Continued)

        An analysis of our business segment information and reconciliation to the consolidated financial statements is as follows:

42

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(7) Segment Information (Continued)

        The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2. Adjusted OIBDA for each segment is defined as operating income before depreciation, amortization, intangible impairments and (gain) loss on disposal/write-down of property, plant and equipment, net directly attributable to the segment. Internally, we use Adjusted OIBDA as the basis for evaluating the performance of, and allocating resources to, our operating segments.

        A reconciliation of Adjusted OIBDA to income from continuing operations before provision (benefit) for income taxes on a consolidated basis is as follows:

(8) Commitments and Contingencies

a.

Litigation

        We are involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business. A portion of the defense and/or settlement costs associated with such litigation is covered by various commercial liability insurance policies purchased by us and, in limited cases, indemnification from third parties. Our policy is to establish reserves for loss contingencies when the losses are both probable and reasonably estimable. We record legal costs associated with loss contingencies as expenses in the period in which they are incurred. The matters described below represent our significant loss contingencies. We have evaluated each matter and, if both probable and estimable, accrued an amount that represents our estimate of any probable loss associated with such matter. In addition, we have estimated a reasonably possible range for all loss contingencies including those described below. We believe it is reasonably possible that we could incur aggregate losses in addition to amounts currently accrued for all matters up to an additional $40,000 over the next several years.

b.

Patent Infringement Lawsuit

        In August 2010, we were named as a defendant in a patent infringement suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas by Oasis Research, LLC. The plaintiff alleges that the technology found in our Connected and LiveVault products infringed certain U.S. patents owned by the plaintiff and seeks an unspecified amount of damages. The trial is scheduled to begin on March 4, 2013. As part of the sale of our Digital Business, discussed at Note 10, our Connected and LiveVault

43

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(8) Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

products were sold to Autonomy, and Autonomy has assumed this obligation and the defense of this litigation and has agreed to indemnify us against any losses.

c.

Government Contract Billing Matter

        Since October 2001, we have provided services to the U.S. Government under several General Services Administration ("GSA") multiple award schedule contracts (the "Schedules"). The earliest of the Schedules was renewed in October 2006 with certain modifications to its terms. The Schedules contain a price reductions clause ("Price Reductions Clause") that requires us to offer to reduce the prices billed to the Government under the Schedules to correspond to the prices billed to certain benchmark commercial customers. Over the five years and nine months ended June 30, 2012 we billed approximately $50,000 under the Schedules. In 2011, we initiated an internal review covering the contract period commencing in October 2006, and we discovered potential non-compliance with the Price Reductions Clause. We voluntarily disclosed the potential non-compliance to the GSA and its Office of Inspector General ("OIG") in June 2011.

        We continue to review this matter and will provide the GSA and OIG with information regarding our pricing practices and the proposed pricing adjustment amount to be refunded. The GSA and OIG, however, may not agree with our determination of the refund amount and may request additional pricing adjustments, refunds, civil penalties, up to treble damages and/or interest related to our Schedules.

        In April 2012, the U.S. Government sent us a subpoena seeking information that substantially overlaps with the subjects that are covered by the voluntary disclosure process that we initiated with the GSA and OIG in June 2011, except that the subpoena seeks information dating back to 2000. Despite the substantial overlap, we understand that the subpoena relates to a separate inquiry, under the civil False Claims Act, that has been initiated independent of the GSA and OIG voluntary disclosure matter. We cannot determine at this time whether this separate inquiry will result in liability in addition to the amount that may be paid in connection with the voluntary disclosure to the OIG and GSA described above.

        Given the above, it is reasonably possible that an adjustment to our estimates may be required in the future as a result of updated facts and circumstances. To the extent that an adjustment to our estimates is necessary in a future period, we will assess, at that time, whether the adjustment is a result of a change in estimate or the correction of an error. A change in estimate would be reflected as an adjustment through the then-current period statement of operations. A correction of an error would require a quantitative and qualitative analysis to determine the approach to correcting the error. A correction of an error could be reflected in the then-current period statement of operations or as a restatement of prior period financial information, depending upon the underlying facts and circumstances and our quantitative and qualitative analysis.

d.

State of Massachusetts Notices of Assessment

        During the second quarter of 2012, we received notices of assessment from the state of Massachusetts related to a corporate excise audit of the 2004 through 2006 tax years in the aggregate amount of $8,191, including tax, interest and penalties through the assessment date. In addition, we are

44

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(8) Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

currently under a corporate excise audit by the state of Massachusetts for the 2007 and 2008 tax years. The final outcome of this audit may result in an assessment of corporate excise tax, which is comprised of two measures, an income tax, which is a component of the provision for income taxes, and a net worth tax, which is an operating charge. We will appeal the assessments to the Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board. We intend to defend this matter vigorously.

e.

Italy Fire

        We experienced a fire at a facility we leased in Aprilla, Italy on November 4, 2011. The cause of the fire is currently being investigated. The facility primarily stored archival and inactive business records for local area businesses. Despite quick response by local fire authorities, damage to the building was extensive, and the building was a total loss. We believe we carry adequate insurance and continue to assess the impact of the fire but do not expect that this event will have a material impact to our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. As discussed at Note 10, we sold our Italian Business on April 27, 2012 and we indemnified the buyers related to certain obligations and contingencies associated with the fire.

        Our policy related to business interruption insurance recoveries is to record gains within other (income) expense, net in our consolidated statement of operations and proceeds received within cash flows from operating activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows. Such amounts are recorded in the period the cash is received. Our policy with respect to involuntary conversion of property, plant and equipment is to record any gain or loss within (gain) loss on disposal/write-down of property, plant and equipment, net within operating income in our consolidated statement of operations and proceeds received within cash flows from investing activities within our consolidated statement of cash flows. Losses are recorded when incurred and gains are recorded in the period when the cash received exceeds the carrying value of the related property, plant and equipment. As a result of the sale of the Italian Business, statements of operation and cash flow impacts related to the fire will be reflected as discontinued operations.

(9) Stockholders' Equity Matters

        Our board of directors has authorized up to $1,200,000 in repurchases of our common stock. All repurchases are subject to stock price, market conditions, corporate and legal requirements and other factors. As of June 30, 2012, we had a remaining amount available for repurchase under our share repurchase program of $66,035, which represents approximately 1% in the aggregate of our outstanding common stock based on the closing stock price on such date.

        In February 2010, our board of directors adopted a dividend policy under which we have paid and in the future intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. Declaration and payment of

45

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(9) Stockholders' Equity Matters (Continued)

future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors. In fiscal year 2011 and in the first six months of 2012, our board of directors declared the following dividends:

(10) Discontinued Operations

Digital Operations

        On June 2, 2011, IMI completed the sale of the Digital Business to Autonomy pursuant to the Digital Sale Agreement. In the Digital Sale, Autonomy purchased (1) the shares of certain of IMI's subsidiaries through which IMI conducted the Digital Business and (2) certain assets of IMI and its subsidiaries relating to our Digital Business. The Digital Sale qualified as discontinued operations and, as a result, the financial position, operating results and cash flows of the Digital Business, for all periods presented, including the gain on the sale, have been reported as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes.

        Pursuant to the Digital Sale Agreement, IMI received approximately $395,400 in cash, consisting of the initial purchase price of $380,000 and a preliminary working capital adjustment of approximately $15,400, which remains subject to a customary post-closing adjustment based on the amount of working capital at closing. The purchase price for the Digital Sale will be increased on a dollar-for-dollar basis if the working capital balance at the time of closing exceeds the target amount of working capital as set forth in the Digital Sale Agreement and decreased on a dollar-for-dollar basis if such closing working capital balance is less than the target amount. We and Autonomy are in disagreement regarding the working capital adjustment in the Digital Sale Agreement. As a result, as contemplated by the Digital Sale Agreement, the matter has been referred to an independent third party accounting firm for determination of the appropriate adjustment amount. Any change in the estimated amount of working capital adjustment will be recorded within gain (loss) on the sale of discontinued operations, net of tax within our consolidated statement of operations. Transaction costs relating to the Digital Sale amounted to $7,387. Additionally, $11,075 of inducements are payable to Autonomy and have been netted against the proceeds in calculating the gain on the Digital Sale. A gain on sale of discontinued operations in the amount of $245,654 ($193,349, net of tax) was recorded during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 as a result of the Digital Sale.

46

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(10) Discontinued Operations (Continued)

        The table below summarizes certain results of operations of the Digital Business:

        There have been no allocations of corporate general and administrative expenses to discontinued operations. In accordance with our policy, we have allocated corporate interest associated with all debt that is not specifically allocated to a particular component based on the proportion of the assets of the Digital Business to our total consolidated assets at the applicable weighted average interest rate associated with such debt for such reporting period. Interest allocated to the Digital Business and included in loss from discontinued operations amounted to $978 and $2,396 for three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.

New Zealand Business

        We completed the sale of the New Zealand Business on October 3, 2011 for a purchase price of approximately $10,000. During the second quarter of 2011, we recorded an impairment charge of $4,900 to write-down the long-lived assets of the New Zealand Business to its estimated net realizable value, which is included in income (loss) from discontinued operations. Additionally, we recorded a tax benefit of $9,442 during the second quarter of 2011 associated with the outside tax basis of our New Zealand Business, which is also reflected in income (loss) from discontinued operations. No valuation allowance was provided against the $9,442 recorded as such amount is recoverable against the capital gain associated with the Digital Sale. For all periods presented, the financial position, operating results and cash flows of the New Zealand Business, including the gain on the sale, have been reported as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes.

47

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

(10) Discontinued Operations (Continued)

        The table below summarizes certain results of operations of the New Zealand Business:

Italian Business

        We committed in December 2011 to a plan to sell the Italian Business. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2011, the Italian Business was classified as held for sale, and, for all periods presented, the financial position, operating results and cash flows of the Italian Business have been reported as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes. We sold the Italian Business on April 27, 2012. We agreed to indemnify the buyers of the Italian Business for certain possible costs associated with the fire in Italy discussed more fully at Note 8.e. A loss on sale of discontinued operations in the amount of $1,885 was recorded during the three month period ended June 30, 2012 as a result of the sale of the Italian Business. Approximately $383 of cumulative translation adjustment associated with our Italian Business was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive items, net and reduced the loss on the sale by the same amount.

        The table below summarizes certain results of operations of the Italian Business:

48

---

Table of Contents

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for (1) the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, included herein, and (2) the year ended December 31, 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2012 ("Annual Report").

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        We have made statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that constitute "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other securities laws. These forward-looking statements concern our operations, economic performance, financial condition, goals, beliefs, future growth strategies, investment objectives, plans and current expectations, such as our (1) commitment to future dividend payments, (2) expected target leverage ratio, (3) expected internal revenue growth rate and capital expenditures for 2012, and (4) estimated range of taxes and other costs in 2012 in connection with our proposed conversion to a real estate investment trust. These forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. When we use words such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates" or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our expected results may not be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, among others: (1) the cost to comply with current and future laws, regulations and customer demands relating to privacy issues; (2) the impact of litigation or disputes that may arise in connection with incidents in which we fail to protect our customers' information; (3) changes in the price for our services relative to the cost of providing such services; (4) changes in customer preferences and demand for our services; (5) the adoption of alternative technologies and shifts by our customers to storage of data through non-paper based technologies; (6) the cost or potential liabilities associated with real estate necessary for our business; (7) the performance of business partners upon whom we depend for technical assistance or management expertise outside the U.S.; (8) changes in the political and economic environments in the countries in which our international subsidiaries operate; (9) with regard to our estimated tax and other REIT-conversion costs, our estimates may not be accurate, and such costs may turn out to be materially different than our estimates due to unanticipated outcomes in the private letter rulings, changes in our support functions and support costs, the unsuccessful execution of internal planning, including restructurings and cost reduction initiatives, or other factors; (10) claims that our technology violates the intellectual property rights of a third party; (11) the cost of our debt; (12) the impact of alternative, more attractive investments on dividend; (13) our ability or inability to compete acquisitions on satisfactory terms and to integrate acquired companies efficiently; and (14) other trends in competitive or economic conditions affecting our financial condition or results of operations not presently contemplated. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements except as statements of our present intentions and of our present expectations, which may or may not occur. Other risks may adversely impact us, as described more fully under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should read these cautionary statements as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to release publicly the result of any revision to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we have made in this document, as well as our other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

49

---

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Measures

Adjusted Operating Income Before Depreciation, Amortization and Intangible Impairments ("Adjusted OIBDA")

        Adjusted OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation, amortization, intangible impairments and (gain) loss on disposal/write-down of property, plant and equipment, net. Adjusted OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted OIBDA by total revenues. We use multiples of current or projected Adjusted OIBDA in conjunction with our discounted cash flow models to determine our overall enterprise valuation and to evaluate acquisition targets. We believe Adjusted OIBDA and Adjusted OIBDA Margin provide current and potential investors with relevant and useful information regarding our ability to generate cash flow to support business investment. These measures are an integral part of the internal reporting system we use to assess and evaluate the operating performance of our business. Adjusted OIBDA does not include certain items that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results, specifically: (1) (gain) loss on disposal/write-down of property, plant and equipment, net; (2) intangible impairments; (3) other expense (income), net; (4) cumulative effect of change in accounting principle; (5) income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax; (6) gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax; and (7) net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests.

        Adjusted OIBDA also does not include interest expense, net and the provision (benefit) for income taxes. These expenses are associated with our capitalization and tax structures, which we do not consider when evaluating the operating profitability of our core operations. Finally, Adjusted OIBDA does not include depreciation and amortization expenses in order to eliminate the impact of capital investments, which we evaluate by comparing capital expenditures to incremental revenue generated and as a percentage of total revenues. Adjusted OIBDA and Adjusted OIBDA Margin should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), such as operating or net income (loss) or cash flows from operating activities from continuing operations (as determined in accordance with GAAP).

Reconciliation of Adjusted OIBDA to Operating Income, Income from Continuing Operations and Net Income (in thousands):

50

---

Table of Contents

Free Cash Flows before Acquisitions and Discretionary Investment ("FCF")

        FCF is defined as Cash Flows from Operating Activities—Continuing Operations less capital expenditures (excluding real estate), net of proceeds from the sales of property and equipment and other, net and additions to customer relationship and acquisition costs. Our management uses this measure when evaluating the operating performance of our consolidated business. We believe this measure provides relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors. FCF is a useful measure in determining our ability to generate excess cash that may be used for reinvestment in the business, discretionary deployment in investments such as real estate or acquisition opportunities, returning of capital to our stockholders and voluntary prepayments of indebtedness.

Reconciliation of FCF to Cash Flows from Operating Activities—Continuing Operations (in thousands):

Adjusted Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations ("Adjusted EPS")

        Adjusted EPS is defined as reported earnings per share from continuing operations excluding: (1) (gain) loss on the disposal/write-down of property, plant and equipment, net; (2) intangible impairments; (3) other expense (income), net; and (4) the tax impact of reconciling items and discrete tax items. We do not believe these excluded items to be indicative of our ongoing operating results, and they are not considered when we are forecasting our future results. We believe Adjusted EPS is of value to investors when comparing our results from past, present and future periods.

Reconciliation of Adjusted EPS—Fully Diluted from Continuing Operations to Reported EPS—Fully Diluted from Continuing Operations:

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The

51

---

Table of Contents

preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following, which are listed in no particular order:

•

Revenue Recognition



•

Accounting for Acquisitions



•

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credit Memos



•

Impairment of Tangible and Intangible Assets



•

Accounting for Internal Use Software



•

Income Taxes



•

Stock-Based Compensation



•

Self-Insured Liabilities

        Further detail regarding our critical accounting policies can be found in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes included therein. Management has determined that no material changes concerning our critical accounting policies have occurred since December 31, 2011.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 allows, but does not require, entities to first assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative two-step impairment test is required; otherwise, no further testing is required. We adopted ASU 2011-08 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Overview

        The following discussions set forth, for the periods indicated, management's discussion and analysis of results. Significant trends and changes are discussed for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 within each section. Trends and changes that are consistent within the three and six month periods are not repeated and are discussed on a year-to-date basis.

Potential Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") Conversion

        On June 5, 2012, we announced that our board of directors, following a thorough analysis of alternatives and careful consideration of the topic and after the unanimous recommendation of the Strategic Review Special Committee (the "Special Committee"), unanimously approved a plan for IMI to pursue conversion (the "Conversion Plan") to a REIT. We have begun implementation of the Conversion Plan and we plan to make a tax election for REIT status no sooner than our taxable year

52

---

Table of Contents

beginning January 1, 2014. Any REIT election made by us must be effective as of the beginning of a taxable year; therefore, if, as a calendar year taxpayer, we are unable to convert to a REIT by January 1, 2014, the next possible conversion date would be January 1, 2015.

        If we are able to convert to, and qualify as, a REIT, we will generally be permitted to deduct from U.S. federal income taxes dividends paid to our stockholders. The income represented by such dividends would not be subject to U.S. federal taxation at the entity level but would be taxed, if at all, only at the stockholder level. Nevertheless, the income of our U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"), which will hold our U.S. operations that may not be REIT-compliant, will be subject, as applicable, to U.S. federal and state corporate income tax, and we will continue to be subject to foreign income taxes in jurisdictions in which we hold assets or conduct operations, regardless of whether held or conducted through qualified REIT subsidiaries ("QRS") or TRS. We will also be subject to a separate corporate income tax on any gains recognized during a specified period (generally, 10 years) following the REIT conversion that are attributable to "built-in" gains with respect to the assets that we own on the date we convert to a REIT. Our ability to qualify as a REIT will depend upon our continuing compliance following our conversion to a REIT with various requirements, including requirements related to the nature of our assets, the sources of our income and the distributions to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to some federal, state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property. In particular, while state income tax regimes often parallel the U.S. federal income tax regime for REITs described above, many states do not completely follow U.S. federal rules and some may not follow them at all.

        We currently estimate the incremental operating and capital expenditures associated with the Conversion Plan over the next five-year period to be approximately $100.0 million to $150.0 million. Of these amounts, approximately $20.0 million to $30.0 million is expected to be incurred in 2012, inclusive of approximately $10.0 million of capital expenditures. If the Conversion Plan is successful, we also expect to incur an additional $5.0 million to $10.0 million in annual compliance costs in future years. We may also incur costs and record non-cash charges in connection with certain potential modifications to our employee equity compensation plans associated with our conversion to a REIT.

        The Conversion Plan currently includes seeking private letter ruling ("PLR") requests from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS"). We expect that our PLR requests will have multiple components, and the conversion to a REIT will require favorable rulings from the IRS on numerous technical tax issues, including the characterization of our racking assets as real estate. We submitted our PLR requests to the IRS in July 2012, but the IRS may not provide a favorable response to our PLR requests until 2013 or at all.

Discontinued Operations

        On June 2, 2011, we completed the sale (the "Digital Sale") of our online backup and recovery, digital archiving and eDiscovery solutions businesses of our digital business (the "Digital Business") to Autonomy Corporation plc, a corporation formed under the laws of England and Wales ("Autonomy"), pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement dated as of May 15, 2011 among Iron Mountain Incorporated ("IMI"), certain subsidiaries of IMI and Autonomy (the "Digital Sale Agreement"). Additionally, on October 3, 2011, we sold our records management business in New Zealand (the "New Zealand Business"). Also, on April 27, 2012, we sold our records management business in Italy (the "Italian Business"). The financial position, operating results and cash flows of the Digital Business, New Zealand Business and the Italian Business, including the gain on the sale of the Digital Business and the New Zealand Business and the loss on the sale of the Italian Business, for all periods presented, have been reported as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes. See Note 10 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

53

---

Table of Contents

General

        Our revenues consist of storage rental revenues as well as service revenues. Storage rental revenues, which are considered a key performance indicator for the information management services industry, consist primarily of recurring periodic charges related to the storage of materials or data (generally on a per unit basis) that are typically retained by customers for many years. Service revenues are comprised of charges for related core service activities and a wide array of complementary products and services. Included in core service revenues are: (1) the handling of records, including the addition of new records, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records and the destruction of records; (2) courier operations, consisting primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request; (3) secure shredding of sensitive documents; and (4) other recurring services, including hybrid services, which relate to physical and digital records, and recurring project revenues. Our complementary services revenues include special project work, customer termination and permanent withdrawal fees, data restoration projects, fulfillment services, consulting services, technology services and product sales (including specially designed storage containers and related supplies). A by-product of our secure shredding and destruction services is the sale of recycled paper (included in complementary services revenues), the price of which can fluctuate from period to period, adding to the volatility and reducing the predictability of that revenue stream.

        We recognize revenue when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Storage rental and service revenues are recognized in the month the respective storage rental or service is provided, and customers are generally billed on a monthly basis on contractually agreed-upon terms. Amounts related to future storage rental or prepaid service contracts for customers where storage rental fees or services are billed in advance are accounted for as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the applicable storage rental or service period or when the service is performed. Revenue from the sales of products, which is included as a component of service revenues, is recognized when products are shipped to the customer and title has passed to the customer. Revenues from the sales of products have historically not been significant.

        Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) consists primarily of wages and benefits for field personnel, facility occupancy costs (including rent and utilities), transportation expenses (including vehicle leases and fuel), other product cost of sales and other equipment costs and supplies. Of these, wages and benefits and facility occupancy costs are the most significant. Trends in total wages and benefits in dollars and as a percentage of total consolidated revenue are influenced by changes in headcount and compensation levels, achievement of incentive compensation targets, workforce productivity and variability in costs associated with medical insurance and workers compensation. Trends in facility occupancy costs are impacted by the total number of facilities we occupy, the mix of properties we own versus properties we occupy under operating leases, fluctuations in per square foot occupancy costs, and the levels of utilization of these properties.

        The expansion of our international and secure shredding businesses has impacted the major cost of sales components. Our international operations are more labor intensive than our North American Business segment and, therefore, add incremental labor costs at a higher percentage of segment revenue than our North American Business segment. Our secure shredding operations incur lower facility costs and higher transportation costs as a percentage of revenues compared to our core physical businesses.

54

---

Table of Contents

        Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits for management, administrative, information technology, sales, account management and marketing personnel, as well as expenses related to communications and data processing, travel, professional fees, bad debts, training, office equipment and supplies. Trends in total wage and benefit dollars and as a percentage of total consolidated revenue are influenced by changes in headcount and compensation levels, achievement of incentive compensation targets, workforce productivity and variability in costs associated with medical insurance. The overhead structure of our expanding international operations, as compared to our North American operations, is more labor intensive and has not achieved the same level of overhead leverage, which may result in an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenue, as our international operations become a more meaningful percentage of our consolidated results.

        Our depreciation and amortization charges result primarily from the capital-intensive nature of our business. The principal components of depreciation relate to storage systems, which include racking, building and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and buildings. Amortization relates primarily to customer relationship acquisition costs and is impacted by the nature and timing of acquisitions.

        Our consolidated revenues and expenses are subject to variations caused by the net effect of foreign currency translation on revenues and expenses incurred by our entities outside the U.S. It is difficult to predict how much foreign currency exchange rates will fluctuate in the future and how those fluctuations will impact our consolidated statement of operations. Due to the expansion of our international operations, some of these fluctuations have become material on individual balances. However, because both the revenues and expenses are denominated in the local currency of the country in which they are derived or incurred, the impact of currency fluctuations on our operating income and operating margin is partially mitigated. In order to provide a framework for assessing how our underlying businesses performed excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, we compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in this report using constant currency disclosure. The constant currency growth rates are calculated by translating the 2011 results at the 2012 average exchange rates.

        The following table is a comparison of underlying average exchange rates of the foreign currencies that had the most significant impact on our U.S. dollar-reported revenues and expenses:

 

55

---

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

        Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

 

56

---

Table of Contents

REVENUES

 

        Our consolidated storage rental revenues increased $14.3 million, or 3.4%, to $433.4 million and increased $23.9 million, or 2.9%, to $858.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, from $419.1 million and $834.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The increase is attributable to internal revenue growth of 3.5% and 3.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations decreased our storage rental revenue growth rate by approximately 2.6% and 1.7% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Net acquisition/divestitures contributed 2.4% and 1.2% of the increase in reported storage rental revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Our storage rental internal growth rate in the first six months of 2012 was driven by sustained storage rental internal growth of 2.2% and 6.9% in our North American and International Business segments, respectively. Global records management net volumes increased by more than 1% over prior year levels, in-line with recent quarterly performance.

        Consolidated service revenues, consisting of core service and complementary services, decreased $20.7 million, or 6.1%, to $318.7 million and decreased $29.8 million, or 4.5%, to $639.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 from $339.4 million and $669.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Service revenue internal growth was negative 5.2% and negative 3.6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The service revenue internal growth for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was driven by negative complementary service revenue internal growth of 11.8% and 10.3%, respectively, due primarily to the significant decrease in recycled paper prices in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same prior year period, which resulted in $11.2 million and $16.1 million less of recycled paper revenue for the

57

---

Table of Contents

three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. This decline was partially offset by strong hybrid revenue growth and increased project revenues. Core service internal growth in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was negative 2.7% and negative 1.2%, respectively, due to expected declines in activity-based core services, particularly in North America, consistent with prior quarters. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations decreased reported service revenues by 2.6% and 1.7% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, over the same periods in 2011. Offsetting the decrease in reported service revenues were net acquisition/divestitures, which contributed 1.7% and 0.9% to our service revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

        For the reasons stated above, our consolidated revenues decreased $6.4 million, or 0.8%, to $752.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and decreased $5.9 million, or 0.4%, to $1,498.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $758.6 million and $1,504.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a $6.0 million reduction to reported revenues related to a pricing adjustment involving a government contract. Internal growth calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 exclude this adjustment. Internal revenue growth was negative 0.3% and positive 0.2% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. We calculate internal revenue growth in local currency for our international operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations decreased our consolidated revenues by 2.6% and 1.7%, respectively, primarily due to the weakening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Euro against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods. Offsetting the decrease in reported consolidated revenues were net acquisition/divestitures, which contributed 2.1% and 1.1% to our consolidated revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Internal Growth—Eight-Quarter Trend

        We expect our consolidated internal revenue growth rate for 2012 to be approximately (1)% to 2%. During the past eight quarters our storage rental internal growth rate has ranged between 2.3% and 3.5%. Our storage rental growth rate moderated in late 2009 and through 2010 due to the economic downturn, which resulted in reduced average net pricing gains in North America due to the low inflationary environment, episodic destructions in the physical data protection business and lower new sales and higher destruction rates in our North American Business segment. These impacts were offset by new sales in international markets. Our storage rental growth rate in 2011 and into 2012 was driven by continued solid storage rental growth in the International Business segment and sustained growth in our North American Business segment. The internal revenue growth rate for service revenue is inherently more volatile than the storage rental revenue internal growth rate due to the more discretionary nature of certain complementary services we offer, such as large special projects, and the volatility of prices for recycled paper. These revenues, which are often event-driven and impacted to a greater extent by economic downturns as customers defer or cancel the purchase of certain services as a way to reduce their short-term costs, may be difficult to replicate in future periods. As a commodity, recycled paper prices are subject to the volatility of that market. The revenue internal growth rate for service revenues reflects the following: (1) moderate declines in activity-based service revenues related to the handling and transportation of items in storage and secure shredding, particularly in North America; (2) the expected softness in our complementary service revenues, such as fulfillment services;

58

---

Table of Contents

and (3) fluctuations in the price of recycled paper, which increased during the first half of fiscal year 2011 and then began a sharp decline at the end of 2011 which continued into 2012 and (4) higher fuel surcharges.

OPERATING EXPENSES

Cost of Sales

        Consolidated cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) is comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):

 

Labor

        Labor expense increased to 20.5% of consolidated revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 19.8% in the comparable prior year period. Labor expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased by 5.4%, on a constant currency basis, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to merit increases and the reclassification of certain overhead expenses to cost of sales, as well as a $3.6 million increase in labor costs associated with our recent acquisitions. For the three and six month period ended June 30, 2012, favorable currency rate changes reduced the reported growth rate of labor expenses by 3.1 and 2.1 percentage points, respectively.

Facilities

        Facilities costs decreased to 14.0% of consolidated revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 14.3% in the comparable prior year period. The largest component of our facilities cost is rent expense, which, in constant currency terms, decreased by $0.6 million to $102.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 primarily due to facility consolidations in North America in fiscal year 2011. Other facilities costs decreased by approximately $0.4 million, in constant currency terms, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. Facilities costs increased by $3.5 million, in constant currency terms, in

59

---

Table of Contents

the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a $2.8 million increase in facilities costs within our International Business segment, consisting primarily of costs associated with our recent acquisitions. Facilities costs were favorably impacted by 2.8 and 1.7 percentage points due to currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Transportation

        Transportation expenses increased by $1.3 million in constant currency terms during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 as a result of a $1.2 million increase in fuel and vehicle repair costs. Transportation expenses were favorably impacted by 2.8 and 1.8 percentage points due to currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Product Cost of Sales and Other

        Product cost of sales and other, which includes cartons, media and other service, storage and supply costs, is highly correlated to complementary revenue streams. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, product cost of sales and other increased by $0.4 million as compared to the prior year on an actual basis and is correlated to higher project revenues. These costs were favorably impacted by 3.7 and 2.5 percentage points due to currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):

 

60

---

Table of Contents

General and Administrative

        General and administrative expenses decreased to 16.4% of consolidated revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 16.5% in the comparable prior year period. In constant currency terms, general and administrative expenses increased by $2.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to increased stock-based compensation expense of $6.9 million, as well as $5.3 million of additional costs related to the Conversion Plan, and a $1.5 million increase associated with our recent acquisitions, which was partially offset by a decrease in professional fees associated with our proxy contest in fiscal year 2011, as well as the reclassification of certain overhead expenses to cost of sales. In constant currency terms, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to corporate overhead efficiency initiatives, in addition to $10.5 million of costs that were incurred in the second quarter of 2011 associated with our proxy contest, partially offset by $3.3 million of additional costs related to the Conversion Plan, as well as a $3.0 million increase in stock-based compensation. General and administrative expenses were favorably impacted by 2.3 and 1.6 percentage points due to currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Sales, Marketing & Account Management

        Sales, marketing and account management expenses decreased to 7.8% of consolidated revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 8.4% in the comparable prior year period. In constant currency terms, the decrease of $8.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 is primarily due to a $6.7 million reduction in compensation expenses, primarily associated with a decrease in commissions expense within our North American Business segment, as well as a corresponding reduction in the associated payroll taxes. Sales, marketing and account management expenses were favorably impacted by 2.0 and 1.3 percentage points due to currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Information Technology

        In constant currency terms, information technology expenses decreased $7.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to decreased compensation expenses of $5.7 million, as well as, decreased professional fees of $1.2 million. Information technology expenses were favorably impacted by 2.3 and 1.5 percentage points due to currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Bad Debt Expense

        Consolidated bad debt expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $0.6 million, or 12.4%, to $4.2 million (0.3% of consolidated revenues) compared to $4.8 million (0.3% of consolidated revenues) in the same period in 2011. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts that is calculated based on our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances of individual receivable balances. We continue to monitor our customers' payment activity and make adjustments based on their financial condition and in light of historical and expected trends.

Depreciation, Amortization, and (Gain) Loss on Disposal/Write-down of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

        Depreciation expense decreased $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, consisting of $3.0 million within our North American Business and Corporate segments associated with information technology assets reaching the end of their useful life

61

---

Table of Contents

and $2.4 million in our International Business segment primarily related to accelerated depreciation taken in previous years due to the decision to exit certain facilities in the United Kingdom.

        Amortization expense increased $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the increased amortization of customer relationship intangible assets acquired through business combinations.

        Consolidated loss on disposal/write-down of property, plant and equipment, net was $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Consolidated gain on disposal/write-down of property, plant and equipment, net was $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

OPERATING INCOME and ADJUSTED OIBDA

        As a result of the foregoing factors, (1) consolidated operating income increased $9.8 million, or 6.5%, to $158.7 million (21.1% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $148.9 million (19.6% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2011; (2) consolidated operating income increased $14.0 million, or 4.9%, to $300.5 million (20.1% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $286.5 million (19.0% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2011; (3) consolidated Adjusted OIBDA increased $8.0 million, or 3.5%, to $235.6 million (31.3% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $227.6 million (30.0% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2011; and (4) consolidated Adjusted OIBDA increased $11.2 million, or 2.5%, to $456.1 million (30.4% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $444.9 million (29.6% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

OTHER EXPENSES, NET

Interest Expense, Net

        Consolidated interest expense, net increased $9.6 million to $58.2 million (7.7% of consolidated revenues) and $19.8 million to $117.0 million (7.8% of consolidated revenues) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, from $48.6 million (6.4% of consolidated revenues) and $97.2 million (6.5% of consolidated revenues) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, primarily due to the issuance of $400.0 million in aggregate principal of our 7³/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2019 (the "7³/4% Notes due 2019") in September 2011, as well as increased borrowings under our revolving credit facility, which was partially offset by the early retirement of $231.3 million of our 7³/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 (the "7³/4% Notes due 2015") during early 2011. Our weighted average interest rate was 6.6% and 7.1% at June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively.

Other (Income) Expense, Net (in thousands)

        Net foreign currency transaction losses of $9.2 million, based on period-end exchange rates, were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2012. Losses were primarily a result of changes in the

62

---

Table of Contents

exchange rate of each of the Euro and Brazilian real, as these currencies relate to our intercompany balances with and between our European and Brazilian subsidiaries, as well as additional losses associated with our British pound sterling denominated debt and forward foreign currency swap contracts. These losses were partially offset by gains resulting primarily from Euro denominated bonds issued by IMI, as well as additional gains resulting from the change in the exchange rate of the British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar compared to December 31, 2011, as it relates to our intercompany balances with and between our subsidiary in the United Kingdom.

        Net foreign currency transaction gains of $1.2 million, based on period-end exchange rates, were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2011. Gains resulted primarily from changes in the exchange rate of each of the British pound sterling, Euro, Russian ruble and Australian dollar against the U.S. dollar compared to December 31, 2010, as these currencies relate to our intercompany balances with and between our European and Australian subsidiaries, which were partially offset by losses as a result of British pound sterling denominated debt and forward foreign currency swap contracts and Euro denominated bonds issued by IMI.

        We recorded a gain of approximately $0.9 million in the first quarter of 2011 related to the early extinguishment of $231.3 million of the 7³/4% Notes due 2015 that were redeemed. This gain consists of original issue premiums, net of deferred financing costs related to our 7³/4% Notes due 2015 that were redeemed. Additionally, we recorded a charge of $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2011 related to the early retirement of our previous revolving credit and term loan facilities, representing a write-off of deferred financing costs.

        Other, net in the six months ended June 30, 2012 consists primarily of $1.5 million of gains associated with our acquisition of equity interests that we previously held associated with our Turkish and Swiss joint ventures and $0.4 million of gains related to certain marketable securities held in a trust for the benefit of employees included in a deferred compensation plan we sponsor. Other, net in the six months ended June 30, 2011 consists primarily of a $5.9 million gain associated with the fair valuing of the 20% equity interest that we previously held associated with our Polish joint venture in connection with our acquisition of the remaining 80% interest in January 2011.

Provision for Income Taxes

        Our effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were 31.0% and 24.0%, respectively. Our effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were 54.2% and 42.0%, respectively. The primary reconciling items between the federal statutory rate of 35% and our overall effective tax rate are state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and differences in the rates of tax at which our foreign earnings are subject, including foreign exchange gains and losses in different jurisdictions with different tax rates. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, foreign currency losses were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments while foreign currency gains were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of intercompany loan positions, which reduced our 2011 effective tax rate during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 by 2.2% and 7.0%, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, foreign currency gains were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments while foreign currency losses were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of intercompany loan positions, which increased our 2012 effective tax rate by 10.2% and 0.9%, respectively.

        We provide for income taxes during interim periods based on our estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. Discrete items and changes in our estimate of the annual effective tax rate are recorded in the period they occur. Our effective tax rate is subject to variability in the future due to, among other items: (1) changes in the mix of income from foreign jurisdictions; (2) tax law changes; (3) volatility in

63

---

Table of Contents

foreign exchange gains (losses); (4) the timing of the establishment and reversal of tax reserves; and (5) our ability to utilize foreign tax credits that we generate. We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We are subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we have significant business operations. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional assessments by tax authorities and provide for these matters as appropriate. Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could result in changes in our estimates.

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

        As a result of the foregoing factors, (1) consolidated income from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $26.0 million, or 38.6%, to $41.4 million (5.5% of consolidated revenues) from income from continuing operations of $67.5 million (8.9% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and (2) consolidated income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $46.1 million, or 31.0%, to $102.5 million (6.8% of consolidated revenues) from income from continuing operations of $148.6 million (9.9% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND GAIN (LOSS) ON SALE OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX

        Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax was $(7.8) million and $(0.6) million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and $(14.3) million and $(5.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

        A gain on sale of discontinued operations in the amount of $245.7 million ($193.3 million, net of tax) was recorded during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 as a result of the Digital Sale. A loss on sale of discontinued operations in the amount of $1.9 million ($1.9 million, net of tax) was recorded during the three month period ended June 30, 2012 as a result of the sale of the Italian Business.

NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

        For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests resulted in a decrease in net income attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated of $0.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $0.4 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. These amounts represent our noncontrolling partners' share of earnings/losses in our majority-owned international subsidiaries that are consolidated in our operating results.

Segment Analysis (in thousands)

        Our reportable operating segments are North American Business, International Business and Corporate. See Note 7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our North American Business segment offers information management services throughout the United States and Canada, including the storage of paper documents, as well as other media such as microfilm and microfiche, master audio and videotapes, film, X-rays and blueprints, including healthcare information services, vital records services, service and courier operations, and the collection, handling and disposal of sensitive documents for corporate customers ("Hard Copy"); the storage and rotation of backup computer media as part of corporate disaster recovery plans, including service and courier operations ("Data Protection"); information destruction services ("Destruction"); the scanning, imaging and document conversion services of active and inactive records ("Hybrid Services"); the storage, assembly, and detailed reporting of customer marketing literature and delivery to sales offices, trade shows and

64

---

Table of Contents

prospective customers' sites based on current and prospective customer orders ("Fulfillment"); and technology escrow services that protect and manage source code. Our International Business segment offers information management services throughout Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific, including Hard Copy, Data Protection, Destruction and Hybrid Services. Corporate consists of costs related to executive and staff functions, including finance, human resources and information technology, which benefit the enterprise as a whole. These costs are primarily related to the general management of these functions on a corporate level and the design and development of programs, policies and procedures that are then implemented in the individual segments, with each segment bearing its own cost of implementation. Corporate also includes stock-based employee compensation expense associated with all employee stock-based awards.

North American Business

 

        During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, revenue in our North American Business segment decreased 1.0% and 0.8% compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, primarily due to negative internal growth of 1.3% and 0.7%, respectively. The negative internal growth was driven by negative complementary service revenue internal growth of 13.3% and 11.8%, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The negative complementary service revenue internal growth was primarily a result of a decrease in the price of recycled paper. The negative internal growth was also driven by negative core service internal growth of 3.0% and 1.7%, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, which was primarily a result of lower service and activity levels. Partially offsetting the negative service growth was storage rental revenue internal growth of 2.2% related to increased new sales and lower volume outflows in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. Additionally, unfavorable foreign currency rate changes related to the Canadian dollar resulted in decreased reported revenues, as measured in U.S. dollars, of 0.3% for the first half of 2012. Adjusted OIBDA, as a percentage of segment revenue, decreased in the first half of 2012 compared to the first half of 2011 as a result of the decrease in recycled paper revenue.

65

---

Table of Contents

International Business

 

        Revenue in our International Business segment increased 0.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2012 over the same period last year due to internal growth of 3.2%. Foreign currency fluctuations in 2012, primarily in Europe, resulted in decreased 2012 revenue, as measured in U.S. dollars, of approximately 8.9% and 5.9% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to 2011. Total internal revenue growth for the segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was supported by solid 7.7% and 6.9% storage rental internal growth, respectively. Acquisitions contributed 5.9% and 3.4% of the increase in total reported international revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, primarily due to our acquisition in Poland in the first quarter of 2011 and our acquisitions in Switzerland and Brazil in the second quarter of 2012. Adjusted OIBDA as a percentage of segment revenue increased by 180 basis points in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the comparable prior year period primarily due to increased operating income from productivity gains, pricing actions and disciplined cost management.

Corporate

 

66

---

Table of Contents

        During the six months ended June 30, 2012, expenses in the Corporate segment as a percentage of consolidated revenue decreased 0.7% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to the advisory fees associated with our proxy contest that were incurred in fiscal year 2011 of $14.2 million that did not repeat in 2012, as well as reduced information technology expenses of $6.6 million, partially offset by a $7.8 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and $5.3 million of costs incurred related to the Conversion Plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The following is a summary of our cash balances and cash flows (in thousands) as of and for the six months ended June 30,

        Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $216.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $241.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The 10.1% decrease resulted primarily from higher cash payments for incentive compensation and income taxes in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.

        Our business requires significant capital expenditures to support our expected revenue growth and ongoing operations as well as new products and services and increased profitability. These expenditures are included in the cash flows from investing activities from continuing operations. The nature of our capital expenditures has evolved over time along with the nature of our business. We make capital expenditures to support a number of different objectives. The majority of our capital goes to support business line growth and our ongoing operations, but we also expend capital to support the development and improvement of products and services and projects designed to increase our profitability. These expenditures are generally small and more discretionary in nature. Cash paid for our capital expenditures, cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired) and additions to customer acquisition costs during the six months ended June 30, 2012 amounted to $107.4 million, $107.3 million and $8.1 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, capital expenditures, net, cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired) and additions to customer acquisition costs were funded with cash flows provided by operating activities from continuing operations, cash equivalents on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Excluding potential future acquisitions, we expect our capital expenditures to be approximately $235.0 million in the year ending December 31, 2012. Included in our estimated capital expenditures for 2012 is approximately $30.0 million of real estate purchases (inclusive of data warehousing capital spend).

        Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations was $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we received net borrowings under our revolving credit and term loan facilities and other debt of $119.6 million and $11.0 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and purchases under the employee stock purchase plan. We used the proceeds from these financing transactions and cash on hand to repurchase $38.1 million of our common stock and to pay dividends in the amount of $86.0 million on our common stock.

        Our board of directors has authorized up to $1.2 billion in repurchases of our common stock. All repurchases are subject to stock price, market conditions, corporate and legal requirements and other factors. As of June 30, 2012, we had a remaining amount available for repurchase under our share repurchase program of $66.0 million, which represents approximately 1% in the aggregate of our outstanding common stock based on the closing stock price on such date.

67

---

Table of Contents

        The following table is a summary of our repurchase activity under all of our share repurchase programs during the first six months of 2012:

        In February 2010, our board of directors adopted a dividend policy under which we have paid and in the future intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. Declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors. In June 2012, we announced an 8% increase to our next six regular quarterly dividend payments, accelerating distributions to stockholders over that period with total cash dividends of approximately $280.0 million, based on our currently outstanding shares of common stock. We may pay certain distributions after becoming a REIT in the form of cash and common stock. In fiscal year 2011 and in the first six months of 2012, our board of directors declared the following dividends:

        In April 2011, we announced a three-year strategic plan that included stockholder payouts through a combination of share buybacks, ongoing quarterly dividends and potential one-time dividends of approximately $2.2 billion through 2013, with approximately $1.2 billion to be paid out by May 2012. We fulfilled our commitment to returning $1.2 billion of capital to stockholders by May 2012. The REIT Conversion Plan, however, includes several modifications to our commitment to stockholder payouts that was initiated in April 2011. In accordance with tax rules applicable to REIT conversions, we anticipate making distributions to stockholders of our accumulated earnings and profits of approximately $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion (collectively, the "E&P Distribution"), which we expect to pay in a combination of common stock and cash dividends, with up to 80% of the E&P Distribution in the form of common stock and at least 20% in cash. We expect we will distribute a significant portion of the E&P Distribution in the fourth quarter of 2012, in advance of potential tax law changes impacting dividends. The balance will be paid out over several years beginning in 2013 based, in part, on IRS rules and the timing of the conversions of additional international operations into the REIT structure. With regard to our levels of indebtedness, we plan to operate within our target leverage ratio range of 3x - 4x EBITDA (as defined in our revolving credit facility).

68

---

Table of Contents

        There are significant tax and other costs associated with implementing the Conversion Plan, and certain tax liabilities may be incurred regardless of the whether we ultimately succeed in converting to a REIT. In addition, we must undertake major modifications to our internal systems, including accounting, information technology and real estate, in order to convert to a REIT. We currently estimate that we will incur approximately $325.0 million to $425.0 million in costs to support the Conversion Plan, including related tax liabilities associated with a change in our method of depreciating and amortizing various assets, including our racking, from its current method to methods that are consistent with the characterization of such assets as real property. The total recapture of depreciation and amortization expenses across all relevant assets is expected to result in U.S. federal and state income tax liabilities of approximately $225.0 million to $275.0 million, to be paid out over up to five years beginning in 2012, a significant portion of which may be paid in 2012. These liabilities were already reflected as long-term deferred income taxes on our consolidated balance sheet. As such, there will be no income statement impact associated with the payment of these tax liabilities. However, we have reclassified $44.0 million of long-term deferred income tax liabilities against current deferred income taxes and prepaid and other assets included within current assets and accrued expenses included within current liabilities of our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012. Additionally, we currently estimate the incremental operating and capital expenditures associated with the Conversion Plan over the next five-year period to be approximately $100.0 million to $150.0 million. Of these amounts, approximately $20.0 million to $30.0 million is expected to be incurred in 2012, inclusive of approximately $10.0 million of capital expenditures.

        Financial instruments that potentially subject us to market risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents (including money market funds and time deposits), restricted cash (primarily U.S. Treasuries) and accounts receivable. The only significant concentrations of liquid investments as of June 30, 2012 relate to cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash held on deposit with five global banks and two "Triple A" rated money market funds, which we consider to be large, highly-rated investment-grade institutions. As per our risk management investment policy, we limit exposure to concentration of credit risk by limiting the amount invested in any one mutual fund or financial institution to a maximum of $75.0 million. As of June 30, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash balance was $206.8 million, including money market funds and time deposits amounting to $170.4 million. A substantial portion of the money market funds is invested in U.S. Treasuries.

69

---

Table of Contents

        We are highly leveraged and expect to continue to be highly leveraged for the foreseeable future. Our consolidated debt as of June 30, 2012 was comprised of the following (in thousands):

        On June 27, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement that consists of (1) revolving credit facilities under which we can borrow, subject to certain limitations as defined in the credit agreement, up to an aggregate amount of $725.0 million (including Canadian dollars, British pounds sterling and Euros, among other currencies) (the "Revolving Credit Facility") and (2) a $500.0 million term loan facility (the "Term Loan Facility", and collectively with the Revolving Credit Facility, the "Credit Agreement"). We have the right to increase the aggregate amount available to be borrowed under the Credit Agreement up to a maximum of $1.8 billion. The Revolving Credit Facility is supported by a group of 19 banks. IMI, Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc. ("IMIM"), Canada Company, Iron Mountain Europe (Group) Limited ("IME"), Iron Mountain Australia Pty Ltd., Iron Mountain Switzerland Gmbh and any other subsidiary of IMIM designated by IMIM (the "Other Subsidiaries") may, with the consent of the administrative agent, as defined in the Credit Agreement, borrow under certain of the following tranches of the Revolving Credit Facility: (1) tranche one in the amount of $400.0 million is available to IMI and IMIM in U.S. dollars, British pounds sterling and Euros,

70

---

Table of Contents

(2) tranche two in the amount of $150.0 million is available to IMI or IMIM in either U.S. dollars or Canadian dollars and available to Canada Company in Canadian dollars and (3) tranche three in the amount of $175.0 million is available to IMI or IMIM and the Other Subsidiaries in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, British pounds sterling, Euros and Australian dollars, among others. The Revolving Credit Facility terminates on June 27, 2016, at which point all revolving credit loans under such facility become due. With respect to the Term Loan Facility, loan payments are required through maturity on June 27, 2016 in equal quarterly installments of the aggregate annual amounts based upon the following percentage of the original principal amount in the table below (except that each of the first three quarterly installments in the fifth year shall be 10% of the original principal amount and the final quarterly installment in the fifth year shall be 35% of the original principal):

        The Term Loan Facility may be prepaid without penalty or premium, in whole or in part, at any time. IMI and IMIM guarantee the obligations of each of the subsidiary borrowers. The capital stock or other equity interests of most of the U.S. subsidiaries, and up to 66% of the capital stock or other equity interests of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries, are pledged to secure the Credit Agreement, together with all intercompany obligations of foreign subsidiaries owed to us or to one of our U.S. subsidiary guarantors. The interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Agreement varies depending on our choice of interest rate and currency options, plus an applicable margin, which varies based on certain financial ratios. Additionally, the Credit Agreement requires the payment of a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility, which fee ranges from between 0.3% to 0.5% based on certain financial ratios. There are also fees associated with any outstanding letters of credit. As of June 30, 2012, we had $268.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, all of which was denominated in U.S. dollars; we also had various outstanding letters of credit totaling $2.3 million. The remaining availability under the Revolving Credit Facility on June 30, 2012, based on IMI's leverage ratio, which is calculated based on the last 12 months' earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") and other adjustments as defined in the Credit Agreement and current external debt, was $454.7 million. The interest rate in effect under the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility was 2.0% and 2.3%, respectively, as of June 30, 2012.

        The Credit Agreement, our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability to complete acquisitions, pay cash dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets and take certain other corporate actions. The covenants do not contain a rating trigger. Therefore, a change in our debt rating would not trigger a default under the Credit Agreement, our indentures or other agreements governing our indebtedness. The Credit Agreement, as well as our indentures, use EBITDA-based calculations as primary measures of financial performance, including leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios. IMI's revolving credit and term leverage ratio was 3.4 and 3.5 as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 5.5. Similarly, our bond leverage ratio, per the indentures, was 3.9 and 4.1 as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 6.5. IMI's revolving credit and term loan fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.5 and 1.4 as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to a minimum allowable ratio of 1.2. Noncompliance with these leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

71

---

Table of Contents

        Our ability to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, working capital levels and capital structure, which are subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors which may be beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that future financings will be available on acceptable terms or in amounts sufficient to enable us to service or refinance our indebtedness or to make necessary capital expenditures.

        In April 2012, we acquired the stock of Grupo Store, a records management and data protection business in Brazil with locations in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre and Recife, for a purchase price of approximately $79.0 million ($76.0 million, net of cash acquired) in order to enhance our existing operations in Brazil. Included in the purchase price is approximately $8.0 million being held in escrow to secure a working capital adjustment and the indemnification obligations of the former owners of the business ("Sellers") to IMI. The amounts held in escrow for purposes of the working capital adjustment will be distributed either to IMI or the Sellers based on the final agreed upon working capital amount. Unless paid to us in accordance with the terms of the agreement, all amounts remaining in escrow after the final working capital adjustment and any indemnification payments are paid out will be released to the Sellers in four annual installments, commencing on the two-year anniversary of the closing date.

        In May 2012, we acquired a controlling interest of our joint venture in Switzerland (Sispace AG) in a stock transaction for a cash purchase price of approximately $21.6 million, which provides storage rental and records management services.

        We expect to meet our cash flow requirements for the next twelve months from cash generated from operations, existing cash, cash equivalents, borrowings under the Credit Agreement, other financings, which may include senior subordinated notes, secured credit facilities, securitizations and mortgage or capital lease financings, and the issuance of equity. We expect to meet our long-term cash flow requirements using the same means described above. If we convert to a REIT, we expect our long-term capital allocation strategy will naturally shift toward increased use of equity to support lower leverage, though our leverage may increase in the short-term to fund the costs to support the Conversion Plan.

Net Operating Losses and Foreign Tax Credit Carryforwards

        We have federal net operating loss carryforwards, which begin to expire in 2020 through 2025, of $25.9 million ($9.0 million, tax effected) at June 30, 2012 to reduce future federal taxable income. We have an asset for state net operating losses of $7.9 million (net of federal tax benefit), which begins to expire in 2012 through 2025, subject to a valuation allowance of approximately 99%. We have assets for foreign net operating losses of $40.3 million, with various expiration dates, subject to a valuation allowance of approximately 72%. We also have foreign tax credits of $56.1 million, which begin to expire in 2014 through 2019, subject to a valuation allowance of approximately 65%.

Inflation

        Certain of our expenses, such as wages and benefits, insurance, occupancy costs and equipment repair and replacement, are subject to normal inflationary pressures. Although to date we have been able to offset inflationary cost increases through increased operating efficiencies and the negotiation of favorable long-term real estate leases, we can give no assurance that we will be able to offset any future inflationary cost increases through similar efficiencies, leases or increased storage or service charges.

72

---

Table of Contents

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        The term "disclosure controls and procedures" is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information is recorded, processed, summarized and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding what is required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act. As of June 30, 2012 (the "Evaluation Date"), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2012, we determined that we had a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, because we failed to maintain effective controls over the identification and monitoring of price reduction clauses in certain U.S. government customer contracts. As discussed below, our management is in the process of actively addressing and remediating this material weakness. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as a result of our unremediated material weakness. To address this control weakness, we performed additional analysis and performed other procedures in order to prepare the unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, in conformity with GAAP.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

        Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

        During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we have continued to undertake actions to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting identified at the end of 2011. These actions include appropriate and reasonable steps to make necessary improvements to our internal control over financial reporting including:

•

Hiring a government contract compliance specialist;



•

Developing and implementing a process to appropriately identify government contracts with price reduction clauses; and



•

Developing and implementing procedures to track and monitor benchmark pricing and calculating any related price reductions under these contracts.

        We continue our remediation efforts and we expect these efforts, which include design, implementation and testing, to continue throughout fiscal year 2012. We believe that the remediation measures described above will strengthen our internal control over financial reporting and remediate the material weakness we have identified. We plan to continue making assessments of and implementing such other actions that are determined to be necessary or advisable in further remediation of this area of our internal control over financial reporting.

        Except as otherwise discussed above, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

73

---

Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

        Our businesses face many risks. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and under "Forward Looking Statements" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as in Part I—Item 1A under the heading "Risk Factors" and the information contained under the heading "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2012, and the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other documents that we file with the SEC from time to time before making an investment decision regarding our securities. If any of these risks actually occurs, our businesses, financial condition or results of operations could suffer and the trading price of our debt or equity securities could decline.

        The information presented below updates and should be read in connection with the risk factors and information disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2012.

Risks Related to the Proposed REIT Conversion

Although following our strategic review process we have chosen to pursue conversion to a REIT, we may not be successful in converting to a REIT effective January 1, 2014, or at all.

        As previously announced, in June 2011 we formed the Special Committee to, among other things, evaluate ways to maximize stockholder value through alternative financing, capital, and tax strategies, including evaluating a potential conversion to a REIT. In June 2012, our board of directors unanimously approved the Conversion Plan. There are significant implementation and operational complexities to address before we can convert to a REIT, including obtaining a favorable PLR from the IRS, completing internal reorganizations, modifying accounting, information technology and real estate systems, receiving stockholder approvals and making required stockholder payouts. Further, changes in legislation or the federal tax rules could adversely impact our ability to convert to a REIT.

        Additionally, several conditions must be met in order to complete the conversion to a REIT, and the timing and outcome of many of these conditions are beyond our control. For example, we cannot provide assurance that the IRS will ultimately provide us with a favorable PLR or that any favorable PLR will be received in a timely manner for us to convert successfully to a REIT as of January 1, 2014. Even if the transactions necessary to implement REIT conversion are effected, our board of directors may decide not to elect REIT status, or to delay such election, if it determines in its sole discretion that it is not in the best interests of us or our stockholders. We can provide no assurance if or when conversion to a REIT will be successful. Furthermore, the effective date of the REIT conversion could be delayed beyond January 1, 2014, in which event we could not elect REIT status until the taxable year beginning January 1, 2015, at the earliest.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits to stockholders, including the achievement of significant tax savings for us, increases in income distributable to stockholders, the potential to lower our cost of financing through increased ownership of currently leased real estate and the expansion of our stockholder base.

        Even if we convert to a REIT and elect REIT status, we cannot provide assurance that our stockholders will experience benefits attributable to our qualification and taxation as a REIT, including our ability to (1) reduce our corporate level federal tax through distributions to stockholders, (2) lower our cost of financing or (3) expand our stockholder base. The realization of the anticipated benefits to stockholders will depend on numerous factors, many of which are outside our control, including interest rates. In addition, future distributions to stockholders will depend on our cash flows, as well as the impact of alternative, more attractive investments as compared to dividends. Further, changes in legislation or the federal tax rules could adversely impact the benefits of being a REIT.

74

---

Table of Contents

We may not qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

        Although, if we convert to a REIT, we plan to operate in a manner consistent with REIT qualification rules, we cannot provide assurance that we will, in fact, qualify as a REIT or remain so qualified. REIT qualification involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), to our operations as well as various factual determinations concerning matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. There are limited judicial or administrative interpretations of these provisions.

Complying with REIT qualification requirements may limit our flexibility or cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

        To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our common stock. For example, under the Code, no more than 25% of the value of the assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of one or more TRS and other nonqualifying assets. This limitation may affect our ability to make large investments in other non-REIT qualifying operations or assets. As such, compliance with REIT tests may hinder our ability to make certain attractive investments, including the purchase of significant nonqualifying assets and the material expansion of non-real estate activities.

There are uncertainties relating to our estimate of our E&P Distribution, as well as the timing of such E&P Distribution and the percentage of common stock and cash we may distribute.

        We have provided an estimated range of the E&P Distribution. We are in the process of conducting a study of our pre-REIT accumulated earnings and profits as of the close of our 2010 taxable year using our historic tax returns and other available information. This is a very involved and complex study, which is not yet complete, and the actual result of the study relating to our pre-REIT accumulated earnings and profits as of the close of our 2010 taxable year may be materially different from our current estimates. In addition, the estimated range of our E&P Distribution is based on our projected taxable income for our 2011, 2012 and 2013 taxable years and our current business plans and performance, but our actual earnings and profits (and the actual E&P Distribution) will vary depending on, among other items, the timing of certain transactions, our actual taxable income and performance for 2012 and 2013 and possible changes in legislation or tax rules and IRS revenue procedures relating to distributions of earnings and profits. For these reasons and others, our actual E&P Distribution may be materially different from our estimated range.

        We anticipate distributing a significant portion of the E&P Distribution in the fourth quarter of 2012, with the balance being distributed over several years beginning in 2013, but the timing of the planned E&P Distribution, which may or may not occur, may be affected by potential tax law changes, including an extension of the current tax regime on the taxation of dividends, the completion of various phases of the REIT conversion process and other factors beyond our control.

        We also anticipate paying up to 80% of the E&P Distribution in the form of common stock. We may in fact decide, based on our cash flows and strategic plans, IRS revenue procedures relating to distributions of earnings and profits, leverage and other factors, to pay some or all of the E&P Distribution entirely in cash or a different mix of cash and common stock.

We may be required to borrow funds or raise equity to satisfy our E&P Distribution and other conversion costs.

        Depending on the ultimate size and timing of the stockholder distributions and the cash outlays associated with our conversion to a REIT, we may raise debt and/or issue equity in the near-term to fund these disbursements, even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these

75

---

Table of Contents

borrowings or offerings. Whether we issue equity, at what price and amount and other terms of any such issuances will depend on many factors, including alternative sources of capital, our then existing leverage, our need for additional capital, market conditions and other factors beyond our control. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities or debt convertible into equity securities, the percentage of stock ownership by our existing stockholders may be reduced. In addition, new equity securities or convertible debt securities could have rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of our current stockholders, which could substantially decrease the value of our securities owned by them. Depending on the share price we are able to obtain, we may have to sell a significant number of shares in order to raise the capital we deem necessary to execute our long-term strategy, and our stockholders may experience dilution in the value of their shares as a result.

There are uncertainties relating to the costs associated with implementing the Conversion Plan.

        We have provided an estimated range of our tax and other costs to convert to a REIT, including estimated tax liabilities associated with a change in our method of depreciating and amortizing various assets and annual compliance costs. Our estimate of these taxes and other costs, however, may not be accurate, and such costs may in actuality be materially different from our estimates due to unanticipated outcomes in the PLR, changes in our business support functions and support costs, the unsuccessful execution of internal planning, including restructurings and cost reduction initiatives, or other factors.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

        We did not sell any unregistered securities during the three months ended June 30, 2012, nor did we repurchase any shares of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $66.0 million available for future repurchase under our authorized stock repurchase program.

76

---

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Exhibits

(a)   Exhibits

        Certain exhibits indicated below are incorporated by reference to documents we have filed with the Commission. Each exhibit marked by a pound sign (#) is a management contract or compensatory plan.

77

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

78

---