UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  

For the quarterly period ended April 17, 2015

  

OR

  

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  

For the transition period from __________ to ___________.

 

Commission file number                                     0-2396

 

 

 

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

California	95-1778176
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	identification number)

 

1308 N. Patt Street, Anaheim, CA  92801 (Address of principal executive offices-Zip code)

714-526-5533 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   [ X ]                  No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes   [ X ]                  No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer [   ]	Accelerated filer [   ]
Non-accelerated filer [   ]   (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [ X ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes   [   ]                  No [ X ]

As of May 18, 2015 the registrant had 9,098,537 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT

INDEX

      

References to "Bridgford Foods" or the "Company" contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q refer to Bridgford Foods Corporation.

 

      

Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements		Page
	a. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 17, 2015 (unaudited) and October 31, 2014.	3
	b. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015 and April 18, 2014 (unaudited)	4
	c. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015 and April 18, 2014 (unaudited)	5
	d. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		10
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		21
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		21
Part II. Other Information
Item 1A. Risk Factors		22
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		22
Item 6. Exhibits		23
Signatures		24

 

Items 1, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II have been omitted because they are not applicable with respect to the Company and/or the current reporting period.

 

 

Part I.  Financial Information

Item 1. a.

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 

  

 

Item 1. b.

 

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Item 1. c.

 

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

  

 

Item 1. d.

 

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except percentages, share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(dollars in thousands)

 

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).  Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Bridgford Foods Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; adverse publicity; acceptance of new product offerings; consumer trial and frequency; changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; commodity, labor, and employee benefit costs; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; weather conditions; construction schedules; and other factors referenced in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Assumptions relating to budgeting, marketing, and other management decisions are subjective in many respects and thus susceptible to interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments, the impact of which may cause us to alter our marketing, capital expenditure or other budgets, which may in turn affect our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.  The reader is therefore cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained herein and to consider other risks detailed more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014.  We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Management Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the respective reporting periods.   Some of the estimates needed to be made by management include the allowance for doubtful accounts, promotional and returns allowances, inventory reserves, the estimated useful lives of property and equipment, and the valuation allowance for the Company’s deferred tax assets. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. We determine the amounts to record based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we view as reasonable under the circumstances and consider all relevant available information.  The results of this analysis form the basis for our conclusion as to the value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other independent sources.   Amounts estimated related to liabilities for self-insured workers’ compensation, employee healthcare and pension benefits are especially subject to inherent uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts which vary from our current estimates.

 

During the twelve weeks ended April 17, 2015, the Company re-evaluated the loss rates used to estimate the liability for self-insured workers compensation based on company specific historical claims and loss experience. As a result, the Company reduced its liability by $264 during the twelve weeks ended April 17, 2015. This change in accounting estimate increased net income by $264 or $0.03 per share.

 

Current accounting principles require that our pension benefit obligation be measured using an internal rate of return (“IRR”) analysis to be included in the discount rate selection process. The IRR calculation for the Retirement Plan for Employees of Bridgford Foods Corporation is measured annually and based on the Citigroup Pension Discount Rate. The Citigroup Pension Discount Rate as of March 31, 2015 was 3.75% as compared to 4.05% at October 31, 2014. The discount rate applied can significantly affect the value of the projected benefit obligation as well as the net periodic benefit cost.

 

Our credit risk is diversified across a broad range of customers and geographic regions. Losses due to credit risk have recently been immaterial.  The provision for doubtful accounts receivable is based on historical trends and current collection risk.  We have significant receivables with a few large, well known customers which, although historically secure, could be subject to material risk should these customers’ operations suddenly deteriorate. We monitor these customers closely to minimize the risk of loss.

 

The table on the next page shows customers that accounted for more than 20% of consolidated accounts receivable (“AR”) or 10% of consolidated revenues for the twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015 and April 18, 2014, respectively.

 

 

Customer Concentration > 10% Sales *

 

		Wal-Mart								Dollar General
		Sales				AR				Sales				AR
April 17, 2015			28.4	%			32.3	%			8.8	%			21.8	%
April 18, 2014			15.7	%			29.2	%			-				-

  

* = No other customer accounted for more than 20% of consolidated accounts receivable or 10% of consolidated revenues for the twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015 or the twenty-four weeks April 18, 2014.

 

Revenues are recognized upon passage of title to the customer, typically upon product pick-up, shipment or delivery to customers. Products are delivered to customers primarily through our own long-haul fleet or through our own direct store delivery system.   

 

We record the cash surrender or contract value for life insurance policies as an adjustment of premiums paid in determining the expense or income to be recognized under the contract for the period.

 

Management is required to evaluate whether a valuation allowance should be established against its deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence using a "more likely than not" standard. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon taxable income in prior carryback years, estimates of future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. Management concluded at the end of 2008 that it was more likely than not that deferred tax assets would not be realized and recorded a full valuation allowance on all deferred tax assets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Management re-evaluated the need for a full valuation allowance as of April 17, 2015. Management evaluated both positive and negative evidence. The weight of negative factors and level of economic uncertainty in our current business continued to support the conclusion that the realization of our deferred tax assets does not meet the more likely than not standard. Therefore, a full valuation allowance remains against the net deferred tax assets at April 17, 2015.

 

We provide tax reserves for federal, state, local and international exposures relating to audit results, tax planning initiatives and compliance responsibilities.  The development of these reserves requires judgments about tax issues, potential outcomes and timing, and is a subjective estimate.  Although the outcome of these tax audits is uncertain, in management’s opinion adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for potential liabilities, if any, resulting from these reviews.  Actual outcomes may differ materially from these estimates.

 

We assess the recoverability of our long-lived assets on a quarterly basis or whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances or business climate indicate that expected undiscounted future cash flows related to such long-lived assets may not be sufficient to support the net book value of such assets.  If undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to support the recorded assets, we recognize an impairment to reduce the carrying value of the applicable long-lived assets to their estimated fair value.

 

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “PPACA”), was signed into law.  The PPACA contains provisions which may impact the Company’s accounting of other postemployment benefit (“OPEB”) obligations in future periods.  Regulatory guidance for implementation of some of the provisions of the PPACA has not yet been established.  Requirements of the law include the removal of the lifetime limits on retiree medical coverage, expanding dependent coverage to age 26 and elimination of pre-existing conditions that may impact OPEB costs.  In addition, the PPACA includes an excise tax in 2018 on the value of benefits that exceed a pre-defined limit which may require changes in benefit plan levels in order to minimize this additional cost. We will continue to assess the accounting implications of the PPACA and its impact on our financial position and results of operations as more legislative and interpretive guidance becomes available.  The potential future effects and cost of complying with the provisions of the PPACA are not determinable at this time.

  

Overview of Reporting Segments

 

We operate in two business segments – the processing and distribution of frozen products (the Frozen Food Products segment), and the processing and distribution of snack food products (the Snack Food Products segment).  For information regarding the separate financial performance of the business segments refer to Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  We manufacture and distribute an extensive line of food products, including biscuits, bread dough items, roll dough items, dry sausage products and beef jerky.    

 

 

Frozen Food Products Segment

 

In our Frozen Food Products segment, we manufacture and distribute an extensive line of food products, including biscuits, bread dough items, roll dough items and sandwiches.  All items within this segment are considered similar products and have been aggregated at this level.  Our Frozen Food Products segment serves both food service and retail customers.  Products produced in this segment are supplied through leased long-haul vehicles to food service and retail distributors that take title to the product upon shipment receipt.  Approximately 160 unique frozen food products are sold through wholesalers, cooperatives and distributors to approximately 21,000 retail outlets and 24,000 restaurants and institutions. 

  

Snack Food Products Segment

 

In our Snack Food Products segment, we primarily distribute products manufactured by us.   All items within this segment are considered similar products and have been aggregated at this level.  The dry sausage division includes products such as jerky, meat snacks, sausage and pepperoni products.   This segment sells approximately 100 different items through a direct store delivery network serving approximately 13,000 supermarkets, mass merchandise and convenience retail stores located in 49 states.  These customers are comprised of large retail chains and smaller “independent” operators. 

 

Products produced or distributed by the Snack Food Products segment are supplied to customers through either direct-store-delivery or direct delivery to customer warehouses. Product delivered using the company-owned fleet direct to the store is considered a direct-store-delivery. In this case, we provide the service of setting up and maintaining the display and stocking our products. Products delivered to customer warehouses are distributed to the retail store and stocked by the customer where it is then resold to the end consumer. Prior to fiscal 2015, the Snack Food Products segment included refrigerated snack food products that were prepared and distributed by our Refrigerated Deli Products Division.  However, we discontinued operation of the Refrigerated Deli Products Division at the end of fiscal 2014 because of continued losses.

  

Results of Operations for the Twelve Weeks ended April 17, 2015 and April 18, 2014.

 

Net Sales-Consolidated

 

Net sales decreased by $4,547 (14.6%) to $26,696 in the second twelve-week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twelve-week period last year.  The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:

 

Impact on Net Sales-Consolidated		%					$
Selling price per pound			-13.7				(4,717	)
Unit sales volume in pounds			-1.8				(602	)
Returns activity			2.9				1,072
Promotional activity			6.4				2,213
Continuing operations - Decrease in net sales			-6.2				(2,034	)
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-8.4				(2,513	)
Decrease in net sales			-14.6				(4,547	)

 

The decrease in net sales in fiscal 2015 was attributable to a large seasonal low margin program with a customer in the prior year period that did not reoccur in the current year. Selling price per pound and to a lesser extent unit sales volume in pounds decreased significantly in the Snack Food Products segment as discussed in the segment analysis below. Returns and promotional activity were lower than the prior year period due to the large seasonal low margin program mentioned above.

   

Net Sales-Frozen Food Products Segment

 

Net sales in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $570 (4.7%) to $11,560 in the second twelve-week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twelve-week period last year.  The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:

 

Impact on Net Sales-Frozen Food Products		%					$
Selling price per pound			-2.2				(300	)
Unit sales volume in pounds			-5.0				(677	)
Returns activity			-0.4				(45	)
Promotional activity			2.9				452
Decrease in net sales			-4.7				(570	)

 

 

The decrease in net sales for the twelve weeks ended April 17, 2015 primarily relates to an unfavorable change in product mix that caused both lower selling prices per pound and unit sales volume in pounds. Returns activity also increased.  Lower promotional activity compared to the same twelve-week period in fiscal year 2014 favorably impacted net sales.

  

Net Sales-Snack Food Products Segment

 

Net sales in the Snack Food Products segment, decreased by $3,977 (20.8%) to $15,136 in the second twelve-week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twelve-week period last year.  The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:

 

Impact on Net Sales-Snack Food Products		%					$
Selling price per pound			-21.4				(4,416	)
Unit sales volume in pounds			0.4				75
Returns activity			4.5				1,117
Promotional activity			8.9				1,759
Continuing operations - Decrease in net sales			-7.6				(1,465	)
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-13.2				(2,512	)
Total - Decrease in net sales			-20.8				(3,977	)

 

The decrease in net sales in fiscal 2015 was attributable to lower per pound selling prices. The main contributing factor to lower sales during the second quarter of fiscal 2015 was a large low margin program with a customer in the prior year period that did not reoccur in the current year. Returns and promotional activity were lower than the prior year period due to the large seasonal low margin program mentioned above. At the end of fiscal 2014, we discontinued operation of our Refrigerated Deli Products Division and ceased refrigerated snack food product distribution because of continued net losses.

 

Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin-Consolidated

 

Cost of products sold decreased by $5,889 (26.4%) to $16,419 in the second twelve-week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twelve-week period in fiscal year 2014.  The reduction in cost of products sold primarily relates to a large low margin program of high cost beef products in the prior year that did not reoccur in the current year. Overhead spending decreased due to a significant reduction in workers’ compensation, facility repairs, over time wages and lower utility costs. The Company's workers' compensation benefits cost decreased due to a one-time gain of $214 on closing out older policy years and by $79 because of favorable trends in claims experience in the current fiscal year. In addition, workers’ compensation benefits cost decreased by an additional $87 due to a change in accounting method to estimate future liabilities. In addition, lower sales volume contributed to the decrease in cost of products sold as described in the segment analysis below.  The gross margin increased from 28.6% to 38.5%.

 

Change in Cost of Products Sold by Segment		$				%				Commodity $ (Decrease) Increase
Frozen Food Products Segment			(392	)			-1.8				(68	)
Snack Food Products Segment			(4,424	)			-19.8				530
Continuing operations			(4,816	)			-21.6				462
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			(1,073	)			-4.8				-
Total			(5,889	)			-26.4				462

 

Cost of Products Sold-Frozen Food Products Segment

 

Cost of products sold in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $392 (5.2%) to $7,103 in the second twelve-week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twelve-week period in fiscal year 2014. Cost of products sold decreased due to lower sales volume and lower commodity costs. Overhead spending decreased due to significantly lower workers’ compensation costs and lower utility costs. However, this favorable trend was partially off-set by lower overhead absorption. Lower sales volume and to a lesser extent lower flour commodity costs were the primary contributing factors to this decrease.  The cost of purchased flour decreased approximately $68 in the second twelve-week period of fiscal 2015 compared to the same twelve-week period in the prior year.  The gross margin percentage increased slightly from 38.2% to 38.6% in the second twelve-week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twelve-week period in the prior fiscal year.

 

 

Cost of Products Sold-Snack Food Products Segment

 

Cost of products sold in the Snack Food Products segment decreased by $5,645 (37.7%) to $9,316 in the second twelve-week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twelve-week period in fiscal year 2014 due primarily to a large low margin program of high cost beef products in the prior year that did not reoccur in the current year. Overhead spending decreased due to a significant reduction in workers’ compensation, facility repairs, over time wages and lower utility costs. The cost of significant meat commodities increased approximately $530 in the second twelve-week period of fiscal 2015 compared to the same period in the prior year.  The gross margin earned in this segment increased from 22.5% to 38.5% in the second twelve-week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the prior year primarily as a result of a favorable change in product mix composed of higher margin product sales.

  

Change in Cost of Products Sold by Division		$				%				Commodity $ (Decrease) Increase
Snack Food Products Division			(4,424	)			-32.9				530
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division (includes intersegment cost of product sold)			(1,221	)			-4.8				-
Total			(5,645	)			-37.7				530

  

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Consolidated

 

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses decreased by $2,140 (20.9%) to $8,075 in the second twelve-week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twelve-week period in the prior fiscal year.  The table below summarizes the significant expense/gain increases/decreases included in this category:

 

		12 Weeks Ended
		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014				Expense Increase (Decrease)
Product advertising		$	1,061			$	1,693			$	(632	)
Wages and bonus			3,466				2,990				476
Fuel			698				1,092				(394	)
Workers’ compensation			(83	)			203				(286	)
Other SG&A			2,933				3,066				(133	)
Continuing operations - SG&A			8,075				9,044				(969	)
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-				1,171				(1,171	)
Total		$	8,075			$	10,215			$	(2,140	)

 

Costs for product advertising decreased compared to the same twelve week period in fiscal 2014 mainly as a result of lower sales and spending trends in the Frozen Food Products segment during the second quarter of fiscal 2015. Higher profits and profit sharing accruals resulted in increased wages and bonus in the second twelve weeks of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in fuel expense was driven by per gallon fuel price decreases compared to the prior year as a result of lower trends in petroleum markets. The Company's workers' compensation benefits cost decreased due to a one-time gain of $125 on closing out older policy years and by $46 because of favorable trends in claims experience in the current fiscal year. In addition, workers’ compensation benefits cost decreased by an additional $51 due to a change in accounting method to estimate future liabilities. Recent claim trends have been favorable. None of the changes individually or as a group of expenses in “Other SG&A” were significant enough to merit separate disclosure.  The major components comprising the increase of “Other SG&A” expenses were decreases in healthcare and outside consultants.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Frozen Food Products Segment

 

SG&A expenses in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $829 (21.0%) to $3,116 in the second twelve-week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twelve-week period in the prior fiscal year.  The overall decrease in SG&A expenses was mainly due to lower product advertising and lower workers’ compensation costs as described above.

 

    

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Snack Food Products Segment

 

SG&A expenses in the Snack Food Products segment decreased by $1,311 (20.9%) to $4,959 in the second twelve-week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twelve-week period in the prior fiscal year.  Most of the decrease was due to the closure of the Refrigerated Deli Products Division at the end of fiscal 2014.

 

		12 Weeks Ended
		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014				Expense Increase (Decrease)
Snack Food Products Segment		$	4,959			$	5,099			$	(140	)
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-				1,171				(1,171	)
Total		$	4,959			$	6,270			$	(1,311	)

 

Income Taxes-Consolidated

 

Income tax for the twelve weeks ended April 17, 2015 and April 18, 2014, respectively, was as follows: 

 

		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014
Income tax provision		$	-			$	-
Effective tax rate			0.0	%			0.0	%

 

We recorded zero benefit on income taxes for the twelve-week period ended April 17, 2015, related to federal and state taxes, based on the Company's expected annual effective tax rate.  

 

The Company policy outlines measurable objective criteria that must be met before a release of the valuation allowance will occur.  The three criteria set forth in the policy must all be satisfied before the valuation allowance can be reversed.  The criteria are as follows: first, the Company’s projected available federal tax net operating loss ("NOL") must be zero; second, the prior thirty-six month cumulative book basis pre-tax income (loss), after considering “one-time” events, is positive; and third, the Company considers its outlook of near term profitable operations and assesses any material negative and positive trends or events on the immediate horizon.  As of April 17, 2015 the Company (1) has a projected federal tax NOL for fiscal 2015, (2) has positive thirty-six month cumulative book income and (3) there are current negative economic trends including lower operating profit for the Snack Food Products segment and higher commodity costs for meat.  Only the second criterion has been satisfied, therefore, the Company will maintain a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as of April 17, 2015.

 

Net Income (loss) -Consolidated

 

The net income of $2,202 in the twelve weeks ended April 17, 2015 includes a non-taxable gain on life insurance policies in the amount of $70. The net loss of $1,280 in the twelve weeks ended April 18, 2014 includes a non-taxable gain on life insurance policies in the amount of $66. Gains and losses on life insurance policies are dependent upon the performance of the underlying equities that support policy values and future results may vary considerably.

 

Results of Operations for the Twenty-four Weeks ended April 17, 2015 and April 18, 2014

 

Net Sales-Consolidated

 

Net sales decreased by $2,302 (3.6%) to $61,407 in the twenty-four week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twenty-four week period last year.  The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:

 

Impact on Net Sales-Consolidated		%				$
Selling price per pound			-5.9				(4,028	)
Unit sales volume in pounds			5.0				3,377
Returns activity			1.8				1,191
Promotional activity			3.2				2,173
Continuing operations - Increase in net sales			4.1				2,713
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-7.7				(5,015	)
Decrease in net sales			-3.6				(2,302	)

 

 

The decrease in net sales in fiscal 2015 was attributable to a large seasonal low margin program with a customer in the prior year period that did not reoccur in the current year. Selling price per pound decreased and was partially offset by an increase in unit sales volume in pounds in the Snack Food Products segment as discussed in the segment analysis below. Returns decreased compared to the same period in fiscal 2014. Returns and promotional activity were lower than the prior year period due to the large seasonal low margin program mentioned above.

   

Net Sales-Frozen Food Products Segment

 

Net sales in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $822 (3.3%) to $24,213 in the twenty-four week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twenty-four week period last year.  The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:

 

Impact on Net Sales-Frozen Food Products		%				$
Selling price per pound			-1.7				(489	)
Unit sales volume in pounds			-3.4				(959	)
Returns activity			-0.3				(74	)
Promotional activity			2.1				700
Decrease in net sales			-3.3				(822	)

 

The decrease in net sales for the twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015 primarily relates to lower unit sales volume and selling prices per pound. Returns activity also increased.  Lower promotional activity compared to the same twenty-four week period in fiscal year 2014 favorably impacted net sales.

  

Net Sales-Snack Food Products Segment

 

Net sales in the Snack Food Products segment, decreased by $1,480 (3.8%) to $37,194 in the twenty-four week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twenty-four week period last year.  The changes in net sales were comprised as follows:

 

Impact on Net Sales-Snack Food Products		%				$
Selling price per pound			-9.0				(3,539	)
Unit sales volume in pounds			11.0				4,337
Returns activity			3.1				1,266
Promotional activity			3.7				1,471
Continuing operations - Increase in net sales			8.8				3,535
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-12.6				(5,015	)
Total - Decrease in net sales			-3.8				(1,480	)

 

The increase in net sales from continuing operations in fiscal 2015 was attributable to increased unit sales volume in pounds partially offset by lower selling prices per pound related to an unfavorable sales mix. Returns and promotional activity were lower than the prior year period due to the large seasonal low margin program mentioned above. At the end of fiscal 2014, we discontinued operation of our Refrigerated Deli Products Division and ceased refrigerated snack food product distribution because of continued net losses. The reduction in sales from the discontinued operation offset the increase in sales from continuing operations.

 

Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin-Consolidated

 

Cost of products sold decreased by $2,993 (6.7%) to $41,513 in the twenty-four week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twenty-four week period in fiscal year 2014 due primarily to a large low margin program of high cost beef products in the prior year that did not reoccur in the current year. Overhead spending decreased due to a significant reduction in workers’ compensation, facility repairs, over-time wages and lower utility costs. The Company's workers' compensation benefits cost decreased due to a one-time gain of $214 on closing out older policy years and by $79 because of favorable trends in claims experience in the current fiscal year. In addition, workers’ compensation benefits cost decreased by an additional $87 due to a change in accounting method to estimate future liabilities. Significant increases in meat commodity costs partially offset the decrease in cost of products sold as described in the segment analysis below.  The gross margin increased from 30.1% to 32.4%.

  

 

Change in Cost of Products Sold by Segment		$				%				Commodity $ (Decrease) Increase
Frozen Food Products Segment			(749	)			-1.7				(128	)
Snack Food Products Segment			(42	)			-0.1				2,912
Continuing operations			(791	)			-1.8				2,784
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			(2,202	)			-4.9				-
Total			(2,993	)			-6.7				2,784

 

 

Cost of Products Sold-Frozen Food Products Segment

 

Cost of products sold in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $749 (4.8%) to $14,914 in the first twenty-four week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twenty-four week period in fiscal year 2014. Lower unit volume and to a lesser extent flour commodity costs were the primary contributing factors to this decrease.  The cost of purchased flour decreased approximately $128 in the twenty-four week period of fiscal 2015 compared to the same twenty-four week period in the prior year.  The gross margin percentage increased from 37.4% to 38.4% in the first twenty-four week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twenty-four week period in the prior fiscal year.

 

Cost of Products Sold-Snack Food Products Segment

 

Cost of products sold in the Snack Food Products segment decreased by $2,578 (8.8%) to $26,599 in the first twenty-four week period of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same twenty-four week period in fiscal year 2014 due to lower unit sales volume. Cost of products sold was also reduced due to significantly lower workers’ compensation costs and lower utility costs. The cost of significant meat commodities increased approximately $2,912 in the twenty-four week period of fiscal 2015 compared to the same period in the prior year.  The gross margin earned in this segment increased from 25.4% to 28.5% in the twenty-four week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the prior year primarily as a result of a favorable change in product mix composed of high margin product sales.

 

Change in Cost of Products Sold by Division		$				%				Commodity $ (Decrease) Increase
Snack Food Products Division			(42	)			-3.9				2,912
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division (includes intersegment cost of product sold)			(2,536	)			-4.9				-
Total			(2,578	)			-8.8				2,912

  

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Consolidated

 

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses decreased by $3,024 (14.9%) to $17,225 in the first twenty-four week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twenty-four week period in the prior fiscal year.  The table below summarizes the significant expense/gain increases/decreases included in this category:

 

		24 Weeks Ended
		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014				Expense Increase (Decrease)
Wages and bonus		$	6,964			$	6,228			$	736
Product advertising			1,398				2,034				(636	)
Fuel			698				1,013				(315	)
Workers’ compensation			43				353				(310	)
Other SG&A			8,122				8,244				(122	)
Continuing operations - SG&A			17,225				17,872				(647	)
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-				2,377				(2,377	)
Total		$	17,225			$	20,249			$	(3,024	)

 

 

Higher profits and profit sharing accruals resulted in increased wages and bonus in the first twenty-four weeks of the 2015 fiscal year compared to the same period in the prior year. Costs for product advertising decreased compared to the same twenty-four week period in fiscal 2014 mainly as a result of lower sales and spending trends in the Frozen Food Products Segment during the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The decrease in fuel expense was driven by per gallon fuel price decreases compared to the prior year as a result of lower trends in petroleum markets. The Company's workers' compensation benefits cost decreased due to a one-time gain of $125 on closing out older policy years and by $46 because of favorable trends in claims experience in the current fiscal year. In addition, workers’ compensation benefits cost decreased by an additional $51 due to a change in accounting method to estimate future liabilities. The major components comprising the decrease of “Other SG&A” expenses were decreases in healthcare and outside consultants.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Frozen Food Products Segment

 

SG&A expenses in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $1,023 (13.1%) to $6,797 in the first twenty-four week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twenty-four week period in the prior fiscal year.  The overall decrease in SG&A expenses was mainly due to lower product advertising and lower workers’ compensation costs as described above.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Snack Food Products Segment

 

SG&A expenses in the Snack Food Products segment decreased by $2,001 (16.1%) to $10,428 in the twenty-four week period of fiscal year 2015 compared to the same twenty-four week period in the prior fiscal year.  Most of the decrease was due to the closure of the Refrigerated Deli Products Division at the end of fiscal 2014.

 

		24 Weeks Ended
		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014				Expense Increase (Decrease)
Snack Food Products Segment		$	10,428			$	10,051			$	377
Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division			-				2,378				(2,378	)
Total		$	10,428			$	12,429			$	(2,001	)

 

Income Taxes-Consolidated

 

Income tax for the twenty-four week ended April 17, 2015 and April 18, 2014, respectively, was as follows: 

 

		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014
Income tax provision		$	-			$	-
Effective tax rate			0.0	%			0.0	%

 

We recorded zero benefit on income taxes for the twenty-four week period ended April 17, 2015, related to federal and state taxes, based on the Company's expected annual effective tax rate.  

 

The Company policy outlines measurable objective criteria that must be met before a release of the valuation allowance will occur.  The three criteria set forth in the policy must all be satisfied before the valuation allowance can be reversed.  The criteria are as follows: first, the Company’s projected available federal tax net operating loss ("NOL") must be zero; second, the prior thirty-six month cumulative book basis pre-tax income (loss), after considering “one-time” events, is positive; and third, the Company considers its outlook of near term profitable operations and assesses any material negative and positive trends or events on the immediate horizon.  As of April 17, 2015, the Company (1) has a projected federal tax NOL for fiscal 2015, (2) has positive thirty-six month cumulative book income and (3) there are current negative economic trends including lower operating profit for the Snack Food Products segment and higher commodity costs for meat.  Only the second criterion has been satisfied, therefore, the Company will maintain a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as of April 17, 2015.

 

Net Income (loss) -Consolidated

 

The net income of $2,669 in the first twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015 includes a non-taxable gain on life insurance policies in the amount of $136. The net loss of $1,046 in the first twenty-four weeks ended April 18, 2014 includes a non-taxable gain on life insurance policies in the amount of $215. Gains and losses on life insurance policies are dependent upon the performance of the underlying equities that support policy values and future results may vary considerably.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The principal source of our operating cash flow is cash receipts from the sale of our products, net of costs to manufacture, store, market and deliver our products.  Prior to August 2014, we had remained free of bank debt for the past twenty-six years and normally funded our operations from cash balances and cash flow generated from operations.  Historically, we expect positive operating cash flows in the first quarter of our fiscal year from the liquidation of inventory and accounts receivable balances related to holiday season sales.  Anticipated commodity price trends may affect future cash balances.  However, certain commodities may be purchased in advance of our immediate needs to lower the ultimate cost of processing.

  

Cash flows from operating activities for the twenty-four weeks ended:

 

		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014
Net (loss) income		$	2,669			$	(1,046	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation			1,462				1,210
Provision for losses on accounts receivable			45				102
Reduction in (provision for) promotional allowances			379				(1,732	)
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment			(117	)			(68	)
Changes in operating working capital			3,455				1,023
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		$	7,893			$	(511	)

 

For the twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was $7,893, $8,404 more cash provided than during the same period in fiscal 2014.  Net cash provided by operating activities increased due to a liquidation of inventory of $5,595 and net income of $2,669. The significant liquidation of inventory related to shipments of product to satisfy large warehouse customer orders during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The decrease in accounts receivable related to lower promotional allowances.  During the twenty-four week period ended April 17, 2015 we funded $556 towards our defined benefit pension plan. Plan funding strategies may be adjusted depending upon economic conditions, investment options, tax deductibility, or recent legislation changes in funding requirements. The Company did not borrow on the line of credit with Wells Fargo during the twenty-four weeks ended April 17, 2015.

 

Our cash conversion cycle (defined as days of inventory and trade receivables less days of trade payables outstanding) was equal to 50 days for the twenty-four week period ended April 17, 2015.  The liquidation of finished goods inventories during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 during the holiday selling season contributed to the quick conversion cycle which was consistent with the prior year comparative quarter.

 

For the twenty-four weeks ended April 18, 2014, operating cash flows were increased due to the collection of accounts receivable. Specifically, the lower accounts receivable and inventory balances were due to collection of sales made during the holiday season that occur in the fourth and first quarters. During the twenty-four week period ended April 18, 2014 we funded $714 towards our defined benefit pension plan.

 

Cash used in investing activities for the twenty-four weeks ended:

 

		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2015
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		$	29			$	77
Additions to property, plant and equipment			(293	)			(2,163	)
Net cash used in investing activities		$	(264	)		$	(2,086	)

 

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment include the acquisition of new equipment, upgrading of facilities to maintain operating efficiency and investments in cost effective technologies to lower costs. In general, we capitalize the cost of additions and improvements and expense the cost for repairs and maintenance.  The Company may also capitalize costs related to improvements that extend the life, increase the capacity, or improve the efficiency of existing machinery and equipment.  Specifically, capitalization of upgrades of facilities to maintain operating efficiency include acquisitions of machinery and equipment used on packaging lines and refrigeration equipment used to process food products.

 

 

The table below highlights additions to property, plant and equipment for the twenty-four weeks ended:

 

		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014
Changes in projects in process		$	34			$	1,589
Processing equipment			-				286
Direct store delivery vehicles			220				151
Building improvements			-				10
Packaging lines			11				117
Temperature control and product storage			6				10
Salesman’s vehicles			22				-
Additions to property, plant and equipment		$	293			$	2,163

 

 

Cash used in financing activities for the twenty-four weeks ended:

 

		April 17, 2015				April 18, 2014
Shares repurchased		$	(119	)		$	(126	)
Payment of capital lease obligations			(103	)			(106	)
Cash dividends paid			-				-
Net cash used in financing activities		$	(222	)		$	(232	)

 

Our stock repurchase program was approved by the Board of Directors in November 1999 and was expanded in June 2005.  Under the stock repurchase program, we are authorized, at the discretion of management and the Board of Directors, to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock on the open market.  As of April 17, 2015, 142,632 shares were still authorized for repurchase under the program.  

 

We invested in OTR (over-the-road) tractors during the third quarter of fiscal 2012 financed by a capital lease obligation in the amount of $1,848. After reevaluating our fleet delivery needs, we returned five OTR tractors financed by the capital lease arrangement with a remaining liability of $656 during the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The total capital lease obligation remaining as of April 17, 2015 is $796. The capital lease arrangement replaced the long-standing month-to-month leases of transportation equipment.

 

We maintain a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that expires on March 1, 2016. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we converted our line of credit to a revolving line of credit. Under the terms of this line of credit, we may borrow up to $4,000 at an interest rate equal to the bank’s prime rate or Libor plus 1.5%. The borrowing agreement contains various covenants, the more significant of which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth and a minimum net income after tax and total capital expenditures less than $3,000. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of April 17, 2015. There have been no borrowings under this line of credit during fiscal 2015.

 

The impact of inflation on the Company’s financial position and results of operations has not been significant. Management is of the opinion that the Company’s financial position and its capital resources are sufficient to provide for its operating needs and capital expenditures for remainder of the fiscal 2015.  

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements 

 

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The guidance modified the definition of a discontinued operation to include disposals that qualify as a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The guidance becomes effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 14, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect this statement will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers to supersede previous revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP. The guidance presents steps for comprehensive revenue recognition that requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, with no early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this statement and its impact on its results of operations or financial position.

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We are not engaged in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

 

Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Not applicable to smaller reporting company.

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, with the participation and under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on this evaluation the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report in their design and operation to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management and  recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and were accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

 

The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

 

We maintain and evaluate a system of internal accounting controls, and a program of internal auditing designed to provide reasonable assurance that our assets are protected and that transactions are performed in accordance with proper authorization, and are properly recorded. This system of internal accounting controls is continually reviewed and modified in response to evolving business conditions and operations and to recommendations made by the independent registered public accounting firm.  On May 14, 2013, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) published Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) (the "2013 Framework") and related illustrative documents as an update to Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) (the "1992 Framework"). The Company has adopted the 2013 Framework this fiscal year and has determined that the 17 principles are present and functioning during our assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls. We have established a code of conduct.  Our management believes that the accounting and internal control systems provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and financial information is reliable.

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors meets regularly with our financial management and counsel, and with the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by us.  Internal accounting controls and the quality of financial reporting are discussed during these meetings. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed by the auditing standards adopted or established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee and the independent registered public accounting firm have discussed the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence from the Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 “Communicating with Audit Committees Concerning Independence”.

 

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended April 17, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

Part II.  Other Information

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

The risk factors listed in Part I “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014 should be considered with the information provided elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.  There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

We have not sold any equity securities during the period covered by this Report.

 

The following table provides information regarding repurchases by us of our common stock, for each of the three four-week periods included in the interim twelve week period ended April 17, 2015.

 

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Period (1)		Total Number of Shares Purchased				Average Price Paid Per Share				Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)				Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
January 24, 2015 – February 20, 2015			3,768			$	7.92				3,768				149,204
February 21, 2015 – March 20, 2015			5,364				7.88				5,364				143,840
March 21, 2015 – April 17, 2015			1,208				8.32				1,208				142,632
Total			10,340			$	7.95				10,340

 

(1)

The periods shown are the fiscal periods during the twelve-week quarter ended April 17, 2015.

 

(2)

All repurchases reflected in the foregoing table were made on the open market.  Our stock repurchase program was approved by the Board of Directors in November 1999 (1,500,000 shares authorized, disclosed in a Form 10-K filed on January 26, 2000) and was expanded in June 2005 (500,000 additional shares authorized, disclosed in a press release and Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2005).  Under the stock repurchase program, we are authorized, at the discretion of management and the Board of Directors, to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock on the open market.  Our Stock Purchase Plan (“Purchase Plan”) is administered by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”) for purchase of shares of common stock (“Stock”) issued by us in compliance with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).  Commencing on October 15, 2014 and continuing through and including October 14, 2015, CGM shall act as our exclusive agent to purchase Stock under the Purchase Plan.  This Purchase Plan supplements any purchases of stock by us “outside” of the Purchase Plan, which may occur from time to time, in open market transactions pursuant to Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. The daily purchase quantity is defined as a number of shares up to, but not to exceed, each day’s applicable Rule 10b-18 maximum volume limit (i.e. 25% of the prior four calendar weeks’ average daily trading volume); however, once per week a block of stock may be purchased that exceeds the Rule 10b-18 average daily trading volume condition, provided that no other Purchase Plan purchases are made on any day on which such a block is purchased.  As of April 17, 2015, the total maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the Purchase Plan is 142,632 at a purchase price not to exceed $10.00 per share at a total maximum aggregate price (exclusive of commission) of $1,426,320.

  

 

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

	Exhibit No.	Description
	31.1	Certification of Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer), as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1	Certification of Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer), as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.*
	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.*
	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.*
	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.*
	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.*
	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.*

 

---

 

*                             The XBRL information is being furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

  

  

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

	BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION
		(Registrant)
Dated: May 29, 2015	By:	/s/ Raymond F. Lancy
		Raymond F. Lancy
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

    

 

24 of 24