nvcsr
As filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 3, 2006
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21462
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 222, Overland Park, KS 66210
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
David J. Schulte
10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 222, Overland Park, KS 66210
(Name and address of agent for service)
913-981-1020
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Date of fiscal year end: November 30
Date of reporting period: November 30, 2005
Item 1. Report to Stockholders.
Company at a Glance
|
|
|
A pioneering closed-end investment company investing primarily in equity securities
of Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) operating energy infrastructure assets |
|
|
|
|
Objectives: Yield, Growth, Quality |
About Master Limited Partnerships
MLPs are limited partnerships whose units trade on public exchanges such as the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE), the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) and NASDAQ. Buying MLP units makes an investor
a limited partner in the MLP. There are currently more than 50 MLPs in the market, mostly in
industries related to energy, natural resources and real estate.
Investment Objectives: Yield, Growth and Quality
Tortoise Energy invests primarily in MLPs in the energy infrastructure sector. Our goal is to
provide our stockholders with a high level of total return with an emphasis on current
distributions paid to stockholders. Energy infrastructure MLPs are engaged in the transportation,
storage and processing of crude oil, natural gas, and refined products from production points to
the end users. Our investments are primarily in mid-stream (mostly pipeline) operations, which
produce steady cash flows with less exposure to commodity prices than many alternative investments
in the broader energy industry. With the growth potential of this sector along with our disciplined
investment approach, we endeavor to generate a predictable and increasing dividend stream for our
investors.
Tortoise Energy Investment Versus a Direct Investment in MLPs
Tortoise Energy provides its stockholders with an efficient alternative to investing directly
in MLPs. A direct investment in an MLP offers the opportunity to receive an attractive distribution
that is approximately 80 percent tax deferred, with a historically low correlation to returns on
stocks and bonds. However, the tax characteristics of a direct MLP investment are generally
undesirable for tax-exempt investors such as retirement plans. Tortoise Energy is structured as a C
Corporationaccruing federal and state income taxes, based on taxable earnings and profits. Because
of this innovative structure, pioneered by Tortoise Capital Advisors, institutions and retirement
accounts are able to join individual stockholders as investors in MLPs.
Additional features of Tortoise Energy include:
|
|
One Form 1099 per stockholder at the end of the year, thus avoiding multiple K-1s and
multiple state filings for individual partnership investments; |
|
|
A professional management team, with nearly 100 years combined investment experience, to
select and manage the portfolio on your behalf; |
|
|
The ability to access investment grade credit markets to enhance the dividend rate; and |
|
|
Access to direct placements and other investments not available through the public markets. |
2005 Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Characterization |
|
Paid |
|
per share |
|
|
for Tax Purposes |
|
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
$ |
0.440 |
|
|
Return of Capital |
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
0.445 |
|
|
Return of Capital |
September 1, 2005 |
|
|
0.450 |
|
|
Return of Capital |
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
0.455 |
|
|
Return of Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.790 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
Summary Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended November 30 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Market value per share |
|
$ |
28.72 |
|
Net asset value per share |
|
|
27.12 |
|
Total net assets |
|
|
404,273,500 |
|
Unrealized appreciation of investments
(excluding interest rate swap contracts) before deferred taxes |
|
|
57,338,735 |
|
Unrealized appreciation of investments and interest rate swap
contracts after deferred taxes |
|
|
36,586,625 |
|
Net investment loss |
|
|
(2,664,574 |
) |
Total realized gain |
|
|
3,910,013 |
|
Total return (based on market value) |
|
|
13.06 |
% |
Net operating expenses before leverage costs and taxes as a percent of average total assets(1) |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Distributable cash flow as a percent of average net assets(2) |
|
|
6.64 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents expenses, after fee reimbursement, excluding leverage
costs and taxes. |
|
(2) |
|
See Key Financial Data which illustrates the
calculation of distributable cash flow. |
2005 Annual Report 1
Yield
High
current dividends paid to stockholders
January 20, 2006
O
u r F e
l l o w S t o c k h o
l d e r s ,
We are
pleased to submit the fiscal 2005 annual report for Tortoise Energy
Infrastructure Corp. (Tortoise Energy)our first
full year as a public companyand we are pleased to report that we are achieving the investment objective we pioneered upon
our IPO in February 2004. We are fully invested and are well on the way to establishing a track record of steady dividend
growth. Last year our total return, based on market value, was 13.06 percent. We believe that our steady dividend growth
should result in continued attractive total returns for our stockholders.
Yield,
Growth and Quality
Tortoise Energy paid dividends totaling $1.79 per common share during fiscal year 2005. For tax purposes, these distributions
in 2005 are return of capital. Tortoise Energy delivered attractive distribution growth in fiscal year 2005, raising its
dividend each quarter, finishing the year with a $0.455 quarterly dividend, for an annualized dividend rate of $1.82. This
compares to the fiscal 2004 fourth quarter annualized dividend rate of $1.72. We have achieved our objective by focusing our
investments in companies which pay increasing distributions. This year, ninety percent of our portfolio companies raised their
cash distributions, enabling Tortoise Energy to raise its dividend. Our expectation is that long-term dividend growth will be
approximately 4 percent on an annual basis.
Tortoise Energy concentrates on the energy infrastructure industry which benefits from an increasing demand from economic and
population growth. Revenue growth in the sector results from both volume growth plus some inflation. Several of the companies
in our portfolio have set expectations for growth through new project development, affirming to us that they will extend the
U.S. energy infrastructure network and further increase potential growth of our dividends.
(Unaudited)
2
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
G
r o w t h
An industry with real, hard assets and increasing
demand from economic and population growth
We also seek to maintain a high quality portfolio by selecting well-managed businesses
with real, hard assets and stable recurring revenue streams. We seek to reduce risk further by
diversifying holdings among issuers, geographies and energy commodities to achieve a stable
dividend yield which is attractive when compared to other business models with similar risk
characteristics.
Year in
Review
The two sub-sectors of the S&P 500 with the best performance in 2005 were the energy and
utilities sectors. These sectors provide insight into why MLPs were a solid investment
opportunity in 2005, and why MLPs should continue to be a good investment in 2006. The energy
sector is characterized increasingly by demand growth with supply struggling to meet demand.
Infrastructure is required to keep the commodities flowing from supply to demand points. This is
driving energy prices to higher and sustainable levels. The utility market performance resulted
from similar strong demand for end-use energy as well as investor appetite for safe yield with
modest growth. Utilities have monopoly market positions, and have regulated rates of return.
With the restructuring of balance sheets and renewed focus on core capabilities being largely
completed, investors are looking to the utility sector for long-term stability. We believe MLPs
share many of these characteristics with higher yields and growth prospects. The success of the
MLP sector has been driven by the ability of MLPs to continue to increase their quarterly
distributions due to organic growth and accretive acquisitions.
(Unaudited)
2005 Annual Report 3
Q u a l i t y
Strategic asset selection of stable recurring revenue
streams
by an experienced management
team
During the year we participated in several direct placements and public offerings, as well
as purchasing stock in the secondary market. One example of how our capital has created value
was our participation in a private placement in Crosstex Energy, L.P. (Crosstex). Our investment
was used by Crosstex to help fund its pipeline construction to move growing gas production out
of the Barnett Shale region in North Texas.
In Conclusion
In 2005, Tortoise Energy established a track record of visible dividend growth by focusing on
the fundamental principles that guide us: Yield, Growth and Quality. We look forward to
serving you in the coming year and hope to see you at the Annual Stockholders Meeting on
April 12, 2006. For those unable to attend, please access our webcast of the meeting at
www.tortoiseadvisors.com.
Sincerely,
The Managers
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
(Unaudited)
4 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
K
e y F i n a n c i
a l D a t a
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/2711/30 |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
2005
by Quarter(1) |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
11/302005 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q3 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
|
Total Distributions Received
from Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions received from master
limited partnerships |
|
$ |
14,305 |
|
|
$ |
36,172 |
|
|
$ |
7,643 |
|
|
$ |
8,546 |
|
|
$ |
9,864 |
|
|
$ |
10,119 |
|
Dividends paid in stock |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
Dividends from common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Short-term interest and dividend Income |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total from investments |
|
|
16,935 |
|
|
|
41,791 |
|
|
|
8,942 |
|
|
|
9,944 |
|
|
|
11,276 |
|
|
|
11,629 |
|
Operating Expenses Before
Leverage Costs and Current Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory fees, net of reimbursement |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
01 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
6,255 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable cash flow before leverage
costs and current taxes |
|
|
13,873 |
|
|
|
35,536 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
9,584 |
|
|
|
9,932 |
|
Leverage Costs(2) |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
2,263 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
Current income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable Cash Flow |
|
$ |
12,641 |
|
|
$ |
27,543 |
|
|
$ |
6,463 |
|
|
$ |
6,529 |
|
|
$ |
7,321 |
|
|
$ |
7,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
$ |
12,278 |
|
|
$ |
26,506 |
|
|
$ |
6,487 |
|
|
$ |
6,581 |
|
|
$ |
6,674 |
|
|
$ |
6,764 |
|
Payout percentage for period(3) |
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
Total assets, end of period |
|
|
518,946 |
|
|
|
695,978 |
|
|
|
623,527 |
|
|
|
671,399 |
|
|
|
746,797 |
|
|
|
695,978 |
|
Average total assets during period(4) |
|
|
392,076 |
|
|
|
663,318 |
|
|
|
581,668 |
|
|
|
640,138 |
|
|
|
713,072 |
|
|
|
725,506 |
|
Leverage (Tortoise Notes and
Preferred Stock) |
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
27.94 |
% |
|
|
33.77 |
% |
|
|
23.25 |
% |
|
|
29.79 |
% |
|
|
31.47 |
% |
|
|
33.77 |
% |
Unrealized appreciation after deferred
taxes, end of period |
|
|
47,869 |
|
|
|
84,456 |
|
|
|
80,622 |
|
|
|
79,151 |
|
|
|
108,388 |
|
|
|
84,456 |
|
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
336,553 |
|
|
|
404,274 |
|
|
|
418,339 |
|
|
|
410,284 |
|
|
|
432,553 |
|
|
|
404,274 |
|
Average net assets during period(4) |
|
|
301,784 |
|
|
|
414,802 |
|
|
|
388,523 |
|
|
|
416,695 |
|
|
|
432,245 |
|
|
|
421,244 |
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
|
26.53 |
|
|
|
27.12 |
|
|
|
28.37 |
|
|
|
27.75 |
|
|
|
29.16 |
|
|
|
27.12 |
|
Market value per share |
|
|
27.06 |
|
|
|
28.72 |
|
|
|
29.44 |
|
|
|
28.33 |
|
|
|
32.10 |
|
|
|
28.72 |
|
Shares outstanding |
|
|
12,684 |
|
|
|
14,906 |
|
|
|
14,744 |
|
|
|
14,787 |
|
|
|
14,832 |
|
|
|
14,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent
of Average Total Assets(5)
|
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.24 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
|
6.43 |
% |
Total distributions received
from investments |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.24 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
|
6.43 |
% |
Operating expenses before leverage
costs and current taxes |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.84 |
% |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Distributable cash flow before leverage
costs and current taxes |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
5.49 |
% |
As a
Percent of Average Net Assets |
Distributable cash flow(5) |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
6.64 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
6.72 |
% |
|
|
6.88 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Q1 is the period from December 2004 through February 2005. Q2 is the period from March 2005
through May 2005. Q3 is the period from June 2005 through August 2005. Q4 is the period from
September 2005 through November 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Leverage costs include interest expense, auction agent fee, interest
rate swap expenses and preferred dividends. |
|
(3) |
|
Dividends paid as a percentage of Distributable Cash Flow. |
|
(4) |
|
Computed by averaging month-end
values within each period.
|
|
(5) |
|
Annualized
for periods less than a year. |
2005 Annual Report 7
M a n a g e m e n t s D i s c
u s s i o n
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our Annual
Financial Statements and the Notes thereto. In addition, this report contains certain
forward-looking statements. These statements include the plans and objectives of management for
future operations and financial objectives and can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as may, will, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, or continue or
the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. These forward-looking
statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions.
Certain factors that could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those
projected in these forward-looking statements are set forth in the Risk Factors section of our
public filings with the SEC.
Overview
Tortoise Energy is now fully invested in U.S. energy infrastructure MLPs. Our goal is to
provide a growing dividend stream to our investors, and when combined with MLP growth prospects,
the investment offers the opportunity for an attractive total return. We seek to provide our
stockholders with an efficient vehicle to invest in the energy infrastructure sector. While we are
a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, we are not a regulated
investment company for federal tax purposes. Our dividends do not generate unrelated business
taxable income (UBTI) and our stock may therefore be suitable for holding by pension funds, IRAs
and mutual funds as well as taxable accounts.
We invest primarily in MLPs through privately negotiated and public market purchases. MLPs are
publicly traded partnerships, whose equity interests are traded in the form of units on public
exchanges, such as the NYSE. Our private finance activity principally involves providing financing
directly to an MLP through privately negotiated equity investments. Our private financing is
generally used to fund growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations, debt repayments and bridge
financings. We generally invest in companies that are publicly reporting, but for which a privately
negotiated financing offers advantages.
Critical Accounting Policies
The financial statements are based on the selection and application of critical accounting
policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Critical
accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of our financial
condition and results of operations and require managements most difficult, complex, or subjective
judgments. Our critical accounting policies are those applicable to the valuation of investments
and certain revenue recognition matters as discussed below.
Investment Income
Distributions received from our investments in MLPs generally are comprised of income and
return of capital from the MLP. We record investment income and return of capital based on
estimates made at the time the distribution is received. These estimates are based on historical
information available from each MLP and other industry sources. These estimates may be revised
based on information received from MLPs after their tax reporting periods are concluded.
Valuation of Portfolio Investments
We primarily own securities that are listed on a securities exchange. We value those
securities at their last sale price on that exchange on the valuation date. We also invest in
restricted securities, including debt and equity securities of companies. Securities that have
restrictions on sale are typically valued at a discount from the public market value of the
security pursuant to valuation policies established by our Board.
Federal Income Taxation
The Company, as a corporation, is obligated to pay federal and state income tax on its
taxable income. The Company invests its assets primarily in MLPs, which generally are treated as
partnerships for federal income tax purposes. As a limited partner in the MLPs, the Company reports
its allocable share of the MLPs taxable income in computing its own taxable income.
(Unaudited)
8 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
M a n a g e m e n t s D i s c
u s s i o n
(Continued)
Determining Dividends to Stockholders
Our portfolio has historically generated cash flow from which we pay dividends to
stockholders. We pay dividends out of our distributable cash flow, which is simply our income from
investments less our total operating expenses. The income from our investments includes the amount
received by us as cash distributions from MLPs, paid-in-kind distributions, and interest payments.
The total operating expenses include current or anticipated operating expenses, current income
taxes on our operating income and total leverage costs. Each are summarized for you in the table on
page 7 and are discussed in more detail below. We intend to reinvest the after-tax proceeds of
sales of investments in order to maintain and grow our dividend rate.
Our Board of Directors reviews the dividend rate quarterly, and may adjust the quarterly dividend
throughout the year. Our goal is to declare what we believe to be sustainable increases in our
regular quarterly dividends. We have targeted to pay at least 95 percent of distributable cash flow
on an annual basis.
Investment Income
Our ability to generate cash is dependent on the ability of our portfolio of investments to
generate cash flow from their operations. In order to maintain and grow our dividend to our
stockholders, we evaluate each holding based upon its contribution to our investment income, our
anticipation of its growth rate, and its risk relative to other potential investments.
We concentrate on MLPs with an increasing demand for services from economic and population growth.
We utilize our disciplined investment process to select well-managed businesses with real, hard
assets and stable, recurring revenue streams.
Fundamental operating performance in the energy infrastructure sector was strong throughout 2005,
despite challenges posed by hurricanes. During the last quarter of 2005, weakness in the broader
energy sector and more volatility of oil prices pulled down the value of MLPs along with energy
companies, creating, in our view, a great opportunity to invest in growth MLP companies at
favorable valuations.
We believe that as the economy grows, more oil and gas will flow through MLP company pipelines,
resulting in distribution increases. Economic growth is commonly measured by Gross Domestic Product
(GDP), which grew 4.2 percent in 2004 and 4.1 percent through the third quarter of 2005 as reported
by the U.S. Department of Commerces Bureau of Economic Analysis, and we expect similar growth
rates over the long term.
Our focus remains primarily on investing in fee-based service providers that operate long-haul,
interstate pipelines. We further diversify among issuers, geographies and energy commodities to
achieve a dividend yield equivalent to a direct investment in energy infrastructure MLPs. In
addition, most energy infrastructure companies are regulated and utilize an inflation escalator
index that factors in inflation as a cost pass through. So, over the long term, we believe MLPs
will outpace interest rate increases and produce positive returns.
MLP companies grow organically, through acquisitions and increasingly through new project
development. More than $1 billion of energy infrastructure assets were sold in the third and fourth
quarters of 2005. There were almost $7 billion of MLP equity offerings during the year$3.5 billion
came in the form of follow-on offerings, $1.5 billion came in new IPOs and the remainder in direct
placements. This influx of capital strengthened the balance sheets of MLPs and will enable them to
complete long-term growth projects. In context, the MLP equity market capitalization was
approximately $51 billion at the beginning of the year, increasing to approximately $61 billion by
year end.
In our view, these occurrences have set the stage for the current environment which we believe is
very healthy and favorable for new investments in the MLP sector and the growth in distributions
from our existing investments.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of two types of expenses, leverage costs and other operating
expenses, primarily the advisory fees. The net operating expenses before leverage costs increased
from $3.06 million for the period ended November 30, 2004 to $6.26 million for the year ended 2005.
The increase was because fiscal year 2004 did not reflect operations for a full year, and because
of the increase in average assets under management, which increased advisory fees. On a percentage
basis, net operating expenses before leverage costs were 0.94 percent of average total assets for
the year ended 2005 as compared to an annualized ratio of 1.03 percent for the period ended 2004.
(Unaudited)
2005 Annual Report 9
M a n a g e m e n t s D i s c
u s s i o n
(Continued)
Leverage costs consist of four major components: (1) the direct interest expense, which will
vary from period to period as all of our Tortoise Notes have variable rates of interest; (2) the
auction agent fees, which are the marketing costs for the variable rate leverage; (3) the realized
gain or loss on our swap arrangements; and (4) our preferred dividends, which also carry a variable
rate dividend. We have now locked-in our cost of capital through interest rate swap agreements,
converting our variable rate obligations to fixed rate obligations for the term of the swap
agreements. With no short-term interest rate risk in Tortoise Energy, we now have an all-in
weighted average cost of leverage of approximately 4.5 percent. The swaps range in maturity from
2011 to 2020. We believe that locking the cost of leverage for the term of the swap agreements
protects us from the impact of increasing short-term interest rates resulting from the use of
leverage. For more detailed information regarding our swap arrangements, see the footnotes to our
financial statements. In the future, expect any increases in interest expense to be offset by gains
in the swap arrangements, and conversely for any decrease in interest expense to be offset by a
loss on the swap arrangement, in essence fixing our interest rate costs for the term of the swaps.
The amount of unrealized gain reflected represents amounts that may differ for tax purposes. Fiscal
year 2005 reflects an increase in all leverage costs due to the increased amounts of leverage
outstanding and the full year of operation. Leverage costs increased from $1.2 million in our first
eight months of operation to $7.8 million for the year ended November 30, 2005.
November Distributable Cash Flow
From an accounting perspective, we expect to report net investment losses due to the nature
of our investments in MLPs, however, as the information in the Key Financial Data reflects, our
distributable cash flow is strong. We believe distributable cash flow is the best measure of our
dividend paying capacity.
For the year ended 2005, our aggregate distributable cash flow was $27.5 million and we paid
dividends in an aggregate of $26.5 million, or 96.2 percent of distributable cash flow. On a per
share basis, the fund paid a $0.455 dividend on November 30, 2005, for an annual rate of $1.82.
This compares to the fiscal 2004 fourth quarter annual rate of $1.72. With the growth in
distributions from the MLPs in which we invest, we expect the dividend to continue to grow at least
4 percent annually.
Taxation of Our Dividends
We invest in partnerships which typically have larger distributions of cash than the
accounting and taxable income they generate. Accordingly, the distributions generally include a
return of capital component for accounting and tax purposes. Dividends declared and paid by the
Company in a year generally may include the distribution of current year taxable income or returns
of capital, as further described below.
The taxability of the dividend you receive depends on whether the Company has annual earnings and
profits. If so, those earnings and profits are first allocated to the preferred shares, and then to
the common shares. Because most of the distributions we have received from MLPs are not income for
tax purposes, we have little taxable income and from that we deduct operating expenses and leverage
costs. For 2005, we anticipate a loss for tax purposes even after considering the amount of
realized gains. You will receive your 1099 early in 2006. In the case where there are no earnings
and profits, as will be the circumstance for 2005, your dividend received is generally a return of
capital and would be a reduction in basis, taxed upon your sale of your securities as a capital
transaction.
In future periods, however, Tortoise Energy could have earnings and profits and that would make the
character of our dividend like any other corporate dividend and taxable at the 15 percent qualified
dividend rate. Our dividend would include a taxable component for either of two reasons: first, the
tax characterization of the distributions we receive from MLPs could change and become less return
of capital and more in the form of income. Second, and more likely, we could sell an MLP investment
in which Tortoise Energy has a gain. The unrealized gain we have in the portfolio is reflected in
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Tortoise Energys Investments at Value reflect $689.9
million, and
a cost of $554.0 million. The $135.9 million difference is gain that would be recognized if those
investments were sold at those values. A sale would give rise to earnings and profits in that
period and make the distributions taxable qualified dividends. The amount of unrealized gain
reflected represents book amounts and may differ for tax purposes. Note, however, that the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities reflects as a deferred tax liability the possible future tax
liability we would pay if all investments were liquidated at their indicated value. It is for these
two reasons that we only estimate the tax treatment each time we send a dividend, because both of
these items are unpredictable until the year is concluded. We currently expect that our estimated
annual taxable income for 2006 will be less than 20 percent of our estimated dividend distributions
to stockholders in 2006, although the ultimate determination will not be made until January 2007.
(Unaudited)
10 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
M a n a g e m e n t s D i s c
u s s i o n
(Continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Tortoise Energy had total assets of $696 million at year end. Our total assets reflect
primarily the value of our investments, which are itemized in the schedule of investments. It also
reflects cash, interest and other receivables and any expenses that may have been prepaid from time
to time. During the year, total assets grew from $519 million to $696 million. This growth was the
result of several factors. Some of the key factors include $53 million from the net proceeds of an
offering of common shares, $89 million from the issuance of Tortoise Notes and MMP Shares, $5.6
million from reinvestment of shares in our dividend reinvestment plan, and $36.6 million from
unrealized appreciation of investments. This increase was offset primarily by $28.1 million in
dividends paid to preferred and common stockholders.
As a result of the issuance of Tortoise Notes and MMP shares as described above, our total leverage
outstanding as of fiscal year end 2005 is $235 million, or 33.8 percent of total assets, which is
close to our target for leverage of approximately 33 percent of total assets.
Our leverage strategy involves borrowing at costs that are less than the total return we expect
from our MLP asset investments, thereby increasing stockholder value.
While we currently have no plans to do so, we may in the future raise new debt and equity capital
from time to time in order to fund investments we believe are beneficial to our stockholders. We
have filed a shelf registration statement to allow us to issue new debt or equity capital quickly
in the event suitable opportunities are presented.
(Unaudited)
2005 Annual Report 11
B u s i n e s s D e s c r i p t i o n
November 30, 2005
Tortoise Energy
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp. (Tortoise Energy) commenced operations in February 2004.
Tortoise Energys investment objective is to seek a high level of total return with an emphasis on
current distributions paid to stockholders and dividend growth. For purposes of Tortoise Energys
investment objective, total return includes capital appreciation of, and all distributions received
from, securities in which Tortoise Energy will invest regardless of the tax character of the
distributions.
Tortoise Energy seeks to provide its stockholders with an efficient vehicle to invest in a
portfolio of publicly traded master limited partnerships (MLPs) in the energy infrastructure
sector. Similar to the tax characterization of distributions made by MLPs to its unitholders,
Tortoise Energy believes that it will have relatively high levels of deferred taxable income
associated with dividends paid to its stockholders.
Tortoise Energy is regulated as a non-diversified investment management company, for which Tortoise
Capital Advisors, L.L.C. (the Adviser) serves as the Companys investment adviser.
Energy Infrastructure Industry
Energy infrastructure companies engage in the business of transporting, processing, storing,
distributing or marketing natural gas, natural gas liquids (primarily propane), coal, crude oil or
refined petroleum products, or exploring, developing, managing or producing such commodities.
Tortoise Energy invests solely in energy infrastructure companies organized in the United States.
Energy infrastructure companies (other than most pipeline MLPs) do not operate as public
utilities or local distribution companies, and are therefore not subject to rate regulation by
state or federal utility commissions. However, energy infrastructure companies may be subject to
greater competitive factors than utility companies, including competitive pricing in the absence of
regulated tariff rates, which could cause a reduction in revenue and which could adversely affect
profitability. Most pipeline MLPs are subject to government regulation concerning the construction,
pricing and operation of pipelines.
Pipeline MLPs are able to set prices (rates or tariffs) to cover operating costs, depreciation and
taxes, and provide a return on investment. These rates are monitored by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) which seeks to ensure that consumers receive adequate and reliable
supplies of energy at the lowest possible price while providing energy suppliers and transporters a
just and reasonable return on capital investment and the opportunity to adjust to changing market
conditions.
Master Limited Partnerships
Under normal circumstances, Tortoise Energy invests at least 70 percent of its total assets in
equity securities of MLPs that derive at least 90 percent of their income from energy
infrastructure operations and are organized as partnerships, thereby eliminating income tax at the
entity level.
The MLP has two classes of partners, the general partner and the limited partners. The general
partner is usually a major energy company, investment fund or the direct management of the MLP.
The general partner normally controls the MLP through a two percent equity interest plus units that
are subordinated to the common (publicly traded) units for at least the first five years of the
partnerships existence and then only converting to common if certain financial tests are met.
As a motivation for the general partner to successfully manage the MLP and increase cash flows, the
terms of most MLPs typically provide that the general partner receives a larger portion of the net
income as distributions reach higher target levels. As cash flow grows, the general partner
receives a greater interest in the incremental income compared to the interest of limited partners.
The general partners incentive compensation typically increases up to 50 percent of incremental
income.
Nevertheless, the aggregate amount distributed to limited partners will increase as MLP
distributions reach higher target levels. Given this incentive structure, the general partner has
an incentive to streamline operations and undertake acquisitions and growth projects in order to
increase distributions to all partners.
Energy infrastructure MLPs in which Tortoise Energy invests can generally be classified in the
following categories:
|
|
Pipeline MLPs are common carrier transporters of natural gas, natural gas liquids (primarily
propane, ethane, butane and natural gasoline), crude oil or refined petroleum products
(gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel). Pipeline |
(Unaudited)
12 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
B u s i n e s s D e s c r i p t i o n
(Continued)
MLPs also may operate ancillary businesses such as storage and marketing of such products.
Revenue is derived from capacity and transportation fees. Historically, pipeline output has been
less exposed to cyclical economic forces due to its low cost structure and government-regulated
nature. In addition, pipeline MLPs do not have direct commodity price exposure because they do
not own the product being shipped.
|
|
Processing MLPs are gatherers and processors of natural gas as well as providers of
transportation, fractionation and storage of natural gas liquids (NGLs). Revenue is derived
from providing services to natural gas producers, which require treatment or processing before
their natural gas commodity can be marketed to utilities and other end user markets. Revenue
for the processor is fee based, although it is not uncommon to have some participation in the
prices of the natural gas and NGL commodities for a portion of revenue. |
|
|
Propane MLPs are distributors of propane to homeowners for space and water heating. Revenue
is derived from the resale of the commodity on a margin over wholesale cost. The ability to
maintain margin is a key to profitability. Propane serves approximately three percent of the
household energy needs in the U.S., largely for homes beyond the geographic reach of natural
gas distribution pipelines. Approximately 70 percent of annual cash flow is earned during the
winter heating season (October through March). Accordingly, volumes are weather dependent, but
have utility type functions similar to electricity and natural gas. |
|
|
Coal MLPs own, lease and manage coal reserves. Revenue is derived from production and sale of
coal, or from royalty payments related to leases to coal producers. Electricity generation is
the primary use of coal in the U.S. Demand for electricity and supply of alternative fuels to
generators are the primary drivers of coal demand. Coal MLPs are subject to operating and
production risks, such as: the MLP or a lessee meeting necessary production volumes; federal,
state and local laws and regulations which may limit the ability to produce coal; the MLPs
ability to manage production costs and pay mining reclamation costs; and the effect on demand
that the Clean Air Act standards have on coal end-users. |
Tortoise Energy invests primarily in equity securities of MLPs, which currently consist of the
following instruments: common units, convertible subordinated units and I-Shares. Almost all MLP
common units and I-Shares in which Tortoise Energy invests are listed and traded on the NYSE, AMEX
or NASDAQ. Tortoise Energy also may purchase MLP common units through direct placements. MLP
convertible subordinated units are not listed or publicly traded and are typically purchased in
directly negotiated transactions with MLP affiliates or institutional
holders of such shares.
MLP common unitholders have typical limited partner rights, including limited management and voting
rights. MLP common units have priority over convertible subordinated units upon liquidation. Common
unit holders are entitled to minimum quarterly distributions (MQD), including arrearage rights,
prior to any distribution payments to convertible subordinated unit holders or incentive
distribution payments to the general partner. MLP convertible subordinated units are convertible
into common units on a one-to-one basis after the passage of time and/or achievement of specified
financial goals. MLP convertible subordinated units are entitled to MQD after the payments to
holders of common units and before incentive distributions to the general partner. MLP convertible
subordinated units do not have arrearage rights.
I-Shares have similar features to common units except that distributions are payable in additional
I-Shares rather than cash. Tortoise Energy invests in I-Shares only if it has adequate cash to
satisfy its distribution targets. Although Tortoise Energy also may invest in equity and debt
securities of energy infrastructure companies that are organized and/or taxed as corporations, it
is likely that any such investments will be in debt securities because the dividends from equity
securities of such corporations typically do not meet Tortoise Energys investment objective.
Tortoise Energy may also invest in securities of general partners or other affiliates of MLPs and
private companies operating energy infrastructure assets.
Summary of Investment Policies
Under normal circumstances, Tortoise Energy will invest at least 90 percent of its total
assets (including assets obtained through leverage) in securities of energy infrastructure
companies, and will invest at least 70 percent of its total assets in equity securities of MLPs.
(Unaudited)
2005 Annual Report 13
B u s i n e s s D e s c r i p t i o n
(Continued)
Tortoise Energy has adopted the following additional nonfundamental investment policies:
|
|
Tortoise Energy may invest up to 30 percent of its total assets in restricted securities.
Subject to this policy, the Company may invest without limitation in illiquid securities. |
|
|
Tortoise Energy may invest up to 25 percent of total assets in debt securities of energy
infrastructure companies, including securities rated below noninvestment grade (commonly
referred to as junk bonds). |
|
|
Tortoise Energy will not invest more than 10 percent of total assets in any single issuer. |
|
|
Tortoise Energy will not engage in short sales. |
Tax Status of Company
Unlike most investment companies, Tortoise Energy is not treated as a regulated investment
company under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue Code).
Therefore, Tortoise Energy is obligated to pay federal and applicable state corporate taxes on its
taxable income. Unlike regulated investment companies, Tortoise Energy is not required to
distribute substantially all of its income and capital gains. Tortoise Energy invests a substantial
portion of its assets in MLPs.
Although the MLPs generate income taxable to Tortoise Energy, the Company expects the MLPs to pay
cash distributions in excess of the taxable income reportable by the Company. Similarly, Tortoise
Energy expects to distribute cash in excess of its taxable income to its stockholders and intends
to distribute substantially all of its distributable cash flow (generally, cash from operations
less certain operating expenses and reserves).
Stockholder Tax Features
Stockholders of Tortoise Energy hold stock of a corporation. Shares of stock differ
substantially from partnership interests for federal income tax purposes. Unlike holders of MLP
common units, stockholders of Tortoise Energy will not recognize an allocable share of Tortoise
Energys income, gains, losses and deductions. Stockholders recognize income only if Tortoise
Energy pays distributions from current or accumulated earnings and profits allocable to the
particular shares held by a stockholder. Such distributions will be taxable to a stockholder in the
current period as dividend income. Dividend income will be treated as qualified dividends for
federal income tax purposes, subject to favorable capital gains rates. If distributions exceed
Tortoise Energys allocated current or accumulated earnings and profits, such excess distributions
will constitute a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a stockholders basis in its stock.
To the extent excess distributions exceed a stockholders basis, the amount in excess of basis will
be taxed as capital gain.
Based on the historical performance of MLPs, Tortoise Energy expects that a significant portion of
distributions to holders of stock will constitute a tax-free return of capital. In addition,
earnings and profits are treated generally, for federal income tax purposes, as first being used to
pay distributions on the MMP Shares, and then to the extent remaining, if any, to pay distributions
on common stock. There is no assurance that Tortoise Energy will make regular distributions or that
Tortoise Energys expectation regarding the tax character of its distributions will be realized.
The special tax treatment for qualified dividends is scheduled to
expire as of December 31, 2008.
Upon the sale of stock, a stockholder generally will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the
difference between the sale proceeds received by the stockholder and the stockholders federal
income tax basis in its stock sold, as adjusted to reflect return(s) of capital. Generally, such
capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if stock were held as a capital asset
for more than one year.
Distributions
Tortoise Energy intends to pay out substantially all of its Distributable Cash Flow (DCF) to
stockholders through quarterly distributions. DCF is the amount received by Tortoise Energy as cash
or paid-in-kind distributions from MLPs or their affiliates, and interest payments received on debt
securities owned by Tortoise Energy, less current or anticipated operating expenses, dividends on
MMP shares, taxes on Company taxable income, and leverage costs paid by Tortoise Energy. Tortoise
Energys Board of Directors adopted a policy to target distributions to stockholders in an amount
of at least 95 percent of DCF on an annual basis. Distributions will be paid each fiscal quarter
out of DCF, if any. There is no assurance that Tortoise Energy will continue to make regular
distributions.
(Unaudited)
14 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
S c h e d u l e o f I n v e s t m e n t s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock0.9%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing0.9%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosstex Energy, Inc. (Cost $2,280,917) |
|
|
56,836 |
|
|
$ |
3,715,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Limited Partnerships166.9%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal1.2%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Resource Partners, L.P. |
|
|
86,400 |
|
|
|
4,975,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude/Refined Products Pipelines99.4%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P. |
|
|
568,802 |
|
|
|
24,805,455 |
|
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. |
|
|
904,000 |
|
|
|
41,584,000 |
|
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. |
|
|
427,070 |
|
|
|
16,519,068 |
|
Kinder Morgan Management, LLC# |
|
|
1,436,408 |
|
|
|
68,803,943 |
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. |
|
|
1,668,474 |
|
|
|
53,641,439 |
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.^ |
|
|
521,739 |
|
|
|
15,568,692 |
|
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. |
|
|
656,500 |
|
|
|
19,478,355 |
|
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.^ |
|
|
325,200 |
|
|
|
9,060,072 |
|
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. |
|
|
1,247,155 |
|
|
|
49,536,997 |
|
Sunoco Logistics Partners, L.P. |
|
|
934,625 |
|
|
|
35,469,019 |
|
TEPPCO Partners, L.P. |
|
|
812,745 |
|
|
|
29,900,888 |
|
Valero, L.P. |
|
|
709,874 |
|
|
|
37,268,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,636,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquid Pipelines16.1%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise GP Holdings, L.P. |
|
|
71,400 |
|
|
|
2,463,300 |
|
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. |
|
|
2,248,940 |
|
|
|
56,290,968 |
|
Northern Border Partners, L.P. |
|
|
144,600 |
|
|
|
6,172,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,927,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
Gas Gathering/Processing33.1%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copano Energy, LLC |
|
|
91,950 |
|
|
|
3,447,205 |
|
Copano Energy, LLC^ |
|
|
531,701 |
|
|
|
19,534,695 |
|
Crosstex Energy L.P.^ |
|
|
160,009 |
|
|
|
4,957,079 |
|
Crosstex Energy L.P.^ |
|
|
108,578 |
|
|
|
3,449,523 |
|
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. |
|
|
1,804,600 |
|
|
|
60,941,342 |
|
Hiland Partners, L.P. |
|
|
36,548 |
|
|
|
1,450,225 |
|
Markwest Energy Partners, L.P. |
|
|
805,810 |
|
|
|
37,937,535 |
|
Williams Partners, L.P. |
|
|
59,750 |
|
|
|
2,011,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,729,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipping5.1%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P. |
|
|
71,300 |
|
|
|
2,489,083 |
|
K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P.^ |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
16,245,000 |
|
Teekay LNG Partners, L.P. |
|
|
67,200 |
|
|
|
1,883,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,617,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
2005 Annual Report 15
S c h e d u l e o f I n v e s t m e n t s
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Propane
Distribution12.0%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inergy, L.P. |
|
|
1,767,979 |
|
|
|
44,641,470 |
|
Inergy, L.P.^ |
|
|
82,655 |
|
|
|
1,848,992 |
|
Inergy Holdings, L.P. |
|
|
61,761 |
|
|
|
2,204,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,695,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Master Limited Partnerships (Cost $540,092,473) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
674,581,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Promissory Notes1.6%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipping1.6%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.W. Transportation, LLCUnregistered, 8.56%, Due 3/31/2009 (Cost $6,309,278)^@ |
|
$ |
6,379,054 |
|
|
|
6,309,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments1.3%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Government Obligations Money Market FundClass Y, 3.67% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $5,329,456)(1) |
|
|
5,329,456 |
|
|
|
5,329,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments170.7%+ (Cost $554,012,124) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
689,935,849 |
|
Auction
Rate Senior Notes(40.8%)+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165,000,000 |
) |
Interest
Rate Swap Contracts0.7%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$345,000,000 notionalUnrealized Appreciation, Net(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,902,516 |
|
Liabilities
in Excess of Other Assets(13.3%)+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,564,865 |
) |
Preferred
Shares at Redemption Value(17.3%)+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders100.00%+ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
404,273,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Calculated as a percentage of net assets applicable to common stockholders. |
|
^ |
|
Fair valued securities represent a total market value of $76,973,331 which represents 19.1%
of net assets. These securities are deemed to be restricted; see Note 6 for further
disclosure. |
|
# |
|
Security distributions are paid in kind. |
|
@ |
|
Security is a variable rate instrument. Interest rate is as of November 30, 2005. |
|
(1) |
|
7-day effective yield. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 10 for further disclosure. |
See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
16 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
S t a t e m e n t o f A s s e t s & L i a b i l i t i e s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Investments at value (cost $554,012,124) |
|
$ |
689,935,849 |
|
Cash |
|
|
45,422 |
|
Receivable for Adviser reimbursement |
|
|
275,801 |
|
Receivable for investments sold |
|
|
366,959 |
|
Interest and dividend receivable |
|
|
37,763 |
|
Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
2,902,516 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
2,413,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
695,977,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Payable to Adviser |
|
|
1,139,177 |
|
Dividend payable on preferred shares |
|
|
183,726 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
391,924 |
|
Current tax liability |
|
|
214,261 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
54,775,177 |
|
Auction rate senior notes payable: |
|
|
|
|
Series A, due July 15, 2044 |
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
Series B, due July 15, 2044 |
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
Series C, due April 10, 2045 |
|
|
55,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
221,704,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares |
|
|
|
|
$25,000 liquidation value per share applicable to 2,800 outstanding shares
(7,500 shares authorized) |
|
|
70,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
404,273,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders Consist of |
|
|
|
|
Capital stock, $0.001 par value; 14,905,515 shares issued and outstanding
(100,000,000 shares authorized) |
|
$ |
14,906 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
318,834,703 |
|
Accumulated net investment loss, net of income tax effect |
|
|
(2,907,862 |
) |
Undistributed realized gain, net of income tax effect |
|
|
3,875,986 |
|
Net unrealized gain on investments and interest rate swap contracts,
net of income tax effect |
|
|
84,455,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
404,273,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value per common share outstanding (net assets applicable to common shares,
divided by common shares outstanding) |
|
$ |
27.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
2005 Annual Report 17
S t a t e m e n t o f O p e r a t i o n s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
Investment Income |
|
|
|
|
Distributions received from master limited partnerships |
|
$ |
36,171,740 |
|
Less return of capital on distributions |
|
|
(30,211,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution income from master limited partnerships |
|
|
5,960,111 |
|
Dividends from common stock |
|
|
95,813 |
|
Dividends from money market mutual funds |
|
|
486,361 |
|
Interest |
|
|
634,686 |
|
Total Investment Income |
|
7,176,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Advisory fees |
|
|
6,339,680 |
|
Administrator fees |
|
|
437,139 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
405,980 |
|
Reports to stockholders |
|
|
193,624 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
102,170 |
|
Custodian fees and expenses |
|
|
67,768 |
|
Fund accounting fees |
|
|
60,831 |
|
Registration fees |
|
|
46,182 |
|
Stock transfer agent fees |
|
|
14,508 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
121,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses before Interest Expense and Auction Agent Fees |
|
|
7,789,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,812,145 |
|
Auction agent fees |
|
|
478,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense and Auction Agent Fees |
|
|
5,290,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses |
|
|
13,079,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less expense reimbursement by Adviser |
|
|
(1,534,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Expenses |
|
|
11,545,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Loss, before income taxes |
|
|
(4,368,154 |
) |
Current tax expense |
|
|
(214,261 |
) |
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
1,917,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
|
1,703,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Loss |
|
|
(2,664,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments |
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investments |
|
|
7,264,671 |
|
Net realized loss on interest rate swap settlements |
|
|
(854,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain, before deferred tax expense |
|
|
6,409,857 |
|
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
(2,499,844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investments and interest rate swap settlements |
|
|
3,910,013 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments |
|
|
57,338,735 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
3,111,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain, before deferred tax expense |
|
|
60,449,781 |
|
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
(23,863,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
36,586,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on Investments |
|
|
40,496,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Stockholders |
|
|
(1,639,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
Resulting from Operations |
|
$ |
36,192,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
18 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
S t a t e m e n t o f C h a n g e s I n N e t A s s e t s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 27, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004(1) |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
November 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment loss |
|
$ |
(2,664,574 |
) |
|
$ |
(243,288 |
) |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and interest
rate swap settlements |
|
|
3,910,013 |
|
|
|
(34,027 |
) |
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and interest
rate swap contracts |
|
|
36,586,625 |
|
|
|
47,869,142 |
|
Dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(1,639,910 |
) |
|
|
(152,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders
resulting from operations |
|
|
36,192,154 |
|
|
|
47,439,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of capital |
|
|
(26,506,341 |
) |
|
|
(12,278,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends to common stockholders |
|
|
(26,506,341 |
) |
|
|
(12,278,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering of 11,000,000 common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,000,000 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of 1,600,000 common shares in connection
with exercising an overallotment option granted to underwriters
of the initial public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000,000 |
|
Proceeds from secondary offering of 1,755,027 common shares |
|
|
47,999,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 263,254 common shares in connection
with exercising an overallotment option granted to underwriters
of the secondary offering |
|
|
7,199,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and offering expenses associated with
the issuance of common shares |
|
|
(2,443,688 |
) |
|
|
(14,705,165 |
) |
Underwriting discounts and offering expenses associated with
the issuance of preferred shares |
|
|
(356,815 |
) |
|
|
(725,000 |
) |
Issuance of 203,080 and 61,107 common shares from reinvestment
of dividend distributions to stockholders, respectively |
|
|
5,635,662 |
|
|
|
1,453,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets, applicable to common stockholders,
from capital share transactions |
|
|
58,035,144 |
|
|
|
301,022,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders |
|
|
67,720,957 |
|
|
|
336,184,121 |
|
Net Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
336,552,543 |
|
|
|
368,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
404,273,500 |
|
|
$ |
336,552,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net investment loss, net of deferred tax benefit,
at end of period |
|
$ |
(2,907,862 |
) |
|
$ |
(243,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Commencement of Operations. |
See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
2005 Annual Report 19
S t a t e m e n t o f C a s h F l o w s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
Distributions received from master limited partnerships |
|
$ |
36,171,740 |
|
Interest and dividend income received |
|
|
1,183,801 |
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
(172,064,905 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of long-term investments |
|
|
31,230,812 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(2,487,089 |
) |
Payments for interest rate swap contracts, net |
|
|
(854,814 |
) |
Interest expense paid |
|
|
(5,349,296 |
) |
Operating expenses paid |
|
|
(6,003,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(118,172,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
55,199,985 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
35,000,000 |
|
Issuance of auction rate senior notes payable |
|
|
55,000,000 |
|
Common and preferred stock issuance costs |
|
|
(2,632,812 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(804,099 |
) |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(1,498,670 |
) |
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
|
|
(26,324,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
113,939,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash |
|
|
(4,233,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cashbeginning of period |
|
|
4,278,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cashend of period |
|
$ |
45,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders
resulting from operations to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders resulting from operations |
|
|
36,192,154 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets applicable to common stockholders
resulting from operations to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of long-term investments, net of return of capital adjustments |
|
|
(141,853,276 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments |
|
|
31,230,812 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(2,487,089 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
24,445,159 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
(60,449,781 |
) |
Realized gains on investments and interest rate swap settlements |
|
|
(6,409,857 |
) |
Accretion of discount on investments |
|
|
(19,327 |
) |
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
50,730 |
|
Dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
1,639,910 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Increase in interest and dividend receivable |
|
|
(13,732 |
) |
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(523,770 |
) |
Increase in payable to Adviser, net of expense reimbursement |
|
|
290,078 |
|
Increase in current tax liability |
|
|
214,261 |
|
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(479,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(154,365,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(118,172,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions by common stockholders in additional common shares |
|
$ |
5,635,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
20 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2004(1) |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
November 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
26.53 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Public offering price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
Underwriting discounts and offering costs on initial public
offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.17 |
) |
Underwriting discounts and offering costs on issuance
of preferred shares |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
Premiums and underwriting discounts and offering costs
on secondary offering(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment loss(8) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments(8) |
|
|
2.67 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase from investment operations |
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Dividends to Preferred Stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of capital |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Dividends to Common Stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of capital |
|
|
(1.79 |
) |
|
|
(0.97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends to common stockholders |
|
|
(1.79 |
) |
|
|
(0.97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, end of period |
|
$ |
27.12 |
|
|
$ |
26.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share market value, end of period |
|
$ |
28.72 |
|
|
$ |
27.06 |
|
Total Investment Return Based on Market Value(3) |
|
|
13.06 |
% |
|
|
12.51 |
% |
Supplemental Data and Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common stockholders, end of period
(000s) |
|
|
404,274 |
|
|
|
336,553 |
|
Ratio of expenses (including current and deferred income tax
expense) to average net assets before waiver:(4)(6)(9) |
|
|
9.10 |
% |
|
|
15.20 |
% |
Ratio of expenses (including current and deferred income tax
expense) to average net assets after waiver:(4)(6)(9) |
|
|
8.73 |
% |
|
|
14.92 |
% |
Ratio of expenses (excluding current and deferred income tax
expense) to average net assets before waiver:(4)(6)(9) |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
Ratio of expenses (excluding current and deferred income tax
expense) to average net assets after waiver:(4)(6)(9) |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
Ratio of expenses (excluding current and deferred income tax
expense), without regard to non-recurring organizational
expenses, to average net assets before waiver:(4)(6)(9) |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
(Continued)
2005 Annual Report 21
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2004(1) |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
November 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of expenses (excluding current and deferred income tax
expense), without regard to non-recurring organizational
expenses, to average net assets after waiver:(4)(6)(9) |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets before
waiver:(4)(6)(10) |
|
|
(1.42 |
)% |
|
|
(0.45 |
)% |
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets after
waiver:(4)(6)(10) |
|
|
(1.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.17 |
)% |
Ratio of net
investment loss to average net assets after current and deferred income tax expense, before waiver:(4)(9) |
|
|
(7.37 |
)% |
|
|
(13.37 |
)% |
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets after current
and deferred income tax expense, after waiver:(4)(9) |
|
|
(7.00 |
)% |
|
|
(13.65 |
)% |
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
Tortoise Auction Rate Senior Notes, end of period (000s) |
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
Tortoise Preferred Shares, end of period (000s) |
|
$ |
70,000 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
Per common share amount of auction rate senior notes outstanding
at end of period |
|
$ |
11.07 |
|
|
$ |
8.67 |
|
Per common share amount of net assets, excluding auction rate
senior notes, at end of period |
|
$ |
38.19 |
|
|
$ |
35.21 |
|
Asset coverage, per $1,000 of principal amount of auction rate
senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
$ |
3,874 |
|
|
$ |
4,378 |
|
Series B |
|
$ |
3,874 |
|
|
$ |
4,378 |
|
Series C |
|
$ |
3,874 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Asset coverage, per $25,000 liquidation value per share
of preferred shares |
|
$ |
169,383 |
|
|
$ |
265,395 |
|
Asset coverage ratio of auction rate senior notes(5) |
|
|
387 |
% |
|
|
438 |
% |
Asset coverage ratio of MMP shares(11) |
|
|
272 |
% |
|
|
332 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Commencement of Operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Information presented relates to a share of common stock outstanding for the entire period. |
|
(3) |
|
Not Annualized for periods less than a year. Total investment return is calculated assuming a
purchase of common stock at the market price on the first day and a sale at the current market
price on the last day of the period reported. The calculation also assumes reinvestment of
dividends at actual prices pursuant to the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment
return does not reflect brokerage commissions.
|
|
(4) |
|
Annualized for periods less than one full year. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents value of total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by
auction rate senior notes and MMP shares at the end of the period divided by auction rate senior
notes outstanding at the end of the period. |
|
(6) |
|
The expense ratios and net investment ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to
preferred stockholders. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount is less than $0.01 per share, and represents the premium on the secondary offering
of $0.14 per share, less the underwriting discounts and offering costs of $0.14 per share for the
year ending November 30, 2005. |
|
(8) |
|
The ratios for the period ended November 30, 2004, do not reflect the change in estimate of
investment income and return of capital. See note 2. |
|
(9) |
|
The Company accrued $24,659,420 and $30,330,018 for the year ended November 30, 2005 and for
the period from February 27, 2004 through November 30, 2004, respectively, in current and deferred
income taxes. |
|
(10) |
|
The ratio excludes net deferred income tax benefit on net investment income. |
|
(11) |
|
Represents value of total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by
auction rate senior notes and MMP shares at the end of the period, divided by the sum of auction
rate senior notes and MMP shares outstanding at the end of the period. |
See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
22 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
N o t e s t o F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s
November 30, 2005
1. Organization
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp. (the Company) was organized as a Maryland corporation
on October 29, 2003, and is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Companys investment objective is
to seek a high level of total return with an emphasis on current dividends paid to shareholders.
The Company seeks to provide its shareholders with an efficient vehicle to invest in the energy
infrastructure sector. The Company commenced operations on February 27, 2004. The Companys shares
are listed on the NYSE under the symbol TYG.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
A. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of
assets and liabilities, recognition of distribution income and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
B. Investment Valuation
The Company primarily owns securities that are listed on a securities exchange. The Company values
those securities at their last sale price on that exchange on the valuation date. If the security
is listed on more than one exchange, the Company will use the price of the exchange that it
generally considers to be the principal exchange on which the security is traded. Securities listed
on the NASDAQ will be valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price, which may not necessarily
represent the last sale price. If there has been no sale on such exchange or NASDAQ on such day,
the security will be valued at the mean between bid and ask price on such day.
The Company may invest up to 30 percent of its total assets in restricted securities. Restricted
securities are subject to statutory or contractual restrictions on their public resale, which may
make it more difficult to obtain a valuation and may limit the Companys ability to dispose of
them. Investments in private placement securities and other securities for which market quotations
are not readily available will be valued in good faith by using fair value procedures approved by
the Board of Directors. Such fair value procedures consider factors such as discounts to publicly
traded issues, securities with similar yields, quality, type of issue, coupon, duration and rating.
The Company generally values its interest rate swap contracts by discounting the future cash flows
from the stated terms of the interest rate swap agreement by using interest rates currently
available in the market, or based on dealer quotations, if available.
The Company generally values short-term debt securities at prices based on market quotations for
such securities, except those securities purchased with 60 days or less to maturity are valued on
the basis of amortized cost, which approximates market value.
If events occur that will affect the value of the Companys portfolio securities before the net
asset value has been calculated (a significant event), the portfolio securities so affected will
generally be priced using a fair value procedure.
C. Security Transactions and Investment Income
Security transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade
date). Realized gains and losses are reported on an identified cost basis. Interest income is
recognized on the accrual basis, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from the Companys
investments in master limited partnerships (MLPs) generally are comprised of ordinary income,
capital gains and return of capital from the MLP. The Company records investment income and return
of capital based on estimates made at the time such distributions are received. Such estimates are
based on historical information available from each MLP and other industry sources. These estimates
may subsequently be revised based on information received from MLPs after their tax reporting
periods are concluded, as the actual character of these distributions are not known until after the
Companys fiscal year-end.
For the period from February 27, 2004 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2004, the
Company estimated the allocation of investment income and return of capital for the distributions
received from MLPs within the Statement of Operations. For this period, the Company had estimated
approximately 18 percent as investment income and approximately 82 percent as return of capital.
2005 Annual Report 23
N o t e s t o F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s
(Continued)
Subsequent to November 30, 2004, the Company reclassified the amount of investment income and
return of capital it recognized based on the 2004 tax reporting information received from the
individual MLPs. This reclassification amounted to a decrease in pre-tax net investment income of
approximately $2.2 million or $0.15 per share ($1.3 million or $0.09 per share, net of deferred tax
benefit), and a corresponding increase in unrealized appreciation of investments for the year ended
November 30, 2005. The reclassification is reflected in the accompanying financial statements, and
had no impact on the net assets applicable to common stockholders.
D. Dividends to Stockholders
Dividends to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The character of dividends
to common stockholders made during the year may differ from their ultimate characterization for
federal income tax purposes. For the period ended November 30, 2004, and the year ended November
30, 2005, the Companys dividend, for book purposes, was comprised entirely of return of capital as
a result of the net investment loss incurred by the Company in each reporting period. For the
periods ended November 30, 2004 and 2005, for tax purposes, the Company determined the current
dividend to common stockholders is also comprised of 100 percent return of capital.
Dividends to preferred shareholders are based on variable rates set at auctions, normally held
every 28 days. Dividends on preferred shares are accrued on a daily basis for the subsequent 28 day
period at a rate as determined on the auction date. Dividends on preferred shares are payable every
28 days, on the first day following the end of the dividend period.
E. Federal Income Taxation
The Company, as a corporation, is obligated to pay federal and state income tax on its taxable
income. The Company invests its assets primarily in MLPs, which generally are treated as
partnerships for federal income tax purposes. As a limited partner in the MLPs, the Company reports
its allocable share of the MLPs taxable income in computing its own taxable income. The Companys
tax expense or benefit will be included in the Statement of Operations based on the component of
income or gains (losses) to which such expense or benefit relates. Deferred income taxes reflect
the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
F. Organization Expenses, Offering and Debt Issuance Costs
The Company is responsible for paying all organizational expenses, which are expensed as incurred.
Offering costs related to the issuance of common and preferred stock are charged to additional
paid-in capital when the shares are issued. Offering costs (excluding underwriter commissions) of
$695,476 and $905,165 were charged to additional paid-in capital for the year ended November 30,
2005 and for the period from February 27, 2004 through November 30, 2004, respectively. Debt
issuance costs related to the auction rate senior notes payable are capitalized and amortized over
the period the notes are outstanding. The amounts of such costs (excluding underwriter commissions)
capitalized in the year ended November 30, 2005 and the period from February 27, 2004 through
November 30, 2004 were $254,099 and $724,986, respectively.
G. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments (principally interest rate swap contracts) to
manage interest rate risk. The Company has established policies and procedures for risk assessment
and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument activities. The
Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. All
derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in value during the
reporting period, and amounts accrued under the agreements, included as unrealized gains or losses
in the Statement of Operations. Monthly cash settlements under the terms of the interest rate swap
agreements are recorded as realized gains or losses in the Statement of Operations.
H. Indemnifications
Under the Companys organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against
certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Company. In addition, in
the normal course of business, the Company may enter into contracts that provide general
indemnification to other parties. The Companys maximum exposure under these arrangements is
unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet
occurred, and may not occur. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to
these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
I. Reclassification
Certain amounts from prior year were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
24 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
N o t e s t o F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s
(Continued)
3. Concentration of Risk
The Companys investment objective is to seek a high level of total return with an emphasis
on current dividends paid to its shareholders. Under normal circumstances, the Company intends to
invest at least 90 percent of its total assets in securities of domestic energy infrastructure
companies, and will invest at least 70 percent of its total assets in equity securities of MLPs.
The Company will not invest more than 10 percent of its total assets in any single issuer as of the
time of purchase. The Company may invest up to 25 percent of its assets in debt securities, which
may include below investment grade securities. Companies that primarily invest in a particular
sector may experience greater volatility than companies investing in a broad range of industry
sectors. The Company may, for defensive purposes, temporarily invest all or a significant portion
of its assets in investment grade securities, short-term debt securities and cash or cash
equivalents. To the extent the Company uses this strategy, it may not achieve its investment
objectives.
4. Agreements
The Company has entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with Tortoise Capital Advisors,
LLC (the Adviser). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will pay the Adviser a fee equal
to an annual rate of 0.95 percent of the Companys average monthly total assets (including any
assets attributable to leverage) minus the sum of accrued liabilities (other than deferred income
taxes, debt entered into for purposes of leverage and the aggregate liquidation preference of
outstanding preferred shares) (Managed Assets), in exchange for the investment advisory services
provided. For the period following the commencement of the Companys operations through February
28, 2006, the Adviser has agreed to waive or reimburse the Company for fees and expenses in an
amount equal to 0.23 percent of the average monthly Managed Assets of the Company. For years ending
February 28, 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Adviser has agreed to waive or reimburse the Company for fees
and expenses in an amount equal to 0.10 percent of the average monthly Managed Assets of the
Company.
The Company has engaged U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC to serve as the Companys administrator.
The Company will pay the administrator a monthly fee computed at an annual rate of 0.07 percent of
the first $300 million of the Companys Managed Assets, 0.06 percent on the next $500 million of
Managed Assets and 0.04 percent on the balance of the Companys Managed Assets, subject to a
minimum annual fee of $45,000.
Computershare Investor Services, LLC serves as the Companys transfer agent, dividend paying agent,
and agent for the automatic dividend reinvestment plan.
U.S. Bank, N.A. serves as the Companys custodian. The Company pays the custodian a monthly fee
computed at an annual rate of 0.015 percent on the first $100 million of the Companys Managed
Assets and 0.01 percent on the balance of the Companys Managed Assets, subject to a minimum annual
fee of $4,800.
5. Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the
carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Components of
the Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities as of November 30, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
6,566,312 |
|
Organization costs |
|
|
63,056 |
|
Other |
|
|
214,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,843,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities and interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
54,142,234 |
|
Basis reduction of investment in MLPs |
|
|
7,476,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,618,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
54,775,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended November 30, 2005, the components of income tax expense include foreign
taxes of $214,261 and deferred federal and state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit) of
$21,915,988 and $2,529,171, respectively. As of November 30, 2005, the Company had a net operating
loss for federal income tax purposes of approximately
2005 Annual Report 25
N o t e s t o F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s
(Continued)
$19,171,000. If not utilized, this net operating loss will expire as follows: $2,833,000 and
$16,338,000 in the years ending November 30, 2024 and 2025, respectively.
Total income taxes differ from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax
rate of 35 percent to net investment income and realized and unrealized gains on investments and
interest rate swap contracts before taxes as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Application of statutory income tax rate |
|
$ |
21,872,019 |
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
2,499,659 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
287,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,659,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
At November 30, 2005, the cost basis of investments for federal income tax purposes was
$534,841,426 and gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income
tax purposes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
155,094,423 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
155,094,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Restricted Securities
Certain of the Companys investments are restricted and are valued as determined in
accordance with procedures established by the Board of Directors and more fully described in Note
2. The table below shows the number of units held or principal amount, the acquisition dates,
acquisition costs, value per unit of such securities and percent of net assets which the securities
comprise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Units or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Investment Security |
|
Amount |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Per Unit |
|
|
Net Assets |
|
|
K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P. |
|
Common Units |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
6/01/05 |
|
|
$ |
16,080,000 |
|
|
$ |
32.49 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. |
|
Subordinated Units |
|
|
521,739 |
|
|
|
4/13/05 |
|
|
|
14,999,996 |
|
|
|
29.84 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Copano Energy, LLC |
|
Common Units |
|
|
531,701 |
|
|
|
8/01/05 |
|
|
|
15,000,089 |
|
|
|
36.74 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
Subordinated Units |
|
|
160,009 |
|
|
|
6/24/05 |
|
|
|
5,350,004 |
|
|
|
30.98 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
Common Units |
|
|
108,578 |
|
|
|
11/01/05 |
|
|
|
4,000,014 |
|
|
|
31.77 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. |
|
Common Units |
|
|
325,200 |
|
|
|
9/30/05 |
|
|
|
9,824,902 |
|
|
|
27.86 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Inergy, L.P. |
|
Subordinated Units |
|
|
82,655 |
|
|
|
9/14/04 2/04/05 |
|
|
|
2,232,123 |
|
|
|
22.37 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
E.W. Transportation, LLC |
|
Promissory Note |
|
$ |
6,379,054 |
|
|
|
5/03/04 |
|
|
|
8,569,500 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,056,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Investment Transactions
For the year ended November 30, 2005, the Company purchased (at cost) and sold securities (at
proceeds) in the amount of $172,064,905 and $31,230,812 (excluding short-term debt securities and
interest rate swaps), respectively.
8. Auction Rate Senior Notes
The Company has issued $60,000,000, $50,000,000, and $55,000,000 aggregate principal amount
of auction rate senior notes Series A, Series B, and Series C, respectively (collectively, the
Notes). The Notes were issued in denominations of $25,000. The principal amount of the Notes will
be due and payable on July 15, 2044 for Series A and Series B, and April 10, 2045 for Series C.
Fair value of the notes approximates carrying amount because the interest rate fluctuates with
changes in interest rates available in the current market.
26 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
N o t e s t o F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s
(Continued)
Holders of the Notes are entitled to receive cash interest payments at an annual rate that
may vary for each rate period. Interest rates for Series A, Series B, and Series C as of November
30, 2005 were 4.30 percent, 4.34 percent, and 4.25 percent, respectively. The weighted average
interest rates for Series A and Series B for the year ended November 30, 2005, were 3.40 percent
and 3.43 percent, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for Series C for the period from
April 11, 2005 through November 30, 2005 was 3.72 percent. These rates include the applicable rate
based on the latest results of the auction, plus commissions paid to the auction agent in the
amount of 0.25 percent. For each subsequent rate period, the interest rate will be determined by an
auction conducted in accordance with the procedures described in the Notes prospectus. Generally,
the rate period will be 28 days for Series A and Series B, and 7 days for Series C. The Notes will
not be listed on any exchange or automated quotation system.
The Notes are redeemable in certain circumstances at the option of the Company. The Notes are also
subject to a mandatory redemption if the Company fails to meet an asset coverage ratio required by
law, or fails to cure a deficiency as stated in the Companys rating agency guidelines in a timely
manner.
The Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and, upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of the Company, will rank: (1) senior to all the Companys outstanding preferred shares; (2) senior
to all of the Companys outstanding common shares; (3) on a parity with any unsecured creditors of
the Company and any unsecured senior securities representing indebtedness of the Company; and (4)
junior to any secured creditors of the Company.
9. Preferred Shares
The Company has 7,500 authorized preferred shares, of which 2,800 shares (1,400 MMP Shares
and 1,400 MMP II Shares) are currently outstanding. The MMP and MMP II Shares have rights
determined by the Board of Directors. The MMP and MMP II Shares have a liquidation value of $25,000
per share plus any accumulated, but unpaid dividends, whether or not declared.
Holders of the MMP and MMP II Shares are entitled to receive cash dividend payments at an annual
rate that may vary for each rate period. The dividend rates for MMP and MMP II Shares as of
November 30, 2005 were 4.37 percent and 4.35 percent, respectively. The weighted average dividend
rate for MMP shares for the year ended November 30, 2005, was 3.44 percent. The weighted average
dividend rate for MMP II shares for the period from July 11, 2005 through November 30, 2005, was
4.03 percent. These rates include the applicable rate based on the latest results of the auction,
plus commissions paid to the auction agent in the amount of 0.25 percent. Under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, the Company may not declare dividends or make other distribution on shares of
common stock or purchases of such shares if, at the time of the declaration, distribution or
purchase, asset coverage with respect to the outstanding Preferred Shares would be less than 200
percent.
The MMP and MMP II Shares are redeemable in certain circumstances at the option of the Company. The
MMP and MMP II Shares are also subject to a mandatory redemption if the Company fails to meet an
asset coverage ratio required by law, or fails to cure a deficiency as stated in the Companys
rating agency guidelines in a timely manner.
The holders of MMP and MMP II Shares have voting rights equal to the holders of common stock (one
vote per share) and will vote together with the holders of shares of common stock as a single class
except on matters affecting only the holders of preferred stock or the holders of common stock.
2005 Annual Report 27
N o t e s t o F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s
(Continued)
10. Interest Rate Swap Contracts
The Company has entered into interest rate swap contracts to protect itself from increasing
interest expense on its leverage resulting from increasing short-term interest rates. A decline in
interest rates may result in a decline in the value of the swap contracts, which may result in a
decline in the net assets of the Company. In addition, if the counterparty to the interest rate
swap contracts defaults, the Company would not be able to use the anticipated receipts under the
swap contracts to offset the interest payments on the Companys leverage. At the time the interest
rate swap contracts reach their scheduled termination, there is a risk that the Company would not
be able to obtain a replacement transaction or that the terms of the replacement would not be as
favorable as on the expiring transaction. In addition, if the Company is required to terminate any
swap contract early due to the Company failing to maintain a required 300 percent asset coverage of
the liquidation value of the outstanding auction rate senior notes or if the Company loses its
credit rating on its auction rate senior notes, then the Company could be required to make a
termination payment, in addition to redeeming all or some of the auction rate senior notes. Details
of the interest rate swap contracts outstanding as of November 30, 2005, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
Floating Rate |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Paid by |
|
|
Received by |
|
|
Appreciation/ |
|
Counterparty |
|
Date |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
The Company |
|
|
The Company |
|
|
(Depreciation) |
|
|
U.S. Bank, N.A. |
|
|
7/10/2007 |
|
|
$ |
60,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.54% |
|
|
1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR |
|
$ |
1,116,589 |
|
U.S. Bank, N.A.* |
|
|
7/10/2011 |
|
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.63% |
|
|
1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR |
|
|
499,536 |
|
U.S. Bank, N.A. |
|
|
7/17/2007 |
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.56% |
|
|
1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR |
|
|
943,766 |
|
U.S. Bank, N.A.* |
|
|
7/17/2011 |
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.64% |
|
|
1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR |
|
|
409,492 |
|
U.S. Bank, N.A. |
|
|
5/1/2014 |
|
|
|
55,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.54% |
|
|
1 week U.S. Dollar LIBOR |
|
|
1,296,705 |
|
U.S. Bank, N.A. |
|
|
11/12/2020 |
|
|
|
35,000,000 |
|
|
|
5.20% |
|
|
1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR |
|
|
(667,614 |
) |
U.S. Bank, N.A. |
|
|
11/18/2020 |
|
|
|
35,000,000 |
|
|
|
5.21% |
|
|
1 month U.S. Dollar LIBOR |
|
|
(695,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
345,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,902,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Company has entered into additional interest rate swap contracts for Series A and Series B
notes with settlements commencing on 7/10/2007 and 7/17/2007, respectively. |
The Company is exposed to credit risk on the interest rate swap contracts if the counterparty
should fail to perform under the terms of the interest rate swap contracts. The amount of credit
risk is limited to the net appreciation of the interest rate swap contract, as no collateral is
pledged by the counterparty.
The net realized loss on interest rate swap settlements of $854,814 is derived by summing the
interest rate swap expense of $848,850 and the change in interest rate swap expense payable from
November 30, 2004 of $5,964.
11. Common Stock
The Company has 100,000,000 shares of capital stock authorized and 14,905,515 shares
outstanding at November 30, 2005. Transactions in common shares for the period February 27, 2004
(commencement of operations) to November 30, 2004 and the year ended November 30, 2005, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at February 27, 2004 |
|
|
23,047 |
|
Shares sold through initial public offering and exercise of overallotment options |
|
|
12,600,000 |
|
Shares issued through reinvestment of dividends |
|
|
61,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at November 30, 2004 |
|
|
12,684,154 |
|
Shares sold through secondary offering and exercise of overallotment options |
|
|
2,018,281 |
|
Shares issued through reinvestment of dividends |
|
|
203,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at November 30, 2005 |
|
|
14,905,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Subsequent Event
On December 9, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to file with the
SEC one or more shelf registrations to permit the Company to issue, in one or more offerings: (1)
Common Stock, including Common Stock issued pursuant to the Companys Dividend Reinvestment Plan;
(2) Preferred Stock; and (3) debt securities of the Company as the Board of Directors or a duly
appointed committee shall deem to be in the best interests of the Company.
28 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
R e p o r t o f I n d e p e n d e n t R e g i s t e r e d
P u b l i c A c c o u n t i n g F i r m
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tortoise Energy
Infrastructure Corporation (the Company), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30,
2005, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the
statements of changes in net assets and financial highlights for the periods indicated therein.
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial
highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of
material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2005, by correspondence
with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at November 30, 2005, the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets and
financial highlights for the periods indicated therein, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
Kansas City, Missouri
January 6, 2006
2005 Annual Report 29
C
o m p a n y O f f i c e r s A n d D i r e c t o r s
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Public |
|
|
Position(s) Held |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Company |
|
|
with Company and |
|
|
|
Portfolios in Fund |
|
Directorships |
|
|
Length of Time |
|
|
|
Complex Overseen |
|
Held by |
Name and Age* |
|
Served |
|
Principal Occupation During Past Five Years |
|
by Director |
|
Director |
|
Independent
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conrad S. Ciccotello, 45
|
|
Director since 2003
|
|
Tenured Associate
Professor of Risk
Management and
Insurance,
Robinson College of
Business, Georgia
State University
since
1999; Director of
Graduate Personal
Financial Planning
Programs,
Editor, Financial
Services Review
since 2001 (an
academic journal
dedicated to the
study of individual
financial
management).
Formerly, faculty
member,
Pennsylvania State
University
(19971999).
|
|
Three
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham, 60
|
|
Director since 2003
|
|
Executive-in-Residence and Professor of
Finance, College of
Business
Administration,
Kansas State
University (has
served
as a professor or
adjunct professor
since 1970);
Chairman of
the Board,
President and CFO,
Graham Capital
Management,
Inc. and Owner of
Graham Ventures.
Formerly, CEO,
Kansas
Farm Bureau
Financial Services,
including seven
affiliated
insurance or
financial service
companies
(19792000).
|
|
Three
|
|
Erie Indemnity
Company; Erie
Family Life
Insurance Co.;
Kansas State
Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles E. Heath, 63
|
|
Director since 2003
|
|
Retired in 1999.
Formerly, Chief
Investment Officer,
General
Electrics
Employers
Reinsurance Corp.
(19891999). CFA
since 1974.
|
|
Three
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interested Directors
and Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kevin Birzer, 46
|
|
Director and
Chairman of the
Board since 2003
|
|
Managing Director
of the Adviser.
Partner/Senior
Analyst,
Fountain Capital
Management, L.L.C.
(Fountain
Capital), a
registered
investment advisor
(1989present);
Formerly, Vice
President,
Corporate Finance
Department, Drexel
Burnham
Lambert
(19861989); Vice
President, F.
Martin Koenig &
Co. (19831986).
|
|
Three
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terry C. Matlack, 49
|
|
Director and Chief
Financial Officer
since 2003
|
|
Managing Director
of the Adviser.
Managing Director,
Kansas City Equity
Partners LC
(KCEP), a private
equity
firm
(2001present);
Formerly,
President,
GreenStreet Capital
(19952001).
|
|
Three
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Schulte, 44
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
since 2003
|
|
Managing Director
of the Adviser.
Managing Director,
KCEP
(1993present).
|
|
Three
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zachary A. Hamel, 40
|
|
Secretary since 2003
|
|
Managing Director
of the Adviser.
Partner/Senior
Analyst
with Fountain
Capital
(1997present).
|
|
Three
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth P. Malvey, 40
|
|
Vice President since
2003, Treasurer since
November 2005
|
|
Managing Director
of the Adviser.
Partner/Senior
Analyst,
Fountain Capital
(2002present);
Formerly,
Investment Risk
Manager and member
of the Global
Office of
Investments,
GE Capitals
Employers
Reinsurance
Corporation
(19962002).
|
|
Three
|
|
None |
|
|
|
* |
|
The address of each of these individuals is 10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 222, Overland Park, Kan.
66210 |
|
|
|
30 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
|
|
|
A
d d i t i o n a l I n f o r m a t i o n
(Unaudited)
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of
1933. By their nature, all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual
results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Several
factors that could materially affect Tortoise Energys actual results are the performance of the
portfolio of stocks held by it, the conditions in the U.S. and international financial, petroleum
and other markets, the price at which shares of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp. will trade in
the public markets and other factors discussed in Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.s periodic
filings with the SEC.
Proxy Voting Policies
A description of the policies and procedures that the Company uses to determine how to vote
proxies relating to portfolio securities owned by the Company and information regarding how the
Company voted proxies relating to the portfolio of securities during the period ended June 30, 2005
is available to stockholders (i) without charge, upon request by calling the Company at (913)
981-1020 or toll-free at (888) 728-8784; and (ii) on the SECs Web site at www.sec.gov.
Form N-Q
The Company files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the first and third
quarters of each fiscal year with the SEC on Form N-Q. The Companys Form N-Q and statement of
additional information are available without charge upon request by calling the Company at (888)
728-8784 or by visiting the SECs Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, you may review and copy the
Companys Form N-Q at the Commissions Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Certification Disclosure
The Companys Chief Executive Officer has submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the annual
CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
The Company has filed with the SEC the certification of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Privacy Policy
In order to conduct its business, the Company collects and maintains certain nonpublic
personal information about our shareholders of record with respect to their transactions in shares
of our securities. This information includes the shareholders address, tax identification or
Social Security number, share balances, and dividend elections. We do not collect or maintain
personal information about shareholders whose share balances of our securities are held in street
name by a financial institution such as a bank or broker.
We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about you, our other shareholders or our
former shareholders to third parties unless necessary to process a transaction, service an account,
or as otherwise permitted by law.
To protect your personal information internally, we restrict access to nonpublic personal
information about our shareholders to those employees who need to know that information to provide
services to our shareholders. We also maintain certain other safeguards to protect your nonpublic
personal information.
A
d d i t i o n a l I n f o r m a t i o n
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan
If a stockholders shares are registered directly with the Company or with a brokerage firm
that participates in the Companys Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the Plan), all
distributions are automatically reinvested for stockholders by the Plan Agent, Computershare
Investor Services, L.L.C. (Computershare), in additional shares of common stock of the Company
(unless a stockholder is ineligible or elects otherwise). Stockholders who elect not to participate
in the Plan will receive all distributions payable in cash paid by check mailed directly to the
stockholder of record (or, if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to such
nominee) by Computershare, as dividend paying agent. Distributions subject to tax (if any) are
taxable whether or not shares are reinvested.
On the distribution payment date, if the net asset value per share of the common stock is equal to
or less than the market price per share of common stock plus estimated brokerage commissions, the
Company will issue additional shares of common stock to participants. The number of shares will be
determined by the greater of the asset value per share or 95 percent of the market price.
Otherwise, shares generally will be purchased on the open market by the Plan Agent.
There are no brokerage charges with respect to shares issued directly by the Company as a result of
distributions payable either in shares or in cash. However, each participant will pay a pro rata
share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agents open-market purchases in
connection with the reinvestment of distributions. If a participant elects to have the Plan Agent
sell part or all of his or her common stock and remit the proceeds, such participant will be
charged his or her pro rata share of brokerage commissions on the shares sold.
Stockholders may elect not to participate in the Plan by sending written instructions to
Computershare, as dividend paying agent, at the address set forth below. Participation in the Plan
is completely voluntary and may be terminated or resumed at any time without penalty by giving
notice in writing to the Plan Agent; such termination will be effective with respect to a
particular distribution if notice is received prior to such record date.
Additional information about the Plan may be obtained by writing to Computershare at 2 North
LaSalle St., Chicago, Ill. 60602. You may also contact Computershare by phone at (888) 728-8784 or
visit their Web site at www.computershare.com.
|
|
|
32 Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
|
|
|
Office of the Company and of
the Investment Adviser
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
10801 Mastin Boulevard, Suite 222
Overland Park, Kan. 66210
(913) 981-1020
(913) 981-1021 (fax)
www.tortoiseadvisors.com
Executive Management of
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
H. Kevin Birzer
Zachary A. Hamel
Kenneth P. Malvey
Terry Matlack
David J. Schulte
Board of Directors of
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
H. Kevin Birzer, Chairman
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
Terry Matlack
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
Conrad S. Ciccotello
Independent
John R. Graham
Independent
Charles E. Heath
Independent
ADMINISTRATOR
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, L.L.C.
615 East Michigan St.
Milwaukee, Wis. 53202
CUSTODIAN
U.S. Bank, N.A.
425 Walnut St.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
TRANSFER AGENT
Computershare Investor Services, L.L.C.
2 North LaSalle St.
Chicago, Ill. 60602
(888)728-8784
www.computershare.com
LEGAL COUNSEL
Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP
4801 Main St.
Kansas City, Mo. 64112
INVESTOR RELATIONS
(913) 981-1020
info@tortoiseadvisors.com
STOCK SYMBOL
Listed NYSE Symbol: TYG
This report is for stockholder information. This is not a
prospectus
intended for use in the purchase or sale of fund shares.
Past
performance is no guarantee of future results and your
investment
may be worth more or less at the time you sell.
Tortoise Capital Advisors Family of Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
Ticker/ |
|
Targeted |
|
Investor |
|
Investment |
|
as of 11/30/05 |
Name |
|
Inception Date |
|
Investments |
|
Suitability |
|
Restrictions |
|
($ in millions) |
|
Tortoise Energy
|
|
TYG
|
|
U.S. Energy Infrastructure,
|
|
Retirement Accounts
|
|
30% Restricted
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
|
Feb. 2004
|
|
More Diversified in MLPs
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
10% Issuer-limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tortoise Capital
|
|
TYY
|
|
U.S. Energy Infrastructure,
|
|
Retirement Accounts
|
|
50% Restricted
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
|
May 2005
|
|
More concentrated
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
15% Issuer-limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More direct placements
|
|
Taxable Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tortoise North America
|
|
TYN
|
|
Canadian and U.S.
|
|
Taxable Accounts
|
|
50% Restricted
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
|
Oct. 2005
|
|
Energy Infrastructure,
|
|
|
|
Diversified to meet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified in Canadian RITs
|
|
|
|
RIC requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and U.S. MLPs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrants President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Registrant has not made any amendments to its
code of ethics during the period covered by this report. The Registrant has not granted any
waivers from any provisions of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
A copy of the registrants Code of Ethics is filed herewith.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Registrants Board of Directors has determined that there is at least one audit committee
financial expert serving on its audit committee. Mr. Conrad Ciccotello is the audit committee
financial expert and is considered to be independent as each term is defined in Item 3 of Form
N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The Registrant has engaged its principal accountant to perform audit services, audit-related
services and tax services during the past two fiscal years. Audit services refer to performing
an audit of the Registrants annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by
the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal
years. Audit-related services refer to the assurance and related services by the principal
accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit. Tax services refer to
professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax
planning. The following table details the aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year for audit
fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees by the principal accountant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FYE 11/30/2005 |
|
FYE 11/30/2004 |
|
Audit Fees |
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
|
229,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
none |
|
|
none |
|
|
The audit committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures that require the audit
committee to pre-approve (i) the selection of the Registrants independent auditors, (ii) the
engagement of the independent auditors to provide any non-audit services to the Registrant, (iii)
the engagement of the independent auditors to provide any non-audit services to the Adviser or any
entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing
services to the Registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial
reporting of the Registrant, and (iv) the fees and other compensation to be paid to the independent
auditors. The Chairman of the audit committee may grant the pre-approval of any engagement of the
independent auditors for non-audit services of less than $5,000, and such
1
delegated pre-approvals will be presented to the full audit committee at its next meeting. Under
certain limited circumstances, pre-approvals are not required under securities law regulations for
certain non-audit services below certain de minimus thresholds. Since the adoption of these
policies and procedures, the audit committee has pre-approved all audit and non-audit services
provided by the principal accountant, and all non-audit services provided by the principal
accountant for the Adviser, or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with
the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, that are related to the operation of
the Registrant. None of these services provided by the principal accountant were approved by the
audit committee pursuant to the de minimus exception under Rule 2.01(c)(7)(i)(C) or Rule
2.01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X. All of the principal accountants hours spent on auditing the
registrants financial statements were attributed to work performed by full-time permanent
employees of the principal accountant.
The following table indicates the non-audit fees billed by the Registrants principal accountant
for services to the Registrant and to the Adviser (and any other entity controlling, controlled by,
or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant) for the
last two fiscal years. The audit committee has considered whether the principal accountants
provision of services (other than audit services) to the Registrant, the Adviser or any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides services to the
Registrant is compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence in performing
audit services, and has concluded that the provision of such non-audit services by the principal
accountant has not compromised the principal accountants independence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Audit Fees |
|
FYE 11/30/2005 |
|
FYE 11/30/2004 |
|
Registrant |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
104,000 |
|
Registrants Investment Adviser |
|
none |
|
|
none |
|
|
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The Registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is comprised of Mr. Conrad Ciccotello,
Mr. John Graham and Mr. Charles Heath.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation
1. Introduction
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation (the Company) has adopted and implemented the
following policies and procedures, which it believes are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies
are voted in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In pursuing this
2
policy, proxies should be voted in a manner that is intended to maximize shareholder value and all
conflicts of interests should be resolved exclusively in favor of the Company.
2. Delegation
The Company hereby delegates responsibility for voting proxies for which it is entitled to vote to
Tortoise Capital Advisors, LLC (the Adviser) and the Adviser hereby accepts such delegation and
agrees to vote proxies in accordance with these Policies and Procedures. The Adviser may delegate
its responsibilities under these Policies and Procedures to a third party, provided that no such
delegation shall relieve the Adviser of its responsibilities hereunder and the Adviser shall retain
final authority and fiduciary responsibility for such proxy voting.
3. General
a. |
|
Because of the unique nature of the Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) in which the Company
primarily invests, the Adviser shall evaluate each proxy on a case-by-case basis. Because
proxies of MLPs are expected to relate only to extraordinary measures, the Company does not
believe it is prudent to adopt pre-established voting guidelines. |
b. |
|
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for monitoring Company actions and ensuring that
(i) proxies are received and forwarded to the appropriate decision makers; and (ii) proxies
are voted in a timely manner upon receipt of voting instructions. The Company is not
responsible for voting proxies it does not receive, but will make reasonable efforts to obtain
missing proxies. |
c. |
|
The Chief Executive Officer shall implement procedures to identify and monitor potential
conflicts of interest that could affect the proxy voting process, including (i) significant
client relationships; (ii) other potential material business relationships; and (iii) material
personal and family relationships. |
d. |
|
All decisions regarding proxy voting shall be determined by the Investment Committee of the
Adviser and shall be executed by the Chief Executive Officer. Every effort shall be made to
consult with the portfolio manager and/or analyst covering the security. |
e. |
|
The Company may determine not to vote a particular proxy, if the costs and burdens exceed the
benefits of voting (e.g., when securities are subject to loan or to share blocking
restrictions). |
4. Conflicts of Interest
The Adviser shall use commercially reasonable efforts to determine whether a potential conflict may
exist, and a potential conflict shall be deemed to exist only if one or more of the Managers of the
Adviser actually knew or should have known of the conflict. The Company is sensitive to conflicts
of interest that may arise in the proxy decision-making process and has identified the following
potential conflicts of interest:
|
|
A principal of the Company or any person involved in the proxy
decision-making process serves on the Board of the portfolio
company. |
3
|
|
An immediate family member of a principal of the Company or any
person involved in the proxy decision-making process serves as a
director or executive officer of the portfolio company. |
|
|
The Company, any venture capital fund managed by the Company, or
any affiliate holds a significant ownership interest in the
portfolio company. |
This list is not intended to be exclusive. All employees are obligated to disclose any potential
conflict to Terry Matlack.
If a material conflict is identified, Company management may (i) disclose the potential conflict to
the Board of Directors and obtain consent; or (ii) establish an ethical wall or other informational
barriers between the person(s) that are involved in the conflict and the persons making the voting
decisions.
5. Board Reporting.
a. |
|
The Adviser shall submit a report at the next regularly scheduled meeting, but no less
frequently than annually to the Board regarding any issues arising under the Policy, including
any issues arising under these Policies and Procedures since the last report to the Board and
the resolution of such issues, including information about conflicts. |
b. |
|
The Adviser shall submit a report at the next regularly scheduled meeting, but no less
frequently than annually, identifying any recommended changes in practices. |
6. Recordkeeping
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for maintaining the following records:
|
|
proxy voting policies and procedures; |
|
|
proxy statements (provided, however, that the Company may rely on the Securities and
Exchange Commissions EDGAR system if the Company filed its proxy statements via
EDGAR or may rely on a third party as long as the third party has provided the
Company with an undertaking to provide a copy of the proxy statement promptly upon
request); |
|
|
records of votes cast; and |
|
|
any records prepared by the Company that were material to a proxy voting decision or
that memorialized a decision. |
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
1. Introduction
Unless a client is a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 or
a client requests Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C. (the Adviser) to do so in writing,
4
the Adviser does not vote proxy materials for its clients. In the event the Adviser receives
any proxies intended for clients who have not delegated proxy voting responsibilities to the
Adviser, the Adviser will promptly forward such proxies to the client for the client to vote. When
requested by the client, the Adviser may provide advice to the client regarding proposals submitted
to the client for voting. In the event an employee determines that the Adviser has a conflict of
interest due to, for example, a relationship with a company or an affiliate of a company, or for
any other reason which could influence the advice given, the employee will advise the Compliance
Officer who will advise the Investment Committee, and the Investment Committee will decide whether
the Adviser should either (1) disclose to the client the conflict to enable the client to evaluate
the advice in light of the conflict or (2) disclose to the client the conflict and decline to
provide the advice.
In cases in which the client is a registered investment company under the Investment Company
Act of 1940 or in cases where the client has delegated proxy voting responsibility and authority to
the Adviser, the Adviser has adopted and implemented the following policies and procedures, which
it believes are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interests of its
clients. In pursuing this policy, proxies should be voted in a manner that is intended to maximize
value to the client. In situations where Adviser accepts such delegation and agrees to vote
proxies, Adviser will do so in accordance with these Policies and Procedures. The Adviser may
delegate its responsibilities under these Policies and Procedures to a third party, provided that
no such delegation shall relieve the Adviser of its responsibilities hereunder and the Adviser
shall retain final authority and fiduciary responsibility for such proxy voting.
2. General
|
a. |
|
Because of the unique nature of the Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), the
Adviser shall evaluate each proxy of an MLP on a case-by-case basis. Because proxies
of MLPs are expected to relate only to extraordinary measures, the Adviser does not
believe it is prudent to adopt pre-established voting guidelines. |
|
|
b. |
|
In the event requests for proxies are received with respect to the voting of
equity securities other than MLP equity units, on routine matters, such as election of
directors or approval of auditors, the proxies usually will be voted with management
unless the Adviser determines it has a conflict or the Adviser determines there are
other reasons not to vote with management. On non-routine matters, such as amendments
to governing instruments, proposals relating to compensation and stock option and
equity compensation plans, corporate governance proposals and shareholder proposals,
the Adviser will vote, or abstain from voting if deemed appropriate, on a case by case
basis in a manner it believes to be in the best economic interest of the Companys
shareholders. In the event requests for proxies are received with respect to debt
securities, the Adviser will vote on a case by case basis in a manner it believes to be
in the best economic interest of the Companys shareholders. |
|
|
c. |
|
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for monitoring Advisers proxy
voting actions and ensuring that (i) proxies are received and forwarded to the
appropriate |
5
decision makers; and (ii) proxies are voted in a timely manner upon receipt of
voting instructions. The Adviser is not responsible for voting proxies it does not
receive, but will make reasonable efforts to obtain missing proxies.
|
d. |
|
The Chief Executive Officer shall implement procedures to identify and monitor
potential conflicts of interest that could affect the proxy voting process, including
(i) significant client relationships; (ii) other potential material business
relationships; and (iii) material personal and family relationships. |
|
|
e. |
|
All decisions regarding proxy voting shall be determined by the Investment
Committee of the Adviser and shall be executed by the Chief Executive Officer. Every
effort shall be made to consult with the portfolio manager and/or analyst covering the
security. |
|
|
f. |
|
The Adviser may determine not to vote a particular proxy, if the costs and
burdens exceed the benefits of voting (e.g., when securities are subject to loan or to
share blocking restrictions). |
3. Conflicts of Interest
The Adviser shall use commercially reasonable efforts to determine whether a potential
conflict may exist, and a potential conflict shall be deemed to exist only if one or more of the
managers of the Adviser actually knew or should have known of the conflict. The Adviser is
sensitive to conflicts of interest that may arise in the proxy decision-making process and has
identified the following potential conflicts of interest:
|
|
|
A principal of the Adviser or any person involved in the proxy decision-making
process currently serves on the Board of the portfolio company. |
|
|
|
|
An immediate family member of a principal of the Adviser or any person involved in
the proxy decision-making process currently serves as a director or executive officer
of the portfolio company. |
|
|
|
|
The Adviser, any venture capital fund managed by the Adviser, or any affiliate holds
a significant ownership interest in the portfolio company. |
This list is not intended to be exclusive. All employees are obligated to disclose any
potential conflict to the Advisers Compliance Officer.
If a material conflict is identified, Adviser management may (i) disclose the potential
conflict to the client and obtain consent; or (ii) establish an ethical wall or other informational
barriers between the person(s) that are involved in the conflict and the persons making the voting
decisions.
6
4. Recordkeeping
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for maintaining the following records:
|
|
|
proxy voting policies and procedures; |
|
|
|
|
proxy statements (provided, however, that the Adviser may rely on the Securities and
Exchange Commissions EDGAR system if the issuer filed its proxy statements via EDGAR
or may rely on a third party as long as the third party has provided the Adviser with
an undertaking to provide a copy of the proxy statement promptly upon request); |
|
|
|
|
records of votes cast and abstentions; and |
|
|
|
|
any records prepared by the Adviser that were material to a proxy voting decision or
that memorialized a decision. |
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
a. Not Applicable
b. None
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and
Affiliated Purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Value) of Shares |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
(or Units) that May |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
(b) |
|
of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share (or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
Month #1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/05-6/30/05 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Month #2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/1/05-7/31/05 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Month #3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/05-8/31/05 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Month #4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/05-9/30/05 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Month #5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/1/05-10/31/05 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Month #6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/1/05-11/30/05 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
7
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) |
|
The Registrants President/Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act)) are effective as of a date within 90 days
of the filing date of the report, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures
required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
(b) |
|
There were no significant changes in the Registrants internal controls over financial
reporting (as defined in rule 30a-3(d)) that occurred during the Registrants second fiscal
quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a) |
|
(1) Any code of ethics or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required
by Item 2, to the extent that the Registrant intends to satisfy Item 2 requirements through
filing of an exhibit. Filed herewith. |
(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given
during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the Registrant to 10 or more persons.
None.
(b) |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith. |
8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title)*
|
/s/ David J. Schulte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Schulte, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title)*
|
/s/ David J. Schulte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Schulte, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title)*
|
|
/s/ Terry C. Matlack |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terry C. Matlack, Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
9