UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2004

OR

For the transition period from            to           

Commission File No. 0-27640

RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

2525 West End Avenue, Suite 600, Nashville, Tennessee 37203
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 345-5500

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days). Yes x No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No o

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

INDEX

Note: Items 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II are omitted because they are not applicable

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

1. Basis of Presentation

Overview

     Renal Care Group, Inc. (the Company) provides dialysis services to patients with chronic kidney failure, also known as end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As of September 30, 2004, the Company provided dialysis and ancillary services to over 29,300 patients through more than 410 owned outpatient dialysis centers in 32 states, in addition to providing acute dialysis services at more than 200 hospitals.

     Renal Care Group’s net revenue has been derived primarily from the following sources:

     Most patients with end-stage renal disease receive three dialysis treatments each week in an outpatient setting. Reimbursement for these services is provided primarily by the Medicare ESRD program based on rates established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). For the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2004, approximately 55% and 53%, respectively, of the Company’s net revenue was derived from reimbursement under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Medicare reimbursement is subject to rate and other legislative changes by Congress and periodic changes in regulations, including changes that may reduce payments under the ESRD program. Neither Congress nor CMS approved an increase in the composite rate for 2003 or 2004. Congress has approved an increase of 1.6% in the Medicare ESRD composite rate for 2005, as well as changes in the way we are paid for separately billable drugs.

     The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 provides that dialysis providers will be reimbursed for separately billable drugs, including EPO, at the drugs’ average acquisition cost and that the composite rate will be increased by an amount equal to the providers’ lost profit on those separately billable drugs. Congress stated that it intended these changes to be budget neutral. On July 27, 2004 CMS issued proposed regulations to implement these changes, which propose that we will be reimbursed for separately billable drugs at a 3% discount from the average sale price and that the composite rate be increased by 11.3%. These proposed regulations also include a case-mix adjustment and a geographic adjustment to the composite rate as well as a related budget neutrality adjustment. If the proposed regulations become effective, management believes they will result in a net reduction of approximately $0.03 per share in diluted net income for 2005.

     The Medicare composite rate applies to a designated group of outpatient dialysis services, including the dialysis treatment, supplies used for the treatment, certain laboratory tests and medications, and most of the home dialysis services we provide. Renal Care Group receives separate reimbursement outside the composite rate for some other services, laboratory tests and drugs, including specific drugs such as EPO and some physician-ordered tests provided

4

to dialysis patients. Congress and CMS have considered expanding the drugs and services that are included in the composite rate.

     If a patient is younger than 65 years old and has private health insurance, then that patient’s treatment is typically reimbursed at rates significantly higher than Medicare during the first 30 months of care. After that period, Medicare becomes the primary payor. Reimbursement for dialysis services provided pursuant to a hospital contract is negotiated with the individual hospital and is usually higher than the Medicare composite rate. Because dialysis is a life-sustaining therapy to treat a chronic disease, utilization is predictable and is not subject to seasonal fluctuations.

     Renal Care Group derives a significant portion of its net revenue and net income from the administration of EPO. EPO is manufactured by a single company, Amgen Inc. EPO is used to treat anemia, a medical complication frequently experienced by dialysis patients. The Company administers EPO to most of its patients. Net revenue from the administration of EPO was 24% and 27% of the net revenue of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Interim Financial Statements

     Management believes the information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q reflects all adjustments necessary to make the results of operations for the interim periods a fair representation of such operations. All of these adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year as a whole. We suggest that you read these financial statements in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in our current report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on April 19, 2004.

2. Business Acquisitions

2004 Acquisitions

     During the first nine months of 2004, we completed seven acquisitions. The combined net assets acquired and resulting net cash purchase price paid in these acquisitions were $274,644. Our largest acquisition was the purchase of National Nephrology Associates, Inc. (NNA) on April 2, 2004. The purchase price of NNA consisted of a net cash payment of approximately $163,000 and an assumption of all of NNA’s outstanding debt, including its $160,000, 9% senior subordinated notes. NNA provided dialysis services to approximately 5,600 patients and operated 87 outpatient dialysis facilities in 15 states, as well as providing acute dialysis services to approximately 55 hospitals.

     Each of the seven transactions involved the acquisition of one or more entities that provide care to ESRD patients through owned dialysis facilities. The acquired businesses either strengthened existing market share within a specific geographic area or provided an entrance into a new market. We began recording the results of operations for each of these acquired businesses at the effective dates of the respective transactions.

     The following table summarizes the preliminarily estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition for the seven acquisitions completed during the first nine months of 2004:

     Some of the estimated fair values of assets and liabilities are preliminary and may be adjusted. Items that may be adjusted include items such as deferred tax assets and liabilities, workers compensation and medical malpractice

5

accruals, and valuation of certain assets as a result of independent appraisals. Intangible assets primarily represent the value assigned to contracts such as non-competition agreements and acute dialysis service agreements entered into in the transactions. Related amounts will be amortized over the lives of the contracts, which generally range from five to fifteen years. The Company recorded estimated employee severance costs of $1,000 and estimated contract termination costs of $1,500 associated with the NNA acquisition. As of September 30, 2004 $714 remains outstanding pending the employee terminations and the full amount remains outstanding for the resolution of contractual matters.

Pro Forma Data

     The following summary, prepared on a pro forma basis, combines our results of operations with those of the businesses we acquired in 2003 and 2004. These pro forma results reflect the acquisitions as if we consummated them as of the beginning of the periods presented, giving effect to adjustments such as amortization of intangibles, interest expense and related income taxes.

     The unaudited pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the acquisitions had been completed as of the beginning of the periods presented.

3. Long-Term Debt

     Long-term debt consisted of the following as of December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2004:

Credit Agreements

     As of December 31, 2003, we had two credit agreements with a group of banks totaling $150,000. On February 10, 2004, we entered into a new credit agreement (the 2004 Agreement) with a group of banks totaling up to $700,000. The 2004 Agreement replaced both of our prior facilities. The 2004 agreement has a $150,000 revolving credit facility, a $325,000 term loan facility and a $225,000 incremental term loan facility. Borrowings under the incremental term loan facility are subject to obtaining commitments from the banks and finalizing specific terms. The revolving credit facility and the $325,000 term loan facility have a final maturity of February 10, 2009. Each of our wholly-owned subsidiaries has guaranteed all of our obligations under the 2004 Agreement. Further, our obligations under the 2004 Agreement, and our subsidiaries’ obligations under their guarantees, are secured by a pledge of the equity interests we hold in each of our subsidiaries. The 2004 Agreement includes financial covenants that are customary based on the amount and duration of the agreement.

     Borrowings under the revolving credit facility and $150,000 of the committed term loan facility under the 2004 Agreement may be used for acquisitions, repurchases of Company common stock, capital expenditures, working

6

capital and general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the 2004 Agreement bear interest at variable rates determined by the Company’s leverage ratio. Effective June 30, 2004, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge interest rate risk on $150,000 of our term loan (See “Interest Rate Swap” below). The portion of our borrowings that is subject to variable rates carries a degree of interest rate risk. Specifically, the Company will face higher interest costs on this debt if interest rates rise.

9% Senior Subordinated Notes

     With our acquisition of NNA, we assumed all of NNA’s outstanding debt including its 9% senior subordinated notes (the Notes), due 2011. We recorded the Notes at the face value of $160,000 plus an additional $25,600 representing the difference between the fair value of the Notes and the face amount on the date of acquisition. Accordingly, the Notes were recorded at the estimated fair value of $185,600. As of September 30, 2004, the outstanding balance of the Notes was $183,968.

     The Notes bear interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the face amount. The fair value premium is being recognized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method and is recorded as a reduction to interest expense. Accordingly, the effective interest rate on the Notes as of September 30, 2004 was 6.4%. Each of our wholly-owned subsidiaries has guaranteed all of our obligations under these notes. The rights of the noteholders and our obligations under these notes are set forth in an indenture that NNA entered into in October 2003, which we assumed in connection with the NNA acquisition. The indenture includes customary financial covenants.

Interest Rate Swap

     Effective June 30, 2004, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest rate risk on $150,000 of our term loan. Under these interest rate swap agreements we will exchange fixed and variable rate interest payments based on a $150,000 notional principal amount through March 30, 2007. The notional amount of $150,000 and interest payments of 3.5% are fixed in the agreements. The interest payments are subject to adjustment based on our leverage ratio. The changes in cash flows under these agreements are expected to offset the changes in interest rate payments attributable to fluctuations in LIBOR. The hedge is structured to qualify for the shortcut method as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; therefore, we will record changes in the fair value of the agreement directly in comprehensive income. As of September 30, 2004, the notional amount of the swap agreements was $150,000 and its fair value was a $1,700 liability, resulting in a comprehensive loss during the third quarter of 2004 of $1,045 (net of related taxes).

Maturities of Long-Term Debt

     The aggregate maturities of long-term debt, excluding the fair value premium, at September 30, 2004 are as follows:

Guarantor Information

     Our wholly-owned subsidiaries have guaranteed the Notes as well as our obligations under the 2004 Agreement. We conduct substantially all of our business through subsidiaries. Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. The information segregates Renal Care Group, Inc. (the parent company), the combined wholly-owned subsidiary guarantors, the combined non-guarantor subsidiaries and consolidating adjustments. All of the subsidiary guarantees are both full and unconditional, and joint and several.

7

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

8

Condensed Consolidating Income Statements

9

Condensed Consolidating Income Statements

10

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

11

4. Net Income per Share

     The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (shares in thousands):

5. Stockholders’ Equity

Stock-based Compensation

     We account for stock-based compensation to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Accordingly, we recognize no compensation expense when we grant fixed options to employees and directors, because the exercise price of the stock options equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying stock on the dates of grant. Option grants to medical directors and non-vested stock grants are expensed over their vesting periods.

     The following table presents the pro forma effect on net income and net income per share as if we had applied the fair value based method and recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS No. 123) to stock-based compensation to employees and directors:

     The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 for providing pro forma disclosures are not likely to be representative of the effects on reported net income for future periods.

12

Stock Split

     On April 27, 2004, we announced a three-for-two stock split in the form of a stock dividend distributed to shareholders of record as of May 7, 2004. On May 24, 2004 we issued one share for every two shares held by shareholders as of the record date. The par value of our common stock remained unchanged at $0.01.

Authorized Shares

     On June 9, 2004, our shareholders approved an amendment to the certificate of incorporation increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock from 90,000 to 150,000.

6. Contingencies

     On August 30, 2000, 19 patients were hospitalized and one patient died shortly after becoming ill while receiving treatment at one of our dialysis centers in Youngstown, Ohio. One of the 19 hospitalized patients also died some time later. In March 2001, one of the affected patients sued the Company in Mahoning County, Ohio for injuries related to the August 30, 2000 incident. Additional suits were filed. As of September 30, 2004, we had settled all of these suits. Additional defendants were named in each of the suits. Additional defendants in some of the suits include the water system vendors who installed and maintained the water system in the dialysis center. We filed cross-claims against the water system vendors, and these cross-claims remain outstanding against one of the water system vendors. We intend to pursue these cross-claims vigorously.

     We are involved in other litigation and regulatory investigations arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, management believes these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on Renal Care Group’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

     Laws and regulations governing the Medicare and Medicaid programs are complex and subject to interpretation. We believe that we are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing the Medicare and Medicaid programs. On October 25, 2004, we received a subpoena from the office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. The subpoena requires the production of documents related to numerous aspects of our business and operations, including those of RenaLab, Inc., our laboratory. The subpoena includes specific requests for documents related to testing for parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and vitamin D therapies. Other than this subpoena, we are not aware of any pending or threatened investigations involving allegations of potential noncompliance with applicable laws or regulations. While no regulatory inquiries have been made other than the subpoena we received on October 25, 2004, compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future government review and interpretation, and non-compliance or alleged non-compliance could result in significant regulatory action including fines, penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

     We generally engage practicing board-certified or board-eligible nephrologists to serve as medical directors for our centers. Medical directors are responsible for the administration and monitoring of patient care policies, including patient education, administration of dialysis treatment, development programs and assessment of all patients in our dialysis centers. We pay medical director fees that are consistent with the fair market value of the required supervisory services. Our medical director agreements typically have a term of seven years with a three-year renewal option.

7. Defined Benefit Plan

     Effective January 29, 2003, we implemented a retirement benefit plan for our former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. He died March 20, 2003. The plan provides that we will make 120 monthly payments of $54 each to our former Chairman’s beneficiary, beginning in April 2003. As a result, in the first quarter of 2003, we recorded a $5,350 charge included in general and administrative expenses representing the pre-tax net present value of these payments. As of September 30, 2004, we have accrued liabilities totaling $4,677 related to this defined benefit plan.

13

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2004

     Net Revenue. Net revenue increased from $253.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $356.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $102.3 million, or 40.3%. This increase resulted primarily from a 36.8% increase in the number of treatments that we performed from 822,551 in the 2003 period to 1,125,021 in the 2004 period. This growth in treatments is the result of our acquisition of NNA and other dialysis facilities along with a 3.2% increase in same-market treatments for the 2004 period over the 2003 period. In addition, average patient revenue per treatment increased 1.9% from $308 in 2003 to $314 in 2004. The increase in patient revenue per treatment from 2003 is largely due to the impact of our annual price increase implemented in the fourth quarter of 2003 along with an increase in the utilization of certain ancillary drugs, primarily EPO. This increase was partially offset by lower revenue per treatment realized in the former NNA operations.

     As we transition NNA’s patients into our laboratory, we expect revenue per treatment to remain steady or improve in the remainder of 2004. Excluding any potential changes in ancillary drug utilization, we expect net revenue to remain between $310 and $315 per treatment for the remainder of 2004.

     Patient Care Costs. Patient care costs consist of costs directly related to the care of patients, including direct labor, drugs and other medical supplies, and operational costs of facilities. Patient care costs increased from $165.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $239.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 45.1%. This increase was due principally to the increase in the number of treatments we performed during the period, which resulted in corresponding increases in the use of labor, drugs and supplies. Patient care costs as a percentage of net revenue increased from 65.0% in the 2003 period to 67.2% in the 2004 period. This increase is due to generally higher salary and benefit costs and routine supply costs experienced in the former NNA facilities. Patient care costs per treatment increased 6.0% from $201 in the 2003 period to $213 in the 2004 period. This increase was due to an increase in the utilization of certain ancillary drugs as well as the higher cost structure in the former NNA facilities.

     General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include corporate office costs and other costs not directly related to the care of patients, including facility administration, accounting, billing and information systems. General and administrative expenses increased from $21.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $26.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 24.1%. The increase in general and administrative expenses over the third quarter of 2003 is due to increased costs associated with the acquisitions that we closed in the first nine months of 2004. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 8.4% in 2003 to 7.4% in 2004 as we leveraged our corporate functions over a larger base of revenue as a result of our acquisitions in 2004.

     Provision for Doubtful Accounts. We determine the provision for doubtful accounts as a function of payor mix, billing practices and other factors. We reserve for doubtful accounts in the period when we recognize the revenue. Management establishes these reserves based on its estimate of the net collectibility of the accounts receivable while considering a variety of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, analysis of revenues generated from payor sources, subsequent collection testing and regular reviews of detailed accounts receivable agings. We make adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts as necessary based on the results of management’s ongoing reviews of the net collectibility of accounts receivable. The provision for doubtful accounts increased from $6.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $8.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $1.9 million, or 29.1%. This increase was principally the result of increases in our net revenue. The provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 2.6% in the 2003 period to 2.4% in the 2004 period. The decrease in the provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net revenue was due to improvements in the Company’s historical collection results.

     Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased from $11.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $15.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 35.0%.

14

This increase was due to increases in plant and equipment and separately identifiable intangible assets associated with our recent acquisitions, as well as start-up of dialysis facilities, normal replacement costs of dialysis facilities and equipment, and purchases of information systems. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 4.5% in 2003 to 4.3% in 2004 principally as a result of NNA’s practice of leasing dialysis equipment under operating leases, which resulted in lower depreciation and amortization and higher patient care costs.

     Income from Operations. Income from operations increased from $49.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $66.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 33.9%. Income from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 19.6% in the 2003 period to 18.7% in the 2004 period principally as a result of the acquisition of NNA, which had generally lower margins than the Company as a result of NNA’s lower revenue per treatment and higher patient care costs and other factors discussed above.

     Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense increased from $76,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004. This increase was due to higher average borrowings outstanding during the quarter, which were associated with the completion of our program to repurchase $250.0 million in common stock between November 2003 and March 2004, our recent acquisitions and the assumption of NNA’s $160.0 million 9% senior subordinated notes.

     Minority Interest. Minority interest represents the proportionate equity interest of other owners in consolidated entities that we do not wholly own. The financial results of those entities are included in the Company’s consolidated results. Minority interest as a percentage of net revenue increased from 2.7% in the 2003 period to 2.9% in the 2004 period. The change in minority interest expense as a percentage of revenue occurred as our recent acquisitions increased the percentage of our facilities that operate as joint ventures. As of September 30, 2004, we were the majority and controlling owner in 67 joint ventures.

     Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense increased from $16.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $19.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $2.8 million million or 17.2%. The increase is a result of higher pre-tax earnings described above. Our effective tax rate was 38.0% for the 2003 period compared to 38.5% for the 2004 period. The increase reflects a higher overall effective rate associated with the operations acquired from NNA.

     Net Income. Net income increased from $26.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $30.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $3.9 million or 14.8%. The increase was a result of the items discussed above.

Nine months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Nine months Ended September 30, 2004

     Net Revenue. Net revenue increased from $743.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $975.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $232.0 million, or 31.2%. This increase resulted primarily from a 27.5% increase in the number of treatments that we performed from 2,415,805 in the 2003 period to 3,080,520 in the 2004 period. This growth in treatments is the result of our acquisition of NNA and other dialysis facilities along with a 3.6% increase in same-market treatments for the 2004 period over the 2003 period. In addition, average patient revenue per treatment increased 2.6% from $307 in 2003 to $315 in 2004. The increase in patient revenue per treatment is largely due to the impact of our annual price increase implemented in the fourth quarter of 2003 along with an increase in the utilization of certain ancillary drugs, primarily EPO, and the favorable resolution of several contractual issues with payors during the first quarter of 2004. This increase was partially offset by lower revenue per treatment realized in the former NNA operations.

     Patient Care Costs. Patient care costs consist of costs directly related to the care of patients, including direct labor, drugs and other medical supplies, and operational costs of facilities. Patient care costs increased from $482.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $648.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 34.4%. This increase was due principally to the increase in the number of treatments we performed during the period, which was reflected in corresponding increases in the use of labor, drugs and supplies. Patient care costs as a percentage of net revenue increased from 64.9% in 2003 to 66.5% in 2004. This increase is due to generally higher salary and benefit costs and routine supply costs experienced in the former NNA facilities.

15

Patient care costs per treatment increased 5.5% from $200 in 2003 to $211 in 2004. This increase was due to an increase in the utilization of certain ancillary drugs as well as the higher cost structure in the former NNA facilities.

     General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include corporate office costs and other costs not directly related to the care of patients, including facility administration, accounting, billing and information systems. General and administrative expenses increased from $68.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $76.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 11.1%. The increase in general and administrative expenses over the 2003 period is due to costs associated with acquisitions that closed in the first nine months of 2004. This increase was partially offset by a $5.4 million charge related to a supplemental retirement benefit plan for the Company’s former chairman, chief executive and president that we recorded in the first quarter of 2003. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased from 9.2% in the 2003 period to 7.8% in the 2004 period. This decrease was the result of leveraging our corporate functions over a larger base of revenue as well as the absence of the retirement charge in the 2004 period.

     Provision for Doubtful Accounts. We determine the provision for doubtful accounts as a function of payor mix, billing practices and other factors. We reserve for doubtful accounts in the period in which the revenue is recognized. Management establishes these reserves based on its estimates of the net collectibility of accounts receivable while considering a variety of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, analysis of revenues generated from payor sources, subsequent collection testing and regular reviews of detailed accounts receivable agings. We make adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts as necessary based on the results of management’s ongoing reviews of the net collectibility of accounts receivable. The provision for doubtful accounts increased from $19.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $23.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $4.2 million, or 21.5%. The provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 2.6% in 2003 to 2.4% in 2004. The decrease in the provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net revenue was due to improvements in the Company’s historical collection results.

     Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased from $33.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $42.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $9.2 million, or 27.6%. This net increase was due to increases in plant and equipment and separately identifiable assets associated with our recent acquisitions, as well as start-up of dialysis facilities, normal replacement costs of dialysis facilities and equipment, and purchases of information systems. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 4.5% in 2003 to 4.3% in 2004 principally as a result of NNA’s practice of leasing dialysis equipment under operating leases, which resulted in lower depreciation and amortization and higher patient care costs.

     Income from Operations. Income from operations increased from $139.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $184.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $44.8 million, or 32.2%. Income from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased from 18.7% in the 2003 period to 18.9% in the 2004 as a result of the factors discussed above.

     Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense increased from $526,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $13.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The increase was the result of higher average borrowings in 2004, which were associated with the completion of our program to repurchase $250.0 million in common stock between November 2003 and March 2004, our recent acquisitions and the assumption of NNA’s $160.0 million 9% senior subordinated notes.

     Minority Interest. Minority interest represents the proportionate equity interest of other owners in consolidated entities that we do not wholly own. The financial results of those entities are included in the Company’s consolidated results. Minority interest as a percentage of net revenue was 2.6% in the 2003 and 2004 periods. As of September 30, 2004, we were the majority and controlling partner in 67 joint ventures.

     Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense increased from $45.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $55.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $10.2 million or 22.4%. The increase is a result of higher pre-tax earnings described above. The Company’s effective tax rate was 38.0% for the 2003 period compared to 38.3% for the 2004 period. The increase reflects a higher overall effective rate associated with the operations acquired from NNA.

16

     Net Income. Net income increased from $74.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $89.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $15.6 million or 21.1%. The increase was a result of the items discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     We require capital primarily to acquire and develop dialysis centers, to purchase property and equipment for existing centers, to repurchase shares of our common stock and to finance working capital needs. At September 30, 2004, our working capital was $138.1 million, cash and cash equivalents were $42.0 million, and our current ratio was approximately 1.6 to 1.0.

     Net cash provided by operating activities was $136.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Cash provided by operating activities consists of net income before depreciation and amortization expense and income applicable to minority interest, adjusted for changes in components of working capital. Net cash used in investing activities was $348.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Net cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of $274.6 million of cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, as well as $66.5 million in purchases of property and equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities was $203.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Net cash provided by financing activities primarily reflects proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $325.0 million, net proceeds of $17.8 million from the issuance of common stock, offset by $137.8 million in repurchases of our common stock.

     As of December 31, 2003, we had two credit agreements with a group of banks totaling $150.0 million. On February 10, 2004, we entered into a new credit agreement (the 2004 Agreement) with a group of banks totaling up to $700.0 million. The 2004 Agreement replaced both of our prior facilities. The 2004 agreement has a $150.0 million revolving credit facility, a $325.0 million term loan facility and a $225.0 million incremental term loan facility. Borrowings under the incremental term loan facility are subject to obtaining commitments from the banks and finalizing specific terms. The revolving credit facility and the $325.0 million term loan facility have a final maturity of February 10, 2009. Each of our wholly-owned subsidiaries has guaranteed all of our obligations under the 2004 Agreement. Further, our obligations under the 2004 Agreement, and our subsidiaries’ obligations under their guarantees, are secured by a pledge of the equity interests we hold in each of our subsidiaries. The 2004 Agreement includes financial covenants that are customary based on the amount and duration of the agreement.

     Borrowings under the $150.0 million revolving credit facility may be used for acquisitions, repurchases of our stock, capital expenditures, working capital and general corporate purposes. As of September 30, 2004, we can borrow up to $150.0 million under the revolving credit facility but cannot borrow any additional amounts under the $325.0 million term loan facility. At September 30, 2004, our outstanding indebtedness was $516.5 million, including a remaining balance of $316.9 million under the term loan facility, $10.4 million under the revolving credit facility, $184.0 million of senior subordinated notes assumed in the NNA transaction and $5.3 million of other indebtedness, primarily capital leases.

     Borrowings under the 2004 Agreement bear interest at variable rates determined by our leverage ratio. These variable rate debt instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk and we will face higher interest costs on this debt if interest rates rise.

     Effective June 30, 2004, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest rate risk on $150.0 million of our term loan. Under these interest rate swap agreements we will exchange fixed and variable rate interest payments based on a $150.0 million notional principal amount through March 30, 2007. The notional amount of

17

$150.0 million and the interest rate of 3.5% are fixed in the agreements. The changes in cash flows under these agreements are expected to offset the changes in interest rate payments attributable to fluctuations in LIBOR. The hedge is structured to qualify for the shortcut method; therefore, we will record changes in the fair value of the agreement directly in comprehensive income. The interest payments under this agreement are settled on a net basis each calendar quarter.

     The senior subordinated notes we assumed in the NNA transaction bear interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the face amount that was $160.0 million at the date of acquisition. As of September 30, 2004 these notes have a remaining face value of $159.7 million and are recorded at their fair value of $184.0 million. These notes do not provide for scheduled principal amortization and are scheduled to mature on November 1, 2011. Each of our wholly-owned subsidiaries has guaranteed all of our obligations under these notes. The rights of the noteholders and our obligations under these notes are set forth in an indenture that NNA entered into in October 2003, which we assumed in connection with the NNA acquisition. The indenture includes customary financial covenants.

     As a result of our indebtedness, we will incur substantial interest expense in and after 2004. Based on our outstanding indebtedness of $492.3 million, excluding the unamortized fair value premium of $24.3 million on the Notes, the aggregate maturities of our borrowings are as follows: 2004 — $19.8 million; 2005 — $22.3 million; 2006 — $30.5 million; 2007 — $56.9 million; 2008 — $156.4 million; and thereafter — $206.4 million.

     A significant component of our growth strategy is the acquisition and development of dialysis facilities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or to close acquisitions on acceptable terms. Management believes that existing cash and funds from operations, together with funds available under our credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our acquisition, expansion, capital expenditure and working capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, in order to finance certain large strategic acquisition opportunities, we may need to incur additional short and long-term bank indebtedness or to issue equity or debt securities. The availability and terms of any future financing will depend on market and other conditions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to secure additional financing, if required, on acceptable terms.

     We plan to make capital expenditures of between $85.0 million and $95.0 million in 2004, primarily for equipment replacement, expansion of existing dialysis facilities and construction of de novo facilities. As of September 30, 2004, we had made approximately $66.5 million of capital expenditures for these purposes in 2004. We expect that these capital expenditures will be funded with cash provided by operating activities and our existing credit facilities. Management believes that capital resources available to us will be sufficient to meet the needs of our business, both on a short- and long-term basis.

     Management, from time to time, determines the appropriateness of repurchasing common stock in accordance with a repurchase plan initially authorized by the Board of Directors in October 2000. In 2001, we began repurchasing shares of our common stock by purchasing 150,000 shares of common stock for approximately $3.1 million. In 2002, we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our common stock for approximately $90.9 million. In October 2003, we announced that the Board of Directors had approved an increase in the repurchase plan to allow the purchase of up to a total of $450.0 million in common stock, and we announced that we intended to repurchase $250.0 million in common stock between November 1, 2003 and March 31, 2004. During 2003, we repurchased 5.5 million shares of common stock for $140.5 million. In the first half of 2004, we repurchased 4.6 million shares for $137.8 million. Through September 30, 2004, we had repurchased an aggregate of 14.5 million shares under the plan, for a total of approximately $372.2 million.

Critical Accounting Policies

     The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a financial reporting release, FR-60, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies. In accordance with that release, management has identified accounting policies that it considers critical to the business of Renal Care Group. Those policies include net revenue and contractual provisions, provision for doubtful accounts, self-insurance accruals, and impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of. These policies were identified as critical based on their importance to the consolidated financial statements as well as on the degrees of subjectivity and complexity involved in these policies. There have been no changes in Renal Care Group’s critical accounting policies or in the application of those policies from those described in the annual report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 4, 2004 and in the current report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on April 19, 2004.

18

RISK FACTORS

     You should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in Renal Care Group. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing Renal Care Group. Other risks and uncertainties that we have not predicted or assessed may also adversely affect us.

     If any of the following risks occurs, our earnings, financial condition or business could be materially harmed, and the trading price of our common stock could decline, resulting in the loss of all or part of your investment.

If payments by private insurers, hospitals or managed care organizations decrease, then our revenue and earnings could decrease.

     If private insurers, managed care organizations or hospitals reduce their rates or if we experience a significant shift in our revenue mix toward additional Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, then our revenue and earnings will decline. We estimate that approximately 43% of our net revenue for 2002, 45% of our net revenue for 2003, and 47% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was derived from sources other than Medicare and Medicaid. In general, payments we receive from private insurers and hospitals for our services are at rates significantly higher than the Medicare or Medicaid rates. Payments we receive from managed care organizations are also at rates higher than Medicare and Medicaid rates but generally lower than those paid by private insurers.

     In addition, we have been able to implement annual price increases for private insurers and managed care organizations that we have not been able to implement for federal programs. Management believes that health insurance pricing is cyclical and that we may be at or near the top of the cycle. As a result, management believes that our ability to maintain or raise rates to private insurers and managed care companies will likely be more limited over the next several years than it has been in the recent past. We have recently experienced reductions in reimbursement from two commercial insurers, and management believes that the reductions in reimbursement by these two commercial insurers along with pricing pressure from other commercial insurers and managed care organizations will likely adversely impact our revenue per treatment and earnings per share in 2004. Any of the following events could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and earnings:

     If Congress or CMS changes the Medicare or Medicaid programs for dialysis, then our revenue and earnings could decrease.

     If the government changes the Medicare, Medicaid or similar government programs or the rates those programs pay for our services, then our revenue and earnings may decline. We estimate that approximately 50% of our net revenue for 2002, 49% of our net revenue for 2003, and 49% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 consisted of reimbursements from Medicare, including reimbursement for the administration of EPO. We also estimate that approximately 7% of our net revenue for 2002, 6% of our net revenue for 2003 and 4% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 consisted of reimbursements from Medicaid or comparable state programs. Any of the following actions in connection with government programs could cause our revenue and earnings to decline:

19

     Specifically, Congress and CMS have proposed expanding the drugs and services that are included in the flat composite rate. CMS has indicated that it believes such a mechanism would be fairer and easier to administer. In addition, Congress mandated a change in the way we will be paid beginning in 2005 for some of the drugs, including EPO, that we bill for outside of the flat composite rate. This change will result in lower reimbursement for these drugs and a higher composite rate. Congress stated that these changes are not intended to reduce overall reimbursement to dialysis providers. CMS recently issued proposed regulations to implement these changes. These proposed regulations provide that we will be reimbursed for separately billable drugs at a 3% discount from the average sale price and that the composite rate will be increased by 11.3%. These proposed regulations also include a case-mix adjustment and a geographic adjustment to the composite rate as well as a budget-neutrality adjustment. If these regulations become effective as proposed, management believes they will result in a net reduction of approximately $0.03 per share in diluted net income in 2005.

If states lower Medicaid reimbursement, then we would be less profitable.

     The Medicaid programs in some of the states in which we operate have formerly reimbursed us, or currently reimburse us, at rates higher than those paid by Medicare. Some of these programs, like Washington’s, Wisconsin’s, and New Mexico’s, have approved reductions in reimbursement. Other programs have proposed reductions or have announced that they are considering reductions. In addition, a number of the states where we operate are experiencing budget shortfalls, and some of these states may consider reducing Medicaid reimbursement or changing their Medicaid programs to cut costs. We are unable to predict whether and, if so, when any reductions in Medicaid reimbursement, other than those already approved, might occur and what their precise effect will be.

If reimbursement for EPO decreases, then we could be less profitable.

     If government or private payors decrease reimbursement rates for EPO, for which we are currently reimbursed separately outside of the flat composite rate, then our revenue and earnings will decline. Revenues from the administration of EPO were approximately 23% of our net revenue for 2002, 24% of our net revenue for 2003 and 27% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Most of our payments for EPO come from government programs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement represented approximately 53% of the total revenue we derived from EPO. A reduction in the reimbursement rate for EPO or the inclusion of EPO in the list of items covered by the flat composite rate could materially and adversely affect our revenue and earnings. As discussed above, Congress has mandated a change in the way we will be reimbursed for EPO, and CMS has proposed regulations to implement the change. This change and others in the proposed regulations could, as discussed above, adversely affect our net income in 2005.

If Amgen raises the price for EPO or if EPO becomes in short supply, then we could be less profitable.

     EPO is produced by a single manufacturer, Amgen, Inc., and there are no substitute products currently marketed to dialysis providers in the United States. In April 2002, Amgen announced a 3.9% increase in the price of EPO. This price increase adversely affected our earnings in 2003, and changes in the rebate structure under our current contract with Amgen may adversely affect our earnings in 2004. If Amgen imposes additional EPO price increases or if Amgen or other factors interrupt the supply of EPO, then our revenue and earnings will decline.

20

If Amgen markets Aranesp^® for ESRD patients, then we could be less profitable.

     Amgen has developed and obtained FDA approval for a new drug to treat anemia that is marketed as Aranesp^® (darbepoetin alfa). Aranesp^® is a longer acting form of bio-engineered protein that, like EPO, can be used to treat anemia. EPO is usually administered in conjunction with each dialysis treatment. Aranesp^® can remain effective for between two and three weeks. If Amgen markets Aranesp^® for the treatment of dialysis patients, then our earnings could be materially and adversely affected by either of the following factors:

If our business is alleged or found to violate heath care or other applicable laws, our revenue and earnings could decrease.

     We are subject to extensive federal, state and local regulation. The laws that apply to our operations include, but are not limited to, the following:

     Much of the regulation of our business, particularly in the areas of fraud and abuse and patient referral, is complex and open to differing interpretations. Due to the broad application of the statutory provisions and the absence in many instances of regulations or court decisions addressing the specific arrangements by which we conduct our business, including our arrangements with medical directors, physician stockholders and physician joint venture partners, governmental agencies could challenge some of our practices under these laws.

     New regulations governing electronic transactions and the collection, use, storage, and disclosure of health information impose significant administrative and financial obligations on our business. If, after the required compliance date, we are found to have violated these regulations, we could be subject to:

     Government investigations of health care providers, including dialysis providers, have continued to increase. We have been the subject of investigations in the past, and the government may investigate our business in the future.

21

One of our competitors, DaVita, Inc., has announced that it is the subject of an investigation by the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Another competitor, Gambro Healthcare, Inc., has announced that it is the subject of an investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in St. Louis, Missouri. Gambro recently announced that it has reached an agreement in principle to settle matters related to that investigation and to pay approximately $350.0 million in connection with the settlement. On October 25, 2004, we received a subpoena from the office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. The subpoena requires the production of documents related to numerous aspects of our business and operations, including those of RenaLab, Inc., our laboratory. The subpoena includes specific requests for documents related to testing for parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and vitamin D therapies. Our competitors DaVita, Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care AG, as well as other participants in the dialysis industry, have announced that they have received similar subpoenas. If any of our operations are found to violate applicable laws, then we may be subject to severe sanctions, or we could be required to alter or discontinue the challenged conduct or both. If we are required to alter our practices, we may not be able to do so successfully. If any of these events occurs, our revenue and earnings could decline.

If our joint ventures are found to violate the law, our business could be damaged.

     A number of the dialysis centers we operate are owned by joint ventures in which we own a controlling interest and one or more physicians or physician practice groups maintain a minority interest. The physician owners may also provide medical director services to those centers or other centers we own and operate. Because our relationships with physicians are governed by the Anti-Kickback Statute, we have sought to satisfy as many safe harbor requirements as possible in structuring these joint venture arrangements. However, our joint venture arrangements do not satisfy all elements of a safe harbor. Also, we believe we have structured the physician relationships in these joint ventures in a way that meets applicable exceptions under the Stark Law or that otherwise complies with the Stark Law. If the joint ventures were found to be in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute or the Stark Law, we could be required to restructure them or refuse to accept referrals for designated health services from the physicians with whom the joint venture centers have a relationship. We also could be required to repay to Medicare amounts received by the joint ventures pursuant to prohibited referrals, and we could be subject to monetary penalties. If the joint venture centers are subject to any of these penalties, our business could be damaged.

Changes in the health care delivery, financing or reimbursement systems could adversely affect our business.

     The health care industry in the United States may be entering a period of change and uncertainty. Health care organizations, public or private, may dramatically change the way they operate and pay for services. Our business is designed to function within the current health care financing and reimbursement system. During the past several years, the health care industry has been subject to increasing levels of government regulation of, among other things, reimbursement rates and relationships with referring physicians. In addition, proposals to reform the health care system have been considered by Congress. In light of the continued increases in the cost of health care and the current economic situation coupled with the federal budget deficit, there may be new proposals to change the health care system and control costs. These proposals, if enacted, could further increase the government’s oversight role and involvement in health care, lower reimbursement rates and otherwise change the operating environment for health care companies. We cannot predict the likelihood of those events or what impact they may have on our business.

If local physicians stop sending patients to our centers or were prohibited from doing so for regulatory reasons, then our revenue and earnings would decline.

     Our dialysis centers depend on local nephrologists sending patients to the centers. Typically, one or a few physicians’ patients make up all or a significant portion of the patient base at each of our dialysis centers, and the loss of the patient base of one or more of these physicians could have a material adverse effect on the operations of that center. The loss of the patient base of a significant number of local physicians could cause our revenue and earnings to decline. In many instances, the primary referral sources for our centers are physicians who also serve as medical directors of our centers and may be shareholders. If the medical director relationship or stock ownership were found to violate applicable federal or state law, including fraud and abuse laws and laws prohibiting self-referrals, then the physicians acting as medical directors or owning our stock could be forced to stop referring patients to our centers.

     A number of our medical director agreements will expire over the next three years, unless they are renewed or renegotiated. We did not renew or renegotiate a small number of our medical director agreements that expired in 2003, and we may not be able to renew or renegotiate expiring medical director agreements successfully, or we may not be able to enforce the non-competition provisions of some of our medical director or other agreements. Any of these factors could result in a loss of patients, since dialysis patients are typically treated at a center where their

22

physician or a member of his or her practice group serves as medical director. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain qualified physicians to serve as medical directors of our dialysis centers.

The dialysis business is highly competitive. If we do not compete effectively in our markets, then we could lose market share and our rate of growth could slow.

     The dialysis industry is largely consolidated, and the consolidation trend continues as large providers acquire smaller providers. There is a small number of large dialysis companies that compete for the acquisition of outpatient dialysis centers and the development of relationships with referring physicians. Two of our major competitors are part of larger companies that also manufacture dialysis equipment, which allows them to benefit from lower equipment costs. Several of our competitors, including these equipment manufacturers, are larger than we are and have greater financial resources and more established operations. We may also face competition from new entrants into the market, including centers established by former medical directors or other referring physicians. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively with any of our competitors.

If we are unable to make acquisitions in the future, then our rate of growth will slow.

     Much of our historical growth has come from acquisitions. Although we intend to continue to pursue growth through the acquisition of dialysis centers, we may be unable to identify and complete suitable acquisitions at prices we are willing to pay, or we may be unable to obtain the necessary financing. Further, due to the increased size of our business, the amount that acquired businesses contribute to our revenue and profits will continue to be smaller on a percentage basis. Also, as a result of consolidation in the dialysis industry, we believe the four largest providers of outpatient dialysis services now own approximately 66% of the outpatient dialysis facilities in the United States. We compete with these other companies to identify and complete suitable acquisitions. We believe this competition has intensified in light of the smaller pool of available acquisition candidates and other market forces. As a result, we believe it will be more difficult for us to acquire suitable companies on favorable terms. Further, the businesses we acquire may not perform well enough to justify our investment. If we are unable to make additional acquisitions on suitable terms, then we may not meet our growth expectations.

If we fail to integrate acquired companies, then we will be less profitable.

     We have grown significantly by acquisitions of other dialysis providers since our formation. We recently acquired NNA, Midwest Kidney Centers, and dialysis programs in Des Moines, Iowa; Las Vegas, Nevada; Tampa, Florida; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Danville, Virginia. We intend to pursue acquisitions of more dialysis businesses in the future. We are unable to predict the number and size of any future acquisitions. We face significant challenges in integrating an acquired company’s management and other personnel, clinical operations, and financial and operating systems with ours, often without the benefit of continued services from key personnel of the acquired company. We face these challenges particularly in larger acquisitions like the acquisition of NNA. We may be unable to integrate the businesses we acquire successfully or to achieve anticipated benefits from an acquisition in a timely manner, which could lead to substantial costs and delays or other operational, technical or financial problems, including diverting management’s attention from our existing business. Any of these results could damage our profitability and our prospects for future growth.

If acquired businesses have unknown liabilities, then we could be exposed to liabilities that could harm our business and profitability.

     Businesses we acquire may have unknown or contingent liabilities, including liabilities for failure to comply with health care laws. Although we generally attempt to identify practices that may give rise to unknown or contingent liabilities and conform them to our standards after the acquisition, private plaintiffs or governmental agencies may still assert claims. Even though we generally seek to obtain indemnification from the sellers of businesses we buy, unknown and contingent liabilities may not be covered by indemnification or may exceed contractual limits or the financial capacity of the indemnifying party.

23

If we complete future acquisitions, we may dilute existing stockholders by issuing more of our common stock or we may incur expenses related to debt and goodwill, which could reduce our earnings.

     We may issue equity securities in future acquisitions that could be dilutive to our shareholders. We also may incur additional debt in future acquisitions. Interest expense on debt incurred to fund our acquisitions may significantly reduce our profitability. While goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized to expense under generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to review all of these assets at regular intervals for impairment and to charge an appropriate amount to expense when we identify impairment. If we identify impairment and are required to write off a significant portion of our intangible assets at one time, then there could be a material adverse impact on our stock price.

We may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.

     As of September 30, 2004, we had total consolidated debt of approximately $516.5 million, including a $24.3 million fair value premium on the 9% senior subordinated notes, and cash of approximately $42.0 million. Also, subject to limitations, including those included in our credit facility and those contained included in the indenture for the 9% senior subordinated notes we assumed in the NNA acquisition, we are not and will not be prohibited from incurring additional debt.

     Due to the large amount of our consolidated debt, we may not generate enough cash from our operations to meet these obligations or to fund other liquidity needs. Our ability to generate cash in the future is, to some extent, subject to risks and uncertainties that are beyond our control. If we are unable to meet our debt obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, sell assets or raise funds in the capital markets. However, we can not assure you that, if we are unable to pay our debt, we will be able to refinance it, obtain additional equity capital or sell assets, in each case on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or otherwise to fund our liquidity needs.

     If for any reason we are unable to meet our debt obligations, we would be in default under the terms of the agreements governing our outstanding debt. If such a default were to occur, the lenders under our credit facility could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the credit facility immediately due and payable, and the lenders would not be obligated to continue to advance funds under our credit facility. In addition, if such a default were to occur, the 9% senior subordinated notes would become immediately due and payable. If the amounts outstanding under these debt agreements are accelerated, we cannot assure you that our assets will be sufficient to repay the money we owe to banks and other debt holders.

The large amount and terms of our outstanding debt may prevent us from taking actions we would otherwise consider in our best interest.

     The indenture governing our 9% senior subordinated notes and our credit facility contain numerous financial and operating covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities such as:

24

     Our credit facility also requires us to comply with financial covenants including a net worth test, a leverage ratio test and a fixed charge coverage ratio test. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section. A breach of any of the covenants contained in our credit facility or our inability to comply with the required financial covenants could result in an event of default, which would allow the lenders under our credit facility to declare all borrowings outstanding to be due and payable, which would, in turn, trigger an event of default under the indenture governing our 9% senior subordinated notes. In addition, our lenders could require us to apply all of our available cash to repay our borrowings or they could prevent us from making debt service payments on our 9% senior subordinated notes. If the amounts outstanding under our credit facility or these notes are accelerated, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full the money we owe the banks and our other debt holders.

     The large amount of our outstanding debt and the limitations our credit facility impose on us could have adverse consequences, including:

If a change of control occurs, we may have to spend a substantial amount of cash or incur additional indebtedness to satisfy our obligation to repurchase the notes we assumed in the NNA acquisition from holders who choose to tender their notes pursuant to certain procedures in the indenture.

     Upon specified change of control events the holders of the 9% senior subordinated notes we assumed in the NNA acquisition have the right to require us to repurchase all or any part (equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof) of the notes they hold at an offer price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the date of purchase. When a change of control occurs, we may not be able to pay the purchase price for all of the notes tendered for repurchase. Our failure to purchase tendered notes would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the 9% senior subordinated notes, which in turn would constitute a default under our credit facility. In addition, the terms of our credit facility restrict our ability to purchase the 9% senior subordinated notes. Future credit agreements or other agreements relating to debt may contain similar or more restrictive provisions. We may not be able to secure the consent of our lenders to repurchase the 9% senior subordinated notes or refinance the borrowings that prohibit us from repurchasing the notes. If we do not obtain a consent or repay the borrowings, we could not repurchase the notes.

     Alternatively, even if we are able to pay the purchase price for the notes tendered for repurchase, we may have to use a substantial amount of cash to do so, which will deplete our funds to meet our other cash obligations or cause us to incur additional indebtedness to repurchase the notes.

     These repurchase requirements may also delay or make it harder for others to obtain control of Renal Care Group.

25

If our costs of insurance and claims increase, then our earnings could decrease.

     We currently maintain programs of general and professional liability insurance and directors’ and officers’ insurance with significant deductible or self-insured retention amounts on each claim. In addition, we generally self-insure our employee health plan and workers’ compensation program, while maintaining excess insurance for some very large claims. We have accepted higher deductibles and self-insurance exposure in each of the last several years to offset part of the increases in premiums for the programs. These deductibles and premiums increased substantially in 2002 and 2003. The rate of increase in deductibles and premiums has moderated somewhat in 2004, but there have been increases, and there may be larger increases in the future. Our earnings could be materially and adversely affected by any of the following:

If our board of directors does not approve an acquisition or change in control, then our shareholders may not realize the full value of their stock.

     Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain a number of provisions that may delay, deter or inhibit a future acquisition or change in control that is not first approved by our board of directors. This could occur even if our shareholders receive an attractive offer for their shares or if a substantial number or even a majority of our shareholders believe the takeover is in their best interest. These provisions are intended to encourage any person interested in acquiring us to negotiate with and obtain approval from our board of directors before pursuing a transaction. Provisions that could delay, deter or inhibit a future acquisition or change in control include the following:

     These provisions could also discourage bids for our common stock at a premium and cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our stock price is volatile and as a result, the value of your investment may go down for reasons unrelated to the performance of our business.

     Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The market price of our common stock has been volatile, ranging from a low closing price of $27.55 per share to a high closing price of $34.29 per share during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The market price for our common stock could fluctuate substantially based on a variety of factors, including the following:

26

     Furthermore, stock prices for many companies fluctuate widely for reasons that may be unrelated to their operating results. These fluctuations, coupled with changes in demand or reimbursement levels for our services and general economic, political and market conditions, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Forward-Looking Statements

     Some of the information in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q represents forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate” and “continue” or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully for the following reasons:

     We believe it is important to communicate our expectations to our investors. There may, however, be events in the future that we are not able to predict accurately or over which we have no control. The risk factors listed above, as well as any cautionary language in or incorporated by reference into this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” the information we file with them, which means we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in the above risk factors, elsewhere in or incorporated by reference into this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other events that we have not predicted or assessed could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, financial condition and business. If the events described above or other unpredicted events occur, then the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     The following discusses our exposure to market risk related to changes in interest rates.

Cash balances

     We maintain all cash in United States dollars in highly liquid, interest-bearing, investment grade instruments with maturities of less than three months, which we consider cash equivalents; therefore, the Company has no “market risk sensitive instruments.”

Outstanding debt

     As of September 30, 2004, we had outstanding debt of $516.5 million, including a $24.3 million fair value premium on the 9% senior subordinated notes. This debt consisted of $316.9 million outstanding under the term facility in our 2004 credit agreement, $184.0 million of indebtedness relating to the 9% senior subordinated notes due 2011 and approximately $15.7 million outstanding under various capital leases and notes payable. Borrowings of $166.9 million under the term loan bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR rates or the prime rate that are determined by our leverage ratio. The remaining $150.0 million under the term loan are fixed at a rate of 3.5% plus an additional spread based on the Company’s leverage ratio under interest rate swap agreements that became effective on June 30, 2004. Our weighted average borrowing rate under the term loan as of September 30, 2004, was 4.2%. We expect this rate to rise in the future if interest rates rise on the portion that bears interest at floating rates. Outstanding senior subordinated notes bear nominal interest at 9% on the $159.7 million outstanding face amount of the notes. The unamortized $24.3 million fair value premium is being recognized over the life of the notes using the

27

effective interest method and is recorded as a reduction to interest expense. Accordingly, the effective interest rate on the notes as of September 30, 2004 was 6.4%. At September 30, 2004, the fair value of our indebtedness under the credit facility and senior subordinated notes approximated carrying value. At the September 30, 2004 borrowing levels and giving effect to the impact of our interest rate swap agreements, if there had been a 1% increase in the variable interest rates, then our pre-tax income would have decreased by approximately $453,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     (a) Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report Renal Care Group maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

     (b) There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely materially to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     On October 25, 2004, the Company received a subpoena from the office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. The subpoena requires the production of documents related to numerous aspects of the Company’s business and operations, including those of RenaLab, Inc., the Company’s laboratory. The subpoena includes specific requests for documents related to testing for parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and vitamin D therapies. To the Company’s knowledge no proceedings have been initiated against the Company at this time, although the Company cannot predict whether or when proceedings might be initiated. The Company intends to cooperate with the government’s investigation.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

28

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

29

RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX

* In accordance with Release No. 34-47551, this exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document. It is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, and it shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

30