SUPPL
Filed Pursuant to
General Instruction II.K of Form F-9
File No. 333-151327
The
information in this preliminary prospectus supplement is not
complete and may be changed. This preliminary prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus are not an offer to
sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy
these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject
to Completion, dated March 19, 2009
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To
Prospectus dated June 12, 2008)
$
Barrick
Gold Corporation
% Notes due
Interest
payable on March 15 and September 15
The % Notes
(the Notes) of Barrick Gold Corporation
(Barrick) will mature
on , .
Notes may be redeemed, in whole or in part, as described under
Description of the Notes Optional
Redemption. Notes may also be redeemed, in whole but not
in part, under certain circumstances relating to changes in
applicable tax laws as described under Description of
Notes Tax Redemption. In addition, upon the
occurrence of both (i) a change of control of Barrick and
(ii) a downgrade within a specified period of the Notes
below an investment grade rating by each of Moodys
Investors Service Inc. and Standard & Poors
Ratings Services, Barrick will be required to make an offer to
purchase the Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
repurchase.
The Notes
will be unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of Barrick and
will rank equally with Barricks other unsecured,
unsubordinated obligations.
Investing
in the Notes involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on
page S-1
of this prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
to
|
|
|
|
Price
to
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
Barrick,
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Commission
|
|
|
before
expenses
|
|
|
Per Note
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Neither
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the Notes
or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offence.
We are
permitted, under a multi-jurisdictional disclosure system
adopted by the United States and Canada, to prepare this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus in
accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements. Prospective
purchasers should be aware that such requirements are different
from those of the United States.
Owning
the Notes may subject you to tax consequences both in the United
States and Canada. Such tax consequences may not be described
fully herein. You should read the tax discussion beginning on
page S-16
of this prospectus supplement.
Your
ability to enforce civil liabilities under the United States
federal securities laws may be affected adversely because
Barrick is incorporated under the laws of the Province of
Ontario, Canada, some of the officers and directors of Barrick
and some of the experts named in this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus are Canadian residents, and a
majority of Barricks assets and the assets of those
officers, directors and experts are located outside of the
United States.
The
underwriters expect to deliver the Notes to purchasers on or
about March , 2009 through the book-entry
facilities of The Depository Trust Company and its direct
and indirect participants, including Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V.
and Clearstream Banking société anonyme.
Joint
Book-Running Managers
|
|
|
Morgan
Stanley |
J.P.
Morgan |
Citi |
March ,
2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Prospectus
Supplement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
S-2
|
|
|
|
|
S-3
|
|
|
|
|
S-4
|
|
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
|
|
S-6
|
|
|
|
|
S-15
|
|
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
|
|
|
S-18
|
|
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
|
|
|
S-22
|
|
Prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
About This Prospectus
|
|
|
1
|
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
|
1
|
|
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
|
|
|
3
|
|
Barrick
|
|
|
4
|
|
BNAF and BGF
|
|
|
5
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
5
|
|
Earnings Coverage
|
|
|
5
|
|
Description of Debt Securities and the Guarantees
|
|
|
5
|
|
Certain Income Tax Considerations
|
|
|
20
|
|
Trading Price and Volume of Common Shares
|
|
|
20
|
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
|
21
|
|
Non-GAAP Performance Measures
|
|
|
22
|
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
25
|
|
Documents filed as part of the Registration Statement
|
|
|
25
|
|
Experts
|
|
|
25
|
|
Auditors Consent
|
|
|
26
|
|
Schedule A Annual Financial Statements of Barrick
Gold Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Schedule B Interim Financial Statements of Barrick
Gold Corporation for the three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
i
IMPORTANT
NOTICE ABOUT INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS
This
document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus
supplement, which describes the specific terms of the Notes and
also adds to and updates certain information contained in the
accompanying final base shelf prospectus dated June 12,
2008 and the documents incorporated by reference. The second
part is the accompanying final base shelf prospectus, which
gives more general information, some of which may not apply to
the Notes. The accompanying final base shelf prospectus is
referred to as the prospectus in this prospectus
supplement.
If the
description of the Notes varies between this prospectus
supplement and the prospectus, you should rely on the
information in this prospectus supplement.
You
should rely only on the information contained in or incorporated
by reference in this prospectus supplement and the prospectus.
We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized any other
person to provide you with different information. If anyone
provides you with different or inconsistent information, you
should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are not,
making an offer to sell the Notes in any jurisdiction where the
offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the
information in this prospectus supplement and the prospectus, as
well as information in any document incorporated by reference
that we previously filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC) or with the Ontario
Securities Commission (the OSC), is accurate only as
of its respective date.
Unless
otherwise indicated, references to $ in this
prospectus supplement are to U.S. dollars and references to
Cdn$ in this prospectus supplement are to Canadian
dollars.
In this
prospectus supplement, Barrick Gold Corporation will be referred
to as Barrick. Unless the context requires
otherwise, we, us and our
refer to Barrick and/or, as applicable, one or more of its
subsidiaries.
Barrick
presents its financial statements in U.S. dollars and its
primary financial statements are prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP).
Unless
otherwise indicated, financial information in this prospectus
supplement has been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP
and thus may not be comparable to financial data prepared by
other Canadian companies.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
This
prospectus supplement is deemed to be incorporated by reference
in the prospectus solely for the purpose of the offering of
Notes hereunder.
Other
documents are also incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by
reference in the prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information in the prospectus. The documents listed below,
which have been filed with or furnished to the SEC and the OSC,
are specifically incorporated by reference in, and form an
integral part of, this prospectus supplement and the prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
annual
information form of Barrick dated March 27, 2008 for the
year ended December 31, 2007, but expressly excluding
Barricks annual audited financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and the related managements
discussion and analysis incorporated by reference therein;
|
|
|
|
annual
audited consolidated financial statements of Barrick for the
year ended December 31, 2008, including consolidated
balance sheets as at December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 and the consolidated statements of
income, cash flow, shareholders equity and comprehensive
income for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008 and related notes, together with the
auditors report thereon;
|
|
|
|
managements
discussion and analysis of Barrick for the financial year ended
December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
management
information circular of Barrick dated March 27, 2008, in
connection with the annual and special meeting of shareholders
held on May 6, 2008;
|
|
|
|
material
change report of Barrick dated March 3, 2008 regarding
Barricks agreement with Kennecott Explorations (Australia)
Ltd., a subsidiary of Rio Tinto PLC, to purchase its 40%
interest in the Cortez Joint Venture in Nevada;
|
|
|
|
material
change report of Barrick dated April 2, 2008 regarding
Barricks former Chief Executive Officer taking a leave of
absence;
|
|
|
|
material
change report of Barrick dated September 18, 2008 regarding
the issuance by Barrick North America Finance LLC and Barrick
Gold Financeco LLC, each a wholly owned subsidiary of
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick, of
an aggregate principal amount of US$1.25 billion of debt
securities guaranteed by Barrick;
|
|
|
|
|
|
material
change report of Barrick dated December 31, 2008 regarding
the appointment of Aaron Regent as Barricks Chief
Executive Officer; and
|
|
|
|
the document
entitled Summary Gold Mineral Reserves and Mineral
Resources filed with or furnished to the securities
regulatory authorities in Canada and with the SEC on
March 19, 2009 relating to the mineral reserves and
resources of Barrick for the years ended December 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007 (the Summary of Reserves and
Resources).
|
Barrick will
provide to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom
this prospectus supplement is delivered, without charge, upon
request to the Secretary of Barrick at Brookfield Place, TD
Canada Trust Tower, PO Box 212, Suite 3700,
161 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2S1
(416) 861-9911,
copies of the documents incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus.
Any material
change reports (excluding any confidential material change
reports), annual information forms, annual financial statements
(including the auditors report thereon), interim financial
statements, managements discussion and analysis and
information circulars that Barrick files with the OSC after the
date of this prospectus supplement and prior to the termination
of this offering will be incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement and the prospectus and will automatically
update and supersede information contained or incorporated by
reference in this prospectus supplement or the prospectus. In
addition, any report filed or furnished by Barrick with the SEC
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or submitted to the SEC
pursuant to
Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Exchange Act, after the date of this prospectus
supplement and prior to the termination of this offering shall
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement and the prospectus and the registration statement of
which the prospectus forms a part, if and to the extent
expressly provided in such report.
Any
statement contained in this prospectus supplement, the
prospectus or in a document incorporated or deemed to be
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement or the
prospectus shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for the
purposes of this prospectus supplement and the prospectus to the
extent that a statement contained in this prospectus supplement
or in any subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed
to be incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement
modifies or supersedes that statement. Any statement so modified
or superseded shall not constitute a part of this prospectus
supplement or the prospectus except as so modified or
superseded. The modifying or superseding statement need not
state that it has modified or superseded a prior statement or
include any information set forth in the document that it
modifies or supersedes. The making of a modifying or superseding
statement shall not be deemed an admission for any purposes that
the modified or superseded statement, when made, constituted a
misrepresentation, an untrue statement of a material fact or an
omission to state a material fact that is required to be stated
or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light
of the circumstances in which it was made.
DOCUMENTS
FILED AS PART OF THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
In addition
to the documents specified in the accompanying prospectus under
Documents Filed as Part of the Registration
Statement, the underwriting agreement referred to under
Underwriting will be filed with the SEC as part of
the registration statement to which this prospectus supplement
relates.
iii
NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain
information contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement, including any information as to our
strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance,
constitutes forward-looking statements. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, are
forward-looking statements. The words believe,
expect, anticipate,
contemplate, target, plan,
intend, continue, budget,
estimate, may, will,
schedule and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions
that, while considered reasonable by us, are inherently subject
to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties
and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not
limited to: the impact of global liquidity and credit
availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of
assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows;
fluctuations in the currency markets (such as Canadian and
Australian dollars, South African rand, Chilean peso,
Argentinean peso, Peruvian sol and Papua New Guinean kina versus
the U.S. dollar); fluctuations in the spot and forward
price of gold and copper or certain other commodities (such as
silver, diesel fuel and electricity); changes in
U.S. dollar interest rates or gold lease rates that could
impact the mark-to-market value of outstanding derivative
instruments and ongoing payments/receipts under interest rate
swaps and variable rate debt obligations; risks arising from
holding derivative instruments (such as credit risk, market
liquidity risk and mark-to-market risk); changes in national and
local government legislation, taxation, controls, regulations
and political or economic developments in Canada, the United
States, Dominican Republic, Australia, Papua New Guinea, Chile,
Peru, Argentina, South Africa, Tanzania, Russia, Pakistan or
Barbados or other countries in which we do or may carry on
business in the future; business opportunities that may be
presented to, or pursued by, us; our ability to successfully
integrate acquisitions; operating or technical difficulties in
connection with mining or development activities; employee
relations; availability of and increasing costs associated with
mining inputs and labour; litigation; the speculative nature of
mineral exploration and development, including the risks of
obtaining necessary licenses and permits; diminishing quantities
or grades of reserves; adverse changes in our credit rating; and
contests over title to properties, particularly title to
undeveloped properties. In addition, there are risks and hazards
associated with the business of exploration, development and
mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents,
unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding
and gold bullion or copper cathode losses (and the risk of
inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover
these risks). Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can
affect our actual results and could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied in any
forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers
are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements
made in this prospectus supplement are qualified by these
cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the Summary
of Reserves and Resources and to Risk Factors in the
annual information form of Barrick dated March 27, 2008 for
the year ended December 31, 2007 and to the
managements discussion and analysis for the financial year
ended December 31, 2008, in each case incorporated by
reference herein, and to the section Risk Factors in
this prospectus supplement, for a discussion of some of the
factors underlying forward-looking statements. We disclaim any
intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable law.
NOTICE
REGARDING PRESENTATION OF OUR MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL
RESOURCE ESTIMATES
Mineral
reserves have been calculated in accordance with National
Instrument
43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI
43-101),
as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities. For
United States reporting purposes, Industry Guide 7 (under the
Exchange Act) as interpreted by Staff of the SEC, applies
different standards in order to classify mineralization as a
reserve. For U.S. reporting purposes, as at
December 31, 2008, the mineralization at Cerro Casale was
classified as mineralized material and approximately 600,000
ounces of mineralization at Pueblo Viejo (Barricks 60%
interest) classified as reserves under NI
43-101 were
classified as mineralized material. In addition, while the terms
measured, indicated and
inferred mineral resources are required pursuant to
NI 43-101,
the SEC does not recognize such terms. Canadian standards differ
significantly from the requirements of the SEC, and mineral
resource information contained herein and in the documents
incorporated herein by reference is not comparable to similar
information regarding mineral reserves disclosed in accordance
with the requirements of the SEC. Investors should understand
that inferred mineral resources have a great amount
of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty
iv
as to their
economic and legal feasibility. In addition, investors are
cautioned not to assume that any part or all of our mineral
resources constitute or will be converted into reserves.
ENFORCEABILITY
OF CERTAIN CIVIL LIABILITIES
Barrick is a
corporation existing under the laws of the Province of Ontario,
Canada. A majority of our assets are located outside of the
United States and some of our directors and officers and some of
the experts named in this prospectus supplement, the prospectus,
and the documents incorporated by reference herein are residents
of Canada, and a majority of their assets are located outside of
the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for United
States investors to effect service of process within the United
States upon those directors, officers or experts who are not
residents of the United States, or to realize in the United
States upon judgments of courts of the United States predicated
upon civil liability of such directors, officers or experts
under United States federal securities laws.
v
RISK
FACTORS
Before
making an investment decision, prospective purchasers should
carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below
and under the heading Risk Factors in Barricks
annual information form dated March 27, 2008 for the year
ended December 31, 2007, which is incorporated by reference
herein. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones
facing Barrick. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently
known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair
our business operations. If any such risks actually occur, our
business, financial condition and operating results could be
materially harmed.
Current
global financial condition
Current
global financial conditions have been characterized by
volatility and several financial institutions have either gone
into bankruptcy or have had to be rescued by governmental
authorities. Access to financing has been negatively impacted by
many factors as a result of the global financial crisis. This
may impact our ability to obtain financing in the future on
terms favourable to us. Additionally, global economic conditions
may cause decreases in asset values that are deemed to be other
than temporary, which may result in impairment losses. If such
volatility and market turmoil continue, our operations and
financial condition could be adversely impacted and the market
value of the Notes and our ability to make payments of principal
and/or
interest on the Notes may be adversely affected.
Bankruptcy,
liquidation or reorganization of Barricks
subsidiaries
Barrick
conducts a substantial portion of its operations through
subsidiaries. The Notes will be obligations exclusively of
Barrick. Barricks subsidiaries will not guarantee or
otherwise be responsible for the payment of principal or
interest or other payments required to be made by Barrick under
the Notes. Accordingly, the Notes will effectively be
subordinated to all existing and future liabilities (including
trade payables and indebtedness) of such subsidiaries. In the
event of an insolvency, liquidation or other reorganization of
any such subsidiaries, Barricks creditors (including the
holders of the Notes) will have no right to proceed against the
assets of such subsidiaries. Creditors of such subsidiaries
would generally be entitled to payment in full from such assets
before any assets are made available for distribution to Barrick.
Credit
ratings may change, adversely affecting the market value of the
Notes and our cost of capital
There is no
assurance that the credit ratings assigned to the Notes or
Barrick will remain in effect for any given period of time or
that any such rating will not be revised or withdrawn entirely
by a rating agency. Real or anticipated changes in credit
ratings assigned to the Notes will generally affect the market
price of the Notes. In addition, real or anticipated changes in
our credit ratings may also affect the cost at which we can
access the capital markets.
Absence
of market for the Notes
Prior to
this offering, there was no public market for the Notes and
there can be no assurance that a secondary market for the Notes
will develop. Barrick has been informed by the underwriters that
they presently intend to make a market in the Notes after this
offering is completed, as permitted by applicable laws and
regulations. The underwriters are not obligated, however, to
make a market in the Notes and any market making may be
discontinued at any time at the sole discretion of the
underwriters. In addition, the liquidity of the trading market
in the Notes and the market price quoted for the Notes may be
adversely affected by changes in the overall market for debt
securities and by changes in our financial performance or
prospects or in the prospects for companies in our industry
generally. As a result, you cannot be sure that an active
trading market will develop for the Notes or as to the liquidity
of any trading market that may develop.
Changes
in interest rates may cause the value of the Notes to
decline
Prevailing
interest rates will affect the market price or value of the
Notes. The market price or value of the Notes may decline as
prevailing interest rates for comparable debt instruments rise,
and increase as prevailing interest rates for comparable debt
instruments decline.
We may
issue additional Notes
Under the
terms of the Indenture (as defined below), we may, from time to
time, without notice to, or the consent of, the holders of the
Notes, reopen the Notes and issue additional notes,
which notes will be equal in rank to the Notes in all respects
(or in all respects except for the payment of interest accruing
prior to the issue date of the new notes or except for the first
payment of interest following the issue date of the new notes)
so that the new notes may be consolidated with and
S-1
form a
single series with, and have the same terms as to status,
redemption or otherwise as, the Notes offered under this
prospectus supplement.
We may be
unable to purchase the Notes upon a change of control repurchase
event
If we
experience a change of control and the Notes experience a
specified credit rating decline, we will be required to offer to
purchase the Notes for cash at a price equal to 101% of the
principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest
to the date of purchase in order to avoid an event of default
under the Indenture. See Description of the
NotesChange of Control Repurchase Event. A change of
control may also require us to purchase certain of our other
indebtedness and give rise to the early termination of our
primary bank credit facility. In the event of a change of
control and a specified credit rating decline relating to our
debt, we may not have sufficient funds to purchase all of the
affected indebtedness and to repay the amounts owing under our
primary bank credit facility.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The net
proceeds to Barrick from the sale of the Notes, after deducting
the estimated expenses of this offering, will be approximately
$ million.
The net
proceeds from this offering will be used for general corporate
purposes, including to fund construction at our projects and to
make investments in our subsidiaries. Barrick, which as of
December 31, 2008 had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $1,437 million, believes that it is important
to maintain a sound capital position given the current global
economic uncertainty.
S-2
CONSOLIDATED
CAPITALIZATION
The
following table sets forth the cash and cash equivalents and the
consolidated capitalization of Barrick as at December 31,
2008, the date of Barricks most recently filed financial
statements, and as at December 31, 2008 as adjusted to give
effect to the issuance of the Notes, the receipt of the net
proceeds from this offering and the anticipated application of
the net proceeds from this offering as described under Use
of Proceeds. The table should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements of Barrick as at
and for the year ended December 31, 2008, including the
notes thereto, and the related managements discussion and
analysis, which are incorporated by reference into this
prospectus supplement. There has been no material change in the
capitalization of Barrick since December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt(2)
|
|
$
|
4,350
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
13,372
|
|
|
|
13,372
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
15,277
|
|
|
|
15,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capitalization(3)
|
|
$
|
19,627
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
After
deducting the estimated expenses of the offering of the Notes.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Long-term
debt excludes the current portion of long-term debt, reclamation
and closure costs and other liabilities and includes capital
leases. Refer to note 20b to Barricks comparative
audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008 for more information regarding
Barricks long-term debt.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Total
capitalization is long-term debt plus shareholders equity.
|
S-3
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
INFORMATION
The
following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial and operating information of Barrick prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP (other than in the case of
operating statistics). Such data should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements of Barrick as
at and for the year ended December 31, 2008, including the
notes thereto and the related managements discussion and
analysis, which are incorporated by reference in this prospectus
supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in
millions, except percentages and operating statistics)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold sales
|
|
$
|
6,656
|
|
|
$
|
5,027
|
|
|
$
|
4,493
|
|
Copper sales
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
Cost of
sales(1)
|
|
|
3,876
|
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,207
|
|
|
$
|
3,043
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
24,161
|
|
|
|
21,951
|
|
|
|
21,510
|
|
Long-term
debt(2)
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
15,277
|
|
|
|
15,256
|
|
|
|
14,199
|
|
Long-term debt to total shareholders
equity(2)(3)
|
|
|
28.5%
|
|
|
|
20.7%
|
|
|
|
22.8%
|
|
Long-term debt to total
capitalization(2)(4)(5)
|
|
|
22.2%
|
|
|
|
17.1%
|
|
|
|
18.6%
|
|
Operating Statistics (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold production (millions of
ounces)(6)
|
|
|
7,657
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
8,643
|
|
Average realized gold price per
ounce(8)
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
Gold reserves: proven and probable (thousands of
ounces)(6)(7)
|
|
|
138,506
|
|
|
|
124,588
|
|
|
|
123,066
|
|
Copper production (millions of pounds)
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Average realized copper price per
pound(8)
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
Copper reserves: proven and probable (millions of
pounds)(7)
|
|
|
6,392
|
|
|
|
6,203
|
|
|
|
6,006
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Cost
of sales includes all costs that are capitalized to inventory
except for amortization of property, plant and equipment. The
amount of amortization from operating segments excluded from
cost of sales was $971 million in 2008, $984 million
in 2007 and $716 million in 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Long-term
debt excludes the current portion of long-term debt, reclamation
and closure costs and other liabilities and includes capital
leases. Refer to note 20b to Barricks audited
comparative consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Equals
long-term debt divided by shareholders equity.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Total
capitalization is long-term debt plus shareholders equity.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Equals
long-term debt divided by total capitalization.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Barricks
share.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mineral
reserves and mineral resources have been calculated as at
December 31, 2008 in accordance with NI
43-101 as
required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities. For
United States reporting purposes, Industry Guide 7 (under the
Exchange Act), as interpreted by Staff of the SEC, applies
different standards in order to classify mineralization as a
reserve. Accordingly, for U.S. reporting purposes, the
mineralization at Cerro Casale is classified as mineralized
material and approximately 600,000 ounces of mineralization for
Pueblo Viejo (Barricks 60% interest) classified as
reserves under NI 43-101 are classified as mineralized
material. For a breakdown of reserves and resources by category
and for a more detailed description of the key assumptions,
parameters and methods used in calculating Barricks
reserves and resources, see the Summary of Reserves and
Resources incorporated by reference herein and Barricks
most recent annual information
form/Form 40-F
on file with Canadian provincial securities regulatory
authorities and the SEC.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Average
realized gold price per ounce and average realized copper price
per pound are non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation of sales to
realized price per ounce / per pound is included in the table
below. For further information on non-GAAP measures used by
Barrick, please see our managements discussion and
analysis for the financial year ended December 31, 2008,
incorporated by reference herein.
|
S-4
Reconciliation
of Sales to Realized Price Per Ounce/Per Pound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(in
millions, except ounces/pounds sold and per ounce/pound
data)
|
|
Sales
|
|
$6,656
|
|
$5,027
|
|
$4,493
|
|
$1,228
|
|
$1,305
|
|
$1,137
|
Sales attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
(56)
|
|
(38)
|
|
52
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Unrealized non-edge gold/copper derivative (gains) losses
|
|
2
|
|
(2)
|
|
7
|
|
(23)
|
|
(26)
|
|
13
|
Unrealized mark to market provisional price adjustments
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
1
|
|
38
|
|
10
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales as adjusted
|
|
$6,601
|
|
$4,985
|
|
$4,553
|
|
$1,243
|
|
$1,289
|
|
$1,150
|
Ounces/pounds sold (000s)
|
|
7,595
|
|
8,055
|
|
8,390
|
|
367
|
|
401
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gold/copper price per ounce/pound
|
|
$870
|
|
$619
|
|
$543
|
|
$3.39
|
|
$3.22
|
|
$3.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS
COVERAGE
This pro
forma coverage information for the 12 months ended
December 31, 2008 is included in accordance with Canadian
disclosure requirements. The coverage has been calculated using
financial information prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP. The coverage provided below has been calculated
to reflect the offering of Notes under this prospectus
supplement, and also includes required adjustments for all
issuances and repayments of long-term debt since
December 31, 2008 and servicing costs incurred in relation
thereto. Specifically, our pro forma earnings coverage
calculations for the 12 months ended December 31, 2008
have been adjusted for the effect of this offering of Notes.
Our pro
forma interest requirements on our consolidated long-term debt
would have been $ million for
the 12 months ended December 31, 2008 (including
amounts capitalized during the period). Our earnings before
interest expense and income taxes for the 12 months ended
December 31, 2008 were $1,396 million, which
is times
our pro forma interest requirements for this period.
S-5
DESCRIPTION
OF THE NOTES
The
following description of the particular terms of the Notes
(referred to in the prospectus as the Debt
Securities) supplements, and to the extent
inconsistent therewith, replaces the description of the Debt
Securities set forth in the prospectus under Description
of Debt Securities and the Guarantees and should be read
in conjunction with such description. Such information does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to all of the provisions of the Notes and the
Indenture, including the definition of certain terms contained
therein. In this section, the term Barrick refers
only to Barrick Gold Corporation without any of its
subsidiaries. Capitalized terms used and not defined in this
section of this prospectus supplement have the meanings ascribed
to them under the heading Description of Debt Securities
and the Guarantees in the prospectus.
The Notes
issued by Barrick will be a separate series of Debt Securities
under the indenture, dated as of September 11, 2008 (the
Indenture), between Barrick, Barrick North
America Finance LLC, Barrick Gold Financeco LLC and The Bank of
New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), as trustee (the
Trustee).
General
The Notes
will be unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of Barrick
initially issued in an aggregate principal amount of
$ million and will mature
on , .
The Notes will bear interest at the rate
of % per annum from and including
March , 2009 or from and including the most
recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or
provided for, payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15
and September 15 of each year, commencing
September , 2009, to the persons in whose names
the Notes are registered at the close of business on the
preceding March 1 or September 1, as the case may be.
Payment of
the principal of, interest on, and premium, if any, on the Notes
will be made in United States dollars. The Notes will trade in
the Same-Day
Funds Settlement System of The Depository Trust Company
(the Depositary), and secondary market
trading activity in the Notes will therefore be required by the
Depositary to settle in immediately available funds.
Interest on
the Notes will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year
of twelve
30-day
months. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on, the
Notes will be payable, and the Notes may be presented for
registration of transfer and exchange, at the office or agency
of Barrick maintained for such purpose in the Borough of
Manhattan, The City of New York, which initially shall be the
office of the Trustee.
The Notes
will not be entitled to the benefit of a sinking fund and will
not be subject to repurchase by Barrick at the option of the
holders thereof prior to maturity except as described below
under Change of Control Repurchase Event.
The Notes
will be issued in fully registered form without coupons in
minimum denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000
in excess thereof. As described below under Global
Securities and Book-Entry System, the Notes will be issued
in book-entry form and will be evidenced by one or more global
securities. Subject to the terms of the Indenture, no service
charge will be made for any registration of transfer or exchange
or redemption of Notes, except for certain taxes or other
governmental charges that may be imposed with any registration
of transfer or exchange.
Barrick may
issue Debt Securities and incur additional indebtedness other
than through the offering of Notes pursuant to this prospectus
supplement.
Reopening
of the Notes
Barrick may,
from time to time, without notice to, or the consent of, the
holders of the Notes, create and issue additional notes under
the Indenture equal in rank to the Notes offered under this
prospectus supplement in all respects (or in all respects except
for the payment of interest accruing prior to the issue date of
the new notes or except for the first payment of interest
following the issue date of the new notes) so that the new notes
may be consolidated with and form a single series with, and have
the same terms as to status, redemption and otherwise as, the
Notes offered under this prospectus supplement.
Optional
Redemption
Barrick may
redeem the Notes, in whole or from time to time in part, on any
date (each, a redemption date) at a
redemption price equal to the greater of
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
100% of the
principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed; and
|
|
|
(2)
|
the sum of
the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of
principal and interest on the Notes to be redeemed (exclusive of
interest accrued to the applicable redemption date) discounted
|
S-6
|
|
|
|
|
to such
redemption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a
360-day year
consisting of twelve
30-day
months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined below)
plus basis points,
|
plus, in the
case of both clauses (1) and (2) above, accrued and
unpaid interest on the principal amount of the Notes being
redeemed to such redemption date. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
instalments of interest on Notes being redeemed that are due and
payable on interest payment dates falling on or prior to the
relevant redemption date will be payable to the holders of such
Notes registered as such at the close of business on the
relevant record dates according to their terms and the
provisions of the Indenture.
In
connection with such optional redemption, the following defined
terms apply:
Comparable
Treasury Issue means, with respect to any redemption
date for the Notes, the United States Treasury security selected
by the Independent Investment Banker as having a maturity
comparable to the remaining term of the Notes that would be
utilized, at the time of selection and in accordance with
customary financial practice, in pricing new issues of corporate
debt securities of comparable maturity to the remaining term of
the Notes.
Comparable
Treasury Price means, with respect to any redemption
date for the Notes, (a) the average of four Reference
Treasury Dealer Quotations for such redemption date, after
excluding the highest and lowest such Reference Treasury Dealer
Quotations, (b) if Barrick obtains fewer than four but more
than one such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations for such
redemption date, the average of all such quotations or
(c) if Barrick obtains only one such Reference Treasury
Dealer Quotation for such redemption date, that Reference
Treasury Dealer Quotation.
Final
Maturity Date
means , .
Independent
Investment Banker means, with respect to any
redemption date for the Notes, the Reference Treasury Dealer
appointed by Barrick.
Reference
Treasury Dealer means, with respect to any redemption
date for the Notes, (a) each of Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and their respective successors or, in each case,
one of their respective affiliates which is a Primary Treasury
Dealer (as defined below); provided, however, that if any of the
foregoing shall cease to be a primary U.S. government
securities dealer in New York City (a Primary Treasury
Dealer), Barrick shall substitute therefor another Primary
Treasury Dealer; and (b) one other Primary Treasury Dealer
selected by Barrick.
Reference
Treasury Dealer Quotations means, with respect to each
Reference Treasury Dealer and any redemption date for the Notes,
the average, as determined by Barrick, of the bid and asked
prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case
as a percentage of its principal amount) quoted in writing to
Barrick by such Reference Treasury Dealer at
5:00 p.m. New York City time on the third Business Day
preceding such redemption date.
Treasury
Rate means, with respect to any redemption date for
the Notes,
(1) the
yield, under the heading that represents the average for the
immediately preceding week, appearing in the most recently
published statistical release designated H.15 (519)
or any successor publication which is published weekly by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and which
establishes yields on actively traded United States Treasury
securities adjusted to constant maturity under the caption
Treasury Constant Maturities, for the maturity
corresponding to the Comparable Treasury Issue (if no maturity
is within three months before or after the Final Maturity Date
for the Notes, yields for the two published maturities most
closely corresponding to the Comparable Treasury Issue shall be
determined and the Treasury Rate shall be interpolated or
extrapolated from such yields on a straight line basis, rounding
to the nearest month) or
(2) if
such release (or any successor release) is not published during
the week preceding the calculation date or does not contain such
yields, the rate per annum equal to the semi-annual equivalent
yield to maturity of the Comparable Treasury Issue, calculated
using a price for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed as a
percentage of its principal amount) equal to the Comparable
Treasury Price for such redemption date.
The Treasury
Rate shall be calculated on the third Business Day preceding the
applicable redemption date. As used in the immediately preceding
sentence and in the definition of Reference Treasury
Dealer Quotations above, the term Business
Day means each Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday
and Friday which is not a day on which banking institutions in
The City of New York are authorized or obligated by law,
regulation or executive order to close.
Notice of
any redemption will be mailed at least 30 days but not more
than 60 days before the redemption date to each holder of
the Notes to be redeemed at such holders registered
address. If less than all the Notes are to be redeemed at the
option of Barrick, the Trustee will select, by lot or in such
manner as it deems fair and appropriate, the Notes (or portions
thereof) to be redeemed.
S-7
Unless
Barrick defaults in payment of the redemption price, on and
after the redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on the
Notes or any portion thereof called for redemption on such
redemption date.
Barrick will
have the right to purchase Notes in the market, by private
contract or by tender at any time at any price.
Payment
of Additional Amounts
All payments
made by or on behalf of Barrick under or with respect to the
Notes will be made free and clear of and without withholding or
deduction for or on account of any present or future tax, duty,
levy, impost, assessment or other governmental charge (including
penalties, interest and other liabilities related thereto)
imposed or levied by or on behalf of the Government of Canada or
any province or territory thereof or by any authority or agency
therein or thereof having power to tax (hereafter
Canadian Taxes), unless Barrick is required
to withhold or deduct Canadian Taxes by law or by the
interpretation or administration thereof. If Barrick is so
required to withhold or deduct any amount for or on account of
Canadian Taxes from any payment made under or with respect to
the Notes, Barrick will pay to each holder of such Notes as
additional interest such additional amounts (Additional
Amounts) as may be necessary so that the net amount
received by each such holder after such withholding or deduction
(and after deducting any Canadian Taxes on such Additional
Amounts) will not be less than the amount such holder would have
received if such Canadian Taxes had not been withheld or
deducted, except as described below. However, no Additional
Amounts will be payable with respect to a payment made to a Note
holder (such holder, an Excluded Holder) in
respect of the beneficial owner thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
with which
Barrick does not deal at arms length (for the purposes of
the Income Tax Act (Canada)) at the time of the making of
such payment;
|
|
|
which is
subject to such Canadian Taxes by reason of the Note holder
being a resident, domiciliary or national of, engaged in
business or maintaining a permanent establishment or other
physical presence in or otherwise having some connection with
Canada or any province or territory thereof otherwise than by
the mere holding of the Notes or the receipt of payments
thereunder;
|
|
|
which is
subject to such Canadian Taxes by reason of the Note
holders failure to comply with any certification,
identification, documentation or other reporting requirements if
compliance is required by law, regulation, administrative
practice or an applicable treaty as a precondition to exemption
from, or a reduction in the rate of deduction or withholding of,
such Canadian Taxes (provided that Barrick advises the Trustee
and the holders of the Notes then outstanding of any change in
such requirements); or
|
|
|
which is a
fiduciary or partnership or Person other than the sole
beneficial owner of such payment to the extent that the Canadian
Taxes would not have been imposed on such payment had such
holder been the sole beneficial owner of such Notes.
|
Barrick will
also:
|
|
|
|
|
make such
withholding or deduction; and
|
|
|
remit the
full amount deducted or withheld to the relevant authority in
accordance with applicable law.
|
Barrick will
furnish to the holders of the Notes, within 60 days after
the date the payment of any Canadian Taxes is due pursuant to
applicable law, certified copies of tax receipts or other
documents evidencing such payment by such person.
Barrick will
indemnify and hold harmless each holder of Notes (other than an
Excluded Holder) from and against, and upon written request
reimburse each such holder for the amount (excluding any
Additional Amounts that have previously been paid by Barrick
with respect thereto) of:
|
|
|
|
|
any Canadian
Taxes so levied or imposed and paid by such holder as a result
of payments made under or with respect to the Notes;
|
|
|
any
liability (including penalties, interest and expenses) arising
therefrom or with respect thereto; and
|
|
|
any Canadian
Taxes imposed with respect to any reimbursement under the
preceding two bullet points, but excluding any such Canadian
Taxes on such holders net income.
|
In any
event, no Additional Amounts or indemnity amounts will be
payable under the provisions described above in respect of any
Note in excess of the Additional Amounts and the indemnity
amounts which would be required if, at all relevant times, the
holder of such Note were a resident of the United States and a
qualifying person for purposes of the Canada-U.S. Income
Tax Convention (1980), as amended, including any protocols
thereto. As a result of the limitation on the payment of
Additional Amounts and indemnity amounts discussed in the
preceding sentence, the Additional Amounts or indemnity amounts
received by certain holders of Notes will be less than the
amount of Canadian Taxes withheld or deducted or the amount of
Canadian Taxes (and related amounts) levied or imposed giving
rise to the obligation to pay the
S-8
indemnity
amounts, as the case may be, and, accordingly, the net amount
received by such holders of Notes will be less than the amount
such holders would have received had there been no such
withholding or deduction in respect of Canadian Taxes or had
such Canadian Taxes (and related amounts) not been levied or
imposed.
Wherever in
the Indenture there is mentioned, in any context, the payment of
principal, premium, if any, interest, if any, or any other
amount payable under or with respect to a Note, such mention
shall be deemed to include mention of the payment of Additional
Amounts to the extent that, in such context, Additional Amounts
are, were or would be payable in respect thereof.
Tax
Redemption
Barrick may
redeem the Notes at any time, in whole but not in part, at a
redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof together
with accrued and unpaid interest to the date fixed for
redemption, upon the giving of a notice as described below, if:
|
|
|
|
|
as a result
of any change (including any announced prospective change) in or
amendment to the laws (or any regulations or rulings promulgated
thereunder) of Canada (or the jurisdiction of organization of
the successor of Barrick) or of any political subdivision or
taxing authority thereof or therein affecting taxation, or any
change in official position regarding the application or
interpretation of such laws, regulations or rulings (including a
holding by a court of competent jurisdiction), which change or
amendment is announced or becomes effective on or after the date
of this prospectus supplement, and which in a written opinion to
Barrick of legal counsel of recognized standing has resulted or
will result (assuming, in the case of any announced prospective
change, that such announced change will become effective as of
the date specified in such announcement and in the form
announced) in Barrick becoming obligated to pay, on the next
succeeding date on which interest is due, Additional Amounts
with respect to any Note as described under
Payment of Additional Amounts; or
|
|
|
|
on or after
the date of this prospectus supplement, any action has been
taken by any taxing authority of, or any decision has been
rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction in, Canada (or the
jurisdiction of organization of the successor of Barrick) or any
political subdivision or taxing authority thereof or therein,
including any of those actions specified in the paragraph
immediately above, whether or not such action was taken or
decision was rendered with respect to Barrick, or any change,
amendment, application or interpretation shall be officially
proposed, which, in any such case, in the written opinion to
Barrick of legal counsel of recognized standing, will result
(assuming, in the case of any announced prospective change, that
such announced change will become effective as of the date
specified in such announcement and in the form announced) in
Barrick becoming obligated to pay, on the next succeeding date
on which interest is due, Additional Amounts with respect to any
Note;
|
and, in any
such case, Barrick (or its successor), in its business judgment,
determines that such obligation cannot be avoided by the use of
reasonable measures available to it (or its successor).
In the event
that Barrick elects to redeem the Notes pursuant to the
provisions set forth in the preceding paragraph, it shall
deliver to the Trustee a certificate, signed by an authorized
officer, stating that it is entitled to redeem such Notes
pursuant to their terms.
Notice of
intention to redeem such Notes will be given not more than 60
nor less than 30 days prior to the date fixed for
redemption and will specify the date fixed for redemption.
Change of
Control Repurchase Event
If a change
of control repurchase event occurs in respect of the Notes,
unless Barrick has exercised its right to redeem the Notes as
described above under Optional Redemption or
Tax Redemption, Barrick will be required to
make an offer to each holder of the Notes to repurchase all or
any part (in minimum denominations of $2,000 and integral
multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof) of that holders
Notes at a repurchase price in cash equal to 101% of the
aggregate principal amount of the Notes repurchased plus any
accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes repurchased to, but not
including, the date of repurchase. Within 30 days following
any change of control repurchase event or, at Barricks
option, prior to any change of control, but after the public
announcement of the proposed change of control, Barrick will
mail a notice to each holder, with a copy to the Trustee,
describing the transaction or transactions that constitute or
may constitute the change of control repurchase event and
offering to repurchase Notes on the payment date specified in
the notice, which date will be no earlier than 30 days and
no later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed,
other than as may be required by law. The notice shall, if
mailed prior to the date of consummation of the change of
control, state that the offer to purchase is conditioned on a
change of control repurchase event occurring on or prior to the
payment date
S-9
specified in
the notice. Holders of Notes electing to have their Notes
purchased pursuant to a change of control repurchase event offer
will be required to surrender their Notes, with the form
entitled Option of Holder to Elect Purchase on the
reverse of the Note completed, to the paying agent at the
address specified in the notice, or transfer their Notes to the
paying agent by book-entry transfer pursuant to the applicable
procedures of the paying agent, prior to the close of business
on the third business day prior to the repurchase payment date.
Barrick will comply with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1
under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and
regulations thereunder to the extent those laws and regulations
are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the Notes as
a result of a change of control repurchase event. To the extent
that the provisions of any applicable securities or corporate
laws or regulations conflict with the change of control
repurchase event provisions of the Notes, Barrick will comply
with the applicable securities or corporate laws and regulations
and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under
the change of control repurchase event provisions of the Notes
by virtue of such conflict.
On the
repurchase date following a change of control repurchase event,
Barrick will, to the extent lawful:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
accept for
payment all Notes or portions of the Notes properly tendered
pursuant to Barricks offer;
|
|
|
(2)
|
deposit with
the paying agent an amount equal to the aggregate purchase price
in respect of all the Notes or portions of the Notes properly
tendered; and
|
|
|
(3)
|
deliver or
cause to be delivered to the Trustee the Notes properly
accepted, together with an officers certificate stating
the aggregate principal amount of Notes being purchased by
Barrick.
|
The paying
agent will promptly mail to each holder of Notes properly
tendered the purchase price for the Notes (or make payment
through the Depositary), and the Trustee will promptly
authenticate and mail (or cause to be transferred by book-entry)
to each holder a new Note equal in principal amount to any
unpurchased portion of any Notes surrendered; provided that each
new Note will be in a minimum principal amount of $2,000 and
integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof.
Barrick will
not be required to make an offer to repurchase the Notes issued
by it upon a change of control repurchase event if a third party
makes such an offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in
compliance with the requirements for an offer made by Barrick
and such third party purchases all Notes properly tendered and
not withdrawn under its offer.
For purposes
of the foregoing discussion of a repurchase at the option of
holders, the following definitions are applicable:
change
of control means the occurrence of any of the
following:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
the direct
or indirect sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other
disposition (other than by way of merger, amalgamation, plan of
arrangement or consolidation), in one or a series of related
transactions, of all or substantially all of the assets of
Barrick and its subsidiaries taken as a whole to any
person (as that term is used in
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) other than to Barrick
or one of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
(2)
|
the
consummation of any transaction (including, without limitation,
any merger, amalgamation, plan of arrangement or consolidation)
the result of which is that any person (as that term
is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) (other
than a subsidiary of Barrick) becomes the beneficial owner (as
defined in
Rules 13d-3
and 13d-5
under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more than
50% of the combined voting power of Barricks voting stock
or other voting stock into which Barricks voting stock is
reclassified, consolidated, exchanged or changed measured by
voting power rather than number of shares;
|
|
|
(3)
|
Barrick
consolidates with, or merges or amalgamates with or into, or
enters into a plan of arrangement with, any person
(as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange
Act), or any person consolidates with, or merges with or into,
Barrick, in any such event pursuant to a transaction in which
any of the outstanding voting stock of Barrick or such other
person is converted into or exchanged for cash, securities or
other property, other than any such transaction where the shares
of the voting stock of Barrick outstanding immediately prior to
such transaction constitute, or are converted into or exchanged
for, a majority of the voting stock of the surviving person or
any direct or indirect parent company of the surviving person
immediately after giving effect to such transaction;
|
|
|
(4)
|
the first
day on which the majority of the members of the board of
directors of Barrick cease to be continuing directors; or
|
|
|
(5)
|
the adoption
of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of Barrick.
|
S-10
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, a transaction will not be deemed to involve a
change of control if (1) Barrick becomes a direct or
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of a holding company and (2)(A)
the direct or indirect holders of the voting stock of such
holding company immediately following that transaction are
substantially the same as the holders of Barricks voting
stock immediately prior to that transaction or
(B) immediately following that transaction, no
person (as that term is used in
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) (other than a holding
company satisfying the requirements of this sentence) is the
beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of
the voting stock of such holding company.
The
definition of change of control includes a phrase relating to
the direct or indirect sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or
other disposition of all or substantially all of
Barricks and its subsidiaries properties or assets
taken as a whole. Although there is a limited body of case law
interpreting the phrase substantially all, there is
no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable
law. Accordingly, the ability of a holder of Notes to require
Barrick to repurchase such holders Notes as a result of a
sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of less
than all of Barricks and its subsidiaries assets
taken as a whole to another person or group may be uncertain.
change
of control repurchase event means the Notes cease to
be rated investment grade by each of the rating agencies on any
date during the
60-day
period (which period shall be extended so long as the rating of
the Notes is under publicly announced consideration for a
possible downgrade by any of the rating agencies) after the
earlier of (1) the occurrence of a change of control; and
(2) public notice of the intention by Barrick to effect a
change of control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a change of
control repurchase event will be deemed not to have occurred in
connection with any particular change of control unless and
until such change of control has actually been consummated.
continuing
director means, as of any date of determination, any
member of the board of directors of Barrick who:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
was a member
of such board of directors on the date of the closing of this
offering; or
|
|
|
(2)
|
was
nominated for election, elected or appointed to such board of
directors with the approval of a majority of the continuing
directors who were members of such board of directors at the
time of such nomination, election or appointment (either by a
specific vote or by approval of Barricks proxy statement
in which such member was named as a nominee for election as a
director, without objection to such nomination).
|
investment
grade means a rating of Baa3 or better by Moodys
(or its equivalent under any successor rating categories of
Moodys); a rating of BBB-or better by S&P (or its
equivalent under any successor rating categories of S&P);
and the equivalent investment grade credit rating from any
additional rating agency or rating agencies selected by Barrick
as a replacement rating agency or replacement ratings agencies.
Moodys
means Moodys Investors Service Inc., a subsidiary of
Moodys Corporation, and its successors.
rating
agency means each of Moodys and S&P;
provided, that if either Moodys or S&P ceases to rate
the Notes or fails to make a rating of the Notes publicly
available for reasons outside of Barricks control, Barrick
may select (as certified by a resolution of Barricks board
of directors) a nationally recognized statistical rating
organization within the meaning of
Rule 15c3-1(c)(2)(vi)(F)
under the Exchange Act, as a replacement agency for Moodys
or S&P, or both of them, as the case may be.
S&P
means Standard & Poors Ratings Services, a
division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and its successors.
voting
stock of any specified person (as that
term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) as of
any date means the capital stock of such person that is at the
time entitled to vote generally in the election of the board of
directors of such person.
The change
of control repurchase event feature of the Notes may in certain
circumstances make more difficult or discourage a sale or
takeover of Barrick and, thus, the removal of incumbent
management. Subject to the limitations discussed below, Barrick
could, in the future, enter into certain transactions, including
acquisitions, refinancings or other recapitalizations, that
would not constitute a change of control repurchase event under
the Notes, but that could increase the amount of indebtedness
outstanding at such time or otherwise affect Barricks
capital structure or credit ratings on the Notes. Restrictions
on Barricks ability to incur liens are contained in the
covenants as described under Description of Debt
Securities and the GuaranteesCertain
CovenantsLimitation on Liens in the prospectus.
Barrick may
not have sufficient funds to repurchase all the Notes upon a
change of control repurchase event.
Global
Securities and Book-Entry System
The Notes
will be represented by one or more global notes (collectively,
the Global Securities) registered in the name
of the nominee of the Depositary. The provisions described under
Description of Debt Securities and the
S-11
GuaranteesRegistered
Global Securities in the prospectus will be applicable to
the Notes. Except as described under Description of Debt
Securities and the GuaranteesRegistered Global
SecuritiesSpecial Situations When Global Security Will be
Terminated in the prospectus, owners of beneficial
interests in the Notes will not be entitled to receive Notes in
definitive form and will not be considered holders of Notes
under the Indenture.
The
Depositary
The
Depositary has advised Barrick and the underwriters as follows:
The
Depositary is a limited-purpose trust company organized under
the New York Banking Law, a banking organization
within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the
Federal Reserve System, a clearing corporation
within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and
a clearing agency registered pursuant to the provisions of
Section 17A of the Exchange Act. The Depositary holds and
provides asset servicing for securities that the
Depositarys participants (Direct
Participants) deposit with the Depositary. The
Depositary also facilitates the post-trade settlement among
Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions
in deposited securities, through electronic computerized
book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct
Participants accounts. This eliminates the need for
physical movement of securities certificates. Direct
Participants include both U.S. and
non-U.S. securities
brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing
corporations and certain other organizations. The Depositary is
a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depositary Trust &
Clearing Corporation (DTCC). DTCC, in turn,
is owned by a number of Direct Participants of the Depositary
and Members of the National Securities Clearing Corporation,
Government Securities Clearing Corporation, MBS Clearing
Corporation, and Emerging Markets Clearing Corporation (NSCC,
GSCC, MBSCC, and EMCC, respectively, also are subsidiaries of
DTCC), as well as by the NYSE Euronext and the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Access to the
Depositarys system is also available to others such as
both U.S. and
non-U.S. securities
brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing
corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial
relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or
indirectly (Indirect Participants). The
Depositarys Rules applicable to its participants are on
file with the SEC.
Purchases of
Notes under the Depositarys system must be made by or
through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for
such Notes on the Depositarys records. The ownership
interest of each actual purchaser of Notes represented by the
Global Securities (a Beneficial Owner), is in
turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect
Participants records. Beneficial Owners will not receive
written confirmation from the Depositary of their purchase, but
Beneficial Owners are expected to receive written confirmation
providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic
statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect
Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the
transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in Global
Securities are to be accomplished by entries made on the books
of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of
Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive Notes in
definitive form representing their ownership interests therein,
except in the limited circumstances described under
Description of Debt Securities and the
GuaranteesRegistered Global SecuritiesSpecial
Situations When Global Security Will be Terminated in the
prospectus.
To
facilitate subsequent transfers, the Global Securities deposited
with the Depositary will be registered in the name of the
Depositarys partnership nominee, Cede & Co. The
deposit of the Global Securities with the Depositary and their
registration in the name of Cede & Co. does not effect
any change in beneficial ownership. The Depositary has no
knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Global
Securities representing the Notes. The Depositarys records
reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose
accounts such Notes are credited, which may or may not be the
Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will
remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on
behalf of their customers.
Conveyance
of notices and other communications by the Depositary to Direct
Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants,
and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to
Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them,
subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in
effect from time to time.
Redemption
notices shall be sent to Cede & Co. If less than all
of the Notes are being redeemed, the Depositarys practice
is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct
Participant in the Notes.
Neither the
Depositary nor Cede & Co. will consent or vote with
respect to the Global Securities unless authorized by a Direct
Participant in accordance with the Depositarys procedures.
Under its usual procedures, the Depositary mails an omnibus
proxy (an Omnibus Proxy) to Barrick as soon
as possible after the applicable record date. The Omnibus Proxy
assigns Cede & Co.s consenting or voting rights
to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the Notes are
credited on the applicable record date (identified in a listing
attached to the Omnibus Proxy).
Principal,
premium, if any, and interest payments on the Global Securities
will be made to the Depositary. The Depositarys practice
is to credit Direct Participants accounts on the
applicable payment date in accordance with their
S-12
respective
holdings shown on the Depositarys records unless the
Depositary has reason to believe that it will not receive
payment on such date. Payments by Direct and Indirect
Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing
instructions and customary practices, as is the case with
securities held for the account of customers in bearer form or
registered in street name, and will be the
responsibility of such participants and not of the Depositary,
the Trustee or Barrick, subject to any statutory or regulatory
requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of
principal, premium, if any, and interest to Cede & Co.
is the responsibility of Barrick, disbursement of such payments
to Direct Participants shall be the responsibility of the
Depositary, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial
Owners shall be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect
Participants. Neither Barrick nor the Trustee will have any
responsibility or liability for the disbursements of payments in
respect of ownership interests in the Notes by the Depositary or
the Direct or Indirect Participants or for maintaining or
reviewing any records of the Depositary or the Direct or
Indirect Participants relating to ownership interests in the
Notes or the disbursement of payments in respect thereof.
The
information in this section concerning the Depositary and the
Depositarys system has been obtained from sources that
Barrick believes to be reliable, but is subject to any changes
to the arrangements between Barrick and the Depositary and any
changes to such procedures that may be instituted unilaterally
by the Depositary.
Global
Clearance and Settlement Procedures
Initial
settlement for the Notes will be made in immediately available
funds. Secondary market trading between Depositary participants
(DTC Participants) will occur in the ordinary
way in accordance with the Depositarys rules and will be
settled in immediately available funds using the
Depositarys
Same-Day
Funds Settlement System. Secondary market trading between
Clearstream Banking S.A. (Clearstream,
Luxembourg) participants (Clearstream
Participants)
and/or
Euroclear System (Euroclear) participants
(Euroclear Participants) will occur in the
ordinary way in accordance with the applicable rules and
operating procedures of Clearstream, Luxembourg and Euroclear,
as applicable.
Cross-market
transfers between persons holding directly or indirectly through
the Depositary on the one hand, and directly or indirectly
through Clearstream Participants or Euroclear Participants, on
the other, will be effected through the Depositary in accordance
with the Depositarys rules on behalf of the relevant
European international clearing system by its
U.S. depositary; however, such cross-market transactions
will require delivery of instructions to the relevant European
international clearing system by the counterparty in such system
in accordance with its rules and procedures and within its
established deadlines (European time). The relevant European
international clearing system will, if the transaction meets its
settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its
U.S. depositary to take action to effect final settlement
on its behalf by delivering securities to or receiving
securities from the Depositary, and making or receiving payment
in accordance with normal procedures for
same-day
funds settlement applicable to the Depositary. Clearstream
Participants and Euroclear Participants may not deliver
instructions directly to their respective U.S. depositaries.
Because of
time-zone differences, credits of Notes received in Clearstream,
Luxembourg or Euroclear as a result of a transaction with a DTC
Participant will be made during subsequent securities settlement
processing and dated the business day following the
Depositarys settlement date. The credits or any
transactions in the Notes settled during the processing will be
reported to the relevant Euroclear Participant or Clearstream
Participant on that business day. Cash received in Clearstream,
Luxembourg or Euroclear as a result of sales of the Notes by or
through a Clearstream Participant or a Euroclear Participant to
a DTC Participant will be received with value on the
Depositarys settlement date but will be available in the
relevant Clearstream, Luxembourg or Euroclear cash account only
as of the business day following settlement through the
Depositary.
Although the
Depositary, Clearstream, Luxembourg and Euroclear have agreed to
the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of
Notes among participants of the Depositary, Clearstream,
Luxembourg and Euroclear, they are under no obligation to
perform or continue to perform such procedures and such
procedures may be discontinued or changed at any time.
Entire
Agreement
The
Indenture and the Notes will constitute the entire agreement
between us, the Trustee and holders of Notes pertaining to the
Notes. No implied covenant, agreement, representation or
warranty will be read into the Indenture against us, including
any covenant, agreement, representation or warranty pertaining
to the protection of the reasonable expectations of holders of
Notes. For purposes of any rights or remedies under the
Business Corporations Act (Ontario) that holders of Notes
or the Trustee may assert or employ, any of our acts or
omissions that does not constitute a default in the performance,
or breach, of our covenants and agreements in the Indenture will
be deemed conclusively to be fair and reasonable insofar as the
interests of holders of Notes are concerned and in accordance
with the reasonable expectations of holders of Notes pertaining
to the Notes. For greater certainty, representations, warranties
and statements made by us or on our behalf (whether orally or in
writing and whether in connection with the issue of the Notes or
thereafter) will not give
S-13
rise to, or
form the basis of, any reasonable expectations of holders of
Notes pertaining to the Notes for purposes of any rights or
remedies under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario)
that holders of Notes or the Trustee may assert or employ.
Neither the Indenture nor the Notes may be supplemented, amended
or modified, directly or indirectly, except by one or more
supplemental indentures entered into pursuant to the applicable
provisions of the Indenture.
The above
provisions are intended to preclude holders of Notes from making
assertions that we have obligations to them which extend beyond
our covenants and agreements in the Indenture, or that an act or
omission on our part which does not constitute a default in the
performance, or breach, of our covenants and agreements in the
Indenture, is nevertheless inconsistent with their reasonable
expectations or otherwise unfair or unreasonable insofar as
holders interests are concerned.
Other
The
effective yield of the Notes, if held to maturity,
is % per annum. Interest on the
Notes will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year
of twelve
30-day
months. For the purposes of disclosure under the Interest Act
(Canada), the yearly rate of interest to which interest
calculated on a Note for any period in any calendar year (the
calculation period) is equivalent to the rate
payable under such Note in respect of the calculation period
multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the actual
number of days in such calendar year and the denominator of
which is the actual number of days in the calculation period.
The information in the immediately preceding sentence is
provided solely for purposes of complying with applicable
Canadian law and will not affect the manner in which interest
payable on the Notes is calculated or the amount of interest
payable on the Notes. See Risk FactorsCredit ratings
may change, adversely affecting the market value of the Notes
and our cost of capital.
The Trustee
has obtained an order from the OSC pursuant to subsection 46(4)
of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) exempting the
Indenture from Part V of the Business Corporations Act
(Ontario). The Trustee, its officers and directors, and the
assets of the Trustee are located outside of Ontario and, as a
result, it may be difficult for a holder of Notes to enforce
rights against same. A holder of Notes may have to enforce such
rights in the United States.
S-14
CREDIT
RATINGS
The
following table discloses anticipated credit ratings of the
Notes by the rating agencies indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
Rating
Agency
|
|
Rating
|
|
Outlook
|
|
Moodys Investors Service
|
|
Baa1
|
|
Stable
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
A-
|
|
Stable
|
Moodys
Investors Service (Moodys) and
Standard & Poors Ratings Services
(S&P) (each a Rating
Agency) have indicated that the Notes will be rated
Baa1 and A-, respectively, subject to receipt of final
documentation.
Moodys
credit ratings are on a long-term debt rating scale that ranges
from Aaa to C, which represents the range from highest to lowest
quality of such securities rated. According to Moodys, a
rating of Baa is the fourth highest of nine major categories.
Moodys applies numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 in each
generic rating classification from Aa to Caa in its corporate
bond rating system. The modifier 1 indicates that the issue
ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category, the
modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking and the modifier 3
indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic
rating category. According to the Moodys rating system,
obligations rated Baa are subject to moderate credit risk and
may possess certain speculative characteristics.
S&Ps
credit ratings are on a long-term debt rating scale that ranges
from AAA to D, which represents the range from highest to lowest
quality of such securities rated. According to S&P, the A
rating is the third highest of ten major categories. The ratings
from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or
minus (−) sign to show relative standing within the major
rating categories. According to the S&P rating system, debt
securities rated A are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse
effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than
obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the
obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the
obligation is still strong.
We
understand that the ratings are based on, among other things,
information furnished to the Rating Agencies by us and
information obtained by the Rating Agencies from publicly
available sources. The credit ratings given to the Notes by the
Rating Agencies are not recommendations to buy, hold or sell the
Notes since such ratings do not comment as to market price or
suitability for a particular purchaser. There is no assurance
that any rating will remain in effect for any given period of
time or that any rating will not be revised or withdrawn
entirely by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment,
circumstances so warrant and if any such rating is so revised or
withdrawn, we are under no obligation to update this prospectus
supplement.
S-15
U.S.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The
following summary discusses certain material U.S. federal
income tax consequences to U.S. Holders (as defined below)
relating to the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the
Notes. This summary deals only with Notes held as capital assets
(generally, assets held for investment) and is applicable only
to initial purchasers of the Notes who purchase the Notes in
this offering at their issue price. The following discussion
does not deal with the U.S. federal income tax consequences
to any particular investor or to persons in special tax
situations such as:
|
|
|
|
|
banks,
insurance companies, trusts and financial institutions;
|
|
|
broker-dealers;
|
|
|
U.S. expatriates;
|
|
|
traders that
elect to mark-to-market their Notes;
|
|
|
tax-exempt
entities;
|
|
|
pass-through
entities (and investors in such entities);
|
|
|
mutual funds;
|
|
|
U.S. Holders
whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
persons
liable for alternative minimum tax; or
|
|
|
persons
holding Notes as part of a straddle, hedging, conversion or
integrated transaction.
|
The
discussion below is based upon the provisions of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), and U.S. Treasury regulations,
rulings and judicial decisions as of the date hereof. Those
authorities may be changed, perhaps retroactively, so as to
result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different
from those discussed below. There can be no assurance that the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
will not challenge one or more of the tax consequences discussed
herein.
A
U.S. Holder that is considering the purchase of Notes
should consult its own tax advisors concerning the
U.S. federal, state and local income tax consequences to it
and any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing
jurisdiction.
For purposes
of this summary, a U.S. Holder is a beneficial
owner of Notes that is:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or
individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
a
corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or
the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
an estate
that is subject to U.S. federal income tax without regard
to its source; or
|
|
|
a trust if
(i) a U.S. court is able to exercise supervision over
the administration of the trust and one or more
U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has a valid
election in effect to be treated as a U.S. person for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
If a
partnership, or other entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, holds the Notes, the tax
treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend
upon the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. A holder of Notes that is a partner of a
partnership holding the Notes should consult its own tax
advisors regarding the U.S. federal tax consequences
relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Notes.
Additional
Payments
In certain
circumstances (see Description of the Notes
Change of Control Repurchase Event), Barrick may be
obligated to pay amounts in excess of stated interest or
principal on the Notes. The obligation to make these payments
may implicate the provisions of the U.S. Treasury
regulations relating to contingent payment debt
instruments. We believe that the likelihood that Barrick
will be obligated to make any such payments is remote.
Therefore, we do not intend to treat the potential payment of
these amounts as subjecting the Notes to the contingent payment
debt instrument rules. Our determination that this contingency
is remote is binding on a U.S. Holder unless such
U.S. Holder discloses its contrary position in the manner
required by applicable U.S. Treasury regulations. Our
determination is not, however, binding on the IRS, and if the
IRS were to challenge this determination, the tax consequences
to a U.S. Holder could differ from those discussed herein.
The remainder of this disclosure assumes that the Notes will not
be treated as contingent payment debt instruments.
Interest
on the Notes
Interest on
the Notes generally will be taxable to a U.S. Holder as
ordinary income at the time that such interest is paid or
accrued, in accordance with the U.S. Holders regular
method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
S-16
Interest on
the Notes will constitute income from sources outside the United
States and generally will be passive category income
or general category income, which are treated
separately from other income for U.S. foreign tax credit
purposes. Due to the complexity of the U.S. foreign tax
credit rules, U.S. Holders should consult their own tax
advisors with respect to the application of the
U.S. foreign tax credit rules to their particular
circumstances.
Sale,
Exchange, Redemption or Other Disposition of the Notes
A
U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss upon the
sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of a Note in an
amount equal to the difference, if any, between the amount
realized upon the sale, exchange, redemption or other
disposition (reduced by any amounts attributable to accrued but
unpaid interest, which will be taxable as interest in the manner
described above under Interest on the
Notes) and such U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis
in the Note. Any gain or loss that a U.S. Holder recognizes
on a disposition of a Note will be capital gain or loss, and
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder
has held such Note for more than one year. Long-term capital
gain of U.S. Holders may be eligible for reduced rates of
taxation. Such gain or loss generally will be treated as income
or loss from within the United States for U.S. foreign tax
credit purposes. A U.S. Holders ability to deduct
capital losses may be limited.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
In general,
information reporting requirements will apply to certain
payments of principal and interest on the Notes and the proceeds
of the sale or other disposition of a Note, unless a
U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient (such as a corporation).
Backup withholding will generally apply to such payments if a
U.S. Holder fails to provide a correct taxpayer
identification number or certification of exempt status
and/or fails
to otherwise comply with the backup withholding requirements, or
if the IRS notifies a payor that the U.S. Holder has
underreported interest or dividend income.
Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a
refund or a credit against a U.S. Holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required
information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.
CANADIAN
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The
following is, as of the date hereof, a general summary of the
principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally
applicable to a holder of Notes who acquires the Notes under
this prospectus supplement and who, at all relevant times, for
purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the Tax
Act) and any applicable income tax treaty or
convention, is not, and is not deemed to be, a resident of
Canada, deals with Barrick at arms length, and does not
use or hold and is not deemed to use or hold the Notes in a
business carried on in Canada (a Non-resident
Holder). Special rules, which are not discussed in
this summary, may apply to a non-resident that is an insurer
carrying on business in Canada and elsewhere.
This summary
is based on the current provisions of the Tax Act and the
regulations thereunder, all specific proposals to amend the Tax
Act and the regulations thereunder publicly announced by or on
behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date
hereof, and the administrative practices of the Canada Revenue
Agency published in writing prior to the date hereof. This
summary is not exhaustive of all possible Canadian federal
income tax considerations and, except as mentioned above, does
not anticipate any changes in law or administrative practice
whether by legislative, regulatory, governmental, administrative
or judicial decision or action, nor does it take into account
provincial, territorial or foreign tax considerations, which may
differ significantly from those discussed herein.
This
summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be,
nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any
particular Non-resident Holder, and no representation with
respect to the income tax consequences to any particular
Non-resident Holder is made. Consequently, prospective
purchasers of Notes should consult their own tax advisors for
advice with respect to the tax consequences to them of
acquiring, holding and disposing of Notes, having regard to such
prospective purchasers own particular
circumstances.
Under the
Tax Act, interest, discount, principal and any premium paid or
credited by Barrick on the Notes to a Non-resident Holder, and
the proceeds received by a Non-resident Holder on disposition of
Notes, including redemption, will be exempt from Canadian
withholding tax. No other taxes on income (or gains) will be
payable under the Tax Act by a Non-resident Holder on interest,
discount, principal and any premium or on the proceeds received
by a Non-resident Holder on the disposition of a Note including
on redemption and payment on maturity.
S-17
UNDERWRITING
Under the
terms and subject to the conditions contained in the
underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus
supplement, Barrick has agreed to sell to each of the
underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. are acting as joint book-running managers, and each
of such underwriters has severally agreed to purchase, the
principal amount of Notes set forth opposite its name below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount of
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
the
Notes
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
$
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
underwriters are offering the Notes subject to their acceptance
of the Notes from Barrick and subject to prior sale. The
underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the Notes
may be terminated at their discretion on the basis of their
assessment of the state of financial markets or on the
occurrence of certain stated events and are also subject to the
approval of legal matters by counsel and other conditions. The
underwriters are, however, obligated to take and pay for all of
the Notes if any are taken. The underwriting agreement also
provides that if an underwriter defaults, the purchase
commitments of the non-defaulting underwriters shall be
increased subject to a maximum increased amount or, if the
increase would exceed the maximum, the purchase commitments may
be terminated. The offering price and other terms of this
offering have been determined by negotiations between Barrick
and the underwriters.
The
underwriters initially propose to offer some of the Notes
directly to the public at the public offering price shown on the
cover page of this prospectus supplement and to offer some of
the Notes to certain dealers at that price less a concession not
in excess of % of the principal
amount. The underwriters may allow, and the dealers may reallow,
a commission not in excess of % of
the principal amount on sales to other dealers. After the
underwriters have made a reasonable effort to sell the Notes at
the initial offering price, they may change the offering price
from time to time to an amount not greater than the initial
offering price, and may also change the concession and
reallowance from time to time. In such an event, the
compensation realized by the underwriters will be decreased by
the amount that the aggregate price paid by purchasers for the
Notes is less than the gross proceeds paid to us by the
underwriters.
The
underwriting commission that Barrick will pay to the
underwriters in connection with the Notes, expressed as a
percentage of the principal amount of the Notes,
is %.
Barrick
estimates that its aggregate expenses for this offering,
excluding underwriting commissions, will be approximately
$ .
The issue of
the Notes is a new issue of securities with no established
trading market. Barrick does not intend to apply for listing of
the Notes on a national securities exchange or any automated
quotation system. However, Barrick has been advised by the
underwriters that the underwriters presently intend to make a
market in the Notes, as permitted by applicable laws and
regulations. The underwriters are not obligated, however, to
make a market in the Notes and any market making may be
discontinued at any time at the sole discretion of the
underwriters. Accordingly, no assurance can be given as to the
liquidity of, or trading market for, the Notes.
The Notes
will not be qualified for sale under the securities laws of any
province or territory of Canada and may not be offered or sold,
directly or indirectly, in Canada or to residents of Canada
except pursuant to an exemption from the prospectus requirements
of applicable securities laws. In addition, the Notes may only
be offered and sold in any province or territory of Canada by a
securities dealer appropriately registered under the securities
laws of that jurisdiction or pursuant to an exemption from the
registered dealer requirements of such securities laws. Each
underwriter has agreed that it will not, directly or indirectly,
offer, sell or deliver any Notes purchased by it in Canada or to
residents of Canada except pursuant to an exemption from the
prospectus requirements of applicable securities laws and in
accordance with the dealer registration requirements of
applicable laws or pursuant to an exemption from such
requirements and that any selling agreement or similar agreement
with respect to the Notes will require each dealer or other
party thereto to make an agreement to the same effect. The Notes
offered under this prospectus supplement to purchasers outside
of Canada are being qualified under the securities laws of the
Province of Ontario.
In order to
facilitate the offering of the Notes, the underwriters may
engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise
affect the price of the Notes. Specifically, the underwriters
may over-allot in connection with the offering, creating a short
position in the Notes for their own account. In addition, to
cover over-allotments or to stabilize the price of
S-18
the Notes,
the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, Notes in the open
market. Finally, the underwriting syndicate may reclaim selling
concessions allowed to an underwriter or a dealer for
distributing Notes in this offering if the syndicate repurchases
previously distributed Notes in transactions to cover syndicate
short positions, in stabilization transactions or otherwise. Any
of these activities may stabilize or maintain the market price
of the Notes above independent market levels. The underwriters
are not required to engage in these activities, and may
discontinue any of these activities at any time.
Barrick has
agreed to indemnify the underwriters against specified
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
In the
ordinary course of business, each of the underwriters
and/or its
affiliates has provided and may provide in the future investment
banking, commercial banking and other financial services to us
for which it has received or will receive compensation. The
underwriters
and/or
certain of their affiliates are also lenders under
Barricks $1.5 billion primary bank credit facility
(the Credit Facility)
and/or
counterparties under certain financial and hedging arrangements
with us. Accordingly, we may be considered a connected
issuer with each such underwriter for the purposes of
Canadian securities legislation. Affiliates of each of Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (collectively, the Lender
Affiliates), are lenders under our Credit Facility.
The Lender Affiliates have committed $75 million,
$105 million and $150 million, respectively, to the
Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is unsecured and has an
interest rate of Libor plus 0.25% to 0.35% on drawn down
amounts, and a commitment rate of 0.07% to 0.08% on undrawn
amounts. We are currently in compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Credit Facility and no breach thereof has been
waived by the Lender Affiliates, as lenders under the Credit
Facility. As at the date hereof, there are no amounts
outstanding under the Credit Facility.
The decision
to distribute the Notes, including the determination of the
terms of this offering, was made through negotiations between
Barrick and the underwriters. The Lender Affiliates did not have
any involvement in such decision or determination.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in the European Economic Area
In relation
to each member state of the European Economic Area that has
implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a relevant member
state), with effect from and including the date on which the
Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member
state (the relevant implementation date), an offer of Notes
described in this prospectus supplement may not be made to the
public in that relevant member state prior to the publication of
a prospectus in relation to the Notes that has been approved by
the competent authority in that relevant member state or, where
appropriate, approved in another relevant member state and
notified to the competent authority in that relevant member
state, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except
that, with effect from and including the relevant implementation
date, an offer of Notes may be offered to the public in that
relevant member state at any time:
|
|
|
|
|
to any legal
entity that is authorized or regulated to operate in the
financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose
corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
|
|
to any legal
entity that has two or more of (1) an average of at least
250 employees during the last financial year; (2) a
total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000,
as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts;
|
|
|
|
to fewer
than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined below) subject to obtaining the prior
consent of the joint book-running managers for any such
offer; or
|
|
|
|
in any other
circumstances that do not require the publication of a
prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus
Directive.
|
Each
purchaser of Notes described in this prospectus supplement
located within a relevant member state will be deemed to have
represented, acknowledged and agreed that it is a
qualified investor within the meaning of
Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive.
For purposes
of this provision, the expression an offer to the
public in any relevant member state means the
communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be
offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or
subscribe the securities, as the expression may be varied in
that member state by any measure implementing the Prospectus
Directive in that member state, and the expression
Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and
includes any relevant implementing measure in each relevant
member state.
S-19
Barrick has
not authorized and does not authorize the making of any offer of
Notes through any financial intermediary on its behalf, other
than offers made by the underwriters with a view to the final
placement of the Notes as contemplated in this prospectus
supplement. Accordingly, no purchaser of the Notes, other than
the underwriters, is authorized to make any further offer of the
Notes on behalf of Barrick or the underwriters.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in the United Kingdom
This
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is only
being distributed to, and is only directed at, persons in the
United Kingdom that are qualified investors within the meaning
of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive that are
also (i) investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the
Order) or (ii) high net worth entities,
and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated,
falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order
(each such person being referred to as a relevant
person). This prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus and its contents are confidential and
should not be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or
in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other persons in the
United Kingdom. Any person in the United Kingdom that is not a
relevant person should not act or rely on this document or any
of its contents.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in France
Neither this
prospectus supplement nor any other offering material relating
to the Notes described in this prospectus supplement has been
submitted to the clearance procedures of the Autorité des
Marchés Financiers or of the competent authority of another
member state of the European Economic Area and notified to the
Autorité des Marchés Financiers. The Notes have not
been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly
or indirectly, to the public in France. Neither this prospectus
supplement nor any other offering material relating to the Notes
has been or will be:
|
|
|
|
|
released,
issued, distributed or caused to be released, issued or
distributed to the public in France; or
|
|
|
used in
connection with any offer for subscription or sale of the Notes
to the public in France.
|
Such offers,
sales and distributions will be made in France only:
|
|
|
|
|
to qualified
investors (investisseurs qualifiés)
and/or to a
restricted circle of investors (cercle restreint
dinvestisseurs), in each case investing for their own
account, all as defined in, and in accordance with,
articles L.411-2,
D.411-1, D.411-2, D.734-1, D.744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the
French Code monétaire et financier;
|
|
|
to
investment services providers authorized to engage in portfolio
management on behalf of third parties; or
|
|
|
in a
transaction that, in accordance with article
L.411-2-II-1tm-or-2tm-or
3tm
of the French Code monétaire et financier and
article 211-2
of the General Regulations (Règlement Général) of
the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, does not
constitute a public offer (appel public à
lépargne).
|
The Notes
may be resold directly or indirectly, only in compliance with
articles L.411-1,
L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 through L.621-8-3 of the French
Code monétaire et financier.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Hong Kong
The Notes
may not be offered or sold in Hong Kong by means of any document
other than (i) in circumstances which do not constitute an
offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap. 32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (ii) to
professional investors within the meaning of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong)
and any rules made thereunder, or (iii) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a
prospectus within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap. 32, Laws of Hong Kong) and no advertisement,
invitation or document relating to the Notes may be issued or
may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue
(in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is
directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed
or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do
so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to Notes
which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons
outside Hong Kong or only to professional investors
within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.
571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Japan
The Notes
offered in this prospectus supplement have not been registered
under the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan. The Notes have
not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold,
directly or indirectly, in Japan or to or for
S-20
the account
of any resident of Japan, except (i) pursuant to an
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
and Exchange Law and (ii) in compliance with any other
applicable requirements of Japanese law.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Singapore
This
prospectus supplement has not been registered as a prospectus
with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this
prospectus supplement and any other document or material in
connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for
subscription or purchase, of the Notes may not be circulated or
distributed, nor may the Notes be offered or sold, or be made
the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase,
whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other
than (i) to an institutional investor under
Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act,
Chapter 289 of Singapore (the SFA),
(ii) to a relevant person pursuant to Section 275(1),
or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in
accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275 of
the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance
with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the
SFA, in each case subject to compliance with conditions set
forth in the SFA.
Where the
Notes are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 of the
SFA by a relevant person which is:
|
|
|
|
|
a
corporation (which is not an accredited investor (as defined in
Section 4A of the SFA)) the sole business of which is to
hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned
by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited
investor; or
|
|
|
a trust
(where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole
purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary of the trust
is an individual who is an accredited investor,
|
shares,
debentures and units of shares and debentures of that
corporation or the beneficiaries rights and interest
(howsoever described) in that trust shall not be transferred
within six months after that corporation or that trust has
acquired the Notes pursuant to an offer made under
Section 275 of the SFA except:
|
|
|
|
|
to an
institutional investor (for corporations, under Section 274 of
the SFA) or to a relevant person defined in Section 275(2)
of the SFA, or to any person pursuant to an offer that is made
on terms that such shares, debentures and units of shares and
debentures of that corporation or such rights and interest in
that trust are acquired at a consideration of not less than
S$200,000 (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) for each
transaction, whether such amount is to be paid for in cash or by
exchange of securities or other assets, and further for
corporations, in accordance with the conditions specified in
Section 275 of the SFA;
|
|
|
where no
consideration is or will be given for the transfer; or
|
|
|
where the
transfer is by operation of law.
|
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain
legal matters relating to United States law will be passed upon
for Barrick by Shearman & Sterling LLP. Certain legal
matters relating to Canadian law will be passed upon for Barrick
by Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP. Certain legal
matters relating to United States law will be passed upon for
the underwriters by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP.
EXPERTS
The
comparative audited consolidated financial statements
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement have
been so incorporated in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, given on the
authority of that firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The address of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is Suite 3000,
P.O. Box 82, Royal Trust Tower, Toronto-Dominion
Centre, Toronto, Ontario, M5K 2G8.
S-21
Auditors
Consent
We have read
the preliminary prospectus supplement of Barrick Gold
Corporation (Barrick) dated March 19, 2009 to a short form
base shelf prospectus dated June 12, 2008 (collectively,
the Prospectus) relating to the issue and sale of debt
securities of Barrick (the Prospectus Supplement). We have
complied with Canadian generally accepted standards for an
auditors involvement with offering documents.
We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus Supplement
of our report dated February 19, 2009 to the shareholders
of Barrick on the consolidated balance sheets of Barrick as at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the
consolidated statements of income, cash flow, shareholders
equity and comprehensive income for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008 prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered
Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto,
Ontario
March 19,
2009
S-22
SHORT FORM BASE SHELF PROSPECTUS
Barrick Gold Corporation
|
|
Barrick
North America Finance LLC
|
Barrick Gold Financeco LLC
|
US $2,000,000,000
Debt Securities
Barrick, BNAF or BGF may offer and issue from time to time their
debt securities consisting of debentures, notes, bonds
and/or other
similar evidences of indebtedness (collectively, the Debt
Securities) up to an aggregate principal amount of
$2,000,000,000 or the equivalent thereof in one or more foreign
currencies or composite currencies. Any Debt Securities issued
by BNAF or BGF will be unconditionally and irrevocably
guaranteed by Barrick. Debt Securities may be offered,
separately or together, in separate series, in amounts, at
prices and on terms to be determined at the time of sale. The
issuer of the Debt Securities, the specific designation,
aggregate principal amount, currency, denomination, maturity,
rate (which may be fixed or variable) and time of payment of
interest, if any, any terms for redemption at the option of the
issuer or the holders, any terms for sinking fund payments, the
initial offering price (or the manner of determination thereof
if offered on a non-fixed price basis) any listing on a
securities exchange and any other terms in connection with the
offering and sale of any series of Debt Securities in respect of
which this prospectus is being delivered will be set forth in
the accompanying prospectus supplement relating thereto. The net
proceeds to the applicable issuer from such sale will be set
forth in a prospectus supplement.
The Debt Securities have not been approved or disapproved by
the Ontario Securities Commission, the Securities and Exchange
Commission or any state securities regulator, nor has the
Ontario Securities Commission, the Securities and Exchange
Commission or any state securities regulator, passed upon the
accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
We are permitted to prepare this prospectus in accordance
with Canadian disclosure requirements, which are different from
those of the United States.
Owning the Debt Securities may subject you to tax
consequences both in the United States and Canada. You should
read the tax discussion in any applicable prospectus supplement.
This prospectus or any applicable prospectus supplement may not
describe these tax consequences fully.
Your ability to enforce civil liabilities under United States
federal securities laws may be affected adversely because
Barrick is incorporated under the laws of the Province of
Ontario, Canada, some of the officers and directors of Barrick,
BNAF and BGF, and some of the experts named in this prospectus
are Canadian residents, and a majority of Barricks assets
and the assets of those officers, directors and experts are
located outside of the United States.
BNAF and BGF are incorporated under the laws of Delaware, a
foreign jurisdiction, and reside in, and have assets located in,
the United States. Although each of BNAF and BGF has appointed
Barrick as its agent for service of process for certain
securities law purposes in Ontario, it may not be possible for
investors to collect from BNAF or BGF judgments obtained in
Ontario courts predicated on the civil liability provisions of
securities legislation. Judgments against BNAF or BGF may
therefore have to be enforced in the United States and may be
subject to additional defences as a result.
ABOUT THIS
PROSPECTUS
References to $ in this prospectus are to U.S.
dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
In this prospectus, Barrick Gold Corporation will be referred to
as either Barrick or the Guarantor,
Barrick North America Finance LLC will be referred to as
BNAF and Barrick Gold Financeco LLC will be referred
to as BGF. Unless the context requires otherwise,
we, us and our refer to
Barrick and its subsidiaries, including BNAF and BGF.
This prospectus has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC, as part of a registration statement on
Form F-9
and
Form F-3
relating to the Debt Securities and the guarantees (the
Guarantees) by Barrick of any Debt Securities issued
by BNAF or BGF and with the Ontario Securities Commission, or
the OSC, in each case using a shelf registration
process. Under this shelf process we may sell any combination of
the Debt Securities described in this prospectus in one or more
offerings up to a total aggregate principal amount of
$2,000,000,000. This prospectus provides you with a general
description of the Debt Securities we may offer. Each time we
sell Debt Securities we will provide a supplement to this
prospectus that will contain specific information about the
terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also add,
update or change information about the terms of the offering or
of the Debt Securities to be issued. You should read both this
prospectus and any prospectus supplement together with
additional information described under the heading Where
You Can Find More Information below. This prospectus does
not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement, certain parts of which are omitted in accordance with
the rules and regulations of the SEC. You may refer to the
registration statement and the exhibits to the registration
statement for further information with respect to us and the
Debt Securities.
WHERE YOU CAN
FIND MORE INFORMATION
Barrick files certain reports with and furnishes other
information to each of the SEC and the OSC. Our SEC file number
is 1-9059. Under a multijurisdictional disclosure system adopted
by the United States, such reports and other information may be
prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements of
Canada, which requirements are different from those of the
United States. Barricks reports and other information
filed with the SEC since June 2002 are available, and
Barricks reports and other information filed in the future
with the SEC will be available, from the SECs Electronic
Document Gathering and Retrieval System
(http://www.sec.gov),
which is commonly known by the acronym EDGAR, as
well as from commercial document retrieval services. You may
also read (and by paying a fee, copy) any document Barrick files
with the SEC at the SECs public reference room in
Washington, D.C. (100 F Street N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549). Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for more information on the public reference room. You may also
inspect Barricks SEC filings at the New York Stock
Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
Barricks OSC filings are available over the Internet at
http://www.sedar.com.
The SEC and the OSC allow Barrick to incorporate by
reference into this prospectus the information filed with
them, which means that Barrick can disclose important
information to you by referring you to these documents.
Information has been incorporated by reference in this
prospectus from documents filed with the SEC and the OSC. We
will provide to each person to whom a prospectus is delivered,
including any beneficial owner of Debt Securities, without
charge, upon oral or written request to the secretary of Barrick
at Brookfield Place, Canada Trust Tower, Suite 3700, 161
Bay Street, P.O. Box 212, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J
2S1,
(416) 861-9911,
copies of the documents incorporated herein by reference.
This prospectus incorporates by reference the documents listed
below:
|
|
|
|
|
the comparative audited consolidated financial statements of
Barrick and the notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2007 prepared in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP,
together with the report of the auditors thereon and
managements discussion and analysis of financial and
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating results for the year ended December 31, 2007,
found on pages 25 through 76 of Barricks 2007 annual
report (the Consolidated Financial Statements);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the comparative unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements of Barrick and the notes thereto for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP, together with managements discussion and
analysis of financial and operating results for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 found on pages 8 through 28 of
Barricks first quarter report;
|
|
|
|
the annual information form of Barrick dated March 27, 2008
for the year ended December 31, 2007;
|
|
|
|
the management information circular of Barrick dated
March 27, 2008 prepared for the annual and special meeting
of Barrick shareholders held on May 6, 2008, other than the
sections entitled Report on Executive Compensation
and Performance Graph;
|
|
|
|
the material change report of Barrick dated March 3, 2008
regarding Barricks agreement with Kennecott Explorations
(Australia) Ltd., a subsidiary of Rio Tinto PLC, to purchase its
40% interest in the Cortez Joint Venture in Nevada; and
|
|
|
|
the material change report of Barrick dated April 2, 2008
regarding Barricks Chief Executive Officer taking a leave
of absence.
|
After the date of this prospectus and prior to the termination
of the distribution of the Debt Securities, any material change
reports (excluding any confidential material change reports),
annual financial statements (including the auditors report
thereon), interim financial statements and information circulars
(other than those sections, if any, in respect of the downward
repricing of options, the composition of the compensation
committee of the Barrick board of directors and its report on
executive compensation, and the yearly percentage change in
Barricks cumulative total shareholders return on publicly
traded securities compared with the cumulative total return of
the S&P/TSX Gold Index, the S&P/TSX Composite Index or
any other broad equity market index or a published industry or
line-of-business index) that Barrick files with the OSC will be
incorporated by reference in this prospectus and will
automatically update and supersede information incorporated by
reference in this prospectus. In addition, any report filed or
furnished by Barrick, BNAF or BGF with the SEC pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) or
submitted to the SEC pursuant to
Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Exchange Act, after the date of this prospectus shall
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus
and the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part, if and to the extent expressly provided in such report.
Barrick, BNAF and BGF have obtained relief from the OSC (the
OSC Order) which exempts each of BNAF and BGF from:
(i) the requirements of National Instrument
51-102
Continuous Disclosure Obligations; (ii) the requirements of
Multilateral Instrument
52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim
Filings; (iii) the requirements under applicable securities
law relating to audit committees; (iv) the requirements of
National Instrument
58-101
Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices; and (v) the
requirement under
Form 44-101F1
promulgated under National Instrument
44-101
Short Form Prospectus Distributions to: (A) include in
this Prospectus and any prospectus supplement for any future
offering of Notes earnings coverage ratios required under
Section 6.1 of
Form 44-101F1;
and (B) incorporate by reference in this Prospectus and any
prospectus supplement for any future offering of Notes any of
the documents specified under paragraphs 1 through 4, 6 and
7 of Section 11.1(1) of
Form 44-101F1,
provided, in each case that, among other things: (X) BNAF,
BGF and the Guarantor continue to satisfy all of the conditions
set forth in subsection 13.4(2) of NI
51-102,
other than paragraph 13.4(2)(g); (Y) the Guarantor
discloses in each of its interim financial statements and annual
financial statements filed with the OSC and the SEC any
significant restrictions on the ability of the Guarantor to
obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan; and
(Z) if certain restricted net asset tests that
are described in greater detail in the OSC Order are met, the
Guarantor provides additional disclosure in each of its interim
financial statements and annual
- 2 -
financial statements filed with the OSC and the SEC concerning:
(i) the nature of any restrictions on the ability of
consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated subsidiaries of the
Guarantor to transfer funds to the Guarantor in the form of cash
dividends, loans or advances and (ii) the amount of
restricted net assets. In compliance with the
requirements of the SEC, attached hereto as Schedule
A and Schedule B, respectively, are the
annual financial statements of the Guarantor for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and the interim financial statements of
the Guarantor for the three months ended March 31, 2008, in
each case revised to include an additional note relating to BNAF
and BGF. From and after May 9, 2008, being the date of
formation of BNAF and BGF, the financial results of BNAF and BGF
will be included in the consolidated financial results of
Barrick. A copy of the OSC Order can be obtained from the OSC
website at www.osc.gov.on.ca.
All information omitted from this prospectus which is permitted
to be omitted under applicable securities laws will be contained
in one or more supplements that will be delivered to purchasers
of the Debt Securities together with this prospectus. Any such
supplement to this prospectus will be incorporated by reference
into this prospectus as of the date of the supplement, but only
for the purposes of the offering of Debt Securities to which the
supplement relates.
The documents listed above, including the Gurantors annual
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007
and the Guarantors interim financial statements for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, each of which was filed
on SEDAR and would otherwise be deemed to be incorporated in
this prospectus after the date of this prospectus, are not
incorporated by reference to the extent that their contents are
modified or superseded by any statement contained in this
prospectus (including the revised financial statements attached
as Schedule A and Schedule B), any
amendment or supplement to this prospectus or any subsequently
filed document that is also incorporated by reference in this
prospectus.
You should rely only on the information contained in or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus or any applicable
prospectus supplement and on the other information included in
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
different or additional information. We are not making an offer
of these Debt Securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is
not permitted by law. You should not assume that the information
contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus or any
applicable prospectus supplement is accurate as of any date
other than the date on the front of any applicable prospectus
supplement.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in
this Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus, including any
information as to our strategy, plans or future financial or
operating performance, constitutes forward-looking
statements. All statements, other than statements of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words
believe, expect, anticipate,
contemplate, target, plan,
intends, continue, budget,
estimate, may, will,
schedule and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions
that, while considered reasonable by us, are inherently subject
to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties
and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not
limited to: fluctuations in the currency markets (such as the
Canadian and Australian dollars versus the U.S. dollar);
fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper or
certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel and
electricity); changes in U.S. dollar interest rates or gold
lease rates that could impact the mark-to-market value of
outstanding derivative instruments and ongoing payments/receipts
under interest rate swaps and variable rate debt obligations;
risks arising from holding derivative instruments (such as
credit risk, market liquidity risk and mark-to-market risk);
changes in national and local government legislation, taxation,
controls, regulations and political or economic developments in
Canada, the United States, Dominican Republic, Australia, Papua
New
- 3 -
Guinea, Chile, Peru, Argentina, Tanzania, South Africa,
Pakistan, Russia or Barbados or other countries in which we do
or may carry on business in the future; business opportunities
that may be presented to, or pursued by, us; our ability to
successfully integrate acquisitions; operating or technical
difficulties in connection with mining or development
activities; employee relations; availability and increasing
costs associated with mining inputs and labor; the speculative
nature of mineral exploration and development, including the
risks of obtaining necessary licenses and permits; diminishing
quantities or grades of reserves; adverse changes in our credit
rating; and contests over title to properties, particularly
title to undeveloped properties. In addition, there are risks
and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration,
development and mining, including environmental hazards,
industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations,
pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the
risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance,
to cover these risks). Many of these uncertainties and
contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf
of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. All of the
forward-looking statements made in this Short Form Base
Shelf Prospectus are qualified by these cautionary statements.
Specific reference is made to Narrative Description of the
Business Mineral Reserves and Mineral
Resources and Risk Factors in the annual
information form of Barrick dated March 27, 2008 for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and to the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial and
Operating Results for the year ended December 31,
2007 incorporated by reference herein for a discussion of
some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements.
We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by
applicable law.
BARRICK
Barrick is a leading international gold company. Barrick entered
the gold mining industry in 1983 and is now the largest gold
mining company in the world in terms of production, reserves and
market capitalization. Barrick has operating mines and projects
in Canada, the United States, Dominican Republic, Australia,
Papua New Guinea, Peru, Chile, Argentina, Pakistan, Russia,
South Africa and Tanzania. Barricks principal products and
sources of earnings are gold and copper.
In 2007, Barricks mines produced approximately
8.06 million ounces of gold and 402 million pounds of
copper at total cash costs of $350 per ounce and $0.83 per
pound, respectively. Barrick expects to produce between 7.6 and
8.1 million ounces of gold in 2008 at expected average
total cash costs of $390 to $415 per ounce. 2008 copper
production is targeted at approximately 380 to 400 million
pounds at expected total cash costs of approximately $1.15 to
$1.25 per pound. Total cash costs per ounce and
Total cash cost per pound are non-GAAP performance
measures. For an explanation of Barricks use of these
measures, including a reconciliation of total cash costs
per ounce and total cash cost per pound to
total cash production costs, see the discussion under the
heading Non-GAAP Performance Measures on pages
22-24 of this prospectus.
Barrick is a corporation governed by the Business Corporations
Act (Ontario) resulting from the amalgamation, effective
July 14, 1984 under the laws of the Province of Ontario, of
Camflo Mines Limited, Bob-Clare Investments Limited and the
former Barrick Resources Corporation. By articles of amendment
effective December 9, 1985, the Company changed its name to
American Barrick Resources Corporation. Effective
January 1, 1995, as a result of an amalgamation with a
wholly-owned subsidiary, the Company changed its name from
American Barrick Resources Corporation to Barrick Gold
Corporation. In connection with its acquisition of Placer Dome
Inc., Barrick amalgamated with Placer Dome Inc. pursuant to
articles of amalgamation dated May 9, 2006. Barricks
head and registered office is located at Brookfield Place, TD
Canada Trust Tower, 161 Bay Street, Suite 3700,
Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1.
- 4 -
BNAF AND
BGF
BNAF and BGF are Delaware limited liability companies which were
formed in May 2008 and are wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries of
Barrick. Their primary purpose is the financing of other
subsidiaries or affiliates of Barrick. BNAF and BGF do not plan
to have other operations and they have no assets, operations,
revenues or cash flows other than those which are related to the
issuance, administration and repayment of the Debt Securities
guaranteed by Barrick. Neither BNAF nor BGF intends to make
available publicly or to its securityholders annual or other
reports or other separate continuous disclosure information.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of the Debt
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
to repay indebtedness outstanding from time to time;
|
|
|
|
to make equity investments in and advances to subsidiaries of
Barrick;
|
|
|
|
for capital expenditures and investment programs; and
|
|
|
|
for other general corporate purposes.
|
We may invest funds that we do not immediately require in
short-term marketable securities. Specific information about the
use of proceeds from the sale of any Debt Securities will be
included in the applicable supplement to this prospectus.
EARNINGS
COVERAGE
This earnings coverage information for the 12 months ended
December 31, 2007 and the 12 months ended
March 31, 2008 is prepared in accordance with Canadian
disclosure requirements. The coverages have been calculated
using financial information prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP. These coverages do not reflect any offering of
Debt Securities but do reflect any required adjustments for
issuances and repayments of long-term debt since
December 31, 2007 and servicing costs incurred in relation
thereto. Specifically, Barricks pro forma earnings
coverage calculations for the 12 months ended
December 31, 2007 reflect actual interest incurred during
such period, adjusted for the effect of the $990 million
drawdown to partially fund the acquisition of the 40% interest
in Cortez (which occurred in the first quarter of 2008) as
if such drawdown had occurred on January 1, 2007.
Barricks earnings before interest and income taxes for the
12 months ended December 31, 2007 were
$1,573 million. These earnings were 5.8 times
Barricks pro forma interest requirements for the period of
$272 million (including amounts capitalized during the
period). Barricks actual interest requirements for the
12 months ended December 31, 2007 were
$237 million (including amounts capitalized during the
period), and Barricks earnings before interest and income
taxes for this period were 6.6 times Barricks actual
interest requirements for the period.
Barricks earnings before interest and income taxes for the
12 months ended March 31, 2008 were
$2,322 million. These earnings were 11.2 times
Barricks pro forma interest requirements for the period of
$221 million (including amounts capitalized during the
period). Barricks actual interest requirements for the
12 months ended March 31, 2008 were $221 million
(including amounts capitalized during the period), and
Barricks earnings before interest and income taxes for
this period were 11.2 times Barricks actual interest
requirements for the period.
DESCRIPTION OF
DEBT SECURITIES AND THE GUARANTEES
In this section only, the term Barrick refers only
to Barrick Gold Corporation without any of its subsidiaries, the
term BNAF refers only to Barrick North America
Finance LLC without any of its subsidiaries and the term
BGF refers only to Barrick Gold Financeco LLC
without any of its subsidiaries. In addition, in this section
only, each of the terms we, us, or
our refers only to Barrick in the case of
- 5 -
Debt Securities and Guarantees issued by Barrick, and only to
BNAF or BGF in the case of Debt Securities issued by BNAF or
BGF, as applicable, and the term issuer refers only
to Barrick, BNAF or BGF in the case of Securities issued by
Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as applicable. This description sets forth
certain general terms and provisions of the Debt Securities and,
if issued by BNAF or BGF, the Guarantees of Barrick as
Guarantor. We will provide particular terms and provisions of a
series of Debt Securities, and a description of how the general
terms and provisions described below may apply to that series,
in a supplement to this prospectus.
The Debt Securities and Guarantees will be issued under an
Indenture to be entered into between Barrick as Issuer and
Guarantor, BNAF and BGF as Issuers, and The Bank of New York as
trustee (the Trustee). The Indenture is subject to
and governed by the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939,
as amended. A copy of the form of the Indenture has been filed
as an exhibit to our registration statement filed with the SEC
and with the prospectus filed with the OSC. The following
summary highlights some of the provisions of the Indenture, and
may not contain all of the information that is important to you.
Wherever we refer to particular provisions or defined terms of
the Indenture, such provisions or defined terms are incorporated
in this prospectus by reference as part of the statement made,
and the statement is qualified by such reference. The term
Securities as used under this caption, refers to all
securities (other than Guarantees) issued under the Indenture,
including the Debt Securities.
Barrick, BNAF and BGF may issue Debt Securities and incur
additional indebtedness otherwise than through the offering of
Debt Securities pursuant to this prospectus.
General
The Indenture does not limit the amount of Securities which we
may issue under the Indenture, and we may issue Securities in
one or more series. Securities may be denominated and payable in
any currency. We may offer no more than $2,000,000,000 (or the
equivalent in other currencies) aggregate principal amount of
Securities pursuant to this prospectus. Unless otherwise
indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, the Indenture
permits us, without the consent of the holders of any
Securities, to increase the principal amount of any series of
Securities we previously have issued under the Indenture and to
issue such increased principal amount.
The applicable prospectus supplement will set forth the
following terms relating to the Securities offered by such
prospectus supplement (the Offered Securities):
|
|
|
|
|
whether the Offered Securities are Debt Securities issued by
Barrick or guaranteed Debt Securities issued by BNAF or BGF;
|
|
|
|
the specific designation of the Offered Securities; any limit on
the aggregate principal amount of the Offered Securities; the
date or dates, if any, on which the Offered Securities will
mature and the portion (if less than all of the principal
amount) of the Offered Securities to be payable upon declaration
of acceleration of maturity;
|
|
|
|
the rate or rates at which the Offered Securities will bear
interest, if any, the date or dates from which any such interest
will accrue and on which any such interest will be payable and
the record dates for any interest payable on the Offered
Securities which are in registered form;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions under which we may be obligated to
redeem, repay or purchase the Offered Securities pursuant to any
sinking fund or analogous provisions or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions upon which we may redeem the Offered
Securities, in whole or in part, at our option;
|
|
|
|
whether the Offered Securities will be issuable in registered
form or bearer form or both, and, if issuable in bearer form,
the restrictions as to the offer, sale and delivery of the
Offered Securities which are in bearer form and as to exchanges
between registered form and bearer form;
|
- 6 -
|
|
|
|
|
whether the Offered Securities will be issuable in the form of
registered global securities (Global Securities),
and, if so, the identity of the depositary for such registered
Global Securities;
|
|
|
|
the denominations in which registered Offered Securities will be
issuable, if other than denominations of $1,000 and any multiple
thereof, and the denominations in which bearer Offered
Securities will be issuable, if other than $5,000;
|
|
|
|
each office or agency where payments on the Offered Securities
will be made (if other than the offices or agencies described
under Payment below) and each office or agency where
the Offered Securities may be presented for registration of
transfer or exchange;
|
|
|
|
if other than U.S. dollars, the currency in which the
Offered Securities are denominated or the currency in which we
will make payments on the Offered Securities;
|
|
|
|
any index, formula or other method used to determine the amount
of payments of principal of (and premium, if any) or interest,
if any, on the Offered Securities; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms of the Offered Securities which apply solely to
the Offered Securities, or terms generally applicable to the
Securities which are not to apply to the Offered Securities.
|
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement:
|
|
|
|
|
holders may not tender Securities to us for repurchase; and
|
|
|
|
the rate or rates of interest on the Securities will not
increase if we become involved in a highly leveraged transaction
or we are acquired by another entity.
|
We may issue Securities under the Indenture bearing no interest
or interest at a rate below the prevailing market rate at the
time of issuance and, in such circumstances, we will offer and
sell those Securities at a discount below their stated principal
amount. We will describe in the applicable prospectus supplement
any Canadian and U.S. federal income tax consequences and
other special considerations applicable to any discounted
Securities or other Securities offered and sold at par which are
treated as having been issued at a discount for Canadian
and/or
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Debt Securities issued by Barrick and the Guarantees will be
direct, unconditional and unsecured obligations of Barrick and
will rank equally among themselves and with all of
Barricks other unsecured, unsubordinated obligations,
except to the extent prescribed by law. Debt Securities issued
by BNAF or BGF will be direct, unconditional and unsecured
obligations of BNAF or BGF, as the case may be, and will rank
equally among themselves and with all of BNAFs or
BGFs other unsecured, unsubordinated obligations, except
to the extent prescribed by law. BNAFs and BGFs, as
the case may be, obligations under its Debt Securities will be
unconditionally guaranteed by Barrick as more fully described
below under Guarantees. Debt Securities issued by
Barrick and the Guarantees will be structurally subordinated to
all existing and future liabilities, including trade payables
and other indebtedness, of Barricks subsidiaries.
Barrick has agreed to provide to the Trustee (i) annual
reports containing audited financial statements and
(ii) quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each
fiscal year containing unaudited financial information.
Form,
Denomination, Exchange and Transfer
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement, we will issue Securities only in fully registered
form without coupons, and in denominations of $1,000 and
multiples of $1,000. Securities may be presented for exchange
and registered Securities may be presented for registration of
transfer in the manner set forth in the Indenture and in the
applicable prospectus supplement, without service charges. We
may, however, require payment sufficient to cover any taxes or
other governmental charges due in
- 7 -
connection with the exchange or transfer. We have appointed the
Trustee as security registrar. Bearer Securities and the coupons
applicable to bearer Securities thereto will be transferable by
delivery.
Payment
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement, we will make payments on registered Securities
(other than Global Securities) at the office or agency of the
Trustee, 101 Barclay Street 4E, New York, New York
10286 or, in the case of holders in Ontario, BNY
Trust Company of Canada, Suite 1101, 4 King Street
West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1B6, except that we may choose to
pay interest (a) by check mailed to the address of the
person entitled to such payment as specified in the security
register or (b) by wire transfer to an account maintained
by the person entitled to such payment as specified in the
security register. Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable
prospectus supplement, we will pay any interest due on
registered Securities to the persons in whose name such
registered Securities are registered on the day or days
specified by us.
Registered Global
Securities
Registered Debt Securities of a series may be issued in whole or
in part in global form that will be deposited with, or on behalf
of, a depositary identified in the prospectus supplement. Global
Securities will be registered in the name of a financial
institution we select, and the Debt Securities included in the
Global Securities may not be transferred to the name of any
other direct holder unless the special circumstances described
below occur. The financial institution that acts as the sole
direct holder of the Global Securities is called the
Depositary. Any person wishing to own Debt
Securities issued in the form of Global Securities must do so
indirectly by virtue of an account with a broker, bank or other
financial institution that, in turn, has an account with the
Depositary.
Special Investor
Considerations for Global Securities
Our obligations, as well as the obligations of the Trustee and
those of any third parties employed by us or the Trustee, run
only to persons who are registered as holders of Debt
Securities. For example, once we make payment to the registered
holder, we have no further responsibility for the payment even
if that holder is legally required to pass the payment along to
you but does not do so. As an indirect holder, an
investors rights relating to a Global Security will be
governed by the account rules of the investors financial
institution and of the Depositary, as well as general laws
relating to debt securities transfers.
An investor should be aware that when Debt Securities are issued
in the form of Global Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
the investor cannot have Debt Securities registered in his or
her own name;
|
|
|
|
the investor cannot receive physical certificates for his or her
interest in the Debt Securities;
|
|
|
|
the investor must look to his or her own bank or brokerage firm
for payments on the Debt Securities and protection of his or her
legal rights relating to the Debt Securities;
|
|
|
|
the investor may not be able to sell interests in the Debt
Securities to some insurance companies and other institutions
that are required by law to hold the physical certificates of
Debt Securities that they own;
|
|
|
|
the Depositarys policies will govern payments, transfers,
exchange and other matters relating to the investors
interest in the Global Security. We and the Trustee have no
responsibility for any aspect of the Depositarys actions
or for its records of ownership interest in the Global Security.
We and the Trustee also do not supervise the Depositary in any
way; and
|
|
|
|
the Depositary will usually require that interests in a Global
Security be purchased or sold within its system using
same-day
funds.
|
- 8 -
Special
Situations When Global Security Will be Terminated
In a few special situations described below, a Global Security
will terminate and interests in it will be exchanged for
physical certificates representing Debt Securities. After that
exchange, an investor may choose whether to hold Debt Securities
directly or indirectly through an account at its bank or
brokerage firm. Investors must consult their own banks or
brokers to find out how to have their interests in Debt
Securities transferred into their own names, so that they will
be direct holders.
The special situations for termination of a Global Security are:
|
|
|
|
|
when the Depositary notifies us that it is unwilling, unable or
no longer qualified to continue as Depositary (unless a
replacement Depositary is named); and
|
|
|
|
when and if we decide to terminate a Global Security.
|
The prospectus supplement may list situations for terminating a
Global Security that would apply only to the particular series
of Debt Securities covered by the prospectus supplement. When a
Global Security terminates, the Depositary (and not Barrick,
BNAF, BGF or the Trustee) is responsible for deciding the names
of the institutions that will be the initial direct holders.
Guarantees
Barrick will guarantee the payment of the principal of, premium,
if any, and interest on Debt Securities issued by BNAF or BGF
and any Additional Amounts payable with respect to such
Securities when they become due and payable, whether at the
stated maturity thereof, by declaration of acceleration or
otherwise.
Certain
Covenants
Limitation on
Liens
Barrick will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary
to, create, incur or assume any Lien (except for Permitted
Liens) on any Principal Assets securing payment of Indebtedness
of Barrick or any of its Subsidiaries unless the Securities
(together with, at Barricks option, any other obligations
that are not subordinate in right of payment to the Securities)
are secured equally and ratably with (or prior to) any and all
obligations secured or to be secured by any such Lien and for so
long as such obligations are so secured. For greater certainty,
the following do not constitute Liens securing payment of
Indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
all rights reserved to or vested in any Governmental Authority
by the terms of any lease, license, franchise, grant or permit
held by Barrick or any Restricted Subsidiary, or by any
statutory provision, to terminate any such lease, license,
franchise, grant or permit, or to require annual or other
periodic payments as a condition of the continuance thereof or
to distrain against or to obtain a charge on any property or
assets of Barrick or any Restricted Subsidiary in the event of
failure to make any such annual or other periodic payment;
|
|
|
|
any Lien upon any Principal Asset in favor of any party to a
joint development or operating agreement or any similar person
paying all or part of the expenses of developing or conducting
operations for the recovery, storage, treatment, transportation
or sale of the mineral resources of the Principal Asset (or
property or assets with which it is united) that secures the
payment to such person of Barricks or any Restricted
Subsidiarys proportionate part of such development or
operating expenses;
|
|
|
|
any acquisition by Barrick or by any Restricted Subsidiary of
any Principal Asset subject to any reservation or exception
under the terms of which any vendor, lessor or assignor creates,
reserves or excepts or has created, reserved or excepted an
interest in precious metals or any other mineral or timber in
place or the proceeds thereof; and
|
- 9 -
|
|
|
|
|
any conveyance or assignment whereby Barrick or any Restricted
Subsidiary conveys or assigns to any Person or Persons an
interest in precious metals or any other mineral or timber in
place or the proceeds thereof.
|
This covenant applies to Barrick and its Restricted
Subsidiaries, which term does not include Subsidiaries of
Barrick that maintain a substantial portion of their fixed
assets outside of Canada or the United States.
Consolidation,
Amalgamation and Merger
None of Barrick, BNAF or BGF may consolidate or amalgamate with
or merge into any other Person or convey, transfer or lease its
properties and assets substantially as an entirety to any other
Person unless:
|
|
|
|
|
in a transaction in which Barrick, BNAF or BGF does not survive
or continue in existence or in which Barrick, BNAF or BGF
transfers or leases its properties and assets substantially as
an entirety to any other Person, the successor entity is a
corporation, partnership or trust organized under the laws of
Canada or any province or territory of Canada or the United
States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia or, if
such transaction would not impair (as determined by the Board of
Directors of Barrick by resolution) the rights of the holders of
the Securities or the Guarantees, in any other country, provided
that if such successor entity is organized under the laws of a
jurisdiction other than Canada or any province or territory of
Canada, or the United States, any state thereof or the District
of Columbia, the successor entity assumes by a supplemental
indenture the obligations of Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case
may be, under the Securities, the Guarantee and the Indenture to
pay Additional Amounts, adding the name of such successor
jurisdiction in addition to Canada in each place that Canada
appears in -Payment of Additional Amounts below and
adding references to the provinces, territories, states or other
applicable political subdivisions of such successor jurisdiction
in addition to references to the provinces and territories of
Canada appearing in -Payment of Additional Amounts;
|
|
|
|
the surviving entity shall expressly assume by a supplemental
indenture the obligations of Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case
may be, in respect of the Securities, and in the case of
Barrick, the Guarantees and the performance and observance of
every covenant of the Indenture to be performed or observed by
Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case may be;
|
|
|
|
immediately before and after giving effect to any such
transaction, no Event of Default or event that after notice or
passage of time or both would be an Event of Default shall have
occurred and be continuing; and
|
|
|
|
if, as a result of any such transaction, any Principal Assets
would become subject to a Lien, then, unless such Lien could be
created pursuant to the Indenture provisions described under
Limitation on Liens above without equally
securing the Securities, Barrick, prior to or simultaneously
with such transaction, shall have caused the Securities to be
secured equally with or prior to the indebtedness secured by
such Lien.
|
Certain
Definitions Applicable to Covenants
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets means, at a
particular date, the aggregate amount of assets (less applicable
reserves and other properly deductible items) shown on the most
recent consolidated financial statements of Barrick filed with
or furnished to the SEC by Barrick (or, in the event that
Barrick is not required by law or pursuant to the Indenture to
file reports with the SEC, as set forth on the most recent
consolidated financial statements provided to the Trustee) less
(a) all current liabilities (excluding any portion
constituting Funded Debt); (b) all goodwill, trade names,
trademarks, patents, unamortized debt discount and expense and
other like intangibles (excluding from intangibles, for greater
- 10 -
certainty, mineral rights, interests in mineral properties,
deferred mining, acquisition, exploration and stripping costs
and deferred charges relating to hedging agreements); and
(c) appropriate adjustments on account of minority
interests of other persons holding shares of any of the
Subsidiaries, all as set forth on the most recent balance sheet
of Barrick and its consolidated Subsidiaries filed with or
furnished to the SEC by Barrick (or, in the event that Barrick
is not required by law or pursuant to the Indenture to file
reports with the SEC, as set forth on the most recent
consolidated financial statements provided to the Trustee) (but
in any event, as of a date within 150 days of the date of
determination) and computed in accordance with the accounting
principles used in Barricks annual financial statements
contained in Barricks annual report delivered to its
shareholders in respect of the fiscal year immediately prior to
the date of such computation; which, on the date of this
prospectus, were U.S. GAAP; provided that in no event shall
any amount be deducted in respect of unrealized mark-to-market
adjustments (whether positive or negative and whether or not
reflected in Barricks consolidated financial statements)
relating to hedging and other financial risk management
activities of Barrick or any of its Subsidiaries (including,
without limitation, commodity, interest rate and foreign
exchange trading and sales agreements).
Financial Instrument Obligations means
obligations arising under:
|
|
|
|
|
interest rate swap agreements, forward rate agreements, floor,
cap or collar agreements, futures or options, insurance or other
similar agreements or arrangements, or any combination thereof,
entered into by a Person relating to interest rates or pursuant
to which the price, value or amount payable thereunder is
dependent or based upon interest rates in effect from time to
time or fluctuations in interest rates occurring from time to
time;
|
|
|
|
currency swap agreements, cross-currency agreements, forward
agreements, floor, cap or collar agreements, futures or options,
insurance or other similar agreements or arrangements, or any
combination thereof, entered into by a Person relating to
currency exchange rates or pursuant to which the price, value or
amount payable thereunder is dependent or based upon currency
exchange rates in effect from time to time or fluctuations in
currency exchange rates occurring from time to time; and
|
|
|
|
commodity swap, hedging or sales agreements, floor, cap or
collar agreements, commodity futures or options or other similar
agreements or arrangements, or any combination thereof, entered
into by a Person relating to one or more commodities or pursuant
to which the price, value or amount payable thereunder is
dependent or based upon the price of one or more commodities in
effect from time to time or fluctuations in the price of one or
more commodities occurring from time to time.
|
Funded Debt as applied to any Person, means
all indebtedness of such Person maturing after, or renewable or
extendable at the option of such Person beyond, 12 months
from the date of determination.
Governmental Authority means any nation or
government, any state, province, territory or other political
subdivision thereof and any entity exercising executive,
legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative functions of
or pertaining to government.
Indebtedness means obligations for money
borrowed whether or not evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures or
other similar evidences of indebtedness.
Lien means any mortgage, lien, pledge,
charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind created,
incurred or assumed in order to secure payment of Indebtedness.
Non-Recourse Debt means Indebtedness to
finance the creation, development, construction or acquisition
of properties or assets and any increases in or extensions,
renewals or refinancings of such Indebtedness, provided that the
recourse of the lender thereof (including any agent, trustee,
receiver or other Person acting on behalf of such entity) in
respect of such Indebtedness is limited in all circumstances to
the properties or assets created, developed, constructed or
acquired in respect of which such Indebtedness has been
incurred, to the capital stock and debt securities of the
Restricted Subsidiary
- 11 -
that acquires or owns such properties or assets and to the
receivables, inventory, equipment, chattels, contracts,
intangibles and other assets, rights or collateral connected
with the properties or assets created, developed, constructed or
acquired and to which such lender has recourse.
North American Subsidiary means any
Subsidiary that maintains a substantial portion of its fixed
assets within Canada or the United States.
Permitted Liens means:
|
|
|
|
|
Liens existing on the date of the Indenture, or arising
thereafter pursuant to contractual commitments entered into
prior to such date;
|
|
|
|
Liens securing the Securities;
|
|
|
|
Liens incidental to the conduct of the business of Barrick or
any Restricted Subsidiary or the ownership of their assets that,
in the aggregate, do not materially impair the operation of the
business of Barrick and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole,
including, without limitation, any such Liens created pursuant
to joint development agreements and leases, subleases, royalties
or other similar rights granted to or reserved by others;
|
|
|
|
Purchase Money Mortgages;
|
|
|
|
any Lien on any Principal Asset existing at the time Barrick or
any Restricted Subsidiary acquires the Principal Asset (or any
business entity then owning the Principal Asset) whether or not
assumed by Barrick or such Restricted Subsidiary and whether or
not such Lien was given to secure the payment of the purchase
price of the Principal Asset (or any entity then owning the
Principal Asset), provided that no such Lien shall extend to any
other Principal Asset;
|
|
|
|
any Lien to secure Indebtedness owing to Barrick or to another
Subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
Liens on the assets of a corporation existing at the time the
corporation is liquidated or merged into, or amalgamated or
consolidated with, Barrick or any Restricted Subsidiary or at
the time of the sale, lease or other disposition to Barrick or
any Restricted Subsidiary of the properties of such corporation
as, or substantially as, an entirety;
|
|
|
|
any attachment or judgment Lien provided that (i) the
execution or enforcement of the judgment it secures is
effectively stayed and the judgment is being contested in good
faith, (ii) the judgment it secures is discharged within
60 days after the later of the entering of such judgment or
the expiration of any applicable stay, or (iii) the payment
of the judgment secured is covered in full (subject to a
customary deductible) by insurance;
|
|
|
|
any Lien in connection with Indebtedness which by its terms is
Non-Recourse Debt;
|
|
|
|
any Lien for taxes, assessments or governmental charges or
levies (a) that are not yet due and delinquent or
(b) the validity of which is being contested in good faith;
|
|
|
|
any Lien of materialmen, mechanics, carriers, workmen,
repairmen, landlords or other similar Liens, or deposits to
obtain the release of these Liens;
|
|
|
|
any Lien (a) to secure public or statutory obligations
(including reclamation and closure bonds and similar
obligations), (b) to secure payment of workmens
compensation, employment insurance or other forms of
governmental insurance or benefits, (c) to secure
performance in connection with tenders, leases of real property,
environmental, land use or other governmental or regulatory
permits, bids or contracts or (d) to secure (or in lieu of)
surety or appeal bonds, and Liens made in the ordinary course of
business for similar purposes;
|
|
|
|
any Lien granted in the ordinary course of business in
connection with Financial Instrument Obligations;
|
- 12 -
|
|
|
|
|
any Lien created for the sole purpose of renewing or refunding
any of the Liens described in the list above, provided that the
Indebtedness secured thereby shall not exceed the principal
amount of Indebtedness so secured at the time of such renewal or
refunding, and that such renewal or refunding Lien shall be
limited to all or any part of the same property which secured
the Lien renewed or refunded; and
|
|
|
|
any Lien not otherwise permitted under the list above, provided
that the aggregate principal amount of Indebtedness secured by
all such Liens would not then exceed 10% of Consolidated Net
Tangible Assets.
|
Person means an individual, partnership,
corporation, business trust, trust, unincorporated association,
joint venture, Governmental Authority or other entity of
whatever nature.
Principal Asset means (i) any real
property interest (all such interests forming an integral part
of a single development or operation being considered as one
interest), including any mining claims and leases, and any
plants, buildings or other improvements thereon, and any part
thereof, located in Canada or the United States that is held by
Barrick or any Restricted Subsidiary and has a net book value,
on the date as of which the determination is being made,
exceeding 5% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets (other than any
such interest that the Board of Directors of Barrick determines
by resolution is not material to the business of Barrick and its
Subsidiaries taken as a whole) or (ii) any of the capital
stock or debt securities issued by any Restricted Subsidiary.
Purchase Money Mortgage means any Lien on any
Principal Asset (or the capital stock or debt securities of any
Restricted Subsidiary that acquires or owns any Principal Asset)
incurred in connection with the acquisition of that Principal
Asset or the construction or repair of any fixed improvements on
that Principal Asset (or in connection with financing the costs
of acquisition of that Principal Asset or the construction or
repair of improvements on that Principal Asset) provided that
the principal amount of Indebtedness secured by any such Lien
shall at no time exceed 100% of the original cost to Barrick or
any Restricted Subsidiary of the Principal Asset or such
construction or repairs.
Restricted Subsidiary means any North
American Subsidiary that owns or leases a Principal Asset
referred to in clause (i) of the definition of
Principal Asset or is engaged primarily in the
business of owning or holding capital stock of one or more
Restricted Subsidiaries. Restricted Subsidiary,
however, does not include (1) any Subsidiary whose primary
business consists of (A) financing operations in connection
with leasing and conditional sale transactions on behalf of
Barrick and its Subsidiaries, (B) purchasing accounts
receivable or making loans secured by accounts receivable or
inventory or (C) being a finance company or (2) any
Subsidiary which the Board of Directors of Barrick has
determined by resolution does not maintain a substantial portion
of its fixed assets within Canada or the United States.
Subsidiary means (i) a corporation more
than 50% of the outstanding Voting Stock of which at the time of
determination is owned, directly or indirectly, by Barrick or by
one or more Subsidiaries of Barrick and the votes carried by
such Voting Stock are sufficient, if exercised, to elect a
majority of the board of directors of the corporation or
(ii) any other Person (other than a corporation) in which
at the time of determination Barrick or one or more Subsidiaries
of Barrick, directly or indirectly, has or have at least a
majority ownership and power to direct the policies, management
and affairs of the Person.
Voting Stock means securities or other
ownership interests of a corporation, partnership or other
entity having by the terms thereof ordinary voting power to vote
in the election of the board of directors or other persons
performing similar functions of such corporation, partnership or
other entity (without regard to the occurrence of any
contingency).
Payment of
Additional Amounts
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus
supplement, all payments made by or on behalf of Barrick, BNAF
or BGF under or with respect to the Securities or the Guarantees
will be made free and clear of and without withholding or
deduction for or on account of any present or future tax, duty,
levy, impost, assessment or other governmental charge (including
penalties, interest and other liabilities related
- 13 -
thereto) imposed or levied by or on behalf of the Government of
Canada or any province or territory thereof or by any authority
or agency therein or thereof having power to tax (hereafter
Canadian Taxes), unless Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the
case may be, is required to withhold or deduct Canadian Taxes by
law or by the interpretation or administration thereof. If
Barrick, BNAF or BGF is so required to withhold or deduct any
amount for or on account of Canadian Taxes from any payment made
under or with respect to the Securities or the Guarantees,
Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case may be, will pay to each
holder of such Securities as additional interest such additional
amounts (Additional Amounts) as may be necessary so
that the net amount received by each such holder after such
withholding or deduction (and after deducting any Canadian Taxes
on such Additional Amounts) will not be less than the amount
such holder would have received if such Canadian Taxes had not
been withheld or deducted, except as described below. However,
no Additional Amounts will be payable with respect to a payment
made to a Securities holder (such holder, an Excluded
Holder) in respect of the beneficial owner thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
with which Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case may be, does not
deal at arms length (for the purposes of the Income Tax
Act (Canada)) at the time of the making of such payment;
|
|
|
|
which is subject to such Canadian Taxes by reason of the
Securities holder being a resident, domiciliary or national of,
engaged in business or maintaining a permanent establishment or
other physical presence in or otherwise having some connection
with Canada or any province or territory thereof otherwise than
by the mere holding of the Securities or the receipt of payments
thereunder;
|
|
|
|
which is subject to such Canadian Taxes by reason of the
Securities holders failure to comply with any
certification, identification, documentation or other reporting
requirements if compliance is required by law, regulation,
administrative practice or an applicable treaty as a
precondition to exemption from, or a reduction in the rate of
deduction or withholding of, such Canadian Taxes (provided that
Barrick, BNAF or BGF advises the Trustee and the holders of the
Securities then outstanding of any change in such
requirements); or
|
|
|
|
which is a fiduciary or partnership or Person other than the
sole beneficial owner of such payment to the extent that the
Canadian Taxes would not have been imposed on such payment had
such holder been the sole beneficial owner of such Securities.
|
Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case may be, will also:
|
|
|
|
|
make such withholding or deduction; and
|
|
|
|
remit the full amount deducted or withheld to the relevant
authority in accordance with applicable law.
|
Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case may be, will furnish to the
holders of the Securities, within 60 days after the date
the payment of any Canadian Taxes is due pursuant to applicable
law, certified copies of tax receipts or other documents
evidencing such payment by such person.
Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case may be, will indemnify and
hold harmless each holder of Securities (other than an Excluded
Holder) from and against, and upon written request reimburse
each such holder for the amount (excluding any Additional
Amounts that have previously been paid by Barrick, BNAF or BGF
with respect thereto) of:
|
|
|
|
|
any Canadian Taxes so levied or imposed and paid by such holder
as a result of payments made under or with respect to the
Securities or the Guarantees;
|
|
|
|
any liability (including penalties, interest and expenses)
arising therefrom or with respect thereto; and
|
|
|
|
any Canadian Taxes imposed with respect to any reimbursement
under the preceding two bullet points, but excluding any such
Canadian Taxes on such holders net income.
|
- 14 -
In any event, no Additional Amounts or indemnity amounts will be
payable under the provisions described above in respect of any
Security in excess of the Additional Amounts and the indemnity
amounts which would be required if, at all relevant times, the
holder of such Security were a resident of the United States for
purposes of the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980),
as amended, including any protocols thereto. As a result of the
limitation on the payment of Additional Amounts and indemnity
amounts discussed in the preceding sentence, the Additional
Amounts or indemnity amounts received by certain holders of
Securities will be less than the amount of Canadian Taxes
withheld or deducted or the amount of Canadian Taxes (and
related amounts) levied or imposed giving rise to the obligation
to pay the indemnity amounts, as the case may be, and,
accordingly, the net amount received by such holders of
Securities will be less than the amount such holders would have
received had there been no such withholding or deduction in
respect of Canadian Taxes or had such Canadian Taxes (and
related amounts) not been levied or imposed.
Wherever in the Indenture there is mentioned, in any context,
the payment of principal, premium, if any, interest, if any, or
any other amount payable under or with respect to a Security or
a Guarantee, such mention shall be deemed to include mention of
the payment of Additional Amounts to the extent that, in such
context, Additional Amounts are, were or would be payable in
respect thereof.
Tax
Redemption
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus
supplement, the applicable issuer may redeem the Securities of
any series at any time, in whole but not in part, at a
redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof together
with accrued and unpaid interest to the date fixed for
redemption, upon the giving of a notice as described below, if:
|
|
|
|
|
as a result of any change (including any announced prospective
change) in or amendment to the laws (or any regulations or
rulings promulgated thereunder) of Canada (or the jurisdiction
of organization of the successor to the applicable issuer or, if
the Securities of such series are guaranteed by Barrick, of
Barrick) or of any political subdivision or taxing authority
thereof or therein affecting taxation, or any change in official
position regarding the application or interpretation of such
laws, regulations or rulings (including a holding by a court of
competent jurisdiction), which change or amendment is announced
or becomes effective on or after the date specified in the
applicable prospectus supplement, and which in a written opinion
to the applicable issuer or Barrick of legal counsel of
recognized standing has resulted or will result (assuming, in
the case of any announced prospective change, that such
announced change will become effective as of the date specified
in such announcement and in the form announced) in such issuer,
or in the case of guaranteed Securities, Barrick becoming
obligated to pay, on the next succeeding date on which interest
is due, Additional Amounts with respect to any Security of such
series as described under - Payment of Additional
Amounts; or
|
|
|
|
on or after the date specified in the applicable prospectus
supplement, any action has been taken by any taxing authority
of, or any decision has been rendered by a court of competent
jurisdiction in, Canada (or the jurisdiction of organization of
the successor to the applicable issuer or, if the Securities of
such series are guaranteed by Barrick, of Barrick) or any
political subdivision or taxing authority thereof or therein,
including any of those actions specified in the paragraph
immediately above, whether or not such action was taken or
decision was rendered with respect to the applicable issuer or
Barrick, or any change, amendment, application or interpretation
shall be officially proposed, which, in any such case, in the
written opinion to the applicable issuer or Barrick of legal
counsel of recognized standing, will result (assuming, in the
case of any announced prospective change, that such announced
change will become effective as of the date specified in such
announcement and in the form announced) in such issuer, or in
the case of guaranteed Securities, Barrick becoming obligated to
pay, on the next succeeding
|
- 15 -
|
|
|
|
|
date on which interest is due, Additional Amounts with respect
to any Security of such series;
|
and, in any such case, the applicable issuer or, in the case of
guaranteed Securities, Barrick (or its successor), in its
business judgment, determines that such obligation cannot be
avoided by the use of reasonable measures available to it (or
its successor).
In the event that Barrick, BNAF or BGF elects to redeem the
Securities of any series pursuant to the provisions set forth in
the preceding paragraph, it shall deliver to the Trustee a
certificate, signed by an authorized officer, stating that it is
entitled to redeem such Debt Securities pursuant to their terms.
Notice of intention to redeem such Debt Securities will be given
not more than 60 nor less than 30 days prior to the date
fixed for redemption and will specify the date fixed for
redemption.
Events of
Default
The term Event of Default with respect to Securities
of any series means any of the following:
(a) default in the payment of the
principal of (or any premium on) any Security of that series at
its Maturity;
(b) default in the payment of any
interest on any Security of that series when it becomes due and
payable, and continuance of such default for a period of
30 days;
(c) default in the deposit of any
sinking fund payment when the same becomes due by the terms of
the Securities of that series;
(d) default in the performance, or
breach, of any other covenant or agreement of the applicable
issuer or, in the case of guaranteed Securities, Barrick in the
Indenture in respect of the Securities of that series (other
than a covenant or agreement for which default or breach is
specifically dealt with elsewhere in the Indenture), where such
default or breach continues for a period of 90 days after
written notice to the issuer of such Securities and, in the case
of guaranteed Securities, Barrick by the Trustee or the holders
of at least 25% in principal amount of all outstanding
Securities affected thereby;
(e) failure to pay when due, after
the expiration of any applicable grace period, any portion of
the principal of, or involuntary acceleration of the maturity
(which acceleration is not rescinded or annulled within
10 days) of, Indebtedness of the applicable issuer or (in
the case of guaranteed Securities) Barrick having an aggregate
principal amount outstanding in excess of the greater of
(i) $150,000,000 and (ii) 5% of Consolidated Net
Tangible Assets;
(f) certain events of bankruptcy,
insolvency or reorganization; or
(g) any other Events of Default
provided with respect to the Securities of that series.
If an Event of Default described in clause (a), (b) or
(c) above occurs and is continuing with respect to
Securities of any series, then the Trustee or the holders of not
less than 25% in principal amount of the outstanding Securities
of that series may require the principal amount (or, if the
Securities of that series are Original Issue Discount Securities
or Indexed Securities, such portion of the principal amount as
may be specified in the terms of that series) of all the
outstanding Securities of that series and any accrued but unpaid
interest on such Securities be paid immediately. If an Event of
Default described in clause (d) or (g) above occurs
and is continuing with respect to Securities of one or more
series, then the Trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in
principal amount of the outstanding Securities of all series
affected thereby (as one class) may require the principal amount
(or, if any of the Securities of such affected series are
Original Issue Discount Securities or Indexed Securities, such
portion of the principal amount as may be specified in the terms
of such affected series) of all the outstanding Securities of
such affected series and any accrued but unpaid interest on such
Securities be paid immediately. If an Event of Default described
in clause (e) or (f) above occurs and is continuing,
then the Trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in
principal amount of all outstanding Securities (as a class) may
require the principal amount (or, if the Securities or any
series are Original Issue Discount Securities or Indexed
Securities, such portion of the
- 16 -
principal amount as may be specified in the terms of that
series) of all the outstanding Securities and any accrued but
unpaid interest on such Securities be paid immediately. However,
at any time after a declaration of acceleration with respect to
Securities of any series (or of all series, as the case may be)
has been made and before a judgment or decree for payment of the
money due has been obtained, the holders of a majority in
principal amount of the outstanding Securities of such series
(or of all series, as the case may be), by written notice to
Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as applicable, and the Trustee, may, under
certain circumstances, rescind and annul such acceleration. The
applicable prospectus supplement will contain provisions
relating to acceleration of the maturity of a portion of the
principal amount of Original Issue Discount Securities or
Indexed Securities upon the occurrence of any Event of Default
and the continuation thereof.
Except during default, the Trustee is not obligated to exercise
any of its rights and powers under the Indenture at the request
or direction of any of the holders, unless the holders have
offered to the Trustee reasonable indemnity. If the holders
provide reasonable indemnity, the holders of a majority in
principal amount of the outstanding Securities of all series
affected by an Event of Default may, subject to certain
limitations, direct the time, method and place of conducting any
proceeding for any remedy available to the Trustee, or
exercising any trust or power conferred on the Trustee, with
respect to the Securities of all series affected by such Event
of Default.
No holder of a Security of any series will have any right to
institute any proceedings, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
such holder has previously given to the Trustee written notice
of a continuing Event of Default with respect to the Securities
of that series;
|
|
|
|
the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the
outstanding Securities of all series affected by such Event of
Default have made written request and have offered reasonable
indemnity to the Trustee to institute such proceedings as
trustee; and
|
|
|
|
the Trustee has failed to institute such proceeding, and has not
received from the holders of a majority in the aggregate
principal amount of outstanding Securities of all series
affected by such Event of Default a direction inconsistent with
such request, within 60 days after such notice, request and
offer.
|
However, these limitations do not apply to a suit instituted by
the holder of a Security for the enforcement of payment of
principal of or interest on such Security on or after the
applicable due date of such payment.
We will be required to furnish to the Trustee annually an
officers certificate as to the performance of certain of
our obligations under the Indenture and as to any default in
such performance.
Defeasance
When we use the term defeasance, we mean discharge
from some or all of our obligations under the Indenture with
respect to Securities of a particular series. If Barrick, BNAF
or BGF deposits with the Trustee sufficient cash or government
securities to pay the principal, interest, any premium and any
other sums due to the stated maturity or a redemption date of
the Securities of a particular series, then at its option:
|
|
|
|
|
the applicable issuer and, in the case of guaranteed Securities,
Barrick will each be discharged from its obligations with
respect to the Securities of such series with certain
exceptions, such as the obligation to pay Additional Amounts,
and the holders of the Securities of the affected series will
not be entitled to the benefits of the Indenture except for
registration of transfer and exchange of Securities and
replacement of lost, stolen or mutilated Securities and certain
other limited rights. Such holders may look only to such
deposited funds or obligations for payment; or
|
|
|
|
the applicable issuer and, in the case of guaranteed Securities,
Barrick will no longer be under any obligation to comply with
the Limitation on Liens covenant, the
Consolidation,
|
- 17 -
|
|
|
|
|
Amalgamation and Merger covenant and certain other
covenants under the Indenture, and certain Events of Default
will no longer apply to them.
|
To exercise defeasance Barrick, BNAF or BGF also must deliver to
the Trustee:
|
|
|
|
|
an opinion of U.S. counsel to the effect that the deposit
and related defeasance would not cause the holders of the
Securities of the applicable series to recognize income, gain or
loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes and that holders
of the Securities of that series will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same
manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such
defeasance had not occurred; and
|
|
|
|
an opinion of Canadian counsel or a ruling from Canada Revenue
Agency that there would be no such recognition of income, gain
or loss for Canadian federal or provincial tax purposes and that
holders of the Securities of such series will be subject to
Canadian federal and provincial income tax on the same amounts,
in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the
case if such defeasance had not occurred.
|
In addition, no Event of Default with respect to the Securities
of the applicable series can have occurred, Barrick cannot be an
insolvent person under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
(Canada) and neither BNAF nor BGF can be an insolvent
person under the relevant legislation applicable to them.
In order for U.S. counsel to deliver the opinion that would
allow the applicable issuer and, in the case of guaranteed
Securities, Barrick to be discharged from all of its obligations
under the Securities of any series, the applicable issuer or, in
the case of guaranteed Securities, Barrick must have received
from, or there must have been published by, the Internal Revenue
Service a ruling, or there must have been a change in law so
that the deposit and defeasance would not cause holders of the
Securities of such series to recognize income, gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and so that such holders
would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the same
amounts, in the same manner and at the same time as would have
been the case if such defeasance had not occurred.
Modifications and
Waivers
We may modify or amend the Indenture with the consent of the
holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the
outstanding Securities of all series affected by such
modification or amendment; provided, however, that we must
receive consent from the holder of each outstanding Security of
such affected series to:
|
|
|
|
|
change the stated maturity of the principal of, or interest on,
such outstanding Security;
|
|
|
|
reduce the principal amount of or interest on such outstanding
Security;
|
|
|
|
reduce the amount of the principal payable upon the acceleration
of the maturity of an outstanding Original Issue Discount
Security;
|
|
|
|
change the place or currency of payments on such outstanding
Security;
|
|
|
|
impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of any
payment on or with respect to such outstanding Security;
|
|
|
|
reduce the percentage in principal amount of outstanding
Securities of such series, from which the consent of holders is
required to modify or amend the Indenture or waive compliance
with certain provisions of the Indenture or waive certain
defaults; or
|
|
|
|
modify any provisions of the Indenture relating to modifying or
amending the Indenture or waiving past defaults or covenants
except as otherwise specified.
|
The holders of a majority in principal amount of Securities of
any series may waive our compliance with certain restrictive
provisions of the Indenture with respect to such series. The
holders of a majority in principal amount of outstanding
Securities of all series with respect to which an Event of
Default has
- 18 -
occurred may waive any past default under the Indenture, except
a default in the payment of the principal of or interest on any
Security or in respect of any item listed above.
The Indenture or the Securities may be amended or supplemented,
without the consent of any holder of such Securities, in order
to, among other things, cure any ambiguity or inconsistency or
to make any change, in any case, that does not have a materially
adverse effect on the rights of any holder of such Securities.
Consent to
Jurisdiction and Service
Under the Indenture, Barrick has irrevocably appointed CT
Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue,
13th Floor,
New York, New York, 10011 as its agent for service of process in
any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the
Indenture, the Securities and the Guarantees and for actions
brought under federal or state securities laws brought in any
federal or state court located in The City of New York, and has
submitted to such non-exclusive jurisdiction.
Governing
Law
The Indenture, the Securities and the Guarantees will be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of New York.
Enforceability of
Judgments
Since many of Barricks assets are outside the United
States, any judgment obtained in the United States against
Barrick, including judgments with respect to payments under the
Guarantees, may not be collectible within the United States.
Barrick has been informed by its Canadian counsel, Davies Ward
Phillips & Vineberg LLP, that a court of competent
jurisdiction in the Province of Ontario (an Ontario
Court) would give a judgment in Canadian dollars at an
exchange rate determined in accordance with the Courts of
Justice Act (Ontario) based upon a final and conclusive in
personam judgment of a U.S. federal or New York state
court located in the State of New York (New York
Court) for a sum certain obtained against Barrick with
respect to a claim pursuant to the Indenture, without
reconsideration of the merits, if:
|
|
|
|
|
the New York Court rendering such judgment had jurisdiction over
Barrick, as recognized by the courts of the Province of Ontario
for purposes of enforcement of foreign judgments (and submission
by Barrick in the Indenture to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of
the New York Court will be sufficient for the purpose);
|
|
|
|
such judgment was: (a) not obtained by fraud or in any
manner contrary to the principles of natural justice;
(b) not for a claim based on any laws of the United States
or the State of New York or any other jurisdiction other than
the Province of Ontario which an Ontario Court would
characterize under the laws of the Province of Ontario as
revenue, expropriatory, penal or other public laws; (c) not
contrary to public policy, as such term is interpreted under the
laws of the Province of Ontario or contrary to any order made by
the Attorney General of Canada under the Foreign
Extraterritorial Measures Act (Canada) or by the Competition
Tribunal under the Competition Act (Canada) in respect of
certain judgments referred to therein; and (d) subsisting
and unsatisfied and not impeachable as void or voidable under
New York law;
|
|
|
|
an action to enforce the judgment is commenced in the Ontario
Court within any applicable limitation period; and
|
provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
such Ontario Court has discretion to stay or decline to hear an
action on such judgment if the judgment is under appeal, or
there is another subsisting judgment in Ontario, New York or any
other jurisdiction relating to the same cause of action as such
judgment; and
|
- 19 -
|
|
|
|
|
an action in Ontario on such judgment may be affected by
bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar laws affecting the
enforcement of creditors rights generally.
|
Barrick has been advised by its Canadian counsel that there is
some doubt as to the enforceability in Canada, against Barrick,
or against any of their respective directors, officers and
experts who are not residents of the United States, by a court
in original actions or in actions to enforce judgments of United
States courts, of civil liabilities predicated solely upon the
United States federal securities laws.
The
Trustee
The Trustee under the Indenture is The Bank of New York.
CERTAIN INCOME
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The applicable prospectus supplement will describe certain
Canadian federal income tax consequences to investors described
therein of acquiring Debt Securities, including, in the case of
an investor who is not a resident of Canada (for purposes of the
Income Tax Act (Canada)), if applicable, whether payment of
principal, premium, if any, and interest will be subject to
Canadian non-resident withholding tax.
The applicable prospectus supplement will also describe certain
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of Debt Securities by an initial
investor who is a U.S. person (within the meaning of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code), if applicable, including, to
the extent applicable, any such consequences relating to Debt
Securities payable in a currency other than the
U.S. dollar, issued at an original issue discount for
U.S. federal income tax purposes or containing early
redemption provisions or other special terms.
TRADING PRICE AND
VOLUME OF COMMON SHARES
The common shares of Barrick are listed and traded on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Toronto Stock
Exchange (the TSX). As a result, Barrick is required
to disclose certain information herein regarding the price range
and trading volume of its common shares. The data set forth
herein with respect to the trading of Barricks common
shares is not, and should not be regarded as, a representation
with respect to the manner in which the Debt Securities may be
traded on the secondary market in the future or that the Debt
Securities, when offered and issued, will be listed and posted
for trading on the NYSE or the TSX.
- 20 -
The following table presents the high and low closing prices for
the common shares of Barrick and the average daily trading
volume, on a monthly basis on the NYSE and TSX, for the
twelve-month period prior to the date hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
29.75
|
|
|
|
28.17
|
|
|
|
6,308,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
|
|
34.55
|
|
|
|
29.60
|
|
|
|
6,931,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
August
|
|
|
34.29
|
|
|
|
30.10
|
|
|
|
6,111,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
40.94
|
|
|
|
33.40
|
|
|
|
8,270,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
October
|
|
|
44.13
|
|
|
|
39.25
|
|
|
|
7,659,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
|
|
|
46.98
|
|
|
|
38.92
|
|
|
|
8,179,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
42.88
|
|
|
|
37.39
|
|
|
|
5,862,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
53.57
|
|
|
|
46.02
|
|
|
|
15,677,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
February
|
|
|
53.33
|
|
|
|
47.54
|
|
|
|
9,800,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
|
|
|
53.55
|
|
|
|
41.94
|
|
|
|
10,287,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
|
|
|
46.04
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
8,768,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
May
|
|
|
42.69
|
|
|
|
37.36
|
|
|
|
9,484,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
June (to June 11)
|
|
|
42.07
|
|
|
|
38.85
|
|
|
|
8,189,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
(Cdn$)
|
|
|
(Cdn$)
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
31.80
|
|
|
|
29.97
|
|
|
|
2,560,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
|
|
36.20
|
|
|
|
31.54
|
|
|
|
2,433,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
August
|
|
|
36.03
|
|
|
|
32.39
|
|
|
|
2,902,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
40.92
|
|
|
|
35.04
|
|
|
|
4,244,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
October
|
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
|
39.19
|
|
|
|
3,410,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
|
|
|
43.30
|
|
|
|
38.27
|
|
|
|
3,231,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
|
37.40
|
|
|
|
2,397,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
53.77
|
|
|
|
45.65
|
|
|
|
5,760,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
February
|
|
|
52.00
|
|
|
|
47.50
|
|
|
|
3,543,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
|
|
|
52.92
|
|
|
|
42.77
|
|
|
|
4,209,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
|
|
|
46.12
|
|
|
|
37.95
|
|
|
|
3,719,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
May
|
|
|
42.08
|
|
|
|
37.96
|
|
|
|
3,547,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
June (to June 11)
|
|
|
42.92
|
|
|
|
39.66
|
|
|
|
2,850,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We may sell Debt Securities for cash or other consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
through agents;
|
|
|
|
through underwriters or dealers; or
|
|
|
|
directly to purchasers.
|
We will describe in a prospectus supplement the specific plan of
distribution for a particular series of Debt Securities,
including the name or names of any underwriters or agents, the
purchase price or prices of the Offered Securities, the form of
consideration accepted for the Offered Securities, the proceeds
to Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as the case may be, from the sale of
the Offered Securities, any initial public offering price, any
underwriting discount or commission and any discounts,
concessions or commissions allowed or reallowed or paid by any
underwriter to other dealers. Any initial public offering price
and any discounts, concessions or commissions allowed or
reallowed or paid to dealers may be changed from time to time.
We may distribute Debt Securities from time to time in one or
more transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
at a fixed price or prices, which may change;
|
|
|
|
at market prices prevailing at the time of sale;
|
|
|
|
at prices related to such prevailing market prices; or
|
|
|
|
at prices to be negotiated with purchasers.
|
Debt Securities may be sold through agents designated by us. The
agents may solicit offers by institutions to purchase the
offered Debt Securities directly from Barrick, BNAF or BGF, as
the case may be, pursuant to contracts providing for payment and
delivery on a future date. The applicable prospectus supplement
will set forth the commission we will pay to the agents and any
conditions to any such contracts.
In connection with the sale of Debt Securities, Barrick, BNAF or
BGF, or purchasers of Debt Securities for whom the underwriters
may act as agents may compensate the underwriters in the form of
- 21 -
discounts, concessions or commissions. Underwriters, dealers,
and agents that participate in the distribution of Debt
Securities may be deemed to be underwriters and any fees or
commissions received by them from Barrick, BNAF or BGF, and any
profit on the resale of Debt Securities by them, may be deemed
to be underwriting commissions under the U.S. Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. The applicable prospectus supplement
will identify any underwriters with respect to the Offered
Securities.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we also may
issue some or all of the Debt Securities offered by this
prospectus in exchange for property, including securities or
assets of ours or other companies we may acquire in the future.
We may enter into agreements to indemnify underwriters, dealers
and agents who participate in the distribution of Debt
Securities against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The underwriters,
dealers and agents with whom we enter into agreements may be
customers of, engage in transactions with, or perform services
for us in the ordinary course of business.
This prospectus may qualify the distribution of the Debt
Securities under the securities laws of the Province of Ontario
to purchasers resident outside of the Province of Ontario, if a
prospectus supplement specifically states that it is intended to
do so. This prospectus may also qualify the distribution of the
Debt Securities under the securities laws of the Province of
Ontario to purchasers resident in the Province of Ontario, if a
prospectus supplement specifically states that it is intended to
do so. The Debt Securities may only be offered and sold in
Canada : (A) in the Province of Ontario pursuant to this
prospectus (if the applicable supplement so provides); or
(B) pursuant to an exemption from the prospectus
requirements of Ontario securities laws, or an exemption from
the prospectus requirements of the securities laws of any other
province or territory in which the Debt Securities are offered
or sold. In addition, the Debt Securities may only be offered
and sold in any province or territory of Canada by a securities
dealer appropriately registered under the securities laws of
that jurisdiction, or pursuant to an exemption from the
registered dealer requirements of those securities laws. Each
underwriter and each dealer participating in the distribution of
the Offered Securities will agree, unless the applicable
prospectus supplement indicates otherwise, that it will only
offer or sell the Offered Securities in Canada: (A) to
purchasers resident in the Province of Ontario pursuant to this
prospectus (if the applicable supplement so provides), or to
purchasers resident in any province or territory of Canada
pursuant to an exemption from the prospectus requirements of
those securities laws; and (B) in accordance with the
dealer registration requirements of applicable securities laws,
or pursuant to an exemption from those requirements. Except in
the case of purchasers in Ontario acquiring Debt Securities
pursuant to this prospectus (if the applicable supplement so
provides), any Debt Securities acquired by a purchaser in Canada
may be subject to resale restrictions under Canadian securities
laws, which may in some cases apply to resales made to persons
outside of Canada.
NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
Total cash costs per ounce/pound are non-GAAP financial
measures. Total cash costs per ounce/pound include all costs
absorbed into inventory, as well as royalties, by-product
credits, production taxes and accretion expense, and exclude
inventory purchase accounting adjustments and amortization. The
presentation of these statistics in this manner allows Barrick
to monitor and manage those factors that impact production costs
on a monthly basis. Barrick calculates total cash costs based on
its equity interest in production from its mines. Total cash
costs per ounce/pound are calculated by dividing the aggregate
of these costs by gold ounces, copper pounds sold or ore tons
mined. Total cash costs and total cash costs per ounce/pound are
calculated on a consistent basis for the periods presented. In
Barricks income statement, amortization is presented
separately from cost of sales. Some companies include
amortization in cost of sales, which results in a different
measurement of cost of sales in the income statement. Barrick
has provided the reconciliations set out below to illustrate the
impact of excluding amortization and inventory purchase
accounting adjustments from total cash costs per ounce/pound
statistics. Under purchase accounting rules, Barrick recorded
the fair value of acquired work in progress and finished goods
inventories as at the date of its acquisition of Placer Dome
Inc. As the acquired inventory is sold, any
- 22 -
purchase accounting adjustments reflected in the carrying amount
of inventory at acquisition, impacts cost of sales. The method
of valuing these inventories is based on estimated selling
prices less costs to complete and a reasonable profit margin.
Consequently, the fair values do not necessarily reflect costs
to produce consistent with ore mined and processed into gold and
copper after the acquisition.
Management believes that using an equity interest presentation
is a fairer, more accurate way to measure economic performance
than using a consolidated basis. For mines where Barrick holds
less than a 100% share in the production, it excludes the
economic share of gold production that flows to its partners who
hold a non-controlling interest. Consequently, for the Tulawaka
mine, although Barrick fully consolidated this mine in its
Consolidated Financial Statements (which are incorporated in
this prospectus by reference), its production and total cash
cost statistics only reflect its equity share of the production.
In managing its mining operations, Barrick disaggregates cost of
sales between amortization and the other components of cost of
sales. Barrick uses total cash costs per ounce/pound statistics
as a key performance measure internally to monitor the
performance of its regional business units. Management uses
these statistics to assess how well the Companys regional
business units are performing against internal plans, and also
to assess the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the
Companys mining operations. Management also use
amortization costs per ounce/pound statistics to monitor
business performance. By disaggregating cost of sales into these
two components and separately monitoring them, management is
better able to identify and address key performance trends.
Management believes that the presentation of these statistics in
this manner enhances the ability of investors to assess the
Companys performance. These statistics also enable
investors to better understand year-over-year changes in cash
production costs, which in turn affect Barricks
profitability and ability to generate cash flow.
The principal limitation associated with total cash costs per
ounce/pound statistics is that they do not reflect the total
costs to produce gold/copper, which in turn impacts the earnings
of Barrick. Management believes that it has compensated for this
limitation by highlighting the fact that total cash costs
exclude amortization and inventory purchase accounting
adjustments as well as providing details of the financial
effect. Management believes that the benefits of providing
disaggregated information outweigh the limitation in the method
of presentation of total cash costs per ounce/pound statistics.
Total cash costs per ounce/pound statistics are intended to
provide additional information, do not have any standardized
meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP and should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The
measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or
cash flow from operations as determined under U.S. GAAP.
Other companies may calculate these measures differently.
- 23 -
Illustration
of Impact of Excluding Certain Costs from Total Cash Costs per
Ounce/Pound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except per ounce/pound information in dollars)
|
|
For the years ended December 31
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
Copper1
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
sales2
|
|
$2,842
|
|
$2,348
|
|
$1,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
$342
|
|
$393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales at Deep South included in discontinued operations
|
|
-
|
|
101
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales attributable to non-controlling
interests3
|
|
(15)
|
|
(63)
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory purchase accounting adjustments included in cost of
sales4
|
|
-
|
|
(11)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
(97)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales equity basis
|
|
2,827
|
|
2,375
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization at producing mines consolidated
|
|
865
|
|
648
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization at South Deep included in discontinued operations
|
|
-
|
|
18
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization at producing mines attributable to non-controlling
interests3
|
|
(6)
|
|
(16)
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization at producing mines equity basis
|
|
859
|
|
650
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory purchase accounting
adjustments4
|
|
-
|
|
11
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales including amortization and inventory purchase
accounting adjustments equity basis
|
|
$3,686
|
|
$3,036
|
|
$1,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
$461
|
|
$461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31
|
Total cash costs per ounce/pound
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
Copper1
|
(per ounce/pound information in dollars)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ounces/pounds sold consolidated (thousands/millions)
|
|
8,108
|
|
8,566
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales attributable to non-controlling
interests3
|
|
(53)
|
|
(176)
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ounces/pounds sold equity basis
|
|
8,055
|
|
8,390
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash costs per ounce/pound equity basis
|
|
$350
|
|
$283
|
|
$227
|
|
|
|
$0.83
|
|
$0.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization per ounce/pound equity basis
|
|
104
|
|
81
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory purchase accounting adjustments per ounce/pound
|
|
-
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales and amortization per ounce/pound attributable to
non-controlling
interests3
|
|
1
|
|
9
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs per
ounce/pound5
consolidated basis
|
|
$455
|
|
$374
|
|
$311
|
|
|
|
$1.15
|
|
$1.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
The 2005 comparative periods for
copper have been omitted as Barrick did not produce any
significant amounts of copper prior to the production from the
copper mines acquired with Placer Dome Inc.
|
|
2.
|
|
The aggregate amount of cost of
sales for gold and copper is as per Barricks Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
3.
|
|
Relates to a 70% interest in
Tulawaka and a 50% interest in South Deep prior to 2007.
|
|
4.
|
|
Based on Barricks equity
interest.
|
|
5.
|
|
Includes amortization, amounts
attributable to non-controlling interests and inventory purchase
accounting adjustments.
|
- 24 -
LEGAL
MATTERS
General
Certain legal matters will be passed upon by:
|
|
|
|
|
Shearman & Sterling LLP, our United States counsel, on
matters of United States law; and
|
|
|
|
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP, our Canadian
counsel, on matters of Ontario law and the federal laws of
Canada applicable in Ontario.
|
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP may rely on
Shearman & Sterling LLP in issuing opinions about the
validity of the Securities being sold. If different lawyers are
relied on at the time of an offering of Securities, this will be
included in the prospectus supplement.
On the date of this prospectus, the partners and associates of
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP and
Shearman & Sterling LLP, respectively, own
beneficially, directly or indirectly, less than 1% of the
securities of Barrick.
DOCUMENTS FILED
AS PART OF THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
The following documents have been filed with the SEC as part of
the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part:
|
|
|
|
|
the documents listed as being incorporated by reference in this
prospectus under the heading Where You Can Find More
Information in this prospectus;
|
|
|
|
consents of accountants and counsel;
|
|
|
|
powers of attorney;
|
|
|
|
form of the trust indenture relating to the Debt Securities and
the Guarantees; and
|
|
|
|
statement of eligibility of the Trustee on
Form T-1.
|
EXPERTS
The comparative audited consolidated financial statements
incorporated by reference in this prospectus have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, Chartered Accountants, given on the authority of that firm
as experts in auditing and accounting. The address of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is Suite 3000,
P.O. Box 82, Royal Trust Tower, Toronto-Dominion
Centre, Toronto, Ontario, M5K 1G8.
- 25 -
June 12, 2008
Auditors
Consent
We have read the short form base shelf prospectus of Barrick
Gold Corporation (Barrick), Barrick North America Finance LLC
(BNAF) and Barrick Gold Financeco LLC (BGF) dated June 12,
2008 relating to the issue and sale of debt securities of
Barrick, BNAF and BGF. We have complied with Canadian generally
accepted standards for an auditors involvement with
offering documents.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
above-mentioned prospectus of our report to the shareholders of
Barrick on the consolidated balance sheets of Barrick as at
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and the
consolidated statements of income, cash flows,
shareholders equity and comprehensive income for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.
Our report is dated February 20, 2008.
We also consent to the use in the above-mentioned prospectus of
our report to the directors of Barrick on the consolidated
balance sheets of Barrick as at December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 and the consolidated statements of
income, cash flows, shareholders equity and comprehensive
income for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007. Our report is dated February 20,
2008 (except as to note 29 which is as of May 30,
2008).
/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Ontario
- 26 -
SCHEDULE
A
ANNUAL FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Independent Auditors Report
To the Directors of
Barrick Gold Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Barrick Gold Corporation as at December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements
of income, cash flow, shareholders equity and
comprehensive income for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits of the Companys financial
statements as at December 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006 and for each of the years then ended in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States).We conducted our audit of the Companys financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of
financial statements includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. A financial statement audit also includes assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as at December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 2007 in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 20, 2008
except for note 29 which is as of May 30, 2008.
PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other member firms of
PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a
separate and independent legal entity.
A-1
Comments by
Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting
Differences
In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require
the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion
paragraph) when there is a change in accounting principles that
has a material effect on the comparability of the Companys
financial statements, such as the changes described in
Note 2e to these consolidated financial statements. Our
report to the directors dated February 20, 2008 (except
note 29 which is as of May 30, 2008) is expressed
in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not
require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in
the Auditors report when the change is properly accounted
for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.
/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 20, 2008
except for note 29 which is as of May 30, 2008
A-2
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Barrick Gold
Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States
Dollars, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales (notes 4 and 5)
|
|
|
$ 6,332
|
|
|
|
$ 5,630
|
|
|
|
$ 2,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
sales1
(note 6)
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization (note 4)
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate administration
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration (notes 4 and 7)
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project development expense (note 7)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (note 8A)
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges (note 8B)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,983
|
|
|
|
4,147
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (note 20B)
|
|
|
(113)
|
|
|
|
(126)
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (note 8C)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
taxes and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (note 9)
|
|
|
(341)
|
|
|
|
(348)
|
|
|
|
(60)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests (note 2C)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in investees (note 12)
|
|
|
(43)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations (note 3H)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting
principles
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
$ 1,119
|
|
|
|
$ 1,506
|
|
|
|
$ 401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share data (note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$ 1.28
|
|
|
|
$ 1.44
|
|
|
|
$ 0.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$ 1.27
|
|
|
|
$ 1.42
|
|
|
|
$ 0.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$ 1.29
|
|
|
|
$ 1.79
|
|
|
|
$ 0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$ 1.28
|
|
|
|
$ 1.77
|
|
|
|
$ 0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Exclusive of amortization
(note 6).
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
A-3
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flow
Barrick Gold
Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States
dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$ 1,119
|
|
|
|
$ 1,506
|
|
|
|
$ 401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization (note 4)
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (notes 9 and 23)
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of investments (note 8C)
|
|
|
(71)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions to AROs at closed mines (notes 8A and 21)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
(585)
|
|
|
|
(280)
|
|
|
|
(80)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations (note 3H)
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
(297)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items (note 11A)
|
|
|
(73)
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(80)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures (note 4)
|
|
|
(1,046)
|
|
|
|
(1,087)
|
|
|
|
(1,104)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $13 million
(2006: $1,108 million) (note 3)
|
|
|
(1,122)
|
|
|
|
(208)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
(369)
|
|
|
|
(89)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications (note 12)
|
|
|
(66)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities (note 11B)
|
|
|
(42)
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,562)
|
|
|
|
(1,593)
|
|
|
|
(1,180)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on exercise of stock options
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends (note 24A)
|
|
|
(261)
|
|
|
|
(191)
|
|
|
|
(118)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 20B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
2,189
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(1,128)
|
|
|
|
(1,581)
|
|
|
|
(59)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of derivative instruments acquired with Placer Dome
|
|
|
(197)
|
|
|
|
(1,840)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(1,036)
|
|
|
|
(1,347)
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
(836)
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
(361)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year (note 20A)
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of year (note 20A)
|
|
|
$ 2,207
|
|
|
|
$ 3,043
|
|
|
|
$ 1,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
A-5
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
Barrick Gold
Corporation
At December 31 (in millions of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents (note 20A)
|
|
|
$ 2,207
|
|
|
|
$ 3,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (note 14)
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories (note 13)
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets (note 14)
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,288
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments (note 12)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method investments (note 12)
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (note 15)
|
|
|
8,596
|
|
|
|
8,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets (note 16)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (note 17)
|
|
|
5,847
|
|
|
|
5,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (note 18)
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$21,951
|
|
|
|
$21,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
$ 686
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt (note 20B)
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities (note 19)
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 20B)
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations (note 21)
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities (note 23)
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (note 22)
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,613
|
|
|
|
7,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (note 24)
|
|
|
13,273
|
|
|
|
13,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 25)
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
15,256
|
|
|
|
14,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies and commitments (notes 15 and 28)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
$ 21,951
|
|
|
|
$ 21,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
A-6
Consolidated
Statements
of Shareholders Equity
Barrick Gold
Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States
dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (number in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on exercise of stock options (note 26A)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on acquisition of Placer Dome
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
$ 13,106
|
|
|
|
$ 4,222
|
|
|
|
$ 4,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on exercise of stock options (note 26A)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on acquisition of Placer Dome (note 3G)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,761
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options issued on acquisition of Placer Dome (note 3G)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of stock option expense (note 26A)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
13,273
|
|
|
|
13,106
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
(341)
|
|
|
|
(624)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends (note 24A)
|
|
|
(261)
|
|
|
|
(191)
|
|
|
|
(118)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
(341)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (note 25)
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity at December 31
|
|
|
$ 15,256
|
|
|
|
$ 14,199
|
|
|
|
$ 3,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements
of Comprehensive Income
Barrick Gold
Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States
dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$ 1,119
|
|
|
|
$ 1,506
|
|
|
|
$ 401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (note 25)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
(100)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
$ 1,151
|
|
|
|
$ 1,656
|
|
|
|
$ 301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
A-7
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Barrick Gold Corporation. Tabular dollar
amounts in millions of United States dollars, unless otherwise
shown. References to C$, A$, ZAR, EUR, CLP, ARS, PGK and TZS are
to Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, South African Rands,
Euros, Chilean Pesos, Argentinean Pesos, Papua New Guinea Kina
and Tanzanian Schillings respectively.
1
>
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Barrick Gold Corporation (Barrick or the
Company) principally engages in the production and
sale of gold, as well as related activities such as exploration
and mine development. We also produce some copper and hold
interests in a platinum group metals development project and a
nickel development project, both located in Africa, and a
platinum group metals project located in Russia. Our mining
operations are concentrated in our four regional business units:
North America, South America, Africa and Australia Pacific. We
sell our gold production into the world market and we sell our
copper production into the world market and to private customers.
2
>
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A Basis of
Preparation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared under
United States generally accepted accounting principles (US
GAAP). In 2007, we amended the income statement
classification of certain income and expense items, including
non-hedge derivative gains and losses (see note 2E), to
provide enhanced disclosure of significant business activities
and reflect the increasing significance of amounts spent on
those activities. To ensure comparability of financial
information, prior year amounts have been reclassified to
reflect changes in the financial statement presentation.
B Principles
of Consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Barrick Gold Corporation and those entities we have the ability
to control either through voting rights or means other than
voting rights. FIN 46R provides guidance on the
identification and reporting of entities controlled through
means other than voting rights and defines such entities as
variable interest entities (VIEs). We apply this
guidance to all entities, including those in the development
stage, except for unincorporated joint ventures, which are
outside the scope of FIN 46R. For VIEs where we are the
primary beneficiary, we consolidate the entity and record a
non-controlling interest, measured initially at its estimated
fair value, for the interest held by other entity owners. For
VIEs where we are not the primary beneficiary we use the equity
method of accounting.
For incorporated joint ventures (JVs) where we have
the ability to exercise control, subject in some cases to
protective rights held by our JV partners, we consolidate the JV
and record a non-controlling interest for the interest held by
our JV partner. For incorporated JVs where we do not have the
ability to exercise control, we account for our investment using
the equity method of accounting. For unincorporated JVs under
which we hold an undivided interest in the assets and
liabilities of the joint venture, we include our pro rata share
of the assets and liabilities in our financial statements.
A-8
The following table illustrates our policy used to account for
significant entities where we hold less than a 100% economic
interest. We consolidate all other wholly owned entities.
Consolidation
Method at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity type at Dec 31, 2007
|
|
Economic Interest
|
|
Method
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round Mountain Mine
|
|
Unincorporated JV
|
|
50%
|
|
Pro Rata
|
Hemlo Property Mine
|
|
Unincorporated JV
|
|
50%
|
|
Pro Rata
|
Marigold Mine
|
|
Unincorporated JV
|
|
33%
|
|
Pro Rata
|
Cortez
Mine1
|
|
Unincorporated JV
|
|
60%
|
|
Pro Rata
|
Turquoise Ridge Mine
|
|
Unincorporated JV
|
|
75%
|
|
Pro Rata
|
Pueblo Viejo Project
|
|
VIE
|
|
60%
|
|
Consolidation
|
Donlin Creek
Project2
|
|
VIE
|
|
50%
|
|
Equity Method
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerro Casale Project
|
|
VIE
|
|
51%
|
|
Equity Method
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalgoorlie Mine
|
|
Unincorporated JV
|
|
50%
|
|
Pro Rata
|
Porgera
Mine3
|
|
Unincorporated JV
|
|
95%
|
|
Pro Rata
|
Reko Diq
Project4
|
|
VIE
|
|
37.5%
|
|
Equity Method
|
Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulawaka Mine
|
|
Corporate Joint Venture
|
|
70%
|
|
Consolidation
|
Kabanga
Project5
|
|
VIE
|
|
50%
|
|
Equity Method
|
Sedibelo
Project6
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
50%
|
|
Consolidation
|
Russia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fedorova
Project7
|
|
VIE
|
|
50%
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Including Cortez Hills Project.
|
|
2 |
|
For the period from January 2006
until November 2007, we recorded our proportionate 70% share of
project expenditures in project development expense based on the
previous joint venture agreement. Effective in November 2007, a
new agreement was reached with our partner which caused us to
classify our interest as an equity method investment on a
prospective basis (note 12).
|
|
3 |
|
We hold an undivided interest in
our share of assets and liabilities at the Porgera mine. In
August 2007, we increased our ownership interest from 75% to 95%
(note 3E).
|
|
4 |
|
We hold a 50% interest in Atacama
Copper, which has a 75% interest in the Reko Diq project. We use
the equity method to account for our interest in Atacama Copper
(note 12).
|
|
5 |
|
In accordance with an agreement
with our partner, in 2007 and 2006 our partner was responsible
for funding 100% of exploration and project expenditures and we
did not record any amounts for our economic interest in this
period. After our partner has funded $145 million of
exploration and project expenditures we will be responsible for
funding our share of future expenditures. At December 31,
2007 our partner had spent $103 million of this funding
commitment.
|
|
6 |
|
Until completion of a bankable
feasibility study (BFS), we are responsible for
funding 100% of project expenditures at the Sedibelo project. In
the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded project
development expenses totaling $22 million (2006:
$10 million). On completion of a BFS, as part of our
earn-in agreement, we are entitled to earn a 50% economic
interest in the entity that owns the Sedibelo project and to
recoup from our partner their 50% share of the costs to complete
the BFS.
|
|
7 |
|
In accordance with our agreement
with minority shareholders, we have an earn-in option for an
additional 29% interest in the entity that owns the rights to
the Fedorova project (for a total 79% interest), provided that
we deliver a BFS by January 1, 2009. We are responsible for
funding 100% of project expenditures until the BFS is finalized,
and therefore a non-controlling interest has not been recorded
through December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-9
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Entities
Consolidated using the Pro Rata Method Income Statement and Cash
Flow Information (100%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$ 2,076
|
|
|
|
$ 1,776
|
|
|
|
$ 1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(1,665
|
)
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$ 411
|
|
|
|
$ 319
|
|
|
|
$ 213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities1
|
|
|
$ 147
|
|
|
|
$ 473
|
|
|
|
$ 318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities1
|
|
|
$ (139
|
)
|
|
|
$ (284
|
)
|
|
|
$ (75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities 1,2
|
|
|
$ 81
|
|
|
|
$ (185
|
)
|
|
|
$ (237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net cash inflow (outflow).
|
2 |
|
Includes cash flows between the
joint ventures and joint venture partners.
|
Balance Sheet
Information (100%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
$ 430
|
|
|
|
$ 365
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,512
|
|
|
|
$ 2,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
$ 216
|
|
|
|
$ 205
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 530
|
|
|
|
$ 449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling
Interests - Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pueblo Viejo project
|
|
|
$ 30
|
|
|
|
$ 9
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulawaka mine
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 14
|
|
|
|
$ 1
|
|
|
|
$ (1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Foreign
Currency Translation
The functional currency of all our operations is the US dollar.
We translate non-US dollar balances into US dollars as follows:
|
|
Ø
|
Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and equity
method investments using historical rates;
|
Ø
|
Available for sale securities using closing rates with
translation gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive
income;
|
Ø
|
Asset retirement obligations using historical rates;
|
Ø
|
Long-term debt using closing rates;
|
Ø
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities using closing rates with
translation gains and losses recorded in income tax expense;
|
Ø
|
Other assets and liabilities using closing rates with
translation gains and losses recorded in other
income/expense; and
|
Ø
|
Income and expenses using average exchange rates, except for
expenses that relate to non-monetary assets and liabilities
measured at historical rates, which are translated using the
same historical rate as the associated non-monetary assets and
liabilities.
|
D Use
of Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to
make estimates and assumptions. The most significant ones are:
quantities of proven and probable mineral reserves; fair values
of acquired assets and liabilities under business combinations,
including the value of mineralized material beyond proven and
probable mineral reserves; future costs and expenses to produce
proven and probable mineral reserves; future commodity prices
for gold, copper, silver and other products; the future cost of
asset retirement obligations; amounts and likelihood of
contingencies; the fair values of reporting units that include
goodwill; and uncertain tax positions. Using these and other
estimates and assumptions, we make various decisions in
preparing the financial statements including:
|
|
Ø
|
The treatment of expenditures at mineral properties prior to
when production begins as either an asset or an expense
(note 15);
|
Ø
|
Whether tangible and intangible long-lived assets are impaired,
and if so, estimates of the fair value of those assets and any
corresponding impairment charge (note 15);
|
Ø
|
Our ability to realize deferred income tax assets and amounts
recorded for any corresponding valuation allowances
(note 23);
|
Ø
|
The useful lives of tangible and intangible long-lived assets
and the measurement of amortization (note 15);
|
Ø
|
The fair value of asset retirement obligations (note 21);
|
Ø
|
Whether to record a liability for loss contingencies and the
amount of any liability (notes 15 and 28);
|
Ø
|
Whether investments are other than temporarily impaired
(note 12);
|
Ø
|
The amount of income tax expense (note 9);
|
Ø
|
Allocations of the purchase price in business combinations to
assets and liabilities acquired, including goodwill
(notes 3 and 17);
|
Ø
|
Whether any impairments of goodwill have occurred and if so the
amounts of impairment charges (note 17);
|
Ø
|
Transfers of value beyond proven and probable reserves to
amortized assets (note 15);
|
Ø
|
Amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions
(note 23), and
|
Ø
|
The timing and amounts recorded of proceeds for insurable losses
under insurance claims (note 15).
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-10
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
As the estimation process is inherently uncertain, actual future
outcomes could differ from present estimates and assumptions,
potentially having material future effects on our financial
statements.
E Accounting
Changes
Accounting Changes Implemented
in 2007
FSP AUG AIR - 1 -
Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities (FSP
AIR-1)
On January 1, 2007, we adopted FSP AIR-1 which amends
guidance from the AICPA Industry Audit Guide, Audits of Airlines
(Airline Guide) with respect to planned major
maintenance activities and makes this guidance applicable to
entities in all industries. Of the three methods of accounting
for planned major maintenance allowed by FSP AIR-1, we adopted
the built-in overhaul method. The built-in overhaul method is
based on segregation of plant and equipment costs into those
that should be depreciated over the useful life of the asset and
those that require overhaul at periodic intervals. The estimated
cost of the overhaul component included in the purchase price of
an asset is set up separately from the cost of the asset and is
amortized to the expected date of the initial overhaul. The cost
of the initial overhaul is then capitalized and amortized to the
next overhaul, at which time the process is repeated. We adopted
FSP AIR-1 on January 1, 2007. The implementation of this
standard did not have a material impact on our Financial
Statements.
FASB
Interpretation No. 48 - Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(Accounting for Income Taxes) (FIN 48)
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FIN 48 to create a single model to address
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet
before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48
also provides guidance on de-recognition, measurement,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. As a
result of the implementation of FIN 48, no adjustment was
required to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
Change in
Financial Statement Presentation - Derivative Gains and
Losses
In 2007, we made a change in the financial statement
classification of changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting under
FAS 133 (non-hedge derivatives), which was retroactively
applied. Prior to this change, we recorded the change in fair
value of all non-hedge derivative gains and losses as a
component of other income, with the exception of changes in the
fair value of embedded derivatives implicit in concentrate sales
contracts, which were recorded as a component of revenue.
Beginning in 2007, we record changes in the fair value of
non-hedge derivatives in a manner consistent with the intended
purpose of the instrument as follows: gold and copper derivative
instruments are recorded in revenue; silver and fuel derivative
contracts are recorded in cost of sales; interest rate swaps are
recorded in interest income or interest expense, depending on
the intended purpose of the swap; and share purchase warrants
are recorded in other income.
The impact of this change in accounting policy for prior periods
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
December 31
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold revenue
|
|
|
$ 8
|
|
|
|
$ (2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Copper revenue
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting
Changes Implemented in 2006
FAS 123R, Accounting for
Stock - Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted FAS 123R. Prior to this
date we applied FAS 123 and accounted for stock options
under the intrinsic value method, recording compensation cost
for stock options as the excess of the market price of the stock
at the grant date of an award over the exercise price.
Historically, the exercise price of stock options equaled the
market price of the stock at the grant date resulting in no
recorded compensation cost. We provided pro forma disclosure of
the effect of expensing the fair value of stock options.
We adopted FAS 123R using the modified prospective method,
which meant that financial statements for periods prior to
adoption were not restated. From January 1, 2006 we
recorded compensation expense for all new stock option grants
based on the grant date fair value, amortized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period. We also recorded compensation
expense for the unvested portion of stock option grants
occurring prior to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date
fair value that was previously estimated and used to provide for
pro forma disclosures for financial statement periods prior to
2006, amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
vesting period for those unvested stock options. Details of
stock-based compensation expense are included in note 26.
The application of FAS 123R to Restricted Share Units
(RSUs) and Deferred Share Units (DSUs) did not result in any
significant change in the method of accounting for RSUs or DSUs.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-11
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
FAS 151,
Inventory Costs
FAS 151 specifies the general principles applicable to the
pricing and allocation of certain costs to inventory. Under
FAS 151, abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and wasted materials are recognized as
current period charges rather than capitalized to inventory.
FAS 151 also requires that the allocation of fixed
production overhead to the cost of inventory be based on the
normal capacity of production facilities.
FAS 151 was applicable prospectively from January 1,
2006 and we modified our inventory accounting policy consistent
with its requirements. Under our modified accounting policy for
inventory, production-type costs that are considered abnormal
are excluded from inventory and charged directly to the cost of
sales. Interruptions to normal activity levels at a mine could
occur for a variety of reasons including equipment failures and
major maintenance activities, strikes, power supply
interruptions and adverse weather conditions. When such
interruptions occur we evaluate the impact on the cost of
inventory produced in the period, and to the extent the actual
cost exceeds the cost based on normal capacity we expense any
excess directly to cost of sales. The adoption of FAS 151
did not have any significant effect on our financial statements.
FAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Post-retirement Plans
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 158 that requires
employers to fully recognize the obligations associated with
single-employer defined benefit pension, retiree health care and
other post-retirement plans in their financial statements.
FAS 158 was developed to respond to concerns that past
accounting standards needed to be revisited to improve the
transparency and usefulness of the information reported. Under
past accounting standards, the funded status of an
employers post-retirement benefit plan (i.e., the
difference between the plan assets and obligations) was not
completely reported in the balance sheet. Employers reported an
asset or liability that differed from the plans funded
status because previous accounting standards allowed employers
to delay recognition of certain changes in plan assets and
obligations that affected the costs of providing such benefits.
Past standards only required an employer to disclose the funded
status of its plans in the notes to the financial statements.
FAS 158 requires recognition of the funded status of a
benefit plan on the balance sheet measured as the
difference between plan assets at fair value (with limited
exceptions) and the benefit obligation, as at the fiscal
year-end. For a pension plan, the benefit obligation is the
projected benefit obligation; for any other post-retirement
benefit plan, such as a retiree health care plan, the benefit
obligation is the accumulated post-retirement benefit
obligation. FAS 158 also requires recognition, as a
component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, of the
gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise
during the period but are not recorded as components of net
periodic benefit cost. Amounts recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income are adjusted as they are subsequently
recorded as components of net periodic cost. FAS 158
requires disclosure of information about certain effects of net
periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from
delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs
or credits, and transition asset or obligation.
We adopted the provisions of FAS 158 in 2006, as required,
except for the requirement to measure the plan assets and
benefit obligations at the fiscal year-end, which is effective
in fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of FAS 158 did not significantly impact our
financial statements.
SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108 - Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108)
In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB 108, which was
effective in fourth quarter 2006 for Barrick. SAB 108
addresses the multiple methods used to quantify financial
statement misstatements and evaluate the accumulation of
misstatements on the balance sheet.
SAB 108 requires registrants to evaluate prior period
misstatements using both a balance sheet approach (the
iron curtain method) and an income statement approach
(the rollover method). Barrick historically used the
rollover method in quantifying potential financial statement
misstatements. As required by SAB 108, we re-evaluated
prior period immaterial errors using the iron curtain method.
Based upon the result of our evaluation, we did not identify any
material errors or misstatements that were previously deemed not
material under the rollover approach.
Accounting
Changes Implemented in 2005
EITF
04-6
Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred During Production in the
Mining Industry
In 2005, we adopted
EITF 04-6
and changed our accounting policy for stripping costs incurred
in the production phase. Prior to adopting
EITF 04-6,
we capitalized stripping costs incurred in the production phase,
and we recorded amortization of the capitalized costs as a
component of the cost of inventory produced each period. Under
EITF 04-6,
stripping costs are recorded directly as a component of the cost
of inventory produced each period. Using an effective date of
adoption of January 1, 2005, we recorded a decrease in
capitalized mining costs of $226 million; an increase in
the cost of inventory of $232 million; and a
$6 million credit to earnings for the cumulative effect of
this change. For 2005, the effect of adopting
EITF 04-6
compared to the prior policy was an increase in net income of
$44 million ($0.08 per share), excluding the cumulative
effect on prior periods.
F Accounting
Developments
FAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157)
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157 that provides
enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and
liabilities. FAS 157 is meant to ensure that the
measurement of fair value is more comparable and consistent, and
improve
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-12
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
disclosure about fair value
measures. As a result of FAS 157, there is now a common
definition of fair value to be used throughout US GAAP.
FAS 157 applies whenever US GAAP requires (or permits)
measurement of assets or liabilities at fair value. FAS 157
does not address when the use of fair value measurements is
required.
In December 2007 the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-b,
which provided a one year deferral until January 1, 2009
for the implementation of FAS 157 for non-financial assets
and liabilities. The deferral is intended to provide the FASB
additional time to consider the effects of various
implementation issues that have arisen, or that may arise, from
the application of FAS 157. Barrick is required to
implement FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities that
are carried at fair value effective January 1, 2008. We do
not expect the adoption of FAS 157 to have any significant
impact on valuations of investments or derivative instruments.
FAS 159 -
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (FAS 159)
In February 2007 the FASB issued FAS 159, which allows an
irrevocable option, Fair Value Option (FVO), to carry eligible
financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the
election made on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis. Changes in fair value for these instruments would be
recorded in earnings. The objective of FAS 159 is to
improve financial reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
Under FAS 159 an entity must elect whether to use the FVO
on the date an item is initially recognized, with limited
exceptions. Since the FVO is an
instrument-by-instrument
election, companies may record identical financial assets and
liabilities either at fair value or on another measurement basis
permitted by US GAAP, such as amortized cost. One exception to
the
instrument-by-instrument
guidance is that for investments that would otherwise fall under
equity method accounting, the election must be made for all of
the investors financial interests (equity and debt,
including guarantees) in the same entity.
FAS 159 will be effective for Barrick beginning in first
quarter 2008 and must be applied prospectively. Barrick will not
adopt the FVO on its eligible financial instruments, which
include available-for-sale securities, equity method investments
and long-term debt, existing as at January 1, 2008.
FAS 141(R),
Business Combinations (FAS 141(R))
In December 2007 the FASB issued FAS 141(R), which will
replace FAS 141 prospectively for business combinations
consummated after the effective date of December 15, 2008.
Early adoption is not permitted. Under FAS 141(R), business
acquisitions will be accounted for under the acquisition
method, compared to the purchase method
mandated by FAS 141.
The more significant changes that will result from applying the
acquisition method include: (i) the definition of a
business is broadened to include development stage entities, and
therefore more acquisitions will be accounted for as business
combinations rather than asset acquisitions; (ii) the
measurement date for equity interests issued by the acquirer is
the acquisition date instead of a few days before and after
terms are agreed to and announced, which may significantly
change the amount recorded for the acquired business if share
prices differ from the agreement and announcement date to the
acquisition date; (iii) all future adjustments to income
tax estimates will be recorded to income tax expense, whereas
under FAS 141 certain changes in income tax estimates were
recorded to goodwill; (iv) acquisition-related costs of the
acquirer, including investment banking fees, legal fees,
accounting fees, valuation fees, and other professional or
consulting fees will be expensed as incurred, whereas under
FAS 141 these costs are capitalized as part of the cost of
the business combination; (v) the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are recorded at 100% of fair value even if
less than 100% is obtained, whereas under FAS 141 only the
controlling interests portion is recorded at fair value;
and (vi) the non-controlling interest will be recorded at
its share of fair value of net assets acquired, including its
share of goodwill, whereas under FAS 141 the
non-controlling interest is recorded at its share of carrying
value of net assets acquired with no goodwill being allocated.
FAS 160,
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(FAS 160)
In December 2007 the FASB issued FAS 160, which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Under FAS 160, non-controlling interests will be
measured at 100% of the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. Under current standards, the
non-controlling interest is measured at book value. For
presentation and disclosure purposes, non-controlling interests
will be classified as a separate component of shareholders
equity. In addition, FAS 160 will change the manner in
which increases/decreases in ownership percentages are accounted
for. Changes in ownership percentages will be recorded as equity
transactions and no gain or loss will be recognized as long as
the parent retains control of the subsidiary. When a parent
company deconsolidates a subsidiary but retains a
non-controlling interest, the non-controlling interest is
re-measured at fair value on the date control is lost and a gain
or loss is recognized at that time. Under FAS 160,
accumulated losses attributable to the non-controlling interests
are no longer limited to the original carrying amount, and
therefore non-controlling interests could have a negative
carrying balance. The provisions of FAS 160 are to be
applied prospectively with the exception of the presentation and
disclosure provisions, which are to be applied for all prior
periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is
not permitted.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-13
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
G Other
Notes to the Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant acquisitions and divestitures
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment information
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue and gold sales contracts
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and project development expense
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow other items
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other current assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation and claims
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
A-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Subsidiaries
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 >
SIGNIFICANT ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid on
acquisition1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Star
|
|
|
$ 722
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porgera (additional 20% interest)
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kainantu
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pioneer Metals
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placer Dome
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,122
|
|
|
|
$ 208
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds on
sale1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celtic2
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paddington
Mill3
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grace
Claim3
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 105
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Deep mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations sold to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldcorp
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$2,828
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
All amounts are presented net of
cash acquired/divested. Potential deferred tax adjustments may
arise from these acquisitions.
|
|
2 |
|
Included within investment sales in
the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow
|
|
3 |
|
Included within Property, Plant and
Equipment sales in the Consolidated Statement of Cash flow
|
A Acquisition
of 40% Interest in Cortez
In February 2008, our subsidiary, Barrick Gold Finance Inc.,
entered into a definitive purchase agreement with Kennecott
Explorations (Australia) Ltd., a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc
(Rio Tinto) to acquire its 40% interest in the
Cortez property for $1.695 billion in cash consideration,
due on closing, with a further $50 million payable if and
when we add an additional 12 million ounces of contained
gold resources to our December 31, 2007 reserve statement
for Cortez. A sliding scale royalty is payable to Rio Tinto on
40% of all production in excess of 15 million ounces on and
after January 1, 2008. The acquisition will consolidate
100% ownership for Barrick of the existing Cortez mine and the
Cortez Hills development project plus any future potential from
the property. We expect to fund the purchase price through a
combination of our existing cash balances and by drawing down
our line of credit. The agreement is subject to the normal and
customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the
first quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-14
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
B Acquisition
of Arizona Star Resources Corporation (Arizona
Star)
On December 19, 2007, we paid $722 million which
reflects the purchase price net of cash acquired of
$8 million, for 40.7 million common shares of Arizona
Star. These shares represent 94% of the outstanding common
shares of Arizona Star on a fully-diluted basis. It is our
intention to acquire the remaining outstanding Arizona Star
common shares by way of a compulsory acquisition. The Offer
price for Arizona Stars common shares was CDN$18.00.
Arizona Star owns a 51% interest in the Cerro Casale deposit in
the Maricunga district of Region III in Chile. The
acquisition of Arizona Star has been accounted for as an asset
purchase. The purchase price allocation will be finalized in
2008 with the determination of the deferred tax portion, if any.
Purchase
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase cost per agreement
|
|
|
$ 728
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price adjustments and transaction costs
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: cash acquired
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary
Purchase Price Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investment in Cerro Casale project
|
|
|
$ 732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
$ 722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Kainantu
Acquisition
On December 12, 2007 we completed the acquisition of the
Kainantu mineral property and various exploration licenses in
Papua New Guinea from Highlands Pacific Limited for
$135 million in cash, which reflects the purchase price,
net of $7 million withheld pending certain permit renewals.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase of assets.
The purchase price allocation will be finalized in 2008.
D Sale
of Paddington Mill
In 2007, we completed the sale of the Paddington mill and
associated land tenements in Australia to Norton Goldfields
Limited and the sale of certain land tenements to Apex Minerals
for total proceeds of $32 million, $30 million in cash
and $2 million in Apex Minerals NL shares, respectively. We
recorded a gain of $8 million in other income on closing.
E Porgera
Mine Acquisition
In 2007, we completed the acquisition of an additional 20%
interest in the Porgera mine in Papua New Guinea from Emperor
Mines Limited, for cash consideration of $259 million. The
acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination.
Following this transaction our interest in the Porgera mine
increased from 75% to 95%. The Government of Papua New Guinea
holds the remaining 5% undivided interest in Porgera. We have
entered into a call option deed regarding the possible sale of
up to a 5% interest to the Government of Papua New Guinea, for
the proportionate acquisition cost paid by Barrick.
Purchase
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase cost per agreement with Emperor Mines Limited
|
|
|
$ 250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price adjustments and transaction costs
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: cash acquired
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Purchase
Price Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
$ 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current ore in
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
stockpiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
$ 259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Acquisition
of Pioneer Metals Inc. (Pioneer)
In 2006, we acquired control of Pioneer through the acquisition
of 59.2 million shares, representing approximately 91% of
the outstanding shares of Pioneer, for cash consideration of
$54 million. Pioneer had a portfolio of exploration
properties and interests, including the Grace property which is
adjacent to NovaGold Resources Inc.s
(NovaGold) Galore Creek project. In 2007, we
acquired all of the remaining outstanding shares of Pioneer for
cash consideration of $6 million and recorded purchase
price adjustments totaling $3 million.
Purchase
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase cost
|
|
|
$ 63
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: cash acquired
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-15
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase of assets.
The purchase price allocation was as follows:
Summary Purchase
Price Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
$ 54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In third quarter 2007 we sold the Grace property to NovaGold for
cash proceeds of $54 million. There was no after-tax gain
or loss arising on closing.
G Acquisition
of Placer Dome Inc. (Placer Dome)
In first quarter 2006 we acquired 100% of the outstanding common
shares of Placer Dome. Placer Dome was one of the worlds
largest gold mining companies. It had 12 mining operations based
in North America, South America, Africa and Australia/Papua New
Guinea, as well as four projects that are in various stages of
exploration/development. Its most significant mines were Cortez
in the United States, Zaldívar in Chile, Porgera in Papua
New Guinea, North Mara in Tanzania and South Deep in South
Africa. The most significant projects are Cortez Hills and
Donlin Creek LLC (Donlin Creek) in the United
States, and Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic. The business
combination between ourselves and Placer Dome was an opportunity
to create a Canadian-based leader in the global gold mining
industry, which strengthens our competitive position, including
in respect of gold reserves, gold production, growth
opportunities, and balance sheet strength.
Accounting for
the Placer Dome Acquisition
The Placer Dome acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase
business combination, with Barrick as the accounting acquirer.
We acquired Placer Dome on January 20, 2006, with the
results of operations of Placer Dome consolidated from
January 20, 2006 onwards. The purchase cost was
$10 billion and was funded through a combination of common
shares issued, the drawdown of a $1 billion credit
facility, and cash resources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of 322.8 million Barrick common shares issued at
$27.14 per
share1
|
|
|
$ 8,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of 2.7 million fully vested stock options
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 10,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
The measurement of the common share component of the purchase
consideration represents the average closing price on the New
York Stock Exchange for the two days prior to and two days after
the public announcement on December 22, 2005 of our final
offer for Placer Dome.
|
In accordance with the purchase method of accounting, the
purchase cost was allocated to the underlying assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based primarily upon their estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition. The estimated fair
values were based on a combination of independent appraisals and
internal estimates. The excess of purchase cost over the net
identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired represents
goodwill. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of Placer Dome
principally represents the ability for the company to continue
as a going concern by finding new mineral reserves as well as
the value of synergies that we expect to realize as a direct
consequence of the acquisition of Placer Dome. Details of the
allocation of goodwill arising on acquisition are included in
note 17.
On the acquisition of Placer Dome in first quarter 2006, we
completed a preliminary purchase price allocation for assets and
liabilities acquired. Amortization expense for the first three
quarters of 2006 was based on this preliminary purchase price
allocation. In fourth quarter 2006, we completed final purchase
price allocations and updated our calculations of amortization
expense prospectively. The effect of the final purchase price
allocation on the amount of amortization expense recorded in
2007 compared to amounts recorded in 2006 based on the
preliminary allocation, was an increase of $189 million.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-16
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
The principal valuation methods for major classes of assets and
liabilities were:
Final Summary
Purchase Price Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
$ 1,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and probable reserves
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value beyond proven and
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
probable reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
15,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instrument
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
$ 10,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Includes operations that were sold to Goldcorp Inc.
|
At acquisition we recorded liabilities totaling $48 million
that primarily relate to employee severance at Placer Dome
offices that were closed during the year. All amounts were
settled by the end of 2007.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-17
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
H Discontinued
Operations
Results of Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Deep operations
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 158
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations sold to Goldcorp
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 241
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Deep
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of South Deep
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations sold to Goldcorp
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 9
|
|
|
|
$ 297
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
Deep
On December 1, 2006, we sold our 50% interest in the South
Deep mine in South Africa to Gold Fields Limited (Gold
Fields). The consideration on closing was
$1,517 million, of which $1,209 million was received
in cash and $308 million in Gold Fields shares. On closing
we recorded a gain of $288 million, representing the
consideration received less transaction costs and the carrying
amount of net assets of South Deep, including goodwill relating
to South Deep of $651 million.
The results of the operations of South Deep in 2006 are
presented under discontinued operations in the
income statement and cash flow statement. As required by
accounting rules applicable to discontinued operations,
amortization of property, plant and equipment at South Deep
ceased on September 1, 2006, the date when they were
classified as held for sale, and we allocated interest expense
of $2 million to these discontinued operations.
In second quarter 2006, a loaded skip and 6.7 kilometers of rope
fell 1.6 kilometers down the South Deep mines Twin Shaft
complex during routine maintenance, causing extensive damage but
no injuries. Repair costs for assets that were damaged were
expensed as incurred. We were insured for property damage and a
portion of business interruption losses. In fourth quarter 2006
we recorded a receivable for insurance recoveries of
$12 million related to this incident. In second quarter
2007, a final settlement was reached with Gold Fields on the
allocation of insurance proceeds and, as a result, we recorded
further proceeds of $9 million within income from
discontinued operations. During the third quarter,
$21 million was received in cash and has been classified
under Cash Flows of Discontinued Operations in our Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows.
Operations Sold
to Goldcorp
In second quarter 2006, we sold all of Placer Domes
Canadian properties and operations (other than Placer
Domes office in Vancouver), including all mining,
reclamation and exploration properties, Placer Domes
interest in the La Coipa mine in Chile, 40% of Placer
Domes interest in the Pueblo Viejo project in the
Dominican Republic, certain related assets and, our share in
Agua de la Falda S.A., which included our interest in the
Jeronimo project, to Goldcorp Inc. (Goldcorp)
(collectively, the Operations sold to Goldcorp).
Goldcorp is responsible for all liabilities relating solely to
these properties and operations, including employment
commitments and environmental, closure and reclamation
liabilities.
The sales proceeds for the operations sold to Goldcorp were
$1,641 million. The aggregate net amount of assets and
liabilities of these operations were recorded in the purchase
price allocation at $1,641 million based on the terms of
the sale agreement with Goldcorp that was in place at the time
we acquired Placer Dome. The results of the operations sold to
Goldcorp were included under discontinued operations
in the income statement and cash flow statement until closing.
Interest expense of $21 million was allocated to the
results from the operations sold to Goldcorp. No gain or loss
arose on closing of the sale.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-18
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
4 > SEGMENT
INFORMATION
Income Statement
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Segment cost of sales
|
|
|
Segment
income1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
2,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,791
|
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
$
|
1,052
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,332
|
|
|
$
|
5,630
|
|
|
$
|
2,348
|
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
|
$
|
2,741
|
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
$
|
2,164
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Segment
income represents segment sales, less cost of sales and
amortization.
Income Statement
Information (contd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration1
|
|
|
Regional business unit
costs1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December
31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses outside reportable segments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Exploration and regional business unit costs are excluded from
the measure of segment income but are reported separately by
operating segment to the Chief Operating Decision Maker.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-19
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Geographic
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
assets1
|
|
|
Sales2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$
|
2,638
|
|
|
$
|
2,518
|
|
|
$
|
1,431
|
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
1,702
|
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominican
Republic
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peru
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papua New
Guinea
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanzania
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,748
|
|
|
$
|
10,784
|
|
|
$
|
5,181
|
|
|
$
|
6,332
|
|
|
$
|
5,630
|
|
|
$
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment and
other tangible non-current assets.
|
2 Presented
based on the location in which the sale originated.
Reconciliation of
Segment Income to Income from Continuing Operations Before
Income Taxes and Other Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
|
|
$
|
2,164
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of corporate assets
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project development expense
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate administration
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
charges1
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and other
items
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
1,560
|
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
In 2007, impairment charges include $42 million of goodwill
impairments in the North America region.
|
Asset
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment long-lived
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Segment capital
expenditures1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
4,305
|
|
|
$
|
3,572
|
|
|
$
|
1,744
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total
|
|
|
11,271
|
|
|
|
10,250
|
|
|
|
4,880
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,847
|
|
|
|
5,855
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items not allocated to segments
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise total
|
|
$
|
21,951
|
|
|
$
|
21,510
|
|
|
$
|
6,929
|
|
|
$
|
1,004
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
1,090
|
|
|
$
|
1,031
|
|
|
$
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Segment capital expenditures are presented on an accrual basis.
Capital expenditures in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows are presented on a cash basis. In 2007, cash expenditures
were $1,046 million (2006: $1,087 million; 2005:
$1,104 million) and the increase in accrued expenditures
were $44 million (2006: $(56) million; 2005: nil).
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-20
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
5 > REVENUE
AND GOLD SALES CONTRACTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold bullion
sales1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot market sales
|
|
|
$ 3,823
|
|
|
|
$ 3,957
|
|
|
|
$ 1,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold sales contracts
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
4,326
|
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate
sales2
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 5,027
|
|
|
|
$ 4,493
|
|
|
|
$ 2,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
sales1,3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper cathode sales
|
|
|
$ 1,063
|
|
|
|
$ 937
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate sales
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,305
|
|
|
|
$ 1,137
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Revenues include amounts transferred from OCI to earnings for
commodity cash flow hedges (see note 20C and 25).
|
2
|
Gold sales include gains and losses on gold derivative contracts
which have been economically offset, but not yet settled, and on
embedded derivatives in smelting contracts: 2007:
$4 million loss (2006: $4 million gain; 2005:
$3 million gain).
|
3
|
Copper sales include gains and losses on economic copper hedges
that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and on
embedded derivatives in copper smelting contracts: 2007:
$53 million gain (2006: $14 million loss; 2005: $nil).
|
Principal
Products
All of our gold mining operations produce gold in doré
form, except Eskay Creek, which produces gold concentrate and
gold doré; Bulyanhulu which produces both gold doré
and gold concentrate; and Osborne which produces a concentrate
that contains both gold and copper. Gold doré is unrefined
gold bullion bars usually consisting of 90% gold that is refined
to pure gold bullion prior to sale to our customers. Gold
concentrate is a processing product containing the valuable ore
mineral (gold) from which most of the waste mineral has been
eliminated, that undergoes a smelting process to convert it into
gold bullion. Gold bullion is sold primarily in the London spot
market or under gold sales contracts. Gold concentrate is sold
to third-party smelters. At our Zaldívar mine we produce
pure copper cathode, which consists of 99.9% copper, a form that
is deliverable for sale in world metals exchanges.
Revenue
Recognition
We record revenue when the following conditions are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery and
transfer of title (gold revenue only) have occurred under the
terms of the arrangement; the price is fixed or determinable;
and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue in 2007 is
presented net of direct sales taxes of $15 million (2006:
$16 million; 2005: $nil).
Gold Bullion
Sales
We record revenue from gold and silver bullion sales at the time
of physical delivery, which is also the date that title to the
gold or silver passes. The sales price is fixed at the delivery
date based on either the terms of gold sales contracts or the
gold spot price. Incidental revenues from the sale of
by-products such as silver are classified within cost of sales.
Gold Sales
Contracts
At December 31, 2006, we had 2.5 million ounces of
Corporate Gold Sales Contracts. We delivered 2.5 million
ounces into the Corporate Gold Sales Contracts at an average
price of $404 per ounce in the first half of 2007. At
December 31, 2007, there were no remaining Corporate Gold
Sales Contracts. At December 31, 2007, we had Project Gold
Sales Contracts with various customers for a total of
9.5 million ounces of future gold production of which
1.7 million ounces are at floating spot prices.
The terms of gold sales contracts are governed by master trading
agreements (MTAs) that we have in place with customers. The
contracts have final delivery dates primarily over the next
10 years, but we have the right to settle these contracts
at any time over this period. Contract prices are established at
inception through to an interim date. If we do not deliver at
this interim date, a new interim date is set. The price for the
new interim date is determined in accordance with the MTAs which
have contractually agreed price adjustment mechanisms based on
the market gold price. The MTAs have both fixed and floating
price mechanisms. The fixed-price mechanism represents the
market price at the start date (or previous interim date) of the
contract plus a premium based on the difference between the
forward price of gold and the current market price. If at an
interim date we opt for a floating price, the floating price
represents the spot market price at the time of delivery of gold
adjusted based on the difference between the previously fixed
price and the market gold price at that interim date. The final
realized selling price under a contract primarily depends upon
the timing of the actual future delivery date, the market price
of gold at the start of the contract and the actual amount of
the premium of the forward price of gold over the spot price of
gold for the periods that fixed selling prices are set.
Mark-to-Market
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
At Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ounces in
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|
millions
|
|
|
value1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Gold Sales Contracts
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
(4,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
At a spot gold price of $834 per ounce.
|
Concentrate
Sales
Under the terms of concentrate sales contracts with independent
smelting companies, gold and copper sales prices are set on a
specified future date after shipment based on market prices. We
record revenues under these contracts at the time of shipment,
which is also when title passes to the smelting companies, using
forward market gold and copper prices on the expected date that
final sales prices will be fixed. Variations between the price
recorded at the shipment date and the actual final price set
under the smelting contracts are caused by changes in market
gold and
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-21
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
copper prices, and result in an
embedded derivative in the accounts receivable. The embedded
derivative is recorded at fair value each period until final
settlement occurs, with changes in fair value classified as a
component of revenue. The notional amount outstanding in
accounts receivable is typically between ten and fifteen
thousand ounces of gold and four and seven million pounds of
copper.
Copper Cathode
Sales
Under the terms of copper cathode sales contracts, copper sales
prices are set on a specified future date based upon market
commodity prices plus certain price adjustments. Revenue is
recognized at the time of shipment when risk of loss passes to
the customer, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue
is measured using forward market prices on the expected date
that final selling prices will be fixed. Variations occur
between the price recorded on the date of revenue recognition
and the actual final price under the terms of the contracts due
to changes in market copper prices, which result in the
existence of an embedded derivative in the accounts receivable.
This embedded derivative is recorded at fair value each period
until final settlement occurs, with changes in fair value
classified as a component of revenue. The notional amount
outstanding in accounts receivable is between twenty and thirty
million pounds of copper.
6 > COST OF
SALES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods
sold1
|
|
|
$ 2,757
|
|
|
|
$ 2,294
|
|
|
|
$ 1,249
|
|
|
|
$ 337
|
|
|
|
$ 390
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
By-product
revenues2,3
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalty expense
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining production taxes
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,842
|
|
|
|
$ 2,348
|
|
|
|
$ 1,198
|
|
|
|
$ 342
|
|
|
|
$ 393
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Cost of goods sold includes accretion expense at producing mines
of $40 million (2006: $31 million; 2005:
$11 million). Cost of goods sold includes charges to reduce
the cost of inventory to net realizable value as follows:
$13 million in 2007; $28 million in 2006 and
$15 million in 2005. The cost of inventory sold in the
period reflects all components capitalized to inventory, except
that, for presentation purposes, the component of inventory cost
relating to amortization of property, plant and equipment is
classified in the income statement under
amortization. Some companies present this amount
under cost of sales. The amount presented in
amortization rather than cost of sales was $984 million in
2007; $716 million in 2006 and $409 million in 2005.
|
2
|
We use silver sales contracts to sell a portion of silver
produced as a by-product. Silver sales contracts have similar
delivery terms and pricing mechanisms as gold sales contracts.
At December 31, 2007, we had sales contract commitments to
deliver 18.2 million ounces of silver over periods up to
10 years. The mark-to-market on silver sales contracts at
December 31, 2007 was negative $111 million (2006:
negative $100 million; 2005: $52 million).
|
3
|
By-product credits include gains and losses on economic silver
hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment: 2007:
$nil (2006: $5 million loss; 2005: $nil).
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-22
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Royalties
Certain of our properties are subject to royalty arrangements
based on mineral production at the properties. The most
significant royalties are at the Goldstrike, Bulyanhulu and
Veladero mines and the Pascua-Lama project. The primary type of
royalty is a net smelter return (NSR) royalty. Under this type
of royalty we pay the holder an amount calculated as the royalty
percentage multiplied by the value of gold production at market
gold prices less
third-party
smelting, refining and transportation costs. Other types of
royalties include:
|
|
Ø
|
Net profits interest (NPI) royalty,
|
Ø
|
Net smelter return sliding scale (NSRSS) royalty,
|
Ø
|
Gross proceeds sliding scale (GPSS) royalty,
|
Ø
|
Gross smelter return (GSR) royalty,
|
Ø
|
Net value (NV) royalty, and a
|
Ø
|
Land tenement (LT) royalty
|
Royalty expense is recorded at the time of sale of gold
production, measured using the applicable royalty percentage for
NSR royalties or estimates of NPI amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing mines
|
|
Type of royalty
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
Goldstrike
|
|
0%-5% NSR, 0%-6% NPI
|
|
|
Eskay Creek
|
|
1% NSR
|
|
|
Williams
|
|
1.5% NSR, 0.5% NV, 1% NV
|
|
|
David Bell
|
|
3% NSR
|
|
|
Round Mountain
|
|
3.53%-6.35% NSRSS
|
|
|
Bald Mountain
|
|
3.5%-4% NSR
|
|
|
Ruby Hill
|
|
3% modified NSR
|
|
|
Cortez
|
|
1.5% GSR
|
|
|
Cortez
Pipeline/South
Pipeline deposit
|
|
0.4%-5% GSR
|
|
|
Cortez portion of Pipeline/South Pipeline deposit
|
|
5% NV
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
Veladero
|
|
3.75% modified NSR
|
|
|
Lagunas Norte
|
|
2.51% NSR
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Porgera
|
|
2% NSR
|
|
|
Queensland and Western Australia production
|
|
2.5%-2.7% of gold revenue
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
|
|
Bulyanhulu
|
|
3% NSR
|
|
|
North Mara
|
|
3% NSR
|
|
|
North Mara Gokona pit
|
|
3% NSR, 1.1% LT
|
|
|
|
|
7
>
EXPLORATION AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minesite exploration
|
|
|
$ 63
|
|
|
|
$ 54
|
|
|
|
$ 27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 179
|
|
|
|
$ 171
|
|
|
|
$ 109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pueblo
Viejo1
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donlin
Creek2
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sedibelo
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fedorova
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buzwagi
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pascua-Lama
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowal3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 188
|
|
|
|
$ 119
|
|
|
|
$ 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Represents 100% of project
expenditures. We record a non-controlling interest credit for
our partners share of expenditures within
non-controlling interests in the income statement.
|
|
2 |
|
Amounts for 2007 include a recovery
of $64 million of cumulative project costs from our
partner. See note 12 for further details.
|
|
3 |
|
The Cowal mine began production in
second quarter 2006.
|
Accounting
Policy
We capitalize costs incurred at projects that meet the
definition of an asset after mineralization is classified as
proven and probable gold reserves (as defined by United States
reporting standards). Before classifying mineralization as
proven and probable reserves, costs incurred at projects are
considered project development expenses that are expensed as
incurred. Project costs include: drilling costs; costs to
prepare engineering scoping and feasibility studies;
metallurgical testing; permitting; and sample mining. The cost
of start-up
activities at mines and projects such as recruiting and training
are also expensed as incurred within project development
expense. Drilling costs incurred at our operating mines are
expensed as incurred as mine site exploration expense, unless we
can conclude with a high degree of confidence, prior to the
commencement of a drilling program, that the drilling costs will
result in the conversion of a mineral resource into a proven and
probable reserve. Our assessment of confidence is based on the
following factors: results from previous drill programs; results
from geological models; results from a mine scoping study
confirming economic viability of the resource; and preliminary
estimates of mine inventory, ore grade, cash flow and mine life.
The costs of a drilling program that meets our highly confident
threshold are capitalized as mine development costs.
The Pueblo Viejo, Donlin Creek, Sedibelo, and Fedorova projects
are in various stages and none of the projects had met the
criteria
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-23
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
for cost capitalization at
December 31, 2007. The Reko Diq project is owned through an
equity investee and project expenses are included in
equity investees in the income statement (see
note 12).
Effective May 1, 2007, we determined that mineralization at
Buzwagi met the definition of proven and probable reserves for
United States reporting purposes. Following this determination,
we began capitalizing costs that meet the definition of an asset
at Buzwagi.
Funding of our partners share of ongoing project expenses
for Donlin Creek, which is recoverable from the other partner,
is shown under loans issued to joint venture partners under
investing activities in the cash flow statement.
8
>
OTHER EXPENSE
A Other
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional business unit
costs1
|
|
|
$ 99
|
|
|
|
$ 90
|
|
|
|
$ 38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community development
costs2
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental costs
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
World Gold Council fees
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimate of AROs at closed
mines3
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense at closed mines (note 21)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-hedge derivative losses (note 20C)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other post- retirement benefit expense
(notes 27B and
27E)4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 208
|
|
|
|
$ 216
|
|
|
|
$ 114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Relates to costs incurred at
regional business unit offices.
|
|
2 |
|
In 2007, amounts relate to
community programs in Peru, Tanzania and Papua New Guinea. In
2006, amounts related to community programs in Peru and Tanzania.
|
|
3 |
|
In 2006, amount relates to change
in estimate of the ARO at the Nickel Plate property In British
Columbia, Canada.
|
|
4 |
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2007, $nil million of pension credit that
relates to active employees at producing mines is included in
cost of sales (2006: $4 million; 2005: $nil), and $nil
million is included in corporate administration (2006:
$2 million; 2005: $nil).
|
Environmental
Costs
During the production phases of a mine, we incur and expense the
cost of various activities connected with environmental aspects
of normal operations, including compliance with and monitoring
of environmental regulations; disposal of hazardous waste
produced from normal operations; and operation of equipment
designed to reduce or eliminate environmental effects. In
limited circumstances, costs to acquire and install plant and
equipment are capitalized during the production phase of a mine
if the costs are expected to mitigate risk or prevent future
environmental contamination from normal operations.
When a contingent loss arises from the improper use of an asset,
a loss accrual is recorded if the loss is probable and
reasonably estimable. Amounts recorded are measured on an
undiscounted basis, and adjusted as further information develops
or if circumstances change. Recoveries of environmental
remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when
receipt is deemed probable.
B Impairment
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
(note 17)1
|
|
|
$ 42
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges on investments
(note 12)2
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived
assets3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 65
|
|
|
|
$ 23
|
|
|
|
$ 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
In 2007, the carrying amounts of
Eskay Creek and Golden Sunlight were tested for impairment as
part of the annual goodwill impairment test. Impairment charges
of $7 million and $35 million respectively, were
recorded to reduce the carrying amount for goodwill to its
implied fair value.
|
|
2 |
|
In 2007, we recorded an impairment
charge on Asset Backed Commercial Paper of $20 million.
|
|
3 |
|
In 2006, the carrying amount of
Cuerpo Sur, an extension of Pierina, was tested for impairment
on completion of the annual life of mine planning process. An
impairment charge of $17 million was recorded to reduce the
carrying amount to the estimated fair value.
|
C Other
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-hedge derivative gains (note 20C)
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 2
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation gains
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of
assets1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of investments (note 12)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on vend-in to Highland Gold (note 12)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalty income
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of water rights
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 103
|
|
|
|
$ 93
|
|
|
|
$ 46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-24
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
In 2007, we sold certain properties
in South America and Australia, including an $8 million
gain on the sale of the Paddington Mill. In 2006, we sold
certain properties in Canada and Chile. In 2005, we sold some
land positions in Australia.
|
9
>
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
$ (3
|
)
|
|
|
$ 13
|
|
|
|
$ (3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 515
|
|
|
|
$ 457
|
|
|
|
$ 90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
$ 19
|
|
|
|
$(131
|
)
|
|
|
$ (6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (6
|
)
|
|
|
$ (85
|
)
|
|
|
$(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense before elements below
|
|
|
$ 509
|
|
|
|
$ 372
|
|
|
|
$ 76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency translation gains on deferred tax balances
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian tax rate changes
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in tax status in Australia
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Release of end of year valuation allowances - Tanzania
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense
|
|
|
$ 341
|
|
|
|
$ 348
|
|
|
|
$ 60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
Translation
Deferred tax balances are subject to remeasurement for changes
in currency exchange rates each period. The most significant
balances are Canadian deferred tax assets with a carrying amount
of approximately $439 million and Australian deferred tax
liabilities with a carrying amount of approximately
$95 million. In 2007, the appreciation of the Canadian and
Australian dollar against the US dollar resulted in net
translation gains arising totaling $76 million. These gains
are included within deferred tax expense/recovery.
Canadian Tax Rate
Changes
In the second and fourth quarters of 2007 and the second quarter
of 2006, federal rate changes were enacted in Canada that
lowered the applicable tax rate. The impact of this tax rate
change was to reduce net deferred tax assets in Canada by
$64 million in 2007 and $35 million in 2006 that was
recorded as a component of deferred income tax expense. Also in
second quarter 2006, on change of tax status of a Canadian
subsidiary, we recorded a deferred income tax credit of
$23 million to reflect the impact on the measurement of
deferred income tax assets and liabilities.
Change in Tax
Status in Australia
In first quarter 2006, an interpretative decision
(ID) was issued by the Australia Tax Office that
clarified the tax treatment of currency gains and losses on
foreign denominated liabilities. Under certain conditions, for
taxpayers who have made the functional currency election, and in
respect of debt that existed at the time the election was made,
the ID provided clarification that unrealized foreign exchange
gains that currently exist on intercompany debt will not
crystallize upon repayment of the debt. The effect of the ID was
recorded as a $31 million reduction of deferred tax
liabilities.
Release of
Tanzanian Valuation Allowances
In 2007, we released $156 million of end of year deferred
tax valuation allowances in Tanzania due to the impact of higher
market gold prices.
Reconciliation to
Canadian Statutory Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 36.12% (2006 36.12% and 2005: 38%) statutory rate
|
|
|
$ 535
|
|
|
|
$ 563
|
|
|
|
$ 176
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowances and special tax
deductions1
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of foreign tax
rates2
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses not
tax-deductible
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency translation gains on deferred tax balances
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Release of end of year valuation allowances - Tanzania
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of valuation allowances - Other
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowances set up against current year tax losses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of changes in tax status in Australia
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian tax rate changes
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withholding taxes
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining taxes
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
$ 341
|
|
|
|
$ 348
|
|
|
|
$ 60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
We are able to claim certain
allowances and tax deductions unique to extractive industries
that result in a lower effective tax rate.
|
|
2 |
|
We operate in multiple foreign tax
jurisdictions that have tax rates different than the Canadian
statutory rate. Additionally, we have reinvested earnings and
cash flow generated by the Zaldívar mine in Chile to fund a
portion of
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-25
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
the construction cost of
Pascua-Lama. The reinvestment of these earnings and cash flow
resulted in a lower tax rate applied for the period. Amounts in
2007 included the impact of losses realized on deliveries into
corporate gold sales contracts in a low tax jurisdiction.
|
10
>
EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except shares in millions and per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amounts in dollars)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
$ 1,110
|
|
|
|
$ 1,110
|
|
|
|
$ 1,209
|
|
|
|
$ 1,209
|
|
|
|
$ 395
|
|
|
|
$ 395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: interest on convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders and after assumed
conversions
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting
principles
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$ 1,119
|
|
|
|
$ 1,121
|
|
|
|
$ 1,506
|
|
|
|
$ 1,510
|
|
|
|
$ 401
|
|
|
|
$ 401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
$ 1.28
|
|
|
|
$ 1.27
|
|
|
|
$ 1.44
|
|
|
|
$ 1.42
|
|
|
|
$ 0.74
|
|
|
|
$ 0.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting
principles
|
|
|
$ 1.29
|
|
|
|
$ 1.28
|
|
|
|
$ 1.79
|
|
|
|
$ 1.77
|
|
|
|
$ 0.74
|
|
|
|
$ 0.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$ 1.29
|
|
|
|
$ 1.28
|
|
|
|
$ 1.79
|
|
|
|
$ 1.77
|
|
|
|
$ 0.75
|
|
|
|
$ 0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available
to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share
reflect the potential dilution that could occur if additional
common shares are assumed to be issued under securities that
entitle their holders to obtain common shares in the future. For
stock options, the number of additional shares for inclusion in
diluted earnings per share calculations is determined using the
treasury stock method. Under this method, stock options, whose
exercise price is less than the average market price of our
common shares, are assumed to be exercised and the proceeds are
used to repurchase common shares at the average market price for
the period. The incremental number of common shares issued under
stock options and repurchased from proceeds is included in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share. For convertible
debentures, the number of additional shares for inclusion in
diluted earnings per share calculations is determined using the
as if converted method. The incremental number of common shares
issued is included in the number of weighted average shares
outstanding and interest on the convertible debentures is
excluded from the calculation of income.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-26
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
11
>
CASH FLOW - OTHER ITEMS
A
Operating Cash Flows - Other Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec.
31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for non-cash income statement items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation (gains) losses (note 8A and 8C)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense (note 21)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative accounting changes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of discount/premium on debt securities
(note 20B)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs (note 20B)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense (note 26)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-hedge derivative gold options
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge losses on acquired gold hedge position
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Highland vend-in (note 8C)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Kabanga transaction (note 8C)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in investees (note 12)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of long-lived assets (note 8C)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges (note 8B and 12)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on write-down of inventory (note 13)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests (note 2B)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARO reduction
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of AROs (note 21)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other net operating activities
|
|
|
$ (73
|
)
|
|
|
$ 63
|
|
|
|
$ (80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow includes payments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan contributions (note 27A)
|
|
|
$ 49
|
|
|
|
$ 36
|
|
|
|
$ 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)
|
|
|
$ 236
|
|
|
|
$ 211
|
|
|
|
$ 108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Investing
Cash Flows - Other Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to joint venture partners
|
|
|
$ (47
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-hedge derivative copper options
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash (note 14)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other net investing activities
|
|
|
$ (42
|
)
|
|
|
$ 17
|
|
|
|
$ (5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Non-Cash
Investing and Financing Activities
Donlin
Creek
In 2007, we formed a limited liability company with NovaGold to
advance the Donlin Creek project. We determined that we share
joint control with NovaGold and we use the equity method of
accounting for our investment in Donlin Creek. The initial cost
of our investment is $64 million.
Placer Dome
Acquisition
We purchased all of the common shares of Placer Dome in 2006 for
$10,054 million (see note 3G). In conjunction with the
acquisition, liabilities were assumed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets
acquired1
|
|
|
$ 15,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid
|
|
|
10,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
assumed2
|
|
|
$ 4,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Includes cash of
$1,102 million.
|
|
2 |
|
Includes debt obligations of
$1,252 million (note 20B).
|
Vend-in of Assets to Highland Gold (Highland)
In 2006, we exchanged various interests in mineral properties
for 34.3 million Highland shares with a value of
$95 million at the time of closing of the transaction (see
note 12).
Sale of South Deep
In 2006 we sold the South Deep mine to Gold Fields Limited
(Gold Fields) for $1,517 million. The proceeds
included 18.7 million Gold Fields common shares with a
value of $308 million (see note 3H).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-27
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
12
>
INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
(losses)
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
(losses)
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
in OCI
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
in OCI
|
|
Available-for-sale Securities in an unrealized gain
position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
plans:1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-income securities
|
|
|
$ 4
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 5
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NovaGold
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Gold Fields
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Securities in an unrealized loss position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity
securities2
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 96
|
|
|
|
$ 41
|
|
|
|
$ 646
|
|
|
|
$ 53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
securities
Asset-Backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Paper
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 142
|
|
|
|
$ 41
|
|
|
|
$ 646
|
|
|
|
$ 53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Under various benefit plans for certain former Homestake
executives, a portfolio of marketable fixed-income and equity
securities are held in a rabbi trust that is used to fund
obligations under the plans.
|
|
2
|
Other equity securities in a loss position consist of
investments in various junior mining companies.
|
Accounting Policy
for Available-for-Sale Securities
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with
unrealized gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive
income (OCI). Realized gains and losses are recorded
in earnings when investments mature or on sale, calculated using
the average cost of securities sold. Investments in debt
securities that we intend to hold to maturity are classified as
held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity investments are recorded at
amortized cost. If the fair value of an investment declines
below its carrying amount, we undertake an assessment of whether
the impairment is other-than-temporary. We consider all relevant
facts and circumstances in this assessment, particularly: the
length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than
the carrying amount; the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the investee, including any specific events that
have impacted its fair value; both positive and negative
evidence that the carrying amount is recoverable within a
reasonable period of time; and our ability and intent to hold
the investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an
expected recovery of the fair value up to or beyond the carrying
amount. We record in earnings any unrealized declines in fair
value judged to be other than temporary.
Available-for-Sale
Securities Continuity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldfields
|
|
|
NovaGold
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
January 1, 2005
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 61
|
|
|
|
$ 61
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Mark to market adjustments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Received in consideration for sale of South Deep (note 3H)
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Mark to market adjustments
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
Mark to market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 96
|
|
|
|
$ 96
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Fields
Limited (Gold Fields)
The investment in Gold Fields was acquired on December 1,
2006, as partial consideration for the sale of our interest in
South Deep and was recorded net of an initial liquidity discount
of $48 million to reflect a
120-day
restriction on our ability to trade the shares. During 2007, we
sold our entire position of 18.7 million shares for
proceeds of $356 million and recorded a gain of
$48 million.
NovaGold
Resources Inc. (NovaGold)
During 2007, we sold our entire investment in NovaGold for
proceeds of $221 million and we recorded a gain of
$3 million on the sale.
Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper (ABCP)
As at December 31, 2007, we held $66 million of
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) which has
matured, but for which no payment has been received. On
August 16, 2007, it was announced that a group representing
banks, asset providers and major investors had agreed to a
standstill with regard to all non-bank sponsored ABCP (the
Montreal Proposal ABCP).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-28
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
On December 23, 2007, a tentative deal was reached between
investors and banks to restructure the majority of the Montreal
Proposal ABCP. It has been determined that our ABCP
investments are ineligible for inclusion in the proposed Master
Asset Partnerships. As with other ineligible Montreal
Proposal ABCP, our investments will be restructured on an
individual basis and will not be pooled with other Montreal
Proposal ABCP assets. Our investments will maintain
exposure to the existing underlying ineligible assets. New
floating rate notes will be issued with maturities and interest
rates based on the respective maturities and amounts available
from the underlying investments. We have assessed the fair value
of the ABCP considering the best available data regarding market
conditions for such investments at December 31, 2007. We
recorded an impairment of $20 million in 2007 on the ABCP
investments.
Our ownership of ABCP investments is comprised of trust units
which have underlying investments in various securities. The
underlying investments are further represented by residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed
securities, other asset-backed securities and collateralized
debt obligations. We have based the 30% impairment on our
assessment of the inherent risks associated with the underlying
investments. The 30% impairment is comprised of reductions for
credit, liquidity and market risk of 5%, 20% and 5%,
respectively. The impairment is further supported by an
indicative value obtained from a third party. We believe that
our valuation approximates fair value. The impairment of our
ABCP investments has no effect on our investment strategy or
covenant compliance.
There is currently no certainty regarding the outcome of the
ABCP investments and therefore there is uncertainty in
estimating the amount and timing of cash flows associated. This
ABCP was classified under Other Investments at December 31,
2007, and as an investing activity in the Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Method Investment Continuity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerro
|
|
|
Donlin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highland
|
|
|
Atacama
|
|
|
Casale
|
|
|
Creek
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
At January 1, 2005
|
|
|
$ 86
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 86
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Equity
pick-up
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2006
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Vend-in
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Equity
pick-up
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2007
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Acquired under Arizona Star acquisition
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
Equity
pick-up
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
$ 169
|
|
|
|
$ 109
|
|
|
|
$ 732
|
|
|
|
$ 64
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 1,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Policy
for Equity Method Investments
Under the equity method, we record our equity share of the
income or loss of equity investees each period. On acquisition
of an equity investment, the underlying identifiable assets and
liabilities of an equity investee are recorded at fair value and
the income or loss of equity investees is based on these fair
values. For an investment in a company that represents a
business, if the cost of any equity investment exceeds the total
amount of the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities,
any excess is accounted for in a manner similar to goodwill,
with the exception that an annual goodwill impairment test is
not required. Additional funding into an investee is recorded as
an increase in the carrying value of the investment. The
carrying amount of each investment in an equity investee is
evaluated for impairment using the same method as an
available-for-sale security.
Highland Gold
Mining Ltd. (Highland)
We acquired 11 million common shares for cash of
$50 million in 2005; and 34.3 million common shares as
part of a vend-in transaction in 2006.
On November 17, 2006, we entered into an agreement with
Highland to transfer ownership of certain companies holding
Russian and Kyrgyz licenses in return for 34.3 million
Highland common shares increasing our ownership of Highland from
20% to 34%. In effect, we contributed our 50% interest in the
Taseevskoye deposit, as well as other exploration properties in
Russia and Central Asia, to Highland, thereby consolidating
ownership of these properties under one company. As part of the
transaction, we seconded several of our employees to Highland,
and received two additional Board seats. Completion of the
transaction occurred on December 15, 2006. On closing, the
fair value of Highland common shares exceeded the
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-29
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
carrying amount of assets exchanged
by $76 million. We recorded this difference as a gain of
$51 million in other income to the extent of the ownership
in Highland held by independent third parties, and the balance
of $25 million as a reduction in the carrying amount of our
investment in Highland. The Fedorova PGM deposit was not
included in this transaction.
The difference between the cost of our investment in Highland
and the underlying historic cost of net assets was
$111 million at June 30, 2007.
During 2007, Highland announced the issue of 130.1 million
new shares for $400 million. The equity was purchased by
Millhouse LLC (Millhouse) in two tranches. The first
tranche of 65 million shares was completed on
December 11, 2007 giving Millhouse a 25% interest in
Highland and reducing our position to 25.4%. The second tranche
of 65 million shares was completed on January 16, 2008
giving Millhouse a 40% interest in Highland and further reducing
our interest to 20.3%.
On completion of the first tranche, Millhouse is entitled to
appoint 3 of 9 Directors to the Board. On completion of the
second tranche, Millhouse is entitled to appoint the CEO of
Highland who will not serve on the Board. Our ability to appoint
Directors has been reduced from 3 to 2. We continue to account
for the investment in Highland under the equity method of
accounting.
Donlin
Creek
In January 2006, as part of the acquisition of Placer Dome, we
acquired an interest in the Donlin Creek project. Under a
pre-existing joint venture agreement we held the right to earn a
70% interest in the project subject to meeting certain
conditions under the agreement. In December 2007, we
restructured our agreement with our joint venture partner and
formed a limited liability company, Donlin Creek LLC, to advance
the Donlin Creek project. Donlin Creek has a board of four
directors, with two nominees selected by each company. All
significant decisions related to Donlin Creek require the
approval of both companies. We own 50% of the limited liability
company.
We determined that Donlin Creek LLC is a VIE and consequently
used the principles of FIN 46R to determine how to account
for our ownership interest. We concluded that neither ourselves
nor NovaGold are a primary beneficiary and neither ourselves nor
NovaGold have the right to control Donlin Creek under the
limited liability company agreement. We determined that we share
joint control with NovaGold, and because Donlin Creek is a
corporate joint venture, we use the equity method of accounting
for our investment in Donlin Creek. The initial cost of our
investment in Donlin Creek is $64 million and represents
the cost basis of assets transferred into the limited liability
company. Our maximum exposure to loss in this entity is limited
to the carrying amount of our investment in Donlin Creek, which
totaled $64 million and accounts receivable from our
partner totaling a further $64 million that are
collateralized against NovaGolds interest in the value of
Donlin Creek as of December 31, 2007.
Atacama Copper Pty
Limited (Atacama Copper)
In September 2006, we acquired a 50% interest in Atacama Copper.
The other 50% interest in Atacama Copper is owned by Antofagasta
plc. Atacama Copper is responsible for advancing the Reko Diq
project. The Reko Diq project is located in Pakistan and
comprises a variety of exploration licenses, an interest in some
of which has been retained by the government of Balochistan.
We determined that Atacama Copper is a VIE and consequently we
have used the principles of FIN 46R to determine how to
account for our ownership interest. We concluded that neither
ourselves nor Antofagasta are a primary beneficiary and
consequently we evaluated whether either ourselves or
Antofagasta have the right to control Atacama under the joint
venture agreement. We determined that we share joint control
with Antofagasta and because Atacama is a corporate joint
venture we use the equity method of accounting for our
investment. Our maximum exposure to loss in this entity is
limited to our investment in Atacama, which totaled
$109 million as of December 31, 2007, and amounts we
will prospectively fund for Atacamas interim exploration
program.
Companía Minera
Casale (Cerro Casale)
In December 2007, we acquired 94% of the common shares of
Arizona Star. We have determined that Arizona Stars
interest in the entity that holds the Cerro Casale deposit is a
VIE and consequently we have used the principles of FIN 46R
to determine how to account for this ownership interest. We
evaluated whether either ourselves or Kinross have the right to
control Cerro Casale under the joint venture agreement and we
determined that we share joint control with Kinross. Therefore,
neither ourselves nor Kinross are a primary beneficiary and
because Cerro Casale is a corporate joint venture, we use the
equity method of accounting for Arizona Stars investment
in Cerro Casale. Our maximum exposure to loss in this entity is
limited to our investment in Cerro Casale, which totaled
$732 million as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-30
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
13 >
INVENTORIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore in stockpiles
|
|
|
$ 698
|
|
|
|
$ 485
|
|
|
|
$ 63
|
|
|
|
$ 51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore on leach pads
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine operating supplies
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold doré/bullion
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper cathode
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
concentrate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
concentrate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current ore in
stockpiles1
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,020
|
|
|
|
$ 816
|
|
|
|
$ 98
|
|
|
|
$ 115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ore that we do not expect to process in the next 12 months.
|
Accounting Policy
for Inventory
Material extracted from our mines is classified as either ore or
waste. Ore represents material that we expect to be processed
into a saleable form, and sold at a profit. Ore is recorded as
an asset that is classified within inventory at the point it is
extracted from the mine. Ore is accumulated in stockpiles that
are subsequently processed into gold/copper in a saleable form
under a mine plan that takes into consideration optimal
scheduling of production of our reserves, present plant
capacity, and the market price of gold/copper. Gold/copper in
process represents gold/copper in the processing circuit that
has not completed the production process, and is not yet in a
saleable form.
Gold ore stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of
tons added and removed from the stockpile, the number of
contained ounces (based on assay data) and the estimated
metallurgical recovery rates (based on the expected processing
method). Copper ore stockpiles are measured estimating the
number of tons added and removed from the stockpile. Stockpile
ore tonnages are verified by periodic surveys. Costs are
allocated to a stockpile based on relative values of material
stockpiled and processed using current mining costs incurred up
to the point of stockpiling the ore, including applicable
overhead, depreciation, depletion and amortization relating to
mining operations, and removed at each stockpiles average
cost per recoverable unit.
We record gold in process, gold doré and gold in
concentrate form at average cost, less provisions required to
reduce inventory to market value. Average cost is calculated
based on the cost of inventory at the beginning of a period,
plus the cost of inventory produced in a period. Costs
capitalized to inventory include direct and indirect materials
and consumables; direct labor; repairs and maintenance;
utilities; amortization of property, plant and equipment; waste
stripping costs; and local mine administrative expenses. Costs
are removed from inventory and recorded in cost of sales and
amortization expense based on the average cost per ounce of gold
in inventory. Mine operating supplies are recorded at purchase
cost. We record provisions to reduce inventory to net realizable
value, to reflect changes in economic factors that impact
inventory value or to reflect present intentions for the use of
slow moving and obsolete supplies inventory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory impairment charges
|
|
|
$ 13
|
|
|
|
$ 28
|
|
|
|
$ 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heap Leach
Inventory
The recovery of gold and copper from certain oxide ores is
achieved through the heap leaching process. Our Pierina, Lagunas
Norte, Veladero, Cortez, Bald Mountain, Round Mountain, Ruby
Hill and Marigold mines all use a heap leaching process for gold
and our Zaldívar mine uses a heap leaching process for
copper. Under this method, ore is placed on leach pads where it
is treated with a chemical solution, which dissolves the gold or
copper contained in the ore. The resulting pregnant
solution is further processed in a plant where the gold or
copper is recovered. For accounting purposes, costs are added to
ore on leach pads based on current mining and leaching costs,
including applicable depreciation, depletion and amortization
relating to mining operations. Costs are removed from ore on
leach pads as ounces or pounds are recovered based on the
average cost per recoverable ounce of gold or pound of copper on
the leach pad.
Estimates of recoverable gold or copper on the leach pads are
calculated from the quantities of ore placed on the leach pads
(measured tons added to the leach pads), the grade of ore placed
on the leach pads (based on assay data) and a recovery
percentage (based on ore type). In general, leach pads recover
between 35% and 95% of the ounces or pounds placed on the pads.
Although the quantities of recoverable gold or copper placed on
the leach pads are reconciled by comparing the grades of ore
placed on pads to the quantities of gold or copper actually
recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching
process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor
inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing
process is constantly monitored and estimates are refined based
on actual results over time. Historically, our operating results
have not been materially impacted by variations between the
estimated and actual recoverable quantities of gold or copper on
our leach pads. At December 31, 2007, the weighted average
cost per recoverable ounce of gold and recoverable pound of
copper on leach pads was $287 per ounce and $0.39 per pound,
respectively (2006: $180 per ounce of gold and $0.45 per pound
of copper). Variations between actual and estimated quantities
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-31
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
resulting from changes in
assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to
net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis.
The ultimate recovery of gold or copper from a leach pad will
not be known until the leaching process is concluded. Based on
current mine plans, we expect to place the last ton of ore on
our current leach pads at dates for gold ranging from 2013 to
2020 and for copper ranging from 2024 to 2029. Including the
estimated time required for residual leaching, rinsing and
reclamation activities, we expect that our leaching operations
will terminate within a period of up to six years following the
date that the last ton of ore is placed on the leach pad.
The current portion of ore inventory on leach pads is determined
based on estimates of the quantities of gold or copper at each
balance sheet date that we expect to recover during the next
12 months.
Ore in
Stockpiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldstrike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore that requires roasting
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore that requires autoclaving
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalgoorlie
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porgera
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowal
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veladero
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cortez
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turquoise Ridge
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden Sunlight
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zaldívar
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Goldstrike, we expect to fully process the ore in stockpiles
by 2031. At Kalgoorlie, we expect to fully process the stockpile
by 2018. At Porgera, we expect to fully process the stockpile by
2021. At Zaldívar, we expect to fully process the stockpile
by 2029.
14 >ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due from concentrate sales
|
|
|
$ 19
|
|
|
|
$ 24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due from copper cathode sales
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 256
|
|
|
|
$ 234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets (note 20C)
|
|
|
$ 334
|
|
|
|
$ 201
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods and services taxes
recoverable
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 707
|
|
|
|
$ 588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 >
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Assets not subject to amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired mineral properties and capitalized
mine development costs1,4
|
|
|
$ 2,010
|
|
|
|
$ 1,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets subject to amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized mineral property
acquisition and mine development
costs4,5
|
|
|
6,297
|
|
|
|
6,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings, plant and
equipment2,5
|
|
|
8,192
|
|
|
|
7,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
|
|
15,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
amortization3
|
|
|
(7,903
|
)
|
|
|
(6,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 8,596
|
|
|
|
$ 8,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Assets in the exploration or
development stages that are not subject to amortization.
|
|
2 |
|
Includes $146 million (2006:
$131 million) of assets under capital leases.
|
|
3 |
|
Includes $66 million (2006:
$41 million) of accumulated amortization for assets under
capital leases.
|
|
4 |
|
Includes a $176 million
reclassification from amortized assets to assets not subject to
amortization for Cortez Hills. This reclassification has no
impact on total property, plant & equipment and no
impact on amortization expense.
|
|
5 |
|
Includes a $108 million
reclassification in 2006 from Buildings, plant and equipment to
Capitalized mine development costs. This classification has no
impact on total property, plant and equipment and no impact on
amortization expense.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-32
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
A Unamortized
Assets Acquired Mineral Properties and Capitalized Mine
Development Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount at
|
|
|
amount at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration projects and other
land positions
|
|
|
$ 109
|
|
|
|
$ 287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value beyond proven and probable
reserves at producing
mines
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Hill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pascua-Lama
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cortez
Hills1
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pueblo Viejo
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sedibelo
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donlin
Creek2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buzwagi
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Punta Colorada Wind
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farm
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kainantu and PNG exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
licenses
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,010
|
|
|
|
$ 1,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
$176 million and
$48 million have been classified from acquired mineral
properties and capitalized mine development costs and value
beyond proven and probable reserves of producing mines,
respectively, to the Cortez Hills development stage project for
2007 and 2006. This reclassification has no effect on the total
property, plant and equipment balance and no effect on net
income in either year.
|
|
2 |
|
See note 12 for further
details.
|
Value beyond
proven and probable reserves (VBPP)
At the end of each fiscal year, as part of our annual business
cycle, we prepare estimates of proven and probable gold and
copper mineral reserves for each mineral property. An amount is
transferred out of VBPP into amortizable assets based on the
quantity of resources converted into reserves. In 2007, we
transferred $54 million from VBPP to amortizable assets
(2006 and 2005: $nil).
Acquisitions
We capitalize the cost of acquisition of land and mineral
rights. On acquiring a mineral property, we estimate the fair
value of proven and probable reserves as well as the value
beyond proven and probable reserves and we record these amounts
as assets at the date of acquisition. At the time mineralized
material is converted into proven and probable reserves, we
classify the capitalized acquisition cost associated with those
reserves as a component of acquired mineral properties, which
are subject to amortization. When production begins, capitalized
acquisition costs that are subject to amortization are amortized
to operations using the units-of-production method.
In 2007, amortization of property, plant and equipment began at
our Ruby Hill mine after it moved from construction into the
production phase. (2006: Cowal mine; 2005: Tulawaka, Lagunas
Norte and Veladero mines). Amortization also began in 2005 at
the Western 102 power plant in Nevada that was built to supply
power for the Goldstrike mine as it moved from construction into
the production phase.
Gold and Copper
Mineral Reserves
At the end of each fiscal year, as part of our annual business
cycle, we prepare estimates of proven and probable gold and
copper mineral reserves for each mineral property, including the
transfer of the values beyond proven and probable
(VBPP) reserves to assets subject to amortization.
We prospectively revise calculations of amortization of
property, plant and equipment. The effect of changes in reserve
estimates and transfers of VBPP reserves to assets subject to
amortization on amortization expense for 2007 was an increase of
$31 million (2006: $75 million decrease; 2005:
$28 million decrease).
Interest
Costs
Interest cost is considered an element of the historical cost of
an asset when a period of time is necessary to prepare it for
its intended use. We capitalize interest costs to assets under
development or construction while activities are in progress. We
also capitalize interest costs on the value assigned to projects
acquired from third parties. We also capitalize interest costs
on the carrying amount of eligible equity method investments.
B Assets
Subject to Amortization
Capitalized Mineral Property Acquisition and Mine Development
Costs
We start amortizing capitalized mineral property acquisition and
mine development costs when production begins. Amortization is
calculated using the units-of-production method,
where the numerator is the number of ounces produced and the
denominator is the estimated recoverable ounces of gold
contained in proven and probable reserves.
During production at underground mines, we incur development
costs to build new shafts, drifts and ramps that will enable us
to physically access ore underground. The time over which we
will continue to incur these costs depends on the mine life, and
in some cases could be up to 25 years. These underground
development costs are capitalized as incurred. Costs incurred
and capitalized to enable access to specific ore blocks or areas
of the mine, and
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-33
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
which only provide an economic
benefit over the period of mining that ore block or area, are
attributed to earnings using the units-of-production method
where the denominator is estimated recoverable ounces of gold
contained in proven and probable reserves within that ore block
or area. If capitalized underground development costs provide an
economic benefit over the entire mine life, the costs are
attributed to earnings using the units-of-production method,
where the denominator is the estimated recoverable ounces of
gold contained in total accessible proven and probable reserves.
At our Open Pit mining operations, costs of moving overburden
waste materials are capitalized until the production stage has
commenced.
Buildings, Plant
and Equipment
We record buildings, plant and equipment at cost. We capitalize
costs that extend the productive capacity or useful economic
life of an asset. Costs incurred that do not extend the
productive capacity or useful economic life of an asset are
considered repairs and maintenance and expensed as incurred. We
amortize the capitalized cost of assets less any estimated
residual value, using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful economic life of the asset based on their
expected use in our business. The longest estimated useful
economic life for buildings and equipment at ore processing
facilities is 25 years and for mining equipment is
15 years.
In the normal course of our business, we have entered into
certain leasing arrangements whose conditions meet the criteria
for the leases to be classified as capital leases. For capital
leases, we record an asset and an obligation at an amount equal
to the present value at the beginning of the lease term of
minimum lease payments over the lease term. In the case of our
capital leasing arrangements, there is transfer of ownership of
the leased assets to us at the end of the lease term and
therefore we amortize these assets on a basis consistent with
our other owned assets.
C Impairment
Evaluations Producing Mines and Development Projects
We review and test the carrying amounts of assets when events or
changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may
not be recoverable. We group assets at the lowest level for
which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the
cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For operating mines
and development projects, all assets related to a mine or
project are included in one group. If there are indications that
an impairment may have occurred at a particular mine site, we
compare the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be
generated from that mine to its carrying amount. If the sum of
undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount, an
impairment charge is recognized if the carrying amounts of the
individual long-lived assets within the group exceed their fair
values.
Long-lived assets subject to potential impairment at operating
mines and development projects include buildings, plant and
equipment, and capitalized mineral property acquisition and mine
development costs. For impairment assessment purposes, the
estimated fair value of buildings, plant and equipment is based
on a combination of current depreciated replacement cost and
current market value. The estimated fair value of capitalized
mineral property acquisition and mine development costs is based
on a discounted cash flow model.
Exploration
Projects
After acquisition, various factors can affect the recoverability
of the capitalized cost of land and mineral rights, particularly
the results of exploration drilling. The length of time between
the acquisition of land and mineral rights and when we undertake
exploration work varies based on the prioritization of our
exploration projects and the size of our exploration budget. If
we conclude that an impairment may exist, we compare the
carrying amount to its fair value. The fair value for
exploration projects is based on a discounted cash flow model.
For projects that do not have reliable cash flow projections, a
market approach is applied. In the event land and mineral rights
are impaired, we reduce the carrying amount to estimated fair
value and an impairment charge is recorded.
D Capital
Commitments
In addition to entering into various operational commitments in
the normal course of business, we had commitments of
approximately $159 million at December 31, 2007 for
construction activities at our development projects.
E Insurance
We purchase insurance coverage for certain insurable losses,
subject to varying deductibles, at our mineral properties
including losses such as property damage and business
interruption. We record losses relating to insurable events as
they occur. Proceeds receivable from insurance coverage are
recorded at such time as receipt is probable and the amount
receivable is fixed or determinable.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-34
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Insurance
Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$ 16
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 37
|
|
|
|
$ 12
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 >
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
rights1
|
|
|
$ 28
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 28
|
|
|
|
$ 28
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology2
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
contracts3
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties4
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 85
|
|
|
|
$ 17
|
|
|
|
$ 68
|
|
|
|
$ 85
|
|
|
|
$ 10
|
|
|
|
$ 75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate period amortization expense
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$7
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 10
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated aggregate amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 5
|
|
|
|
$ 3
|
|
|
|
$ 1
|
|
|
|
$ 1
|
|
|
|
$ 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
The water rights at Zaldívar
are subject to annual impairment testing and will be amortized
when we use them in the future.
|
|
2 |
|
The acquired technology will be
used at the Pueblo Viejo project. The amount will be amortized
using the units-of-production method over the estimated proven
and probable reserves of the mine, with no assumed residual
value.
|
|
3 |
|
Supply contracts are being
amortized over the weighted average contract lives of
4-8 years, with no assumed residual value.
|
|
4 |
|
Royalties are being amortized using
the units-of-production method over the total ounces subject to
royalty payments under the agreement.
|
Supply Agreement
with Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd. (Yokohama)
In December 2007, we signed an agreement with Yokohama to secure
the supply of tires. Under the agreement, in January 2008, we
advanced Yokahama $35 million to fund expansion of their
production facility and secure supply of tires for a
10-year
period.
17 >
GOODWILL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance, January 1, 2006
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions1
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
6,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
$ 2,423
|
|
|
|
$ 1,811
|
|
|
|
$ 441
|
|
|
|
$ 373
|
|
|
|
$ 64
|
|
|
|
$ 743
|
|
|
|
$ 5,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments4
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
$ 2,381
|
|
|
|
$ 1,845
|
|
|
|
$ 441
|
|
|
|
$ 373
|
|
|
|
$ 64
|
|
|
|
$ 743
|
|
|
|
$ 5,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Represents goodwill acquired as a
result of the acquisition of Placer Dome Inc. No portion of this
goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
|
|
2 |
|
Represents goodwill associated with
the sale of our 50% interest in the South Deep mine to Gold
Fields Ltd.
|
|
3 |
|
Represents goodwill acquired as a
result of the acquisition of an additional 20% interest in
Porgera. This goodwill is expected to be deductible for income
tax purposes (note 3E).
|
|
4 |
|
Impairment charges recorded in the
fourth quarter related to the Golden Sunlight ($35 million)
and Eskay Creek ($7 million) mines, as a result of our
annual goodwill impairment test. The goodwill impairment charges
are primarily due to the short remaining lives of these mines.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-35
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Accounting Policy
for Goodwill and Goodwill Impairment
Under the purchase method, the cost of business acquisitions is
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based
on the estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. The
excess of purchase cost over the net fair value of identified
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired
represents goodwill that is allocated to reporting units. We
believe that goodwill arises principally because of the
following factors: (1) The going concern value implicit in
our ability to sustain
and/or grow
our business by increasing reserves and resources through new
discoveries; and (2) The ability to capture unique
synergies that can be realized from managing a portfolio of both
acquired and existing mines and mineral properties in our
regional business units.
In 2006, we determined that goodwill should be allocated to
reporting units that would either represent components
(individual mineral properties) or aggregations of components up
to a regional business unit level. As at December 31, 2006,
the process of determining the appropriate level to allocate
goodwill was ongoing. In fourth quarter 2006, we completed
impairment tests of goodwill assuming both no aggregation of
mineral properties, and aggregation of mineral properties up to
the regional business unit level and determined that there were
no impairments at that date under either methodology. In second
quarter 2007, we determined that an individual mineral property
that is an operating mine is a reporting unit for the purposes
of allocating goodwill. On this basis, we allocated goodwill
arising from the Placer Dome acquisition to both acquired and
existing mineral properties.
Allocations for goodwill arising on the acquisition of Placer
Dome were calculated by first comparing the fair value of
acquired reporting units to the fair value of net identified
assets allocated to the reporting units. Secondly, the fair
value of estimated synergies arising on the combination between
Barrick and Placer Dome was used to allocate goodwill both to
reporting units acquired and existing Barrick reporting units
expected to benefit from the combination.
On an annual basis in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, we
evaluate the carrying amount of goodwill assigned to reporting
units for potential impairment. This impairment assessment
involves estimating the fair value of each reporting unit that
includes goodwill. We compare this fair value to the total
carrying amount of each reporting unit (including goodwill). If
the carrying amount exceeds this fair value, then we estimate
the fair values of all identifiable assets and liabilities in
the reporting unit, and compare this net fair value of assets
less liabilities to the estimated fair value of the entire
reporting unit. The difference represents the implied fair value
of the reporting units goodwill, which is compared to its
carrying amount. Any excess of the carrying value over the fair
value is charged to earnings.
Gold mining companies typically trade at a market capitalization
that is based on a multiple of net asset value
(NAV), whereby NAV represents a discounted cash flow
valuation based on projected future cash flows. For goodwill
impairment testing purposes, we estimate the fair value of a
gold property by applying a multiple to the reporting units NAV.
For a copper property, the estimated fair value is based on its
NAV and no multiple is applied. The process for determining fair
value is subjective and requires us to make numerous assumptions
including, but not limited to, projected future revenues based
on estimated production, long-term metal prices, operating
expenses, capital expenditures, discount rates and NAV
multiples. In particular, our assumptions with respect to
long-term gold prices and the appropriate NAV multiple to apply
have a significant impact on our estimate of fair value. In our
2007 annual goodwill impairment test we used a long-term gold
price of $800 per ounce and NAV multiples ranging from 1.0 to
2.0, depending on each propertys geographic location and
estimated remaining economic life. On completion of this test,
we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $35 million at
our Golden Sunlight mine and $7 million at our Eskay Creek
mine. The goodwill impairment charges at these mines are
primarily a result of their short remaining lives.
18 > OTHER
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec.31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current ore in stockpiles
(note 13)
|
|
|
$ 510
|
|
|
|
$ 368
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets (note 20C)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods and services taxes recoverable
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets (note 23)
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issue costs
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred share-based compensation (note 26B)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits receivable
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,936
|
|
|
|
$ 1,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Issue
Costs
In 2007, no new debt financings were put into place and there
were no additions to debt issue costs. Amortization of debt
issue costs is calculated using the interest method over the
term of each debt obligation, and classified as a component of
interest cost (see note 20B).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-36
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
19 > OTHER
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations (note 21)
|
|
|
$ 74
|
|
|
|
$ 50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities (note 20C)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement benefits (note 27)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable (note 9)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 255
|
|
|
|
$ 303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 >
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments include cash; evidence of ownership in an
entity; or a contract that imposes an obligation on one party
and conveys a right to a second entity to deliver/receive cash
or another financial instrument. Information on certain types of
financial instruments is included elsewhere in these financial
statements as follows: accounts receivable
note 14; investments note 12; restricted
share units note 26B.
A Cash
and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include cash, term deposits and treasury
bills with original maturities of less than 90 days. Cash
and equivalents include $480 million (2006:
$605 million) held in Argentinean and Chilean subsidiaries
that have been designated for use in funding construction costs
at our Pascua-Lama project.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-37
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
B Long-Term
Debt6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Placer
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
Amortization5
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
Amortization5
|
|
|
Dome
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
Amortization5
|
|
|
|
|
7.50%
debentures
1
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$500
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 498
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 490
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.80%/4.875%
notes
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veladero
financing
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulyanhulu
financing
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
debt2
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper-
linked notes
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar
notes
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
convertible debentures
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
leases
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B
Preferred
Securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
First credit
facility3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3,957
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
current
portion
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,153
|
|
|
|
$ 408
|
|
|
|
$ 1,109
|
|
|
|
$ 3
|
|
|
|
$ 3,244
|
|
|
|
$ 2,152
|
|
|
|
$ 1,244
|
|
|
|
$ 12
|
|
|
|
$ 1,252
|
|
|
|
$ 1,721
|
|
|
|
$ 179
|
|
|
|
$ 59
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
debt
Demand
financing
facility
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
credit
facility4
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 131
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 19
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 150
|
|
|
|
$ 37
|
|
|
|
$ 337
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 450
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
During second quarter 2007, we
repaid the $500 million 7.5% debentures from existing
cash balances and proceeds from the sale of investments.
|
|
2 |
|
The debt has an aggregate principal
amount of $923 million, of which $163 million is
subject to floating interest rates and $760 million is
subject to fixed interest rates ranging from 6.37% to 7.75%. The
notes mature at various times between 2009 and 2035.
|
|
3 |
|
We have a credit and guarantee
agreement with a group of banks (the Lenders), which
requires the Lenders to make available to us a credit facility
of up to $1.5 billion or the equivalent amount in Canadian
currency. The credit facility, which is unsecured, has an
interest rate of Libor plus 0.25% to 0.35% on drawn down
amounts, and a commitment rate of 0.07% to 0.08% on undrawn
amounts. We increased the limit of this facility from
$1 billion in August 2006. The facility currently matures
in 2011.
|
|
4 |
|
During third quarter 2006, we
terminated a second credit facility which consisted of unused
bank lines of credit of $850 million with an international
consortium of banks.
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of debt
discount/premium.
|
|
6 |
|
The agreements which govern our
long-term debt each contain various provisions which are not
summarized herein. In certain cases, these provisions allow
Barrick to, at its option, redeem indebtedness prior to maturity
at specified prices and also may permit redemption of debt by
Barrick upon the occurrence of certain specified changes in tax
legislation.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-38
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Veladero
Financing
One of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Minera Argentina Gold S.A.
in Argentina, has a limited recourse amortizing loan facility
for $250 million, the majority of which has a variable
interest rate. We have guaranteed the loan until completion
occurs, after which it will become non-recourse to the parent
company. As at December 31, 2007, completion as defined in
the loan agreement has not occurred. The loan is insured for
political risks by branches of the Canadian and German
governments.
Copper-Linked
Notes/US Dollar Notes
In October 2006, we issued $1,000 million of Copper-Linked
Notes. During the first three years, the full
$1,000 million obligation of these notes is to be repaid
through the delivery of (the US dollar equivalent of)
324 million pounds of copper. At December 31, 2007,
156 million pounds of copper remained to be delivered
(2008 103 million pounds; 2009
53 million pounds). Coincident with the repayment of (the
US dollar equivalent of) 324 million pounds of copper, we
will reborrow $1,000 million. Over the next two years, the
total amount outstanding under these notes will continue to be
$1,000 million, with a portion repayable in a copper-linked
equivalent and a portion repayable in a fixed amount of US
dollars at the maturity of the notes (2016 and 2036). As the
copper-linked equivalent is repaid, the fixed US dollar
obligation will increase. After 2009, only the fixed US dollar
obligation will remain. The accounting principles applicable to
these Copper-Linked Notes require separate accounting for the
future delivery of copper (a fixed-price forward sales contract
that meets the definition of a derivative that must be
separately accounted for) and for the underlying bond (see
note 20C).
Senior
Convertible Debentures
The convertible senior debentures (the Securities)
mature in 2023 and had an aggregate principal amount of
$293 million outstanding as at the end of 2007. Holders of
the Securities may, upon the occurrence of certain circumstances
and within specified time periods, convert their Securities into
common shares of Barrick. These circumstances are: if the
closing price of our common shares exceeds 120% of the
conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the 30
consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter; if certain credit ratings
assigned to the Securities fall below specified levels or if the
Securities cease to be rated by specified rating agencies or
such ratings are suspended or withdrawn; if for each of five
consecutive trading days, the trading price per $1,000 principal
amount of the Securities was less than 98% of the product of the
closing price of our common shares and the then current
conversion rate; if the Securities have been called for
redemption provided that only such Securities called for
redemption may be converted and upon the occurrence of specified
corporate transactions. On December 31, 2007 the conversion
rate per each $1,000 principal amount of Securities was 39.99
common shares and the effective conversion price was $25.01 per
common share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in
certain circumstances. As such, the effective conversion price
may also change.
The Securities were convertible from October 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007. No holder of Securities
converted during this period. However, had all the Securities
been converted and settlement occurred on December 31,
2007, we would have issued approximately 9.2 million common
shares with an aggregate fair value of approximately
$386.7 million based on our closing share price on
December 31, 2007. The Securities are also convertible from
January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008.
We may redeem the Securities at any time on or after
October 20, 2010 and prior to maturity, in whole or in
part, at a prescribed redemption price that varies depending
upon the date of redemption from 100.825% to 100% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The maximum
amount we could be required to pay to redeem the securities is
$232 million plus accrued interest. Holders of the
Securities can require the repurchase of the Securities for 100%
of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, on
October 15, 2013 and October 15, 2018. In addition, if
specified designated events occur prior to maturity of the
Securities, we will be required to offer to purchase all
outstanding Securities at a repurchase price equal to 100% of
the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. For
accounting purposes the Securities are classified as a
conventional convertible debenture and the
conversion feature has not been bifurcated from the host
instrument.
Series B
Preferred Securities
On December 18, 2006, we redeemed all of the outstanding
8.5% Series B Preferred Securities due December 31,
2045 for total cash of $80 million. The redemption price
was comprised of the outstanding principal amount of
$77 million plus accrued and unpaid interest to
December 17, 2006 of $3 million.
Demand Financing
Facility
We have a demand financing facility that permits borrowings of
up to $150 million. The terms of the facility require us to
maintain cash on deposit with the lender as a compensating
balance equal to the amount outstanding under the facility,
which is restricted as to use. The net effective interest rate
is 0.4% per annum. At December 31, 2007, $131 million
had been drawn on the facility and an equal amount had been
placed on deposit that is included in restricted cash
(see note 14).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-39
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Effective
|
|
Interest
|
|
Effective
|
|
Interest
|
|
Effective
|
|
|
|
|
cost
|
|
rate1
|
|
cost
|
|
rate1
|
|
cost
|
|
rate1
|
|
|
7.50% debentures
|
|
$ 16
|
|
9.9%
|
|
$ 49
|
|
9.8%
|
|
$ 41
|
|
8.21%
|
|
|
5.80%/4.875% notes
|
|
41
|
|
5.6%
|
|
41
|
|
5.5%
|
|
42
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
Veladero financing
|
|
21
|
|
10.2%
|
|
25
|
|
10.2%
|
|
20
|
|
8.6%
|
|
|
Bulyanhulu financing
|
|
5
|
|
6.2%
|
|
6
|
|
5.5%
|
|
10
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
Other debt
|
|
60
|
|
6.1%
|
|
53
|
|
5.4%
|
|
3
|
|
4.1%
|
|
|
Copper-linked notes/US dollar notes
|
|
63
|
|
6.2%
|
|
13
|
|
5.8%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Senior convertible debentures
|
|
2
|
|
0.8%
|
|
6
|
|
2.0%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
6
|
|
7.7%
|
|
6
|
|
6.7%
|
|
6
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Securities
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
3
|
|
4.4%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Demand financing facility
|
|
13
|
|
8.9%
|
|
12
|
|
8.8%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
First credit facility
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
29
|
|
7.4%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Second credit facility
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
6
|
|
5.0%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other interest
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest allocated to discontinued operations
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(23)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest capitalized
|
|
(124)
|
|
|
|
(102)
|
|
|
|
(118)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 113
|
|
|
|
$ 126
|
|
|
|
$ 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
$ 236
|
|
|
|
$ 211
|
|
|
|
$ 108
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premium
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on interest rate hedges
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest accruals
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$ 237
|
|
|
|
$ 251
|
|
|
|
$ 121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
The effective rate includes the stated interest rate under the
debt agreement, amortization of debt issue costs and debt
discount/premium and the impact of interest rate contracts
designated in a hedging relationship with long term
debt.
|
Scheduled Debt
Repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 and
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
thereafter
|
|
|
5.80%/4.875% notes
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 750
|
|
|
Veladero financing
|
|
48
|
|
53
|
|
30
|
|
10
|
|
22
|
|
|
Bulyanhulu financing
|
|
34
|
|
17
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Copper-linked notes/US dollar
notes1
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Other debt
|
|
-
|
|
16
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
844
|
|
|
Senior convertible debentures
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 82
|
|
$ 86
|
|
$ 30
|
|
$ 10
|
|
$ 2,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum annual payments under
capital leases
|
|
$ 21
|
|
$ 24
|
|
$ 20
|
|
$ 8
|
|
$ 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 The
Copper-linked notes/US dollar notes have scheduled repayments
through the delivery of pre-determined amounts of copper (see
Copper-Linked Notes/US Dollar Notes).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-40
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
C Use
of Derivative Instruments
(Derivatives) in Risk Management
In the normal course of business, our assets, liabilities and
forecasted transactions are impacted by various market risks
including:
Under our risk management policy, we seek to mitigate the impact
of these market risks to provide certainty for a portion of our
revenues and to control costs and enable us to plan our business
with greater certainty. The timeframe and manner in which we
manage these risks varies for each item based upon our
assessment of the risk and available alternatives for mitigating
risk. For these particular risks, we believe that derivatives
are an effective means of managing risk.
The primary objective of the hedging elements of our derivative
positions is that changes in the values of hedged items are
offset by changes in the values of derivatives. Most of the
derivatives we use meet the FAS 133 hedge effectiveness
criteria and are designated in a hedge accounting relationship.
Some of the derivative positions are effective in achieving our
risk management objectives but they do not meet the strict
FAS 133 hedge effectiveness criteria, and they are
classified as non hedge derivatives. The
change in fair value of these non-hedge derivatives is recorded
in earnings, in a manner consistent with the derivative
positions intended use.
Non-Hedge
Derivative Gains/Losses
|
|
|
|
|
Income statement
|
|
|
classification
|
Gold contracts
|
|
Revenue
|
Copper contracts
|
|
Revenue
|
Silver contracts
|
|
Cost of sales
|
Fuel contracts
|
|
Cost of sales
|
Currency contracts
|
|
Other expense
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
income/expense
|
Share purchase warrants
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-41
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Summary of
Derivatives at Dec. 31,
20071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount by Term to
|
|
Accounting Classification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
by Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 to 5
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
flow
|
|
value
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
Total
|
|
hedge
|
|
hedge
|
|
Hedge
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
US dollar interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive-fixed swaps (millions)
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 50
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 50
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 50
|
|
|
$ 1
|
|
|
Pay-fixed swaps (millions)
|
|
-
|
|
(125)
|
|
-
|
|
(125)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(125)
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net swap position
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ (75)
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ (75)
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ (75)
|
|
|
$ (10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C$:US$ contracts (C$ millions)
|
|
C$331
|
|
C$219
|
|
C $ -
|
|
C$550
|
|
C$450
|
|
C $ -
|
|
C$100
|
|
|
$ 31
|
|
|
A$:US$ contracts (A$ millions)
|
|
A$1,379
|
|
A$3,232
|
|
A $ -
|
|
A$4,611
|
|
A$4,518
|
|
A $ -
|
|
A$93
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
EUR:US$ contracts ( millions)
|
|
4
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
4
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
CLP:US$ contracts (CLP billions)
|
|
CLP 42
|
|
CLP -
|
|
CLP -
|
|
CLP42
|
|
CLP42
|
|
CLP -
|
|
CLP -
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper call option spread contracts (millions of pounds)
|
|
103
|
|
53
|
|
-
|
|
156
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
156
|
|
|
$ 25
|
|
|
Copper sold forward contracts (millions of pounds)
|
|
100
|
|
72
|
|
-
|
|
172
|
|
172
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Copper collar contracts (millions of pounds)
|
|
299
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
299
|
|
272
|
|
-
|
|
27
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Diesel forward contracts (thousands of
barrels)2
|
|
1,868
|
|
2,910
|
|
440
|
|
5,218
|
|
4,505
|
|
-
|
|
713
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Excludes
gold sales contracts (see note 5), gold lease rate swaps
(see note 5),
|
|
2 |
Diesel commodity contracts represent a combination of WTI, WTB,
MOPS and JET hedge contracts and diesel price contracts based on
the price of WTI, WTB, MOPS, and JET, respectively, plus a
spread. WTI represents West Texas intermediate, WTB represents
Water Borne, MOPS represents Mean of Platts Singapore, JET
represents Jet Fuel.
|
US Dollar
Interest Rate Contracts
Receive-fixed swaps totaling $300 million were closed out
in third quarter 2007. They had been designated against the
Copper-linked notes/US dollar notes, included in long-term debt,
as a hedge of the variability in the fair value of the
debentures caused by changes in LIBOR. For these hedges,
prospective hedge effectiveness was assessed by comparing the
effects of theoretical shifts in forward interest rates on the
fair value of both the debt and the swaps. The retrospective
assessment involved comparing the effect of changes in the
underlying interest rate (i.e., LIBOR) on both the debt and the
swaps.
In the second quarter, receive-fixed swaps totaling
$500 million expired. These swaps were set up as fair value
hedges of the $500 million 7.5% debentures which
matured on May 1, 2007. Changes in fair value of the swaps,
together with changes in fair value of the debentures caused by
changes in LIBOR, were recorded in earnings each period. Also,
as interest payments on the debentures are recorded in earnings,
an amount equal to the net of the fixed-rate interest receivable
and the variable-rate interest payable is recorded in earnings
as a component of interest costs.
Currency
Contracts
Cash Flow
Hedges
Currency contracts totaling C$450 million,
A$4,518 million, 1 million and CLP
42 billion have been designated against forecasted local
currency denominated expenditures as a hedge of the variability
of the US dollar amount of those expenditures caused by changes
in currency exchange rates over the next four years. Hedged
items are identified as the first stated quantity of dollars of
forecasted expenditures in a future month. For a
C$450 million,
A$4,452 million, 1 million and CLP
42 billion portion of the contracts, we have concluded that
the hedges are 100% effective under FAS 133 because the
critical terms (including notional amount and maturity date) of
the hedged items and currency contracts are the same. For the
remaining A$66 million, prospective and retrospective hedge
effectiveness is assessed using the hypothetical derivative
method under FAS 133. The prospective test involves
comparing the effect of a theoretical shift in forward exchange
rates on the fair value of both the actual and hypothetical
derivative. The retrospective test involves comparing the effect
of historic changes in exchange rates each period on the fair
value of both the actual and hypothetical derivative using a
dollar offset approach. The effective portion of changes in fair
value of the currency contracts is recorded in OCI until the
forecasted expenditure impacts earnings. For expenditures
capitalized to the cost of inventory, this is upon sale of
inventory, and for capital expenditures, this is when
amortization of the capital assets is recorded in earnings.
Non-hedge
Contracts
On December 31, 2007 we had non-hedge Canadian currency
contracts of $100M. We entered these contracts to hedge the
purchase price of Arizona Star. The contracts qualified for
hedge accounting treatment from the designation date to the
acquisition date of December 20, 2007. After
December 20, 2007, the contracts were no longer considered
hedges under FAS 133, and all changes in fair value
subsequent to that date were recorded in current period
earnings. These non-hedge contracts matured at the end of
January 2008.
During 2007, we entered into a series of A$ contracts as
identified above. A$93 million contracts were not
designated as hedges and are outstanding as of December 31,
2007.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-42
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Commodity
Contracts
Cash Flow
Hedges
Commodity contracts totaling 4,505 thousand barrels of diesel
fuel have been designated against forecasted purchases of the
commodities for expected consumption at our mining operations.
The contracts act as a hedge of the impact of variability in
market prices on the cost of future commodity purchases over the
next seven years. Hedged items are identified as the first
stated quantity in millions of barrels/gallons of forecasted
purchases in a future month. Prospective and retrospective hedge
effectiveness is assessed using the hypothetical derivative
method under FAS 133. The prospective test is based on
regression analysis of the month - on - month change
in fair value of both the actual derivative and a hypothetical
derivative caused by actual historic changes in commodity prices
over the last three years. The retrospective test involves
comparing the effect of historic changes in commodity prices
each period on the fair value of both the actual and
hypothetical derivative using a dollar offset approach. The
effective portion of changes in fair value of the commodity
contracts is recorded in OCI until the forecasted transaction
impacts earnings. The cost of commodity consumption is
capitalized to the cost of inventory, and therefore this is upon
the sale of inventory.
The terms of a series of copper-linked notes resulted in an
embedded fixed-price forward copper sales contract for
324 million pounds that meets the definition of a
derivative and must be separately accounted for. At
December 31, 2007, embedded fixed-price forward copper
sales contracts for 156 million pounds were outstanding due
to deliveries of copper totaling 168 million pounds. The
resulting copper derivative has been designated against future
copper cathode at the Zaldívar mine as a cash flow hedge of
the variability in market prices of those future sales. Hedged
items are identified as the first stated quantity of pounds of
forecasted sales in a future month. Prospective hedge
effectiveness is assessed on these hedges using a dollar offset
method. The dollar offset assessment involves comparing the
effect of theoretical shifts in forward copper prices on the
fair value of both the actual hedging derivative and a
hypothetical hedging derivative. The retrospective assessment
involves comparing the effect of historic changes in copper
prices each period on the fair value of both the actual and
hypothetical derivative using a dollar offset approach. The
effective portion of changes in fair value of the copper
contracts is recorded in OCI until the forecasted copper sale
impacts earnings.
During 2007 we added 392 million pounds of copper collar
contracts which provide a floor price and a cap price for copper
sales. 315 million pounds of the collars were designated
against copper cathode sales at our Zaldívar mine and
77 million pounds are designated against copper concentrate
sales at our Osborne mine. At December 31, 2007 we had
207 million pounds of copper collar contracts remaining at
Zaldívar and 65 million pounds at Osborne.
For collars designated against copper cathode production, the
hedged items are identified as the first stated quantity of
pounds of forecasted sales in a future month. Prospective hedge
effectiveness is assessed on these hedges using a dollar offset
method. The dollar offset assessment involves comparing the
effect of theoretical shifts in forward copper prices on the
fair value of both the actual hedging derivative and a
hypothetical hedging derivative. The retrospective assessment
involves comparing the effect of historic changes in copper
prices each period on the fair value of both the actual and
hypothetical derivative using a dollar offset approach. The
effective portion of changes in fair value of the copper
contracts is recorded in OCI until the forecasted copper sale
impacts earnings.
Concentrate sales at our Osborne mine contain both gold and
copper, and as a result, are exposed to price changes of both
commodities. Prospective hedge effectiveness is assessed using a
regression method. The regression method involves comparing
month-by-month
changes in fair value of both the actual hedging derivative and
a hypothetical derivative (derived from the price of
concentrate) caused by actual historical changes in commodity
prices over the last three years. The retrospective assessment
involves comparing the effect of historic changes in copper
prices each period on the fair value of both the actual and
hypothetical derivative using a dollar offset approach. The
effective portion of changes in fair value of the copper
contracts is recorded in OCI until the forecasted copper sale
impacts earnings. During 2007, we recorded ineffectiveness of
$5 million on these hedges. The ineffectiveness was caused
by changes in the price of gold impacting the hypothetical
derivative, but not the hedging derivative. Prospective
effectiveness tests indicate that these hedges are expected to
be highly effective in the future.
Nonhedge
Contracts
Nonhedge fuel contracts are used to mitigate the risk of
oil price changes on other fuel consumption. On completion of
regression analysis, we concluded that the contracts do not meet
the highly effective criterion in FAS 133 due
to currency and basis differences between contract prices and
the prices charged to the mines by oil suppliers. Despite not
qualifying as an accounting hedge, the contracts protect the
Company to a significant extent from the effects of oil price
changes. Changes in fair value of non-hedge fuel contracts are
recorded in current period cost of sales.
In first quarter 2007, we purchased and sold call options on
274 million pounds of copper over the next 2
1/2 years. These options, when combined with the
aforementioned fixed-price forward copper sales contracts,
economically lock in copper sales prices between $3.08/lb and
$3.58/lb over a period of
2 1/2 years.
At December 31, 2007, the notional amount of options
outstanding had decreased to 156 million pounds due to
expiry of options totaling 118 million pounds in 2007.
These contracts do not meet the highly effective
criterion for hedge accounting in FAS 133. We paid net
option premiums of $23 million for these positions that
were included under investing activities in the cash flow
statement. Changes in fair value of these copper options are
recorded in current period revenue.
During 2007, we entered into a series of copper collar contracts
for 27 million pounds of copper that were not designated as
hedges and were outstanding as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-43
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Non-hedge
Derivative Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income statement
|
For the years ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
classification
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
$ 48
|
|
|
|
$ (14
|
)
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
Revenue
|
Gold
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Revenue
|
Silver
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
Fuel
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
Currency contracts
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Other income/expense
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Interest income/expense
|
Share purchase warrants
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Other income/expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing hedge inefficiency
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Various
|
Due to changes in timing of hedged items
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 41
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
At Jan. 1
|
|
|
$ 178
|
|
|
|
$ 204
|
|
Acquired with Placer Dome
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,707
|
)
|
Derivatives cash (inflow) outflow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-hedge derivatives
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective portion
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Ineffective portion
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Share purchase warrants
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fair value hedges
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
|
$ 389
|
|
|
|
$ 178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$ 334
|
|
|
|
$ 201
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
Other longterm obligations
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 389
|
|
|
|
$ 178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net by
offsetting related amounts due to/from counterparties if the
conditions of FIN No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts
Related to Certain Contracts, are met. Amounts receivable from
counterparties netted against derivative liabilities totaled
$5 million at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-44
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Cash Flow Hedge
Gains (Losses) in OCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity price hedges
|
|
|
Currency hedges
|
|
|
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
costs
|
|
|
costs
|
|
|
expenditures
|
|
|
balances
|
|
|
debt
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2004
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of change in fair value of hedging instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On recording hedged items in earnings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness due to changes in timing of hedged items
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2005
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of change in fair value of hedging instruments
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On recording hedged items in
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2006
|
|
|
$ 17
|
|
|
|
$ 57
|
|
|
|
$ 21
|
|
|
|
$ 155
|
|
|
|
$ 14
|
|
|
|
$ 39
|
|
|
|
$ (3
|
)
|
|
|
$ (17
|
)
|
|
|
$ 283
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of change in fair value of hedging instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On recording hedged items in earnings
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)1
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
$ 15
|
|
|
|
$ 14
|
|
|
|
$ 79
|
|
|
|
$ 238
|
|
|
|
$ 27
|
|
|
|
$ (1
|
)
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ (17
|
)
|
|
|
$ 355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge gains/losses classified within
|
|
sales
|
|
|
sales
|
|
|
sales
|
|
|
sales
|
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of hedge gain (loss) expected to affect 2008
earnings2
|
|
|
$ 2
|
|
|
|
$ 24
|
|
|
|
$ 27
|
|
|
|
$ 141
|
|
|
|
$ 18
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ (1
|
)
|
|
|
$ 211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
On determining that certain forecasted capital expenditures were
no longer likely to occur within two months of the originally
specified time frame.
|
|
2
|
Based on the fair value of hedge contracts at December 31,
2007.
|
D Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is the value at which a financial instrument could be
closed out or sold in a transaction with a willing and
knowledgeable counterparty over a period of time consistent with
our risk management or investment strategy. Fair value is based
on quoted market prices, where available. If market quotes are
not available, fair value is based on internally developed
models that use market-based or independent information as
inputs. These models could produce a fair value that may not be
reflective of future fair value.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-45
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and
equivalents1
|
|
|
$ 2,207
|
|
|
|
$ 2,207
|
|
|
|
$ 3,043
|
|
|
|
$ 3,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable1
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities2
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method
investments3
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
assets4
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
securities5
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 4,233
|
|
|
|
$ 4,272
|
|
|
|
$ 4,537
|
|
|
|
$ 4,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities Accounts
payable1
|
|
|
$ 808
|
|
|
|
$ 808
|
|
|
|
$ 686
|
|
|
|
$ 686
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt6
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
3,957
|
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liabilities4
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted share
units7
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred share
units7
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 4,332
|
|
|
|
$ 4,228
|
|
|
|
$ 4,919
|
|
|
|
$ 4,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Recorded at cost. Fair value approximates the carrying amounts
due to the short-term nature and generally negligible credit
losses.
|
|
|
2
|
Recorded at fair value. Quoted market prices are used to
determine fair value.
|
|
|
3
|
Recorded at cost, adjusted for our share of income/loss and
dividends of equity investees. Excludes the investment in
Atacama Pty for which there is no readily determinable fair
value.
|
|
|
4
|
Recorded at fair value based on internal valuation models that
reflect forward market commodity prices, currency exchange rates
and interest rates, and a discount factor that is based on
market US dollar interest rates. If a forward market does not
exist, we obtain broker-dealer quotations. Valuations assume all
counterparties have an AA credit rating.
|
|
|
5
|
Includes ABCP.
|
|
|
6
|
Long-term debt is generally recorded at cost except for
obligations that are designated in a fair-value hedge
relationship, which are recorded at fair value in periods where
a hedge relationship exists. The fair value of long-term debt is
calculated by discounting the future cash flows under a debt
obligation by a discount factor that is based on US dollar
market interest rates adjusted for our credit quality.
|
|
|
7
|
Recorded at fair value based on our period end closing market
share price.
|
E Credit
Risk
Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill
its performance obligations under the terms of a financial
instrument. For cash and equivalents and accounts receivable,
credit risk represents the carrying amount on the balance sheet,
net of any overdraft positions.
For derivatives, when the fair value is positive, this creates
credit risk. When the fair value of a derivative is negative, we
assume no credit risk. In cases where we have a legally
enforceable master netting agreement with a counterparty, credit
risk exposure represents the net amount of the positive and
negative fair values for similar types of derivatives. For a net
negative amount, we regard credit risk as being zero. A net
positive amount for a counterparty is a reasonable measure of
credit risk when there is a legally enforceable master netting
agreement. We mitigate credit risk by:
|
|
Ø
|
entering into derivatives with high credit-quality
counterparties;
|
Ø
|
limiting the amount of exposure to each counterparty; and
|
Ø
|
monitoring the financial condition of counterparties.
|
Location of credit risk is determined by physical location of
the bank branch, customer or counterparty.
Credit Quality of
Financial Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
S&P Credit rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA− or
|
|
|
A− or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
higher
|
|
|
higher
|
|
|
B to BBB
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and
equivalents1
|
|
|
$ 2,225
|
|
|
|
$ 30
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 2,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives2
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current
assets3
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,672
|
|
|
|
$ 33
|
|
|
|
$ 257
|
|
|
|
$ 2,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of counterparties
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Largest counterparty (%)
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrations of
Credit Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
States
|
|
Canada
|
|
International
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and
equivalents1
|
|
$ 1,831
|
|
$ 103
|
|
$ 321
|
|
$ 2,255
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives2
|
|
151
|
|
139
|
|
115
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
191
|
|
46
|
|
19
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current
assets3
|
|
46
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,219
|
|
$ 288
|
|
$ 455
|
|
$ 2,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
The amounts presented reflect the outstanding bank balance held
with institutions as at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
2
|
The amounts presented reflect the net credit exposure after
considering the effect of master netting agreements.
|
|
|
3
|
Other non-current assets include ABCP.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-46
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
F Risks
Relating to the Use of Derivatives
By using derivatives, in addition to credit risk, we are
affected by market risk and market liquidity risk. Market risk
is the risk that the fair value of a derivative might be
adversely affected by a change in commodity prices, interest
rates, gold lease rates, or currency exchange rates, and that
this in turn affects our financial condition. We manage market
risk by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the
types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. We
mitigate this risk by establishing trading agreements with
counterparties under which we are not required to post any
collateral or make any margin calls on our derivatives. Our
counterparties cannot require settlement solely because of an
adverse change in the fair value of a derivative.
Market liquidity risk is the risk that a derivative cannot be
eliminated quickly, by either liquidating it or by establishing
an offsetting position.
Under the terms of our trading agreements, counterparties cannot
require us to immediately settle outstanding derivatives, except
upon the occurrence of customary events of default such as
covenant breaches, including financial covenants, insolvency or
bankruptcy. We generally mitigate market liquidity risk by
spreading out the maturity of our derivatives over time.
21 > ASSET
RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Asset Retirement
Obligations (AROs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
$ 893
|
|
|
|
$ 446
|
|
|
|
|
|
AROs acquired with Placer Dome
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
AROs arising in the period
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of revisions to expected cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions to carrying amount of assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded in
earnings1
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement gains
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
AROs reclassified under Liabilities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 892
|
|
|
|
$ 843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
In 2006, we recognized an increase of $37 million for a
change in estimate of the ARO at the Nickel Plate property in
British Columbia, Canada. The adjustment was made on receipt of
an environmental study that indicated a requirement to treat
ground water for an extended period of time. The increase was
recorded as a component of other expense (note 8A).
|
Each period we assess cost estimates and other assumptions used
in the valuation of AROs at each of our mineral properties to
reflect events, changes in circumstances and new information
available. Changes in these cost estimates and assumptions have
a corresponding impact on the fair value of the ARO. For closed
mines, any change in the fair value of AROs results in a
corresponding charge or credit within other expense, whereas at
operating mines the charge is recorded as an adjustment to the
carrying amount of the corresponding asset. In 2007, we recorded
adjustments of $53 million for changes in estimates of the
AROs at our Hemlo, Cowal, Bulyanhulu, Lagunas Norte and Veladero
operating mines. In 2007, charges of $6 million were
recorded for changes in cost estimates for AROs at closed mines
(2006: $53 million; 2005: $15 million expense).
AROs arise from the acquisition, development, construction and
normal operation of mining property, plant and equipment, due to
government controls and regulations that protect the environment
on the closure and reclamation of mining properties. The major
parts of the carrying amount of AROs relate to tailings
and heap leach pad closure/rehabilitation; demolition of
buildings/mine facilities; ongoing water treatment; and ongoing
care and maintenance of closed mines. The fair values of AROs
are measured by discounting the expected cash flows using a
discount factor that reflects the credit-adjusted riskfree
rate of interest. We prepare estimates of the timing and amount
of expected cash flows when an ARO is incurred. We update
expected cash flows to reflect changes in facts and
circumstances. The principal factors that can cause expected
cash flows to change are: the construction of new processing
facilities; changes in the quantities of material in reserves
and a corresponding change in the life of mine plan; changing
ore characteristics that impact required environmental
protection measures and related costs; changes in water quality
that impact the extent of water treatment required; and changes
in laws and regulations governing the protection of the
environment. When expected cash flows increase, the revised cash
flows are discounted using a current discount factor whereas
when expected cash flows decrease the reduced cash flows are
discounted using a historic discount factor, and then in both
cases any change in the fair value of the ARO is recorded. We
record the fair value of an ARO when it is incurred. At
producing mines AROs incurred and changes in the fair value of
AROs are recorded as an adjustment to the corresponding asset
carrying amounts. At closed mines, any adjustment to the fair
value of an ARO is charged directly to earnings. AROs are
adjusted to reflect the passage of time (accretion) calculated
by applying the discount factor implicit in the initial
fair-value measurement to the beginning-of-period carrying
amount of the AROs. For producing mines, accretion is recorded
in the cost of goods sold each period. For development projects
and closed mines, accretion is recorded in other expense. Upon
settlement of an ARO, we record a gain or loss if the actual
cost differs from the carrying amount of the ARO. Settlement
gains/losses are recorded in other (income) expense. Other
environmental remediation costs that are not AROs as defined by
FAS 143 are expensed as incurred (see note 8A).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-47
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
22 > OTHER
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits (note 27)
|
|
|
$ 87
|
|
|
|
$ 85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-retirement benefits (note 27)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities (note 20C)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted share units (note 26B)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 431
|
|
|
|
$ 518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 >
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
Recognition and
Measurement
We record deferred income tax assets and liabilities where
temporary differences exist between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities in our balance sheet and their tax bases.
The measurement and recognition of deferred income tax assets
and liabilities takes into account: enacted rates that will
apply when temporary differences reverse; interpretations of
relevant tax legislation; tax planning strategies; estimates of
the tax bases of assets and liabilities; and the deductibility
of expenditures for income tax purposes. We recognize the effect
of changes in our assessment of these estimates and factors when
they occur. Changes in deferred income tax assets, liabilities
and valuation allowances are allocated between net income and
other comprehensive income based on the source of the change.
Deferred income taxes have not been provided on the
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, which are
considered to be reinvested indefinitely outside Canada. The
determination of the unrecorded deferred income tax liability is
not considered practicable.
Sources of
Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax loss carry forwards
|
|
|
$ 729
|
|
|
|
$ 798
|
|
Capital tax loss carry forwards
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Post-retirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
(1,377
|
)
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (119
|
)
|
|
|
$ (270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets (note 18)
|
|
|
$ 722
|
|
|
|
$ 528
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (119
|
)
|
|
|
$ (270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiry Dates of
Tax Losses and AMT Credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expiry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
09
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12+
|
|
|
date
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Tax losses1
Canada
|
|
|
$3
|
|
|
|
$5
|
|
|
|
$-
|
|
|
|
$-
|
|
|
|
$1,583
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$1,591
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Barbados
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
Tanzania
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3
|
|
|
|
$5
|
|
|
|
$2
|
|
|
|
$-
|
|
|
|
$2,706
|
|
|
|
$ 1,071
|
|
|
|
$3,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMT
credits2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$ 247
|
|
|
|
$ 247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Represents the gross amount of tax
loss carry forwards translated at closing exchange rates at
December 31, 2007.
|
|
2 |
|
Represents the amounts deductible
against future taxes payable in years when taxes payable exceed
minimum tax as defined by United States tax
legislation.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-48
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Net Deferred Tax
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
$ 494
|
|
|
|
$ 487
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Tanzania
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
United States
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Other
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Chile
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Tanzania
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
United States
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (419
|
)
|
|
|
$ (658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
$ 722
|
|
|
|
$ 528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
Allowances
We consider the need to record a valuation allowance against
deferred tax assets, taking into account the effects of local
tax law. A valuation allowance is not recorded when we conclude
that sufficient positive evidence exists to demonstrate that it
is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be
realized. The main factors considered are:
|
|
Ø
|
Historic and expected future levels of taxable income;
|
Ø
|
Tax plans that affect whether tax assets can be
realized; and
|
Ø
|
The nature, amount and expected timing of reversal of taxable
temporary differences.
|
Levels of future taxable income are mainly affected by: market
gold and silver prices; forecasted future costs and expenses to
produce gold reserves; quantities of proven and probable gold
reserves; market interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates. If these factors or other circumstances change, we record
an adjustment to valuation allowances to reflect our latest
assessment of the amount of deferred tax assets that will more
likely than not be realized.
A deferred income tax asset totaling $439 million has been
recorded in Canada. This deferred tax asset primarily arose due
to mark-to-market losses realized for acquired Placer Dome
derivative instruments. Projections of various sources of income
support the conclusion that the realizability of this deferred
tax asset is more likely than not, and consequently no valuation
allowance has been set up for this deferred tax asset.
A deferred tax asset of $167 million has been recorded in
Tanzania following the release of tax valuation allowances
totaling $189 million in 2007. The release of tax valuation
allowances resulted from the impact of rising market gold prices
on expectations of future taxable income and the ability to
realize these tax assets.
A partial valuation allowance of $190 million has been set
up against deferred tax assets in the United States at
December 31,2007. The majority of this valuation allowance
relates to AMT credits in periods when partly due to low market
gold prices, Barrick was an AMT taxpayer in the United States.
If market gold prices continue to rise, it is reasonably
possible that some or all of these valuation allowances could be
released in future periods.
A valuation allowance of $105 million exists as at
December 31, 2007 against tax loss carry forwards in Chile
that exist in entities that have no present sources of income.
Source of Changes
in Deferred Tax Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Temporary differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
$ 24
|
|
|
|
$ (1,111
|
)
|
|
|
$ 30
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Tax loss carry forwards
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (110
|
)
|
|
|
$ (402
|
)
|
|
|
$ (38
|
)
|
Net currency translation gains on deferred tax balances
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Canadian tax rate changes
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Adjustment to deferred tax balances due to change in tax
status1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Release of end of year Tanzanian valuation allowances
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Release of other valuation allowances
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 146
|
|
|
|
$ (325
|
)
|
|
|
$ (64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intraperiod allocation to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
$ 174
|
|
|
|
$ 109
|
|
|
|
$ (30
|
)
|
Placer Dome acquisition (note 3G)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Porgera mine acquisition (note 3E)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
OCI (note 25)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 151
|
|
|
|
$ (297
|
)
|
|
|
$ (69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Relates to changes in tax status in
Australia (note 9).
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-49
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Unrecognized Tax
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
20
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
20071,2
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
If recognized, the total amount of
$15 million would be recognized as a benefit to income
taxes on the income statement, and therefore would impact the
reported effective tax rate.
|
|
2 |
|
Includes interest and penalties of
$1 million.
|
We expect the amount of unrecognized tax benefits to decrease
within 12 months of the reporting date by approximately $2
to $3 million, related primarily to the expected settlement
of Canadian income and mining tax assessments.
Tax Years Still
Under Examination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
2003-2007
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2003-2007
|
|
Peru
|
|
|
2004-2007
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
2004-2007
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
2002-2007
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
all years open
|
|
Papua New Guinea
|
|
|
2002-2007
|
|
Tanzania
|
|
|
all years open
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peruvian Tax
Assessment
On September 30, 2004, the Tax Court of Peru issued a
decision in our favor in the matter of our appeal of a 2002
income tax assessment for an amount of $32 million,
excluding interest and penalties. The assessment mainly related
to the validity of a revaluation of the Pierina mining
concession, which affected its tax basis for the years 1999 and
2000. The full life-of-mine effect on current and deferred
income tax liabilities totaling $141 million was fully
recorded at December 31, 2002, as well as other related
costs of about $21 million.
In January 2005, we received written confirmation that there
would be no appeal of the September 30, 2004 Tax Court of
Peru decision. In December 2004, we recorded a $141 million
reduction in current and deferred income tax liabilities and a
$21 million reduction in other accrued costs. The
confirmation concluded the administrative and judicial appeals
process with resolution in Barricks favor.
Notwithstanding the favorable Tax Court decision we received in
2004 on the 1999 to 2000 revaluation matter, on an audit
concluded in 2005, SUNAT has reassessed us on the same issue for
tax years 2001 to 2003. On October 19, 2007, SUNAT
confirmed their reassessment. The tax assessment is for
$49 million of tax, plus interest and penalties of
$116 million. We filed an appeal to the Tax Court of Peru
within the statutory period. We believe that the audit
reassessment has no merit, that we will prevail in court again,
and accordingly no liability has been recorded for this
reassessment.
24 > CAPITAL
STOCK
A Common
Shares
Our authorized capital stock includes an unlimited number of
common shares (issued 869,886,631 common shares); 9,764,929
First preferred shares Series A (issued nil); 9,047,619
Series B (issued nil); 1 Series C special voting share
(issued 1); and 14,726,854 Second preferred shares Series A
(issued nil).
In 2007, we declared and paid dividends in US dollars totaling
$0.30 per share ($261 million) (2006: $0.22 per share,
$191 million; 2005: $0.22 per share, $118 million).
B Exchangeable
Shares
In connection with a 1998 acquisition, Barrick Gold Inc.
(BGI), issued 11.1 million BGI exchangeable
shares, which are each exchangeable for 0.53 of a Barrick common
share at any time at the option of the holder, and have
essentially the same voting, dividend (payable in Canadian
dollars), and other rights as 0.53 of a Barrick common share.
BGI is a subsidiary that holds our interest in the Hemlo and
Eskay Creek Mines.
At December 31, 2007, 1.4 million (2006
1.4 million) BGI exchangeable shares were outstanding,
which are equivalent to 0.7 million Barrick common shares
(2006 0.7 million common shares), and are
reflected in the number of common shares outstanding. We have
the right to require the exchange of each outstanding BGI
exchangeable share for 0.53 of a Barrick common share. While
there are exchangeable shares outstanding, we are required to
present summary consolidated financial information relating to
BGI.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-50
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Summarized
Financial Information for BGI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues and other income
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
Less: costs and
expenses1
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes payable
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
(370)
|
|
|
|
(315)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2006 includes a $37 million
increase in the ARO at the Nickel Plate property (see
note 21).
|
25 > OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (OCI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI at Jan. 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge gains, net of tax of $60, $61, $95
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
|
Investments, net of tax of $7, $nil, $nil
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $nil, $nil, $nil
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
|
|
(146)
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits, net of tax of
$4, $nil, $nil
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
(28)
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
(31)
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of investments
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to minimum pension liability prior to adoption of
FAS 158
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
FAS 158 adjustments (note 27C):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of minimum pension liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain (loss)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustments for gains/losses recorded in
earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of cash flow hedge (gains) losses to earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On recording hedged items in earnings
|
|
|
(185)
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(134)
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness due to changes in timing of hedged items
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than temporary impairment charges
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
Gains realized on sale
|
|
|
(71)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-51
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
(134)
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery (expense) related to OCI
|
|
|
(48)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
(100)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI at Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge gains, net of tax of $105, $60, $61
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
Investments, net of tax of $4, $7, $nil
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $nil, $nil, $nil
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits, net of tax of
$2, $4, $nil
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
(28)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
(31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 >
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
A Stock
Options
In September 2006, the SEC released a letter on accounting for
stock options. The letter addresses the determination of the
grant date and measurement date for stock option awards. For
Barrick, the stock option grant date is the date when the
details of the award, including the number of options granted by
individual and the exercise price, are approved. The application
of the principles in the letter issued by the SEC did not change
the date that has been historically determined as the
measurement date for stock option grants.
Under Barricks stock option plan certain officers and key
employees of the Corporation may purchase common shares at an
exercise price that is equal to the closing share price on the
day before the grant of the option. Stock options vest evenly
over four years, beginning in the year after granting. Options
granted in July 2004 and prior are exercisable over
10 years, whereas options granted since December 2004 are
exercisable over 7 years. At December 31, 2007,
10 million (2006: 13 million; 2005: 12 million)
common shares, in addition to those currently outstanding, were
available for granting options. Stock options when exercised
result in an increase to the number of common shares issued by
Barrick.
Compensation expense for stock options was $25 million in
2007 (2006: $27 million; 2005: $nil), and is presented as a
component of cost of sales, corporate administration and other
expense, consistent with the classification of other elements of
compensation expense for those employees who had stock options.
The recognition of compensation expense for stock options
reduced earnings per share for 2007 by $0.03 per share (2006:
$0.03 per share).
Total intrinsic value relating to options exercised in 2007 was
$58 million (2006: $27 million; 2005:
$22 million).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-52
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Employee Stock
Option Activity (Number of Shares in Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
|
C$ options
At Jan. 1
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
Issued on acquisition of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placer Dome
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3.9)
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
(2.4)
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
(3.8)
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
(0.2)
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
(0.8)
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(0.8)
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
(1.9)
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Jan. 1
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
Issued on acquisition of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placer Dome
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1.7)
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
(0.9)
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
(0.3)
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.3)
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
(0.4)
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
(0.4)
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
(0.4)
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
Outstanding (Number of Shares in Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Range of exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average life
|
|
|
Value1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Value1
|
|
|
|
prices
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
C$ options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$22-$27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
|
$28-$31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
$32-$43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$9-$19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
$20-$27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
$28-$41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Based on the closing market share
price on Dec. 31, 2007 of C$41.78 and US$42.05.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-53
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Option
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec.
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(per share and per option amounts in dollars)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Valuation assumptions
|
|
|
Lattice1,2
|
|
|
Lattice1,2
|
|
|
Black-Scholes1
|
|
|
Lattice2
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
4.5-5
|
|
|
4.5-5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Expected
volatility2
|
|
|
30%-38%
|
|
|
30%-38%
|
|
|
23%-30%
|
|
|
31%-38%
|
|
|
Weighted average expected
volatility2
|
|
|
36.6%
|
|
|
31.6%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
33.3%
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.7%-0.9%
|
|
|
0.7%-0.9%
|
|
|
0.8%-1.0%
|
|
|
0.9%
|
|
|
Risk-free interest
rate2
|
|
|
3.2%-5.1%
|
|
|
4.3%-5.1%
|
|
|
3.8%-4.0%
|
|
|
4.3%-4.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted (in
millions)3
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value per option
|
|
$
|
12.91
|
|
$
|
9.42
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
$
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Different assumptions were used for
the multiple stock option grants during the year.
|
|
2 |
|
Stock option grants issued after
September 30, 2005 were valued using the Lattice valuation
model. The volatility and risk-free interest rate assumption
varied over the expected term of these stock option grants.
|
|
3 |
|
Excludes 2.7 million fully
vested options issued on the acquisition of Placer Dome.
|
We changed the model used to value stock option grants from the
Black-Scholes model to the Lattice valuation model for stock
options granted after September 30, 2005. We believe the
Lattice valuation model provides a more representative fair
value because it incorporates more attributes of stock options
such as employee turnover and voluntary exercise patterns of
option holders. For options granted before September 30,
2005, fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes method.
The expected volatility assumptions have been developed taking
into consideration both historical and implied volatility of our
US dollar share price. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the US Treasury yield
curve in effect at the time of the grant.
We use the straight-line method for attributing stock option
expense over the vesting period. Stock option expense
incorporates an expected forfeiture rate. The expected
forfeiture rate is estimated based on historical forfeiture
rates and expectations of future forfeitures rates. We make
adjustments if the actual forfeiture rate differs from the
expected rate.
Under the Black-Scholes model the expected term assumption takes
into consideration assumed rates of employee turnover and
represents the estimated average length of time stock options
remain outstanding before they are either exercised or
forfeited. Under the Lattice valuation model, the expected term
assumption is derived from the option valuation model and is in
part based on historical data regarding the exercise behavior of
option holders based on multiple share-price paths. The Lattice
model also takes into consideration employee turnover and
voluntary exercise patterns of option holders.
As at December 31, 2007, there was $33 million (2006:
$39 million; 2005: $56 million) of total unrecognized
compensation cost relating to unvested stock options. We expect
to recognize this cost over a weighted average period of
2 years (2006: 2 years; 2005: 2 years).
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-54
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
For years prior to 2006, we utilized the intrinsic value method
of accounting for stock options, which resulted in no
compensation expense. If compensation expense had been
determined in accordance with the fair value provisions of
SFAS No. 123 pro-forma net income and net income per
share would have been as follows:
Stock Option
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec.
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
(26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported - basic
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
As reported - diluted
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma1
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Basic
and diluted.
B Restricted
Share Units (RSUs) and Deferred Share Units (DSUs)
Under our RSU plan, selected employees are granted RSUs where
each RSU has a value equal to one Barrick common share. RSUs
vest at the end of a three year period and are settled in cash
on the third anniversary of the grant date. Additional RSUs are
credited to reflect dividends paid on Barrick common shares over
the vesting period.
A liability for RSUs is recorded at fair value on the grant
date, with a corresponding amount recorded as a deferred
compensation asset that is amortized on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period. Changes in the fair value of the RSU
liability are recorded each period, with a corresponding
adjustment to the deferred compensation asset. Compensation
expense for RSUs incorporates an expected forfeiture rate. The
expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on historical
forfeiture rates and expectations of future forfeiture rates. We
make adjustments if the actual forfeiture rate differs from the
expected rate. At December 31, 2007, the weighted average
remaining contractual life of RSUs was 2.5 years.
Compensation expense for RSUs was $16 million in 2007
(2006: $6 million; 2005: $2 million) and is presented
as a component of cost of sales, corporate administration and
other expense, consistent with the classification of other
elements of compensation expense for those employees who had
RSUs. As at December 31, 2007 there was $75 million of
total unamortized compensation cost relating to unvested RSUs
(2006: $36 million; 2005: $11 million).
Under our DSU plan, Directors must receive a specified portion
of their basic annual retainer in the form of DSUs, with the
option to elect to receive 100% of such retainer in DSUs. Each
DSU has the same value as one Barrick common share. DSUs must be
retained until the Director leaves the Board, at which time the
cash value of the DSUs will be paid out. Additional DSUs are
credited to reflect dividends paid on Barrick common shares.
DSUs are recorded at fair value on the grant date and are
adjusted for changes in fair value. The fair value of amounts
granted each period together with changes in fair value are
expensed.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-55
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
DSU and RSU
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSUs
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2004
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
Settled for cash
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
|
(0.9)
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
Converted to stock options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
|
Credits for dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
Change in value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2005
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
Settled for cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(82)
|
|
|
|
(2.5)
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(58)
|
|
|
|
(1.6)
|
|
|
|
Granted1
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
Converted to stock
options1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
|
Credits for dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Change in value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2006
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
$
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
Settled for cash
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
(0.3)
|
|
|
|
(119)
|
|
|
|
(4.9)
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
|
(1.4)
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
Credits for dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
Change in value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
$
|
100.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 In
January 2006, under our RSU plan, 18,112 restricted share units
were converted to 72,448 stock options.
C Employee
Share Purchase Plan
During the first quarter of 2008, Barrick is expected to launch
an Employee Share Purchase Plan. This plan will enable Barrick
employees to purchase Company shares through payroll deduction.
Each year, employees may contribute 1%-6% of their combined base
salary and annual bonus, and Barrick will match 50% of the
contribution, up to a maximum of $5,000 per year.
27
>
POST-RETIREMENT
BENEFITS
A Defined Contribution Pension Plans
Certain employees take part in defined contribution employee
benefit plans. We also have a retirement plan for certain
officers of the Company, under which we contribute 15% of the
officers annual salary and bonus. Our share of
contributions to these plans, which is expensed in the year it
is earned by the employee, was $49 million in 2007,
$36 million in 2006 and $20 million in 2005.
B Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
We have qualified defined benefit pension plans that cover
certain of our United States, Canadian and Australian employees
and provide benefits based on employees years of service.
Through the acquisition of Placer Dome, we acquired pension
plans in the United States, Canada and Australia. Our policy is
to fund the amounts necessary on an actuarial basis to provide
enough assets to meet the benefits payable to plan members.
Independent trustees administer assets of the plans, which are
invested mainly in fixed-income and equity securities. On
June 30, 2007, one of our qualified defined benefit plans
in Canada was
wound-up. No
curtailment gain or loss resulted and the obligations of the
plans are expected to be settled at the end of 2008. On
November 30, 2007, one of our defined benefit plans in
Australia was
wound-up and
on December 31, 2007, the other defined benefit plan in
Australia was
wound-up. No
curtailment gain or loss resulted for either plan. In 2006,
actuarial assumptions were amended for one of our qualified
defined benefit plans in Canada and on June 30, 2006, one
of our other plans in Canada was partially
wound-up;
no
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-56
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
curtailment gain or loss resulted for either plan. Also in 2006,
one of our qualified defined benefit plans was amended to freeze
benefits in the United States accruals for all employees,
resulting in a curtailment gain of $8 million.
As well as the qualified plans, we have non-qualified defined
benefit pension plans covering certain employees and former
directors of the Company. An irrevocable trust (rabbi
trust) was set up to fund these plans. The fair value of
assets held in this trust was $19 million in 2007 (2006:
$21 million), and is recorded in our consolidated balance
sheet under
available-for-sale
securities.
Actuarial gains and losses arise when the actual return on plan
assets differs from the expected return on plan assets for a
period, or when the expected and actuarial accrued benefit
obligations differ at the end of the year. We amortize actuarial
gains and losses over the average remaining life expectancy of
plan participants, in excess of a 10% corridor.
Pension
Expense (Credit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
$ (21)
|
|
|
|
$ (20)
|
|
|
|
$ (11)
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gains
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3
|
|
|
|
$ (1)
|
|
|
|
$ 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Pension
Plan Information
Fair Value of
Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
|
$ 301
|
|
|
|
$ 166
|
|
|
|
$ 170
|
|
Increase for plans assumed on acquisition of Placer Dome
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(35)
|
|
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
|
Balance at Dec. 31
|
|
|
$ 293
|
|
|
|
$ 301
|
|
|
|
$ 166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
Target
|
|
Actual
|
|
Actual
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
60%
|
|
45%
|
|
$ 130
|
|
$180
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
40%
|
|
42%
|
|
123
|
|
106
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
35
|
|
-
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
9
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
$ 293
|
|
$ 301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-57
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Projected Benefit
Obligation (PBO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
$ 389
|
|
$ 224
|
|
|
Increase for plans assumed on acquisition of Placer Dome
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
2
|
|
4
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
21
|
|
22
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
1
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(35)
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
(14)
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Dec. 31
|
|
$ 364
|
|
$ 389
|
|
|
|
|
Funded
status1
|
|
$ (71)
|
|
$ (88)
|
|
|
|
|
ABO2,3
|
|
$ 254
|
|
$ 386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Represents the fair value of plan
assets less projected benefit obligations. Plan assets exclude
investments held in a rabbi trust that are recorded separately
on our balance sheet under Investments (fair value
$19 million at December 31, 2007). In the year ending
December 31, 2008, we do not expect to make any further
contributions.
|
|
2 |
|
For 2007, we used a measurement
date of December 31, 2007 to calculate accumulated benefit
obligations.
|
|
3 |
|
Represents the accumulated benefit
obligation (ABO) for all plans. The ABO for plans
where the PBO exceeds the fair value of plan assets was
$254 million (2006: $110 million).
|
Pension Plan
Assets/Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
$ 25
|
|
$ 5
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
(8)
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
(87)
|
|
(85)
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
income1
|
|
(8)
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (78)
|
|
$ (82)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amounts represent actuarial (gains)
losses.
|
The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets
for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess
of plan assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation, end of year
|
|
$ 329
|
|
$ 111
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year
|
|
$ 258
|
|
$ 62
|
|
|
|
|
The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets
for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation, end of year
|
|
$ 329
|
|
$ 111
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year
|
|
$ 330
|
|
$ 110
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year
|
|
$ 258
|
|
$ 62
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Future
Benefit Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ending Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$ 61
|
|
|
2009
|
|
24
|
|
|
2010
|
|
31
|
|
|
2011
|
|
24
|
|
|
2012
|
|
24
|
|
|
2013 2017
|
|
$ 117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-58
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
D Actuarial
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
rate1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation
|
|
4.50-6.30%
|
|
|
4.40-5.90%
|
|
|
|
5.50%
|
|
|
|
Pension cost
|
|
4.50-5.81%
|
|
|
4.40-5.90%
|
|
|
|
5.50%
|
|
|
|
Return on plan
assets1
|
|
4.50-7.25%
|
|
|
7.00-7.25%
|
|
|
|
7.00%
|
|
|
|
Wage increases
|
|
3.50-5.00%
|
|
|
3.5-5.00%
|
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Effect of a one-percent change:
Discount rate: $25 million decrease in ABO and
$1 million increase in pension cost; Return on plan assets:
$3 million decrease in pension cost.
|
Pension plan assets, which consist primarily of fixed-income and
equity securities, are valued using current market quotations.
Plan obligations and the annual pension expense are determined
on an actuarial basis and are affected by numerous assumptions
and estimates including the market value of plan assets,
estimates of the expected return on plan assets, discount rates,
future wage increases and other assumptions. The discount rate,
assumed rate of return on plan assets and wage increases are the
assumptions that generally have the most significant impact on
our pension cost and obligation.
The discount rate for benefit obligation and pension cost
purposes is the rate at which the pension obligation could be
effectively settled. This rate was developed by matching the
cash flows underlying the pension obligation with a spot rate
curve based on the actual returns available on high-grade
(Moodys Aa) US corporate bonds. Bonds included in this
analysis were restricted to those with a minimum outstanding
balance of $50 million. Only non-callable bonds, or bonds
with a make-whole provision, were included. Finally, outlying
bonds (highest and lowest 10%) were discarded as being
non-representative and likely to be subject to a change in
investment grade. The resulting discount rate from this analysis
was rounded to the nearest 25 basis points. The procedure
was applied separately for pension and post-retirement plan
purposes, and produced the same rate in each case.
The assumed rate of return on assets for pension cost purposes
is the weighted average of expected long-term asset return
assumptions. In estimating the long-term rate of return for plan
assets, historical markets are studied and long-term historical
returns on equities and fixed-income investments reflect the
widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher
volatility generate a greater return over the long run. Current
market factors such as inflation and interest rates are
evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are
finalized.
Wage increases reflect the best estimate of merit increases to
be provided, consistent with assumed inflation rates.
|
|
E
|
Other
Post-retirement Benefits
|
We provide post-retirement medical, dental, and life insurance
benefits to certain employees. We use the corridor approach in
the accounting for post-retirement benefits. Actuarial gains and
losses resulting from variances between actual results and
economic estimates or actuarial assumptions are deferred and
amortized over the average remaining life expectancy of
participants when the net gains or losses exceed 10% of the
accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation.
Other
Post-retirement Benefits Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$ 2
|
|
$ 2
|
|
$ 2
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2
|
|
$ 2
|
|
$ 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-59
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Fair Value of
Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Dec. 31
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Post-retirement Benefit Obligation (APBO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
$ 37
|
|
$ 39
|
|
$ 29
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
(7)
|
|
(1)
|
|
11
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Dec. 31
|
|
$ 30
|
|
$ 37
|
|
$ 39
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
(30)
|
|
(37)
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
1
|
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial losses
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Net benefit liability recorded
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
$ (31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Post-retirement Assets/Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Current liability
|
|
$ (3)
|
|
$ (3)
|
|
|
Non-current liability
|
|
(27)
|
|
(33)
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
(1)
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (31)
|
|
$ (31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
consist
of:1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended Dec. 31
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$ (2)
|
|
$ 3
|
|
|
Transition obligation (asset)
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (1)
|
|
$ 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
The estimated amounts that will be
amortized into net periodic benefit cost in 2008.
|
We have assumed a health care cost trend of 9% in 2008,
decreasing ratability to 5% in 2010 and thereafter. The assumed
health care cost trend had a minimal effect on the amounts
reported. A one percentage point change in the assumed health
care cost trend rate at December 31, 2007 would have had no
significant effect on the post-retirement obligation and would
have had no significant effect on the benefit expense for 2007.
Expected Future
Benefit Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ending Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2013 2017
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-60
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
28
>
LITIGATION
AND CLAIMS
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial
statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company
but which will only be resolved when one or more future events
occur or fail to occur. In assessing loss contingencies related
to legal proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted
claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company and its
legal counsel evaluate the perceived merits of any legal
proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits
of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought.
If the assessment of a contingency suggests that a loss is
probable, and the amount can be reliably estimated, then a loss
is recorded. When a contingent loss is not probable but is
reasonably possible, or is probable but the amount of loss
cannot be reliably estimated, then details of the contingent
loss are disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are
generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which
case we disclose the nature of the guarantee. Legal fees
incurred in connection with pending legal proceedings are
expensed as incurred.
Wagner
Complaint
On June 12, 2003, a complaint was filed against Barrick and
several of its current or former officers in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The complaint is on behalf of Barrick shareholders who purchased
Barrick shares between February 14, 2002 and
September 26, 2002. It alleges that Barrick and the
individual defendants violated U.S. securities laws by
making false and misleading statements concerning Barricks
projected operating results and earnings in 2002. The complaint
seeks an unspecified amount of damages. Other parties filed
several other complaints, making the same basic allegations
against the same defendants. In September 2003, the cases were
consolidated into a single action in the Southern District of
New York. The plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint on
January 6, 2005. On May 23, 2005, Barrick filed a
motion to dismiss part of the Third Amended Complaint. On
January 31, 2006, the Court issued an order granting in
part and denying in part Barricks motion to dismiss.
Both parties moved for reconsideration of a portion of the
Courts January 31, 2006 Order. On December 12,
2006, the Court issued its order denying both parties
motions for reconsideration. On February 15, 2008, the
Court issued an order granting the plaintiffs motion for
class certification. Discovery is ongoing. We intend to defend
the action vigorously. No amounts have been accrued for any
potential loss under this complaint.
Marinduque
Complaint
Placer Dome has been named the sole defendant in a Complaint
filed on October 4, 2005, by the Provincial Government of
Marinduque, an island province of the Philippines
(Province), with the District Court in Clark County,
Nevada. The action was removed to the Nevada Federal District
Court on motion of Placer Dome. The Complaint asserts that
Placer Dome is responsible for alleged environmental degradation
with consequent economic damages and impacts to the environment
in the vicinity of the Marcopper mine that was owned and
operated by Marcopper Mining Corporation
(Marcopper). Placer Dome indirectly owned a minority
shareholding of 39.9% in Marcopper until the divestiture of its
shareholding in 1997. The Province seeks to recover
damages for injuries to the natural, ecological and wildlife
resources within its territory, but does not seek to
recover damages for individual injuries sustained by its
citizens either to their persons or their property. In
addition to damages for injury to natural resources, the
Province seeks compensation for the costs of restoring the
environment, an order directing Placer Dome to undertake and
complete the remediation, environmental cleanup, and
balancing of the ecology of the affected areas, and
payment of the costs of environmental monitoring. The Complaint
addresses the discharge of mine tailings into Calancan Bay, the
1993 Maguila-guila dam breach, the 1996 Boac river tailings
spill, and alleged past and continuing damage from acid rock
drainage.
At the time of the amalgamation of Placer Dome and Barrick Gold
Corporation, a variety of motions were pending before the
District Court, including motions to dismiss the action for lack
of personal jurisdiction and for forum non conveniens
(improper choice of forum). However, on June 29, 2006,
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-61
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
the Province filed a Motion to join Barrick Gold Corporation as
an additional named Defendant and for leave to file a Third
Amended Complaint. The Court granted that motion on
March 2, 2007. On March 6, 2007, the Court issued an
order setting a briefing schedule on the Companys motion
to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens. Briefing was
completed on May 21, 2007, and on June 7, 2007, the
Court issued an order granting the Companys motion to
dismiss. On June 25, 2007, the Province filed a motion
requesting the Court to reconsider its Order dismissing the
action. The Company opposed the motion for reconsideration. On
July 6, 2007, the Province filed a Notice of Appeal to the
Ninth Circuit from the Order on the motion to dismiss. On
August 8, 2007, the Ninth Circuit issued an order holding
the appeal in abeyance pending the district courts
resolution of the motion for reconsideration. On
January 16, 2008, the district court issued an order
denying the Provinces motion for reconsideration.
Following the district court order, the Province has filed an
amended Notice of Appeal. We will challenge the claims of the
Province on various grounds and otherwise vigorously defend the
action. No amounts have been accrued for any potential loss
under this complaint.
Calancan
Bay (Philippines) Complaint
On July 23, 2004, a complaint was filed against Marcopper
and Placer Dome Inc. (PDI) in the Regional Trial
Court of Boac, on the Philippine island of Marinduque, on behalf
of a putative class of fishermen who reside in the communities
around Calancan Bay, in northern Marinduque. The complaint
alleges injuries to health and economic damages to the local
fisheries resulting from the disposal of mine tailings from the
Marcopper mine. The total amount of damages claimed is
approximately US$900 million.
On October 16, 2006, the court granted the plaintiffs
application for indigent status, allowing the case to proceed
without payment of filing fees. On January 17, 2007, the
Court issued a summons to Marcopper and PDI. To date, we are
unaware of any attempts to serve the summons on PDI, nor do we
believe that PDI is properly amenable to service in the
Philippines. If service is attempted, the Company intends to
defend the action vigorously. No amounts have been accrued for
any potential loss under this complaint.
Pakistani
Constitutional Litigation
On November 28, 2006, a Constitutional Petition was filed
in the High Court of Balochistan by three Pakistan citizens
against: Barrick, the governments of Balochistan and Pakistan,
the Balochistan Development Authority (BDA), Tethyan
Copper Company (TCC), Antofagasta Plc
(Antofagasta), Muslim Lakhani and BHP (Pakistan) Pvt
Limited (BHP).
The Petition alleged, among other things, that the entry by the
BDA into the 1993 Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) with
BHP to facilitate the exploration of the Reko Diq area and the
grant of related exploration licenses were illegal and that the
subsequent transfer of the interests of BHP in the JVA and the
licenses to TCC was also illegal and should therefore be set
aside. Barrick currently indirectly holds 50% of the shares of
TCC, with Antofagasta indirectly holding the other 50%.
On June 26, 2007, the High Court of Balochistan dismissed
the Petition against Barrick and the other respondents in its
entirety. On August 23, 2007, the petitioners filed a Civil
Petition for Leave to Appeal in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has not yet considered the Civil
Petition for Leave to Appeal. Barrick intends to defend this
action vigorously. No amounts have been accrued for any
potential loss under this complaint.
NovaGold
Litigation
On August 24, 2006, during the pendency of Barricks
unsolicited bid for NovaGold Resources Inc., NovaGold filed a
complaint against Barrick in the United States District Court
for the District of Alaska. The complaint was amended on several
occasions with the most recent amendment having been filed in
January 2007. The complaint, as amended, sought a declaration
that Barrick will be
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-62
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
unable to satisfy the requirements of the Mining Venture
Agreement between NovaGold and Barrick which would allow Barrick
to increase its interest in the Donlin Creek joint venture from
30% to 70%. NovaGold also asserted that Barrick breached its
fiduciary and contractual duties to NovaGold, including its duty
of good faith and fair dealing, by misusing confidential
information of NovaGold regarding NovaGolds Galore Creek
project in British Columbia. NovaGold sought declaratory relief,
an injunction and an unspecified amount of damages.
Barricks Motion to Dismiss NovaGolds amended
complaint was heard on February 9, 2007. On July 17,
2007 the Court issued its order granting the Motion to Dismiss
with respect to all claims. On August 28, 2007, NovaGold
filed a notice of appeal as to a portion of the district
courts order granting Barricks motion to dismiss.
On August 11, 2006, NovaGold filed a complaint against
Barrick in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The complaint
asserted that in the course of discussions with NovaGold of a
potential joint venture for the development of the Galore Creek
project, Barrick misused confidential information of NovaGold
regarding that project to, among other things, wrongfully
acquire Pioneer Metals, a company that holds mining claims
adjacent to NovaGolds project. NovaGold asserted that
Barrick breached fiduciary duties owed to NovaGold,
intentionally and wrongfully interfered with NovaGolds
interests and has been unjustly enriched. NovaGold sought a
constructive trust over the shares in Pioneer acquired by
Barrick and an accounting for any profits of Barricks
conduct, as well as an unspecified amount of damages.
On December 3, 2007 Barrick and NovaGold announced that a
global settlement of all disputes between them had been reached.
As a result of this settlement, all pending legal actions
between Barrick and NovaGold have been dismissed.
29
>
FINANCE
SUBSIDIARIES
On May 9, 2008, we incorporated two wholly-owned finance
subsidiaries, Barrick North America Finance LLC and Barrick Gold
Financeco LLC, the sole purpose of which is to issue debt
securities. On May 30, 2008, we filed a preliminary short
form base shelf prospectus and registration statement in respect
of the future offer and issuance of debt securities up to an
aggregate principal amount of $2 billion by Barrick and the
finance subsidiaries. Barrick will fully and unconditionally
guarantee any debt securities issued by the finance subsidiaries.
|
|
|
BARRICK YEAR-END
2007
|
A-63
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
SCHEDULE
B
INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2008
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick Gold Corporation
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
(in millions of United States dollars, except per share
data) (Unaudited)
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Sales (notes 4 and 5)
|
|
$ 1,958
|
|
$ 1,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (notes 4 and
6)1
|
|
775
|
|
740
|
|
|
Amortization and accretion (notes 4 and 14)
|
|
241
|
|
220
|
|
|
Corporate administration
|
|
33
|
|
33
|
|
|
Exploration (note 9)
|
|
43
|
|
30
|
|
|
Project development expense (note 9)
|
|
46
|
|
37
|
|
|
Other expense (note 7A)
|
|
54
|
|
38
|
|
|
Impairment charges (note 7B)
|
|
41
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
17
|
|
39
|
|
|
Interest expense (note 15B)
|
|
(6)
|
|
(36)
|
|
|
Other income (note 7C)
|
|
32
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and other items
|
|
768
|
|
12
|
|
|
Income tax expense (note 8)
|
|
(253)
|
|
(147)
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
(3)
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Income (loss) from equity investees (note 12)
|
|
2
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
$ 514
|
|
$ (159)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share data (note 10):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ 0.59
|
|
$ (0.18)
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ 0.58
|
|
$ (0.18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Exclusive of amortization
(note 4).
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements
B-1
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick Gold Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
$ 514
|
|
$ (159)
|
|
|
Amortization and accretion (notes 4 and 14)
|
|
241
|
|
220
|
|
|
Income tax expense (note 8)
|
|
253
|
|
147
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
(127)
|
|
(129)
|
|
|
Impairment charges (note 7B)
|
|
41
|
|
-
|
|
|
Increase in inventory (note 13)
|
|
(133)
|
|
(20)
|
|
|
Other items (note 11)
|
|
(61)
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
728
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures (note 4)
|
|
(265)
|
|
(248)
|
|
|
Sales proceeds
|
|
4
|
|
6
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $21 (note 3)
|
|
(1,722)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
(15)
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
Sales proceeds
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
|
Long-term supply contract (note 12)
|
|
(35)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
(35)
|
|
(27)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(2,066)
|
|
(270)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on exercise of stock options
|
|
70
|
|
31
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
990
|
|
-
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
(5)
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
1,055
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents
|
|
7
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and equivalents
|
|
(276)
|
|
(84)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
2,207
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ 1,931
|
|
$ 2,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements
B-2
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick Gold
Corporation
|
|
As at March 31,
|
|
As at December 31,
|
|
|
(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$ 1,931
|
|
$ 2,207
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
291
|
|
256
|
|
|
Inventories (note 13)
|
|
1,246
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
774
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,242
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments (note 12)
|
|
123
|
|
142
|
|
|
Equity method investments (note 12)
|
|
1,147
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (note 14)
|
|
10,339
|
|
8,596
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
5,865
|
|
5,847
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
75
|
|
68
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
2,102
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ 23,893
|
|
$ 21,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ 874
|
|
$ 808
|
|
|
Short term debt (note 15)
|
|
234
|
|
233
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
472
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 15)
|
|
4,137
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
932
|
|
892
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
858
|
|
841
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
582
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
8,089
|
|
6,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
93
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (note 17)
|
|
13,348
|
|
13,273
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
2,346
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 18)
|
|
17
|
|
151
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
15,711
|
|
15,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies and commitments (notes 14 and 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ 23,893
|
|
$ 21,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
B-3
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick Gold Corporation
|
For the three months ended March 31 (in millions of
United States dollars) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Common shares (number in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
870
|
|
864
|
|
|
Issued on exercise of stock options
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31
|
|
872
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
$ 13,273
|
|
$ 13,106
|
|
|
Issued on exercise of stock options
|
|
70
|
|
31
|
|
|
Recognition of stock option expense
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31
|
|
$ 13,348
|
|
$ 13,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
$ 1,832
|
|
$ 974
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
514
|
|
(159)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31
|
|
$ 2,346
|
|
$ 815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 18)
|
|
$ 17
|
|
$ 126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity at March 31
|
|
$ 15,711
|
|
$ 14,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick Gold Corporation
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited)
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ 514
|
|
$ (159)
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax (note 18)
|
|
(134)
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ 380
|
|
$ (152)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
B-4
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Barrick Gold Corporation. Tabular dollar
amounts in millions of United States dollars, unless otherwise
shown. References to C$, A$, ZAR, CLP, PGK, TZS, ARS and EUR are
to Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, South African rands,
Chilean pesos, Papua New Guinea kina, Tanzanian schillings,
Argentinean pesos and Euros respectively.
1
>
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Barrick Gold Corporation (Barrick or the
Company) principally engages in the production and
sale of gold, as well as related activities such as exploration
and mine development. We also produce copper and hold interests
in a platinum group metals development project and a nickel
development project, both located in Africa, and a platinum
group metals project located in Russia. Our mining operations
are concentrated in our four regional business units: North
America, South America, Africa and Australia Pacific. We sell
our gold production into the world market and we sell our copper
production into the world market and to private customers.
2
>
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A Basis
of Preparation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared under
United States generally accepted accounting principles (US
GAAP). In first quarter 2008, we amended the income
statement classification of accretion expense. To ensure
comparability of financial information, prior year amounts have
been reclassified to reflect changes in the financial statement
presentation.
B Use
of Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to
make estimates and assumptions. The most significant ones are:
quantities of proven and probable mineral reserves; fair values
of acquired assets and liabilities under business combinations,
including the value of mineralized material beyond proven and
probable mineral reserves; future costs and expenses to produce
proven and probable mineral reserves; future commodity prices
for gold, copper, silver and other products; the future cost of
asset retirement obligations; amounts and likelihood of
contingencies; the fair values of reporting units that include
goodwill; and uncertain tax positions. Using these and other
estimates and assumptions, we make various decisions in
preparing the financial statements including:
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
The treatment of expenditures at mineral properties prior to
when production begins as either an asset or an expense;
|
|
Ø
|
Whether tangible and intangible long-lived assets are impaired,
and if so, estimates of the fair value of those assets and any
corresponding impairment charge;
|
|
Ø
|
Our ability to realize deferred income tax assets and amounts
recorded for any corresponding valuation allowances;
|
|
Ø
|
The useful lives of tangible and intangible long-lived assets
and the measurement of amortization;
|
|
Ø
|
The fair value of asset retirement obligations;
|
|
Ø
|
Whether to record a liability for loss contingencies and the
amount of any liability;
|
|
Ø
|
Whether investments are other than temporarily impaired;
|
|
Ø
|
The amount of income tax expense;
|
|
Ø
|
Allocations of the purchase price in business combinations to
assets and liabilities acquired, including goodwill;
|
|
Ø
|
Whether any impairments of goodwill have occurred and if so the
amounts of impairment charges;
|
|
Ø
|
Transfers of value beyond proven and probable reserves to
amortized assets;
|
|
Ø
|
Amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions, and
|
|
Ø
|
The timing and amounts recorded of proceeds for insurable losses
under insurance claims.
|
As the estimation process is inherently uncertain, actual future
outcomes could differ from present estimates and assumptions,
potentially having material future effects on our financial
statements.
Significant
Changes in Estimates
Gold and Copper
Mineral Reserves
At the end of each fiscal year, as part of our annual business
cycle, we prepare estimates of proven and probable gold and
copper mineral reserves for each mineral property, and we record
a transfer of value beyond proven and probable reserves
(VBPP) to assets subject to amortization. We
prospectively revise calculations of amortization of property,
plant and equipment based on the latest reserve estimates. The
effect of changes in reserve estimates including the effect of
transfers of VBPP to assets subject to amortization, on
amortization expense for the three months ended March 31,
2008 was a decrease of $13 million (2007: $15 million
decrease).
Asset Retirement
Obligations (AROs)
Each quarter we update cost estimates, and other assumptions
used in the valuation of AROs at each of our mineral properties
to reflect new events, changes in circumstances and any new
information that is available. Changes in these cost estimates
and assumptions have a corresponding impact on the fair value of
the ARO. During first quarter 2008, we recorded an adjustment of
$20 million for changes in estimates of the AROs at our
Buzwagi, Tulawaka and Veladero properties. These adjustments
were recorded with a corresponding adjustment to property, plant
and equipment. During first quarter 2007, we recorded an
increase in AROs of $29 million for a change in estimate of
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-5
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
the ARO at our Hemlo property
following receipt of an updated closure study for the property.
This adjustment was recorded with a corresponding adjustment to
property, plant and equipment.
C Accounting
Changes
FAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (FAS 159)
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159, which allows an
irrevocable option, the Fair Value Option (FVO), to carry
eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with
the election made on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis. Changes in fair value for these instruments would be
recorded in earnings. The objective of FAS 159 is to
improve financial reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
FAS 159 was effective for Barrick beginning in first
quarter 2008 and was applied prospectively. Barrick has not
adopted the FVO for any of its eligible financial instruments,
which primarily include available-for-sale securities,
equity-method investments and long-term debt.
FAS 157,
Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157)
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157 that defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
US GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.
FAS 157 applies under other US GAAP pronouncements that
require (or permit) fair value measurements where fair value is
the relevant measurement attribute.
In February 2008 the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-2.
FSP
FAS 157-2
delays the effective date of FAS 157 to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 for non-financial assets
and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. Therefore, we will apply the requirements of
FAS 157 to fair value measurements used in accounting for
property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, goodwill and
asset retirement obligations beginning in 2009.
In the first quarter of 2008, we implemented FAS 157
subject to the delay specified in FSP
FAS 157-2
for non-financial assets and liabilities. Refer to note 16
for details of the adoption of FAS 157 and related
disclosures.
Changes in
Financial Statement Presentation Accretion
expense
In first quarter 2008, we made a change to our accounting policy
regarding the financial statement classification of accretion
expense. Prior to this change, we recorded accretion expense at
producing mines as a component of cost of sales and accretion
expense at closed mines as a component of other expense.
Beginning in first quarter 2008, we recorded accretion expense
at producing mines and accretion expense at closed mines in
amortization and accretion on our Consolidated Statements of
Income.
D Accounting
Developments
FAS 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(FAS 161)
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, which will require
entities to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and
why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. FAS 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application
encouraged. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting
FAS 161 on our note disclosures related to derivative
instruments and hedging activities.
FAS 141(R),
Business Combinations (FAS 141(R))
In December 2007 the FASB issued FAS 141(R), which replaces
FAS 141 prospectively for business combinations consummated
after the effective date of December 15, 2008. Early
adoption is not permitted. Under FAS 141(R), business
acquisitions are accounted for under the acquisition
method, compared to the purchase method
mandated by FAS 141.
The more significant changes that will result from applying the
acquisition method include: (i) the definition of a
business is broadened to include development stage entities, and
therefore more acquisitions will be accounted for as business
combinations rather than asset acquisitions; (ii) the
measurement date for equity interests issued by the acquirer is
the acquisition date instead of a few days before and after
terms are agreed to and announced, which may significantly
change the amount recorded for the acquired business if share
prices differ from the agreement and announcement date to the
acquisition date; (iii) all future adjustments to income
tax estimates are recorded to income tax expense, whereas under
FAS 141 certain changes in income tax estimates were
recorded to goodwill; (iv) acquisition-related costs of the
acquirer, including investment banking fees, legal fees,
accounting fees, valuation fees, and other professional or
consulting fees are expensed as incurred, whereas under
FAS 141 these costs are capitalized as part of the cost of
the business combination; (v) the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are recorded at 100% of fair value even if
less than 100% is obtained, whereas under FAS 141 only the
controlling interests portion is recorded at fair value;
and (vi) the non-controlling interest is recorded at its
share of fair value of net assets acquired, including its share
of goodwill, whereas under FAS 141 the non-controlling
interest is recorded at its share of carrying value of net
assets acquired with no goodwill being allocated.
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-6
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
FAS 160,
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(FAS 160)
In December 2007 the FASB issued FAS 160, which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Under FAS 160, non-controlling interests are measured
at 100% of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. Under current standards, the non-controlling interest
is measured at book value. For presentation and disclosure
purposes, non-controlling interests are classified as a separate
component of shareholders equity. In addition,
FAS 160 changes the manner in which increases/decreases in
ownership percentages are accounted for. Changes in ownership
percentages are recorded as equity transactions and no gain or
loss is recognized as long as the parent retains control of the
subsidiary. When a parent company deconsolidates a subsidiary
but retains a non-controlling interest, the non-controlling
interest is re-measured at fair value on the date control is
lost and a gain or loss is recognized at that time. Under
FAS 160, accumulated losses attributable to the
non-controlling interests are no longer limited to the original
carrying amount, and therefore non-controlling interests could
have a negative carrying balance. The provisions of FAS 160
are to be applied prospectively with the exception of the
presentation and disclosure provisions, which are to be applied
for all prior periods presented in the financial statements.
Early adoption is not permitted.
3
>
ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash paid on
acquisition1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Star
|
|
$ 41
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
Cortez
|
|
1,681
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,722
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
All amounts are presented net of
cash acquired/divested. Potential deferred tax adjustments may
arise from these acquisitions.
|
B Acquisition
of Arizona Star Resources Corporation (Arizona
Star)
On March 12, 2008, we acquired all of the remaining common
shares of Arizona Star pursuant to its statutory right of
compulsory acquisition for $41 million. Arizona Star owns a
51% interest in the Cerro Casale deposit in the Maricunga
district of Region III in Chile. The acquisition of Arizona
Star has been accounted for as an asset purchase. The tables
below represent the purchase cost and preliminary purchase price
allocation for the acquisition of 100% of the common shares of
Arizona Star, 94% of the common shares were acquired in the
fourth quarter of 2007. The principal area outstanding is the
determination of deferred tax effects of the purchase price
allocation, which will be finalized in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Cost
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase cost per agreement
|
|
$ 769
|
|
|
Purchase price adjustments and transaction costs
|
|
1
|
|
|
Less: cash acquired
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$ 1
|
|
|
Equity investment in Cerro Casale project
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ 763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Acquisition
of 40% Interest in Cortez
On March 5, 2008, we completed our acquisition of an
additional 40% interest in the Cortez property from Kennecott
Explorations (Australia) Ltd. (Kennecott), a
subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, for a total cash consideration of
$1.695 billion. A further $50 million will be payable
if and when we add an additional 12 million ounces of
contained gold resources beyond our December 31, 2007
reserve statement for Cortez. A sliding scale royalty is payable
to Kennecott on 40% of all production in excess of
15 million ounces on and after January 1, 2008. Both
of these contingent payments will be recognized as an additional
cost of the acquisition only if the resource/production targets
are met and the amounts become payable as a result.
The acquisition consolidates 100% ownership for Barrick of the
existing Cortez mine and the Cortez Hills expansion plus any
future potential from the property. We have determined that the
transaction represents a business combination. The allocation of
the purchase price is based upon our preliminary estimates with
respect to the fair value of the assets acquired. The actual
fair values of the assets acquired may differ materially from
the amounts disclosed below. We expect that the purchase price
allocation will be completed in 2008. The terms of the
acquisition are effective March 1, 2008 and the revenues
and expenses attributable to the 40% interest have been included
in our consolidated statements of income from that date onwards.
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase cost per agreement
|
|
$1,695
|
|
|
Less: cash acquired
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-7
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary Purchase Price
Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$47
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
1
|
|
|
Non-current ore in stockpiles
|
|
17
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment Building, plant and equipment
|
|
184
|
|
|
Capitalized mineral property acquisition and mine development
costs
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
Value beyond proven and probable reserves
|
|
388
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
23
|
|
|
Asset Retirement Obligations
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$1,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Kainantu
Acquisition
On December 12, 2007 we completed the acquisition of the
Kainantu mineral property and various exploration licenses in
Papua New Guinea from Highlands Pacific Limited for
$135 million in cash, which reflects the purchase price,
net of $7 million withheld pending certain permit renewals.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase of assets.
The purchase price allocation will be finalized in 2008.
4
>
SEGMENT INFORMATION
In first quarter 2008, we formed a dedicated Capital Projects
group, distinct from our existing regional business units to
focus on managing development projects and building new mines.
This specialized group manages all project development
activities up to and including the commissioning of new mines,
at which point responsibility for mine operations will be handed
over to the regional business units. We have revised the format
of information provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker in
order to make resource allocation decisions and assess the
operating performance of this group. Accordingly, we have
revised our operating segment disclosure to be consistent with
the internal management structure and reporting changes, with
restatement of comparative information to conform to the current
period presentation.
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-8
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
Income
Statement Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
Segment cost of sales
|
|
(loss)1
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$ 594
|
|
$ 312
|
|
$ 320
|
|
$ 277
|
|
$ 196
|
|
$ (34)
|
|
|
South America
|
|
471
|
|
212
|
|
100
|
|
79
|
|
327
|
|
84
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
393
|
|
210
|
|
184
|
|
224
|
|
149
|
|
(60)
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
150
|
|
92
|
|
80
|
|
78
|
|
51
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
274
|
|
216
|
|
58
|
|
56
|
|
196
|
|
142
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
76
|
|
47
|
|
33
|
|
26
|
|
28
|
|
13
|
|
|
Capital Projects
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(40)
|
|
(33)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,958
|
|
$ 1,089
|
|
$ 775
|
|
$ 740
|
|
$ 907
|
|
$ 102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Segment income (loss) represents segment sales, less cost of
sales, less amortization and accretion. For the three months
ended March 31, 2008, accretion expense was
$13 million (2007: $12 million), see note 14B for
further details. Segment income (loss) for the Capital Projects
segment includes Project Development expense., see note 9
for further details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional business unit
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration1
|
|
costs1,2
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
March 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$ 16
|
|
$ 11
|
|
$ 10
|
|
$ 6
|
|
|
South America
|
|
10
|
|
5
|
|
7
|
|
6
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
11
|
|
8
|
|
10
|
|
9
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
3
|
|
2
|
|
4
|
|
1
|
|
|
Capital Projects
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other expense outside reportable segments
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 43
|
|
$ 30
|
|
$ 31
|
|
$ 22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Exploration and regional business unit costs are excluded from
the measure of segment income but are reported separately by
operating segment to the Chief Operating Decision Maker.
|
2
|
All amounts related to the Capital Projects segment are included
within Project Development Expense.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-9
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
Reconciliation
of Segment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
Amortization of corporate assets
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
(43)
|
|
|
|
(30)
|
|
|
|
Other project expenses
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
Corporate administration
|
|
|
(33)
|
|
|
|
(33)
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
(54)
|
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(41)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(36)
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
and other items
|
|
$
|
768
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment capital
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
expenditures1
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$ 71
|
|
$ 62
|
|
$ 54
|
|
$ 34
|
|
|
South America
|
|
42
|
|
47
|
|
23
|
|
54
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
57
|
|
43
|
|
44
|
|
60
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
18
|
|
24
|
|
14
|
|
25
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
20
|
|
18
|
|
11
|
|
3
|
|
|
Australia Pacific
|
|
15
|
|
8
|
|
7
|
|
1
|
|
|
Capital Projects
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
123
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total
|
|
223
|
|
202
|
|
276
|
|
235
|
|
|
Other items not allocated to segments
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
17
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise total
|
|
$ 228
|
|
$ 208
|
|
$ 293
|
|
$ 238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Segment capital expenditures are presented on an accrual basis.
Capital expenditures in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows are presented on a cash basis. For the three months ended
March 31, 2008, cash expenditures were $265 million
(2007: $248 million) and the increase in accrued
expenditures were $28 million (2007: ($10) million).
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-10
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
5 > REVENUE
AND GOLD SALES CONTRACTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Gold bullion
sales1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot market sales
|
|
$ 1,560
|
|
$ 58
|
|
|
Gold sales contracts
|
|
-
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
768
|
|
|
Concentrate
sales2
|
|
48
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,608
|
|
$ 826
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
sales1,3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper cathode sales
|
|
$ 269
|
|
$ 218
|
|
|
Concentrate sales
|
|
81
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 350
|
|
$ 263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Revenues include amounts transferred from OCI to earnings for
commodity cash flow hedges (see note 15C and 18).
|
2
|
Gold sales include gains and losses on gold derivative contracts
which have been economically offset, but not yet settled and on
embedded derivatives in smelting contracts: first quarter 2008:
$2 million loss (2007: $1 million loss).
|
3
|
Copper sales include gains and losses on economic copper hedges
that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and on
embedded derivatives in copper smelting contracts: first quarter
2008: $12 million gain (2007: $10 million gain).
|
Revenue is presented net of direct sales taxes of
$8 million (2007: $5 million).
Gold Sales
Contracts
At March 31, 2008, we had Project Gold Sales Contracts with
various customers for a total of 9.5 million ounces of
future gold production, of which 2.8 million ounces are at
floating spot prices.
Mark-to-Market
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ounces in
|
|
At Mar. 31,
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|
millions
|
|
20081
|
|
|
|
|
Project Gold Sales Contracts
|
|
9.5
|
|
$ (5,285)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
At a spot gold price of $934 per ounce. Refer to note 16
for further information on fair value measurements.
|
6 > COST OF
SALES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
For the three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods
sold1
|
|
$ 663
|
|
$ 640
|
|
$ 91
|
|
$ 80
|
|
|
By-product
revenues2,3
|
|
(35)
|
|
(30)
|
|
(1)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Royalty expense
|
|
48
|
|
40
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
Mining production
|
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 684
|
|
$ 659
|
|
$ 91
|
|
$ 81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Cost of goods sold includes charges to reduce the cost of
inventory to net realizable value as follows: $7 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (2007:
$1 million). The cost of inventory sold in the period
reflects all components capitalized to inventory, except that,
for presentation purposes, the component of inventory cost
relating to amortization of property, plant and equipment is
classified in the income statement under
amortization. Some companies present this amount
under cost of sales. The amount presented in
amortization rather than cost of sales was $223 million in
the three months ended March 31, 2008 (2007:
$202 million).
|
2
|
We use silver sales contracts to sell a portion of silver
produced as a by-product. Silver sales contracts have similar
delivery terms and pricing mechanisms as gold sales contracts.
At March 31, 2008, we had fixed-price commitments to
deliver 12 million ounces of silver at an average price of
$8.11 per ounce and floating spot price silver sales contracts
for 6 million ounces over periods primarily of up to
10 years. The mark-to-market on silver sales contracts at
March 31, 2008 was negative $146 million (Dec 31,
2007: negative $103 million). Refer to note 16 for
further information on fair value measurements.
|
7 > OTHER
EXPENSE
A Other Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Regional business unit
costs1
|
|
$ 31
|
|
$ 22
|
|
|
Community development
costs2
|
|
11
|
|
6
|
|
|
Environmental remediation costs
|
|
6
|
|
5
|
|
|
World Gold Council fees
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
|
Pension and other post-retirement benefit expense
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
|
Other
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 54
|
|
$ 38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Relates to costs incurred at regional business unit offices.
|
2
|
Amounts relate to community programs in Peru, Tanzania and Papua
New Guinea.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-11
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
B Impairment
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges on
investments1
|
|
$ 39
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
Other
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 41
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
In the first quarter of 2008, we recorded an impairment charge
on Asset-Backed Commercial Paper of $39 million. Refer to
note 12 for further details.
|
C Other
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
$ 4
|
|
$ 6
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
|
Currency translation gains
|
|
15
|
|
-
|
|
|
Royalty income
|
|
6
|
|
3
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
3
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other
|
|
3
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 32
|
|
$ 18
|
|
|
|
|
8 > INCOME
TAX EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ 210
|
|
$ 119
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
43
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 253
|
|
$ 147
|
|
|
|
|
Actual effective tax rate
|
|
33%
|
|
1225%
|
|
|
Impact of deliveries into
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Gold Sales contracts
|
|
-
|
|
(1198%)
|
|
|
Net currency translation losses on deferred tax balances
|
|
(3%)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated effective tax rate on ordinary income
|
|
30%
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
|
The primary reasons why our effective income tax rate on
ordinary income differs from the 33.5% Canadian statutory rate
are mainly due to certain allowances and special deductions
unique to extractive industries, and also because we operate in
multiple tax jurisdictions, some of which have lower tax rates
than the applicable Canadian federal and provincial rates.
Peruvian Tax
Assessment
On September 30, 2004, the Tax Court of Peru issued a
decision in our favor in the matter of our appeal of a 2002
income tax assessment for an amount of $32 million,
excluding interest and penalties. The assessment mainly related
to the validity of a revaluation of the Pierina mining
concession, which affected its tax basis for the years 1999 and
2000. The full life-of-mine effect on current and deferred
income tax liabilities totaling $141 million was fully
recorded at December 31, 2002, as well as other related
costs of about $21 million.
In January 2005, we received written confirmation that there
would be no appeal of the September 30, 2004 Tax Court of
Peru decision. In December 2004, we recorded a $141 million
reduction in current and deferred income tax liabilities and a
$21 million reduction in other accrued costs. The
confirmation concluded the administrative and judicial appeals
process with resolution in Barricks favor.
Notwithstanding the favorable Tax Court decision we received in
2004 on the 1999 to 2000 revaluation matter, on an audit
concluded in 2005, SUNAT has reassessed us on the same issue for
tax years 2001 to 2003. On October 19, 2007, SUNAT
confirmed their reassessment. The tax assessment is for $49
million of tax, plus interest and penalties of
$116 million. We filed an appeal to the Tax Court of Peru
within the statutory period. We believe that the audit
reassessment has no merit, that we will prevail in court again,
and accordingly no liability has been recorded for this
reassessment.
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-12
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
9 >
EXPLORATION AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minesite exploration
|
|
$ 26
|
|
$ 10
|
|
|
Projects
|
|
17
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 43
|
|
$ 30
|
|
|
|
|
Project development expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pueblo
Viejo1
|
|
17
|
|
$ 6
|
|
|
Donlin Creek
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Sedibelo
|
|
5
|
|
4
|
|
|
Fedorova
|
|
4
|
|
2
|
|
|
Buzwagi
|
|
1
|
|
4
|
|
|
Pascua-Lama
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
|
Kainantu
|
|
6
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other
|
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
Other project expenses
|
|
6
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 46
|
|
$ 37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Represents 100% of project expenditures. We record a
non-controlling interest credit for our partners share of
expenditures within non-controlling interests in the
income statement.
|
10 >
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
period ended
|
|
Three month period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
ended March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except shares in
millions and per share amounts in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dollars)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
Diluted
|
|
Basic
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ 514
|
|
$ 514
|
|
$ (159)
|
|
$ (159)
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: interest on convertible debentures
|
|
-
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ 514
|
|
$ 515
|
|
$ (159)
|
|
$ (159)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
872
|
|
872
|
|
865
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options
|
|
-
|
|
4
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
-
|
|
9
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
885
|
|
865
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ 0.59
|
|
$ 0.58
|
|
$ (0.18)
|
|
$ (0.18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-13
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
11 >
OPERATING CASH FLOW OTHER ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for non-cash income statement items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation gains (note 7C)
|
|
$ (15)
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
Amortization of
discount/premium on debt securities
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
|
(Income) loss from equity
investees (note 12)
|
|
(2)
|
|
21
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
(note 7C)
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
Gain on sale of long-lived assets (note 7C)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
Net changes in operating assets
and liabilities (excluding
inventory)
|
|
(38)
|
|
93
|
|
|
Settlement of AROs
|
|
(7)
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
Other net operating activities
|
|
$ (61)
|
|
$ 104
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow includes
payments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest costs
|
|
$ 17
|
|
$ 8
|
|
|
|
|
12 >
INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Mar. 31
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
|
Fair1
|
|
(losses)
|
|
Fair
|
|
(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
in OCI
|
|
value
|
|
in OCI
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
Securities4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in an unrealized gain position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
plans:2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
$ 3
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 4
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
14
|
|
1
|
|
|
Other investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondex
|
|
4
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
58
|
|
26
|
|
73
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
26
|
|
91
|
|
42
|
|
|
Securities in an
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized
loss position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
plans:2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
11
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity
securities3
|
|
13
|
|
(3)
|
|
5
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 89
|
|
$ 22
|
|
$ 96
|
|
$ 41
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Paper
|
|
7
|
|
-
|
|
46
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loan receivable from Yokohama Rubber Co.
Ltd.5
|
|
27
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 123
|
|
$ 22
|
|
$ 142
|
|
$ 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Refer to note 16 for further
information on the measurement of fair value.
|
2 |
|
Under various benefit plans for
certain former Homestake executives, a portfolio of marketable
fixed-income and equity securities are held in a rabbi trust
that is used to fund obligations under the plans.
|
3 |
|
Other equity securities in a loss
position consist of investments in various junior mining
companies.
|
4 |
|
Available-for-sale securities are
recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded
in other comprehensive income (OCI). Realized gains
and losses are recorded in earnings when investments mature or
on sale, calculated using the average cost of securities sold.
We record in earnings any unrealized declines in fair value
judged to be other than temporary.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-14
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
The long-term loan receivable is
measured at amortized cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on Investments Recorded in Earnings
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Gains realized on sales
|
|
$ 1
|
|
$ 2
|
|
|
Cash proceeds from sales
|
|
$ 2
|
|
$ 3
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Method Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Mar. 31
|
|
At Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
value1
|
|
amount
|
|
value1
|
|
amount
|
|
|
|
Highland
|
|
$ 278
|
|
$ 177
|
|
$ 208
|
|
$ 169
|
|
|
Atacama (Reko
Diq)2
|
|
n/a
|
|
124
|
|
n/a
|
|
109
|
|
|
Cerro
Casale2
|
|
n/a
|
|
771
|
|
n/a
|
|
732
|
|
|
Donlin
Creek2
|
|
n/a
|
|
75
|
|
n/a
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,147
|
|
|
|
$ 1,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Refer to note 16 for further
information fair value measurement.
|
2 |
|
As our Investments are not publicly
traded companies, there are no quoted prices to determine fair
values. For impairment purposes we utilized an expected present
value technique to determine the fair value of underlying assets
and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Method Investment Continuity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerro
|
|
Donlin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highland
|
|
Atacama
|
|
Casale
|
|
Creek
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2008
|
|
$ 169
|
|
$ 109
|
|
$ 732
|
|
$ 64
|
|
$ 1,074
|
|
|
Equity
pick-up
|
|
7
|
|
(5)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2
|
|
|
Funding
|
|
-
|
|
20
|
|
-
|
|
11
|
|
31
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
41
|
|
-
|
|
42
|
|
|
Elimination of non-controlling interest
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(2)
|
|
-
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008
|
|
$ 177
|
|
$ 124
|
|
$ 771
|
|
$ 75
|
|
$ 1,147
|
|
|
|
|
Highland Gold
Mining Ltd. (Highland)
During 2007, Highland announced the issue of 130.1 million
new shares for $400 million. The equity was purchased by
Millhouse LLC (Millhouse) in two tranches. The first
tranche of 65 million shares was completed on
December 11, 2007 giving Millhouse a 25% interest in
Highland and reducing our position to 25.4%. The second tranche
of 65 million shares was completed on January 16, 2008
giving Millhouse a 40% interest in Highland and further reducing
our interest to 20.3%.
On completion of the first tranche, Millhouse was entitled to
appoint 3 of 9 Directors to the Board. On completion of the
second tranche, Millhouse was entitled to appoint the CEO of
Highland who will not serve on the Board. Our ability to appoint
Directors has been reduced from 3 to 2. We continue to account
for the investment in Highland using the equity method of
accounting.
Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper (ABCP)
As at March 31, 2008, we held $66 million of Ironstone
Trust, Series B Asset-Backed Commercial Paper
(ABCP) which has matured, but for which no payment
has been received. On August 16, 2007, it was announced
that a group representing banks, asset providers and major
investors had agreed to a standstill with regard to all non-bank
sponsored ABCP (the Montreal Accord).
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-15
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
On March 17, 2008, all affected ABCP was placed under CCAA
protection. It has been determined that our ABCP investments
will restructured on an individual basis and will not be pooled
with other Montreal Accord ABCP assets. Our investments will
maintain exposure to the existing underlying assets. New
floating rate notes are expected to be issued with maturities
and interest rates based on the respective maturities and
amounts available from the underlying investments. The new notes
are expected to mature in 2021 and 2027.
We have assessed the fair value of the ABCP considering the
available data regarding market conditions for such investments
at March 31, 2008. As a result of current market
conditions, we recorded an impairment of $39 million in the
first quarter of 2008 on the ABCP investments, resulting in a
total impairment to date of $59 million.
Our ownership of ABCP investments is comprised of trust units
which have underlying investments in various asset backed
securities. The underlying investments are further represented
by residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial
mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities and
collateralized debt obligations. We have based the 90%
impairment on our assessment of the inherent risks associated
with the underlying investments. The impairment is further
supported by an indicative value obtained from a third party,
which was facilitated by the Pan-Canadian Investors Committee.
The impairment of our ABCP investments has no effect on our
investment strategy or covenant compliance.
There is currently no certainty regarding the outcome of the
ABCP investments and therefore there is uncertainty in
estimating the amount and timing of the associated cash flows.
This ABCP is classified under Other Investments at
March 31, 2008.
Agreement with
Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd. (Yokohama)
In January 2008, we advanced $35 million (the
loan) to Yokohama to fund expansion of their production
facility and secure a guaranteed supply of OTR tires. Interest
on the loan is calculated at a lower than market rate, due to
the benefit of the supply agreement, and is compounded annually.
The principal amount and accrued interest is to be repaid in
full no later than 7 years from the initial date of the
loan. In the event that Barrick does not satisfy certain minimum
monthly purchase commitments, Yokohama has the right to apply
the dollar value of the purchase shortfall against the principal
balance of the loan.
The loan was initially recorded at its fair value, based on an
estimated market borrowing rate for a comparable loan without
the related tire supply agreement. After initial recognition,
the loan is recorded at amortized cost and interest income is
recognized at an effective rate of 6%. We determined that the
supply contract component of the agreement is an intangible
asset with an initial fair value of $8 million. The
intangible asset is amortized on a straight line basis over its
useful life.
13 >
INVENTORIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials Ore in stockpiles
|
|
$ 790
|
|
$ 698
|
|
$ 32
|
|
$ 63
|
|
|
Ore on leach pads
|
|
167
|
|
149
|
|
127
|
|
81
|
|
|
Mine operating supplies
|
|
385
|
|
351
|
|
22
|
|
20
|
|
|
Work in process
|
|
152
|
|
109
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
|
Finished products Gold
|
|
102
|
|
87
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
doré/bullion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
5
|
|
9
|
|
|
cathode
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
11
|
|
16
|
|
|
concentrate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
27
|
|
40
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
concentrate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
1,434
|
|
202
|
|
194
|
|
|
Non-current ore in
stockpiles1
|
|
(494)
|
|
(414)
|
|
(85)
|
|
(85)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,129
|
|
$ 1,020
|
|
$ 117
|
|
$ 109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Ore that we do not expect to
process in the next 12 months is classified within Other
Assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory impairment
charges
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-16
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
14>
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
A Unamortized
Assets
Acquired Mineral
Properties and Capitalized Mine Development Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
amount at
|
|
|
amount at
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Exploration projects and other land positions
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
Value beyond proven and probable reserves at producing mines
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
Projects1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pascua-Lama
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
Pueblo Viejo
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
Sedibelo
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Buzwagi
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
Punta Colorado Wind Farm
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Kainantu
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,117
|
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Excludes Cerro Casale, Reko Diq and
Donlin Creek that are held through equity investees and Cortez
Hills which is included as a component of the acquired mineral
property and capitalized mine development costs attributable to
the Cortez mine.
|
Value beyond
proven and probable reserves (VBPP)
On acquiring a mineral property, we estimate the VBPP and record
these amounts as assets. At the end of each fiscal year, as part
of our annual business cycle, we prepare estimates of proven and
probable gold and copper mineral reserves for each mineral
property. The change in reserves, net of production, is used to
determine the amount to be converted from VBPP to amortized
assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we
transferred $69 million of VBPP to amortized assets (2007:
$189 million). We added $388 million to VBPP on
acquiring the additional 40% of Cortez, based on the preliminary
purchase price allocation.
B Amortization
and Accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Amortization
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Capital
Commitments
In addition to entering into various operational commitments in
the normal course of business, we had commitments of
approximately $173 million at March 31, 2008 mainly at
our various projects.
15 >
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
A Cash and
Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include cash, term deposits and treasury
bills with original maturities of less than 90 days. Cash
and equivalents include $1,160 million (December 31,
2007: $480 million) held by Argentinean and Chilean
subsidiaries that have been designated for use in funding
construction costs at our Pascua-Lama project and other capital
projects.
B Long-Term
Debt
Interest
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Incurred
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
(44)
|
|
|
|
(30)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expensed
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, Cortez Hills,
Pascua-Lama, Buzwagi, Pueblo Viejo, Donlin Creek, Sedibelo, Reko
Diq, Kainantu, Cerro Casale and Punta Colorado Wind farm
qualified for interest capitalization.
Proceeds
In first quarter 2008, we drew down $990 million to
partially fund our acquisition of the 40% interest in Cortez.
The amounts were drawn down using our existing $1.5 billion
credit facility. The credit facility, which is unsecured, has an
interest rate of Libor plus 0.25% to 0.35% on the outstanding
loan amount, and a commitment rate of 0.07% to 0.08% on any
undrawn amounts. For the amounts drawn down at March 31,
2008, $200 million matures on April 29, 2012 and the
balance matures on April 29, 2013.
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-17
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
C Use
of Derivative Instruments (Derivatives) in Risk
Management
In the normal course of business, our assets, liabilities and
forecasted transactions are impacted by various market risks
including, but not limited to:
Under our risk management policy, we seek to mitigate the impact
of these risks to provide certainty for a portion of our
revenues and to control costs and enable us to plan our business
with greater certainty. The timeframe and manner in which we
manage these risks varies for each item based upon our
assessment of the risk and available alternatives for mitigating
risk. For these particular risks, we believe that derivatives
are an appropriate way of managing the risk.
The primary objective of the hedging elements of our derivative
instrument positions is that changes in the values of hedged
items are offset by changes in the values of derivatives. Many
of the derivatives we use meet the FAS 133 hedge
effectiveness criteria and are designated in a hedge accounting
relationship. Some of the derivative instruments are effective
in achieving our risk management objectives, but they do not
meet the strict FAS 133 hedge effectiveness criteria, and
they are classified as economic hedges. The change
in fair value of these economic hedges is recorded in current
period earnings, classified with the income statement line item
that is consistent with the derivative instruments
intended risk objective.
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-18
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
Summary of
Derivatives at Mar. 31,
20081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount by Term to
|
|
Accounting Classification by
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1
|
|
2 to 5
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
|
Cash flow
|
|
value
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
Total
|
|
hedge
|
|
hedge
|
|
Hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive-fixed swaps (millions)
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 50
|
|
$
|
|
$ 50
|
|
$
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 50
|
|
$ 2
|
|
|
Pay-fixed swaps (millions)
|
|
-
|
|
(125)
|
|
-
|
|
(125)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(125)
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net swap position
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ (75)
|
|
$ -
|
|
$(75)
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ (75)
|
|
$12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C$:US$ contracts (C$ millions)
|
|
C$ 238
|
|
C$ 220
|
|
C$ -
|
|
C$458
|
|
C$455
|
|
C$ -
|
|
C$ 3
|
|
$ 24
|
|
|
A$:US$ contracts (A$ millions)
|
|
A$ 1,414
|
|
A$3,064
|
|
A$ -
|
|
A$4,478
|
|
A$4,408
|
|
A$ -
|
|
A$ 70
|
|
295
|
|
|
EUR:US$ contracts ( millions)
|
|
3
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
3
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
3
|
|
-
|
|
|
TZS:US$ contracts (TZS millions)
|
|
TZS 7,212
|
|
TZS -
|
|
TZS -
|
|
TZS7,212
|
|
TZS7,212
|
|
TZS -
|
|
TZS -
|
|
-
|
|
|
CLP:US$ contracts (CLP millions)
|
|
CLP31,719
|
|
CLP -
|
|
CLP -
|
|
CLP1,719
|
|
CLP31,719
|
|
CLP -
|
|
CLP -
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper call option spread contracts
(millions of pounds)
|
|
98
|
|
33
|
|
-
|
|
131
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
131
|
|
$ 39
|
|
|
Copper sold forward contracts
(millions of pounds)
|
|
115
|
|
69
|
|
-
|
|
184
|
|
184
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(122)
|
|
|
Copper collar contracts
(millions of pounds)
|
|
277
|
|
252
|
|
-
|
|
529
|
|
490
|
|
-
|
|
39
|
|
(114)
|
|
|
Diesel forward contracts
(thousands of
barrels)2
|
|
2,017
|
|
3,153
|
|
320
|
|
5,490
|
|
4,776
|
|
-
|
|
714
|
|
129
|
|
|
Natural Gas (thousands of btus)
|
|
910
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
910
|
|
605
|
|
-
|
|
305
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Excludes gold and silver sales contracts (see notes 5 and
6), refer to note 16 for further information on fair value
measurements.
|
2
|
Diesel commodity contracts represent a combination of WTI, WTB,
MOPS and JET hedge contracts and diesel price contracts based on
the price of WTI, WTB, MOPS, and JET, respectively, plus a
spread. WTI represents West Texas Intermediate, WTB represents
Waterborne, MOPS represents Mean of Platts Singapore, JET
represents Jet Fuel.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-19
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
US Dollar
Interest Rate Contracts
Non-hedge
Contracts
We have a net $75 million US dollar pay-fixed interest-rate
swap position outstanding that was used to economically hedge
the US dollar interest-rate risk implicit in a prior gold lease
rate swap position. Changes in the fair value of these interest
rate swaps are recognized in current period earnings through
interest expense.
Currency
Contracts
Cash Flow
Hedges
Currency contracts totaling C$455 million,
A$4,408 million, 7,212 million TZS and CLP
31,719 million have been designated against forecasted
non-US dollar denominated expenditures as a hedge of the
variability of the US dollar amount of those expenditures caused
by changes in currency exchange rates over the next four years.
Hedged items are identified as the first stated quantity of
dollars of forecasted expenditures in a future month. For
C$371 million, A$4,230 million, 7,212 million TZS
and CLP 31,719 million portions of the contracts, we have
concluded that the hedges are 100% effective under FAS 133
because the critical terms (including notional amount and
maturity date) of the hedged items and currency contracts are
the same. For the remaining C$84 million and
A$178 million, prospective and retrospective hedge
effectiveness is assessed using the hypothetical derivative
method under FAS 133. For details of how we apply the
hypothetical derivative method refer to note 20C of our
2007 Year End Financial Statements.
Economic Hedge
Contracts
We have C$3 million, A$70 million
and 3 million contracts that were not designated
as hedges were outstanding as of March 31, 2008. Changes in
the fair value of economic hedge currency contracts were
recorded in cost of sales, corporate administration or interest
income/expense.
Commodity
Contracts
Cash Flow
Hedges
Diesel Fuel
Commodity contracts totaling 4,776 thousand barrels of diesel
fuel have been designated against forecasted purchases of the
commodities for expected consumption at our mining operations.
The contracts act as a hedge of the impact of variability in
market prices on the cost of future commodity purchases over the
next six years. Hedged items are identified as the first stated
quantity in thousands of barrels of forecasted purchases in a
future month. Prospective and retrospective hedge effectiveness
is assessed using the hypothetical derivative method under
FAS 133. For details of how we apply the hypothetical
method refer to note 20C of our 2007 Year End
Financial Statements.
Copper
The terms of a series of copper-linked notes resulted in an
embedded fixed-price forward copper sales contract (for
324 million pounds) that met the definition of a derivative
and must be separately accounted for. At March 31, 2008,
embedded fixed-price forward copper sales contracts for
131 million pounds were outstanding after deliveries of
copper totaling 193 million pounds. The resulting copper
derivative has been designated against future copper cathode at
the Zaldívar mine as a cash flow hedge of the variability
in market prices of those future sales. Hedged items are
identified as the first stated quantity of pounds of forecasted
sales in a future month. Prospective hedge effectiveness is
assessed on these hedges using a dollar offset method. For
details of how we apply the dollar offset method refer to
note 20C of our 2007 Year End Financial Statements.
During first quarter 2008 we added 338 million pounds of
copper collar contracts which provide a floor price and a cap
price for copper sales. 257 million pounds of the collars
were designated against copper cathode sales at our
Zaldívar mine and 66 million pounds are designated
against copper concentrate sales at our Osborne mine. At
March 31, 2008 we had 372 million pounds of copper
collar contracts remaining at Zaldívar and 117 million
pounds at Osborne.
For collars designated against copper cathode production, the
hedged items are identified as the first stated quantity of
pounds of forecasted sales in a future month. Prospective
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-20
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
hedge effectiveness is assessed on these hedges using a dollar
offset method. For details of how we apply the dollar offset
method refer to note 20C of our 2007 Year End
Financial Statements.
Concentrate sales at our Osborne mine contain both gold and
copper, and as a result, are exposed to price changes of both
commodities. Prospective hedge effectiveness is assessed using a
regression method. For details of how we apply the regression
method refer to note 20C of our 2007 Year End
Financial Statements. During first quarter 2008, we recorded
ineffectiveness of $5 million on these hedges. The
ineffectiveness was caused by changes in the price of gold
impacting the hypothetical derivative, but not the hedging
derivative. Prospective effectiveness tests indicate that these
hedges are expected to be highly effective in the future.
Economic hedge
Contracts
Diesel Fuel
Economic hedge fuel contracts are used to mitigate the risk of
oil price changes on fuel consumption at various mines. On
completion of regression analysis, we concluded that contracts
totaling 714 thousand barrels do not meet the highly
effective criterion in FAS 133 due to currency and
basis differences between derivative contract prices and the
prices charged to the mines by oil suppliers. Although not
qualifying as an accounting hedge, the contracts protect the
Company to a significant extent from the effects of oil price
changes. Changes in the fair value of economic hedge fuel
contracts are recorded in current period cost of sales.
Copper
In first quarter 2007, we purchased and sold call options on
274 million pounds of copper over the next 2
1/2 years. These options, when combined with the
aforementioned fixed-price forward copper sales contracts,
economically lock in copper sales prices between $3.08/lb and
$3.58/lb over a period of 2 1/2 years. At March 31,
2008, the notional amount of options outstanding had decreased
to 131 million pounds due to expiry of options totaling
25 million pounds in first quarter 2008. These contracts do
not meet the highly effective criterion for hedge
accounting under FAS 133. We paid option premiums of
$23 million at the inception of these contracts in first
quarter 2007 that was included under investing activities in the
cash flow statement in first quarter 2007. Changes in the fair
value of these copper options are recorded in current period
revenue.
We entered into a series of copper collar contracts for a
notional 39 million pounds of copper that were not
designated as hedges and were outstanding as of March 31,
2008.
Economic Hedge
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income statement
|
ended Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
classification
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
Revenue
|
Gold
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
Fuel
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
Currency contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
sales/corporate
administration/other
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
income/expense
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
contracts
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
income/expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-21
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
Cash Flow
Hedge Gains (Losses) in OCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity price hedges
|
|
|
Currency hedges
|
|
|
Interest rate hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Long-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
costs
|
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
expenditures
|
|
|
balances
|
|
|
term debt
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(17)
|
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of
change in fair value of
hedging instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(269)
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(112)
|
|
|
|
Transfers to earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On recording hedged items in earnings
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
(43)
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Mar. 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(227)
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(16)
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge gains/losses
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
classified within
|
|
sales
|
|
|
sales
|
|
|
sales
|
|
|
sales
|
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of hedge gain (loss) expected to
affect earnings over
the next
12 months1
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on the fair value of hedge contracts at March 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-22
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
16 > FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In first quarter 2008, we adopted FAS 157 for financial
assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP, and requires
expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The primary
assets and liabilities affected were available-for-sale
securities and derivative instruments. The adoption of
FAS 157 did not change the valuation techniques that we use
to value these assets and liabilities. We have also begun to
provide the fair value information that is required to be
disclosed under FAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, for our normal gold and silver sales
contracts in this note. We have elected to present information
for derivative instruments on a net basis. Beginning in 2009, we
will also apply FAS 157 to non-financial assets and
liabilities that we periodically measure at fair value under US
GAAP. The principal assets and liabilities that will be affected
are impaired long-lived tangible assets, impaired intangible
assets, goodwill and asset retirement obligations.
The fair value hierarchy established by FAS 157 establishes
three levels to classify the inputs to valuation techniques used
to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices in markets
that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability(for example,
interest rate and yield curves observable at commonly quoted
intervals, forward pricing curves used to value currency and
commodity contracts and volatility measurements used to value
option contracts), or inputs that are derived principally from
or corroborated by observable market data or other means.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable (supported by little or no
market activity). The fair value hierarchy gives the highest
priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to
Level 3 inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for- sale securities
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
Held-to- maturity
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
securities Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
Held-to-maturity
|
Mar. 31
|
|
securities
|
|
|
At January 1, 2008
|
|
$ 46
|
Total gains or losses (realized/ unrealized)
|
|
|
Recorded in
earnings1
|
|
(39)
|
Recorded in OCI
|
|
-
|
Purchases, issuances and
|
|
-
|
settlements
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008
|
|
$ 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
The total loss of $39 million
included in earnings for the period is reported in Impairment
Charges on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
Valuation
Techniques
Available-for-sale
securities
The fair value of available-for-sale securities is determined
based on a market approach reflecting the closing price of each
particular security at the balance sheet date. The closing price
is a quoted market price obtained from the exchange that is the
principal active market for the particular security, and
therefore available-for-sale securities are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy established by
FAS 157.
Derivative
Instruments
The fair value of derivative instruments is determined using
either present value techniques or option pricing models that
utilize a variety of inputs that are a combination of quoted
prices and market-corroborated inputs. The fair value of US
dollar interest rate and currency swap
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-23
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
contracts is determined by discounting contracted cash flows
using a discount rate derived from observed LIBOR and swap rate
curves for comparable assets and liabilities. In the case of
currency contracts, we convert non-US dollar cash flows into US
dollars using an exchange rate derived from currency swap curves
for comparable assets and liabilities. The fair value of
commodity forward contracts is determined by discounting
contractual cash flows using a discount rate derived from
observed LIBOR and swap rate curves. Contractual cash flows are
calculated using a forward pricing curve derived from observed
forward prices for each commodity. The fair value of commodity
options is determined using option-pricing models that utilize a
combination of inputs including quoted market prices and market
corroborated inputs. Derivative instruments are classified
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Held-to-maturity-investments
The fair value of our held-to-maturity investments (ABCP) is
determined by our assessment of the risks associated with the
underlying investments. Our assessment allocated an estimated
impairment percentage to the various underlying asset classes
within the ABCP using unobservable inputs. The impairment value
was applied sequentially to the various tranches within the
ABCP, resulting in an estimated fair value for each investment
class. This value was supported by an indicative value obtained
from a third party, which was facilitated by the Pan-Canadian
Investors Committee for Third-Party Structured Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper.
The indicative value was released publicly on March 14,
2008 as part of the Report on Restructuring. The
indicative value from this report is consistent with the fair
value calculated by Barrick. ABCP is classified within
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, because there is
currently no active market for these securities.
Normal gold and
silver sales contracts
The fair value of normal gold and silver sales contracts is
calculated by discounting expected cash flows using discount
rates based on gold and silver contango rate curves. Gold and
silver contango rates are market observable inputs, and
therefore our normal gold and silver sales contracts would be
classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
17 > CAPITAL
STOCK
Exchangeable
Shares
In connection with a 1998 acquisition, Barrick Gold Inc.
(BGI), issued 11.1 million BGI exchangeable
shares, which are each exchangeable for 0.53 of a Barrick common
share at any time at the option of the holder, and have
essentially the same voting, dividend (payable in Canadian
dollars), and other rights as 0.53 of a Barrick common share.
BGI is a subsidiary that holds our interest in the Hemlo and
Eskay Creek Mines.
At March 31, 2008, 1.3 million BGI exchangeable shares
were outstanding, which are equivalent to 0.7 million
Barrick common shares (2007 0.7 million common
shares), and are reflected in the number of common shares
outstanding. We have the right to require the exchange of each
outstanding BGI exchangeable share for 0.53 of a Barrick common
share. While there are exchangeable shares outstanding, we are
required to present summary consolidated financial information
relating to BGI.
Summarized
Financial Information for BGI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Total revenues and other income
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
Less: costs and expenses
|
|
|
(51)
|
|
|
|
(47)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxes
|
|
$
|
(5)
|
|
|
$
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(5)
|
|
|
$
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Intercompany notes payable
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
(325)
|
|
|
|
(370)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-24
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
18 > OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (OCI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended Mar. 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Accumulated OCI at Jan. 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge gains, net of tax of $105, $60
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Investments, net of tax of $4, $7
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $nil, $nil
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits, net of tax of
$2, $4
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(112)
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Changes in fair value of investments
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustments for gains/losses recorded in
earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of cash flow hedge gains to earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On recording hedged items in earnings
|
|
|
(25)
|
|
|
|
(43)
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains realized on sale
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, before tax
|
|
|
(156)
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Income tax expense related to OCI
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(134)
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI at Mar. 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge gains, net of tax of $84, $66
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Investments, net of tax of $3, $13
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $nil, $nil
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
|
|
(143)
|
|
Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits, net of tax of
$2, $4
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-25
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
19 >
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Employee Share
Purchase Plan
On April 1, 2008, Barrick launched an Employee Share
Purchase Plan. This plan enables Barrick employees to purchase
Company shares through payroll deduction. Each year, employees
may contribute 1%-6% of their combined base salary and annual
bonus, and Barrick will match 50% of the contribution, up to a
maximum of $5,000 per year.
20 >
LITIGATION AND CLAIMS
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial
statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company
but which will only be resolved when one or more future events
occur or fail to occur. In assessing loss contingencies related
to legal proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted
claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company and its
legal counsel evaluate the perceived merits of any legal
proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits
of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought.
If the assessment of a contingency suggests that a loss is
probable, and the amount can be reliably estimated, then a loss
is recorded. When a contingent loss is not probable but is
reasonably possible, or is probable but the amount of loss
cannot be reliably estimated, then details of the contingent
loss are disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are
generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which
case we disclose the nature of the guarantee. Legal fees
incurred in connection with pending legal proceedings are
expensed as incurred.
Wagner
Complaint
On June 12, 2003, a complaint was filed against Barrick and
several of its current or former officers in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The complaint is on behalf of Barrick shareholders who purchased
Barrick shares between February 14, 2002 and
September 26, 2002. It alleges that Barrick and the
individual defendants violated U.S. securities laws by
making false and misleading statements concerning Barricks
projected operating results and earnings in 2002. The complaint
seeks an unspecified amount of damages. Other parties filed
several other complaints, making the same basic allegations
against the same defendants. In September 2003, the cases were
consolidated into a single action in the Southern District of
New York. The plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint on
January 6, 2005. On May 23, 2005, Barrick filed a
motion to dismiss part of the Third Amended Complaint. On
January 31, 2006, the Court issued an order granting in
part and denying in part Barricks motion to dismiss.
Both parties moved for reconsideration of a portion of the
Courts January 31, 2006 Order. On December 12,
2006, the Court issued its order denying both parties
motions for reconsideration. On February 15, 2008, the
Court issued an order granting the plaintiffs motion for
class certification. Discovery is ongoing. We intend to defend
the action vigorously. No amounts have been accrued for any
potential loss under this complaint.
Marinduque
Complaint
Placer Dome has been named the sole defendant in a Complaint
filed on October 4, 2005, by the Provincial Government of
Marinduque, an island province of the Philippines
(Province), with the District Court in Clark County,
Nevada. The action was removed to the Nevada Federal District
Court on motion of Placer Dome. The Complaint asserts that
Placer Dome is responsible for alleged environmental degradation
with consequent economic damages and impacts to the environment
in the vicinity of the Marcopper mine that was owned and
operated by Marcopper Mining Corporation
(Marcopper). Placer Dome indirectly owned a minority
shareholding of 39.9% in Marcopper until the divestiture of its
shareholding in 1997. The Province seeks to recover
damages for injuries to the natural, ecological and wildlife
resources within its territory, but does not seek to
recover damages for individual injuries sustained by its
citizens either to their persons or their property. In
addition to damages for injury to natural resources, the
Province seeks compensation for the costs of restoring the
environment, an order directing Placer Dome to undertake and
complete the remediation, environmental cleanup, and
balancing of the ecology of the affected areas, and
payment of the costs of environmental monitoring. The Complaint
addresses the discharge of mine tailings into Calancan Bay, the
1993 Maguila-guila dam breach, the 1996 Boac river tailings
spill, and alleged past and continuing damage from acid rock
drainage.
At the time of the amalgamation of Placer Dome and Barrick Gold
Corporation, a variety of motions were pending before the
District Court, including motions to dismiss the action for lack
of personal jurisdiction and for forum non conveniens
(improper choice of forum). On June 29, 2006, the
Province filed a Motion to join Barrick Gold Corporation as an
additional named Defendant and for leave to file a Third Amended
Complaint which the Court granted on March 2, 2007.
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-26
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
On March 6, 2007, the Court issued an order setting a
briefing schedule on the Companys motion to dismiss on
grounds of forum non conveniens. On June 7, 2007, the Court
issued an order granting the Companys motion to dismiss.
On June 25, 2007, the Province filed a motion requesting
the Court to reconsider its Order dismissing the action. On
January 16, 2008, the district court issued an order
denying the Provinces motion for reconsideration.
Following the district courts order, the Province filed
Notice of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit. On March 19, 2008, the Court of Appeals issued a
schedule for briefing of the appeal. We will challenge the
claims of the Province on various grounds and otherwise
vigorously defend the action. No amounts have been accrued for
any potential loss under this complaint.
Calancan Bay
(Philippines) Complaint
On July 23, 2004, a complaint was filed against Marcopper
and Placer Dome Inc. (PDI) in the Regional Trial
Court of Boac, on the Philippine island of Marinduque, on behalf
of a putative class of fishermen who reside in the communities
around Calancan Bay, in northern Marinduque. The complaint
alleges injuries to health and economic damages to the local
fisheries resulting from the disposal of mine tailings from the
Marcopper mine. The total amount of damages claimed is
approximately US$900 million.
On October 16, 2006, the court granted the plaintiffs
application for indigent status, allowing the case to proceed
without payment of filing fees. On January 17, 2007, the
Court issued a summons to Marcopper and PDI. On March 25,
2008, an attempt was made to serve PDI by serving the summons
and complaint on Placer Dome Technical Services (Philippines)
Inc. (PDTS). PDTS has returned the summons and
complaint with a manifestation stating that PDTS is not an agent
of PDI for any purpose and is not authorized to accept service
or to take any other action on behalf of PDI. On April 3,
2008, PDI made a special appearance by counsel to move to
dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and on
other grounds.
The Company intends to defend the action vigorously. No amounts
have been accrued for any potential loss under this complaint.
Pakistani
Constitutional Litigation
On November 28, 2006, a Constitutional Petition was filed
in the High Court of Balochistan by three Pakistan citizens
against: Barrick, the governments of Balochistan and Pakistan,
the Balochistan Development Authority (BDA), Tethyan
Copper Company (TCC), Antofagasta Plc
(Antofagasta), Muslim Lakhani and BHP (Pakistan) Pvt
Limited (BHP).
The Petition alleged, among other things, that the entry by the
BDA into the 1993 Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) with
BHP to facilitate the exploration of the Reko Diq area and the
grant of related exploration licenses were illegal and that the
subsequent transfer of the interests of BHP in the JVA and the
licenses to TCC was also illegal and should therefore be set
aside. Barrick currently indirectly holds 50% of the shares of
TCC, with Antofagasta indirectly holding the other 50%.
On June 26, 2007, the High Court of Balochistan dismissed
the Petition against Barrick and the other respondents in its
entirety. On August 23, 2007, the petitioners filed a Civil
Petition for Leave to Appeal in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has not yet considered the Civil
Petition for Leave to Appeal. Barrick intends to defend this
action vigorously. No amounts have been accrued for any
potential loss under this complaint.
21 > FINANCE
SUBSIDIARIES
On May 9, 2008, we incorporated two wholly-owned finance
subsidiaries, Barrick North America Finance LLC and Barrick Gold
Financeco LLC, the sole purpose of which is to issue debt
securities. On May 30, 2008, we filed a preliminary short
form base shelf prospectus and registration statement in respect
of the future offer and issuance of debt securities up to an
aggregate principal amount of $2 billion by Barrick and the
finance subsidiaries. Barrick will fully and unconditionally
guarantee any debt securities issued by the finance subsidiaries.
|
|
|
BARRICK FIRST
QUARTER
2008
|
B-27
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|