Edgar Filing: METRON TECHNOLOGY N V

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 000-27863

METRON TECHNOLOGY N.V.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

The Netherlands
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

98-0180010
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

4425 Fortran Drive
San Jose, California 95134-2300

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (408) 719-4600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common shares, par value 0.44 EUR per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the last sale price of the Common Shares on November 28, 2003 as reported by the Nasdaq National Market, was approximately $41,676,000. Shares held by each officer and director of the registrant and by each person who owns 5 percent or more of the outstanding Common Shares have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status for this purpose is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant's Common Shares, 0.44 EUR par value, as of July 31, 2004 was 12,831,996.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Information required by Part III will be contained in the Company's definitive proxy statement with respect to the Company's 2004 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview and Industry Background

Metron Technology N.V. was organized under the laws of The Netherlands in 1975 as a holding company. Today, we are a leading global provider of outsource solutions to the semiconductor industry. Metron is focused on delivering outsourcing alternatives to semiconductor device manufacturers, original equipment manufacturers and suppliers of production materials.

The manufacture of semiconductor devices requires a wide array of equipment, materials and services all geared toward cost-effective and high-throughput results in a wafer fabrication facility, or "fab". The high cost of development and the desire of device manufacturers to buy products from financially and technically strong suppliers have led to consolidation among equipment manufacturers. At the same time, the long-term growth prospects of the industry continue to attract small players with new technologies to fill product niches.

The semiconductor industry has experienced significant volatility, but has generally grown over time. The increasing use of semiconductors in communications, computers, consumer electronics and networking has fueled this growth. In order to take advantage of market growth, device manufacturers seek suppliers that can support production with peripheral services at competitive prices and with global standards. In the meantime, they are making advances in technology, requiring higher investment on the front end of production due to increases in manufacturing steps and increasingly complicated manufacturing processes. The high capital cost of a fab, which can exceed $2 billion, requires that optimal productivity levels are reached quickly and maintained, maximizing the return on investment. Many device manufacturers are required to run their fabs around-the-clock and in multiple locations throughout the world. The requirement for the rapid ramp-up of new facilities and new products has led many device manufacturers to concentrate on the standardization of all aspects of their operations.

Outsourcing is an emerging trend in today's semiconductor industry that addresses the needs of both the fab and the industry's suppliers. Dramatic swings in the global business environment have compelled companies to re-evaluate costly, inflexible business practices and adopt outsourcing alternatives as their preferred business processes. We have positioned Metron as a global resource, providing an option in the market for companies to outsource non-core functions of their business through the business solutions we have defined as "Fab Solutions" and "Equipment Solutions".

A semiconductor device manufacturer is faced with the challenges of shrinking design widths and increasing complexity of design. To stay competitive, a device manufacturer must closely monitor the supply chain that provides production materials, exercise careful judgment with capital expenditures and service contracts and maintain the highest integrity in production standards. By outsourcing the non-core areas of a production facility, a device manufacturer is able to better focus valuable resources on staying competitive and developing leading-edge technologies.

An original equipment manufacturer (OEM) is faced with different challenges. While also faced with the challenges of shrinking design widths and increasing complexity of design, an OEM needs to

focus resources on the development of next generation equipment and provide high levels of service and support for equipment in the field. The OEM must have the resources to service leading-edge systems as well as previous generation systems, which can remain in production for ten or more years, ensuring customer satisfaction and protecting their reputation in the market. By outsourcing the sales, manufacturing, spare parts supply and field support of previous generation equipment, the OEM gains the ability to concentrate on next generation systems, which are at the heart of its future success.

For a supplier of production materials, while the barriers to entry into the market are comparatively low, the challenges of growing market share and meeting the demands of a growing global customer base are high. Customers require local inventories of materials to meet their production schedules, just-in-time deliveries and on-demand support. A supplier must have a significant revenue stream to establish a global infrastructure to adequately support global customers. By outsourcing sales, marketing and managed inventory services for their products, suppliers can concentrate on their core competencies of product development and manufacturing standards.

Metron is focused exclusively on bringing outsourcing alternatives to the semiconductor industry. Since 1975, we have developed the expertise and resources needed to serve semiconductor industry customers at all levels of technology and in all regions of the world. We provide the critical link between semiconductor device manufacturers, OEMs and suppliers. Metron is a leading global provider of outsource solutions to the semiconductor industry.

We provide semiconductor device manufacturers with an alternative for outsourcing non-core, critical functions of the fab. Our Fab Solutions offering is focused on enabling device manufacturers to:

•: simplify the supply chain by consolidating material, equipment and services through one supplier throughout the world;
•: focus valuable resources on product design, development and marketing; and
•: increase fab productivity in a cost-effective manner.

We provide OEMs with an outsourcing alternative for manufacturing, marketing, sales and service of previous generation equipment. Our Legends Product Line is focused on enabling OEMs to:

•: concentrate on the design and development of advanced, next generation technology equipment;
•: maintain critical levels of support for previous generation equipment without the investment in infrastructure; and
•: increase customer satisfaction.

We provide semiconductor industry suppliers with timely and comprehensive marketing, sales, service and support solutions. Both our Fab Solutions and Equipment Solutions offerings enable suppliers to:

•: focus resources on product development and manufacturing of products;
•: reduce time to market, financial risk and marketing investment; and
•: compete more effectively with larger companies that have established infrastructures.

Strategy

Our mission is to provide the semiconductor industry with cost-effective, risk-free solutions for outsourcing critical non-core functions. The following are the key elements to our strategy:

• Leverage our global infrastructure and expand our leadership position
We believe that our global infrastructure, as well as our history of serving the semiconductor industry for more than 25 years, provides us with a significant competitive advantage in serving our customers

and suppliers. As of May 31, 2004, we had over 435 sales and marketing and customer service and support employees in 37 offices in Asia, Europe and the United States.

• Continue to broaden product and service offerings
We plan to selectively broaden our product lines and service offerings to meet the needs of our customers. We plan to expand into products and services that are tied to the utilization of that fab and which tend to be less cyclical. We plan to expand on-site maintenance, repair and refurbishment, inventory management and other support services. We also plan to add additional equipment to our Legends Product Line. We believe these efforts will strengthen our long-term relationships with our customers.

• Continue to develop and strengthen our Outsource Solutions Center concept
We seek to provide an integrated solution for outsourcing critical, non-core functions of semiconductor fabs through the development of regional Outsource Solution Centers. Outsource Solution Centers are expected to provide customers with one local source for many of the products and services used in device manufacturing. We will continue to work with customers to develop customized solutions based on their local requirements. We believe that our Outsource Solution Centers offer significant benefits to fabs worldwide for improving the efficiency of the supply chain and re-focusing critical resources away from the non-core functions and back to their areas of expertise: the development and manufacture of semiconductor devices.

• Acquire complementary businesses
To enable us to better serve our suppliers and customers, we plan to selectively acquire complementary businesses. Potential acquisition candidates include independent regional sales, service and support companies, which currently operate in a highly-fragmented segment of the semiconductor industry. We believe that our acquisition strategy will allow us to gain access to new suppliers and territories, broaden our offerings to existing customers and gain new customers. As examples of this strategy, our acquisition of T.A. Kyser Co. in July 1998 established Metron in the United States as a key supplier of production materials and components. With our acquisition of Shieldcare Ltd. in March 2000, we entered the process tool parts cleaning business, and in November 2000, we acquired Intec Technology (S) Pte. Ltd., a supplier of cleanroom products and manufacturer of cleanroom garments in Singapore and Malaysia. In March 2002, we acquired the AG Associates rapid thermal processing (RTP) product line from Mattson Technologies, and in May 2002, we acquired substantially all the assets of Advanced Stainless Technologies (AST), a small Texas-based manufacturer of electro-polished stainless steel tubing and fittings. In June 2003, we acquired certain assets of the cleanroom consumable business of Prudential Cleanroom Services, a business unit of Prudential Overall Supply, Inc. In September 2003, we acquired certain assets related to the Eclipse physical vapor deposition line from Tokyo Electron Limited (TEL).

Products and Services

Metron's portfolio is focused on delivering outsource solutions to the semiconductor industry. Prior to fiscal 2004, we were organized in two divisions: Equipment Division and Materials Division. In fiscal 2004, to better serve our customers, we reorganized into two new worldwide operating groups: Fab Solutions Group and Equipment Solutions Group.

The Metron Fab Solutions Group represents a new outsourcing model for the semiconductor industry, with products and services solely focused on the needs of the semiconductor fab. Through an extensive network of preferred suppliers and branded services, we are able to offer fab customers worldwide a comprehensive portfolio to address the critical, non-core functions of the fab. Our Fab Solutions Group is organized into five distinct product lines: Cleanroom Integrated Services, Gas & Fluid Handling, Materials Logistics & Spares, Parts Cleaning & Conditioning and Repair

Refurbishment & Service. As of May 31, 2004, the Fab Solutions product lines represented over 100 suppliers and provided a myriad of fab services.

The table below provides a view of the categories of products and services sold within the Fab Solutions Group and the major suppliers within each category, for fiscal 2004:

Products and Services	Types of Products	Major Suppliers
Cleanroom Integrated Solutions	Cleanroom consumables, wipers & swabs Cleanroom consumables: latex gloves Cleanroom apparel	Texwipe Omni Sales Fristads Metron
Gas & Fluid Handling	Valves, fittings and other components for ultrapure applications Stainless steel control valves and regulators Electropolished stainless steel tubing High end filtration products and systems	Entegris Fujikin/Carten Tescom Metron AST Pall
Materials, Spares & Logistics	Pellicles Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) pads Pumps Device handling vacuum release transport trays Quartz components	MLI Planar Labs IDI-Cybor Gel-Pak MGI Products
Parts Cleaning & Conditioning	Parts cleaning & conditioning services, logistics & tracking	Metron
Repair, Refurbishment & Service	Pump repair RF matching network repair	Metron Trazar authorized Metron Repair
	Chiller repair Robot repair	Metron Metron

The Metron Equipment Solutions Group is focused on providing OEMs with a complete, integrated outsource package for all stages of the life cycle of capital equipment—from sales, installation, warranty, field service and beyond, with retrofit and refurbishment services. Metron Equipment Solutions include a range of equipment and services categorized under two distinct product lines: Legends Product Line and Specialty Equipment product line.

The Legends Product Line concentrates on the extension of the life cycle of previous generation equipment. OEMs have production equipment installed in fabs worldwide. The installed base varies across a wide range of technology and in the age of the equipment. The infrastructure required to support previous generation equipment is an expense that distracts OEMs from their core competency: the development of next generation technology. Our Legends Product Line specifically focuses on supporting customers of previous generation systems, alleviating the cost of support to the OEM and enabling the customer to secure quality production results from their investments. We manufacture, market, sell and provide spare parts and field service for our Legends products on a global basis.

Our Legends Product Line includes:

•: rapid thermal processing (or RTP, a process in which wafers are rapidly heated to high temperature and cooled back to room temperature in an ambient gas environment and a necessity for the fabrication of advanced semiconductor devices) tools developed by AG Associates;

•: physical vapor deposition (or PVD, a coating process involving the transport of a material to a wafer under an electric field) tools developed by Varian Associates; and
•: PVD tools known as Eclipse developed by Materials Research Corporation (MRC) and acquired in an asset purchase from TEL.

The Specialty Equipment product line has been a long-standing element of our business model. Specialty Equipment systems are produced by external suppliers and retain the suppliers' brand identification when delivered to the market. We provide the marketing, sales, support and spare parts for Specialty Equipment lines, allowing the original manufacturers to focus on developing their technologies rather than diluting their resources to reach distant markets. Our global infrastructure and employed base of engineers are both key facets of the Specialty Equipment business.

Our Specialty Equipment line includes:

•: photomask coating and development systems, for the process of patterning the high-purity quartz or glass plates used to transfer integrated circuit design patterns to wafers;
•: microlithography systems, for the process in which an image is projected onto a wafer by passing light through a photomask;
•: metrology systems, for the measurement and inspection of wafers during the fabrication process; and
•: wafer inspection and defect characterization systems, for the process in which wafers are inspected during and after fabrication.

Product selection is critical to Metron's success. In our evaluation of new product lines, we review numerous factors, including: current and projected revenue stream and market share; development within the targeted market segment; the existence or absence of distribution arrangements; the prospective supplier's anticipated ability to offer innovative and advanced products; the history and stability of the prospective supplier; and our ability to market, sell and provide a consistent level of service and support for the product line.

Sales and Marketing

Our worldwide sales and marketing organization is essential to our strategy to develop the Metron Outsource Solution Center (OSC) concept. In fiscal year 2004, we organized our sales group into 12 OSCs. Each OSC is strategically located in a major semiconductor production region of the world and is focused on providing the customers of that region with one local source for products and services used in the manufacturing cycle. Metron OSCs offer call center capability and are networked across our infrastructure, enabling us to maintain a reliable inventory management and order processing system and thereby increasing the speed of order fulfillment. We plan to expand the exposure of our OSCs within the industry to elevate awareness of our capabilities.

As of May 31, 2004, we had 241 sales and marketing employees. We also employ 128 highly-skilled technicians and engineers and 171 manufacturing and production personnel around the world. This skilled infrastructure is critical to support our sales and marketing organization and our customers. Our service personnel receive extensive training in Metron standards and receive certification in the technical aspects of the products they support. We believe that prompt and effective field support is critical to our sales efforts.

By continuing to maintain a local focus in most major markets and staffing those offices with nationals fluent in local languages and customs, we are able to provide our suppliers and customers of Fab and Equipment Solutions with sales, service, applications and other field support 24 hours per day, seven days per week, where necessary.

Customers

We market outsource capabilities to most of the world's device manufacturers and to many other customers in the semiconductor industry. In fiscal 2004, our ten largest customers accounted for an aggregate of 32% of our sales. We expect that sales to industry-related customers will continue to account for a significant percentage of our revenue, although the relative revenue ranking of individual customers may change from period to period. The table below lists in alphabetical order our ten largest customers in fiscal 2004 based on revenue, and the geographic regions where we support them:

Customer		Locations
Advanced Mask Technology		Germany
Applied Materials, Inc		Israel, Italy, Japan, United States
Canon		Japan, United States
Celerity Group		United States
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing		Singapore
Intel		China, Ireland, Israel, United Kingdom, United States
Motorola		China, France, United Kingdom, United States
Philips		France, Germany, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States
ST Microelectronics		France, Italy, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States
Tower Semiconductor		Israel

Competition

The semiconductor industry is highly competitive. We face substantial competition on two distinct fronts: competition for product lines and competition for customers.

Competition for Product Lines

We compete with independent sales companies that are generally smaller than Metron and localized to a specific geographic region for the right to sell specific product lines. Some of these independent sales companies have long-standing collaborative business relationships with semiconductor industry suppliers, or a history of supplying to a specific region, both of which are challenges to securing product lines. While there are many independent sales companies in the competitive landscape, there are few positioned to support product lines with consistent sales, marketing and support globally. We believe that to compete effectively for product lines we must maintain a high level of investment in marketing, customer service and support in all of the markets in which we operate. We consider our global infrastructure, fab-oriented operations and our reputation to be significant competitive advantages for securing product lines.

Competition for Customers

We compete with semiconductor industry suppliers who sell directly to customers and with other independent sales companies who may represent a supplier to specific device manufacturer customers. Some of these competitors have greater name recognition in the territories they serve or long-standing relationships with device manufacturers that may give them a competitive advantage. There are other industry suppliers with whom we may compete within a segment of our offering, but who do not offer the same depth and breath of products and services as Metron, which is a competitive advantage for our company.

price. We anticipate that as we expand our product portfolio and expand into new markets, we will encounter additional competition.

We believe that customers in the semiconductor industry are seeking to streamline purchasing and require a global company that offers a comprehensive global outsource solution. We consider our global infrastructure and our diverse product offering to be significant competitive advantages for securing customers.

Financial Information about Segments and Geographic Areas

See Note 16 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.

Employees

As of May 31, 2004, we had 725 full-time employees, of which 413 were in our Fab Solutions group, 214 were in our Equipment Solutions group and 98 were in general administrative activities, including finance and accounting, shipping and receiving and corporate management. Of our full-time employees, 222 are located in the United States, 298 are located in Europe and 205 are located in Asia. None of our employees is covered by a collective bargaining arrangement. We consider our relationships with our employees to be good.

RISK FACTORS

Our business faces significant risks. These risks include those described below and may include additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks occurs, our business, operating results or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. These risks should be read in conjunction with the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Metron.

Our internal controls may not be sufficient to ensure timely and reliable financial information.

In response to a letter the Audit Committee of our Supervisory Board received from our independent registered public accountants regarding a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal controls, we believe we need to correct deficiencies in our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The deficiency identified related to insufficient internal controls over revenue recognition to ensure transactions were properly recorded in accordance with management's criteria and generally accepted accounted principles. Specifically, our independent registered public accountants identified six instances where revenue had been recognized in the books of our subsidiaries even though the transactions did not meet our established revenue recognition policy. Failure to address this deficiency in a timely manner increases the risk of material future financial reporting misstatements occurring and not being detected on a timely basis and may prevent us from being able to meet our filing deadlines.

Working with our Audit Committee, we are continuing the process of identifying and implementing corrective actions where required to improve the design and effectiveness of our internal controls, including the enhancement of systems and procedures. Significant additional resources will be required to establish and maintain appropriate controls and procedures and to prepare the required financial and other information during this process.

Even after corrective actions are implemented, the effectiveness of our controls and procedures may be limited by a variety of risks including:

•: faulty human judgment and simple errors, omissions or mistakes;
•: collusion of two or more people;
•: inappropriate management override of procedures; and
•: risk that enhanced controls and procedures may still not be adequate to assure timely and reliable financial information.

If we fail to have effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting in place, we could be unable to provide timely and reliable financial information.

We may need to raise additional capital, and any inability to raise required funds could harm our business.

As of May 31, 2004, we had $12.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and $13.9 million of short-term borrowings, of which $12.2 million were under our various borrowing facilities and $1.1 million was due to TEL. We incurred net losses of $16.9 million, $26.7 million and $2.8 million for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In June 2004, we issued $6.0 million principal amount of convertible debentures due 2008. We believe that our available cash resources, which are comprised of cash and cash equivalents (including the net proceeds from our June 2004 issuance of $6.0 million of convertible debentures), amounts available under the Company's credit facilities (giving effect to the repayment and termination of the Compass Bank facility and to the

obtaining of a new facility from CIT, both of which occurred in November 2003), and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company's anticipated cash requirements through the next 12 months. However, if our revenues are lower than expected or our expenses are higher than anticipated, or if inventory, accounts receivable or other assets require a greater use of cash than anticipated, our available cash resources, including amounts available under our credit facilities, may not be sufficient for our cash requirements to meet all of our obligations, including current payments of $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively, to TEL under the $7.7 million promissory note and the $6.0 million obligation for the license agreement in connection with the purchase of certain assets from TEL. Failure to meet these obligations could impact our revenues if we are unable to sell Eclipse products pursuant to the license arrangement with TEL. Further, existing and potential customers and vendors may take actions that could harm our liquidity position if they believe that our cash balances are not adequate. Depending on market conditions, any additional financing the Company may need may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. In addition, if revenues increase materially, we may need to raise additional cash resources from external sources to permit us to conduct our operations in the ordinary course of business through fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2005, we will continue to evaluate whether we should seek additional financing to meet our anticipated cash requirements for fiscal 2006 and beyond.

We cannot give any assurance that financing will be available when needed on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we determine that we need to issue additional equity securities or debt securities convertible into equity to address our need for cash resources, the issuance of additional equity securities or debt securities convertible into equity is likely to result in significant dilution to our existing shareholders, and the new equity securities or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our existing common shares. It may be necessary to raise additional funds through strategic transactions, in which event we may cease conducting or relinquish rights to a portion of our current business. Strategic transactions may not be available on terms that are favorable to us from a longer-term perspective.

In addition to our intent to raise capital to fund our operations, we may need to raise additional capital through public or private sales of equity and/or additional borrowings for significant acquisitions, significant capital expenditures or other extraordinary transactions. If we cannot raise additional funds, if needed, on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop our business, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, all of which could seriously harm our business and results of operations.

Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources are expected to be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement. This statement involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our, or our industry's, actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in these "Risks Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We may not be able to meet certain covenants in or renew certain credit facilities.

As of May 31, 2004, we had $13.9 million of short-term borrowings, of which $12.2 million were under our various lines of credit and the remaining balance primarily related to the current portion of the debt incurred in connection with purchase of certain assets from TEL. Certain of our credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to meet and maintain certain financial tests. We were in violation of the covenant under the CIT facility for January 2004, for which we obtained a waiver. As of May 31, 2004, we were in compliance with this covenant and all other covenants in our credit facilities.

A breach of a covenant in a credit facility could result in the lender demanding repayment of all or part of our indebtedness, could impair our ability to obtain additional access to our current or alternate credit facilities and could result in a cross-default under our convertible debentures.

All of our lines of credit are payable on demand or subject to periodic, generally annual, review. Given recent developments in our business and industry, we cannot give any assurance that our lenders will agree to continue to make our credit facilities available to us, or that new lenders will agree to make credit facilities available to us, on terms or in amounts acceptable to us, or at all.

Any failure to retain our existing credit facilities or enter into replacement facilities may impair our ability to fund our current operations and achieve our longer-term business objectives. If our significant credit facility lenders demand repayment of all or a significant portion of our indebtedness during fiscal 2005, may not have the cash resources necessary to repay such indebtedness when due.

Our outstanding convertible debentures may accelerate upon the occurrence of certain events of default, and we may not be able to repay our convertible debentures upon such acceleration.

In August 2003 and June 2004, the Company completed the sale of $7.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively, aggregate principal amount of its convertible debentures. Upon any "Event of Default" (as defined in the convertible debentures and described below), the outstanding convertible debentures and any unpaid interest thereon may, at the holder's election, become immediately due and payable in cash. Upon any such acceleration, the aggregate amount so due and payable is determined according to a formula set forth in the convertible debentures, which could result in an aggregate payment in excess of 120% of the principal amount of convertible debentures plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon plus all other amounts, costs, expenses and liquidated damages due in respect of the convertible debentures. The "Events of Default" under the convertible debentures include, among other things:

•: any default in the payment of principal, interest or liquidated damages in respect of any convertible debentures (subject to a 5-day cure period);
•: any material breach of any material covenant contained in any of the documents or agreements executed in connection with the Financing (subject to a 15-day cure period);
•: the commencement of certain bankruptcy, liquidation or related procedures by or against the Company or certain of its subsidiaries;
•: any default by the Company in its obligations under certain of the Company's current or future mortgages, credit agreements, facilities and other indebtedness if that default results in the acceleration of any payment under that indebtedness;
•: certain change of control transactions involving the Company or certain redemptions or repurchases by the Company of more than 100,000 of the Company's outstanding common shares; and
•: certain other events described in the convertible debentures.

We cannot give any assurance that our cash reserves in the event of such an acceleration of the convertible debentures will be sufficient to repay the amounts due and payable upon such an acceleration. In addition, the use of our cash reserves to make any such accelerated repayment of the convertible debentures could seriously harm our business.

We are dependent on a few key suppliers for a majority of our revenue; therefore, the loss of or change in our relationship with one or more of our key suppliers could seriously harm our business.

If, for any reason, any of our key suppliers were to materially reduce its business or terminate its relationship with us, the loss of the key supplier would have a material adverse effect on our business.

In each of our last three fiscal years, a majority of our revenue came from the sale of products from five or fewer of our suppliers, which is how we refer to the semiconductor materials and equipment companies we represent. Although the suppliers that comprise our largest sources of revenue may change from period to period, we expect that revenue from the sale of products of a relatively small number of suppliers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenue for at least the next five years.

All of the semiconductor materials, equipment and products we market, sell, service and support are sold pursuant to agreements with our suppliers. These agreements are generally cancellable at will, subject to notification periods that range from 30 days to two years. We generally do not sell competing products in the same market, and, therefore, the number of suppliers we can represent at any one time is limited. It is likely that in the future some of our suppliers will terminate their relationships with us upon relatively short notice. If we lose a key supplier, we may not be able to find a replacement quickly, or at all. The loss of a key supplier may cause us to lose customers and incur expenses associated with ending our agreement with that supplier. We may lose suppliers for various reasons, including:

•: mergers and acquisitions involving our suppliers and other semiconductor materials and equipment manufacturers that we do not represent;
•: a supplier's decision to attempt to build a direct sales organization;
•: the expansion of a supplier's product offerings to compete with the products of another supplier, because we generally do not offer competing product lines;
•: a supplier's dissatisfaction with our level or quality of service; and
•: the failure of a supplier's business.

We have lost suppliers in the past. For example, in March 1999, A.G. Associates was acquired by Steag. As a result of this acquisition, we ceased marketing and selling A.G. Associates' products in September 1999. In July 1999, FSI sold its chemical management division to BOC Edwards. As a result of this divestiture, we no longer market and sell these products. In October 1999, Applied Materials acquired Obsidian. As a result of the acquisition, Obsidian terminated its agreement with us. In May 2002, by mutual agreement, we terminated our distributor agreement with August Technology, except in Korea. In August 2002, Cabot Microelectronics advised us of its decision to assume the direct distribution of its products in Europe and Singapore; the effective date of the transition was June 1, 2003. Revenue from the sale of products manufactured by Cabot Microelectronics excluding Israel was approximately $1.3 million, 32.9 million and 31.8 million, which represented 0.6%, 14.0% and 13.7% of our total revenue for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In October 2002, FSI advised us of its decision to assume the direct distribution of its products in Europe (except Israel) and Asia; the effective date of the transition was March 1, 2003. The Company's revenues for FSI products and services in Europe and Asia were approximately $1.8 million, $26.9 million and 29.0 million, which represented 0.9%, 11.4% and 12.5% of our total revenue for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. During May 2004, we modified our distributor agreement with Zeiss to exclude the distribution of their AIMS product line. In June 2004, Pall Corporation delivered written notice to us that it intends to terminate all agreements between Pall and us, including two exclusive distribution agreements and a license agreement. The effective date of termination will be August 31, 2004 for the microelectronics, biopharmaceutical and food and beverage markets and July 31, 2004 for the fuels and chemicals markets. Pall products represented approximately 7% of the Company's revenues for fiscal year 2004.

In addition, in January 2001, we entered into an agreement with Entegris to modify our existing distribution relationship, whereby Entegris assumed direct sales responsibility for products from its Microelectronics Group in Europe beginning April 1, 2001, and in Asia beginning May 1, 2001. We are

currently in discussions with Entegris to modify our existing distribution relationship. Our distribution agreement with Entegris expires in August 2005 and may be terminated earlier under certain circumstances. We cannot give any assurance that we will enter into a new agreement with Entegris or that our existing agreement with Entegris will continue for any specified period of time. If we are not able to reach a new agreement with Entegris or our existing distribution agreement with Entegris is terminated, it could seriously harm our business.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical, and during its periodic downturns, our operating results will deteriorate.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and historically has experienced periodic downturns, which often have resulted in decreased expenditures by semiconductor manufacturers. These downturns generally have adversely affected the sales, gross profits and operating results of semiconductor materials and equipment suppliers. Our business depends in large part on the procurement expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, which, in turn, depend on the current and anticipated demand for semiconductors and products utilizing semiconductors. The downturn in the semiconductor industry from mid-1996 until the end of 1998 had a material adverse effect on our operating results. In February 2001, we started to experience a downturn in new orders, as well as delays in shipment for existing orders. The continuation of the downturn for any extended period, or an increase in the number of shipment delays, would have a materially adverse effect on our operating results.

We may not be able to successfully implement our restructuring efforts, and such efforts may adversely impact our ability to retain and attract future employees.

In October 2002, we announced that we would be reducing our workforce by approximately 125 employees worldwide. The total number of employees terminated as of May 31, 2003 was 125 people. On March 1, 2003, we transferred 93 employees to FSI. During fiscal 2004, we terminated an additional 84 employees, and we abandoned unutilized leased facilities as part of our restructuring. Workforce reductions could result in a temporary lack of focus and reduced productivity by our remaining employees, which in turn may affect our revenues in the current or a future quarter. In addition, prospects and current customers may decide to delay or not purchase our products due to the perceived uncertainty caused by our reduction in force. We cannot assure you that we will not reduce or otherwise adjust our workforce again in the future or that the related transition issues associated with such a reduction will not occur again. Further, we believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly-skilled personnel. We may have difficulty attracting such personnel as a result of a perceived risk of future workforce reductions.

If we are unable to successfully identify new products and enter into and implement arrangements with the suppliers of these products, our business will be seriously harmed.

To the extent we are unable to enter into relationships with suppliers who anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments or customer requirements, we could suffer a loss of competitiveness. Such loss, or any significant delays in product development or introductions by these suppliers, could have a materially adverse effect on our business. The semiconductor materials and equipment market is subject to rapid technological change, changing customer requirements and frequent new product introductions. Because of this, the life cycle of products that we market and sell is difficult to determine. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on our suppliers' ability to keep pace with changes in the market and, particularly because we generally do not carry competing product lines, on our ability to identify and obtain new product lines which achieve market success.

We face intense competition from companies with significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources, which could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase sales.

We face intense competition on two distinct fronts: competition for product lines and competition for customers.

If we are unable to compete successfully for product lines against independent sales companies that have greater financial resources, are more established or have longer-standing relationships with semiconductor industry suppliers, we will be unable to offer competitive products, which will negatively impact our sales.

We compete with independent sales companies that are generally smaller than Metron and localized to a specific geographic region for the right to sell specific product lines. Some of these independent sales companies have long-standing collaborative business relationships with semiconductor industry suppliers, or a history of supplying to a specific region, both of which are challenges to securing product lines. We believe that to compete effectively for product lines we must maintain a high level of investment in marketing, customer service and support in all of the markets in which we operate. If we are unable to effectively compete with independent sales companies for product lines, our business will be adversely affected.

If we are unable to compete for customers owing to our inability to provide sales, marketing and support services or particular product offerings, our ability to maintain or increase sales will be adversely affected.

We compete with semiconductor industry suppliers who sell directly to customers and with other independent sales companies who may represent a supplier to specific device manufacturer customers. Some of these competitors have greater name recognition in the territories they serve or long-standing relationships with device manufacturers that may give them a competitive advantage. Furthermore, we believe that once a semiconductor manufacturer has selected a particular product for a specific use from a vendor that is not one of our suppliers, it may be difficult to achieve significant sales of a competing product to that customer unless there are compelling reasons for the customer to switch products, such as significant performance or cost advantages.

On a product or service basis, there are other significant competitive factors, which include: product specifications and quality; product performance; product reliability; process repeatability; customer service and support; timeliness of product introductions; delivery; total cost of ownership; and price. We anticipate that as we expand our product portfolio and expand into new markets, we will encounter additional competition. If we cannot continue to compete successfully for customers in the future, any such lack of success will have a significant negative impact on our business.

The management information systems that we currently use in our day-to-day operations are not integrated across the globe and some of them need to be upgraded. Upgrading them will be costly, and if the new system is not successfully implemented, our business may suffer material adverse consequences.

While our financial reporting management information system is integrated and operational, the current management information systems that we use to control our day-to-day operations are not integrated across the globe. To accommodate growth in the past, we have had to hire additional people to compensate for the lack of a fully-functional, integrated operations management information system. We are currently investing in a new operations management information system in order to maintain our current level of business and accommodate any future growth. We commenced implementation of the new system in Europe in 2001 and 2002. We implemented the financial management reporting system to support the centralization of our European operations into one of our subsidiaries, Metron Europa, during our second quarter of fiscal 2004, and we commenced the roll-out in Asia with the successful implementation in Singapore in May 2004. The next installation scheduled is for Taiwan and China. We currently anticipate that the total costs associated with the implementation of the new

system will be approximately $12.0 to $15.0 million and that the system will be fully implemented over the next 15 to 20 months. Any failure to successfully implement our new operations management information system may result in delayed growth, increased inefficiency due to a lack of centralized data, higher inventories, increased expenses associated with employing additional employees, a loss of our investment in the new operations management information system and may have additional material adverse effects on our business.

We need to successfully manage the anticipated expansion in our operations or our business may suffer material adverse consequences.

To the extent we are unable to effectively manage future expansion and the system and procedural transitions required by expansion, our business and our operating results could be seriously harmed. We have expanded our operations in the past and anticipate future expansion of our operations through acquisitions and otherwise. Our growth has placed and will continue to place significant demands on our management, operational, financial and technical resources, as well as our accounting and control systems, as we work to integrate geographically dispersed offices and administrative personnel, diverse service and maintenance operations and different accounting and financial systems. Our future operating results will depend on the ability of our management and other employees to:

•: implement and improve our operational, customer support and financial control systems;
•: recruit, train, manage and motivate our employees;
•: identify companies that are strategic acquisition candidates and successfully acquire and integrate them with our existing business;
•: communicate information efficiently throughout our organization; and
•: work effectively with suppliers and customers.

We cannot predict whether these efforts will be successful or will occur in a timely or efficient manner. We may not be able to install adequate control systems in an efficient and timely manner, and our current or planned operational systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. The difficulties associated with installing and implementing new systems, procedures and controls may place a significant burden on our management and our internal resources. Delays in the implementation of new systems or operational disruptions when we transition to new systems would impair our ability to accurately forecast sales demand, manage our product inventory and record and report financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis.

Our indebtedness and debt service obligations may adversely affect our cash flow and ability to obtain additional financing.

Our annual debt service obligations for our convertible debentures (8% due 2007 and 6.5% due 2008) require approximately $0.95 million per year in interest payments. In addition, we have an obligation to TEL for both the $7.7 million note payable and the $6.0 million license obligation that requires principal and interest payments through 2008. Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences, including: requiring the dedication of a portion of our expected cash flows from operations to service our indebtedness if we do not make interest payments for our convertible debentures in our common shares rather than cash, thereby reducing the amount of our expected cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures; increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; limiting our ability to obtain additional financing; limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we compete; and placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to less leveraged competitors and competitors that have better access to capital resources. The existence of debt service obligations and

the anti-dilution provisions of our convertible debentures may also limit our ability to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us.

We may not be successful in our effort to penetrate Japan, which could limit our future growth.

On April 8, 2003, we announced the opening of Metron Technology (Japan) K.K. (Metron Japan) in Yokohama, Japan. Approximately 23% of the world's production of semiconductors in 2003 took place in Japan. Accordingly, to reach all of the world's major semiconductor markets, we will need to be successful in our efforts to establish or acquire sales, marketing and/or service capabilities in Japan. Historically, it has been difficult for non-Japanese companies to succeed in establishing themselves in Japan. We intend Metron Japan to serve as our headquarters for building partnerships with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in Japan and to provide service and outsource solutions in the local market. We cannot predict whether our efforts to penetrate the Japanese market will be successful. If we are not successful in our efforts to penetrate the Japanese market, our future growth may be limited.

We expect continued downward pressure on the gross margins of the products we sell, and as a result, if we are unable to continue to decrease our operating expenses as a percentage of sales or find replacement product lines with higher gross margins, we will be unable to increase or maintain our operating margins.

Particularly during industry down cycles, pressure on the gross margins of the products we sell is intense and can adversely impact our financial performance. We have experienced significant downward pressure on our gross margins, mainly as a result of sales discounts offered by our competitors and pressure from our customers to reduce prices and from our suppliers to reduce the discounts they provide to us. This, in turn, has put significant downward pressure on our operating margins. To maintain or increase our gross margins, we must develop and maintain relationships with suppliers who introduce new products and product enhancements on a timely basis. As a result of continued pressure on gross margins, we must find ways to decrease our selling, general, administrative and other expenses as a percentage of sales to increase or maintain our operating margins. If our suppliers cannot continue to innovate, if we cannot maintain our relationships with innovating suppliers, if we cannot otherwise identify product lines with higher gross margins or if we cannot successfully manage our selling, general, administrative and other expenses, our operating margins may decrease. If our operating margins decline as a result of these factors, our business would be harmed.

Our employment costs in the short-term are to a large extent fixed, and therefore any cyclical revenue shortfall could adversely affect our operating results.

Our operating expense levels are based in significant part on our head count, which is generally driven by longer-term revenue goals. For a variety of reasons, particularly the high cost and disruption of lay-offs and the costs of recruiting and training, our head count in the short-term is, to a large extent, fixed. In addition, approximately half of our employees are in Europe, and the costs associated with any reductions of our labor force in Europe are high. As a result of these factors, we were unable to reduce employment costs in a timely manner to compensate for the cyclical revenue or gross margin shortfall we have suffered during the current downturn, which has had a material adverse effect on our operating results. We cannot assure you that we will be able to reduce employment costs sufficiently to compensate for future cyclical revenue shortfall.

We may bear inventory risk due to an inability to return products, and if we are unable to manage our inventory effectively, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We bear inventory risk because we generally take title to the products we sell when we receive them from our suppliers, and we cannot always return products to the supplier in the event the

products are not sold. Our customers do not always purchase at the time or in the quantities we originally anticipated. For example, as a result of the current industry downturn beginning in fiscal 2001, we had excess inventory for which we booked reserves in Europe, the United States and Asia. Typically, products cannot be returned to suppliers after they have been in our inventory for a certain period of time; this time period varies depending on the product and the supplier. In addition, although it is typical when a relationship with a supplier terminates for that supplier to repurchase most of the inventory we have of that supplier's products, it is possible under certain circumstances that a supplier may be unable or unwilling to repurchase our inventory. If we fail to manage our inventory and accumulate substantial product that cannot be returned, our operating results could be adversely affected. Furthermore, if a supplier cannot provide refunds in cash for the inventory we desire to return, we may be forced to dispose of inventory below cost, and this may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Our revenue and operating results may fluctuate in future periods, which could adversely affect our share price.

In the past, we have experienced fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results and anticipate that these fluctuations will continue in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. Fluctuations in our results could cause our share price to decline substantially. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful, and you should not rely upon them as indicators of our future performance. Our sales in, and the operating results for, a particular quarter can vary significantly due to a variety of factors, including those described elsewhere in this report and the following:

•: The Timing Of Significant Customer Orders And Customer Spending Patterns. During industry downturns, our customers may ask us to delay or even cancel the shipment of previously firm orders. Delays and cancellations may adversely affect our operating results in any particular quarter if we are unable to recognize revenue for particular sales in the quarter in which those sales were expected.
•: The Timing Of Product Shipments By Our Suppliers. For the most part, we recognize sales upon the shipment of goods to our customers. Most of the equipment and some of the materials we sell are shipped by the supplier directly to our customers, and we do not necessarily have any control over the timing of a particular shipment. If we are unable to recognize revenue for a particular sale in the quarter in which that sale was expected, our operating results in that particular quarter will be negatively affected.
•: The Timing Of New Product And Service Announcements By Our Suppliers And Their Competitors. New product announcements by our suppliers and their competitors could cause our customers to delay a purchase or to decide to purchase products of one of our supplier's competitors which would adversely affect our revenue and, therefore, our results of operations. New product announcements by others may make it necessary for us to reduce prices on our products or offer more service options, which could adversely impact operating margins and net income.
•: The Mix Of Products Sold And The Market Acceptance Of Our New Product Lines. The mix of products we sell varies from period to period, and because margins vary amongst and/or within different product lines, this can adversely affect our results of operations. If we fail to sell our products that generate higher margins, our average gross margins may be lower than expected. If we fail to sell our new product lines, our revenue may be lower than expected.
•: General Global Economic Conditions Or Economic Conditions In A Particular Region. When economic conditions in a region or worldwide worsen, customers may delay or cancel their orders. There may also be an increase in the time it takes to collect from our customers or even outright defaults in payments. This can negatively affect our cash flow and our results.

•: Costs We May Incur If We Become Involved In Future Litigation. Litigation is often costly, and even if we are successful in defending or making any claim, the expenses incurred may significantly impact our results.
•: Charges to Earnings for Other Long Lived Assets. As a result of our market capitalization being less than our shareholders' equity, we may be required to recognize an impairment charge in connection with the carrying value of our long-lived assets. This could negatively impact our results.

As a result of the factors listed above, our future operating results are difficult to predict. Further, we base our current and future expense plans in significant part on our expectations of our longer-term future revenue. As a result, we expect our expense levels to be relatively fixed in the short-run. A decline in revenue for a particular quarter may disproportionately affect our net income in that quarter. If our revenue is below our projections, then our operating results will also be below expectations and, as we have in the past, we may even have losses in the short-run. Any one of the factors listed above, or a combination thereof, could adversely affect our quarterly results of operations, and consequently may cause a decline in our share price.

We depend on sales to a relatively small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue, and if any of our large customers were to stop or reduce their purchasing from us, this would materially and adversely affect our revenue.

A loss or a significant reduction or delay in sales to any of our major customers could materially and adversely affect our revenue. We depend on a small number of customers for a substantial portion of our revenue. In fiscal 2004, our top ten customers accounted for an aggregate of 32% of our sales. Although a ranking by revenue of our largest customers will vary from period to period, we expect that revenue from a relatively small number of customers will account for a substantial portion of our revenue in any accounting period for the foreseeable future. Consolidation in the semiconductor industry may result in increased customer concentration and the potential loss of customers as a result of acquisitions. Unless we diversify and expand our customer base, our future success will significantly depend upon certain factors which are not within our control, including:

•: the timing and size of future purchase orders, if any, from our larger customers;
•: the product requirements of our customers; and
•: the financial and operational success of our customers.

If any of our largest customers were to stop or reduce their purchasing from us, our financial results could be adversely affected. In October 2002, FSI advised us of its decision to assume the direct distribution of its products in Europe (except Israel) and Asia; the effective date of the transition was March 1, 2003. As a result of this transition, we no longer sell these FSI products to our customers in these regions. A significant decrease in sales to a major customer or the deferral or cancellation of any significant order would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Our sales cycle, particularly for equipment, is long and unpredictable, which could require us to incur high sales and marketing expenses with no assurance that a sale will result.

Sales cycles for some of our products, particularly equipment, can run as long as 12 to 18 months. As a result, we may not recognize revenue from efforts to sell particular products for extended periods of time, or at all. We believe that the length of the sales cycle may increase as some current and potential customers of our key suppliers centralize purchasing decisions into one decision-making entity. We expect this may intensify the evaluation process and require us to make additional sales and marketing expenditures with no assurance that a sale will result.

We have recently expanded our operations to include manufacturing, an activity with which we do not have significant experience. This new activity will require us to hire managers and employees with different skills from those of our existing employees and to develop systems to manage processes with which we have no prior experience.

We now manufacture, under license from the original equipment manufacturer, Varian sputtering (PVD) equipment, licensed from Novellus, AG Associates rapid thermal processing (RTP) equipment, licensed from Mattson and, MRC Eclipse (PVD) equipment licensed from TEL. Prior to our entry into what is commonly called the legacy equipment business, we did not manufacture any equipment. With our entry into this business, we have had to hire managers and other employees who have different skills from those of our existing employees. We have also had to install new systems to keep track of manufacturing inventories. As a consequence of our lack of experience, our newly initiated manufacturing activity may incur unanticipated costs, and we may not realize the gross margins that we planned to in making the necessary investments. In May 2002, we acquired certain assets of Advanced Stainless Technologies (AST), a Texas-based manufacturer of electro-polished stainless steel tubes and fittings.

We have not yet developed a strategy to sell to our customers over the Internet, and if a competitor develops and implements an effective e-commerce strategy, we may lose some of our customers, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Although we have begun efforts to develop an e-commerce strategy, we have not implemented a process to sell to our customers over the Internet. Because our suppliers grant us the right to sell their products only for specific territories and sales conducted over the Internet may occur anywhere around the globe, it is difficult to adopt e-commerce practices in our industry. If our suppliers decide to directly distribute their products over the Internet, if our competitors develop a successful strategy for engaging in e-commerce or if our customers require e-commerce capabilities which we are unable to provide, we may lose customers, which would have a negative impact on our revenue and on our operating results.

Risks related to our international operations.

Economic difficulties in countries in which we sell our products can lead to a decrease in demand for our products and impair our financial results.

The volatility of general economic conditions and fluctuations in currency exchange and interest rates can lead to decreased demand in countries in which we sell products. For example, in 1997 and 1998 many Asian countries experienced economic and financial difficulties. During this period, we experienced cancellation or delay of orders for our products from customers in Asia, which adversely affected our results of operations. Moreover, any economic, banking or currency difficulties experienced by countries in which we have sales may lead to economic instability in those countries. This in turn may result in the cancellation or delay of orders for our products from customers in those countries, thus adversely affecting our results of operations.

Most of our product sales are outside the United States, and currency fluctuations may impair our financial results.

While most of our international sales are denominated in United States dollars, some are denominated in various foreign currencies. To the extent that our sales and operating expenses are denominated in foreign currencies, our operating results may be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. In fiscal 2004 and 2003, approximately $612,000 and $449,000, respectively, of the foreign exchange loss pertained to the cost of hedging the Israel Shekel, primarily due to the difference in the interest rates between the United States dollar and Israel Shekel. Given the number of

currencies involved, the substantial volatility of currency exchange rates and our constantly changing currency exposures, we cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on our future operating results. Although we engage in foreign currency hedging transactions from time to time, these hedging transactions can be costly, and, therefore, we do not attempt to cover all potential foreign currency exposures. These hedging techniques do not eliminate all of the effects of foreign currency fluctuations on anticipated revenue.

Risks related to investing in our common shares.

Our share price is volatile.

The trading price of our common shares is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including factors discussed elsewhere in this report and the following:

•: failure to meet our publicly-stated expectations or the published expectations of securities analysts for a given quarterly period;
•: changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
•: changes in market values of comparable companies;
•: stock market price and volume fluctuations, which are particularly common among securities of high technology companies;
•: stock market price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels;
•: additions or departures of key personnel; and
•: commencement of our involvement in litigation.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation may result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business.

Risks related to being a Dutch company.

Our Supervisory Board has the authority to issue shares without shareholder approval, which may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

As a Netherlands "Naamloze Vennootschap," or N.V., we are subject to requirements not generally applicable to corporations organized in United States jurisdictions. Among other things, under Netherlands law, the issuance of shares of an N.V. must be approved by the shareholders unless the shareholders have delegated the authority to issue shares to another corporate body. Our articles of association provide that the shareholders have the authority to resolve to issue shares, common or preferred. The shareholders may designate the Company's Supervisory Board as the corporate body with the authority to adopt any resolution to issue shares, but this designation may not exceed a period of five years. Our articles also provide that as long as the Supervisory Board has the authority to adopt a resolution to issue shares, the shareholders will not have this authority. Pursuant to the Metron articles, the Supervisory Board has the authority to adopt resolutions to issue shares until five years from the November 19, 1999, deed of conversion from a B.V. to an N.V. and the related amendment of our articles of association. This authorization of the Supervisory Board may be renewed by the shareholders from time to time. As a result, our Supervisory Board currently has the authority to issue common and preferred shares without shareholder approval unless such approval is required under the terms of our Nasdaq listing agreement.

The issuance of preferred shares could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of the outstanding shares of our share capital.

It may not be possible to enforce United States judgments against Netherlands corporations, directors and others.

Our articles provide that Metron has two separate boards of directors, a Managing Board and a Supervisory Board. A significant percentage of our assets are located outside the United States. Furthermore, judgments of United States courts, including judgments against us, our directors or our officers predicated on the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States, are not directly enforceable in The Netherlands.

Provisions of our charter documents and Dutch law could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay, deter or prevent a change in control.

Our articles of association and the applicable law of The Netherlands contain provisions that may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects. These provisions may delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in the best interest of our shareholders. For example, our articles may be amended only pursuant to a proposal of the Supervisory Board followed by a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders. To amend our articles requires that at a general meeting of shareholders, (1) more than half of the issued share capital is represented and (2) the resolution to amend the articles is supported by a two-thirds majority of the valid votes cast. This supermajority voting requirement may have the effect of discouraging a third party from acquiring a majority of the outstanding Metron shares. In addition, these provisions could have a negative impact on our share price. Furthermore, some United States tax laws may discourage third parties from accumulating significant blocks of our common shares.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements under the captions "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are "forward-looking statements." These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our, or our industry's, actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including the factors described under Item 1—Business—Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "may," "should," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "could," "would" or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. We do not assume any obligation to publicly release the results of any revision or updates to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or unanticipated occurrences.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Jose, California. The head of our global Fab solutions group is based in Austin, Texas. We own our 30,000 square foot facility in Livingston, Scotland, 16,300 square foot facility in Glenrothes, Scotland and our 6,500 square foot facility in Almere, The Netherlands. In May 2004, we sold our 18,000 square foot facility in Aschheim, Germany. In addition, we lease space for marketing and customer service and support purposes in 37 locations worldwide. We operate a class 100 cleanroom facility with 560 square feet in Austin, Texas, a 9,900 square foot class 1,000 cleanroom facility in Glenrothes, Scotland, a 3,300 square foot class 10,000 cleanroom facility in Gilbert, Arizona and a 5,750 square foot class 10,000 cleanroom facility in San Jose, California.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's common shares, 0.44 EUR par value per share, have been traded on the Nasdaq National Market (Nasdaq) under the symbol "MTCH" since our initial public offering on November 19, 1999. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices, as reported by Nasdaq, for the periods indicated.

		High		Low
Fiscal 2004
	First Quarter	$	4.85	$	1.98
	Second Quarter		5.20		3.59
	Third Quarter		5.05		3.15
	Fourth Quarter		3.80		2.37
Fiscal 2003
	First Quarter	$	9.27	$	2.84
	Second Quarter		3.19		0.57
	Third Quarter		2.17		1.10
	Fourth Quarter		2.50		1.00

There were approximately 71 shareholder accounts of record on July 31, 2004.

Dividends

The Company has not paid dividends on its common shares.

Certain Dutch tax consequences of holding Metron common shares

General. The following is a summary of the material anticipated Dutch tax consequences of the holding of common shares in Metron Technology N.V. by non-Dutch resident individuals and corporate entities. This summary addresses only dividend withholding tax, personal income tax, corporate income tax, and gift and inheritance tax. It does not cover other taxes imposed by The Netherlands and/or its political subdivisions. Further this summary does not purport to be an exhaustive discussion or analysis of all relevant tax matters related to the holding of our common shares. In particular, this summary does not address the tax consequences under any non-Dutch tax laws, nor does it address the tax position of a holder of our common shares to which a special tax regime is applicable or any other special circumstances that may apply to any individual holder. Accordingly, a holder of our common shares should consult his, her or its own tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the holding of our common shares. This summary is based on the tax laws of The Netherlands as in effect on July 31, 2004 and is subject to changes in such laws which changes may have retroactive effect. Metron expressly disclaims any responsibility to update this summary for changes in facts or laws occurring subsequent to the date of the filing of this Form 10-K.

This summary represents Metron's interpretation of existing Dutch tax law and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that the tax authorities or the courts in The Netherlands will agree with the summary below. This summary addresses the Dutch tax consequences to a holder of our common shares who or which neither is, nor is deemed to be, a resident of The Netherlands for purposes of the relevant tax laws (a "non-resident shareholder"). Under Dutch tax law, residence is determined both by reference to the relevant facts and circumstances and to several principles of law.

Taxation Regarding Dividends. To the extent that Metron distributes dividends, such dividends will, in principle, be subject to dividend withholding tax at a rate of 25%. For this purpose, dividends

include, among other things, dividends in cash or in kind, deemed dividends, constructive dividends, repayments of paid-in capital not recognized for tax purposes and liquidation proceeds in excess of paid-in capital as recognized for tax purposes. Stock dividends are subject to dividend withholding tax unless distributed out of Metron's paid-in share premium as recognized for tax purposes. With respect to non-resident corporate shareholders, or shareholders that are treated as corporate taxpayers for tax purposes, which have a permanent establishment or permanent representative in The Netherlands to which the common shares are attributable, no withholding is required in connection with distributions to such shareholders, provided that The Netherlands participation exemption applies with respect to their respective holding of the common shares. A non-resident shareholder may be eligible for a reduction or a refund of dividend withholding tax pursuant to the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive or a tax convention in effect between the country of residence of the non-resident shareholder and The Netherlands. The Netherlands has concluded such a convention with the United States, the Convention between the Kingdom of The Netherlands and the United States of America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income (the "Treaty"), which became effective as of January 1, 1994. In 2004, the United States of America and The Netherlands have signed a Protocol containing amendments to the Treaty. The Protocol needs ratification to take effect. Ratification has not been completed at the date hereof. A holder of our common shares can claim the benefits of the Treaty only if such holder is a resident of the United States as defined in the Treaty and if such holder's entitlement to such benefits is not limited by the limitations on benefits provisions of Article 26 of the Treaty. Under the Treaty, dividends paid by Metron to a holder of our common shares who or which is entitled to the benefits of the Treaty, are generally eligible for a reduction of The Netherlands statutory rate of withholding tax of 25%, to 15%. The withholding tax rate will be reduced to 5% if the beneficial owner is a qualifying United States resident company that directly holds at least 10% of the voting power of Metron. The Treaty provides, under certain conditions, for a complete exemption for dividends received by exempt pension funds and exempt organizations.

No dividend withholding tax is due on any part of a dividend, that is considered excessive pursuant to a transitional regime effective as of January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2005 and which, under these transitional rules, gives rise to the additional corporate income tax, as described below.

The corporate income tax payable by Metron will be increased by 20% of the difference between the total amount of dividends paid in a calendar year and the highest of the following amounts:

•: 4% of the market value of the issued share capital at the beginning of the calendar year;
•: double the amount of the normal dividend, which is the average dividend paid in the three years preceding 2001, provided that there is a consistent policy;
•: the profit for accounting purposes of the preceding financial year in accordance with the published (consolidated) annual accounts as amended in accordance with the statute.

The temporary additional corporate income tax is not levied to the extent that the total profit distributions during the period from January 1, 2001 up to and including December 31, 2005 are in excess of the balance of the assets, liabilities and provisions, calculated on the basis of fair market value, reduced by the paid-in capital at the end of the book year that ended prior to January 1, 2001.

The temporary additional corporate income tax will be decreased proportionally to the extent that the common shares have been held for a period of at least three years by shareholders that have an interest of at least 5% at the time of the dividend payment. A requirement is, however, that the relevant shareholder is a resident of The Netherlands, The Netherlands Antilles, Aruba, an EU-member state, or a jurisdiction that has concluded a tax treaty in respect of taxes on income and capital gains with The Netherlands.

The Netherlands has anti-avoidance legislation in order to counteract so-called "dividend stripping". Pursuant to this legislation, a reduction, or refund of dividend withholding tax is denied if the recipient of the dividend is not the beneficial owner. The new legislation generally targets situations, commonly referred to as "dividend stripping", in which a shareholder retains its economic interest in shares, but tries to reduce the withholding tax cost on dividends by a transaction with another party that would be better positioned to claim a reduction or the refund of such withholding tax in the absence of these rules. The Dutch tax authorities will also apply the proposed definition of beneficial ownership in the context of a tax treaty in respect of taxes on income and capital gains.

Personal Income Tax And Corporate Income Tax. A non-resident shareholder will not be subject to personal income tax or corporate income tax with respect to dividends or capital gains derived from the common shares, provided that:

•: the common shares are not attributable to (1) a business or part of a business of the shareholder that is in whole or in part carried on through a permanent establishment, a deemed permanent establishment or a permanent representative in The Netherlands, which we refer to as a "Netherlands business", or to (2) a deemed "Netherlands business";
•: the shareholder does not have a substantial interest or a deemed substantial interest in Metron, or in any of Metron's subsidiaries, or in the event that such shareholder is a corporate entity and does have such interest, it forms part of the business assets of such a shareholder.
•: in the case of an individual shareholder, the dividends received from the common shares and capital gain realized in respect of a disposal of the common shares are not regarded, for personal income tax purposes, as "taxable income from one or more activities performed in The Netherlands not being activities that generate taxable profit or taxable wages" (belastbaar resultaat uit overige werkzaamheden in Nederland); and
•: the shareholder is not an individual who has made an election to be treated as a resident of the Netherlands for personal income tax purposes.

In general terms, a substantial interest in the share capital of Metron does not exist if the non-resident shareholder, his/her spouse, registered partner, other persons sharing his/her household or certain of their relatives by blood or marriage in the direct line (including foster children), do not hold alone or together, directly or indirectly, the ownership of, or right to acquire, common shares representing 5% or more of the total issued and outstanding capital, or the issued and outstanding capital of any class of shares of Metron, or profit sharing rights representing an entitlement to at least 5% of the annual profit of Metron or of the proceeds upon the liquidation of Metron. The substantial interest tax rate for individuals is 25%. The maximum tax rate for corporate shareholders is 34.5%. A holder of common shares entitled to the benefits of the Treaty will generally be protected under the Treaty from taxation on income or capital gains derived from a substantial interest in the share capital of Metron.

Gift And Inheritance Tax. A gift or inheritance of our common shares from a holder of our common shares who is not a resident nor deemed to be a resident of The Netherlands, will not be subject to gift and inheritance tax, unless: (1) such shareholder, at the time of the gift has, or at the time of death had, a business or an interest in a business that is or was, in whole or in part, carried on through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in The Netherlands and to which business or part thereof, as the case may be, the common shares are or were attributable; or (2) in the case of a gift of the common shares by an individual who at the date of the gift was neither resident nor deemed to be resident of The Netherlands, such individual dies within 180 days after the date of the gift, while at the time of death being resident or deemed to be resident of The Netherlands.

HOLDERS OF MTNV SHARES ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS ABOUT THE DUTCH TAX CONSEQUENCES TO SUCH SPECIFIC HOLDER OF THE HOLDING OF MTNV SHARES.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Information required by this item will be contained under the caption "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in the Company's definitive proxy statement with respect to the Company's 2004 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC (the "Proxy Statement") and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In November 2000, the Company acquired all the common shares of Intec Technology (S) Pte. Ltd. ("Intec"), a company incorporated in Singapore. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase. Accordingly, the Consolidated Statement of Operations Data includes the results of operations of Intec from the acquisition date. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future fiscal year.

			Fiscal Year Ended May 31,
			2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
			(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
	Net revenue		$	205,867		$	235,665		$	232,240		$	517,441		$	337,551
	Operating income (loss)		$	(13,130	)	$	(21,761	)	$	(1,998	)	$	23,746		$	12,437
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(1,465	)	$	—
	Net income (loss)		$	(16,878	)	$	(26,669	)	$	(2,768	)	$	11,510		$	7,752
	Basic earnings (loss) per common share
		Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.22	)	$	0.98		$	0.66
		Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(0.11	)	$	—
		Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.22	)	$	0.87		$	0.66
	Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
		Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.22	)	$	0.94		$	0.60
		Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(0.11	)	$	—
		Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.22	)	$	0.83		$	0.60
	Pro forma amounts assuming change in accounting principle is applied retroactively
		Net income													$	6,193
		Basic earnings per common share													$	0.53
		Diluted earnings per common share													$	0.48
	Shares used for basic earnings (loss) per common share calculation			12,674			12,996			12,870			13,260			11,675
	Shares used for diluted earnings (loss) per common share calculation			12,674			12,996			12,870			13,793			12,896

(1): Change in accounting principle for the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements."

		As of May 31,
		2004		2003		2002		2001		2000
		(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,107	$	12,179	$	19,949	$	27,769	$	22,911
	Total assets		145,513		128,487		163,636		213,499		181,369
	Short-term borrowings excluding current portion of long-term debt		12,159		13,110		19,396		19,141		12,893
	Current portion of long-term debt		1,723		151		836		366		247
	Working capital		36,059		35,513		50,145		55,115		54,387
	Long-term debt		7,745		1,662		1,791		979		1,227
	8% convertible debentures		1,531		—		—		—		—
	Eclipse license obligation due TEL, including the current portion		6,000		—		—		—		—
	Other long-term liabilities		2,521		3,148		3,093		2,270		2,253
	Total shareholders' equity		47,668		57,806		80,369		80,143		72,515

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The information in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, except for the historical information, contains forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our, or our industry's, actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including the factors described under Item 1—Business—Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, as actual results could differ materially. We do not assume any obligation to publicly release the results of any revision or updates to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or unanticipated occurrences. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion of fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 refers to the fiscal years which ended on May 31 of each year.

Overview

Metron Technology N.V. is a holding company organized under the laws of The Netherlands. Through our various operating subsidiaries, we are a global provider of marketing, sales, service and support solutions to semiconductor materials and equipment suppliers and semiconductor manufacturers. We operate in all areas of the world where there is a significant semiconductor industry. The following tables show our sales in Europe, Asia and the United States in dollars and as a percentage of net revenue for each of the three fiscal years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

			Year Ended May 31,
			2004		2003		2002
			(in thousands)
Net revenue
	Europe		$	86,185	$	113,655	$	125,235
	Asia			47,479		51,535		48,127
	United States			72,203		70,475		58,878

		Total net revenue	$	205,867	$	235,665	$	232,240

			Year Ended May 31,
			2004		2003		2002
			(percentage of net revenue)
Net revenue
	Europe		41.9	%	48.2	%	53.9	%
	Asia		23.1		21.9		20.7
	United States		35.0		29.9		25.4

		Total net revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

We derive our revenue from sales of materials, equipment, service and spare parts to the semiconductor industry, as well as from commissions on sales of equipment and materials. For products from our suppliers, we generally recognize revenue upon the shipment of goods to customers. We defer the portion of our equipment revenue associated with our installation. In certain circumstances, depending on the specific terms of the transaction, such as when the amount the customer retainage exceeds the deferred installation revenue, all or a portion of the residual equipment revenue is deferred. We recognize installation revenue, and any deferred equipment revenue, upon technical acceptance of the equipment by the customer. Revenue is deferred until we receive technical acceptance for the sales of legacy equipment where we have no manufacturing history. We recognize service revenue in the periods the services are rendered to customers.

Prior to our fiscal year 2004, we were organized into two worldwide operating divisions: materials and equipment. However, our portfolio is focused on delivering outsource solutions to the semiconductor industry. Beginning in fiscal 2004, to better serve our customers, we reorganized into two new worldwide operating groups: equipment solutions and fab solutions.

Equipment solutions are focused on two distinct areas of the semiconductor capital equipment market: advanced technology equipment and previous generation equipment. Many innovative, specialized semiconductor equipment manufacturers lack sufficient infrastructure to market, sell and support their products in a global market. We believe that our experienced, global organization will be key to the introduction and continued support of these advanced technologies in the industry. Over the last several years, under license from OEMs, we have begun to market, sell, manufacture and support previous generation semiconductor equipment. Our outsource offering to OEMs allows them to concentrate on the development of new generation equipment and maintain critical levels of support

for mature equipment. Our focus on previous generation equipment ensures customer satisfaction through an extended product life cycle. We refer to the previous generation equipment as the Legends Product Line. Previous generation equipment remains fundamental for many semiconductor manufacturers today. As the installed equipment base matures, access to critical technical expertise and repair capability can deteriorate. We provide the continued availability of service, spares and manufacturing capability for mature capital equipment.

To facilitate the transition to the Legends Product Line, we acquired previous generation product lines from OEMs. In March 2002, we purchased the AG Associates RTP product line from Mattson Technology. In September 2003, we acquired inventory and certain assets related to the Eclipse PVD equipment product line from TEL. The Company also operates as an authorized re-manufacturer of PVD equipment for a well-known supplier of automated systems for chemical vapor deposition (CVD).

Fab solutions represent a new outsourcing model for the semiconductor industry. Fab solutions are focused on the needs of the semiconductor fab. Through an extensive network of preferred suppliers and branded services, we are able to offer our customers a comprehensive portfolio to address the critical, non-core functions of the fab. Our fab solutions model allows our customers to streamline the supply chain while maintaining the flexibility to manage varying market conditions. By outsourcing the critical, non-core areas of the fab, customers can focus valuable resources on developing competitive technologies. Our fab solutions group derives the majority of its revenue from sales of materials and components. The remainder of the group's revenue comes from parts cleaning services, other outsourcing services and commissions. The materials and components we sell are used both in the production of semiconductors and in the building and maintenance of semiconductor equipment and manufacturing facilities. Materials include products such as wafer surface preparation materials, fluid-handling components such as fittings, valves and tubing and disposable cleanroom clothing. Sales of these products tend to be less cyclical than sales of semiconductor equipment and generally offer higher gross margins than externally sourced equipment.

For fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, a majority of our revenue came from the sale of products from five or fewer of the semiconductor materials and equipment companies that we represent, who we refer to as our suppliers. Although the suppliers that comprise our largest sources of revenue may change from period to period, we expect that revenue from the sale of products of a relatively small number of suppliers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenue. However, with our increased focus on manufacturing the products in our Legends Product Line, we believe that suppliers will comprise a smaller source of revenue compared to our manufactured products.

During fiscal years 2003 and 2002, we modified or terminated distribution agreements with three of our largest suppliers: FSI, Cabot Microelectronics and Entegris. In addition, FSI is an affiliate, one of our largest shareholders, and held 11.7% of our outstanding shares as of May 31, 2004.

In October 2002, the Company and FSI entered into a transition agreement providing for the early termination of their distribution agreements in Europe and Asia. Pursuant to the agreement, effective March 1, 2003 (the closing date), FSI assumed direct sales, service and applications support and logistics responsibilities for its surface conditioning and microlithography products in Europe and Asia, except that the Company will continue to represent FSI products in Israel. The Company's revenues for FSI products and services in Europe and Asia were approximately $1.8 million, $26.9 million and $29.0 million, which represented 0.9%, 11.4% and 12.5% of our total revenue, for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

In August 2002, Cabot Microelectronics advised the Company of its decision to assume the direct distribution of its products in Europe and Singapore. The effective date of the transition was June 1, 2003. Metron will continue to market Cabot Microelectronics products in Israel. Revenue from the sale of products manufactured by Cabot Microelectronics excluding Israel was approximately $1.3 million,

$32.9 million and $31.8 million, which represented 0.6%, 14.0% and 13.7% of our total revenue for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

In January 2001, the Company and Entegris entered into an agreement to modify their existing distribution relationship. In February 2001, the Company entered into a transition agreement whereby Entegris assumed direct sales responsibility for products from its Microelectronics Group in Europe. In March 2001, the companies entered into a new distribution agreement, under which Metron will continue to distribute products from Entegris' Fluid Handling Group in all regions in Europe, Asia and parts of the United States covered under the previous distribution agreements. The new distribution agreement is in effect until August 31, 2005 and may be terminated earlier under certain circumstances. We are currently in discussions with Entegris to modify our existing distribution relationship. We cannot give any assurance that we will enter into a new agreement with Entegris or that our existing agreement with Entegris will continue for any specified period of time. The Company recorded a total gain of $8.4 million in other operating income over an 18 month period beginning February 2001 on a straight-line basis, which included $1.6 million, $5.4 million and $1.4 million in 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Revenue from products distributed for the Microelectronics Group under the previous distribution agreement was $4.3 million or 1.8% of our total revenue for fiscal year 2002.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Metron's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based on the Company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, goodwill and income taxes. Metron bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Together these form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB104), which superceded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB101). SAB 104 incorporates Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which was implemented by the Company during its second quarter of fiscal 2004. EITF 00-21 addresses accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The effect of implementing EITF 00-21 on our consolidated financial position and results of operations was not significant. We have adopted specific and detailed guidelines for recognizing revenue. Nevertheless, certain judgments affect the application of our revenue policy. Most equipment sales are recorded as "multiple element" transactions in which the portion of the sale represented by the fair value of future installation is deferred and only the residual amount of the sale representing the equipment itself is recognized upon shipment to the customer. In certain circumstances, depending on the specific terms of the transaction, such as when the customer's retainage exceeds the amount of deferred installation revenue, all or a portion of the residual equipment revenue is deferred. The installation revenue we defer for each product sold requires us to estimate the amount of time we expect it to take to install the equipment. The estimated time is valued using the fair value of our service rates in each country. We review the adequacy of our estimates periodically and revise them as necessary. We recognize deferred installation revenue and deferred equipment revenue, if any, when the customer accepts the equipment as production enabled in the fab.

We continue to expand our capability to manufacture and rebuild certain legacy equipment (Legends Product Line) as we acquire rights to do so from OEMs that no longer intend to build the legacy equipment. Revenues from the sale of legacy equipment where we do not have any manufacturing history are recognized only upon customer acceptance.

Revenues from the sale of materials and other products other than equipment are generally recognized on the shipment of goods to customers. Revenue from service agreements is recognized ratably over the agreement period, while revenue from service without a service agreement is recognized in the periods in which the services are rendered to customers when all of the other criteria for revenue recognition are met.

Valuation of accounts receivable and inventory. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The estimate is based on our historical collection and write-off experience, and our current assessment of the credit worthiness of specific customers. The allowances are re-evaluated and adjusted at each balance sheet date as additional information is received that impacts the realizability of our accounts receivable.

The Company values its inventory at the lower of cost or market. The Company analyzes the composition of its inventory and identifies and evaluates slow-moving or obsolete inventory to determine if any provisions are required. Estimated provisions are based on past usage and on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Any recoveries on amounts previously written down are only recognized when the related inventory is sold.

Evaluation of long-lived assets. We review our long-lived assets primarily fixed and intangible assets periodically. We record an impairment loss to reduce the carrying value of our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable because it exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets.

As a result of some of our business acquisitions, we had as of May 31, 2002, approximately $8.3 million in goodwill remaining after amortizing $1.2 million and $1.3 million of goodwill during fiscal 2001 and 2002, respectively. As of May 31, 2004, we had no goodwill. With the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets as of June 1, 2002, goodwill was not amortized during fiscal 2003. In lieu of amortization, we were required to perform an impairment review of our goodwill. Under the transition provisions of SFAS 142, the Company performed an assessment to determine if there was an indication that goodwill was impaired as of the date of adoption. Additionally, as a result of the Company's restructuring activities and an agreement providing for the early termination of the FSI distribution agreement, the Company performed an interim assessment of the carrying value of goodwill during its second quarter ended February 28, 2003. The result of both assessments indicated that the carrying value of the Company's goodwill was not impaired.

However, the Company's market capitalization (share price quoted on NASDAQ multiplied by common shares outstanding) had been below its net book value (NBV) since July 2002, and was substantially below NBV throughout the eight-month period ended February 2003. As a result, the comparison for estimates of the fair value of the Company's assets and liabilities to the lower market capitalization indicated that the Company's carrying value of goodwill had been completely impaired. Accordingly, the Company charged $8.3 million, the entire carrying value of goodwill, to the Company's statement of operations during its third quarter of fiscal 2003.

Income taxes. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income tax assets and liabilities in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process may result in the recording of deferred tax assets which represent temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and financial statement amounts reported by each subsidiary, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. At each balance sheet date, we assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets based on our ability to carryback the temporary differences to recover taxes previously paid, if any, or our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in the relevant tax jurisdiction. If we determine the recoverability of the deferred tax asset is in doubt, we record a valuation allowance. We regularly update our estimate of future taxable income in each jurisdiction, and these updates can result in changes in the valuation allowance and our estimated tax liabilities. During our fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we provided a valuation allowance for substantially all of our deferred tax assets, which remain fully reserved. Tax provisions in fiscal 2004 primarily reflect taxable income in foreign jurisdictions and certain adjustments for changes in estimated tax liabilities.

Results of Operations

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, the semiconductor industry began to recover from the slowdown that began in the second half of 1996. The recovery continued through fiscal 2001, and we returned to profitability. However, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, we began to experience order cancellations, delays in booking new orders and delays in shipping orders to customers, all of which contributed to the significant reduction in our revenue in fiscal 2002. This directly affected the sales of semiconductor capital equipment and the sales of materials. As a result of the decline in revenue, we recorded operating losses for fiscal 2002. We believed that, despite short-term slowdowns, the semiconductor industry had long-term growth opportunities. As a result, we believed we had to maintain our infrastructure, even during periodic slowdowns, in order to continue to serve our customers and to be in a position to take advantage of long-term growth opportunities. Consequently, we did not reduce our operating expenses in the first and second quarters of fiscal 2003. However, we continued to incur operating losses during fiscal 2003. As a result, we announced in October 2002 plans to reduce our number of employees by approximately 125 in addition to the approximately 90 employees we expected to be transferred to FSI as part of the termination of our distribution agreement with FSI. As of May 31, 2003, we had terminated 125 employees, and, on March 1, 2003, we transferred 93 employees to FSI. During fiscal 2004, our revenues and expenses did not meet our expectations. Accordingly, we terminated an additional 84 employees and abandoned the use of eight leased facilities. We expect that revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 will be approximately the same as our revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

The following table summarizes our historical results of operations as a percentage of net revenue for the fiscal years indicated. The historical financial data for fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 were derived

from, and should be read in conjunction with, our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

	Fiscal Year Ended May 31,
	2004		2003		2002
Net revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenue	78.3		81.2		80.3

Gross margin	21.7	%	18.8	%	19.7	%
Selling, general, administrative and other expenses	25.3		23.8		22.6
Research, development and engineering	1.0		0.2		—
Restructuring costs	2.0		2.2		0.5
Goodwill impairment	—		3.5		—
Other operating income, net of associated costs	0.2		1.7		2.5

Operating margin (loss)	(6.4	)%	(9.2	)%	(0.9	)%

Net Revenue. The following table shows our net revenue and percent of net revenue for our equipment and fab solutions groups:

		Fiscal Year Ended May 31,
		2004			2003			2002
					Reclassified			Reclassified
Net revenue (dollars in millions)
	Equipment solutions group	$	68.6		$	85.7		$	99.8
	Fab solutions group		137.3			150.0			132.4
Net revenue
	Equipment solutions group		33.3	%		36.4	%		43.0	%
	Fab solutions group		66.7			63.6			57.0

Equipment solutions group. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, we began to experience a severe slowdown, which has continued through fiscal 2004. The equipment group net revenue in fiscal 2004 was $68.6 million, down $17.1 million or 20.0% from fiscal 2003. In April 2003, Metron and FSI terminated their distribution agreement for the sale of FSI products and services in all areas of the world except Israel. The loss of revenue from FSI products and services amounted to $25.1 million for fiscal 2004 and was the principal cause for our equipment solutions group revenue decline. The decline of equipment revenues for Europe and the United States was partially offset by an increase of revenue in Asia. The equipment solutions group's net revenue in fiscal 2003 was $85.7 million, down $14.1 million or 14.1% from fiscal 2002. Geographically, during fiscal 2003, equipment revenues in the United States increased by over 80%, which more than offset the revenue decline in both Europe and Asia. For fiscal 2002, revenue was $99.8 million, down $155.8 million, or 61.0%, from $255.6 million in fiscal 2001. Consequently, this resulted in significantly lower revenues in all geographic regions for fiscal 2002 when compared with fiscal 2001.

Fab solutions group. As with the equipment solutions group, the fab solutions group experienced a severe slowdown beginning with our fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, which continued through fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2004, the fab solutions group revenue was $137.3 million, down $12.7 million or 8.5% from the group's 2003 revenue. In June 2003, Cabot Microelectronics terminated its distribution agreement with us in all areas of the world except Israel. The loss of Cabot product revenues amounted to $31.6 million for fiscal 2004, which caused the decline in revenue for the fab solutions group. Geographically, revenues for Europe and Asia declined in fiscal 2004, however, the decline was partially offset by an increase of revenue in the United States. In fiscal 2003, the group's revenue was

$150.0 million, a $17.6 million or 13.3% increase from the $132.4 million of revenue for fiscal 2002. Fiscal 2003 revenues increased significantly in Asia and were slightly higher in the United States, however, revenues in Europe continued to decline. The fab solutions group's net revenue in fiscal 2002 was $132.4 million, down $129.4 million, or 49.4%, from $261.8 million in fiscal 2001.

Gross Margins. The following table shows our gross margins for our equipment and fab solutions groups:

		Fiscal Year Ended May 31,
		2004	2003	2002
			Reclassified	Reclassified
Gross margins
	Equipment solutions group	24.2%	16.6%	21.4%
	Fab solutions group	20.5%	20.0%	18.5%

Equipment solutions group. The group's gross margin of 24.2% for fiscal 2004 increased 760 basis points from 16.6% when compared to fiscal 2003. The increase was primarily due to the increase in margins from legacy spare parts sales, service and commission revenue. Of the improvement in gross margins, approximately 115 basis points pertained to the sale of products where inventory had been previously written down. Margins from the legacy spares equipment component contributed to the increase primarily because of the margin on the sales of spare parts from the Eclipse product line acquired during our second quarter of fiscal 2004. However, margins for specialty spare parts declined as a result of lower margins resulting from the sale of the remaining FSI spare parts inventory during fiscal 2004. Margins for specialty equipment declined due to the mix of low margin equipment being sold in fiscal 2004. Geographically, margins improved in both Asia and Europe, but declined in the United States. Gross margins for fiscal 2003 decreased 484 basis points to 16.6% for the equipment solutions group when compared to fiscal 2002. While spare parts improved, lower group margins were primarily caused by higher service costs partly due to the FSI termination agreement and partly as the result of our restructuring activities. Gross margins in Asia increased but decreases in Europe and the United States contributed to the overall decline. In fiscal 2002, gross margins increased by 600 basis points from fiscal 2001. The group's margins improved in all revenue categories for fiscal 2002, with the majority of the increase coming from service and spare parts. Service margins improved as a result of the recognition of installation revenues deferred from earlier periods. Commissions also contributed to the margin improvement because they represented a higher proportion of division revenue in fiscal 2002 than in fiscal 2001.

Fab solutions group. The gross margin of 20.5% for the fab solutions group increased 50 basis points for fiscal 2004 when compared to fiscal 2003. Margins for the materials component improved and parts cleaning units became profitable. These were the primary reason for the overall increase for the group for fiscal 2004. Geographically, margins improvement in Europe and Asia was offset by a decline in the United States. During fiscal 2003, gross margins for the group increased by 150 basis points to 20.0% when compared to fiscal 2002. The improved growth in the gross margin of the group was primarily the result of significantly improved margins from our parts cleaning units when compared to fiscal 2002. The parts cleaning units continued to have less than break even margins associated with the start up activities. Additionally, for fiscal 2003, the overall increase of the group's margins were offset by higher warehousing costs, and lower material commission revenue. Gross margins in the fab solutions group declined 150 basis points in fiscal 2002 to 18.5%. The margins from our material products were dampened by less than break even margins from the start up activities of our parts cleaning units. Additionally, warehousing costs increased on a relative basis, which, coupled with a reduction in commission revenue, resulted in lower overall margins.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A). SG&A expenses for fiscal 2004 were $52.0 million, down $4.0 million or 7.2% from the $56.0 million incurred for fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2003, SG&A expenses increased $3.7 million to $56.1 million or 7.0% when compared with fiscal 2002. SG&A expenses in fiscal 2002 were $52.4 million, down $17.2 million, or 24.7%, from fiscal 2001. Our acquisition of Intec accounted for $0.5 million of SG&A in fiscal 2002.

SG&A expenses consist principally of salaries and other employment-related costs, occupancy costs, travel and entertainment, communications and computer-related expense, trade show and professional services and depreciation. In fiscal 2002, SG&A also included the amortization of acquisition goodwill, however, with the adoption of FAS 142 on June 1, 2003, goodwill is no longer amortized to the income statement. As of May 31, 2004, we had no goodwill. Our SG&A expenses are a function principally of our total headcount. Almost 57% of our operating expenses consist of salaries and other employment-related costs.

In fiscal 2004, personnel and related costs accounted for $1.8 million of decrease in SG&A expenses primarily due to a reduction in the number of employees. However, the increase in the value of the EURO and British Pound contributed to an increase of approximately $1.7 million of SG&A costs for fiscal 2004 when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase in SG&A expense in fiscal 2003 was primarily due to under-utilized facilities and personnel costs. The under utilized facilities were the result of our restructuring program, and were not abandoned until late in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. In addition, we retained FSI sales and service personnel until the end of our third quarter of fiscal 2003, in accordance with the terms of the transition agreement for terminating our distribution agreement with FSI. The decrease in SG&A expense in fiscal 2002 was due principally to lower personnel expenses amounting to $11.5 million, which includes incentive plans and bonuses, and lower travel and entertainment expense amounting to $2.5 million. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we succeeded in substantially reducing the amount of receivables that were over 90 days. Consequently, we reduced our provision for doubtful accounts by $1.1 million.

Restructuring costs. During 2004, the Company terminated 84 employees, of which the equipment solutions group terminated 43 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 29 employees, and 12 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. The Company incurred approximately $2.5 million of restructuring costs in the equipment solutions segment, which included $0.3 million of cost for the abandonment of leased facilities in Scotland, France, Germany and Sweden and $0.6 million of leasehold improvements and fixed assets. The fab solutions segment incurred approximately $0.9 million of restructuring costs, of which $0.3 million pertained to the cost of the abandonment of leased facilities in the United States and Singapore. Other groups incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring costs, which primarily pertained to terminations. The Company continues to evaluate its operating costs and may if deemed appropriate execute additional restructuring. In estimating the accrual for abandoned leased facilities, the Company made assumptions regarding the future sublease income of these facilities. These assumptions will be updated periodically and additional adjustments may be required.

During fiscal 2003, as a result of continuing slow industry conditions, the Company announced plans to reduce the number of its employees by approximately 125 in addition to the 93 employees that were transferred to FSI. The restructuring cost of terminating these individuals amounted to $3.0 million. Additionally, the Company incurred approximately $2.2 million of restructuring costs pertaining to the cost of the abandonment of certain leased facilities within both the equipment and materials segments, which expire through 2014. The total number of employees terminated during the year was 125 people. The equipment division reduced its headcount by 69 employees, the materials division terminated 14 employees, and 42 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. In estimating the accrual for abandoned leased facilities, the Company assumed it could sublease the facilities in the future.

Restructuring costs of $1.1 million incurred during fiscal 2002 were comprised of termination costs of $0.7 million and abandonment of a lease amounting to $0.4 million. During fiscal 2002, the termination costs pertained to a reduction in headcount totaling 56 employees, 27 of whom worked in the equipment division, 17 in the materials division and 12 in finance and administration.

We expect to incur additional restructuring costs for personnel during our first quarter of fiscal 2005 amounting to approximately $0.5 million.

Goodwill impairment. The Company's market capitalization has been below net book value (NBV) since July 2002, and was substantially below NBV for the eight-month period ended February 28, 2003. The comparison for estimates of the fair value of the Company's assets and liabilities to the lower market capitalization indicated that the Company's carrying value of goodwill was fully impaired. Accordingly, the Company charged $8.3 million of goodwill, the entire carrying value, to the Company's statement of operations during our third quarter of fiscal 2003. At May 31, 2004, we had no goodwill remaining.

Research, development and engineering. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we hired engineers and technicians to support our internally-manufactured equipment for both specialty and legend equipment. With the addition of the Eclipse product line during our second quarter of fiscal 2004, approximately 38 additional engineers and technicians were hired to support the manufacturing of the new Eclipse product line. This accounted for substantially all of the $2.2 million of research, development and engineering expense incurred in fiscal 2004.

Other Operating Income, Net of Associated Costs. In fiscal 2004, other operating income is primarily the residual of gain from the early termination of the Company's distribution agreement with FSI. In fiscal 2003, other operating income was comprised of $1.3 million for the remainder of the Entegris gain, and a net gain of $2.7 million from the early termination of the Company's distribution agreement with FSI. Other operating income for fiscal 2002 represented a portion of the total gain of $8.4 million from the modification of Metron's distribution agreement with Entegris.

In October 2002, the Company and FSI, one of the Company's suppliers and shareholders, entered into a transition agreement providing for the early termination of their distribution agreements in Europe and Asia. Pursuant to the agreement, effective March 1, 2003, FSI assumed direct sales, service and applications support and logistics responsibilities for its surface conditioning and microlithography products in Europe and Asia, while the Company will continue to represent FSI products in Israel. Our revenues for FSI products and services in Europe and Asia were approximately $1.8 million, $26.9 million, and $29.0 million (0.9%, 11.4% and 12.5% of revenue) for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

Under the terms of the transition agreement, during the second quarter of fiscal 2003, FSI advanced $3.0 million in cash to the Company. On the closing date, the advance was applied toward the repurchase by FSI of inventory and equipment that the Company purchased under the current distribution arrangement. As consideration, FSI agreed to pay to the Company an early termination fee of $2.75 million. The agreement required FSI to surrender up to 1,154,000 of the Company's common shares owned by FSI with a maximum value of $2.75 million as a form of consideration for the termination fee.

During April 2003, the transition of the distribution agreements with FSI was completed. The Company recorded a gain of $2.7 million for the termination of the FSI distribution agreement. FSI transferred to the Company 567,105 common shares of the Company with a fair market value of $0.7 million, which is in addition to the $3.0 million cash advance that the Company received in October 2002. As a result, FSI's ownership of the Company's outstanding common shares was reduced from approximately 20.5% to approximately 16.8%. 93 employees who were dedicated to sales,

technical service and applications engineering activities related to the distribution of FSI products in Europe and Asia were transferred to FSI.

Loss From Impairment of Investment. During fiscal 2002, we recorded a loss of $1.1 million for an estimated "other than temporary" impairment in the value of our investments in AST and Abeto GmbH (Abeto). $0.4 million of the loss was recorded against our equity investment in AST. The remainder of the loss pertained to Abeto, an investment we made in May 2000. Abeto was established in September 1999 as a spin-off from Infineon Technologies AG to provide outsource services in the reclamation and refurbishment of packaging materials for the semiconductor industry. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we assessed Abeto's ability to continue as a going concern without additional financial support, and, in the fourth quarter, as a result of our assessment, we recorded an impairment loss of $0.7 million.

Other expense, net. The following table summarizes the components of other income (expense).

	Year Ended May 31,
	2004			2003			2002
	(in thousands)
Foreign exchange loss	$	(654	)	$	(719	)	$	(197	)
Interest income		56			109			397
Interest expense		(2,228	)		(1,073	)		(1,323	)
Other income		595			318			157

Other expense, net	$	(2,231	)	$	(1,365	)	$	(966	)

We engage in limited hedging activities to reduce our exposure to exchange risks arising from fluctuations in foreign currency, but because hedging activities can be costly, we do not attempt to cover all potential foreign currency exposures. During the three-year period ended May 31, 2004, we entered into contracts to hedge firm purchase commitments, to hedge the maturities of foreign currency denominated liabilities with foreign currency denominated assets and to hedge differences existing between foreign currency assets and liabilities. The currencies in which we purchase forward exchange contracts have numerous market makers to provide ample depth and liquidity for our hedging activities. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, approximately $612,000 and $449,000 of the foreign exchange loss pertained to the cost of hedging the Israel Shekel, which was primarily due to the difference in the interest rates between the United States dollar and Israel Shekel. We expect this cost will be significantly lower in fiscal 2005.

Interest income represents primarily earnings on our available cash balances. The decrease in our interest income for each of the three fiscal years is a result of lower average cash balances and of lower interest rates.

Interest expense reflects interest on our borrowings as well as the accretion of non-cash interest discount related to the 8% convertible debenture, which resulted from the $2.3 million for the fair value of the warrants, and $3.4 million from the deemed dividend relating to the issuing of our $7.0 million of convertible debentures. Interest accretion from the non-cash deemed dividend for the beneficial conversion feature and the amortization of the placement agent fees for fiscal 2004 was approximately $305,000. The reduction of interest expense in fiscal 2003 results primarily from lower utilization of the credit facilities. The decrease of interest expense in fiscal 2002 was primarily due to lower amount available from our credit facilities, and lower interest rates.

Other income for fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 consisted of various miscellaneous non-operating income.

Provision for Income Taxes. For fiscal 2004, our tax provision resulted in an effective rate of 9.9% representing income tax on taxable income in foreign jurisdictions and certain adjustments for changes in estimated tax liabilities. In fiscal 2003, our effective income tax rate was 15.3% consisting primarily of tax on taxable income in foreign jurisdictions. We established a valuation allowance for all of our net deferred tax assets during fiscal 2003, due to the uncertainty of our ability to generate sufficient taxable income to realize these net deferred tax assets. This allowance, which has been maintained throughout fiscal 2004 due to recurring losses, is the primary reason for the difference between the Netherlands statutory rate and our effective tax rate for fiscal years 2003 and 2004. In fiscal 2002, our effective income tax rate was a benefit of 31.9%. The effective rate was lower than The Netherlands' statutory tax rate of 35%, primarily because of non-deductible losses in Asia, and tax losses in Asia for which we recorded a valuation allowance, which eliminates any benefit to our effective tax rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We define liquidity as our ability to generate resources to pay our current obligations and to finance our growth during periods of business expansion. Our principal requirement for capital is for working capital to finance receivables and inventories. For the past three fiscal years, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flow from operations and bank borrowings. However, in August 2003, we obtained $6.7 million, net of $0.3 million of cash issuance costs, from the issuance of convertible debentures, which are due in February 2007. Our working capital, current assets less current liabilities, at May 31, 2004 was $36.1 million, compared to $35.5 million at May 31, 2003. Our current ratio, current assets divided by current liabilities, was 1.4 and 1.5 at May 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Operating Activities.

During fiscal 2004, we used cash totaling $5.7 million in our operating activities. Our net loss adjusted for non-cash operating expenses totaled $(10.4) million, which was partially offset by the positive cash flow of $4.7 million from changes in assets and liabilities, primarily from an increase in deferred revenue. The net reduction of our accounts receivable to include amounts due from affiliates were substantially offset by the net increases in our accounts payable to include amounts due to affiliates.

Cash flows generated by operating activities in fiscal 2003 were $0.3 million, which represents a $1.5 million decline from fiscal 2002. Our net loss plus non-cash items included in net loss totaled $(9.9) million, a decrease of $5.8 million from fiscal 2002. Changes in assets and liabilities were due to a decrease in receivables, and the reduction of inventories, which was partially offset by the reductions in payables and deferred revenue generated $10.2 million in cash, which offset the net loss plus non-cash items.

Cash flows generated by operating activities in fiscal 2002 were $1.7 million, which represents a $3.4 million decline from fiscal 2001. Our net loss plus non-cash items included in net loss totaled $(4.2) million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of $22.1 million from fiscal 2001. Changes in assets and liabilities were due to a substantial decrease in receivables, and the reduction of inventories, which was partially offset by the reductions in payables generated $5.9 million in cash. The cash generated by changes in assets and liabilities more than offset the net loss plus non-cash items.

Investing Activities.

In September 2003, we purchased approximately $7.7 million of assets, primarily inventory for the Eclipse product line in exchange for a note payable, and entered into a $6.0 million obligation for the license agreement from TEL. Other capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment for fiscal 2004 totaled $1.9 million. Of these amounts, we invested $0.6 million in 2004 in our operations management information system. To date, we have invested $8.8 million in the new system, and we

estimate the total cost will reach $12.0 to $15.0 million over the next 15 to 20 months. We expect that our capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment in fiscal 2005 will total approximately $2.0 million, which includes estimated expenditures for our new information system.

Our capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $3.2 million for fiscal 2003, down from $12.2 million for fiscal 2002. In 2003, we spent approximately $1.1 million on our new operations management information system and $0.8 million for the purchase of additional computer equipment, while the remaining amounts bought furniture, fixtures, and leasehold improvements.

Our capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $12.2 million for fiscal 2002, up from $9.6 million for fiscal 2001. We spent approximately $2.9 million in fiscal 2002 to build our parts cleaning facilities in The Netherlands, and we invested $5.1 million in our operations management information system.

Financing Activities.

Debt. In August 2003, the Company issued convertible debentures and warrants due in February 2007 in the principal amount of $7.0 million with an annual interest rate of 8%, payable quarterly beginning December 1, 2003. In September 2003, we issued a $7.7 million promissory note primarily for the purchase of the Eclipse product line assets and entered into a $6.0 million obligation for the license arrangement with TEL. In November 2003, we completed a $10.0 million financing facility with CIT, repaid the remaining balance of the Compass Bank facility of $2.9 million from the initial CIT funding and terminated our credit facility with Compass Bank. The total reduction of short-term borrowings was $0.9 million for fiscal 2004. For fiscal 2003, we paid down $6.3 million of the amounts we had borrowed on our credit facilities. In fiscal 2002, we increased our long-term debt by $1.5 million in exchange for the assets acquired from AST.

Equity. During fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, we received $0.5 million, $0.3 million, and $1.0 million, respectively, from employees for exercised stock options and the purchase of common shares through our employee stock purchase plan. In fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, approximately 175,000, 17,000, and 160,000 common shares were exercised from stock option plans. In fiscal 2003 and 2002, approximately 134,000, and 76,000 common shares were purchased through our employee stock purchase plan.

Current and future liquidity position. As of May 31, 2004, the Company had $12.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and $13.9 million of short-term borrowings, of which $12.2 million were outstanding under various borrowing facilities and $1.1 million due to TEL. In June 2004, we issued $6.0 million principal amount of convertible debentures due 2008. We believe that our available cash resources, which are comprised of cash and cash equivalents (including the net proceeds from our June 2004 issuance of $6.0 million of convertible debentures), amounts available under the Company's credit facilities (giving effect to the repayment and termination of the Compass Bank facility and to the acquisition of a facility from CIT, both of which occurred in November 2003), and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company's anticipated cash requirements through the next 12 months. However, if our revenues are lower than expected or our expenses are higher than anticipated, or if inventory, accounts receivable or other assets require a greater use of cash than anticipated, our available cash resources, including amounts available under our credit facilities, may not be sufficient for our cash requirements to meet all of our obligations, including current payments of $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively, to TEL under the $7.7 million promissory note and the $6.0 million obligation for the license agreement in connection with the purchase of certain assets from TEL. Failure to meet these obligations could impact our revenues if we are unable to sell Eclipse products pursuant to the license arrangement with TEL. Further, existing and potential customers and vendors may take actions that could harm our liquidity position if they believe that our cash balances are not adequate. Depending on market conditions, any additional financing the Company may need

may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. In addition, if revenues increase materially, we may need to raise additional cash resources from external sources to permit us to conduct our operations in the ordinary course of business through fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2005, we will continue to evaluate whether we should seek additional financing to meet our anticipated cash requirements for fiscal 2006 and beyond.

Certain of our credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to meet and maintain certain financial tests. We were in violation of a covenant under the CIT facility for January 2004, for which we obtained a waiver. As of May 31, 2004, we were in compliance with this covenant and all other covenants in our credit facilities.

We intend to pursue discussions with our lenders to further increase availability under our borrowing facilities and to waive, modify or, possibly, eliminate certain financial covenants in our credit facilities and to pursue discussions with additional lenders that may not require such financial covenants. However, we cannot give any assurance that the lenders will agree to increase our availability or modify or eliminate such covenants or that we will be able to enter into arrangements with additional or alternative lenders that do not require such covenants. While we anticipate that we will be able to comply with covenants in our credit facilities, we cannot give any assurance that we can comply with the covenants of our existing credit facilities. A breach of a covenant in a credit facility could result in the lender demanding repayment of all or part of our indebtedness, could impair our ability to obtain additional access to our current or alternate credit facilities and could result in a cross-default under our convertible debentures.

While we believe that our current borrowing facilities will continue to be available to us through fiscal 2005, all of our borrowing facilities other than the CIT facility, which is renewable in November 2005, are payable on demand or subject to periodic review. Given recent developments in our business and industry, we cannot give any assurance that our lenders will agree to continue to make our borrowing facilities available to us, or that new lenders will agree to make borrowing facilities available to us, on terms or in amounts acceptable to us, or at all.

Any failure to retain our existing borrowing facilities or enter into replacement facilities may impair our ability to fund our current operations and achieve our longer-term business objectives. If our significant borrowing facility lenders demand repayment of all or a significant portion of our indebtedness, we may not have the cash resources necessary to repay such indebtedness when due.

We cannot give any assurance that financing will be available when needed on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. If we determine that we need to issue additional equity securities or debt securities convertible into equity to address our need for cash resources, the issuance of additional equity securities or debt securities convertible into equity is likely to result in significant dilution to our existing shareholders, and the new equity securities or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our existing common shares. It may be necessary to raise additional funds through strategic transactions, in which event we may cease conducting or relinquish rights to a portion of our current business. Strategic transactions may not be available on terms that are favorable to us from a longer-term perspective.

In addition to the liquidity issues associated with our need for capital from external sources, our ability to generate our anticipated cash flows from operations is subject to the risks and uncertainties

discussed under Risk Factors—Risks Related to Metron. These risks include, in particular, our dependence upon a few key suppliers and a relatively small number of customers for a majority of our revenue, variations in the amount of time it takes for us to sell our products, including the related volume and price per unit, and to collect accounts receivable and in the timing of customer orders and risks associated with the semiconductor industry and its periodic downturns.

Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources are expected to be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement. This statement involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our, or our industry's, actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed under Risk Factors—Risks Related to Metron and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations as of May 31, 2004. Additionally, we issued $6.0 million principal amount of convertible debentures in June 2004, which are not reflected in the table.

	Payments Due By Period
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years
	(Dollars in thousands)
Long-term debt payable to TEL including current portion	$	7,677	$	1,044	$	3,033	$	3,600	$	—
Other long-term debt including current portion		1,791		679		1,034		44		34
8% convertible debentures		7,000		—		—		7,000		—
Short-term borrowing obligations		12,159		12,159		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations		18,856		6,064		7,283		2,781		2,728
Purchase commitments		34,379		27,046		6,133		1,200		—
License arrangement with TEL		6,000		1,200		2,400		2,400		—
Other long-term liabilities		2,009		149		492		—		1,368

Total contractual obligations and commercial commitments for cash	$	89,871	$	48,341	$	20,375	$	17,025	$	4,130

Transactions with related parties:

During fiscal 2004, Entegris ceased to be an affiliate of Metron. However, FSI continued as an affiliate and owned approximately 11.7% of the outstanding shares of the Company as of May 31, 2004. The Company purchases goods from affiliates and their subsidiaries for resale in the normal course of business under terms and conditions similar to those with unrelated vendors. For the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, such purchases totaled approximately $1.8 million, $31.9 million, and $24.4 million, respectively. Sales to affiliates during fiscal 2004 and 2003 were $23 million and $2.8 million, respectively. At May 31, 2004 and 2003, amounts payable to affiliates were $3.0 million and $8.7 million, respectively. At May 31, 2004 and 2003, amounts receivable from affiliates were $2.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

In July 1995, an officer/Managing Director of Metron entered into a Tax Indemnification Agreement ("TIA") with the Company as part of its acquisition of Transpacific Technology Corporation. At the time of the acquisition and until it completed its initial public offering in November 1999, Metron was a "controlled foreign corporation" under Subpart F of the US Internal Revenue Code ("Subpart F"), and as a "US person" the officer/director was liable for personal income tax on income imputed to him under Subpart F. Under the agreement, the Company has provided cash advances for taxes due for Subpart F income that totaled $270,000 as of May 31, 2004. Under the TIA, the officer/Managing Director is required to repay these advances only to the extent that he benefits from the

increase in the tax basis of his holding of Metron stock. Accordingly, in fiscal 2001, the Company recorded an allowance of $160,000 against these advances. Repayment of a portion of the advances is required beginning with the first sale of shares owned by the officer/director.

Bank Borrowing Facilities

The following table summarizes our material borrowing facilities and most recent interest rates as of May 31, 2004:

	U.S. $ Equivalent Facility Amount		Amount Currently Outstanding		Maximum Amount Available(1)		Recent Interest Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
CIT	$	10,000	$	4,381	$	5,619	5.5%
HSBC		2,500		1,134		1,366	4.3%
Deutsche Bank(2)		1,710		590		905	8.5%
Royal Bank of Scotland		4,218		3,182		858	5.8%
Bank Leumi		2,156		998		331	5.9%
All Others		3,232		1,874		1,321	3.3% to 9.8%

Total	$	23,816	$	12,159	$	10,400

(1): Amounts available are subject to respective borrowing base formula.
(2): The Deutsche Bank borrowing facility was reduced to $0.4 million in June 2004 after the sale of our building in Germany.

Effect of Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Exchange Rate Risk Management

A significant portion of our business is conducted outside of the United States through our foreign subsidiaries. While most of our international sales are denominated in United States dollars, some are denominated in various foreign currencies. To the extent that our sales and operating expenses are denominated in foreign currencies, our operating results may be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. Owing to the number of currencies involved, the substantial volatility of currency exchange rates, and our constantly changing currency exposures, we cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on our future operating results. Although we engage in foreign currency hedging transactions from time to time, these hedging transactions can be costly, and therefore, we do not attempt to cover all potential foreign currency exposures. These hedging techniques do not eliminate all of the effects of foreign currency fluctuations on anticipated revenue.

Market Risk

At May 31, 2004, we had aggregate forward exchange contracts in various currencies as follows:

Currency	Amount Bought US $000	Amount Sold US $000	Weighted Average Contract Rate	Fair Value US $000			Expiration Date
Euro	510	706	1.20	$	(7	)	June 2004
Israeli Shekel	—	7,279	4.58		(9	)	June 2004
Singapore Dollar	540	—	1.70		4		June 2004

				$	(12	)

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

See information/discussion appearing under the subcaption "Market Risk" of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		Page Number
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		44
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		45
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2004 and 2003		46
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		47
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		48
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		49

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Metron Technology N.V.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Metron Technology N.V. and its subsidiaries at May 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" on June 1, 2002.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
August 11, 2004

METRON TECHNOLOGY N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

	Year ended May 31,
	2004			2003			2002
Net revenue	$	205,867		$	235,665		$	232,240
Cost of revenue		161,153			191,469			186,513

Gross profit		44,714			44,196			45,727
Selling, general, and administrative expenses		52,049			56,059			52,390
Research, development and engineering expenses		2,213			442			—
Restructuring costs		4,030			5,204			1,083
Goodwill impairment		—			8,292			—
Other operating income, net of associated costs		448			4,040			5,748

Operating loss		(13,130	)		(21,761	)		(1,998	)
Loss from impairment of investments		—			—			(1,100	)
Other expense, net		(2,231	)		(1,365	)		(966	)

Loss before income taxes		(15,361	)		(23,126	)		(4,064	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,517			3,543			(1,296	)

Net loss	$	(16,878	)	$	(26,669	)	$	(2,768	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.22	)
Weighted average number of shares for basic and diluted		12,674			12,996			12,870

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

METRON TECHNOLOGY N.V.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)

			May 31,
			2004			2003
ASSETS
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	12,107		$	12,179
	Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $1,251, and $1,135, respectively			43,937			37,316
	Amounts due from affiliates			2,050			852
	Loan to officer/shareholder			110			110
	Inventories			46,719			38,131
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			12,384			12,796

		Total current assets		117,307			101,384
	Property, plant and equipment, net			20,035			24,921
	Intangibles and other assets, net			8,171			2,182

		Total Assets	$	145,513		$	128,487

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Accounts payable		$	34,847		$	21,511
	Amounts due to affiliates			3,044			8,711
	Accrued wages and employee-related expenses			4,716			5,231
	Deferred revenue			11,187			4,496
	Short term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt			13,882			13,261
	Amounts payable to shareholders			149			170
	Other current liabilities			13,423			12,491

		Total current liabilities		81,248			65,871
Long-term debt, excluding current portion				7,745			1,662
8% convertible debentures				1,531			—
Other long-term liabilities				7,321			3,148

		Total liabilities		97,845			70,681

Commitments (Note 14)				—			—
Shareholders' equity:
	Preferred shares, par value EUR 0.44; Authorized: 10,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding: none			—			—
	Common shares and additional paid-in capital, par value EUR 0.44; Authorized: 40,000,000 shares Issued: 14,179,036 and 14,003,979 shares, respectively Outstanding: 12,784,135 and 12,609,078 shares, respectively			47,459			41,285
	Retained earnings			699			17,577
	Cumulative other comprehensive income (loss)			123			(443	)
	Treasury shares: 1,394,901 shares			(613	)		(613	)

		Total shareholders' equity		47,668			57,806

		Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	145,513		$	128,487

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

METRON TECHNOLOGY N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)

					Year ended May 31,
					2004			2003			2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net loss				$	(16,878	)	$	(26,669	)	$	(2,768	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization				6,267			5,672			5,058
		Provision for doubtful accounts				104			(799	)		(1,126	)
		Gain from termination and modification of distribution agreements				(448	)		(2,069	)		(5,416	)
		Deferred income taxes				—			5,689			(1,079	)
		Goodwill impairment				—			8,292			—
		Loss from impairment of investments				—			—			1,100
		Non-cash interest for convertible debenture discount and debt issuance costs				305			—			—
		Restructuring costs, non-cash portion				548			—			—
		Other				(286	)		(75	)		76
		Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
			Accounts receivable			(6,713	)		5,627			47,455
			Amounts due from affiliates			(1,198	)		(688	)		397
			Loan to officer/shareholder			—			—			(31	)
			Inventories			(681	)		14,478			6,491
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets			412			(4,954	)		(1,363	)
			Accounts payable			13,336			(1,976	)		(11,001	)
			Amounts due to affiliates			(5,667	)		2,923			(23,125	)
			Accrued wages and employee-related expenses			(515	)		643			(5,311	)
			Deferred revenue			6,626			(7,995	)		(3,019	)
			Other current liabilities			179			2,117			(4,696	)
			Other non-current assets and liabilities			(1,096	)		57			82

				Net cash flows provided (used in) operating activities		(5,705	)		273			1,724

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Additions to property, plant, and equipment					(1,903	)		(3,241	)		(12,236	)
	Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment					1,767			508			316
	Purchase of Eclipse product line inventories, license agreement and other assets					(13,677	)		—			—

				Net cash flows used in investing activities		(13,813	)		(2,733	)		(11,920	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
	Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings					(993	)		(6,776	)		256
	Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt					156			41			710
	Proceeds from issuance of 8% convertible debentures					7,000			—			—
	Issuance costs of 8% convertible debentures					(287	)		—			—
	Issuance of notes payable and license obligation for the purchase of the Eclipse produce line from TEL					13,677			—			—
	Principal payments on long-term debt					(180	)		(910	)		(435	)
	Principal payments on indebtedness to officer and shareholder					(145	)		(62	)		(62	)
	Proceeds from issuance of common shares					462			285			1,035

				Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		19,690			(7,422	)		1,504

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents						(244	)		2,112			872

Net change in cash and cash equivalents						(72	)		(7,770	)		(7,820	)
Beginning cash and cash equivalents						12,179			19,949			27,769

Ending cash and cash equivalents					$	12,107		$	12,179		$	19,949

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

METRON TECHNOLOGY N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

	Common Shares and Additional Paid-in Capital
									Cumulative Other Comprehensive Loss
						Retained Earnings						Treasury Shares						Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Shares		Amount			Retained Earnings						Treasury Shares			Total			Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balances at May 31, 2001	12,790		$	38,714		$	49,448		$	(7,427	)	$	(592	)	$	80,143
Net loss							(2,768	)								(2,768	)	$	(2,768	)
Foreign translation adjustment										1,663						1,663			1,663
Unrealized gain from foreign currency forward contracts										296						296			296
Stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan	235			1,035												1,035

Balances at May 31, 2002	13,025			39,749			46,680			(5,468	)		(592	)		80,369			(809	)

Net loss							(26,669	)								(26,669	)		(26,669	)
Foreign translation adjustment										5,025						5,025			5,025
Treasury shares acquired from FSI	(567	)		(442	)								(272	)		(714	)
Treasury shares cancelled				1,693			(2,434	)					251			(490	)
Stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan	151			285												285

Balances at May 31, 2003	12,609			41,285			17,577			(443	)		(613	)		57,806			(21,644	)

Net loss							(16,878	)								(16,878	)		(16,878	)
Foreign translation adjustment										566						566			566
Fair value of warrants issued with convertible debentures				2,348												2,348
Deemed dividend for convertible debentures from beneficial conversion feature				3,364												3,364
Stock option exercises	175			462												462

Balances at May 31, 2004	12,784		$	47,459		$	699		$	123		$	(613	)	$	47,668		$	(16,312	)

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

METRON TECHNOLOGY N.V.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

Metron Technology N.V. ("Metron" or the "Company") is a holding company organized under the laws of The Netherlands. Metron and its subsidiaries provide marketing, sales, manufacturing, service and support solutions to semiconductor materials and equipment suppliers and semiconductor manufacturers in Europe, Asia, and the United States. The majority of Metron's revenue is derived from sales of materials and equipment.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") applicable in the United States of America. Certain prior period items have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation, and had no significant impact on reported results of operations. Conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future results may differ from these estimates.

Liquidity

For fiscal years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company incurred net losses of $16.9 million, $26.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively. In addition, the Company had $5.7 million of net cash outflows from operations in fiscal 2004. As of May 31, 2004, the Company had $12.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and $13.9 million of short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt, of which $12.2 million was outstanding under its various borrowing facilities and $1.1 million was due to Tokyo Electron Ltd. (TEL). Borrowing facilities except for the CIT facility, which is renewable in November 2005, are payable on demand or subject to periodic review.

Metron operates in a highly competitive market characterized by rapidly changing technology together with competitors that have significantly greater financial resources than the Company. The Company has substantially completed a significant shift in its focus to expand its capability to manufacture and rebuild certain legacy equipment in addition to supporting its continuing distribution activities for both the equipment solution and fab solution groups. The Company has acquired the rights from certain original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to build and sell certain legacy products and to provide continuing manufacturing capability and field support to the OEMs' customer base for those products.

The Company currently anticipates that its available cash resources, which are comprised of cash and cash equivalents (including the net proceeds from the Company's June 2004 issuance of $6.0 million of convertible debentures—See Note 19), amounts available under the Company's credit facilities (giving effect to the repayment and termination of the Compass Bank facility and to obtaining a new facility from CIT, both of which occurred in November 2003), and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company's anticipated cash requirements through the next 12 months. However, if our revenues are lower than expected or our expenses are higher than anticipated, or if inventory, accounts receivable or other assets require a greater use of cash than anticipated, our available cash resources, including amounts available under our credit facilities, may not be sufficient for our cash requirements to meet all of our obligations including current payments of $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively, to TEL under the $7.7 million promissory note and the $6.0 million obligation for the license agreement in connection with the purchase of certain assets from TEL. Failure to meet these obligations could impact our revenues if we are unable to sell Eclipse products pursuant to the license arrangement with TEL. Further, existing and potential customers and

vendors may take actions that could harm our liquidity position if they believe that our cash balances are not adequate. Depending on market conditions, any additional financing the Company may need may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. In addition, if revenues increase materially, we may need to raise additional cash resources from external sources to permit us to conduct our operations in the ordinary course of business through fiscal 2005.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The functional currency of the Company's foreign subsidiaries is predominantly their local currencies. All of the assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are translated to the US Dollar at the current year end exchange rates, while income and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates for the period.

Revenue Recognition

The Company's revenue consists primarily of product revenues generated from the sale of equipment and materials and revenues associated with the provision of services. Revenue is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB104), which superceded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB101). SAB 104 incorporates Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which was implemented by the company during its second quarter of fiscal 2004. EITF 00-21 addresses accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The effect of implementing EITF 00-21 on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations was not significant.

The Company buys equipment made by OEMs for resale where it acts as principal, including taking title to the equipment and assuming all responsibility for installation and warranty. These equipment sales are recorded as "multiple element" transactions in which the portion of the sale represented by future installation is deferred, and only the residual amount of the sale representing the equipment itself is recognized upon shipment to the customer. In certain circumstances, depending on the specific terms of the transaction, such as when the customer's retainage exceeds the amount of deferred installation revenue, all or a portion of the residual equipment revenue is deferred. Installation revenue and deferred equipment revenue, if any, are recognized upon completion of the installation and the customer's acknowledgement that the equipment is available for production use. Occasionally, the Company sells equipment as agent for OEMs and recognizes commission income, rather than revenue from an equipment sale, upon shipment. The Company continues to expand its capability to manufacture and rebuild certain legacy equipment (Legends Product Line) as it acquires rights to do so from OEMs. Revenues from the sale of legacy equipment where the Company does not have a manufacturing history are recognized upon customer acceptance.

Research, development and engineering

Research, development and engineering expenditures are expensed to operations as incurred.

Cumulative Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Cumulative other comprehensive income (loss) consists of expenses, gains, and losses that are not included in net income, but rather are recorded directly in shareholders' equity. For the fiscal years ended May 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had one item of cumulative other comprehensive income (loss) related to its foreign currency translation adjustment. For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002, the Company had two items: a foreign currency translation adjustment; and an unrealized gain from foreign currency forward contracts amounting to $296,000. At May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the balance of cumulative other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of foreign currency translation adjustments and amounted to $0.1 million, $(0.4) million and $(5.5) million, respectively.

Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted loss per common share are based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding in each year. The weighted-average number of shares for the three years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were 12,674,000 shares, 12,996,000 shares and 12,870,000 shares, respectively.

The share equivalents for stock options were excluded from diluted earnings per share for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 because their effect was anti-dilutive, amounted to approximately 3,555,000, 3,845,000 and 3,385,000 shares, respectively. Additionally, approximately 1,847,000 common shares issuable upon conversion of $7.0 million of convertible debentures issued August 2003 (excluding shares that may be issued in payment of interest), and approximately 867,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in conjunction with the $7.0 million of convertible debentures were excluded from the computation because their effect was anti-dilutive for the fiscal 2004.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents are short-term, highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of purchased products and are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out or weighted average basis) or net realizable value. Provisions are made for slow-moving and obsolete items. Components of inventory were as follows:

	May 31,
	2004		2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Raw materials	$	1,714	$	531
Work in process		4,687		1,766
Equipment, spare parts and material inventory		32,908		34,953
Equipment delivered to customers pending acceptance		7,410		881

Inventories	$	46,719	$	38,131

Foreign Currency Hedging

The Company records all derivatives from foreign currency hedging activities on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify, or are not effective as hedges, are recognized currently in earnings.

Foreign Exchange Exposure Management

The Company generally acquires and sells products internationally in US Dollars. Occasional purchases are made in foreign currency, and Metron operates subsidiaries internationally generating additional foreign currency exchange risk. Metron continues its policy of limited hedging of forecasted and actual foreign currency risk with forward contracts that expire within 12 months. Derivatives are employed to eliminate, reduce or transfer selected foreign currency risks that can be confidently identified and quantified. The fair value of derivatives hedging non-functional currency monetary assets and liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and recognized currently in earnings. In accordance with SFAS 133, hedges of anticipated transactions that are designated and documented at inception as cash flow hedges are evaluated for effectiveness, excluding time value, at least quarterly. As the critical terms of the forward contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception, forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in value of the anticipated transaction to the spot to spot change in value of the related forward contracts, with the effective portion of the hedge accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss). Any residual change in fair value of the instruments, including time value excluded from effectiveness testing, are recognized immediately in Other Expense, net. An immaterial amount of time value and contract ineffectiveness were recognized in the year ended May 31, 2004 and 2003. See Note 13 for summary of outstanding financial instruments at May 31, 2004.

Financial Instruments and Credit Risk

The carrying value of the Company's consolidated financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt, approximates fair value. Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable.

The Company sells its products and services principally to leading, well-established semiconductor companies. Credit risk is concentrated in United States, Europe and Asia. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and, generally, does not require collateral from its customers. The Company reviews its historical write-offs of accounts receivable, and, based on an ongoing evaluation of its accounts receivable collectibility and customer creditworthiness, believes it has adequately provided for potential losses, which have been within management's expectations.

The Company attempts to reduce its exposure arising from foreign currency fluctuations by matching the maturities of foreign currency assets and liabilities, mainly accounts receivable and accounts payable. The Company enters into forward exchange contracts that are designated to hedge differences existing between foreign currency assets and liabilities. Any gains or losses on these contracts are recognized in the income statement, and generally offset the resulting gains and losses on the related balance sheet items. The Company also uses forward exchange contracts that are designated to hedge firm purchase commitments. Any unrealized gains or losses are deferred and realized gains or losses adjust the carrying basis of assets acquired, principally inventory. Such amounts were not significant for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are determined primarily by the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset, while leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the estimated useful life or the lease term, as follows:

Buildings and leasehold improvements		10 – 50 years
Computers and software		3 – 7 years
Machinery, equipment, vehicles and fixtures		3 – 17 years

Gains and losses on disposals are included in income at amounts equal to the difference between the net book value of the disposed assets and the proceeds received upon disposal. Repair and maintenance costs are capitalized only if they extend the useful life of the related asset. The Company reviews the carrying value of these assets for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and disposition. Where undiscounted expected cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of an asset. No impairment of property, plant and equipment has been recognized in fiscal 2004, 2003 or 2002.

Goodwill

As of May 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had no goodwill. Goodwill represented the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill was amortized in selling, general, administrative and other expenses over a 10-year period, using the straight-line method. On June 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets determined to have an indefinite useful life and acquired in a purchase business combination are not to be amortized and should be evaluated for impairment at least annually.

As of June 1, 2002, the Company had approximately $8,292,000 of unamortized goodwill, which was subject to the transition provisions of SFAS 142. Under the transition provisions of SFAS 142, the Company during the second quarter of fiscal 2003 performed an assessment to test the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment as of June 1, 2002. The assessment determined the fair value of reporting units based on discounted cash flow. Additionally, during the second quarter of fiscal 2003, an interim assessment of the carrying value of goodwill was performed as a result of the Company's restructuring and an agreement providing for the early termination of the distribution agreements with FSI International, Inc. as described in Note 7. This assessment of fair value was determined using expected future cash flows after taking into account the anticipated lost revenue from FSI. The result of both assessments indicated that the carrying value of the Company's goodwill was not impaired.

However, the Company's market capitalization (share price quoted on NASDAQ multiplied by common shares outstanding) has been below its net book value (NBV) since July 2002 and was substantially below NBV for the eight-month period ended February 28, 2003. As a result, the comparison for estimates of the fair value of the Company's assets and liabilities to the lower market capitalization indicated that the Company's carrying value of goodwill was fully impaired. Accordingly, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $8.3 million of goodwill, the entire carrying value. Goodwill impairment amounted to $7.4 million that pertained to the former equipment segment, and $0.9 million for the former materials segment. The following table presents the impact of not amortizing goodwill on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per common share had SFAS 142 been in effect for all periods.

	Year Ended May 31,
	2004			2003			2002
	(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Net loss	$	(16,878	)	$	(26,669	)	$	(2,768	)
Amortization of goodwill		—			—			1,314

Proforma net loss excluding goodwill amortization	$	(16,878	)	$	(26,669	)	$	(1,454	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share as reported	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.22	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share excluding goodwill amortization	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.11	)

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are provided to reflect the net tax effects of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes, and of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is recorded to the extent that management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the final enactment date.

Accounting for Stock Options

The Company uses the intrinsic value-based method under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board No. 25 to account for employee stock-based compensation plans. The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (an amendment of SFAS 123).

The following pro-forma information has been prepared as if the Company had accounted for its stock options and ESPP using the fair value accounting method established by SFAS 123. Additional compensation expense arising from the application of SFAS 123 has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation method from the date of grant. For purposes of the pro forma disclosures below, additional compensation cost is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period.

		Years Ended May 31,
		2004			2003			2002
		(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net loss:
	Net loss as reported	$	(16,878	)	$	(26,669	)	$	(2,768	)
	Fair value of stock based employee compensation expense (a) (b)		2,324			3,003			2,802
	Stock based employee compensation expense in the financial statements as reported		—			—			—

	Pro forma net loss	$	(19,202	)	$	(29,672	)	$	(5,570	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share
	As reported	$	(1.33	)	$	(2.05	)	$	(0.22	)
	Pro forma	$	(1.52	)	$	(2.28	)	$	(0.43	)

(a): Based on the following assumptions for stock option grants in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002: risk-free weighted average interest rates of 2.84%, 3.58% and 4.50%, respectively; weighted average expected option lives of 5.0 years for all years; and no dividend yield in each year. A volatility of 80%, 83% and 62% has been used for fiscal years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
(b): Based on the following assumptions for the ESPP in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002: risk-free weighted average interest rates of 1.03%, 1.41% and 2.73%, respectively; weighted average expected option lives of 6 months; and no dividend yield in each year. A volatility of 74%, 83% and 62% has been used for fiscal years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

2. ACQUISITIONS AND PURCHASES OF PRODUCT LINES

In September 2003, the Company acquired certain assets related to the Eclipse physical vapor deposition equipment product line from TEL. These assets consisted of $7.6 million of inventories, $6.0 million of intellectual properties pursuant to a license agreement and $0.1 million for other assets. As consideration, Metron Technology Distribution Corporation (MTDC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued to TEL a five-year promissory note in the principal amount of approximately $7.7 million, which bears interest at approximately 1.6% per annum, primarily for the purchase of Eclipse inventory at fair value. Principal and interest are payable quarterly beginning September 2004 over a five-year period. As part of the agreement, MTDC paid approximately $33,000 at closing for the excess over $100,000 of TEL's net book value of fixed assets acquired. Additionally, MTDC entered into a royalty-free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, and nontransferable license agreement providing for payments by MTDC over a 5 year period totaling $6.0 million and an agreement to sublease the facility used by TEL in connection with manufacturing of the Eclipse products. The fair value of the license agreement ($6.0 million) has been recorded in intangibles and other long-term assets and is being amortized to cost of revenue ($0.8 million for fiscal 2004) on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of 5 years. The current and future payment obligations for the license ($6.0 million) agreement has been recorded in other current liabilities of $1.2 million and other long-term liabilities of $4.8 million in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2004. At May 31, 2004, the future amortization of the acquired intangible assets was as follows:

Fiscal Year	(Dollars in thousands)
2005	$	1,200
2006		1,200
2007		1,200
2008		1,200
2009		400

Total	$	5,200

In May 2002, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Advanced Stainless Technologies ("AST"). AST is a manufacturer of electro-polished stainless steel tubing and fittings. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase, and AST's results of operations are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from May 1, 2002. The fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately $2.5 million. As consideration for the assets acquired, the Company assumed certain debt of AST amounting to $1.5 million and contributed its 20% equity interest, which the Company held prior to the acquisition. Metron agreed to pay additional consideration of up to the lesser of 51,500 of the Company's common shares or $1.2 million in the form of the Company's common shares, if certain performance milestones are achieved over the two fiscal years following the acquisition. As of May 31, 2004, performance milestones were not achieved, accordingly, the additional consideration is no longer an obligation of the Company.

In March 2002, the Company bought inventory and certain other assets of AG Associates RPT product line from Mattson Technologies, as part of its expansions of the Legends Product Line. The purchase price was $3.2 million, substantially all of which was assigned to the acquired inventory.

3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

	May 31,
	2004		2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Land	$	424	$	1,003
Buildings and leasehold improvements		11,960		13,716
Machinery, equipment, vehicles and fixtures		14,101		15,295
Computers and software		17,649		16,780
Construction in progress		961		427

		45,095		47,221
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		25,060		22,300

Net property, plant and equipment	$	20,035	$	24,921

Depreciation and amortization expense relating to property, plant and equipment for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $5.5 million, $5.7 million and $3.7 million, respectively.

4. LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS

During May 2000, the Company acquired an approximately 16% interest in Abeto GmbH. Abeto was established in September 1999 as a spin-off from Infineon Technologies AG to provide outsource services in the reclaim and refurbishment of packaging materials for the semiconductor industry. During fiscal 2002, the Company assessed Abeto's ability to continue as a going concern without additional financial support. As a result of its assessment, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $0.7 million to fully write-off the investment in Abeto.

During August 2000, the Company acquired an approximately 20% interest in Advanced Stainless Technologies, Inc. ("AST"), and during fiscal 2002 we recognized an impairment in the value of our investment of $0.4 million. In April 2002, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of AST. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase, and our remaining equity interest was contributed to one of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries, T.A. Kyser Co. ("Kyser"), as part of the acquisition. (See Note 2). Accordingly, the acquired assets of AST have been consolidated as part of the Company since April 2002.

5. BORROWINGS AND DEBT

Short-term borrowings consisted of the following:

	May 31,
	2004		2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Credit facilities with banks	$	12,159	$	13,110
Current portion of long-term debt (primarily TEL and AST)		1,723		151

Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	$	13,882	$	13,261

In November 2003, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, T.A. Kyser Co., entered into a financing agreement with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. ("CIT"), which expires in November 2005. The agreement provides the Company with up to $10.0 million dollars under a revolving line of credit facility. The amount available for borrowing is based on a formula of Kyser's eligible accounts receivable, and is subject to certain adjustments. Interest is payable monthly, and is

based on a per annum rate comprised of the prime rate of Chase Bank plus 1.5%, which is applied to the average daily balances outstanding under the facility. The interest rate at May 31, 2004 was 5.5%. The facility is collateralized by the assets of Kyser, guaranteed by the Company, and is subject to a financial covenant based on a defined formula. Upon funding of the facility, the Company terminated its credit facility with Compass Bank, and repaid the remaining balance of $2.9 million from the initial funds borrowed from CIT. Borrowings under the CIT agreement at May 31, 2004 were $4.4 million.

The Company and its subsidiaries have short-term borrowing facilities in various currencies with a number of other banks (HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland, Bank Leumi and others) which expire at various dates through June 2005. Borrowings outstanding under these facilities were $7.8 million at both May 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The amounts available for borrowings are based on formulas stated in each agreement and are subject to certain adjustments. Interest is based on per annum interest rates ranging from 3.3% to 9.9% and is payable monthly. The facilities are collateralized by the assets of the entities.

Weighted average interest rates on the outstanding facilities for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were approximately 5.7% and 5.9%, respectively. At May 31, 2004, the total amount available and unutilized under the Company's short-term borrowings was approximately $10.4 million. The Company and its subsidiaries have guaranteed certain short-term credit facilities.

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

		May 31,
		2004		2003
		(Dollars in thousands)
Note payable to an individual in conjunction with the acquisition of AST with an interest rate based on a bank prime rate determined quarterly (4.75% at May 31, 2004). Quarterly payments of interest only commenced September 2002 are payable through June 2004. Quarterly payments of principal and interest commence September 2004 until paid in June 2006		$	1,500	$	1,500
Note payable to Tokyo Electron Ltd. for the purchase of inventory with an interest rate of 1.6% per annum. Annual principal payments and quarterly interest payments commence September 2004 and continue through August 2008.			7,677		—
Various notes maturing through May 2008; interest rates range from 0.4% to 10.1%			291		313

			9,468		1,813
	Less current portion		1,723		151

Long-term debt		$	7,745	$	1,662

Future fiscal year ("FY") annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows: FY2005, $1.7 million; FY2006, $2.1 million, FY2007, $2.1 million, FY2008, $1.8 million, FY2009, $1.8 million, and thereafter $34,000.

6. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

In August 2003, the Company issued convertible debentures with a $7.0 million face value (resulting in $6.7 million of proceeds, net of issuance costs) with an annual interest rate of 8% ("8% convertible debentures"), payable quarterly beginning December 1, 2003. In June 2004, the Company issued additional convertible debentures with substantially the same terms for $6.0 million with an annual interest rate of 6.5% (the "6.5% convertible debentures") and warrants (See Note 19). The issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures required certain anti-dilution adjustments for both the

conversion price per share and warrants price per share for the 8% convertible debentures. As a result of the issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures, the 8% convertible debentures are convertible into approximately 1,847,000 common shares of the Company based on a per share price equal to $3.60 (previously $3.79). The closing per share price of the 8% convertible debentures was equal to the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company as listed on NASDAQ for ten days prior to and including August 20, 2003. The quarterly interest is payable at the Company's option with either cash or, subject to certain conditions, registered common shares of the Company. The Company, at its option, can require the holders to convert the 8% convertible debentures into common shares of the Company in the event the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company for any 20 consecutive trading days exceeds $10.34, subject to certain conditions. After February 25, 2007, the remaining balance of the 8% convertible debentures not converted into common shares must be repaid to the holders in cash, including any accrued interest.

The Company issued the purchasers and the placement agent of the 8% convertible debentures warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 867,000 common shares of the Company. One-half of the warrants are exercisable at $3.79 per share (previously $3.97 per share), with the remaining warrants being exercisable at $4.09 per share (previously $4.31 per share). All warrants are exercisable for a four-year period after August 2003. The debt issuance cost associated with the 8% convertible debt was approximately $437,000. Approximately $150,000 of this cost pertains to the allocation of the fair value of the warrants issued to the placement agent, and was an offset in shareholders' equity. Additionally, a fee of $287,000 paid to the placement agent, was recorded as an asset, which is being amortized over the life of the debt.

The 8% convertible debentures and warrants were recorded at their relative fair values. The fair value of the debt was determined to be $4.7 million. The fair value assigned to the warrants was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model and approximately $2.3 million was recorded as a discount of the debt and as an increase in shareholders' equity. In addition, in accordance with EITF 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, and EITF 98-5 Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios, the Company recorded a deemed dividend because the conversion price of the 8% convertible debentures, after taking into account the fair value of the warrants, was less than the closing price of the Company's common shares, which was $4.34 per share on the closing date. The deemed dividend of approximately $3.4 million was recorded as a further discount to the 8% convertible debentures and an increase to shareholders' equity. The deemed dividend and fair value of the warrants will be accreted as additional non-cash interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. The following table summarizes the valuation of the 8% convertible debentures.

			May 31, 2004
			(Dollars in thousands)
8% convertible debentures principal			$	7,000
Less: Interest discount included in shareholders' equity:
	Fair value of warrants			2,348
	Deemed dividend			3,364

				1,288
	Interest accretion			243

		8% convertible debentures	$	1,531

7. MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION OF DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS

In October 2002, the Company and FSI International, Inc. ("FSI") entered into a transition agreement, providing for the early termination of their distribution agreements in Europe and Asia. Pursuant to the agreement, effective March 1, 2003 (the "closing date"), FSI assumed direct sales, service and applications support and logistics responsibilities for its surface conditioning and microlithography products in Europe and Asia, except that the Company will continued to represent FSI products in Israel. The Company's revenues for FSI products and services in Europe and Asia were approximately $1.8 million, $26.9 million, and $29.0 million for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Under the terms of the transition agreement, FSI advanced $3.0 million in cash to the Company. On the closing date, the advance was applied toward the repurchase by FSI of inventory and equipment that the Company purchased under the current distribution arrangement. As consideration, FSI agreed to pay to the Company an early termination fee of $2.8 million. The agreement required FSI to surrender up to 1,154,000 of the Company's common shares owned by FSI with a maximum value of $2.5 million as a form of consideration for the termination fee.

On April 7, 2003, the transition of the distribution agreements with FSI was completed. The Company recorded a total gain of $2.7 million for the termination of the FSI distribution agreement. FSI transferred to the Company 567,105 common shares of the Company with a fair market value of $0.7 million, which was in addition to the $3.0 million cash advance the Company received. As a result, FSI's ownership of the Company's outstanding common shares was reduced from approximately 20.5% to approximately 16.8% at May 31, 2003. 93 employees who were dedicated to sales, technical service and applications engineering activities related to the distribution of FSI products in Europe and Asia transferred to FSI.

In August 2002, Cabot Microelectronics advised the Company of its decision to assume the direct distribution of its products in Europe and Singapore with a June 1, 2003 transition date. Metron continues to market Cabot Microelectronics products in Israel. Revenue, excluding Israel, from the sale of products manufactured by Cabot Microelectronics was approximately $1.3 million, $32.9 million, and $31.8 million for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

During January 2001, the Company and Entegris, Inc. ("Entegris"), one of the Company's suppliers and shareholders, entered into an agreement to modify their existing distribution relationship. In February 2001, the Company entered into a transition agreement whereby Entegris assumed direct sales responsibility for products from its Microelectronics Group in Europe. In March 2001, the companies entered into a new distribution agreement, under which Metron will continue to distribute products from Entegris' Fluid Handling Group in all regions in Europe, Asia and parts of the United States covered under the previous distribution agreements. The new distribution agreement will be in effect until August 31, 2005. As consideration for modifying the distribution agreement, Entegris transferred to the Company 1,125,000 shares of Metron it owned which had a fair market value of $6.6 million, and made cash payments totaling $1.75 million over a 15-month period. The Company recorded a total gain of $8.4 million in other operating income over an 18 month period from February 2001 on a straight-line basis, which included $1.4 million, $5.4 million and $1.6 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Revenue from products distributed for the Microelectronics Group under the previous distribution agreement for the years ended May 31 2002 were $4.3 million.

8. RESTRUCTURING COSTS

The following table summarizes the restructuring costs and remaining accrued liability for restructuring costs.

			Personnel Costs (Cash)			Abandoned Lease Facilities (Cash)			Fixed Assets (non-cash)			Total
			(Dollars in thousands)
Restructuring costs
	Amounts accrued		$	651		$	432		$	—		$	1,083
	Amounts paid			(651	)		(28	)		—			(679	)

		Balances, May 31, 2002		—			404			—			404
	Amounts accrued			3,019			2,185			—			5,204
	Amounts paid			(2,412	)		(491	)		—			(2,903	)

		Balances, May 31, 2003		607			2,098			—			2,705
	Amounts accrued			2,674			808			548			4,030
	Non-cash reductions			—			—			(548	)		(548	)
	Amounts paid			(2,736	)		(1,628	)		—			(4,364	)

		Balances, May 31, 2004	$	545	(1)	$	1,278	(2)	$	—		$	1,823

(1): Included in accrued wages and employee-related expense
(2): $1.0 million is included in other current liabilities, and $0.3 million is included in other long-term liabilities (See Note 17).

During fiscal 2004, the Company terminated 84 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 43 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 29 employees and 12 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. Remaining accrued personnel costs as of May 31, 2004 will be paid during fiscal 2005. The Company incurred approximately $2.5 million of restructuring costs in the equipment solutions segment, of which $1.7 million was for personnel terminations and $0.8 million pertained to the cost of the abandonment of leased facilities, leasehold improvements and fixed assets. The fab solutions group incurred approximately $0.9 million of restructuring costs, of which $0.4 million was for personnel terminations and $0.5 million pertained to the abandonment of leased facilities. Other groups incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring costs, which primarily pertained to personnel terminations. In estimating the accrual for abandoned leased facilities, the Company made assumptions regarding the future sublease income of these facilities. These assumptions will be updated periodically and additional adjustments may be required.

During fiscal 2003, the Company announced plans to reduce the number of its employees by approximately 125 in addition to the 93 employees that were transferred to FSI (see note 7). The restructure cost of terminating these individuals amounted to $3.0 million. Additionally, the Company incurred approximately $2.2 million of restructuring costs pertaining to the cost of the abandonment of certain leased facilities within both the equipment and material segments, which expire through 2014. The total number of employees terminated during the year was 125 people. The equipment solutions group reduced its headcount by 69 employees, the fab solutions group division terminated 14 employees, and 42 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. In estimating the accrual for abandoned leased facilities the Company made assumptions regarding the future sublease income of these facilities.

Restructuring costs of $1.1 million incurred during fiscal 2002 were comprised of termination costs of $0.7 million and abandonment of a lease amounting to $0.4 million. During fiscal 2002, the

termination costs pertained to a reduction in headcount totaling 56 employees, 27 of whom worked in the equipment solutions group, 17 in the fab solutions group and 12 in finance and administration.

9. RELATED PARTIES

During fiscal 2004, Entegris ceased being an affiliate of Metron as a result of a reduction in ownership. However, FSI continued as an affiliate and owned approximately 11.7% of the outstanding shares of the Company as of May 31, 2004. The Company purchases goods from affiliates and their subsidiaries for resale in the normal course of business under terms and conditions similar to those with unrelated vendors. For the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, such purchases totaled approximately $1.8 million, $31.9 million and $24.4 million, respectively. Sales to affiliates during fiscal 2004 and 2003 were $2.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively. At May 31, 2004 and 2003, amounts payable to affiliates were $3.0 million and $8.7 million, respectively. At May 31, 2004 and 2003, amounts receivable from affiliates were $2.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

10. INCOME TAXES

The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before taxes for each year ended May 31 were as follows:

		Years ended May 31,
		2004			2003			2002
		(Dollars in thousands)
The Netherlands		$	(2,193	)	$	(4,397	)	$	154
Other countries:
	Singapore		2,471			2,585			1,401
	Hong Kong		66			284			2,619
	Germany		(1,315	)		(1,279	)		537
	Italy		(1,504	)		(1,054	)		(63	)
	Israel		(1,868	)		(1,096	)		1,274
	France		(3,042	)		(1,315	)		(1,234	)
	United States		(4,322	)		(5,098	)		(5,082	)
	United Kingdom		(4,670	)		(9,844	)		(2,808	)
	All other countries		1,016			(1,912	)		(862	)

Loss before income taxes		$	(15,361	)	$	(23,126	)	$	(4,064	)

The components of income tax provision (benefit) for each year ended May 31 were as follows:

			Years ended May 31,
			2004			2003			2002
			(Dollars in thousands)
Current:
	The Netherlands		$	(164	)	$	(572	)	$	365
	Other countries:
		Hong Kong		832			49			35
		Singapore		633			(395	)		—
		United States		410			(1,160	)		(1,587	)
		Israel		(229	)		—			1,074
		France		(89	)		(485	)		(600	)
		All other countries		(30	)		68			170

	Current income tax provision (benefit)			1,363			(2,495	)		(543	)

Deferred:
	The Netherlands			383			4			62
	Other countries:
		Singapore		(172	)		380			398
		United States		—			1,866			(300	)
		Israel		—			1,055			(612	)
		Taiwan		—			571			(230	)
		United Kingdom		—			491			(534	)
		Germany		—			431			243
		France		—			386			219
		All other countries		(57	)		854			1

	Deferred income tax provision (benefit)			154			6,038			(753	)

Total income taxes			$	1,517		$	3,543		$	(1,296	)

Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are set forth below.

		May 31,
		2004			2003
		(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred tax assets (included in Other current assets and Other assets):
	Deferred revenue	$	350		$	216
	Account receivable and inventory valuation		1,230			806
	Accruals deductible when paid		2,389			460
	Net operating loss carryforwards and other items		13,113			4,143

			17,082			5,625
Less valuation allowance			17,082			5,625

			—			—
Deferred tax liabilities primarily depreciation of property, plant, and equipment			246			419

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) recorded in consolidated balance sheets		$	(246	)	$	(419	)

At May 31, 2004, the Company had $13.1 million in net operating loss carryforwards, primarily in the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands, which represented approximately

$3.0 million, $2.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of tax benefit. Some of these benefits will begin to expire in 2007, others, depending on jurisdiction, will carryforward indefinitely.

The Company established a valuation allowance for all the deferred tax assets during the year ended May 31, 2003, due to the Company's assessment that it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. The net change in the valuation allowance for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was an increase (decrease) of $11.5 million, $3.8 million and $(0.1) million, respectively.

Differences between the statutory income tax rate of The Netherlands and the Company's effective income tax rate are reconciled as follows:

		Years ended May 31,
		2004		2003		2002
Tax benefit at statutory income tax rate		(34.5	)%	(34.5	)%	(35.0	)%
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
	Tax rate differential in other countries	(4.3	)	2.5		(6.8	)
	Permanent differences other than goodwill	(6.8	)	—		—
	Current year net operating losses for which no benefit is recognized	50.1		35.1		(0.6	)
	Utilization of prior year net operating losses for which no benefit was previously recognized	—		—		7.7
	Changes in estimated tax accruals	5.3		(1.9	)	(2.7	)
	Amortization and impairment of goodwill	—		13.8		5.6
	All other	0.1		0.3		(0.1	)

Effective income tax rate		9.9	%	15.3	%	(31.9	)%

11. CAPITAL STOCK

Treasury Shares

As partial consideration for the termination of the FSI distribution agreement, FSI transferred 567,105 shares of the Metron common shares it owned to Metron. On March 1, 2003, the closing date, the common shares transferred by FSI had a fair market value of $714,000. Under the laws of The Netherlands, the number of shares allowed as treasury shares cannot exceed 10% of the shares issued by the Company. Accordingly, upon the transfer of the common shares from FSI, the Company cancelled 578,211 of its treasury shares, which had a carrying value (on a first-in, first-out cost basis) of approximately $2.4 million.

Stock Option Plans

In fiscal 1996, the Company established an Employee Stock Option Plan to award options to managing directors and employees, and in fiscal 1997 established a Supervisory Directors' Stock Option Plan to award options to supervisory directors. In 2002, the shareholders approved the amendment of the Employee Stock Option Plan to increase the aggregate number of common shares authorized for issuance by 1,000,000 shares. In fiscal 2003, the Supervisory Director's approved a supplemental stock option plan to award up to 500,000 common shares. The three plans are now authorized to grant options to purchase up to 5,475,000 common shares (5,250,000 shares for Managing Directors and employees and 225,000 for Supervisory Directors). The plans require that the exercise price of options be not less than the fair value of the common shares at the grant date. Options generally vest over a four-year period and are exercisable in installments beginning one year after the grant date and expire after 10 years if not exercised.

There were approximately 1,073,714 and 51,250 shares available for future employee awards and Supervisory Director awards, respectively, at May 31, 2004. The following table summarizes award activity for all plans for the fiscal years listed:

	2004				2003				2002
	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year	3,845,228		$	6.99	3,384,626		$	8.24	2,369,719		$	8.65
Stock options granted	1,028,900			3.00	1,265,430			4.94	1,440,572		$	7.24
Stock options exercised	(175,057	)		2.64	(17,000	)		4.13	(159,559	)	$	3.88
Awards canceled	(1,144,153	)		7.37	(787,828	)		9.01	(266,106	)	$	9.14

Outstanding, end of year	3,554,918		$	5.99	3,845,228		$	6.99	3,384,626		$	8.24

Options exercisable at end of year	2,027,281		$	7.32	1,862,847		$	7.70	1,512,487		$	7.71

Summary information concerning outstanding and exercisable options as of May 31, 2004 was as follows:

Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$ 0.98 – $ 2.00	468,797	8.5 yrs	$	1.88	142,390	$	2.69
$ 2.24 – $ 2.95	856,498	7.1 yrs		2.58	466,848		3.26
$ 3.09 – $ 3.84	145,000	9.4 yrs		3.39	3,750		3.26
$ 4.15 – $ 4.52	233,000	9.1 yrs		4.31	625		4.48
$ 6.13 – $ 6.84	220,917	6.1 yrs		6.49	152,492		6.43
$ 7.00 – $ 7.83	821,106	6.1 yrs		7.32	597,180		7.37
$ 8.00 – $ 8.93	374,100	5.8 yrs		8.74	254,146		8.66
$10.37 – $19.00	435,500	6.2 yrs		13.74	409,850		13.95

	3,554,918		$	5.99	2,027,281	$	7.32

All options issued during the past three years have an exercise price equal to the fair value of the common shares on the date of grant. The following weighted average fair values of options granted have been determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation method.

	Years Ended May 31,
	2004		2003		2002
Options granted		1,028,900		1,265,430		1,440,572
Weighted average exercise price	$	3.00	$	4.94	$	7.24
Weighted average fair value, stock options	$	2.00	$	3.37	$	4.10
Weighted average fair value, ESPP		—	$	1.28	$	2.14

The Company has a 1997 and 2003 employee stock purchase plans ("1997 ESPP", "2003 ESPP") for the benefit of U.S. and international employees. The U.S. plans are qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase the Company's common shares through payroll deductions at a price equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning or end of each six-month offering period. Stock purchases under the ESPP are limited to 5 percent of an employee's eligible compensation, in any plan year. Shares issued under the 1997 ESPP were approximately 134,000 and 76,000 for fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively. No

shares were issued under the 2003 ESPP in fiscal 2004. At May 31, 2004, there were approximately 11,000 shares and 200,000 shares reserved for future issuance under the 1997 ESPP and 2003 ESPP, respectively.

12. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Most employees of the Company are covered by one of several defined contribution retirement plans. Contributions are generally based on the participant's compensation. The amount of pension expense charged to operating expenses for defined contribution plans was $0.6 million in fiscal 2004, $1.3 million in fiscal 2003 and $1.1 million in fiscal 2002.

A subsidiary previously had an employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP") for its employees. Upon the acquisition of the subsidiary in 1998, all of the subsidiary's shares held by the ESOP were exchanged for shares of the Company. In July 2001, the IRS approved the dissolution of the ESOP, and in October and November 2001, the subsidiary distributed the shares held by the ESOP to their beneficial owners.

13. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments approximate fair value. At May 31, 2004, the Company had aggregate forward exchange contracts in various currencies as follows:

Currency	Amount Bought US $000	Amount Sold US $000	Weighted Average Contract Rate	Fair Value US $000			Expiration Date
Euro	510	706	1.20	$	(7	)	June 2004
Israeli Shekel	—	7,279	4.58		(9	)	June 2004
Singapore Dollar	540	—	1.70		4		June 2004

				$	(12	)

14. COMMITMENTS

The Company and its subsidiaries lease certain facilities and equipment under various operating lease agreements. Future minimum payments under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms of one year or more at May 31, 2004 are listed in the table below. The amounts listed have not been reduced by the amount of our restructuring liability or by expected sub lease income used in determination of the leased facilities restructuring cost.

Fiscal Year	(Dollars in thousands)
2005	$	6,064
2006		4,524
2007		2,759
2008		1,529
2009		1,252
Thereafter		2,728

Total minimum lease payments	$	18,856

The Company's rental expense for operating leases for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $7.4 million, $5.2 million and $5.0 million, respectively.

15. ADDITIONAL SALES INFORMATION AND CONCENTRATION OF RISK

In fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, no individual customer represented sales of 10% or more of net revenue. A large portion of the Company's sales are made to a number of major publicly owned corporations. In fiscal 2004, our five largest customers accounted for an aggregate of 23% of our sales.

There is a concentration of credit risk in accounts receivable from these customers. At May 31, 2004, 31% of accounts receivable balance outstanding pertained to five customers. Metron performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. Credit risk associated with nonpayment from these customers is affected by conditions or occurrences within their industry. The Company believes that there is no significant credit risk with respect to these receivables.

16. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA

The Company operates in the semiconductor industry. Metron provides marketing, sales, service and support solutions to semiconductor materials and equipment suppliers and semiconductor manufacturers. Reportable segments are based on the way the Company is organized, reporting responsibilities to the chief executive officer and on the nature of the products offered to customers. Reportable segments are the equipment solutions group, which includes certain specialized process chemicals, spare part sales, and equipment; the fab solutions group, which includes components used in construction and maintenance, parts cleaning service and other, which includes finance, administration and corporate functions.

Segment operating results are measured based on net income (loss) before tax, adjusted if necessary, for certain segment specific items. There are no inter-segment sales. Identifiable assets are the Company's assets that are identified with classes of similar products or operations in each geographic region. Corporate assets include primarily cash, short and long term investments and assets related to the administrative headquarters of the Company.

Segment information

		Equipment Solutions Group			Fab Solutions Group			Other			Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Year ended May 31, 2004
	Net revenues	$	68,602		$	137,265		$	—		$	205,867
	Depreciation and amortization expense		2,283			2,265			1,719			6,267
	Interest income		—			—			56			56
	Interest expense		—			—			2,228			2,228
	Restructuring costs		(2,488	)		(877	)		(665	)		(4,030	)
	Income (loss) before income taxes		(227	)		6,237			(21,371	)		(15,361	)
	Total assets		61,818			58,548			25,147			145,513
	Capital expenditures		1,197			464			242			1,903
Year ended May 31, 2003, reclassified
	Net revenue	$	85,705		$	149,960		$	—		$	235,665
	Depreciation and amortization expense		2,462			1,540			1,670			5,672
	Interest income		—			—			109			109
	Interest expense		—			—			1,073			1,073
	Restructuring costs		(4,294	)		(410	)		(500	)		(5,204	)
	Goodwill impairment		(7,352	)		(940	)		—			(8,292	)
	Income (loss) before income taxes		(11,574	)		9,580			(21,132	)		(23,126	)
	Total assets		58,948			51,545		$	17,994			128,487
	Capital expenditures		1,389			877			975			3,241
Year ended May 31, 2002, reclassified
	Net revenues	$	99,818		$	132,422		$	—		$	232,240
	Depreciation and amortization expense		2,909			1,031			1,118			5,058
	Interest income		—			—			397			397
	Interest expense		—			—			1,323			1,323
	Income (loss) before income taxes		2,941			10,152			(17,157	)		(4,064	)
	Total assets		67,492			71,017			25,127			163,636
	Capital expenditures		3,215			2,504			6,517			12,236

Geographic information

		Year ended May 31,
		2004		2003		2002
		(Dollars in thousands)
Net revenue:
	United States	$	72,203	$	70,475	$	58,878
	France		10,118		34,953		21,467
	Singapore		23,999		34,285		28,016
	Germany		20,982		25,344		32,020
	United Kingdom		17,890		16,267		27,906
	Israel		18,975		15,438		22,203
	The Netherlands		8,516		9,549		9,093
	Hong Kong		518		6,071		13,014
	Other nations		32,666		23,283		19,643

Geographic totals		$	205,867	$	235,665	$	232,240

		May 31,
		2004		2003
		(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed assets:
	The Netherlands	$	9,809	$	11,207
	United Kingdom		3,959		4,731
	United States		2,370		2,590
	Singapore		1,911		2,584
	Other nations		1,986		3,809

Geographic totals		$	20,035	$	24,921

Intangible assets, net; United States		$	5,200	$	—

17. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		May 31,
		2004		2003
		(Dollars in thousands)
Other current liabilities:
	Accrued taxes including income taxes	$	4,722	$	4,604
	Customer prepayments		681		801
	Restructure costs, facilities		1,022		1,327
	Current portion of Eclipse license obligation due to TEL		1,200		—
	Other		5,798		5,759

Total other current liabilities		$	13,423	$	12,491

		May 31,
		2004		2003
		(Dollars in thousands)
Other long-term liabilities:
	Eclipse license obligation due to TEL net of current portion	$	4,800	$	—
	Other		2,521		3,148

Total other long-term liabilities		$	7,321	$	3,148

		Year ended May 31,
		2004		2003		2002
		(Dollars in thousands)
Net revenue:
	Product revenue	$	178,446	$	211,424	$	202,897
	Service revenues		27,421		24,241		29,343

Net revenue		$	205,867	$	235,665	$	232,240

		Year Ended May 31,
		2004			2003			2002
		(in thousands)
Other expense, net
	Foreign exchange loss	$	(654	)	$	(719	)	$	(197	)
	Interest income		56			109			397
	Interest expense		(2,228	)		(1,073	)		(1,323	)
	Other income		595			318			157

Other expense, net		$	(2,231	)	$	(1,365	)	$	(966	)

			Years ended May 31,
			2004		2003		2002
			(Dollars in thousands)
Supplemental cash flow information:
	Cash payments for:
		Interest	$	2,002	$	1,024	$	1,317
		Income taxes	$	1,584	$	2,669	$	5,010
	Noncash transactions:
		Treasury stock received from FSI for early termination of distribution agreement	$	—	$	1,719	$	—
		Note payable acquired in exchange for assets of AST	$	—	$	—	$	1,500
		Cancellation of treasury stock	$	—	$	2,434	$	—
		Contribution of residual equity interest for the acquisition of AST assets	$	—	$	—	$	404

18. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

		First			Second			Third			Fourth
		(Dollars in thousands)
Year ended May 31, 2004
	Net revenue	$	46,938		$	44,022		$	52,739		$	62,168
	Gross profit	$	9,582		$	9,122		$	11,537		$	14,473
	Operating income (loss)	$	(4,731	)	$	(6,305	)	$	(3,152	)	$	1,058
	Net loss	$	(5,182	)	$	(7,468	)	$	(4,139	)	$	(89	)
	Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.59	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.01	)
Year ended May 31, 2003
	Net revenue	$	64,320		$	56,804		$	57,896		$	56,645
	Gross profit	$	11,430		$	10,561		$	10,822		$	11,383
	Operating loss	$	(1,466	)	$	(5,723	)	$	(12,962	)	$	(1,610	)
	Net loss	$	(2,419	)	$	(5,363	)	$	(12,627	)	$	(6,260	)
	Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.96	)	$	(0.49	)

19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In June 2004, the Company issued $6.0 million principal amount of convertible debentures for $5.6 million of proceeds, net of $0.4 million of issuance costs, with an annual interest rate of 6.5%, payable quarterly beginning September 1, 2004. The 6.5% convertible debentures are convertible into approximately 1,667,000 common shares of the Company at any time after the closing date based on a per-share price equal to $3.60. [As a result of the issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures, the 8% convertible debentures became convertible into approximately 1,847,000 common shares of the Company based on a per share price equal to $3.60 (previously $3.79)—see Note 6. The closing per share price of the transaction was equal to the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company as listed on NASDAQ for ten days prior to and including May 21, 2004. The quarterly interest is payable at the Company's option with either cash or, subject to certain conditions, registered common shares of the Company. The Company, at its option, can require the holders to convert the 6.5% convertible debentures into common shares of the Company in the event the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company for any 20 consecutive trading days exceeds $11.00, subject to certain conditions. After June 16, 2008, the remaining balance of the 6.5% convertible debentures not converted into common shares must be repaid to the holders in cash, including any accrued interest.

The Company issued the purchasers of the 6.5% convertible debentures warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 767,000 common shares of the Company. One-half of the warrants are exercisable at $3.79 per share, with the remaining warrants being exercisable at $3.92 per share. All warrants are exercisable for a five-year period after June 2004. Additionally, the Company paid a fee of $364,000 to the placement agent, which will be recorded as an asset and amortized over the life of the debt.

The 6.5% convertible debentures and warrants will be recorded at their relative fair values in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 21 Interest on Receivables and Payables. The relative fair value allocated to the debt was determined to be $4.8 million. The relative fair value assigned to the warrants was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model, and approximately $1.2 million will be recorded as a discount of the debt and as an increase in shareholders' equity. The fair value of the warrants will be accreted as additional non-cash interest

expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. The following table summarizes the valuation of the 6.5% convertible debentures.

(Dollars in thousands)
6.5% convertible debenture		$	6,000
Less: Interest discount included in shareholders' equity for the fair value of warrants			1,162

	6.5% convertible debentures	$	4,838

The Company was required to file a registration statement on Form S-3 within 30 days of issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures to register the resale of the common shares issuable upon conversion of the debentures (including common shares payable as interest on the debentures) and upon exercise of the warrants. The Company received a waiver to defer the filing of the registration statement on Form S-3 until August 13, 2004 from each of the debenture holders. In the event the registration statement is not effective within 90 days from the closing date (120 days in the event the SEC reviews the registration statement), the Company is required to pay liquidated damages equal to 2% per month of the value of the debentures.

20. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

During January 2003, the Financial Accountings Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Equities" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 requires that if an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the variable interest entity should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the entity. FIN 46(R) was issued in December 2003. The Company adopted FIN 46(R) in January 2004. The Company has evaluated its investments in variable interest entities, and has determined that the adoption of FIN 46(R) did not have a material impact on its operating results of financial condition.

On December 17, 2003, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the Staff) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition" (SAB 104), which supercedes Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" (SAB 101). SAB 104 rescinds accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, superceded as a result of the issuance of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21 (EITF 00-21), "Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." Additionally, SAB 104 rescinds the SEC's Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers (the FAQ) issued with SAB 101 that had been codified in SEC topic 13, "Revenue Recognition". While the wording of SAB 104 has changed to reflect the issuance of EITF 00-21, the revenue recognition principles of SAB 101 remain largely unchanged by the issuance of SAB 104. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued EITF Issue No. 03-6, "Participating Securities and the Two-class Method Under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share." EITF Issue No. 03-6 addresses a number of questions regarding the computation of earnings per share ("EPS") by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the company when, and if, it declares dividends on its common stock. The issue also provides further guidance in applying the two-class method of calculating EPS. It clarifies what constitutes a participating security and how to apply the two-class method of Computing EPS once it is determined that a security is participating, including how to allocate undistributed Earnings to such a security. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal periods beginning after March 31, 2004. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of EITF 03-6 to determine the impact, if any, on its computation of EPS.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Internal Controls and Procedures for Revenue Recognition

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding revenue recognition for proper disclosure.

In connection with the completion of their audit of, and the issuance of their report on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2004, our independent registered public accountants identified deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of the Company's internal controls that they consider to be a material weakness in the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls pursuant to standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A significant deficiency is defined as a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, that adversely affects the company's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the company's financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Our independent registered public accountants advised the Audit Committee of the Company's Supervisory Board of the following matter, which they consider to be a material weakness: the Company's internal controls over revenue recognition were not sufficient to ensure transactions were properly recorded in accordance with management's criteria and generally accepted accounting principles. Specifically, our independent registered public accountants identified six instances where revenue had been recognized in the books of the Company's subsidiaries even though the transactions did not meet the Company's established revenue recognition policy and generally accepted accounting principles. Our independent registered public accountants did acknowledge that adjustments were properly recorded by the Company prior to the reporting of financial results for the respective period.

Our independent registered public accountants have discussed the areas of weakness described above with the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is taking an active role in responding to the deficiencies identified by our independent registered public accountants, including overseeing management's implementation of the remedial measures described below. To this end, management of the Company is working with the Audit Committee to identify and implement corrective actions where required to improve the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls, including the enhancement of systems and procedures. The Company is implementing the following measures:

•: reviewing financial controls and procedures for revenue recognition;
•: assigning an individual in the Company's equipment solutions group to be the revenue recognition manager;
•: conducting revenue recognition training of personnel responsible for authorizing and recording revenue transactions throughout the Company;

•: such other remedial measures as deemed necessary by the Audit Committee and management,
•: requiring the review and approval by certain officers of the Company for revenue transactions above a specified level;
•: engaging an independent internal controls consultant to assist the Company to document, test and develop current and expanded internal controls and procedures; and
•: assigning Company employees to directly assist the independent internal controls consultant.

Management believes that the measures noted above will address the matter identified by our independent registered public accountants as a material weakness. The Audit Committee and management plan to continue to monitor the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls and procedures on an ongoing basis and will take further action, as appropriate.

As required by required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of the Audit Committee and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the year covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that deficiencies identified by our independent registered public accountants, as described above, caused the Company's disclosure controls and procedures not to be effective at a reasonable assurance level. However, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer noted that the Company is actively seeking to remedy the deficiencies identified by our independent registered public accountants.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. However, the Company believes the measures it is currently implementing to improve its internal controls are reasonably likely to have a material impact on its internal controls over financial reporting in future periods.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information required by this item will be contained under the captions "Election of Supervisory Directors," "Election of Managing Directors," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," "Code of Ethics" and "Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Executive Compensation" and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Certain Transactions" and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Auditors' Fees" and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)

1. Financial Statements

The financial statements required by this item, along with the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, are submitted in a separate section beginning on page 43 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules for which provisions are made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference:

Exhibit Number		Description of Document
2.1(i)		Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization among Metron Technology B.V., Metron Acquisition Sub, Inc. and T.A. Kyser Co. dated June 12, 1998.
2.2(ii)		Agreement for the acquisition of the whole of the issued share capital of Shieldcare Limited.
2.3(i)		Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization among Metron Technology B.V., Metron Acquisition Sub, Inc. and T.A. Kyser Co. dated July 13, 1998.
2.4(i)		Joinder Agreement among certain stockholders of T.A. Kyser Co, Metron Technology B.V. and Metron Acquisition Sub, Inc. dated July 13, 1998.
3.1(i)		Articles of Association of the Registrant and translation thereof.
4.1(i)		Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 10.23, 10.24, 10.26, 10.47, 10.48, 10.53 and 10.54.
4.2(i)		Specimen Common Share Certificate.
4.3(viii)		Form of 8% Convertible Debenture issued to the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated August 25, 2003.
4.4		Form of 6.5% Convertible Debenture issued to the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated May 26, 2004.
10.1(i)		1997 Supervisory Directors' Stock Option Plan.
10.2(i)		Form of 1997 Supervisory Directors' Stock Option Agreement.
10.4(i)		Form of Metron Technology N.V. Employee Stock Option Agreement (for employees in countries other than the United States and the United Kingdom).
10.5(i)		Form of Metron Technology N.V. Employee Stock Option Agreement (for employees in the United States).
10.6(i)		Form of Metron Technology N.V. Employee Stock Option Agreement (for employees in the United Kingdom).

10.7(i)		Aufhebungs und Ruhestandsvertrag (Cancellation and Early Retirement Agreement) between Metron Technology (Deutschland) GmbH, Metron Technology B.V. and Udo Jaensch dated February 2, 1999 and translation thereof.
10.8(i)		Share Purchase Agreement (CME) between FSI International, Inc. and Metron Technology B.V. dated February 27, 1999.
10.9(i)		Share Purchase Agreement (CMK) between FSI International, Inc. and Metron Technology B.V. dated February 27, 1999.
10.10(i)		Agreement to Terminate Joint Venture Agreements and Distribution Agreement between FSI International, Inc. and Metron Technology B.V. dated May 18, 1999.
10.11(i)		FSI/Metron Distribution Agreement dated March 31, 1998 between FSI International, Inc. and Metron Technology B.V.
10.12(i)		Distribution Agreement dated July 6, 1995 between Fluoroware, Inc. (now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Entegris, Inc.) and Metron Semiconductors Europa B.V. (now Metron Technology N.V.).
10.13(i)		U.S. Stocking Distributor Five-Year Agreement as of September 1, 1997 between Fluoroware, Inc. and Kyser Company.
10.14(i)		Form of Employment Agreement among Metron Technology B.V., Metron Technology Corporation and Edward D. Segal, Michael A. Grandinetti, Peter V. Leigh and Keith Reidy.
10.17(i)		Metron Technology Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
10.18(i)		T.A. Kyser Co. Employee Stock Ownership Trust as amended and restated March 17, 1997.
10.19(i)		Amendment No. 1 dated July 13, 1998 to the T.A. Kyser Co. Employee Stock Ownership Trust.
10.20(i)		T.A. Kyser Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan as amended and restated March 17, 1997.
10.21(i)		Amendment No. 1 dated June 12, 1998 to the T.A. Kyser Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
10.22(i)		Amendment No. 2 dated July 13, 1998 to the T.A. Kyser Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
10.23(i)		Investors Rights Agreement dated July 6, 1995 among Metron Semiconductors Europa B.V. and the Investors as defined therein.
10.24(i)		Accession Agreement dated October 15, 1998 among Metron Technology B.V., the Original Parties as defined therein, Segal Investments, L.P., M. Segal, N. Segal, M. Segal as trustee of the Matthew Dean Segal 1997 Trust and N. Segal as trustee of the Matthew Dean Segal 1997 Trust.
10.25(i)		Confirmation Agreement dated October 15, 1998 among Metron Technology B.V. and the Investors as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement of July 6, 1995.
10.26(i)		Accession Agreement dated July 13, 1998 among Metron Technology B.V., the Stockholders and the Signing Stockholders as defined therein.
10.27(i)		Consent Agreement dated July 13, 1998 among Metron Technology B.V. and the Investors as defined therein.

10.33(i)		Amended and Restated Buy and Sell Agreement among Metron Technology B.V. and the Significant Shareholders as defined therein, as of July 6, 1995.
10.34(i)		Form of Indemnification Agreement among Metron Technology B.V. and the Investors as defined therein.
10.35(i)		Employment Agreement dated September 1, 1999 among Metron Technology B.V., Metron Technology Corporation and Edward D. Segal.
10.39(iii)		Tax Indemnification Agreement dated July 6, 1995 among Metron Technology B.V., Metron Technology Corporation and Edward D. Segal.
10.40(iv)		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2000, among Metron Technology N.V. and Cher Lew Hiong James, Chia Chiap Heng Basil, Cher Lew Kwang Francis and Elite Star Enterprises Pte. Ltd.
10.41(v)		Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2001, by and among Entegris, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Fluoroware, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and Metron Technology N.V., a Netherlands corporation.
10.42(v)		Transition Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2001, by and among Entegris, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Fluoroware, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and Metron Technology N.V., a Netherlands corporation.
10.43(v)		Letter Agreement, dated February 23, 2001, by and among Entegris, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Fluoroware, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and Metron Technology N.V., a Netherlands corporation.
10.44(v)		Worldwide Stocking Distributor Agreement, dated March 1, 2001, between Entegris, Inc. and Metron Technology N.V.
10.45(vi)		Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2001 among Metron Technology N.V., Metron Technology Corporation and Dennis Riccio.
10.46(viii)		Subscription Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2003, by and between Metron Technology N.V. and the purchasers identified therein.
10.47(viii)		Form of Common Share Warrant issued to the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated August 25, 2003.
10.48(viii)		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2003, by and between Metron Technology N.V. and the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated August 25, 2003.
10.49(ix)		Amended and Restated Metron Technology Supplemental Stock Option Plan.
10.50(x)		Employment Agreement, dated January 27, 2003, among Metron Technology N.V., Metron Technology Distribution Corporation and Douglas J. McCutcheon.
10.51(xi)		Metron Technology 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
10.52(xii)		Subscription Agreement, dated May 26, 2004, by and between Metron Technology N.V. and the purchasers identified therein.
10.53		Form of Common Share Warrant issued to the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated May 26, 2004.

10.54		Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 16, 2004, by and between Metron Technology N.V. and the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated May 26, 2004.
21.1		List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1		Consent of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm.
24.1		Power of Attorney (included on signature page).
31.1		Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2		Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1*		Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350).

(i): Incorporated by reference from the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-87665), filed with the Commission on September 23, 1999, as amended through the date hereof.
(ii): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 17, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
(iii): Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-K/A, filed with the Commission on September 15, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
(iv): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on January 16, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
(v): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
(vi): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on August 15, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.
(vii): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 14, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.
(viii): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 27, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
(ix): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on August 29, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
(x): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-K/A, filed with the Commission on September 19, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
(xi): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-110756), filed with the Commission on November 25, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
(xii): Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 27, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.
*: This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(b): Reports on Form 8-K:
: The Company's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 7, 2004, describing and furnishing the press release announcing our earnings for the fiscal quarter ended February 29, 2004, which press release included our condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of operations for the period.
: The Company's current report on Form 8-K filed the SEC on May 27, 2004, announcing the execution of and filing a Subscription Agreement with certain purchasers, under which Metron agreed to issue and sell to the purchasers in a private placement certain convertible debentures due in 2008, in an aggregate principal amount of $6,000,000, and warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 767,000 of Metron's common shares, and describing and filing a related press release.
(c): See Exhibits listed under Item 15(a).
(d): Not applicable. See Item 15(a).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Jose, State of California, on August 11, 2003.

Metron Technology N.V.
By:	/s/ EDWARD D. SEGAL Edward D. Segal Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director (Principal Executive Officer)
By:	/s/ DOUGLAS J. MCCUTCHEON Douglas J. McCutcheon Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Managing Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Edward D. Segal and Douglas J. McCutcheon, and each or any one of them, his true and lawful agent, proxy and attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to (i) act on, sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission this Annual Report on Form 10-K, (ii) act on, sign and file such certificates and other documents as may be necessary or appropriate in connection therewith, and (iii) take any and all actions which may be necessary or appropriate to be done, as fully for all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby approving, ratifying and confirming all that such agent, proxy and attorney-in-fact or any of his or her substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ ROBERT R. ANDERSON Robert R. Anderson	Supervisory Director	August 11, 2003
/s/ DANA C. DITMORE Dana C. Ditmore	Supervisory Director	August 11, 2003
/s/ JOEL A. ELFTMANN Joel A. Elftmann	Supervisory Director	August 11, 2003
/s/ WILLIAM L. GEORGE William L. George	Supervisory Director	August 11, 2003

/s/ BRUCE M. JAFFE Bruce M. Jaffe	Supervisory Director	August 11, 2003
/s/ SHO NAKANUMA Sho Nakanuma	Supervisory Director	August 11, 2003
/s/ EDWARD D. SEGAL Edward D. Segal	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director (Principal Executive Officer)	August 11, 2003
/s/ DOUGLAS J. MCCUTCHEON Douglas J. McCutcheon	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Managing Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	August 11, 2003