FORM 10-K/A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
|
|
|
þ |
|
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
MYLAN INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
25-1211621
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1500 Corporate Drive, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(724) 514-1800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class:
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: |
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share
6.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market
The NASDAQ Stock Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check One):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common stock, other than shares held by persons
who may be deemed affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2008, the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $3,668,813,108.
The number of outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant as of February 16, 2009,
was 304,704,472.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
|
|
|
|
Parts of Form 10-K |
|
|
into which |
|
|
Document is |
Document |
|
Incorporated |
Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end
of the registrants fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
|
|
III |
Explanatory Note
On February 23, 2009, Mylan Inc. (the Company) filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The Company hereby amends its Annual Report on Form 10-K to
amend Items 8 and 15 and the Exhibit Index and to include conformed signatures of Deloitte & Touche
LLP (D&T) on each of D&Ts reports listed in Items 8 and 15 and in D&Ts consent filed as Exhibit
23. These conformed signatures were inadvertently omitted from the original filing of the Companys
Form 10-K. This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the original Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Other than amending Items 8 and 15 and the Exhibit Index and including the
conformed signatures of D&T on each of D&Ts reports listed in Items 8 and15 and in D&Ts consent
filed as Exhibit 23, this amendment does not modify or update in any way the disclosures in the
Companys original Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, as required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, new Certifications
by the Company's CEO and CFO are filed as Exhibits to the Form 10-K/A.
2
MYLAN INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-K/A
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
3
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and
Supplementary Financial Information
4
MYLAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
557,147 |
|
|
$ |
484,202 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
40,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
42,260 |
|
|
|
91,361 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,164,613 |
|
|
|
1,132,121 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,065,990 |
|
|
|
1,063,840 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
199,278 |
|
|
|
192,113 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
105,076 |
|
|
|
95,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,174,673 |
|
|
|
3,059,301 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,063,996 |
|
|
|
1,102,932 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
2,453,161 |
|
|
|
2,978,706 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,161,580 |
|
|
|
3,855,971 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
16,493 |
|
|
|
18,703 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
539,956 |
|
|
|
337,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,409,859 |
|
|
$ |
11,353,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
585,711 |
|
|
$ |
608,070 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
151,109 |
|
|
|
144,355 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
92,158 |
|
|
|
169,518 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt and other long-term obligations |
|
|
5,099 |
|
|
|
410,934 |
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
24,344 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
708,638 |
|
|
|
645,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,544,650 |
|
|
|
2,002,351 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
18,021 |
|
|
|
122,870 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
5,165,419 |
|
|
|
4,706,716 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
404,031 |
|
|
|
206,672 |
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
545,121 |
|
|
|
876,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
7,677,242 |
|
|
|
7,915,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
29,108 |
|
|
|
34,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock par value $0.50 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized: 5,000,000 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued: 2,139,000 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
Common stock par value $0.50 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized: 600,000,000 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued: 395,368,062 and 395,260,355 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
197,684 |
|
|
|
197,630 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
3,873,743 |
|
|
|
3,785,729 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
594,352 |
|
|
|
922,857 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings |
|
|
(380,802 |
) |
|
|
83,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,286,047 |
|
|
|
4,990,330 |
|
Less treasury stock at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares: 90,635,441 and 90,885,188 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
1,582,538 |
|
|
|
1,586,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,703,509 |
|
|
|
3,403,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
10,409,859 |
|
|
$ |
11,353,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
MYLAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
4,631,237 |
|
|
$ |
2,162,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,586,947 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
506,348 |
|
|
|
15,818 |
|
|
|
24,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
5,137,585 |
|
|
|
2,178,761 |
|
|
|
1,611,819 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
3,067,364 |
|
|
|
1,304,313 |
|
|
|
768,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,070,221 |
|
|
|
874,448 |
|
|
|
843,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
317,217 |
|
|
|
146,063 |
|
|
|
103,692 |
|
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269,036 |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
385,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,053,485 |
|
|
|
449,598 |
|
|
|
215,538 |
|
Litigation settlements, net |
|
|
16,634 |
|
|
|
(1,984 |
) |
|
|
(50,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,772,336 |
|
|
|
1,862,713 |
|
|
|
416,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
297,885 |
|
|
|
(988,265 |
) |
|
|
427,554 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
357,045 |
|
|
|
179,410 |
|
|
|
52,276 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
11,337 |
|
|
|
86,611 |
|
|
|
50,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(47,823 |
) |
|
|
(1,081,064 |
) |
|
|
425,512 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
137,423 |
|
|
|
60,073 |
|
|
|
208,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings before minority interest |
|
|
(185,246 |
) |
|
|
(1,141,137 |
) |
|
|
217,495 |
|
Minority interest (income) expense |
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
(3,112 |
) |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings before preferred dividends |
|
|
(181,215 |
) |
|
|
(1,138,025 |
) |
|
|
217,284 |
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
139,035 |
|
|
|
15,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(320,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,154,024 |
) |
|
$ |
217,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.49 |
) |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.49 |
) |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
304,360 |
|
|
|
257,150 |
|
|
|
215,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
304,360 |
|
|
|
257,150 |
|
|
|
219,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
MYLAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
309,150,251 |
|
|
$ |
154,575 |
|
|
$ |
418,954 |
|
|
$ |
1,939,045 |
|
|
|
(98,971,431 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,727,373 |
) |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
|
$ |
787,651 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
Net unrealized loss on marketable securities,
net of tax |
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification for losses included in net earnings |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,162,500 |
|
|
|
13,081 |
|
|
|
476,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489,096 |
|
Stock options exercised, net of shares tendered for payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,048,450 |
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
47,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,267 |
|
Sale of warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,360 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of shares withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,665 |
) |
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,242 |
) |
Shares issued for the acquisition of Matrix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,058,139 |
|
|
|
140,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,741 |
|
Purchase of bond hedge, net of tax of $44,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,900 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,156 |
|
Tax benefit of stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,419 |
|
Dividends declared ($0.24 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,047 |
) |
Adjustment to intitially adopt SFAS No. 158, net
of tax of $751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,361,201 |
|
|
|
169,681 |
|
|
|
962,746 |
|
|
|
2,103,282 |
|
|
|
(90,948,957 |
) |
|
|
(1,588,393 |
) |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
1,648,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,138,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,138,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,138,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrecognized losses and prior service
cost related to post-retirement plans, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,602 |
|
|
|
87,602 |
|
Net unrecognized losses on derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,723 |
) |
|
|
(4,723 |
) |
Net unrealized loss on marketable securities,
net of tax |
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification for gains included in net earnings |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,056,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,440,000 |
|
|
|
27,720 |
|
|
|
720,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,051 |
|
Stock options exercised, net of shares tendered for payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459,154 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
7,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,139,000 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,073,886 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of shares withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,769 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,332 |
|
Tax benefit of stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,648 |
|
Adoption of FIN 48, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,478 |
) |
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,999 |
) |
Dividends declared ($0.06 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,923 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,139,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
|
395,260,355 |
|
|
$ |
197,630 |
|
|
$ |
3,785,729 |
|
|
$ |
922,857 |
|
|
|
(90,885,188 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,586,904 |
) |
|
$ |
83,044 |
|
|
$ |
3,403,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
MYLAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(181,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrecognized losses and prior service cost
related to post-retirement plans, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,529 |
) |
|
|
(2,529 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(420,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(420,167 |
) |
|
|
(420,167 |
) |
Net unrecognized gains on derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,633 |
) |
|
|
(40,633 |
) |
Net unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax |
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification for losses included in net earnings |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(463,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(645,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised, net of shares tendered for payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,707 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of shares withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,747 |
|
|
|
4,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,639 |
|
Tax expense of stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Sale of warrants, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,560 |
|
Adoption of EITF 06-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,255 |
) |
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,035 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,139,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
|
395,368,062 |
|
|
$ |
197,684 |
|
|
$ |
3,873,743 |
|
|
$ |
594,352 |
|
|
|
(90,635,441 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,582,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(380,802 |
) |
|
$ |
2,703,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
MYLAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings before preferred dividends |
|
$ |
(181,215 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,138,025 |
) |
|
$ |
217,284 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings before preferred
dividends to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
425,279 |
|
|
|
157,800 |
|
|
|
61,512 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
30,639 |
|
|
|
17,332 |
|
|
|
22,156 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269,036 |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
(3,112 |
) |
|
|
211 |
|
Net income from equity method investees |
|
|
(4,161 |
) |
|
|
(2,573 |
) |
|
|
(6,659 |
) |
Change in estimated sales allowances |
|
|
10,576 |
|
|
|
31,337 |
|
|
|
14,386 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(193,564 |
) |
|
|
(77,131 |
) |
|
|
(50,479 |
) |
Non-cash impairments |
|
|
457,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
31,076 |
|
|
|
54,408 |
|
|
|
7,914 |
|
Litigation settlements, net |
|
|
16,635 |
|
|
|
(4,526 |
) |
|
|
6,464 |
|
Cash received from Somerset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,870 |
|
Gain on foreign exchange contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(172,447 |
) |
|
|
(124,385 |
) |
|
|
(60,773 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(83,327 |
) |
|
|
16,305 |
|
|
|
(28,987 |
) |
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
23,166 |
|
|
|
86,467 |
|
|
|
(29,312 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
73,983 |
|
|
|
(34,632 |
) |
|
|
73,567 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(113,998 |
) |
|
|
34,864 |
|
|
|
(5,504 |
) |
Other operating assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
68,319 |
|
|
|
(30,413 |
) |
|
|
15,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
384,447 |
|
|
|
167,689 |
|
|
|
390,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(165,113 |
) |
|
|
(110,538 |
) |
|
|
(161,851 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,001,930 |
) |
|
|
(761,049 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(38,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(18,032 |
) |
|
|
(275,802 |
) |
|
|
(655,948 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
65,712 |
|
|
|
357,922 |
|
|
|
848,520 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
(4,976 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(152,830 |
) |
|
|
(7,035,324 |
) |
|
|
(730,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(137,495 |
) |
|
|
(29,825 |
) |
|
|
(50,751 |
) |
Payment of financing fees |
|
|
(15,074 |
) |
|
|
(89,538 |
) |
|
|
(15,329 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,073,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,051 |
|
|
|
657,678 |
|
Purchase of bond hedge |
|
|
(161,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of warrants |
|
|
62,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,360 |
|
Change in short-term borrowing, net |
|
|
26,239 |
|
|
|
26,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
581,352 |
|
|
|
7,701,240 |
|
|
|
1,556,251 |
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(524,536 |
) |
|
|
(4,389,183 |
) |
|
|
(689,938 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
49,824 |
|
Change in outstanding checks in excess of cash disburements
accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,008 |
|
|
|
10,403 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
5,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(166,936 |
) |
|
|
6,068,782 |
|
|
|
1,442,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on cash and cash equivalents of changes in exchange rates |
|
|
8,264 |
|
|
|
30,690 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
72,945 |
|
|
|
(768,163 |
) |
|
|
1,102,241 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
|
|
484,202 |
|
|
|
1,252,365 |
|
|
|
150,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
|
$ |
557,147 |
|
|
$ |
484,202 |
|
|
$ |
1,252,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
218,012 |
|
|
$ |
179,092 |
|
|
$ |
176,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
307,895 |
|
|
$ |
174,034 |
|
|
$ |
59,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
9
Mylan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Nature of Operations
Mylan Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or Mylan) are engaged in the development,
licensing, manufacture, marketing and distribution of generic, brand and branded generic
pharmaceutical products for resale by others and active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) globally
through three reportable segments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
(SFAS No. 131), the Generics Segment, the Specialty Segment and the Matrix Segment. The principal
markets for the Generics Segment products are proprietary and ethical pharmaceutical wholesalers
and distributors, drug store chains, drug manufacturers, institutions, and public and governmental
agencies primarily within the United States (U.S.) and Canada (collectively, North America),
Europe, Middle East and Africa (collectively, EMEA), and Australia, Japan and New Zealand
(collectively, Asia Pacific). The Matrix Segment has a wide range of products in multiple
therapeutic categories and focuses mainly on developing API with non-infringing processes to
partner with generic manufacturers in regulated markets such as the U.S. and the European Union
(EU) at market formation. The principal market for the Specialty Segment is also pharmaceutical
wholesalers and distributors primarily in the U.S.
The Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name from Mylan Laboratories
Inc. to Mylan Inc., effective as of October 2, 2007.
Effective October 2, 2007, the Company amended its bylaws, to change the Companys fiscal year
from beginning April 1st and ending on March 31st, to beginning January 1st and ending on
December 31st.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
Mylan Inc. and those of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Non-controlling interests in the Companys
subsidiaries are recorded net of tax as minority interest.
On October 2, 2007, Mylan completed its acquisition of Merck KGaAs generics business (the
former Merck Generics business). Accordingly, Mylan began consolidating the results of operations
of the former Merck Generics business as of October 2, 2007 (see Note 3).
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of highly liquid
investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.
Available-for-Sale Securities. Debt and marketable equity securities are classified as
available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value, with net unrealized gains and losses, net of
income taxes, reflected in accumulated other comprehensive earnings as a component of shareholders
equity. Net realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities are computed on a
specific security basis and are included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Concentrations of Credit Risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
credit risk consist principally of interest-bearing investments, derivatives and accounts
receivable.
Mylan invests its excess cash in high-quality, liquid money market instruments, principally
overnight deposits, highly rated money market funds and market auction securities. The Company
maintains deposit balances at certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured
amounts. Periodically, the Company reviews the creditworthiness of its counterparties to derivative
transactions, and it does not expect to incur a loss from failure of any counterparties to perform
under agreements it has with such counterparties.
Mylan performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require
collateral. Approximately 37% and 34% of the accounts receivable balances represent amounts due
from three customers at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Total allowances for doubtful
accounts were $26.9 million and $38.1 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
10
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by
the first-in, first-out method. Provisions for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory,
including pre-launch inventory, are made based on our analysis of inventory levels, historical
obsolescence and future sales forecasts.
Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed and recorded on a straight-line basis over the
assets estimated service lives (3 to 19 years for machinery and equipment and 15 to 39 years for
buildings and improvements). The Company periodically reviews the original estimated useful lives
of assets and makes adjustments when appropriate. Depreciation expense was $122.8 million,
$57.1 million and $39.1 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the nine months
ended December 31, 2007 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, respectively.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill. Intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated
amortization. Amortization is generally recorded on a straight-line basis over estimated useful
lives ranging from 5 to 20 years. The Company periodically reviews the original estimated useful
lives of assets and makes adjustments when events indicate that a shorter life is appropriate.
The Company accounts for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting, which
requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at
their respective fair values. The cost to acquire a business, including transaction costs, is
allocated to the underlying net assets of the acquired business in proportion to their respective
fair values. Amounts allocated to acquired in-process research and development are expensed at the
date of acquisition. Definite lived intangible assets are amortized over the expected life of the
asset. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired
is recorded as goodwill.
The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can materially impact the Companys
results of operations. Fair values and useful lives are determined based on, among other factors,
the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset and
projected cash flows.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The carrying values of long-lived assets, which include
property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives, are evaluated periodically
in relation to the expected future cash flows of the underlying assets and monitored for other
potential triggering events. Adjustments are made in the event that estimated undiscounted net cash
flows are less than the carrying value.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually or when events or other changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable based on
managements assessment of the fair value of the Companys identified reporting units as compared
to their related carrying value. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying
value, additional steps, including an allocation of the estimated fair value to the assets and
liabilities of the reporting unit, would be necessary to determine the amount, if any, of goodwill
impairment.
Indefinite-lived intangibles are tested at least annually for impairment. Impairment is
determined to exist when the fair value is less than the carrying value of the assets being tested.
Other Assets. Investments in business entities in which the Company has the ability to exert
significant influence over operating and financial policies (generally 20% to 50% ownership) are
accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, investments are initially recorded
at cost and are adjusted for dividends, distributed and undistributed earnings and losses, changes
in foreign exchange rates, and additional investments. Other assets are periodically reviewed for
other-than-temporary declines in fair value.
Short-Term Borrowings. Matrix has a financing arrangement for the sale of its accounts
receivable with certain commercial banks. The commercial banks purchase the receivables at a
discount and Matrix records the proceeds as short-term borrowings. Upon receipt of payment of the
receivable, the short-term borrowings are reversed. As the banks have recourse to Matrix on the
receivables sold, the receivables are included in accounts receivable, net in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Additionally, Matrix has working capital facilities with several banks which are
secured first by Matrixs current assets and second by Matrixs property, plant and equipment. The
working capital facilities carry interest rates of 4%-14%.
Revenue Recognition. Mylan recognizes revenue for product sales when title and risk of loss
pass to its customers and when provisions for estimates, including discounts, rebates, price
adjustments, returns, chargebacks and other promotional programs, are reasonably determinable. No
revisions were made to the methodology used in determining these provisions during the calendar
year ended December 31, 2008. The following briefly describes the nature of each provision and how
such provisions are estimated.
11
Discounts are reductions to invoiced amounts offered to customers for payment within a
specified period and are estimated upon sale utilizing historical customer payment experience.
Rebates are offered to key customers to promote customer loyalty and encourage greater product
sales. These rebate programs provide that upon the attainment of pre-established volumes or the
attainment of revenue milestones for a specified period, the customer receives credit against
purchases. Other promotional programs are incentive programs periodically offered to our customers.
The Company is able to estimate provisions for rebates and other promotional programs based on the
specific terms in each agreement at the time of sale.
Consistent with industry practice, Mylan maintains a return policy that allows customers to
return product within a specified period prior to and subsequent to the expiration date. The
Companys estimate of the provision for returns is generally based upon historical experience with
actual returns.
Price adjustments, which include shelf stock adjustments, are credits issued to reflect
decreases in the selling prices of products. Shelf stock adjustments are based upon the amount of
product which the customer has remaining in its inventory at the time of the price reduction.
Decreases in selling prices are discretionary decisions made by the Company to reflect market
conditions. Amounts recorded for estimated price adjustments are based upon specified terms with
direct customers, estimated launch dates of competing products, estimated declines in market price
and, in the case of shelf stock adjustments, estimates of inventory held by the customer.
The Company has agreements with certain indirect customers, such as independent pharmacies,
managed care organizations, hospitals, nursing homes, governmental agencies and pharmacy benefit
management companies, which establish contract prices for certain products. The indirect customers
then independently select a wholesaler from which to actually purchase the products at these
contracted prices. Mylan will provide credit to the wholesaler for any difference between the
contracted price with the indirect party and the wholesalers invoice price. Such credit is called
a chargeback. The provision for chargebacks is based on expected sell-through levels by our
wholesaler customers to indirect customers, as well as estimated wholesaler inventory levels.
At March 31, 2007, as a result of significant uncertainties surrounding the Food and Drug
Administrations (FDAs) approval of additional abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) with
respect to a product launched by the Company in late March 2007, the Company was not able to
reasonably estimate the amount of potential price adjustments that would occur as a result of the
additional approvals. As a result, revenues on shipments of this product were deferred until such
uncertainties were resolved. Initially, such uncertainties were considered to be resolved upon our
customers sale of this product. During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as a result of
additional competition entering the market upon companies receiving final FDA approval, these
uncertainties were resolved and the Company was able to reasonably estimate the amount of potential
price adjustments. Accordingly, all revenues on shipments previously deferred were recognized and
revenue is currently being recorded as described above.
Accounts receivable are presented net of allowances relating to the above provisions. No
revisions were made to the methodology used in determining these provisions during the calendar
year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended December 31, 2007. Such allowances were
$496.5 million and $420.4 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Other current
liabilities include $236.3 million and $301.8 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
for certain rebates and other adjustments that are paid to indirect customers.
The Company periodically enters into various types of revenue arrangements with third-parties,
including agreements for the sale or license of product rights or technology, research and
development agreements, collaboration agreements and others. These agreements may include the
receipt of upfront and milestone payments, royalties, and payment for contract manufacturing and
other services.
The Company recognizes all non-refundable payments as revenue in accordance with the guidance
provided in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 104, Revenue Recognition, corrected copy, and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Non-refundable fees received upon
entering into license and other collaborative agreements where the Company has continuing
involvement are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as other revenue over an appropriate
period of time.
Royalty revenue from licensees, which are based on third-party sales of licensed products and
technology, is earned in accordance with the contract terms when third-party sales can be reliably
measured and collection of the funds is reasonably assured. Royalty revenue is included in other
revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
12
The Company recognizes contract manufacturing and other service revenue when the service is
performed or when the Companys partners take ownership and title has passed, collectability is
reasonably assured, the sales price is fixed or determinable and there is persuasive evidence of an
arrangement.
During the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, sales to McKesson Corporation and Cardinal
Health, Inc. represented 12% and 10% of consolidated net revenues. Sales to Cardinal Health, Inc.
and McKesson Corporation represented 11% and 16% of consolidated net revenues during the nine
months ended December 31, 2007. Sales to AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and
McKesson Corporation represented approximately 13%, 18% and 19%, respectively, of net revenues in
fiscal 2007.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses are charged to operations as
incurred.
Income Taxes. Income taxes have been provided for using an asset and liability approach in
which deferred income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future years of events that the Company
has already recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. Changes in enacted tax rates or
laws will result in adjustments to the recorded tax assets or liabilities in the period that the
new tax law is enacted.
(Loss) Earnings per Common Share. Basic (loss) earnings per share excludes dilution and is
computed by dividing net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted (loss) earnings per share is computed by
dividing net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the period increased by the number of additional shares that would have
been outstanding related to stock options, convertible instruments, warrants and other instruments
indexed in the Companys stock if the impact is dilutive.
With respect to the Companys convertible preferred stock, the Company considered the effect
on diluted earnings per share of the preferred stock conversion feature using the if-converted
method. The preferred stock is convertible into between 125,234,172 shares and 152,785,775 shares
of the Companys common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, depending on the average stock
price of its common stock over the 20 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to
conversion. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended December 31,
2007, the preferred stock conversion would have been anti-dilutive and, as such, was not assumed in
the computation of diluted loss per share.
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic (loss) earnings available to common shareholders
(numerator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings before preferred dividends |
|
$ |
(181,215 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,138,025 |
) |
|
$ |
217,284 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
139,035 |
|
|
|
15,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(320,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,154,024 |
) |
|
$ |
217,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (denominator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
304,360 |
|
|
|
257,150 |
|
|
|
215,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.49 |
) |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive (loss) earnings available to common shareholders
(numerator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(320,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,154,024 |
) |
|
$ |
217,284 |
|
Add: Preferred stock dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders and assumed conversions |
|
$ |
(320,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,154,024 |
) |
|
$ |
217,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (denominator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,024 |
|
Preferred stock conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dilutive shares outstanding assuming conversions |
|
|
304,360 |
|
|
|
257,150 |
|
|
|
219,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.49 |
) |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional stock options or restricted stock awards representing 20.7 million, 12.5 million
and 1.6 million shares were outstanding for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the nine
months ended December 31, 2007, and fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, respectively, but were not
included in the computation of diluted (loss) earnings per share because the effect would be
anti-dilutive.
13
During the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid dividends of $137.5 million
on the preferred stock. On January 29, 2009, the Company announced that a quarterly dividend of
$16.25 per share was declared (based on the annual dividend rate of 6.5% and a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share) payable on February 17, 2009, to the holders of preferred stock of
record as of February 1, 2009.
Stock Options. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), effective April 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R requires the recognition of the fair
value of stock-based compensation in net earnings. Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted
for its stock options using the intrinsic value method of accounting provided under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB No. 25),
and related Interpretations, as permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Share Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123).
Mylan adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, using the modified prospective transition
method. Under this method, compensation expense recognized in the calendar year ended December 31,
2008, the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007
includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to April 1, 2006, but
for which the requisite service period had not been completed as of April 1, 2006 based on the
grant date fair value, estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and
(b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to April 1, 2006, based on
the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.
Foreign Currencies. The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in the reporting
currency of Mylan, U.S. Dollars (USD). Statements of Operations and Cash Flows of all of the
Companys subsidiaries that have functional currencies other than USD are translated at a weighted
average exchange rate for the period, whereas assets and liabilities are translated at the end of
the period exchange rates. Translation differences are recorded directly in shareholders equity as
cumulative translation adjustments. Gains or losses on transactions denominated in a currency other
than the subsidiaries functional currency, which arise as a result of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Derivatives. From time to time the Company may enter into derivative instruments (mainly
foreign currency exchange forward contracts, purchased currency options, interest rate swaps and
purchased equity call options) designed to hedge the cash flows resulting from existing assets and
liabilities and transactions expected to be entered into over the next twelve months, in currencies
other than the functional currency, to hedge the variability in interest expense on floating rate
debt or to hedge cash or share payments required on conversion of issued convertible notes. When
such instruments qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133), they are recognized on the balance sheet with
the change in the fair value recorded as a component of other comprehensive income until the
underlying hedged item is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. When such
derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, they are recognized on the
balance sheet at their fair value, with changes in the fair value recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and included in other income, net.
Financial Instruments. The Companys financial instruments consist primarily of short-term and
long-term debt, interest rate swaps, forward contracts, and option contracts. The Companys
financial instruments also include cash and cash equivalents as well as accounts and other
receivables and accounts payable, the fair values of which approximate their carrying values. As a
policy, the Company does not engage in speculative or leveraged transactions, nor does the Company
hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments for the purpose of hedging foreign currency
and interest rate exposures, which exist as part of ongoing business operations or to hedge cash or
share payments required on conversion of issued convertible notes. The Company carries derivative
instruments on the balance sheet at fair value, determined by reference to market data such as
forward rates for currencies, implied volatilities and interest rate swap yield curves. The
accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been
designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements. The preparation of financial
statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP), requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Because of the uncertainty inherent in such
estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates.
14
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP No. EITF 03-6-1).
FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities
and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption
of FSP No. EITF 03-6-01 will not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP No. APB
14-1). Under the new rules for convertible debt instruments (including our Senior Convertible
Notes) that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion, an entity should
separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that
reflects the issuers economic interest cost. The effect of the new rules for the debentures is
that the equity component would be included in the paid-in-capital section of stockholders equity
on our consolidated balance sheet and the value of the equity component would be treated as
original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Senior Convertible
Notes. FSP No. APB 14-1 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
for interim periods within those fiscal years, with retrospective application required. Higher
interest expense will result through the accretion of the discounted carrying value of the Senior
Convertible Notes to their face amount over the term of the Senior Convertible Notes. Prior period
interest expense will also be higher than previously reported interest expense due to retrospective
application. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company evaluated the impact of adopting FSP
No. APB 14-1 on its Consolidated Financial Statements and determined that the retrospective
application will increase the net loss available to common shareholders by approximately
$10.0 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, and $15.0 million for calendar year
ended December 31, 2008. In addition, at December 31, 2008, additional paid-in capital will
increase by $85.0 million and long-term debt, retained earnings and tax assets will decrease by
$87.0 million, $26.0 million and $28.0 million, respectively.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP No. FAS 142-3). FSP No. FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142) in order to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)), and other
GAAP. FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of FSP No. FAS 142-3 will not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires
enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities, including (i) how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This standard is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Management is currently assessing the
impact of the disclosures on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF No. 07-5, Determining
Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock (EITF No. 07-5).
EITF No. 07-5 states that if an instrument (or an embedded feature) has the characteristics of a
derivative instrument under paragraphs 6-9 of SFAS No. 133, and is indexed to an entitys own
stock, it is necessary to evaluate whether it is classified in shareholders equity (or would be
classified in shareholders equity if it were a freestanding instrument). EITF No. 07-5 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of EITF No. 07-5 will
not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. E23, Hedging
General: Issues Involving the Application of the Shortcut Method under Paragraph 58 (Issue
No. E23). Issue No. E23 provides guidance on certain practice issues related to the application of
the shortcut method by amending paragraph 68 of SFAS No. 133 with respect to the conditions that
must be met in order to apply the shortcut method for assessing hedge effectiveness of interest
rate swaps. In addition to applying the provisions of Issue No. E23 on hedging arrangements
designated on or after January 1, 2008, an assessment was required to be made on January 1, 2008 to
determine whether preexisting hedging arrangements met the provisions of Issue No. E23 as of their
original inception. Management performed such an assessment and determined that the adoption of
Issue No. E23 did not have a material impact on preexisting hedging arrangements.
15
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis (the fair
value option) with changes in fair value reported in earnings. The Company already records
marketable securities at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115), and derivative contracts and hedging
activities at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have
a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements as management did not elect
the fair value option for any other financial instruments or certain other assets and liabilities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R). SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations, (SFAS No. 141) and retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141,
including that the purchase method be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be
identified for each business combination. This standard defines the acquirer as the entity that
obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the
acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control instead of the date that the
consideration is transferred. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer in a business combination,
including business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisition), to recognize the assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition
date, measured at their fair values at that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the
recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual
contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for any business combination with an acquisition date on or after
January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 141(R) on the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. This standard defines a noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest,
as the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.
SFAS No. 160 requires, among other items, that a noncontrolling interest be included in the
consolidated balance sheet within equity separate from the parents equity; consolidated net income
to be reported at amounts inclusive of both the parents and noncontrolling interests shares and,
separately, the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and noncontrolling
interest all on the consolidated statement of operations; and if a subsidiary is deconsolidated,
any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be measured at fair value
and a gain or loss be recognized in net income based on such fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Although certain captions and disclosures will
be revised, the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will not have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2007, the EITF issued EITF No. 06-10, Accounting for Collateral Assignment
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF No. 06-10). Under the provisions of EITF
No. 06-10, an employer is required to recognize a liability for the postretirement benefit related
to a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement with the employee. The
provisions of EITF No. 06-10 also require an employer to recognize and measure the asset in a
collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement based on the nature and substance of
the arrangement. The Company adopted the provisions of EITF No. 06-10 as of January 1, 2008. As a
result of the adoption, the Company recognized a liability of $8.3 million, representing the
present value of the future premium payments to be made under the existing policies. In accordance
with the transition provisions of EITF No. 06-10, this amount was recorded as a direct decrease to
retained earnings.
In March 2007, the EITF issued EITF No. 06-04, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsed Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF
No. 06-4), which concludes that an employer should recognize a liability for post-employment
benefits promised an employee based on the substantive arrangement between the employer and the
employee. The Company adopted the provisions of EITF No. 06-04 as of January 1, 2008. The adoption
of EITF No. 06-04 did not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Note 3. Acquisitions
Acquisition of the Former Merck Generics Business
On May 12, 2007, Mylan and Merck KGaA announced the signing of a definitive agreement under
which Mylan agreed to purchase Mercks generic pharmaceutical business in an all-cash transaction.
On October 2, 2007, Mylan completed its acquisition of the former Merck Generics business.
16
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, the Company used the purchase method of accounting to
account for this transaction. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the transaction were recorded at the date of acquisition at the estimate of
their respective fair values.
The purchase price plus acquisition costs exceeded the estimate of fair values of acquired
assets and assumed liabilities resulting in the recognition of goodwill in the preliminary amount
of $3.17 billion. This was a cash-free/debt-free transaction as defined in the Share Purchase
Agreement (SPA). The total purchase price, including acquisition costs of $38.7 million, was
approximately $7.0 billion. The operating results of the former Merck Generics business from
October 2, 2007 are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The allocation of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed for the former Merck Generics business as of the acquisition date
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Current assets (excluding inventories) |
|
$ |
765,495 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
645,449 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net(4) |
|
|
344,454 |
|
Identified intangible assets |
|
|
2,654,163 |
|
Other non-current assets(2) |
|
|
140,015 |
|
In-process research and development(1) |
|
|
1,269,036 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,166,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
8,984,617 |
|
Current liabilities(3) |
|
|
(820,444 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(1,020,040 |
) |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
(142,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
7,001,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount allocated to acquired in-process research and
development represents an estimate of the fair value of
purchased in-process technology for research projects that,
as of the closing date of the acquisition, had not reached
technological feasibility and had no alternative future
use. The fair value of the acquired in-process technology
and research projects was based on the excess earnings
method on a project-by-project basis. This amount was
written-off upon acquisition as acquired in-process
research and development expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in non-current assets is $137.1 million of
receivables for the agreement of Merck KGaA under the terms
of the SPA to indemnify Mylan for certain acquired
significant litigation (see Note 19). |
|
(3) |
|
Included in current liabilities are $74.3 million of
restructuring reserves that impacted goodwill. These
estimated exit costs are associated with involuntary
termination benefits for the former Merck Generics business
employees and costs to exit certain activities of the
former Merck Generics business and were recorded as a
liability in conjunction with recording the initial
purchase price. |
|
(4) |
|
Included in property, plant and equipment are $36.4 million
of asset writedowns that have impacted goodwill. These
writedowns relate to adjusting equipment and buildings down
to their expected residual value upon their sale or
closure. |
At December 31, 2007, as a result of the Companys preliminary allocation of goodwill,
approximately $2.4 billion and $711.2 million were allocated to its Generics Segment and Specialty
Segment.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has finalized the purchase price allocation. Finalization
of the purchase price allocation consisted of net adjustments to deferred tax liabilities,
adjustments to certain asset fair values, and additional restructuring liabilities. During the
calendar year ended December 31, 2008, a net decrease of approximately $53.1 million was recorded
to goodwill related to the finalization of the purchase price allocation (see Note 10).
The Company has finalized its plans to exit certain activities of the former Merck Generics
business as of December 31, 2008. As a result, the Company has a $67.0 million reserve at
December 31, 2008 related to involuntary termination benefits and certain other exit costs
accounted for in accordance with EITF No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Conjunction with a
Purchased Business Combination (EITF No. 95-3) (see Note 6).
17
In conjunction with the acquisition of the former Merck Generics business, the Company assumed
certain loss contingencies. As disclosed in Note 19 Contingencies, Merck KGaA has indemnified
Mylan under the provisions of the SPA for certain of these contingencies.
Also in conjunction with the acquisition, Mylan entered into a deal-contingent foreign
currency option contract in order to mitigate the risk of foreign currency exposure related to the
Euro-denominated purchase price. The contract was contingent upon the closing of the acquisition,
and included a premium of $121.9 million, which was paid upon such closing on October 2, 2007. The
value of the foreign currency option contract fluctuated depending on the value of the U.S. dollar
compared to the Euro. The Company accounted for this instrument under the provisions of
SFAS No. 133. This instrument did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 and
therefore was required to be adjusted to fair value with the change in the fair value of the
instrument recorded in current earnings. The Company recorded a gain of $85.0 million (net of the
premium), during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, related to the deal-contingent
foreign currency option contract. This amount is included within other income, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. In conjunction with the closing on October 2, 2007 of the
acquisition of the former Merck Generics business, this foreign currency option contract was
settled (net of the premium).
Acquisition of Matrix Laboratories Limited
On August 28, 2006, Mylan Inc. entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the Share Purchase
Agreement) to acquire, through MP Laboratories (Mauritius) Ltd, its wholly-owned indirect
subsidiary, a controlling interest in Matrix, a publicly traded company in India. Matrix is engaged
in the manufacture of APIs and solid oral dosage forms and is headquartered in Hyderabad, India.
Pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, Mylan agreed to pay a cash purchase price of 306
Rupees per share for approximately 51.5% of the outstanding share capital of Matrix held by certain
selling shareholders (the Selling Shareholders).
In accordance with applicable Indian law, MP Laboratories (Mauritius) Ltd, along with the
Company, commenced an open offer to acquire up to an additional 20% of the outstanding shares of
Matrix (the Public Offer) from Matrixs shareholders (other than the Selling Shareholders) on
November 22, 2006, which Public Offer expired on December 11, 2006. The price in the Public Offer
was 306 Rupees per share, in accordance with applicable Indian regulations.
On December 21, 2006, the Public Offer was completed and a total of 54,585,189 shares were
validly tendered, of which Mylan accepted 30,836,662 shares. Payment in the amount of
$210.6 million for the shares properly tendered and accepted was dispatched to the shareholders. On
January 8, 2007, Mylan completed its acquisition of approximately 51.5% of Matrixs outstanding
shares from the Selling Shareholders for approximately $545.6 million, thereby increasing its
ownership to approximately 71.5% of the voting share capital of Matrix. Including the Matrix
shareholdings maintained by Prasad Nimmagadda (one of the Selling Shareholders), which are subject
to a voting arrangement with Mylan, Mylan controls in excess of 75% of the voting share capital of
Matrix.
Following the closing of this transaction, certain of the Selling Shareholders used
approximately $168.0 million of their proceeds to acquire Mylan Inc. common stock from the Company
in a private sale at a price of $20.85 per share. In connection with these transactions a total of
8,058,139 shares were issued to the Selling Shareholders. For purchase accounting purposes, the
Company valued these shares at $20.32 per share, which represents Mylans average stock price for
the period two business days before and two business days after the August 28, 2006 announcement of
the acquisition.
As a result of Mylans aggregate ownership in Matrix, Mylan accounted for this transaction as
a purchase under SFAS No. 141 and has consolidated the results of operations of Matrix since
January 8, 2007. The purchase price has been allocated to the fair value of the tangible and
intangible assets and liabilities with the excess being recorded as goodwill as of the effective
date of the acquisition. As the acquisition was structured as a purchase of equity, the
amortization of the portion of the purchase price assigned to assets in excess of Matrixs historic
tax basis will not be deductible for income tax purposes.
18
The total purchase price of $776.2 million, including acquisition costs of $24.3 million, less
cash acquired of $10.9 million, was $765.2 million. The allocation of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed for Matrix is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Current assets (excluding cash and inventories) |
|
$ |
129,621 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
123,000 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
152,580 |
|
Identified intangible assets |
|
|
270,440 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
65,878 |
|
In-process research and development(1) |
|
|
147,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
505,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
1,394,320 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(374,458 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(106,470 |
) |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
(104,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
(584,973 |
) |
Total minority interest |
|
|
(44,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
765,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount allocated to acquired in-process research and
development represents an estimate of the fair value of
purchased in-process technology for research projects that,
as of the closing date of the acquisition, had not reached
technological feasibility and had no alternative future
use. The fair value of the acquired in-process technology
and research projects was based on the excess earnings
method on a project-by-project basis. This amount was
written-off upon acquisition as acquired in-process
research and development expense. |
In conjunction with the Matrix transaction, the Company entered into a foreign exchange
forward contract to purchase Indian Rupees with U.S. Dollars in order to mitigate the risk of
foreign currency exposure related to the Indian Rupee-denominated purchase price. The Company
accounted for this instrument under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. This instrument did not qualify
for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 and therefore was required to be adjusted to fair
value with the change in the fair value of the instrument recorded in current earnings. The Company
recorded a gain of $16.2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 related to this
deal-contingent forward contract. This amount is included within other income, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Pro forma financial results
The operating results of the former Merck Generics business have been included in Mylans
Consolidated Financial Statements since October 2, 2007. The operating results of Matrix have been
included in Mylans Consolidated Financial Statements since January 8, 2007. Pro forma results of
operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 included below assumes that the former Merck
Generics business acquisition occurred on April 1, 2007. Matrixs actual results of operations are
included in the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
Pro forma results of operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 included below assume both
acquisitions occurred on April 1, 2006. This summary of the unaudited pro forma results of
operations is not necessarily indicative of what Mylans results of operations would have been had
the former Merck Generics business and Matrix been acquired at the beginning of the periods
indicated, nor does it purport to represent results of operations for any future periods.
The unaudited pro forma financial information for each of periods below includes the following
material, non-recurring charges directly attributable to the accounting for the acquisitions: In
the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, amortization of the step-up of inventory of
$109.4 million and an acquired in-process research and development charge of $1.27 billion for the
former Merck Generics business. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, $141.7 million related to
the amortization of the step-up of inventory and an acquired in-process research and development
charge of $147.0 million for Matrix and $1.27 billion for the former Merck Generics business. In
addition, the pro forma financial information for each period presented includes the effects of the
preferred and common stock offerings closed in November 2007, the proceeds of which were used to
repay the Interim Term Loans (see Notes 12 and 14).
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,428,231 |
|
|
$ |
4,197,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before preferred dividend |
|
$ |
(1,290,242 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,311,466 |
) |
Preferred dividend |
|
|
(104,276 |
) |
|
|
(121,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,394,518 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,433,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(4.91 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(4.91 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
283,900 |
|
|
|
267,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
283,900 |
|
|
|
267,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2008, Mylan purchased from Watson Pharmaceutical Inc. a 50% interest in the
outstanding shares of Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mylan had previously owned the other 50% of
Somerset and had accounted for the investment using the equity method. This acquisition was not
material to the Companys statements of financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Note 4. Impairment of Long-lived Assets Including Goodwill
On February 27, 2008, the Company announced that it was reviewing strategic alternatives for
its specialty business, Dey, including the potential sale of the business. This decision was based
upon several factors, including a strategic review of the business, the expected performance of the
Perforomist® product, where anticipated growth was determined to be slower than expected
and the timeframe to reach peak sales was determined to be longer than was originally anticipated.
As a result of its ongoing review of strategic alternatives, the Company determined that it
was more likely than not that the business would be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly
before the end of its previously estimated useful life. Accordingly, a recoverability test of Deys
long-lived assets was performed during the three months ended March 31, 2008 in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). The
Company included both cash flow projections and estimated proceeds from the eventual disposition of
the long-lived assets. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows exceeded the book values of the
long-lived assets and, as a result, no impairment charge was recorded.
Upon the closing of the former Merck Generics business acquisition, Dey was defined as the
Specialty Segment under the provisions of SFAS No. 131. Dey is also considered a reporting unit
under the provisions of SFAS No. 142. Upon closing of the transaction, the Company allocated
$711.2 million of goodwill to Dey.
The Company tests goodwill for possible impairment on an annual basis and at any other time
events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired. As the
Company had determined that it was more likely than not that the business would be sold or
otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, the
Company was required, during the three months ended March 31, 2008, to assess whether any portion
of its recorded goodwill balance was impaired.
The first step of the SFAS No. 142 impairment analysis consisted of a comparison of the fair
value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including the goodwill. The Company performed
extensive valuation analyses, utilizing both income and market-based approaches, in its goodwill
assessment process. The following describes the valuation methodologies used to derive the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit.
Income Approach: To determine fair value, the Company discounted the expected future cash
flows of the reporting unit, using a discount rate, which reflected the overall level of inherent
risk and the rate of return an outside investor would have expected to earn. To estimate cash flows
beyond the final year of its model, the Company used a terminal value approach. Under this
approach, the Company used estimated operating income before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization in the final year of its model, adjusted to estimate a normalized cash flow, applied a
perpetuity growth assumption, and discounted by a perpetuity discount factor to determine the
terminal value. The Company incorporated the present value of the resulting terminal value into its
estimate of fair value.
20
Market-Based Approach: To corroborate the results of the income approach described above,
Mylan estimated the fair value of its reporting unit using several market-based approaches,
including the guideline company method which focused on comparing its risk profile and growth
prospects to a select group of publicly traded companies with reasonably similar guidelines.
Based on the SFAS No. 142 step one analysis that was performed for Dey, the Company
determined that the carrying amount of the net assets of the reporting unit was in excess of its
estimated fair value. As such, the Company was required to perform the step two analysis for Dey,
in order to determine the amount of any goodwill impairment. The step two analysis consisted of
comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill, with an
impairment charge resulting from any excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the implied
fair value of the goodwill based on a hypothetical allocation of the estimated fair value to the
net assets. Based on the second step analysis, the Company concluded that $385.0 million of the
goodwill recorded at Dey was impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill
impairment charge of $385.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008, which represented
its best estimate as of March 31, 2008. The allocation discussed above was performed only for
purposes of assessing goodwill for impairment; accordingly, Mylan has not adjusted the net book
value of the assets and liabilities on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet, other than
goodwill, as a result of this process.
The determination of the fair value of the reporting unit required the Company to make
significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reporting units expected future cash flows.
These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to, the discount rate,
terminal growth rates, operating income before depreciation and amortization, and capital
expenditures forecasts. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual
results could differ from those estimates. In addition, changes in underlying assumptions would
have a significant impact on either the fair value of the reporting unit or the goodwill impairment
charge.
The hypothetical allocation of the fair value of the reporting unit to individual assets and
liabilities within the reporting unit also requires the Company to make significant estimates and
assumptions. The hypothetical allocation requires several analyses to determine the estimate of the
fair value of assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (see Note 10).
In September 2008, following the completion of the comprehensive review of strategic
alternatives for Dey, the Company announced its decision to retain the Dey business. This decision
included a plan to realign the business, including positioning the Company to divest Deys current
facilities over the next two years (see Note 6). As a result, the Company expects to incur
severance and other exit costs. In addition, the comprehensive review resulted in the impairment of
certain non-core, insignificant, third-party products.
Note 5. Revenue Recognition
In January 2006, the Company announced an agreement with Forest Laboratories Holdings, Ltd.
(Forest), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Forest Laboratories, Inc., for the commercialization,
development and distribution of Bystolic® in the United States and Canada (the 2006
Agreement). Under the terms of that agreement, Mylan received a $75.0 million up-front payment and
$25.0 million upon approval of the product. Such amounts were being deferred until the commercial
launch of the product and were to be amortized over the remaining term of the license agreement.
Mylan also had the potential to earn future milestones and royalties on Bystolic sales and an
option to co-promote the product, while Forest assumed all future development and selling and
marketing expenses.
In February 2008, Mylan executed an agreement with Forest whereby Mylan sold to Forest its
rights to Bystolic (the Amended Agreement). Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, Mylan
received a one-time cash payment of $370.0 million, which was deferred along with the
$100.0 million received under the 2006 Agreement, and retained its contractual royalties for three
years, through 2010. Mylans obligations under the 2006 Agreement to supply Bystolic to Forest were
unchanged by the Amended Agreement. Mylan believed that these supply obligations represented
significant continuing involvement as Mylan remained contractually obligated to manufacture the
product for Forest while the product was being commercialized. As a result of this continuing
involvement, Mylan had been amortizing the $470.0 million of deferred revenue ratably through 2020
pending the transfer of manufacturing responsibility that was anticipated to occur in the second
half of 2008.
In September 2008, Mylan completed the transfer of all manufacturing responsibilities for the
product to Forest, and Mylans supply obligations have therefore been eliminated. The Company
believes that it no longer has significant continuing involvement and that the earnings process has
been completed. As such, the remaining deferred revenue of $455.0 million was recognized and
included in other revenues in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
21
Future royalties are considered to be contingent consideration and are recognized in other
revenues as earned upon sales of the product by Forest. Such royalties are recorded at the net
royalty rates specified in the Amended Agreement.
Note 6. Restructuring
The Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008, includes a $67.0 million
restructuring reserve, which relates to certain estimated exit costs associated with the
acquisition of the former Merck Generics business. The plans related to these exit activities have
now been finalized. Payments of approximately $9.4 million were made during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2008, of which $6.1 million were severance costs and the remaining $3.3 million were
other exit costs.
The Company announced its intent to restructure certain activities and incur certain related
exit costs, including related to the realignment of the Dey business. In accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities
(SFAS No. 146), the Company has recorded a reserve for such activities of which approximately
$8.0 million remains at December 31, 2008 and made payments of approximately $0.7 million. In
addition, the Company recorded approximately $3.7 million for the acceleration of depreciation
expense, during the calendar year ended December 31, 2008. As finalization of the plans are still
in progress, the Company has not yet estimated the total amount expected to be incurred in
connection with such activities. However, Mylan expects the majority of such costs will relate to
one-time termination benefits and certain asset write-downs and could be significant.
Note 7. Comparative Nine-Month Financial Information
Effective as of October 2, 2007, the Board of Directors of Mylan approved a change to its
fiscal year end from March 31st to December 31st. Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
nine months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below. All data for the nine months
ended December 31, 2006 are derived from the Companys unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
MYLAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
2,162,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,247 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
15,818 |
|
|
|
21,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,178,761 |
|
|
|
1,124,557 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,304,313 |
|
|
|
515,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
874,448 |
|
|
|
608,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
146,063 |
|
|
|
66,844 |
|
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
1,269,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
449,598 |
|
|
|
152,784 |
|
Litigation settlements, net |
|
|
(1,984 |
) |
|
|
(46,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,862,713 |
|
|
|
173,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings from operations |
|
|
(988,265 |
) |
|
|
435,347 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
179,410 |
|
|
|
31,292 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
86,611 |
|
|
|
39,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(1,081,064 |
) |
|
|
443,840 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
60,073 |
|
|
|
155,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings before minority interest |
|
|
(1,141,137 |
) |
|
|
288,573 |
|
Minority interest income |
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings before preferred dividends |
|
|
(1,138,025 |
) |
|
|
288,573 |
|
Preferred dividend |
|
|
15,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders |
|
|
(1,154,024 |
) |
|
|
288,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(4.49 |
) |
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(4.49 |
) |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
257,150 |
|
|
|
211,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
257,150 |
|
|
|
215,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Balance Sheet Components
Selected balance sheet components consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
273,232 |
|
|
$ |
255,744 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
157,473 |
|
|
|
160,918 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
635,285 |
|
|
|
647,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,065,990 |
|
|
$ |
1,063,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
56,945 |
|
|
$ |
62,824 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
577,182 |
|
|
|
583,097 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
1,012,748 |
|
|
|
980,340 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
110,721 |
|
|
|
125,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,757,596 |
|
|
|
1,751,943 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
693,600 |
|
|
|
649,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,063,996 |
|
|
$ |
1,102,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and employee benefit plan accruals |
|
$ |
181,316 |
|
|
$ |
136,232 |
|
Accrued rebates |
|
|
236,312 |
|
|
|
301,829 |
|
Fair value of financial instruments |
|
|
91,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal and professional accruals |
|
|
71,813 |
|
|
|
58,883 |
|
Other |
|
|
127,400 |
|
|
|
148,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
708,638 |
|
|
$ |
645,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9. Available-for-Sale Fixed Income Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale fixed income securities were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
$ |
42,146 |
|
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
|
$ |
(2,260 |
) |
|
$ |
41,658 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,146 |
|
|
$ |
2,374 |
|
|
$ |
(2,260 |
) |
|
$ |
42,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
$ |
88,806 |
|
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
|
$ |
(315 |
) |
|
$ |
90,239 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88,806 |
|
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
(315 |
) |
|
$ |
91,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of debt securities at fair value as of December 31, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Mature within one year |
|
$ |
2,819 |
|
Mature in one to five years |
|
|
14,115 |
|
Mature in five years and later |
|
|
24,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains of $0.1 million, $1.8 million and $0.8 million and gross losses of $0.2 million,
$1.5 million and $1.8 million were realized during the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the
nine months ended December 31, 2007 and fiscal year 2007, respectively.
23
The Company also had approximately $9.1 million and $40.6 million of auction rate securities
(ARS) at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. During the nine months ended December 31, 2007,
no auctions failed. During the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the securities were subject
to a failed auction in May 2008. These ARS continue to pay interest according to their terms. The
securities were issued by a state educational loan authority and are backed by student loans. The
state educational loan authority has requested and received required consent from bondholders to
amend the existing indentures governing the securities to add a call provision, which permits the
securities to be called at par after August 1, 2008. The Company does not believe these securities
are subject to any impairment as the Company has the intent and the ability to hold these
securities until maturity or until called.
Note 10. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A rollforward of goodwill from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008 and from March 31, 2007
to December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
3,855,971 |
|
Impairment loss on goodwill |
|
|
(385,000 |
) |
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
(309,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,161,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Goodwill balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
612,742 |
|
Acquisition of Merck Generics |
|
|
3,166,005 |
|
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
77,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
3,855,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in foreign currency translation and other for the calendar year ended December 31,
2008 is an approximate $53.1 million net decrease to goodwill related to the finalization of the
Merck Generics acquisition purchase price allocation. Finalization of the purchase price allocation
consisted of net adjustments to deferred tax liabilities, adjustments to certain asset fair values,
and additional restructuring liabilities.
At December 31, 2008, approximately $2.39 billion, $320.0 million and $455.4 million were
allocated to our Generics Segment, Specialty Segment and Matrix Segment, respectively.
Intangible assets consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Life |
|
|
Original |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
(Years) |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and technologies |
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
118,926 |
|
|
$ |
71,631 |
|
|
$ |
47,295 |
|
Product rights and licenses |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,738,191 |
|
|
|
433,169 |
|
|
|
2,305,022 |
|
Other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
129,563 |
|
|
|
28,719 |
|
|
|
100,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,986,680 |
|
|
$ |
533,519 |
|
|
$ |
2,453,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and technologies |
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
118,926 |
|
|
$ |
65,578 |
|
|
$ |
53,348 |
|
Product rights and licenses |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,961,712 |
|
|
|
152,865 |
|
|
|
2,808,847 |
|
Other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
129,031 |
|
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
|
116,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,209,669 |
|
|
$ |
230,963 |
|
|
$ |
2,978,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles consist principally of customer lists and contracts. As a result of the
acquisition of a controlling interest in Matrix the Company recorded intangible assets of
$270.4 million, primarily product rights and licenses, which have a weighted average
24
useful life of
eight years. As a result of the acquisition of the former Merck Generics business, the Company
recorded intangible assets of $2.65 billion, primarily product rights and licenses, which have a
weighted average useful life of 10 years (see Note 3).
Amortization expense, which is classified within cost of sales on the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations, for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the nine months ended
December 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was $368.2 million, $100.7 million and
$22.4 million, respectively, and is expected to be $298.5 million, $291.6 million, $283.1 million,
$267.7 million and $244.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 through 2013, respectively.
Included within amortization expense for calendar year ended December 31, 2008, is
approximately $65.7 million of non-cash intangible impairment charges related primarily to certain
non-core, insignificant, third-party manufactured products and assets.
Note 11. Financial Instruments and Risk Management
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
A significant portion of the Companys revenues and earnings are exposed to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. The Company seeks to manage its foreign exchange risk in part through
operational means, including managing same currency revenues in relation to same currency costs,
and same currency assets in relation to same currency liabilities.
Foreign exchange risk is also managed through the use of foreign currency forward-exchange
contracts. These contracts are used to hedge the potential earnings effects from mostly
intercompany foreign currency assets and liabilities that arise from operations and from
intercompany loans.
The Company enters into financial instruments to hedge or offset, by the same currency, a
portion of the currency risk and the timing of the hedged or offset item.
As of December 31, 2008, the more significant financial instruments employed to manage foreign
exchange risk are as follows:
|
|
|
812.4 million ($1.13 billion) of borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement that are
designated as a hedge of our net investment in certain Euro-functional currency
subsidiaries. The after-tax impact of revaluing these borrowings due to changes in spot
exchange rates is included in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of other
comprehensive (loss) earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity. |
|
|
|
|
$489.6 million net notional value of foreign exchange forward contracts maturing within
one month that serve to offset changes in spot exchange rates of intercompany foreign
currency denominated assets or liabilities. The Company recognizes the earnings impact of
these contracts in other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the
terms of the contracts, along with the earnings impact of the items they generally offset. |
As of December 31, 2007, the more significant financial instruments employed to manage foreign
exchange risk are as follows:
|
|
|
875.4 million ($1.23 billion) of borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement that are
designated as a hedge of our net investment in certain Euro-functional currency
subsidiaries. The after-tax impact of revaluing these borrowings due to changes in spot
exchange rates is included in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of other
comprehensive (loss) earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity. |
|
|
|
|
$345.6 million net notional value of foreign exchange forward contracts maturing within
one month that serve to offset changes in spot exchange rates of intercompany foreign
currency denominated assets or liabilities. The Company recognizes the earnings impact of
these contracts in other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the
terms of the contracts, along with the earnings impact of the items they generally offset. |
All derivative contracts used to manage foreign currency exchange risk are measured at fair
value and reported as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. Any ineffectiveness in a hedging
relationship is recognized immediately into earnings. There was no significant ineffectiveness
during the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 or the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
25
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys interest-bearing investments and borrowings are subject to interest rate risk.
The Company invests primarily on a variable-rate basis. The Company borrows on both a fixed and
variable-rate basis. From time to time, depending on market conditions,
the Company will fix interest rates either through entering into fixed-rate borrowings or
through the use of derivative financial instruments.
In 2008, the Company executed the following interest rate derivatives in order to fix the
interest rate on a portion of the Companys variable-rate U.S. Tranche B Term Loans under the
Senior Credit Agreement. These swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of expected future
borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement.
|
|
|
$500.0 million of notional interest rate swaps that fix a rate of 5.44% until March 2010 |
|
|
|
|
$500.0 million of notional interest rate swaps that fix a rate of 6.03% until December
2010 |
During the nine months ended December 31, 2007, the Company executed $1.0 billion of notional
interest rate swaps in order to fix the interest rate on a portion of the Companys U.S. Tranche B
Term Loans under the Senior Credit Agreement (see Note 12). These swaps are designated as cash flow
hedges of the variability of interest expense related to our variable rate debt and fix a rate of
7.37% until December 2010.
The Company recognizes the earnings impact of the interest rate swaps in interest expense in
the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations upon the recognition of the interest related to
the hedged items.
All derivative contracts used to manage interest rate risk are measured at fair value and
reported as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. Changes in fair value are reported in
earnings or deferred, depending on the nature and effectiveness of the offset. Any ineffectiveness
in a hedging relationship is recognized immediately in earnings. There was no significant
ineffectiveness during the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 or the nine months ended
December 31, 2007.
In February 2009, the Company executed an additional 200.0 ($277.8) million of notional
interest rate swaps in order to fix the interest rate on a portion of our Euro Tranche B Term
Loans. This swap fixes a rate of 5.38% on a portion of the Companys variable rate debt until
March 2011 and are designated as a cash flow hedge of expected future borrowings under the Senior
Credit Agreement.
Equity Risk
From time to time the Company may enter into derivative instruments to hedge cash or
share-based payments required on conversion of issued convertible notes.
Fair Value Measurement
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
(SFAS No. 157) for financial assets and liabilities and any other assets and liabilities carried
at fair value. This pronouncement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Companys adoption of SFAS No. 157
did not have a material effect on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
financial assets and liabilities and any other assets and liabilities carried at fair value.
Effective September 30, 2008, the Company adopted FSP No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair
Value of a Financial Asset when the Market for that Asset is not Active, (FSP No. FAS 157-3).
FAS No. FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and
provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The Companys adoption of FSP
No. FAS 157-3 did not have a material impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements,
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs
used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1
inputs.
26
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but
corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair
value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as
considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2008 are classified
in the table below in one of the three categories described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale fixed income investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,583 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,583 |
|
Available-for-sale equity securities |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602 |
|
Foreign exchange derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,632 |
|
Purchased cash convertible note hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,750 |
|
Auction rate securities(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,075 |
|
|
|
9,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value(1) |
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
282,965 |
|
|
$ |
9,075 |
|
|
$ |
292,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,402 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,402 |
|
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,395 |
|
Cash conversion feature of cash convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
327,547 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
327,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company chose not to elect the fair value option as prescribed by SFAS No. 159 for its financial assets
and liabilities that had not been previously carried at fair value. Therefore, material financial assets
and liabilities such as short-term and long-term debt obligations and trade accounts receivable and
payable, are still reported at their carrying values. |
|
(2) |
|
There have been no changes to the fair value of these securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. |
Due to the lack of observable market quotes on the Companys ARS portfolio, the Company
utilizes valuation models that rely exclusively on Level 3 inputs, including those that are based
on expected cash flow streams and collateral values. The Company has approximately $9.1 million in
ARS, which were subject to a failed auction in May 2008. These ARS continue to pay interest
according to their terms. The securities were issued by a state educational loan authority and are
backed by student loans. The state educational loan authority has requested and received required
consent from bondholders to amend the existing indentures governing the securities to add a call
provision, which permits the securities to be called at par after August 1, 2008. The Company does
not believe these securities are subject to any other than temporary impairment as the Company has
the intent and the ability to hold these securities until maturity or until called.
For financial assets and liabilities that utilize Level 2 inputs, the Company utilizes both
direct and indirect observable price quotes, including the LIBOR yield curve, foreign exchange
forward prices, and bank price quotes. Below is a summary of valuation techniques for Level 1 and
Level 2 financial assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Municipal bonds valued at the quoted market price from broker or dealer quotations or
transparent pricing sources at the reporting date. |
|
|
|
|
Other available-for-sale fixed income investments valued at the quoted market price
from broker or dealer quotations or transparent pricing sources at the reporting date. |
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities valued using quoted stock prices from the London Exchange at the
reporting date and translated to U.S. dollars at prevailing spot exchange rates. |
27
|
|
|
Interest rate swap derivative assets and liabilities valued using the LIBOR yield curve
at the reporting date. Counterparties to these contracts are highly rated financial
institutions, none of which experienced any significant downgrades during the calendar year
ended December 31, 2008, that would reduce the receivable amount owed, if any, to the
Company. |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative assets and liabilities valued using quoted forward foreign
exchange prices at the reporting date. Counterparties to these contracts are highly rated
financial institutions, none of which experienced any significant downgrades during the
calendar year ended December 31, 2008, that would reduce the receivable amount owed, if any,
to the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Feature of Cash Convertible Notes and Purchased Convertible Note Hedge
valued using quoted prices for the Companys cash convertible notes, its implied
volatility and the quoted yield on the Companys other long-term debt at the reporting date.
Counterparties to the Purchased Convertible Note Hedge are highly rated financial
institutions, none of which experienced any significant downgrades during the calendar year
ended December 31, 2008, that would reduce the receivable amount owed, if any, to the
Company. |
Although the Company has not elected the fair value option for financial assets and
liabilities existing at January 1, 2008 or transacted during the calendar year ended December 31,
2008, any future transacted financial asset or liability will be evaluated for the fair value
election as prescribed by SFAS No. 159 and adjusted to fair value as determined under the
provisions of SFAS No. 157.
Note 12. Long-Term Debt
A summary of long-term debt is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
U.S. Tranche A Term Loans(A) |
|
$ |
265,625 |
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
Euro Tranche A Term Loans(A) |
|
|
413,684 |
|
|
|
516,127 |
|
U.S. Tranche B Term Loans(A) |
|
|
2,504,880 |
|
|
|
2,556,000 |
|
Euro Tranche B Term Loans(A) |
|
|
714,583 |
|
|
|
773,273 |
|
Revolving Facility(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Senior Convertible Notes(B) |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
Cash Convertible Notes(C) |
|
|
655,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
14,586 |
|
|
|
54,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,168,800 |
|
|
$ |
5,112,094 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
405,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
5,165,419 |
|
|
$ |
4,706,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
On October 2, 2007, the Company entered into a credit
agreement (the Senior Credit Agreement) among the
Company, a wholly-owned European subsidiary (the Euro
Borrower), certain lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
National Association, as Administrative Agent, pursuant to
which the Company borrowed $500.0 million in Tranche A Term
Loans (the U.S. Tranche A Term Loans) and $2.0 billion in
Tranche B Term Loans (the U.S. Tranche B Term Loans), and
the Euro Borrower borrowed approximately 1.13 billion
($1.6 billion) in Euro Term Loans (the Euro Term Loans
and, together with the U.S. Tranche A Term Loans and the
U.S. Tranche B Term Loans, the Term Loans). The proceeds
of the Term Loans were used (1) to pay a portion of the
consideration for the acquisition of the former Merck
Generics business, (2) to refinance the 2007 credit
facility and the 2006 credit facility, (together the
Existing Credit Agreements), by and among the Company,
the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent, (3) to purchase the
Senior Notes tendered pursuant to the cash tender offers
therefore and (4) to pay a portion of the fees and expenses
in respect of the foregoing transactions (collectively, the
Transactions). The termination of the Existing Credit
Agreements was concurrent with, and contingent upon, the
effectiveness of the Senior Credit Agreement. The Senior
Credit Agreement also contains a $750.0 million revolving
facility (the Revolving Facility and, together with the
Term Loans, the Senior Credit Facilities) under which
either the Company or the Euro Borrower may obtain
extensions of credit, subject to the satisfaction of
specified conditions. In conjunction with the closing of
the former Merck Generics business acquisition the Company
borrowed $300.0 million under the Revolving Facility. The
Revolving Facility includes a $100.0 million subfacility
for the issuance of letters of credit and a $50.0 million
subfacility for swingline borrowings. Borrowings under the
Revolving Facility are available in U.S. dollars, Euro,
Pounds Sterling, Yen or other currencies that may be
agreed. The Euro Term Loans are guaranteed by the Company
and the Senior Credit Facilities are guaranteed by
substantially all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries
(the Guarantors). The Senior Credit Facilities are also
secured by a pledge of the capital stock of substantially
all direct subsidiaries of the Company and the Guarantors
(limited to 65% of outstanding voting stock of foreign
holding companies and any foreign subsidiaries) and
substantially all of the other tangible and intangible
property and assets of the Company and the Guarantors. The
Revolving Facility expires in October 2013. |
28
|
|
|
|
|
The U.S. Tranche A Term Loans currently bear interest at
LIBOR (determined in accordance with the Senior Credit
Agreement) plus 3% per annum, if the Company chooses to
make LIBOR borrowings, or at a base rate (determined in
accordance with the Senior Credit Agreement) plus 2% per
annum. The U.S. Tranche B Term Loans currently bear
interest at LIBOR (determined in accordance with the Senior
Credit Agreement) plus 3.25% per annum, if the Company
chooses to make LIBOR borrowings, or at a base rate
(determined in accordance with the Senior Credit Agreement)
plus 2.25% per annum. The Euro Tranche A Term Loans
currently bear interest at the Euro Interbank Offered Rate
(EURIBO) determined in accordance with the Senior Credit
Agreement) plus 3% per annum. The Euro Tranche B Term Loans
currently bear interest at the EURIBO determined in
accordance with the Senior Credit Agreement) plus 3.25% per
annum. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility currently
bear interest at LIBOR (or EURIBO, in the case of
borrowings denominated in Euro) plus 2.50% per annum, if
the Company chooses to make LIBOR (or EURIBO, in the case
of borrowings denominated in Euro) borrowings, or at a base
rate plus 1.50% per annum. The applicable margins over
LIBOR, EURIBO or the base rate for the Revolving Facility
and the U.S. Tranche A Term Loans can fluctuate based on a
calculation of the Companys Consolidated Leverage Ratio as
defined in the Senior Credit Agreement. The Company also
pays a facility fee on the entire amount of the Revolving
Facility. The facility fee is currently 0.50% per annum,
but can decrease to 0.375% per annum based on the Companys
Consolidated Leverage Ratio. |
|
|
|
The Senior Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative
covenants for facilities of this type, including covenants
pertaining to the delivery of financial statements, notices
of default and certain other information, maintenance of
business and insurance, collateral matters and compliance
with laws, as well as customary negative covenants for
facilities of this type, including limitations on the
incurrence of indebtedness and liens, mergers and certain
other fundamental changes, investments and loans,
acquisitions, transactions with affiliates, dispositions of
assets, payments of dividends and other restricted
payments, prepayments or amendments to the terms of
specified indebtedness (including the Interim Credit
Agreement described below) and changes in lines of
business. The Senior Credit Agreement contains financial
covenants requiring maintenance of a minimum interest
coverage ratio and a senior leverage ratio, both of which
are defined within the agreement. |
|
|
|
The Senior Credit Agreement contains default provisions
customary for facilities of this type, which are subject to
customary grace periods and materiality thresholds,
including, among other things, defaults related to payment
failures, failure to comply with covenants,
misrepresentations, defaults or the occurrence of a change
of control under other material indebtedness, bankruptcy
and related events, material judgments, certain events
related to pension plans, specified changes in control of
the Company and invalidity of guarantee and security
agreements. If an event of default occurs under the Senior
Credit Agreement, the lenders may, among other things,
terminate their commitments, declare immediately payable
all borrowings and foreclose on the collateral. |
|
|
|
The U.S. Tranche A Term Loans and the Euro Tranche A Term
Loans mature on October 2, 2013. The U.S. Tranche B Term
Loans and the Euro Tranche B Term Loans mature on
October 2, 2014. The U.S. Tranche B Term Loans and the Euro
Term Loans amortize quarterly at the rate of 1.0% per annum
beginning in 2008. The Senior Credit Agreement requires
prepayments of the Term Loans with (1) up to 50% of Excess
Cash Flow, as defined within the Senior Credit Agreement,
beginning in 2009, with reductions based on the Companys
Consolidated Leverage Ratio, (2) the proceeds from certain
asset sales and casualty events, unless the Companys
Consolidated Leverage Ratio is equal to or less than 3.5 to
1.0, and (3) the proceeds from certain issuances of
indebtedness not permitted by the Senior Credit Agreement.
Amounts drawn on the Revolving Facility become due and
payable on October 2, 2013. The Term Loans and amounts
drawn on the Revolving Facility may be voluntarily prepaid
without penalty or premium. |
|
|
|
In addition, on October 2, 2007, the Company entered into a
credit agreement (the Interim Credit Agreement) among the
Company, certain lenders and Merrill Lynch Capital
Corporation, as Administrative Agent, pursuant to which the
Company borrowed $2.85 billion in term loans (the Interim
Term Loans). The proceeds of the Interim Term Loans were
used to finance in part the acquisition of the former Merck
Generics business. On November 19, 2007, the Interim Term
Loans were paid using primarily the proceeds received from
the preferred stock and common stock issuances of
$2.82 billion and the remaining $28.1 million was paid
using existing cash of the Company. |
|
|
|
On December 20, 2007, the Euro Borrower, certain lenders
and the Administrative Agent entered into an Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement (the Amended Senior Credit
Agreement), which became effective December 28, 2007,
that, among other things, amends certain provisions of the
Original Senior Credit Agreement as set out below. |
|
|
|
The Amended Senior Credit Agreement (i) reduced the
principal amount of the U.S. Tranche A Term Loans of the
Company to an aggregate principal amount of $312.5 million,
(ii) increased the principal amount of the U.S. Tranche B
Term Loans of the Company to an aggregate principal amount
of $2.56 billion, (iii) created a tranche of Euro Tranche A
Term Loans of the Euro Borrower in an aggregate principal
amount of 350.4 ($516.1) million and (iv) reduced the Euro
Tranche B Term Loans of the Euro Borrower to an aggregate
principal amount of 525.0 ($773.3) million. |
|
|
|
The Euro Tranche A Term Loans currently bear interest at
EURIBO (determined in accordance with the Amended Senior Credit |
29
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement) plus 3.25% per annum. Under the terms of
the Amended Senior Credit Agreement, the applicable margin
over EURIBO for the Euro Tranche A Term Loans can fluctuate
based on the Companys Consolidated Leverage Ratio. |
|
|
|
The Amended Senior Credit Agreement added a prepayment
premium of 1.0% of the principal amount of the U.S.
Tranche B Term Loans or Euro Tranche B Term Loans prepaid
in connection with voluntary and certain mandatory
prepayments during the 12 months following the date of
effectiveness of the Amended Senior Credit Agreement. |
|
|
|
During the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the
company paid $46.9 million on the U.S. Tranche A Term
Loans, which included $31.3 million of prepayments related
to 2009, 52.6 ($74.4) million on the Euro Tranche A Term
Loans, which included 35.0 ($49.6) million of prepayments
related to 2009, $51.1 million on the U.S. Tranche B Term
Loans, which included $25.6 million of prepayments related
to 2009, and 10.5 ($15.2) million on the Euro Tranche B
Term Loans, which included 5.3 ($7.4) million of
prepayments related to 2009. On September 15, 2008, the
outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility were
repaid in the amount of $300.0 million using proceeds from
the Cash Convertible Notes. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had
outstanding letters of credit of $83.6 million and
$51.3 million. |
|
(B) |
|
On March 1, 2007, Mylan entered into a purchase agreement
relating to the sale by the Company of $600.0 million
aggregate principal amount of the Companys 1.25% Senior
Convertible Notes due 2012 (the Senior Convertible
Notes). The Senior Convertible Notes bear interest at a
rate of 1.25% per year, accruing from March 7, 2007.
Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and
September 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2007.
The Senior Convertible Notes will mature on March 15, 2012,
subject to earlier repurchase or conversion. Holders may
convert their notes subject to certain conversion
provisions determined by, among others, the market price of
the Companys common stock and the trading price of the
Senior Convertible Notes. The Senior Convertible Notes have
an initial conversion rate of 44.5931 shares of common
stock per $1,000 principal amount (equivalent to an initial
conversion price of approximately $22.43 per share),
subject to adjustment, with the principal amount payable in
cash and the remainder in cash or stock at the option of
the Company. The accounting related to the Senior
Convertible Notes will change in accordance with the
adoption of FSP No. APB 14-1 (see Note 2). |
|
|
|
On March 1, 2007, concurrently with the sale of the Senior
Convertible Notes, Mylan entered into a convertible note
hedge transaction, comprised of a purchased call option,
and two warrant transactions with each of Merrill Lynch
International, an affiliate of Merrill Lynch, and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch, an
affiliate of JPMorgan, each of which the Company refers to
as a counterparty. The net cost of the transactions was
$80.6 million. The purchased call options will cover
approximately 26.8 million shares of Mylan common stock,
subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar
to the anti-dilution adjustments for the Senior Convertible
Notes, which under most circumstances represents the
maximum number of shares that underlie the Senior
Convertible Notes. Concurrently with entering into the
purchased call options, the Company entered into warrant
transactions with the counterparties. Pursuant to the
warrant transactions, the Company will sell to the
counterparties warrants to purchase in the aggregate
approximately 26.8 million shares of Mylan common stock,
subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. The
warrants may not be exercised prior to the maturity of the
Senior Convertible Notes, subject to certain limited
exceptions. |
|
|
|
The purchased call options are expected to reduce the
potential dilution upon conversion of the Senior
Convertible Notes in the event that the market value per
share of Mylan common stock at the time of exercise is
greater than approximately $22.43, which corresponds to the
initial conversion price of the Senior Convertible Notes.
The sold warrants have an exercise price that is 60.0%
higher than the price per share of $19.50 at which the
Company offered common stock in a concurrent equity
offering. If the market price per share of Mylan common
stock at the time of conversion of any Senior Convertible
Notes is above the strike price of the purchased call
options, the purchased call options will, in most cases,
entitle the Company to receive from the counterparties in
the aggregate the same number of shares of our common stock
as the Company would be required to issue to the holder of
the converted Senior Convertible Notes. Additionally, if
the market price of Mylan common stock at the time of
exercise of the sold warrants exceeds the strike price of
the sold warrants, the Company will owe the counterparties
an aggregate of approximately 26.8 million shares of Mylan
common stock. The purchased call options and sold warrants
may be settled for cash at the Companys election. |
|
|
|
The purchased call options and sold warrants are separate
transactions entered into by the Company with the
counterparties, are not part of the terms of the Senior
Convertible Notes, and will not affect the holders rights
under the Senior Convertible Notes. Holders of the Senior
Convertible Notes will not have any rights with respect to
the purchased call options or the sold warrants. The
purchased call options and sold warrants meet the
definition of derivatives under SFAS No. 133 (as amended by
SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments
and Certain Hedging Activities and SFAS No. 149, Amendment
of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities). However, because these instruments have been
determined to be indexed to the Companys own stock (in
accordance with the guidance of EITF Issue No. 01-6, The
Meaning of Indexed to a Companys Own Stock (EITF Issue
No. 01-6)) and have been recorded in stockholders equity
in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet (as determined
under EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments Indexed to, and |
30
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially Settled
in, a Companys Own Stock (EITF Issue No. 00-19)), the
instruments are exempted from the scope of SFAS No. 133 and
are not subject to the fair value provisions of that
standard. |
|
(C) |
|
On September 15, 2008, Mylan entered into a purchase
agreement relating to the sale by the Company of
$575.0 million aggregate principal amount of Cash
Convertible Notes due 2015 (Cash Convertible Notes). The
Cash Convertible Notes bear stated interest at a rate of
3.75% per year, accruing from September 15, 2008. The
effective interest rate at December 31, 2008 is 9.5%.
Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15
and September 15 of each year, beginning on March 15, 2009.
The Cash Convertible Notes will mature on September 15,
2015, subject to earlier repurchase or conversion. Holders
may convert their notes subject to certain conversion
provisions determined by the market price of the Companys
common stock, specified distributions to common
shareholders, a fundamental change, and certain time
periods specified in the purchase agreement. The Cash
Convertible Notes have an initial conversion reference rate
of 75.0751 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal
amount (equivalent to an initial conversion reference price
of $13.32 per share), subject to adjustment, with the
principal amount and remainder payable in cash. The Cash
Convertible Notes are not convertible into our common stock
or any other securities under any circumstance. |
|
|
|
On September 15, 2008, concurrent with the sale of the Cash
Convertible Notes, Mylan entered into a convertible note
hedge and warrant transaction with certain counterparties.
The net cost of the transactions was $98.6 million. The
cash convertible note hedge is comprised of purchased
cash-settled call options that are expected to reduce the
Companys exposure to potential cash payments required to
be made by Mylan upon the cash conversion of the Cash
Convertible Notes. Concurrent with entering into the
purchased cash-settled call options, the Company entered
into respective warrant transactions with the
counterparties pursuant to which the Company has sold to
each counterparty warrants for the purchase of shares of
our common stock. Pursuant to the warrant transactions, the
Company sold to the counterparties warrants to purchase in
the aggregate up to approximately 43.2 million shares of
Mylan common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments
substantially similar to the anti-dilution adjustments for
the Cash Convertible Notes, which under most circumstances
represents the maximum number of shares that underlie the
conversion reference rate for the Cash Convertible Notes.
The warrants may not be exercised prior to the maturity of
the Cash Convertible Notes. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the call option transactions, if the market
price per share of the Companys common stock at the time
of cash conversion of any Cash Convertible Notes is above
the strike price of the purchased cash-settled call
options, such call options will, in most cases, entitle us
to receive from the counterparties in the aggregate the
same amount of cash as we would be required to issue to the
holder of the cash converted notes in excess of the
principal amount thereof. The sold warrants have an
exercise price of $20.00 (which represents an exercise
price of approximately 80% higher than the market price per
share of $11.10) and are net share settled, meaning that
Mylan will issue a number of shares per warrant
corresponding to the difference between our share price at
each warrant expiration date and the exercise price. |
|
|
|
The purchased call options and sold warrants are separate
contracts entered into by us with the counterparties, are
not part of the notes and do not affect the rights of
holders under the Cash Convertible Notes. Holders of the
Cash Convertible Notes will not have any rights with
respect to the purchased call options or the sold warrants.
The purchased cash-settled call options meet the definition
of derivatives under SFAS No. 133. As such, the instrument
is marked to market each period. In addition, the liability
associated with the cash conversion feature of the Cash
Convertible Notes is marked to market each period. At
December 31, 2008, the $655.4 million consists of
$419.7 million of debt ($575.0 million face amount, net of
$155.3 million discount) and a liability with a fair value
of $235.8 million related to the bifurcated conversion
feature. The purchased call options are assets recorded at
their fair value of $235.8 million within other assets in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008. The
warrants meet the definition of derivatives under
SFAS No. 133; however, because these instruments have been
determined to be indexed to the Companys own stock (in
accordance with the guidance of EITF Issue No. 01-6 and
have been recorded in shareholders equity in the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets (as determined under EITF Issue
No. 00-19), the instruments are exempt from the scope of
SFAS No. 133 and are not subject to the fair value
provisions of that standard. |
31
Details of the interest rates in effect at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 on the
outstanding borrowings under the Term Loans are in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
(in thousands, except interest rates) |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Basis |
|
Rate |
|
U.S. Tranche A Term Loans |
|
$ |
265,625 |
|
|
LIBOR + 3% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
Euro Tranche A Term Loans |
|
$ |
413,684 |
|
|
EURIBO + 3% |
|
|
7.86 |
% |
U.S. Tranche B Term Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swapped to Fixed Rate December 2010(1) |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
6.03 |
% |
Swapped to Fixed Rate March 2010(1)(2) |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
Swapped to Fixed Rate December 2010(1) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
7.37 |
% |
Floating Rate |
|
|
504,880 |
|
|
LIBOR + 3.25% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Tranche B Term Loans |
|
$ |
2,504,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Tranche B Term Loans |
|
$ |
714,583 |
|
|
EURIBO + 3.25% |
|
|
8.11 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Designated as a cash flow hedge of expected future
borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement |
|
(2) |
|
This interest rate swap has been extended to March 2012 at
a rate of 5.38%, effective March 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
(in thousands, except interest rates) |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Basis |
|
Rate |
|
U.S. Tranche A Term Loans |
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
|
LIBOR + 3.25% |
|
|
8.31 |
% |
Euro Tranche A Term Loans |
|
$ |
516,127 |
|
|
EURIBO + 3.25% |
|
|
7.75 |
% |
U.S. Tranche B Term Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swapped to Fixed Rate December 2010 |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
7.37 |
% |
Floating Rate |
|
|
1,556,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 3.25% |
|
|
8.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Tranche B Term Loans |
|
$ |
2,556,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Tranche B Term Loans |
|
$ |
773,273 |
|
|
EURIBO + 3.25% |
|
|
7.75 |
% |
All financing fees associated with the Companys borrowings are being amortized over the life
of the related debt. The total unamortized amounts of $83.8 million and $83.0 million are included
in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
In conjunction with the refinancing of debt, approximately $12.1 million of deferred financing
fees were written off for the Senior Notes and Credit Facilities on October 2, 2007. There was also
a tender offer premium to the Senior Notes holders made in the amount of approximately
$30.8 million. In conjunction with the financing for the former Merck Generics business
acquisition, Mylan incurred approximately $132.4 million in financing fees, of which approximately
$42.8 million were refunded from our financial institution upon the repayment of the Interim Term
Loans, and an additional $14.3 million was expensed.
At December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the fair value of the Senior Convertible Notes was
approximately $444.0 million and $545.5 million. At December 31, 2008, the fair value of the Cash
Convertible Notes was approximately $524.4 million.
Certain of the Companys debt agreements contain certain cross-default provisions.
Mandatory minimum repayments remaining on the outstanding borrowings under the term loans and
convertible notes at December 31, 2008 are as follows for each of the periods ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Euro |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Euro |
|
|
Senior |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tranche A |
|
|
Tranche A |
|
|
Tranche B |
|
|
Tranche B |
|
|
Convertible |
|
|
Convertible |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Term Loans |
|
|
Term Loans |
|
|
Term Loans |
|
|
Term Loans |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Total |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
46,875 |
|
|
|
73,003 |
|
|
|
25,560 |
|
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,730 |
|
2011 |
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
97,338 |
|
|
|
25,560 |
|
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,690 |
|
2012 |
|
|
78,125 |
|
|
|
121,672 |
|
|
|
25,560 |
|
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832,649 |
|
2013 |
|
|
78,125 |
|
|
|
121,671 |
|
|
|
25,560 |
|
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,648 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,402,640 |
|
|
|
685,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,088,055 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655,442 |
|
|
|
655,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
265,625 |
|
|
$ |
413,684 |
|
|
$ |
2,504,880 |
|
|
$ |
714,583 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
655,442 |
|
|
$ |
5,154,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Note 13. Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Federal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
219,370 |
|
|
$ |
101,659 |
|
|
$ |
242,434 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(90,470 |
) |
|
|
(29,343 |
) |
|
|
(46,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,900 |
|
|
|
72,316 |
|
|
|
195,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
28,226 |
|
|
|
9,598 |
|
|
|
16,746 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
15,978 |
|
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
|
(3,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,204 |
|
|
|
11,501 |
|
|
|
13,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
79,187 |
|
|
|
23,413 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(114,868 |
) |
|
|
(47,157 |
) |
|
|
(1,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,681 |
) |
|
|
(23,744 |
) |
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
137,423 |
|
|
$ |
60,073 |
|
|
$ |
208,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax (loss) earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
(303,167 |
) |
|
$ |
(413,886 |
) |
|
$ |
586,298 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
255,344 |
|
|
|
(667,178 |
) |
|
|
(160,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(47,823 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,081,064 |
) |
|
$ |
425,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
(287.4 |
)% |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary differences and carry forwards that result in the deferred tax assets and
liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits |
|
$ |
48,868 |
|
|
$ |
40,038 |
|
|
$ |
16,501 |
|
Legal matters |
|
|
65,988 |
|
|
|
59,388 |
|
|
|
5,048 |
|
Accounts receivable allowances |
|
|
145,579 |
|
|
|
152,123 |
|
|
|
126,191 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
23,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,859 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,250 |
|
Investments |
|
|
16,852 |
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
7,256 |
|
Other reserves |
|
|
26,158 |
|
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
Net operating losses |
|
|
134,779 |
|
|
|
99,289 |
|
|
|
17,111 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
42,733 |
|
|
|
40,514 |
|
|
|
44,100 |
|
Other |
|
|
82,428 |
|
|
|
20,885 |
|
|
|
3,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591,501 |
|
|
|
426,900 |
|
|
|
275,229 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
(110,194 |
) |
|
|
(76,100 |
) |
|
|
(18,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
481,307 |
|
|
|
350,800 |
|
|
|
256,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
16,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment |
|
|
77,056 |
|
|
|
67,425 |
|
|
|
40,698 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
663,987 |
|
|
|
947,009 |
|
|
|
98,285 |
|
Investments |
|
|
2,541 |
|
|
|
9,813 |
|
|
|
10,779 |
|
Other |
|
|
66,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
812,592 |
|
|
|
1,041,144 |
|
|
|
151,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax (liabilities) assets, net |
|
$ |
(331,285 |
) |
|
$ |
(690,344 |
) |
|
$ |
105,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit current |
|
$ |
199,278 |
|
|
$ |
192,113 |
|
|
$ |
145,343 |
|
Deferred income tax liability current |
|
|
(1,935 |
) |
|
|
(24,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit noncurrent |
|
|
16,493 |
|
|
|
18,703 |
|
|
|
45,779 |
|
Deferred income tax liability noncurrent |
|
|
(545,121 |
) |
|
|
(876,816 |
) |
|
|
(85,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax (liability) asset, net |
|
$ |
(331,285 |
) |
|
$ |
(690,344 |
) |
|
$ |
105,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
A reconciliation of the statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2007 |
Statutory tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and Puerto Rico income taxes and credits |
|
|
(41.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Research and Development tax credits |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Acquired In-Process R & D |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(41.1 |
)% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Effect of foreign operations |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
(281.8 |
)% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other items |
|
|
(14.0 |
)% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
(287.4 |
)% |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance
A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance has been applied to certain
foreign and state deferred tax assets in the amount of $110.2 million.
Net Operating Losses
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for international
and U.S. state income tax purposes of approximately $1.06 billion, some of which will expire in
fiscal years 2009 through 2029, while others can be carried forward indefinitely. Of these loss
carryforwards, there is an amount of $568.1 million related to state losses. A majority of the
state net operating losses are attributable to Pennsylvania, where a taxpayers use is limited to
the greater of 12.5% of taxable income or $3.0 million each taxable year. In addition, the Company
has foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $494.7 million, of which
$367.6 million can be carried forward indefinitely, with the remainder expiring in years 2009
through 2023. Most of the net operating losses (foreign and state) are fully reserved.
Acquired In-Process Research and Development
On January 8, 2007, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Matrix, as discussed in
Note 3. Of the purchase price, $147.0 million was allocated to acquired in-process research and
development and expensed. This amount is not deductible for tax purposes, and no deferred tax
benefit is recorded, as required by EITF Issue No. 96-7, Accounting for Deferred Taxes on
In-Process Research and Development Activities Acquired in a Purchase Business Combination (EITF
No. 96-7).
On October 2, 2007, the Company acquired the former Merck Generics business. Of the purchase
price, $1.27 billion was allocated to acquired in-process research and development and expensed.
Applying the guidance in EITF No. 96-7, we determined that this amount is not deductible for tax
purposes.
Undistributed Earnings
Operations in Puerto Rico benefit from incentive grants from the government of Puerto Rico,
which partially exempt the Company from income, property and municipal taxes. In fiscal 2001, a tax
grant was negotiated with the government of Puerto Rico, extending tax incentives until fiscal
years 2010. This grant exempts all earnings during this grant period from tollgate tax upon
repatriation of cash to the United States. In fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2004, $46.5 million
and $100.0 million of cash from post-fiscal 2000 earnings was repatriated to the United States.
Pursuant to the terms of our tax grant, no tollgate tax was due for these repatriations.
Federal Tax Credits and Ongoing IRS Examinations
Federal tax credits result principally from qualified research and development expenditures in
the United States. State tax credits are comprised mainly of awards for expansion and wage credits
at the Companys manufacturing facilities and research credits awarded by certain states. State
income taxes and state tax credits are shown net of the federal tax effect.
Beginning with fiscal year 2007, Mylan became a voluntary participant in the IRS Compliance
Assurance Process (CAP) which results in real-time federal issue resolution. The calendar year
2007 CAP return was filed in the third quarter of calendar year 2008 and a Partial Acceptance
Letter was received. Mylan did not reach agreement on a single issue that will be audited in
accordance with regular IRS processes. The Company anticipates that the CAP 2007 year will be
settled in the first quarter of 2009. Tax and interest continue to be accrued related to certain
tax positions.
34
FIN 48
Effective April 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, which prescribes a comprehensive model
for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements
uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. Though the
validity of any tax position is a matter of tax law, the body of statutory, regulatory and
interpretive guidance on the application of the law is complex and often ambiguous. Because of
this, whether a tax position will ultimately be sustained may be uncertain. Prior to April 1, 2007,
the impact of an uncertain tax position that did not create a difference between the financial
statement basis and the tax basis of an asset or liability was included in our income tax provision
if it was probable the position would be sustained upon audit. The benefit of any uncertain tax
position that was temporary was reflected in our tax provision if it was more likely than not that
the position would be sustained upon audit. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, Mylan recognized
interest expense based on our estimates of the ultimate outcomes of the uncertain tax positions.
Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain tax position that is more likely than not of being
sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority must be recognized at the largest amount that
is more likely than not to be sustained. No portion of an uncertain tax position will be recognized
if the position has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Also, under FIN 48, interest
expense is recognized on the full amount of deferred benefits for uncertain tax positions.
As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet
reflects a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $166.5 million and $77.6 million. Accrued
interest and penalties included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet were $34.8 million and
$24.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. For the calendar year ended
December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended December 31, 2007, Mylan recognized $8.9 million and
$1.8 million for interest expense related to uncertain tax positions.
The major state taxing jurisdictions applicable to the Company remain open from fiscal year
2005 through fiscal year 2008. The major taxing jurisdictions for the Company internationally
remain open from 2002 through 2008 some of which are indemnified by Merck KGaA for tax assessments.
A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008
and from March 31, 2007 to December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized Tax |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Benefits |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
77,600 |
|
Additions for current year tax positions |
|
|
49,169 |
|
Additions for prior year tax positions |
|
|
538 |
|
Reductions for prior year tax positions |
|
|
(3,313 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to expirations of statute of limitations |
|
|
(4,819 |
) |
Addition due to cumulative adjustment |
|
|
47,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
166,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized Tax |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Benefits |
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
42,900 |
|
Additions for current year tax positions |
|
|
5,700 |
|
Additions for prior year tax positions |
|
|
4,400 |
|
Reductions for prior year tax positions |
|
|
(3,300 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
(10,500 |
) |
Reductions related to expirations of statute of limitations |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
Addition due to cumulative adjustment |
|
|
39,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
77,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with Mylans accounting policy, both before and after adoption of FIN 48,
interest expense and penalties related to income taxes are included in the tax provision.
35
It is anticipated that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease in the next
twelve months. The Company foresees issues involving purchase accounting, state tax audits and the
expiration of certain statutes of limitations having a significant impact on its results of
operations, cash flows and financial position. We expect the range of the decrease of our existing
reserve to be between $20.0 million and $35.0 million. We do not anticipate significant increases
to the reserve within the next twelve months.
Note 14. Preferred and Common Stock
The Company entered into a Rights Agreement (the Rights Agreement) with American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent, to provide the Board with sufficient time to assess and
evaluate any takeover bid and explore and develop a reasonable response. Effective November 1999,
the Rights Agreement was amended to eliminate certain limitations on the Boards ability to redeem
or amend the rights to permit an acquisition and also to eliminate special rights held by incumbent
directors unaffiliated with an acquiring shareholder. The Rights Agreement will expire on
August 13, 2014 unless it is extended or such rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged.
In fiscal year 1985, the Board of Directors (the Board) authorized 5,000,000 shares of
$0.50 par value preferred stock. Prior to November 19, 2007, no preferred stock had been issued. On
November 19, 2007, the Company completed public offerings of 2,139,000 shares of 6.5% mandatory
convertible preferred stock (preferred stock) at $1,000 per share, as well as an offering of
55,440,000 shares of common stock at $14.00 per share, pursuant to a shelf registration statement
previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The preferred stock will pay, when declared by the Board of Directors, dividends at a rate of
6.50% per annum on the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, payable quarterly in arrears in
cash, shares of Mylan common stock or a combination thereof at the Companys election. The first
dividend date was February 15, 2008. Each share of preferred stock will automatically convert on
November 15, 2010, into between 58.5480 shares and 71.4286 shares of the Companys common stock,
depending on the average daily closing price per share of our common stock over the 20 trading day
period ending on the third trading day prior to November 15, 2010. The conversion rate will be
subject to anti-dilution adjustments in certain circumstances. Holders may elect to convert at any
time at the minimum conversion rate of 58.5480 shares of common stock for each share of preferred
stock.
During the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid dividends of $137.5 million
on the preferred stock. On January 29, 2009, the Company announced that a quarterly dividend of
$16.25 per share was declared, payable on February 17, 2009, to the holders of preferred stock of
record as of February 1, 2009. Accordingly, Mylan recorded a dividend payable of $17.5 million and
$16.0 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The Company expects to pay dividends in
cash on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15 (or, as applicable, the next business day)
of each year prior to November 15, 2010. Under certain circumstances, the Company may not be
allowed to pay dividends in cash. If this were to occur, any unpaid dividend would be payable in
shares of common stock on November 15, 2010 based on the market value of common stock at that time.
Note 15. Stock-Based Incentive Plan
Mylans shareholders approved the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan on July 25, 2003, and approved
certain amendments on July 28, 2006 and April 25, 2008 (as amended, the 2003 Plan). Under the
2003 Plan, 37,500,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance to key employees,
consultants, independent contractors and non-employee directors of Mylan through a variety of
incentive awards, including: stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares and units,
performance awards, other stock-based awards and short-term cash awards. Awards are granted at the
fair value of the shares underlying the options at the date of the grant, generally become
exercisable over periods ranging from three to four years, and generally expire in ten years. In
the 2003 Plan, no more than 5,000,000 shares may be issued as restricted shares, restricted units,
performance shares and other stock-based awards.
Upon approval of the 2003 Plan, the 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the 1997 Plan) was
frozen, and no further grants of stock options will be made under that plan. However, there are
stock options outstanding from the 1997 Plan, expired plans and other plans assumed through
acquisitions.
36
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Under Option |
|
per Share |
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
21,358,670 |
|
|
$ |
15.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
1,139,400 |
|
|
|
21.65 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(4,053,061 |
) |
|
|
12.18 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(797,281 |
) |
|
|
17.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
17,647,728 |
|
|
|
16.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
4,303,792 |
|
|
|
15.91 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(459,836 |
) |
|
|
13.18 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(661,148 |
) |
|
|
17.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
20,830,536 |
|
|
|
16.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
4,180,133 |
|
|
|
11.46 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(107,707 |
) |
|
|
10.20 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(1,479,921 |
) |
|
|
16.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
23,423,041 |
|
|
$ |
15.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
22,852,133 |
|
|
$ |
15.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
15,048,569 |
|
|
$ |
15.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, options outstanding, options vested and expected to vest, and options
exercisable had average remaining contractual terms of 5.93 years, 5.86 years and 4.49 years,
respectively. Also at December 31, 2008, options outstanding, options vested and expected to vest
and options exercisable had aggregate intrinsic values of $0.1 million, $0.1 million and
$0.05 million, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested restricted stock and restricted stock unit
awards is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
Restricted |
|
Number of Restricted |
|
Grant-Date |
Stock Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
Fair Value |
Nonvested at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,295,347 |
|
|
$ |
16.95 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,699,856 |
|
|
|
11.30 |
|
Released |
|
|
(367,939 |
) |
|
|
15.57 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(83,916 |
) |
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,543,348 |
|
|
$ |
13.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the 1,699,856 awards granted during the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, 601,801 vest
ratably over 3 years, 750,246 vest in three years, 262,388 vest one-third immediately with the
remaining vesting ratably over two years, 56,421 vest in one year, and the remaining 29,000 vest
ratably over four years.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had $40.2 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all of its stock-based awards, which will be
recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.72 years. The total intrinsic value of
stock-based awards exercised and restricted stock units converted during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended December 31, 2007 was $4.7 million and $3.3 million.
With respect to options granted under the Companys stock-based compensation plans, the fair
value of each option grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free interest
rate, the dividend yield and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the
model are based mainly on the historical volatility of the Companys stock price and other factors.
The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. The model incorporates exercise and post-vesting forfeiture assumptions based on an analysis
of historical data. The expected lives of the grants are derived from historical and other factors.
The assumptions used are as follows:
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2007 |
Volatility |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Expected term of options (in years) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Forfeiture rate |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Weighted average grant date fair value per option |
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
$ |
5.60 |
|
|
$ |
6.90 |
|
In addition, Matrix has a stock option plan under which 3,288,965 options have been granted to
its employees as of March 31, 2007. These grants were made prior to the acquisition of Matrix by
Mylan. During the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine-month period ended
December 31, 2007, no options were granted under the Matrix plan. As of December 31, 2008, there
were 1.9 million options exercisable.
Note 16. Employee Benefits
Defined Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors various defined benefit pension plans in several countries, most of which
were assumed in the acquisition of the former Merck Generics business. Benefit formulas are based
on varying criteria on a plan by plan basis. Mylans policy is to fund domestic pension liabilities
in accordance with the minimum and maximum limits imposed by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and Federal income tax laws. The Company funds non-domestic pension
liabilities in accordance with laws and regulations applicable to those plans, which typically
results in these plans being unfunded. The amounts accrued related to these benefits were
$48.3 million and $37.5 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
The Company has a plan covering certain employees in the United States and Puerto Rico to
provide for limited reimbursement of postretirement supplemental medical coverage. In addition, in
December 2001, the Supplemental Health Insurance Program for Certain Officers of the Company was
adopted to provide full postretirement medical coverage to certain officers and their spouses and
dependents. The program was terminated in April 2006, except with respect to certain individuals.
These plans generally provide benefits to employees who meet minimum age and service requirements.
The amounts accrued related to these benefits were not material at December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
Effective March 31, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106,
and 132(R) (SFAS No. 158). The provisions of SFAS No. 158 require that the funded status of the
Companys pension plans and the benefit obligations of our post-retirement benefit plans be
recognized in the balance sheet. SFAS No. 158 did not change the measurement or recognition of
these plans, although it did require that plan assets and benefit obligations be measured as of the
balance sheet date. The Company has historically measured the plan assets and benefit obligations
as of the balance sheet date. Under SFAS No. 158, changes in the funded status will be recognized
in other comprehensive income until they are amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost.
The adjustments to adopt SFAS No. 158 were not material and were recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income at the adoption date.
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company sponsors defined contribution plans covering certain of its employees in the
United States and Puerto Rico, as well as certain employees in a number of countries related to the
former Merck Generics business acquisition. Its domestic defined contribution plans consist
primarily of a 401(k) retirement plan with a profit sharing component for non-union employees and a
401(k) retirement plan for union employees. Profit sharing contributions are made at the discretion
of the Board. Its non-domestic plans vary in form depending on local legal requirements. The
Companys contributions are based upon employee contributions, service hours, or pre-determined
amounts depending upon the plan. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution plans are
recognized as expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations when they are due. Total
employer contributions to defined contribution plans were $20.4 million for the calendar year ended
December 31, 2008, $12.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 and $16.5 million for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
Additionally, Matrix has several defined contribution plans covering certain employees and a
Provident Fund which, in accordance with Indian Law, covers all employees located in India.
38
Other Benefit Arrangements
The Company provides supplemental life insurance benefits to certain management employees.
Such benefits require annual funding and may require accelerated funding in the event that the
Company would experience a change in control.
The production and maintenance employees at the Companys manufacturing facilities in
Morgantown, West Virginia, are covered under a collective bargaining agreement that expires in
April 2012. In addition, there are non-U.S. Mylan locations, primarily concentrated in Europe and
India, that have employees who are unionized or part of works councils or trade unions. These
employees represented approximately 13% and 17% of the Companys total permanent workforce at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Note 17. Segment Information
Mylan has three reportable segments: the Generics Segment, the Specialty Segment, and the
Matrix Segment. The Generics Segment primarily develops, manufactures, sells and distributes
generic or branded generic pharmaceutical products in tablet, capsule or transdermal patch form.
The Specialty Segment engages mainly in the manufacture and sale of branded specialty nebulized and
injectable products. The Matrix Segment engages mainly in the manufacture and sale of APIs and FDFs
and the distribution of certain branded generic products. Additionally, certain general and
administrative expenses, as well as litigation settlements, non-cash impairment charges and other
expenses not attributable to segments are reported in Corporate/Other.
The Companys chief operating decision maker evaluates the performance of its reportable
segments based on total revenues and segment profitability. For the Generics, Specialty and Matrix
Segments, segment profitability represents segment gross profit less direct research and
development expenses and direct selling, general and administrative expenses. Amortization of
intangible assets as well as other purchase accounting related items including the write-off of
in-process research and development and the amortization of the inventory step-up, non-cash
impairment charges and revenue related to the sale of Bystolic product rights are excluded from
segment profitability. The Company does not report depreciation expense, total assets and capital
expenditures by segment, as such information is not used by the chief operating decision maker.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2 to
Consolidated Financial Statements. Intersegment revenues are accounted for at current market
values.
The table below presents segment information for the periods identified and provides a
reconciliation of segment information to total consolidated information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Generics Segment |
|
|
Specialty Segment |
|
|
Matrix Segment |
|
|
Corporate/Other(1) |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party |
|
$ |
3,907,518 |
|
|
$ |
385,963 |
|
|
$ |
376,007 |
|
|
$ |
468,097 |
|
|
$ |
5,137,585 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
31,278 |
|
|
|
68,813 |
|
|
|
(101,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,909,316 |
|
|
|
417,241 |
|
|
|
444,820 |
|
|
|
366,208 |
|
|
$ |
5,137,585 |
|
Segment profitability |
|
$ |
969,929 |
|
|
$ |
36,649 |
|
|
$ |
25,033 |
|
|
$ |
(733,726 |
) |
|
$ |
297,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Generics Segment |
|
|
Specialty Segment |
|
|
Matrix Segment |
|
|
Corporate/Other(1) |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party |
|
$ |
1,812,404 |
|
|
$ |
102,126 |
|
|
$ |
264,231 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,178,761 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
29,547 |
|
|
|
(33,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,812,967 |
|
|
|
105,527 |
|
|
|
293,778 |
|
|
|
(33,511 |
) |
|
$ |
2,178,761 |
|
Segment profitability |
|
$ |
590,363 |
|
|
$ |
18,880 |
|
|
$ |
18,120 |
|
|
$ |
(1,615,628 |
) |
|
$ |
(988,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Generics Segment |
|
|
Specialty Segment |
|
|
Matrix Segment |
|
|
Corporate/Other(1) |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party |
|
$ |
1,532,407 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,412 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,611,819 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,389 |
|
|
|
(16,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,532,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,801 |
|
|
|
(16,389 |
) |
|
$ |
1,611,819 |
|
Segment profitability |
|
$ |
712,685 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,578 |
|
|
$ |
(293,709 |
) |
|
$ |
427,554 |
|
39
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes corporate general and administrative expenses,
litigation settlements, intercompany eliminations, revenue
related to the sale of Bystolic product rights,
amortization of intangible assets and certain purchase
accounting items (such as the write-off of in-process
research and development and the amortization of the
inventory step-up), non-cash impairment charges, and other
expenses not directly attributable to segments. |
The Companys consolidated net revenues are generated via the sale of products in the
following therapeutic categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Allergy |
|
$ |
219,308 |
|
|
$ |
28,301 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Anti-infective Agents |
|
|
455,513 |
|
|
|
166,383 |
|
|
|
60,768 |
|
Cardiovascular |
|
|
889,523 |
|
|
|
587,020 |
|
|
|
463,610 |
|
Central Nervous System |
|
|
1,235,340 |
|
|
|
584,466 |
|
|
|
579,814 |
|
Dermatology |
|
|
72,944 |
|
|
|
44,718 |
|
|
|
58,066 |
|
Endocrine and Metabolic |
|
|
408,384 |
|
|
|
198,875 |
|
|
|
133,967 |
|
Gastrointestinal |
|
|
357,489 |
|
|
|
149,804 |
|
|
|
59,655 |
|
Renal and Genitourinary |
|
|
209,374 |
|
|
|
122,484 |
|
|
|
148,494 |
|
Respiratory Agents |
|
|
310,993 |
|
|
|
71,167 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
472,369 |
|
|
|
209,725 |
|
|
|
74,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,631,237 |
|
|
$ |
2,162,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,586,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other consists of numerous therapeutic classes, none of
which individually exceeds 5% of consolidated net revenues. |
Geographic Information
The Companys principal markets are North America, EMEA, and Asia Pacific. Net revenues are
classified based on the geographic location of the customers and are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Net third-party revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Americas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
2,075,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,342,564 |
|
|
$ |
1,506,419 |
|
Other Americas |
|
|
163,512 |
|
|
|
68,117 |
|
|
|
2,622 |
|
Europe(1) |
|
|
1,755,807 |
|
|
|
508,549 |
|
|
|
50,958 |
|
Asia |
|
|
636,610 |
|
|
|
243,713 |
|
|
|
26,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,631,237 |
|
|
$ |
2,162,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,586,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Sales in France consisted of 16% of consolidated net
revenues for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008. |
Note 18. Commitments
The Company leases certain property under various operating lease arrangements that expire
over the next seven years. These leases generally provide the Company with the option to renew the
lease at the end of the lease term. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2008, the nine months
ended December 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, the Company made lease payments
of $33.0 million, $9.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
40
Future minimum lease payments under these commitments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
December 31, |
|
Leases |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
30,081 |
|
2010 |
|
|
24,178 |
|
2011 |
|
|
19,230 |
|
2012 |
|
|
12,814 |
|
2013 |
|
|
10,128 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
57,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
154,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into various product licensing and development agreements. In some of
these arrangements, the Company provides funding for the development of the product or to obtain
rights to the use of the patent, through milestone payments, in exchange for marketing and
distribution rights to the product. Milestones represent the completion of specific contractual
events, and it is uncertain if and when these milestones will be achieved, hence, we have not
attempted to predict the period in which such milestones would possibly be incurred. In the event
that all projects are successful, milestone and development payments of approximately $39.3 million
would be paid subsequent to December 31, 2008.
The Company has also entered into employment and other agreements with certain executives and
other employees that provide for compensation and certain other benefits. These agreements provide
for severance payments under certain circumstances. Additionally, the Company has split-dollar life
insurance agreements with certain retired executives.
In the normal course of business, Mylan periodically enters into employment, legal settlement
and other agreements which incorporate indemnification provisions. While the maximum amount to
which Mylan may be exposed under such agreements cannot be reasonably estimated, the Company
maintains insurance coverage, which management believes will effectively mitigate the Companys
obligations under these indemnification provisions. No amounts have been recorded in the
Consolidated Financial Statements with respect to the Companys obligations under such agreements.
Note 19. Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
While it is not possible to determine with any degree of certainty the ultimate outcome of the
following legal proceedings, the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses with respect to
the claims asserted against it and intends to vigorously defend its position. The Company is also
party to certain litigation matters, some of which are described below, for which Merck KGaA has
agreed to indemnify the Company, under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement by which Mylan
acquired the former Merck Generics business. An adverse outcome in any of these proceedings, or the
inability or denial of Merck KGaA to pay an indemnified claim, could have a material adverse effect
on the Companys financial position and results of operations.
Omeprazole
On May 17, 2000, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (MPI) filed an ANDA seeking approval from the
FDA to manufacture, market and sell omeprazole delayed-release capsules and on August 8, 2000 made
Paragraph IV certifications to several patents owned by AstraZeneca PLC (AstraZeneca) that were
listed in the FDAs Orange Book. On September 8, 2000, AstraZeneca filed suit against MPI and
Mylan in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging infringement of
several of AstraZenecas patents. On May 29, 2003, the FDA approved MPIs ANDA for the 10 mg and
20 mg strengths of omeprazole delayed-release capsules, and, on August 4, 2003, Mylan announced
that MPI had commenced the sale of omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg delayed-release capsules. AstraZeneca
then amended the pending lawsuit to assert claims against Mylan and MPI and filed a separate
lawsuit against MPIs supplier, Esteve Quimica S.A. (Esteve), for unspecified money damages and a
finding of willful infringement. MPI has certain indemnity obligations to Esteve in connection with
this litigation. On May 31, 2007, the district court ruled in Mylans and Esteves favor by finding
that the asserted patents were not infringed by Mylans/Esteves products. On July 18, 2007,
AstraZeneca appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On
June 10, 2008, the appellate court issued a judgment and decision affirming the district courts
finding of noninfringement and the mandate was issued on July 1, 2008.
41
Lorazepam and Clorazepate
On June 1, 2005, a jury verdict was rendered against Mylan, MPI, and co-defendants Cambrex
Corporation and Gyma Laboratories in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in the
amount of approximately $12.0 million, which has been accrued for by the Company. The jury found
that Mylan and its co-defendants willfully violated Massachusetts, Minnesota and Illinois state
antitrust laws in connection with API supply agreements entered into between the Company and its
API supplier (Cambrex) and broker (Gyma) for two drugs, lorazepam and clorazepate, in 1997, and
subsequent price increases on these drugs in 1998. The case was brought by four health insurers who
opted out of earlier class action settlements agreed to by the Company in 2001 and represents the
last remaining antitrust claims relating to Mylans 1998 price increases for lorazepam and
clorazepate. Following the verdict, the Company filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, a
motion for a new trial, a motion to dismiss two of the insurers and a motion to reduce the verdict.
On December 20, 2006, the Companys motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new
trial were denied and the remaining motions were denied on January 24, 2008. In post-trial filings,
the plaintiffs requested that the verdict be trebled and that request was granted on January 24,
2008. On February 6, 2008, a judgment was issued against Mylan and its co-defendants in the total
amount of approximately $69.0 million, some or all of which may be subject to indemnification
obligations by Mylan. Plaintiffs are also seeking an award of attorneys fees and litigation costs
in unspecified amounts and prejudgment interest of approximately $9.0 million. The Company and its
co-defendants have appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The appeals have
been held in abeyance pending a ruling on the motion for prejudgment interest. In connection with
the Companys appeal of the lorazepam Judgment, the Company submitted a surety bond underwritten by
a third-party insurance company in the amount of $74.5 million. This surety bond is secured by a
pledge of a $40.0 million cash deposit (which is included as restricted cash on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008) and an irrevocable letter of credit for
$34.5 million issued under the Senior Credit Agreement. On October 27, 2008, a U.S. magistrate
judge issued a report recommending the granting of plaintiffs motion for prejudgment interest. The
report also recommends requiring the surety bond amount to be increased to include prejudgment
interest. Mylan has submitted objections to the magistrate judges recommendations and now pending
is the district courts determination of whether to accept or reject those recommendations. If the
magistrates recommendations on prejudgment interest are accepted, Mylan intends to contest these
rulings as part of its pending appeal.
Pricing and Medicaid Litigation
On June 26, 2003, MPI and UDL received requests from the U.S. House of Representatives Energy
and Commerce Committee (the Committee) seeking information about certain products sold by MPI and
UDL Laboratories Inc. (UDL) in connection with the Committees investigation into pharmaceutical
reimbursement and rebates under Medicaid. MPI and UDL cooperated with this inquiry and provided
information in response to the Committees requests in 2003. Several states attorneys general
(AG) have also sent letters to MPI, UDL and Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals Inc., demanding that
those companies retain documents relating to Medicaid reimbursement and rebate calculations pending
the outcome of unspecified investigations by those AGs into such matters. In addition, in July
2004, Mylan received subpoenas from the AGs of California and Florida in connection with civil
investigations purportedly related to price reporting and marketing practices regarding various
drugs. As noted below, both California and Florida subsequently filed suits against Mylan, and the
Company believes any further requests for information and disclosures will be made as part of that
litigation.
Beginning in September 2003, Mylan, MPI and/or UDL, together with many other pharmaceutical
companies, have been named in civil lawsuits filed by state AGs and municipal bodies within the
state of New York alleging generally that the defendants defrauded the state Medicaid systems by
allegedly reporting Average Wholesale Prices and/or Wholesale Acquisition Costs that exceeded
the actual selling price of the defendants prescription drugs. To date, Mylan, MPI and/or UDL have
been named as defendants in substantially similar civil lawsuits filed by the AGs of Alabama,
Alaska, California, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts,
Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin and also by the city of New York
and approximately 40 counties across New York State. Several of these cases have been transferred
to the AWP multi-district litigation proceedings pending in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts for pretrial proceedings. Others of these cases will likely be litigated
in the state courts in which they were filed. Each of the cases seeks an unspecified amount in
money damages, civil penalties and/or treble damages, counsel fees and costs, and injunctive
relief. In each of these matters Mylan, MPI and/or UDL either have either moved to dismiss the
complaints or have answered the complaints denying liability. Mylan and its subsidiaries intend to
defend each of these actions vigorously.
In May 2008, an amended complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Massachusetts by a plaintiff on behalf of the United States of America, against Mylan, MPI, UDL and
several other generic manufacturers. The original complaint was filed under seal in April 2000, and
Mylan, MPI and UDL were added as parties in February 2001. The claims against Mylan, MPI, UDL and
the other generic manufacturers were severed from the April 2000 complaint (which remains under
seal) as a result of the federal
42
governments decision not to intervene in the action as to those defendants. The complaint
alleges violations of the False Claims Act and sets forth allegations substantially similar to
those alleged in the state AG cases mentioned in the preceding paragraph and purports to seek
recovery of any and all alleged overpayment of the federal share under the Medicaid program.
Mylan has moved to dismiss the complaint and intends to defend the action vigorously.
In addition, by letter dated January 12, 2005, MPI was notified by the U.S. Department of
Justice of an investigation concerning calculations of Medicaid drug rebates. The investigation
involves whether MPI and UDL may have violated the False Claims Act or other laws by classifying
certain authorized generics launched in the 1990s and early 2000s as non-innovator rather than
innovator drugs for purposes of Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs until 2005. MPI and
UDL deny the governments allegations and deny that they engaged in any wrongful conduct. Based on
our understanding of the governments allegations, the alleged difference in rebates for the MPI
and UDL products currently at issue may be up to approximately $100.0 million, which includes
interest. Remedies under the False Claims Act could include treble damages and penalties. MPI and
UDL have been cooperating fully with the governments investigation and are currently in
discussions with the government about a possible resolution of the matter. Additionally, the
Company believes that it has contractual and other rights to recover from the innovator a
substantial portion of any payments that MPI and UDL may remit to the government. The Company has
not recorded any amounts in the consolidated financial statements related to this matter.
Dey, L.P. is a defendant currently in lawsuits brought by the state AGs of Arizona,
California, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, South Carolina (on behalf of
the state and the state health plan), Utah and Wisconsin and the city of New York and approximately
40 New York counties. Dey is also named as a defendant in several class actions brought by
consumers and third-party payors. Dey has reached a settlement of most of these class actions,
which has been preliminarily approved by the court. Additionally, the U.S. federal government filed
a claim against Dey, L.P. in August 2006. These cases all generally allege that Dey falsely
reported certain price information concerning certain drugs marketed by Dey. Dey intends to defend
each of these actions vigorously. In conjunction with the former Merck Generics business
acquisition by Mylan, Mylan is entitled to indemnification by Merck KGaA for these Dey pricing
related suits.
The Company has approximately $118.6 million recorded in other liabilities related to the
price-related litigation involving Dey. As stated above, in conjunction with the former Merck
Generics business acquisition, Mylan is entitled to indemnification from Merck KGaA under the Share
Purchase Agreement. As a result, the Company has recorded approximately $119.7 million in other
assets.
Modafinil Antitrust Litigation and FTC Inquiry
Beginning in April 2006, Mylan, along with four other drug manufacturers, has been named as a
defendant in civil lawsuits filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by a variety of
plaintiffs purportedly representing direct and indirect purchasers of the drug modafinil and a
third-party payor and one action brought by Apotex, Inc., a manufacturer of generic drugs, seeking
approval to market a generic modafinil product. These actions allege violations of federal and
state laws in connection with the defendants settlement of patent litigation relating to
modafinil. These actions are in their preliminary stages, and motions to dismiss each action are
pending, with the exception of the third-party payor action, in which Mylans response to the
complaint is not due until the motions filed in the other cases have been decided. Mylan intends to
defend each of these actions vigorously. In addition, by letter dated July 11, 2006, Mylan was
notified by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of an investigation relating to the
settlement of the modafinil patent litigation. In its letter, the FTC requested certain information
from Mylan, MPI and MTI pertaining to the patent litigation and the settlement thereof. On
March 29, 2007, the FTC issued a subpoena, and on April 26, 2007, the FTC issued a civil
investigative demand to Mylan requesting additional information from the Company relating to the
investigation. Mylan is cooperating fully with the governments investigation and completed all
requests for information. On February 13, 2008, the FTC filed a lawsuit against Cephalon in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the case has subsequently been transferred to
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Mylan is not named as a defendant
in the FTCs lawsuit, although the complaint includes certain allegations pertaining to the
Mylan/Cephalon settlement.
Levetiracetam
In March 2004, Mylan Inc. and MPI, along with Dr. Reddys Laboratories, Inc., were named in a
civil lawsuit filed in the Northern District of Georgia by UCB Society Anonyme and UCB Pharma, Inc.
(UCB) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,943,639 relating to levetiracetam tablets. This
litigation was settled in October 2007. Under the terms of the settlement, Mylan was granted the
right to market 250 mg, 500 mg, and 750 mg levetiracetam tablets in the United States beginning on
November 1, 2008, provided that UCB obtained pediatric exclusivity for its product and Mylan
obtained final approval for its ANDA from the FDA. Pediatric exclusivity has been granted. In
addition, by letter dated November 19, 2007, Mylan was notified by the FTC of an investigation
43
relating to the settlement of the levetiracetam patent litigation. In its letter, the FTC
requested certain information from Mylan pertaining to the patent litigation and the settlement
thereof. On April 9, 2008, the FTC issued a civil investigative demand requesting additional
information from Mylan relating to the investigation. Mylan is cooperating fully with the
governments investigation and has complied with all requests for information. Mylan launched its
250 mg, 500 mg, and 750 mg levetiracetam tablet products in November 2008.
Digitek® Recall
On April 25, 2008, Actavis Totowa LLC, a division of Actavis Group, announced a voluntary,
nationwide recall of all lots and all strengths of Digitek® (digoxin tablets USP).
Digitek is manufactured by Actavis and distributed in the United States by MPI and UDL. The Company
has tendered its defense and indemnity in all lawsuits and claims arising from this event to
Actavis, and Actavis has accepted that tender, subject to a reservation of rights. While the
Company is unable to estimate total potential costs with any degree of certainty, such costs could
be significant. To date, approximately 198 lawsuits have been filed against Mylan, UDL and Actavis
pertaining to the recall. An adverse outcome in these lawsuits or the inability or denial of
Actavis to pay on an indemnified claim could have a materially adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations.
Pioglitazone
On February 21, 2006, a district court in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York held that Mylan, MPI and UDLs pioglitazone ANDA product infringed a patent
asserted against them by Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. and Takeda Chemical Industries,
Ltd (hereinafter, Takeda) and that the patent was enforceable. That same court also held that
Alphapharm Pty, Ltd and Genpharm, Inc.s pioglitazone ANDA product infringed the Takeda patent and
that the patent was valid. Subsequently, the district court granted Takedas motion to find the
cases to be exceptional and to award attorneys fees and costs in the amounts of $11.4 million from
Mylan and $5.4 million from Alphapharm/Genpharm, with interest. Mylan and Alphapharm/Genpharm both
separately appealed the underlying patent validity and enforceability determinations and the
exceptional case findings to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, but the findings were
affirmed. Although the required amounts have been paid, Mylan and Alphapharm/Genpharm intend to
continue to challenge the exceptional case findings by filing petitions for writ of certiorari with
the United States Supreme Court.
Litigation related to the former Merck Generics Business
Generics UK Ltd. was accused of having been involved in pricing agreements pertaining to
certain drugs during the years 1996 to 2000. Generics UK Ltd. was able to settle civil claims for
damages brought by the National Health Service in England, and Wales, and health authorities in
Scotland and Northern Ireland out of court, without any admission of liability. In addition to
these civil claims, in 2006 criminal proceedings were filed in Southwark Crown Court against
Generics UK Ltd. and other companies, as well as against a number of individuals who were alleged
to be responsible for decision making in the companies. In early 2008, the House of Lords ruled
that a price fixing cartel was not at the relevant times a criminal offense. The case was remanded
back to the Crown Court for the prosecution to make an application to amend the indictment. On
July 11, 2008, the Crown Court refused to allow the prosecutions application, quashed the
indictment and denied the prosecutions application for permission to appeal. On July 17, 2008, the
prosecution applied to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) for permission to appeal. On
December 3, 2008, the Court of Appeal denied the prosecutions application for permission to
appeal. Accordingly, all civil and criminal proceedings relating to the above described pricing
agreements have now been either terminated or resolved.
Other Litigation
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings that are considered normal to its
business, including certain proceedings assumed as a result of the former Merck Generics business
acquisition. While it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of such other proceedings,
the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of such other proceedings will not have a material
adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
44
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of Mylan Inc. (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In conducting the December 31, 2008 assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control Integrated
Framework (COSO). As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in the COSO framework,
management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has audited ths
internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte & Touche LLPs opinion on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting appears on page 122 of this Form 10-K.
45
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Mylan Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mylan Inc. and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, the nine
months ended December 31, 2007 and the year ended March 31, 2007. Our audits also included the
consolidated financial statement schedule included in Item 15. These financial statements, and
financial statement schedule, are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Mylan Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, the
nine months ended December 31, 2007, and the year ended March 31, 2007, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, effective April 1, 2007, the
Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective October 2, 2007,
the Company changed its fiscal year to begin on January 1 and end on December 31.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 16, 2009
46
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Mylan Inc.:
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Mylan Inc. and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including
the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 of the Company and our report
dated February 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and
financial statement schedule.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 16, 2009
47
Mylan Inc.
Supplementary Financial Information
Quarterly Financial Data
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008(3) |
|
2008 |
|
2008(4) |
|
2008 |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
1,074,461 |
|
|
$ |
1,203,122 |
|
|
$ |
1,656,848 |
|
|
$ |
1,203,154 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
350,221 |
|
|
|
414,210 |
|
|
|
911,137 |
|
|
|
394,653 |
|
Net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders |
|
|
(443,893 |
) |
|
|
(8,366 |
) |
|
|
171,999 |
|
|
|
(39,990 |
) |
(Loss) earnings per share(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
Share prices(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
15.40 |
|
|
$ |
13.35 |
|
|
$ |
14.02 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
10.33 |
|
|
$ |
11.40 |
|
|
$ |
10.85 |
|
|
$ |
5.77 |
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007(5) |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
546,321 |
|
|
$ |
477,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,155,349 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
296,708 |
|
|
|
221,641 |
|
|
|
356,099 |
|
Net (loss) earnings available to common shareholders |
|
|
79,727 |
|
|
|
149,827 |
|
|
|
(1,383,577 |
) |
(Loss) earnings per share(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
(5.04 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
(5.04 |
) |
Share prices(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
22.64 |
|
|
$ |
18.19 |
|
|
$ |
16.87 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
18.19 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
$ |
13.25 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of earnings per share for the quarters may not equal earnings per share for the total year due to changes
in the average number of common shares outstanding and the effect of the if-converted method related to our
outstanding mandatorily redeemable preferred stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Closing prices for all dates prior to December 29, 2008 are as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. Closing
prices for December 31, 2008 are as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market. |
|
(3) |
|
The results for the three months ended March 31, 2008, include a $385.0 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge. |
|
(4) |
|
The results for the three months ended September 30, 2008, include $455.0 million of revenue and gross profit
related to the sale of the Bystolic product rights. |
|
(5) |
|
The results for the three months ended December 31, 2007, include the results of the former Merck Generics business
since its acquisition on October 2, 2007, and certain purchase accounting adjustments, including $1.27 billion
related to acquired in-process research and development. |
48
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
1. Consolidated Financial Statements
The Consolidated Financial Statements listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
are filed as part of this Form.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
MYLAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Deductions) |
|
(Deductions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
Costs and |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Ending |
Description |
|
Balance |
|
Expenses |
|
Accounts |
|
Deductions |
|
Balance |
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
38,088 |
|
|
$ |
(2,355 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,502 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,338 |
) |
|
$ |
26,893 |
|
Nine months ended December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
15,149 |
|
|
$ |
9,959 |
|
|
$ |
13,255 |
* |
|
$ |
(275 |
) |
|
$ |
38,088 |
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
10,954 |
|
|
$ |
(500 |
) |
|
$ |
4,778 |
** |
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
15,149 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
76,100 |
|
|
$ |
53,421 |
|
|
$ |
(16,285 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,042 |
) |
|
$ |
110,194 |
|
Nine months ended December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
18,355 |
|
|
$ |
33,545 |
|
|
$ |
24,200 |
* |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
76,100 |
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,644 |
|
|
$ |
5,531 |
|
|
$ |
11,180 |
** |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,355 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Allowance recorded as part of the former Merck Generics business
acquisition. |
|
** |
|
Allowance recorded as part of the Matrix acquisition. |
3. Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1(a)
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.1(b)
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the registrant, filed as Exhibit
3.2 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 5, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
3.1(c)
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the registrant, filed as Exhibit
3.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 20, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of the registrant, as amended to date, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Report of Form 8-K
filed on December 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.1(a)
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of August 22, 1996, between the registrant and American Stock Transfer
& Trust Company, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September
3, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.1(b)
|
|
Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of November 8, 1999, between the registrant and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, filed as Exhibit 1 to Form 8-A/A filed with the SEC on March 31,
2000, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.1(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement dated as of August 13, 2004, between the registrant and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on August 16, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.1(d)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Rights Agreement dated as of September 8, 2004, between the registrant and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on September 9, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. |
49
|
|
|
4.1(e)
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Rights Agreement dated as of December 2, 2004, between the registrant and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 3, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.1(f)
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Rights Agreement dated as of December 19, 2005, between the registrant and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 19, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.2(a)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 21, 2005, between the registrant and The Bank of New York, as
trustee, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.2(b)
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2007, among the registrant, the
Subsidiaries of the registrant listed on the signature page thereto and The Bank of New York, as
trustee, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 5, 2007,
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2005, among the registrant, the Guarantors
party thereto and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, BNY Capital Markets, Inc.,
KeyBanc Capital Markets (a Division of McDonald Investments Inc.), PNC Capital Markets, Inc. and
SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on July 27, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Indenture, dated as of September 15, 2008, among the registrant, the guarantors named therein and
Bank of New York Mellon as trustee, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended to date, filed as Exhibit 10(b) to Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1993, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended to date, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
1992 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan, as amended to date, filed as Exhibit 10(l) to Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.4(a)
|
|
Amended and Restated 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as Appendix A to Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference.* |
|
|
|
10.4(b)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4(b)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.4(c)
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Award under the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4(c)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.4(d)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated as of December
17, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.4(d)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Mylan Inc. Severance Plan, amended as of December 17, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.5
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
3.75% Cash Convertible Notes due 2015 Purchase Agreement dated September 9, 2008, among the
registrant and the initial purchaser named therein, filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.7(a)
|
|
Confirmation of OTC Convertible Note Hedge Transaction dated September 9, 2008, among the
registrant, Merrill Lynch International and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.7(b)
|
|
Confirmation of OTC Convertible Note Hedge Transaction, amended as of November 25, 2008, among
the registrant, Merrill Lynch International and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, filed as Exhibit 10.7(b)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Confirmation of OTC Convertible Note Hedge Transaction dated September 9, 2008, between the
registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated September 9, 2008, among the registrant, Merrill
Lynch International and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, filed as Exhibit 10.3
to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated September 9, 2008, between the registrant and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
50
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amendment to Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated September 15, 2008 among the
registrant, Merrill Lynch International and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Amendment to Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated September 15, 2008, between the
registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Amendment to Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated as of September 9, 2008 among Mylan
Inc., Merrill Lynch International and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, filed
as Exhibit 10.7 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Amendment to Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated as of September 9, 2008 among Mylan
Inc., Merrill Lynch International and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, filed
as Exhibit 10.8 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Calculation Agent Agreement dated September 9, 2008, among the registrant, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association and Goldman Sachs International, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.16(a)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of April 3, 2006, between the
registrant and Robert J. Coury filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.16(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of December 22,
2008, between the registrant and Robert J. Coury, filed as Exhibit 10.16(b)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.17(a)
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2004, between the registrant and Edward J.
Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, and
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.17(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of April 3, 2006, between the
registrant and Edward J. Borkowski filed as Exhibit 10.6(b) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.17(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of March 12, 2008, by and between
registrant and Edward J. Borkowski filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on March 12, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.17(d)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, by and between
registrant and Edward J. Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.17(d)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.18(a)
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2007, between the registrant and Heather
Bresch filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, and incorporated
herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.18(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007, by and between the
registrant and Heather Bresch filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.18(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, by and between
the registrant and Heather Bresch, filed as Exhibit 10.18(c)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.19(a)
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2007, between the registrant and Rajiv
Malik filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, and incorporated
herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.19(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007, by and between the
registrant and Rajiv Malik filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.19(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, by and between
the registrant and Rajiv Malik, filed as Exhibit 10.19(c)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.20(a)
|
|
Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of December 31, 2004, between the registrant and Robert J.
Coury filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, and
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.20(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2006, between the registrant
and Robert J. Coury filed as Exhibit 10.11(b) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.20(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, between the
registrant and Robert J. Coury, filed as Exhibit 10.20(c)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
51
|
|
|
10.21(a)
|
|
Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of December 31, 2004, between the registrant and Edward J.
Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, and
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.21(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2006, between the registrant
and Edward J. Borkowski filed as Exhibit 10.12(b) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.21(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, between the
registrant and Edward J. Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.21(c)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Retirement Benefit Agreement dated January 27, 1995, between the registrant and C.B. Todd, filed
as Exhibit 10(b) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995, and incorporated herein
by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.23(a)
|
|
Retirement Benefit Agreement dated January 27, 1995, between the registrant and Milan Puskar,
filed as Exhibit 10(b) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995, and incorporated
herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.23(b)
|
|
First Amendment to Retirement Benefit Agreement dated September 27, 2001, between the registrant
and Milan Puskar, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001,
and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.23(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of April 25, 2008, by and between
registrant and Milan Puskar, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangement between the registrant and the Milan Puskar Irrevocable
Trust filed as Exhibit 10(h) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996, and
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.25(a)
|
|
Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 15, 2003, between the registrant and
Robert J. Coury, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, and
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.25(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 2, 2004, between the
registrant and Robert J. Coury, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.25(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of April 3, 2006, between the
registrant and Robert J. Coury filed as Exhibit 10.19(c) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.25(d)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, between the
registrant and Robert J. Coury, filed as Exhibit 10.25(d)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.26(a)
|
|
Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 15, 2003, between the registrant and
Edward J. Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003,
and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.26(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 2, 2004, between the
registrant and Edward J. Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.26(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of April 3, 2006, between the
registrant and Edward J. Borkowski filed as Exhibit 10.20(c) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.26(d)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, between the
registrant and Edward J. Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.26(d)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.27(a)
|
|
Amended and Restated Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007, between the
registrant and Heather Bresch, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.27(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, between the
registrant and Heather Bresch, filed as Exhibit 10.27(b)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.28(a)
|
|
Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of January 31, 2007, between the registrant and
Rajiv Malik, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.28(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transition and Succession Agreement dated as of December 22, 2008, between the
registrant and Rajiv Malik, filed as Exhibit 10.28(b)
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Executives Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
52
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Supplemental Health Insurance Program For Certain Officers of the registrant, effective December
15, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the registrant and each Director, filed as Exhibit
10.31 to Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, and incorporated herein by
reference.* |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Description of the registrants Director Compensation Arrangements in effect as of the date
hereof, filed as Exhibit 10.32
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Agreement Regarding Consulting Services and Shareholders Agreement dated as of December 31, 2007
by and among the registrant, MP Laboratories (Mauritius) Ltd, Prasad Nimmagadda, Globex and G2
Corporate Services Limited, filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Form 10-KT/A for the period ended December
31, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.34(a)
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated May 12, 2007 by and among Merck Generics Holding GmbH, Merck
Internationale Beteiligung GmbH, Merck KGaA and the registrant, filed with the Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 17, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.34(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Share Purchase Agreement by and among the registrant and Merck Generics
Holding GmbH, Merck S.A. Merck Internationale Beteiligung GmbH and Merck KGaA, filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 5, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 20, 2007 by and among the registrant,
Mylan Luxembourg 5 S.à.r.l., certain lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
December 27, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release dated February 20, 2009, by and between the registrant and
Edward J. Borkowski, filed as Exhibit 10.36
to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant. |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this Form to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized on March 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mylan Inc.
|
|
|
by |
/s/ EDWARD J. BORKOSKI
|
|
|
|
Edward J. Borkowski |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
23 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32 |
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
55