def14a
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTICE OF
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 27, 2009
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.:
Notice is hereby given that the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland
corporation, will be held at 9:00 a.m., local time, on
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at the corporate offices of BioMed,
17190 Bernardo Center Drive, San Diego, California 92128
for the following purposes:
1. To elect seven directors to serve until the next annual
meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly
elected and qualify;
2. To consider and vote upon the ratification of the
selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009;
3. To consider and vote upon an amendment and restatement
of our 2004 Incentive Award Plan, which includes increasing the
number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance
thereunder from 2,500,000 to 5,340,000 shares; and
4. To transact such other business as may be properly
brought before the annual meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the
attached proxy statement, which forms a part of this notice and
is incorporated herein by reference. Our board of directors has
fixed the close of business on March 11, 2009 as the record
date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of
and to vote at the annual meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
We are pleased to take advantage of the new Securities and
Exchange Commission rules allowing companies to furnish proxy
materials to their stockholders over the Internet. We believe
that this new
e-proxy
process will expedite stockholders receipt of proxy
materials and lower the costs and reduce the environmental
impact of our annual meeting. We sent a Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials on or about April 14, 2009,
and provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet,
beginning on April 14, 2009, for the beneficial owners of
our common stock as of the close of business on the record date.
If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the
proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials instructs you on how to access
and review this proxy statement and our annual report and how to
authorize your vote online or by telephone. If you received a
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and
would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you
should follow the instructions for requesting such materials
included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials. We are also sending proxy materials to any
stockholder who has elected to receive its proxy materials by
mail.
Your proxy is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the
annual meeting, please authorize your proxy by Internet,
telephone, or, if you received a paper copy of the materials by
mail, mark, sign, date and return your proxy card, so that your
shares will be represented at the annual meeting. If you plan to
attend the annual meeting and wish to vote your shares
personally, you may do so at any time before the proxy is voted.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Jonathan P. Klassen
Secretary
San Diego, California
April 14, 2009
BIOMED
REALTY TRUST, INC.
17190 Bernardo Center Drive
San Diego, California 92128
for
2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
May 27, 2009
The board of directors of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland
corporation, is soliciting the accompanying proxy for use at the
2009 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday,
May 27, 2009 at 9:00 a.m., local time, and at any
adjournments or postponements thereof. The annual meeting will
be held at the corporate offices of BioMed, 17190 Bernardo
Center Drive, San Diego, California 92128. This proxy
statement will be first furnished or sent to stockholders on or
about April 14, 2009.
Unless contrary instructions are indicated on the proxy, all
shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this
solicitation (and not revoked before they are voted) will be
voted FOR the election of the board of directors
nominees for directors, or for a substitute or substitutes in
the event a nominee or nominees are unable to serve or decline
to do so, FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG
LLP as the companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009, and
FOR the approval of the amendment and restatement of the
companys and BioMed Realty, L.P.s 2004 Incentive
Award Plan, which includes that the shares of common stock of
the company authorized thereunder be increased by
2,840,000 shares to 5,340,000 shares. As to any other
business which may properly come before the annual meeting and
be submitted to a vote of the stockholders, proxies received by
the board of directors will be voted in the discretion of the
designated proxy holders. A proxy may be revoked by written
notice to the Secretary of BioMed at any time prior to the
annual meeting, by executing a later dated proxy or by attending
the annual meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the
annual meeting will not by itself revoke a proxy.
Stockholders can vote in person at the annual meeting or by
proxy. There are three ways to vote by proxy:
|
|
|
|
|
By Telephone Beneficial stockholders who
received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
(the Notice of Internet Availability) and who live
in the United States or Canada may submit proxies by telephone
by calling the telephone number indicated in the notice and
following the instructions. These stockholders will need to have
the control number that appears on their notice available when
authorizing their vote. Beneficial stockholders who have
received a paper copy of a proxy card or a voting instruction
card by mail may submit proxies by telephone by calling the
number on the card and following the instructions. These
stockholders will need to have the control number that appears
on their card available when authorizing their vote.
|
|
|
|
By Internet Beneficial stockholders who
received a Notice of Internet Availability may submit proxies
over the Internet by following the instructions on the notice.
Beneficial stockholders who have received a paper copy of a
proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies
over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy
card or voting instruction card.
|
|
|
|
By Mail Stockholders who received a paper
copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may
submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy
card or voting instruction card and mailing it in the
accompanying pre-addressed envelope.
|
We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. In addition to
the use of mails, proxies may be solicited by personal
interview, telephone, facsimile,
e-mail or
otherwise, by our officers, directors and other employees.
Although we have not retained a proxy solicitor to assist in the
solicitation of proxies, we may do so in the future if the need
arises, and do not believe that the cost of any such proxy
solicitor will be material. We also will request persons, firms
and corporations holding shares in their names, or in the names
of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others to
send or cause to be sent proxy materials to, and obtain proxies
from, such beneficial owners and will reimburse such holders for
their reasonable expenses in so doing.
1
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 27,
2009
This proxy statement and BioMeds annual report are
available electronically at www.biomedrealty.com/08ar.
Voting
Holders of record of our common stock, $.01 par value per
share, at the close of business on March 11, 2009 will be
entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting or any
adjournments or postponements thereof.
As of March 11, 2009, 81,180,596 shares of our common
stock were outstanding and represent our only voting securities.
Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote. The
presence in person or by proxy of stockholders entitled to cast
a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at the annual
meeting on any matter will constitute a quorum at the annual
meeting. Directors are elected by a plurality of all of the
votes cast. The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the
proposal. The approval of the amendment and restatement of our
2004 Incentive Award Plan requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast on the proposal, provided that the
total votes cast on this proposal represent a majority of the
shares of our common stock entitled to vote on this proposal.
Votes cast by proxy or in person at the annual meeting will be
counted by the person appointed by us to act as inspector of
election for the annual meeting. The inspector of election will
treat shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions (or
votes withheld) or include broker non-votes as
shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of
determining the presence of a quorum. Broker non-votes refer to
unvoted proxies submitted by brokers who are not able to vote on
a proposal absent instructions from the applicable beneficial
owner. Since brokers are empowered to vote with regard to the
election of directors, there will be no broker non-votes with
respect to the first proposal. Withhold votes will have no
effect on the election of directors. For purposes of the vote on
the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm, abstentions and broker
non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no
effect on the result of the vote. For purposes of the vote on
the approval of the amendment and restatement of our 2004
Incentive Award Plan, abstentions and broker non-votes will have
the same effect as votes against the proposal, unless a majority
of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on this
proposal cast votes, in which event broker non-votes will have
no effect on the result of the vote. Any executed, unmarked
proxies, including those submitted by brokers or nominees, will
be voted in favor of the nominees for the board of directors,
for the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm and for approval
of the amendment and restatement of our 2004 Incentive Award
Plan, as indicated in the accompanying proxy card.
No person is authorized to make any representation with respect
to the matters described in this proxy statement other than
those contained herein and, if given or made, such information
or representation must not be relied upon as having been
authorized by us or any other person.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Our board of directors has nominated and recommends for election
as directors the seven persons named herein to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective
successors are duly elected and qualify. All of the nominees are
presently directors of BioMed, and following the annual meeting
there will be no vacancies on the board. Directors are elected
by a plurality of all of the votes cast at the annual meeting.
Cumulative voting is not permitted. The enclosed proxy will be
voted in favor of the persons nominated unless otherwise
indicated. If any of the nominees should be unable to serve or
should decline to do so, the discretionary authority provided in
the proxy will be exercised by the proxy holders to vote for a
substitute or substitutes nominated by the board of directors,
or the board of directors, on the recommendation of the
nominating and corporate governance committee, may reduce the
size of the board and number of nominees. The board of directors
does not believe at this time that any substitute nominee or
nominees will be required. There are no family relationships
between any of our directors or executive officers.
2
Information
Regarding Nominees
The table below indicates the name, position with BioMed and age
of each nominee for director as of March 11, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
48
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
Director, Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
54
|
|
Barbara R. Cambon
|
|
Director
|
|
|
55
|
|
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
67
|
|
Richard I. Gilchrist
|
|
Director
|
|
|
63
|
|
Theodore D. Roth
|
|
Director
|
|
|
57
|
|
M. Faye Wilson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
71
|
|
Information
Regarding Directors
Alan D. Gold has served as our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer since our formation in 2004, and served as our
President from 2004 until December 2008. Mr. Gold served as
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of our
privately-held predecessor, Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc.,
from August 1998 until August 2004. Mr. Gold was a
co-founder and served as President and a director of Alexandria
Real Estate Equities, Inc., a publicly traded real estate
investment trust, or REIT, specializing in acquiring and
managing laboratory properties for lease to the life science
industry, from its predecessors inception in 1994 until he
resigned as President in August 1998 and as a director at the
end of 1998. Mr. Gold served as managing partner of Gold
Stone Real Estate Finance and Investments, a partnership engaged
in the real estate and mortgage business, from 1989 to 1994. He
also served as Assistant Vice President of Commercial Real
Estate for Northland Financial Company, a full service
commercial property mortgage banker, from 1989 to 1990 and as
Real Estate Investment Officer Commercial Real
Estate for John Burnham Company, a regional full service real
estate company, from 1985 to 1989. Mr. Gold received his
Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration and his
Master of Business Administration from San Diego State
University.
Gary A. Kreitzer has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel and as a director since our
formation in 2004. Mr. Kreitzer also served in the same
role with Bernardo Property Advisors from December 1998 until
August 2004. Mr. Kreitzer was a co-founder and served as
Senior Vice President and In-House Counsel of Alexandria Real
Estate Equities, Inc. from its predecessors inception in
1994 until December 1998. From 1990 to 1994, Mr. Kreitzer
was In-House Counsel and Vice President for Seawest Energy
Corporation, an alternative energy facilities development
company. Mr. Kreitzer also served with The Christiana
Companies, Inc., a publicly traded investment and real estate
development company, in a number of roles from 1982 to 1989,
including as In-House Counsel, Secretary and Vice President.
Mr. Kreitzer received his Juris Doctor Degree, with honors,
from the University of San Francisco and a Bachelor of Arts
Degree in Economics from the University of California,
San Diego. Mr. Kreitzer is a member of the California
State Bar and the American Bar Association.
Barbara R. Cambon has been a director since 2004.
Ms. Cambon has been a real estate advisor and independent
consultant since October 2002. From November 1999 to October
2002, Ms. Cambon served as a Principal of Colony Capital,
LLC, a private real estate investment firm, where she also
served as Chief Operating Officer from April 2000 until October
2002. From 1985 to October 1999, she served as President and was
a founder of Institutional Property Consultants, Inc., a real
estate consulting company. Ms. Cambon currently serves on
the boards of directors of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust,
Inc. and KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. She
received her Bachelor of Science Degree in Education from the
University of Delaware and her Master of Business Administration
with an emphasis in real estate and finance from Southern
Methodist University.
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D. has been a director since
2004. Dr. Dennis is Distinguished Professor and former
Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and
Professor in the Department of Pharmacology in the School of
Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, where
he has served as a faculty member since 1970.
3
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University and
his Master of Arts and Doctorate of Philosophy in Chemistry from
Harvard University, and served as a Research Fellow at Harvard
Medical School.
Richard I. Gilchrist has been a director since 2007.
Mr. Gilchrist has served as President of the Investment
Properties Group of The Irvine Company, a privately held real
estate investment company, since 2006. He served as President
and Co-Chief Executive Officer and on the board of directors of
Maguire Properties, Inc., a publicly held REIT, from 2002 to
2006. From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Gilchrist served as Chief
Executive Officer, President and member of the board of
directors of Commonwealth Atlantic Properties, a privately held
REIT. Mr. Gilchrist currently serves on the board of
directors of Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., a publicly
traded REIT, and is the Chairman of the Whittier College Board
of Trustees, where he received a Bachelor of Arts degree. He
earned a law degree from the University of California, Los
Angeles.
Theodore D. Roth has been a director since 2004.
Mr. Roth has been a Managing Director of Roth Capital
Partners, LLC, an investment banking firm, since February 2003.
For more than 15 years prior to that time, Mr. Roth
was employed by Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp., most recently
serving as President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Roth
currently serves on the boards of directors of Alliance
Pharmaceutical and Orange 21 Inc. He received his Juris Doctor
Degree from Washburn University and a Master of Laws in
Corporate and Commercial Law from the University of Missouri in
Kansas City.
M. Faye Wilson has been a director since 2005.
Ms. Wilson is Chair of Wilson Boyles and Company LLC, a
business management and strategic planning consulting firm, and
has been a principal since 2003. She served on the board of
directors of Farmers Insurance Group of Companies from 1993
through 2001 and the board of directors of The Home Depot, Inc.
from 1992 through 2001. Ms. Wilson was also a senior officer of
Home Depot from 1998 through 2002. From 1992 until 1998,
Ms. Wilson served in several senior management roles at
Bank of America Corporation including Chairman of Security
Pacific Financial Services and Executive Vice President and
Chief Credit Officer for Bank of Americas National
Consumer Banking Group. She earned her Masters Degrees in
International Relations and Business Administration from the
University of Southern California and an Undergraduate Degree
from Duke University. She became a certified public accountant
in 1961.
Information
Regarding the Board
Board
Independence
Our board of directors has determined that each of our current
directors, except for Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer, has no
material relationship with BioMed (either directly or as a
partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with BioMed) and is independent within
the meaning of our director independence standards, which
reflect the New York Stock Exchange director independence
standards, as currently in effect. Furthermore, our board of
directors has determined that each of the members of each of the
audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating
and corporate governance committee has no material relationship
with BioMed (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or
officer of an organization that has a relationship with BioMed)
and is independent within the meaning of our
director independence standards.
Board
Meetings
Our board of directors held eight meetings during fiscal 2008.
No director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of the
total number of meetings of our board of directors and the total
number of meetings of committees of our board of directors on
which he or she served during the period for which he or she was
a director.
To ensure free and open discussion among the independent
directors of the board, regularly scheduled executive sessions
are held, at which only independent directors are present. The
independent directors have nominated the chair of the nominating
and corporate governance committee, currently Mr. Roth, to
serve as presiding director at each executive session.
4
Committees
of the Board
Our board of directors has three standing committees: the audit
committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and
corporate governance committee.
Audit Committee. The audit committee has been
established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The audit committee
helps ensure the integrity of our financial statements, the
qualifications and independence of our independent registered
public accounting firm and the performance of our internal audit
function and independent registered public accounting firm. The
audit committee appoints, assists and meets with the independent
registered public accounting firm, oversees each annual audit
and quarterly review, establishes and maintains our internal
audit controls and prepares the report that federal securities
laws require be included in our annual proxy statement.
Ms. Wilson is the chair and Ms. Cambon and
Mr. Gilchrist serve as members of the audit committee. Our
board of directors has determined that each of Ms. Wilson,
Ms. Cambon and Mr. Gilchrist is an audit
committee financial expert as defined by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The audit committee held four meetings
in 2008.
Compensation Committee. The compensation
committee reviews and approves our compensation philosophy and
compensation and benefits of our executive officers and
Section 16 officers; reviews and approves all executive
officers employment agreements and severance arrangements;
administers and makes recommendations to our board of directors
regarding our compensation and stock incentive plans; reviews
and approves policies concerning perquisite benefits, policies
regarding compensation paid to our executive officers in excess
of limits deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and policies with
respect to change of control and parachute payments;
and produces an annual report on executive compensation for
inclusion in our proxy statement. Dr. Dennis is the chair
and Ms. Cambon and Mr. Gilchrist serve as members of
the compensation committee. The compensation committee held six
meetings in 2008.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The nominating and corporate
governance committee develops and recommends to our board of
directors a set of corporate governance principles, adopts a
code of ethics, adopts policies with respect to conflicts of
interest, monitors our compliance with corporate governance
requirements of state and federal law and the rules and
regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, establishes criteria
for prospective members of our board of directors, conducts
candidate searches and interviews, oversees and evaluates our
board of directors and management, evaluates from time to time
the appropriate size and composition of our board of directors,
recommends, as appropriate, increases, decreases and changes in
the composition of our board of directors and recommends to our
board of directors the slate of directors to be elected at each
annual meeting of our stockholders. Mr. Roth is the chair
and Dr. Dennis and Ms. Wilson serve as members of the
nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating
and corporate governance committee held three meetings in 2008.
Our board of directors has adopted charters for each of the
audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and
corporate governance committee. Each of the charters is
available on our website at www.biomedrealty.com and will be
provided without charge upon request to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc., 17190 Bernardo Center Drive, San Diego,
California 92128, Attention: Secretary. The information
contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into
and does not form a part of this proxy statement.
Our board of directors may from time to time establish certain
other committees to facilitate the management of BioMed.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
There were no insider participations or compensation committee
interlocks among the members of the committee during fiscal year
2008. At all times during fiscal year 2008, the compensation
committee was comprised solely of independent, non-employee
directors.
Director
Qualifications
The nominating and corporate governance committee has not set
minimum qualifications for board nominees. However, pursuant to
its charter, in identifying candidates to recommend for election
to the board, the nominating
5
and corporate governance committee considers the following
criteria: (1) personal and professional integrity, ethics
and values, (2) experience in corporate management, such as
serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly held
company, and a general understanding of marketing, finance and
other elements relevant to the success of a publicly traded
company in todays business environment,
(3) experience in our industry and with relevant social
policy concerns, (4) experience as a board member of
another publicly held company, (5) academic expertise in an
area of our operations and (6) practical and mature
business judgment, including ability to make independent
analytical inquiries. Our board of directors evaluates each
individual in the context of our board as a whole, with the
objective of assembling a group that can best perpetuate the
success of the business and represent stockholder interests
through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of
experience in these various areas. In determining whether to
recommend a director for re-election, the nominating and
corporate governance committee also considers the
directors past attendance at meetings and participation in
and contributions to the activities of the board.
Identifying
and Evaluating Nominees for Directors
The nominating and corporate governance committee identifies
nominees by first evaluating the current members of our board
willing to continue in service. Current members with
qualifications and skills that are consistent with the
nominating and corporate governance committees criteria
for board service are re-nominated. As to new candidates, the
nominating and corporate governance committee will generally
poll board members and members of management for their
recommendations. The nominating and corporate governance
committee may also hire a search firm if deemed appropriate to
identify and perform background due diligence on potential
candidates. An initial slate of candidates will be presented to
the chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee,
who will then make an initial determination as to the
qualification and fit of each candidate. Candidates will be
interviewed by the Chief Executive Officer and independent board
members. The nominating and corporate governance committee will
then approve final director candidates and, after review and
deliberation of all feedback and data, will make its
recommendation to our board of directors. Recommendations
received by stockholders will be considered and processed and
are subject to the same criteria as are candidates nominated by
the nominating and corporate governance committee.
The foregoing notwithstanding, if we are legally required by
contract or otherwise to permit a third party to designate one
or more of the directors to be elected or appointed (for
example, pursuant to articles supplementary designating the
rights of a class of preferred stock to elect one or more
directors upon a dividend default), then the nomination or
appointment of such directors shall be governed by such
requirements.
Each of the nominees for election as director at the annual
meeting is recommended by the nominating and corporate
governance committee to stand for reelection.
Stockholder
Recommendations for Director Nominees
The nominating and corporate governance committees policy
is to consider candidates recommended by stockholders. The
stockholder must submit a detailed resume of the candidate and
an explanation of the reasons why the stockholder believes the
candidate is qualified for service on our board of directors and
how the candidate satisfies the boards criteria. The
stockholder must also provide such other information about the
candidate as would be required by the Securities and Exchange
Commission rules to be included in a proxy statement. In
addition, the stockholder must include the consent of the
candidate and describe any arrangements or undertakings between
the stockholder and the candidate regarding the nomination. The
stockholder must submit proof of BioMed stockholdings. All
communications are to be directed to the chair of the nominating
and corporate governance committee,
c/o BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc., 17190 Bernardo Center Drive, San Diego,
California 92128, Attention: Secretary. For any annual meeting,
recommendations received after 120 days prior to the
anniversary of the mailing of the proxy materials for the prior
years annual meeting will likely not be considered timely
for consideration at that annual meeting.
6
Compensation
of Directors
Each of our directors who is not an employee of our company or
our subsidiaries receives an annual fee of $25,000 for services
as a director. The chair of the audit committee receives an
additional $15,000 annual fee and each director who is not an
employee of our company or our subsidiaries who chaired any
other committee of the board of directors receives an additional
$5,000 annual fee for each committee chaired. In addition, each
director who is not an employee of our company or our
subsidiaries receives a fee of $1,500 for each board of
directors meeting attended in person ($750 for telephonic
attendance), a fee of $1,500 for each audit committee meeting
attended in person ($500 for telephonic attendance), and a fee
of $1,000 for each other committee meeting attended in person
($500 for telephonic attendance). Non-employee directors receive
fees for attending committee meetings whether or not a meeting
of the board of directors is held on the same day. Directors are
also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred to attend board
of directors and committee meetings. Directors who are employees
of our company or our subsidiaries do not receive compensation
for their services as directors.
Our non-employee directors also receive automatic grants of
restricted stock under our 2004 Incentive Award Plan. We grant
2,000 shares of restricted common stock to each
non-employee director who is initially elected or appointed to
the board of directors on the date of such initial election or
appointment. Thereafter, on the date of each annual meeting of
stockholders, each non-employee director who continues to serve
on the board of directors is granted 2,000 shares of
restricted common stock. The restricted stock granted to
non-employee directors vests one year from the date of grant.
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the company
to non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name(1)
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Stock Awards(2)
|
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Barbara R. Cambon
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
$
|
54,098
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
101,728
|
|
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D.
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
54,098
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
104,728
|
|
Richard I. Gilchrist
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
80,167
|
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
|
|
124,137
|
|
Mark J. Riedy, Ph.D.(4)
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
21,282
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
39,572
|
|
Theodore D. Roth
|
|
|
44,250
|
|
|
|
54,098
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
100,978
|
|
M. Faye Wilson
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
54,098
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
111,728
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Alan D. Gold, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Gary
A. Kreitzer, our Executive Vice President and General Counsel,
are not included in this table because they are employees and
thus receive no compensation for their services as directors.
The compensation received by Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer as
employees is shown in the Summary Compensation Table below. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts shown for stock awards reflect the dollar value
recognized for financial statement purposes for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)),
including amounts related to restricted stock granted in prior
years that was unvested at January 1, 2008, as further
described in Notes 2 and 9 to our consolidated financial
statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The costs for awards
disregard adjustments for forfeiture assumptions. At our 2008
annual meeting, each of our independent directors was granted
2,000 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate value on
the grant date under SFAS 123(R) of approximately $53,000,
based on the closing market price of our common stock on
May 21, 2008 of $26.69. The shares vest one year from the
date of grant, and represent the only unvested shares of
restricted stock held by our non-employee directors at
December 31, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
All other compensation represents dividends paid on unvested
restricted stock, and excludes dividends paid on vested
restricted stock. Dividends are paid on the entirety of the
restricted stock grants, including the unvested portion, from
the date of the grant. |
|
(4) |
|
Dr. Riedy retired from our board of directors concurrent
with our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders on May 21,
2008. |
7
Policy
Governing Stockholder Communications with the Board of
Directors
Our board of directors welcomes communications from our
stockholders. Any stockholder or other interested party who
wishes to communicate with the board or one or more members of
the board should do so in writing in care of the General Counsel
of BioMed, at our principal office, 17190 Bernardo Center Drive,
San Diego, California 92128. The General Counsel is
directed to forward each appropriate communication to the
director or directors for whom it is intended.
Policy
Governing Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of
Stockholders
We encourage, but do not require, our board members to attend
the annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors
attended our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders, which was held
on May 21, 2008.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance
Guidelines
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to our officers, employees, agents and directors. In
addition, our board of directors has adopted Corporate
Governance Guidelines to assist the board in the exercise of its
responsibilities and to serve the interests of BioMed and its
stockholders. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and
Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on our website at
www.biomedrealty.com and will be provided without charge upon
request to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., 17190 Bernardo Center
Drive, San Diego, California 92128, Attention: Secretary.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR
each of the nominees set forth above. Proxies solicited by the
board of directors will be so voted unless stockholders specify
otherwise on the enclosed proxy.
8
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION
OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The audit committee of our board of directors has selected KPMG
LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting
firm for the year ending December 31, 2009, and our board
of directors has directed that management submit the selection
of the independent registered public accounting firm for
ratification by our stockholders at the annual meeting. KPMG LLP
has audited our financial statements since our inception in
2004. Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at
the annual meeting. Such representatives will have the
opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are
expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm is not required by
our bylaws or otherwise. However, the board of directors is
submitting the selection of KPMG LLP to the stockholders for
ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the
stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the audit committee
will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the
selection is ratified, the audit committee in its discretion may
direct the appointment of a different independent registered
public accounting firm at any time during the year if the audit
committee determines that such a change would be in the best
interests of the company.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
annual meeting is required for the ratification of the selection
of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR
the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the
companys independent registered public accounting firm for
the year ending December 31, 2009.
9
PROPOSAL 3
APPROVAL OF
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF
THE 2004 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
OF BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
We are asking our stockholders to approve an amendment and
restatement of the 2004 Incentive Award Plan of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P. (the 2004 Plan).
The proposed amended and restated 2004 Plan is referred to
herein as the Restated Plan. Currently, the 2004
Plan authorizes 2,500,000 shares of BioMed common stock for
issuance. As of March 11, 2009, 446,314 shares
remained available for issuance under the 2004 Plan. The
Restated Plan would increase the number of shares authorized for
issuance under the 2004 Plan by 2,840,000 shares for a
total of 5,340,000 shares. BioMeds board of directors
approved the Restated Plan on February 10, 2009, but
specified that it was subject to approval by BioMeds
stockholders. The proposed Restated Plan, the text of which is
attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement,
would become effective immediately upon stockholder approval at
the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders. As of March 11,
2009, 81,180,596 shares of our common stock were
outstanding; in addition, as of March 11, 2009, 2,795,364
limited partnership units in BioMed Realty, L.P., a Maryland
limited partnership of which BioMed is the sole general partner
(the Operating Partnership), were outstanding, which
may be exchanged for 2,795,364 shares of our common stock.
The closing share price for our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange on March 11, 2009 was $7.66.
The Restated Plan will also implement the following changes:
|
|
|
|
|
The term of the Restated Plan will be extended until 2019.
|
|
|
|
The list of performance criteria that may be used by the
compensation committee of our board of directors for purposes of
granting awards under the Restated Plan that are intended to
qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code has been expanded, as described
below under the heading Description of Proposed Restated
Plan Performance Criteria.
|
|
|
|
All stock options and stock appreciation rights will have an
exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of
our common stock on the date the stock option or stock
appreciation right is granted.
|
|
|
|
No dividend equivalents will be payable for any award which
vests based on the satisfaction of performance criteria, unless
and until that award vests.
|
|
|
|
Without stockholder approval, the exercise price of outstanding
options or stock appreciation rights may not be reduced, and
outstanding options or stock appreciation rights may not be
cancelled, exchanged, substituted, bought or surrendered in
exchange for cash or another award that has an exercise price
that is less than the original exercise price of the outstanding
option or stock appreciation right that is being exchanged.
|
|
|
|
The governing law of the Restated Plan will be changed from
California to Maryland.
|
|
|
|
Awards granted under the Restated Plan will be subject to and
designed to be compliant with Section 409A of the Code, to
the extent applicable.
|
In addition, certain other immaterial changes have been included
in the Restated Plan to conform its terms to company practice.
BioMed is also seeking stockholder approval of the material
terms of performance goals under the Restated Plan. Stockholder
approval of such terms would preserve BioMeds ability to
deduct compensation associated with future performance-based
awards made under the Restated Plan to certain executives.
Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductions a
publicly-held company can claim for compensation in excess of
$1 million paid in a given year to its chief executive
officer and its three other most highly-compensated executive
officers (other than its chief financial officer) (these
officers are generally referred to as the covered
employees). Performance-based compensation
that meets certain requirements is not counted against the
$1 million deductibility cap. Stock options and stock
appreciation rights qualify as performance-based compensation.
Other awards that we may grant under the Restated Plan may
qualify as performance-based compensation if the payment,
retention or vesting of the award
10
is subject to the achievement during a performance period of
performance goals selected by the compensation committee. The
compensation committee retains the discretion to set the level
of performance for a given performance measure under a
performance-based award. For such awards to qualify as
performance-based compensation, the stockholders must approve
the material terms of the performance goals every five years.
For a discussion of the performance criteria for which approval
is being sought, please see the discussion under
Description of Proposed Restated Plan
Performance Criteria below.
If this Proposal 3 is not approved, the Restated Plan will
not become effective, but the existing 2004 Plan will remain in
effect.
THE BOARD
RECOMMENDS THAT
YOU VOTE
FOR THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2004
PLAN
Why You
Should Vote for the Amendment and Restatement of the 2004
Plan
Equity
Incentive Awards Are an Important Part of Our Compensation
Philosophy
Our equity incentive plan is critical to our long-term goal of
building stockholder value. As discussed in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this
proxy statement, equity incentive awards are central to our
compensation program. Our board of directors and its
compensation committee believe that our ability to grant equity
incentive awards, including restricted stock and long-term
incentive plan units (LTIP units), to new and
existing employees, directors and eligible consultants has
helped us attract, retain and motivate the best professionals in
the life science real estate industry. Historically, we have
issued restricted stock and LTIP units under the 2004 Plan.
These forms of equity compensation provide a strong incentive
for employees, directors and consultants to work to grow the
business and build stockholder value, and are attractive to
employees, directors and consultants who share the
entrepreneurial spirit that has made us successful.
Our equity incentive program is broad-based. As of
March 11, 2009, 61 of our 125 employees had received
grants of equity awards. We believe we must continue to offer a
competitive equity compensation plan in order to attract and
motivate the world-class talent necessary for our continued
growth and success.
The
2004 Plan Will No Longer Have Shares Available for
Grant
Under our current forecasts, the 2004 Plan will run out of
shares available for grant at the end of 2009, and we will not
be able to issue equity to our employees, directors and
consultants unless our stockholders approve the amendment to the
2004 Plan. Our 2004 Plan is the only equity incentive plan we
currently have in place. While we could increase cash
compensation to a limited extent if we are unable to grant
equity incentives, we anticipate that we will have difficulty
attracting, retaining and motivating our employees, directors
and consultants if we are unable to make equity grants to them.
Equity-based grants are a more effective compensation vehicle
than strictly cash, because they better align the financial
interests of our employees and our stockholders, and encourage
actions that maximize long-term stockholder value.
We
Manage Our Equity Incentive Award Use Carefully
We manage our long-term stockholder dilution by limiting the
number of equity awards granted annually. The compensation
committee carefully monitors our total dilution and equity
expense to ensure that we maximize stockholder value by granting
only the appropriate number of equity awards necessary to
attract, reward and retain employees. Aggregate grants of equity
awards, which included shares of restricted stock and LTIP
units, constituted 0.8%, 0.7% and 0.4% of our weighted average
diluted shares outstanding in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
11
The
Restated Plan Combines Compensation and Governance Best
Practices
The proposed Restated Plan includes provisions that are designed
to protect our stockholders interests and to reflect
corporate governance best practices, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued broad-based eligibility for equity
awards. We grant equity awards to a significant
number of our employees. By doing so, we link employee interests
with stockholder interests throughout the organization and
motivate our employees to act as owners of the business.
|
|
|
|
Stockholder approval is required for additional
shares. The Restated Plan does not contain an
annual evergreen provision. The Restated Plan
authorizes a fixed number of shares, so that stockholder
approval is required to increase the maximum number of
securities which may be issued under the Restated Plan.
|
|
|
|
No discount stock options or stock appreciation
rights. All stock options and stock appreciation
rights will have an exercise price equal to or greater than the
fair market value of our common stock on the date the stock
option or stock appreciation right is granted. To date, we have
not granted any stock options or stock appreciation rights under
the 2004 Plan.
|
|
|
|
Repricing is not allowed. The Restated Plan
prohibits the repricing of stock options and stock appreciation
rights without prior stockholder approval.
|
Description
of Proposed Restated Plan
The following summary of the terms of the Restated Plan is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 2004
Plan and the various award agreements used thereunder, forms of
which have been filed as exhibits to BioMeds Current
Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 14, 2005 and January 5,
2007. The proposed Restated Plan is attached as
Appendix A to this proxy statement.
Purposes
of the Restated Plan
The purposes of the Restated Plan are:
|
|
|
|
|
to promote the success and enhance the value of BioMed by
linking the personal interests of our employees, directors and
consultants to those of our stockholders and by providing such
individuals with an incentive for performance to maximize
long-term returns for our stockholders, and
|
|
|
|
to provide us with the ability to motivate, attract and retain
the services of our employees, directors and consultants upon
whose judgment, interest and special effort our continued
success is largely dependent.
|
Securities
Subject to the Restated Plan
The aggregate number of shares of common stock subject to awards
under the 2004 Plan is currently 2,500,000. That number may be
adjusted for changes in BioMeds capitalization and certain
corporate transactions, as described below under the heading
Changes in Control and Corporate Transactions. As of
March 11, 2009, awards covering an aggregate of
2,053,686 shares were outstanding under the 2004 Plan, and
446,314 shares (plus any shares that might in the future be
returned to the 2004 Plan as a result of cancellations,
forfeitures, repurchases or expiration of awards) remained
available for future grants. Of the 2,053,686 shares
outstanding under the 2004 Plan, 1,074,183 shares remained
subject to vesting restrictions. As noted above, the Restated
Plan would increase the number of shares authorized for issuance
under the Restated Plan by 2,840,000 shares for a total of
5,340,000 shares. Under the Restated Plan, each LTIP unit
issued pursuant to an award shall be counted against the share
reserve under the Restated Plan as one share of common stock,
but only to the extent that such LTIP unit is convertible into
shares of common stock and on the same basis as the conversion
ratio applicable to the LTIP unit.
To the extent that an award expires, terminates or lapses, or an
award is settled in cash without the delivery of shares of
common stock to the participant, then any unexercised shares
subject to the award will be available for future grant or sale
under the Restated Plan. Shares of restricted stock which are
forfeited or repurchased by us pursuant to the Restated Plan may
again be optioned, granted or awarded under the Restated Plan.
In addition, shares of common stock which are delivered by the
holder or withheld by us upon the exercise of any award under
12
the Restated Plan in payment of the exercise or purchase price
of such award or tax withholding thereon may again be optioned,
granted or awarded under the Restated Plan. The payment of
dividend equivalents in cash in conjunction with any outstanding
awards will not be counted against the shares available for
issuance under the Restated Plan.
The maximum number of shares that may be subject to awards
granted under the Restated Plan to any individual in any rolling
three-year period may not exceed 1,500,000.
The proposed increase in shares available for issuance under the
Restated Plan has been reviewed and approved by BioMeds
board of directors, which determined that the existing number of
shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan was
insufficient to meet our needs to provide long-term incentive
grants on an ongoing and regular basis to motivate, reward, and
retain key employees who create stockholder value. The increase
in shares has been necessitated by the hiring of new employees
and by granting additional stock awards to current employees as
long-term incentives. The increase will enable us to continue
our policy of equity ownership by employees, directors and
consultants as an incentive to contribute to our continued
success.
Administration
The Restated Plan will generally be administered by the
compensation committee of BioMeds board of directors (the
Administrator). However, BioMeds board of
directors determines the terms and conditions of, interprets and
administers the Restated Plan for awards granted to our
non-employee directors and, with respect to these awards, the
term Administrator refers to BioMeds board of
directors. As appropriate, administration of the Restated Plan
may be revested in BioMeds board of directors. In
addition, for administrative convenience, BioMeds board of
directors or the compensation committee may determine to grant
to one or more members of BioMeds board of directors or to
one or more officers the authority to make grants to individuals
who are not directors or executive officers.
Eligibility
The Restated Plan authorizes discretionary grants to our
employees, consultants and non-employee directors, and to the
employees and consultants of our subsidiaries, of stock options,
restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and other
stock-based awards. As of March 11, 2009, outstanding
equity awards have been issued to 61 of our 125 employees
and to our five non-employee directors under the 2004 Plan.
Awards
under the Restated Plan
Stock Options. The Restated Plan provides for
discretionary grants of non-qualified stock options, or NQSOs,
to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The
Restated Plan also provides for the grant of incentive stock
options, or ISOs, which may only be granted to employees.
Options may be granted with terms determined by the
Administrator; provided that ISOs must meet the requirements of
Section 422 of the Code. The Restated Plan provides that a
holder of ISOs may exercise his or her option for three months
following termination of employment, directorship or consultancy
and for twelve months in the event such termination results from
death or disability. The exercise price for stock options
granted under the Restated Plan is set by the Administrator and
may not be less than fair market value on the date of grant. The
Administrator may also substitute a stock appreciation right for
an option at any time prior to or upon exercise of the option,
provided that the stock appreciation right is exercisable for
the same number of shares of common stock for which the
substituted option would have been exercisable. To date, no
options have been granted under the Restated Plan.
Restricted Stock. Unless otherwise provided in
the applicable award agreement, participants generally have all
of the rights of a stockholder with respect to restricted stock.
Restricted stock may be issued for a nominal purchase price and
may be subject to vesting over time or upon attainment of
performance targets. Any dividends or other distributions paid
on restricted stock are also subject to restrictions to the same
extent as the underlying stock. Award agreements related to
restricted stock may provide that restricted stock is subject to
repurchase by BioMed in the event that the participant ceases to
be an employee, director or consultant prior to vesting. To
date, 1,413,536 shares of restricted stock (net of
forfeitures) have been granted under the Restated Plan.
13
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Restated Plan
provides for discretionary grants of stock appreciation rights
to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. Stock
appreciation rights may be granted with terms determined by the
Administrator, provided that the exercise price for stock
appreciation rights may not be less than fair market value on
the date of grant. The Administrator may pay amounts owed upon
exercise of a stock appreciation right in shares of common stock
or cash, at the Administrators discretion. To date, no
stock appreciation rights have been granted under the Restated
Plan.
Performance Bonus Awards. The Restated Plan
provides for grants of performance bonus awards to employees,
non-employee directors and consultants based upon objectively
determinable bonus formulas relating to the performance criteria
included in the Restated Plan, provided that no performance
bonus award in excess of $1,500,000 becomes payable to a
covered employee as defined in
Section 162(m)(3) of the Code. To date, no performance
bonus awards have been granted under the 2004 Plan.
Other Stock Awards. The Restated Plan allows
for various other awards including dividend equivalents, stock
payments, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards,
with such terms generally as the Administrator may determine in
its discretion, provided that no dividend equivalents may be
payable with respect to options.
LTIP unit awards under the Restated Plan are substantially
similar to restricted stock awards. Like the restricted stock
awards, the LTIP units are subject to vesting over a period of
time. However, an LTIP unit represents an equity interest in the
Operating Partnership, rather than BioMed. Initially, LTIP units
will not have full parity with common units of the Operating
Partnership with respect to liquidating distributions. Upon the
occurrence of certain triggering events, the LTIP
units can over time achieve full parity with common units of the
Operating Partnership for all purposes, and therefore accrete to
an economic value equivalent to one share of common stock of
BioMed. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP units may be
redeemed for cash in an amount equal to the then fair market
value of an equal number of shares of BioMed common stock or
converted into an equal number of shares of BioMed common stock,
as determined by BioMed at its election. The Administrator will
specify the purchase price, if any, to be paid by the recipient
for an LTIP unit. To date, 640,150 LTIP units have been granted
under the Restated Plan.
Non-Employee
Director Awards
Our non-employee directors are eligible to receive automatic
restricted stock awards under the Restated Plan, as described
above under Information Regarding the Board
Compensation of Directors.
Performance
Criteria
The compensation committee may designate employees as
covered employees whose compensation for a given
fiscal year may be subject to the limit on deductible
compensation imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code. The
compensation committee may grant to such covered employees
restricted stock, dividend equivalents, stock payments,
restricted stock units, cash bonuses and other stock-based
awards that are paid, vest or become exercisable upon the
attainment of company performance criteria which are related to
one or more of the following performance criteria as applicable
to our performance or the performance of a division, business
unit or an individual, measured either in absolute terms, on a
same-property basis, as compared to any incremental increase or
as compared to results of a peer group:
|
|
|
|
|
net earnings (either before or after interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization),
|
|
|
|
sales or revenue,
|
|
|
|
net income (either before or after taxes),
|
|
|
|
operating earnings,
|
|
|
|
cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow
and free cash flow),
|
|
|
|
return on net assets,
|
|
|
|
return on stockholders equity,
|
|
|
|
return on sales,
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
gross or net profit margin,
|
|
|
|
working capital,
|
|
|
|
earnings per share,
|
|
|
|
price per share of common stock, or
|
|
|
|
funds from operations.
|
The compensation committee may provide that one or more
objectively determinable adjustments will be made to one or more
of the performance goals established for any performance period.
Such adjustments may include one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
items related to a change in accounting principle,
|
|
|
|
items relating to financing activities,
|
|
|
|
expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives,
|
|
|
|
other non-operating items,
|
|
|
|
items related to acquisitions,
|
|
|
|
items attributable to the business operations of any entity
acquired by us during the performance period,
|
|
|
|
items related to the disposal of a business of segment of a
business,
|
|
|
|
items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as
a segment of a business under GAAP,
|
|
|
|
items attributable to any stock dividend, stock split,
combination or exchange of shares occurring during the
performance period,
|
|
|
|
any other items of significant income or expense which are
determined to be appropriate adjustments,
|
|
|
|
items relating to unusual or extraordinary corporate
transactions, events or developments,
|
|
|
|
items related to amortization of acquired intangible assets,
|
|
|
|
items that are outside the scope of our core, on-going business
activities, or
|
|
|
|
items relating to any other unusual or nonrecurring events or
changes in applicable laws, accounting principles or business
conditions.
|
Awards
Generally Not Transferable
Awards under the Restated Plan are generally not transferable
during the award holders lifetime without the consent of
the Administrator. The Administrator may allow an award to be
transferable to certain permitted transferees for estate or tax
planning purposes.
Changes
in Control and Corporate Transactions
In the event of certain changes in the capitalization of our
company or certain corporate transactions involving our company
and certain other events (including a change in control, as
defined in the Restated Plan), the Administrator may make
appropriate adjustments to awards under the Restated Plan and is
authorized to provide for the acceleration, cash-out,
termination, assumption, substitution or conversion of such
awards. Except as may be set forth in the applicable award
agreement, if a change in control, as defined in the Restated
Plan, occurs and the holders awards are not assumed or
replaced, those awards become fully exercisable and vested.
Award holders will also have an opportunity to exercise any
vested awards prior to the consummation of such changes in
control or other corporate transactions or events.
15
Term of
the Restated Plan; Amendment and Termination
If the stockholders approve this Proposal 3, the Restated
Plan will be in effect until May 2019, unless BioMeds
board of directors terminates the Restated Plan at an earlier
date. BioMeds board of directors may terminate the
Restated Plan at any time with respect to any shares not then
subject to an award under the Restated Plan. BioMeds board
of directors may also modify the Restated Plan from time to
time, except that BioMeds board of directors may not,
without prior stockholder approval, (1) amend the Restated
Plan so as to increase the number of shares of stock that may be
issued under the Restated Plan, (2) reduce the exercise
price per share of the shares subject to any outstanding option
or stock appreciation right or cancel, exchange, substitute,
buyout or surrender existing options or stock appreciation
rights in exchange for cash or other awards with an exercise
price that is less than the exercise price of the original
options or stock appreciation rights, or (3) amend the
Restated Plan in any manner which would require stockholder
approval to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule
or which would alter the rights or obligations of any
outstanding award.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences Associated with the Restated
Plan
The following is a general summary under current law of the
material federal income tax consequences to participants in the
Restated Plan. This summary deals with the general tax
principles that apply and is provided only for general
information. Some kinds of taxes, such as state, local and
foreign income taxes and federal employment taxes, are not
discussed. Tax laws are complex and subject to change and may
vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to
locality. The summary does not discuss all aspects of income
taxation that may be relevant in light of a holders
personal investment circumstances. This summarized tax
information is not tax advice.
Non-Qualified Stock Options. For federal
income tax purposes, if an optionee is granted NQSOs under the
Restated Plan, the optionee will not have taxable income on the
grant of the option, nor will we be entitled to any deduction.
Generally, upon exercise of NQSOs the optionee will recognize
ordinary income, and we will be entitled to a deduction, in an
amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of a common
share over the option exercise price on the date each such
option is exercised. The optionees basis for the stock for
purposes of determining gain or loss on subsequent disposition
of such shares generally will be the fair market value of the
common stock on the date the optionee exercises such option. Any
subsequent gain or loss will be generally taxable as capital
gains or losses.
Incentive Stock Options. There is no taxable
income to an optionee when an optionee is granted an ISO or when
that option is exercised. However, the amount by which the fair
market value of the shares at the time of exercise exceeds the
option price will be an item of adjustment for the
optionee for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. Gain
realized by the optionee on the sale of an ISO is taxable at
capital gains rates, and no tax deduction is available to us,
unless the optionee disposes of the shares within (a) two
years after the date of grant of the option or (b) within
one year of the date the shares were transferred to the
optionee. If the common shares are sold or otherwise disposed of
before the end of the two-year and one-year periods specified
above, the excess of the fair market value of a common share
over the option exercise price on the date of the options
exercise will be taxed at ordinary income rates (or, if less,
the gain on the sale), and we will be entitled to a deduction to
the extent the optionee must recognize ordinary income. If such
a sale or disposition takes place in the year in which the
optionee exercises the option, the income the optionee
recognizes upon sale or disposition of the shares will not be
considered an item of adjustment for alternative minimum tax
purposes.
An ISO exercised more than three months after an optionee
terminates employment, for reasons other than death or
disability, will be taxed as a NQSO, and the optionee will
recognize ordinary income on the exercise. We will be entitled
to a tax deduction equal to the ordinary income, if any,
realized by the optionee.
Restricted Stock. An individual to whom
restricted stock is issued generally will not recognize taxable
income upon such issuance, and we generally will not then be
entitled to a deduction, unless an election is made by the
participant under Section 83(b) of the Code. However, when
restrictions on shares of restricted stock lapse, such that the
shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of
forfeiture, the individual generally will recognize ordinary
income, and we generally will be entitled to a deduction for an
amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the
shares at the date such restrictions lapse over the purchase
price. If a timely election is made
16
under Section 83(b) with respect to restricted stock, the
participant generally will recognize ordinary income on the date
of the issuance equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market
value of the shares at that date over the purchase price of such
shares, and we will be entitled to a deduction for the same
amount. Participants may only make an 83(b) election with the
consent of the Administrator.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant will
not be taxed upon the grant of a stock appreciation right. Upon
the exercise of the stock appreciation right, the participant
will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of cash or
the fair market value of the stock received upon exercise. At
the time of exercise, BioMed will be eligible for a tax
deduction as a compensation expense equal to the amount that the
participant recognizes as ordinary income.
LTIP Units. LTIP unit awards that constitute
profits interests within the meaning of the Code and
published Internal Revenue Service guidance will generally not
be taxed at the time of grant, though the holder will be
required to report on his income tax return his allocable share
of the Operating Partnerships income, gain, loss,
deduction and credit, regardless of whether the Operating
Partnership makes a distribution of cash. Instead, LTIP units
are generally taxed upon a disposition of the LTIP units or
distributions of money to the extent that such amounts received
exceed the basis in the LTIP units. Generally, no deduction is
available to us upon the grant, vesting or disposition of the
LTIP units.
If LTIP units are granted to a recipient who is an employee, the
issuance of those units may cause wages paid to the recipient to
be characterized and subject to taxation as self-employment
income. If treated as a self-employed partner, the recipient
will be required to make quarterly income tax payments rather
than having amounts withheld by us. Additionally, if
self-employed, the recipient must pay the full amount of all
FICA employment taxes on the employees compensation,
whereas regular employees are only responsible for 50% of these
taxes. To date, the Internal Revenue Service has not issued
definitive guidance regarding the treatment of wages paid to
partner-employees.
Other Stock Awards and Performance Bonus
Awards. The participant will have ordinary income
upon receipt of stock or cash payable under performance awards,
dividend equivalents, restricted stock units and stock payments.
BioMed will be eligible for a tax deduction as a compensation
expense equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the
participant.
Section 162(m) of the Code. In general,
under Section 162(m), income tax deductions of
publicly-held corporations may be limited to the extent total
compensation (including base salary, annual bonus, stock option
exercises and non-qualified benefits paid) for specified
executive officers exceeds $1 million (less the amount of
any excess parachute payments as defined in
Section 280G of the Code) in any one year. However, under
Section 162(m), the deduction limit does not apply to
certain qualified performance-based compensation
established by an independent compensation committee which
conforms to certain conditions stated under the Code and related
regulations. Options and stock appreciation rights granted by
the compensation committee under the Restated Plan are intended
to qualify as qualified performance-based
compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. The
Restated Plan has been structured with the intent that certain
other awards granted under the Restated Plan may, in the
discretion of the compensation committee, be structured so as to
qualify for the qualified performance-based
compensation exception to the $1 million annual
deductibility limit of Section 162(m) of the Code.
Section 409A of the Code. Certain types
of awards under the Restated Plan may constitute, or provide
for, a deferral of compensation under Section 409A of the
Code. Unless certain requirements set forth in Section 409A
are complied with, holders of such awards may be taxed earlier
than would otherwise be the case (e.g., at the time of vesting
instead of the time of payment) and may be subject to an
additional 20% federal penalty tax (and, potentially, certain
interest penalties). To the extent applicable, the Restated Plan
and awards granted under the Restated Plan will be structured
and interpreted to comply with Section 409A of the Code and
the Treasury Regulations and other interpretive guidance that
may be issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.
If a plan award is subject to and fails to satisfy the
requirements of Section 409A, the recipient of that award
may recognize the compensation deferred under the award as
ordinary income when such amounts are vested, which may be prior
to when the compensation is actually or constructively received.
Also, if an award that is subject
17
to Section 409A fails to comply, Section 409A imposes
an additional 20% federal income tax on the deferred
compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest
on such deferred compensation.
Plan
Benefits
Under the 2004 Plan, our executive officers have received the
following equity awards:
Alan D. Gold, our Chief Executive Officer, has received
311,667 shares of restricted stock and 175,000 LTIP units;
Kent Griffin, our President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has received 153,881 shares of
restricted stock and 63,882 LTIP units; Gary A. Kreitzer, our
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, has received
82,333 shares of restricted stock and 80,879 LTIP units;
and Matthew G. McDevitt, our Executive Vice President,
Acquisitions and Leasing, has received 103,000 shares of
restricted stock and 125,012 LTIP units. As of March 11,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
All of our executive officers as a group have received:
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,881 shares of restricted stock, and
|
|
|
|
444,773 LTIP units under the 2004 Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the aggregate we have granted to employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361,536 shares of restricted stock (net of
forfeitures), and
|
|
|
|
640,150 LTIP units under the 2004 Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our non-employee directors as a group have received:
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,000 shares of restricted stock under the 2004 Plan.
|
Our non-employee directors are also eligible to receive
automatic restricted stock awards under the Restated Plan, as
described above under Information Regarding the
Board Compensation of Directors.
All other future grants under the Restated Plan are within the
discretion of the Administrator and the benefits of such grants
are, therefore, not determinable.
Required
Vote
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by
stockholders who are present or represented by proxy and
entitled to vote at the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders
shall be required to approve the amendment and restatement of
the 2004 Plan, provided that the total votes cast on this
proposal represent a majority of the shares of our common stock
entitled to vote on this proposal.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR
the approval of the amendment and restatement of the 2004
Plan.
18
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth as of March 11, 2009, except
as otherwise set forth in the footnotes to the table, the
beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock and shares of
common stock into which units of limited partnership in our
operating partnership, BioMed Realty, L.P., a Maryland limited
partnership of which we are the sole general partner, are
exchangeable for (1) each person who is the beneficial
owner of 5% or more of our outstanding common stock,
(2) each executive officer named in the Summary
Compensation Table below (the Named Executive
Officers), (3) each director and nominee for director
and (4) executive officers and directors as a group. Each
person named in the table has sole voting and investment power
with respect to all of the shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by such person, except as otherwise set forth
in the footnotes to the table. The extent to which a person
holds operating partnership units as opposed to shares of common
stock is set forth in the footnotes below. Unless otherwise
indicated, the address of each named person is
c/o BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc., 17190 Bernardo Center Drive, San Diego,
California 92128. We are not aware of any arrangements,
including any pledge of our common stock, that could result in a
change in control of the company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
Common Stock and
|
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
|
of Common Stock and
|
|
|
|
Units Beneficially
|
|
|
Stock Beneficially
|
|
|
Units Beneficially
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
|
Owned(2)
|
|
|
Owned(2)(3)
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold(4)
|
|
|
1,785,707
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.(5)
|
|
|
217,763
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer(6)
|
|
|
959,255
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt(7)
|
|
|
291,212
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John F. Wilson, II(8)
|
|
|
575,433
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Barbara R. Cambon(9)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D.(9)
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard I. Gilchrist(9)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Theodore D. Roth(9)(10)
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
M. Faye Wilson(9)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Cohen & Steers, Inc.(11)
|
|
|
7,186,484
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Barclays Global Fund Advisors(12)
|
|
|
6,806,262
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(13)
|
|
|
6,541,241
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Deutsche Bank AG(14)
|
|
|
6,354,260
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group
(9 persons)(15)
|
|
|
3,310,437
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Amounts assume that all units are exchanged for shares of our
common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on a total of 81,180,596 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of March 11, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on a total of 2,795,364 limited partnership units and
566,540 LTIP units outstanding as of March 11, 2009, which
may be exchanged for cash or shares of our common stock under
certain circumstances. The total number of shares of common
stock and units outstanding used in calculating these
percentages assumes that none of the units held by other persons
are exchanged for shares of our common stock. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 1,141,742 limited partnership units, 110,000 LTIP
units, 179,927 shares of common stock and
175,000 shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Gold
directly. 1,141,742 limited partnership units and
179,927 shares of common stock held by Mr. Gold
directly are pledged as security for a loan and as security for
a related interest rate swap agreement. Also includes
Mr. Golds interest in 179,038 limited partnership
units held by entities in which Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer
share voting and investment power. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 120,529 shares of restricted stock and 63,882 LTIP
units. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 642,528 limited partnership units, 80,879 LTIP units
and 3,000 shares of restricted stock held by
Mr. Kreitzer directly, of which 424,069 limited partnership
units are pledged as security for a non-purpose loan. Also
includes 80,000 limited partnership units held by Ventanas Del
Mar, L.P., over which Mr. Kreitzer |
19
|
|
|
|
|
has sole voting and investment power, and includes
Mr. Kreitzers interest in 109,715 limited partnership
units held by entities in which Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer
share voting and investment power. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 44,541 limited partnership units, 125,012 LTIP units
and 60,000 shares of restricted stock held by
Mr. McDevitt directly, of which 44,541 limited partnership
units are pledged as security for a non-purpose loan. Also
includes 43,659 limited partnership units and 18,000 shares
of common stock held by Mr. McDevitts wife, which are
also pledged as security for the same non-purpose loan. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 111,661 LTIP units held by Mr. Wilson directly.
Also includes 425,073 limited partnership units held by SIXJWS,
L.P., over which Mr. Wilson has sole voting and investment
power, and which, along with 31,823 shares of common stock
held by Mr. Wilson directly, have been pledged as security
for a non-purpose loan. Also includes 6,876 limited partnership
units held by Mr. Wilsons wife. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 2,000 shares of restricted common stock. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 6,500 shares of common stock held in a margin
account. |
|
(11) |
|
Cohen & Steers, Inc.s address is 280 Park
Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, New York 10017. The foregoing
information is based on Cohen & Steers, Inc.s
Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 9, 2009. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 2,438,278 shares, 92,848 shares and
29,152 shares beneficially owned by Barclays Global
Investors, NA., Barclays Global Investors, Ltd, and Barclays
Global Investors Japan Limited, respectively. Barclays Global
Fund Advisors address is 400 Howard Street,
San Francisco, California 94105. The foregoing information
is based on Barclays Global Fund Advisors
Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 5, 2009. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 109,784 shares beneficially owned by Vanguard
Fiduciary Trust Company (VFTC), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., as a result of its
serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. VFTC
directs the voting of these shares. The Vanguard Group,
Inc.s address is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern,
Pennsylvania 19355. The foregoing information is based on The
Vanguard Group, Inc.s Schedule 13G/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2009. |
|
(14) |
|
Reflects shares beneficially owned by the Private Clients and
Asset Management business group of Deutsche Bank AG, and does
not reflect any shares beneficially owned by any other business
group of Deutsche Bank AG. Deutsche Bank AGs address is
Theodor-Heuss-Allee 70, 60468 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The
foregoing information is based on Deutsche Bank AGs
Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 12, 2009. |
|
(15) |
|
Excludes Mr. Wilson, who retired from his position as
Executive Vice President of BioMed on December 31, 2008. |
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
Our executive officers and their ages as of March 11, 2009
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
48
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
54
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
39
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
Executive Vice President, Acquisitions and Leasing
|
|
|
43
|
|
Biographical information with respect to Messrs. Gold and
Kreitzer is set forth above under Election of
Directors Information Regarding Directors.
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. has served as our
President and Chief Operating Officer since December 2008. He
continues to serve as our Chief Financial Officer, a position he
has held since March 2006. Mr. Griffin previously was part
of the real estate investment banking group at Raymond
James & Associates, Inc. where he was a Senior Vice
President responsible for advising real estate clients on public
and private equity and debt issuance, mergers and acquisitions,
and other services. Prior to joining Raymond James in 2003,
Mr. Griffin spent four years with JP Morgan in its
global real estate investment banking group in both New York and
San Francisco. Mr. Griffin was part of the real estate
service group for Arthur Andersen LLP from 1992 to 1997, where
he was responsible for a range of audit and advisory services as
a certified public accountant. Mr. Griffin received a
Master of Business
20
Administration from the University of North Carolina and a
Bachelor of Science Degree in Business and Accountancy from Wake
Forest University. Mr. Griffin is a member of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.
Matthew G. McDevitt has served as our Executive Vice
President, Acquisitions and Leasing since February 2008 and
served as our Regional Executive Vice President from February
2006 to February 2008, having joined us in 2004 as our Vice
President, Acquisitions. Mr. McDevitt previously served as
President of McDevitt Real Estate Services, Inc.
(MRES), which Mr. McDevitt formed in October
1997 as a full service real estate provider focusing on the life
science industry. Before founding MRES, Mr. McDevitt spent
ten years as a commercial real estate broker in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Mr. McDevitt
received his Bachelor of Arts Degree in Business from Gettysburg
College. He currently serves on the board of directors of the
Massachusetts Chapter of the National Association of Industrial
and Office Properties, and is a member of the Pennsylvania
Biotechnology Association.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
This section provides an overview and analysis of our
compensation program and policies, the material compensation
decisions we have made under those programs and policies with
respect to our Named Executive Officers, and the material
factors that we considered in making those decisions. Our Named
Executive Officers include:
|
|
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
|
|
|
|
Kent Griffin, our President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer,
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer, our Executive Vice President and General
Counsel,
|
|
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt, our Executive Vice President, Acquisitions
and Leasing, and
|
|
|
|
John F. Wilson, II, our Executive Vice President, who
retired from our company on December 31, 2008, and, as a
result, did not participate in our compensation committees
executive compensation and performance reviews for 2008.
|
On December 15, 2008, Mr. Griffin was promoted to the
position of President and Chief Operating Officer, and continues
to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. In connection with
Mr. Griffins promotion, Mr. Gold relinquished
his title of President and continues to serve as our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer.
Executive
Compensation Program Overview
Our executive compensation program is administered under the
direction of the compensation committee of the board of
directors. The responsibilities of the compensation committee
are more fully described under Election of
Directors Information Regarding the
Board Committees of the Board
Compensation Committee.
Objectives of Our Executive Compensation
Program. Our executive compensation program is
designed to meet the following objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
to attract, retain and motivate executives with superior
ability, experience and leadership capability by providing
compensation that is competitive relative to the compensation
paid to similarly situated executives of our peer companies,
|
|
|
|
to reward individual achievement appropriately and promote
individual accountability to deliver on our business
objectives, and
|
|
|
|
to enhance BioMeds long-term financial performance and
position, and thus stockholder value, by significantly aligning
the financial interests of our executives with those of our
stockholders.
|
21
To accomplish these objectives, our executive compensation
program primarily includes:
|
|
|
|
|
annual base salaries, intended to provide a stable annual income
at a level that is consistent with the individual executive
officers role and contribution to the company,
|
|
|
|
bonuses, intended to link each executive officers
compensation to our overall financial and operating performance
and the officers performance versus established goals and
objectives for a particular year, and
|
|
|
|
long-term incentives through equity-based compensation,
including restricted stock and LTIP unit grants, intended to
further promote retention through time-based vesting, to
significantly align the financial interests of our executives
with those of our stockholders and to encourage actions that
maximize long-term stockholder value.
|
Each of our executive officers is also entitled to certain
benefits upon a change of control of the company or upon his or
her termination from the company without cause or
for good reason, including severance benefits and
full vesting of all long-term incentives held by the officer. We
provide these benefits to our executive officers in order to
give them the personal security and stability necessary for them
to focus on the performance of their duties and responsibilities
to us, and in order to attract and retain executives as we
compete for talented employees in a marketplace where such
protections are commonly offered. These items are described
under Employment Agreements and
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change
in Control.
Determination
of Compensation Awards
The compensation committee annually reviews and determines the
total compensation to be paid to our executive officers.
Role of Management. Mr. Gold, our Chief
Executive Officer, makes recommendations and presents analyses
to the compensation committee based on its requests. He also
discusses with the committee:
|
|
|
|
|
the companys and its peers performance,
|
|
|
|
the financial and other impacts of proposed compensation changes
on our business,
|
|
|
|
peer group data, and
|
|
|
|
the performance of the other executives, including information
on how he evaluates the other executives individual and
business unit performances.
|
Mr. Gold attends compensation committee meetings, but he
does not attend the portion of compensation committee meetings
intended to be held without members of management present, or
any deliberations relating to his own compensation.
Mr. Griffin, our President, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, when directed accordingly, also
provides information on the companys and its peers
performance and evaluates the financial implications of
compensation committee actions under consideration and provides
related information.
Competitive Market Data and Compensation
Consultant. The compensation committee has
retained FPL Associates to provide executive compensation
advisory services. Neither the compensation committee nor the
company has any other professional relationship with FPL
Associates, except that Ferguson Partners Ltd., an affiliate of
FPL Associates, was also retained in connection with our
identification and review of potential board candidates in 2007.
In connection with the compensation committees year-end
2008 compensation review and determinations, FPL Associates
provided data regarding market practices and provided advice
regarding executive annual base salaries, bonuses and long-term
incentive compensation, consistent with our compensation
philosophies and objectives.
In determining compensation for our executive officers, the
compensation committee utilizes data and surveys provided by FPL
Associates of the companies in our peer groups and examines each
peer companys performance and the compensation elements
and levels provided to their executive officers. The
compensation committee then carefully evaluates our corporate
performance and generally determines whether the compensation
elements and levels that we provide to our executive officers
are appropriate relative to the compensation elements and levels
22
provided to their counterparts at our peer companies, in light
of each executive officers individual and business unit
performance and contributions.
The compensation committee, with input from the compensation
consultant and management, annually reviews the composition of
the peer groups and the criteria and data used in compiling the
peer group lists, and makes appropriate modifications to account
for certain factors such as peer company size, market
capitalization, asset focus and growth statistics. The
compensation committee does not consider the methodology that
each peer company employs in making compensation decisions as a
factor in selecting the companies for inclusion in the
peer group.
For 2008, the compensation committee utilized two peer groups of
real estate companies, including the office peer
group and the size-based peer group. The
office peer group consisted of nine public real estate
investment trusts, or REITs, focused primarily on the
development, ownership and operation of office properties,
having individual total capitalizations in the range of
$3.0 billion to $8.8 billion, with a median total
capitalization of $5.0 billion, as of June 30, 2008.
The office peer group included the following companies:
|
|
|
Alexandria Real Estate Equities,
Inc.
|
|
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
|
Brandywine Realty Trust
|
|
Kilroy Realty Corporation
|
Corporate Office Properties Trust
|
|
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
|
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
|
|
Maguire Properties, Inc.
|
Duke Realty Corporation
|
|
|
The size-based peer group included 15 public REITs which
develop, own and operate properties for varying types of uses,
having individual total capitalizations in the range of
$2.3 billion to $6.1 billion, with a median total
capitalization of $3.0 billion, as of June 30, 2008.
The size-based peer group included the following REITs:
|
|
|
Alexandria Real Estate Equities,
Inc.
|
|
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
|
Brandywine Realty Trust
|
|
Kilroy Realty Corporation
|
BRE Properties, Inc.
|
|
National Retail Properties, Inc.
|
Colonial Properties Trust
|
|
PS Business Parks, Inc.
|
Corporate Office Properties Trust
|
|
Realty Income Corporation
|
DCT Industrial Trust Inc.
|
|
Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated
|
|
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust
|
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
|
Certain peers with characteristics within the two peer groups
were not selected due to company size and merger and acquisition
activity.
Although the compensation committee obtains and reviews
compensation data from the companys peers, it does not
believe that it is appropriate to establish compensation levels
based solely on benchmarking. Instead, the compensation
committee relies upon its judgment in making compensation
decisions, after reviewing the specific performance criteria of
the company and carefully evaluating an executive officers
individual performance during the year and, for executive
officers other than Mr. Gold, business unit performance
during the year, each as more specifically described below.
Based on the performance of the company and our executive team,
the compensation committee sought to target total compensation
for 2008 for our executive officers at a level that was
generally at or near the 75th percentile of the total
compensation paid in 2007 (the most recent data available at
that time) to executives holding comparable positions within the
size-based peer group and at or near the 50th percentile of
the total compensation paid in 2007 to executives holding
comparable positions within the office peer group. The committee
compared the executive compensation programs as a whole and also
compared the pay of individual executives if the positions were
sufficiently similar to make the comparisons meaningful. The
compensation committee also sought to allocate total
compensation between cash and equity compensation based on a
number of factors, including the compensation mix of our peer
group companies, total compensation targets, and the guidelines
and requirements established in the executives employment
agreements at the time of BioMeds formation for base
23
salaries and bonus ranges. However, the compensation committee
does not have a stated policy regarding the mix of our executive
officers compensation between cash and equity
compensation. Instead, the compensation committee strives to
strike an appropriate balance among base salary, annual bonus
and long-term incentives, and it may adjust the allocation of
pay in order to facilitate the achievement of BioMeds
objectives or remain competitive in the market for executive
talent.
Performance Measures. The compensation
committee evaluates the executive officers based on three
performance measures:
|
|
|
|
|
individual performance,
|
|
|
|
business unit performance (except for Mr. Gold), and
|
|
|
|
corporate performance.
|
The three performance measures are accorded different weights
depending on the executive officer and whether the compensation
being evaluated is the annual bonus or long-term equity
incentive compensation. The weightings are described in further
detail under Elements of the Executive
Compensation Program-Annual Bonuses and
Elements of the Executive Compensation
Program Long-Term Incentives Restricted
Stock and LTIP Unit Awards.
Individual Performance. In the beginning of
each year, our Chief Executive Officer, with input from the
individual executives, sets certain goals and expectations for
each executive officer, tailored to the executives
specific role within and expected contribution to the company as
well as developmental requirements. These goals and expectations
are generally subjective in nature and relate primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
driving execution of BioMeds business plan and the success
of the company as a whole (without singularly focusing on
achieving only the specific objectives within that
officers area of responsibility),
|
|
|
|
demonstrated individual leadership skills,
|
|
|
|
continuous self-development,
|
|
|
|
teamwork,
|
|
|
|
fostering effective communication and coordination across
company departments,
|
|
|
|
developing and motivating employees to achieve high performance,
|
|
|
|
cultivating employees engagement and alignment with our
companys core values, and
|
|
|
|
adaptability and flexibility to changing circumstances.
|
While the compensation committee focuses on evaluating
individual performance in the context of an overall effective
manager, performance relative to the individual goals listed
above generally requires a subjective evaluation, and the
compensation committee may emphasize certain goals over others
in its discretionary decision-making that do not lend themselves
to a formulaic approach.
Business Unit Performance. In the beginning of
each year, our Chief Executive Officer, as a result of an
extensive process involving analyses and discussions with
management, sets certain goals and expectations for individual
business units, which include, for example:
|
|
|
|
|
operating business units within the established budgets,
|
|
|
|
controlling general and administrative costs,
|
|
|
|
executing on acquisition and development programs according to
plans,
|
|
|
|
achieving financing milestones and the optimal mix of borrowing
designed to protect our long-term financial stability,
|
|
|
|
strengthening operational, budgeting and management
processes, and
|
|
|
|
developing and managing the successful execution of appropriate
leasing strategies.
|
24
Although more objectively quantifiable than individual
performance evaluations, business unit performance goals are
still both quantitative and qualitative in nature, and the
compensation committee exercises discretion in making business
unit performance determinations by emphasizing certain goals
over others and taking into account general business environment
considerations with respect to each goal, including changes in
the business environment that have occurred between when the
goals were originally set and when the evaluation is conducted.
Corporate Performance.
Corporate Performance as a Component of Annual Bonus
Determination. As a component in determining the
executive officers annual bonuses, our companys
corporate performance is evaluated based on two criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
the achievement of per share funds from operations, or FFO,
within the annual guidance range generally provided on the third
quarter earnings press release of the preceding year, as
adjusted for any stock splits, stock offerings or similar
transactions, and
|
|
|
|
the achievement of two to three percent
year-over-year
growth in cash basis same property net operating income, or NOI.
|
Our methodology for calculating FFO is described in detail in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 in Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Funds from
Operations. We compute NOI by adding or subtracting
certain items from net income, including minority interest in
the operating partnership, gains or losses from investment in
unconsolidated partnerships, interest expense, interest income,
depreciation and amortization, and general and administrative
expenses. We use NOI as a performance measure because it
reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred
at the property level.
In evaluating the achievement of these corporate performance
goals, the compensation committee may exercise its discretion
whether or not to make certain adjustments based on
non-recurring events during the year.
Corporate Performance as a Component of Long-Term Equity
Incentive Determination. As a component in
determining the executive officers long-term equity
incentive awards, our companys corporate performance is
evaluated based on stockholder performance, which can be divided
into two categories:
|
|
|
|
|
the companys absolute total stockholder return for the
year, which is calculated based on a combination of total
dividend return and the change in common share price during the
year, as adjusted for any stock splits, stock offerings or
similar transactions, with an annual target absolute total
stockholder return of nine percent, and
|
|
|
|
the companys total stockholder return as compared to the
MSCI US REIT Index, or RMZ.
|
We use total stockholder return as a long-term incentive award
criteria because we believe it further aligns the interests of
the executive to stockholder interests. In evaluating the
achievement of these corporate performance goals, the
compensation committee may exercise its discretion whether or
not to make certain adjustments based on general equity market
conditions.
Elements
of the Executive Compensation Program
The compensation committee carefully reviews the corporate
performance of the company and individual and business unit
performances of the executive officers to determine the
appropriate level of total compensation for the executive
officers, while also taking into consideration how each
executive officers total compensation compares to other
similarly situated executives in the peer companies as described
above. In addition, the compensation committee seeks to
optimally allocate total compensation among its various
components, which include base salary, bonus and long-term
equity incentive compensation, based on the criteria as
described below.
Base
Salary
The initial base salary for each executive officer is provided
in the employment agreement between BioMed and such officer, as
described below under Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control, subject to annual
increases based on increases in the consumer price index and
further increases in the discretion of
25
the board of directors or compensation committee. In determining
base salary increases, the compensation committee considered
each executive officers individual performance and
business unit performance, as well as the companys overall
performance, market conditions and competitive salary
information.
In connection with the annual review of their performance, in
January 2008, the compensation committee approved increases to
the annual base salaries of our executive officers, effective
January 1, 2008, with Mr. Golds annual base
salary increased 5% to $472,500, each of
Messrs. Wilsons, Griffins and McDevitts
annual base salary increased 5% to $313,500, and
Mr. Kreitzers annual base salary increased 5% to
$157,500.
In connection with the annual compensation review in January
2009, the compensation committee decided not to increase the
annual base salaries of our executive officers.
Messrs. Gold, Griffin and McDevitt also each waived their
rights under their employment agreements to receive a consumer
price index adjustment in their annual base salary for 2009. In
addition, pursuant to an amendment to his employment agreement,
Mr. Kreitzers annual base salary was set at $100,000
for 2009.
Annual
Bonuses
Our annual executive bonus program is intended to reward our
executive officers for individual achievement in supporting the
fulfillment of corporate objectives for the year, including
financial and operating performance goals. Each Named Executive
Officers annual bonus (other than Mr. Kreitzer) is
also based in part on their employment agreements, which provide
for annual bonus ranges as a percentage of base salary of 50% to
200% for Mr. Gold and 50% to 150% for each of
Messrs. Griffin and McDevitt.
In determining the executive officers respective annual
bonuses, the compensation committee primarily considers the
corporate performance of the company, while also taking into
consideration the respective individual performances of each of
the executive officers and the respective business unit
performances for each of Messrs. Griffin and McDevitt. The
companys corporate performance is assessed through the
evaluation of the companys FFO per diluted share and same
property cash NOI results, with FFO per diluted share weighted
approximately twice as much as same property cash NOI.
The following is a brief analysis of the compensation
committees deliberations regarding individual and business
unit performance on an executive by executive basis:
Mr. Gold. Mr. Gold, as our Chief
Executive Officer, is responsible for the overall management and
stewardship of the company, including focusing on broader,
longer-term corporate strategies. In its evaluation of
Mr. Golds individual performance, the compensation
committee noted the following accomplishments:
|
|
|
|
|
successfully guiding the company through a difficult economic
environment to achieve strong overall operating results in 2008,
|
|
|
|
providing key leadership in the continual development of our
strategy to ensure that stockholder value is maximized over the
long-term, particularly with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
raising capital and maintaining our strong long-term financial
stability,
|
|
|
|
developing an aggressive leasing strategy to maximize the value
of our properties,
|
|
|
|
driving the cost effective construction of our development and
redevelopment properties, and
|
|
|
|
providing cost effective operational services to our tenants to
meet their changing needs,
|
|
|
|
|
|
providing highly valuable guidance to the other executives and
employees and effectively fostering an environment of dedicated
professionalism and hard work, and
|
|
|
|
maintaining the right tone at the top and creating a
culture of strong corporate governance, transparency and ethics.
|
Mr. Griffin. Mr. Griffin, as our
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
is responsible for the
day-to-day
execution of our corporate strategy. Mr. Griffin served as
our Chief Financial Officer throughout 2008, having been
promoted to serve the additional role of President and Chief
Operating Officer in December
26
2008. As a result, Mr. Griffins role and
responsibilities within the company have expanded. In its
evaluation of Mr. Griffins individual performance and
business unit performance, the compensation committee noted the
following accomplishments:
|
|
|
|
|
working with the Chief Executive Officer and our board of
directors to effectively manage capital requirements, including
anticipated near-term debt maturities,
|
|
|
|
playing a key role in two successful public offerings of our
common stock in April 2008 and October 2008, raising over
$360 million in net proceeds,
|
|
|
|
increasing engagement with the board of directors beyond
financial matters,
|
|
|
|
increasing exposure within our investor and analyst communities,
|
|
|
|
increasing management of the companys
day-to-day
to operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
raising capital and maintaining our strong long-term financial
stability,
|
|
|
|
the management of property operations within budget,
|
|
|
|
the effective control of general and administrative
expenses, and
|
improving efficiency and accuracy in the budgetary
processes, and
|
|
|
|
|
fostering increased coordination and communication across our
functional departments.
|
Mr. McDevitt. Mr. McDevitt, as our
Executive Vice President, Acquisitions and Leasing, is tasked
with implementing and managing the execution of leasing and
acquisition strategies on a company-wide basis. In its
evaluation of Mr. McDevitts individual performance,
the compensation committee noted the following accomplishments:
|
|
|
|
|
managing the regional leasing teams in the execution of
approximately 848,000 square feet of new leases, lease
extensions and renewals in 2008, in the context of challenging
market conditions,
|
|
|
|
providing key mentorship, guidance and support of leasing and
acquisitions team members as they assume greater
responsibilities and leadership for executing the companys
strategy, and
|
|
|
|
continuing to establish strong relationships with major life
science companies with significant space requirements, including
through lease renewals and expansions with existing tenants, the
execution of leases with new tenants and the development of ties
with prospective tenants.
|
Mr. Kreitzer. Mr. Kreitzer, our
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, served in such
capacity at 50% of a full-time work schedule in 2008.
Mr. Kreitzer oversaw the legal department in 2008,
including the supervision of the Vice President, Legal and Vice
President, Real Estate Counsel. Mr. Kreitzer also continues
to serve as a member of the board of directors of the company,
and provides his guidance and leadership with respect to the
companys long-term strategy.
In terms of corporate performance criteria, we achieved an FFO
per diluted share of $1.82 for 2008. As adjusted for the
companys stock issuances in April 2008 and October 2008,
the exchangeable notes repurchases in the fourth quarter of
2008, an ineffectiveness charge on certain forward-starting
swaps and the retirement of an executive officer in the fourth
quarter of 2008, we achieved an estimated FFO per diluted share
of $1.93 for 2008, which was two cents above the mid-point of
the guidance range of $1.91 disclosed in our third quarter 2007
earnings press release in November 2007. In addition, we
achieved same property cash NOI
year-over-year
growth of 3.7% in the fourth quarter of 2008, which was 1.2%
above the 2.5% targeted mid-point of the compensation
committees two to three percent range.
The specific amounts of the bonuses awarded to our Named
Executive Officers for the 2008 fiscal year are reflected in the
Summary Compensation Table. The bonuses for Messrs. Gold
and McDevitt were below the midpoint of the annual bonus ranges
in their respective employment agreements, and
Mr. Griffins bonus was slightly above the midpoint of
the annual bonus range in his employment agreement. These
bonuses for the 2008
27
fiscal year also were approximately 53%, 42% and 59% lower than
the annual bonuses received for the 2007 fiscal year for
Messrs. Gold, Griffin and McDevitt, respectively.
Long-Term
Incentives Restricted Stock and LTIP Unit
Awards
Long-term incentive awards are designed to increase senior
managements stock ownership in BioMed, to directly align
employee compensation with the interests of our stockholders and
to encourage actions that maximize long-term stockholder value.
Our long-term incentive awards generally vest over three to five
years, thereby providing an incentive for the grantee to remain
with BioMed, and dividends are paid on the entirety of the grant
from the date of the grant.
The compensation committee has historically provided a set
dollar amount of long-term equity incentive awards that may be
granted to executives and other employees, which was established
annually by the committee based on a variety of factors,
including the number of executives and key employees, the
previous years pool size, peer company pool allotments and
the general performance of the company. The total equity
incentive award pool available for the 2008 year-end grants
was set by the compensation committee at ten million dollars.
Executives are generally allocated 60% of the pool, while other
key employees are allocated the remaining 40% of the pool. While
the compensation committee can grant up to the amount authorized
in the equity incentive award pool, the committee takes into
consideration the individual and business unit performance
measures, business environment, competitive salary environment
and company performance and impact to determine grants, which
may result in the compensation committee granting less than the
authorized amount.
The compensation committee has determined that for future years
it will base the size of the equity incentive award pool on the
committees review of the companys financial
performance, with an emphasis on the companys performance
in generating cash flow available to pay dividends to its
stockholders, in addition to the companys absolute total
stockholder performance and relative total stockholder
performance, as described in Determination of
Compensation Awards Performance Measures
Corporate Performance Corporate Performance as a
Component of Long-Term Equity Incentive Determination. The
compensation committee believes that determining the growth of
the equity incentive award plan based on stockholder performance
is appropriate, because, as stated before, it further aligns the
interests of our executives and employees with the long-term
total return goals of our stockholders. The committee believes
that the level of cash flow available to pay dividends to its
stockholders is also an appropriate component of the pool
calculation, as such cash flow represents a broader
consideration of financial position and performance than other
discrete financial metrics, and dividends represent real return
of value to stockholders, are extensively reviewed and approved
by the full board of directors and generally normalize for
one-time events.
In determining the executive officers respective long-term
incentive awards, the compensation committee primarily considers
the corporate performance of the company, while also taking into
consideration the respective individual performances of each of
the executive officers and the respective business unit
performances for each of Messrs. Griffin and McDevitt. The
companys corporate performance is measured by the absolute
total stockholder return and relative stockholder return of the
company, with each given equal weighting. In addition, the
compensation committee may adjust the amounts of long-term
incentive awards to avoid significant
year-over-year
fluctuations, to achieve targeted total compensation in light of
salary levels and cash bonus awards, and to take into
consideration peer company practices and the awards goals
of long term performance and retention of highly talented
executives.
BioMeds absolute total stockholder return for 2008 was
(45.5%), and the RMZs total stockholder return for 2008
was (38.0%). BioMeds relative total stockholder return
underperformed the RMZs total stockholder return by 7.5%.
For the 2008 fiscal year, in January 2009, Mr. Gold was
granted 175,000 shares of restricted stock,
Mr. Griffin was granted 90,000 shares of restricted
stock, Mr. McDevitt was granted 60,000 shares of
restricted stock, and Mr. Kreitzer was granted
3,000 shares of restricted stock. In total, the Named
Executive Officers received $3.6 million of the
$6.0 million available under the executive pool for 2008.
These awards were based upon the compensation committees
consideration of the foregoing factors, as well as the
committees assessment of the economic environment, the
companys share price, the number and dollar value of prior
equity awards granted to the
28
executives, and the total compensation to the executives in
absolute terms and with reference to the total compensation paid
to similarly situated executives at the companys peers.
The awards vest at a rate of 25% per year for Messrs. Gold,
Griffin and McDevitt and vest approximately one year after the
date of grant for Mr. Kreitzer. The equity incentive awards
granted to our Named Executive Officers in 2008 are reflected in
the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.
Equity
Grant Practices
The annual awards of unvested restricted stock and LTIP units
are typically granted to our executive officers at the
compensation committees regularly scheduled meeting in the
first quarter of each year. Such equity awards are effective
upon grant. Board and committee meetings are generally scheduled
at least a year in advance. Scheduling decisions are made
without regard to anticipated earnings or other major
announcements by the company. We have not awarded any stock
options.
Other
Benefits
We provide benefits such as a 401(k) plan, medical, dental and
life insurance and disability coverage for all of our employees,
including our executive officers. We also provide personal paid
time off and other paid holidays to all employees, including the
executive officers, which are similar to those provided at
comparable companies. In addition, under the terms of the
executive officers employment agreements described below,
we provide reimbursement for the premiums for long-term
disability and life insurance policies and car allowances. We
believe that our employee benefit plans are an appropriate
element of compensation, are competitive within our peer group
companies and are necessary to attract and retain employees.
Employment
Agreements
In order to specify our expectations with regard to our
executive officers duties and responsibilities and to
provide greater certainty with regard to the amounts payable to
our executive officers in connection with certain terminations
or change in control events, our board of directors has approved
and we have entered into employment agreements with each of our
executive officers, which are described in more detail under
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change
in Control below.
Tax
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The compensation committee considers the anticipated tax
treatment to the company and the executive officers in its
review and establishment of compensation programs and payments.
The deductibility of some types of compensation payments can
depend upon the timing of the executives vesting or
exercise of previously granted rights. Interpretations of and
changes in applicable tax laws and regulations as well as other
factors beyond the committees control also can affect
deductibility of compensation. The committees general
policy is to maintain flexibility in compensating executive
officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate
goals. Accordingly, the compensation committee has not adopted a
policy that all compensation must be deductible.
Compensation
Committee Report
The compensation committee of the companys board of
directors has submitted the following report for inclusion in
this proxy statement:
The compensation committee of the board of directors of BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, has reviewed and
discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in
the proxy statement for the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders
with management. Based on the committees review of and the
discussions with management with respect to the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, the committee recommended to the board
of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be
included in the proxy statement for the 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders and in the companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
29
This report of the compensation committee shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating
by reference the proxy statement for the 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this
information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed
filed under such acts.
The foregoing report has been furnished by the compensation
committee.
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D., Chair
Barbara R. Cambon
Richard I. Gilchrist
Date of report: March 9, 2009
Summary
Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned
by each of our Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
Total
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
472,500
|
|
|
$
|
567,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,012,091
|
|
|
$
|
185,863
|
|
|
$
|
2,237,454
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
1,203,527
|
|
|
|
1,040,875
|
|
|
|
156,077
|
|
|
|
2,850,479
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
|
765,748
|
|
|
|
1,201,145
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
2,482,893
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
351,120
|
|
|
|
644,265
|
|
|
|
158,291
|
|
|
|
1,467,176
|
|
President, Chief Operating Officer and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
298,500
|
|
|
|
606,466
|
|
|
|
766,732
|
|
|
|
125,058
|
|
|
|
1,796,756
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
222,115
|
|
|
|
430,807
|
|
|
|
282,180
|
|
|
|
78,094
|
|
|
|
1,013,196
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513,501
|
|
|
|
88,491
|
|
|
|
759,492
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
303,555
|
|
|
|
576,499
|
|
|
|
96,726
|
|
|
|
1,126,780
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
246,548
|
|
|
|
297,200
|
|
|
|
571,487
|
|
|
|
44,194
|
|
|
|
1,159,429
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
250,800
|
|
|
|
796,960
|
|
|
|
164,831
|
|
|
|
1,526,091
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
298,500
|
|
|
|
609,798
|
|
|
|
761,770
|
|
|
|
144,989
|
|
|
|
1,815,057
|
|
Acquisitions and Leasing
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
288,750
|
|
|
|
409,978
|
|
|
|
354,812
|
|
|
|
69,129
|
|
|
|
1,122,669
|
|
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,370,048
|
|
|
|
141,952
|
|
|
|
1,512,000
|
|
Former Executive Vice President(4)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
298,500
|
|
|
|
612,077
|
|
|
|
632,162
|
|
|
|
113,160
|
|
|
|
1,655,899
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
288,750
|
|
|
|
397,200
|
|
|
|
538,157
|
|
|
|
48,140
|
|
|
|
1,272,247
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The bonuses to our Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007 were payable in a combination of
vested LTIP units, shares of our common stock and cash, as set
forth below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
LTIP Units(a)
|
|
Common Stock(a)
|
|
Cash
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
$
|
229,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
974,252
|
|
|
$
|
1,203,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
|
78,773
|
|
|
$
|
78,750
|
|
|
|
448,943
|
|
|
|
606,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
43,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,800
|
|
|
|
303,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
140,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469,772
|
|
|
|
609,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
|
129,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,550
|
|
|
|
612,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Based on the closing market price of our common stock of $22.29
on January 30, 2008, the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Amounts shown for stock awards reflect the dollar value
recognized for financial statement purposes for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with
SFAS 123(R), including amounts related to restricted stock
granted in prior years that were unvested at January 1,
2008, as further described in Notes 2 and 9 to our
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The costs for awards
disregard adjustments for forfeiture assumptions, and the costs
for awards made prior to 2006 are |
30
|
|
|
|
|
determined in accordance with the modified prospective
transition method under SFAS 123(R). Additional information
regarding grants awarded in 2008 is presented in the Grants of
Plan-Based Awards table below. |
|
(3) |
|
All other compensation for 2008 represents health, life and
disability insurance premiums, 401(k) matching contributions,
automobile allowances and dividends and distributions on
unvested restricted stock and LTIP units (and excludes dividends
and distributions on vested restricted stock and LTIP units), as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(K)
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Matching
|
|
Automobile
|
|
Stock and
|
|
Total Other
|
Name
|
|
Premiums
|
|
Contributions(a)
|
|
Allowances
|
|
LTIP Units
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
$
|
20,705
|
|
|
$
|
7,750
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
145,408
|
|
|
$
|
185,863
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
|
22,357
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
119,184
|
|
|
|
158,291
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
8,840
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
70,428
|
|
|
|
88,491
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
22,374
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
125,707
|
|
|
|
164,831
|
|
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
|
21,240
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
103,962
|
|
|
|
141,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
We established and maintain a retirement savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Code to cover our eligible employees,
including our executive officers, which became effective as of
January 1, 2005. The plan allows eligible employees to
defer, within prescribed limits, up to 100% of their
compensation on a pre-tax basis through contributions to the
plan. We currently match each eligible participants
contributions, within prescribed limits, with an amount equal to
50% of such participants initial 6% tax-deferred
contributions. In addition, we reserve the right to make
additional discretionary contributions on behalf of eligible
participants.
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Wilson retired from his position as Executive Vice
President of BioMed on December 31, 2008. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
The table below provides information about restricted stock and
LTIP unit awards granted to our Named Executive Officers during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number
|
|
Value of Stock
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
of Shares of Stock or Units(1)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
|
1/30/08
|
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,281,675
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
|
1/30/08
|
|
|
|
42,763
|
|
|
|
953,187
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
1/30/08
|
|
|
|
11,879
|
|
|
|
264,783
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
1/30/08
|
|
|
|
38,012
|
|
|
|
847,287
|
|
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
|
1/30/08
|
|
|
|
35,161
|
|
|
|
783,739
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
10,286 LTIP unit awards for Mr. Gold, 3,534 LTIP unit
awards and 3,533 shares of restricted stock for
Mr. Griffin, 1,963 LTIP unit awards for Mr. Kreitzer,
6,282 LTIP unit awards for Mr. McDevitt and 5,811 LTIP unit
awards for Mr. Wilson vested on the date of grant. The
remaining equity awards granted vest at a rate of 20% per year.
We entered into an Employment Transition and Consulting
Agreement with Mr. Wilson effective as of December 31,
2008 in connection with his retirement, under which
Mr. Wilsons remaining 73,725 unvested LTIP unit
awards vested on December 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
This column has been calculated by multiplying the closing
market price of our common stock on the grant date for the
respective forfeitable LTIP unit awards and restricted stock
awards by the number of units or shares awarded, in accordance
with SFAS 123R. The closing market price on
January 30, 2008 was $22.29. |
Employment
Agreements
Except as provided below, all of the employment agreements with
our executive officers contain substantially similar terms. We
believe that the employment agreements offer competitive terms
and are appropriate to attract and retain individuals at the
executive officer level.
31
We entered into employment agreements, effective as of
August 6, 2004, with Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, McDevitt
and Wilson and an employment agreement, effective as of
March 27, 2006, with Mr. Griffin. On December 14,
2007, we entered into amended and restated employment agreements
with Messrs. Gold, Griffin, Kreitzer, McDevitt and Wilson,
all of which were further amended on December 15, 2008. The
primary purpose of the amendments to the amended and restated
employment agreements is to reflect the promotion of
Mr. Griffin to President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer and the relinquishment of the title of
President by Mr. Gold that occurred on December 15,
2008, and to ensure that certain payments to be made pursuant to
the employment agreements will be exempt from or comply with the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code. In addition, the
amendment to Mr. Kreitzers amended and restated
employment agreement provided that Mr. Kreitzer would
receive an annual base salary of $100,000 commencing on
January 1, 2009. In connection with his retirement, we
entered into an Employment Transition and Consulting Agreement
with Mr. Wilson, under which his employment agreement was
terminated effective as of December 31, 2008.
The employment agreements provide for Mr. Gold to serve as
our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Griffin to
serve as our President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, Mr. Kreitzer to serve as our Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, and Mr. McDevitt to
serve as our Executive Vice President, Acquisitions and Leasing.
These employment agreements require Messrs. Gold, Griffin,
Kreitzer and McDevitt, as applicable, to devote such attention
and time to our affairs as is necessary for the performance of
their duties (provided that, in the case of Mr. Kreitzer,
he is not required to devote more than 50% of a full-time work
schedule), but also permit them to devote time to their outside
business interests consistent with past practice. Under the
employment agreements with Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer, we
will use our best efforts to cause Mr. Gold to be nominated
and elected as Chairman of our board of directors and
Mr. Kreitzer to be nominated and elected as a member of our
board of directors.
Each of the employment agreements with Messrs. Gold,
Griffin, Kreitzer and McDevitt has a term of one year and
provides for automatic one-year extensions thereafter, unless
either party provides at least six months notice of
non-renewal.
The employment agreements provide for:
|
|
|
|
|
initial annual base salaries, subject to annual increases based
on increases in the consumer price index and further increases
in the discretion of our board of directors or the compensation
committee of our board of directors,
|
|
|
|
eligibility for annual cash performance bonuses, based on the
satisfaction of performance goals established by our board of
directors or the compensation committee of our board of
directors,
|
|
|
|
participation in other incentive, savings and retirement plans
applicable generally to our senior executives,
|
|
|
|
medical and other group welfare plan coverage and fringe
benefits provided to our senior executives,
|
|
|
|
payment of the premiums for a long-term disability insurance
policy which will provide benefits equal to at least 60% of an
executives annual base salary,
|
|
|
|
payment of the premiums for a $1 million term life
insurance policy, and
|
|
|
|
monthly payments of $750 ($1,000 in the case of Mr. Gold
and $375 in the case of Mr. Kreitzer) for an automobile
allowance.
|
Each executive, other than Mr. Kreitzer, has a minimum
annual cash bonus equal to 50% of base salary.
Mr. Golds annual cash bonus may be up to 200% of his
base salary. Messrs. Griffin and McDevitt may have annual
cash bonuses up to 150% of their base salary.
The employment agreements provide that, if an executives
employment is terminated by us without cause or by
the executive for good reason (each as defined in
the applicable employment agreement), the executive will be
32
entitled to the following severance payments and benefits,
subject to his execution and non-revocation of a general release
of claims:
|
|
|
|
|
an amount, which we refer to as the severance amount, equal to
the sum of the then-current annual base salary plus average
bonus over the prior three years, multiplied by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to Messrs. Gold, Griffin and Kreitzer,
three, or
|
|
|
|
with respect to Mr. McDevitt, one,
|
50% of which amount shall be paid in a lump sum within ten
days of the date that the executives general release of
claims becomes non-revocable, and the remaining 50% of which
amount will be paid in a lump sum on March 1 of the year
following the calendar year when the termination occurs,
|
|
|
|
|
an amount equal to the premiums for long-term disability
insurance and life insurance for 12 months, which shall be
paid in a lump sum within ten days of the date that the
executives general release of claims becomes non-revocable,
|
|
|
|
health benefits for 18 months following the
executives termination of employment at the same level as
in effect immediately preceding such termination, subject to
reduction to the extent that the executive receives comparable
benefits from a subsequent employer,
|
|
|
|
up to $15,000 worth of outplacement services at our
expense, and
|
|
|
|
100% of the unvested stock options held by the executive will
become fully exercisable and 100% of the unvested restricted
stock held by such executive will become fully vested.
|
Under the employment agreements, we agree to make an additional
tax gross-up
payment to the executive if any amounts paid or payable to the
executive would be subject to the excise tax imposed on certain
so-called excess parachute payments under
Section 4999 of the Code. However, if a reduction in the
payments and benefits of 10% or less would render the excise tax
inapplicable, then the payments and benefits will be reduced by
such amount, and we will not be required to make the
gross-up
payment.
Each employment agreement provides that, if the executives
employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive
for good reason within one year after a change in
control (as defined in the applicable employment
agreement), then the executive will receive the above benefits
and payments as though the executives employment was
terminated without cause or for good reason. However, the
severance amount shall be paid in a lump sum.
Each employment agreement also provides that the executive or
his estate will be entitled to certain severance benefits in the
event of his death or disability. Specifically, each executive
or, in the event of the executives death, his
beneficiaries, will receive:
|
|
|
|
|
an amount equal to the then-current annual base salary,
|
|
|
|
health benefits for the executive
and/or his
eligible family members for 12 months following the
executives termination of employment, and
|
|
|
|
in the event the executives employment is terminated as a
result of his disability, we will pay, in a single lump sum
payment, an amount equal to 12 months of premiums on the
long-term disability and life insurance policies described above.
|
The employment agreements also contain standard confidentiality
provisions, which apply indefinitely, and non-solicitation
provisions, which apply during the term of the employment
agreements and for any period thereafter during which the
executive is receiving payments from us.
2004
Incentive Award Plan
We have adopted the 2004 Incentive Award Plan of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P., which is described above
under Proposal 3.
33
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The table below provides information about outstanding equity
awards for each of our Named Executive Officers as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Market Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
Stock or Units That
|
|
|
of Stock or Units That
|
|
Name
|
|
Have Not Vested(1)
|
|
|
Have Not Vested(2)
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
|
101,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,190,623
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
|
84,446
|
|
|
|
989,707
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
48,666
|
|
|
|
570,366
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
89,230
|
|
|
|
1,045,776
|
|
John F. Wilson, II(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The equity awards granted vest over three to five years. |
|
(2) |
|
Market value has been calculated as the closing market price of
our common stock at December 31, 2008 of $11.72, multiplied
by the outstanding unvested restricted stock or LTIP unit awards
for each Named Executive Officer. |
|
(3) |
|
We entered into an Employment Transition and Consulting
Agreement with Mr. Wilson effective as of December 31,
2008 in connection with his retirement, under which
Mr. Wilsons remaining 73,725 unvested LTIP unit
awards vested on December 31, 2008. |
Stock
Vested
The table below provides information about restricted stock and
LTIP unit vesting for each of our Named Executive Officers
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, except that
it does not include restricted stock and LTIP units that vested
on January 1, 2008 and instead includes restricted stock
and LTIP units that vested on January 1, 2009. Restricted
stock and LTIP units that vested on January 1, 2008 are
reported in our 2008 proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock and Unit Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Acquired on
|
|
|
Value Realized on
|
|
Name
|
|
Vesting(1)
|
|
|
Vesting(2)
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
|
37,567
|
|
|
$
|
440,285
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
|
23,388
|
|
|
|
274,107
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
18,233
|
|
|
|
213,691
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
28,846
|
|
|
|
338,075
|
|
John F. Wilson, II(3)
|
|
|
73,725
|
|
|
|
864,057
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This column represents the aggregate of equity grants from
August 6, 2004 through December 31, 2008 to the Named
Executive Officers that vested on January 1, 2009.
Restricted stock and LTIP units that vested on January 1,
2008 are reporting in our 2008 proxy statement. |
|
(2) |
|
This column represents the value as calculated by multiplying
the closing market price of our common stock at
December 31, 2008 of $11.72, by the number of shares that
vested. |
|
(3) |
|
We entered into an Employment Transition and Consulting
Agreement with Mr. Wilson effective as of December 31,
2008 in connection with his retirement, under which
Mr. Wilsons remaining 73,725 unvested LTIP unit
awards vested on December 31, 2008. |
34
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The table below reflects the amount of compensation that each of
our Named Executive Officers would be entitled to receive under
his existing employment agreement with the company upon
termination of such executives employment in certain
circumstances. The amounts shown assume that such termination
was effective as of December 31, 2008, and are only
estimates of the amounts that would be paid out to such
executives upon termination of their employment. The actual
amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of
such executives separation from the company. In the event
of a termination by the company for cause or by the executive
without good reason, including in connection with a change in
control, such executive would not be entitled to any of the
amounts reflected in the table. In connection with his
retirement, we entered into an Employment Transition and
Consulting Agreement with Mr. Wilson, under which his
employment agreement was terminated effective as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
w/o Cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w/o Cause or
|
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
Reason (in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason (apart
|
|
|
connection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Change-
|
|
|
with Change-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Benefit
|
|
in-Control)(1)
|
|
|
in-Control)(1)
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability(2)
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
Severance Payment
|
|
$
|
3,953,775
|
|
|
$
|
3,953,775
|
|
|
$
|
472,500
|
|
|
$
|
472,500
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Award Vesting(3)
|
|
|
1,190,623
|
|
|
|
1,190,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Benefits(4)
|
|
|
24,258
|
|
|
|
24,258
|
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Disability Benefits(5)
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance Benefits(5)
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise Tax
Gross-up(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value:
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,190,536
|
|
|
$
|
5,190,536
|
|
|
$
|
488,672
|
|
|
$
|
495,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Kent Griffin, Jr.
|
|
Severance Payment
|
|
$
|
2,328,893
|
|
|
$
|
2,328,893
|
|
|
$
|
313,500
|
|
|
$
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Award Vesting(3)
|
|
|
989,707
|
|
|
|
989,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Benefits(4)
|
|
|
23,852
|
|
|
|
23,852
|
|
|
|
15,901
|
|
|
|
15,901
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Disability Benefits(5)
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance Benefits(5)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise Tax
Gross-up(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value:
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,365,877
|
|
|
$
|
4,465,310
|
|
|
$
|
329,401
|
|
|
$
|
337,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
Severance Payment
|
|
$
|
1,073,255
|
|
|
$
|
1,073,255
|
|
|
$
|
157,500
|
|
|
$
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Award Vesting(3)
|
|
|
570,366
|
|
|
|
570,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Benefits(4)
|
|
|
11,903
|
|
|
|
11,903
|
|
|
|
7,935
|
|
|
|
7,935
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Disability Benefits(5)
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance Benefits(5)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise Tax
Gross-up(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value:
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,671,318
|
|
|
$
|
1,671,318
|
|
|
$
|
165,435
|
|
|
$
|
166,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
Severance Payment
|
|
$
|
737,025
|
|
|
$
|
737,025
|
|
|
$
|
313,500
|
|
|
$
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Award Vesting(3)
|
|
|
1,045,776
|
|
|
|
1,045,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Benefits(4)
|
|
|
22,785
|
|
|
|
22,785
|
|
|
|
15,190
|
|
|
|
15,190
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Disability Benefits(5)
|
|
|
7,864
|
|
|
|
7,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,864
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance Benefits(5)
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise Tax
Gross-up(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value:
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,829,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,829,215
|
|
|
$
|
328,690
|
|
|
$
|
337,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the event the executives employment is terminated
without cause or for good reason, other than within one year
after a change in control, 50% of the severance payment will be
paid in a lump sum within ten days of the date that the
executives general release of claims becomes non-revocable
and the remaining 50% will be paid in a lump sum on March 1 of
the year following the calendar year during which the
termination occurs. If the executives employment is
terminated without cause or for good reason within one year
after a change in control, the severance payment is paid in a
single lump sum. The severance payment is an amount equal to the
sum of the then-current annual base salary plus average bonus
over the prior three years (or such lesser number of years as
the executive has been employed by us), multiplied by
(a) with respect to Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and
Griffin, three, or (b) with respect to Mr. McDevitt,
one. The calculations in the table are based on the annual base
salary on December 31, 2008 and an averaging of the bonuses
paid in 2007, 2008 and 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
This column assumes permanent disability (as defined in the
existing employment agreements) for each executive at
December 31, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
For purposes of this calculation, each executives total
unvested equity awards, including restricted stock and LTIP
units, on December 31, 2008 are multiplied by the closing
market price of our common stock at December 31, 2008 of
$11.72. |
|
(4) |
|
If the executives employment is terminated without cause
or for good reason, this figure represents the amount needed to
pay for health benefits for the executive and his eligible
family members for 18 months following the executives
termination of employment at the same level as in effect
immediately preceding such termination. If the executives
employment is terminated by reason of the executives death
or disability, this figure represents the amount needed to pay
for health benefits for the executive and his eligible family
members for 12 months following the executives
termination of employment at the same level as in effect
immediately preceding such termination. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the amount needed to pay, in a single lump sum, for
premiums for long-term disability and life insurance for
12 months at the levels in effect for each executive
officer as of December 31, 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the employment agreement of each executive, we agree to
make an additional tax
gross-up
payment to the executive if any amounts paid or payable to the
executive would be subject to the excise tax imposed on certain
so-called excess parachute payments under
Section 4999 of the Code. However, if a reduction in the
payments and benefits of 10% or less would render the excise tax
inapplicable, then the payments and benefits will be reduced by
such amount and we will not be required to make the
gross-up
payment. |
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain equity compensation plan
information for BioMed as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
|
Securities to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Be Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
under Equity
|
|
|
|
upon Exercise
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
(excluding securities
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
reflected in
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
column (a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795,879
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Audit
Committee Report
The audit committee of the board of directors of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, oversees BioMeds
financial accounting and reporting processes and the audits of
the financial statements of BioMed. All committee members
satisfy the definition of independent director set forth in the
listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The board of
directors adopted a written charter for the audit committee on
August 6, 2004, a copy of which is available on
BioMeds website at www.biomedrealty.com.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the committee
reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial
statements in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including a discussion of the quality, and not just the
acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness
of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the
financial statements.
BioMeds independent registered public accounting firm,
KPMG LLP, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the
conformity of its audited financial statements with generally
accepted accounting principles. KPMG LLP met with the committee
and expressed its judgment as to the quality, not just the
acceptability, of BioMeds accounting principles and
discussed with the committee other matters as required under
generally accepted auditing standards, including those matters
required under Statement on Accounting Standards No. 114
(The Auditors Communication with Those Charged with
Governance) or the Codification of Statements on Auditing
Standards, AU Section 380. In addition, KPMG LLP discussed
the auditors independence from BioMed and from
BioMeds management and delivered to the audit committee
the written disclosures and the letter satisfying the applicable
requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
regarding the auditors communications with the audit
committee concerning independence.
The committee discussed with BioMeds independent
registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plan of
its audit. The committee meets with the independent registered
public accounting firm, with and without our management present,
to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of
our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial
reporting.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above,
the committee has recommended that the audited financial
statements be included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
This report of the audit committee shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating
by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the company
specifically incorporates this information by reference, and
shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.
The foregoing report has been furnished by the audit committee.
M. Faye Wilson, Chair
Barbara R. Cambon
Richard I. Gilchrist
Date of report: February 13, 2009
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We have adopted a written policy regarding the review, approval
and ratification of any related party transaction. Under this
policy, our audit committee will review the relevant facts and
circumstances of each related party transaction, including if
the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be
obtained in arms-length dealings with an unrelated third
party and the extent of the related partys interest in the
transaction, and either approve or disapprove the related party
transaction. Any related party transaction shall be consummated
and shall continue only if the audit committee has approved or
ratified the transaction in accordance with the guidelines set
forth in the policy. For purposes of our policy, a Related
Party Transaction is a transaction, arrangement or
relationship (or any series of
37
similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) requiring
disclosure under Item 404(a) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any
successor provision, as then in effect, except that the $120,000
threshold stated therein shall be deemed to be $60,000.
Formation
Transactions and Contribution of Properties
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. was formed as a Maryland corporation
on April 30, 2004. We also formed our operating
partnership, BioMed Realty, L.P., as a Maryland limited
partnership on April 30, 2004. In connection with our
initial public offering in August 2004, we acquired interests in
six properties through our operating partnership that were
previously owned by limited partnerships and a limited liability
company in which Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, McDevitt and
Wilson, entities affiliated with them, and private investors and
tenants who are not affiliated with them owned interests.
Contribution
Agreements
We received the interests in the properties contributed by our
executive officers and their affiliates under contribution
agreements with the individuals or entities that held those
interests. Under the contribution agreements we agreed that if
our operating partnership directly or indirectly sells,
exchanges or otherwise disposes of (whether by way of merger,
sale of assets or otherwise) in a taxable transaction any
interest in the properties contributed by our executive officers
and their affiliates before the tenth anniversary of the
completion of our initial public offering, then our operating
partnership will indemnify each contributor for all direct and
indirect adverse tax consequences. The calculation of damages
will not be based on the time value of money or the time
remaining within the indemnification period. These tax
indemnities do not apply to the disposition of a restricted
property under certain circumstances.
We have also agreed for a period of ten years following the date
of our initial public offering to use reasonable best efforts
consistent with our fiduciary duties to maintain at least
$8.0 million of debt, some of which must be property
specific, to enable the contributors of these properties to
guarantee such debt in order to defer any taxable gain they may
incur if our operating partnership repays existing debt.
Redemption
or Exchange of the Limited Partnership Units in our Operating
Partnership
As of October 1, 2005, limited partners of our operating
partnership, including Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, McDevitt and
Wilson, have the right to require our operating partnership to
redeem all or a part of their units for cash, based upon the
fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of our
common stock at the time of the redemption, or, at our election,
shares of our common stock in exchange for such units, subject
to certain ownership limits set forth in our charter. As of
March 11, 2009, the limited partners of our operating
partnership held units exchangeable for an aggregate of
2,795,364 shares of our common stock, assuming the exchange
of units into shares of our common stock on a
one-for-one
basis.
Other
Benefits to Related Parties
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson have agreed to indemnify
the lenders of the debt on the contribution properties for
certain losses incurred by the lender as a result of breaches by
the borrowers of the loan documents. In connection with our
initial public offering, we agreed to indemnify
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson against any payments they
may be required to make under such indemnification agreements.
However, our indemnification obligation will not be effective
with respect to losses relating to a breach of the environmental
representations and warranties made to our operating partnership
by Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson in their respective
contribution agreements. For losses relating to such breaches,
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson have agreed to indemnify
our operating partnership.
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with the
limited partners in our operating partnership to provide
registration rights to holders of common stock to be issued upon
redemption of their units. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, in the fourth quarter of 2005, we filed and caused to
become effective a registration statement on
Form S-3
for the registration of the common stock to be issued upon
redemption of the units, which expired in the fourth quarter of
2008. Prior to that registration statements expiration, we
filed and caused to become effective a new registration
statement on
Form S-3
for the registration of the common stock to be issued upon
redemption of the units.
38
GENERAL
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit and Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate fees
billed to us by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm, for the indicated services for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
997,200
|
|
|
$
|
987,763
|
|
Audit Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
68,000
|
|
|
|
126,350
|
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,065,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,114,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services performed
by KPMG LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements and
review of financial statements included in our
10-Q
filings, services in connection with securities offerings and
the filing of our registration statements on
Forms S-11
and S-3, and
services that are normally provided in connection with statutory
and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit Fees also include
fees for professional services rendered for the audits of
(a) managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and (b) the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit related fees consist of fees for professional services
performed by KPMG LLP for the audit of joint venture financial
statements. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services performed by
KPMG LLP with respect to tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning. Certain other tax fees not included in the table were
paid to Ernst & Young LLP, who is not our independent
registered public accounting firm. |
Audit
Committee Policy Regarding Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible
Non-Audit Services of Our Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Our audit committee has established a policy that requires that
all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our
independent registered public accounting firm will be
pre-approved by the audit committee or a designated audit
committee member. These services may include audit services,
audit-related services, tax services and other services. All
permissible non-audit services provided by our independent
registered public accounting firm have been pre-approved by the
audit committee or a designated audit committee member. Our
audit committee has considered whether the provision of
non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the
accountants independence and determined that it is
consistent with such independence.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, directors, officers and beneficial owners of 10% or
more of our common stock, or reporting persons, are required to
report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on a timely
basis the initiation of their status as a reporting person and
any changes with respect to their beneficial ownership of our
common stock. Based solely on our review of such forms received
by us and the written representations of the reporting persons,
we believe that no reporting persons known to us were delinquent
with respect to their reporting obligations as set forth in
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during 2008.
Stockholder
Proposals
Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at our annual
meeting of stockholders to be held in 2010 must be received by
us no later than December 15, 2009, in order to be included
in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that
meeting. Such proposals must comply with the requirements as to
form and substance established by the Securities and Exchange
Commission for such proposals and the requirements contained in
our bylaws in order to be included in the proxy statement. A
stockholder who wishes to make a nomination or proposal at the
2010 annual meeting without including the proposal in our proxy
statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting must, in
accordance with our current bylaws, notify us between
November 15, 2009 and December 15, 2009. If the
stockholder fails to give timely notice as required by our
bylaws, the nominee or proposal will be
39
excluded from consideration at the meeting. In addition, our
bylaws include other requirements for nomination of candidates
for director and proposals of other business.
Annual
Report
We sent a Notice of Internet Availability and provided access to
our annual report over the Internet to stockholders of record on
or about April 14, 2009. The annual report does not
constitute, and should not be considered, a part of this proxy
solicitation material.
If any person who was a beneficial owner of our common stock
on the record date for the annual meeting of stockholders
desires additional information, a copy of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
will be furnished without charge upon receipt of a written
request identifying the person so requesting a report as a
stockholder of BioMed at such date. Requests should be directed
to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., 17190 Bernardo Center Drive,
San Diego, California 92128, Attention: Secretary.
Stockholders
Sharing the Same Address
The rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
permit companies, brokers, banks or other intermediaries to
deliver a single copy of a proxy statement, annual report and
Notice of Internet Availability to households at which two or
more stockholders reside. This practice, known as
householding, is designed to reduce duplicate
mailings and save significant printing and postage costs as well
as natural resources. Stockholders sharing an address who have
been previously notified by their broker, bank or other
intermediary and have consented to householding will receive
only one copy of our proxy statement, annual report and Notice
of Internet Availability. If you would like to opt out of this
practice for future mailings and receive separate proxy
statements, annual reports and Notices of Internet Availability
for each stockholder sharing the same address, please contact
your broker, bank or other intermediary. You may also obtain a
separate proxy statement, annual report or Notice of Internet
Availability without charge by sending a written request to
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., 17190 Bernardo Center Drive,
San Diego, California 92128, Attention: Secretary, or by
telephone at
(858) 485-9840.
We will promptly send additional copies of the proxy statement,
annual report or Notice of Internet Availability upon receipt of
such request. Stockholders sharing an address that are receiving
multiple copies of the proxy statement, annual report or Notice
of Internet Availability can request delivery of a single copy
of the proxy statement, annual report or Notice of Internet
Availability by contacting their broker, bank or other
intermediary or sending a written request to BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. at the address above.
Other
Matters
Our board of directors does not know of any matter to be
presented at the annual meeting which is not listed on the
notice of annual meeting and discussed above. If other matters
should properly come before the meeting, however, the persons
named in the accompanying proxy will vote all proxies in their
discretion.
BENEFICIAL
STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO AUTHORIZE A PROXY BY INTERNET OR
TELEPHONE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ALL STOCKHOLDERS WHO RECEIVED
PROXY MATERIALS BY MAIL ARE URGED TO COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN
THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Jonathan P. Klassen
Secretary
Dated: April 14, 2009
40
APPENDIX A
2009 AMENDMENT
AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
2004 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
ARTICLE 1
PURPOSE
The purpose of the BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty,
L.P. 2004 Incentive Award Plan (the Plan) is
to promote the success and enhance the value of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
Company), and BioMed Realty, L.P., a Maryland
limited partnership (the Partnership), by
linking the personal interests of the members of the Board,
Employees, and Consultants to those of Company stockholders and
by providing such individuals with an incentive for performance
to generate returns to Company stockholders. The Plan is further
intended to provide flexibility to the Company and the
Partnership in their ability to motivate, attract, and retain
the services of members of the Board, Employees, and Consultants
upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful
conduct of the Companys and the Partnerships
operation is largely dependent.
ARTICLE 2
DEFINITIONS
AND CONSTRUCTION
Wherever the following terms are used in the Plan they shall
have the meanings specified below, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise. The singular pronoun shall include the
plural where the context so indicates.
2.1 Administrator means the Board
or a committee of the Board as described in Article 12.
2.2 Award means an Option, a
Restricted Stock award, a Stock Appreciation Right award, a
Dividend Equivalents award, a Stock Payment award, a Restricted
Stock Unit award, an Other Stock-Based Award, a Performance
Bonus Award, or a Performance-Based Award granted to a
Participant pursuant to the Plan.
2.3 Award Agreement means any
written agreement, contract, or other instrument or document
evidencing an Award.
2.4 Board means the Board of
Directors of the Company.
2.5 Change in Control means and
includes each of the following:
(a) the acquisition, directly or indirectly, by any
person or group (as those terms are
defined in Sections 3(a)(9), 13(d), and 14(d) of the
Exchange Act and the rules thereunder) of beneficial
ownership (as determined pursuant to
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act) of securities entitled to vote generally
in the election of directors (voting securities) of
the Company that represent 20% or more of the combined voting
power of the Companys then outstanding voting securities,
other than
(i) an acquisition by a trustee or other fiduciary holding
securities under any employee benefit plan (or related trust)
sponsored or maintained by the Company or any person controlled
by the Company or by any employee benefit plan (or related
trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any person
controlled by the Company, or
(ii) an acquisition of voting securities by the Company or
a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders
of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their
ownership of the stock of the Company, or
(iii) an acquisition of voting securities pursuant to a
transaction described in subsection (c) below that would
not be a Change in Control under subsection (c).
A-1
Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither of the following events
shall constitute an acquisition by any person or
group for purposes of this subsection (a): (1) a change in
the voting power of the Companys voting securities based
on the relative trading values of the Companys then
outstanding securities as determined pursuant to the
Companys Articles of Incorporation, or (2) an
acquisition of the Companys securities by the Company
which causes the Companys voting securities beneficially
owned by a person or group to represent 20% or more of the
combined voting power of the Companys then outstanding
voting securities;
(b) individuals who, as of the Effective Date, constitute
the Board (the Incumbent Board) cease for any
reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided,
however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to
the Effective Date whose appointment, election, or nomination
for election by the Companys stockholders, was approved by
a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising
the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such
individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding,
for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption
of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election
contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or
other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents
by or on behalf of a person other than the Board;
(c) the consummation by the Company (whether directly
involving the Company or indirectly involving the Company
through one or more intermediaries) of a merger, consolidation,
reorganization, or business combination, a sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of the Companys
assets, or the acquisition of assets or stock of another entity,
in each case, other than a transaction
(i) which results in the Companys voting securities
outstanding immediately before the transaction continuing to
represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted
into voting securities of the Company or the person that, as a
result of the transaction, controls, directly or indirectly, the
Company or owns, directly or indirectly, all or substantially
all of the Companys assets or otherwise succeeds to the
business of the Company (the Company or such person, the
Successor Entity)) directly or indirectly, at
least 50% of the combined voting power of the Successor
Entitys outstanding voting securities immediately after
the transaction, and
(ii) after which more than 50% of the members of the board
of directors of the Successor Entity are members of the
Incumbent Board at the time of the Boards approval of the
agreement providing for the transaction or other action of the
Board approving the transaction, and
(iii) after which no person or group beneficially owns
voting securities representing 20% or more of the combined
voting power of the Successor Entity; provided, however, that no
person or group shall be treated for purposes of this paragraph
(iii) as beneficially owning 20% or more of combined voting
power of the Successor Entity solely as a result of the voting
power held in the Company prior to the consummation of the
transaction; or
(d) the Companys stockholders approve a liquidation
or dissolution of the Company.
For purposes of subsection (a) above, the calculation of
voting power shall be made as if the date of the acquisition
were a record date for a vote of the Companys
stockholders, and for purposes of subsection (c) above, the
calculation of voting power shall be made as if the date of the
consummation of the transaction were a record date for a vote of
the Companys stockholders.
The Administrator shall have full and final authority, which
shall be exercised in its discretion, to determine conclusively
whether a Change in Control of the Company has occurred pursuant
to the above definition, and the date of the occurrence of such
Change in Control and any incidental matters relating thereto.
2.6 Code means the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
2.7 Committee means the committee
of the Board described in Article 12.
2.8 Company Consultant means any
consultant or adviser if:
(a) The consultant or adviser renders bona fide services to
the Company or any Company Subsidiary;
A-2
(b) The services rendered by the consultant or adviser are
not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a
capital-raising transaction and do not directly or indirectly
promote or maintain a market for the Companys
securities; and
(c) The consultant or adviser is a natural person who has
contracted directly with the Company or any Company Subsidiary
to render such services.
2.9 Company Employee means any
employee (as defined in accordance with Section 3401(c) of
the Code) of the Company or any entity which is then a Company
Subsidiary.
2.10 Company Subsidiary means
(i) any subsidiary corporation of the Company
as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code and any applicable
regulations promulgated thereunder, (ii) any other entity
of which a majority of the outstanding voting stock or voting
power is beneficially owned directly or indirectly by the
Company, or (iii) any partnership or limited liability
company of which 50% or more of the capital and profits interest
is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company or by one or
more Company Subsidiaries or by the Company and one or more
Company Subsidiaries; provided, however, that
Company Subsidiary shall not include the Partnership
or any Partnership Subsidiary.
2.11 Consultant means any Company
Consultant or any Partnership Consultant.
2.12 Covered Employee means an
Employee who is, or is likely to become, a covered
employee within the meaning of Section 162(m)(3) of
the Code.
2.13 Disability means a permanent
and total disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3)
of the Code, as it may be amended from time to time.
2.14 Dividend Equivalents means a
right granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8 to
receive the equivalent value (in cash or Stock) of dividends
paid on Stock.
2.15 Effective Date shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 13.1.
2.16 Eligible Individual means
any person who is a member of the Board, a Consultant or an
Employee, as determined by the Administrator.
2.17 Employee means any Company
Employee or Partnership Employee.
2.18 Exchange Act means the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.
2.19 Fair Market Value means, as
of any date, the value of Stock determined as follows:
(a) If the Stock is listed on any established stock
exchange or a national market system, including without
limitation the Nasdaq Global Market or The Nasdaq Capital
Market, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price
for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported)
as quoted on such exchange or system for the date of
determination (or the last trading date prior to the date of
determination, if the Stock does not trade on the date of
determination) as reported in The Wall Street Journal or
such other source as the Administrator deems reliable;
(b) If the Stock is regularly quoted by a recognized
securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, its Fair
Market Value shall be the mean of the closing bid and asked
prices for the Stock on the date of determination (or the last
trading date prior to the date of determination if the Stock
does not trade on the date of determination) as reported in
The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the
Administrator deems reliable; or
(c) In the absence of an established market for the Stock,
the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined in good faith
by the Administrator.
2.20 Incentive Stock Option means
an Option that is intended to be an incentive stock option and
meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any
successor provision thereto.
2.21 Independent Director means a
member of the Board who is not a Company Employee or a
Partnership Employee.
A-3
2.22 Non-Employee Director means
a member of the Board who qualifies as a Non-Employee
Director as defined in
Rule 16b-3(b)(3)
of the Exchange Act, or any successor definition adopted by the
Board.
2.23 Non-Qualified Stock Option
means an Option that is not intended to be an Incentive Stock
Option.
2.24 Option means a right granted
to a Participant pursuant to Article 5 of the Plan to
purchase a specified number of shares of Stock at a specified
price during specified time periods. An Option may be either an
Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
2.25 Other Stock-Based Award
means an Award granted or denominated in Stock or units of Stock
pursuant to Section 8.4 of the Plan or denominated in other
equity interests, including, without limitation, equity
interests of the Partnership, such as partnership profits
interests, that are convertible or exchangeable into Stock.
2.26 Participant means any
Eligible Individual who, as a member of the Board, a Consultant
or an Employee, has been granted an Award pursuant to the Plan.
2.27 Partnership Agreement means
the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BioMed Realty, L.P.,
dated as of April 30, 2004, as the same may be amended,
modified or restated from time to time.
2.28 Partnership Consultant means
any consultant or adviser if:
(a) The consultant or adviser renders bona fide services to
the Partnership or any Partnership Subsidiary;
(b) The services rendered by the consultant or adviser are
not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a
capital-raising transaction and do not directly or indirectly
promote or maintain a market for the Companys
securities; and
(c) The consultant or adviser is a natural person who has
contracted directly with the Partnership or any Partnership
Subsidiary to render such services.
2.29 Partnership Employee means
any employee (as defined in accordance with Section 3401(c)
of the Code) of the Partnership or any entity which is then a
Partnership Subsidiary.
2.30 Partnership Subsidiary means
(i) any entity of which a majority of the outstanding
voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned directly or
indirectly by the Partnership, or (ii) any partnership or
limited liability company of which 50% or more of the capital
and profits interest is owned, directly or indirectly, by the
Partnership or by one or more Partnership Subsidiaries or by the
Partnership and one or more Partnership Subsidiaries.
2.31 Performance-Based Award
means an Award granted to selected Covered Employees pursuant to
Articles 6 and 8, but which is subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in Article 9.
2.32 Performance Bonus Award has
the meaning set forth in Section 8.5.
2.33 Performance Criteria means
the criteria that the Administrator selects for purposes of
establishing the Performance Goal or Performance Goals for a
Participant for a Performance Period.
(a) The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish
Performance Goals are limited to the following: net earnings
(either before or after interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization), sales or revenue, net income (either before or
after taxes), operating earnings, cash flow (including, but not
limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), return on
net assets, return on stockholders equity, return on
sales, gross or net profit margin, working capital, earnings per
share, price per share of Stock, and funds from operations, in
each case as determined according to U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or in accordance with
standards established by the Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts in its March 1995
White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002, and as
further amended from time to time), any of which may be measured
either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental
increase or as compared to results of a peer group or on a
same-property basis. The Administrator shall, within the time
prescribed by Section 162(m) of the
A-4
Code, define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating
the Performance Criteria it selects to use for such Performance
Period for such Participant.
(b) The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, provide
that one or more objectively determinable adjustments shall be
made to one or more of the Performance Goals. Such adjustments
may include one or more of the following: (i) items related
to a change in accounting principle; (ii) items relating to
financing activities; (iii) expenses for restructuring or
productivity initiatives; (iv) other non-operating items;
(v) items related to acquisitions; (vi) items
attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired
by the Company during the Performance Period; (vii) items
related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business;
(viii) items related to discontinued operations that do not
qualify as a segment of a business under GAAP; (ix) items
attributable to any stock dividend, stock split, combination or
exchange of shares occurring during the Performance Period;
(x) any other items of significant income or expense which
are determined to be appropriate adjustments; (xi) items
relating to unusual or extraordinary corporate transactions,
events or developments; (xii) items related to amortization
of acquired intangible assets; (xiii) items that are
outside the scope of the Companys core, on-going business
activities; or (xiv) items relating to any other unusual or
nonrecurring events or changes in applicable laws, accounting
principles or business conditions. For all Awards intended to
qualify as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, such
determinations shall be made within the time prescribed by, and
otherwise in compliance with, Section 162(m) of the Code.
2.34 Performance Goals means, for
a Performance Period, the goals established in writing by the
Administrator for the Performance Period based upon the
Performance Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used
to establish such Performance Goals, the Performance Goals may
be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the
performance of a Subsidiary, division or other operational unit.
2.35 Performance Period means the
one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and
overlapping durations, as the Administrator may select, over
which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be
measured for the purpose of determining a Participants
right to, and the payment of, a Performance-Based Award.
2.36 Plan means this BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P. 2004 Incentive Award
Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.
2.37 Qualified Performance-Based
Compensation means any compensation that is
intended to qualify as qualified performance-based
compensation as described in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of
the Code.
2.38 REIT means a real estate
investment trust within the meaning of Sections 856 through
860 of the Code.
2.39 Restatement Effective Date
shall have the meaning set forth in Section 13.1.
2.40 Restricted Stock means Stock
awarded to a Participant pursuant to Article 6 that is
subject to certain restrictions and may be subject to risk of
forfeiture or repurchase.
2.41 Restricted Stock Unit means
an Award granted pursuant to Section 8.3.
2.42 Securities Act shall mean
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended from time to time.
2.43 Stock means the common stock
of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, and such other
securities of the Company that may be substituted for Stock
pursuant to Article 11.
2.44 Stock Appreciation Right or
SAR means a right granted pursuant to
Article 7 to receive a payment equal to the excess of the
Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Stock on
the date the SAR is exercised over the Fair Market Value of such
number of shares of Stock on the date the SAR was granted as set
forth in the applicable Award Agreement.
2.45 Stock Payment means
(a) a payment in the form of shares of Stock, or
(b) an option or other right to purchase shares of Stock,
as part of any bonus, deferred compensation or other
arrangement, made in lieu of all or any portion of the
compensation, granted pursuant to Section 8.2.
2.46 Subsidiary means any Company
Subsidiary or Partnership Subsidiary.
A-5
ARTICLE 3
SHARES SUBJECT
TO THE PLAN
3.1 Number of Shares.
(a) Subject to Article 11 and Section 3.1(b), the
aggregate number of shares of Stock which may be issued or
transferred pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be
5,340,000 shares. Other Stock-Based Awards which are
denominated in Partnership units, shall count against the number
of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan only to
the extent that such Partnership unit is convertible into shares
of Stock and on the same basis as the conversion ratio
applicable to the Partnership Unit.
(b) To the extent that an Award terminates, expires, or
lapses for any reason, or an Award is settled in cash without
the delivery of shares of Stock to the Participant, then any
shares of Stock subject to the Award shall again be available
for the grant of an Award pursuant to the Plan. Additionally,
any shares of Stock tendered or withheld to satisfy the grant or
exercise price or tax withholding obligation pursuant to any
Award shall again be available for the grant of an Award
pursuant to the Plan. Any shares of Stock forfeited or
repurchased by the Company under Section 6.3 shall again be
available for Awards. To the extent permitted by applicable law
or any exchange rule, shares of Stock issued in assumption of,
or in substitution for, any outstanding awards of any entity
acquired in any form of combination by the Company, the
Partnership or any Subsidiary shall not be counted against
shares of Stock available for grant pursuant to this Plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Other Stock-Based Awards covering
units in the Partnership shall, to the extent such Partnership
units are convertible into Stock, reduce the maximum aggregate
number of shares of Stock that may be issued under this Plan, or
to any one Participant pursuant to Section 3.3, on the same
basis as such Partnership unit is convertible into Stock, i.e.,
each such unit shall be treated as an equivalent award of Stock.
The payment of Dividend Equivalents in cash in conjunction with
any outstanding Awards shall not be counted against the shares
available for issuance under the Plan.
3.2 Stock Distributed. Any Stock
distributed pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in
part, of authorized and unissued Stock or Stock purchased on the
open market.
3.3 Limitation on Number of Shares Subject to
Awards. Notwithstanding any provision in the
Plan to the contrary, and subject to Article 11, the
maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to one or more
Awards that may be granted to any one Participant during a
rolling three-year period (measured retrospectively from the
date of any grant) shall be 1,500,000.
ARTICLE 4
ELIGIBILITY
AND PARTICIPATION
4.1 Eligibility. Persons eligible
to participate in this Plan include Employees, Consultants and
all members of the Board, as determined by the Administrator.
4.2 Participation. Subject to the
provisions of the Plan, the Administrator may, from time to
time, select from among all Eligible Individuals those to whom
Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature and
amount of each Award. No individual shall have any right to be
granted an Award pursuant to this Plan.
ARTICLE 5
STOCK OPTIONS
5.1 General. The Administrator is
authorized to grant Options to Eligible Individuals on the
following terms and conditions:
(a) Exercise Price. The exercise
price per share of Stock subject to an Option shall be
determined by the Administrator and set forth in the Award
Agreement; provided that the exercise price for any
Option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a
share of Stock on the date the Option is granted (or, as to
Incentive Stock Options, on the date the Option is modified,
extended or renewed for purposes of Section 424(h) of the
Code).
A-6
(b) Time and Conditions of
Exercise. The Administrator shall determine
the time or times at which an Option may be exercised in whole
or in part; provided that the term of any Option granted
under the Plan shall not exceed ten years. The Administrator
shall also determine the performance or other conditions, if
any, that must be satisfied before all or part of an Option may
be exercised.
(c) Evidence of Grant. Each Option
grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall
specify the exercise price for the Option, the term of the
Option, the number of shares of Stock to which the Option
pertains, and such other provisions as the Administrator shall
determine. The Award Agreement shall also specify whether the
Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option or a
Non-Qualified Stock Option. Award Agreements evidencing
Incentive Stock Options shall contain such terms and conditions
as may be necessary to meet the applicable provisions of
Section 422 of the Code.
5.2 Incentive Stock
Options. Incentive Stock Options may be
granted only to employees (as defined in accordance with
Section 3401(c) of the Code) of the Company or a Company
Subsidiary which constitutes a subsidiary
corporation of the Company within Section 424(f) of
the Code and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder,
and the terms of any Incentive Stock Options granted pursuant to
the Plan must comply with the following additional provisions of
this Section 5.2:
(a) Expiration of Option. Subject
to Section 5.2(c), an Incentive Stock Option may not be
exercised to any extent by anyone after the first to occur of
the following events; provided, however, that the
Administrator may, prior to the expiration of the Incentive
Stock Option under the circumstances described in paragraphs
(ii), (iii) or (iv) below, provide in writing that the
Option will expire on a later date, but if the expiration date
of an Incentive Stock Option is so extended, it will
automatically become a Non-Qualified Stock Option:
(i) Ten years from the date it is granted, unless an
earlier time is set in the Award Agreement.
(ii) Three months after termination of the
Participants employment for any reason other than the
Participants Disability or death.
(iii) One year after the termination of the
Participants employment on account of Disability or death.
(iv) One year after the Participants death if the
Participant dies while employed or during the three-month period
described in paragraph (ii) or during the one-year period
described in paragraph (iii) and before the Option
otherwise expires.
Upon the Participants Disability or death, any Incentive
Stock Options exercisable at the Participants Disability
or death may be exercised by the Participants legal
representative or representatives, by the person or persons
entitled to do so pursuant to the Participants last will
and testament, or, if the Participant fails to make testamentary
disposition of such Incentive Stock Option or dies intestate, by
the person or persons entitled to receive the Incentive Stock
Option pursuant to the applicable laws of descent and
distribution.
(b) Individual Dollar
Limitation. The aggregate Fair Market Value
(determined as of the time the Option is granted) of all shares
of Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are first
exercisable by a Participant in any calendar year may not exceed
$100,000.00 or such other limitation as imposed by
Section 422(d) of the Code, or any successor provision. To
the extent that Incentive Stock Options are first exercisable by
a Participant in excess of such limitation, the excess shall be
considered Non-Qualified Stock Options.
(c) Ten Percent Owners. An
Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to any individual who,
at the date of grant, owns stock possessing more than ten
percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of
Stock of the Company or any subsidiary corporation
of the Company or parent corporation of the Company
(each within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code) only
if such Option is granted at an exercise price per share that is
not less than 110% of Fair Market Value on the date of grant and
the Option is exercisable for no more than five years from the
date of grant.
(d) Transfer Restriction. An
Incentive Stock Option shall not be transferable by the
Participant other than by will or by the laws of descent or
distribution.
A-7
(e) Expiration of Incentive Stock
Options. No Award of an Incentive Stock
Option may be made pursuant to this Plan after the Expiration
Date.
(f) Right to Exercise. During a
Participants lifetime, an Incentive Stock Option may be
exercised only by the Participant.
5.3 Substitution of Stock Appreciation
Rights. The Administrator may provide in the
Award Agreement evidencing the grant of an Option that the
Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to
substitute a Stock Appreciation Right for such Option at any
time prior to or upon exercise of such Option, subject to the
provisions of Sections 7.3 and 14.1 hereof; provided
that such Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable for
the same number of shares of Stock for which such substituted
Option would have been exercisable.
5.4 Paperless Exercise. In the
event that the Company establishes, for itself or using the
services of a third party, an automated system for the exercise
of Options, such as a system using an internet website or
interactive voice response, then the paperless exercise of
Options by a Participant may be permitted through the use of
such an automated system.
5.5 Partial Exercise. An
exercisable Option may be exercised in whole or in part.
However, an Option shall not be exercisable with respect to
fractional shares and the Administrator may require that, by the
terms of the Option, a partial exercise must be with respect to
a minimum number of shares.
5.6 Manner of Exercise. All or a
portion of an exercisable Option shall be deemed exercised upon
delivery of all of the following to the Secretary of the
Company, or such other person or entity designated by the
Administrator, or his, her or its office, as applicable:
(a) A written notice complying with the applicable rules
established by the Administrator stating that the Option, or a
portion thereof, is exercised. The notice shall be signed by the
Participant or other person then entitled to exercise the Option
or such portion of the Option;
(b) Such representations and documents as the
Administrator, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or
advisable to effect compliance with all applicable provisions of
the Securities Act and any other federal, state or foreign
securities laws or regulations. The Administrator may, in its
sole discretion, also take whatever additional actions it deems
appropriate to effect such compliance including, without
limitation, placing legends on share certificates and issuing
stop-transfer notices to agents and registrars;
(c) In the event that the Option shall be exercised
pursuant to Section 10.6 by any person or persons other
than the Participant, appropriate proof of the right of such
person or persons to exercise the Option; and
(d) Full payment of the exercise price and applicable
withholding taxes to the Secretary of the Company for the shares
with respect to which the Option, or portion thereof, is
exercised, in a manner permitted by Section 10.1 and 10.2.
ARTICLE 6
RESTRICTED
STOCK AWARDS
6.1 Grant of Restricted Stock. The
Administrator is authorized to make Awards of Restricted Stock
to any Eligible Individual selected by the Administrator in such
amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as determined
by the Administrator. All Awards of Restricted Stock shall be
evidenced by a written Restricted Stock Award Agreement. The
Administrator shall determine the mechanism for the transfer of
the Restricted Stock and payment therefor in the case of Awards
to Partnership Employees or Partnership Consultants, and any
forfeiture or repurchase of such Restricted Stock pursuant to
Section 6.3.
6.2 Issuance and
Restrictions. Restricted Stock shall be
subject to such repurchase restrictions, forfeiture
restrictions, restrictions on transferability and other
restrictions as the Administrator may impose (including, without
limitation, limitations on the right to vote Restricted Stock or
the right to receive dividends on the Restricted Stock). These
restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such
times, pursuant to such circumstances or installments or
otherwise as the Administrator determines at the time of the
grant of the Award or thereafter.
A-8
Alternatively, these restrictions may lapse pursuant to the
satisfaction of one or more Performance Goals or other specific
performance goals as the Administrator determines to be
appropriate at the time of the grant of the Award or thereafter,
in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or
periods determined by the Administrator.
6.3 Repurchase or
Forfeiture. Except as otherwise determined by
the Administrator at the time of the grant of the Award or
thereafter, upon termination of employment or service during the
applicable restriction period, Restricted Stock that is at that
time subject to restrictions shall be forfeited or subject to
repurchase by the Company under such terms as the Administrator
shall determine; provided, however, that the
Administrator may (a) provide in any Restricted Stock Award
Agreement that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to
Restricted Stock will be waived in whole or in part in the event
of terminations resulting from specified causes, and (b) in
other cases waive in whole or in part restrictions or forfeiture
conditions relating to Restricted Stock.
6.4 Certificates for Restricted
Stock. Restricted Stock granted pursuant to
the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Administrator
shall determine. Certificates or book entries evidencing shares
of Restricted Stock must bear an appropriate legend referring to
the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such
Restricted Stock, and the Company may, at its discretion, retain
physical possession of any stock certificate until such time as
all applicable restrictions lapse.
6.5 Automatic Grants to Independent
Directors. During the term of the Plan:
(a) A person who is initially elected to the Board and who
is an Independent Director at the time of such initial election
automatically shall be granted 2,000 shares of Restricted
Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in
Article 11) on the date of such initial election.
(b) Each Independent Director shall be granted
2,000 shares of Restricted Stock (subject to adjustment as
provided in Article 11) on the date of each annual
meeting of the Companys stockholders other than the annual
meeting at which the Independent Director first receives an
award of Restricted Stock pursuant to paragraph (a) above.
(c) The purchase price per share of any awards of
Restricted Stock pursuant to this Section 6.5 shall be the
par value per share of the Stock. Awards of Restricted Stock
pursuant to this Section 6.5 shall be subject to a
repurchase restriction in favor of the Company in the event of
an Independent Directors termination of service as a
Director for any reason. Such repurchase restriction shall lapse
on the first anniversary of the date of issuance of such
Restricted Stock, subject to an Independent Directors
continued service as a Director on such date.
ARTICLE 7
STOCK
APPRECIATION RIGHTS
7.1 Grant of Stock Appreciation
Rights. A Stock Appreciation Right may be
granted to any Eligible Individual selected by the
Administrator. A Stock Appreciation Right shall be subject to
such terms and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as the
Administrator shall impose and shall be evidenced by an Award
Agreement (including, without limitation, in the case of Awards
to Partnership Employees or Partnership Consultants, the
mechanism for the transfer of rights under such Awards).
7.2 Value of Stock Appreciation
Right. A Stock Appreciation Right shall
entitle the Participant (or other person entitled to exercise
the Stock Appreciation Right pursuant to the Plan) to exercise
all or a specified portion of the Stock Appreciation Right (to
the extent then exercisable pursuant to its terms) and to
receive from the Company an amount determined by multiplying the
difference obtained by subtracting the exercise price per share
of the Stock Appreciation Right from the Fair Market Value on
the date of exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right by the
number of shares of Stock with respect to which the Stock
Appreciation Right shall have been exercised, subject to any
limitations the Administrator may impose. Except as described in
Section 7.3 below, the exercise price per share of Stock
subject to each Stock Appreciation Right shall be set by the
Administrator, but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair
Market Value on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted.
A-9
7.3 Stock Appreciation Right
Vesting. The period during which the right to
exercise, in whole or in part, a Stock Appreciation Right vests
in the Participant shall be set by the Administrator and the
Administrator may determine that a Stock Appreciation Right may
not be exercised in whole or in part for a specified period
after it is granted. Such vesting may be based on service with
the Company or any Subsidiary, or any other criteria selected by
the Administrator. At any time after grant of a Stock
Appreciation Right, the Administrator may, in its sole
discretion and subject to whatever terms and conditions it
selects, accelerate the period during which a Stock Appreciation
Right vests. No portion of a Stock Appreciation Right which is
unexercisable at Termination of Service shall thereafter become
exercisable, except as may be otherwise provided by the
Administrator either in the Award Agreement or by action of the
Administrator following the grant of the Stock Appreciation
Right.
7.4 Manner of Exercise. All or a
portion of an exercisable Stock Appreciation Right shall be
deemed exercised upon delivery of all of the following to the
Secretary of the Company, or such other person or entity
designated by the Administrator, or his, her or its office, as
applicable:
(a) A written notice complying with the applicable rules
established by the Administrator stating that the Stock
Appreciation Right, or a portion thereof, is exercised. The
notice shall be signed by the Participant or other person then
entitled to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right or such
portion of the Stock Appreciation Right;
(b) such representations and documents as the
Administrator, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or
advisable to effect compliance with all applicable provisions of
the Securities Act and any other federal, state or foreign
securities laws or regulations. The Administrator may, in its
sole discretion, also take whatever additional actions it deems
appropriate to effect such compliance; and
(c) In the event that the Stock Appreciation Right shall be
exercised pursuant to this Section 7.4 by any person or
persons other than the Participant, appropriate proof of the
right of such person or persons to exercise the Stock
Appreciation Right.
7.5 Payment. Payment of the
amounts determined under Section 7.2 shall be in cash,
shares of Stock (based on its Fair Market Value as of the date
the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised), or a combination of
both, as determined by the Administrator.
ARTICLE 8
OTHER TYPES
OF AWARDS
8.1 Dividend Equivalents.
(a) Any Eligible Individual selected by the Administrator
may be granted Dividend Equivalents based on the dividends on
the shares of Stock that are subject to any Award, to be
credited as of dividend payment dates, during the period between
the date the Award is granted and the date the Award is
exercised, vests or expires, as determined by the Administrator.
Such Dividend Equivalents shall be converted to cash or
additional shares of Stock by such formula and at such time and
subject to such limitations as may be determined by the
Administrator. The Administrator shall specify the mechanism for
the transfer of the Stock pursuant to a Dividend Equivalent
Award in the case of Awards to Partnership Employees or
Partnership Consultants.
(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Dividend Equivalents
shall be payable with respect to Options or any Award which
vests based on satisfaction of performance criteria (whether or
not such criteria satisfy the requirements of Performance
Criteria or such Award is a Performance Based Award), unless and
until such Award vests.
8.2 Stock Payments. Any Eligible
Individual selected by the Administrator may receive Stock
Payments in the manner determined from time to time by the
Administrator; provided, that unless otherwise determined
by the Administrator such Stock Payments shall be made in lieu
of base salary, bonus, or other cash compensation otherwise
payable to such Participant. The number of shares shall be
determined by the Administrator and may be based upon the
Performance Goals or other specific performance goals determined
appropriate by the Administrator, determined on the date such
Stock Payment is made or on any date thereafter, in each case on
a specified
A-10
date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the
Administrator. The Administrator shall specify the mechanism for
the transfer of the Stock pursuant to a Stock Payment Award and
payment therefor, if applicable, in the case of Awards to
Partnership Employees or Partnership Consultants.
8.3 Restricted Stock Units. The
Administrator is authorized to make Awards of Restricted Stock
Units to any Eligible Individual selected by the Administrator
in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as
determined by the Administrator. At the time of grant, the
Administrator shall specify the date or dates on which the
Restricted Stock Units shall become fully vested and
nonforfeitable, and may specify such conditions to vesting as it
deems appropriate. Alternatively, Restricted Stock Units may
become fully vested and nonforfeitable pursuant to the
satisfaction of one or more Performance Goals or other specific
performance goals as the Administrator determines to be
appropriate at the time of the grant of the Restricted Stock
Units or thereafter, in each case on a specified date or dates
or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator.
The Administrator shall specify, or permit the Participant to
elect, the conditions and dates upon which the shares of Stock
underlying the Restricted Stock Units which shall be issued,
which dates shall not be earlier than the date as of which the
Restricted Stock Units vest and become nonforfeitable and which
conditions and dates shall be subject to compliance with
Section 409A of the Code. On the distribution dates, the
Company shall issue to the Participant one unrestricted, fully
transferable share of Stock for each vested and nonforfeitable
Restricted Stock Unit. The Administrator shall specify the
purchase price, if any, to be paid by the Participant to the
Company for such shares of Stock pursuant to Restricted Stock
Unit Awards and the mechanism for the transfer of the Stock and
payment therefor in the case of Awards to Partnership Employees
or Partnership Consultants.
8.4 Other Stock-Based Awards. Any
Eligible Individual selected by the Administrator may be granted
one or more Awards that provide such Eligible Individual with
shares of Stock or other equity interests or the right to
purchase shares of Stock or other equity interests or that have
a value derived from the value of, or an exercise or conversion
privilege at a price related to, or that are otherwise payable
in shares of Stock or other equity interests and which may be
linked to any one or more of the Performance Goals or other
specific performance goals determined appropriate by the
Administrator, in each case on a specified date or dates or over
any period or periods determined by the Administrator. The
Administrator shall specify the mechanism for the transfer of
the Stock or other equity interests pursuant to Other
Stock-Based Awards and payment therefor in the case of Awards to
Partnership Employees or Partnership Consultants.
8.5 Performance Bonus Awards. Any
Eligible Individual selected by the Administrator may be granted
one or more Performance-Based Awards in the form of a cash bonus
(a Performance Bonus Award) payable upon the
attainment of Performance Goals that are established by the
Administrator and relate to one or more of the Performance
Criteria, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any
period or periods determined by the Administrator. Any such
Performance Bonus Award paid to a Covered Employee shall be
based upon objectively determinable bonus formulas established
in accordance with Article 9. The maximum amount of any
Performance Bonus Award payable to a Covered Employee with
respect to any fiscal year of the Company shall not exceed
$1,500,000.
8.6 Term. Except as otherwise
provided herein, the term of any Award of Dividend Equivalents,
Stock Payments, Restricted Stock Units, Other Stock-Based Awards
or Performance Bonus Awards shall be set by the Administrator in
its discretion.
8.7 Exercise or Purchase
Price. The Administrator may establish the
exercise or purchase price, if any, of any Award of Stock
Payments, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Award;
provided, however, that such price shall not be less than
the par value of a share of Stock on the date of grant, unless
otherwise permitted by applicable state law.
8.8 Award Agreement. All Awards
under this Article 8 shall be subject to such additional
terms and conditions as determined by the Administrator and
shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement.
A-11
ARTICLE 9
PERFORMANCE-BASED
AWARDS
9.1 Purpose. The purpose of this
Article 9 is to provide the Administrator the ability to
qualify Awards other than Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
and that are granted pursuant to Articles 6 and 8 as
Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. If the Administrator,
in its discretion, decides to grant a Performance-Based Award to
a Covered Employee, the provisions of this Article 9 shall
control over any contrary provision contained in Articles 6
or 8; provided, however, that the Administrator may in
its discretion grant Awards to Covered Employees that are based
on Performance Criteria or Performance Goals but that do not
satisfy the requirements of this Article 9.
9.2 Applicability. This
Article 9 shall apply only to those Covered Employees
selected by the Administrator to receive Performance-Based
Awards. The designation of a Covered Employee as a Participant
for a Performance Period shall not in any manner entitle the
Participant to receive an Award for the period. Moreover,
designation of a Covered Employee as a Participant for a
particular Performance Period shall not require designation of
such Covered Employee as a Participant in any subsequent
Performance Period and designation of one Covered Employee as a
Participant shall not require designation of any other Covered
Employees as a Participant in such period or in any other period.
9.3 Procedures with Respect to Performance-Based
Awards. To the extent necessary to comply
with the Qualified Performance-Based Compensation requirements
of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, with respect to any
Award granted under Articles 6 and 8 which may be granted
to one or more Covered Employees, no later than ninety
(90) days following the commencement of any fiscal year in
question or any other designated fiscal period or period of
service (or such other time as may be required or permitted by
Section 162(m) of the Code), the Administrator shall, in
writing, (a) designate one or more Covered Employees,
(b) select the Performance Criteria applicable to the
Performance Period, (c) establish the Performance Goals,
and amounts of such Awards, as applicable, which may be earned
for such Performance Period, and (d) specify the
relationship between Performance Criteria and the Performance
Goals and the amounts of such Awards, as applicable, to be
earned by each Covered Employee for such Performance Period.
Following the completion of each Performance Period, the
Administrator shall certify in writing whether the applicable
Performance Goals have been achieved for such Performance
Period. In determining the amount earned by a Covered Employee,
the Administrator shall have the right to reduce or eliminate
(but not to increase) the amount payable at a given level of
performance to take into account additional factors that the
Administrator may deem relevant to the assessment of individual
or corporate performance for the Performance Period.
9.4 Payment of Performance-Based
Awards. Unless otherwise provided in the
applicable Award Agreement, a Participant must be employed by
the Company, the Partnership or a Subsidiary on the day a
Performance-Based Award for such Performance Period is paid to
the Participant. Furthermore, a Participant shall be eligible to
receive payment pursuant to a Performance-Based Award for a
Performance Period only if the Performance Goals for such period
are achieved.
9.5 Additional
Limitations. Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Plan, any Award which is granted to a Covered
Employee and is intended to constitute Qualified
Performance-Based Compensation shall be subject to any
additional limitations set forth in Section 162(m) of the
Code (including any amendment to Section 162(m) of the
Code) or any regulations or rulings issued thereunder that are
requirements for qualification as qualified performance-based
compensation as described in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the
Code, and the Plan shall be deemed amended to the extent
necessary to conform to such requirements.
ARTICLE 10
PROVISIONS
APPLICABLE TO AWARDS
10.1 Payment. The Administrator
shall determine the methods by which payments by any Participant
with respect to any Awards granted under the Plan shall be made,
including, without limitation: (a) cash or check,
(b) shares of Stock (including, in the case of payment of
the exercise price of an Award, shares of Stock issuable
A-12
pursuant to the exercise of the Award) or shares of Stock held
for such period of time as may be required by the Administrator
in order to avoid adverse accounting consequences, in each case,
having a Fair Market Value on the date of delivery equal to the
aggregate payments required, (c) delivery of a notice that
the Participant has placed a market sell order with a broker
with respect to shares of Stock then issuable upon exercise or
vesting of an Award, and that the broker has been directed to
pay a sufficient portion of the net proceeds of the sale to the
Company in satisfaction of the aggregate payments required,
provided, that payment of such proceeds is then made to
the Company upon settlement of such sale, or (d) other form
of legal consideration acceptable to the Administrator. The
Administrator shall also determine the methods by which shares
of Stock shall be delivered or deemed to be delivered to
Participants. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to
the contrary, no Participant who is a Director or an
executive officer of the Company within the meaning
of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act shall be permitted to
make payment with respect to any Awards granted under the Plan,
or continue any extension of credit with respect to such payment
with a loan from the Company or a loan arranged by the Company
in violation of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act.
10.2 Tax Withholding. The Company,
the Partnership or any Subsidiary shall have the authority and
the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to
remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal,
state, local and foreign taxes (including the Participants
FICA or employment tax obligation) required by law to be
withheld with respect to any taxable event concerning a
Participant arising as a result of the Plan. The Administrator
may in its sole discretion and in satisfaction of the foregoing
requirement allow a Participant to elect to have the Company
withhold shares of Stock otherwise issuable under an Award (or
allow the surrender of shares of Stock). The number of shares of
Stock which may be so withheld or surrendered shall be limited
to the number of shares which have a Fair Market Value on the
date of withholding or repurchase equal to the aggregate amount
of such liabilities based on the minimum statutory withholding
rates for federal, state, local and foreign income tax and
payroll tax purposes that are applicable to such supplemental
taxable income. The Administrator shall determine the fair
market value of the Stock, consistent with applicable provisions
of the Code, for tax withholding obligations due in connection
with a broker-assisted cashless Option or Stock Appreciation
Right exercise involving the sale of shares to pay the Option or
Stock Appreciation Right exercise price or any tax withholding
obligation.
10.3 Stand-Alone and Tandem
Awards. Awards granted pursuant to the Plan
may, in the discretion of the Administrator, be granted either
alone, in addition to, or in tandem with, any other Award
granted pursuant to the Plan. Awards granted in addition to or
in tandem with other Awards may be granted either at the same
time as or at a different time from the grant of such other
Awards.
10.4 Award Agreement. Awards under
the Plan shall be evidenced by Award Agreements that set forth
the terms, conditions and limitations for each Award which may
include the term of an Award, the provisions applicable in the
event the Participants employment or service terminates,
and the Companys authority to unilaterally or bilaterally
amend, modify, suspend, cancel or rescind an Award.
10.5 Limits on Transfer. No right
or interest of a Participant in any Award may be pledged,
encumbered, or hypothecated to or in favor of any party other
than the Company, the Partnership or a Subsidiary, or shall be
subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of such
Participant to any other party other than the Company, the
Partnership or a Subsidiary. Except as otherwise provided by the
Administrator, no Award shall be assigned, transferred, or
otherwise disposed of by a Participant other than by will or the
laws of descent and distribution. The Administrator by express
provision in the Award or an amendment thereto may permit an
Award (other than an Incentive Stock Option) to be transferred
to, exercised by and paid to certain persons or entities related
to the Participant, including but not limited to members of the
Participants family, charitable institutions, or trusts or
other entities whose beneficiaries or beneficial owners are
members of the Participants family
and/or
charitable institutions, or to such other persons or entities as
may be expressly approved by the Administrator, pursuant to such
conditions and procedures as the Administrator may establish.
Any permitted transfer shall be subject to the condition that
the Administrator receive evidence satisfactory to it that the
transfer is being made for estate
and/or tax
planning purposes (or to a blind trust in connection
with the Participants termination of employment or service
with the Company, the Partnership or a Subsidiary to assume a
position with a governmental, charitable, educational or similar
non-profit institution) and on a basis consistent with the
Companys lawful issue of securities.
A-13
10.6 Beneficiaries. Notwithstanding
Section 10.5, a Participant may, in the manner determined
by the Administrator, designate a beneficiary to exercise the
rights of the Participant and to receive any distribution with
respect to any Award upon the Participants death. A
beneficiary, legal guardian, legal representative, or other
person claiming any rights pursuant to the Plan is subject to
all terms and conditions of the Plan and any Award Agreement
applicable to the Participant, except to the extent the Plan and
Award Agreement otherwise provide, and to any additional
restrictions deemed necessary or appropriate by the
Administrator. If the Participant is married and resides in a
community property state, a designation of a person other than
the Participants spouse as his or her beneficiary with
respect to more than 50% of the Participants interest in
the Award shall not be effective without the prior written
consent of the Participants spouse. If no beneficiary has
been designated or survives the Participant, payment shall be
made to the person entitled thereto pursuant to the
Participants will or the laws of descent and distribution.
Subject to the foregoing, a beneficiary designation may be
changed or revoked by a Participant at any time provided the
change or revocation is filed with the Administrator.
10.7 Stock
Certificates. Notwithstanding anything herein
to the contrary, the Company shall not be required to issue or
deliver any certificates evidencing shares of Stock pursuant to
the exercise of any Award, unless and until the Board has
determined, with advice of counsel, that the issuance and
delivery of such certificates is in compliance with all
applicable laws, regulations of governmental authorities and, if
applicable, the requirements of any exchange on which the shares
of Stock are listed or traded. All Stock certificates delivered
pursuant to the Plan are subject to any stop-transfer orders and
other restrictions as the Administrator deems necessary or
advisable to comply with federal, state, or foreign
jurisdiction, securities or other laws, rules and regulations
and the rules of any national securities exchange or automated
quotation system on which the Stock is listed, quoted, or
traded. The Administrator may place legends on any Stock
certificate to reference restrictions applicable to the Stock.
In addition to the terms and conditions provided herein, the
Administrator may require that a Participant make such
reasonable covenants, agreements, and representations as the
Administrator, in its discretion, deems advisable in order to
comply with any such laws, regulations, or requirements. The
Administrator shall have the right to require any Participant to
comply with any timing or other restrictions with respect to the
settlement or exercise of any Award, including a window-period
limitation, as may be imposed in the discretion of the
Administrator.
10.8 Transfer of Shares to a Partnership Employee,
Partnership Consultant or Partnership
Director. As soon as practicable after the
Company issues shares of Stock with respect to which an Award
(which was issued to and is held by a Partnership Employee,
Partnership Consultant or Partnership Director in such
capacity), then, with respect to each such Award:
(a) The Company shall sell to the Partnership the number of
shares equal to the number of shares deliverable with respect to
such Award. The price to be paid by the Partnership to the
Company for such shares shall be an amount equal to the product
of (x) the number of shares multiplied by (y) the Fair
Market Value of a share of Stock at the time of exercise or
delivery less the amount paid by the Participant for such
shares, if anything, pursuant to Section 10.1; and
(b) The Company shall contribute to the Partnership an
amount of cash equal to the sum of the amount paid by the
Participant, if any, for such shares of Stock, and the amount
paid by the Partnership under Section 10.8(a) and the
Partnership shall issue an additional interest in the
Partnership on the terms set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
10.9 Allocation of
Payment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to
the extent that a Participant provides services to more than one
of the Company, the Partnership, or any Subsidiary, the Company
may, in its discretion, allocate the payment or issuance of
shares of Stock with respect to any Awards exercised by or
otherwise delivered to such Participant or (and the services
performed by the Participant) among such entities for purposes
of the provisions of Section 10.8 in order to ensure that
the relationship between the Company and the Partnership or such
Subsidiary remains at arms-length.
10.10 Section 409A. To the
extent that the Administrator determines that any Award granted
under the Plan is subject to Section 409A of the Code, the
Award Agreement evidencing such Award shall incorporate the
terms and conditions required by Section 409A of the Code.
To the extent applicable, the Plan and Award Agreements shall be
interpreted in accordance with Section 409A of the Code and
Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive
guidance issued thereunder, including without limitation any
such regulations or other guidance that
A-14
may be issued after the Restatement Effective Date.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in
the event that following the Restatement Effective Date the
Administrator determines that any Award may be subject to
Section 409A of the Code and related Department of Treasury
guidance (including such Department of Treasury guidance as may
be issued after the Restatement Effective Date), the
Administrator may adopt such amendments to the Plan and the
applicable Award Agreement or adopt other policies and
procedures (including amendments, policies and procedures with
retroactive effect), or take any other actions, that the
Administrator determines are necessary or appropriate to
(a) exempt the Award from Section 409A of the Code
and/or
preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided
with respect to the Award, or (b) comply with the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code and related
Department of Treasury guidance and thereby avoid the
application of any penalty taxes under such Section.
ARTICLE 11
CHANGES IN
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
11.1 Adjustments.
(a) In the event of any stock dividend, stock split,
combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation,
spin-off, recapitalization, distribution of Company assets to
stockholders (other than normal cash dividends), or any other
corporate event affecting the Stock or other equity interests or
the share price of the Stock, the Administrator shall make such
proportionate adjustments, if any, as the Administrator in its
discretion may deem appropriate to reflect such change with
respect to (i) the aggregate number and type of shares or
units that may be issued under the Plan (including, but not
limited to, adjustments of the limitations in Sections 3.1,
3.3 and 6.5); (ii) the terms and conditions of any
outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, any
applicable performance targets or criteria with respect
thereto); and (iii) the grant or exercise price per share
or other unit for any outstanding Awards under the Plan. Any
adjustment affecting an Award intended as Qualified
Performance-Based Compensation shall be made consistent with the
requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.
(b) In the event of any transaction or event described in
Section 11.1(a) or any unusual or nonrecurring transactions
or events affecting the Company, any affiliate of the Company,
or the financial statements of the Company or any affiliate
(including without limitation any Change in Control), or of
changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting
principles, and whenever the Administrator determines that such
action is appropriate in order to prevent the dilution or
enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be
made available under the Plan or with respect to any Award under
the Plan, to facilitate such transactions or events or to give
effect to such changes in laws, regulations or principles, the
Administrator, in its sole discretion and on such terms and
conditions as it deems appropriate, either by the terms of the
Award or by action taken prior to the occurrence of such
transaction or event and either automatically or upon the
Participants request, is hereby authorized to take any one
or more of the following actions:
(i) To provide for either (A) termination of any such
Award in exchange for an amount of cash, if any, equal to the
amount that would have been attained upon the exercise of such
Award or realization of the Participants rights (and, for
the avoidance of doubt, if as of the date of the occurrence of
the transaction or event described in this Section 11.1(b)
the Administrator determines in good faith that no amount would
have been attained upon the exercise of such Award or
realization of the Participants rights, then such Award
may be terminated by the Company without payment) or
(B) the replacement of such Award with other rights or
property selected by the Administrator in its sole discretion;
(ii) To provide that such Award be assumed by the successor
or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, or
shall be substituted for by similar options, rights or awards
covering the stock or other equity interests of the successor or
survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, with
appropriate adjustments as to the number and kind of shares or
other equity interests and prices;
(iii) To make adjustments in the number and type of shares
of Stock (or other securities or property) subject to
outstanding Awards, and in the number and kind of outstanding
Restricted Stock
and/or in
the terms and conditions of (including the grant or exercise
price), and the criteria included in, outstanding options,
rights and awards and options, rights and awards which may be
granted in the future;
A-15
(iv) To provide that such Award shall be exercisable or
payable or fully vested with respect to all shares or other
equity interests covered thereby, notwithstanding anything to
the contrary in the Plan or the applicable Award
Agreement; and
(v) To provide that the Award cannot vest, be exercised or
become payable after such event.
11.2 Acceleration Upon a Change in
Control. Notwithstanding Section 11.1,
and except as may otherwise be provided in any applicable Award
Agreement, if a Change in Control occurs and a
Participants Awards are not continued, converted, assumed,
or replaced by (a) the Company or a parent or Subsidiary of
the Company, or (b) a successor or a parent or subsidiary
of such successor, such Awards shall become fully exercisable
and all forfeiture restrictions on such Awards shall lapse.
Upon, or in anticipation of, a Change in Control, the
Administrator may cause any and all Awards outstanding hereunder
to terminate at a specific time in the future, including but not
limited to the date of such Change in Control, and shall give
each Participant the right to exercise such Awards during a
period of time as the Administrator, in its sole and absolute
discretion, shall determine.
11.3 No Other Rights. Except as
expressly provided in the Plan, no Participant shall have any
rights by reason of any subdivision or consolidation of shares
of stock of any class, the payment of any dividend, any increase
or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class or any
dissolution, liquidation, merger, or consolidation of the
Company or any other corporation. Except as expressly provided
in the Plan or pursuant to action of the Administrator under the
Plan, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any
class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any
class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall
be made with respect to, the number of shares of Stock subject
to an Award or the grant or exercise price of any Award.
ARTICLE 12
ADMINISTRATION
12.1 Administrator. The
Administrator of the Plan shall be the Committee,
which shall consist solely of two or more members of the Board
each of whom is both an outside director, within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, and a Non-Employee
Director. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (a) the full
Board, acting by a majority of its members in office, shall
conduct the general administration of the Plan with respect to
all Awards granted to Independent Directors and for purposes of
such Awards the term Administrator as used in this
Plan shall be deemed to refer to the Board and (b) the
Committee may delegate its authority hereunder to the extent
permitted by Section 12.5. Appointment of Committee members
shall be effective upon acceptance of appointment. The Board may
abolish the Committee at any time and revest in the Board the
administration of the Plan. Committee members may resign at any
time by delivering written notice to the Board. Vacancies in the
Committee may only be filled by the Board.
12.2 Action by the
Administrator. A majority of the
Administrator shall constitute a quorum. The acts of a majority
of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is
present, and, subject to applicable law, acts approved in
writing by a majority of the Administrator in lieu of a meeting,
shall be deemed the acts of the Administrator. Each member of
the Administrator is entitled to, in good faith, rely or act
upon any report or other information furnished to that member by
any officer or other employee of the Company or any Subsidiary,
the Companys independent certified public accountants, or
any executive compensation consultant or other professional
retained by the Company to assist in the administration of the
Plan.
12.3 Authority of
Administrator. Subject to any specific
designation in the Plan, the Administrator has the exclusive
power, authority and discretion to:
(a) Designate Participants to receive Awards;
(b) Determine the type or types of Awards to be granted to
each Participant;
(c) Determine the number of Awards to be granted and the
number of shares of Stock to which an Award will relate;
(d) Determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted
pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited to, the
exercise price, grant price, or purchase price, any reload
provision, any restrictions or limitations
A-16
on the Award, any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions
or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and
accelerations or waivers thereof, any provisions related to
non-competition and recapture of gain on an Award, based in each
case on such considerations as the Administrator in its sole
discretion determines; provided, however, that the
Administrator shall not have the authority to accelerate the
vesting or waive the forfeiture of any Performance-Based Awards;
(e) Determine whether, to what extent, and pursuant to what
circumstances an Award may be settled in, or the exercise price
of an Award may be paid in, cash, Stock, other Awards, or other
property, or an Award may be canceled, forfeited, or surrendered;
(f) Prescribe the form of each Award Agreement, which need
not be identical for each Participant;
(g) Decide all other matters that must be determined in
connection with an Award;
(h) Establish, adopt, or revise any rules and regulations
as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the Plan;
(i) Interpret the terms of, and any matter arising pursuant
to, the Plan or any Award Agreement; and
(j) Make all other decisions and determinations that may be
required pursuant to the Plan or as the Administrator deems
necessary or advisable to administer the Plan.
12.4 Decisions Binding. The
Administrators interpretation of the Plan, any Awards
granted pursuant to the Plan, any Award Agreement and all
decisions and determinations by the Administrator with respect
to the Plan are final, binding, and conclusive on all parties.
12.5 Delegation of Authority. To
the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may from
time to time delegate to a committee of one or more members of
the Board or one or more officers of the Company the authority
to grant or amend Awards to Participants other than
(a) senior executives of the Company who are subject to
Section 16 of the Exchange Act, (b) Covered Employees,
or (c) officers of the Company (or members of the Board) to
whom authority to grant or amend Awards has been delegated
hereunder. Any delegation hereunder shall be subject to the
restrictions and limits that the Committee specifies at the time
of such delegation, and the Committee may at any time rescind
the authority so delegated or appoint a new delegatee. At all
times, the delegatee appointed under this Section 12.5
shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the Committee.
ARTICLE 13
EFFECTIVE
AND EXPIRATION DATE
13.1 Effective Date. The Plan was
originally effective as of August 3, 2004 (the
Effective Date). This amended and restated
Plan shall be effective on the date it is approved by a majority
of the Companys stockholders at a duly held meeting in
2009 (the Restatement Effective Date).
13.2 Expiration Date. The Plan
will expire on, and no Award may be granted pursuant to the Plan
on or after, the tenth anniversary of the Restatement Effective
Date (the Expiration Date). Any Awards that
are outstanding on the Expiration Date shall remain in force
according to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award
Agreement. Each Award Agreement shall provide that it will
expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant of the
Award to which it relates.
ARTICLE 14
AMENDMENT,
MODIFICATION, AND TERMINATION
14.1 Amendment, Modification, And
Termination. The Board or the Committee may
terminate, amend or modify the Plan; provided, however,
that (a) to the extent necessary to comply with any
applicable law, regulation, or stock exchange rule, the Company
shall obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment in such
a manner and to such a degree as required, and
(b) stockholder approval is required for any amendment to
the Plan that increases the number of shares available under the
Plan (other than any adjustment as provided by Article 11).
A-17
Except in connection with a transaction specified in
Section 11.1 (including, without limitation, any stock
dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend,
recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation,
split-up,
spin-off, combination, or exchange of shares), the terms of
outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise
price of outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or
cancel, exchange, substitute, buyout or surrender outstanding
Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for cash, other
Awards or Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with an exercise
price that is less than the exercise price of the original
Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, without stockholder
approval.
14.2 Awards Previously Granted. No
termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan shall
adversely affect in any material way any Award previously
granted pursuant to the Plan without the prior written consent
of the Participant.
ARTICLE 15
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
15.1 No Rights to Awards. No
Participant, employee, or other person shall have any claim to
be granted any Award pursuant to the Plan, and neither the
Company nor the Administrator is obligated to treat
Participants, employees, and other persons uniformly.
15.2 No Stockholders Rights. No
Award gives the Participant any of the rights of a stockholder
of the Company unless and until shares of Stock are in fact
issued to such person in connection with such Award.
15.3 No Right to Employment or
Services. Nothing in the Plan or any Award
Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of
the Company, the Partnership or any Subsidiary to terminate any
Participants employment or services at any time, nor
confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ
or service of the Company, the Partnership or any Subsidiary.
15.4 Unfunded Status of
Awards. The Plan is intended to be an
unfunded plan for incentive compensation. With
respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant
to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Award
Agreement shall give the Participant any rights that are greater
than those of a general creditor of the Company or any
Subsidiary.
15.5 Indemnification. To the
extent allowable pursuant to applicable law, the Administrator
(and each member thereof) shall be indemnified and held harmless
by the Company from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that
may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by such member in
connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or
proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or
she may be involved by reason of any action or failure to act
pursuant to the Plan and against and from any and all amounts
paid by him or her in satisfaction of judgment in such action,
suit, or proceeding against him or her; provided he or
she gives the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to
handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle
and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of
indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of
indemnification to which such persons may be entitled pursuant
to the Companys Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, each
as amended from time to time, as a matter of law, or otherwise,
or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold
them harmless.
15.6 Relationship to other
Benefits. No payment pursuant to the Plan
shall be taken into account in determining any benefits pursuant
to any pension, retirement, savings, profit sharing, group
insurance, welfare or other benefit plan of the Company, the
Partnership or any Subsidiary except to the extent otherwise
expressly provided in writing in such other plan or an agreement
thereunder.
15.7 Expenses. The expenses of
administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company, the
Partnership and their Subsidiaries.
15.8 Titles and Headings. The
titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for
convenience of reference only and, in the event of any conflict,
the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall
control.
A-18
15.9 Fractional Shares. No
fractional shares of Stock shall be issued and the Administrator
shall determine, in its discretion, whether cash shall be given
in lieu of fractional shares or whether such fractional shares
shall be eliminated by rounding up or down as appropriate.
15.10 Limitations Applicable to
Section 16 Persons. Notwithstanding
any other provision of the Plan, the Plan, and any Award granted
or awarded to any Participant who is then subject to
Section 16 of the Exchange Act, shall be subject to any
additional limitations set forth in any applicable exemptive
rule under Section 16 of the Exchange Act (including any
amendment to
Rule 16b-3
of the Exchange Act) that are requirements for the application
of such exemptive rule. To the extent permitted by applicable
law, the Plan and Awards granted or awarded hereunder shall be
deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such
applicable exemptive rule.
15.11 Government and Other
Regulations. The obligation of the Company to
make payment of awards in Stock or otherwise shall be subject to
all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such
approvals by government agencies as may be required. The Company
shall be under no obligation to register pursuant to the
Securities Act any of the shares of Stock paid pursuant to the
Plan. If the shares paid pursuant to the Plan may in certain
circumstances be exempt from registration pursuant to the
Securities Act, the Company may restrict the transfer of such
shares in such manner as it deems advisable to ensure the
availability of any such exemption.
15.12 Restrictions on Awards. This
Plan shall be interpreted and construed in a manner consistent
with the Companys status as a REIT. No Award shall be
granted or awarded, and with respect to an Award already granted
under the Plan, such Award shall not be exercisable:
(a) to the extent such Award or exercise could cause the
Participant to be in violation of the Ownership Limit (as
defined in the Companys Articles of Incorporation, as
amended from time to time); or
(b) if, in the discretion of the Administrator, such Award
or exercise could impair the Companys status as a REIT.
15.13 Governing Law. The Plan and
all Award Agreements shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of the State of Maryland without regard to
the conflicts of law principles thereof.
15.14 Conflicts with Companys Articles of
Incorporation. Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Plan, no Participant shall acquire or have any
right to acquire any Stock, and shall not have any other rights
under the Plan, which are prohibited under the Companys
Articles of Incorporation, as amended from time to time.
15.15 Grant of Awards to Certain Employees or
Consultants. The Company and the Partnership
or any Subsidiary may provide through the establishment of a
formal written policy or otherwise for the method by which
shares of Stock
and/or
payment therefore may be exchanged or contributed between the
Company and such other party, or may be returned to the Company
upon any forfeiture or repurchase of Stock by the Participant,
for the purpose of ensuring that the relationship between the
Company and the Partnership or such Subsidiary remains at
arms length.
A-19
PLEASE
MARK, DATE, SIGN AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE PROXY CARD USING THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. IF YOUR ADDRESS IS INCORRECTLY SHOWN, PLEASE PRINT
CHANGES.
|
|
|
Please mark your
votes as indicated
in this example
|
|
X |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND FOR THE OTHER PROPOSALS AS DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR each of |
|
WITHHOLD |
|
FOR all |
1.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS UNTIL THE NEXT ANNUAL |
|
the above |
|
AUTHORITY |
|
nominees |
MEETING
OF STOCKHOLDERS AND UNTIL THEIR |
|
nominees for |
|
for all |
|
except the |
SUCCESSORS
ARE DULY ELECTED AND QUALIFY. |
|
director |
|
nominees |
|
following |
|
Nominees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 Alan D. Gold
02 Barbara R. Cambon
03 Edward A. Dennis Ph.D.
04 Richard I. Gilchrist
05 Gary A. Kreitzer
06 Theodore D. Roth
07 M. Faye Wilson
|
|
c |
|
c
|
|
c
|
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual
nominee, mark the FOR all nominees except the following box and
write that nominees name in the space provided below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
2. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG LLP AS THE
COMPANYS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009.
|
|
c |
|
c |
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
2004 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN, INCLUDING THE INCREASE
IN THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK RESERVED FOR
ISSUANCE THEREUNDER FROM 2,500,000 TO
5,340,000 SHARES. |
|
c |
|
c |
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. TO VOTE AND OTHERWISE REPRESENT THE UNDERSIGNED ON ANY OTHER MATTER
THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT
THEREOF IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to
vote upon such other business as may properly come before
the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof. |
All other proxies heretofore given by
the undersigned to vote shares of stock
of the Company, which the undersigned
would be entitled to vote if personally
present at the annual meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof,
are hereby expressly revoked.
CHECK HERE ONLY IF YOU PLAN
TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING
IN PERSON
|
|
|
Mark Here for
Address Change or
Comments
SEE REVERSE
|
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Signature (if Co-Owner)
|
|
Date |
|
PLEASE DATE THIS PROXY AND SIGN IT EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME OR NAMES APPEAR HEREON. WHEN SHARES ARE
HELD BY JOINT TENANTS, BOTH SHOULD SIGN. WHEN SIGNING AS AN ATTORNEY, EXECUTOR, ADMINISTRATOR,
TRUSTEE OR GUARDIAN, PLEASE GIVE FULL TITLE AS SUCH. IF SHARES ARE HELD BY A CORPORATION, PLEASE
SIGN IN FULL CORPORATE NAME BY THE PRESIDENT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED OFFICER. IF SHARES ARE HELD BY A
PARTNERSHIP, PLEASE SIGN IN PARTNERSHIP NAME BY AN AUTHORIZED PERSON.
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
The Companys proxy statement and annual
report are available electronically at:
www.biomedrealty.com/08ar.
46173
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 27, 2009
The undersigned stockholder of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
Company), hereby appoints Alan D. Gold and Gary A. Kreitzer, and each of them, as proxies for
the undersigned with full power of substitution, to attend the annual meeting of the Companys
stockholders to be held on May 27, 2009 at 9:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournment or
postponement thereof, to cast on behalf of the undersigned all votes that the undersigned is
entitled to cast at such meeting and otherwise to represent the undersigned at the annual
meeting with all powers possessed by the undersigned if personally present at the annual
meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and the accompanying Proxy Statement, the terms of each of which are incorporated
by reference, and revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to such meeting.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE
UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY
PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF. IF NO
DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, FOR THE
OTHER PROPOSALS AS DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS
ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR
POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BNY MELLON SHAREOWNER SERVICES |
|
Address Change/Comments |
|
|
|
P.O. BOX 3550 |
|
(Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side) |
|
|
|
SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can now access your BNY Mellon Shareowner Services account online.
Access your BNY Mellon Shareowner Services shareholder/stockholder account online via Investor
ServiceDirect® (ISD).
The transfer agent for BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., now makes it easy and convenient to get current
information on your shareholder account.
View account status
View certificate history
View book-entry information
View payment history for dividends
Make address changes
Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form
Establish/change your PIN
Visit us on the web at http://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd
For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm
Monday-Friday Eastern Time
****TRY IT OUT****
www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd
Investor ServiceDirect®
Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week
Choose
MLinkSM for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future
proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply
log on to Investor
ServiceDirect®
at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd where
step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment.
46173