Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-8681
KID BRANDS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
22-1815337 |
(State of or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
1800 Valley Road, Wayne, New Jersey
|
|
07470 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(201) 405-2400
(Registrants Telephone Number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of July
30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
CLASS
|
|
SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.10 stated value
|
|
21,546,174 |
PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
KID BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,593 |
|
Accounts receivable- trade, less allowances of $7,121 in 2010 and $7,101 in 2009 |
|
|
43,089 |
|
|
|
42,940 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
37,565 |
|
|
|
37,018 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
87,047 |
|
|
|
87,349 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
4,445 |
|
|
|
4,251 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
78,971 |
|
|
|
80,352 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
27,669 |
|
|
|
30,993 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,390 |
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
201,522 |
|
|
$ |
206,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
13,513 |
|
|
$ |
13,533 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
5,975 |
|
|
|
15,100 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
19,843 |
|
|
|
17,420 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
8,388 |
|
|
|
8,684 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
51,553 |
|
|
|
58,367 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
47,500 |
|
|
|
54,492 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
101,418 |
|
|
|
115,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $0.10 stated value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued
26,727,780 shares at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
89,932 |
|
|
|
89,756 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
108,321 |
|
|
|
100,377 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 5,181,606 and 5,227,985 shares at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
(101,265 |
) |
|
|
(102,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
100,104 |
|
|
|
91,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
201,522 |
|
|
$ |
206,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
KID BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
67,921 |
|
|
$ |
59,966 |
|
|
$ |
129,395 |
|
|
$ |
116,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
47,215 |
|
|
|
41,013 |
|
|
|
90,021 |
|
|
|
80,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
20,706 |
|
|
|
18,953 |
|
|
|
39,374 |
|
|
|
35,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
12,810 |
|
|
|
11,388 |
|
|
|
24,823 |
|
|
|
23,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment and valuation reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
7,896 |
|
|
|
(8,055 |
) |
|
|
14,551 |
|
|
|
(3,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, including amortization
and write-off of deferred financing
costs |
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
(1,714 |
) |
|
|
(2,064 |
) |
|
|
(3,893 |
) |
Interest and investment income |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,792 |
) |
|
|
(3,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
provision (benefit) |
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
(9,540 |
) |
|
|
12,759 |
|
|
|
(7,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
(3,851 |
) |
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
(2,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,476 |
|
|
$ |
(5,689 |
) |
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
|
$ |
(4,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,545,000 |
|
|
|
21,370,000 |
|
|
|
21,545,000 |
|
|
|
21,369,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,028,000 |
|
|
|
21,370,000 |
|
|
|
21,920,000 |
|
|
|
21,369,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
KID BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
|
$ |
(4,353 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Provision for impairment and valuation reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,620 |
|
Provision for customer allowances |
|
|
17,689 |
|
|
|
13,932 |
|
Provision for inventory reserve |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
(3,362 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(17,893 |
) |
|
|
(13,699 |
) |
Income tax receivable |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
11,276 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
(7,515 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
(4,787 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
17,745 |
|
|
|
12,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(7,012 |
) |
|
|
(16,200 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
Net (payment) borrowing on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(9,125 |
) |
|
|
5,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(15,906 |
) |
|
|
(12,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
(1,007 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
2,844 |
|
|
$ |
2,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
2,277 |
|
|
$ |
3,666 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
799 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Kid Brands, Inc. (KID), together with its subsidiaries (collectively with KID, the
Company), is a leading designer, importer, marketer and distributor of infant and juvenile
consumer products. The Company operates in one segment: the infant and juvenile business.
The Companys operations, which consist of: Kids Line, LLC (Kids Line); Sassy, Inc.
(Sassy); LaJobi, Inc., (LaJobi); and CoCaLo, Inc., (CoCaLo), each direct or indirect
wholly-owned subsidiaries of KID, design, manufacture through third parties and market products in
a number of categories including, among others: infant bedding and related nursery accessories and
décor (Kids Line and CoCaLo); nursery furniture and related products (LaJobi); and developmental
toys and feeding, bath and baby care items with features that address the various stages of an
infants early years (Sassy). The Companys products are sold primarily to retailers in North
America, the UK and Australia, including large, national retail accounts and independent retailers
(including toy, specialty, food, drug, apparel and other retailers).
On December 23, 2008, KID entered into, and consummated the transactions contemplated by, a
Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with The Russ Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Buyer), for the sale of the capital stock of all of KIDs subsidiaries actively engaged in the
gift business (the Gift Business), and substantially all of KIDs assets used in the Gift
Business (the Gift Sale).
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the
Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
for interim financial reporting and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule
10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared under generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to such principles and regulations. The information furnished
reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature and
necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Results for interim periods are not
necessarily an indication of results to be expected for the year. This Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as amended (the 2009 10-K).
The Company evaluates all subsequent events prior to filing.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
NOTE 2 SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Share-Based Compensation
As of June 30, 2010, the Company maintained (i) its Equity Incentive Plan (the EI Plan),
which is a successor to the Companys 2004 Stock Option, Restricted and Non-Restricted Stock Plan
(the 2004 Option Plan, and together with the EI Plan, the Plans) and (ii) the 2009 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the 2009 ESPP), which was a successor to the Companys Amended and Restated
2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 2004 ESPP). The EI Plan and the 2009 ESPP were each
approved by the Companys shareholders on July 10, 2008. In addition, the Company may issue equity
awards outside of the Plans. As of June 30, 2010, there were 20,000 stock options outstanding that
were granted outside the Plans. The exercise or measurement price for equity awards issued under
the Plans or otherwise is generally equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on the
New York Stock Exchange as of the date the award is granted. Generally, equity awards under the
Plans (or otherwise) vest over a period ranging from three to five years from the grant date as
provided in the award agreement governing the specific grant. Options and stock appreciation rights
generally expire 10 years from the date of grant. Shares in respect of equity awards are issued
from authorized shares reserved for such issuance or treasury shares.
The EI Plan, which became effective July 10, 2008 (at which time no further awards could be
made under the 2004 Option Plan), provides for awards in any one or a combination of: (a) Stock
Options, (b) Stock Appreciation Rights, (c) Restricted Stock, (d) Stock Units, (e) Non-Restricted
Stock, and/or (f) Dividend Equivalent Rights. Any award under the EI Plan may, as determined by the
committee administering the EI Plan (the Plan Committee) in its sole discretion, constitute a
Performance-Based Award (an award
that qualifies for the performance-based compensation exemption of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). All awards granted under the EI Plan are evidenced by a
written agreement between the Company and each participant (which need not be identical with
respect to each grant or participant) that provide the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with
the requirements of the EI Plan, associated with such awards, as determined by the Plan Committee
in its sole discretion. A total of 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock have been reserved for issuance
under the EI Plan. In the event all or a portion of an award is forfeited, terminated or cancelled,
expires, is settled for cash, or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all or a portion of
the
6
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
shares of Common Stock subject to the award in connection with the exercise or settlement of
such award (Unissued Shares), such Unissued Shares will in each case again be available for
awards under the EI Plan pursuant to a formula set forth in the EI Plan. The preceding sentence
applies to any awards outstanding on July 10, 2008 under the 2004 Option Plan, up to a maximum of
an additional 1,750,000 shares of Common Stock. At June 30, 2010, 929,256 shares were available for
issuance under the EI Plan.
The 2009 ESPP became effective on January 1, 2009. A total of 200,000 shares of Common Stock
have been reserved for issuance under the 2009 ESPP. At June 30, 2010, 122,096 shares were
available for issuance under the 2009 ESPP.
Impact on Net Income
The components of share-based compensation expense follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
Restricted stock expense |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Restricted stock unit expense |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
SAR expense |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
ESPP expense |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based payment expense |
|
$ |
462 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records share-based compensation expense in the statements of operations within
the same categories that payroll expense is recorded in selling general and administrative expense.
No share-based compensation expense was capitalized in inventory or any other assets for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The relevant Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) standard requires the cash flows related to tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in
excess of compensation costs recognized for those equity compensation grants (excess tax benefits)
to be classified as financing cash flows.
The fair value of stock options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) granted under the Plans
or otherwise is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model
using assumptions with respect to dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, volatility and expected
term, which are included below for SARs only, as there were no stock options issued during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Expected volatilities are calculated based on the
historical volatility of the Companys stock. The expected term of options or SARs granted is
derived from the vesting period of the award, as well as historical exercise behavior, and
represents the period of time that the award is expected to be outstanding. Management monitors
exercises and employee termination patterns to estimate forfeiture rates within the valuation
model. Separate groups of employees, directors and officers that have similar historical exercise
behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The risk-free interest rate is based on
the Treasury note interest rate in effect on the date of grant for the expected term of the award.
Stock Options
Stock options are rights to purchase the Companys Common Stock in the future at a
predetermined per share exercise price (generally the closing price for such stock on the New York
Stock Exchange on the date of grant). Stock options may be either: Incentive Stock Options
(stock options which comply with Section 422 of the Code), or Nonqualified Stock Options (stock
options which are not Incentive Stock Options). There were no stock options issued during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
As of June 30, 2010, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
stock options, net of forfeitures, was approximately $1.7 million, and is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
7
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Activity regarding outstanding stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Stock Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Options Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
880,615 |
|
|
$ |
13.14 |
|
Options Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Forfeited/Cancelled* |
|
|
(132,640 |
) |
|
$ |
12.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding as of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
747,975 |
|
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option price range at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
6.63-$34.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See disclosure below regarding forfeitures. |
The aggregate intrinsic value of the unvested and vested outstanding options was $36,000 and
$0 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value is the total
pretax value of in-the-money options, which is the difference between the fair value at the
measurement date and the exercise price of each option. No options were exercised during the six
months ended June 30, 2010. The weighted average fair value of stock options vested for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 was $14.43.
A summary of the Companys unvested stock options at June 30, 2010 and changes during the six
months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Unvested stock options |
|
Options |
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Unvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
499,400 |
|
|
$ |
12.28 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(30,200 |
) |
|
$ |
14.43 |
|
Forfeited/cancelled* |
|
|
(36,000 |
) |
|
$ |
9.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested options at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
433,200 |
|
|
$ |
12.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See disclosure below regarding forfeitures. |
Restricted Stock
Restricted Stock is Common Stock that is subject to restrictions, including risks of
forfeiture, determined by the Plan Committee in its sole discretion, for so long as such Common
Stock remains subject to any such restrictions. A holder of restricted stock has all rights of a
shareholder with respect to such stock, including the right to vote and to receive dividends
thereon, except as otherwise provided in the award agreement relating to such award. Restricted
Stock Awards are equity classified within the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of each
restricted stock grant is estimated on the date of grant using the closing price of the Companys
Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, there were no shares of restricted stock
issued under the EI Plan or otherwise. There were 55,400 and 56,980 shares of unvested restricted
stock outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These restricted stock
grants have vesting periods ranging from three to five years, with fair values (per share) at date
of grant ranging from $13.65 to $16.77. Compensation expense is determined for the issuance of
restricted stock by amortizing over the requisite service period, or the vesting period, the
aggregate fair value of the restricted stock awarded based on the closing price of the Companys
Common Stock effective on the date the award is made.
As of June 30, 2010, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to issuances
of restricted stock was approximately $0.6 million, and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
Restricted Stock Units
A Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) is a notional account representing a participants conditional
right to receive at a future date one (1) share of Common Stock or its equivalent in value. Shares
of Common Stock issued in settlement of an RSU may be issued with or without other consideration as
determined by the Plan Committee in its sole discretion. RSUs may be settled in the sole discretion
of the Plan Committee: (i) by the distribution of shares of Common Stock equal to the grantees
RSUs, (ii) by a lump sum payment of an amount in cash equal to the fair value of the shares of
Common Stock which would otherwise be distributed to the
8
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
grantee, or (iii) by a combination of cash
and Common Stock. The RSUs issued under the EI Plan vest (and will be settled) ratably over a
5-year period commencing from the date of grant and are equity classified in the consolidated
balance sheets. There were 2,000 and 149,250 RSUs issued to employees of the Company during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. There were no RSUs issued during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
The fair value of each RSU grant is estimated on the grant date. The fair value is set using
the closing price of the Companys Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of
grant. Compensation expense for RSUs is recognized ratably over the vesting period, based upon the
market price of the shares underlying the awards on the date of grant.
A summary of the Companys unvested RSUs at June 30, 2010 and changes during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
41,120 |
|
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
Granted |
|
|
149,250 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled* |
|
|
(2,160 |
) |
|
$ |
5.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
188,210 |
|
|
$ |
5.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See disclosure below regarding forfeitures. |
As of June 30, 2010, there was approximately $0.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
4.5 years.
Stock Appreciation Rights
A Stock Appreciation Right (a SAR) is a right to receive a payment in cash, Common Stock or
a combination thereof, as determined by the Plan Committee, in an amount or value equal to the
excess of: (i) the fair value, or other specified valuation (which may not exceed fair value), of a
specified number of shares of Common Stock on the date the right is exercised, over (ii) the fair
value or other specified amount (which may not be less than fair value) of such shares of Common
Stock on the date the right is granted; provided, however, that if a SAR is granted in tandem with
or in substitution for a stock option, the designated fair value for purposes of the foregoing
clause (ii) will be the fair value on the date such stock option was granted. No SARs will be
exercisable later than ten (10) years after the date of grant. The SARs issued under the EI Plan
vest ratably over a period ranging from zero to five years and unless terminated earlier, expire on
the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. SARs are typically granted at an exercise price equal
to the closing price of the Companys Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of
grant. There were 429,250 and 564,943 SARs granted during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. SARs are accounted for at fair value at the date of grant in the consolidated
income statement, are generally amortized on a straight line basis over the vesting term, and are
equity-classified in the consolidated balance sheets.
The assumptions used to estimate the weighted average fair value of the SARs granted during
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
0.830 |
% |
|
|
0.837 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Weighted-average fair value of SARs granted |
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
9
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
A summary of the Companys unvested SARs at June 30, 2010 and changes during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Value Per Share |
|
Unvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
579,400 |
|
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
Granted |
|
|
429,250 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
Forfeited* |
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
|
$ |
5.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
937,690 |
|
|
$ |
4.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See disclosure below regarding forfeitures. |
As of June 30, 2010, there was approximately $1.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested SARs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.9
years.
The aggregate intrinsic value of the unvested and vested outstanding SARs at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 was $3.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value is
the total pretax value of in-the-money SARs, which is the difference between the fair value at the
measurement date and the exercise price of each SAR. There were 5,180 and 0 SARs exercised for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively. The weighted average fair value of SARs
vested for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $1.53.
Option/SAR Forfeitures
All of the forfeited options/SARs described in the charts set forth above resulted from the
termination of the employment of the respective grantees and the resulting forfeiture of unvested
and/or vested but unexercised options/SARs. Pursuant to the Plans, upon the termination of
employment of a grantee, such grantees outstanding unexercised options/SARs are typically
cancelled and deemed terminated as of the date of termination; provided, that if the termination is
not for cause, all vested options/SARs generally remain outstanding for a period ranging from 30 to
90 days, and then expire to the extent not exercised.
RSU Forfeitures
All
of the forfeited RSUs described in the chart above resulted from the
termination of the employment of the respective grantees and the
resulting forfeiture of unvested RSUs. Pursuant to the award
agreements governing the Companys RSUs, upon a grantees
termination of employment, such grantees outstanding unvested RSUs are forfeited, except in the event of
disability or death, in which case all restrictions lapse.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the 2009 ESPP, eligible employees are provided the opportunity to purchase the Companys
common stock at a discount. Pursuant to the 2009 ESPP, options are granted to participants as of
the first trading day of each plan year, which is the calendar year, and may be exercised as of the
last trading day of each plan year, to purchase from the Company the number of shares of common
stock that may be purchased at the relevant purchase price with the aggregate amount contributed by
each participant. In each plan year, an eligible employee may elect to participate in the 2009 ESPP
by filing a payroll deduction authorization form for up to 10% (in whole percentages) of his or her
compensation. No employee shall have the right to purchase Company common stock under the 2009 ESPP
that has a fair value in excess of $25,000 in any plan year. The purchase price is the lesser of
85% of the closing market price of the Companys common stock on either the first trading day or
the last trading day of the plan year. If an employee does not elect to exercise his or her option,
the total amount credited to his or her account during that plan year is returned to such employee
without interest, and his or her option expires. At June 30, 2010, 122,096 shares were available
for issuance under the 2009 ESPP. At June 30, 2010, there were 110 enrolled participants in the
2009 ESPP.
The fair value of each option granted under the 2009 ESPP is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
89.20 |
% |
|
|
129.0 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Expected volatilities are calculated based on the historical volatility of the Companys
stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield with a term that is
consistent with the expected life of the options. The expected life of options under each of the
2009 ESPP is one year, or the equivalent of the annual plan year.
10
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3 WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
During 2009, the Company adopted a FASB standard which requires the Company to include
specified participating securities in the two-class method of computing earnings per share (EPS).
Under the two-class method, EPS is computed by dividing earnings allocated to common stockholders
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Earnings are allocated
to both common shares and participating securities based on the respective number of
weighted-average shares outstanding for the period. Participating securities include unvested
restricted stock awards where, like the Companys restricted stock awards, such awards carry a
right to receive non-forfeitable dividends, if declared. The requirements of this accounting
standard were effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009. As the Company had incorrectly
included such unvested restricted stock in its basic earnings per share calculation for the first
and second quarters of 2009, which was not the appropriate treatment for such periods, the
Companys EPS for the first and second quarter of 2009 were restated. The effects of such
restatement were immaterial. Upon the vesting of restricted stock, such stock is included in the
calculation of basic earnings per share.
With respect to RSUs, as the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents is contingent
upon vesting or exercise, in accordance with the applicable accounting standard, the Company does
not include unvested RSUs in the calculation of basic earnings per share. To the extent such RSUs
are settled in stock, upon settlement, such stock is included in the calculation of basic earnings
per share.
The weighted average common shares outstanding included in the computation of basic and
diluted net income per share is set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding-Basic |
|
|
21,545 |
|
|
|
21,370 |
|
|
|
21,545 |
|
|
|
21,369 |
|
Dilutive effect of common shares issuable upon
exercise of stock options, RSUs and SARs |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming
dilution |
|
|
22,028 |
|
|
|
21,370 |
|
|
|
21,920 |
|
|
|
21,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 did not include options to purchase approximately 0.6 million and 0.7 million shares of
common stock, respectively because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price
of the common stock during such period. The computation of diluted net income per common share for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 did not include options to purchase 1.7 million shares
of common stock, because there was a net loss for each period and inclusion of the shares
underlying such options would have been anti-dilutive.
NOTE 4 DEBT
Consolidated long-term debt at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Term Loan (Credit Agreement) |
|
$ |
60,500 |
|
|
$ |
67,000 |
|
Note Payable (CoCaLo purchase) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
61,013 |
|
|
|
68,025 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
13,513 |
|
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
47,500 |
|
|
$ |
54,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there was approximately $6.0 million and $15.1
million, respectively, borrowed under the Revolving Loan (defined below), which is classified as
short-term debt. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Revolving Loan Availability was $40.6
million and $31.4 million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2010, the applicable interest rate margins were: 2.75% for LIBOR Loans and
1.75% for Base Rate Loans. The weighted average interest rates for the outstanding loans as of June
30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
LIBOR Loans |
|
|
Base Rate Loans |
|
Revolving Loan |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Term Loan |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
11
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Credit Agreement Summary
The Company, its operating subsidiaries, and I&J Holdco, Inc. (the Borrowers) maintain a
credit facility (the Credit Agreement) with certain financial institutions (the Lenders),
including Bank of America, N.A. (as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association), as
Agent and Fronting Bank, Sovereign Bank as Syndication Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A. as Documentation
Agent and Banc of America Securities LLC as Lead Arranger. The credit facility provides for: (a) a
$50.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Loan), with a subfacility for letters of
credit in an amount not to exceed $5.0 million, and (b) an $80.0 million term loan facility (the
Term Loan). The total borrowing capacity is based on a borrowing base, which is defined as 85% of
eligible receivables plus the lesser of (x) $25.0 million and (y) 55% of eligible inventory. The
scheduled maturity date of the facility is April 1, 2013 (subject to customary early termination
provisions).
The Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Companys option, at a base rate or
at LIBOR, plus applicable margins based on the most recent quarter-end Total Debt to Covenant
EBITDA Ratio. Applicable margins vary between 2.0% and 4.25% on LIBOR borrowings and 1.0% and
3.25% on base rate borrowings (base rate borrowings include a floor of 30 day LIBOR plus 1%). At
June 30, 2010, the applicable margins were 2.75% for LIBOR borrowings and 1.75% for base rate
borrowings. The principal of the Term Loan is required to be repaid in quarterly installments of
$3.25 million through December 31, 2012, and a final payment of $28.0 million due on April 1, 2013.
The Term Loan is also required to be prepaid upon the occurrence, and with the proceeds, of
certain transactions, including most asset sales or debt or equity issuances, and extraordinary
receipts. The Company is also required to pay an agency fee of $35,000 per annum, an annual
non-use fee of 0.55% to 0.80% of the unused amounts under the Revolving Loan, as well as other
customary fees as are set forth in the Credit Agreement.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to comply with the following
financial covenants: (a) a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.35:1.00 for each of second,
third and fourth quarters of 2010 and each fiscal quarter thereafter; (b) a maximum Total Debt to
Covenant EBITDA Ratio of 3.25:1.00 for first three quarters of 2010 and a step down to 2.75:1.00
for the fourth quarter of 2010 and each fiscal quarter thereafter; and (c) an annual capital
expenditure limitation. Covenant EBITDA, as currently defined, is a non-GAAP financial measure
used to determine relevant interest rate margins and the Companys compliance with the financial
covenants set forth above, as well as the determination of whether certain dividends and
repurchases can be made if other specified prerequisites are met. Covenant EBITDA is defined
generally as consolidated net income (after excluding specified non-cash, non-recurring and other
specified items), as adjusted for interest expense; income tax expense; depreciation; amortization;
other non-cash charges (gains); specified costs in connection with each of the Companys senior
financing, specified acquisitions, and specified requirements under the Credit Agreement; non-cash
transaction losses (gains) due solely to fluctuations in currency values; and specified costs in
connection with the sale of the Companys Gift Business. For purposes of the Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio, Covenant EBITDA is further adjusted for unfinanced capital expenditures; specified cash
taxes and distributions pertaining thereto; and specified cash dividends.
The Credit Agreement also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other
restrictions, the Company is restricted in its ability to purchase or redeem stock, incur
additional debt, make acquisitions above certain amounts and pay any CoCaLo or LaJobi Earnout
Consideration (each defined below) or any amounts due with respect to a promissory note to CoCaLo
as part of such acquisition (the CoCaLo Note), unless in each case certain conditions are
satisfied. The Credit Agreement also contains specified events of default related to the CoCaLo
and LaJobi Earnout Consideration. In addition KID may not pay a dividend to its shareholders
unless the LaJobi and CoCaLo Earnout Consideration, if any, has been paid; no default exists or
would result therefrom (including compliance with the financial covenants), Excess Revolving Loan
Availability is at least $4.0 million, and the Total Debt to Covenant EBITDA Ratio for the two most
recently completed fiscal quarters is less than 2.00:1.00.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreement, including a failure to
remain in compliance with all applicable financial covenants, the lenders could elect to declare
all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable. In addition,
an event of default under the Credit Agreement could result in a cross-default under certain
license agreements that the Company maintains. The Borrowers were in compliance with all
applicable financial covenants in the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010.
The Borrowers are required to maintain in effect Hedge Agreements that protect against
potential fluctuations in interest rates with respect to a minimum of 50% of the outstanding amount
of the Term Loan. Pursuant to the requirement to maintain Hedge Agreements, on May 2, 2008, the
Borrowers entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $70 million which
expired on April 30, 2010. Changes in the cost of the swap agreement and its fair value as of
April 30, 2010 resulted in income of approximately $170,000 and $678,000 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and income of approximately
$310,000 and $556,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and such
amounts are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
12
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The Borrowers entered into a new interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $31.9
million on April 30, 2010. An unrealized net loss of $16,000 for this interest rate swap for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, was recorded as a component of comprehensive income, which is
expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months (see Note 7).
The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the Companys domestic assets,
including a pledge of the capital stock of each Borrower and Licensor (defined below), and a
portion of KIDs equity interests in its active foreign subsidiaries, and is also guaranteed by
KID.
Financing costs associated with the 2009 amended revolver and term loans, are deferred and are
amortized over the contractual term of the debt. As a result of an amendment to the Credit
Agreement in March 2009, based upon the FASB standard for deferred financing costs, the Company
recorded a non-cash charge to results of operations of approximately $0.4 million for the write off
of deferred financing costs in the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had obligations under certain letters of credit that require
the Company to make payments to parties aggregating $0.6 million upon the occurrence of specified
events.
NOTE 5 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the components of intangible assets consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Amortization Period |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sassy trade name |
|
Indefinite life |
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
Kids Line customer relationships |
|
20 years |
|
|
28,379 |
|
|
|
29,156 |
|
Kids Line trade name |
|
Indefinite life |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
LaJobi trade name |
|
Indefinite life |
|
|
18,600 |
|
|
|
18,600 |
|
LaJobi customer relationships |
|
20 years |
|
|
11,271 |
|
|
|
11,589 |
|
LaJobi royalty agreements |
|
5 years |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
CoCaLo trade name |
|
Indefinite life |
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
CoCaLo customer relationships |
|
20 years |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
CoCaLo foreign trade name |
|
Indefinite life |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
$ |
78,971 |
|
|
$ |
80,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense was approximately $691,000 and $1,381,000 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Aggregate amortization expense was approximately $736,000
and $1,470,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually, and more
frequently if a triggering event occurs indicating that an impairment may exist. The Companys
annual impairment testing is performed in the fourth quarter of each year (unless specified
triggering events warrant more frequent testing). All intangible assets, both definite-lived and
indefinite-lived, were tested for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2009. See Note 5 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the discussion of Long Lived Assets in the 2009
10-K with respect to the Companys annual impairment testing of intangible assets in 2009, and the
estimates and assumptions used in the Companys analysis. There were no impairments of intangible
assets in 2009 other than the impairment of the Applause® trade name recorded in the second quarter
of 2009. There were no triggering events in the first six months of 2010 to indicate that further
testing of intangible assets (either definite-lived or indefinite-lived) was required.
As many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management, the
assumptions and estimates used in such assessment may change in future periods, which could require
that the Company record additional impairment charges to the Companys assets. The Company will
continue to monitor circumstances and events in future periods to determine whether additional
asset impairment testing or recordation is warranted.
NOTE 6 CONCENTRATION OF RISK
The
following tables present net sales and assets of the Company by geographic area (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Net sales |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net domestic sales |
|
$ |
65,670 |
|
|
$ |
57,752 |
|
|
$ |
124,523 |
|
|
$ |
111,993 |
|
Net foreign sales
(Australia and United
Kingdom)* |
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
4,872 |
|
|
|
4,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
67,921 |
|
|
$ |
59,966 |
|
|
$ |
129,395 |
|
|
$ |
116,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Domestic assets |
|
$ |
197,971 |
|
|
$ |
203,155 |
|
Foreign assets (Australia and United Kingdom) |
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
201,522 |
|
|
$ |
206,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes export sales from the United States. |
The Company categorizes its sales in five product categories: Functional Soft Goods,
Functional Hard Goods, Accessories and Décor, Toys and Entertainment and Other. Functional Soft
Goods includes bedding, blankets, mattresses and sleep positioners; Functional Hard Goods includes
cribs and other nursery furniture, feeding products, baby gear and organizers; Accessories and
Décor includes hampers, lamps, rugs and décor; Toys and Entertainment includes developmental toys,
bath toys and mobiles; Other includes all other products that do not fit in the above four
categories. The Companys consolidated net sales by product category, as a percentage of total
consolidated net sales, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Functional Soft Goods |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
46.4 |
% |
|
|
39.8 |
% |
|
|
45.2 |
% |
Functional Hard Goods |
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
38.9 |
% |
|
|
33.5 |
% |
Accessories and Décor |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Toys and Entertainment |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to customers, (i) Toys R Us, Inc. and Babies R Us, Inc., in the aggregate,
accounted for 52.1% and 49.1% of the Companys consolidated net sales during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and 52.2% and 48.5% for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, respectively, and (ii) Target accounted for approximately 10.4% and 10.3% for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively and 10.2% and 11.7% for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The loss of these customers or any other significant
customers, or a significant reduction in the volume of business conducted with such customers,
could have a material adverse impact on the Company. The Company does not normally require
collateral or other security to support credit sales.
As part of its ongoing risk assessment procedures, the Company monitors concentrations of
credit risk associated with financial institutions with which it conducts business. The Company
seeks to avoid concentration with any single financial institution.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 72% of the Companys dollar volume of
purchases was attributable to manufacturing in the Peoples Republic of China (PRC), compared to
64% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The PRC currently enjoys permanent normal trade
relations (PNTR) status under U.S. tariff laws, which provides a favorable category of U.S.
import duties. The loss of such PNTR status would result in a substantial increase in the import
duty for products manufactured for the Company in the PRC and imported into the United States and
would result in increased costs for the Company.
The supplier accounting for the greatest dollar volume of the Companys purchases accounted
for approximately 19% of such purchases for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and approximately
21% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The five largest suppliers accounted for approximately
45% of the Companys purchases in the aggregate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 49% for
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
NOTE 7 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value of assets and liabilities is determined by reference to the estimated price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The relevant FASB standard
outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the
consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and related disclosures.
14
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair
value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. The Company currently has no Level 1 assets or liabilities that are measured at a
fair value on a recurring basis.
Level 2Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates,
yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs). Most of the Companys
assets and liabilities fall within Level 2 and include foreign exchange contracts (when applicable)
and an interest rate swap agreement. The fair value of foreign currency and interest rate swap
contracts are based on third-party market maker valuation models that discount cash flows resulting
from the differential between the contract rate and the market-based forward rate or curve
capturing volatility and establishing intrinsic and carrying values.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys assessment about the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company currently has no Level
3 assets or liabilities that are measured at a fair value on a recurring basis.
This hierarchy requires the Company to minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to use
observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. Observable inputs are based on
market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs are based on the Companys
market assumptions. Unobservable inputs require significant management judgment or estimation. In
some cases, the inputs used to measure an asset or liability may fall into different levels of the
fair value hierarchy. In those instances, the fair value measurement is required to be classified
using the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In accordance
with the applicable standard, the Company is not permitted to adjust quoted market prices in an
active market.
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the
fair value of the Companys interest rate swap agreement as of June 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreement |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements of $16,000 and $678,000 are included in
the Companys accrued expenses on the balance sheet at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, inventory, income tax receivable, trade
accounts payable, accrued expenses and short-term debt are reflected in the consolidated balance
sheets at carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these
instruments.
The carrying value of the Companys term loan borrowings approximates fair value because
interest rates under the term loan borrowings are variable, based on prevailing market rates.
There were no material changes to the Companys valuation techniques during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to those used in prior periods.
Derivative Instruments
The Company is required by its lenders to maintain in effect interest rate swaps that protect
against potential fluctuations in interest rates with respect to a minimum 50% of the outstanding
amount of the Term Loan. The Company is primarily exposed to interest rate risk through its
variable rate Term Loan. The Companys objective is to offset the variability of cash flows in the
interest payments on a portion of the total outstanding variable rate debt. The Company applies
hedge accounting based upon the criteria established by accounting guidance for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, including designation of its derivatives as fair value hedges
or cash flow hedges and assessment of hedge effectiveness. The Company records its derivatives in
its consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Company does not use derivative instruments for
trading purposes.
Cash Flow Hedges
To comply with a requirement in the Companys Credit Agreement to offset variability in cash flows
related to the interest rate payments on the Term Loan, the Company uses an interest rate swap
designated as a cash flow hedge. The interest rate swap converts the variable rate on a portion of the Term Loan to a specified fixed interest rate by
requiring payment of a fixed rate of interest in exchange for the receipt of a variable rate of
interest at the LIBOR U.S. dollar three month index rate. The duration of the contract is less than
twelve months.
15
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The interest rate swap is recorded at fair value on the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
Accumulated other comprehensive income reflects the difference between the overall change in fair
value of the interest rate swap since inception of the hedge and the amount of ineffectiveness
reclassified into earnings.
The Company assesses hedge effectiveness both at inception of the hedge and at regular
intervals at least quarterly throughout the life of the derivative. These assessments determine
whether derivatives designated as qualifying hedges continue to be highly effective in offsetting
changes in the cash flows of hedged transactions. The Company measures hedge ineffectiveness by
comparing the cumulative change in cash flows of the hedge contract with the cumulative change in
cash flows of the hedged transaction. The Company recognizes any ineffective portion of the hedge
in its Consolidated Statement of Operations as a component of Other, net. The impact of hedge
ineffectiveness on earnings was not significant during the three and six months ended June 30,
2010. Each period, the hedging relationship will be evaluated to determine whether it is expected
that the hedging relationship will continue to be highly effective based on the updated analysis.
In addition, the Company will consider the likelihood of the counterpartys compliance with the
contractual terms of the hedging derivative that could require the counterparty to make payments
(counterparty default risk).
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company did not discontinue any cash flow
hedges.
An unrealized net loss of $16,000 for this interest rate swap agreement, recorded as a
component of comprehensive income, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, is expected to
be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months.
Non-Qualifying Derivative Instruments
A previous interest rate swap contract, utilized to offset exposure of the Companys Term Loan
to interest rate risk, (as required by the Credit Agreement), terminated on April 30, 2010. This
contract converted the variable rate on a portion of the Term Loan to a specified fixed interest
rate by requiring payment of a fixed rate of interest in exchange for the receipt of a variable
rate of interest at the LIBOR USD three month index rate. This contract was not designated as a
hedge and was adjusted to fair value at regular intervals, with any resulting gains or losses
recorded immediately in earnings.
Changes between cost and fair value of this interest rate swap resulted in income of $310,000
and $556,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively and such amounts are included in
interest expense in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations.
NOTE 8 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income, representing all changes in Shareholders Equity during the period other
than changes resulting from the issuance or repurchase of the Companys common stock and payment of
dividends, is reconciled to net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,476 |
|
|
$ |
(5,689 |
) |
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
|
$ |
(4,353 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,363 |
|
|
$ |
(5,526 |
) |
|
$ |
7,928 |
|
|
$ |
(4,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9 INCOME TAXES
The Company uses the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting on
income taxes. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the
realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax
liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. The Companys ability to
realize its deferred tax assets depends upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income to
allow for the utilization of its deductible temporary differences and loss and credit carry
forwards.
16
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions, both within the United States and outside
of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities regarding the inclusion of
certain items in taxable income, the deductibility of certain expenses, transfer pricing, the
utilization and carryforward of various tax credits, and the utilization of various carryforward
items such as charitable contributions and net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). At June 30,
2010, the amount of liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal, state, and foreign
taxes was approximately $4.5 million, including approximately $0.2 million of accrued interest.
The Company has various tax attributes such as NOLs, charitable contribution carryovers, and
foreign tax credit carryovers which could be utilized to offset these uncertain tax positions.
Activity regarding the liability for unrecognized tax benefits for the six months ended June
30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,470 |
|
Increase related to interest expense |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
4,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is currently under examination in several tax jurisdictions and remains subject to
examination until the statute of limitations expires for the respective tax jurisdiction. Based
upon the expiration of statutes of limitations and/or the conclusion of tax examinations in several
jurisdictions, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that the total amount of previously
unrecognized tax benefits discussed above may decrease by up to $3.8 million within twelve months
of June 30, 2010 and such amount is reflected on the Companys consolidated balance sheet as
current taxes payable. The Company anticipates that the valuation allowances of the deferred tax
assets associated with various tax attributes such as foreign tax credit carryforwards would be
increased.
The Companys policy is to classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits as income tax expense.
The difference between the Companys effective tax rate of 36.6% and 37.7% for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and the U.S. Federal statutory rate is primarily
related to the provision for state taxes in the United States offset
by a discrete item related to
the Companys Australia subsidiary. The difference between the Companys effective tax rate of 40.4% and 40.8% for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and the U.S. Federal statutory rate is primarily
related to the provision for state taxes in the United States.
NOTE 10 LITIGATION; COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is party to various copyright, patent and
trademark infringement, unfair competition, breach of contract, customs, employment, product
liability, product recall and other legal actions incidental to its business, as plaintiff or
defendant. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to such
actions that are currently pending will not materially adversely affect the consolidated results of
operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Company.
The
Company has approximately $71.0 million in outstanding purchase commitments at June 30,
2010, consisting primarily of purchase orders for inventory.
The Company enters into various license and distribution agreements relating to trademarks,
copyrights, designs, and products which enable the Company to market items compatible with its
product line. Most of these agreements are for two to four year terms with extensions if agreed to
by both parties. Several of these agreements require prepayments of certain minimum guaranteed
royalty amounts. The amount of minimum guaranteed royalty payments with respect to all license
agreements pursuant to their original terms aggregates approximately $17.6 million, of which the
Company had remaining commitments of approximately $7.7 million at June 30, 2010, approximately
$0.9 million of which are due prior to December 31, 2010. The amount of minimum guaranteed royalty
payments unpaid at December 31, 2009 was approximately $10.0 million. Royalty expense was $1.8
million and $3.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Royalty
expense was $1.6 million and $3.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively.
In connection with the sale of the Gift Business, KID and Russ Berrie U.S. Gift, Inc (U.S. Gift),
our subsidiary at the time, sent a notice of termination, effective December 23, 2010, with respect
to the lease (the Lease) originally entered into by KID (and subsequently assigned to U.S. Gift)
of a facility in South Brunswick, New Jersey. Although this Lease has become the obligation of the
Buyer of the Gift Business (through its ownership of U.S. Gift), KID remains obligated for the
payments due thereunder (to the extent they are not paid by U.S. Gift) until the termination of the
Lease becomes effective (i.e., for a maximum potential remaining obligation of approximately $1.3
million). No payments have been made by KID in connection with the Lease since the sale of the Gift
Business, but there can be no assurance that payments will not be required of KID with respect
thereto to the extent U.S. Gift fails
17
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
to make such payments (as it has in certain prior periods) and no accommodation is secured
from the landlord. The amount of payments required by KID, if any, cannot be ascertained at this
time. To the extent KID is required to make any payments to the landlord in respect of the Lease,
it intends to seek reimbursement from the Buyer under the purchase agreement governing the sale of
our former Gift Business. However, we cannot assure that we will be able to recover any such
amounts in a timely manner, or at all.
The purchase agreement pertaining to the sale of the Gift Business contains various
indemnification, reimbursement and similar obligations. In addition, the Company may remain
obligated with respect to certain contracts and other obligations that were not novated in
connection with their transfer. No payments have been made by the Company in connection with the
foregoing as of June 30, 2010, but there can be no assurance that payments will not be required of
the Company in the future.
Pursuant to each of
the purchase agreements governing the LaJobi and CoCaLo acquisitions, the
Company may be required to pay earnout consideration amounts ranging from (i)
$0.0 to $15.0 million in respect of the LaJobi acquisition (the
“LaJobi Earnout Consideration”) and (ii) $0.0 to $4.0 million
in respect of the CoCaLo acquisition (the “CoCaLo Earnout
Consideration”, and collectively with the LaJobi Earnout Consideration,
the “Earnout Consideration”). In addition, the Company has agreed
to pay 1% of the Agreed Enterprise Value (as defined in the agreement
pertaining to the LaJobi purchase) to a financial institution, payable in the
same manner and at the same time that the LaJobi Earnout Consideration is
paid. The Company cannot currently determine the precise amount of the
Earnout Consideration (or the finder’s fee) that will be required to be
paid. However, based on current projections, the Company anticipates that the
aggregate Earnout Consideration( together with the finder’s fee) will
range from $10 million to $15 million, although the exact amount could be
more or less depending on the actual performance of each of LaJobi and CoCaLo
(combined with Kids Line) for the remaining portion of the applicable
measurement periods, each of which terminate on December 31, 2010. The
Company currently anticipates that cash flow from operations and anticipated
availability under the Credit Agreement will be sufficient to fund the
obligation to pay the Earnout Consideration and the finder’s fee, which
is anticipated to be paid on or around April 2011, and that such payment
will be permitted under the terms of the Credit Agreement and related
documentation.
Any LaJobi Earnout Consideration and/or CoCaLo Earnout Consideration will be recorded as
goodwill when and if paid or, if earlier, when the amount of the Earnout Consideration becomes
probable and estimable in accordance with relevant accounting standards.
NOTE 11 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an amendment to the
standard pertaining to fair value measurements and disclosures. This amendment requires the
Company to: (1) disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level
2 of the fair value hierarchy, (2) disclose activity in Level 3 fair value measurements including
transfers into and out of Level 3 and the reasons for such transfers, and (3) present separately in
its reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements information about purchases, sales, issuances
and settlements on a gross basis. The amendments prescribed by the standard were effective for the
Companys fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, except for the requirements described in item (3)
above, which will be effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
The Company adopted a new FASB standard concerning the determination of the useful life of
intangible assets beginning on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have an
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements at the time of adoption or during the six
month period ended June 30, 2010, but could have an impact in the future. The new guidance amends
the factors that are to be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The new guidance is intended to improve
the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected
cash flows originally used to measure the fair value of the intangible asset under U.S. GAAP.
NOTE 12 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Lawrence Bivona, the President of LaJobi, along with various family members, established L&J
Industries, in Asia. The purpose of the entity is to provide quality control services to LaJobi
for goods being shipped from Asian ports. The Company has used this service since April 2008, and
reimburses L&J Industries for the actual, direct costs incurred by such entity for the services
provided. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred costs, recorded in
cost of goods sold, aggregating approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, related
to the services provided. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company incurred
costs, recorded in cost of goods sold, aggregating approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million
respectively, related to the services provided.
CoCaLo contracts for warehousing and distribution services from a company, that until October
15, 2009, had a partner that was the estate of the father of, and is managed by the spouse of,
Renee Pepys Lowe, an executive officer of the Company. As of October 15, 2009, this company is
owned by unrelated parties although the spouse of Renee Pepys Lowe is still a manager of the
business. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, CoCaLo paid approximately $0.5 million
and $1.1 million to such company for these services, respectively. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, CoCaLo paid approximately $0.4 million and $0.9 million to such company for these services, respectively. In addition, CoCaLo
rented certain office space from the same company at a rental cost for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 of approximately $34,000 and $68,000, respectively. The lease for the office
space expired December 31, 2009. These expenses were recorded in selling, general and
administrative expense.
18
KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In connection with the sale of the Gift Business, KID and the Buyer entered into a transition
services agreement (the TSA), pursuant to which, for periods of time and consideration specified
in the TSA, the Company and the Buyer will provide certain specified transitional services to each
other. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded $0 and $75,000,
respectively in selling, general and administrative expense pursuant to the TSA, not including
payments made by the Australian and U.K. subsidiaries of Kids Line for the sublease of certain
office and warehouse space, which amounts are payable to the Buyer (or its affiliates), or payments
by Sassy to a subsidiary of the Buyer for the use of certain employees in the PRC, each of which is
governed by underlying operating lease agreements.
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The financial and business analysis below provides information which we believe is relevant to
an assessment and understanding of our consolidated financial condition, changes in financial
condition and results of operations. This financial and business analysis should be read in
conjunction with our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part I, Financial Information, Item 1,
Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as amended (the 2009 10-K), and our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, including in each case the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading designer, importer, marketer and distributor of branded infant and juvenile
consumer products. We generated net sales of $67.9 million and $129.4 million in the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
Our infant and juvenile business which currently consists of Kids Line, LaJobi, Sassy and
CoCaLo designs, manufactures through third parties, imports and sells products in a number of
complementary categories including, among others: infant bedding and related nursery accessories
(Kids Line and CoCaLo); infant furniture and related products (LaJobi); and developmental toys and
feeding, bath and baby care items with features that address the various stages of an infants
early years (Sassy). Our products are sold primarily to retailers in North America, the UK and
Australia, including large, national retail accounts and independent retailers (including toy,
specialty, food, drug, apparel and other retailers). We maintain a direct sales force and
distribution network to serve our customers in the United States, the UK and Australia, and sell
through independent manufacturers representatives and distributors in certain other countries.
International sales, defined as sales outside of the United States, including export sales,
constituted 9% and 7% of our net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. One of our strategies is to increase our international sales, both in absolute terms
and as a percentage of total sales, as we seek to expand our presence outside of the United States.
We operate in one segment: the infant and juvenile business. Consistent with our strategy of
building a confederation of complementary businesses, each subsidiary in our infant and juvenile
business is operated substantially independently by a separate group of managers. Our senior
corporate management, together with senior management of our subsidiaries, coordinates the
operations of all of our businesses and seeks to identify cross-marketing, procurement and other
complementary business opportunities.
Aside from funds provided by our senior credit facility, revenues from the sale of products
have historically been the major source of cash for the Company, and cost of goods sold and payroll
expenses have been the largest uses of cash. As a result, operating cash flows primarily depend on
the amount of revenue generated and the timing of collections, as well as the quality of customer
accounts receivable. The timing and level of the payments to suppliers and other vendors also
significantly affect operating cash flows. Management views operating cash flows as a good
indicator of financial strength. Strong operating cash flows provide opportunities for growth both
internally and through acquisitions, and also enable us to pay down debt.
We do not ordinarily sell our products on consignment (although we may do so in limited
circumstances), and we ordinarily accept returns only for defective merchandise. In the normal
course of business, we grant certain accommodations and allowances to certain customers in order to
assist these customers with inventory clearance or promotions. Such amounts, together with
discounts, are deducted from gross sales in determining net sales.
Our products are manufactured by third parties, principally located in the PRC and other
Eastern Asian countries. Our purchases of finished products from these manufacturers are primarily
denominated in U.S. dollars. Expenses for these manufacturers are primarily denominated in Chinese
Yuan. As a result, any material increase in the value of the Yuan relative to the U.S. dollar, as
occurred in past periods, would increase our expenses, and therefore, adversely affects our
profitability. Conversely, a small portion of our revenues are generated by our subsidiaries in
Australia and the U.K. and are denominated primarily in those local currencies. Any material
increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the value of the Australian dollar or British
pound would result in a decrease in the amount of these revenues upon their translation into U.S.
dollars for reporting purposes.
Our gross profit may not be comparable to those of other entities, since some entities include
the costs of warehousing, outbound handling costs and outbound shipping costs in their costs of
sales. We account for the above expenses as operating expenses and classify them under selling,
general and administrative expenses. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the costs
of warehousing, outbound handling costs and outbound shipping costs were $1.7 million and $3.4
million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the costs of warehousing,
outbound handling costs and outbound shipping costs were $1.6 million
and $3.5 million, respectively. In addition, the majority of outbound shipping costs are paid
by our customers, as many of our customers pick up their goods at our distribution centers.
20
If our suppliers experience increased raw materials, labor or other costs, and pass along such
cost increases to us through higher prices for finished goods, our cost of sales would increase. To
the extent we are unable to pass such price increases along to our customers, our gross profit
margins would decrease. Our gross profit margins have been impacted in recent periods by: (i) a
shift in product mix toward lower margin products, including increased sales of licensed products,
which typically generate lower margins as a result of required royalty payments (which are recorded
in cost of goods sold); (ii) our acquisition of LaJobi, which has experienced significant sales
growth but which also typically generates lower gross margins, on average, than our other business
units; (iii) increased pressure from major retailers, primarily as a result of prevailing economic
conditions, to offer additional mark downs and other pricing accommodations to clear existing
inventory and secure new product placements; and (iv) increased freight cost. We believe that our
future gross margins will continue to be under pressure as a result of the items listed above, and
such pressures may be more acute over the next several quarters as a result of anticipated product
cost increases.
We continue to seek to mitigate margin pressure through the development of new products that
can command higher pricing, the identification of alternative, lower-cost sources of supply,
re-engineering of certain existing products to reduce manufacturing costs and, where possible,
price increases. Particularly in the mass market, our ability to increase prices or resist
requests for mark-downs and/or other allowances is limited by market and competitive factors, and,
while we have implemented selective price increases and will likely continue to seek to do so, we
have generally focused on maintaining (or increasing) shelf space at retailers and, as a result,
our market share.
Inventory, which consists of finished goods, is carried on our balance sheet at the lower of
cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method and includes all costs
necessary to bring inventory to its existing condition and location. Market represents the lower
of replacement cost or estimated net realizable value of such inventory. Inventory reserves are
recorded for damaged, obsolete, excess and slow-moving inventory if management determines that the
ultimate expected proceeds from the disposal of such inventory will be less than its carrying cost
as described above. Management uses estimates to determine the necessity of recording these
reserves based on periodic reviews of each product category based primarily on the following
factors: length of time on hand, historical sales, sales projections (including expected sales
prices), order bookings, anticipated demand, market trends, product obsolescence, the effect new
products may have on the sale of existing products and other factors. Risks and exposures in
making these estimates include changes in public and consumer preferences and demand for products,
changes in customer buying patterns, competitor activities, our effectiveness in inventory
management, as well as discontinuance of products or product lines. In addition, estimating sales
prices, establishing markdown percentages and evaluating the condition of our inventories all
require judgments and estimates, which may also impact the inventory valuation. However, we believe
that, based on our prior experience of managing and evaluating the recoverability of our slow
moving, excess, damaged and obsolete inventory in response to market conditions, including
decreased sales in specific product lines, our established reserves are materially adequate. If
actual market conditions and product sales were less favorable than we have projected, however,
additional inventory reserves may be necessary in future periods.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually, and more
frequently if a triggering event occurs indicating that an impairment may exist. The Companys
annual impairment testing is performed in the fourth quarter of each year (unless specified
triggering events warrant more frequent testing). All intangible assets, both definite-lived and
indefinite-lived, were tested for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Strategy
The principal elements of our current global business strategy include:
|
|
|
focusing on design-led and branded product development at each of our
subsidiaries to enable us to continue to introduce compelling new products; |
|
|
|
|
pursuing organic growth opportunities to capture additional market share,
including: |
|
(i) |
|
expanding our product offerings into related categories; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
increasing our existing product penetration (selling more products
to existing customer locations); |
|
|
(iii) |
|
increasing our existing store penetration (selling to more store
locations within each large, national retail customer); and |
21
|
(iv) |
|
expanding and diversifying of our distribution channels, with
particular emphasis on sales into international markets; |
|
|
|
growing through licensing, distribution or other strategic alliances, including
pursuing acquisition opportunities in businesses complementary to ours; |
|
|
|
|
implementing strategies to further capture synergies within and between our
confederation of businesses, through cross-marketing opportunities, consolidation of
certain operational activities and other collaborative activities; and |
|
|
|
|
continuing efforts to manage costs within and across each of our businesses. |
General Economic Conditions as they Impact Our Business
Economic conditions have deteriorated significantly in the United States and many of the other
regions in which we do business and may remain depressed for the foreseeable future. Global
economic conditions have been challenged by slowing growth and the sub-prime debt devaluation
crisis, causing worldwide liquidity and credit concerns. Continuing adverse global economic
conditions in our markets may result in, among other things: (i) reduced demand for our products;
(ii) increased price competition for our products; and/or (iii) increased risk in the
collectibility of cash from our customers. See Item 1A, Risk FactorsThe state of the economy may
impact our business of the 2009 10-K. In addition, our operations and performance depend
significantly on levels of consumer spending, which have deteriorated significantly in many
countries and regions as a result of fluctuating energy costs, conditions in the residential real
estate and mortgage markets, stock market conditions, labor and healthcare costs, access to credit,
consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior.
In addition, if internal funds are not available from our operations, we may be required to
rely on the banking and credit markets to meet our financial commitments and short-term liquidity
needs. Continued disruptions in the capital and credit markets, could adversely affect our ability
to draw on our bank revolving credit facility. Our access to funds under that credit facility is
dependent on the ability of the banks that are parties to the facility to meet their funding
commitments. Those banks may not be able to meet their funding commitments to us if they experience
shortages of capital and liquidity or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests
from us and other borrowers within a short period of time. Such disruptions could require us to
take measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until alternative credit arrangements
or other funding for our business needs can be arranged. See Item 1A, Risk FactorsIf the
national and world-wide financial crisis intensifies, potential disruptions in the credit markets
may adversely affect the availability and cost of short-term funds for liquidity requirements and
our ability to meet long-term commitments, which could adversely affect our results of operations,
cash flows, and financial condition in the 2009 10-K.
SEGMENTS
The Company operates in one segment: the infant and juvenile business.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSTHREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased 13.3% to $67.9 million, compared
to $60.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily the result
of strong growth at LaJobi and Sassy. The strong growth at LaJobi was driven primarily by a strong
performance of its Graco® licensed products, while Sassys increase was driven by the introductory
launch of its licensed Garanimals® product line for Walmart.
Gross profit was $20.7 million, or 30.5% of net sales, for the three months ended June 30,
2010, as compared to $19.0 million, or 31.6% of net sales, for the three months ended June 30,
2009. In absolute terms, gross profit increased as a result of the increase in net sales. Gross
profit margins decreased as a result of : (i) strong sales growth by LaJobi, whose products
typically carry lower gross margins; (ii) a shift in product mix; (iii) increases in licensed
products, which tend to have a lower margin as a result of royalties recorded in cost of goods
sold; and (iv) increased freight costs. The decline in gross profit margins was partially offset by
strong margin gains at CoCaLo and some margin improvement at Kids Line.
Selling, general and administrative expense was $12.8 million, or 18.9% of net sales, for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $11.4 million, or 19.0% of net sales, for the three
months ended June 30, 2009. Selling, general and administrative expense decreased as a percentage
of sales primarily as a result of expense leverage due to sales growth and managements continued
focus on controlling discretionary expenses, partially offset by recent investments in additional
product development, marketing and operational resources to drive future growth. In absolute terms,
the increase in SG&A costs was a function of variable costs associated with higher sales.
22
In connection with the preparation of the Companys financial statements for the second
quarter of 2009, a series of impairment indicators emerged in connection with The Russ Companies,
the buyer of the Gift Business (the Buyer). These indicators included the impact of
macro-economic factors on the Buyer, the deterioration of conditions in the gift market, and other
Buyer specific factors, including declining financial performance, operational and integration
challenges and liquidity issues that impacted the Buyer during the first half of 2009. As a result
of these impairment indicators, the Company tested for impairment its 19.9% investment in the Buyer
and critically evaluated the collectibility of its $15.3 million note receivable from the Buyer.
As a result of this review, the Company determined that its 19.9% investment in the Buyer as well
as the Applause® trade name (licensed to the Buyer) were other than temporarily impaired, and
recorded non-cash charges of approximately $4.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, against
these assets. The Company also recorded a $10.3 million charge to reserve against the difference
between the note receivable and deferred revenue liability. The impact of these actions resulted
in a non-cash charge to income/(loss) from operations in an aggregate amount of $15.6 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and reduced to zero the net carrying value of the Gift Sale
consideration referenced above.
Other expense was $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $1.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This decrease of approximately $0.7 million was
primarily due to lower borrowings and lower borrowing costs partially offset by a net unfavorable
change of $0.1 million in the fair market value of an interest rate swap agreement as compared to
the prior year period.
Income before income tax provision/benefit was $7.1 million for the three months ended June
30, 2010 as compared to a loss before income tax provision/benefit of $9.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, primarily as a result of the items described above.
The income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $2.6 million as compared
to an income tax benefit of $3.9 million in the same period of 2009. The Companys effective tax
rate for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 36.6% as compared to approximately 40.4% for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, primarily related to the provision for state income tax in the
United States and a discrete item in the current year related to the Companys Australia
subsidiary.
As a result of the foregoing, net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $4.5
million, or $0.20 per diluted share, compared to net loss of $5.7 million, or ($0.26) per diluted
share, for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSSIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased 11.3% to $129.4 million, compared
to $116.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily the result of
strong growth at LaJobi and Sassy. The strong growth at LaJobi was driven primarily by a strong
performance of its Graco® licensed products, while Sassys increase was driven by the introductory
launch of its licensed Garanimals® product line for Walmart.
Gross profit was $39.4 million, or 30.4% of net sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
as compared to $35.6 million, or 30.6% of net sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. In
absolute terms, gross profit increased as a result of the increase in net sales. Gross profit
margins decreased as a result of: (i) strong sales at LaJobi, which tend to have lower gross
margins; (ii) a shift in product mix; (iii) increases in licensed products which tend to have a
lower margin; and (iv) increased freight costs.
Selling, general and administrative expense was $24.8 million, or 19.2% of net sales, for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $23.6 million, or 20.3% of net sales, for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. Selling, general and administrative expense decreased as a percentage of
sales primarily as a result of expense leverage due to sales growth. In absolute terms, the
increase in SG&A costs was a function of variable costs, an investment in the business which
consisted mainly of operational personnel and severance costs in the first quarter of 2009 of $0.4
million associated with a former executive that did not recur in the first quarter of 2010.
As described above, the six month period ended June 30, 2009 also included a non-cash charge
to income/(loss) from operations in an aggregate amount of $15.6 million related to the Buyer.
Other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $1.8 million, as compared to $3.7
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This decrease of approximately $1.9 million was
primarily due to lower borrowings, lower borrowing costs, a net favorable change of $0.1 million in
the fair market value of an interest rate swap agreement as compared to the prior period, and
royalty income received from the Buyer during the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $0.3 million
in connection with the License (discussed below). In addition, the prior year period included a
write-off of $0.4 million in deferred financing costs associated with an amendment to the Credit
Agreement that did not recur in the first six months of 2010.
23
Income before income tax provision/benefit was $12.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010 as compared to a loss before income tax provision/benefit of $7.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, primarily as a result of the items described above.
The income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $4.8 million as compared
to an income tax benefit of $3.0 million in the same period of 2009. The Companys effective tax
rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 37.7% compared to 40.8% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, primarily related to the provision for state income tax in the United States and a
discrete item in the current year related to the Companys Australia subsidiary.
As a result of the foregoing, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $7.9
million, or $0.36 per diluted share, compared to net loss of $4.4 million, or ($0.20) per diluted
share, for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, funds from operations, and
availability under our bank facility. Our operating activities generally provide sufficient cash to
fund our working capital requirements and, together with borrowings under our bank facility, are
expected to be sufficient to fund our operating needs and capital requirements for at least the
next 12 months. Any significant future business or product acquisitions and earnout payments (see
below) may require additional debt or equity financing.
The proceeds of our bank facility have historically been used to fund acquisitions, and cash
flows from operations are typically swept on- a daily basis and utilized to pay down our revolving
credit facility and required amortization of our term loan. Accordingly, with the exception of
funding short-term working capital requirements (which are necessitated by our strategy of sweeping
cash to pay down debt), we typically do not actively utilize our revolving credit facility to fund
operations.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $2.8 million compared to
$1.6 million at December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $1.2 million during the
six months ending June 30, 2010 compared to a decrease of $1.0 million during the six months ending
June 30, 2009, primarily reflecting fluctuations in debt repayment. As of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, working capital was $35.5 million and $29.0 million, respectively. The increase
in working capital primarily reflects strong cash flows from operations and the related repayment
of our Revolving Loan.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $17.7 million during the six months ended June
30, 2010 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $12.2 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2009. Operating activities reflected net income of $7.9 million in the first
six months of 2010, as compared to net loss of $4.4 million in the first six months of 2009. Cash
provided by operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 also includes a $2.4 million increase
in accounts payable and a $1.5 million decrease in other current assets, offset by a decrease of
$1.5 million in inventory and accrued expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities was $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
as compared to net cash used of $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, in each case
reflecting capital expenditures. We expect to incur cash expenditures of approximately $1.9 million
in connection with the implementation of a new ERP system, of which a substantial portion will be
expended and capitalized during 2010.
Net cash used in financing activities was $15.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010
as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $12.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009. The cash used in both periods primarily reflects the repayment of debt under the Credit
Agreement.
A portion of the consideration of our April 2008 acquisitions of each of LaJobi and CoCaLo
included contingent earnout consideration based upon the achievement of certain performance
milestones. With respect to LaJobi, if the EBITDA of the Business, as defined in the agreement
governing the purchase (the LaJobi Earnout EBITDA) has grown at a compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) of not less than 4% during the three years ending December 31, 2010 (the Measurement
Date), determined in accordance with the agreement governing the purchase, LaJobi will pay to the
relevant sellers an amount (the LaJobi Earnout Consideration) equal to a percentage of the Agreed
Enterprise Value of LaJobi as of the Measurement Date (subject to acceleration under certain
limited circumstances), with the Agreed Enterprise Value defined as the product of (i) the LaJobi
Earnout EBITDA during the twelve (12) months ending on the Measurement Date, multiplied by (ii) an
applicable multiple (ranging from 5 to 9) depending on the specified levels of CAGR achieved. The
LaJobi Earnout Consideration can range between $0 and a maximum of $15.0 million. In addition, we
have agreed to pay 1% of the Agreed Enterprise Value to a financial institution (which has been
previously paid a finders fee in connection with the LaJobi purchase), payable in the same manner
and at the same time as the LaJobi Earnout Consideration is paid.
24
With respect to CoCaLo, we will pay to the relevant sellers the following earnout
consideration amounts (the CoCaLo Earnout Consideration) with respect to CoCaLos performance
for the aggregate three year period ending December 31, 2010: (i) $666,667 will be paid for the
achievement of specified initial performance targets with respect to each of net sales, gross
profit and specified CoCaLo EBITDA (the latter combined with specified Kids Line EBITDA) (the
Initial Targets), for a maximum payment of $2.0 million in the event of achievement of the
Initial Targets in all three categories; and (ii) up to an additional $666,667 will be paid, on a
sliding scale basis, for achievement in excess of the Initial Targets up to specified maximum
performance targets in each category, for a potential additional payment of $2.0 million in the
event of achievement of the maximum targets in all three categories. The CoCaLo Earnout
Consideration can range between $0 up to an aggregate maximum of $4.0 million.
Pursuant to each of
the purchase agreements governing the LaJobi and CoCaLo acquisitions, the
Company may be required to pay earnout consideration amounts ranging from (i)
$0.0 to $15.0 million in respect of the LaJobi acquisition (the
“LaJobi Earnout Consideration”) and (ii) $0.0 to $4.0 million
in respect of the CoCaLo acquisition (the “CoCaLo Earnout
Consideration”, and collectively with the LaJobi Earnout Consideration,
the “Earnout Consideration”). In addition, the Company has agreed
to pay 1% of the Agreed Enterprise Value (as defined in the agreement
pertaining to the LaJobi purchase) to a financial institution, payable in the
same manner and at the same time that the LaJobi Earnout Consideration is
paid. The Company cannot currently determine the precise amount of the
Earnout Consideration (or the finder’s fee) that will be required to be
paid. However, based on current projections, the Company anticipates that the
aggregate Earnout Consideration( together with the finder’s fee) will
range from $10 million to $15 million, although the exact amount could be
more or less depending on the actual performance of each of LaJobi and CoCaLo
(combined with Kids Line) for the remaining portion of the applicable
measurement periods, each of which terminate on December 31, 2010. The
Company currently anticipates that cash flow from operations and anticipated
availability under the Credit Agreement will be sufficient to fund the
obligation to pay the Earnout Consideration and the finder’s fee, which
is anticipated to be paid on or around April 2011, and that such payment
will be permitted under the terms of the Credit Agreement and related
documentation.
Sale of Gift Business
On December 23, 2008, KID completed the sale of the Gift Business to The Russ Companies, Inc.
(the Buyer). The aggregate purchase price payable by the Buyer for the Gift Business was: (i)
199 shares of the Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Buyer (the Buyer Common
Shares), representing a 19.9% interest in the Buyer after consummation of the transaction, and
(ii) a subordinated, secured promissory note issued by Buyer to KID in the original principal
amount of $19.0 million (the Seller Note). During the 90-day period following the fifth
anniversary of the consummation of the sale of the Gift Business, KID will have the right to cause
the Buyer to repurchase any Buyer Common Shares then owned by KID, at its assumed original value
(which was $6.0 million for all Buyer Common Shares), as adjusted in the event that the number of
Buyer Common Shares is adjusted, plus interest at an annual rate of 5%, compounded annually. The
consideration received from the Gift Sale was recorded at fair value as of December 23, 2008 at
approximately $19.8 million and was recorded as Note Receivable of $15.3 million and Investment of
$4.5 million on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
In addition, in connection with the sale of the Gift Business, our newly-formed, wholly-owned
Delaware limited liability company (the Licensor) executed a license agreement (the License
Agreement) with the Buyer. Pursuant to the License Agreement, the Buyer is required to pay
Licensor a fixed, annual royalty (the Royalty) equal to $1,150,000. The initial annual Royalty
payment was due and payable in one lump sum on December 31, 2009. Thereafter, Royalties are due
quarterly at the close of each three-month period during the term. At any time during the term of
the License Agreement, the Buyer shall have the option to purchase all of the intellectual property
subject to the License Agreement, consisting generally of the Russ ® and
Applause ® trademarks and trade names (the Retained IP) from the Licensor for
$5.0 million, to the extent that at such time (i) the Seller Note shall have been paid in full
(including all principal and accrued interest with respect thereto), and (ii) there shall be no
continuing default under the License Agreement. If the Buyer does not purchase the Retained IP by
December 23, 2013 (or nine months thereafter, if applicable), the Licensor will have the option to
require the Buyer to purchase all of the Retained IP for $5.0 million. In connection therewith, the
Company recorded deferred royalty income of $5.0 million. The Buyer has not paid the initial lump
sum Royalty payment. The Company received $287,500 in respect of the Royalty payment due March 23,
2010, which was recorded as other income in the first quarter of 2010, but has not received any
payment to date in respect of the Royalty payment that was due on June 23, 2010 and therefore
recorded no income in the three months ended June 30, 2010 related to such Royalties.
KID and Buyer continue to discuss a potential restructuring of: (i) the consideration received
by KID for its former Gift Business; (ii) payments due to Licensor under the License Agreement; and
(iii) ongoing arrangements between the parties and their respective affiliates. Such discussions
currently contemplate, among other things, the payment by the Buyer of certain amounts in exchange
for the cancellation of all or substantially all of the Gift Business consideration and the
acquisition by the Buyer of the Retained IP. The amounts potentially to be paid by the Buyer are
anticipated to be substantially less than the face value of the Gift Business consideration. As
previously reported, the Company has written off or fully reserved against all such consideration,
and, accordingly, any payments received in exchange therefor would be recorded as income, if and
when received. There can be no assurance, however, that any defaulted payments under the License
Agreement referred to above will be made, that any future payments due under the License Agreement
will be made in a timely manner, or at all, that any ongoing discussions will result in any
definitive agreement, or that the terms of any definitive agreement will be consistent with those
described above.
25
A detailed description of the Gift Sale can be found in the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed on December 29, 2008.
Debt Financing
Consolidated long-term debt at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Term Loan (Credit Agreement) |
|
$ |
60,500 |
|
|
$ |
67,000 |
|
Note Payable (CoCaLo purchase) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
61,013 |
|
|
|
68,025 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
13,513 |
|
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
47,500 |
|
|
$ |
54,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there was approximately $6.0 million and $15.1
million, respectively, borrowed under the Revolving Loan (defined below), which is classified as
short-term debt. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Revolving Loan Availability was $40.6
million and $31.4 million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2010, the applicable interest rate margins were: 2.75% for LIBOR Loans and
1.75% for Base Rate Loans. The weighted average interest rates for the outstanding loans as of June
30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
LIBOR Loans |
|
|
Base Rate Loans |
|
Revolving Loan |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Term Loan |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Credit Agreement Summary
The Company, its operating subsidiaries, and I&J Holdco, Inc. (the Borrowers) maintain a
credit facility (the Credit Agreement) with certain financial institutions (the Lenders),
including Bank of America, N.A. (as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association), as
Agent and Fronting Bank, Sovereign Bank as Syndication Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A. as Documentation
Agent and Banc of America Securities LLC as Lead Arranger. The credit facility provides for: (a) a
$50.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Loan), with a subfacility for letters of
credit in an amount not to exceed $5.0 million, and (b) an $80.0 million term loan facility (the
Term Loan). The total borrowing capacity is based on a borrowing base, which is defined as 85% of
eligible receivables plus the lesser of (x) $25.0 million and (y) 55% of eligible inventory. The
scheduled maturity date of the facility is April 1, 2013 (subject to customary early termination
provisions).
The Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Companys option, at a base rate or
at LIBOR, plus applicable margins based on the most recent quarter-end Total Debt to Covenant
EBITDA Ratio. Applicable margins vary between 2.0% and 4.25% on LIBOR borrowings and 1.0% and
3.25% on base rate borrowings (base rate borrowings include a floor of 30 day LIBOR plus 1%). At
June 30, 2010, the applicable margins were 2.75% for LIBOR borrowings and 1.75% for base rate
borrowings. The principal of the Term Loan is required to be repaid in quarterly installments of
$3.25 million through December 31, 2012, and a final payment of $28.0 million due on April 1, 2013.
The Term Loan is also required to be prepaid upon the occurrence, and with the proceeds, of
certain transactions, including most asset sales or debt or equity issuances, and extraordinary
receipts. The Company is also required to pay an agency fee of $35,000 per annum, an annual
non-use fee of 0.55% to 0.80% of the unused amounts under the Revolving Loan, as well as other
customary fees as are set forth in the Credit Agreement.
Under the terms of this Credit Agreement, the Company is required to comply with the following
financial covenants: (a) a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.35:1.00 for each the second,
third and fourth quarters of 2010 thereafter; (b) a maximum Total Debt to Covenant EBITDA Ratio of
3.25:1.00 for first three quarters of 2010 and a step down to 2.75:1.00 for the fourth quarter of
2010 and each fiscal quarter thereafter; and (c) an annual capital expenditure limitation.
Covenant EBITDA, as currently defined, is a non-GAAP financial measure used to determine relevant
interest rate margins and the Companys compliance with the financial covenants set forth above, as
well as the determination of whether certain dividends and repurchases can be made if other
specified prerequisites are met. Covenant EBITDA is defined generally as consolidated net income
(after excluding specified non-cash, non-recurring and other specified items), as adjusted for
interest expense; income tax expense; depreciation; amortization; other non-cash charges (gains);
specified costs in connection with each of our senior financing, specified acquisitions, and
specified requirements under the Credit Agreement; non-cash transaction losses (gains) due solely
to fluctuations in currency values; and specified costs in
connection with the sale of our Gift Business. For purposes of the Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio, Covenant EBITDA is further adjusted for unfinanced capital expenditures; specified cash
taxes and distributions pertaining thereto; and specified cash dividends.
26
The Credit Agreement also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other
restrictions, the Company is restricted in its ability to purchase or redeem stock, incur
additional debt, make acquisitions above certain amounts and pay any CoCaLo or LaJobi Earnout
Consideration or any amounts payable under the CoCaLo Note, unless in each case certain conditions
are satisfied. The Credit Agreement also contains specified events of default related to the
CoCaLo and LaJobi Earnout Consideration. In addition, KID may not pay a dividend to its
shareholders unless the LaJobi and CoCaLo Earnout Consideration, if any, has been paid; no default
exists or would result therefrom (including compliance with the financial covenants), Excess
Revolving Loan Availability is at least $4.0 million, and the Total Debt to Covenant EBITDA Ratio
for the two most recently completed fiscal quarters is less than 2.00:1.00.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreement, including a failure to
remain in compliance with all applicable financial covenants, the lenders could elect to declare
all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable. In addition,
an event of default under the Credit Agreement could result in a cross-default under certain
license agreements that we maintain. The Borrowers were in compliance with all applicable
financial covenants in the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010.
The Borrowers are required to maintain in effect Hedge Agreements that protect against
potential fluctuations in interest rates with respect to a minimum of 50% of the outstanding amount
of the Term Loan. Pursuant to the requirement to maintain Hedge Agreements, on May 2, 2008, the
Borrowers entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $70 million which
expired at April 30, 2010. Changes in the cost of this swap agreement and its fair value as of
April 30, 2010 resulted in income of approximately $508,000 and $678,000 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively and income of approximately $310,000 and $556,000 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and such amounts are included in interest
expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Borrowers entered into a new interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $31.9
million on April 30, 2010. An unrealized net loss of $16,000 for this interest rate swap agreement
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was recorded as a component of comprehensive
income, and is expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months.
The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the Companys domestic assets,
including a pledge of the capital stock of each Borrower and Licensor, and a portion of KIDs
equity interests in its active foreign subsidiaries, and is also guaranteed by KID.
Financing costs associated with the Revolving Loan and Term Loan are deferred and are
amortized over their contractual term.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had obligations under certain letters of credit that require
the Company to make payments to parties aggregating $0.6 million upon the occurrence of specified
events.
Other Events and Circumstances Pertaining to Liquidity
In connection with the sale of the Gift Business, KID and Russ Berrie U.S. Gift, Inc. (U.S.
Gift), our subsidiary at the time, sent a notice of termination, effective December 23, 2010, with
respect to the lease (the Lease) originally entered into by KID (and subsequently assigned to
U.S. Gift) of a facility in South Brunswick, New Jersey. Although this Lease has become the
obligation of the Buyer of the Gift Business (through its ownership of U.S. Gift), KID remains
obligated for the payments due thereunder (to the extent they are not paid by U.S. Gift) until the
termination of the Lease becomes effective for a maximum potential remaining obligation of
approximately $1.3 million). No payments have been made by KID in connection with the Lease since
the sale of the Gift Business, but there can be no assurance that payments will not be required of
KID with respect thereto to the extent U.S. Gift fails to make such payments (as it has in certain
prior periods) and no accommodation is secured from the landlord. The amount of payments required
by KID, if any, cannot be ascertained at this time. To the extent KID is required to make any
payments to the landlord in respect of the Lease, it intends to seek reimbursement from the Buyer
under the purchase agreement governing the sale of our former Gift Business. However, we cannot
assure that we will be able to recover any such amounts in a timely manner, or at all.
The purchase agreement pertaining to the sale of the Gift Business contains various KID
indemnification, reimbursement and similar obligations. In addition, KID may remain obligated with
respect to certain contracts or other obligations that were not novated in connection with their
transfer. No payments have been made by KID in connection with any of these obligations as of July
30, 2010, but there can be no assurance that payments will not be required of KID in the future.
27
We are subject to legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business.
We believe such proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We commenced the implementation of a new consolidated information technology system for our
operations, which we believe will provide greater efficiencies, lower costs and greater reporting
capabilities than those provided by the current systems in place across our individual infant and
juvenile companies. In connection with such implementation, we anticipate incurring costs of
approximately $1.9 million, a substantial portion of which is expected to be incurred in 2010 and
is intended to be financed with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our business may
be subject to transitional difficulties as we replace the current systems. These difficulties may
include disruption of our operations, loss of data, and the diversion of our management and key
employees attention away from other business matters. The difficulties associated with any such
implementation, and our failure to realize the anticipated benefits from the implementation, could
harm our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Consistent with our past practices and in the normal course of our business, we regularly
review acquisition opportunities of varying sizes. We may consider the use of debt or equity
financing to fund potential acquisitions. Our current credit agreement includes provisions that
place limitations on our ability to enter into acquisitions, mergers or similar transactions, as
well as a number of other activities, including our ability to: incur additional debt; create liens
on our assets or make guarantees; make certain investments or loans; pay dividends; repurchase our
common stock; or dispose of or sell assets. These covenants could restrict our ability to pursue
opportunities to expand our business operations. We are required to make prepayments of our debt
upon the occurrence of certain transactions, including most asset sales or debt or equity issuances
and extraordinary receipts.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys significant known contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2010 and the future periods in which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
$ |
10,993 |
|
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
|
$ |
2,224 |
|
|
$ |
941 |
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
Capitalized Leases |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Obligations (1) |
|
|
71,036 |
|
|
|
71,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Repayment Obligations (2) |
|
|
60,500 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Payable (3) |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Debt Repayment
Obligations (4) |
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalty Obligations |
|
|
7,716 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
2,711 |
|
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations (5) |
|
$ |
154,901 |
|
|
$ |
80,510 |
|
|
$ |
19,992 |
|
|
$ |
19,327 |
|
|
$ |
31,600 |
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys purchase obligations consist primarily of purchase orders for inventory. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects repayment obligations under the Credit Agreement. See Note 4 of Notes to Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Credit Amendment, including amounts and
dates of repayment obligations and provisions that create, increase and/or accelerate obligations
thereunder. Excludes, as of June 30, 2010, approximately $6.0 million borrowed under the Revolving
Loan. The estimated 2010 interest payment for this Revolving Loan using a 3.5% interest rate is
$0.2 million. Such amounts are estimates only and actual interest payments could differ
materially. The Revolving Loan facility matures in April 2013, at which time any amounts
outstanding are due and payable. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects a note payable with respect to the CoCaLo acquisition (the CoCaLo Note). The present
value of the CoCaLo Note is $513,000 and the aggregate remaining imputed interest at 5.5% is
$20,000. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the note, the holder could elect to
declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable. |
|
(4) |
|
This amount reflects estimated interest payments on the long-term debt repayment obligation as
of June 30, 2010 calculated using an interest rate of 3.5% and then-current levels of outstanding
long-term debt. Such amounts are estimates only and actual interest payments could differ
materially. This amount also excludes interest on amounts borrowed under the Revolving Loan
(discussed in footnote 3 above). |
|
(5) |
|
Does not include contingent obligations under the Lease (or contingent obligations under
other off-balance sheet arrangements described in Item 7 of the 2009 10-K), as the amount if any
and/or timing of their potential settlement is not reasonably estimable. See Other Events and
Circumstances Pertaining to Liquidity above. In connection with the acquisitions of LaJobi and
CoCaLo, the Company has agreed to make certain potential Earnout
Consideration (together with finders fee) payments based on
the performance of the acquired businesses.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
ConditionLiquidity and Capital Resources. These amounts are not included in the above table, as
the amount of their potential settlement is not reasonably estimable.
|
28
The Company has classified $3.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits within current income tax
payable as such amount is expected to be resolved within one year. This amount is not included in
the above table as the timing and amount of the potential settlement is not reasonably estimable.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2010, there have been no material changes in the information provided under the
caption Off Balance Sheet Arrangements of Item 7 of the 2009 10-K, other than the decrease in the
remaining maximum potential obligation of KID under the Lease from $2.7 million to approximately
$1.3 million.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The SEC has issued disclosure advice regarding critical accounting policies, defined as
accounting policies that management believes are both most important to the portrayal of the
Companys financial condition and results and require application of managements most difficult,
subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects
of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the preparation of its
consolidated financial statements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates and
assumptions are reviewed periodically, and revisions made as determined to be necessary by
management. There have been no material changes to the Companys significant accounting estimates
and assumptions or the judgments affecting the application of such estimates and assumptions during
the period covered by this report from those described in the Companys 2009 10-K.
Also see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the 2009 10-K for a summary
of the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Companys consolidated
financial statements. See Note 2 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements herein.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 11 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements. Additional
written and oral forward-looking statements may be made by us from time to time in Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and otherwise. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 provides a safe-harbor for forward-looking statements. These statements may be identified by
the use of forward-looking words or phrases including, but not limited to, anticipate, project,
believe, expect, intend, may, planned, potential, should, will or would. We
caution readers that results predicted by forward-looking statements, including, without
limitation, those relating to our future business prospects, revenues, working capital, liquidity,
capital needs, interest costs and income are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements.
Specific risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A,
Risk Factors, of the 2009 10-K, as updated in the Company's
Prospectus Supplement, filed on June 11, 2010 pursuant to Rule
424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as
a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As of June 30, 2010, there have been no material changes in the Companys market risks as
described in Item 7A of our 2009 10-K.
29
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer (together,
the Certifying Officers), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Certifying
Officers, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15
as of June 30, 2010. Based upon that evaluation, the Certifying Officers have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred
during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, of the Companys 2009 10-K. Certain of such risk factors were updated in the Companys
Prospectus Supplement, filed on June 11, 2010 pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KID BRANDS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Guy A. Paglinco
|
|
Date: August 4, 2010 |
|
Guy A. Paglinco |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
32