UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

      (X)           QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

 

      (   )        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ________to____________

 

Commission file number 000-22904

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

7915 Baymeadows Way, Suite 400

Jacksonville, Florida 32256 

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(904) 732-6100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No __.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such file).    Yes X  No __.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.   See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __  No X.

 

As of August 7, 2013, 92,411,029 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.

---

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.  Financial Statements

PARKERVISION, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

 

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

 

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

 

 

---

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

 

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

 

---

 

 

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

 

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

(UNAUDITED)

1.  Description of Business

 

ParkerVision, Inc. (“We”, the “Company”, or “ParkerVision”) is in the business of innovating fundamental wireless technologies.   We design, develop and market our proprietary radio frequency (“RF”) technologies and products for use in semiconductor circuits for wireless communication products.   Our business is expected to include licensing of our intellectual property and/or the sale of integrated circuits based on our technology for incorporation into wireless devices designed by our customers.   In addition, from time to time, we offer engineering consulting and design services to our customers, for a negotiated fee, to assist them in developing prototypes and/or products incorporating our technologies. 

 

2.  Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our future business plans call for continued investment in sales, marketing, customer support and product development for our technologies and products, as well as investment in continued protection of our intellectual property including prosecution of new patents and defense of existing patents.  Our ability to generate revenues sufficient to offset costs is subject to our ability to successfully support our customers in completing their initial product designs incorporating our technologies, our ability to secure a reasonable share of the market through additional product offerings with our current customers and/or the addition of new customers, and our ability to defend our intellectual property. 

 

We do not expect that revenue generated from the sale of our RF chipsets in 2013, if any, will be sufficient to cover our operational expenses.  Our current capital resources include $13.7 million in cash and available for sale securities at June 30, 2013 and approximately $13 million in net proceeds from our August 2013 sale of common stock (see Note 8).  These resources are sufficient to support our currently projected liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months.

 

We operate in a highly competitive industry with rapidly changing and evolving technologies.  Many of our potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources.  We have made significant investments in developing our technologies and products, the returns on which are dependent upon the generation of future revenues for realization.  The long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon the generation of sufficient revenues from our technologies and products to offset expenses.  In the event that we do not generate sufficient revenues, we will be required to obtain additional funding through public or private equity financing, short or long-term debt financing, and/or reduce our operating costs.  Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through debt or equity financings, and/or reduce operating costs could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our long-term liquidity needs and achieve our intended long-term business objectives.

 

3.  Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2013 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013 or future years.  All normal and recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations have been included. 

---

 

 

The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

 

4.   Accounting Policies

 

There have been no changes in accounting policies from those stated in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.  

 

5.   Loss per Common Share

 

Basic loss per common share is determined based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  Diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share as all common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation, as their effect is anti-dilutive. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were 88,436,532 and 74,581,697, respectively.  The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were 85,905,873 and 71,094,403 respectively.   

 

Options and warrants to purchase 9,848,142 and 8,984,639 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30,  2013 and 2012, respectively.  In addition, unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”), representing 950,136 and 602,168 shares of common stock, were outstanding at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.   These options, warrants and RSUs were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per common share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.    

 

6.   Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.  Share-Based Compensation

 

There has been no material change in the assumptions used to compute the fair value of our equity awards, nor in the method used to account for share-based compensation from those stated in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

 

---

 

The following table presents share-based compensation expense included in our statements of comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

 

 

As of June 30, 2013, we had approximately $5.5 million in unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested share-based compensation awards.  This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately  1.5 years. 

 

In November 2011, we issued 800,000 RSUs  to a consulting firm as a performance incentive in connection with a services agreement. These RSUs vested only upon achievement of certain market conditions, as measured based on the closing price of our common stock during a period ending on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2013 or (ii) thirty days following termination of the related consulting agreement.  The issuance of the RSUs and the underlying shares is exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).    As of June 30, 2013, all of  these RSUs had vested based on achievement of relevant market conditions.  The fair market value of the vested RSUs is measured based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of vesting.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized expense related to these RSUs of approximately $1,215,000 and $1,836,000, respectively which is included in general and administrative expense in the table of share-based compensation above.    

 

8.   Stock Authorization and Issuance

 

On August 6, 2013, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 3,381,573 shares of our common stock, at a price of $3.80 per share, to a limited number of domestic institutional and other accredited investors in a private placement transaction pursuant to an offering exemption under the Securities Act of 1933.   The offering represented 4.0% of our outstanding common stock on an after-issued basis.   The aggregate net proceeds from this offering, after deduction of placement agent fees and other offering costs, are estimated to be approximately $13.0 million and will be used for general working capital purposes.

 

The common stock issued in the private offering will be registered by us for re-offer and re-sale by the investors.  We have committed to file the registration statement by the 20^th calendar day following the closing and to cause the registration statement to become effective by the 75^th calendar day following the closing (or, in the event of a “full review” by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), by the 90^th day following the closing).   However, if we are notified by the SEC that the registration statement will not be reviewed or is no longer subject to further review and comments, we will cause the registration statement to become effective on the fifth trading day following such notice.  We will pay liquidated damages in the event we fail to file the registration statement or cause it to become effective by the deadlines set forth above, or if certain other events occur.  The amount of liquidated damages is one percent of the aggregate subscription amount paid by a purchaser for the shares affected by the event that are still held by the purchaser upon the occurrence of the event, and monthly thereafter, up to a maximum of six percent of the gross proceeds, or $839,399.

 

On March 26, 2013, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 4,715,000 shares of our common stock, at a price of $3.25 per share, in an underwritten offering with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. as underwriter.  The offering represented 5.4% of our outstanding common stock on an after-issued basis.  The aggregate

---

 

net proceeds from this offering, after deduction of placement agent fees and other offering costs which are recorded to additional paid in capital in the accompanying balance sheets, were approximately $14.3 million.

 

The offering was made pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2012 (File No. 333-183713) which was declared effective on September 11, 2012, covering up to $25 million of our securities, and our registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on March 21, 2013 (File No. 333-187403), which became effective immediately upon filing pursuant to Rule 426(b) under the Securities Act, covering approximately an additional $2.5 million of our securities.  As of March 31, 2013, there were no additional securities available for issuance under the registration statement. 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we issued 83,334 and 360,066 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of warrants issued in connection with the sale of equity securities for proceeds of approximately $73,000 and $263,000, respectively.  These proceeds are included in the accompanying statements of cash flows.

 

9. Fair Value Measurements

 

We have determined the estimated fair value amounts of our financial instruments using available market information.  Our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.  Commitments and Contingencies

 

Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of

---

 

our business.  We believe, based upon advice from outside legal counsel, that the final disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.     

 

ParkerVision vs. Qualcomm, Inc.

On July 20, 2011, as amended on February 28, 2012, we filed a complaint in the United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida against Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief for infringement of six of our patents related to radio-frequency receivers and the down-conversion of electromagnetic signals (the “Complaint”).  Qualcomm filed an Answer and Counterclaim to our Complaint (the “Counterclaim”) in which Qualcomm denied infringement and alleged invalidity and unenforceability of each of our patents, including claims of patent unenforceability due to alleged inequitable conduct.  Qualcomm also named our long-time patent prosecution counsel, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC (“SKGF”) as a co-defendant in its Counterclaim and further alleged that we aided and abetted SKGF in its alleged breach of fiduciary duty to Qualcomm and tortiously interfered with Qualcomm’s contractual relationship with SKGF.  Qualcomm also filed a motion to dismiss our claims of indirect patent infringement.  In March 2013, the court denied Qualcomm’s motion to dismiss. 

 

In November 2011, as amended in April 2012, we filed a motion to dismiss Qualcomm’s Counterclaims related to inequitable conduct, aiding and abetting, and tortious interference, and a motion to strike certain of Qualcomm’s affirmative defenses.  SKGF also filed a motion to dismiss Qualcomm’s claims against them.  In November 2012, the court granted SKGF’s motion and dismissed these claims without prejudice; and furthermore, the court abated Qualcomm’s Counterclaims against SKGF such that Qualcomm is unable to file an amended Counterclaim against SKGF until such time that the court lifts the abatement. 

 

In January 2013, the court dismissed with prejudice two of the three theories Qualcomm asserted in support of its claims of inequitable conduct.  The court also dismissed without prejudice and abated the aiding and abetting and tortious interference claims that related to the claims against SKGF that were dismissed.  Furthermore, Qualcomm’s affirmative defenses of inequitable conduct and unclean hands were stricken by the court.  In April 2013, Qualcomm filed an amended Counterclaim which dropped the remaining claims against us that relate to inequitable conduct. 

 

The court held a non-adversarial technology tutorial in July 2012 and a claim construction hearing in August 2012 where we and Qualcomm presented our respective arguments for the proposed construction of disputed claim terms.  On February 20, 2013, the court issued its claim construction ruling in which the court adopted our interpretation for approximately ninety percent of the key terms in dispute.

 

In May 2013, we filed a motion for summary judgment of no invalidity.   Also in May 2013, Qualcomm filed a motion for partial summary judgment to remove certain identified products from the case and to eliminate our claims of induced and contributory infringement for four of the six patents in the case.  In addition, in July 2013, both parties filed motions to disqualify certain of the opposing party’s expert testimony.  The court has not yet ruled on these motions. 

 

Fact discovery has concluded in this case and the trial is scheduled to begin on October 7, 2013.  At this time, we do not believe it is possible to predict the outcome of these proceedings.

 

 

Maxtak Capital Advisors LLC vs. ParkerVision

On December 28, 2011, Maxtak Capital Advisors LLC, Maxtak Partners LP and David Greenbaum (the “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the United States District Court of New Jersey against us, our chief executive officer, Jeffrey Parker and one of our directors, Robert Sterne, alleging common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation of material facts concerning the effectiveness of our technology and our

---

 

success in securing customers.  The Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages, including attorneys’ fees and costs.  On March 3, 2012, we filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to transfer this case to the Middle District of Florida.  In October 2012, the court granted our motion to transfer the case to the Middle District of Florida.  In May 2013, the court denied our motion to dismiss.  Discovery has commenced in this case with a recently amended discovery cut-off date of July 1, 2014 and a trial date commencing February 2, 2015.  We believe this matter is without merit and we do not anticipate that it will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

 

ITEM 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our shareholders and to the public.  This report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, in particular, statements about our future plans, objectives, and expectations contained in this Item.  When used in this report and in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the words or phrases “will likely result”, “management expects”, “we expect”, “will continue”, “is anticipated”, “estimated” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements.”  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, each of which speaks only as of the date made.  Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results and those presently anticipated or projected, including the risks and uncertainties identified in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) and in this Item 2 of Part I of this quarterly report.  Examples of such risks and uncertainties include general economic and business conditions, competition, unexpected changes in technologies and technological advances, the timely development and commercial acceptance of new products and technologies, reliance on key business and sales relationships, reliance on our intellectual property, the outcome of our intellectual property litigation and the ability to obtain adequate financing in the future.  We have no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.

 

Overview

 

We are in the business of innovating fundamental wireless technologies.   We design, develop and market our proprietary RF technologies and products for use in semiconductor circuits for wireless communication products.   Since 2005, we have generated no product or royalty revenue from our wireless technologies.  We have made significant investments in developing and protecting our technologies and products, the returns on which are dependent upon the generation of future revenues for realization. 

 

We are currently engaged in patent litigation with Qualcomm for their alleged infringement of a number of our patents that relate to our receiver intellectual property.  We believe the outcome of this litigation is an important factor in our ability to generate meaningful revenue from certain of our receiver technologies. Therefore, we have devoted substantial resources to this litigation, and expect to continue to do so in the foreseeable future.  The trial is scheduled to begin in October 2013.   Although our litigation team is working on a partial contingency basis, we expect to incur significant costs for legal and expert fees related to this litigation in 2013.

 

We have also devoted substantial resources to the development of RF products that interface with VIA Telecom Inc.’s (“VIA’s”) baseband processors.   In March 2013, we entered into a development agreement with VIA for the development and support of drivers between VIA’s baseband products and our RF chipsets and the ongoing support and maintenance of the custom interfaces between our products.    We have been working with VIA and a mutual customer since 2011 on the design and test of a mobile

---

 

handset solution using our RF chipset.  We believe our recent development agreement with VIA will provide the product integration and support necessary to incorporate our RF chipsets into one or more of the mutual customer’s mobile products.  In the event we secure product orders for our RF chipsets, we expect that available working capital will be used for initial production start-up costs, including test programs and production tooling.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On March 26, 2013, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 4,715,000 shares of our common stock, at a price of $3.25 per share, under a shelf registration statement (File No. 333-183713) and a Rule 426(b) registration statement (File No. 333-187403), in an underwritten offering with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. who acted as underwriter.  The offering represented 5.4% of our outstanding common stock on an after-issued basis.  The aggregate net proceeds from this offering, after deduction of placement agent fees and other offering costs, were approximately $14.3 million.

 

As of June 30, 2013, we had working capital of approximately $12.6 million which represented an increase of approximately $5.4 million from working capital at December 31, 2012.  This increase in working capital is a result of approximately $14.3 million in net proceeds from the March 2013 offering and $0.4 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants, less $9.1 million to fund operations and $0.4 million used for patents and fixed assets during the first half of 2013.   Our use of cash to fund operations increased approximately $2.1 million, or 30%, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase in use of cash is primarily the result of an increase in litigation related fees and expenses. 

 

Our future business plans call for continued investment in sales, marketing, customer support and product development for our technologies and products, as well as investment in continued protection of our intellectual property,  including the prosecution of new patents and defense of existing patents.  Our ability to generate revenues sufficient to offset costs is subject to our ability to successfully support our customers in completing their initial product designs incorporating our technologies, our ability to secure a reasonable share of the market through additional product offerings with our customers, our ability to secure new customers for our products or technologies, and/or our ability to defend our intellectual property. 

 

Revenue generated from the sale of our RF chipsets in 2013, if any, will not be sufficient to cover our operational expenses, and we expect that our continued losses and use of cash will be funded from our available working capital.  In addition, we expect that available working capital may be used for initial production start-up costs, including test programs and production tooling, and for continued litigation expenses to defend our intellectual property.

 

On August 6, 2013, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 3,381,573 shares of our common stock, at a price of $3.80 per share, to a limited number of domestic institutional and other accredited investors in a private placement transaction pursuant to an offering exemption under the Securities Act of 1933.   The offering represented 4.0% of our outstanding common stock on an after-issued basis.   The aggregate net proceeds from this offering, after deduction of placement agent fees and other offering costs, are estimated to be approximately $13.0 million and will be used for general working capital purposes.

 

Our current capital resources, including the net proceeds from the August 2013 private placement transaction, are sufficient to support our currently projected liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months.  The long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon the generation of sufficient revenues from our technologies and products to offset expenses.  In the event that we do not generate sufficient revenues, we will be required to obtain additional funding through public or private equity financing, short or long-term debt financing, and/or reduce our operating costs.  Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through debt or equity financings, and/or reduce operating costs could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our long-term liquidity needs and achieve

---

 

our intended long-term business objectives.

 

The long-term continuation of our business plan through 2013 and beyond is dependent upon the generation of sufficient revenues from our technologies and products to offset expenses.  In the event that we do not generate sufficient revenues, we will be required to obtain additional funding through public or private financing and/or further reduce operating costs.  Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through debt or equity financings, and/or further reduce operating costs could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our long-term liquidity needs and achieve our intended long-term business objectives.  

 

Results of Operations for Each of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Revenue and Gross Margin

We had no product or royalty revenue for the three or six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.  We have been working with one of VIA’s largest mobile handset customers on the design and test of a handset solution incorporating our technology, the successful completion of which, we believe, will lead to the incorporation of our technology into one or more of this customer’s products.  To the extent that our technology is incorporated in the form of integrated circuits supplied by us, additional working capital may be needed to support production start-up costs including test programs and production tooling.

 

In addition, we recently introduced new RF components incorporating our technologies that are being targeted at commercial, industrial and military markets.  

 

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of engineering and related management and support personnel costs; fees for outside engineering design services which we use from time to time to supplement our internal resources; amortization and depreciation expense related to our patents and other assets used in product development; prototype production and materials costs, which represent the fabrication and packaging costs for prototype integrated circuits, as well as the cost of supporting components for prototype board development; software licensing and support costs, which represent the annual licensing and support maintenance for engineering design and other software tools; and rent and other overhead costs for our engineering design facility.  Personnel costs include share-based compensation amounts which have been determined based on the grant date fair value of equity-based awards to our employees and then recorded to expense over the vesting period of the award. 

 

Our research and development expenses increased approximately $787,000, or 44%, during the three months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.   This increase is primarily due to an increase in outside professional fees of approximately $388,000 and an increase in share-based compensation expense of approximately $266,000.     

 

Our research and development expenses increased approximately $1,114,000, or 29%, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.   This increase is primarily due to an increase in share-based compensation expense of approximately $543,000 and an increase in outside professional fees of approximately $355,000. 

 

The increase in outside professional fees for the three and six month periods is the result of an increase in fees for outside design services, including the VIA development arrangement, as well as an increase in legal fees related to patent prosecution.  The increase in share-based compensation expense for the three and six month periods is the result of long-term incentive equity awards granted to engineering executives and employees in July 2012.

 

We expect a significant percentage of our current working capital will continue to be invested in our research and product development activities. However, cash expenditures for research and product

---

 

development activities will fluctuate on a quarter to quarter basis depending on the timing of various projects. 

 

Marketing and Selling Expenses

Marketing and selling expenses consist primarily of marketing and sales personnel costs, including share-based compensation and travel costs, and outside professional fees.  Marketing and selling expenses increased approximately $63,000, or 18% during the three months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase is primarily due to an increase in share-based compensation expense of approximately $51,000 as a result of long-term incentive equity awards granted to engineering executives and employees in July 2012.

 

Marketing and selling expenses increased approximately $65,000, or 9%  during the six months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase is primarily due to an increase in share-based compensation expense of approximately $106,000 as a result of long-term incentive equity awards granted to engineering executives and employees in July 2012, partially offset by decreases in outside professional fees and personnel travel costs.

 

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive, director, finance and administrative personnel costs, including share-based compensation, and costs incurred for insurance, shareholder relations and outside professional services, including litigation and other legal services. 

 

General and administrative expenses increased approximately $1,219,000, or 42%, during the three months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase is primarily due to an increase in share-based compensation expense of approximately $845,000 and an increase in litigation fees of approximately $426,000.

 

General and administrative expenses increased approximately $3,290,000, or 72%, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase is primarily due to an increase in share-based compensation expense of approximately $1,949,000 and an increase in litigation fees of approximately $1,249,000.

 

These increases in litigation fees are the result of fees and other expenses related to our patent infringement litigation against Qualcomm.  The increases in share-based compensation expense are the result of long-term equity incentive awards granted to executive, other administrative employees, and outside directors in July 2012 as well as the recognition of expense recognized upon vesting of performance based RSUs issued to a third-party in 2011.    

 

Net Loss and Net Loss per Common Share

Our net loss increased approximately $2.1 million, or 41%, during the three months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase is primarily the result of a $1.2 million increase in total company share-based compensation expense along with a $0.4 million increase in litigation fees.  On a per share basis, our net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased $0.01, or 14% per common share when compared to the same period in 2012 as a result of a $2.1 million increase in operating expenses, offset by a 19% increase in the weighted average shares outstanding for the period.

 

Our net loss increased approximately $4.5 million, or 49%, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase is primarily the result of a $2.6 million increase in total company share-based compensation expense along with a $1.2 million increase in litigation fees.  On a per share basis, our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $0.03, or 23% per common share when compared to the same period in 2012 as a result of a $4.5 million

---

 

increase in operating expenses, offset by a 21% increase in the weighted average shares outstanding for the period.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions, Arrangements and Other Relationships

As of June 30, 2013, we had outstanding warrants to purchase 2,247,845 shares of common stock that were issued in connection with the sale of equity securities in various public and private placement transactions in 2009, 2010, and 2011. These warrants have exercise prices ranging from $0.54 to $1.88 per share, with a weighted average exercise price of $0.80 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 2.1 years.  The estimated fair value of these warrants of $939,445 is included in shareholders’ equity in our balance sheets. 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

There have been no changes in critical accounting policies from those stated in our Annual Report. 

 

ITEM 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no material changes from the market risk information disclosed under Item 7A of Part II of our Annual Report.

 

ITEM 4.  Controls and Procedures.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30,  2013, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).   Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2013.  

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.  Legal Proceedings.

 

Reference is made to the section entitled “Legal Proceedings” in Note 10 to our unaudited financial statements for a discussion of current legal proceedings, which discussion is incorporated herein by reference. 

 

ITEM 1A.  Risk Factors.

 

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report.  In addition to the information in this quarterly report, the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition.   

 

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

None.

 

---

 

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

ITEM 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 5.  Other Information. 

 

On August 8, 2013, we issued a press release announcing our results of operations and financial condition for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

 

The foregoing information, including the exhibit related thereto, is furnished in response to Item 2.02 of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any disclosure document of the Registrant, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such document.

 

ITEM 6.  Exhibits. 

 

---

 

*Included herewith

---

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

ParkerVision, Inc.

Registrant

 

 

 

 

---

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

 

 

---