def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 |
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
20410 North 19th Avenue
Suite 200
Phoenix, Arizona 85027
(623) 445-9500
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Universal
Technical Institute, Inc. (the Company, UTI, we or our), to be held at 8:00 a.m. local time
on February 27, 2008, at the Companys Avondale automotive technician training campus located at
10695 West Pierce Street, Avondale, Arizona 85323.
At this years meeting, you will vote on (i) the election of two directors, (ii) the
ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm, and (iii) any other matters that may properly come before the meeting. We have
attached a notice of meeting and a proxy statement that contain more information about these items
and the meeting.
Your vote is important. We encourage you to sign and return your proxy before the meeting so
that your shares will be represented and voted at the meeting even if you cannot attend in person.
We look forward to seeing you at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John C. White
John C. White
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
January 15, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
20410 North 19th Avenue
Suite 200
Phoenix, Arizona 85027
(623) 445-9500
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
and
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
To the holders of common stock of Universal Technical Institute, Inc.:
The 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (the Company)
will be held at the Companys Avondale automotive technician training campus located at 10695 West
Pierce Street, Avondale, Arizona 85323 on February 27, 2008 at 8:00 a.m. for the following
purposes:
|
1. |
|
To elect two directors to the Board of Directors to serve for a term of three years or
until their respective successors are elected and qualified. |
|
|
2. |
|
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending September 30, 2008. |
|
|
3. |
|
To consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on January 7, 2008 are entitled to
receive notice of and to vote at the meeting. A list of stockholders entitled to vote will be
available for examination at the meeting by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting.
The list will also be available for the same purpose for ten days prior to the meeting at our
principal executive offices at 20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85027.
To obtain directions to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, please call Investor
Relations at (623) 445-9500.
We have enclosed our 2007 annual report, including financial statements, and the proxy
statement with this notice of annual meeting.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on February 27, 2008
The proxy statement and 2007 annual report to stockholders are available at
www.proxydocs.com/uti.
1
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE ENCLOSED STAMPED ENVELOPE. YOUR PROXY IS BEING
SOLICITED BY THE COMPANYS BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Chad A. Freed
Chad A. Freed
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
|
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona
January 15, 2008
***STOCKHOLDER PROXY VOTING ALERT***
As you may know, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is contemplating eliminating broker
discretionary voting for the election of directors in the near future. Broker discretionary voting
allows your broker to vote on your behalf for many management proposals (such as the election of
directors) if you do not instruct your broker how to vote your shares.
If the NYSE does abolish discretionary voting, your broker may no longer be allowed to vote on your
behalf. It will be necessary for you to actually vote any proxies you receive in order for your
vote to be counted. This change is significant and could cost your Company additional time and
money if you, our stockholders, do not take the time to vote your proxies as soon as they are
received.
We urge you to vote the enclosed proxy even though this year your broker still has discretionary
authority to vote your uninstructed shares. We also request that you vote management proxies you
receive in the future to help save us time and money.
Sincerely,
Your Board of Directors
2
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
20410 North 19th Avenue
Suite 200
Phoenix, Arizona 85027
(623) 445-9500
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
February 27, 2008
General Information
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy are furnished on or about January 15, 2008
to holders of the common stock of Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (the Company, UTI, we
or our), in connection with the solicitation on behalf of the Companys Board of Directors of
proxies to be voted at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) and at any
adjournment or postponement. The Annual Meeting will be held at 8:00 a.m. local time on February
27, 2008 at UTIs Avondale automotive technician training campus located at 10695 West Pierce
Street, Avondale, Arizona 85323.
We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. Copies of solicitation material may be furnished
to brokers, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries for forwarding to beneficial owners of
shares of common stock, and normal handling charges may be paid for such forwarding service. We
may solicit proxies by mail or by personal interview, telephone and other electronic communication
by our officers and other management employees, who will receive no additional compensation for
their services.
Any stockholder giving a proxy pursuant to this solicitation may revoke it at any time prior
to exercise of the proxy by giving written notice of such revocation to our Secretary at our
executive offices at 20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85027, or by attending
the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
At the close of business on January 7, 2008, there were 28,268,530 shares of our common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Only common stockholders of record on
January 7, 2008 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote
on each matter voted upon. Votes may not be cumulated.
Voting Information
At the Annual Meeting, votes will be counted by written ballot. The presence, in person or by
a proxy relating to any matter to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, of the holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of common stock will constitute a quorum for purposes of the Annual
Meeting. For purposes of the quorum requirement and the discussion below regarding the vote
necessary to take stockholder action, stockholders of record who are present at the Annual Meeting
in person or by proxy and who abstain, including brokers holding customers shares of record who
cause abstentions to be recorded at the Annual Meeting, are considered stockholders who are present
and entitled to vote and they count toward the quorum.
3
Brokers holding shares of record for customers generally are not entitled to vote on certain
matters unless they receive voting instructions from their customers. As used in the discussion
below, uninstructed shares means shares held by a broker who has not received instructions from
its customers on such matters and the broker has so notified us on a proxy form in accordance with
industry practice or has otherwise
advised us that it lacks voting authority. As used in the discussion below, broker non-votes
means the votes that could have been cast on the matter in question by brokers with respect to
uninstructed shares if the brokers had received their customers instructions.
Election of Directors. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. That is, the
Director nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of the election.
Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented at the Annual
Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the proposal to ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Uninstructed
shares are entitled to vote on this matter. Therefore abstentions and broker non-votes will have
the effect of negative votes.
Any stockholder entitled to vote on any matter may vote part of such stockholders shares in
favor of the proposal and refrain from voting the remaining shares or, except with respect to the
election of Directors, may vote the remaining shares against the proposal; but if the stockholder
fails to specify the number of shares which the stockholder is voting affirmatively or otherwise
indicates how the number of shares to be voted affirmatively is to be determined, it will be
conclusively presumed that the stockholders approving vote is with respect to all shares which the
stockholder is entitled to vote.
If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration,
including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the meeting to another time or
place, the individuals named as proxies and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on those
matters according to their best judgment to the same extent as the person delivering the proxy
would be entitled to vote. If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, a stockholders proxy
will remain valid and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned meeting. A stockholder still will
be able to revoke the stockholders proxy until it is voted. At the date this Proxy Statement went
to press, the Board of Directors did not know of any matters other than those described in this
Proxy Statement to be presented at the Annual Meeting.
Proxies properly executed and received by the Company prior to the Annual Meeting and not
revoked, will be voted as directed therein on all matters presented at the Annual Meeting. In the
absence of specific direction from a stockholder, proxies will be voted for the election of all
named Director nominees and for the proposal to ratify the appointment of the independent
registered public accounting firm.
4
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board Structure. Our Board of Directors currently has nine members, the majority of whom are
independent directors. The Board is divided into three classes. Directors in each class serve for
three-year terms. At each annual meeting, the term of one class expires. Currently, Messrs.
Conrad and Knight and Ms. McWaters serve as Class I Directors, Messrs. Penske and White and Ms.
Srere serve as Class II Directors, and Messrs. Caputo, Gilmour and Hartman serve as Class III
Directors. Mr. Knight is not standing for re-election as a Class I Director at the Annual Meeting.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently searching for a candidate to
succeed Mr. Knight using the criteria discussed below under Director Qualifications and Review of
Director Nominees.
Nominees for Election at this Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors, acting on the
recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Conrad A. Conrad
and Kimberly J. McWaters for re-election as Class I Directors, each to serve a three-year term
ending in 2011, or when the Directors successor is duly elected. It is intended that the votes
represented by the proxies at the Annual Meeting will be cast for the election of Mr. Conrad and
Ms. McWaters as Directors.
The following table and text presents information as of the date of this Proxy Statement
concerning the nominees for election as Directors, including in each case their current membership
on Committees of the Board of Directors, year first elected a Director and principal occupations or
affiliations during the last five years and certain other directorships held.
Director Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board |
|
Elected to |
Name/Title |
|
Age |
|
Committees |
|
UTI Board |
Conrad A. Conrad
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Audit (Chair) and Compensation
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kimberly J. McWaters
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
None
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Chief Executive
Officer and
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conrad A. Conrad
|
|
Mr. Conrad has served as a Director on UTIs Board
since February 2004. Mr. Conrad was employed with
The Dial Corporation from August 2000 to October
2005, where he served as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer. From 1999 to 2000, Mr.
Conrad was engaged in a number of personal business
ventures, including providing consulting services to
Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, which acquired Quaker
State Corporation in December 1998. From 1974 to
1998, Mr. Conrad held various positions, most
recently Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer,
with Quaker State Corporation, a leading manufacturer
of branded automotive consumer products and services.
Mr. Conrad also serves as a director of Rural/Metro
Corporation and Fender Musical Instruments
Corporation. Mr. Conrad received an AB in Accounting
from The College of William & Mary. |
|
|
|
Kimberly J. McWaters
|
|
Ms. McWaters has served as UTIs Chief Executive
Officer since October 1, 2003 and as a Director on
UTIs Board since 2005. Ms. McWaters has served as
UTIs President since 2000 and previously served on
UTIs Board of Directors from 2002 to 2003. From
1984 to 2000, Ms. McWaters |
5
|
|
|
|
|
held several positions
with UTI, including Vice President of Marketing and
Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Ms. McWaters
also serves as a director of Penske Automotive Group,
Inc. (formerly United Auto Group, Inc.). Ms.
McWaters received a BS in Business Administration
from the University of Phoenix.
|
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of these nominees.
Continuing Directors. The terms of Roger S. Penske, Linda J. Srere and John C. White are
scheduled to end in February 2009 and the terms of A. Richard Caputo, Jr., Allan D. Gilmour and
Robert D. Hartman are scheduled to end in February 2010.
Roger S. Penske, age 70, has served as a Director on UTIs Board since 2002. Mr. Penske has
served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Penske Automotive Group, Inc., a
publicly-traded automotive retailer, since 1999. Mr. Penske has also been Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of Penske Corporation since 1969. Mr. Penske also serves as a director
of General Electric Company, Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (formerly United Auto Group, Inc.) and
Internet Brands, Inc.
Linda J. Srere, age 52, has served as a Director on UTIs Board since 2005. Ms. Srere is a
marketing and advertising consultant. From January 2000 to November 2001, she served as President
of Young & Rubicam Advertising, a worldwide advertising network. From September 1998 to January
2000, Ms. Srere served as Vice Chairman and Chief Client Officer of Young & Rubicam Inc. (Y&R).
From January 1997 to September 1998, she served as President and CEO of Y&Rs New York office. Ms.
Srere joined Y&R in September 1994 as Executive Vice President and Director of Business
Development. Ms. Srere served as the Chairman of advertising agency Earle Palmer Brown New York
from 1992 to 1994, and served as President of advertising agency Rosenfeld, Sirowitz, Humphrey &
Strauss from 1990 to 1992. Ms. Srere is also a director of Electronic Arts Inc. She received a BA
in Psychology from State University of New York at Oswego.
John C. White, age 59, has served as a Director on UTIs Board since 1997 and as Chairman of
the Board since October 1, 2005. From October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2005, Mr. White served as
UTIs Chief Strategic Planning Officer and Vice Chairman. From April 2002 to September 30, 2003,
Mr. White served as UTIs Chief Strategic Planning Officer and Co-Chairman of the Board. From 1997
to March 2002, Mr. White served as UTIs Chief Strategic Planning Officer and Chairman of the
Board. Mr. White served as the President of Clinton Harley Corporation (which operated under the
name Motorcycle Mechanics Institute and Marine Mechanics Institute) from 1977 until it was acquired
by UTI in 1997. Mr. White received a BS in Engineering from the University of Illinois.
A. Richard Caputo, Jr., age 41, has served as a Director on UTIs Board since 1997. Mr. Caputo
is a partner and managing principal of The Jordan Company, LP, and has been an employee of The
Jordan Company, LP and its predecessors and affiliated entities since 1990. The Jordan Company, LP
manages, and is an affiliate of, The Resolute Fund, LP. Since 2002, Mr. Caputo has been a member of
Resolute Fund Partners, LLC, the general partner of The Resolute Fund, LP. Mr. Caputo is also a
director of Safety Insurance Group, Inc., TAL International Group, Inc. and a number of
privately-held companies. Mr. Caputo received a BA in Mathematical and Business Economics from
Brown University.
Allan D. Gilmour, age 73, has served as a Director on UTIs Board since June 2006. From
November 1992 until his initial retirement in January 1995, Mr. Gilmour served as Vice Chairman of
Ford Motor Company. Most recently, Mr. Gilmour again served as Vice Chairman of Ford Motor Company
from May 2002 to February 2005. Mr. Gilmour began his career with Ford Motor Company in 1960.
Over the course of his 34-year tenure at Ford, Mr. Gilmour served in a variety of roles including
as President of the
6
Ford Automotive Group, Executive Vice President, International Automotive Operations and Vice
President, External and Personnel Affairs. He also served as Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President and Controller, and President of Ford Motor Credit Company. Mr. Gilmour also serves on
the board of directors of DTE Energy Company. Mr. Gilmour received an AB in Economics from Harvard
University and an MBA from the University of Michigan.
Robert D. Hartman, age 59, has served as a Director on UTIs Board since 1985 and served as
UTIs Chairman of the Board from October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2005. From 1990 to September 30,
2003, Mr. Hartman served as UTIs Chief Executive Officer, and from April 2002 to September 30,
2003, Mr. Hartman served as the Co-Chairman of the Board. From 1979 to 1990, Mr. Hartman held
several positions with UTI, including Student Services Director, Controller, School Director and
President. He was appointed by the Governor of Arizona to the Arizona State Board for Private
Post-secondary Education in 1990 and served until 1995. In addition, he has served on the Advisory
Council for the Arizona Educational Loan Program, representing the private career school sector.
He was founder and former Chairman of the Western Council of Private Career Schools. Mr. Hartman
received a BA in General Business from Michigan State University and an MBA in Finance from DePaul
University in Chicago.
Corporate Governance and Related Matters
Corporate governance is typically defined as the system that allocates duties and authority
among a companys stockholders, board of directors and management. The stockholders elect the
board and vote on extraordinary matters; the board is the companys governing body, responsible for
hiring, overseeing and evaluating management; and management runs the companys day-to-day
operations. Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors, as described above.
Independent Directors. Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Caputo, Conrad,
Gilmour, Knight and Penske and Ms. Srere qualify as independent in accordance with the published
listing requirements of The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The NYSEs independence definition
includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not an employee of the company
and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with the company. An explanation of the
independence standard used by our Board of Directors, which standard incorporates the NYSE
independence definition, is set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the Board
and discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The Board considers all relevant facts and
circumstances in evaluating the independence of its members from management. Immaterial business
transactions conducted in the ordinary course of business are not determinative of the issue of
independence. As required by the NYSE rules, the Board of Directors has made an affirmative
determination as to each independent director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of
the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of a Director and has affirmatively determined that each independent director
meets the independence standard used by the Board. In making these determinations, the Board
reviewed and discussed information provided by the Directors and our management with regard to each
Directors business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management. The Board
also considered each Directors other relationships that do not involve us or our management such
as joint ownership of private aircraft among entities in which two of our Directors have an
interest as well as the employment of UTI graduates in the service departments of automotive
dealerships owned by an entity of which one of our Directors is an affiliate.
Independence for Audit Committee Members and Audit Committee Financial Expert. In addition,
as required by NYSE rules, the members of our Audit Committee each qualify as independent under
special standards established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for members of
audit committees. Our Audit Committee also includes at least one independent member who is
determined by the Board of Directors to meet the qualifications of an audit committee financial
expert in accordance with SEC rules, including that the person meets the relevant definition of an
independent director. Conrad A. Conrad and Allan D. Gilmour have each been determined to be an
audit committee financial expert. Stockholders should understand that this designation is a
disclosure requirement of the SEC related to Mr. Conrads
and Mr. Gilmours
7
experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters.
The designation does not impose upon Mr. Conrad or Mr. Gilmour any duties, obligations or
liabilities that are greater than are generally imposed on them as members of the Audit Committee
and the Board, and their designation as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this SEC
requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liabilities of any other member of our Audit
Committee or the Board.
Board Meetings
Our Board of Directors and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and also
hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. The Board has
delegated various responsibilities and authority to different board committees as described in this
section of the Proxy Statement. Committees regularly report on their activities and actions to the
full Board. In addition, the Corporate Governance Guidelines that have been adopted by the Board
and which are discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement call for regular executive sessions of
the non-management Directors (those not employed by UTI). The role of presiding director at
regular executive sessions of the non-management Directors rotates on an annual basis. During
fiscal 2005, the chairperson of the Audit Committee presided over executive sessions of the
non-management Directors. During fiscal 2006, the chairperson of the Compensation Committee
assumed the role. During fiscal 2007, the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee presided over executive sessions of the non-management Directors.
Interested parties may contact the non-management Directors as a group by submitting a letter
in a sealed envelope labeled accordingly. This letter should be placed in a larger envelope and
mailed to Universal Technical Institute, Inc., 20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona
85027.
In fiscal 2007, the Board held six meetings. Each Director, with the exception of Roger S.
Penske, attended at least 75% of the Board of Director meetings and meetings of committees on which such
Director served, during the Directors tenure as a Director and committee member.
Board Committees and Charters
In accordance with the NYSE Corporate Governance Rules, we currently have three standing Board
committees: Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance. Each member of the Audit,
Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees is an independent director in
accordance with NYSE standards. Each of the Board committees has a written charter approved by the
Board. Copies of each charter are posted on our website at www.uti.edu under the Investors
Governance captions. We will provide copies of our Board committee charters upon request made by
writing to us at our principal executive offices at 20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200, Phoenix,
Arizona 85027.
The current committee membership is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit |
|
Compensation |
|
Nominating and Corporate |
Director |
|
Committee |
|
Committee |
|
Governance Committee |
A. Richard Caputo, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
Conrad A. Conrad
|
|
Chair
|
|
ü |
|
|
Allan D. Gilmour
|
|
ü
|
|
ü |
|
|
Kevin P. Knight
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
Roger S. Penske
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
Linda J. Srere
|
|
|
|
Chair
|
|
ü |
Audit Committee. Messrs. Conrad, Gilmour and Knight served as members of our Audit Committee
during fiscal 2007. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee
is financially literate and satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE and the SEC. The
Audit
8
Committee has the responsibility for overseeing, among other things: our accounting and financial
reporting processes; the reliability of our financial statements; the effective evaluation and
management of our financial risks; our compliance with laws and regulations; and the effective and
efficient audit of our financial statements by a qualified independent registered public accounting
firm. The Audit Committee met eight times during 2007. The Audit Committee is required by SEC
rules to publish a report to stockholders concerning the Audit Committees activities during the
prior fiscal year. The Audit Committees report is set forth elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Committee. Messrs. Conrad and Knight and Ms. Srere served as members of our
Compensation Committee during fiscal 2007. Mr. Gilmour replaced Mr. Knight on the Compensation
Committee effective September 19, 2007. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of
the Compensation Committee satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE. The primary
responsibility of the Compensation Committee is to develop and oversee the implementation of the
Companys philosophy with respect to the compensation of our officers. In that regard, the
Compensation Committee has the responsibility for, among other things: developing and maintaining a
compensation policy and strategy that creates a direct relationship between pay levels and
corporate performance and returns to stockholders; recommending compensation and benefit plans to
the Board for approval; reviewing and approving annual corporate and personal goals and objectives
to serve as the basis for the chief executive officers compensation, evaluating the chief
executive officers performance in light of the goals and, based on such evaluation, determining
the chief executive officers compensation; determining the annual total compensation for our Named
Executive Officers; approving the grants of stock options and other equity-based incentives as
permitted under our equity-based compensation plans; reviewing and recommending to the Board
compensation for our non-employee Directors; and reviewing and recommending employment agreements,
severance arrangements and change-in-control plans that provide for benefits upon a
change-in-control, or other provisions for our executive officers and directors, to the Board. The
Compensation Committee met ten times during 2007.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Messrs. Caputo and Penske and Ms. Srere served
as members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee during fiscal 2007. The Board of
Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee has the responsibility for, among other things: identifying individuals qualified to
serve as directors of UTI; recommending qualified individuals for election to the Board at the
annual meeting of stockholders; recommending to the Board those Directors to serve on each of the
Board committees; recommending a set of corporate governance guidelines to the Board; reviewing
periodically our Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommending governance issues that should be
considered by the Board; reviewing periodically the Boards committee structure and operations and
the working relationship between each committee and the Board; and considering, discussing and
recommending ways to improve the Boards effectiveness. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and the
composition of the Board. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will
review and consider properly submitted stockholder recommendations on candidates for membership on
the Board of Directors as described below. In evaluating such recommendations, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee will use the same review criteria discussed below under Director
Qualifications and Review of Director Nominees. Any stockholder recommendations proposed for
consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must include the candidates
name, accompanied by relevant biographical information, and must be submitted in accordance with
our Bylaws to the attention of our Corporate Secretary at Universal Technical Institute, Inc.,
20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85027. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee met four times during 2007.
Director Qualifications and Review of Director Nominees
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to the Board of
Directors regarding the size and composition of the Board. The Committee reviews annually with the
Board
9
the composition of the Board as a whole and recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that
the Board reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise and
diversity required for the Board as a whole and contains at least the minimum number of independent
directors required by the NYSE and other applicable laws and regulations. The Committee is
responsible for ensuring that the composition of the Board accurately reflects the needs of UTIs
business and, in accordance with the foregoing, proposing the addition of members and the necessary
resignation of members for purposes of obtaining the appropriate members and skills. Board members
should possess such attributes and experience as are necessary to provide a broad range of personal
characteristics including diversity, management skills, and technological and business experience.
Directors should be able to commit the requisite time for preparation and attendance at regularly
scheduled Board and committee meetings, as well as be able to participate in other matters
necessary to ensure good corporate governance is practiced. In evaluating a director candidate,
the Committee considers factors that are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders,
including the knowledge, experience, integrity and judgment of each candidate; the potential
contribution of each candidate to the diversity of backgrounds, experience and competencies which
the Board desires to have represented; each candidates ability to devote sufficient time and
effort to his or her duties as a director; and any other criteria established by the Board and any
core competencies or technical expertise necessary to staff Board committees. In connection with
each director nomination recommendation, the Committee must consider the issue of continuing
director tenure and whether the Board will be exposed to new ideas and viewpoints, and will
maintain willingness to critically examine the status quo.
Board Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meetings
The Board does not have a formal policy with respect to the Directors attendance at our
annual stockholder meetings, but all Directors are encouraged to attend those meetings. All
Directors who, at the time, were serving as members of the Board attended last years annual
meeting of stockholders with the exception of A. Richard Caputo, Jr.
Communication with the Board of Directors
Stockholders may communicate with the Chairman of the Board, the Directors as a group, the
non-management Directors as a group or an individual Director directly by submitting a letter in a
sealed envelope labeled accordingly. This letter should be placed in a larger envelope and mailed
to Universal Technical Institute, Inc., 20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85027.
Code of Conduct; Corporate Governance Guidelines
We have a Code of Conduct (including a Supplemental Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive
Officer and Senior Financial Officers) (Code) that applies to all of our employees, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. This Code is posted on
our Internet website (www.uti.edu) under the Investors Governance captions.
We will provide a copy of the Code upon request made by writing to us at our principal
executive offices at 20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85027. We intend to
satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver
from, a provision of the Code by posting such information on our website, at the address and
location specified above, and, to the extent required, by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with
the SEC disclosing such information.
As indicated elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors has adopted Corporate
Governance Guidelines. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on our website
(www.uti.edu) under the Investors Governance captions. We will provide a copy of the Corporate
Governance Guidelines upon request made by writing to us at our principal executive offices at the
address indicated above and on the first page of this Proxy Statement.
10
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
In fiscal 2007, our non-employee Directors received a $20,000 annual retainer. Each
non-employee Director also received an annual award under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan
(formerly known as our 2003 Stock Incentive Plan) of 1,000 shares of the Companys common stock and
$2,500 per Board meeting attended in person or by telephone. In addition, each non-employee
Director received reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, including travel expense on commercial
flights or the equivalent cost of advance purchase first class commercial travel for non-employee
Directors utilizing private aircraft.
All non-chairperson Directors serving on committees of the Board receive an additional payment
of $1,000 for each committee meeting attended in person or by telephone, regardless of whether such
committee meeting occurred on the day of a Board meeting for which that Director has been
compensated and regardless of how many committee meetings that Director attended on the same day.
The chairpersons of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee each received $2,000 for each committee meeting attended, and the chairperson of the
Audit Committee received $3,000 for each committee meeting attended. The Audit Committee
chairperson received an additional $10,000 annual retainer.
Directors who are also officers do not receive any separate compensation for serving as
directors.
The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation we paid to our non-employee
directors in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Name |
|
Paid in Cash ($) |
|
($) (1) |
|
Total ($) |
Kevin P. Knight |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
23,630 |
|
|
|
76,130 |
|
Allan D. Gilmour |
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
23,630 |
|
|
|
65,630 |
|
Conrad A. Conrad |
|
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
23,630 |
|
|
|
102,630 |
|
A. Richard Caputo, Jr. |
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
23,630 |
|
|
|
62,630 |
|
Roger S. Penske |
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
23,630 |
|
|
|
56,630 |
|
Linda J. Srere |
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
23,630 |
|
|
|
76,630 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value computed in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R). |
Beginning October 1, 2007, non-employee Directors will receive a $35,000 annual retainer. In
addition, each Director will receive 1,250 shares of the Companys common stock. The chairperson
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of
$12,000. The chairperson of the Compensation Committee will receive an additional annual retainer
of $15,000 and the chairperson of the Audit Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of
$20,000. All non-chairperson Directors serving on the Compensation Committee and the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee will each receive an additional annual retainer of $6,000. All
non-chairperson Directors serving on the Audit Committee will each receive an additional annual
retainer of $8,000. No Director will receive additional compensation for meeting attendance.
We indemnify our Directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law so that they
will be free from undue concern about personal liability in connection with their service to the
Company. This is permitted by our Certificate of Incorporation. We have also entered into
agreements with our Directors, contractually obligating us to provide this indemnification to them.
11
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm with respect to our financial statements for the year ending September 30,
2008. In taking this action, the Audit Committee considered PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs
independence with respect to the services to be performed and other factors that the Audit
Committee and the Board of Directors believe are advisable and in the best interest of the
stockholders. As a matter of good corporate governance, the Audit Committee has decided to submit
its selection to stockholders for ratification. In the event that this selection of independent
registered public accounting firm is not ratified by a majority vote of the shares of common stock
present or represented at the Annual Meeting, it will be considered as a direction to the Audit
Committee to consider the selection of a different firm.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR approval
of the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
As more fully described below, all services to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are
pre-approved by the Audit Committee, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services
and certain other services.
The following table shows the fees that we accrued for the audit and other services provided
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for fiscal years 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
893,644 |
|
|
$ |
913,356 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
23,825 |
|
|
|
29,668 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
917,469 |
|
|
$ |
943,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees. Audit fees for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 relate primarily to
services rendered for the integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting included in our annual report on Form 10-K, for the limited
reviews of the financial information included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and accounting
consultations relating to certain leasing transactions.
Tax Fees. This category consisted principally of professional services rendered by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, primarily in connection with our tax compliance activities, including
technical and tax advice related to the preparation of tax returns.
It is expected that representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the
Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire, and will be available
to respond to any appropriate questions from stockholders.
12
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures for Services Provided by the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Pre-Approval of Audit Services. The Audit Committee shall meet with the independent
registered public accounting firm prior to the audit to review the planning and staffing of the
audit and approve the services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm
in connection with the audit.
Pre-Approval of Non-Audit Services. The Audit Committee shall review and approve in advance
the retention of the independent registered public accounting firm for any non-audit service that
is not prohibited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), provided, however, that:
|
(a) |
|
permitted non-audit services that account for less than $10,000 shall be deemed
to be pre-approved, and |
|
|
(b) |
|
as permitted by Section 302 of the Act, such pre-approval is waived and shall
not be required with respect to non-audit services: |
|
(i) |
|
that account, in the aggregate, for less than 5% of the total
fees paid by the company to its independent registered public accounting firm
during the fiscal year in which such non-audit services are provided; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
that the company did not recognize as non-audit services at
the time of the engagement, and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
that are promptly brought to the attention of, and approved
by, the Committee before the completion of the audit (and such approval may be
given by the Audit Committee or any member of the Audit Committee). |
The Audit Committee may delegate to any one of its members the authority to grant pre-approval of
any permitted non-audit services that account for between $10,000 and $20,000 (and except as
otherwise provided in a resolution of the Audit Committee adopted hereafter, the Audit Committee
shall be deemed to have delegated such authority, such that any one member of the Audit Committee
shall have the authority to grant pre-approval of any permitted non-audit services within such
dollar limits). The pre-approval of any non-audit services pursuant to delegated authority or
deemed approval shall be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
Approval of non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm
pursuant to clause (b) above will be disclosed by the Company as required pursuant to Section 202
of the Act in the applicable reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
The Audit Committee reviews the Companys financial reporting process on behalf of the Board
of Directors. The Audit Committee is currently composed of three independent directors. The Audit
Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is available on
the Companys website at www.uti.edu under the Investors Governance captions. The Audit
Committee met eight times during 2007. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial
statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial
reporting.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee meets with management and the
independent registered public accounting firm to review and discuss the Companys annual and
quarterly financial statements, including the disclosures under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Companys annual report on Form
10-K, any material changes in accounting policies used in preparing the financial statements prior
to the filing of a report on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q with the SEC, and the items required to be
discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61,
13
Communications with Audit Committees (SAS 61), as amended, with respect to annual financial
statements, and Statement of Auditing Standards No. 100, Interim Financial Information, with
respect to quarterly financial statements.
The Audit Committee met and held discussions with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm regarding the fair and complete presentation of the Companys financial
statements, managements assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, and
the significant accounting policies applied by management in the preparation of the Companys
financial statements, as well as any alternative accounting policies. Management represented to
the Audit Committee that the Companys consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and the Audit
Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the
independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent
registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed by SAS 61.
In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the
independent registered public accounting firm required by Independence Standards Board Standard No.
1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, and discussed with the independent registered
public accounting firm such firms independence from the Company and its management. The Audit
Committee also has considered whether the independent registered public accounting firms provision
of permitted non-audit services to the Company is compatible with its independence. The Audit
Committee has concluded that the independent registered public accounting firm is independent from
the Company and its management.
The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the
overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent registered
public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its audit,
the evaluation of the Companys internal controls, the overall quality of the Companys financial
reporting, and other matters required to be discussed by SAS 61.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, the inclusion of the audited
financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2007, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also selected
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conrad A. Conrad (Chair) |
|
|
|
|
Allan D. Gilmour |
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. Knight |
|
|
14
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
We maintain the Management 2002 Stock Option Program (the 2002 Plan) and the 2003 Incentive
Compensation Plan (the Incentive Compensation Plan) pursuant to which we may grant equity awards
to eligible persons.
Management 2002 Stock Option Program. The 2002 Plan was adopted by our Board of Directors and
became effective in April 2002. A maximum of 783,000 shares of common stock may be issued under
the 2002 Plan, which is administered by our Compensation Committee.
The 2002 Plan provides for the grant of incentive and non-qualified stock options to our
employees and employees of related companies, including officers and employee directors, and
non-statutory options to other persons providing material services to us or related companies. A
non-employee director is not eligible to receive an award.
As of September 30, 2007, we issued 190,111 shares of common stock upon the exercise of
options granted under the 2002 Plan. In addition, 500,041 shares of common stock are issuable
pursuant to options granted under the 2002 Plan, at a weighted average exercise price of $4.40 per
share. We do not intend to grant any additional options under the 2002 Plan.
2003 Incentive Compensation Plan. The Incentive Compensation Plan was adopted by our Board of
Directors and approved by holders of the majority voting power of our voting stock and became
effective in December 2003. The Incentive Compensation Plan provides for the issuance of
incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
stock units, performance shares, performance units, performance-based awards and cash bonuses. The
Incentive Compensation Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 4,430,972 shares of our common stock,
subject to proportional adjustment to reflect stock splits, stock dividends and other similar
events.
Awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan may be granted to employees, Directors,
consultants and advisors to the Company or any of our subsidiaries. However, only employees
(including officers and Directors who are also employees) of the Company or any of our subsidiaries
may receive incentive stock options under the Incentive Compensation Plan. The Incentive
Compensation Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee.
As of September 30, 2007, we issued 187,218 shares of common stock upon the exercise of
options granted under the Incentive Compensation Plan, at a weighted average exercise price of
$20.57 per share. In addition, 1,171,588 shares of common stock are issuable pursuant to options
granted under the Incentive Compensation Plan, at a weighted average exercise price of $24.73 per
share.
As of September 30, 2007, we granted 358,049 shares of restricted stock, net of 67,328 shares
forfeited, under the Incentive Compensation Plan, of which 330,660 shares are still subject to
restrictions. During the year ended September 30, 2007, restrictions lapsed with respect to 27,389
shares, of which 9,808 shares were withheld to settle individual participant tax obligations.
15
The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of September 30,
2007. Information is included for both equity compensation plans approved by the stockholders and
equity plans not approved by the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
remaining available for |
|
|
Common shares to be |
|
exercise price of |
|
future issuance under |
|
|
issued upon exercise of |
|
outstanding |
|
equity compensation |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
options, warrants |
|
plans (excluding shares |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
and rights |
|
reflected in column (a)) |
Plan category |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by UTI stockholders |
|
|
2,515,176 |
(1) |
|
$ |
21.25 |
|
|
|
1,870,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved
by UTI stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
2,515,176 |
|
|
$ |
21.25 |
|
|
|
1,870,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Of these shares, options to purchase 500,041 shares were outstanding under the 2002 Plan and
options to purchase 2,015,135 were outstanding under the Incentive Compensation Plan. |
2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We sponsor an employee stock purchase plan that permits
eligible employees, as defined in the plan, to purchase up to 10% of an employees annual base and
overtime pay at a price equal to 95% of the fair market value of a share of stock on the last day
of the offering period. We amended the employee stock purchase plan in 2005 to address changes in
the financial accounting treatment of employee stock purchase plans. Prior to the amendment to the
plan, eligible employees were permitted to purchase up to 10% of the employees annual base and
overtime pay at a price of no less than 85% of the price per share of our common stock either at
the beginning or the end of the six-month offering period, whichever was less. Our Compensation
Committee administers the employee stock purchase plan. The Board of Directors may amend or
terminate the plan. The employee stock purchase plan complies with the requirements of Section 423
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors knows of no matters, other than the proposals presented above, to be
submitted to the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it
is the intention of the persons named in the proxy card enclosed with this Proxy Statement to vote
the shares they represent as the Board may recommend.
16
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
UTIs compensation and benefits programs are designed to attract, reward, motivate and retain
top tier executive talent possessing the key skills and abilities necessary to achieve success for
our customers, stockholders, employees and strategic partners. We believe that in this highly
competitive market for top executive talent, it is critical that we provide our executives with
incentives to excel, be internally and externally equitable, and promote a culture of innovation
and results-oriented customer service.
We believe an effective compensation program rewards the achievement of short-term, long-term
and strategic goals that are closely aligned with the interests of our stockholders. Therefore, we
believe that a meaningful portion of each executives total compensation opportunity should be at
risk and payable only if the executives performance benefits the interests of our stockholders.
We expect that this emphasis on performance-based compensation will contribute to our long-term
success and increase the value of our stockholders investment.
Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the objectives of our compensation and benefits
programs are to:
|
|
|
Attract and retain top talent from a broad array of industry and company backgrounds by
offering the potential for aggregate compensation above the median of our industry. |
|
|
|
|
Align compensation with the achievement of financial and operational performance goals
that foster the creation of long-term stockholder value, while maintaining appropriate
focus on near-term performance. |
|
|
|
|
Drive behaviors which advance UTIs mission of purpose, people and profit. |
|
|
|
|
Align incentive programs with performance goals so that the level of incentive
compensation is commensurate with the level of performance. |
Our compensation and benefits programs are driven by our business environment, objectives and
outcomes. Consequently, we evaluate the performance of our Named Executive Officers, as defined
herein, based on their management of UTI in the context of current business and economic conditions
and the Companys performance relative to its industry peers. We also evaluate each executives
performance relative to his or her individual attainment of key goals and the success of the Named
Executive Officers, as a team, in achieving our operating objectives. Because our Named Executive
Officers have broad policy-making authority, the Compensation Committee holds them responsible for
our financial performance and for upholding our values in a competitive marketplace.
Elements of the Compensation Program and Key Goals
Our executive compensation program is designed around the concept of total direct
compensation. Total direct compensation refers to the combined elements of base salary, annual
incentive, and long-term incentive pay. In setting the appropriate level of total direct
compensation, we review industry and peer group compensation data in order to set executive pay at
a level that is competitive and that will attract and motivate top talent, while keeping the
overall pay levels aligned with stockholder financial interests and commensurate with job
responsibilities (internal equity).
17
The table below sets forth each element of our compensation program, the rationale for our
selection of that element, what each element is designed to reward, and how the Compensation
Committee determines the appropriate amount or value of each element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
Why the Element was |
|
What the Element is |
|
How the Appropriate Value of |
Element |
|
Chosen |
|
Designed to Reward |
|
Each Element is Determined |
Base Salary
|
|
Provides
appropriately
competitive form of
fixed cash
compensation
commensurate with
job
responsibilities.
|
|
Core competencies,
experience and
required skills in
senior leadership
position.
|
|
Base pay for our Named
Executive Officers is
targeted between the median
and 75th
percentile of our composite
comparison group. (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash
Incentive
|
|
Focuses Named
Executive Officers
on the achievement
of short-term
Company goals and
provides meaningful
annual reward upon
achievement of such
goals.
|
|
Variable component
intended to reward
contributions to
the Companys
short-term business
objectives and
achievement of
individual goals.
|
|
The full target incentive
bonus is targeted to be at
or slightly above the
median target incentive
levels expressed as a
percentage of base pay for
companies of our size and
revenue. (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Incentives:
Stock Options and
Restricted Stock
|
|
Focuses Named
Executive Officers
efforts on the
behaviors within
their control that
we believe will
ensure the
long-term health
and success of the
Company, as
measured by
increases in UTIs
stock price over a
period of several
years, growth in
UTIs earnings per
share and other
elements. Provides
equity-based reward
linked to
performance of UTI
stock. Multi-year
vesting acts as a
retention mechanism
for key talent.
Further aligns the
interests of
employees with our
stockholders.
Encourages
ownership of UTI
stock.
|
|
Variable component
intended to reward
contributions to
the long-term
success of the
Company and the
achievement of its
mission and key
business
objectives, and
each Named
Executive Officers
commitment to the
interests of
Company
stakeholders.
|
|
Long-Term Incentive values
are targeted to be at the
median of companies of our
size and revenue. (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Direct
Compensation
|
|
Total direct
compensation refers
to the combined
elements of base
salary, annual
incentive, and
long-term incentive
pay.
|
|
Please see sections
above for Base
Salary, Annual Cash
Incentive and Long
Term Incentives.
|
|
We target total direct
compensation between the
median and the
75th percentile
of our composite comparison
group. (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welfare Benefits:
Health, Life and
Disability Benefits
|
|
Competitive
benefits package is
essential for
recruiting and
retention and is
part of the
Companys
broad-based total
compensation
program. Provides
access to health
care and protection
from catastrophic
financial events
such as illness,
injury or death.
|
|
Named Executive
Officers
participate in
employee benefit
plans generally
available to all
Company employees,
including health,
life and disability
plans.
|
|
Health, life and disability
benefits are benchmarked
annually using the Towers
Perrin 2007 Health Plan
Cost Survey which covers
approximately 9.6 million
U.S. employees, retirees
and dependents. We target
the median of this data to
maintain competitive
benefit levels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
Retirement benefits
are a key component
of a competitive
compensation
package. Assists
the Named Executive
Officer with
financial
preparation for
retirement.
|
|
Named Executive
Officers may
participate in the
Companys 401(k)
Plan which is
generally available
to eligible Company
employees.
|
|
We benchmark our 401(k)
plan annually against
general industry utilizing
data from our 401(k)
administrators (T. Rowe
Price) client database, and
target median levels for
this benefit. We are below
median on the availability
of other retirement
benefits such as deferred
compensation or pension
plans (which we do not
offer). |
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
Why the Element was |
|
What the Element is |
|
How the Appropriate Value of |
Element |
|
Chosen |
|
Designed to Reward |
|
Each Element is Determined |
Severance,
Change-in-Control,
and Other
Post-Employment
Benefits
|
|
Severance and
change-in-control
agreements are
designed to
facilitate the
Companys ability
to attract and
retain executives
in a competitive
marketplace that
commonly offers
such protections.
Our CEO, CFO and
Chairman have
employment
agreements that
provide severance
benefits.
Severance benefits
ease an employees
transition in the
event of an
unexpected
termination due to
changes in the
Companys
employment needs.
Change-in-control
agreements
encourage employees
to remain focused
on the Companys
business in the
event of rumored or
actual fundamental
corporate changes
and aids in
retaining employees
during such
critical times.
Post-employment
medical benefits
for the Chairman
were negotiated as
a part of a
business merger.
|
|
Rewards service and
tenure and
recognizes the need
for financial
security for key
executives when
employment ends.
Rewards focus on
the Companys
ongoing needs
within the changing
landscape of the
for-profit
education industry.
|
|
We review prevalent
practice by utilizing
existing survey data
regarding employment and
severance agreements, and
change-in-control benefits
to ensure our benefits are
consistent with current
practice for companies of
our size and revenue.
In reviewing external
competitive data with
regard to these
arrangements, we also
consider best practices for
specific components of
these agreements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Benefits
and Perquisites
|
|
Executive physicals
are provided to
assist our
executive officers
with the proactive
monitoring of their
health.
Company-paid
premiums and the
Executive Medical
Plan serve as
competitive
recruiting and
retention tools.
Additional Term
Life Insurance
recognizes the
greater salary
replacement need
for our executives
officers
dependents and
beneficiaries in
the event of an
executives death.
|
|
Given the rigorous
demands of an
executive officer
role, we have a
vested interest in
their proactive
focus on their own
health and
security.
|
|
Our philosophy is to limit
the number of perquisites
and benefits. Through
available survey and proxy
data, we have been able to
assess that our perquisites
are minimal in comparison
to other similar
organizations. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See the discussion under the heading Benchmarking of Executive Compensation within this
Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of the composite comparison group. |
|
(2) |
|
We utilize job-specific compensation survey data from general industry organizations with
target revenue of approximately $375 million. Compensation surveys used in 2007 were Mercers
Benchmark Database and Watson Wyatts Top Management Compensation Survey. |
Oversight of the Executive Compensation Program
Compensation Committee Purpose, Composition, Schedule and Responsibilities
The Compensation Committee carries out the Boards responsibilities relating to compensation
of the Companys senior executives. The Compensation Committee also oversees and advises the Board
on adoption of, or changes to, policies that govern employee compensation and benefits, including
incentive compensation and equity-based compensation.
The Compensation Committee is comprised of three or more directors (currently, there are
three) who qualify as all of the following: (i) independent directors under applicable NYSE rules;
(ii) outside
19
directors for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and
(iii) non-employee directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Members of the Compensation Committee are nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee and elected by a majority vote of the Board to serve a one-year term.
The Compensation Committee is required by its charter to meet at least two times annually or
more frequently as the Committee deems appropriate. In fiscal year 2007, the Compensation
Committee met ten times.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and amending the Companys overall
executive compensation philosophy, structure, and the goals and objectives relating to executive
compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Senior Vice Presidents and any other
executives senior to the level of Senior Vice President, if applicable (SVPs).
In determining the appropriate level of compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews the
results of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees annual performance review of the
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. Based on this evaluation and a review of these executives
total compensation, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board for approval.
The Compensation Committee reviews the Chief Executive Officers annual performance review of
each of the SVPs taking into consideration the Companys executive compensation goals and
objectives and, based on this review, is responsible for the approval of each component of each
SVPs compensation. The Committee also reviews and approves adjustments for SVP promotions or
hires and contingent obligations such as severance, change-in-control or similar arrangements.
Timing and Process
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews and approves our executive compensation and
benefits programs to ensure that they are: (i) designed to serve our broader strategic goals of
profitable growth; (ii) designed to reward the achievement of our financial and operational
performance metrics that lead to the creation of long-term stockholder value; and (iii) consistent
with good corporate governance practices and our corporate culture. In 2007, the Compensation
Committee conducted this review in the Fall for base and incentive components of the Named
Executive Officers compensation. The Compensation Committee benchmarked long-term incentive
values in February.
In determining the appropriate level of compensation for our Named Executive Officers, the
Compensation Committee received the assistance of Mercer and Compensia, Inc. (Compensia). Both
Mercer and Compensia are independent, third party consulting firms. For a more complete discussion
on the role of Mercer and Compensia, please refer to Role of Compensation Consultants below.
In assessing the competitiveness of our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee
reviews the total direct compensation opportunities, both short- and long-term, while at the same
time analyzing the competitiveness of each component of compensation. The complete mix of pay
components is monitored and compared to peer company practices to ensure appropriate pay leverage
is maintained in the overall compensation package and in equity-based incentives that emphasize
long-term stockholder value creation.
Role of Executive Officers in Determining Compensation
Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the base
salaries, target bonus, and long-term incentive grant levels of the SVPs, including the Named
Executive Officers (other than the CEO). The CEOs recommendations are based on data provided by
Mercer and analyses provided by Compensia as well as the CEOs evaluation of each officers
performance.
20
Role of Compensation Consultants
The Compensation Committee received and continues to receive assistance from Mercer and
Compensia in fulfilling its duties. Mercer, which was retained by the Companys management,
assisted in assessing the competitiveness of our compensation policies and programs. Mercers
analyses benchmarked our executive compensation levels against companies in our peer group that
have executive positions with responsibilities similar in breadth and scope to ours and that
compete with us for executive talent. Mercers analyses also utilized external market data
compiled from executive compensation surveys. We engaged Mercer on a specific project basis and
instructed them to research the Companys compensation practices for its eleven senior executive
positions using published survey sources and proxy data from the Companys peer companies. We also
requested Mercer to provide compensation data for base pay, total cash compensation, and long-term
incentive practices for each of the senior executive positions.
Compensia, which was retained by the Compensation Committee, assisted in preparing and
developing the appropriate peer comparison group used in benchmarking competitive compensation
levels. Compensia provided advice and analysis to the Compensation Committee with respect to the
propriety and competitive value of long-term incentive grants, and employment and change-in-control
agreements. Compensia works at the direction of, and reports directly to, the Compensation
Committee. Compensia does not perform any services for UTI management unless directed to do so by
the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committees engagement with Compensia is for an
indefinite period and encompasses advisory services such as periodic review of executive
compensation philosophy, competitive assessment of executive compensation levels and
pay-for-performance linkage, executive cash and broad-based equity incentive program design, review
of executive contracts and other ad hoc support.
Benchmarking of Executive Compensation
Peer Group Description and List
To evaluate the competitiveness of our executive compensation program, we compare our pay
levels with a peer comparison group comprised of companies in the for-profit education industry
with similar market capitalization and net revenues. Our comparison group for fiscal 2007 includes
the following companies: Corinthian Colleges, Inc.; DeVry, Inc.; Educate, Inc.; GP Strategies
Corporation; ITT Educational Services, Inc.; Laureate Education, Inc.; Learning Tree International,
Inc.; Lincoln Educational Services Corporation; Nobel Learning Communities, Inc.; Plato Learning,
Inc.; Strayer Education, Inc.; and The Princeton Review, Inc. We also collected job-specific
compensation survey data from general industry organizations with target revenue of approximately
$375 million. Compensation surveys used in 2007 were Mercers Benchmark Database and Watson
Wyatts Top Management Compensation Survey. Data from these surveys is averaged with the data from
our peer comparison group to create a composite comparison group.
When targeting the appropriate level of compensation relative to the composite comparison
group, we analyze and compare our financial performance (measured by Earnings Before Interest and
Taxes (EBIT) growth, EBIT Margin, Return On Net Assets and Total Shareholder Return) to the
comparison group. Based on this analysis, we target base salaries at the appropriate percentile of
the market data, which for 2007 was between the median and the 75th percentile. In establishing
competitive base salaries, we also consider the levels of base pay at industry organizations
outside of our comparison group from which we recruit executives and to whom we are most likely to
lose talent. Our analysis of base pay levels at these other organizations has reinforced our
commitment to target total direct compensation between the median and the 75th percentile of the
composite comparison group.
To establish the target levels of long-term incentive compensation, we review the difference
between each Named Executive Officers total cash compensation (base salary and bonus) and the
market median total direct compensation (base salary, bonus and long-term incentive). The target
for our long-term incentive grant is based on the aggregate dollar value of this difference which
ensures that the total direct
21
compensation of our Named Executive Officers is in line with total direct compensation paid by our
competitors.
As part of its annual compensation review of Named Executive Officers, the Compensation
Committee also analyzes benchmark data provided by Mercer showing the market median bonus levels as
a percentage of salary. The Compensation Committee has determined that the full target incentive
bonus should be at or slightly above the median target incentive levels expressed as a percentage
of base pay for companies of our size and revenue.
Components of the Executive Compensation Program
Base Salaries
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves the base salaries of the Named
Executive Officers utilizing the benchmarking procedures described above. Apart from benchmarking,
base salaries are influenced by a variety of objective and subjective factors such as the level of
responsibility, experience and individual performance and internal equity considerations.
In December 2006, consistent with the Compensation Committees goal to target base pay between
the median and 75th percentile of the Companys peer group, the Compensation Committee approved
increases to the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers by 38% for both Kimberly McWaters
and John White, 14.5% for Jennifer Haslip, 9.8% for David Miller, 9.3% for Larry Wolff and 15.6%
for Sherrell Smith. Larry Wolff received an additional increase of 6.4% in March 2007 when his
responsibilities were increased to include the strategic planning function for the Company.
In December 2007, the Compensation Committee approved a merit increase for Larry Wolff in the
amount of 3.7%. Effective January 2008, Sherrell Smith was promoted to Executive Vice President of
Operations and received a promotional increase in salary of 15.4%.
Annual Incentive Plan
The annual incentive plan provides the Named Executive Officers with the opportunity to earn
performance-based awards based on the achievement of specific performance goals for the fiscal
year. The performance goals are based on specific business criteria for the Company and are
measured on either a consolidated basis, and/or by subsidiary, division, business or geographical
unit. All of our Named Executive Officers, with the exception of Kimberly McWaters, participate in
the Executive Officer Incentive Plan. For fiscal year 2007, Kimberly McWaters incentive
compensation award was granted under the Universal Technical Institute, Inc. 2003 Incentive
Compensation Plan.
For our fiscal year 2007, the Compensation Committee established performance goals for all
Named Executive Officers in both the Executive Officer Incentive Plan and the 2003 Incentive
Compensation Plan based on Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) margin percentage (EBIT
divided by net revenue), Capacity Utilization/Average Undergraduate Student Enrollment (year on
year), and Contract Growth (year on year). Each goal comprised 33.33% of the overall bonus target
for each Named Executive Officer. All goals were measured on a Company-consolidated basis for the
Named Executive Officer group. These metrics were chosen because they captured the Companys
fiscal year business need to drive focus on greater profitability, increased student capacity and
growth of the business. Each metric was viewed to be equally important.
The Compensation Committee approved the following bonus targets and payout levels for fiscal
year 2007:
22
2007 Named Executive Officer Target Bonus as a % of Base
|
|
|
Kimberly J. McWaters |
|
75% |
John C. White |
|
60% |
Jennifer L. Haslip |
|
45% |
David K. Miller |
|
45% |
Larry H. Wolff |
|
45% |
Sherrell E. Smith (1) |
|
45% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Smiths target bonus was increased to 50% commensurate with his promotion to
Executive Vice President of Operations effective January 2008. |
Fiscal Year 2007 Performance Categories and Payout Levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus Payout |
|
Capacity |
|
Bonus Payout |
|
Contract |
|
Bonus Payout |
EBIT Margin |
|
% for |
|
Utilization |
|
% for |
|
Growth |
|
% for |
Percentage |
|
Component |
|
Percentage |
|
Component |
|
Percentage |
|
Component |
8.3% |
|
20.0% |
|
63.4% |
|
20.0% |
|
10.0% |
|
10.0% |
8.9% |
|
25.0% |
|
64.4% |
|
25.0% |
|
11.1% |
|
20.0% |
9.6% |
|
35.0% |
|
65.4% |
|
35.0% |
|
12.2% |
|
30.0% |
10.2% |
|
50.0% |
|
66.4% |
|
50.0% |
|
13.3% |
|
50.0% |
10.6% |
|
70.0% |
|
67.4% |
|
70.0% |
|
14.4% |
|
70.0% |
10.9% |
|
100.0% |
|
68.4% |
|
100.0% |
|
15.9% |
|
100.0% |
Capacity Utilization and Contract Growth results for fiscal year 2007 did not meet the minimum
thresholds for payment. The minimum threshold level for each metric is set forth in the first row
of the chart above and was the minimum target level that had to be reached in order for any bonus
amount attributable to that metric to be paid. The Company did exceed 8.3% EBIT margin percentage
resulting in a payout to the Named Executive Officers of 20% of that component for a total bonus
payout of 6.66% of their target bonus percentage (20% × 33.3%).
In November 2007, the Compensation Committee approved the 2008 Executive Officer Incentive
Plan and the 2008 incentive plan for Kimberly McWaters under the Companys 2003 Incentive
Compensation Plan. The Compensation Committee has determined that for 2008, performance-based
awards for all Named Executive Officers will be based solely on EBIT and measured on a consolidated
basis. The decision to focus on EBIT was driven by the Companys focus on increasing revenue and
containing costs. In December 2007, the Compensation Committee approved a maximum bonus payout
that would pay up to 115% of the target bonus (75% of base salary) to Kimberly McWaters if EBIT
target goals are exceeded. While it is not likely that the EBIT target goal will be exceeded in
fiscal year 2008, the Compensation Committee believes that it is important to reward performance
that significantly exceeds expectations. For the target bonus to be achieved, the Company must
recognize a thirty percent increase in EBIT over fiscal year 2007. To achieve the maximum payout,
fiscal year 2008 EBIT would have to outperform fiscal year 2007 EBIT by 42%.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
2007 Grant
In February 2007, the Compensation Committee approved grants of stock options and restricted
stock to the Named Executive Officers using the benchmarking process described above. The
Compensation Committee considered the Companys profitability, the impact of FAS 123R which
required
23
recording expense related to stock options, competitive market data, and each officers
level of responsibility, when it made grant design determinations. The Compensation Committee also designed the grants with
a view to increasing employee retention and encouraging ownership of Company stock. In 2007, each
of our Named Executive Officers received 75% of his or her grant value in restricted stock and 25%
in stock options. Stock options vest ratably over four years. Restrictions on the shares of
restricted stock lapse at a rate of 50% two years from the grant date and 25% each year thereafter.
The Compensation Committee decided to grant most of the value of the long-term incentive award
in the form of restricted stock based on competitive market practice, the composition of the award
in prior years and the effects of the award on retention and UTI stock ownership. From 2003 to
2005, all of our long-term incentive awards were in the form of stock options. In 2006, we began
to include restricted stock as a small portion (15% to 25%) of the overall grant award. To address
our retention needs and to increase the immediate level of ownership of UTI stock among our Named
Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee increased the proportion of restricted stock to
stock options in the 2007 grant. In reaching this decision, the Compensation Committee reviewed
the retention value of each Named Executive Officers existing holdings of options and restricted
stock as well as the projected future value of these holdings and the dilutive effect of granting
options versus restricted stock. The Compensation Committee believes a blend of stock options and
restricted stock provides the best retention mechanism. Retaining 25% of the award in the form of
stock options was also important to align the incentive value to the interest of stockholders,
since options only increase in value when the stock price increases. Because FAS 123R requires
that the Company now expense stock options at a value less than the value of restricted stock
(depending on a number of factors used in the Black Scholes valuation model), options can be
provided in greater number to each Named Executive Officer. Offering restricted stock, which
retains some value for the executive during difficult business climates, ensures that the long-term
incentive maintains some retention value to our Named Executive Officers. Taking all of this into
account, the Compensation Committee determined that for the 2007 grant, the blend of 25% stock
options and 75% restricted stock provided the best mix of stockholder alignment and employee
retention.
Equity Grant Timing and Practices
Pursuant to the Companys equity granting policy and procedures, equity awards are made upon
the recommendation of the Compensation Committee with approval from the independent members of the
Board during an open trading window. Stock Options are awarded with an exercise price equal to the
closing price of UTIs stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of approval and may never
be less than fair market value. Grants to newly hired or promoted executive officers who are
eligible to receive options or stock awards are proposed for approval at the Boards next regularly
scheduled meeting that occurs during an open trading window following the officers hire or
promotion. Grant timing will be applied consistently and shall under no circumstances occur
outside of an open trading window. Equity grant award levels are based on market data and vary
among participants based on their positions within the Company and, for 2007, were granted at the
Boards regularly scheduled February meeting. Documentation of the award is distributed to the
recipients promptly following approval by the Board.
General Benefits and Executive Perquisites
We offer a health and welfare benefits package to all eligible employees that includes
coverage for medical, dental, disability, life, accidental death and dismemberment, vision,
flexible spending, education assistance, employee assistance and business travel accident. Please
see the table above under the heading Elements of the Compensation Program and Key Goals for
detailed information on the Named Executive Officers benefits and perquisites.
The costs of the perquisites and personal benefits for the Named Executive Officers for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 are included in the All Other Compensation column of the
Summary Compensation Table.
24
Post-Employment Compensation Programs
Retirement Benefits
We offer a 401(k) plan which is generally available to all employees to assist them in saving
for retirement. After the first year of employment, we match 50 cents on each dollar saved up to
the first 5% of eligible pay contributed to the plan. A five-year vesting schedule applies to all
Company matching contributions.
Employment Agreements
We have employment agreements with three of our Named Executive OfficersKimberly McWaters,
John White and Jennifer Haslipthat provide certain post-employment severance and benefits if we
terminate the officers employment other than for cause. Generally speaking, cause includes
conviction of a felony or other crime involving embezzlement or misuse of funds, a knowing breach
of the fiduciary duties owed by the executive to the Company, or a failure to perform the
executives material duties or a neglect of same.
While the details of these agreements vary, each generally provides for salary payments to
continue following termination. No agreement provides for salary payments beyond 18 months
following termination.
Our agreement with Jennifer Haslip provides that if she is terminated without cause or
terminates her employment for good reason (as defined in the agreement) within 12 months of a
change-in-control, she will also receive 12 months of Company-paid COBRA premiums and reasonable
outplacement assistance. Ms. Haslip would also receive a cash lump sum payment in an amount equal
to, with respect to each non-vested option to purchase UTI stock held by her that would have vested
within the twelve month period following her date of termination, the excess, if any, of the then
fair market value of UTI stock over the exercise price of the option. Generally speaking, good
reason is defined as a material reduction in Ms. Haslips authority, perquisites, position or
responsibilities (other than a reduction which affects all of our senior executives on a
substantially equal or proportionate basis), or a requirement that Ms. Haslip relocate outside the
Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area. On December 18, 2007, we announced that Ms. Haslip will be
leaving the Company on or about March 31, 2008. We have
commenced a search for Ms. Haslips replacement and
anticipate that she will continue working with us in the same capacity until such time as her
replacement is identified and integrated. We expect to enter into an agreement with Ms. Haslip
outlining the terms of her continued service to, and separation from, the Company.
Our agreement with John White provides that if he is terminated without cause or terminates
his employment for good reason, his medical benefits will continue to be provided by the Company
until age 65.
For more information, please see the tables below under the heading Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change-in-Control and the information set forth under the heading
Employment-Related Arrangements.
Change-in-Control Agreements
We have entered into change-in-control agreements with those Named Executive Officers who do
not have employment agreements with us. These agreements provide that if the executive is
terminated without cause or terminates employment for good reason within one year of a
change-in-control, the executive will continue to receive salary payments for 12 months and will
receive a prorated bonus calculated by multiplying the executives target bonus percentage by the
executives fiscal year salary earned through the date of termination. The executive is also
entitled to receive 12 months of paid health benefits continuation and outplacement services.
25
For more information, please see the tables below under the heading Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change-in-Control.
Accounting and Tax Considerations
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits our ability to deduct non-performance based
compensation in excess of $1.0 million that we pay to certain of our executive officers. In 2007,
we did not pay non-performance based compensation in excess of the $1.0 million limit to any of our
executive officers and we do not expect to exceed the limit in 2008. The Compensation Committee
intends for all incentive compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers to be deductible for
federal income tax purposes to the greatest extent possible.
Our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan, which was approved by our stockholders, permits the
award of stock options, performance shares, performance units, stock appreciation rights,
performance-based awards and cash bonuses that qualify as performance-based compensation and are
therefore fully deductible under section 162(m) of the Code.
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (FAS 123R) effective for our
2006 fiscal year. In determining equity compensation awards for 2007, we generally considered the
potential expense of those awards under FAS 123R and their impact on earnings per share. We
concluded that the award levels were in the best interests of stockholders given competitive
compensation practices among our peer companies, the awards potential expense, our performance,
and the impact of the awards on employee motivation and retention.
The American Jobs Act of 2004 added Section 409A to the Internal Revenue Code. Section 409A
revises the tax rules governing non-qualified deferred compensation strategies. We will continue
to review Section 409A and its rules and regulations and may adapt our compensation arrangements to
them.
Compensation Committee Interlocks
Ms. Srere and Messrs. Conrad, Gilmour and Knight served as members of our Compensation
Committee during fiscal 2007. None of these Directors was an executive officer or otherwise an
employee of UTI before or during such service, and no executive officer of UTI served on any other
companys compensation committee.
26
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation we paid our Chief Executive Officer, our
Chairman of the Board, our Chief Financial Officer and the three most highly compensated executive
officers of the Company, as well as the compensation for David K. Miller, our former Senior Vice
President of Campus Admissions, who we refer to collectively as the Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards ($) |
|
Option |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary ($) |
|
(1) |
|
Awards ($) (2) |
|
($) (3) |
|
($) |
|
Total ($) |
Kimberly J. McWaters |
|
2007 |
|
547,746 |
|
123,139 |
|
682,335 |
|
27,084 |
|
34,107 (4) |
|
1,414,411 |
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer L. Haslip |
|
2007 |
|
254,288 |
|
39,844 |
|
328,590 |
|
7,591 |
|
30,199 (5) |
|
660,512 |
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. White (6) |
|
2007 |
|
476,167 |
|
75,584 |
|
392,672 |
|
15,385 |
|
28,644 (7) |
|
988,452 |
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David K. Miller |
|
2007 |
|
254,462 |
|
16,389 |
|
112,527 |
|
7,948 |
|
43,781 (8) |
|
435,107 |
Former Senior Vice
President of Campus
Admissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry H. Wolff |
|
2007 |
|
240,192 |
|
39,844 |
|
126,742 |
|
7,165 |
|
21,576 (9) |
|
435,519 |
Senior Vice President
and Chief Information
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sherrell E. Smith |
|
2007 |
|
258,366 |
|
36,471 |
|
127,011 |
|
7,578 |
|
25,785 (10) |
|
455,211 |
Executive Vice
President of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the 2007 expense under FAS 123R for restricted stock awards granted to the Named
Executive Officers. The fair value of these awards is based on the closing market price of
our common stock on the date of grant. The restrictions on the shares of restricted stock
awarded lapse according to specific schedules over a period of four years. |
|
(2) |
|
The value of stock option awards included within this column reflect the dollar amount
recognized in our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007, in accordance with FAS 123R, except that the amount is adjusted for actual forfeitures
not the estimated forfeitures required under FAS 123R. Additional information regarding the
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the stock option awards is included in Note 12
to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our
2007 fiscal year. Each of the options vests ratably on an annual basis over a four-year
period, provided that the option recipient continues to be employed by us on such dates. |
|
(3) |
|
With respect to Kimberly J. McWaters, represents amounts earned under the 2003 Incentive
Compensation Plan. With respect to all other Named Executive Officers, represents amounts
earned under our Executive Officer Incentive Plan for our 2007 fiscal year. These incentives
are discussed under the heading Components of the Executive Compensation Program Annual
Incentive Plan within the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth elsewhere in this
Proxy Statement. The amounts shown were paid to the Named Executive Officers in December
2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects (i) $16,237 in medical premiums, (ii) $1,564 in dental premiums (iii) $195 in vision
premiums, (iv) $1,383 in long-term disability premiums, (v) $983 in short-term disability
premiums, (vi) $2,122 auto insurance reimbursement, (vii) $480 parking fee, and (viii) $11,143
in Exec-u-Care medical reimbursement benefits and premiums paid, but not necessarily incurred,
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. |
27
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Reflects (i) $11,559 in medical premiums, (ii) $922 in dental premiums, (iii) $120 in vision
premiums, (iv) $1,383 in long-term disability premiums, (v) $983 in short-term disability
premiums, (vi) $6,124 matching contribution to a 401(k) plan, (vii) $1,329 auto insurance
reimbursement, (viii) $480 parking fee, and (ix) $7,300 in Exec-u-Care medical reimbursement
benefits and premiums paid, but not necessarily incurred, during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. White is the uncle of David K. Miller, UTIs
former Senior Vice President of Campus Admissions. |
|
(7) |
|
Reflects (i) $11,559 in medical premiums, (ii) $922 in dental premiums, (iii) $120 in vision
premiums, (iv) $1,383 in long-term disability premiums, (v) $983 in short-term disability
premiums, (vi) $3,904 matching contribution to a 401(k) plan, (vii) $480 parking fee and
(viii) $9,293 in Exec-u-Care medical reimbursement benefits and premiums paid, but not
necessarily incurred, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. |
|
(8) |
|
Reflects (i) $16,237 in medical premiums, (ii) $1,564 in dental premiums, (iii) $195 in
vision premiums, (iv) $1,383 in long-term disability premiums, (v) $983 in short-term
disability premiums, (vi) $5,642 matching contribution to a 401(k) plan, (vii) $480 parking
fee, (viii) $6,911 in Exec-u-Care medical reimbursement benefits and premiums and (ix) $10,385
payable pursuant to a Separation Agreement, Waiver and Release between UTI and Mr. Miller,
which is described below in greater detail under the heading Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change-in-Control. |
|
(9) |
|
Reflects (i) $11,559 in medical premiums, (ii) $922 in dental premiums, (iii) $120 in vision
premiums, (iv) $1,383 in long-term disability premiums, (v) $983 in short-term disability
premiums, (vi) $6,005 matching contribution to a 401(k) plan, (vii) $480 parking fee, and
(viii) $125 in Exec-u-Care medical reimbursement premium. |
|
(10) |
|
Reflects (i) $16,237 in medical premiums, (ii) $1,564 in dental premiums, (iii) $195 in
vision premiums, (iv) $1,383 in long-term disability premiums, (v) $983 in short-term
disability premiums, (vi) $4,818 matching contribution to a 401(k) plan, (vii) $480 parking
fee, and (viii) $125 in Exec-u-Care medical reimbursement premium. |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2007
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards in 2007 to
each of our Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
Exercise or |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non- |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Base Price |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
|
Shares of |
|
Securities |
|
of Option |
|
of Stock and |
|
|
Grant |
|
Threshold |
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
Stock or |
|
Underlying |
|
Awards |
|
Option |
Name |
|
Date |
|
($) |
|
Target ($) |
|
($) |
|
Units (#) |
|
Options (#) |
|
($/Sh) (2) |
|
Awards (3) |
Kimberly J. McWaters |
|
2/28/07 |
|
|
|
67,643 |
|
406,267 (4) |
|
15,600 |
|
9,300 |
|
23.63 |
|
470,058 |
Jennifer L. Haslip |
|
2/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
2,800 |
|
23.63 |
|
143,962 |
John C. White |
|
2/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
7,400 |
|
23.63 |
|
376,083 |
David K. Miller |
|
2/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
2,800 |
|
23.63 |
|
143,962 |
Larry H. Wolff |
|
2/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
2,800 |
|
23.63 |
|
143,962 |
Sherrell E. Smith |
|
2/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
2,800 |
|
23.63 |
|
143,962 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown represent the dollar value of the estimated possible payout upon satisfaction
of the conditions subject to the non-equity incentive plan award granted in the fiscal year.
Amounts actually earned in 2007 are reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
column in the Summary Compensation Table. |
28
(2) |
|
Amount shown is the per share exercise price of the option award as determined by reference
to the fair market value of UTIs common stock, which is determined based on the closing price
of the stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. |
(3) |
|
The amount shown is the total estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant
calculated based on FAS 123R requirements and does not include an estimate for forfeitures. |
(4) |
|
Annual incentive plan grant under the 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan, which is discussed
under the heading Components of the Executive Compensation Program Annual Incentive Plan
within the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. |
In fiscal 2007, each of our Named Executive Officers received 75% of his or her grant value in
restricted stock and 25% in nonqualified stock options.
Stock options awarded vest ratably (25% each year) over four years. The option exercise
price may be no less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time of
grant. Under certain circumstances, the vesting of options for all stock option recipients,
including the Named Executive Officers, may accelerate. These circumstances include death,
disability, termination without cause within one year following a change-in-control of the Company,
or termination by the recipient for good reason. Good reason means a material reduction in the
recipients authority, perquisites, position or responsibilities (other than such a reduction which
affects all of the Companys senior executives on a substantially equal or proportionate basis), or
a requirement that the recipient relocate greater than 50 miles from the recipients primary work
location. Options expire on the earliest of the following events: (i) ten years from the grant
date; (ii) the date employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries is terminated for cause;
(iii) 90 days after the date employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries is terminated
for any other reason other than death or disability; or (iv) one year after the date employment
with the Company or any of its subsidiaries is terminated because of an employees death or
disability.
Restrictions on the shares of restricted stock lapse at a rate of 50% two years from the grant
date and 25% each year thereafter. Recipients of restricted stock, including Named Executive
Officers, are considered stockholders with respect to all such shares of restricted stock and have
all of the rights of a stockholder in the Company with respect to the restricted shares (e.g., they
may vote the shares at any meeting of the stockholders of the Company). However, recipients have
no rights to any dividends declared with respect to the restricted shares until the restrictions on
such shares lapse. All restrictions on the restricted shares lapse upon death, disability,
termination without cause within one year following a change-in-control of the Company or
termination by the recipient for good reason (which is described in the paragraph above).
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control
The tables below show the estimated incremental value transfer to each of our current Named
Executive Officers under various scenarios related to a termination of employment. The tables
below assume that such termination occurred on September 30, 2007, except as it relates to Mr.
White as noted below. John Whites employment agreement is structured so that any severance
payments continue through the end of his contract term, which is September 30. To illustrate the
most conservative scenario, we have assumed a termination date at the beginning of this contract
term.
The actual amounts that may be payable to any current Named Executive Officer can only be
determined at the time of an actual termination of employment and may vary from those listed below.
The estimated amounts listed below are in addition to any retirement, welfare and other benefits
that are available to UTI employees generally. For additional information regarding potential
payments upon termination or change-in-control, please see the discussion under the heading
Components of the Executive Compensation Program Post-Employment Compensation Programs within
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
29
and the information set forth under the heading Employment-Related Arrangements set forth
elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement or |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination following |
|
|
Death or |
|
|
Material Reduction |
|
|
|
Resignation |
|
|
without Cause |
|
|
for Cause |
|
|
Change-in-Control |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
in Duties |
|
Kimberly J. McWaters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Payments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
862,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
862,500 |
|
|
$ |
575,000 |
|
|
$ |
862,500 |
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
(unvested and
accelerated) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
(unvested and
accelerated) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,486 |
|
|
|
441,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
862,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,303,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,016,486 |
|
|
$ |
862,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$862,500 represents 18 months of base salary; $575,000 represents 12 months of base salary. |
|
(2) |
|
Payout equal to all unvested options and restricted stock. Value for options is estimated as
of September 30, 2007 using the fair value of UTIs common stock on that date minus the grant
prices and multiplied by the number of shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement or |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination following |
|
|
Death or |
|
|
Material Reduction |
|
|
|
Resignation |
|
|
without Cause |
|
|
for Cause |
|
|
Change-in-Control |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
in Duties |
|
Jennifer L. Haslip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Payments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Benefits (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
(unvested and
accelerated) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
(unvested and
accelerated) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
432,852 |
|
|
$ |
278,000 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$390,000 represents 18 months of base salary; $260,000 represents 12 months of base salary. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 12 months medical and dental and reasonable outplacement benefits. |
|
(3) |
|
Cash lump-sum payout equal to unvested options and restricted stock which would have vested
in a 12-month period. Value for options is estimated as of September 30, 2007 using the fair
value of UTIs common stock on that date minus the grant prices and multiplied by the number
of shares. |
|
(4) |
|
Total amounts payable upon a change-in-control may be reduced to the extent necessary so that
the amount payable is not subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement or |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination following |
|
|
Death or |
|
|
Material Reduction |
|
|
|
Resignation |
|
|
without Cause |
|
|
for Cause |
|
|
Change-in-Control |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
in Duties |
|
John C. White |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Payments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
Benefits (2) |
|
$ |
202,053 |
|
|
$ |
202,053 |
|
|
$ |
202,053 |
|
|
|
202,053 |
|
|
|
202,053 |
|
|
|
202,053 |
|
Stock Options
(unvested and
accelerated) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
(unvested and
accelerated) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,988 |
|
|
|
299,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
202,053 |
|
|
$ |
202,053 |
|
|
$ |
202,053 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,041 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,041 |
|
|
$ |
702,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$500,000 represents 12 months of base salary. With respect to termination as a result of
death or disability, $500,000 represents salary through September 30, 2008 (assuming a
termination date of October 1, 2007). |
30
|
|
|
(2) |
|
All termination events require maintenance of health care and executive medical through age
65. |
|
(3) |
|
Payout equal to all unvested options and restricted stock. Value for options is estimated as
of September 30, 2007 using the fair value of UTIs common stock on that date minus the grant
prices and multiplied by the number of shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement or |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination following |
|
|
Death or |
|
|
Material Reduction |
|
|
|
Resignation |
|
|
without Cause |
|
|
for Cause |
|
|
Change-in-Control |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
in Duties |
|
Larry H. Wolff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Payments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options (unvested
and accelerated) (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
(unvested and
accelerated) (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,400 |
|
|
$ |
140,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
422,410 |
|
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$250,000 represents the highest base annual salary during the last 12 months. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents bonus earned and paid. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents 12 months medical and dental and reasonable outplacement benefits. |
|
(4) |
|
Payout equal to all unvested options and restricted stock. Value for options is estimated as
of September 30, 2007 using the fair value of UTIs common stock on that date minus the grant
prices and multiplied by the number of shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Total amounts payable upon a change-in-control may be reduced to the extent necessary so that
the amount payable is not subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement or |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination following |
|
|
Death or |
|
|
Material Reduction |
|
|
|
Resignation |
|
|
without Cause |
|
|
for Cause |
|
|
Change-in-Control |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
in Duties |
|
Sherrell E. Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Payments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options (unvested
and accelerated) (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
(unvested and
accelerated) (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,936 |
|
|
$ |
135,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
433,862 |
|
|
$ |
135,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$260,000 represents the highest base annual salary during the last 12 months. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents bonus earned and paid. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents 12 months medical and dental and reasonable outplacement benefits. |
|
(4) |
|
Payout equal to all unvested options and restricted stock. Value for options is estimated as
of September 30, 2007 using the fair value of UTIs common stock on that date minus the grant
prices and multiplied by the number of shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Total amounts payable upon a change-in-control may be reduced to the extent necessary so that
the amount payable is not subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code. |
On September 24, 2007, we entered into a Separation Agreement, Waiver and Release with David
K. Miller in connection with Mr. Millers previously announced departure from the Company effective
September 16, 2007.
31
Under the agreement, Mr. Miller will receive approximately $405,000 payable in bi-weekly
installments over a period of 18 months from the date of the agreement. In addition, Mr. Miller
received a bonus in the amount of $7,948 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. The bonus
was paid in December 2007 and was based on the performance metrics previously established by the
Board of Directors. The agreement includes non-compete and non-solicitation restrictions, which
are effective during the 18-month severance period, and other customary provisions including a
release of claims. The agreement also includes a provision restricting Mr. Millers disclosure of
the Companys confidential information. In addition, the agreement provides for the continued
participation of Mr. Miller under the Companys health benefit plans until September 30, 2007 at
which time Mr. Miller may elect to continue his current coverage for up to 18 months in accordance
with the health benefit plans and applicable law. If Mr. Miller does not revoke the agreement, the
Company will continue to pay towards his coverage a monthly amount equal to the Company paid
portion of the insurance premium for the coverage held by Mr. Miller during active employment and
any administrative fee for a period of 18 months. Additionally, Mr. Miller shall be entitled, for
a period of 18 months following his separation from the Company, to the benefits of the Exec-u-Care
program in which Mr. Miller participated at the time of his separation. Mr. Millers outstanding
equity awards will be treated in accordance with their terms.
On December 18, 2007, we announced that Ms. Haslip will be leaving the Company on or about
March 31, 2008. We have commenced a search for
Ms. Haslips replacement and anticipate that she will continue
working with us in the same capacity until such time as her replacement is identified and
integrated. We expect to enter into an agreement with Ms. Haslip outlining the terms of her
continued service to, and separation from, the Company.
32
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth certain information regarding all outstanding equity awards for
each of our Named Executive Officers, as of September 30, 2007. The values contained in the table
below have not been, and may never be, realized. The options might never be exercised and the
value, if any, will depend on the share price on the exercise date. In addition, the awards of
restricted stock are subject to forfeiture and the value, if any, will depend on the share price on
the date an executive sells those shares once the restrictions have lapsed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
Market |
|
Number of |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Units |
|
Value of |
|
Unearned |
|
Awards:Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock |
|
Shares or |
|
Shares, |
|
or Payout Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That |
|
Units of |
|
Units or |
|
of Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have |
|
Stock That |
|
Other |
|
Shares, Units, or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
Option |
|
Not |
|
Have Not |
|
Rights That |
|
Other Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options (#) |
|
Options (#) |
|
Unearned |
|
Exercise |
|
Expiration |
|
Vested |
|
Vested ($) |
|
Have Not |
|
Held That Have |
Name |
|
Award Date |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Options (#) |
|
Price ($) |
|
Date |
|
(#) |
|
(10) |
|
Vested (#) |
|
Not Vested ($) |
Kimberly J. McWaters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/2/2002 |
|
|
|
310,842 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
4/2/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
117,855 |
|
|
|
39,285 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/16/2005 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.46 |
|
|
|
2/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/15/2006 |
|
|
|
13,125 |
|
|
|
39,375 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
|
|
6/15/2016 |
|
|
|
8,927 |
(7) |
|
|
160,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/28/2007 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,300 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.63 |
|
|
|
2/28/2017 |
|
|
|
15,600 |
(9) |
|
|
280,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer L. Haslip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/2/2002 |
|
|
|
64,862 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
4/2/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
75,428 |
|
|
|
25,142 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/16/2005 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.46 |
|
|
|
2/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/15/2006 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
|
|
6/15/2016 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
(7) |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/28/2007 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.63 |
|
|
|
2/28/2017 |
|
|
|
4,800 |
(9) |
|
|
86,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. White |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
76,606 |
|
|
|
25,535 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/16/2005 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.46 |
|
|
|
2/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/15/2006 |
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
|
|
6/15/2016 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
(7) |
|
|
74,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/28/2007 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,400 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.63 |
|
|
|
2/28/2017 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(9) |
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David K. Miller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/15/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
56,571 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/15/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/16/2005 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.46 |
|
|
|
12/15/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/15/2006 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
|
|
12/15/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry H. Wolff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/20/2005 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.27 |
|
|
|
6/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/15/2006 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
|
|
6/15/2016 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
(7) |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/28/2007 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.63 |
|
|
|
2/28/2017 |
|
|
|
4,800 |
(9) |
|
|
86,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sherrell E. Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
|
12/17/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/16/2005 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.46 |
|
|
|
2/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/15/2006 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
8,250 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
|
|
6/15/2016 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
(7) |
|
|
33,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2006 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
4,125 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.22 |
|
|
|
9/1/2016 |
|
|
|
877 |
(8) |
|
|
15,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/28/2007 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.63 |
|
|
|
2/28/2017 |
|
|
|
4,800 |
(9) |
|
|
86,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The option was granted on December 17, 2003. The shares became exercisable on December 17,
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
The option was granted on February 16, 2005. Assuming continued employment with UTI, the
shares will become exercisable on February 16 of each of 2008 and 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The option was granted on June 20, 2005. Assuming continued employment with UTI, the shares
will become exercisable on June 20 of each of 2008 and 2009. |
33
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The option was granted on June 15, 2006. Assuming continued employment with UTI, the shares
will become exercisable on June 15 of each of 2008, 2009 and 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
The option was granted on September 1, 2006. Assuming continued employment with UTI, the
shares will become exercisable on September 1 of each of 2008, 2009 and 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
The option was granted on February 28, 2007. Assuming continued employment with UTI, the
shares will become exercisable on February 28 of each of 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. |
|
(7) |
|
The restricted stock award was granted June 15, 2006. Assuming continued employment with
UTI, restrictions on the shares of restricted stock will lapse ratably on June 15 of each of
2008, 2009, and 2010. |
|
(8) |
|
The restricted stock award was granted September 1, 2006. Assuming continued employment with
UTI, restrictions on the shares of restricted stock will lapse ratably on September 1 of each
of 2008, 2009, and 2010. |
|
(9) |
|
The restricted stock award was granted February 28, 2007. Assuming continued employment with
UTI, restrictions on the shares of restricted stock will lapse at a rate of 50% two years from
the date of the grant and 25% each year thereafter. (50% in 2009 and 25% in each of 2010 and
2011). |
|
(10) |
|
The market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested is based on the per share
closing price of UTIs common stock on September 28, 2007 ($18.00), which was the last trading
day of our 2007 fiscal year. |
2007 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth certain information regarding options exercised by our Named
Executive Officers and restricted stock awards that vested during fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized on |
|
Number of Shares Acquired |
|
Value Realized on |
Name |
|
Acquired on Exercise (#) |
|
Exercise ($) (1) |
|
on Vesting (#) (2) |
|
Vesting ($) (3) |
Kimberly J. McWaters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
71,394 |
|
Jennifer L. Haslip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
23,990 |
|
John C. White |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
33,322 |
|
David K. Miller |
|
|
16,467 |
(4) |
|
|
192,793 |
(4) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
23,990 |
|
Larry H. Wolff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
23,990 |
|
Sherrell E. Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
20,274 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of our common
stock on the date of exercise. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include the net effect of shares withheld to settle individual participant tax
obligations. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the market value of the stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the number of
shares that vested. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents shares acquired and value realized upon exercise of the following stock option
award: option to purchase 16,467 shares awarded on February 25, 2003 with an exercise price of
$7.3122 per share exercised on September 24, 2007 at the fair market value of $19.02 per
share. |
34
Employment-Related Arrangements
Employment Agreement with John C. White. In April 2002, we entered into an employment
agreement with John White. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. White agreed to serve
as Chief Strategic Planning Officer and Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors. Effective October
1, 2003, Mr. White became Vice Chairman of the Board. Subsequently, on October 1, 2005, Mr. White
became Chairman of the Board. The terms of the employment agreement with Mr. White remain in full
force and effect notwithstanding the fact that Mr. White now serves as Chairman of the Board. The
employment agreement provided for an initial term ending September 30, 2006 and automatically
renews for successive one-year terms thereafter, subject to at least 90 days advance notice by
either party of a decision not to renew the employment agreement. Mr. White is entitled to receive
an annual base salary of $312,500, subject to annual cost of living adjustments and other increases
as the Compensation Committee may recommend to the Board.
Employment Agreement with Kimberly J. McWaters. In April 2002, we entered into an employment
agreement with Kimberly McWaters to serve as our President. This agreement provided for an initial
term ending March 31, 2005 and automatically renews for successive one-year terms thereafter,
subject to at least 90 days advance notice by either party of a decision not to renew the
employment agreement. Under the employment agreement, Ms. McWaters is entitled to receive an
annual base salary of $280,000, subject to annual cost of living adjustments and other increases as
the Compensation Committee may recommend to the Board. Effective as of October 1, 2003, Ms.
McWaters became Chief Executive Officer. The terms of the employment agreement with Ms. McWaters
remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the fact that Ms. McWaters now serves as the Chief
Executive Officer as well as its President.
Employment Agreement with Jennifer L. Haslip. In November 2003, we entered into an employment
agreement with Jennifer Haslip to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. This agreement provided
for an initial term ending April 1, 2005 and automatically renews for successive one-year terms
thereafter, subject to 90 days advance notice by either party of a decision not to renew the
employment agreement. Under the employment agreement, Ms. Haslip is entitled to receive an annual
base salary of $195,000, subject to annual cost of living adjustments and other increases as the
Compensation Committee may recommend to the Board.
Provisions Common to Each Employment Agreement. Certain provisions are common to each of the
employment agreements described above. For example, each employment agreement:
|
|
|
provides that each executive may be paid an annual, performance-based bonus to be
determined by the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion; |
|
|
|
|
specifies that each executive is entitled to certain perquisites, including
reimbursement of expenses, paid vacations, health and medical reimbursement plan,
automobile insurance and such other perquisites and benefits. Other perquisites and
benefits established from time to time at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors
include health, short- and long-term disability, pension and life insurance benefits for
executives and their families; |
|
|
|
|
provides for our payment of severance compensation and benefits to the executives under
certain circumstances, such as when the executives employment is terminated by the Company
other than for cause, as defined in the employment agreements, or by the executive if the
Company materially breaches the employment agreement or due to the executives death or
disability; and |
|
|
|
|
restricts the employees disclosure and use of the Companys confidential information,
as defined in the employment agreement, and prohibits the employee from competing with the
Company for a period of one year following the termination of employment. |
The Board of Directors approves the operating budget for a given fiscal year and may, upon the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, award bonuses based upon achievement of established
35
targets. In addition, the Board may, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, award
bonuses based upon additional factors, including but not limited to extraordinary performance or
efforts by individuals, as the Board may in its discretion determine from time to time.
Change-in-Control Severance Agreements. We entered into change-in-control severance
agreements with several of our executive officers and key employees. Each severance agreement
provides for the payment of severance compensation and other benefits to the employee depending
upon the circumstances of the employees termination of employment, such as if the employee is
terminated without cause or if the employee leaves for good reason, in each case within 12 months
after the Company has undergone a change-in-control, as that term is defined in the severance
agreement. Each severance agreement also provides that:
|
|
|
as a precondition to our payment of any severance compensation or benefits, the employee
must execute a waiver and release that the Company provides to the employee; |
|
|
|
|
the amounts paid to or benefits received by the employee are subject to a downward
adjustment so that the total payments to the employee due to a change-in-control do not
constitute an excess parachute payment, as that term is defined in Section 280G of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or cause the employee to be required to pay an
excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code; and |
|
|
|
|
the employee is not required to mitigate any amounts paid or benefits received under the
severance agreement by seeking other employment or otherwise. |
As part of the consideration for the payment of the severance payments and benefits, the
severance agreement provides that, for a period of 12 months after the termination of employment,
the employee covenants not to compete directly or indirectly with the Company or directly or
indirectly solicit, recruit or employ any persons or entities with whom the Company currently has
business relationships, or have had such relationships within the 24 months prior to such
solicitation, recruitment or employment.
401(k) Plan. We maintain a plan qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Under the 401(k) Plan, a participant may contribute a maximum of 50% of his or her pre-tax salary,
commissions and bonuses through payroll deductions, up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit
($15,500 in calendar year 2007). The percentage elected by more highly compensated participants
may be required to be lower. In addition, at the discretion of our Board of Directors, we may make
discretionary matching and/or profit-sharing contributions into the 401(k) Plan for eligible
employees.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
This report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any previous filing by us under either the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 that incorporates future Securities Act or Exchange Act filings in whole or in part by
reference.
The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and the discussions
with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in UTIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2007 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Compensation Committee:
Linda J. Srere (Chair)
Conrad A. Conrad
Allan D. Gilmour (effective September 19, 2007)
Kevin P. Knight
36
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2007 with respect to the
beneficial ownership of shares of common stock by:
|
|
|
each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the
outstanding shares of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
each of our directors, director nominees and Named Executive Officers (with
the exception of David K. Miller); and |
|
|
|
|
all of our executive officers and directors as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and generally includes voting or investment power over securities. Under
this rule, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such
person within 60 days of December 31, 2007 upon the exercise of options. Each beneficial owners
percentage ownership is determined by assuming that all options held by such person that are
exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2007 have been exercised. Except in cases where
community property laws apply or as indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe that each
stockholder identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power over all shares of
common stock shown as beneficially owned by the stockholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Number |
|
Percent |
Directors and Named Executive Officers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kimberly J. McWaters (1) |
|
|
561,324 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Jennifer L. Haslip (2) |
|
|
211,054 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John C. White (3) |
|
|
2,726,014 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
Sherrell E. Smith (4) |
|
|
91,520 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Larry H. Wolff (5) |
|
|
26,187 |
|
|
|
* |
|
A. Richard Caputo, Jr. (6) |
|
|
211,782 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Conrad A. Conrad |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Allan D. Gilmour |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert D. Hartman (7) |
|
|
1,137,524 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Kevin P. Knight |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Roger S. Penske |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Linda J. Srere |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(17 persons) (8) |
|
|
5,398,616 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
5% Holders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, L.P. (9) |
|
|
3,512,100 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
FMR LLC (10) |
|
|
3,455,148 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Royce & Associates, LLC (11) |
|
|
3,519,800 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Wasatch Advisors, Inc. (12) |
|
|
2,720,336 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person named in the table is 20410 North 19th Avenue,
Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85027. |
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes 24,527 shares of restricted stock which are forfeitable until vested (restrictions
on the shares of restricted stock lapse according to specific schedules over a period of four
years); 532,282 shares of common stock subject to exercisable options; 405 shares of
restricted stock held by Ms. McWaters spouse; and 1,675 shares of common stock subject to
exercisable options held by Ms. McWaters spouse. Ms. McWaters has sole voting and investment
power over 559,124 shares and shared voting and investment power over 2,200 shares. Ms.
McWaters is UTIs President and Chief Executive Officer. |
37
(2) |
|
Includes 7,800 shares of restricted stock which are forfeitable until vested (restrictions on
the shares of restricted stock lapse according to specific schedules over a period of four
years); 189,482 shares of common stock subject to exercisable options; 13,000 shares of common
stock held of record by David N. Wine and Jennifer L. Haslip Revocable Living Trust, of which
Ms. Haslip is a trustee; and 100 shares of common stock held by Ms. Haslips spouse. Ms.
Haslip has sole voting and investment power over 197,954 shares and shared voting and
investment power over 13,100 shares. Ms. Haslip is UTIs Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 2,464,675 shares of common stock held of record by Whites Family Company, LLC;
107,314 shares held of record by John C. White and Cynthia L. White 1989 Family Trust, of
which John C. White is a trustee; 16,666 shares of restricted stock which are forfeitable
until vested (restrictions on the shares of restricted stock lapse according to specific
schedules over a period of four years); 136,466 shares of common stock subject to exercisable
options; and 950,000 shares currently pledged as security. The White Descendants Trust u/a/d
September 10, 1997 is the sole member and manager of Whites Family Company, LLC. John C.
White is the trustee of the White Descendants Trust u/a/d September 10, 1997. Mr. White has
sole voting and investment power over 154,025 shares and shared voting and investment power
over 2,571,989 shares. Mr. White is UTIs Chairman of the Board. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 7,552 shares of restricted stock which are forfeitable until vested (restrictions on
the shares of restricted stock lapse according to specific schedules over a period of four
years); 33,925 shares of common stock subject to exercisable options; 3,675 shares of
restricted stock held by Mr. Smiths spouse; and 5,325 shares of common stock subject to
exercisable options held by Mr. Smiths spouse. Mr. Smith has sole voting and investment
power over 80,937 shares and shared voting and investment power over 10,582 shares. Mr. Smith
is UTIs Executive Vice President of Operations. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 7,800 shares of restricted stock which are forfeitable until vested (restrictions on
the shares of restricted stock lapse according to specific schedules over a period of four
years) and 17,700 shares of common stock subject to exercisable options. Mr. Wolff is UTIs
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer. |
|
(6) |
|
A. Richard Caputo, Jr. is a managing principal of The Jordan Company, LP. The business
address for Mr. Caputo is 767 Fifth Avenue, 48th Floor, New York, New York 10153. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 592,886 shares of common stock held by The Robert and Janice Hartman Family Trust,
of which Robert D. Hartman is a trustee; 416,147 shares of common stock held of record by
Hartman Investments Limited Partnership, of which Robert D. Hartman is a general partner; and
128,491 shares of common stock subject to exercisable options. Mr. Hartman has sole voting
and investment power over 721,377 shares and shared voting and investment power over 416,147
shares. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 3,978,928 shares of common stock; 100,478 shares of restricted stock which are
forfeitable until vested (restrictions on the shares of restricted stock lapse according to
specific schedules over a period of four years); and 1,319,227 shares of common stock subject
to exercisable options. |
|
(9) |
|
Based solely on the information provided in Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 1) filed by Columbia
Wanger Asset Management, L.P. (Columbia) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 11, 2007. Columbia is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940. Columbia has sole voting and dispositive authority with respect to 3,512,100
shares. The Schedule 13G includes the shares held by Columbia Acorn Trust, a Massachusetts
business trust that is advised by Columbia. The business address for Columbia is 227 West
Monroe Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, Illinois 60606. |
|
(10) |
|
Based solely on the information provided in Schedule 13G filed by FMR LLC (FMR) with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2007 by FMR LLC (FMR), a parent holding
company, on behalf of a group of FMRs entities or affiliates. FMR has sole dispositive
authority with respect to 3,455,148 shares. The business address for FMR is 82 Devonshire
Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. |
38
(11) |
|
Based solely on the information provided in Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 1) filed by Royce &
Associates, LLC (Royce) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2007.
Royce is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Royce
has sole voting and dispositive authority with respect to 3,519,800 shares. The business
address for Royce is 1414 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019. |
|
(12) |
|
Based solely on the information provided in Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 1) filed by Wasatch
Advisors, Inc. (Wasatch) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2007.
Wasatch is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Wasatch has sole voting and dispositive authority with respect to 2,720,336 shares. The
business address for Wasatch is 150 Social Hall Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and
executive officers to file reports of holdings and transactions in our shares with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Due to administrative error, the following persons inadvertently filed
late reports after the required filing date: Messrs. Freed, Miller, White and Wolff and Ms. Haslip
each reported one late transaction on a Form 5; Ms. McWaters filed one Form 4 after the required
filing date and reported one late transaction on a Form 5; Mr. Smith filed one Form 4 after the
required filing date and reported one late transaction on a Form 5; and Mr. Speer filed one Form 4
after the required filing date.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons
During fiscal 2007, the Board of Directors adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy
(the Policy). In accordance with the Policy, all Interested Transactions with a Related
Party are subject to review and approval by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Ongoing or long-term transactions with a Related Party in existence at the time the Policy was
adopted, if any, will also be subject to ratification on at least an annual basis. For purposes of
the Policy, an Interested Transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship or a series
of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships (including any indebtedness or guaranty of
indebtedness) in an amount equal to or exceeding $60,000 in any fiscal year in which the Company,
including any of its subsidiaries, was, is or will be a participant and in which any Related
Party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Any indirect interest
includes an interest held by or through any entity in which any Related Party is employed or is a
partner or principal; or in a similar position or in which such Related Party has a 10% or
greater beneficial ownership interest. A Related Party includes executive officers, directors,
nominees for director, any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any
class of UTIs voting securities and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons.
In considering whether to approve an Interested Transaction, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate, which may include: (i) the
Related Partys relationship with the Company and interest in the transaction; (ii) the material
facts of the proposed Interested Transaction, including the proposed value of such transaction, or,
in the case of indebtedness, the principal amount that would be involved; (iii) the benefits to the
Company of the Interested Transaction; (iv) an assessment of whether the Interested Transaction is
on terms that are comparable to the terms available with an unrelated party; (v) in the case of an
existing transaction, the impracticability or cost of securing alternative arrangements and (vi)
such other factors as the Committee deems relevant.
The Policy provides for standing pre-approval for certain categories of transactions with a
Related Party without the need for specific approval by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee.
39
These categories are: (i) certain transactions with other companies where the Related Partys
only relationship is as an employee (other than as an executive officer), director or beneficial
owner of less than 10% of the companys shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed
the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other companys gross annual revenues in its most recently
completed fiscal year; (ii) charitable contributions, grants or endowments by the Company to
charitable organizations, foundations or universities at which a Related Partys only relationship
is as an employee (other than as an officer) or a director or trustee, if the aggregate amount
involved does not exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 2% of the charitable organizations total annual
receipts in its most recently completed fiscal year; and (iii) certain other transactions and
arrangements which under certain SEC rules are excepted from disclosure as transactions with a
Related Party.
Registration Rights Agreement
We are a party to a registration rights agreement with the following stockholders: (i) JZ
Equity Partners plc and the permitted transferees of The Jordan Company, LLC (collectively, the TJC
Stockholders); (ii) Charlesbank Voting Trust, Charlesbank Equity Fund V, Limited Partnership, CB
Offshore Equity Fund V, L.P., CB Equity Co-investment Fund V, Limited Partnership and Coyote
Training Group, LLC (collectively, the Charlesbank Stockholders), (iii) Worldwide Training Group,
LLC; (iv) Whites Family Company, LLC; and (v) Robert D. Hartman. Pursuant to the registration
rights agreement, each of the TJC Stockholders, the Charlesbank Stockholders and Worldwide Training
Group, LLC have one demand registration right. Pursuant to this demand right, at any time after
June 13, 2004, any of the TJC Stockholders, the Charlesbank Stockholders and Worldwide Training
Group, LLC could request that we file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 to
cover the restricted shares of our common stock that they own, subject to certain conditions.
Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, this demand right terminates from and after the date
on which for any reason those stockholders having the demand right cease to beneficially own at
least 5% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Each of the TJC Stockholders, the
Charlesbank Stockholders and Worldwide Training Group, LLC have ceased to beneficially own at least
5% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Consequently, the demand registration
right under the registration rights agreement has terminated.
The registration rights agreement also provides for piggyback registration rights with
respect to the restricted shares of our common stock held by each of the stockholders party to this
agreement, including Robert D. Hartman, one of our Directors and our former Chairman of the Board,
and Whites Family Company, LLC, an entity controlled by John White, our Chairman of the Board.
Accordingly, if we propose to register any of our common stock for sale to the public, we are
required to give written notice of our intention to do so to each of the stockholders who is a
party to this agreement and to use our best efforts to include in the registration statement the
number of restricted shares of our common stock beneficially owned and requested to be registered
by such stockholders, subject to reduction of such shares under certain circumstances by an
underwriter. If a reduction of shares is necessary, stockholders who request to participate in the
registration will do so pro rata based on the numbers of shares held by such stockholders on a
fully-diluted basis, except that we will have first priority to register shares of our common stock
if we initiate the registration for our own account.
Transactions with Management and Others
Since 1991, we have leased some of our properties from entities controlled by John C. White,
the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or entities in which Mr. Whites family members have an
interest. A portion of the property comprising the Orlando location is occupied pursuant to a
lease with the John C. and Cynthia L. White 1989 Family Trust, with the lease term expiring on
August 19, 2022. The annual base lease payments for the first year under this lease totaled
approximately $326,000, with annual adjustments based on the higher of (i) an amount equal to 4% of
the total annual rent for the immediately preceding year or (ii) the percentage of increase in the
Consumer Price Index. Another portion of the property comprising the Orlando location is occupied
pursuant to a lease with Delegates LLC, an entity controlled by the White Family Trust, with the
lease term expiring on July 1, 2016. The beneficiaries of the White Family Trust, which is an
irrevocable grantor trust, are Mr. Whites children and the trustee of the trust is not related to
Mr. White.
40
Annual base lease payments under this lease totaled approximately $680,000, with annual
adjustments based on the higher of (i) an amount equal to 4% of the total annual rent for the
immediately preceding year or (ii) the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index.
Additionally, since April 1994, we have leased two of our Phoenix properties under one lease from
City Park LLC, a successor in interest of 2844 West Deer Valley L.L.C. and in which the John C. and
Cynthia L. White 1989 Family Trust holds a 25% interest. This lease expires on February 28, 2015,
and the annual base lease payments under this lease, as amended, totaled approximately $463,000,
with annual adjustments based on the higher of (i) an amount equal to 4% of the total annual rent
for the immediately preceding year or (ii) the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index.
The table below sets forth the total payments that the Company made in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007
under these leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. and Cynthia L. White |
|
|
|
|
City Park LLC |
|
1989 Family Trust |
|
Delegates LLC |
Fiscal 2005
|
|
$ |
488,523 |
|
|
$ |
436,036 |
|
|
$ |
877,544 |
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
$ |
507,351 |
|
|
$ |
534,137 |
|
|
$ |
831,759 |
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$ |
621,992 |
|
|
$ |
564,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,022,818 |
|
We believe that the rental rates under these leases approximate the fair market rental value of the
properties at the time the lease agreements were negotiated.
Chris McWaters, the husband of our Chief Executive Officer, Kimberly McWaters, works for UTI
as our Director of Manufacturer Specific Advanced Training Admissions and has been employed by the
Company for over 15 years. Chris McWaters compensation in fiscal 2007, including the value of
equity-based compensation awarded to him, totaled approximately $119,480. He is eligible to receive
benefits that are provided to all of our employees generally, including equity incentive awards
under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan. In fiscal 2007, Chris McWaters received a grant of 400
shares of restricted stock under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan.
Lori Smith, the wife of our Executive Vice President of Operations, Sherrell Smith, works for
UTI as our Vice President of Financial Aid Operations and Student Services and has been employed by
the Company for 14 years. Lori Smiths compensation in fiscal 2007, including the value of
equity-based compensation awarded to her, totaled approximately $268,521. She is eligible to
receive benefits that are provided to all of our employees generally, including equity incentive
awards under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan. In fiscal 2007, Lori Smith received grants of
1,000 stock options and 4,000 shares of restricted stock under our 2003 Incentive Compensation
Plan.
Michelle Cutler, the wife of our Senior Vice President of Field Admissions, Joseph Cutler,
works for UTI as our Lead Project Coordinator and has been employed by the Company for three years.
Michelle Cutlers compensation in fiscal 2007 totaled approximately $43,557. She is eligible to
receive benefits that are provided to all of our employees generally, including equity incentive
awards under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan.
Bobbie Adler, the wife of our acting Senior Vice President of Campus Admissions, Robert Adler,
works for UTI as our Director of Training for Financial Aid and has been employed by the Company
for one month. She is eligible to receive benefits that are provided to all of our employees
generally, including equity incentive awards under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan.
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
From time to time, stockholders seek to nominate directors or to present proposals for
inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy, or otherwise for consideration at the annual
meeting. To be included in the proxy statement or considered at an annual meeting, a stockholder
must timely submit nominations of directors or other proposals to us in addition to complying with
certain rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We intend to
hold our year 2009 annual meeting during February
41
2009. We must receive proposals for our 2009 annual meeting no later than September 17, 2008, for
possible inclusion in the proxy statement, or between October 30, 2008 and November 29, 2008, for
possible consideration at the meeting. Stockholders should direct any proposals, as well as
related questions, to our Corporate Secretary at the address set forth on the first page of this
Proxy Statement.
ANNUAL REPORT
Our 2007 annual report to stockholders has been mailed to stockholders concurrently with the
mailing of this Proxy Statement, but is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not to be
considered to be a part of our proxy solicitation materials.
Upon request, we will provide, without charge to each stockholder of record as of the record
date specified on the first page of this Proxy Statement, a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the SEC. Any exhibits listed in the annual
report on Form 10-K also will be furnished upon request at the actual expense that we incur in
furnishing such exhibits. Any such requests should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the
address set forth on the first page of this Proxy Statement.
DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO SECURITY HOLDERS
Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we and services that we employ to deliver communications to
our stockholders are permitted to deliver to two or more stockholders sharing the same address a
single copy of each of our annual report to stockholders and the Proxy Statement. Upon written or
oral request, we will deliver a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and/or proxy
statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of each document was
delivered and who wishes to receive separate copies of such documents in the future. Stockholders
receiving multiple copies of such documents may request that we deliver single copies of such
documents in the future. Stockholders may notify us of their requests by calling or writing our
Corporate Secretary at Universal Technical Institute, Inc., 20410 North 19th Avenue, Suite 200,
Phoenix, Arizona 85027, telephone (623) 445-0727.
Phoenix, Arizona
Dated: January 15, 2008
42
Proxy
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR 2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 27, 2008
The undersigned appoints John C. White and Kimberly J. McWaters, and each of them, as proxies, each
with full power of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the
undersigned at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
(UTI), to be held on February 27, 2008, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof and
authorizes them to vote at such meeting, as designated on the reverse side of this form, all the
shares of common stock of UTI held of record by the undersigned on January 7, 2008.
IF NO OTHER INDICATION IS MADE ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM, THE PROXIES WILL VOTE FOR ALL
PROPOSALS AND, IN THEIR DISCRETION, UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE
MEETING.
See reverse for voting instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: PLEASE MARK, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL
THIS PROXY IN THE POST PAID ENVELOPE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes Must Be Indicated
(X) In Black Or Blue Ink: x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Item 1. |
|
|
|
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Item 2. |
1. Election of Directors: |
|
|
|
2. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR all nominees listed (except o
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY o
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
as marked to the contrary)
|
|
to vote for all nominees listed |
|
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXCEPTIONS* o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees: 01 Conrad A. Conrad and 02 Kimberly J. McWaters |
|
|
|
At the proxies discretion on any other matters which may
properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. |
(Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any indicated
nominee, mark the Exceptions* box and write that nominees name
on the blank line below.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED
OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR THE
PROPOSAL. |
Exceptions* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To change your address, please mark this box. o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To include any comments, please mark this box. o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCAN LINE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder sign here
|
|
Co-Owner sign here
|
|
Date |
This proxy should be dated, signed by the stockholder(s) exactly as his or her name appears herein, and returned promptly in the
enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate. If shares are held by joint tenants or as
community property, both stockholders should sign.