Filed by Equity One, Inc.
                         Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933
                                and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under
                                           the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                                         Subject Company: IRT Property Company
                                                 Commission File No. 001-07859






                    IRT PROPERTY COMPANY AND EQUITY ONE, INC.

                       Earnings and Merger Conference Call

                                October 29, 2002

                             11:00 a.m. Eastern time

Operator:  Good day and welcome to the IRT  Property  Company  conference  call.
     Today's  call is being  recorded.  At this  time for  opening  remarks  and
     introductions,  I would  like  to  turn  the  call  over  to the  Chairman,
     President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  Mr. Tom McAuley.  Please go ahead
     sir.

Tom  McAuley:  Thank you Annette.  Good morning and welcome to our third quarter
     conference call. We appreciate you dialing in this morning. We've got a lot
     to discuss with you.

     Immediately  following  our earnings  call,  we will have a joint call with
     Chaim Katzman,  the CEO and the Chairman of Equity One regarding the merger
     announcement that was released this morning.

     At this time, I'll ask Ben Jones, our Executive Vice President of Legal and
     Acquisitions to read our Safe Harbor disclosure.

Ben  Jones:  Thank you Tom.  Statements  made  during this  conference  call may
     contain certain  forward-looking  statements  within the meaning of Section
     27A of the  Securities  Act of 1933 and  Section  21E of the  Securities  &
     Exchange  Act of 1934.  Such  statements  are based  upon  assumptions  and
     expectations, which may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks
     and uncertainties many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy.

     Future events and actual  results,  financial and otherwise may differ from
     the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.

     Risks and other factors that might cause  differences,  some of which could
     be  material,  include  but are no limited to  economic  and credit  market
     condition,  the ability to refinance maturing  indebtedness,  the impact of
     competition,  consumer  buying  trends,  financing and  development  risks,
     construction and lease-up delays, cost overruns, the



     level and  volatility  of  interest  rates,  the rate of revenue  increases
     versus expense increases, and the financial stability of tenants within the
     retail  industry as well as other risks listed from time to time in company
     reports and filed with the  Securities & Exchange  Commission  or otherwise
     publicly disseminated by the company.

     In addition,  any statements with respect to the potential IRT - Equity One
     combination will depend upon the continual  financial success of Equity One
     and IRT's current and  prospective  tenants,  Equity One's ability to merge
     successfully the operations of IRT into Equity One, Equity One's ability to
     realize  the  economies  of scale and other risks  which are  described  in
     Equity  One's Form 10-K which is on file with the  Securities  and Exchange
     Commission.

     Thank you.

Tom  McAuley:  Thank you Ben. We will  dispense with our normal format of having
     our department  heads report on their  respective  areas in the interest of
     time. But I will briefly recap the third quarter activities.

     And at the end of all of our remarks, both Chaim's and mine, we'll open the
     call for questions and answers.

     Our funds from operations were 30 cents in the third quarter compared to 31
     cents in the prior year period.

     We were actually slightly less than a penny below the consensus  estimates,
     primarily due to some dilution from our equity  offering in April which was
     used  primarily  to  pay  down  the  debt,  the  full  rent  starts  in our
     developments that were delivered in the second and early parts of the third
     quarter,  one  planned  acquisition  that  not - that  did not pass our due
     diligence  along  with a loss of one Kmart  lease in which the  designation
     rights purchaser did not purchase the leasehold interest.

     And  we  had  to  reverse  the  accrued  property  taxes  and  common  area
     maintenance along with the loss of rents.

     Leasing  activity for the third  quarter  excluding  our  properties  under
     construction  -- we signed 30 new leases  representing  76,000 square feet,
     representing close to 80,000 in annualized income.

     In  addition,  we renewed 68 leases  totaling  170,000  square feet with an
     average rental  increase of 3.2%.  Year to date, we renewed  432,000 square
     feet at a 4.3% average increase in rents.

     At quarter end, our tenant retention rate was 80% and our portfolio was 92%
     leased. We did finish the quarter with a .8% decrease -- again .8% decrease
     in same store NOI growth primarily due to the loss of the Kmart. But we had
     a 1.8% increase in same store NOI year to date.

     Operating  margins  were 73.5% for the quarter  and 74% year to date.  Even
     those - these  operating  margins  are very good for our  sector,  they are
     below our company goal of 78%.


                                       2



     Our  revenue  capital  expenditures  total  $419,000  for the  quarter  and
     $909,000 year to date. Non-revenue capital totaled $430,000 for the quarter
     and $828,000 year to date.

     At our redevelopment  property,  Carollwood Center in Tampa,  Florida,  the
     construction  of a Publix store  including the  renovation of the center is
     almost complete. And I believe that store will open on November 7th.

     At Bay Pointe Plaza in St.  Petersburg,  the expansion of Publix is nearing
     completion.  And in both  locations as you recall,  we received new 20 year
     leases from Publix.

     We  continued  during the quarter to execute our plan to dispose of smaller
     low growth  properties  in  tertiary  markets.  During the  quarter we sold
     Forest Hills Center in Wilson,  North Carolina,  for $6.5 million resulting
     in a gain of $2.2 million.

     Three additional properties located in Lexington,  Virginia,  Lawrenceburg,
     Tennessee and Venice, Florida are all under contract to sell and in various
     stages of due diligence.  We expect two of the three to close in the fourth
     quarter.

     If all the sales are  completed  according  to  contract  terms,  the total
     proceeds will be approximately  12 million.  We also expect to close on the
     sale of our land in Miramar, Florida in the next 45 days.

     At this time I'll just ask Jay to comment on the balance sheet.

Jay  Levy:  Thanks Tom. Our balance sheet has  continued to strengthen  with the
     repayment  this  quarter of a $2 million  mortgage.  This leaves us with 69
     unencumbered properties. And unencumbered properties represent 67% of total
     real estate investments at cost.

     Our  revolving  term loan had a balance  of $17  million  at the end of the
     quarter, which was priced at 2.86%, and is our only variable rate debt. Our
     interest coverage has gone up 2.9 times and fixed charge coverage increased
     to 2.6 times.

     And also our guidance for the remainder of 2002 remains unchanged at FFO of
     $1.28 to $1.30 per share.

Tom  McAuley:  Thank you Jay. The excitement that we have this morning of course
     is the  announcement  that our board of directors  last night  approved the
     merger of IRT with Equity One.

     I might also add that this  decision was  unanimously  supported by our six
     senior  officers of the company,  five of which will be staying on with the
     company going forward along with approximately 90% of the employees of IRT.

     Over the last several  years,  we've stated our desire and our goal to be a
     larger  company  with at least a  minimum  of $1  billion  in total  market
     capitalization.  This  transaction  accomplishes  that goal. And we believe
     that  we  have   structured  a  transaction   that  clearly   benefits  our
     shareholders,   bond  holders,   employees,   and  in  addition  gives  the
     shareholders the option of taking cash, stock or a combination.


                                       3



     Over the last few years we have  searched for the right fit to maximize the
     value for our shareholders.  We believe that this merger brings together an
     entrepreneurial  leadership  team  coupled  with  an  efficient  management
     organization,   a  conservative   balance  sheet,  a  wonderful  geographic
     concentration  of  properties  from  Texas  through  Louisiana,  Florida up
     through Georgia and the Carolinas.  Florida will be the base of the largest
     concentration of assets.

     This merger further  diversifies  our tenant base,  lessens our exposure to
     any one tenant and gives the company the size and  platform to enhance both
     companies' growth going forward.

     Those  shareholders  that elect the stock option will realize a 3% increase
     in their dividend on the new shares after the exchange ratio,  the dividend
     will be 97.2 cents per share compared to 94 cents per share today.

     We also expect that the larger  company will  realize a higher  multiple to
     the FFO.  And I can't tell you again how  excited we are to be able to work
     this transaction out with Chaim Katzman and his team.

     At this time I'll ask Chaim to make his remarks.

Chaim Katzman: Thank you Tom.  With me this  afternoon  from  Equity  One I have
     Doron Valero,  President  and Chief  Operating  Officer,  as well as Howard
     Sipzner,  our Chief Financial  Officer.  And again, I want to thank you Tom
     and the IRT team for inviting us to  piggy-back  on your  earnings  call on
     such a short notice. We really do appreciate it.

     In my mind, the rationale for this merger is very simple and a very obvious
     one.  We have two  companies  focused on the same region and the same asset
     class, each of them too small to go it alone.

     I believe  that this merger  creates a Southeast  powerhouse,  enhances our
     dominance  in  Florida  and  gives us a great  foothold  in the rest of the
     region.

     Both companies are focused on supermarket  anchored centers.  And a result,
     the combined  entity will have more than 120 shopping  centers  anchored by
     supermarkets out of its 181 properties.

     This merger will  increase  Equity One's  analyst  following and gives us a
     real chance to maintain IRT's investment grade rating.

     Of course there are also some  challenges  involved with the IRT portfolio.
     And the  biggest  one being the Kmart  with  about  $4.2  million  in total
     revenues.  We  have  done  our  due  diligence,  evaluated  each  of  those
     situations. And we are getting into this transaction with our eyes open.

     We have also assumed about $90 million worth of  dispositions to take place
     in the first year of the merger.


                                       4



     On a different note, this is a real friendly  merger.  I have known Tom for
     the  last  four  years  and  have  highest  regard  for him and what he has
     accomplished  here at IRT.  And I look  forward to working with Tom through
     the integration of these two great companies.

     IRT has a highly  skilled  management and employee team as well as our - as
     well as Equity One. We expect to retain  almost all senior  management  and
     employees  of IRT.  And  accordingly  we expect a very  smooth  integration
     process.

     Let me also  remind you that  Equity One has  successfully  integrated  two
     major portfolios in the last couple of years. So we also have experience in
     undergoing the integration process.

     As to our capital  structure,  we are committed to maintain a  conservative
     capital  structure  with 50% of leverage and to maintain a very strong debt
     coverage ratio that will allow us to maintain the  investment  grade rating
     that IRT enjoys.

     As far as the dividend  involved,  we will maintain our current level.  And
     that will spell a 3.4% increase for IRT  shareholders  who will chose stock
     in the merger.

     Our payout ratio will improve and will hover around the 70% mark.  And last
     but no least,  we expect this merger to be 4% accretive to our `03 guidance
     that we have provided  everybody  with. And that spells a range of $1.49 to
     $1.53, the midpoint of which is $1.51, in FFO for `03.

     And with that, let me open the call for questions. We all here available to
     answer your questions.
     Tom McAuley: Annette?

Operator: Yes?

Tom McAuley: We are ready to open the call.

Operator:  Thank you very  much.  And at this time,  if you do have a  question,
     please press star 1 on your touch-tone  telephone  keypad.  Again,  that is
     star 1 to ask a  question.  Also if you do have your  line on mute,  please
     lift your handset to allow your signal to reach our equipment.

     Again,  that is star 1. And  we'll  pause  for  just a  moment.  Our  first
     question today comes from Andrew Rosivach with Piper Jaffray.

Andrew  Rosivach:  Good  morning to both  teams.  A number of  questions  on the
     merger.  First,  could you just walk us through  specifically  what the IRT
     shareholders  can elect?  And  specifically is there an instance where they
     would have to by necessity take cash or stock?

Chaim Katzman: Hi Andy.

Andrew Rosivach: Hi. How are you Chaim?


                                       5


Chaim Katzman: Fine.  There is a minimal 50% stock election.  That is really the
     only I guess - the only string in the  transaction.  An IRT stockholder can
     elect all stock, all cash or a combination of both.

     In the event more than 50% of IRT  stockholders  would elect cash, then the
     cash election would be prorated  downwards,  and they would get whatever is
     in excess of 50% in stock.

Andrew  Rosivach:  Got it.  Okay.  Next,  can  you  describe  any  environmental
     liabilities that may exist in the IRT portfolio,  your underwriting process
     and how you're reserving against it?

Chaim Katzman: Doron would answer this one. Doron, please?

Doron Valero: Hi Andy. We have reviewed the environmental  liabilities.  We have
     found nothing  alarming or any  liabilities  that we are concerned about at
     this point.

Andrew Rosivach:  And did you do any specific  property level  environmental due
     diligence?

Doron Valero: Yes, we have reviewed all the  environmental  issues that IRT have
     in their portfolio.  Also we recognize the fact that IRT has  environmental
     insurance. And our experts that reviewed it have found nothing material.

Andrew Rosivach:  Got you. Have you done any NAV analysis of both Equity One and
     IRT kind of pre- and post-merger, where you would post those numbers?

Howard Sipzner:  Yes,  Andy it's Howard.  I mean in general it's not been Equity
     One's  policy to provide NAV  estimates.  Clearly both  companies  received
     independent  fairness  opinions on the  transaction,  which  included among
     other  things,  NAV  analyses on the basis of those  opinions.  Both boards
     moved  forward to recommend  the  transaction.  And I guess  therefore  the
     conclusion can be that incorporating NAV as well as other fairness measures
     it was a fair transaction to both parties.

Andrew Rosivach:  Okay that's fair.  In terms of your forward  guidance and also
     the cap  rates I  believe  is 9.75 on NOI for  IRT,  what  are the  general
     forward  assumptions  in terms of operating  performance,  especially,  you
     know,  you  mentioned  that you are going in with your eyes open on Kmarts.
     Are you assuming that some of those Kmart are going to come in?

Doron: Andy,  let me answer  your  question  regarding  the Kmart.  We, as Chaim
     mentioned, are going in with our eyes open. We are aware of the challenges.
     But really  when you review the six Kmarts  that IRT has and the two - that
     Equity One has,  really  reviewed the sales figures of them,  there is only
     one that we are  expecting if there'll be another  closure of Kmart,  we're
     expecting that one to close. And that one is about $580,000 total rent that
     that store contributes.

     And as far as the rest of them,  a lot of them  are  $200 per  square  foot
     range.  And the ones that are not,  really it would be a blessing  if we'll
     ever see them coming back to us.

     So we are very focused on it, and are aware of the risk factor.


                                       6


Andrew  Rosivach:  Got you.  And last up, how large were the  transaction  costs
     anticipated for the merger?

Howard Sipzner: Between...

Chaim Katzman: Twelve to 13 million bucks.

Andrew Rosivach: Great. Thanks guys.

Operator:  And  moving  on  we'll  hear  next  from  Tom  Lofton  with  Wachovia
     Securities.

Tom  Lofton: Hi. Can you guys talk a little about with regard to your investment
     grade  ratings?  Can you talk about your - how that fits into your strategy
     going forward,  whether you want to maintain access to the unsecured market
     number one? And number two; can you expand on your  conversations  with the
     rating agencies over the merger?

Howard Sipzner:  Yes sure. This is Howard Sipzner.  Jay Levy and I together with
     Chaim and Tom have spent time already with the rating agencies  introducing
     the  transaction.  Clearly  an  attraction  of  this  transaction  was  the
     opportunity to maintain this rating.  It is certainly a positive feature of
     the combined company.

     And we will be reviewing our financial projections;  capital plans with the
     agencies who have come out preliminary on the transaction with credit watch
     which is to be expected.

     But we will be  working  diligently  with  them to try to meet all of their
     needs and the bondholder needs to maintain that rating.

Tom  Lofton: Okay, thank you.

Operator: And just a reminder if you do have a question,  please press star 1 on
     your  touch-tone  telephone  now.  Again,  that  is  star 1 if  you  have a
     question.  Our next question today comes from Diana Drapkin with Guard Hill
     Capital.

Diana Drapkin: Hi. Yes hi. Just several  questions on the merger.  First of all,
     regarding the regulatory  approvals,  is HSR required for the  transaction,
     Hard-Scott-Rodino?
Tom  McAuley: I'm sorry, could you repeat that?

Diana Drapkin: Sure. Do you need the HSR approval?

Tom  McAuley: HSR - no. We don't think so.

Diana Drapkin: Okay. And are there any collars and walk-aways?

Chaim Katzman: There is, and Howard why don't you elaborate on that.

Howard Sipzner:  Yes, I mean there are certain  collars based on 30 day averages
     with respect to both Equity One's  weighted  average stock price as well as
     IRT's  weighted  average stock


                                       7



     price.  And then there are some  immediately  prior three day checks  right
     before  the   transaction   closes  that  run  and  affect   mutually  both
     companies.1

(Diana Drapkin):  Okay and what is it based on, on what prices,  on what average
     prices?

Howard Sipzner:  Okay with respect to Equity One's stock price,  it's $12.06 for
     the 30 prior trading days and $11 for the three  immediately  prior trading
     days.  And on the IRT side, the 30-day number is $10.935 and $9.935 for the
     three prior trading days.

     Essentially similar calculations off of each company's price going into the
     transaction.

(Diana Drapkin): Okay. Okay and is the merger subject to financing?

Howard Sipzner:  No, Equity One has secured a combination  of equity  investment
     commitments as well as debt  commitments and those are binding and there is
     no financing contingency.

(Diana Drapkin): Okay great, thank you.

Operator: And moving on, we'll hear from Jeff Goldman with First Capital.

Jeff Goldman:  Hi,  good  morning.  I just  wanted to  clarify  one point on the
     election  process.  Am I to understand that if a shareholder wants to elect
     stock that there would be no  pro-ration  in any  circumstance  meaning you
     could get 100% stock but you'd be prorated only on the cash election?

Chaim Katzman: That is correct.

Jeff Goldman: Okay, thank you.

Operator:  And just another  reminder,  if you do have a question or comment for
     our speakers today, please press star 1 on your touch-tone  telephone.  Our
     next question today comes from John Cardosa with Chesapeake Partners.

John Cardosa:  Hi guys,  a couple  of  questions  for  you.  First,  when do you
     estimate closing the transaction?

Chaim Katzman: Late in the  first  quarter  which  means  the mid to late  first
     quarter.


--------
1 Note that there are no collars,  as such,  provided  in the merger  agreement.
However,  if the 30-day  weighted  average  trading  price for Equity One common
stock prior to the  closing of the merger is less than  $12.06 per share,  or if
the 3-day  weighted  average  trading price for Equity One common stock prior to
the  closing  of the  merger is less than  $11.00  per  share,  then the  voting
agreement  executed by certain  Equity One  stockholders  is  terminable by such
stockholders and the IRT board has the right to withdraw its  recommendation  of
the merger to the IRT shareholders. In addition, the Equity One stockholders may
terminate their voting agreement if the 30-day weighted average trading price of
IRT prior to the  closing  of the  merger is less than  10.935  per share or the
3-day weighted  average  trading price for IRT common stock prior to the closing
of the merger is less than 9.935 per share.  You are  referred  to the  specific
provisions of the merger agreement and the voting  agreements which are exhibits
to the  Current  Reports on Form 8-K filed by Equity One and IRT on October  30,
2002, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.


                                       8



John Cardosa:  Okay and maybe you can just walk through in light of that closing
     date the  dividends  that the release  says that Equity One is not going to
     pay the Q1 dividend till after close of the merger.

Chaim Katzman: No. Each of the companies would continue their routine dividends,
     their cycle of dividends.  We would  synchronize the cycle of dividends for
     the two companies in the near future but both companies  would go on paying
     all the dividends ordinarily.

John Cardosa:  Okay,  can you walk me through how you're  going to  synchronize,
     what the synchronization date will be?

Howard Sipzner:  Yes, I mean essentially  right now Equity One pays its dividend
     at the end of the  quarter.  In other words on December  31. IRT pays their
     comparable  dividend on December 1. And when we establish a likelihood of a
     closing  date,  we'll match those up by one party or the other paying a pro
     rata dividend.

John Cardosa: Okay so then is your expectation that you'll pay one dividend, one
     more dividend before the closing of the merger?

Chaim Katzman: We'll pay as many as we'll have between now and the closing.

Howard Sipzner:  Yes I mean certainly  each company will pay their  dividends in
     December if and when declared  through the March 1 and March 31 or anything
     in between it will depend on better knowledge of the actual closing date.

John Cardosa:  Okay  so  it's  basically  one  or  two  but  it's  going  to  be
     synchronized for that.

Man: That is correct.

Man: That's correct.

John Cardosa: Okay. Thanks a lot guys. Congratulations.

Operator: And again just another reminder, if you do have any questions,  please
     press star 1 on your touch-tone phone. Again that is star 1. And we'll hear
     next from S.T. Tallapragada with Cathe Financial.

S.T. Tallapragada: Yes, can you tell me what the drop-dead date is on the merger
     agreement?

Tom  McAuley:  I believe the  drop-dead  date is March 31. We expect to file the
     definitive merger agreement hopefully on Edgar no later than tomorrow.  And
     of course all that will be spelled  out in that  agreement  but March 31 of
     `03 is the drop-dead date.

S.T. Tallapragada: Great, thank you.

Operator: And up next we have Ralph Block with Bay Isle Financial.

Ralph Block: Congratulations  guys.  Could  you  just  give us a  little  bit of
     background as to how this  transaction  originated and when the discussions
     might have began?

                                       9


Tom  McAuley: Well Ralph, as I said in my earlier comments, we've been searching
     for the right fit for our  company,  you know,  and part of - in all of our
     board  meetings  over  the  last  couple  of  years  looking  at  strategic
     alternatives  especially  recognizing  that our  investor  base is  largely
     retail, approximately 72%.

     Of course we want to maximize  all  shareholder  value but we were a little
     bit concerned, not concerned but yes, concerned that we did meet a dividend
     or have a merger candidate that had a dividend that would be something that
     our retail  shareholders  could continue if they elect the stock and get an
     increase in and this transaction seems to fit all of those.

     But I guess the big overriding thing was we've had about a 30% and now it's
     probably 20% of our  portfolio in tertiary  markets.  Two years ago - 2-1/2
     years ago, we started acquiring and developing in Florida. Of course we ran
     into Equity One every time we would do something in Florida.

     We got to know the folks. We've got a good relationship with the folks. And
     the thing that  really  pushed us was that we will be  probably  the second
     largest retail owner of properties in the state of Florida. We will have 80
     grocery  - or  neighborhood  shopping  centers  in  Florida.  We will own I
     believe 40 (Publixes) as a result of this transaction.

     So it  really  does  make a lot of sense  and in  evaluating  a  number  of
     different situations, this one is the one that we felt was the best for all
     of our constituents.

Ralph Block: Thank you.

Operator: And we'll hear next from Lydia Norton with Selective Insurance.

(Deder): This is actually (Deder) at (Goldislager).  I was wondering,  could you
     go into a little  bit more  detail as far as the merged  companies  capital
     structure?  Just  wondering  how much  secured  debt you will have and what
     percent of the portfolio will be encumbered?

Howard Sipzner:  This is Howard  Sipzner.  We have a couple of strategies  going
     into the transaction or objectives.  One is to keep our leverage below 50%,
     to keep our EBITDA to interest  expense  coverage above 2.6 and to keep our
     fixed charge  coverage  above 2.2.  Those are obviously  part of the rating
     agency equation. The other as you pointed out is secured debt.

     One of  the  things  Equity  One  will  be  working  on is  transforming  a
     significant  portion  of its  currently  secured  debt which  primarily  is
     concentrated  in credit and other bank facilities and working with existing
     banks  on both  sides  to come up with a larger  unsecured  facility  which
     should push that overall ratio down to at or perhaps even below 30% secured
     debt.

(Deder): Okay, thanks.

Operator: And we'll move on to David Fick with Legg Mason.

David Fick:Good morning gentlemen.  Congratulations. I have to say that for both
     of the CEOs involved here,  this  strategy's been no secret for a very long
     time not necessarily  the


                                       10


     companies  but the  acquisition  strategy on Equity  One's  part.  And Tom,
     you've been for sale forever.

Tom  McAuley: We're in the real estate business David.

David Fick: The question I have is actually not for the deal guys who don't have
     to run all this stuff, for Doron. Doron, you got your hands full today with
     CEFUS and UIRT. You've got a ton of leasing.  I saw you got the Lowe's deal
     done.  Congratulations  finally.  But now what are you going to do with all
     this?

Doron Valero: Going to go to the beach I guess. Hi David.  Actually I'm excited.
     CEFUS and UIRT as I've mentioned in our call last week have been a seamless
     transition.  It's moving  smoothly.  We're definitely ready to take another
     task and  definitely  with a team of IRT unlike the other two  transactions
     that we had no team,  here we have a wonderful team that really can help us
     put it all together. So I'm extremely optimistic.

David Fick: Well  great,  thank you. I look  forward to coming down and taking a
     look at the real estate.

Doron Valero: Take  longer  this time.  This time it will be a little bit longer
     than a day.

Operator: And again just  another  reminder,  if you do have a question,  please
     press star 1 now.  And we'll hear next from John  Demasi  with Coro  Nation
     Capital.

John Demasi:  Hi,  can you tell me what the policy  will be between  now and the
     closing on the dividend of IRT because you're about a month apart on record
     dates?  Will you,  you know,  coordinate  those so that they're on the same
     date so you avoid,  you know,  having the shareholder pick up two dividends
     or missing a dividend?

Tom  McAuley:  Yes David,  the answer is we will all pay both Equity One and IRT
     will pay  dividends as usual and we expect the next  dividend to be paid on
     December  the 1. Then  depending on the length of time that it takes to get
     the merger completed, we will pay the next dividend if that's the case.

     We  will  synchronize  the  dividends  as was  mentioned  earlier  probably
     sometime  right  after  the  first of the  year.  But we do not  anticipate
     anybody missing any dividend.  And the good thing for the IRT  shareholders
     is they will get a 3.4% increase in their dividend.

John Demasi:  Right,  right. Okay, great. And you did mention earlier that there
     were  collars.  Technically,  you're  not  talking  about  collars  but the
     exchange ratio's fixed, is that right?

Chaim Katzman: That is  correct.  It's  just a walk  away.  There's  a walk away
     provision actually.

John Demasi: Walk away right. Okay, great. Thanks a lot.

Operator:  And our next  question  today comes from Alissa  Assenza with Salomon
     Smith Barney.

(Ross Nussbaum):  Hi,  it's  actually  (Ross  Nussbaum)  here  at  Salomon.  Tom
     congratulations.  One question  for you, in thinking  about doing this deal
     now, how much did your Kmart  exposure  play into this in terms of thinking
     about  your  growth  rate  over the next  year and

                                       11


     a half and saying to yourself,  you know, what maybe it makes more sense to
     sell now rather than wait a year?

Tom  McAuley:  Well clearly  with,  as you know and Jonathan  Litt knows at your
     fine firm, we have been looking for this situation for some time. It wasn't
     pushed any faster because of the Kmart  situation.  As Doron said,  they've
     done their due  diligence  and we feel as does  probably  Doron that in the
     event there's another round of closures which is expected sometime during I
     guess the first  half of `03 if the press is going to be  correct,  we will
     possibly lose one store.

     And as you know, we have weathered  storms of anchor tenant closings before
     and we fully expected to weather this one.  However,  the deal does benefit
     the  shareholders by reducing the exposure to the IRT shareholders to Kmart
     if God forbid they decided just to close all the Kmart's in the Southeast.

     So we have spread that Kmart risk over much larger  capital base.  But that
     in and of itself was not the reason  for the  transaction.  This is a great
     transaction for our shareholders primarily due to that strong concentration
     in Florida.

Ross Nussbaum:  Question for the Equity One guys. What percentage of the company
     will be owned by the affiliated investors after this deal?

Howard Sipzner: Ross assuming a 50% election, the parent companies of Equity One
     will own  slightly  below  50% and  Equity  One's  one  other 5% or  larger
     shareholder will be about 9%.

     But most  importantly,  we'll be more than  doubling  the  public  float of
     Equity One stock and as you know from conversations  that's been one of our
     major  objectives is to increase our float.  We'll go from  something  like
     eight,  nine  million  shares that trade  freely to greater than 20 in a 56
     million share company. And this transaction with IRT and particularly their
     retail base makes it a great fit for us.

Ross Nussbaum:  Is this 5% shareholder  you're talking about, is that Alony Hetz
     or Gazit?

Howard Sipzner: Yes, that is Alony Hetz. That's correct.

Ross Nussbaum:  Okay so including Alony Hetz, we're talking about somewhere just
     under 60% ownership?

Howard  Sipzner:  About 56, 57% that's  right.  And that's  assuming a 50% stock
     election sort of the minimum case.

Tom  McAuley: And I don't know whether it's fair to say Ross, we expect that our
     shareholders  will  probably come in a lot higher than 50% stock because of
     the dividend and the investor base that we have.

Ross Nussbaum: Thank you guys.

Tom  McAuley: Thank you Ross.


                                       12


Operator: Okay, our next question comes from Rick Gable with Sun Life Financial.

Rick Gable: It was just asked, thanks.

Operator: And we'll move on to Mark Zeisloft with RREEF Securities.

Mark Zeisloft: Can someone comment about are there any synergies or cost savings
     associated with this merger?

Howard Sipzner:  Yes, this is Howard.  We've  assumed very minimal  synergies in
     2003,  really just the  immediately  obvious ones, I think about $250,000 a
     quarter and slightly more than that in `04, $375,000 a quarter.  Those were
     the ones that just on the back of the envelope  you can identify  from just
     putting two companies of our type together.

     I would expect once we get further into it, those could even be larger.

Mark Zeisloft:  And the - at this point is that the senior  management team, all
     five of the senior management team of IRT are going to stay on, five of the
     six I guess?

Tom  McAuley: Five out of the six, that's correct Mark.

Mark Zeisloft:  Okay and the  $250,000  that you've  budgeted or you - what does
     that relate to?

Howard Sipzner:  That includes such things as rent savings.  It includes savings
     on common activities such as printing costs,  filing costs, audit fees, all
     the  obvious  costs  that  are  going  to be less  than  the sum of the two
     companies current costs.

Mark Zeisloft:  Okay, who's the one executive  that's not going,  like yourself,
     sticking around? Is that you Tom?

Tom  McAuley: Well you couldn't figure that out by now?

Mark Zeisloft: I'm just a literal type of guy you know?

Tom  McAuley:  I have committed to Chaim and Doron and partially maybe to answer
     Dave Fick's question that I will, have committed that I will assist them in
     the transaction as a management advisor to Chaim and Doron for upwards to a
     year to make sure that this transaction takes the best practices of all the
     companies and we put it together for a real seamless transition.

     And so while I may not be an employee of the company, I certainly expect to
     work with them for at least or up to a year.

Mark Zeisloft: Okay, great. Thanks.

Operator:  And we have a question  from Mike Shannon  with  Westchester  Capital
     Management.

Mike Shannon: My question was answered. Thank you.


                                       13


Operator:  Thank  you and we'll  move on. We have a follow up from John  Cardosa
     with Chesapeake Partners.

John Cardosa:  Hey guys,  one more  quick  question  and  forgive me if this was
     already answered. I had to drop off the call for a little bit.

     You had mentioned  that the companies  have known each other for about four
     years.   Can  you  talk  through   perhaps  some  more  background  to  the
     transaction?   Were  there  other  combinations  contemplated?   Any  other
     companies that were interested and, you know, buying one of the two of you,
     anything like that?

Tom  McAuley:  I really don't think we can comment on it now. I mean,  you know,
     over  time  as -- this is IRT  talking  --  we've  had  conversations  with
     different people about different strategies. But as far as the history, the
     transaction  and I mean just  really  Chaim  and I have kind of known  each
     other through the industry.

John Cardosa:  Okay, so there wasn't a type of thing where, you know, one of the
     companies was necessarily  looking for a buyer. It was more just the two of
     you have known each other for a while.

Chaim Katzman: I think that really evolved out of Tom and me talking a lot and I
     believe that at some point it became clear that these two companies  really
     belonged together and I believe this is how it came about.

Tom  McAuley:  Both from a geographical fit as well as the size fit. Just trying
     to get a greater size.

John Cardosa:  Now in the  course  of the  merger  talks,  were  there any other
     parties  that came in and  discussed  possible  bids in  either  one of the
     companies?

Tom  McAuley: I don't know that I can answer that question.

John Cardosa: Okay, thanks a lot.

Operator: And just  another  reminder,  if you do have a question,  please press
     star 1 on your touch-tone  phone. We have another follow up from David Fick
     with Legg Mason.

David Fick: Thanks.  I have  one  rather  material  question  that  hasn't  been
     discussed  so far and that is the cash  proceeds,  the Gazit and Alony Hetz
     commitment  is  actually a binding  commitment  on them isn't it to provide
     your cash and to the extent that IRT  shareholders  were to elect more than
     50%,  you'll actually end up with excess proceeds from the equity raise, is
     that correct?

     And  then if it is,  how are  you  planning  to  deal  with  the  potential
     dilution?

Howard  Sipzner:  Your  analysis  is  correct  and let me give a  little  bit of
     background.  Both  companies  agreed  that they  wanted a  certain  minimum
     capital structure for the transaction  specifically that there would be the
     issuance of at least 22.3 million shares of Equity One.


                                       14


     And simply doing the math, if the IRT  shareholders  go to the 50% election
     at the .9 ratio,  you need 6.9 million  shares to fill that gap and that is
     the equity commitment that we have secured.

     Cognizant  of the fact that  there  could  very  well be  higher  levels of
     election, we've structured two specific features in that equity commitment.
     Number 1, we can reduce it from 6.9 to six million shares. And secondarily,
     we can defer the  takedown  of as much as 3  million  of the  shares in two
     future tranches.

     So with that structure in place,  we feel pretty  confident that we can put
     all the capital we'll have on hand to proper use.

David Fick: Is that at the $13.30 price?

Howard  Sipzner:  If  there's  an  election  above  50%,  the price at which the
     investors  will  purchase the shares will rise from $13.30 to $13.50 and it
     will max out at that level once an additional two million IRT  shareholders
     seek to pursue stock. Sort of on a sliding scale formula.

David Fick: Okay,  so the follow up on that  question  was what will you do with
     the excess proceeds? Will you be in a sort of general growth type situation
     where you've got money you got to spend?

Howard Sipzner: Well most initially,  we would reduce dramatically the amount of
     interim financing we would use to fund the cash portion.  That's upwards of
     $100  million  commitment.  So that would be the first  place to not access
     those funds.

David Fick: But Howard that's dilutive.

Howard Sipzner:  It certainly would create less  accretion.  As we said earlier,
     the guidance we've provided is at a 50% election level. Obviously we've run
     scenarios at all the different  levels. At some point quite extreme upwards
     of 80%,  90%  election if it were to come to pass,  there would be less and
     possibly no accretion.

     But of course  you'd be looking at a  dramatically  different  company then
     with far stronger  credit ratings for example than a triple B minus company
     would indicate.

     And...

David Fick:But clearly Howard,  I understand that. What is that break-even point
     is in the 80s though in terms of election before the accretion goes away?

Howard Sipzner:  Well  we've run a couple of  different  analyses.  I mean first
     there's the 50/50  we've  talked  about.  And then we've run what we call a
     leverage neutral  scenario,  which basically  maintains all of Equity One's
     current credit statistics.  That's at about a 65% election and that's still
     nominally accretive.

     And then in about the mid to low 70%  election  level you begin to lose the
     accretion in the transaction.


                                       15


David Fick: And above that point it becomes a dilutive transaction?

Howard Sipzner: It could be dilutive, that's correct.

David Fick:  Okay, thank you.

Operator:  And again if you do have a  question,  please  press star 1 and we'll
     hear next from Rick Gable with Sun Life Financial.

Rick Gable:  Hi, I'm sorry if I missed  this but Chaim could you talk about your
     role in the merged  company  and your role in the  Israeli  company and how
     that's going to change if at all?

Chaim Katzman: I'm going to stay the CEO of Equity One,  Chairman  and CEO.  And
     what was the other question, I'm sorry?

Rick Gable:  Just is your  relationship with the Israeli company going to change
     at all?

Chaim Katzman: It would not change. It will stay the same.

Rick Gable:  Okay, thanks.

Operator:  And  again if you do have a  question,  please  press  star 1 on your
     touch-tone  phone now.  Again that is star 1. Our next question  comes from
     Mark Zeisloft with RREEF Securities.

Mark Zeisloft:  Just a follow up,  what is the public  float going to be for EQY
     post deal pro forma?

Chaim Katzman:  Approximately 22 million shares.

Mark Zeisloft:  And what is the  public  going  to own  versus  what's  owned by
     insiders?

Howard Sipzner:  At a 50% election level the numbers break down as follows.  The
     company would have approximately 57 million shares  outstanding.  The Gazit
     group,  various parent  entities of Equity One would own just under half of
     those about 27 million shares.

     Alony Hetz, a current large owner,  10% owner in Equity One would  increase
     their holdings to about 5.1 million shares or about 9%. Various insiders of
     Equity One - I'm sorry,  Stan Kroenke  currently a 7%,  roughly 6% owner of
     IRT shares if he elects  stock  would  situate  at about a 3% owner.  He is
     their largest shareholder currently.

     Various  insiders,  board members and the like would have  approximately 2%
     and what we'll then call the remaining  public float would be as Chaim said
     about 21-1/2 million shares comprising about 38% of the outstanding  common
     stock.

Mark Zeisloft:  All right,  so you're  still  going to be  minority  held to the
     public, okay.

Howard Sipzner: We will still be minority held to the public. Clearly as you get
     to those higher election levels, those numbers begin to transform.


                                       16


Mark Zeisloft:  Okay, great, thank you.

Operator: And as a final reminder if you do have a question, please press star 1
     on  your  touch-tone  phone  now.  Again  that  is  star 1 if you do have a
     question or comment.

And  gentlemen it appears there are no further questions at this time. I'll turn
     the call back to you.

Tom  McAuley:  Okay again on behalf of IRT, we certainly appreciate your calling
     in and being interested in this  transaction.  As I said a few minutes ago,
     we expect the definitive  merger agreement to be filed on Edgar sometime by
     no later than late tomorrow  afternoon that you can access it and thank you
     so much and Chaim if you want to...

Chaim Katzman: In closing again, I will thank the IRT people for really inviting
     us to join this call.  I wish to thank you all for  getting on the call and
     we are really  excited here about this merger and some are tired as well. I
     guess we all need a good night rest after yesterday.  But again,  thank you
     very much for joining us at such a short notice and hope to talk to you all
     the next conference call. Thank you very much.

Tom McAuley:  Thank you very much. Thank you, Annette.

Operator:  Thank you and that does conclude our conference  today.  We thank you
     all for your participation.

                                * * * * * * * *

Equity One will be filing a  registration  statement  on Form S-4,  containing a
joint  proxy   statement/prospectus  and  other  relevant  documents,  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission concerning the proposed merger between Equity
One and IRT. YOU ARE URGED TO READ THE  REGISTRATION  STATEMENT  CONTAINING  THE
JOINT PROXY  STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FILED OR THAT
WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE  BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN
IMPORTANT  INFORMATION ABOUT EQUITY ONE, IRT AND THE MERGER.  You may obtain the
registration statement containing the joint proxy statement/prospectus and other
documents  free of charge at the SEC's web site,  www.sec.gov.  The joint  proxy
statement/prospectus  and these other  documents  may also be obtained  for free
from Equity One by directing a request to Equity One,  1696 N.E.  Miami  Gardens
Drive,  North  Miami  Beach,  Florida  33179,  Attention:   Investor  Relations,
telephone:  (305)  947-1664  and from IRT by directing a request to IRT Property
Company, 200 Galleria Parkway,  Suite 1400, Atlanta,  Georgia 30339,  Attention:
Investor  Relations,  telephone:  (770) 955-4406.  Equity One and IRT, and their
respective   directors  and  executive  officers  and  other  members  of  their
management and employees,  may be deemed to be participants in the  solicitation
of proxies from the  stockholders  of Equity One and IRT in connection  with the
merger. Information about the directors and executive officers of Equity One and
their  ownership  of Equity One shares is set forth in the proxy  statement  for
Equity  One's  2002  annual  meeting  of  stockholders.  Information  about  the
directors and executive  officers of IRT and their ownership of IRT stock is set
forth in the proxy  statement  for IRT's 2002  annual  meeting of  shareholders.
Investors  may obtain  additional  information  regarding  the interests of such
participants  by reading the joint proxy  statement/prospectus  when its becomes
available.