e20vfza
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 17, 2005.
 
 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F/A
(Amendment No. 1)

o    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR
(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

þ    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the year ended December 31, 2004

OR

o    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

o    SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number 1-14400

METSO CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

The Republic of Finland
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

P.O. Box 1220
FIN-00101 Helsinki
Finland

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Title of each class:   Name of each exchange on which registered:
Shares, nominal value 1.70 each,
represented by American Depositary Shares
  New York Stock Exchange, Inc. 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Number of shares, nominal value 1.70 each, outstanding on December 31, 2004: 136,250,545

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorted period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     
Yes þ   No o

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

     
Item 17 o   Item 18 þ
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
     
o Yes   þ No
 
 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

             
        Page  
  iii
 
           
PART I        
 
           
  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers     1  
  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable     1  
  Key Information     1  
 
           
 
  Selected Financial Data     1  
 
  Exchange Rates     3  
 
  Risk Factors     4  
 
           
  Information on the Company     8  
 
           
 
  Organization     8  
 
  History and Development of the Company     8  
 
  Strategy     9  
 
  Corporate Structure     9  
 
  Business Summary     11  
 
  Discontinued Operations     24  
 
  Raw Materials     25  
 
  Seasonality     25  
 
  Dependence on Intellectual Property     25  
 
  Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters     25  
 
  Property, Plants and Equipment     28  
 
  Significant Subsidiaries     30  
 
  Associated companies     30  
 
           
  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects     30  
 
           
 
  Business Overview     31  
 
  Key Management Issues     32  
 
  Recent Acquisitions and Divestments     33  
 
  Critical Accounting Policies     34  
 
  Results of Operations     38  
 
  Principal Differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP     44  
 
  Liquidity and Capital Resources     45  
 
  Capital Expenditure     47  
 
  Research and Development     48  
 
  Foreign Currency Fluctuations     49  
 
  Inflation     50  
 
  Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards     50  
 
  New Accounting Standards     51  
 
  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements     51  
 
           
  Directors, Senior Management and Employees     52  
 
           
 
  Board of Directors     52  
 
  Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Executive Team     53  
 
  Compensation of Directors and Officers     54  
 
  Audit Committee and Compensation Committee     55  
 
  Home Country Practices     55  
 
  Employees     56  
 
  Share Ownership     56  
 
  Authorizations for Board of Directors     57  

(i)


Table of Contents

             
        Page  
  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions     58  
 
           
 
  Major Shareholders     58  
 
  Related Party Transactions     58  
 
           
  Financial Information     59  
 
           
 
  Consolidated Financial Statements     59  
 
  Export Sales     59  
 
  Legal Proceedings     59  
 
  Dividend Policy     60  
 
  Significant Changes     60  
 
           
  The Offer and Listing     61  
 
           
 
  Nature of Trading Market     61  
 
  Trading and Settlement on the Helsinki Stock Exchange     62  
 
  Regulation of the Finnish Securities Market     62  
 
  The Finnish Book-Entry Securities System     63  
 
           
  Additional Information     64  
 
           
 
  Articles of Association     64  
 
  Material Contracts     67  
 
  Exchange Controls     67  
 
  Control of Foreign Ownership     67  
 
  Taxation     67  
 
  Documents on Display     71  
 
           
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     72  
 
           
 
  Exchange Rates and Foreign Currency Exposure     72  
 
  Interest Rate Risk     73  
 
  Equity Price Risk     73  
 
  Commodity Price Risk     73  
 
           
  Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities     74  
 
           
PART II        
 
           
  Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies     75  
  Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds     75  
  Controls and Procedures     75  
  [Reserved]     76  
  Audit Committee Financial Expert     76  
  Code of Ethics     76  
  Principal Accountant Fees and Services     76  
  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committee     77  
  Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers     77  
 
           
PART III        
 
           
  Financial Statements     77  
  Financial Statements     77  
  Exhibits     78  
 EX-12.1
 EX-12.2
 EX-13.1
 EX-13.2

(ii)


Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

     In this annual report, the “Company,” “Metso Corporation,” “Metso,” “Group,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Metso Corporation or Metso Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, as the context may require. As used herein, the term “Finnish State” refers to the Republic of Finland.

CURRENCY PRESENTATION

     We have published our consolidated financial statements in euro for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. As used in this annual report:

  •   “euro” or “” means the lawful currency of the member states of the European Union (the “EU”) participating in the EU’s Economic and Monetary Union;
 
  •   “U.S. dollar,” “U.S.$” or “USD” means the lawful currency of the United States of America;
 
  •   “pound sterling” or “GBP” means the lawful currency of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
 
  •   “Canadian dollar” or “CAD” means the lawful currency of Canada;
 
  •   “South African rand” or “ZAR” means the lawful currency of the Republic of South Africa; and
 
  •   “Swedish krona” or “SEK” means the lawful currency of the Kingdom of Sweden.

     Unless otherwise stated, euro amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars at the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfer in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “noon buying rate”) on December 31, 2004, which was 1.00 = U.S.$1.3538 (U.S.$1.00 = 0.7387). On March 29, 2005, the noon buying rate for the euro was 1.00 = U.S.$1.2913 (U.S.$1.00 = 0.7744).

FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

     Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Finland (“Finnish GAAP”), which differ in certain significant respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). For a discussion of the principal differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see Note 30 to our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, and income statement data for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, included elsewhere in this annual report. See also “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP.”

     The financial information set forth in a number of tables herein has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Accordingly, in certain instances, the sum of the numbers in a column may not conform exactly to the total figure given for that column.

     As used herein, “Nordic Countries” refers to Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. As used herein, “North America” refers to the United States and Canada. As used herein, “South America” refers to all countries in the American continents excluding the United States and Canada.

     We own or otherwise have rights to a substantial number of trademarks that we use in conjunction with our business. Some of these trademarks are referred to in this annual report.

(iii)


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     Certain statements in this annual report, including but not limited to certain statements set forth under the captions “Item 3. Key Information,” “Item 4. Information on the Company,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” “Item 8. Financial Information” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” and elsewhere are based upon the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to our management, and such statements may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Potential investors should note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this annual report, could affect our future operations and future financial results and could cause future operations and future financial results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Some of these factors are:

  •   operating factors, such as the continued success of our manufacturing activities and the achievement of efficiencies therein, continued success of product development, acceptance of new products or services by our targeted customers, success of the existing and future collaboration arrangements, changes in business strategy or development plans or targets, changes in the degree of protection created by our patents and other intellectual property rights, the availability of capital on acceptable terms,
 
  •   success of future acquisitions and restructuring and changes in our business strategy,
 
  •   industry conditions, such as strength of product demand, intensity of competition, prevailing and future global market prices for our products and the pricing pressures thereto, financial condition of the customers and competitors, the potential introduction of competing products and technologies by our competitors, and
 
  •   general economic conditions, such as rates of economic growth in our principal geographic markets or fluctuations in exchange and interest rates, and various other factors both referenced and not referenced in this annual report.

     Should one or more of these factors materialize, or should any assumptions of the management underlying such forward-looking statements prove to be incorrect, our actual operating results or financial condition and prospects could differ materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.

(iv)


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers.

     Not applicable.

Item 2.  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable.

     Not applicable.

Item 3.  Key Information.

Selected Financial Data

     Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Finnish GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation to U.S. GAAP is set forth in Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of the principal differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see also “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP.” Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of American Depository Shares (“ADSs”). Each ADS represents one of our shares. Per share data has been translated into U.S. dollars per ADS where appropriate.

     The selected financial data set forth below as of and for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is a summary derived from our consolidated financial statements and should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.

                                         
    For the year ended December 31,  
    2000     2001(1)     2002     2003     2004  
                     
    (in millions, except per share data)  
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
                                       
Amounts in Accordance with Finnish GAAP
                                       
Net sales
    3,891       4,343       4,691       4,250       3,976  
Operating profit (loss)(2)
    200       246       167       (229 )     111  
Financial income and expenses, net
    (20 )     (24 )     (74 )     (74 )     (62 )
Share of profits of associated companies
    0       0       0       0       0  
 
                             
Income (loss) before extraordinary items and income taxes
    180       222       93       (303 )     49  
 
                             
Extraordinary income and expenses, net
    268       (8 )                  
 
                             
Income (loss) before taxes
    448       214       93       (303 )     49  
Income taxes
    (59 )     (72 )     (26 )     44       21  
Minority interests
    0       (1 )     (2 )     1       (1 )
 
                             
Net income (loss)
    389       141       65       (258 )     69  
 
                             
Earnings (loss) per share(3)(4)
    0.90       1.09       0.48       (1.89 )     0.51  
 
 
                                       
BALANCE SHEET DATA
                                       
Amounts in Accordance with Finnish GAAP
                                       
Total assets
    3,564       5,042       4,399       3,823       3,578  
Cash and cash equivalents
    485       212       190       130       419  
Net interest bearing liabilities
    (53 )     1,251       1,118       1,109       529  
Shareholders’ equity
    1,425       1,469       1,379       1,024       1,052  
 
 
                                       
CASH FLOW DATA
                                       
Amounts in Accordance with Finnish GAAP
                                       
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    300       235       252       146       262  
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    309       (943 )     (14 )     (80 )     359  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (284 )     433       (233 )     (121 )     (333 )
Capital expenditures on fixed assets(5)
    111       154       191       128       89  
Cash dividends declared and paid per share ()(6)
    0.60       0.60       0.60       0.20       0.35  
Cash dividends declared and paid per share (U.S.$)(6)(7)
    0.56       0.53       0.63       0.25       0.47  

1


Table of Contents

                                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2000     2001(1)     2002     2003     2004  
                     
    (in millions, except per share data)  
            (restated)     (restated)     (restated)          
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
                                       
Amounts in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
                                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations(9)
    75       127       3       (196 )     66  
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations(9)
    6       0       19       (39 )     8  
Gain (loss) on disposal of Discontinued Operations
    326                         (72 )
 
                             
Net income (loss)(8)(9)
    407       127       22       (235 )     2  
 
                             
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations(9)
    0.56       0.93       0.02       (1.44 )     0.48  
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from Discontinued Operations(9)
    2.45       0.00       0.14       (0.29 )     (0.47 )
 
BALANCE SHEET DATA
                                       
Amounts in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
                                       
Total assets(9)
    3,799       5,275       4,520       3,996       3,697  
Long-term liabilities(9)
    656       1,553       1,334       1,256       1,231  
Shareholders’ equity(9)
    1,499       1,503       1,326       998       978  


(1)   Effective September 2001, Metso acquired all of the outstanding shares of Svedala AB for a total acquisition price of 943 million. Svedala has been consolidated in our financial statements as of the fourth quarter of 2001.
 
(2)   The operating loss for 2003 includes a goodwill impairment of 205 million and restructuring expenses of 103 million related to the efficiency improvement program launched during the year.
 
(3)   Under Finnish GAAP, the earnings per share calculation excludes extraordinary items. For a discussion of the calculation of earnings (loss) per share, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements. Under U.S. GAAP, these items would either be included in the earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations or in earnings (loss) per share from Discontinued Operations. See Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements.
 
(4)   The average numbers of shares used in calculating this amount were as follows:
         
Year ended December 31,   Number of Shares  
2000
    135,363,537  
2001
    136,135,223  
2002
    136,189,704  
2003
    136,189,704  
2004
    136,189,704  

(5)   Excluding business acquisitions.
 
(6)   Dividends are paid after the decision by the annual general meeting held in the year following the year for which they are attributed to. The dividend for 2004 is the proposal of Metso’s board of directors to the annual general meeting to be held on April 4, 2005.
 
(7)   Solely for the reader’s convenience, amounts in euro have been converted into U.S. dollars at the noon buying rate on December 31, of the respective year.
 
(8)   As of January 1, 2002, for purposes of U.S. GAAP, Metso adopted SFAS 142, which ceased amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Amortization expense on goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on a U.S. GAAP basis for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 was 9 million and 12 million, respectively.
 
(9)   Our 2001, 2002 and 2003 financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been restated to reflect the impact of adjustments made to our pension liabilities recorded in conjunction with our acquisition in 2001. In order to correctly record this pension liability in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the balance sheet at the time of acquisition would have reflected an additional pension liability and a corresponding increase to goodwill, net of the tax impact of the additional pension liability. After consideration of this additional goodwill, our impairment charge in 2003 would have been increased. As a result, our U.S. GAAP income statement reflects an additional loss of 18 million in 2003 (0.13 additional loss per share).
    Our 2002 and 2003 accounts have been restated to reflect the impact of adjustments made to our deferred tax asset valuation allowances recorded in 2002 and 2003. These adjustments would result in substantially a full valuation allowance in relation to our US operations for both periods. In addition, the 2003 results would also include the release of a previously recorded valuation allowance related to our German operations. In order to correctly record the valuation allowance in accordance with U.S. GAAP, an additional valuation allowance of 91 million has been recorded as of December 31, 2002 with a corresponding increase to deferred income tax expense. In 2003, the consolidated balance sheet would still reflect substantially a full valuation allowance for our US deferred tax assets; however, the amounts previously recognized in 2003 to increase this valuation allowance would have been recorded in the previous year as noted above. In addition, the amount previously recognized as a valuation allowance related to our German operations has been reversed in 2003. As such, the 2003 income statement reflects a decrease in deferred tax expense of 28 million, net of translation difference of 15 million. As a result of these adjustments, the income statement under U.S. GAAP net income reflects additional expense of 91 million (0.67 per share) in 2002 and additional income in 2003 of 28 million (0.21 per share).

2


Table of Contents

Exchange Rates

     We present our financial statements in euro. A portion of our revenues and expenses is denominated in euro and a portion is denominated in currencies other than the euro. The first table below sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, the average, high, low and period-end noon buying rates for the euro expressed in euro per U.S. dollar. The second table below sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, the average, high, low and period-end noon buying rates for the U.S. dollar expressed in U.S. dollars per euro.

     The average noon buying rates have been calculated based on the noon buying rate for the last business day of each month or portion of a month during the relevant period. We are providing this information solely for the reader’s convenience. These are not necessarily the rates we used in the preparation of the financial statements and we make no representation that euros could have been converted into U.S. dollars at the rates shown or at any other rate for such periods or at such dates.

     The following tables set forth the noon buying rate for the euro for each of the previous five years, the period from the beginning of the year 2005 until the latest practicable date and for each of the last six months (expressed in euro per one U.S. dollar):

Euro per U.S. Dollar

                                 
Year   Average     High     Low     Period End  
2000
    1.0860       1.2090       0.9675       1.0650  
2001
    1.1711       1.1947       1.0488       1.1235  
2002
    1.0531       1.1636       0.9537       0.9537  
2003
    0.8782       0.9652       0.7938       0.7938  
2004
    0.8014       0.8474       0.7339       0.7387  
2005 (through March 29)
    0.7646       0.7829       0.7421       0.7744  
                                 
Calendar Period   Low     High                  
2004
               
September
    0.8053       0.8297  
October
    0.7823       0.8149  
November
    0.7526       0.7872  
December
    0.7339       0.7562  
 
               
2005
               
January
    0.7421       0.7720  
February
    0.7534       0.7829  
March (through March 29)
    0.7744       0.7427  

3


Table of Contents

     The following tables set forth the noon buying rate for the U.S. dollar for each of the previous five years, and the period from the beginning of the year 2005 until the latest practicable date and for each of the last six months (expressed in U.S. dollars per one euro).

U.S. Dollars per Euro

                                 
Year   Average     High     Low     Period End  
2000
    0.9207       1.0335       0.8270       0.9388  
2001
    0.8952       0.9535       0.8370       0.8901  
2002
    0.9492       1.0485       0.8594       1.0485  
2003
    1.1411       1.2597       1.0361       1.2597  
2004
    1.2478       1.3625       1.1801       1.3538  
2005 (through March 29)
    1.3079       1.3476       1.2773       1.2913  
                                 
Calendar Period   High     Low  
2004
               
September
    1.2417       1.2052  
October
    1.2783       1.2271  
November
    1.3288       1.2703  
December
    1.3625       1.3224  
 
2005
               
January
    1.3476       1.2954  
February
    1.3274       1.2773  
March (through March 29)
    1.3465       1.2913  

     Since July 1, 1999, our shares have been traded on the Helsinki Stock Exchange in euro. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the euro and the U.S. dollar affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of the euro price of the shares on the Helsinki Stock Exchange and, as a result, are likely to affect the market price of our ADSs, which are traded on the New York Stock Exchange. We declare cash dividends in euro and then convert this amount to U.S. dollars for ADS holders. Therefore, exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts that ADS holders receive.

     For a discussion of the effects of exchange rate movements on our operations, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Foreign Currency Fluctuations.”

     Our foreign exchange risk management policy is focused on hedging foreign currency exposures related to firm sale and purchase commitments as well as net investments in foreign subsidiaries to the extent practicable. We have, to a large extent, hedged our foreign currency denominated net assets of foreign subsidiaries through borrowings, currency derivatives and, to some extent, through receivables. Apart from forward foreign exchange contracts, options and currency swaps, as of December 31, 2004, we were not a party to any other derivative foreign currency instruments. For a discussion of our foreign exchange risk management policy, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Exchange Rates and Foreign Currency Exposure.”

Risk Factors

Business Cycles in the Global Economy and Customer Industries

     Business cycles in the global economy and our customer industries influence the demand for our products, our financial condition and results of operations, especially in the short-term. Metso Paper and Metso Automation are affected by the business cycles of the pulp and paper industry. In addition, Metso Automation is also affected by the business cycles of the power, oil and gas industries. Metso Minerals’ operations are dependent on the development of the mining, construction and civil engineering industries. Within the construction and civil engineering industries, the level of infrastructure investments is most significant for Metso Minerals. Management believes that, in the long-term, the effects of business cycles are reduced by the geographical diversity of our operations and the various customer industries served. Also, new equipment orders tend to be more affected by business cycles than the demand for rebuilds and process improvements as well as

4


Table of Contents

aftermarket operations, for which our large global installed base offers a strong platform. Although we have striven actively to reduce the risks of business cycles by growing our product life cycle related operations and long-term partnerships with our customers, as well as increasing the flexibility of our cost base through outsourcing and focusing on the manufacture and assembly of core components, there can be no assurance that business cycles will not continue to significantly affect the demand for our products, our business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Business Overview.”

Competition

     Our competitors vary by business area and product. We aim to differentiate ourselves from competitors through quality, reliability, service and availability, as well as through our high level of technological know-how and long-term commitment to our customers. We aim for competitive advantage through continuous product development based on research and technology development (“RTD”) investments and cooperation with our customers. In addition, we seek to operate flexibly and cost-efficiently in an effort to ensure our competitiveness. While management believes that our product and service range will keep pace with developing technologies and changing customer needs, there can be no assurance that new or enhanced products and technologies developed by current or future competitors will not reduce the competitiveness of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Summary” for a description of our significant competitors in each of our business areas.

Project Activity

     Our operations consist partly of large project deliveries to the pulp and paper industry and the mining industry. These deliveries can involve project-specific risks concerning delivery schedules as well as equipment start-up, capacity and end-product quality. In some cases, project-specific risks may also arise from new technology included in the deliveries. Although the risks of individual projects are generally not significant compared to the magnitude of our business and we seek to reduce project-specific risks by exact sales contract terms, there can be no assurance that such risks, if materialized, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Raw Materials, Suppliers and Subcontractors

     Developments in the global economy or abrupt problems with deliveries by raw material producers can influence the prices and availability of raw materials that we use for our products. This may, in turn, affect our business by increasing our purchasing costs and/or lengthening delivery lead-times. Among key raw materials used by us are steel and scrap iron, the prices and availability of which may fluctuate and have an adverse effect on our operations. The global coverage of our businesses and suppliers is expected to reduce the effect of any local disturbances. We prefer long-term supply contracts in order to reduce the effects of short-term price volatility or availability issues. In addition, when possible, we seek to identify replacement suppliers in order to manage risks related to a single supplier. However, there are limitations to the availability of such actions. For example, a raw material used by Metso Minerals in manufacturing wear parts for crushers, virgin manganese, has its supply limited mainly to South Africa. Delivery problems facing local producers or political or legislative changes in South Africa can affect the availability of manganese, which could have an adverse effect on our Metso Minerals wear parts business. We seek to manage this risk by maximizing the use of recycled manganese. Changes in the prices of electricity, oil and metals may indirectly have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, if these variations decrease the willingness of our customer industries to invest. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Raw Materials.”

     Generally, our risks related to the purchase of raw materials have decreased because we have increasingly focused on manufacturing and assembling core components only. On the other hand, outsourcing increases the importance of, and risks related to, our suppliers and subcontractors. We purchase the majority of product components from our suppliers, for whom it is not necessarily possible to find alternative suppliers at short notice. Delivery problems of our subcontractors may also adversely affect our customer relationships and business. Although we have continued to build a global supplier network and signed long-term contracts with our major raw material suppliers and subcontractors in an attempt to limit the purchasing risks related to availability and pricing of product components, there can be no assurance that such risks, if materialized, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

5


Table of Contents

Political, Economic and Legislative Changes in Developing Countries

     Both our operations and the operations of our customers are geographically widespread. We have our own manufacturing and suppliers based in many developing countries. Also, the demand for our new machinery and equipment is increasingly coming from countries in Asia and South America. Sudden political, economic and/or legislative changes in these countries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. For example, China currently represents a significant portion of our business and, hence, any sudden adverse political, economic or legislative changes in China could, especially in the short-term, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Management believes that the risks related to these developing countries are reduced by our wide geographical and industry coverage as well as our more stable aftermarket operations in Europe and North America.

Product Liability

     We are occasionally involved in product liability claims typical for companies in comparable industries. These claims are covered by our insurance policy with coverage of up to 100 million (U.S.$135 million) per year, subject to applicable insurance conditions. As part of the global coverage, our North American subsidiaries carry local general and product liability policies, which cover claims up to an annual aggregate of 4 million (U.S.$5 million). We also seek to reduce product liability risks by improving product safety through RTD investments, automation and customer training as well as by applicable sales contract terms. Although management believes that our insurance coverage is currently adequate to cover the liability risks, we may be held responsible for damages beyond the scope of our insurance coverage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Environmental Regulation

     Procedures to ensure compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations as well as ISO 14001 compliant environmental systems are key tools in our environmental management. Although our management is not aware of any current environmental matters that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, there can be no assurance that continued compliance with the existing or future environmental laws, and the costs associated therewith, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters.”

Property and Liability Risks

     We manage our exposure to property, business interruption, transport and liability risks (general liability, product liability and management liability) through global insurance schemes. The insurance coverage consists of property, business interruption, transport and liability insurance schemes and their local applications. Our total risk bearing capacity is taken into consideration when setting the amount of deductibles. Our captive insurance company will bear risks to the extent that is financially sustainable. Although management believes that our insurance coverage is currently adequate to cover the liability risks, we may be held responsible for damages beyond the scope of our insurance coverage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Liquidity

     Cash and committed revolving credit facilities are used to protect our short-term liquidity. We manage our liquidity by balancing the proportion of short-term and long-term loans as well as the average remaining maturity of long-term loans. We also manage risks in the availability of funds and pricing in the long-term by diversifying funding between money and capital markets and banks. Credit rating agencies assess our business and publish credit ratings. A lowering of credit ratings could raise the financing costs of possible new loans taken, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of the possible impact of credit ratings downgrades.

Interest Rate Risks

     Changes in market interest rates and interest margins may influence our financing costs, returns on financial investments and valuation of derivative contracts. We manage interest rate risks through the ratio of

6


Table of Contents

floating-rate to fixed-rate loans and the average length of interest rate periods. Additionally, we may use interest rate swaps and other derivative contracts. Although management believes that the measures we have taken to limit our exposure to interest rate risks are currently adequate, there can be no assurance that interest rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Exchange Rates and Foreign Currency Exposure.”

Currency Risks

     Exchange rate changes affect our business, although the geographical diversity of our operations decreases the significance of any individual currency. Exchange rate variations can have a direct effect on the prices of raw materials and production commodities purchased in non-domestic currencies and in the prices of end products for export, in which the invoicing currency is different from the currency of the manufacturing costs (transaction effect). More than one-half of our net sales originate from outside the euro zone. Alongside the euro, the most important currencies used in invoicing are the U.S. dollar and the Swedish krona. When the net sales and results of our subsidiaries outside the euro zone are translated into euro, they may increase or decrease because of exchange rate changes, even though no real change in such net sales or results has occurred (translation effect). Exchange rate movements may also affect our competitive position by weakening the cost competitiveness of our products as against those of our competitors’ products manufactured in another currency area.

     In accordance with our treasury policy, our operating units are required to hedge in full the currency exposures that arise from firm delivery and purchase agreements. In addition, the units can hedge anticipated foreign currency denominated cash flows by taking into account the significance of such cash flows, the competitive situation and other opportunities to adapt. We have operations in countries in which currency regulation affects hedging risks. The most important of these are Brazil and China. We conduct hedging operations in a centralized fashion through our corporate treasury. We have set upper limits on the open currency exposures of the corporate treasury, calculated on the basis of their potential profit impact. These limits cover net exposures from transfers between units and items arising from financing activities. Future cash flows are hedged for periods, which do not normally exceed two years. Accordingly, the majority of future cash flows related to the order backlog are hedged.

     The equity of subsidiaries outside the euro zone is affected by exchange rate risks, which may lead to translation differences in our consolidated equity. We hedge these risks with respect to essential currencies in accordance with our treasury policy by using non-euro denominated loans and forward exchange agreements. Although management believes that the measures we have taken to hedge our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations are currently adequate, there can be no assurance that exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. For a discussion of our foreign exchange risk management policy, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Exchange Rates and Foreign Currency Exposure.”

     In addition, a non-euro investors’ base currency return on an investment in our shares may be negatively affected by any depreciation of the euro against the investor’s functional currency. The value of dividends and other distributions paid in euro, and the value of the shares quoted on the Helsinki Stock Exchange in euro could decline as a result.

Credit Risks and Other Counterparty Risks

     Our operating units are primarily responsible for credit risks pertaining to sales activities. Our business areas determine the guidelines for delivery and payment terms granted to customers, their supervision and enforcement, which are then implemented at the business line and operating unit level. Our corporate treasury provides centralized services related to customer financing and seeks to ensure that the principles of our treasury policy are adhered to with respect to terms of payment and required collateral.

     When investing cash assets and making derivative contracts, our corporate treasury only accepts counterparties that fulfill the credit rating criteria defined in our treasury policy, or parties separately approved in advance by our board of directors. With respect to investments, derivative contracts and borrowing, we have set counterparty-specific limits to avoid risk concentrations.

     We have agreed on extended payment terms with selected customers in our businesses. In establishing credit arrangements, management is required to assess the creditworthiness of the customer and the timing of

7


Table of Contents

cash flows expected to be received under the arrangement. However, should the actual financial position of our customers or general economic conditions differ from our assumptions, we may be required to re-assess the ultimate collectibility of such trade credits, which could result in a write-off of these balances in future periods and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

     Our ability to manage our trade credit exposure, customer financing, risk concentrations and financial counterparty related risks depends on a number of factors, including our capital structure, market conditions affecting our counterparties and our ability to mitigate exposure on acceptable terms. Although the risks related to individual customers or other counterparties are generally not significant compared to the magnitude of our business and we seek to reduce customer risks by exact sales contract and payment terms and collaterals, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in managing the risks connected with our trade credit exposure, customer financing, risk concentrations and financial counterparties that we may from time to time have, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Major Shareholders May Exercise Their Influence to Detriment of Other Shareholders

     See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders” for a discussion of the impact of the ownership interest of the Finnish State in the Company.

Item 4.  Information on the Company.

Organization

     Metso Corporation is a stock corporation organized in the Republic of Finland under the Finnish Companies Act. Metso Corporation’s registered office is located at Fabianinkatu 9A, P.O. Box 1220, 00101 Helsinki, Finland; telephone +358-20-484-100. Our agent for the U.S. federal securities law purposes is Metso USA, Inc., located at 3100 Medlock, Bridge Road, Suite 250, Norcross, Georgia 30071.

History and Development of the Company

     Metso was created as the result of the merger of Valmet and Rauma in July 1999. The new combined company was initially given the name Valmet-Rauma Corporation. The name was changed to Metso Corporation in August 1999.

     Valmet traces its origins back to the industrial plants established in the 1920s and 1930s to meet the needs of the Finnish Armed Forces. These industrial plants were joined to form a conglomerate, which was formally incorporated as a limited liability company in 1950, and during the 1950s began to broaden its product range to accommodate the demands of a market economy. Valmet delivered its first paper machine in 1953. From its establishment in 1950 until its initial public offering in 1988, Valmet was wholly owned by the Finnish State and other Finnish State entities. As of March 24, 2005, the Finnish State owned 11.5 percent of the outstanding share capital of Metso Corporation.

     Rauma’s business groups were formed from a number of companies with long operating histories brought together as a result of a series of strategic acquisitions by a Finnish engineering group Rauma-Repola Oy. In 1990, Rauma-Repola merged with United Paper Mills, a Finnish forest products company. The new company was called Repola Oy and was one of the largest industrial conglomerates in Finland. Its engineering division was organized as Rauma and its forest products division was organized as UPM. In 1996, Repola and Kymmene Corporation, a Finnish forest products company, merged to create a new company called UPM-Kymmene. As a result, Rauma became a majority owned subsidiary of UPM-Kymmene. In 1997, following a secondary offering of Rauma shares, distribution of shares as dividends, and the redemption of shares by Rauma, UPM-Kymmene’s ownership in Rauma was reduced to 34.5 percent. In March 2005, UPM-Kymmene sold the remainder of the shares of Metso Corporation held by it.

     In September 2001, Metso Corporation acquired Svedala, a global supplier of products and services for the rock and mineral processing industry based in Sweden. Svedala was integrated in the Metso Minerals business area. A public offer to acquire all the shares in Svedala was made in June 2000 and the acquisition was completed on September 14, 2001 after the competition authorities of the European Union and the United States gave their approval to the acquisition.

8


Table of Contents

     For a discussion of recent developments, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Recent Acquisitions and Divestments.”

Strategy

     Our vision is to grow from a machine supplier into a provider of competitiveness for our customers. We aim to be a profitably growing and globally leading developer and provider of equipment, solutions and services for our customer industries. Our goal is to assist our customers in improving the productivity and competitiveness of their industrial processes throughout their life cycles.

     Our operations are based on process know-how in the pulp and paper industry and rock and minerals processing industries, on the extensive installed base of machinery and equipment and on automation knowledge. These cornerstones have helped us to become the world’s leading supplier for the pulp and paper industry and rock and minerals processing industries. Our products and services combine control technology, process automation and advanced information and communications technology solutions with process know-how.

     Our customers are industrial companies that require their machine and equipment suppliers to show long-term commitment and assume increasing responsibility for delivered processes. Our customers’ investments are typically large and have long life cycles. These investments require sufficient returns, which can be enhanced by cooperation with the customer covering the entire life cycle of the process. Additionally, many of our customers operate in different parts of the world and expect their suppliers to be located close to them. Our strong global network enables us to serve our customers in all continents.

     Profitability is a requirement for all business areas to enable the development of the Company and utilization of the market potential. To achieve this goal, extensive efficiency improvement measures have been implemented within the Company in recent years. Our business areas are in different stages of development. In determining the strategic focus and profitability targets for each business area for 2005, the market situation, customer needs and profitability have been taken into consideration. Our overall financial targets for 2005 have been determined as an operating profit margin of six percent of net sales and return on capital employed of 12 percent.

     Metso Paper is renewing its business concept to correspond with customer needs. The flexibility required by fluctuating demand is being increased by adapting internal capacity and extending manufacturing cooperation with outside partners. Metso Paper’s financial target for 2005 is an operating profit margin of five percent of net sales. Metso Minerals is seeking to utilize the growth potential of its market and to further improve its organizational efficiency and product-specific profitability, and targets an operating profit margin of seven percent of net sales for 2005. Metso Automation is refocusing on achieving growth by launching new products and strengthening its market position in growing markets while targeting an operating profit margin of eight percent of net sales for 2005. All of Metso Ventures’ businesses are focusing on strengthening their competitiveness to achieve an operating profit margin of six percent of net sales for 2005.

Corporate Structure

     We are a global engineering company headquartered in Helsinki, Finland, and serve our customers in selected areas within the process industry. Our business areas are global in scope with operations in over 50 countries. Our principal production plants are located in Finland, Sweden, France, Italy, Germany, the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States, China, South Africa and Brazil. As of December 31, 2004, approximately 40 percent of our employees were based in Finland.

     Our operations are currently organized into the following four business areas:

  •   Metso Paper designs, develops and delivers pulp and paper machinery and equipment and complete production lines for the pulp and paper industry. Metso Paper also has substantial aftermarket operations. It operates under four business lines: Paper, Board, Tissue and Fiber.

  •   Metso Minerals designs, develops and manufactures equipment and total solutions, as well as aftermarket solutions for rock and minerals processing industries through its four business lines: Crushing & Screening, Minerals Processing, Wear Protection & Conveying and Recycling.

9


Table of Contents

  •   Metso Automation designs, develops and supplies both process automation and field solutions for automation and information management in selected process industries through its two business lines: Process Automation Systems and Field Systems. All Metso Automation operations in North America and Mexico are conducted by a separate business unit. Metso Automation’s operations cover the three principal areas of process automation: (1) automation and information management application networks and systems and life cycle services, (2) flow control solutions, automated and manual control valves, and (3) process measurement solutions and analyzers.

  •   Metso Ventures is comprised of Metso Panelboard, Metso Drives, Foundries, Metso Powdermet and Valmet Automotive. Metso Panelboard develops and supplies complete production lines for the panelboard industry. Metso Drives develops and manufactures paper machine drives and other industrial gears as well as wind turbine gears. Foundries manufacture castings for various engineering industry needs. Metso Powdermet develops materials technology and component solutions for Metso’s customer industries. Valmet Automotive is an independent contract manufacturer of specialty cars.

     The chart below depicts the current structure consisting of the four business areas described above:

(METSO BUSINESS AREAS)

     The current structure is a result of the restructurings described below:

     The earlier Metso Paper business area consisted also of Metso Panelboard before it was transferred to the Metso Ventures business area in March 2002. In November 2002, the Converting business, previously part of Metso Paper, was transferred to be reported under Discontinued Operations after a memorandum of understanding regarding its sale was signed. The divestment was completed in January 2004. In February 2003, Metso Paper’s operations were reorganized to include five business lines: Paper, Board, Tissue, Chemical Pulping and Mechanical Pulping. In October 2003, Metso Paper’s foundries located in Jyväskylä, Finland and Karlstad, Sweden were transferred to the Metso Ventures business area. In March 2004, Metso Paper combined the Chemical Pulping and Mechanical Pulping business lines into one Fiber business line.

     Since August 2002, the Metso Automation business area has consisted of two business lines: Process Automation Systems and Field Systems, which are supported by a North American business unit. Process Automation Systems combines two former business divisions, Paper Automation and Energy & Process Automation.

     After Svedala was acquired and integrated in 2001, Metso Minerals business area has consisted of four business lines: Crushing & Screening, Minerals Processing, Compaction & Paving, and Wear Protection, Service & Parts. In October 2002, a fifth business line called Recycling was created. In September 2003, Metso Minerals’ operations were divided into six business lines: Crushing & Screening, Minerals Processing, Wear Protection & Conveying, Compaction & Paving, Recycling, and Drilling. In June 2004, we divested the

10


Table of Contents

Compaction & Paving business and, in December 2004, the Drilling business. As a result, Metso Minerals currently consists of four business lines.

     Prior to the transfer of Metso Panelboard into Metso Ventures in 2002, the business area was comprised of Metso Engineering and Valmet Automotive. Since the transfer, the business area was reconstructured to comprise of four businesses: Metso Panelboard, Metso Drives, Metso Powdermet and Valmet Automotive. Metso Drives and Metso Powdermet were formerly part of Metso Engineering, similarly to Metso Works and Metso Hydraulics, which have now been sold. In October 2003, three foundries, two of which were formerly part of Metso Paper and one of Metso Minerals, were transferred to the Metso Ventures business area, creating a fifth business within the business area, called Foundries. On March 4, 2005, we announced the signing of an agreement to sell Metso Drives to the funds managed by private equity investor CapMan of Finland. Metso Drives Oy will be transferred to the ownership of the CapMan funds after the relevant regulatory approvals.

     The financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 discussed in this annual report has been restated to reflect the changes in our structure described above. The Converting business has been reported as a separate segment under Discontinued Operations since November 2002 until its final divestment to Bobst Group SA of Switzerland in January 2004. We completed the divestiture of our Compaction & Paving business to Altor, a Nordic private equity investor in June 2004 and our Drilling business to Terex Corporation from the United States in December 2004. These divested businesses are also reported under Discontinued Operations.

Business Summary

Net Sales by Geographic Area

     In 2004, we had total net sales of 3,976 million (U.S.$5,383 million), of which approximately 88 percent were accounted for by exports from Finland and sales by international operations, and an operating profit of 111 million (U.S.$150 million). As of December 31, 2004, our total assets amounted to 3,578 million (U.S.$4,844 million), and we had 22,802 employees worldwide.

     The following table sets forth our total net sales by geographic area for the three most recent years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Finland
    382       357       332  
Nordic Countries (excluding Finland)
    453       310       337  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries).
    1,363       1,272       1,017  
North America
    1,199       989       837  
South America
    417       264       298  
Asia-Pacific
    652       824       909  
Rest of the World
    225       234       246  
 
                 
Total
    4,691       4,250       3,976  
 
                 

Metso Paper

     As a result of our restructurings described under “—Corporate Structure” above, the divested Converting business, or Metso Panelboard, and the operations of the two foundries that were transferred to Metso Ventures are no longer included in the Metso Paper business area.

11


Table of Contents

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Metso Paper for the three most recent years:

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel data)  
Net sales(1)
    1,778       1,651       1,559  
Operating profit
    115       25       11  
Capital employed
    498       538       356  
Capital expenditures
    72       54       33  
Research and development
    72       56       50  
Order backlog
    735       784       946  
Personnel
    9,357       9,085       8,660  


(1)   Includes net sales to other Metso’s business areas of 4 million, 6 million and 9 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

     The following table sets forth the breakdown of Metso Paper’s net sales by geographic area for the three most recent years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    (Percent of total net sales)  
Finland
    10       11       12  
Nordic Countries (excluding Finland)
    10       7       10  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    26       25       17  
North America
    28       28       19  
South America
    9       3       5  
Asia-Pacific
    15       24       32  
Rest of the world
    2       2       5  
 
                 
Total
    100       100       100  
 
                 

     Metso Paper is one of the world’s leading suppliers of equipment and machinery for the pulp and paper industry. Metso Paper provides machines for the production of paper of all printing grades, board and tissue. We develop and deliver, rebuild and service paper, board and tissue machines, paper finishing machines and related air systems. We also develop and deliver equipment and designs plants for the production of chemical and mechanical pulp and recycled fiber as well as provide service to the plants. Spare and wear parts supply, process improvements and optimization are central to our aftermarket activities. Process improvements are expected to be an increasingly important source of revenue as pulp and paper mills strive to enhance process efficiency and meet higher environmental standards. Our customer service activities include start-up assistance; training; corrective, preventive and predictive maintenance programs as well as operations support.

Products and Services

     Paper. Metso Paper delivers new paper machines and production equipment as well as offers machine rebuilds and service. The product lines also include new machines, machine rebuilds and service for coating, calendering, winding and roll handling, and chemical handling equipment for paper mills. Coaters and calenders are used to give base papers certain properties, such as gloss or matt finishes and opacity. Winders are used to cut large paper rolls to smaller sizes to fit printing machines. Roll handling machines consist of roll wrapping and conveyor systems. Metso Paper’s paper machines are among the largest and fastest in the world. A typical paper machine costs between 50 million and 100 million and produces from 200,000 to more than 400,000 tons of paper per year. These machines are designed to meet specific customer needs and are used to produce fine paper (for office stationery), newsprint, supercalendered and coated paper (for magazines and similar publications) and coated base papers (for brochures and art purposes).

     Board. Metso Paper delivers new board machines and production equipment as well as offers machine rebuilds and service. Metso Paper supplies machines for all board and packaging grades, the most important grades being corrugated board, linerboard, folding boxboard and liquid packaging board. A typical board machine costs between 30 million and 100 million and produces from 200,000 to more than 600,000 tons of board per year.

12


Table of Contents

     Tissue. Metso Paper delivers new tissue machines and production equipment as well as offers machine rebuilds and service. Metso Paper produces machines for manufacturing various types of tissue papers and continues to be a leading supplier of Thru-Air ™ technology for tissue production. A typical tissue machine costs between 10 million and 35 million and produces from 10,000 to more than 70,000 tons of tissue per year.

     Fiber. Metso Paper delivers fiber lines, processes and production equipment as well as related aftermarket activities for both the chemical and mechanical pulping technologies. Chemical pulp is used for high quality paper products primarily due to its strength, printability and ability to maintain brightness. Mechanical pulp is used primarily for newsprint and magazine papers and certain paperboard grades. Metso Paper has the complete capability and product offering for utilization of all different kind of recycled fibers for paper, board or tissue making. Metso Paper’s fiber business line includes all process equipment and service necessary for complete fiber plants. Metso Paper offers fiber producers technology that significantly reduces the environmental impact of their operations.

Markets and Customers

     Metso Paper’s products and services are sold to the pulp and paper industry throughout the world. Sales worldwide are handled through a network of sales companies, offices and local representatives. Orders typically require substantial down payments, with the balance paid in installments. Project delivery times depend on the size and nature of the project but may be as long as two years.

     Customers are located in a number of countries, primarily in Europe, North America and Asia. Metso Paper has major production facilities in Finland and Sweden, and a joint venture in China. Our internal production processes have been reorganized by creating a network of plants specializing in designated product areas and manufacturing processes in order to focus on development of specific technologies and expertise.

     As a major supplier to the pulp and paper industry, Metso Paper has most of the significant pulp and paper producers as customers. Customers include large North American-based international groups, such as Georgia-Pacific, International Paper, Kimberly-Clark, Procter & Gamble and Weyerhaeuser; European producers, such as M-real Corporation, Norske Skog, SCA, Stora Enso and UPM-Kymmene; and South American producers, such as Arauco and Suzano; as well as various companies located in Asia, such as April, Asian Pulp and Paper, Daishowa Paper, Hansol Oji, Shandong Chenming Paper Holding, Shandong Huatai Paper and Sun Paper Industry Group.

Marketing

     Customer agreements for Metso Paper products are generally the result of extensive negotiation and coordination with our customers. Service and component sales are made on a continuous basis by regional service locations. Metso Paper has an extensive network of sales companies and sales representatives in the Nordic Countries, Western Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Australia. In addition, a marketing and sales team supports sales activities and develops marketing strategies in line with our customers’ needs.

Competition

     In the paper machine industry, machinery is designed to meet specific customer needs. Paper, board and tissue machines are sold on the basis of machine technology, availability of reference machines for comparative purposes, delivery time, price and service ability. Metso Paper competes for machine sales based on these five factors. Management believes that, based upon aggregate production capacity of paper machines sold, Metso Paper has been the world’s leading producer of large paper machines in the past three years. Management also believes that we occupy a strong position in the large paper machine rebuild markets as a result of our large installed base, advanced technologies and leading position in the new paper machine market. Metso Paper’s principal competitor in large paper machines is the other major producer, Voith Paper Group of Germany. Mitsubishi of Japan is also a competitor in paper machines. Metso Paper’s principal competitor in board making machine lines is Voith Paper Group. In tissue machines, the competitors include Andritz Corporation of Austria and Voith Paper Group, as well as Overmechanica, Recard, Toschi and Celli of Italy.

     Metso Paper’s principal competitors in the pulping industry are Andritz Corporation of Austria and Kvaerner Pulping of Norway. Competition within the pulping industry focuses on fiber quality and energy efficiency. In addition, environmental concerns affect competition as principal suppliers attempt to meet the

13


Table of Contents

increasing demand for environmentally friendly fiber. Within chemical pulping, the environmental focus is on totally chlorine-free and elemental chlorine-free production processes whereas in mechanical pulping focus is on recycled fiber production processes. Market leaders in the area of recycled fiber pulping include Voith Paper Group of Germany and Black Clawson of the United States.

     Competition in the aftermarket operations comes mainly from the principal global competitors mentioned above and from numerous smaller local or regional service providers. Customers also partly employ their own personnel to take care of the activities. Service, for example spare parts, is also often sold in conjunction with new paper and board machines or major rebuilds. Management believes that Metso Paper’s service operations benefit from synergies with Metso Paper products.

Recent Developments

     In December 2004, Metso Paper concluded an agreement to sell its production operations in Karhula, Finland, to Mesera Works Oy. According to the agreement, 105 workers transferred as existing employees to Mesera Works on January 1, 2005.

     In September 2004, Metso Paper completed the outsourcing process of its Jyväskylä plate fabrication. Metso Paper and Konepaja Häkkinen Oy of Finland signed a contract according to which the operation of the plate fabrication shop was transferred to a new company, Rautpohjan Konepaja Oy, a subsidiary of Konepaja Häkkinen Oy. According to the agreement, all 124 workers transferred as existing employees to Rautpohjan Konepaja on October 1, 2004.

     For a description of recent acquisitions and divestments, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Recent Acquisitions and Divestments.”

Metso Minerals

     As a result of our restructurings described under “—Corporate Structure” and the acquisition of Svedala and its consequent integration with Metso Minerals, Metso Minerals’ operations are divided into four business lines: Crushing & Screening, Minerals Processing, Wear Protection & Conveying, and Recycling.

     Metso Minerals is globally a leading supplier in rock and minerals processing and in recycling systems for metals and construction materials. Aftermarket operations form an important part of Metso Minerals’ business, inasmuch as crushing and processing rock and minerals require spare and wear parts continuously. In addition, we provide different types of aftermarket activities for the life cycle of the equipment. Products are sold either through Metso Minerals’ own global sales organization or, in some product lines, through their own distributor network.

     Currently, the principal production plants of Metso Minerals are located in Finland, Sweden, the United States, Germany, South Africa, France and Brazil.

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Metso Minerals (excluding the Compaction & Paving business and Drilling business divested during 2004) for the three most recent years:

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel data)  
Net sales(1)
    1,406       1,253       1,343  
Operating profit (loss)
    28       (189 )     84  
Capital employed
    996       741       729  
Capital expenditures
    39       27       24  
Research and development
    10       10       9  
Order backlog
    413       347       560  
Personnel
    8,479       8,284       8,048  


(1)   Includes net sales to other Metso’s business areas of 5 million, 7 million and 1 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

14


Table of Contents

Products and Services

     Metso Minerals offers total solutions for customers in the aggregates, mining, minerals processing, civil engineering, cement, metal recycling, bulk materials handling industries as well as related aftermarket activities through its four business lines. The product offering includes a wide variety of products with a large number of variations, types and models.

     Crushing & Screening. Metso Minerals’ Crushing and Screening business line offers equipment and solutions used in rock and minerals’ crushing and classifying. It specializes in the design of entire crushing and screening plants, supplying not only stationary plants but also an increasing number of track and wheel-mounted mobile units. In addition, it supplies individual crushers, screens, feeders and conveyors as well as wear and spare parts. Furthermore, its offering includes complete, stationary recycling plants that are mostly focused on retreating demolition and building debris, as well as old concrete and other pavement materials. Within the aggregates industry, quarries and contract crushing are among its key customer groups.

     Minerals Processing. The Minerals Processing business line offers production processes for the mining industry and industrial minerals as well as related products, such as grinding mills, enrichment and pyro processing equipment and slurry pumps. The business line also offers equipment for bulk materials handling, such as stackers and reclaimers, and other products needed in loading and unloading barges, ships and railcars. Furthermore, its offering includes aftermarket services, such as expertise in optimizing existing plants through automation, plant audits, plant upgrades, replacement parts and maintenance.

     Wear Protection & Conveying. Products in the Wear Protection and Conveying business line include grinding mill linings, screening media and other wear, impact, dust and noise protection products as well as conveyer belts and components.

     Recycling. The Recycling business line covers equipment and solutions needed for the recycling, crushing and sorting mainly of metals, such as metal shredders, shears, scrap shears and scrap baling presses.

Markets and Customers

     The following table sets forth the breakdown of Metso Minerals’ net sales (excluding the Compaction & Paving business and Drilling business divested during 2004) by geographic area for the three most recent years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    (Percent of total net sales)  
Finland
    4       3       3  
Nordic Countries (excluding Finland)
    7       7       7  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    31       31       29  
North America
    23       21       23  
South America
    14       13       13  
Asia-Pacific
    12       15       15  
Rest of the world
    9       10       10  
 
                 
Total
    100       100       100  
 
                 

     Customers include quarries, contract crushers, civil engineering companies and the mining and cement industries. Recycle crushing represents a new and growing sector due to the worldwide increase of legislation regulating the disposal of construction debris. The price of rock crushing plants typically ranges from 1 million to 5 million, although it may be as high as 15 million. The price of individual rock crushers ranges from 15,000 to 1 million. The price of a typical complete minerals processing plant delivery to mining industry ranges from 30 million to 100 million.

Marketing

     In order to service its local markets and customers, Metso Minerals’ marketing is subdivided into six market areas: Europe, Southern Africa, North and Central America, South America, Asia-Pacific and China. Metso Minerals has a number of sales companies in Europe, South America, Southern Africa, Asia and Australia. Metso Minerals’ sales network offers the full range of products to the relevant industries. Metso

15


Table of Contents

Minerals supports its sales operations in North America through its own distribution and a network of local distributors.

Competition

     Competition in Metso Minerals’ industries is fragmented, with few global manufacturers and numerous small, regional and local manufacturers. We believe that our competitive advantages include our global operations network, which allows us to meet the increasingly global needs of our customers, and the wide product range we offer. In crushing and screening, our major competitors are Astec, Extec, Komatsu, Sandvik and Terex. In mining and minerals processing, our major competitors include Baker Process, Dorr-Oliver, Heyl&Patterson, FFE, Krupp-Polysius, Larox, Mann-Takraf and Outokumpu, depending on the product line and particular industry segment. In wear protection products and conveyor belts, our major competitors include Bridgestone, Goodyear, Rubber Engineering, Steinhaus/Isenmann, TipTor and Tyler/Polydeck. In recycling, our major competitors include Henschel and Newell-Riverside.

Recent Developments

     On December 31, 2004, the Drilling business line, which operated under the Reedrill name, was divested and transferred to Terex Corporation from the United States. The business had only limited strategic connections with other businesses of Metso Minerals.

     On June 30, 2004, we divested the Compaction & Paving business line to Altor, a Nordic private equity investor. Our construction and paving equipment business operated as an independent business under the Dynapac name and had relatively limited synergies with the other businesses within Metso Minerals.

     In 2003, we announced several restructuring initiatives as part of our corporate wide efficiency improvement program. Some of these actions were completed during the year 2004. These included the closure of our crusher manufacturing site at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in June 2004, the closure of our screen manufacturing unit in Ketsch, Germany in May 2004, and the closure of our pump manufacturing unit in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in May 2004. The decision to close our Keokuk, Iowa plant has also been made as one of the final initiatives of the program and is scheduled to be completed during the first half of 2005.

     For a description of the recent acquisitions and divestments, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Recent Acquisitions and Divestments.”

Metso Automation

     Following the restructuring of our operations in August 2002, our Metso Automation business area operates through two business lines: Process Automation Systems and Field Systems. See “—Corporate Structure” for a further explanation of our corporate restructuring.

     Metso Automation designs, develops, manufactures and maintains a wide range of technologically advanced field devices and analyzers, as well as process automation and information management applications and solutions. Metso Automation’s products are used to measure, monitor and control industrial processes, such as the pulp and paper as well as power, energy, and oil and gas industries. Metso Automation also specializes in several industry-specific automation applications and provides system integration services. Metso Automation is also one of the world’s leading manufacturers and suppliers of control and automated valves for the process industries in a large and fragmented global market. Metso Automation’s devices, applications, solutions and services are designed to improve customer process performance and profitability by increasing productivity, quality, process availability and eco-efficiency.

     Metso Automation has production plants in Finland, the United States and Mexico, as well as a manufacturing joint venture in China. Metso Automation’s global sales operations are handled through a worldwide distribution network including local distributors and Metso Automation sales companies in 36 countries.

16


Table of Contents

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Metso Automation for the three most recent years:

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel data)  
Net sales(1)
    622       531       535  
Operating profit
    16       28       53  
Capital employed
    207       150       136  
Capital expenditures
    13       8       6  
Research and development
    44       33       31  
Order backlog
    185       145       176  
Personnel
    4,150       3,314       3,267  


(1)   Includes net sales to other Metso’s business areas of 43 million, 51 million and 42 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Products and Services

     Metso Automation’s Process Automation Systems provides automation and information management application networks and systems and supporting life cycle services. Field Systems provides various industries with flow control solutions, automated and manual control valves and positioners, as well as specialty analyzers.

  Process Automation Systems

     The Process Automation Systems business line develops and maintains process automation technology for the pulp and paper industry as well as the power, energy, and oil and gas industries. The business line’s principal product is metsoDNA, or Dynamic Network of Applications. The metsoDNA solution offers flexible scalability and easy integration and compatibility with a plant’s other systems. MetsoDNA is based on the free networking of knowledge and information, control automation and embedded field control applications. The concept was first introduced in 1999, and it is constantly being developed by adding new industry and user-specific applications. The most recent innovation is DNAuse, a new metsoDNA user environment for more efficient decision-making. DNAuse integrates information and knowledge as one efficient framework containing process information, history, reports, supporting knowledge and team experiences.

     In addition, key products of the Process Automation Systems business line are Sensodec systems for paper machine runnability and condition monitoring, and the PaperIQ and PaperLab systems for paper quality management as well as IQInsight for paper machine wet end moisture measurement and DNAforesight for web break management system. In 2004, Metso Automation expanded its line of advanced profilers to cover new lines and rebuilds of paper, tissue and board machines.

  Field Systems

     The Field Systems business line develops field systems for various industries, including pulp and paper, power, oil and gas, as well as smart, embedded measurement and control solutions, sensors and analyzers for special applications.

     The product offering of the Field Systems business line in the area of flow control valves covers a range of valves, including simple shut-off valves to complex control and automated valves and intelligent valve controllers. The business line also supplies industrial ball valves, butterfly valves and actuators, serving the process industries, commercial heating, ventilation and air conditioning, and original equipment manufacturer markets. The product names used for our valves are Neles and Jamesbury. The Field Systems business line also develops and manufactures positioners and actuators. A positioner transmits information to an actuator, which in turn operates a valve. Positioners and actuators are key components of control valves, and Metso Automation typically sells these components with their associated valves as a single unit.

     Field Systems’ product offering for the pulp and paper industry includes Kajaani analyzers, sensors and sampling devices for sophisticated fiber and stock property measurements, and a wide selection of shear force, microwave and optical transmitters and sampling devices for pulp consistency measurements. Metso Automation is a leading global supplier of pulp and paper specialty analyzers, consistency transmitters and control valves.

17


Table of Contents

Customer Support Services

     Metso Automation has customer service units in 36 countries. These units, together with local representatives, form an extensive global service network that is also supplemented with remote control solutions. Integration of customers’ systems through communication networks with Metso’s global online service systems enables operations in accordance with our life cycle business concept. The Expert center in Tampere, Finland, which was opened in 2001, can monitor online the performance of customers’ pulp and paper mills. In addition to fast diagnosis and problem solving, the service is designed to improve process availability and performance, resulting in higher efficiency and product quality. In 2002, the second Expert center was opened in Atlanta, Georgia. The third Expert center for power and process industry customers was opened in Tampere, Finland, in 2003.

Markets and Customers

     The following table sets forth the breakdown of Metso Automation’s net sales by geographic area for the three most recent years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    (Percent of total net sales)  
Finland
    20       23       19  
Nordic Countries (excluding Finland)
    4       4       4  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    21       26       27  
North America
    36       29       28  
South America
    5       4       4  
Asia-Pacific
    11       11       14  
Rest of the world
    3       3       4  
 
                 
Total
    100       100       100  
 
                 

     The principal customers of the Process Automation Systems business line and the Field Systems business line are in the pulp and paper industry as well as in the power, energy, and oil and gas industries. In the pulp and paper industry the customers of the Metso Automation business area and the Metso Paper business area are, in many cases, the same pulp and paper companies and mills.

Marketing

     Metso Automation’s devices, applications and solutions are sold individually, as upgrades and add-ons to existing systems, as integrated systems, and as parts of the new machinery or process equipment installations. Automation applications and solutions are primarily sold by Metso Automation’s own worldwide sales organization. Metso Automation also markets conventional valve technology through distributors in North America.

     Management believes that the Metso Automation business area is well positioned to develop innovative, technologically advanced and competitively priced products for customers within the pulp and paper industry through its coordinated operations with Metso Paper. In certain cases, particularly when customers purchase complete pulp or paper machine lines, Metso Automation’s systems are sold jointly with Metso Paper. However, in many cases, pulp and paper machinery customers purchase automation systems, measurement devices and control valves separately.

Competition

     The process automation industry is highly competitive throughout the world. The principal competitors of Metso Automation are process automation and control companies, many of which are divisions of large multinational companies, such as ABB Automation, Emerson Process Management, Honeywell Automation and Control Solutions, Invensys, Siemens A&D, Voith Paper Automation and Yokogawa. The principal factors affecting competition include device and system reliability and availability, application expertise, technological advancement, ease of configuration and customization, engineering support, price, customer support availability, reputation and references. Management believes that Metso Automation is among the leading suppliers worldwide of special measurement and automation systems for the pulp and paper industry.

18


Table of Contents

     Competition in the field systems area, especially in valve industry, is characterized by a large number of participants, many of which specialize in limited niche areas. Key competitors include Emerson, Flowserve and Spectris. Management believes that Metso Automation has a leading position in the supply of control valves to the pulp and paper industry worldwide.

Recent Developments

     In December 2004, Metso Automation decided to close its valve production factory in Chihuahua, Mexico. The closure is scheduled to take place by the end of August 2005.

     For a description of the recent acquisitions and divestments, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Recent Acquisitions and Divestments.”

Metso Ventures

     The Metso Ventures business area comprises five business lines: Metso Panelboard, Metso Drives, Foundries, Metso Powdermet and Valmet Automotive. Metso Panelboard, formerly part of Metso Paper, was transferred to the Metso Ventures business area in March 2002. The Foundries business line was created in October 2003, when two foundries that were formerly part of Metso Paper and one foundry formerly part of Metso Minerals were transferred to the Metso Ventures business area. See “—Corporate Structure” for a further explanation of our corporate restructuring.

  Metso Panelboard

     Metso Panelboard designs and supplies globally entire production lines and individual equipment for the panelboard industry for manufacturing fiberboard, particleboard and oriented strand board. It also provides start-up, optimization, spare part and maintenance services for these lines. Products are developed to use a wide mixture of wood and fiber raw materials. The industry trend is to increasingly use low cost industrial wood residues, such as sawdust and recycled wood, as the main raw material source and, in some cases, non-wood natural fibers can replace wood fibers.

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Metso Panelboard for the three most recent years:

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel data)  
Net sales(1)
    66       93       104  
Operating profit (loss)
    (21 )     (3 )     0  
Capital employed
    2       10       (10 )
Capital expenditures
    2       1       1  
Research and Development
    4       3       3  
Order backlog
    76       87       32  
Personnel
    334       283       264  


(1)   Includes net sales to other Metso’s business areas of 1 million, 1 million and 1 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

  Competition

     Metso Panelboard’s main competitors in complete production lines are G. Siempelkamp Group and Dieffenbacher-Group. Significant competitors in equipment supplies are Andritz Group and Pallmann.

  Markets and Customers

     Metso Panelboard has its main operations in Finland, Sweden and Germany and sells its products globally. The main markets are Europe and Asia-Pacific, followed by South America and North America. Customers are producers of wood-based panels. Some of the main customers are Finsa Group, Georgia Pacific, Ikea, International Paper, Kronospan Group, Masisa Group, Pfleiderer Group and Sonae Group.

19


Table of Contents

     The following table sets forth the breakdown of Metso Panelboard’s net sales by geographic area for the most recent three years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    (Percent of total net sales)  
Finland
    1       0       0  
Nordic Countries (excluding Finland)
    21       10       2  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    24       24       35  
North America
    6       5       4  
South America
    9       4       5  
Asia-Pacific
    39       37       51  
Rest of the world
    0       20       3  
 
                 
Total
    100       100       100  
 
                 

  Marketing

     Products are marketed globally through Metso Panelboard’s sales network and sales agents. Management believes that the ability to supply complete lines and large installed base of machinery provide an advantage in the wood-based panel industry.

  Recent Developments

     During the summer of 2004, Metso Panelboard combined the operations of its German units in Willich and Hannover. This restructuring was part of our corporate wide efficiency improvement program initiated in 2003. As a result, the number of employees was reduced by one-third.

  Metso Drives

     Metso Drives designs, manufactures and sells gears and related aftermarket services for the pulp and paper industry, power generation and rock and minerals processing.

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Metso Drives for the three most recent years:

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002(2)     2003(2)     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel data)  
Net sales(1)
    143       128       157  
Operating profit
    8       2       11  
Capital employed
    91       88       80  
Capital expenditures
    25       4       2  
Research and development
    3       3       2  
Order backlog
    49       60       53  
Personnel
    887       869       897  


(1)   Includes net sales to other Metso’s business areas of 31 million, 27 million and 27 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
 
(2)   The figures for 2002 and 2003 are presented excluding Metso Works and Metso Hydraulics, which have been divested.

  Products and Services

     Metso Drives manufactures and sells special and modular gear units for process and power generation industries. Examples include paper machine drives, grinding mill drives and wind turbine gears. Metso Drives also provides comprehensive service for the entire life cycle of gears.

  Markets and Customers

     Metso Drives has operations in Finland, Sweden, Germany, Canada and the United States, with Europe being the principal market area for Metso Drives. Its key customers are in the pulp and paper industry worldwide and the energy production industry in Europe and North America. Major customers also include

20


Table of Contents

Metso Paper and Metso Minerals. Customers within Metso accounted for approximately one-fifth of Metso Drives’ net sales in 2004.

     The following table sets forth the breakdown of Metso Drives’ net sales by geographic area for the most recent three years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    (Percent of total net sales)  
Finland
    28       27       25  
Nordic Countries (excluding Finland)
    32       27       30  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    25       27       24  
North America
    10       11       9  
South America
    1       1       1  
Asia-Pacific
    4       6       11  
Rest of the world
    0       1       0  
 
                 
Total
    100       100       100  
 
                 

  Marketing

     Mechanical drives for the process and power generation industries, as well as related services, are sold individually through the sales network of Metso Drives. In industrial gears, Metso Drives has a global sales and marketing agreement with the German-based SEW Eurodrive GmbH.

  Competition

     The demand for Metso Drives’ products is dependent on process industry investments and the construction of new wind power plants. Metso Drives’ market position varies according to the industry served. Flender in Germany is the market leader in wind turbine gears. Other key competitors in the industry are Lohmann in Germany and Hansen in Belgium.

  Recent Developments

     On March 4, 2005, we announced the signing of an agreement to sell Metso Drives to funds managed by a Finnish private equity investor, CapMan. The debt-free price for the divestment is estimated to be approximately 98 million. Metso Drives Oy and its foreign subsidiaries are expected to be transferred to the ownership of the CapMan funds after the relevant regulatory approvals.

  Foundries

     Foundries within Metso Ventures consist of three foundries. Two iron foundries, located in Jyväskylä, Finland and Karlstad, Sweden, were previously part of Metso Paper and one steel foundry, located in Tampere, Finland, was part of Metso Minerals. Foundries manufacture castings for customers in several engineering industry segments.

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Foundries for the three most recent years:

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel data)  
Net sales(1)
    72       69       75  
Operating profit (loss)
    5       0       4  
Capital employed
    27       26       25  
Capital expenditures
    3       5       3  
Research and development
          0       0  
Order backlog
    15       20       28  
Personnel
    593       580       587  


(1)   Includes net sales to other Metso’s business areas of 24 million, 30 million and 34 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

21


Table of Contents

  Products and Services

     Foundries manufacture and sell both steel and iron industrial castings such as steel castings for rock crushers, paper machine rolls, crusher frames, crusher wear parts, hydro turbines and other engineering industry components. The combined annual capacity of Foundries is approximately 50,000 tons of steel and iron castings.

  Markets and Customers

     Foundries have operations in Finland and Sweden where their principal market is. The key customers are various engineering companies as well as wind and hydro turbine manufacturers. Major customers also include Metso Paper and Metso Minerals. Approximately two-fifths of Foundries’ sales are derived from customers within Metso.

     The following table sets forth the breakdown of Foundries’ net sales by geographic area for the most recent three years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    (Percent of total net sales)  
Finland
    67       68       70  
Nordic Countries (excluding Finland)
    24       24       16  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    5       4       7  
North America
    4       4       4  
South America
                1  
Asia-Pacific
          0       2  
Rest of the world
                 
 
                 
Total
    100       100       100  
 
                 

  Marketing

     Industrial castings are sold both by our own sales people and sales agents.

  Competition

     The demand for the products of Foundries is dependent on equipment sales of its customers for which the castings are used. There is a wide range of competing foundries both in the Nordic countries and Central Europe. Competition also comes from foundries located elsewhere in the world, increasingly in lower-cost countries. As a result, Foundries are increasingly focusing on technologically more demanding castings.

  Valmet Automotive

     Valmet Automotive is an independent contract manufacturer of high quality specialty cars with production facilities in Uusikaupunki, Finland. The production facilities consist of a body shop, paint shop, assembly shop and product development center. The production is done on a consignment basis, and Valmet Automotive is compensated for the assembly of each vehicle. Valmet Automotive is not required to purchase inventory, and its customers are billed partially in advance so as to limit Valmet Automotive’s working capital requirements. Management estimates that the Uusikaupunki facilities have the capacity, given certain modifications and increased manpower, to assemble up to 100,000 cars per year.

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Valmet Automotive for the three most recent years:

22


Table of Contents

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel and vehicle data)  
Net sales
    128       70       40  
Operating profit (loss)
    23       (8 )     (23 )
Capital employed
    42       31       25  
Capital expenditures
    8       14       12  
Research and development
    4       3       2  
Approximate number of vehicles assembled
    41,066       19,226       10,051  
Personnel
    1,496       716       763  

  Products and Services

     Valmet Automotive produces and develops demanding specialty cars and can supply total niche car projects to OEMs (original equipment manufacturers).

  Markets and Customers

     Valmet Automotive’s current products are the Porsche Boxster and the Porsche Boxster S cars for Dr. Ing.h.c.F.Porsche AG. Valmet Automotive’s current contract with Dr. Ing.h.c.F.Porsche AG is based on a cooperation agreement signed on October 24, 2001, with car production expected to continue until 2011. Valmet Automotive continuously seeks a new car model to add to its production line to improve the capacity utilization of the plant.

  Competition

     Specialty cars of the type produced by Valmet Automotive are designed for very limited customer segments and production is to an increasing extent subcontracted to external manufacturers. Valmet Automotive is one of the principal manufacturers of convertibles and contract manufacturers of specialty cars in Europe. Valmet Automotive’s principal competitors are Karmann in Germany, Magna Steyr in Austria, and Bertone and Pininfarina in Italy.

     Management believes that Valmet Automotive’s principal competitive advantages are its high quality and cost-efficiency, the competence of its personnel and its good readiness to manufacture new products. In December 2003, Valmet Automotive was granted one of the first ISO/TS 16949 quality certificates in the car industry.

  Recent Developments

     Due to the expiration of an agreement with Saab Automobile in April 2003 that provided for a second car model to be produced at the factory, Valmet Automotive does not currently have a sufficient order backlog to employ its entire personnel. Manufacture of new generation of Porsche Boxster cars commenced in the third quarter of 2004. As a result, car-making volumes started to increase in the fourth quarter of 2004. Some of the personnel previously laid off were called back to work. At the end of the year 2004, slightly more than 750 persons were working and approximately 400 continued to be temporarily laid off.

     In November 2001, ThyssenKrupp Automotive AG of Germany acquired a ten percent minority holding in Valmet Automotive with an option to acquire the remaining 90 percent by the end of 2003. In December 2003, ThyssenKrupp Automotive informed us that it would not use its option. In June 2004, ThyssenKrupp Automotive AG further informed that it would not acquire additional shares of Valmet Automotive, and that it would also give up its ten percent minority shareholding in the car manufacturer. On December 15, 2004, we reacquired ThyssenKrupp’s ten percent minority shareholding.

  Metso Powdermet

     Metso Powdermet designs, subcontracts the manufacture of and delivers machine parts based on powder metallurgy and other corresponding manufacturing techniques. It also advises our other businesses in issues related to materials technology. Metso Powdermet’s current main external project involves supplying powder metallurgy parts for the particle accelerator of the European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, located in Switzerland. This project will continue until 2005.

23


Table of Contents

     Metso Powdermet’s net sales totaled 7 million, 10 million and 11 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, Metso Powdermet had 23 employees.

Discontinued Operations

     On June 30, 2004, after approval of the competition authorities, Metso completed the divestiture of its Compaction & Paving business, Dynapac, to Altor, a Nordic private equity investor. Dynapac was excluded from Metso Minerals results from July 1, 2004 and is reported as a separate entity under Discontinued Operations for the years 2002 and 2003 and in 2004 until its sale.

     On December 31, 2004, the Drilling business of Metso Minerals, Reedrill, was divested and transferred to Terex Corporation from the United States. The business line was excluded from Metso Minerals and is reported as a separate entity under Discontinued Operations for all three years reported.

     In November 2002, we signed a memorandum of understanding with Bobst Group SA of Switzerland concerning the divestment of our Converting business. After the required competition authority approvals were received, the sale was completed on January 30, 2004. Based on this development, Converting business was excluded from Metso Paper in 2002 and is reported as a separate entity under Discontinued Operations for the years 2002 and 2003 and in 2004 until its sale. See “—Corporate Structure” for a further discussion of our corporate restructuring.

     The following table sets forth certain financial data regarding Discontinued Operations for the three most recent years:

                         
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except personnel data)  
Net sales
    558       567       267  
Operating profit (loss)
    13       (50 )     (8 )
Capital employed
    452       370        
Capital expenditures
    12       12       4  
Research and development
    13       16       7  
Order backlog
    157       109        
Personnel
    2,903       2,852        

Dynapac

     The products in the Compaction & Paving business, under the Dynapac product brand, included pavers, planers, rollers, light compaction equipment and concrete machinery. In addition to new equipment, the business also provided expertise through services, such as spare and wear parts as well as maintenance.

Drilling

     The Drilling business, under the Reedrill and Texoma product brands, offered equipment and services for drilling. The offering included track- and wheel-mounted drills and rotary drills for surface mining and excavation, multi-boom jumbo-drills for underground excavation and soil drilling equipment.

Converting

     Converting consisted of operations of Italian Valmet Rotomec (“Rotomec”) and U.K. based Atlas Converting plc (“Atlas”). Converting offered a wide range of machines for the packaging and printing industries.

     Rotomec specialized in rotogravure and flexo printing machines and special coating and laminating machines for packaging. Rotomec produced packaging industry machines for various materials, such as paper, board, aluminum, and plastic sheets. Rotomec also produced printing machines for the production of wallpaper and interior furnishing materials. Atlas specialized in slitter rewinders and vacuum-metallizing equipment for the treatment of paper, film and aluminum foil for the converting industry. Its products were mainly used in the film and packaging industries.

24


Table of Contents

Raw Materials

     Each of our business areas procures the raw materials and subcomponents required for its operations from a network of multiple subcontractors and suppliers. We typically have long-term relationships with our network of suppliers, even if long-term supply agreements are typically only used for certain key raw materials. No business area is dependent on a single supplier, and we emphasize the need to identify and monitor replacement suppliers in the event that a particular supplier is unable to meet our requirements. We manufacture internally many core components that are required for our operations.

     The types of raw materials and subcomponents that we use vary widely within each of our business areas. The most important include various mechanical and electrical components, subassemblies for Metso Paper and Metso Minerals, as well as hardware, software and computer applications for Metso Automation. In addition, steel and other metals and minerals are required for Metso Paper’s and Metso Minerals’ operations. We have long-term supply agreements for these key materials, with pricing terms following the prevailing market prices. However, we are not dependent on any single supplier and may procure these raw materials and subcomponents from multiple sources, including the open market. In addition, certain of our business areas require special raw materials. For example, Metso Paper requires rubber, polyurethane, composite and hard coatings in the production of paper machines, including roll covers. Also, Metso Minerals requires manganese, which is a mineral of limited global supply, in the production of castings for various wear parts. Also, Foundries within Metso Ventures requires scrap iron. No individual supplier or supply agreement is material.

     See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors” for a discussion of the risks associated with our reliance on suppliers and subcontractors to procure raw materials and subcomponents.

Seasonality

     Seasonal variations affect, to a relatively limited extent, our net sales. This limited impact is mainly due to seasonality in our customers’ operations. Due to the timing and purchasing decisions in certain of our customer segments, deliveries and sales to such customer segments are typically higher in the fourth quarter than during the other quarters of the year. This applies to all of our business areas. However, large projects, which for us are pulp and paper or mining related, tend to have long delivery timetables and are recognized as sales each quarter based on the percentage of completion. Weather conditions provide an additional reason for some seasonality especially in our Metso Mineral’s Crushing & Screening business line. As customers in the northern hemisphere make required machinery investments to construct roads in the region’s summer months, this typically increases deliveries in the second quarter of the year.

Dependence on Intellectual Property

     We aim to create value through our ownership of intellectual property rights, which include Metso brand, patents, utility models, design protections, trademarks, copyrights and domain names. We emphasize our systematic intellectual property management and harmonized, corporate-wide practices. Attention is also paid to avoid infringements of the intellectual property rights of others.

     We seek to manage our intellectual property rights portfolios in a way that supports both competitiveness and technology leadership in our businesses. For example, our patent portfolio, including 8,500 patents and 3,500 pending applications, is regularly evaluated, screened and developed with current and future business needs and possibilities in mind to raise the value/cost ratio of the portfolio.

     In 2004, our employees filed approximately 620 invention disclosures. We sought protection in the form of patents for approximately 220 new inventions relating to the products and services of all our business areas.

Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters

     Our operations are subject to various local laws of the countries in which we operate, including the United States federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Under various environmental laws, including the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), an owner or operator of property may become liable for the costs of remediation or removal of certain hazardous substances on its property, regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such substances. In addition, a generator of hazardous substances may be

25


Table of Contents

responsible for all or a portion of remedial and investigation costs at offsite disposal locations. There are currently no CERCLA claims pending against us. In addition to the specific matters described below, Metso Minerals Industries, Inc., previously Nordberg Inc., a company belonging to the Metso Minerals business area, has certain environmental concerns typically associated with old industrial facilities, such as potential asbestos in building materials, lead paint, and storing of oil, solvents and paint.

     Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has been named, together with a number of other parties, as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for the remediation of two Wisconsin landfills (Hunt and Muskego), which have been designated as superfund sites under CERCLA. As a PRP, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. is jointly and severally liable for the clean-up costs of such sites. With respect to Hunt landfill site, Metso Minerals Industries Inc., together with the other named PRPs, has entered into a consent decree with the U.S. government pursuant to which Metso Minerals and such other parties have agreed to cover the clean-up costs of the Hunt site, which had been estimated to be in the range of U.S.$13 million to U.S.$22 million. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has a 6.3 percent share of the clean-up costs and is also covered by an indemnification agreement with a previous owner of Nordberg. Construction at the Hunt site was completed in 1996 and Metso Minerals has paid a total of approximately U.S.$0.4 million for the clean-up costs. Additional work at the Hunt site may be required at an estimated cost to Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. of approximately U.S.$0.2 million. Efforts are ongoing to contact appropriate regulatory agencies to determine the extent, if any, of additional work required. With respect to the Muskego site, there is an administrative order in place, with a total estimate of U.S.$15 million for design and clean-up costs, of which the share of the previous owner and Metso Minerals is expected to be at the level of the already paid U.S.$125,000. No activities at the Muskego site have occurred since 1996. Management estimates that Metso Minerals’ maximum remaining liability with respect to the Hunt and Muskego sites will not exceed the currently established reserve of U.S.$267,000, and that the reserve for the remediation costs of the two landfill sites will be sufficient for any remaining liability due to above reasons and the fact that no activity on these sites has occurred for several years.

     In furtherance of the planned closure and sale of the Metso Minerals’ Milwaukee, Wisconsin, manufacturing facility, a Phase II Environmental Assessment (“ESA”) was commenced in early 2004 and completed in April of that year. The ESA indicated the existence of soil and groundwater contamination at the facility, the existence of which was communicated to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“WDNR”) in May 2004. The WDNR notified Metso Minerals Industries Inc. by letter dated May 10, 2004 of its investigation and cleanup responsibilities under applicable law. In October 2004, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. entered into a contract with an environmental consulting and remediation firm to clean up the property for all identified matters in accordance with applicable law for a fixed price. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. also purchased environmental insurance consisting of remediation cost cap insurance in the amount of U.S.$3.3 million and a 10-year, U.S. $10 million in third party pollution legal liability coverage for unknown matters, subject to standard exclusions. The cost of the basic remediation of U.S.$1.1 million has been fully funded. The entire insurance premium of approximately U.S.$425,000 has also been paid by Metso Minerals Industries Inc. On January 31, 2005, this property was sold with the purchaser accepting assignment of the remediation contract, including the potential responsibility for any additional payments thereunder as well as Metso Minerals Industries Inc.’s insured status under the insurance policy. Formal assignment of the insurance policies is expected in the first quarter of this year. Notwithstanding assignment, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. will remain an additional insured party under the third party pollution legal liability portion of the insurance policy and shares the responsibility for up to one-half of the U.S.$250,000 deductible should there be any claims.

     As a result of the acquisition of Svedala, Metso Minerals has two sites with certain environmental concerns. The first is a former manufacturing site in Mt. Olive, New Jersey, which Svedala acquired in 1992. The company acquired by Svedala operated this site from 1955 to 1987. With the closing of manufacturing operations in 1987, the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act triggered an environmental assessment. Both soil and groundwater contamination was identified. The source of most of the contamination was traced back to prior owners and operators of the property, which had been an industrial site since the early 1900s. All known contaminated soil has been removed and the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) has issued a “No Further Action” letter regarding the soil contamination. Metso Minerals has sold the site in Mt. Olive in December 2003. However, liabilities for ground water contamination issues were retained by Metso Minerals. In addition to the prior remediation activities at the site, Metso Minerals conducted a baseline ecological evaluation of the property as required by the NJDEP. The basic purpose of such evaluation was to determine whether site-related contamination presents a risk to or has impacted environmentally sensitive areas within or adjacent to the property. Such evaluation, together with a recommendation that no further ecological evaluation or testing be conducted at the site, was submitted to the NJDEP by an environmental consultant retained by us. There can be no assurance that the NJDEP agrees with such recommendation. However, taking into account (i) that we have purchased a pollution legal liability insurance policy for the site,

26


Table of Contents

which generally covers, subject to standard exclusions, clean-up costs, bodily injury and property damage for pre-existing and unknown pollution conditions, and (ii) that extensive prior remediation activities at the site have already been conducted, we do not anticipate any liability arising out of the final evaluation to be material. The estimated reserve required for the remediation measures relating to the ground water contamination and the completion of the baseline evaluation is U.S.$620,000.

     The second site with environmental concerns is a former manufacturing property in Danville, Pennsylvania. Both soil and groundwater are contaminated with oil from the manufacturing process. In conjunction with the state of Pennsylvania, an approved remediation plan has being developed. Some soil remediation has already been completed. Two additional areas of concern are being investigated and possibly remediated. An U.S.$1.2 million reserve is our best estimate of potential remediation costs at this time.

     Metso Minerals, through its Reedrill business that was divested on December 31, 2004, was earlier identified as a PRP in two CERCLA sites. At one of the sites, liability has been assumed by a predecessor company. Regarding the other site, Metso Minerals (Svedala) has responded in March 2000 to a request for information and identified predecessor companies as the potentially responsible parties. To date, no response by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has been received.

     Metso Minerals Industries Inc. may become subject to remedial costs relating to an old industrial facility in Colorado Springs, Colorado, which was used in foundry and test laboratory operation. The site is for sale. Phase I level evaluations do not suggest any environmental conditions of any major concern. However, in mid-2004, an area of stained soil identified in the Phase I was evaluated and determined to be contaminated with hazardous materials and, thereafter, excavated and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. Additional Phase II level evaluations are likely depending on the requirements of potential purchasers. A reserve of approximately U.S.$420,000 exists to account for the anticipated Phase II costs and the purchase of environmental insurance.

     Since 1992, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has been monitoring the groundwater at its Keokuk, Iowa facility after the removal of contaminated soil and pursuant to a plan of natural attenuation of affected groundwater, under the direction of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (“IDNR”). In November 2004, the IDNR advised that monitoring requirements for most of the compounds being tested for were eliminated. However, IDNR also stated that there had been insufficient attenuation of certain chlorinated compounds and directed Metso Minerals Industries Inc. to prepare a work plan that would enhance the degradation of these compounds. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. accepted a bid for the investigation, delineation and preparation of a work plan. A reserve of U.S.$100,000 was established for estimated costs associated with near-term compliance with IDNR investigation requirements.

     In October 2004, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”) advised Metso Minerals Industries Inc. that an alleged predecessor, McNally Pittsburg Manufacturing Corporation, had disposed of foundry sand at a location where the soil now contains lead and chromium. The KDHE has invited participation in a voluntary cleanup program, failing which administrative action will be taken. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has retained local legal counsel to investigate the scope of potential liability, if any, and has reserved U.S. $100,000 for estimated legal fees and investigation costs.

     Metso Panelboard, part of the Metso Ventures business area, has previously owned a site with certain environmental concerns. The site, located in Belgium, was owned by Constructiewerkhuizen De Mets N.V., a company divested in 2001. Pursuant to the sale agreement, we are required to provide the purchaser with an environmental certificate by the Belgian authorities, to the effect that the soil at the site has not been contaminated. Consequently, a third party conducted environmental studies and assessed the site. The completed report of the results was sent to OVAM (Belgian environmental authority) for acceptance during the fall of 2004. The studies indicate that groundwater has been polluted by chlorinated hydrocarbons but that soil has not been polluted. The use of the chemicals in the groundwater ended at site in 1989. The precautionary measures to prevent the spreading of this historical pollution started in January 2005. A cleaning plan can be presented for acceptance to OVAM after the completed report has been accepted. In accordance with the conditions of the sale agreement, we have estimated that our remaining responsibility for remediation costs will be limited to the currently established reserve of 0.8 million.

     Environmental awareness and environmentally focused technology solutions are an essential part of our competitiveness. We develop solutions that improve eco-efficiency of our customers’ industrial core processes. Our objective is to reduce the environmental impact of products and processes throughout their life cycle.

27


Table of Contents

     In June 2000, we signed the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) Business Charter for sustainable development, which compliments the environmental management principles of our own environmental policy. We expect that our most significant production sites will comply with ISO14001 environmental management systems in the future. In 2004, the ISO14001 certification was granted to three Metso sites, and the current amount of sites with the certification is 33. By the end of 2004, the ISO14001 systems covered 59 percent of our production activity. When systems currently under development will be certified, 78 percent of our production activity will be covered. In 2004, we were selected for the sixth time as a component in Dow Jones Sustainability Index World (“DJSI”) for the period 2004-2005. We also feature in the European sustainability index, DJSI STOXX. We have also been reselected for FTSE4Good corporate social responsibility index. In addition, we have been included in several smaller sustainability indices.

     We are committed to full compliance with all applicable national and international laws, regulations and generally accepted practices. Our environmental reporting procedure covers operating sites with significant environmental impacts. To our best knowledge, overall compliance with site-level permit conditions was proper in 2004. No major non-compliance situations were observed. Minor clean up, monitoring or investigation activities are being carried out at several sites as indicated above. However, we anticipate that these cases do not result in material financial consequences for us. Management is not aware of any other current environmental matters that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Property, Plants and Equipment

     Our principal executive offices are located at Fabianinkatu 9 A, Helsinki, Finland.

     As of December 31, 2004, our principal manufacturing facilities included the following:

                     
    Owned or            
Location of Facility   Leased     Size (sq.ft)     Principal Activities
Metso Corporation
                   
Helsinki, Finland
  Owned     86,920     Corporate head office
 
                   
Metso Paper
                   
Jyväskylä, Finland
  Owned     1,239,034     Large-sized Paper Machines
Järvenpää, Finland
  Owned     624,242     Paper Finishing Machines
Valmet-Xian, Xi’an, China(1)
  Leased     533,890     Paper and Board Machines, Foundry, Air Drying Systems
Sundsvall, Sweden
  Owned     424,417     Pulping Machinery
Karlstad, Sweden
  Owned     421,224     Board and Tissue Machines
Laem Chabang, Thailand
  Owned     312,524     Service Center
Kotka, Finland
  Owned     295,039     Medium-sized Paper Machines, Pulp Dryers
Valkeakoski, Finland
  Owned     231,351     Mechanical Pulping, Refiner Segments, Stock Preparation Equipment and Systems
Como, Italy
  Leased     226,974     Paper and Board Machine Rebuilds
Appleton, Wisconsin, United States
  Owned     166,000     Finishing Products, Roll Service
Turku, Finland
  Leased     155,506     Air Drying Systems
Columbus, Mississippi, United States
  Owned     149,079     Roll Covering
Aiken, South Carolina, United States
  Owned     124,400     Roll Covering
Turku, Finland
  Leased     118,403     Air Drying Systems
Neenah, Wisconsin, United States
  Owned     111,360     Roll Covering
Cernay, France
  Leased     110,312     Roll Covering
Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania, United States
  Owned     110,000     Roll Covering
Tampere, Finland
  Leased     91,386     Roll Factory
Gorizia, Italy
  Owned     89,179     Air Drying Systems
Biddeford, Maine, United States
  Owned     88,000     Tissue Air Drying Systems, Tissue Process Services for Paper Machines
Beloit, Wisconsin, United States
  Leased     86,800     Service Center
Oulu, Finland
  Owned     82,258     Roll Covering
Hollola, Finland
  Owned     77,149     Roll Handling

28


Table of Contents

                     
    Owned or            
Location of Facility   Leased     Size (sq.ft)     Principal Activities
Hagfors, Sweden
  Owned     70,865     Refiner Segments
Järvenpää, Finland
  Leased     68,049     Paper Finishing Machines
Federal Way, Washington, United States
  Owned     62,683     Roll Covering
Thunder Bay, Canada
  Leased     50,908     Air Drying Systems
Wuxi, China
  Owned     50,388     Service Center
Melbourne, Australia
  Owned     49,998     Service Center
Montreal, Canada
  Leased     45,000     Service Center, Components
Shanghai, P.R. China
  Leased     43,670     Logistics Center
Pfungstadt, Germany
  Owned     40,458     Service Center
Florence, Alabama, United States
  Owned     40,000     Woodhandling
Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  Owned     39,288     Service Center
 
                   
Metso Minerals
                   
Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  Owned     898,910     Rock Crushers, Vibrating Equipment, Rollers, Castings
Isithebe, South Africa
  Leased     602,140     Manganese Spare Parts
Viña del Mar, Chile
  Owned     538,000     Wear Protection and Conveyors
Mâcon, France
  Owned     532,723     Rock Crushers and Vibrating Equipment
Tampere, Finland
  Owned     510,990     Rock Crushers, Mobile Crushing Equipment
Düsseldorf, Germany
  Owned     420,223     Metal Recycling Machines
Vereeniging, South Africa
  Owned     330,386     Rock Crushers
Ahmedabad, India
  Owned     350,076     Castings and Parts for Rock Crushers and Pumps
Bawal, India
  Owned     302,571     Rock Crushers, Vibrating Equipment and Pumps
Sala, Sweden
  Owned     247,570     Slurry Pumps and Process Equipment
Trelleborg, Sweden
  Leased     242,100     Rubber Manufacturing
Gastonia, North Carolina, United States
  Owned     168,000     Vibrating Equipment
Warrenton, Missouri, United States
  Owned     150,000     Wire Screen Media Manufacturing
Clarksdale, Mississippi, United States
  Leased     138,400     Conveyor Component Manufacturing
Newcastle, Australia
  Owned     132,500     Vibrating Equipment and Spare Parts
York, Pennsylvania, United States
  Owned     131,965     Mill Equipment and Parts
Kongsvinger, Norway
  Leased     107,639     Conveyor Belts
Keokuk, Iowa, United States(2)
  Owned     98,000     Rubber Manufacturing
Tampere, Finland
  Owned     96,875     Conveyor Belts
Ersmark, Sweden
  Owned     95,800     Rubber Manufacturing
Vicálvaro, Spain
  Owned     80,000     Rock Crusher Spare Parts and Vibrating Equipment
Portland, Oregon, United States
  Owned     70,968     Rock Crusher Service and Spare Parts
Matamata, New Zealand
  Owned     62,400     Rock Crushers and Spare Parts
Belleville, Canada
  Owned     58,000     Idler Manufacturing
Dungannon, Northern Ireland
  Owned     56,000     Mobile Screens
North Bay, Canada
  Owned     55,000     Rubber Manufacturing
Perth, Australia
  Owned     48,438     Rubber Manufacturing
Moers, Germany
  Owned     47,361     Conveyor Belts
Tianjin, China
  Owned     46,466     Rock Crushers
Evergem, Belgium
  Leased     46,285     Conveyor Belts
 
                   
Metso Automation
                   
Helsinki, Finland
  Leased     442,400     Office, Valve and Accessories Manufacturing and Testing
Tampere, Finland
  Owned     323,300     Office, Automation Systems Manufacturing and Testing
Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, United States
  Owned     175,000     Valve and Accessories Manufacturing
Shanghai, China(1)
  Leased     129,000     Valve Manufacturing
Chihuahua, Mexico(3)
  Leased     98,800     Valve Manufacturing
Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States
  Leased     84,700     Office, Control Systems Manufacturing

29


Table of Contents

                     
    Owned or            
Location of Facility   Leased     Size (sq.ft)     Principal Activities
Kajaani, Finland
  Leased     77,600     Office, Specialty Analyzers Manufacturing and Testing
 
                   
Metso Ventures
                   
Uusikaupunki, Finland
  Owned     1,216,000     Car Assembly
Parkano, Finland
  Owned     249,946     Gears 50 percent and the rest hired to an external manufacturer
Jyväskylä, Finland
  Owned     183,645     Gear Manufacturing and Service
Karkkila, Finland
  Owned     126,000     Gear Manufacturing and Service
Wuppertal, Germany
  Leased     65,781     Gears
Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
  Leased     35,000     Gears
Hannover, Germany
  Leased     50,418     Energy plants, dryers
Sundsvall, Sweden
  Leased     38,736     MDF line machines
Nastola, Finland
  Leased     35,572     Particleboard and OSB line machines
Jyväskylä, Finland
  Owned     394,000     Foundry
Tampere, Finland
  Owned     288,020     Foundry
Karlstad, Sweden
  Owned     195,000     Foundry
   
 
(1)   Joint-venture, see “Associated Companies” below.
(2)   Scheduled to be closed during the first half of 2005.
(3)   Scheduled to be closed by the end of August 2005.

     Management believes that the production capacity of each of our production plants is adequate and suitable for our current business needs and that suitable additional or alternative space would be available in the future, if necessary, on commercially reasonable terms.

Significant Subsidiaries

     The majority of our operating assets in Finland and outside of Finland are held through regional or divisional subsidiaries. During 2001, we changed a number of the names of our subsidiaries by eliminating the reference to Valmet, Nordberg, Neles and other predecessor entities, except for Valmet Automotive Oy and the subsidiaries that already contain the Metso name. Our significant subsidiaries, as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, are as follows, each of which is wholly-owned by Metso Corporation:

     
Company Name   Country of Incorporation
Metso Paper Oy
  Finland
Metso Minerals Oy
  Finland
Metso Minerals Holding AB
  Sweden
Metso USA Inc.
  United States
Metso Svenska AB
  Sweden

Associated Companies

     We currently own 35.8 percent of Allimand S.A., which, as of December 31, 2004, had an equity value of approximately 5 million; 48.3 percent of Valmet-Xian Paper Machinery Co. Ltd., which had an equity value of approximately 7 million; 50.0 percent of Shanghai Neles-Jamesbury Valve Co. Ltd., which had an equity value of approximately 3 million; and 48.2 percent of Avantone Oy, which had an equity value of approximately 1 million.

Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.

     The following discussion and analysis by management concerning the financial condition and the results of operations of Metso should be read together with the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Finnish GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation of the amounts of net income and shareholders’ equity reported under Finnish GAAP to the amounts determined under U.S. GAAP, and a

30


Table of Contents

discussion of the principal differences between Finnish and U.S. GAAP are set out in Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this annual report.

Business Overview

  Our Customers

     Our main customer industries are pulp and paper, rock and minerals processing as well as power, energy, oil and gas industries. Certain important trends apply to these industries, which have an effect on our operations. Business driven by the installed base of machinery and equipment has been growing especially in Europe and North America, where our customers have been focusing more on efficiency improvements for their existing processes rather than investing on new machinery or equipment. Demand for new machinery and equipment focuses on areas with strong economic growth and/or good availability of raw materials required, which supports demand for pulp and paper as well as rock and minerals processing investments. Such areas include Asia and South America. Accordingly, we have adapted our own organization in Europe and North America by cutting new machine related resources and strengthened aftermarket and process service related resources, while in the growing markets of Asia and South America we have increased our new machine related resources.

  Business Drivers

     Paper consumption growth is the key driver for pulp and paper investments. Shorter-term capacity utilization rates and changes in paper prices impact the investment activity of Metso Paper’s customers. Within the paper industry, new papermaking capacity has mostly been built in Asia, mainly China, during the past few years. The demand in the Chinese market has been supported by economic growth that, in turn, has increased paper consumption significantly. The equipment demand has been increasing for high-grade paper products, which has increased the investments of Metso Paper’s customers in high-speed and high-quality machinery and equipment. Provided that the strong economic growth in China continues, we expect continued good investment activity in China by our customers in the paper industry. South American customers have in the recent years been active in investing in new pulping capacity due to the good availability of fast growing wood resources, such as eucalyptus, in the region. Management expects this competitive advantage to continue to support demand for pulp equipment in South America during the next several years as well. Our customers in the European pulp and paper industry have in the past few years made only limited investments in new capacity and, instead, they have focused on machine rebuilds and process improvements. As demand for paper products in Europe is not expected to increase significantly, the current investment level could continue for a few years. In North America, investment activity in the pulp and paper industry has been low. Especially in the United States, there have been very few new investments since the 1990s and the demand has been focused on smaller rebuilds and aftermarket activities.

     Metso Minerals’ business environment reflects, on the one hand, demand from the aggregates industry and, on the other, demand from the mining industry. Although the major aggregates producers come from Europe and North America, the growth in demand for aggregates has been moderate, and aggregates have been used mainly to maintain existing infrastructure. In developing countries, such as China and India, infrastructure construction has been supported by higher economic growth and is increasing strongly. Also, large multi-year government programs aimed to improve the infrastructure in these countries have increased the demand for aggregates and investments in new production machines and equipment provided by Metso Minerals. The focus in mining operations has moved to the Southern Hemisphere. In recent years, the demand for new mining equipment has increased in South America, Southern Africa, and Australia, while the emphasis in mining operations in the Northern Hemisphere has been on aftermarket and service operations. Many countries in the Southern Hemisphere have significant metal deposits attracting new investment. Metals prices and the supply-demand balance are important demand drivers for the mining industry as well as for their suppliers. As a result of growing demand for metals, metal prices continued to rise during 2004. The mining industry has been increasing production to answer to the growing demand, and this has improved the demand for both aftermarket services and new equipment provided by Metso Minerals.

     Approximately one-half of Metso Automation’s sales are derived from the pulp and paper industry, and the apparent trends in that industry affect the business environment of Metso Automation. Most of the remaining sales are derived from the power, energy, oil and gas industries where customer investment activity reflects both the demand for and price of energy. Recently, the application of automation in industrial processes has been increasing after a few slower years. The increased oil and gas prices raised demand from customers in those industries during last year. Management expects the growth rate to accelerate in the future inasmuch as many

31


Table of Contents

process industries have systems that are obsolete by today’s standards, and inasmuch as newer technology enables developing solutions that improve the efficiency of equipment and processes. Automation is increasingly embedded in machines and equipment, and more fully integrated in the overall information systems of mills and processes.

Key Management Issues

     In 2004, the key issues in the management of the Company were improving the profitability of our business areas and strengthening our balance sheet. We continued to implement the corporate-wide cost restructuring program and launched a new, additional renewal program in Metso Paper. During the year, we made a few important structural decisions that further concentrated our operations around our future core by divesting three sizeable businesses. These divestments helped us in reaching our target of reducing our debt level. We also strengthened our balance sheet by concentrating on working capital management. After a couple of years of weak market conditions, the market situation in two of our business areas started to improve during the year 2004. Metso Minerals saw increased demand in the construction equipment business in North America and Asia while mining industry investments also clearly picked up. For Metso Automation, the power, energy, oil and gas segment saw a clear improvement.

     Going forward into 2005, we will continue our efforts to improve the profitability of our Metso Paper business. We also intend to take actions to support growth in Metso Minerals and Metso Automation. We have set clear financial targets for the Company and all of its business areas, and management intends to focus strongly on achieving these targets.

Metso Paper’s Business Concept Renewal Program of 2004

     As the investment activity in the pulp and paper industry continued to be slow in 2004, we continued actions to strengthen Metso Paper’s competitiveness by launching a program in June 2004 to renew the business concept and to streamline the cost structure of the business area. The overall cost savings target is to reduce costs by 50 million annually. The decisions made under the program in 2004 resulted in Metso Paper booking 26 million of nonrecurring expenses. These decisions are expected to contribute to approximately 40 million annual cost savings. The remainder of the cost savings target is intended to be covered by decisions to be made during 2005. The measures left for 2005 are related to certain unfinished outsourcing plans in Finland and Sweden and to the global re-engineering of our tissue business. The program’s nonrecurring expenses are estimated to total approximately 40 million, including the already recorded provision of 26 million. The decisions made in 2004 are expected to result in the reduction of approximately 670 Metso Paper employees, of which approximately 200 had left the Company’s payroll by December 31, 2004. In all, the program is estimated to affect 1,100 - 1,300 employees, with one-half being affected by reductions and the other half by participating in outsourcing and other production arrangements. The full benefits of this program are expected to materialize in 2006.

Efficiency Improvement Program of 2003

     In 2003, our board of directors adopted an efficiency improvement program designed to cut fixed costs. The efficiency improvement program was completed in all of our business areas during 2004. The decisions made are estimated to result in annual savings of slightly over 100 million, in line with the original target. As a result of the efficiency improvement program, our personnel has been reduced by approximately 1,900 persons, including a reduction of approximately 1,300 employees in 2004. According to the program and decisions already made, the number of personnel will be reduced further by approximately 140 persons in 2005. Hence, management expects a further positive contribution to the 2005 result from this restructuring. The costs of the program are estimated to total 93 million, rather than the 103 million estimated at the end of 2003. Hence, we were able to revise downwards the provision made at the end of 2003.

     In Metso Paper, the annual cost savings target through the efficiency improvement program is somewhat above 30 million. The organization of Metso Paper was streamlined and Metso Paper’s workforce was reduced in Finland, Sweden, Italy and North America. In addition, in-house manufacturing capacity in Finland was outsourced.

     In Metso Minerals, the annual cost savings target through the efficiency improvement program is just over 50 million. Operational efficiency was improved through the reduction of personnel in factories as well as in the global sales and service network. As part of the program, we closed down the production plant for mining crushers in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a plant for mining industry process equipment and pumps in Colorado

32


Table of Contents

Springs, Colorado, a foundry in Vereeniging, South Africa, and a plant for mining and crushing screens in Ketsch, Germany. We also adjusted our wear protection business in two Swedish units during 2004. The decision to close the Keokuk, Iowa, plant has also been made as one of the final initiatives of the program.

     In Metso Automation, the annual cost savings target through the efficiency improvement program is approximately 8 million. The organization was streamlined and the workforce was reduced in Finland and North America and in the global sales network by mid-2004. As part of the program, Metso Automation also divested CPS Electronics Inc., a contract manufacturer of electronics, in September 2003.

     Smaller annual cost savings targets were set for Metso Ventures and the corporate head office in Finland. Within Metso Ventures, two Metso Panelboard units in Germany were combined as part of the program. At the corporate head office minor personnel reductions were made.

Goodwill Impairment

     Due to the continued demanding market situation in Metso Minerals’ customer industries within rock and minerals processing, an impairment charge of 205 million related to goodwill was recorded in the 2003 figures of Metso Minerals and Discontinued Operations. This goodwill impairment, which had no cash flow effect, decreased our annual amortization of goodwill by approximately 10 million in 2004. There were no goodwill impairments in 2004.

Recent Acquisitions and Divestments

     The most significant development since the formation of Metso through the merger of Valmet and Rauma was our acquisition of Svedala in 2001 in order to build ourselves into a globally leading player in rock and minerals processing, alongside our similar position in the pulp and paper industry. In 2003 and 2004 we have focused on developing the Company further by divesting several businesses that were not considered integral parts of Metso. During this period we only made limited small acquisitions.

     On March 4, 2005, we announced the signing of an agreement to sell Metso Drives to the funds managed by private equity investor CapMan of Finland. The debt-free price of the divestment is estimated to be approximately 98 million. Metso Drives Oy and its foreign subsidiaries will be transferred to the ownership of the CapMan funds after the relevant regulatory approvals.

     On December 31, 2004, we sold our Drilling business to Terex Corporation from the United States. Drilling had sales of 75 million in 2004 and approximately 280 employees. The divestment value, which will be based on the net asset value at closing, will be approximately 28 million.

     On June 30, 2004, we divested our Compaction & Paving business that operated under the Dynapac name to Altor, a Nordic private equity investor. Dynapac had sales of 322 million in 2003 and approximately 1,800 employees. The transaction price was 291 million net of cash sold.

     In January 2004, we sold the Converting business to Bobst S.A. of Switzerland. Converting had sales of 183 million in 2003 and approximately 800 employees. The final transaction price was 68 million net of cash sold.

     In September 2003, we sold CPS Electronics Inc., a subsidiary of Metso Automation, to Scanfil Plc of Finland. CPS Electronics is a contract manufacturer of electronics, specializing in small and medium-sized series production. The number of employees totaled approximately 130.

     In February 2003, we sold the Network Management Solutions companies (“NMS”), part of the Metso Automation business area, to Telvent of Spain. NMS provides SCADA and information management solutions. NMS employed over 400 people and had annual net sales of approximately 59 million in 2002.

     In January 2003, we sold our hydraulic power transmission unit, Metso Hydraulics, which was part of the Metso Ventures business area to Sampo-Rosenlew Oy. Metso Hydraulics net sales in 2001 totaled 18 million and it employed 120 people.

33


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

     The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with Finnish GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable. However, actual results and the timing of the recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates. We have identified the following critical accounting policies and estimates utilized by management in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

     In some instances, accounting policies followed in accordance with U.S. GAAP (as reported in Note 30 to the financial statements) differ from those policies followed in accordance with Finnish GAAP. Where the difference in accounting policy is material and contains significant critical estimates, we have included a separate discussion of those policies below.

Accounts Receivable

     Our policy is to maintain an allowance for bad debts based on our best estimate of the amounts that are potentially uncollectable at the balance sheet date. We base our estimate on a systematic, on-going review and evaluation that we perform as part of our credit-risk evaluation process. As part of this evaluation, we take into account our history of collections, the size and compositions of the receivable balances, current economic events and conditions and other pertinent information.

     We believe that the accounting estimate related to the establishment of a reserve for credit losses is a critical accounting estimate because:

     (1)  the evaluation is inherently judgmental, and requires the use of significant assumptions about expected customer default amounts that may be susceptible to significant change; and

     (2)  changes in the estimates regarding the allowance for bad debts could have a significant impact on our financial statements.

Allowance for Slow-Moving and Obsolete Inventory

     Our policy is to maintain an allowance for slow moving and obsolete inventory based on our best estimate of such amounts at the balance sheet date. We base our estimate on a systematic, on-going review and evaluation of inventory balances. As part of this evaluation, we also consider the average age of the inventory as compared to anticipated necessary levels for future periods. We believe that the accounting estimate related to the establishment for inventory obsolescence reserves is a critical accounting estimate because:

     (1)  the evaluation is inherently judgmental and requires the use of significant assumptions about the expected future sales composition, which may be susceptible to significant change; and

     (2)  changes in the estimates regarding the allowance for inventory obsolescence could have a material impact on our financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

     We deliver complete installations to our customers, where the moment of signing a sales contract (firm commitment) and the final reception of a delivery by the customer can take place in different financial periods. In accordance with our accounting principles, we apply the percentage of completion method (“POC method”) for recognition of such long-term delivery contracts. In year 2004, approximately 20 percent of our net sales were recognized under the POC method, which is based on predetermined milestones and where the revenue is recognized based on the estimated realized value added or on the cost-to-cost method. We use the POC method since reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs applicable to a contract can be established. A projected loss on a firm commitment is recognized in income, when a contract becomes binding to us. The estimated revenue, the costs and profit, including the planned delivery schedule, of the projects are subject to regular revisions as the contract progresses to completion. Revisions in profit estimates are charged to income in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. Although we have significant experience using the POC method, the total costs estimated to be incurred on projects may change over time due to changes in the underlying project costs structures, which may ultimately affect the revenue recognized. As the

34


Table of Contents

reliability of cost estimates is based on our experience in manufacturing and delivering paper machines, pulp making lines and complete crushing installations, we do not apply the POC method for sales where we consider that the final outcome of the project and related costs cannot be pre-established reliably. Completed contract method may also be preferred to POC method when we consider there to be an external risk factor, for example the country of destination.

Accounting for Income Taxes

     As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions and countries in which we operate. This process involves estimating the actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue and cost reserves, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance, we include an expense in the tax reserve in the income statement.

     Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded. We have recorded net deferred tax assets of 179 million as of December 31, 2004, net of a valuation allowance of 113 million as of December 31, 2004, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of operating losses carried forward for certain foreign subsidiaries before expiration and the final outcome of tax audits in some subsidiaries. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income by country in which we operate, and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable based on estimated future taxable income and planned tax strategies to utilize these assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish an additional valuation allowance, which we do not expect to have a material impact our financial condition and results of operations.

     U.S. GAAP

     Under Finnish GAAP, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Available evidence includes internal projections of future earnings which are utilized to assess the probability that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Under U.S. GAAP, if there is objective negative evidence, such as cumulative losses for recent years, the weight given to positive evidence would be commensurate with extent to which it can be objectively verified. As a result, internal projections normally would not be assigned any significant weight in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.

     In addition, in accordance with Finnish GAAP, the need for a valuation allowance is assessed based only on the deferred tax assets which are expected to be utilized over a reasonable time in the future. In determining the need for a valuation allowance in accordance with U.S. GAAP, a company is required to consider taxable income that will arise within the statutory period over which the deferred tax asset may be utilized.

     Due to these items, differences may arise in regards to the determination of the valuation allowance under Finnish GAAP versus U.S. GAAP.

Allocation of Excess Purchase Price to Acquired Assets

     In accordance with our accounting principles, we have allocated excess purchase price to acquired long-lived tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. Whenever feasible, we have used as a basis for such allocations the readily available market values to determine the fair value basis. However, when this has not been possible, as often is the case with long-lived intangible assets and certain assets with no active markets or available price quotations, the valuation has been based on past performance of such asset and its intended future use in our business. The appraisals, which have been based on current replacement costs, discounted cash flows and estimated selling prices depending on the underlying asset, require management to make estimates and assumptions of the future use of these assets and their impact on our financial position. Any change in our future business priorities and orientations may affect the planned outcome of initial appraisals.

35


Table of Contents

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets and Goodwill

     We assess the carrying value of identifiable intangible assets, long-lived assets and goodwill annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying value may not be recoverable. Triggering events for impairment reviews include the following:

    material permanent deterioration in the economic or political environment of our customers or our own activity;
 
    significant under-performance relative to expected historical or projected future performance; and
 
    significant changes in our strategic orientations affecting our business plans and previous investment policies.

     Our accounting policy related to the annual impairment test for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles is based on numerous estimates. We believe that the accounting estimates related to the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets are critical accounting estimates because:

     (1)  The valuation is inherently judgmental and highly susceptible to change from period to period because it requires us to make assumptions about future supply and demand related to our individual business units, future sales prices and what cost savings will be achievable;

     (2)  The value of the benefits and savings that we expect to realize as a result of the efficiency improvement program are inherently subjective;

     (3)  We determine the fair value of the reporting units using a weighted average cost of capital as the rate to discount estimated future cash flows. This rate may not be indicative of actual rates obtained in the market, if incremental borrowings are necessary; and

     (4)  The impact of an impairment charge could be material to our financial statements.

     If we fail to meet our forecasted sales levels, fail to achieve our anticipated cost reductions, or if weak economic conditions prevail in our primary markets, the estimated fair values of our reporting units may be adversely affected, resulting in impairment charges.

     As of September 30, 2003, upon completion of the annual impairment assessment, based on approved updated forecasted plans, we recognized an impairment loss of 205 million related to the Metso Minerals business area and Discontinued Operations. No impairment charge was recorded in 2004.

     U.S. GAAP

     Under U.S. GAAP, we have a significant amount of goodwill and brand names related to acquisitions in prior years that, in accordance with SFAS 142, are no longer being amortized. The goodwill is tested in a two-step process. The first step is performed annually or as necessary based on the criteria and using the same methodology discussed above under Finnish GAAP. The second step requires us to allocate the excess of the fair value determined in Step 1 to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit being tested. In order to complete this step, we must make estimates regarding the valuation of our assets and liabilities. These estimates may not reflect the eventual value recognized related to these items. The estimates are based upon assumptions about replacement cost of specific items, our intended use for our assets and, in the case of intangible assets, detailed calculations to estimate the fair value of such assets. These calculations include significant estimates made by management including the same estimates as described above regarding the valuation process for goodwill. As of December 31, 2003, under U.S. GAAP we had 567 million of goodwill remaining after recording an impairment of 224 million (as restated) relating to Metso Minerals businesses. In addition, an impairment charge on brand names amounting to 13 million was recognized in 2003. Changes to these underlying assumptions could have resulted in a significantly different amount of impairment recorded for U.S. GAAP. No impairment charge was recorded in 2004. As of December 31, 2004, under U.S. GAAP, we had 420 million of goodwill remaining.

36


Table of Contents

     Our impairment charge includes the impact of a restatement related to our acquisition of Svedala in 2001. As a result of this restatement, additional pension liabilities were recorded as of the date of acquisition, with a corresponding increase to goodwill net of the related deferred tax impact. This resulted in an additional goodwill of 26 million and a corresponding additional impairment of 18 million.

Reserve for Warranty Costs

     Our warranty reserve is based on the history of past warranty costs and claims for machines and equipment under warranty. The typical warranty period is 12 months from the date of customer acceptance of the delivered equipment. For larger projects, the average warranty period is two years. For sales involving new technology and long-term delivery contracts, additional warranty reserves can be established on a case by case basis to take into account the potentially increased risk. While we believe that our warranty reserve is adequate and that the judgment applied is conservative, the amounts estimated to become due and payable could differ materially from what will actually transpire in the future. Actual costs of claims incurred or the number of claims incurred could significantly differ from the amounts assumed to estimate this reserve.

Restructuring Costs

     At times, we record restructuring provisions as a result of programs that are implemented throughout our operations. These provisions are recorded in order for us to summarize the impacts of the programs and separate these costs from our recurring operations. When the decisions are made to undertake restructuring activities, management develops a formal plan and presents this to the board of directors for approval. Once the plan is approved, management raises a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it. The costs included in a provision for restructuring are only those costs that are either incremental and incurred as a direct result of the plan, or are the result of a continuing contractual obligation with no continuing economic benefit to us, or a penalty incurred to cancel the contractual obligation. These costs are estimated based on numerous significant assumptions including, but not limited to, the following assumptions:

     (1)  Estimated number of employees to be terminated in order to carry out management’s plans;

     (2)  Estimated level of reduction of production capacity based on projected future production levels;

     (3)  Approximate termination costs for specific contracts, leases, etc.; and

     (4)  Estimated write-downs of asset values based on revised future cash flow projections.

     We believe that the calculation of the amount recorded as a restructuring cost is a critical accounting policy because:

    Although management has devised a formal plan, the plan has not yet been fully implemented at the time the expense is recorded. There could be significant changes to the plan and associated costs upon completion of the measures included in the plan.
 
    The estimated reduction in capacity for specific manufacturing plants is based on management’s anticipated future levels of production based on estimated future order intake. Final outcome could differ from projected amounts due to changes in the overall market conditions.
 
    Estimated write-downs of asset values are based on calculations that are inherently subjective. These calculations include assumptions of future cash flows to be generated from the assets, estimated growth rates and estimated discount rate of the future cash flows, as well as an overall assurance regarding the intended use of these assets.

     Under U.S. GAAP, a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity is recognized when the liability is incurred, and can be measured at fair value. These costs include, but are not limited to, one-time benefits provided to current employees who are involuntary terminated and costs to terminate contracts that are not capital leases. If employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits, the cost under U.S. GAAP is recognized ratably over the future service period.

37


Table of Contents

Pensions

     In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we determine our pension benefit expense based on assumptions that include the following:

     (1)  a weighted average expected return on plan assets. Actual return on plan assets may differ significantly based on market activity.

     (2)  an assumed discount rate to be used in the calculation of the current year pension expense and pension liability balance. This rate may not be indicative of actual rates realized in the market.

     (3)  estimated rates of future pay increases. Actual increases may not reflect actual future increases. Based on the significant change in the Company’s structure and the uncertainty of the global market place, these estimates are difficult to project.

     The actuarial experience that differs from our assumptions and changes in our assumptions can result in gains and losses that are not yet recognized in our consolidated financial statements. We recognize amortization of any unrecognized gain or loss as a component of our pension expense if, as of the beginning of the year, such unrealized net gain or loss exceeds ten percent of the greater of (1) the projected benefit obligation or (2) the market-related value of the plan’s assets. In such case, the amount of amortization expense we recognize is the resulting excess, divided by the average remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits under such plan. Pension benefit expense was 40 million in 2004, 38 million in 2003 and 42 million in 2002. It is based on the expected return on plan assets of 8.0 percent for 2004, 7.9 percent for 2003 and 8.0 percent for 2002. A one percent increase in the expected return on plan assets would have reduced pension benefit expense by approximately 1.6 million, and a one percent decrease in the expected return on plan assets would have increased pension benefit expense by approximately 1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     Our pension liabilities for 2001, 2002 and 2003 in accordance with U.S. GAAP include the impact of a restatement related to our acquisition of Svedala in 2001.

Results of Operations

     Our reportable segments are Metso Paper, Metso Minerals, Metso Automation and Metso Ventures. In addition, we report three divested businesses under Discontinued Operations. In January 2004, we sold the Converting business, previously part of Metso Paper, in June 2004, we sold the Compaction & Paving business, previously part of Metso Minerals and in December 2004, we sold the Drilling business previously part of Metso Minerals. These three businesses are reported separately under Discontinued Operations in this annual report. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Corporate Structure” for a more detailed description of our corporate restructuring, which is reflected in the financial information discussed below.

     The table below sets forth our net sales by business area for the three most recent years in accordance with Finnish GAAP:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    1,778       1,651       1,559  
Metso Minerals
    1,406       1,253       1,343  
Metso Automation
    622       531       535  
Metso Ventures
    446       370       387  
Intra Metso Net Sales
    (119 )     (122 )     (115 )
 
                 
Continuing Operations
    4,133       3,683       3,709  
Discontinued Operations(1)
    558       567       267  
 
                 
Metso Total
    4,691       4,250       3,976  
 
                 
   
 
(1)   Discontinued Operations include three divested businesses: Converting, Compaction & Paving and Drilling for the full years 2002 and 2003. For 2004, Converting is included until January 31, 2004; Compaction & Paving until June 30, 2004; and Drilling until December 31, 2004.

38


Table of Contents

     The table below sets forth our operating profit (loss) by business area for the three most recent years in accordance with Finnish GAAP:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    115       25       11  
Metso Minerals
    28       (189 )     84  
Metso Automation
    16       28       53  
Metso Ventures
    20       (9 )     (7 )
Corporate Office and other
    (25 )     (34 )     (22 )
 
                 
Continuing Operations
    154       (179 )     119  
Discontinued Operations(1)
    13       (50 )     (8 )
 
                 
Metso Total
    167       (229 )     111  
 
                 
   
 
(1)   Discontinued Operations include three divested businesses: Converting, Compaction & Paving and Drilling for the full years 2002 and 2003. For 2004, Converting is included until January 31, 2004; Compaction & Paving until June 30, 2004; and Drilling until December 31, 2004.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2004, compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2003

Net Sales for Continuing Operations

     The Group. In 2004, our total consolidated net sales were 3,976 million, compared to net sales of 4,250 million in 2003, representing a decrease of 274 million, or 6.4 percent. The decrease was due to the divestment of businesses inasmuch as sales from continuing operations were at the previous year’s level. The depreciation of the U.S. dollar also had a negative impact on our sales figure when translated into euro. Calculated with the exchange rates of 2003 the net sales decrease would have been 4.4 percent. Metso Paper accounted for 38 percent, Metso Minerals 33 percent, Metso Automation 13 percent and Metso Ventures nine percent of our net sales in 2004. Discontinued Operations accounted for seven percent of our net sales in 2004. In both 2004 and 2003, 88 percent of our net sales were derived from exports and international operations. Our order intake in 2004 amounted to 4,374 million, representing an increase of 118 million, or 2.8 percent, from 4,256 million in 2003. However, the value of orders received by our continuing operations increased by ten percent and totaled 4,110 million in 2004. Our three biggest business areas, Metso Paper, Metso Minerals and Metso Automation, all saw their order backlog grow during 2004. Our order backlog as of December 31, 2004 was 1,745 million, representing an increase of 240 million, or 15.9 percent, from 1,505 million as of December 31, 2003. The order backlog at the end of 2004 compared to that of continuing operations at the end of 2003 increased by 25 percent.

     Metso Paper. The demand for Metso Paper’s products in 2004 was satisfactory, as in the previous year. The paper industry’s market situation was reflected in cautious investment activity by our customers, and few new paper machines were ordered in 2004. Investments in entire production lines were pending mainly in Asia and, to some extent, also in Europe. In other market areas, demand in 2004 focused on maintenance and process services and rebuilds. The markets for pulping equipment and lines were good mainly in China and South America. The demand for aftermarket services began to increase in the second half of the year 2004, as capacity utilization improved in customer mills. In 2004, net sales of Metso Paper were 1,559 million, compared to net sales of 1,651 million in 2003, representing a decrease of 92 million, or 5.6 percent. Paper machine deliveries were equivalent to those of the comparison year, but tissue machine deliveries were at a clearly lower level than in 2003. Aftermarket activities accounted for 35 percent of Metso Paper’s net sales in 2004, compared to 34 percent in 2003. Metso Paper’s order intake in 2004 amounted to 1,726 million, representing an increase of 16 million, or 0.9 percent, over 1,710 million in 2003. Metso Paper’s order backlog as of December 31, 2004 amounted to 946 million, representing an increase of 162 million, or 20.7 percent, over 784 million as of December 31, 2003.

     Metso Minerals. The demand for Metso Minerals’ crushing and screening equipment for the civil engineering industry in 2004 improved considerably in North America and Asia, but remained at the previous year’s level in Europe. Due to the fact that metal prices have remained high for a relatively long time, the demand for mining industry equipment was good in South America and in the Asia-Pacific region in 2004. The demand for metals recycling equipment remained buoyant. The markets for Metso Minerals’ aftermarket and

39


Table of Contents

service operations were good. In 2004, net sales of Metso Minerals were 1,343 million, compared to net sales of 1,253 million in 2003, representing an increase of 90 million, or 7.2 percent. In particular, deliveries of crushers and metals recycling equipment to the civil engineering industry clearly increased in 2004 from the previous year. Aftermarket activities accounted for 52 percent of Metso Minerals’ net sales in 2004, compared to 51 percent in 2003. Metso Minerals’ order intake in 2004 amounted to 1,566 million, representing an increase of 353 million, or 29.1 percent, from 1,213 million in 2003. Metso Minerals’ order backlog as of December 31, 2004 amounted to 560 million, representing an increase of 213 million, or 61.4 percent, from 347 million as of December 31, 2003.

     Metso Automation. The demand for Metso Automation’s field equipment increased significantly in 2004, although the demand for automation systems remained at the previous year’s level. In 2004, pulp and paper industry demand was focused on solutions that enhance the production of existing machinery and equipment. Increases in crude oil and gas prices boosted the demand for the power, oil and gas industry systems and equipment to a clearly higher level than in the previous year. In 2004, net sales of Metso Automation were 535 million, compared to net sales of 531 million in 2003, representing an increase of 4 million, or 0.8 percent. Deliveries of field equipment for the power, oil and gas industry increased from the previous year. Aftermarket activities accounted for 25 percent of Metso Automation’s net sales both in 2004 and in 2003. Metso Automation’s order intake in 2004 amounted to 570 million, representing an increase of 39 million, or 7.3 percent, from 531 million in 2003. Metso Automation’s order backlog as of December 31, 2004 amounted to 176 million, representing an increase of 31 million, or 21.4 percent, from 145 million as of December 31, 2003.

     Metso Ventures. In 2004, net sales of Metso Ventures were 387 million, compared to net sales of 370 million in 2003, representing an increase of 17 million, or 4.6 percent. Metso Panelboard, Metso Drives and Foundries all increased their net sales due to higher delivery volumes, while lower volumes reduced Valmet Automotive’s sales. Metso Ventures’ order intake in 2004 amounted to 361 million, representing a decrease of 37 million, or 9.3 percent, from 398 million in 2003. Metso Ventures’ order backlog amounted to 118 million as of December 31, 2004, representing a decrease of 57 million, or 32.6 percent, over 175 million as of December 31, 2003 due to the weakened order backlog in our Metso Panelboard business.

Net Sales for Discontinued Operations

     Discontinued Operations. Discontinued Operations include the Converting business, previously part of Metso Paper, sold in January 2004; the Compaction & Paving business, previously part of Metso Minerals, sold in June 2004; and the Drilling business, previously part of Metso Minerals, sold in December 2004. In 2004, net sales of Discontinued Operations were 267 million, compared to net sales of 567 million in 2003. The decrease was due to the timing of the divestments of the Converting business and the Compaction & Paving business. Converting was only included in 2004 figures for one month and Compaction & Paving for the first half of 2004.

Operating Profit/(Loss) for Continuing Operations

     The Group. In 2004, our consolidated operating profit was 111 million, compared to an operating loss of 229 million in 2003, representing an improvement of 340 million. This positive performance was due to the substantially improved profitability of Metso Minerals and Metso Automation that resulted from efficiency improvement measures and increased net sales. Additionally, we did not have a goodwill impairment in 2004 compared to the impairment of 205 million incurred in 2003 in relation to Metso Minerals and Discontinued Operations. Furthermore, the 2003 operating loss included 103 million in restructuring expenses related to the efficiency improvement program, whereas the 2004 result only included similar expenses of 26 million. In 2004, cost of goods sold amounted to 2,959 million (3,211 million in 2003), which represented 74.4 percent of net sales in 2004, compared to 75.6 percent in 2003. Our operating margin improved to a positive 2.8 percent in 2004 from a negative 5.4 percent in 2003.

     Metso Paper. In 2004, the operating profit of Metso Paper was 11 million, compared to an operating profit of 25 million in 2003, representing a decrease of 14 million, or 56.0 percent. Metso Paper’s operating margin decreased to 0.7 percent in 2004 from 1.5 percent in 2003. In 2004, Metso Paper’s operating profit was burdened by 15 million of costs booked for the delay and possible cancellation of the Papiers Gaspésia project in Chandler, Quebec, Canada. The order, which was received in 2002, was for a rebuild of an on-line printing and writing supercalandered coated paper line that was originally expected to be completed by mid-2004. The project was put on hold during 2004. It remains on hold pending additional financing arrangements by the customer. The 15 million costs booked are expected to fully cover our project-related exposure, even if the

40


Table of Contents

project is cancelled. The operating profit in 2004 was further burdened by nonrecurring expenses of 26 million booked in relation to Metso Paper’s business concept renewal program launched in June 2004.

     Metso Minerals. In 2004, the operating profit of Metso Minerals was 84 million, compared to an operating loss of 189 million in 2003, representing an improvement of 273 million. The 2003 loss included a charge relating to the impairment of goodwill of 143 million with no corresponding impairment in 2004. The remaining improvement in the 2004 operating profit was due to a more streamlined cost structure reflecting the measures taken as part of the efficiency improvement program launched in 2003 and due to increased net sales. All of Metso Minerals’ business lines improved their profitability compared with the previous year. The effects of the efficiency improvement program were visible particularly in the crushing and screening business line, which showed substantial improvement. Metso Minerals’ operating margin increased to positive 6.3 percent in 2004 from negative 15.1 percent in 2003.

     Metso Automation. In 2004, the operating profit of Metso Automation was 53 million, compared to an operating profit of 28 million in 2003, representing an increase of 25 million, or 89.3 percent. The operating profit increased significantly in 2004 from the prior year due to the positive impact of the efficiency improvement measures taken in 2003 and the increased sales volume of field equipment. Metso Automation’s operating margin increased to 9.9 percent in 2004 from 5.3 percent in 2003.

     Metso Ventures. In 2004, the operating loss of Metso Ventures was 7 million, compared to an operating loss of 9 million in 2003, representing a decrease of 2 million. Both Metso Drives and Foundries improved their profitability, but due to the volume of cars delivered by Valmet Automotive being clearly smaller than in the comparison year, Metso Ventures as a whole remained at a loss. Metso Ventures’ operating margin was negative 1.8 percent in 2004 compared with negative 2.4 percent in 2003.

Operating Loss for Discontinued Operations

     Discontinued Operations. In 2004, the operating loss of Discontinued Operations was 8 million compared to an operating loss of 50 million in 2003. The decrease in operating loss was due to the timing of the divestments of Converting business and Compaction & Paving business. Converting was only included in the 2004 results for one month and Compaction & Paving was included for the first half of 2004. Operating margin for Discontinued Operations was a negative 3.1 percent in 2004, compared with a negative 8.7 percent in 2003.

Income/(Loss) before Extraordinary Items and Income Taxes

     In 2004, our income before extraordinary items and income taxes was 49 million, compared to a loss before extraordinary items and income taxes of 303 million in 2003. There were no extraordinary items in 2004 or in 2003.

     Financial income for 2004 was 10 million, compared to 8 million for 2003, representing an increase of 2 million. Financial expense for 2004 was 72 million compared to 82 million in 2003. This decrease of 10 million was due to a decrease in net interest bearing liabilities during 2004. Our net interest bearing liabilities amounted to 529 million as of December 31, 2004, compared to 1,109 million as of December 31, 2003.

Net Income/(Loss) and Earnings per Share

     Income Taxes. Income tax benefits were 21 million in 2004, compared to income tax benefits of 44 million in 2003. In October 2004, we received a confirmation from the Finnish Tax Office for Major Corporations that our write-downs of certain subsidiary shares were accepted as being tax-deductible. As a result, we booked an additional tax benefit totaling 53 million for 2004. In 2003, we booked a tax benefit related to the goodwill impairment in Metso Minerals for 51 million.

     Net Income/(Loss). In 2004, we had a net income of 69 million, compared to a net loss of 258 million in 2003. In 2004, we had an earnings per share of 0.51, compared to loss per share of 1.89 in 2003.

41


Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2002

Net Sales for Continuing Operations

     The Group. In 2003, our total consolidated net sales were 4,250 million, compared to net sales of 4,691 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 441 million, or 9.4 percent. The weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro reduced the competitiveness of our products made in Europe, and the value of our sales and earnings in the United States was lower when converted into the euro, our reporting currency. Calculated with the exchange rates of 2002 the net sales decrease was smaller at four percent. Metso Paper accounted for 38 percent, Metso Minerals 28 percent, Metso Automation 12 percent and Metso Ventures nine percent of our net sales. Discontinued Operations accounted for 13 percent of our net sales in 2003. Aftermarket related activities accounted for 37 percent of our net sales in 2003. In 2003, 88 percent of our net sales, or 3,724 million, were derived from exports and international operations, compared to 92 percent, or 4,320 million, in 2002. Our order intake in 2003 amounted to 4,256 million, representing a decrease of 390 million, or 8.4 percent, from 4,646 million in 2002. Calculated with exchange rates in 2002, the value of orders received decreased by three percent. Our order backlog as of December 31, 2003 was 1,505 million, representing a decrease of 84 million, or 5.3 percent, from 1,589 million as of December 31, 2002.

     Metso Paper. In 2003, Metso Paper’s market situation was satisfactory as a whole in 2003, but customers’ willingness to commit to new pulp or paper machine investments continued to be at a low level in Europe and North America. The SARS epidemic temporarily weakened the market situation in China, mainly during the second quarter of 2003, but, in the second half of the year, demand recovered to the good level of the first months of 2003. In 2003, net sales of Metso Paper were 1,651 million, compared to net sales of 1,778 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 127 million, or 7.1 percent. The decline was due to the unfavorable market situation, which affected the sales volume. Aftermarket activities accounted for 34 percent of Metso Paper’s net sales in 2003, compared to 28 percent in 2002. The increase was mainly due to the redefined scope of aftermarket in 2003. The figure now also includes process improvements. Metso Paper’s order intake in 2003 amounted to 1,710 million, representing an increase of 99 million, or 6.1 percent, over 1,611 million in 2002. The increase reflects the good order intake in China. Metso Paper’s order backlog as of December 31, 2003 amounted to 784 million, representing an increase of 49 million, or 6.7 percent, over 735 million as of December 31, 2002.

     Metso Minerals. In 2003, the construction industry was also affected by the global economic uncertainty. However, there were signs of an improvement in the U.S. market in the last quarter of 2003. In China, demand remained good in 2003. The prices of the most common base metals rose steadily throughout 2003 and, towards the end of 2003, the number of mining project inquiries increased in South America, South Africa and Australia. In 2003, net sales of Metso Minerals were 1,253 million, compared to net sales of 1,406 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 153 million, or 10.9 percent. The decline was primarily due to weak demand in the North American markets and the lack of big mining projects. Also exchange rate changes, mainly the weakening U.S. dollar had a negative impact on Metso Minerals business. Aftermarket activities accounted for 51 percent of Metso Minerals’ net sales in 2003, compared to 50 percent in 2002. Metso Minerals’ order intake in 2003 amounted to 1,213 million, representing a decrease of 224 million, or 15.6 percent, from 1,437 million in 2002. Metso Minerals’ order backlog as of December 31, 2003 amounted to 347 million, representing a decrease of 66 million, or 16.0 percent, from 413 million as of December 31, 2002.

     Metso Automation. In 2003, the demand for Metso Automation’s products remained at the low level of 2002 both in North America and in Europe. Generally in 2003, automation demand in the power, energy, oil and gas industries was stronger than in 2002, whereas automation demand in the pulp and paper industry was weaker. In 2003, net sales of Metso Automation were 531 million, compared to net sales of 622 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 91 million, or 14.6 percent. The decrease was largely due to the divestitures of Network Management Solutions and CPS Electronics that were completed during 2003. Aftermarket activities accounted for 25 percent of Metso Automation’s net sales in 2003, compared to 23 percent in 2002. Metso Automation’s order intake in 2003 amounted to 531 million, representing a decrease of 112 million, or 17.4 percent, from 643 million in 2002. Metso Automation’s order backlog as of December 31, 2003 amounted to 145 million, representing a decrease of 40 million, or 21.6 percent, from 185 million as of December 31, 2002. The decrease in order backlog was due to the two divestitures. Excluding the order backlog of the divested companies as of December 31, 2002, Metso Automation’s order backlog as of December 31, 2003 was approximately at the same level as the order backlog as of December 31, 2002.

42


Table of Contents

     Metso Ventures. In 2003, net sales of Metso Ventures were 370 million, compared to net sales of 446 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 76 million, or 17.0 percent. Metso Drives’ volume decrease was mainly due to the low wind turbine gear deliveries in the first half of 2003. Valmet Automotive’s sales decreased in 2003 as the manufacture of Saab cars ceased at the beginning of May 2003, and the manufacturing of Porsche cars decreased in 2003 from the level of 2002. Sales of Metso Panelboard increased significantly in 2003 from the level of 2002 due to the positive sales development in Asia. Sales of Foundries in 2003 were almost at the 2002 level. Metso Ventures’ order intake in 2003 amounted to 398 million, representing a decrease of 70 million, or 15.0 percent, from 468 million in 2002. Metso Ventures’ order backlog amounted to 175 million as of December 31, 2003, representing an increase of 21 million, or 13.6 percent, over 154 million as of December 31, 2002.

Net Sales for Discontinued Operations

     Discontinued Operations. In 2003, net sales of Discontinued Operations were 567 million, compared to net sales of 558 million in 2002, representing a marginal increase of 1.6 percent. Order intake for Discontinued Operations amounted to 525 million in 2003, representing a decrease of 82 million, or 13.5 percent, from 607 million in 2002. Order backlog for Discontinued Operations amounted to 109 million as of December 31, 2003, representing a decrease of 48 million, or 30.6 percent, from 157 million as of December 31, 2002.

Operating Profit/(Loss) for Continuing Operations

     The Group. In 2003, our consolidated operating loss was 229 million, compared to an operating profit of 167 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 396 million. The operating loss included goodwill impairment of 205 million in Metso Minerals and Discontinued Operations. It also included 103 million in restructuring expenses related to the efficiency improvement program. Other factors negatively affecting the operating performance were the lower sales volume, the strengthening of the euro, the lower margins in Metso Paper’s large projects in 2003 compared to 2002, and the continued tight competition related to Metso Minerals’ crushing and screening equipment market. In 2003, cost of goods sold amounted to 3,211 million (3,425 million in 2002), which represented 75.6 percent of net sales in 2003, up from 73.0 percent in 2002. Our operating margin decreased to negative 5.4 percent in 2003 from positive 3.6 percent in 2002. The operating loss included net nonrecurring expenses of 106 million, which included 15 million in income from divestitures and sales of shares, 103 million in restructuring expenses related to the efficiency improvement program, and 18 million in other nonrecurring expenses. Furthermore, the operating loss included a goodwill impairment of 205 million made in Metso Minerals and Discontinued Operations.

     Metso Paper. In 2003, the operating profit of Metso Paper was 25 million, compared to an operating profit of 115 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 90 million, or 78.3 percent. Metso Paper’s operating margin decreased to 1.5 percent in 2003 from 6.5 percent in 2002. Profitability was weakened by lower margins in large projects compared to 2002, under-utilization of production capacity and the strengthening of the euro. The operating profit also includes 36 million of nonrecurring expenses due to the efficiency improvement program.

     Metso Minerals. In 2003, the operating loss of Metso Minerals was 189 million, compared to an operating profit of 28 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 217 million. Metso Minerals’ operating margin decreased to negative 15.1 percent in 2003 from positive 2.0 percent in 2002. The operating loss included goodwill impairment of 143 million due to the continued weak market situation in rock and minerals processing and unfavorable exchange rate movements. The positive effects of the integration of Svedala into Metso Minerals were offset by the effect of exchange rate changes and the weak market situation. In addition, profitability was weakened by the strengthening of the euro and the weak market situation in crushing and screening, as well as in minerals processing. The operating loss included nonrecurring expenses of 65 million of which 55 million relates to the efficiency improvement program.

     Metso Automation. In 2003, the operating profit of Metso Automation was 28 million, compared to an operating profit of 16 million in 2002, representing an increase of 12 million, or 75.0 percent. Metso Automation’s operating margin increased to 5.3 percent in 2003 from 2.6 percent in 2002. This improvement was due to the measures taken to streamline the cost structure in 2002 and 2003. During 2003, process automation systems and the North American operations improved their profitability. The operating profit included nonrecurring income of 11 million from divestitures of Network Management Solutions in February 2003, and CPS Electronics in September 2003, and nonrecurring expenses of 7 million from costs related to the efficiency improvement program.

43


Table of Contents

     Metso Ventures. In 2003, the operating loss of Metso Ventures was 9 million, compared to an operating profit of 20 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 29 million. Metso Ventures’ operating margin decreased to negative 2.4 percent in 2003 from positive 4.5 percent in 2002. Metso Panelboard improved its performance from 2002 but, due to the nonrecurring costs of 4 million related to the combining of two units in Germany as part of the corporate-wide efficiency improvement program, the year 2003 resulted in a loss. Metso Drives made an operating profit in 2003 but the operating profit was clearly lower than the operating profit in 2002 due to the low volumes in early 2003 and the launching cost of new products. Foundries were at a break-even level in 2003. Valmet Automotive made an operating loss in 2003, a significant weakening from 2002, due to over 50 percent decrease in car delivery volumes as well as a 4 million reserve for possible additional costs in 2004 due to the difficult employment situation. Approximately one-half of Valmet Automotive’s personnel were laid off after the Saab manufacture ended in May 2003.

Operating Loss for Discontinued Operations

     Discontinued Operations. In 2003, Discontinued Operations resulted in an operating loss of 50 million compared to an operating profit of 13 million in 2002. Operating margin for Discontinued Operations decreased to a negative 8.7 percent in 2003 from a positive 2.2 percent in 2002.

Income/(Loss) before Extraordinary Items and Income Taxes

     In 2003, our loss before extraordinary items and income taxes was 303 million, compared to an income before extraordinary items and income taxes of 93 million in 2002. There were no extraordinary items in 2003 and 2002.

     Financial income for 2003 was 8 million, compared to 17 million for 2002, representing a decrease of 9 million. Financial expense for 2003 was 82 million compared to 91 million in 2002, representing a decrease of 9 million.

     Our net interest bearing liabilities were slightly down at 1,109 million as of December 31, 2003, compared to 1,118 million as of December 31, 2002.

Net Income/(Loss) and Earnings per Share

     Income Taxes. Income tax benefits were 44 million in 2003, compared to income tax expenses of 26 million in 2002. This was due to the booking of a 51 million tax benefit related to the goodwill impairment in Metso Minerals and in Discontinued Operations. Most of the 205 million goodwill impairment (i.e., 175 million) was accepted as tax-deductible, and the corresponding tax benefit of 51 million reduced the effect of the impairment on the net result.

     Net Loss. In 2003, we had a net loss of 258 million, compared to a net income of 65 million in 2002. In 2003, we had a loss per share of 1.89, compared to earnings per share of 0.48 in 2002.

Principal Differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP

     Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Finnish GAAP.

     Our net income in 2004 under Finnish GAAP was 69 million, compared to net loss of 258 million in 2003 and net income of 65 million in 2002. Under U.S. GAAP, Metso would have reported net income of 2 million in 2004, compared to net loss 235 million (as restated) in 2003 and net income 22 million (as restated) in 2002.

     The principal differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP that affect our net loss, as well as our shareholders’ equity, relate to the business combination of Valmet and Rauma, the acquisition of Svedala, valuation of our deferred tax assets and the non-amortization of goodwill under U.S. GAAP. Our 2001, 2002 and 2003 amounts recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been restated to reflect the impact of adjustments made to our pension liabilities recorded in conjunction with our acquisition of Svedala in 2001. In order to correctly record the pension liability in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the balance sheet at the time of the acquisition would have reflected an additional pension liability and a corresponding increase to goodwill, net of the tax impact of the additional pension liability. After consideration of this additional goodwill, our impairment charge in 2003 would have been increased. As a result, net income under U.S. GAAP would reflect an

44


Table of Contents

additional loss of 18 million in 2003 (0.13 per share). See Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for a description of the principal differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP.

     Our 2002 and 2003 accounts have been restated to reflect the impact of adjustments made to our deferred tax asset valuation allowances recorded in 2002 and 2003. These adjustments would result in substantially a full valuation allowance in relation to our US operations for both periods. In addition, the 2003 results would also include the release of a previously recorded valuation allowance related to our German operations. In order to correctly record the valuation allowance in accordance with U.S. GAAP, an additional valuation allowance of 91 million has been recorded as of December 31, 2002 with a corresponding increase to deferred income tax expense. In 2003, the consolidated balance sheet would still reflect substantially a full valuation allowance for our US deferred tax assets; however, the amounts previously recognized in 2003 to increase this valuation allowance would have been recorded in the previous year as noted above. In addition, the amount previously recognized as a valuation allowance related to our German operations has been reversed in 2003. As such, the 2003 income statement reflects a decrease in deferred tax expense of 28 million, net of translation difference of 15 million. As a result of these adjustments, the income statement under U.S. GAAP net income reflects additional expense of 91 million (0.67 per share) in 2002 and additional income in 2003 of 28 million (0.21 per share).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     In 2004, net cash provided by operating activities amounted to 262 million, compared to 146 million and 252 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Improving cash flow was a key target in management in 2004. Cash flow in 2004 was strengthened by both improved profitability and more efficient utilization of working capital.

     Net cash provided by investing activities amounted to 359 million in 2004, compared to net cash used in investing activities of 80 million and 14 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The net cash used in investing activities in 2004 included capital expenditures of 99 million more than offset by the proceeds from disposals of 463 million. Cash generated through divestitures totaled 390 million, while cash from sale of other assets totaled 66 million. This high level of cash generated through divestments is not expected to be repeated going forward. The net cash used in investing activities in 2003 included gross capital expenditures of 130 million. The net cash used in investing activities in 2002 consisted of gross capital expenditures of 194 million offset by proceeds from the sale of assets amounting to 181 million (primarily divested shares and divested businesses).

     Net cash used in financing activities amounted to 333 million in 2004, compared to 121 million in 2003 and 233 million in 2002. Dividends paid amounted to 27 million in 2004 and to 82 million in both 2003 and 2002. Our net interest bearing liabilities (interest bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing loans receivable and interest bearing accounts receivable) amounted to 529 million as of December 31, 2004, compared to 1,109 million and 1,118 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The positive net cash provided by both operating activities and investing activities helped to substantially reduce interest bearing liabilities and, hence, strengthen our financial position.

     Our liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents) amounted to 419 million as of December 31, 2004, compared to liquid assets of 130 million as of December 31, 2003 and liquid assets of 190 million as of December 31, 2002.

     Our financing is mainly of a long-term nature and long-term debt accounted for 95 percent of our total interest bearing debt at the end of 2004. The long-term debt, consisting primarily of bonds and loans from financial and pension institutions, amounted to 920 million, 957 million and 1,020 million as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The bonds consisted principally of three bond loans with the principal amounts of U.S.$174 million (128 million), 156 million and 274 million. The U.S. dollar denominated bond was issued in the United States in December 1997 and registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). It matures in 2007 and bears a fixed annual interest rate of 6.875 percent. In December 2000, Metso established a Euro Medium Term Note Program of 1 billion, under which initially a 500 million bond loan was issued in December 2001. The bond loan matures in 2006 and carries a fixed interest rate of 6.25 percent. In spring 2004, 88 million worth of the bonds were exchanged into bonds with maturities of five to seven years through private placements. In November 2004, we completed an offer to exchange the remaining bonds to new Euro-denominated bonds maturing in 2011. 256 million of existing

45


Table of Contents

bonds were validly submitted and accepted for exchange, corresponding to 62 percent of the total outstanding amount of existing bonds. 274 million of new bonds were issued and they carry a fixed interest rate of 5.125 percent. As a result on December 31, 2004, the outstanding amount of the bond loan maturing in 2006 totaled 156 million.

     Our loans from financial institutions consist of international bank borrowings with either fixed or variable interest rates. The majority of the loans are either U.S. dollar or SEK denominated. The interest rates vary from 2.4 percent to 10.5 percent, and the loans have maturities ranging from 2005 to 2011.

     In June 2003, we entered into a new five-year revolving credit facility agreement of 450 million with a syndicate of 14 banks. It replaced two earlier revolving credit facilities: 230 million credit facility from 1998 and a 400 million credit facility from year 2000, while extending the maturity of the credit commitments until 2008. As of December 31, 2004, the facility was undrawn and, as of December 31, 2003, 66 million was drawn.

     In May 2004, we signed an 135 million ten-year research and development loan agreement with the European Investment Bank (“EIB”). Under the loan facility, funds may be drawn within 18 months from signing. The overall loan period will be ten years with installment payments starting three years from each draw down. As of December 31, 2004, the facility was undrawn.

     As of December 31, 2004, the undrawn committed long-term credit facilities of Metso totaled 450 million and the undrawn committed short-term credit facilities amounted to 100 million.

     We have a short-term euro commercial paper program of 150 million and a domestic commercial paper program amounting to 300 million with a group of Finnish and international banks in each case. As of December 31, 2004, both facilities were undrawn.

     Management believes that our financial situation is stable, inasmuch as interest bearing debt is mainly long-term debt and there are adequate long-term and short-term financing reserves and facilities for our current scope of operations. Cash in bank and lines of credit are sufficient to cover fluctuations in the cash flows of the businesses.

     The ratio of our net interest bearing liabilities to equity was 50.0 percent as of December 31, 2004, compared to 107.7 percent and 80.6 percent as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We made considerable progress in reducing our ratio of net interest bearing liabilities to equity, which was an important target for 2004. This improvement was a result of divestments and improved profitability in operations.

     As of December 31, 2004, the shareholders’ equity, distributable funds and total assets of the parent company, Metso Corporation, amounted to 1,079 million, 543 million and 2,867 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the shareholders’ equity, distributable funds and total assets of Metso Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries amounted to 1,052 million, 572 million and 3,578 million, respectively.

     On March 3, 2004, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) downgraded our long-term corporate credit rating to BB+ from BBB and considered the outlook on ratings to be stable. Additionally, the ratings of Metso’s outstanding bonds and EMTN program were lowered to BB. At the same time, the short-term rating was lowered to B. On February 17, 2004, Moody’s Investors Services (“Moody’s”) lowered our long-term ratings to Ba1 from Baa3 and considered the outlook on ratings negative. On February 25, 2005, Moody’s confirmed the Ba1 rating on our long-term corporate credit while upgrading the outlook to stable. There are no prepayment covenants in our financial contracts that would be triggered by changes in our credit ratings.

46


Table of Contents

Disclosure about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

     The table below sets forth aggregated information about our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2004.

                                         
            Payments Due by Period  
            Less than                     After  
    Total     1 year     1-3 years     4-5 years     5 years  
    ( in millions)  
Contractual Obligations
                                       
Long-term debt, incl. short-term portion
    939       19       361       125       434  
Capital lease obligations
    23       4       9       4       6  
Operating leases
    142       40       49       27       26  
 
                             
Total contractual cash obligations
    1,104       63       419       156       466  
 
                             
                                         
    Total     Amount of Commitment  
    amounts     Less than                     Over  
    committed     1 year     1-3 years     4-5 years     5 years  
    ( in millions)  
Other Commercial Commitments
                                       
Guarantees
    9       9       0       0       0  
Standby repurchase obligations
    10       6       2       1       1  
Purchase commitments
    304       300       4       0       0  
Other commitments
    32       3       3       2       24  
 
                             
Total commercial commitments
    355       318       9       3       25  
 
                             

     We generally record the pension expense of our employees in accordance with local accounting practices in the countries in which our employees are provided with such benefits. Under U.S. GAAP, pension expense is recorded on a full accrual basis and reflected in the income statement over the working lives of the employees provided with such benefits. The economic and demographic assumptions used in calculating pension expense are to be reviewed and updated periodically to the extent that local market economic conditions and demographics change.

     The companies within Metso have various pension schemes in accordance with the local conditions and practices of the countries in which they operate. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or to trustee-administered funds. The pension payments booked in our Finnish GAAP income statement amounted to approximately 112 million, 104 million and 104 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively. We have also recognized under Finnish GAAP an off-balance sheet liability of 13 million of unfunded pension liabilities for foreign subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 24 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Under Finnish GAAP, we have not recognized the liability for the Finnish defined pension benefit liability of the TEL-system. Under U.S. GAAP, the Finnish pension liability is considered a defined benefit plan that is required to be recognized. The pension benefit obligation amounted to 104 million as of December 31, 2004.

Capital Expenditure

     Our gross capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, amounted to 97 million in 2004, compared to 128 million and 193 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The gross capital expenditure, including acquisitions, totaled 99 million in 2004. For the preceding three years, our capital expenditures have consisted principally of maintenance, development and expansion of existing production capacity, office and service facilities as well as information technology. In 2005, our capital expenditures are projected to be approximately 110 million, which will mainly be related to improvements of existing capacity and facilities. We expect to finance the expenditure with cash flow from operations.

47


Table of Contents

     The table below summarizes our gross capital expenditures by region, excluding acquisitions, for the periods indicated:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Finland
    119       70       54  
Other Nordic Countries
    23       15       10  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    23       19       11  
North America
    14       10       9  
South America
    5       5       8  
Asia-Pacific
    8       7       4  
Rest of the World
    1       2       1  
 
                 
Total
    193       128       97  
 
                 

     Our capital expenditure in 2004 was mainly focused on maintenance due to the implementation of various measures under our efficiency improvement program.

Research and Development

     Our research and technology development is focused, in line with our strategy, on applications to improve the operational efficiency of our processes and strengthen our life cycle business. Rather than just buying machines and equipment, customers are increasingly investing in competitiveness based on processes that function optimally throughout their life cycle. Products and services being developed for the process industry benefit, to a large extent, from the latest information technology and automation solutions.

     We give high priority to research and development and invested 106 million in research and development activities in 2004 (2.7 percent of 2004 net sales), compared to 129 million in 2003 (3.0 percent of 2003 net sales) and 156 million in 2002 (3.3 percent of 2002 net sales). This decrease in the level of investment was due to our more focused approach in research and development activities. At the end of 2004, we had a total of 953 employees working in the area of research and development, representing a decrease of 22 percent from the end of 2003. Of those employees, 48 percent, ten percent, 34 percent, and eight percent worked in Metso Paper, Metso Minerals, Metso Automation and Metso Ventures, respectively. Geographically, our research and development activities are concentrated in Finland and Sweden, although we have significant research and development units in North America and Central Europe as well.

     Following is a summary of our significant research and development activities by business area:

Metso Paper

     Metso Paper’s research and development focuses on developing whole processes and supporting aftermarket solutions for all the main paper, tissue, board and pulp grades. A key target is to improve the competitiveness of customer processes through efficiency, quality, eco-efficiency and optimized life cycle costs.

     In 2004, Metso Paper spent approximately 50 million on research and development, compared to 56 million in 2003 and 72 million in 2002. In line with our strategy, research and development was more clearly focused in 2004 on the products and services needed in service, process improvements and machine rebuilds. Products for modernization and rebuild were developed on the basis, for example, of paper machine technology and related aftermarket operations acquired from Beloit in 2000. Pilot runs were also made in cooperation with customers to develop new machine concepts and tailored rebuild products. The CTMP (chemi-thermomechanical pulp) equipment introduced at the Anjalankoski, Finland, pilot plant in 2003 was important to the support of sales of mechanical pulping processes to China and the development of fiber processing and bleaching methods for hardwood raw material.

     We have 12 technology centers that are located in Finland, Sweden, the United States and Italy.

Metso Minerals

     In 2004, product development at Metso Minerals focused on the development of a new generation of stationary and track-mounted crushers and the shear product family used in metals recycling. In 2004, pilot use of a hybrid wear protection part developed at Metso’s foundries began at a customer plant. This part is much

48


Table of Contents

more durable than before and suited for demanding applications. Metso Minerals also introduced a Chamber Optimi service for the tailoring of crusher wear parts, enabling Metso Minerals to analyze its customers’ crushing processes and develop optimally cost-effective wear parts for each application.

     Metso Minerals spent approximately 9 million on research and development in 2004, compared to 10 million in 2003 and 10 million in 2002.

     Technology centers of Metso Minerals are located in Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, New Zealand, Sweden and the United States.

Metso Automation

     Metso Automation develops automation and field system solutions for chosen process industry needs. Among the most significant of the many new products introduced by Metso Automation in 2004 were the new metsoDNA features aimed at improving process performance and information security. Metso Automation has also expanded its portfolio of advanced profilers for paper, tissue and board machines. The product portfolio now includes IQProfilers for both new production lines and production line rebuilds, as well as for stand-alone units. One of the main field solutions in 2004 was the Field Care field equipment configuration and condition-monitoring tool, which makes it possible to use one system to monitor the condition of different manufacturers’ field equipment in customer production processes.

     Metso Automation spent approximately 31 million on research and development in 2004, compared to 33 million in 2003 and 44 million in 2002.

     Of the over 300 people working in Metso Automation’s research and development, the majority is located in Finland while other locations are in Canada and the United States.

Metso Ventures

     Metso Ventures consists of Metso Drives, Metso Panelboard, Foundries, Metso Powdermet and Valmet Automotive. Metso Ventures spent approximately 8 million on research and development in 2004, compared to 10 million in 2003 and 12 million in 2002.

     Metso Drives’ research and development aims to create mechanical drive solutions, which fulfill customer needs in terms of reliability, cost and eco-efficiency. The activities take place in two locations in Finland in close co-operation with Metso’s other business areas.

     Metso Panelboard’s research and development is focused on improving the competitiveness of its machinery and systems for wood-based panel industries: medium-density fiberboard, particleboard and oriented-strand board.

     Metso Powdermet focuses on developing new material solutions, since increased process speeds and efficiencies are placing more stringent demands on the strength and durability of machine parts. Additionally, new kinds of wear and spare parts solutions that are more durable and cost-efficient are being developed for the needs of our service and aftermarket business.

     Valmet Automotive’s research and development activities focused on the development of a prototype car equipped with a folding hard top to present its competence in automotive shows and at various carmakers.

Foreign Currency Fluctuations

     Exchange rate movements generally affect us through the translation of foreign subsidiary revenues, costs, profits and losses into our consolidated financial statements expressed in euro and through their transaction impact on the amount of the net sales with respect to foreign currency revenues from export sales of our various operations. Exchange rate movements also have certain competitive effects on our sales.

     Both our production and sales activities are distributed throughout numerous geographic regions creating exposure to various currency risks. The principal currencies that we are exposed to are the U.S. dollar, the euro and the Swedish krona. In general, appreciation of the euro relative to the U.S. dollar has an adverse effect on our sales and operating profit, while its depreciation has a positive effect. A majority of our sales in the United States have been supplied by our U.S. production and aftermarket facilities or sourced locally, which

49


Table of Contents

reduces the direct impact of euro—U.S. dollar fluctuations on our profitability in that market. However, Metso Paper, Metso Automation and Metso Minerals all have part of their U.S. sales based on exports from Europe. Some of these sales face competitors with costs in a different currency, typically U.S. based competitors. See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rates.”

     Our foreign currency risk management policy is focused on hedging the foreign currency exposures arising from firm sales and purchase commitments and the net investments in foreign subsidiaries to the extent practicable. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Exchange Rates and Foreign Currency Exposure.” We hedge our currency risks with forward exchange contracts and options.

     In 2004, foreign exchange gains and losses resulted in a net gain of 8 million, compared to a net loss of 3 million in 2003 and a net loss of 6 million in 2002. Of the total foreign exchange gains and losses, a portion included in the operating profit or loss amounted to a net gain of 9 million in 2004, compared to a net gain of 1 million in 2003 and to a net loss of 3 million in 2002. The rest of the foreign exchange gains and losses have been included in the financial items.

     Exchange rate movements also impact our assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the euro. We use loans and receivables, currency swaps, and forward exchange contracts to hedge our equity investments denominated in non-euro currencies, with maturities ranging from less than one year to seven years. We have also made long-term U.S. dollar and pound sterling denominated loans to certain foreign subsidiaries. We hedge the associated currency risk through cross-currency swaps and forward exchange contracts. Foreign exchange contracts are used to hedge our foreign currency risk arising from the short-term borrowings. The principal currency for our short-term borrowings is currently the euro.

Inflation

     Inflation in Finland as measured by the change in the consumer price index was 0.2 percent in 2004, 0.9 percent in 2003 and 1.6 percent in 2002. Inflation in Finland did not have a significant impact on our operating results. However, a major portion of our operations, sales and production is performed in countries with rates of inflation higher or lower of that in Finland. Changes in exchange rates or interest rates may or may not reflect differences in inflation rates. Quantifying the individual or combined effects of these factors on our reported income is therefore not possible.

Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

     In compliance with regulations adopted by the European Commission in June 2002, we converted our financial reporting at the beginning of 2005 from compliance with the Finnish Accounting Standards (“FAS”) to compliance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The transition date for calculating comparative data is January 1, 2004, from which date we will prepare the opening balance sheet in accordance to IFRS principles.

     In terms of the income statement, the main difference between our Finnish and IFRS accounting practices concerns goodwill. According to IFRS 3, goodwill is no longer amortized, but it becomes subject to a yearly impairment test as required by IAS 36.

     In terms of the balance sheet, one of the most important differences between Finnish and IFRS accounting practices concerns employee benefits, which are regulated by IAS 19. According to this standard, we will record liabilities for future disability pensions related to Finland’s employee pension insurance system. The liability related to the future disability pensions of the employee pension insurance system is recognized as a defined benefit plan in the opening balance sheet on the transition date of January 1, 2004, and it will reduce the shareholders’ equity by approximately 60 million (net of taxes). Due to the changes made in 2004 to the Finnish employee pension insurance system, the disability pension will be treated in the future as contribution-based, and the main portion of the liability will be reversed and recognized as income in the last quarter of 2004 and, therefore, will no longer appear as a liability in the opening balance sheet of January 1, 2005. In addition, we have in certain countries defined benefit pension plans and other employee benefit arrangements, for which the liability has to be recognized in full reducing thus the shareholders’ equity as of the transition date.

     IAS 12 on income taxes sets the criteria on the recognition of deferred tax assets arising from the carryforward of unused tax losses and of deductible temporary differences. When an entity has a history of recent losses, a deferred tax asset arising from unused tax losses can only be recognized if there is convincing

50


Table of Contents

evidence that sufficient taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses can be utilized. Under FAS, a deferred tax asset on unused tax losses can be recognized if the management expects the entity to generate future taxable income. As of January 1, 2004, we will recognize, as a reduction of our equity, a valuation allowance of 48 million arising from temporary differences and unused tax losses carried forward by our operations in the United States.

     We will publish a release on the effects on financial information of the transfer to IFRS accounting practice by the end of the first quarter of 2005.

New Accounting Standards

     In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvements and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Medicare Act) was approved in the United States. The Medicare Act provides for two new prescription drug benefit features under Medicare. Metso provides post-retirement benefits to some of its U.S. employees so the benefits provided are impacted by the Medicare Act. SFAS 106, Employers’ Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, requires that enacted changes in the law that take effect in future periods and that will affect the future level of benefit coverage be considered in the current period measurements for benefits expected to be provided in those future periods. Metso has determined that the Medicare Act had an immaterial effect on the cost of medical benefits to be borne by Metso.

     In March 2004, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 03-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments” (“EITF 03-01”). EITF 03-01 provides guidance on other-than-temporary impairment models for marketable debt and equity securities and non-marketable securities accounted for under the cost method. On September 30, 2004, the FASB issued FSP 03-01-1, Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF Issue 03-01, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments, delaying the effective date for the recognition and measurement guidance in EITF 03-01, until certain implementation issues are addressed and a final FSP is issued. The disclosure requirements in EITF 03-01 remain effective. Metso has complied with the disclosure requirements for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, clarifying the existing requirements in ARB No. 43 regarding normal capacity, spoilage costs and idle capacity costs. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of FAS 151 will not have an impact on the Metso’s consolidated results of operation or financial position, since the key elements are already utilized in Metso’s U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2004, the FASB published FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004). Share-Based Payments. This provides guidance on how companies must recognize the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions in their financial statements. It will require companies to recognize a compensation cost for the value of options granted in exchange for employee services, based on the grant date fair value of those instruments. FASB No. 123 (revised) is effective for public entities as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, however early application is possible. Metso intends to adopt this revised standard from January 1, 2005. Metso is currently assessing what impact the pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition (except those discussed in Item 11 in relation to derivative instruments), changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

51


Table of Contents

Item 6.  Directors, Senior Management and Employees.

     Pursuant to the Finnish Companies Act and our articles of association, our control and management is divided among our shareholders, board of directors, and president and chief executive officer. In addition, we have a corporate executive team, which assists our president and chief executive officer in the day-to-day management of the Company. Shareholders can contact the Company, its management and board of directors through the Company’s investor relations department.

     The business address for our directors and executive management is P.O. Box 1220, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland.

Board of Directors

     The board of directors of Metso Corporation has ultimate responsibility for the management and proper arrangement of the operations of the Company, and for assuring good corporate governance in compliance with applicable legislation. The board of directors decides upon matters, which, considering the scope and size of the operations of the Company, are of major importance. These include the acceptance of the goals of the Company and the main strategies for achieving them, the acceptance of action plans, the definition and acceptance of control policies, the acceptance of the organizational structure of the Company, and the nomination of the president and chief executive officer, his deputy and the members of the corporate executive team and the monitoring and evaluating of their performance.

     Our board of directors is composed of at least five and no more than eight members. Our board of directors currently consists of seven members, each of whom was elected by the shareholders at the annual general meeting of shareholders on April 6, 2004, for a term ending at the following annual general meeting of shareholders. Our next annual general meeting will be held on April 4, 2005. Board members may be appointed or removed only by a shareholders’ resolution at a general meeting. The following table lists the names of the members of our board of directors, possible principal occupation or employment and their year of birth:

             
Name   Position   Year of Birth
Matti Kavetvuo
  Chairman of the board     1944  
Jaakko Rauramo
  Vice chairman of the board     1941  
Maija-Liisa Friman
  Director; president and chief executive officer of Aspocomp Group Oyj     1952  
Risto Hautamäki
  Director; president and chief executive officer of Tamfelt Corporation     1945  
Satu Huber
  Director; director of finance and head of finance division in the Finnish State Treasury     1958  
Juhani Kuusi
  Director     1938  
Pentti Mäkinen
  Director; labor representative, Metso Corporation     1952  

     Matti Kavetvuo has been the chairman of our board of directors since 2003. He was president and chief executive officer of Pohjola Insurance Group until 2001, when he retired. Previously, he was president and chief executive officer of Valio Ltd. in 1992-1999, and president and chief executive officer of Orion Corporation in 1985-1991. Mr. Kavetvuo was employed by Instrumentarium Corporation in 1971-1984, where he served as president in 1979-1984. Mr. Kavetvuo is also chairman of the boards of directors of Orion Corporation and Suominen Corporation. He is vice chairman of the boards of directors at Alma Media Corporation and Kesko Corporation. He is also a member of the boards of directors of KCI Konecranes Plc, Marimekko Corporation and Perlos Corporation. Mr. Kavetvuo holds a Master of Science degree in Technology and a Master of Science degree in Economics and Business Administration.

     Jaakko Rauramo has been a member of our board of directors since 1999 and vice chairman since 2004. He served as president and chief executive officer of SanomaWSOY in 1999-2001 and president of Sanoma Corporation in 1984-1999. Mr. Rauramo is the chairman of the board of directors of SanomaWSOY Corporation. He is also a member of the boards of directors of the Foundation of the Confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers, European Publishers Council and Stiftelsen Svenska Dagbladet. He is a member of the international council of the Museum of Television & Radio in New York. He is a trustee of Reuters Founders Share Company Limited. Mr. Rauramo holds a Master of Science degree in Technology.

     Maija-Liisa Friman has been a member of our board of directors since 2003. Ms. Friman is president and chief executive officer of Aspocomp Group since April 2004. In 2000-2004, she was managing director of Vattenfall Oy and, in 1993-2000, president of Gyproc Oy. Ms. Friman is a member of the boards of directors of

52


Table of Contents

Sponda Plc, SYK Ltd and the Finnish Medical Foundation. Ms. Friman holds a Master of Science degree in Technology.

     Risto Hautamäki has been a member of our board of directors since 2004. Mr. Hautamäki has been appointed president of Metso Paper and a member of Metso executive team as of April 1, 2005. Mr. Hautamäki has served as president and chief executive officer of Tamfelt Corporation since 1995, and will continue in this position until the end of March 2005. Previously, he was president and chief executive officer of Valmet Paper Machinery Inc. in 1990-1994 and executive vice president and chief operating officer in 1989-1990. Mr. Hautamäki is a member of the board of directors of Wärtsilä Corporation. Mr. Hautamäki holds a Master of Science degree in Technology.

     Satu Huber has been a member of our board of directors since 2004. Ms. Huber is director of finance and head of finance division in the Finnish State Treasury since 1997. In 1995-1997, she was first vice president in Merita Investment Banking, with her latest responsibilities being Global sales & Scandinavian money and bond markets. Ms. Huber is a member of the boards of directors of Boliden Ab and Ekonomiska Samfundet i Finland rf. Ms. Huber holds a Master of Science degree in Economics and Business Administration.

     Juhani Kuusi has been a member of our board of directors since 2000. Mr. Kuusi previously served as senior vice president, head of Nokia Research Center from 1995 to 2002. Prior to joining Nokia, Mr. Kuusi was director general of the Technology Development Center for 12 years. Mr. Kuusi holds a Doctorate degree in Technology.

     Pentti Mäkinen has been a member of our board of directors since 2000 serving in the capacity of a labor representative. Mr. Mäkinen has been employed by Metso since 1969 and serves as coordinator of vocational competence development in Metso Paper, Jyväskylä, Finland. Previously, he acted as the chief shop steward at the same location in 1999-2004. Mr. Mäkinen is a plate-welder by education.

     On February 2, 2005, Metso Corporation’s nomination committee, consisting of representatives of the four largest shareholders as of December 1, 2004 announced that they will propose to the annual general meeting convening on April 4, 2005, that the number of members of our board of directors be six and that the following members of the board of directors be re-elected for a term of one year: Maija-Liisa Friman, Satu Huber, Matti Kavetvuo, Juhani Kuusi and Jaakko Rauramo. In addition, the nomination committee will propose that Mr. Svante Adde, former chief financial officer of Ahlstrom Corporation, be elected as a new member of the board of directors. Svante Adde is a member of the boards of directors at KCI Konecranes and Sonoco-Alcore S.a.r.l. The nomination committee will further propose that Matti Kavetvuo be re-elected as chairman and Jaakko Rauramo be re-elected as vice chairman of the board of directors.

Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Executive Team

     Metso’s executive officers, which form Metso’s corporate executive team, include our president and chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our business area presidents. The president and chief executive officer guides and supervises the operations of Metso and our business areas. The president and chief executive officer prepares the matters on the agenda of the board of directors and its committees and is responsible for implementing their decisions. The president and chief executive officer also acts as chairman of the corporate executive team and the business area boards. Our executive team assists the president and chief executive officer in the preparation of matters such as our strategy, policies and other matters of joint importance within our Company and its business areas.

     The following table lists the names of the current members of the corporate executive team, their current responsibilities within our Company and their year of birth:

         
Name   Position   Year of Birth
Jorma Eloranta
  President and chief executive officer   1951
Olli Vaartimo
  Executive vice president and chief financial officer, deputy to president and chief executive officer   1950
Vesa Kainu
  President, Metso Ventures   1947
Bertel Karlstedt
  President, Metso Paper   1962
Matti Kähkönen
  President, Metso Automation   1956
Bertel Langenskiöld
  President, Metso Minerals   1950

53


Table of Contents

     Jorma Eloranta has been our president and chief executive officer since March 1, 2004. Prior to such time, Mr. Eloranta was president and chief executive officer of Kvaerner Masa-Yards Inc. in 2001-2004. He has also served as president and chief executive officer of Patria Industries Group in 1997-2001, as deputy chief executive of Finvest Group and Jaakko Pöyry Group in 1996-1997 and as president of Finvest Ltd in 1985-1995. Mr. Eloranta is the chairman of the board of directors of Oy Center-Inn Ab and a member of the supervisory board of Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company. He is also a member of the board of directors of Uponor Corporation. Mr. Eloranta holds a Master of Science degree in Technology.

     Olli Vaartimo has been our executive vice president, chief financial officer, and deputy to the president and chief executive officer since April 22, 2003. He served as interim president and chief executive officer of Metso from September 25, 2003 to February 29, 2004. Mr. Vaartimo has previously served as president of Metso Minerals in 1999-2003 and president and chief executive officer of Nordberg in the Rauma Group in 1993-1999. From 1991 to 1998, he was also executive vice president and chief financial officer of Rauma Corporation. Mr. Vaartimo joined Rauma in 1974. Mr. Vaartimo holds a Master of Science degree in Economics and Business Administration.

     Vesa Kainu has served as president of Metso Ventures since 2003. In 2001-2003, he served as executive vice president of Metso Minerals, and in 1999-2001, he was president of Metso Paper Service. Prior to that, he headed Valmet’s maintenance services business line from 1994. He joined the Company in 1971. Mr. Kainu is a member of the board of directors of Exel Oyj. Mr. Kainu holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Technology.

     Bertel Karlstedt, who has served as president of Metso Paper since 2003, will continue in this position until March 31, 2005. Following the appointment of Risto Hautamäki as president of Metso Paper and a member of Metso executive team as of April 1, 2005, Mr. Karlstedt will then become executive vice president of Metso Paper. Previously, Mr. Karlstedt headed Metso Paper’s paper making business line in 1999-2003, and Valmet’s pulp drying business unit from 1996. He joined Valmet in 1988. Mr. Karlstedt holds a Master of Science degree in Technology.

     Matti Kähkönen has served as president of Metso Automation since 2001. Prior to that, he headed Metso Automation field systems division in 1999-2001, and served as division president of Neles Controls in the Rauma Group from 1993. Mr. Kähkönen joined Rauma in 1980. Mr. Kähkönen holds a Master of Science degree in Technology.

     Bertel Langenskiöld has served as president of Metso Minerals since 2003. Previously, he was president and chief executive officer of Fiskars Corporation in 2001-2003, and president of Tampella Oy/Kvaerner Pulping Oy in 1994-2000. Mr. Langenskiöld is a member of the board of Wärtsilä Corporation. Mr. Langenskiöld holds a Master of Science degree in Technology.

Compensation of Directors and Officers

     For the year ended December 31, 2004, fees totaling 315,258 (U.S.$426,796) were paid to the members of the board of directors of Metso Corporation. This includes the seven current members listed above and two previous members, Heikki Hakala and Mikko Kivimäki, who served on the board of directors until the annual shareholders’ meeting held on April 6, 2004. The annual fees paid were as follows: chairman of the board 60,000 (U.S.$81,228), vice chairman 40,000 (U.S.$54,152) and other board members 30,000 (U.S.$40,614). In addition, a fee of 500 (U.S.$677) per meeting was paid to all members of the board of directors for the meetings they attended. Compensation for traveling expenses and daily allowances were paid in accordance with the general travel rules of Metso.

     For the year ended December 31, 2004, salaries and bonuses totaling 1,880,476 were paid to eight members of our corporate executive team for the actual period they were members of the corporate executive team. Performance bonuses for the year 2003 accounted for 77,518, or 4.1 percent, of the total compensation paid. None of the members received benefits in 2004 exceeding the lesser of 50,000 or ten percent of their total compensation. In addition to the current members of the corporate executive team of Metso Corporation listed above, both the executive vice president of Metso Paper Arto Aaltonen and senior vice president and general counsel Harri Luoto were members of the corporate executive team between January 1 and May 1, 2004. The salaries of all members of the corporate executive team comprise a fixed basic salary and/or a bonus based on the result of the corporation or of the business area in question. The salary may also be based on other development objectives central to our operations.

54


Table of Contents

     We also pay premiums to a pension insurance company to provide for a supplemental group pension insurance covering our corporate executive team and some senior executives, which enables a retirement age of 60. In 2004, the amount of such pension insurance premium payments totaled approximately 1.5 million.

     The annual salary of president and chief executive officer Jorma Eloranta for 2004 was 438,000. According to his service contract, Jorma Eloranta’s age of retirement is 60 years, and his full pension equals 60 percent of the annual salary serving as the basis for the pension calculation. If Mr. Eloranta terminates his contract for a reason for which Metso is responsible, or if his contract is terminated by Metso, he is entitled to compensation corresponding to 24 months’ salary and benefits.

     As of December 31, 2004, there were no loans outstanding to any members of our board of directors or our corporate executive team.

Audit Committee and Compensation Committee

     Audit Committee. The audit committee consists of a chairman and two members elected by the board of directors from among its members. From April 28, 2004, the audit committee has consisted of Maija-Liisa Friman (chairman), Satu Huber and Jaakko Rauramo. The audit committee reviews the financial reporting, Metso’s compliance with laws and regulations and Metso’s procedures, internal control, risk management and matters relating to auditing. The audit committee also maintains procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by Metso regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. Each year, the audit committee draws up a working order for itself, subject to approval by the board of directors. In 2004, the audit committee met thirteen times.

     Compensation Committee. The compensation committee consists of the chairman and vice chairman of the board of directors and one member elected by the board from among its members. From April 29, 2004, the compensation committee has consisted of Matti Kavetvuo (chairman), Risto Hautamäki and Juhani Kuusi. The compensation committee makes proposals to the board of directors concerning the compensation of our management and the personnel compensation systems. Pursuant to the Finnish Companies Act, the shareholders determine the amount of compensation for the board of directors at the annual general meeting. In 2004, the compensation committee met six times.

Home Country Practices

     Foreign private issuers listed on the New York Stock Exchange must disclose any significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. domestic companies under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE listing standards”).

     As a result of a comparison of Metso’s corporate governance practices to those requirements of Section 303A of the NYSE listing standards that are currently applicable to U.S. domestic companies, the following significant differences have been identified:

    The annual general meeting of our shareholders held on April 6, 2004 established a nomination committee, which consists of the representatives of our four biggest shareholders along with the chairman of our board of directors as an expert member. The nomination committee has prepared proposals in respect of the composition of our board of directors and the director remuneration for the following annual general meeting of our shareholders, which is scheduled for April 4, 2005. Pursuant to Section 303A.04 of the NYSE listing standards, domestic companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange must have a nominating or corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors.
 
    Our compensation committee makes recommendations to our board of directors with respect to the compensation of our president and chief executive officer. In accordance with the Finnish Companies Act, the compensation of our president and chief executive officer is approved by our entire board of directors. Section 303A.05 of the NYSE listing standards requires that the compensation committee of a company must determine and approve the compensation of the chief executive officer.
 
    Under the Finnish Companies Act, a general meeting of shareholders of a Finnish company appoints

55


Table of Contents

      the independent auditor(s) of the company. Similarly, only a general meeting of shareholders can remove the independent auditor(s) and appoint their successor. Section 303.06 of the NYSE listing standards requires, pursuant to Rule 10A-3 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that the audit committee of a company must be directly responsible for the appointment and retention of the independent auditor of the company.
 
    Finnish laws and regulations do not mandatorily require companies to have an internal audit function which is required by the Section 303.07 of the NYSE listing standards. Metso has covered this requirement by comprehensive risk management and internal control processes.

Employees

     Metso’s employees numbered 22,802 at year-end 2004, as compared to 26,240 at year-end 2003, and 28,489 at year-end 2002. The reduction has been a result of the divestment of non-core businesses and restructuring measures taken. We believe that we have good relations with our employees and labor unions.

     The following table sets forth the number of employees by business area and by region as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. The increase in the number of the Corporate Office’s personnel in 2003 was due to the inclusion of the financial administration service centers’ employees in the figures.

                                 
    As of December 31,  
                            Percentage of  
    2002     2003     2004     Group  
Employees by business area
                               
Metso Paper
    9,357       9,085       8,660       38  
Metso Minerals
    8,479       8,284       8,048       35  
Metso Automation
    4,150       3,314       3,267       15  
Metso Ventures
    3,466       2,482       2,544       11  
Corporate Office and Other
    134       223       283       1  
 
                       
Continuing Operations
    25,586       23,388       22,802       100  
Discontinued Operations
    2,903       2,852              
 
                       
Metso Total
    28,489       26,240       22,802       100  
 
                       
                                 
    As of December 31,  
                            Percentage of  
    2002     2003     2004     Group  
Employees by geographic area
                               
Finland
    10,566       9,307       9,089       40  
Other Nordic Countries
    3,610       3,446       2,622       11  
Other European countries
    4,802       4,622       2,902       13  
North America
    4,794       4,124       3,557       16  
South America
    1,883       1,894       1,950       8  
Asia-Pacific
    1,341       1,457       1,366       6  
Rest of the world
    1,493       1,390       1,316       6  
 
                       
Total
    28,489       26,240       22,802       100  
 
                       

Share Ownership

     As of March 24, 2005, the members of our board of directors and our corporate executive team held in the aggregate a total of 21,329 shares of Metso Corporation for which they held sole voting or investment power, representing less than one percent of our total issued and outstanding share capital. As of March 24, 2005, members of our board of directors and corporate executive team collectively held in the aggregate 114,900 options of the Company.

     The following table sets forth the total number of shares and options of Metso Corporation beneficially held by each of our directors and members of our corporate executive team as of March 24, 2005:

56


Table of Contents

                                         
                    Number of     Number of     Number of  
    Sole Voting     Beneficially     Series 2000     Series 2001     Series 2003  
    or Investment     Shared Voting     A and B     A and B     A  
    Power     Power     options     options     options  
Directors
                                       
Matti Kavetvuo(1)
          94                    
Maija-Liisa Friman
    1,500                          
Risto Hautamäki
    2,000                          
Satu Huber
    500                          
Juhani Kuusi
    10,000                          
Pentti Mäkinen
                             
Jaakko Rauramo
    4,205                          
 
                                       
Corporate Executive Team
                                       
Jorma Eloranta
    1,800                   1,500       100,000  
Olli Vaartimo
    1,144                          
Vesa Kainu
    60                          
Bertel Karlstedt
    120                          
Matti Kähkönen
                             
Bertel Langenskiöld
                      13,400        
   
 
(1)   Includes 94 shares held by Mr. Kavetvuo’s spouse.

Metso Corporation currently has three option programs, launched in 2000, 2001 and 2003. The programs are part of an incentive system for key personnel, and included 183 people at the end of 2004. Initially, the programs gave the right to subscribe for a maximum of 13,800,000 new shares. Our board of directors decided on May 26, 2004 to reduce the size of the year 2003 option program, after which the three programs together give the right to subscribe for a maximum of 8,900,000 new shares.

     The year 2000 option program includes 5,000,000 options, which entitle their holders to subscribe for a maximum of 5,000,000 shares. The year 2001 option program includes 1,000,000 options, which entitle their holders to subscribe for a maximum of 1,000,000 shares. The year 2000 A and B options and the year 2001 A and B options were combined as one series on April 1, 2003, and the subscription period for these options will end on April 30, 2005. The share subscription price was 13.60 on December 31, 2004. Annually paid dividends are deducted from the subscription price.

     Our board of directors decided on May 26, 2004 to reduce the number of options related to the year 2003 option program to 2,900,000. Previously, 2,600,000 of the options were marked with the symbol 2003A, 2,600,000 were marked with the symbol 2003B and 2,600,000 were marked with the symbol 2003C. However, our board of directors decided that it will not distribute 2,400,000 of the year 2003A and 2,500,000 of the year 2003C options, and that it will propose to the annual general meeting to be held on April 4, 2005, that these options be canceled. With respect to the year 2003 option program, our board of directors reserved 100,000 of the year 2003A options and 100,000 of the year 2003C options for future needs.

     Our board of directors decided that the maximum number of year 2003B options that could be distributed would be 2,500,000. The minimum criteria for a partial distribution of options were a 2004 operating profit that is at least four percent of net sales, a return on capital employed of at least eight percent and earnings per share of at least 0.40. As the minimum criteria were not fulfilled, no 2003B options will be distributed from the program.

     The share subscription price for the 2003A options is 10.45, for the 2003B options the trade-weighted average price of the Metso share on the Helsinki Stock Exchange during the period January 1-March 31, 2005, and for the 2003C options the trade-weighted average price of the Metso share on the Helsinki Stock Exchange during the period January 1-March 31, 2006. Annually paid dividends are deducted from the subscription price. The share subscription period for the 2003A options is April 1, 2006-April 30, 2009, for the 2003B options April 1, 2007-April 30, 2010, and for the 2003C options April 1, 2008-April 30, 2011.

Authorizations for Board of Directors

     The annual general meeting held on April 6, 2004, authorized our board of directors to decide on raising the share capital of Metso Corporation by a rights offering, a convertible bonds issue and/or an issue of share options. The authorization expires one year from the annual general meeting. No more than 12,500,000 new shares with a nominal value of 1.70 may be subscribed for as a result of the rights offering, convertible

57


Table of Contents

bond issue or issue of share options. The Corporation’s share capital may be raised in total by no more than 21,250,000, which represents 9.17 percent of the share capital and votes.

     The authorization allows a deviation from the shareholders’ pre-emptive subscription rights, provided that there are substantial financial grounds from the Company’s perspective, such as financing acquisitions, enabling joint operation arrangements or other development of the Company’s business operations. The board of directors had not exercised these authorizations by the date of this annual report. A similar authorization to our board of directors for a one year period is proposed to the annual general meeting to be held on April 4, 2005.

Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.

Major Shareholders

     The Finnish State currently owns 11.52 percent of our total shares and total votes. There has been no change in the Finnish State’s ownership since 1999 when Metso Corporation was established. On March 25, 2003, Harris Associates L.P. announced that certain funds under its management held 5.07 percent of our total shares and total votes. On October 8, 2004, Marathon Asset Management (Services) Ltd. held according to its announcement 5.04 percent of our total shares. On March 9, 2005, Deutsche Bank AG and its subsidiary companies held according to their announcement 9,801,820 Metso shares to which they had the dispositive rights. This holding amounts to 7.19 percent of the total shares of Metso Corporation. As part of this holding on March 9, 2005, Deutsche Bank AG and its subsidiary companies held 9,189,802 Metso shares to which they had voting rights. This voting authority represents 6.74 percent of the total votes of Metso Corporation.

     Neither the Finnish State, Deutsche Bank AG, Harris Associates L.P., Marathon Asset Management (Services) Ltd. nor any other shareholder has any special voting rights. However, the Finnish State, Deutsche Bank AG, Harris Associates L.P. and Marathon Asset Management (Services) Ltd. may, through their share ownership, continue to have substantial influence in deciding matters submitted for a vote of shareholders, such as approval of the annual financial statements, declarations of annual reserves and dividends, capital increases, amendments to our articles of association and the election and removal of members of our board of directors.

     The following table lists, as of March 24, 2005, the total number of our shares owned by the Finnish State, Deutsche Bank AG, Harris Associates L.P. and Marathon Asset Management (Services) Ltd, the only persons or entities known to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our shares, as well as shares owned by members of our board of directors:

                     
Title of Class   Identity of Person or Group   Number of Shares     Percent  
Shares, nominal value
                   
1.70 each
  The Finnish State     15,695,287       11.52  
Shares, nominal value
                   
1.70 each
  Deutsche Bank AG and its subsidiary companies     9,801,820       7.19  
Shares, nominal value
                   
1.70 each
  Funds managed by Harris Associates L.P.     6,904,600       5.07  
Shares, nominal value
                   
1.70 each
  Funds managed by Marathon Asset Management (Services) Ltd.     6,866,335       5.04  
Shares, nominal value
                   
1.70 each
  Members of our board of directors     18,205       0.01  

Ownership of Our Securities in the United States

     As of March 18, 2005, the most recent practicable date, approximately 8,966,068 shares, or 6.6 percent of the total number of our issued and outstanding shares were held by approximately 41 record holders with addresses in the United States.

Related Party Transactions

     There have been no material transactions during the last fiscal year or during the current fiscal year up to the date of this annual report to which any director or executive officer or any ten percent shareholder or any

58


Table of Contents

relative or spouse of any of them was a party. There is no significant outstanding indebtedness owed to Metso by any director or executive officer or ten percent shareholder.

     There have been no material transactions during the last fiscal year or during the current fiscal year up to the date of this annual report with enterprises controlling, controlled by or under common control with Metso or an associate of Metso.

Item 8.  Financial Information.

Consolidated Financial Statements

     See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”

Export Sales

     The value of exports by Metso, including sales to unaffiliated customers and intra-Group sales, from Finland by destination were as follows for the most recent three years:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Other Nordic Countries
    297       195       210  
Europe (excluding Nordic Countries)
    567       523       420  
North America
    183       209       141  
South America
    137       38       75  
Asia-Pacific
    248       372       526  
Rest of the World
    21       15       23  
 
                 
Total
    1,453       1,352       1,395  
 
                 

     In 2004, without elimination of intra-Group sales, the value of goods exported from Finland, Sweden, other European countries and the United States totaled approximately 1,395 million or 24 percent of our total sales, 506 million or nine percent of our total sales, 252 million or four percent of our total sales, and 205 million or four percent of our total sales, respectively.

Legal Proceedings

     We have extensive worldwide operations and are involved in several legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. While the results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect them to result in liabilities that have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     Several actions raising product liability claims are pending against Metso in the United States. However, we do not believe that the outcome of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition or results of operations. We further believe that the risks of legal disputes concerning deliveries and the taxation of our export delivery projects are customary in our fields of operation and are not material as a whole.

     As of January 31, 2005, there had been a total of 350 complaints alleging asbestos injuries filed in the United States in which a Metso entity is one of the named defendants. Where a given plaintiff has named more than one viable Metso unit as a defendant, the cases are counted by the number of viable Metso defendants. Of these claims, 124 are still pending and 226 cases have been closed. Of the closed cases, two were by summary judgment, 168 were dismissed, and 56 were settled. For the 56 cases settled the average compensation has been U.S.$539 per case. The outcome of the still pending cases is not expected to materially deviate from the outcome of the previous claims. Hence, management believes that Metso has no material asbestos related liability in the United States.

     See “Item 4. Information on the Company — Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters” for a discussion on certain pending environmental issues with possible legal implications.

59


Table of Contents

Dividend Policy

     We pay annual dividends to our shareholders based on a longer-term outlook for our consolidated profitability and financial position. The timing and amount of future dividend payments, if any, will depend on our future earnings, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, working capital requirements and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant. The objective of our dividend policy is to distribute an annual dividend equivalent to at least one-third of the earnings per share.

     For companies domiciled in Finland and incorporated under the Finnish law, dividends on shares are generally only paid annually after shareholder approval of both the company’s financial results and of the amount of dividend proposed by the board of directors. Under the Finnish law, the amount of any dividend is limited to the amount of profits and other distributable equity available at the end of the preceding fiscal year on a consolidated or unconsolidated basis, whichever is lower. Subject to certain exceptions relating to the right of the minority shareholders to request otherwise, the dividend may not exceed an amount recommended by the board of directors. As of December 31, 2004, our parent company’s distributable equity was 543 million (U.S.$735 million) and our consolidated distributable equity was 572 million (U.S.$774 million). The difference between our parent company’s distributable equity of 543 million and our distributable equity including our consolidated subsidiaries of 572 million is caused by earnings related to our parent company’s subsidiaries that are reflected in our consolidated accounts but not in the accounts of our parent company.

     Dividends paid to holders of ADSs who are non-residents of Finland will generally be subject to the Finnish withholding tax at a rate of 28 percent. Such ADS holders may, however, be subject to a lower withholding tax rate and may be allowed an imputation tax credit to reduce the tax on dividends where there is a double taxation treaty with Finland that contains appropriate provisions. The current convention between the United States and Finland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital does not contain provisions that extend such imputation credits to U.S. holders of our shares or ADSs. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation.”

     Our board of directors will propose to the annual general meeting of our shareholders to be held on April 4, 2005 that a dividend of 0.35 per share be paid for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Any dividend decided upon by the annual general meeting will be paid on April 14, 2005 to shareholders entered in the register of shareholders on April 7, 2005. We have paid a dividend of 0.20, 0.60, 0.60 and 0.60 per share for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Significant Changes

     Except as otherwise disclosed in this annual report, no significant change has occurred in our business or financial condition since December 31, 2004.

60


Table of Contents

Item 9.  The Offer and Listing.

Nature of Trading Market

     The principal trading market for our shares is the Helsinki Stock Exchange, where our shares are traded under the symbol “MEO1V.” Since July 1, 1999, our shares have been traded in the United States on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MX” in the form of ADSs. Each ADS represents one share. The depositary for the ADSs is the Bank of New York.

     The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low quoted prices for our shares on the Helsinki Stock Exchange based on its Daily Official List and the high and low quoted prices for our ADSs as reported in the New York Stock Exchange — Composite Transactions:

                                 
    Helsinki Stock Exchange     New York Stock Exchange  
    Price per Share     Price per ADS  
    High     Low     High     Low  
    ()     (U.S.$)  
Annual
                               
                                 
2000
    16.20       8.61       16.25       7.75  
2001
    14.10       7.81       11.30       7.68  
2002
    15.15       7.73       14.26       7.81  
2003
    11.41       7.52       12.77       8.31  
2004
    12.89       9.12       16.49       11.10  
2005 (through March 29)
    14.90       11.31       19.70       14.70  
 
                               
Quarterly
                               
 
                               
2003
                               
First Quarter
    11.41       8.70       12.02       9.75  
Second Quarter
    10.10       7.52       11.15       8.31  
Third Quarter
    10.31       7.62       11.10       8.90  
Fourth Quarter
    10.34       8.50       12.77       10.23  
 
                               
2004
                               
First Quarter
    11.47       9.60       14.37       12.21  
Second Quarter
    11.72       9.12       14.04       11.10  
Third Quarter
    11.05       9.90       13.53       12.27  
Fourth Quarter
    12.89       10.27       16.49       12.72  
 
                               
2005
                               
First Quarter (through March 29)
    14.90       11.31       19.70       14.70  
 
                               
Monthly
                               
 
                               
2004
    14.84       11.31       19.70       14.70  
September
    10.79       9.90       13.07       12.27  
October
    11.17       10.27       14.29       12.72  
November
    12.89       11.07       16.49       14.45  
December
    12.20       11.38       16.43       15.22  
 
                               
2005
                               
January
    12.00       11.31       16.08       14.70  
February
    14.37       11.61       18.99       15.43  
March (through March 29)
    14.90       13.58       19.70       17.86  

61


Table of Contents

Trading and Settlement on the Helsinki Stock Exchange

     Trading in, and clearing of, securities on the Helsinki Stock Exchange, part of the OMX Exchanges, takes place in euro, with the minimum tick size for trading quotations being one euro cent. All price information is produced and published only in euro.

     The trading system of the Helsinki Stock Exchange is based on an electronic trading system SAXESS™ (“Saxess”). Saxess is an order-based system in which orders are matched to trade when price and volume match. Trading is conducted on the basis of trading lots, which are fixed separately for each share series.

     The trading phases consist of a pre-trading session, continuous trading and a post-trading session. For shares, pre-trading begins at 8:30 a.m. and ends at 9:45 a.m. at the prices established during the previous trading day. Trading with calls and continuous trading takes place from 9:45 a.m. to 6:30. p.m. Opening call begins at 9:45 a.m. and ends at 10:00 a.m. Round lot orders entered during the pre-trading session and existing orders with several days’ validity are automatically transferred into the opening call. Continuous trading begins sequentially after the opening call ends at 10:00 a.m. when the first share is assigned its opening price and then becomes subject to continuous trading. After approximately ten minutes, the opening prices for all the shares have been established and trading continues at prices based on market demand until 6:20 p.m. when the closing call is initiated. The closing call ends at approximately 6:30 p.m. when the closing prices are determined. Post-trading, during which only contract transactions for shares can be registered at the prices established during the trading day, takes place from 6:40 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

     Trades are normally cleared in the Finnish Central Securities Depository’s (the “FCSD”) automated clearing and settlement system on the third banking day after the trade date unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

Regulation of the Finnish Securities Market

     The Finnish Financial Supervision Authority supervises the securities market in Finland. The principal statute governing the securities market is the Finnish Securities Market Act of 1989, which contains regulations with respect to company and shareholder disclosure obligations, admission to listing and trading of listed securities and public tender offers and insider obligations, among other things. The Finnish Financial Supervision Authority monitors compliance with these regulations.

     The Finnish Securities Market Act specifies minimum disclosure requirements for Finnish companies applying for listing on the Helsinki Stock Exchange or making a public offering of securities in Finland. The information provided must be sufficient to enable investors to make a sound evaluation of the securities being offered and the issuing company. Finnish listed companies have a continuing obligation to publish regular financial information, and to inform the market of any matters likely to have a material impact on the value of their securities.

     A shareholder is required, without undue delay, to notify a Finnish listed company and the Finnish Financial Supervision Authority when its voting participation in, or its percentage ownership of, the issued share capital of such Finnish listed company reaches, exceeds or falls below five percent, ten percent, 15 percent, 20 percent, 25 percent, 331/ 3 percent, 50 percent or 662/ 3 percent, calculated in accordance with the Finnish Securities Market Act, or when it enters into an agreement or other arrangement that, when effective, has such consequence. If a Finnish listed company receives information indicating that a voting interest or ownership interest has reached, exceeded or fallen below these thresholds, it must disclose such information to the public and to the Helsinki Stock Exchange.

     Pursuant to the Finnish Securities Market Act, a shareholder whose holding in a Finnish listed company increases above two-thirds of the total voting rights attached to the shares of the listed company, calculated in accordance with the Finnish Securities Market Act, after the commencement of a public quotation of such shares must offer to purchase the remaining shares and other securities entitling their holders to shares of such company for fair market value. Under the Finnish Companies Act, a shareholder holding shares representing more than 90 percent of all the share capital in a company and more than 90 percent of the shares and the votes entitled to be cast at a general meeting of shareholders has the right to require the minority shareholders to sell the remaining shares of such company to such shareholder for fair market value. In addition, any minority shareholder that possesses shares that may be so purchased by a majority shareholder is entitled to

62


Table of Contents

require such majority shareholder to purchase its shares. Detailed rules apply for the calculation of the above proportions of shares and votes.

     The Finnish Criminal Code also contains provisions relating to breach of disclosure requirements, misuse of privileged or inside information and market manipulation. Breach of these provisions constitutes a criminal offense.

The Finnish Book-Entry Securities System

General

     Finland has made a gradual changeover from a certificated securities system to a book-entry securities system since August 1, 1991, when the relevant legislation came into effect. Use of the book-entry securities system is mandatory for shares listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange. Our shares were entered into the Finnish book-entry system on May 2, 1996.

     The Finnish book-entry securities system is centralized at the FCSD, which provides national clearing and registration services for securities. The FCSD maintains a central book-entry securities system for both equity and debt securities.

     The FCSD maintains a register of the shareholders of listed companies and book-entry accounts for shareholders who do not wish to utilize the services of a commercial account operator. The issuers participating in the Finnish book-entry securities system and the account operators pay for the expenses incurred by the FCSD in connection with maintaining the central book-entry securities system. The account operators, which consist of credit institutions, investment service companies and other institutions licensed to act as account operators by the FCSD (each, an “Account Operator”), are entitled to make entries in the book-entry register and administer the book-entry accounts.

Registration

     In order to effect entries in the Finnish book-entry securities system, a security holder or its nominee must establish a book-entry account with the FCSD or an Account Operator or register its securities through nominee registration. Finnish shareholders may not register their securities through nominee registration. For shareholders who have not transferred their shares into book-entries, a joint book-entry account shall be opened with the FCSD, the registered holder of which shall be the issuing company. All transactions in securities registered with the Finnish book-entry securities system are executed as computerized book-entry transfers. The Account Operator confirms book-entry transfers by sending notifications of transactions to the holder of the respective book-entry account. The account holders also receive an annual statement of their holdings as of the end of each calendar year.

     Each book-entry account is required to contain specified information with respect to the account holder or the custodian administering the assets of a nominee account. Such information includes the type and number of book-entry securities registered and the rights and restrictions pertaining to the account and to the book-entry securities registered in the account. A possible nominee account is identified as such on the entry. The FCSD and the Account Operators are required to observe strict confidentiality, although certain information (for example the name, nationality and address of each account holder) contained in the register of shareholders maintained by the FCSD must be made available to the public by the FCSD and the issuer, except in the case of nominee registration.

     Each Account Operator is strictly liable for errors and omissions on the registers maintained by it and for any unauthorized disclosure of information. However, if an account holder has suffered a loss as a result of a faulty registration or an amendment to, or deletion of, rights with respect to registered securities and the Account Operator is unable to compensate for such loss, such account holder is entitled to receive compensation from the FCSD. To cover for this contingency, the FCSD maintains a statutory registration fund. The capital of the fund must be at least 0.000048 percent of the average of the total market value of the book-entries kept in the Finnish book-entry securities system during the last five calendar years, and it must not be less than 20 million. The compensation to be paid to one injured party shall be equal to the amount of damages suffered by such injured party from a single Account Operator subject to a maximum amount of 25,000. Furthermore, the liability of the registration fund is limited to 10 million per incident.

63


Table of Contents

Custody of the Shares and Nominees

     A non-Finnish shareholder may appoint an account operator (or certain non-Finnish organizations approved by the FCSD) to act as a custodial nominee account holder on its behalf. A nominee shareholder is entitled to receive dividends and exercise all share subscription rights and other financial and administrative rights attached to the shares, such as the right to attend and vote at general meetings of the company. A beneficial owner wishing to attend and vote at a general meeting must seek a temporary registration and be registered in the register of shareholders not later than ten days prior to the relevant general meeting. A custodial nominee account holder is required to disclose to the Finnish Financial Supervision Authority and the relevant company upon request the name of the beneficial owner of any shares registered in the name of such custodial nominee account holder, where the beneficial owner is known, as well as the number of shares owned by such beneficial owner. If the name of the beneficial owner is not known, the custodial nominee account holder is required to disclose said information on the representative acting on behalf of the beneficial owner and to submit a written declaration to the effect that the beneficial owner of the shares is not a Finnish natural person or legal entity.

     Finnish Depositories for both Clearstream Banking S.A., Luxembourg and Euroclear Bank, S.A./N.V., as operator of the Euroclear System, have nominee accounts within the Finnish book-entry securities system and, accordingly, non-Finnish shareholders may hold their shares through their accounts with Clearstream Banking or Euroclear.

     Shareholders wishing to hold their shares in the Finnish book-entry securities system in their name and who do not maintain a book-entry account in Finland are required to open a book-entry account at an authorized account operator in Finland and a convertible euro account at a bank operating in Finland.

Item 10.  Additional Information.

Articles of Association

Organization and Register

     Metso Corporation is incorporated as a stock corporation (osakeyhtiö) and is organized under the laws of the Republic of Finland. We are registered in the Trade Register maintained by the National Board of Patents and Registration of Finland under the business identity code 1538032-5.

Purpose and Object

     Pursuant to Section 2 of our articles of association, our object is to design, develop, sell and manufacture products and systems for the engineering, mechanical, vehicle, electronics and automation industries, as well as provide spare parts and maintenance services relating to these, either directly or through our subsidiary or affiliate companies. As the parent company, we may also attend to the organization, financing and purchases of the Group and to other joint tasks of the same kind, and we may own real estate, shares and participations and carry on securities trading and other investment business.

Share Capital and Shares

     Pursuant to Section 3 of our articles of association, our share capital may not be less than 170 million nor more than 680 million. Within these limits, our share capital may be increased or decreased without amending our articles of association. Pursuant to Section 4 of our articles of association, the number of shares we issue may not be less than 100 million shares or exceed 400 million shares. The par value of each share is 1.70.

Corporate Governance

     Our corporate governance is based on the Finnish Companies Act and on our articles of association. The shares of Metso Corporation are listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange. Metso Corporation complies with the regulations and guidelines concerning listed companies issued by the Helsinki Stock Exchange and Finland’s Financial Supervision Authority. Our corporate governance system also observes the rules and corporate governance recommendations of the New York Stock Exchange concerning listed companies that are foreign private issuers, and the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our general

64


Table of Contents

operating principles and responsibility relationships are described in our corporate governance principles. Metso’s values and ethical principles create the foundation for corporate governance, personnel and management actions and cooperation with key stakeholders.

     The board of directors of Metso Corporation has ultimate responsibility for the management and proper arrangement of the operations of the Company, and for assuring good corporate governance in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The board of directors decides upon matters, which, considering the scope and size of the operations of Metso Corporation, are of major importance. These include the approval of the goals and strategy of Metso Corporation, the approval of annual business and other major action plans, the definition and approval of corporate policies in key management areas, the approval of the organizational structure of Metso Corporation, and the nomination of the president and chief executive officer, his deputy and the members of the corporate executive team and the monitoring and evaluating of their performance. The members of the board of directors of Metso Corporation are elected by the annual general meeting for a term of one year. In accordance with the articles of association, the board of directors consists of at least five and no more than eight members.

     Pursuant to the Finnish Companies Act, members of our board of directors are prohibited from participating in the negotiation or performance, or otherwise having an involvement in connection with, a contract between themselves and Metso. This prohibition also includes contracts between Metso and a third party if such director would receive a material benefit in conflict with the interests of Metso. With certain limitations, the Finnish Companies Act permits members of our board of directors to borrow money from Metso, so long as such loan is secured and is within the limits of our distributable equity.

     For information relating to our board of directors and corporate executive team, see also “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

Preemptive Rights

     Under Finnish law, existing shareholders of Finnish companies have preferential rights to subscribe, in proportion to their shareholdings, in new shares of such companies as well as for issues of subscription warrants or debt instruments convertible into shares or carrying warrants to subscribe for shares, unless the corporate resolution approving such issue provides otherwise. Under the Finnish Companies Act, a resolution waiving preemptive rights must be approved by at least two-thirds of all votes cast and all shares represented at the general meeting of shareholders.

General Meeting of Shareholders

     Under the Finnish Companies Act, shareholders exercise their power to decide on corporate matters at general meetings of shareholders. Our articles of association require that a general meeting of shareholders be held annually before the end of June on a date decided by our board of directors to decide upon the approval of the income statement and balance sheet and measures warranted by the profit or loss, discharges from liability, emoluments for the members of our board of directors and remuneration of auditors, number and the members of our board of directors and auditors, as well as matters raised by individual shareholders. Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders in respect of specific matters are held when considered necessary by the board of directors, or when requested in writing by an auditor of the Company or by shareholders representing at least one-tenth of all the issued shares.

     Under our articles of association, a shareholder must give notice to the Company of his or her intention to attend a general meeting no later than the date and time specified by the board of directors in the notice of the general meeting, which may not be earlier than ten days before the general meeting. Under our articles of association, notices of general meetings must be given not earlier than two months prior to, and not later than 17 days before, the meeting by publishing an announcement of the meeting in at least two Finnish newspapers published regularly in the Helsinki area designated by the board of directors at its discretion or by in some other verifiable way.

     Inasmuch as the shares have been transferred to the Finnish Book-Entry Securities System, in order to have the right to attend and vote at a general meeting, a shareholder must be registered not later than ten days prior to the relevant general meeting in the register of shareholders kept by the Finnish Central Securities Depository in accordance with the Finnish Companies Act and the Finnish Act on the Book-Entry Securities System. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—The Finnish Book-Entry Securities System—Registration.” Voting rights may not be exercised by a shareholder if such shareholder’s shares are registered in the name of a

65


Table of Contents

nominee. A beneficial owner wishing to exercise such rights should seek a temporary registration in the register of shareholders not later than ten days prior to the relevant general meeting. There are no quorum requirements for general meetings in the Finnish Companies Act or our articles of association. Hence, it is possible that, depending on the attendance at any particular shareholders’ meeting, a relatively limited number of shareholders may approve resolutions put forward at such meetings.

Voting

     A shareholder may attend and vote at a general meeting of shareholders in person or through an authorized representative. Shareholders that have not transferred their shares to the Finnish book-entry securities system may also attend and vote at general meetings if they were registered in the share register maintained by the Company before the date on which the shares should have been transferred to the book-entry securities system at the latest and provide evidence of their ownership of shares on the date of the general meeting.

     Each share is entitled to one vote at a general meeting of shareholders. While resolutions are usually passed by a majority of the votes cast, certain resolutions, such as a resolution to amend our articles of association, a resolution to issue shares not subject to shareholders’ preferential subscription rights and, in certain cases, a resolution regarding a merger or liquidation of the Company, require a majority of at least two-thirds of the votes cast and the shares represented at the general meeting of shareholders. Further, if an amendment of our articles of association would diminish the rights of an entire class of shares, the resolution, in addition to the above majority requirement, requires the consent of shareholders representing at least one-half of all the shares of such class and a majority of two-thirds of the shares of such class represented at the general meeting of shareholders. Any amendment to the purchase obligation provisions of our articles of association (described below) requires at least three-fourths of the votes cast and the shares represented at the meeting.

Liquidation

     If the Company were to be liquidated, any liquidation proceeds remaining after all of its liabilities were paid would be distributed to its shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings.

Purchase Obligations

     Our articles of association contain a clause according to which a shareholder or a group of related shareholders who or which has acquired either 331/ 3 percent or 50 percent of the total ordinary shares or of the total voting power of the Company, at the minimum, is obligated to purchase the shares of all other shareholders who request such purchase. Our articles of association specify that the purchase price of such shares shall be the higher of the following:

     (a) The weighted average trading price of the ordinary shares of the Company on the Helsinki Stock Exchange during the ten business days prior to the day on which the shareholder obligated to purchase ordinary shares of the Company in accordance with this provision informed the Company that the above-mentioned percentage of ownership of ordinary shares or votes has been reached or exceeded or, in the event that no such notification is provided to the Company, or such notification is provided after the expiration of the period of time set forth in our articles of association, then during the ten business days prior to the day on which the Company’s board of directors is informed in any other manner; or

     (b) the weighted average price per share, which the shareholder obligated to purchase ordinary shares of the Company in accordance with this provision has paid for the ordinary shares that he/she has procured or obtained in some other way over the 12 months preceding the date defined in paragraph (a) above.

     In addition, such shareholder is also obligated to purchase any subscription rights, warrants or convertible bonds issued by the Company if so requested by the holder or holders thereof.

     Pursuant to the Securities Market Act, a shareholder who acquires in excess of two-thirds of the total voting rights of the shares of a company after the commencement of a public quotation of the shares must offer to purchase the remaining shares.

66


Table of Contents

Material Contracts

     Neither Metso nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has entered into any contracts in the last two years outside of the ordinary course of business that have had or may reasonably be expected to have a material effect on our business.

Exchange Controls

     Our share may be bought by non-residents of Finland on the Helsinki Stock Exchange without any separate Finnish exchange control consent. Non-residents may receive dividends without separate Finnish exchange control consent, the transfer out of Finland being subject to payment by the Company of withholding taxes. Non-residents that have acquired our shares may receive shares pursuant to a bonus issue or through participation in a new issue without a separate Finnish exchange control consent. Shares may be sold in Finland by non-residents, and the proceeds of such sale may be transferred out of Finland in any convertible currency. There are no Finnish exchange control regulations applying to the sale of shares of the Company by non-residents to other non-residents.

Control of Foreign Ownership

     Restrictions on foreign ownership of Finnish companies were abolished as of January 1, 1993. However, under the Act on the Control of Foreigners’ Acquisition of Finnish Companies of 1992, clearance by the Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry would be required if a foreign person or entity, other than a person or entity from another member state of the European Economic Area or the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or a Finnish entity controlled by one or more such foreign persons or entities, were to acquire a holding of one-third or more of the voting power of the Company. The Ministry of Trade and Industry could refuse clearance where the acquisition would jeopardize important national interests, in which case the matter would be referred to the government of Finland.

Taxation

     The following description is based on tax laws of Finland and the United States as in effect on the date of this annual report and is subject to changes in the Finnish and U.S. law, including changes that could have retroactive effect. Prospective investors should consult their professional advisors as to the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of tax laws of any other jurisdiction.

Finnish Taxation

     The following is a description of the material Finnish income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of shares or ADSs by a holder who is not a resident of Finland (a “non-resident”). It does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential Finnish tax consequences to holders of the shares and ADSs. Prospective investors should consult their own advisers as to the consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of shares or ADSs in light of their particular circumstances, including the effect of any foreign, state, or local tax laws. Statements regarding Finnish tax laws set forth below are based on the laws in force and as interpreted by the relevant taxation authorities as of the date hereof and are subject to any changes in Finnish law, or in the interpretation thereof by the relevant taxation authorities.

     A beneficial owner of an ADS should be treated as the owner of the underlying share for purposes of the current Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Finland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital and for Finnish tax purposes. Accordingly, the Finnish tax consequences to owners of shares discussed below apply also to beneficial owners of ADSs.

Companies

     Finnish companies are subject to national corporate income tax on their worldwide income. With effect from January 1, 2005, the rate of such tax was 26 percent.

67


Table of Contents

Shareholders and Holders of ADSs

  Tax Credit on Dividends

     The Finnish avoir fiscal system has been abolished as of January 1, 2005. The taxation of dividends distributed by a company listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange varies depending on whether a shareholder that is a resident in Finland is a company listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange, a privately held company or a natural person. When the shareholder is a company listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange, dividends received by such shareholder are 75 percent taxable in case the underlying shares are included in the investment assets of the shareholder. If the dividend is paid based on shares that are not included in the investment assets of the shareholder (listed company), the dividend income is not taxable income. If the shareholder is a privately held company, dividends received by such shareholder are 75 percent taxable in case the underlying shares are included in the investment assets of the shareholder. If the shares are not part of the investment assets of the respective shareholder, only 75 percent of the dividends received is taxable income, provided that the respective shareholder does not directly own at least ten percent of the share capital of the distributing company. If the ten percent ownership threshold is met, the dividend income is not treated as taxable income of the respective shareholder (privately held company). If the shareholder is a natural person, 70 percent of the dividends received by such shareholder is taxable as capital income.

     The applicable tax rate is 28 percent. The rest of the dividend income received by such a shareholder from a listed company is not treated as taxable income. Year 2005 serves as a transition period and lower percentages than those described above shall be used in the taxation of dividends. If the shareholder is a privately held company or if the underlying shares are included in the investment assets of the shareholder, 60 percent (instead of 75 percent) of the dividends received by such shareholder will be taxable income in such shareholder’s taxation in tax year 2005. Similarly, if the shareholder is a natural person, 57 percent (instead of 70 percent) of the dividends received by such shareholder will be taxable as capital income in such shareholder’s taxation of year 2005.

  Withholding Tax on Dividends

     Non-residents of Finland are subject to Finnish withholding tax on dividends paid by a Finnish company. In the absence of any applicable treaty, the rate of withholding tax is 28 percent as from January 1, 2005. Finland has entered into double taxation treaties with many countries pursuant to which the withholding tax is reduced on dividends paid to persons entitled to the benefits under such treaties, unless the shares from which such dividends derive are effectively connected with a permanent establishment or a fixed base in Finland, in which case Finnish income taxes are levied on the dividends so derived. In the case of the treaty with the United States, the withholding tax rates are reduced to 15 percent. The Finnish company paying the dividend is responsible for deducting any applicable Finnish withholding tax.

     A reduction of such withholding tax rate can be obtained at source upon the submission of a Source Tax Card or the required information (name, date of birth and address) to the payer prior to the payment of dividends. If such a Source Tax Card or such information is not submitted in a timely manner, a refund of tax withheld in excess of the applicable treaty rate can be obtained upon application to the local tax authority. The Bank of New York as Depositary for the ADSs has agreed to use reasonable efforts to make and maintain arrangements enabling holders to receive tax credits, reduction in Finnish withholding tax or other benefits (pursuant to treaty or otherwise) relating to dividend payments on the ADSs at the time the dividend is paid.

     No withholding tax is levied under Finnish law on dividends paid to corporate entities that reside in the EU and directly hold at least 20 percent of the capital of the distributing Finnish company. In addition, due to the abolishment of the Finnish avoir fiscal system the requirement of a minimum tax relating to avoir fiscal shall no longer apply.

  Finnish Transfer Tax

     There is no transfer tax payable in Finland on share transfers made on the Helsinki Stock Exchange. If the transfer is not made on the Helsinki Stock Exchange, a transfer tax at the rate of 1.6 percent of the relevant sales price is payable by the buyer. However, if the buyer is neither a resident of Finland nor a Finnish branch of a foreign credit institution nor a Finnish branch of a foreign brokerage firm, the seller must collect the tax from the buyer. If neither the buyer nor the seller is a resident of Finland or a Finnish branch of a foreign credit institution or a Finnish branch of a foreign brokerage firm and it is not a question of transfer of shares in a

68


Table of Contents

housing or real estate company, the transfer of shares will be exempt from Finnish transfer tax. No transfer tax is payable in connection with newly issued shares.

  Finnish Capital Gains and Other Taxes

     Shareholders who are not resident in Finland, and who do not engage in trade or business through a permanent establishment or fixed base in Finland which could be regarded as the holder of the relevant shares or ADSs, will normally not be subject to Finnish taxes on capital gains realized on the transfer of shares. Transfers of shares by a non-resident of Finland by way of gift or by reason of the death of the owner are subject to Finnish gift or inheritance tax respectively if either the transferor or the transferee was a resident of Finland at the time of death or when the gift was given, unless Finland has waived its rights in a tax treaty to impose tax.

U.S. Federal Income Taxation

General

     The following is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs, which are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts. This summary addresses only the U.S. federal income tax considerations of holders that are initial purchasers of the shares or ADSs at the initial issue price and that will hold shares or ADSs as capital assets. This summary does not address tax considerations applicable to holders that may be subject to special tax rules, such as financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, grantor trusts, regulated investment companies, dealers or traders in securities or currencies, tax-exempt entities, persons that received shares or ADSs as compensation for the performance of services, certain expatriates, persons that will hold shares or ADSs as part of a “hedging” or “conversion” transaction or as a position in a “straddle” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar or holders that own (or are deemed to own) ten percent or more (by voting power or value) of the stock of the Company. This summary does not address any state, local or foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs.

     Moreover, this summary does not address the U.S. federal estate and gift or alternative minimum tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs. This summary is based (i) on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), U.S. Treasury Regulations and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, in each case as in effect and available on the date hereof, and (ii) in part, on the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. All of the foregoing are subject to change, which change could apply retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described below.

     For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is: (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a partnership or corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof (including the District of Columbia), (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust, if such trust validly elects to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or if (A) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and (B) one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust. A “Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is not a U.S. holder.

     If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of the partnership or a partner in such partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such partner or partnership should consult its own tax advisor as to its tax consequences.

Ownership of ADSs in General

     For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder of ADSs generally will be treated as the owner of the shares represented by such ADSs.

     The U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concern that depositaries for American Depositary Receipts, or other intermediaries between the holders of shares of an issuer and the issuer, may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of U.S. foreign tax credits by U.S. holders of such receipts or shares.

69


Table of Contents

     Accordingly, the analysis regarding the availability of a U.S. foreign tax credit for Finnish taxes and sourcing rules described below could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury Department.

Distributions

     The gross amount of any distribution by the Company of cash or property (other than certain distributions, if any, of shares or ADSs distributed pro rata to all shareholders of the Company including holders of ADSs) with respect to shares or ADSs, before reduction for any Finnish taxes withheld therefrom, will be includible in income by a U.S. Holder as dividend income to the extent such distributions are paid out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxed on such dividends at the lower rates applicable to long-term capital gains (i.e., generally, gains from the sale or exchange of capital assets held for more than one year) for taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2008. A U.S. holder’s eligibility for such preferential rate would be subject to certain holding period requirements and the non-existence of certain risk reduction transactions with respect to the shares. However, such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. Holders. To the extent, if any, that the amount of any distribution by the Company exceeds the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, it will be treated first as a tax-free return of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain. The Company does not maintain calculations of its earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles.

     Any such dividend paid in euro (or any currency other than U.S. dollars) will be included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder in an amount equal to the U.S. dollar value of the euro (or, if not euro, the currency in which the dividend was paid) on the date of receipt, which in the case of ADSs, is the date they are received by the depositary. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution. Any gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder that subsequently sells or otherwise disposes of euro (or, any currency other than U.S. dollars) will be ordinary gain or loss.

     Dividends received by a U.S. Holder with respect to shares or ADSs will be treated as foreign source income, which may be relevant in calculating such holder’s foreign tax credit limitation. Subject to certain conditions and limitations, any Finnish tax withheld on dividends may be deducted from taxable income or credited against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends distributed by the Company generally will constitute “passive income”, or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “financial services income.”

     U.S. holders should note that recently enacted legislation eliminates the “financial services income” category with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006. Under the new legislation, the foreign tax credit limitation categories would be limited to “passive category income” and “general category income”.

     Subject to the discussion below under “Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting Requirements,” a Non-U.S. Holder of shares or ADSs generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends received on shares or ADSs, unless such income is effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the United States.

Sale or Exchange of Shares or ADSs

     A U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss on the sale or exchange of shares or ADSs equal to the difference between the amount realized on such sale or exchange and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares or ADSs. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss. In the case of a non-corporate U.S. Holder, the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to such gain will be lower than the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to ordinary income (other than certain dividends) if such U.S. Holder’s holding period for such shares or ADSs exceeds one year. Gain or loss, if any, recognized by a U.S. Holder generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

     The initial tax basis of shares or ADSs to a U.S. Holder will be the U.S. dollar value of the euro denominated purchase price determined on the date of purchase. If the shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis U.S. Holder (or, if it elects, an accrual basis U.S. Holder) will determine the dollar value of the cost of such shares or ADSs by translating the amount paid at the spot rate of

70


Table of Contents

exchange on the settlement date of the purchase. The conversion of U.S. dollars to euro and the immediate use of that currency to purchase shares or ADSs generally will not result in taxable gain or loss for a U.S. Holder.

     With respect to the sale or exchange of shares or ADSs, the amount realized generally will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined on (i) the date of receipt of payment in the case of a cash basis U.S. Holder and (ii) the date of disposition in the case of an accrual basis U.S. Holder. If the shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis taxpayer (or, if it elects, an accrual basis taxpayer) will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale.

     Subject to the discussion below under “Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting Requirements,” a Non-U.S. Holder of shares or ADSs generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on any gain realized on the sale or exchange of such shares or ADSs unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the United States or (ii) in the case of any gain realized by an individual Non-U.S. Holder, such holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of such sale or exchange and certain other conditions are met.

Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting Requirements

     U.S. backup withholding tax and information reporting requirements generally apply to certain payments to certain noncorporate holders of stock. Information reporting generally will apply to payments of dividends on, and to proceeds from the sale or redemption of, shares or ADSs made within the United States, or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, to a holder of shares or ADSs (other than an “exempt recipient,” including a corporation, a payee that is not a U.S. person that provides an appropriate certification and certain other persons). A payor will be required to withhold backup withholding tax from any payments of dividends on, or the proceeds from the sale or redemption of, shares or ADSs within the United States, or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, to a holder (other than an “exempt recipient”) if such holder fails to furnish its correct taxpayer identification number or otherwise fails to comply with, or establish an exemption from, such backup withholding tax requirements. The backup withholding tax rate is 28 percent through 2010.

     In the case of such payments made within the United States to a foreign simple trust, foreign grantor trust or foreign partnership (other than a payment to a foreign simple trust, foreign grantor trust or foreign partnership that qualifies as a “withholding foreign trust” or a “withholding foreign partnership” within the meaning of the applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations and a payment to a foreign simple trust, foreign grantor trust or foreign partnership that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States), the beneficiaries of the foreign simple trust, the persons treated as the owners of the foreign grantor trust or the partners of the foreign partnership, as the case may be, will be required to provide the certification discussed above in order to establish an exemption from backup withholding tax and information reporting requirements. Moreover, a payer may rely on a certification provided by a payee that is not a U.S. person only if such payer does not have actual knowledge or a reason to know that any information or certification stated in such certificate is incorrect.

     The above description is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs. You should consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation.

Documents on Display

     We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information with the SEC. These materials, including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC in the United States at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains any reports, statements and other information that have been filed electronically with the SEC. We have made electronic filings with the SEC since October 30, 2002. In addition, material submitted by us may be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

71


Table of Contents

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

     The task of Metso’s corporate treasury is to manage financial risks in accordance with the treasury policy reviewed and approved by the board of directors of Metso Corporation, and to safeguard the availability of equity and debt capital under competitive terms. The corporate treasury functions as the counterparty to the operating units, centrally manages external funding and is responsible for the management of financial assets and appropriate hedging measures. Our financial operations are conducted to support business purposes and within the framework of corporate operating policies and guidelines.

     Market risk refers to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in exchange rates, interest rates, and other relevant market prices, such as equity or commodity prices. In order to manage our exposures to market risk, we continually assess our market exposures and attempt to hedge such risks through financial operations to reduce the adverse effects on our profitability.

     Our business units seek to identify the financial risks connected with their business operations and minimize their impact on Metso’s financial results. To control financial risks within limits, we use different derivative and non-derivative instruments, such as forward contracts, currency and interest rate swaps, options and foreign currency denominated balance sheet items. Derivatives are used only to support the underlying businesses (i.e., for hedging purposes only). Currently, we do not hold derivatives for trading (speculative) purposes and we do not use high-risk derivative instruments such as written options on a sole basis or leveraged instruments. For additional information on the derivative financial instruments we use, see Note 26 to our audited consolidated financial statements. Metso meets the criteria for hedge accounting under Finnish GAAP but does not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP.

     We do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, resulting from the use of derivative financial instruments.

     We use sensitivity analysis techniques to measure exchange rate, interest rate, equity price and electricity price risk. The estimated amounts generated from the sensitivity analysis are forward-looking statements of market risk, assuming certain adverse market conditions occur. Actual results in the future may differ materially from the projected results. The method expresses the potential change in future earnings, cash flows or fair values for a specified period resulting from selected hypothetical variations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, equity prices or electricity prices.

Exchange Rates and Foreign Currency Exposure

     In accordance with our treasury policy, under the direction of our corporate treasury department, the business units hedge in full the currency exposures that arise from firm delivery and purchase agreements. In addition, the units can hedge anticipated foreign currency-denominated cash flows by taking into account the significance of such cash flows, the competitive situation and other opportunities to adapt. The business units’ hedging practices are monitored regularly by our corporate treasury department.

     Hedging operations are centralized through Metso’s treasury. Upper limits have been set on the open currency exposures of the corporate treasury, calculated on the basis of their potential profit impact. These limits cover net exposures from transfers between units and items arising from financing activities. Future foreign currency net cash flows are hedged for periods, which do not normally exceed two years. Accordingly, the majority of future cash flows related to the order backlog are hedged.

     We have, to a large extent, hedged our foreign currency denominated net assets of foreign subsidiaries through borrowings, currency derivatives, and to some extent through receivables. As of December 31, 2004, apart from forward foreign exchange contracts, options and currency swaps, we were not a party to any other derivative foreign currency instruments.

     We had hedged approximately 82 percent of our net foreign currency exposure at the end of 2004, arising primarily from long-term contracts, net of any expected matching foreign currency payments. In addition, as of December 31, 2004, we had hedged net of tax effect 48 percent of our Swedish krona, 86 percent of our U.S. dollar and 59 percent of our Canadian dollar denominated net investments in subsidiaries by borrowings and forward exchange contracts.

72


Table of Contents

     Our net gains and losses sustained from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations were approximately a net gain of 8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to a net loss of 3 million and a net loss of 6 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     The basis for the sensitivity analysis to measure foreign exchange risk is an aggregate corporate-level currency exposure, which is composed of future cash flows in foreign currencies. The aggregate foreign exchange transaction exposure is composed of all assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies, excluding those items which have been used to hedge net investments, projected cash flows from firm commitments of both short- and long-term sales and purchase contracts, hedged anticipated cash flows and derivative financial instruments hedging the above items.

     The sensitivity analysis assumes an instantaneous ten percent change in foreign currency rates against the euro from their level as of December 31, 2004, with all other variables held constant. If the euro appreciates or depreciates ten percent against all other currencies, the impact on our cash flows derived from the year-end 2004 net exposure is a corresponding decrease or increase of less than 1 million during future years, compared to approximately 2 million as of December 31, 2003.

     These above assumptions are hypothetical and the actual results may differ substantially from the projected figures.

Interest Rate Risk

     We are exposed to variations in interest rates primarily on euro and U.S. dollar denominated debt and investments, which may cause changes in the values of interest bearing liabilities and assets, which are already in the balance sheet (price risk) and also affect the amounts of future interest income or expenses (reinvestment risk or cash flow risk). To manage interest rate risk, we have set limits for the ratio of floating-rate to fixed-rate loans and the average duration. Interest rate risks can also be managed by interest rate swaps and other derivative contracts.

     We use sensitivity analysis techniques to measure and assess our interest rate risk. The basis for the sensitivity analysis is an aggregate corporate level interest rate exposure, composed of interest bearing investments, interest bearing debts and financial derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, which are used to hedge the above items.

     The sensitivity analysis assumes a one percent (100 basis points) parallel move in interest rates for all maturities from their levels as of December 31, 2004 with all other variables held constant. A one percent move upwards or downwards in all interest rates would lead to a corresponding decrease or increase of approximately 1 million on net interest expenses on the outstanding balances as of December 31, 2004, compared to increase or decrease of 5 million as of December 31, 2003.

Equity Price Risk

     The market value of the shares in publicly traded companies owned by us as of December 31, 2004, was 7 million. If the prices of the shares had decreased by ten percent, the market value of the investments at the end of 2004 would have declined by 1 million in comparison to 2 million at the end of 2003. We have not used any derivative instruments to hedge our equity investments.

Commodity Price Risk

     We are exposed to variations in prices of materials and supplies including energy. To manage risks related to prices of electricity in certain regions, we have since August 2003 used forward contracts to hedge part of these exposures. Hedging is focusing on the estimated energy consumption for the next twelve-month period with some contracts extended to approximately three years.

     We use sensitivity analysis techniques to measure and assess risk on electricity forward contracts. The basis for the sensitivity analysis is the net aggregate amount of energy bought by the forward contracts.

     The sensitivity analysis assumes a ten percent parallel move in electricity price for all maturities from their levels as of December 31, 2004. A ten percent move upwards or downwards in all prices would lead to a corresponding increase or decrease in net assets of approximately 1 million on fair values of electricity forward

73


Table of Contents

contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2004, compared to approximately 1 million as of December 31, 2003.

     Other commodity risks are not managed by using financial instruments.

Item 12.  Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities.

     Not applicable.

74


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 13.  Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.

     None.

Item 14.  Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.

     None.

Item 15.  Controls and Procedures.

     Our president and chief executive officer and our executive vice president and chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2004, have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures cannot be deemed to have been effective to ensure that material information relating to our company was made known to them by others within our company, in light of the errors in our U.S. GAAP reporting discussed below.
     In connection with the preparation of our annual report on Form 20-F, we detected an error in respect of valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets under U.S. GAAP in our 2002 and 2003 financial statements. Under Finnish GAAP, deferred tax assets are not reduced by a valuation allowance unless it is likely that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In this regard, internal projections of future earnings are utilized by management to assess whether the deferred tax assets will be realized. Under U.S. GAAP, the determination of the amount of a valuation allowance is based on the weight of all available evidence, both positive and negative. However, it does require that generally a valuation allowance is needed when there is negative evidence, such as cumulative losses for recent years, as is the case in our situation. Projections of future taxable income will generally not be sufficient to overcome the negative evidence of cumulative losses. As a result, internal projections normally would not be assigned any significant weight in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. Consequently, we have restated our net income under U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 to reflect the impact of the adjustments made to our deferred tax asset valuation allowances recorded in 2002 and 2003. These adjustments would result in a full valuation allowance in relation to our U.S. operations for both periods. As a result, our restated U.S. GAAP income statement under net income reflects additional expense of 91 million ( 0.67 per share) in 2002 and additional income in 2003 of 28 million ( 0.20 per share).
     In addition, in 2004, in conjunction with our transition to IFRS, we undertook a complete review of our defined pension benefit liability under IAS 19. In the course of this review, we detected weaknesses in our controls in our application of actuarial pension data that caused us to omit from our U.S. GAAP adjustment related to pensions certain liabilities in connection with our acquisition of Svedala in 2001. Specifically, in connection with the calculation of the purchase accounting adjustment of pension liabilities under U.S. GAAP arising from our acquisition of Svedala, we made an error in comparing the relevant pension liability amount under U.S. GAAP to the corresponding pension liability under Finnish GAAP. Because we did not compare the relevant pension liability amount under U.S. GAAP to the correct amount under Finnish GAAP, we understated our pension liability by 26 million, net of tax effect of 10 million, under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, our 2001, 2002 and 2003 financial statements, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, were required to be restated to reflect the impact of adjustments made to our pension liabilities combined with the increase in goodwill from the Svedala acquisition in 2001. After consideration of the additional goodwill, our impairment charge in 2003, under U.S. GAAP, would have been increased. As a result, our restated U.S. GAAP income statement reflects an additional impairment loss of 18 million in 2003 ( 0.13 additional loss per share).
     While we still need to improve our understanding of U.S. GAAP, we had previously begun to implement procedures to review our controls related to our reporting of U.S. GAAP information, including the accounting for valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets and pension benefits. Our management, at the direction of our board of directors, continues to actively work to improve the control environment and to implement specific controls and procedures to improve our understanding of U.S. GAAP and to ensure the integrity of our reporting in relation to U.S. GAAP. To address these control issues, we have begun to expand our control procedures to include additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure that our disclosure controls and procedures are adequate in relation to the preparation of our financial statements. In this regard, we now prepare a full U.S. GAAP balance sheet as part of our reconciliation process from our Finnish GAAP balance sheet to U.S. GAAP. We believe that the preparation of a balance sheet under U.S. GAAP on an annual basis will assist in remedying the errors that we have made in performing the required U.S. GAAP reconciliation. In addition, we have begun implementing training relating to enhancing and improving the level of knowledge of U.S. GAAP at each of our significant operating subsidiaries as well as at our corporate office. Although we continue to improve these controls by implementing new processes related to our U.S. GAAP reporting, we believe that we still need to improve our understanding of U.S. GAAP and its applications. We believe that our understanding of U.S. GAAP will improve as part of our transition process from Finnish GAAP to IFRS, which will be completed in 2005. In addition, we continue to analyze our internal controls in order to improve our process of reporting in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
     There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of such controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their controls objectives. Acknowledging this, we have designed our disclosure controls and procedures to provide such reasonable assurance.
     Other than as discussed above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

75


Table of Contents

Item 16.  [Reserved]

Item 16A.  Audit Committee Financial Expert.

     Our board of directors has determined that Ms. Satu Huber is an audit committee financial expert as defined in the instructions to Item 16A of Form 20-F. Both other members of the audit committee, Ms. Maija-Liisa Friman and Mr. Jaakko Rauramo, are independent directors as defined in Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange’s Listed Company Manual.

Item 16B.  Code of Ethics.

     In 2002, we adopted a code of ethics that applies to our president and chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our principal accounting officer. The code of ethics can be viewed on our Internet pages at www.metso.com -> About us -> Values -> Ethical Principles.

Item 16C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

     PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy has served as Metso’s independent public auditor for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, for which audited financial statements appear in this annual report on Form 20-F. The auditor is elected annually by the annual general meeting of our shareholders. During the financial years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, we incurred aggregate expenses of 2.8 million and 3.1 million, respectively, for services rendered by our principal auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers for the audit of our annual financial statements and services rendered in connection with statutory and regulatory filings including the review of documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees

     During the financial years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, we incurred aggregate expenses of 1.3 million and 1.5 million, respectively, for services rendered by our principal auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers for assurance and related services. Audit-related fees consist of fees incurred for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the external auditor, and include consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards; internal control reviews; advice and assistance in connection with local statutory accounting requirements; due diligence reviews related to acquisitions; and employee benefit plan audits and reviews; and miscellaneous reports in connection with grant applications.

Tax Fees

     During the financial years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, we incurred aggregate expenses of 2.7 million and 1.5 million, respectively, for tax services rendered by our principal auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers. Tax fees include fees incurred for tax compliance services, including the preparation of original and amended tax returns and claims for refund; tax consultations, such as assistance in connection with tax audits, tax advice related to mergers and acquisition, transfer pricing, and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities; tax planning services; and expatriate tax compliance, consultation and planning services.

All Other Fees

     During the financial year ended December 31, 2004, we incurred aggregate expenses of 0.1 million for services rendered by our principal auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers for occasional training services. There were no such fees incurred in 2003.

76


Table of Contents

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

     The audit committee has adopted a policy requiring pre-approval of audit, audit-related, tax and other non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. Under this policy, the audit committee shall annually pre-approve an audit plan containing the types of services to be performed by our principal auditor, including an estimate of fees grouped by the type of service, based on a schedule prepared together by Metso and our principal auditor. The appendices to the policy set out the services that have been pre-approved by the audit committee without specific advance consideration, subject to an annual review.

     Any proposed engagement that does not fit within the definition of a pre-approved service may be presented to the audit committee for consideration at its next meeting. The audit committee has also delegated to the chair of the audit committee the authority to pre-approve audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by Company’s independent auditors provided that the chair shall report any decisions to pre-approve such services and fees to the full audit committee at its next regular meeting.

     All of the services described in “Audit-Related Fees, “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees,” were approved by the audit committee in accordance with the Company’s formal policy on auditor independence.

Item 16D.  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees.

     Not applicable.

Item 16E.  Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.

     No equity securities were purchased by the issuer or affiliated purchasers during 2004.

PART III

Item 17.  Financial Statements.

     Not applicable.

Item 18.  Financial Statements.

     See financial statements beginning on page F-1.

77


Table of Contents

Item 19.  Exhibits

     Documents filed as exhibits to this annual report:

1.1   Articles of Association of Metso.*
 
2.1   Not applicable.**
 
4.1   Service contract for Jorma Eloranta, president and chief executive officer of Metso Corporation, dated November 30, 2003.***
 
6.1   See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for information on how earnings per share information was calculated.
 
8.1   List of Subsidiaries.****
 
12.1   Certification of Jorma Eloranta, president and chief executive officer of Metso Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
12.2   Certification of Olli Vaartimo, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Metso Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
13.1   Certification of Jorma Eloranta, president and chief executive officer of Metso Corporation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
13.2   Certification of Olli Vaartimo, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Metso Corporation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*   Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the SEC on April 17, 2003.
 
**   The total amount of long-term debt securities authorized under any instrument does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of the Group on a consolidated basis.
 
***   Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2004.
 
****   Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2005.

78


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

         
     Date: October 17, 2005   METSO CORPORATION



 
 
  By:   /s/         JORMA ELORANTA    
    Name:   Jorma Eloranta   
    Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer   
 



     
  By:   /s/         OLLI VAARTIMO    
    Name:   Olli Vaartimo   
    Title:   Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 
 
 

79


Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF METSO CORPORATION

     
    Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
  F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004
  F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
  F-7
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
  F-9
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
  F-10

F-1


Table of Contents

METSO

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Metso Corporation:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, of cash flows and of changes in shareholders’ equity present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Metso Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Finland. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and the standards generally accepted in Finland. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Accounting principles generally accepted in Finland vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 30, as restated, to the consolidated financial statements.

Helsinki, Finland
March 30, 2005

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy
Authorized Public Accountants

F-2


Table of Contents

METSO

Consolidated Statements of Income
(in millions, except for per share amounts)

                                 
            Year ended December 31,  
    Note     2002     2003     2004  
                     
 
                               
Net sales
            4,691       4,250       3,976  
 
                               
Cost of goods sold
    3,5       (3,425 )     (3,211 )     (2,959 )
 
                         
 
                               
Gross profit
            1,266       1,039       1,017  
 
                               
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    2,3,5       (1,015 )     (906 )     (844 )
Nonrecurring operating income and expenses, net
    4, 9       (27 )     (106 )     (25 )
Goodwill impairment
    11             (205 )      
Amortization of goodwill
    5,11       (57 )     (51 )     (37 )
 
                         
Operating profit (loss)
            167       (229 )     111  
 
                               
Financial income and expenses, net
    6       (74 )     (74 )     (62 )
Share of profits of associated companies
    7       0       0       0  
 
                         
 
                               
Income (loss) before extraordinary items and income taxes
            93       (303 )     49  
 
                               
Extraordinary items
                         
 
                         
 
                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
            93       (303 )     49  
 
                               
Income taxes
    8       (26 )     44       21  
Minority interests
            (2 )     1       (1 )
 
                         
 
                               
Net income (loss)
            65       (258 )     69  
 
                         
 
                               
Earnings (loss) per share
    10       0.48       (1.89 )     0.51  
 
                         

The accompanying Notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3


Table of Contents

METSO

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions)

                         
            As of December 31,  
    Note     2003     2004  
                 
ASSETS
                       
 
                       
Fixed assets and financial assets
                       
Intangible assets
    11                  
Goodwill
            623       458  
Other intangible assets
            137       104  
 
                   
 
            760       562  
 
                   
Tangible assets
    11,12                  
Land and water areas
            80       65  
Buildings
            329       257  
Machinery and equipment
            336       283  
Other tangible assets
            28       17  
Assets under construction
            37       19  
 
                   
 
            810       641  
 
                   
Financial assets
                       
Shareholdings and other securities
    13       44       27  
Own shares
    13       1       1  
Loan and other receivables
    16       37       54  
Accounts receivable
    16       2       7  
Other long-term investments
    14,16       10       4  
 
                   
 
            94       93  
 
                   
Total fixed and financial assets
            1,664       1,296  
 
                   
 
                       
Current assets
                       
Inventories
                       
Materials and supplies
            169       150  
Work in process
            275       316  
Finished products
            299       221  
 
                   
 
            743       687  
 
                   
Receivables
    16                  
Accounts receivable
            719       651  
Costs and earnings of projects under construction in excess of billings
    15       269       191  
Loans receivable
            5       5  
Accrued income and prepaid expenses
            88       86  
Deferred tax asset
    8       145       187  
Other receivables
            53       52  
Other short-term investments
            7       4  
 
                   
 
            1,286       1,176  
 
                   
Cash and cash equivalents
            130       419  
 
                   
Total current assets
            2,159       2,282  
 
                   
 
                       
Total assets
            3,823       3,578  
 
                   

The accompanying Notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4


Table of Contents

METSO

Consolidated Balance Sheets ¾ Continued
(in millions)

                         
            As of December 31,  
    Note     2003     2004  
                 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
                       
 
                       
Shareholders’ equity
    17                  
Share capital
            232       232  
Share premium reserve
            14       14  
Legal reserve
            228       228  
Cumulative translation differences
            (76 )     (80 )
Reserve for own shares
            1       1  
Other reserves
            202       202  
Retained earnings
            681       386  
Net income (loss) for the financial year
            (258 )     69  
 
                   
 
                       
Total shareholders’ equity
            1,024       1,052  
 
                   
 
                       
Minority interests
            6       5  
 
                   
 
                       
Mortgages and contingent liabilities
    23              
 
                   
 
                       
Liabilities
                       
Long-term debt
    18                  
Bonds
            695       746  
Loans from financial institutions
            183       107  
Pension loans
            29       5  
Other long-term debt
            50       62  
 
                   
 
            957       920  
 
                   
 
                       
Other long-term liabilities
                       
Accrued expenses
    19,22       134       122  
Deferred tax liability
    8       22       8  
Other long-term loans
            5       6  
 
                   
 
            161       136  
 
                   

The accompanying Notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5


Table of Contents

METSO

Consolidated Balance Sheets ¾ Continued
(in millions)

                         
            As of December 31,  
    Note     2003     2004  
                 
Current liabilities
                       
Current portion of long-term debt
            17       19  
Other interest bearing short-term debt
    20       295       31  
Advances received
            147       219  
Accounts payable
            282       296  
Billings in excess of costs and earnings of projects under construction
    15       41       124  
Accrued expenses and deferred income
    21,22       818       719  
Other current liabilities
            75       57  
 
                   
 
            1,675       1,465  
 
                   
 
                       
Total liabilities
            2,793       2,521  
 
                   
 
                       
Total shareholders’ equity and liabilities
            3,823       3,578  
 
                   

The accompanying Notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6


Table of Contents

METSO

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
             
Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
Net income (loss)
    65       (258 )     69  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    197       183       155  
Efficiency improvement programs:
                       
Provisions, including usage of previous year provision
          60       (31 )
Asset write-downs
          25       10  
Impairment of goodwill
          205        
Gain on sale of fixed assets
    (7 )     0       (13 )
(Gain) loss on sale of subsidiaries and associated companies
    (1 )     (12 )     18  
Gain on sale of marketable securities
    (7 )     (3 )     (9 )
Share of profits and losses of associated companies
    (1 )     (2 )     (4 )
Change in deferred taxes(1)
    27       (65 )     (51 )
Other non-cash items(2)
    28       23       56  
Change in net working capital, net of effect from business acquisitions and disposals(1)
    (49 )     (10 )     62  
 
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    252       146       262  
 
                       
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
Capital expenditures on fixed assets
    (191 )     (128 )     (89 )
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
    33       14       39  
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
    (1 )     (2 )     (2 )
Investments in associated companies
    (1 )           (1 )
Proceeds from sale of subsidiaries and associated companies, net of cash sold
    38       31       390  
Proceeds from sale of shares and marketable securities
    110       6       34  
Investments in shares and marketable securities
    (2 )     (1 )     (7 )
Other items
                (5 )
 
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (14 )     (80 )     359  
 
                       
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
Dividends paid
    (82 )     (82 )     (27 )
Hedging of net investment in foreign subsidiaries
          12       11  
Net borrowings (payments) on short-term debt
    (50 )     17       (258 )
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
    200       110       180  
Principal payments of long-term debt
    (311 )     (171 )     (234 )
Notes receivable issued
    (4 )     (8 )     (5 )
Proceeds from payments on notes receivable
    14       2       6  
Other items
    0       (1 )     (6 )
 
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (233 )     (121 )     (333 )
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
    (27 )     (5 )     1  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (22 )     (60 )     289  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    212       190       130  
 
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
    190       130       419  
 
                 


(1)   Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
 
(2)   In the year ended December 31, 2004 Other non-cash items include 15 million of bad debt expense related to Papiers Gaspésia.

The accompanying Notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Table of Contents

METSO

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Continued
(in millions)

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
             
Change in net working capital, net of effect from business acquisitions and disposals(1):
                       
(Increase) decrease in assets and increase (decrease) in liabilities:
                       
Inventory
    24       23       (129 )
Receivables
    183       70       (61 )
Other assets
    (25 )     86       (26 )
Percentage of completion: recognized assets and liabilities, net
    (71 )     (140 )     113  
Accounts payable
    (46 )     (26 )     74  
Accrued liabilities
    (86 )     (34 )     17  
Other liabilities
    (28 )     11       74  
 
                 
Total
    (49 )     (10 )     62  
 
                 
 
                       
Supplemental cash flow information
                       
 
                       
Acquisition of businesses:
                       
Intangible assets
    0             1  
Tangible assets
    1              
Goodwill
    4       0       1  
Current assets, other than cash
    2             1  
Minority interests
    0       2        
Liabilities assumed
    (6 )           (1 )
 
                 
Total, net of cash acquired
    1       2       2  
 
                 
 
                       
Disposals of businesses:
                       
Intangible assets
    0       1       35  
Tangible assets
    13       4       67  
Goodwill
    15       0       120  
Current assets, other than cash
    28       38       334  
Minority interests
                (1 )
Liabilities sold
    (19 )     (24 )     (147 )
Gain (loss) on sale
    1       12       (18 )
 
                 
Total, net of cash sold
    38       31       390  
 
                 
 
                       
Revolving credit facility activity:
                       
Borrowings
    1,409       398       50  
Payments
    1,513       426       116  
 
                       
Cash paid (received) during the year for:
                       
Interest
    83       69       60  
Income taxes(2)
    57       (6 )     31  
 
                       
Non-cash exchange of bonds:
                       
New bonds issued
                274  
Bonds redeemed
                256  


(1)   Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
 
(2)   Includes cash receipt of 30 million related to income tax benefit realized for the goodwill impairment for the year ended December 31, 2003.

The accompanying Notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8


Table of Contents

METSO

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
(in millions, unless otherwise indicated)

                                                                         
    Number of             Share             Cumulative     Reserve                    
    shares     Share     premium     Legal     translation     for own     Other     Retained        
    (thousands)     capital     reserve     reserve     differences     shares     reserves     earnings     Total  
                                         
 
                                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2001
    136,251       232       14       221       25       1       202       774       1,469  
 
                                                                       
Dividends
                                              (82 )     (82 )
Translation differences
                            (85 )                       (85 )
Other
                      6                         6       12  
Net income
                                              65       65  
 
                                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2002
    136,251       232       14       227       (60 )     1       202       763       1,379  
 
                                                                       
Dividends
                                              (82 )     (82 )
Translation differences
                            (16 )                       (16 )
Other
                      1                         0       1  
Net income (loss)
                                              (258 )     (258 )
 
                                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2003
    136,251       232       14       228       (76 )     1       202       423       1,024  
 
                                                                       
Dividends
                                              (27 )     (27 )
Translation differences
                            (12 )                       (12 )
Transfer of translation differences
                            8                   (8 )     0  
Other
                                              (2 )     (2 )
Net income
                                              69       69  
 
                                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2004
    136,251       232       14       228       (80 )     1       202       455       1,052  

The accompanying Notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9


Table of Contents

METSO
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Accounting Principles

  Description of businesses

     Metso is a multinational engineering company, which designs, develops and produces systems, automation solutions, machinery and equipment for process industries. The main customer industries are the pulp and paper, mining, construction and civil engineering as well as energy and chemical industries. Metso’s operations are divided into four business areas: Metso Paper, Metso Minerals, Metso Automation and Metso Ventures. Metso Ventures is comprised of Metso Panelboard, Metso Drives, Foundries, Metso Powdermet and Valmet Automotive.

     In January 2004, Metso divested its Converting group to a Swiss company, Bobst Group. In June 2004, Metso divested the Dynapac compaction and paving equipment group, previously part of Metso Minerals, to Altor, a Nordic private equity investor. In December 2004, Metso divested the Reedrill rock drilling equipment business, previously part of Metso Minerals, to the U.S. company Terex Corporation. Divested businesses mentioned above have been transferred under Discontinued Operations.

  Basis of presentation

     The consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with Finnish generally accepted accounting principles (“Finnish GAAP”), include the financial statements of Metso Corporation (the “Parent Company”) and its subsidiaries (together with the Parent Company, “Metso” or the “Company”). Metso Corporation was formed in 1999 as a result of the merger of Rauma Corporation (“Rauma”) and Valmet Corporation (“Valmet”). The merger was consummated on July 1, 1999 and is accounted for by the pooling-of-interests method.

     The financial statements are presented in millions of euros (“”), except for share and per share amounts.

  Use of estimates

     The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with Finnish GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

  Accounting convention

     The financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention.

  Principles of consolidation

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent Company and each of those companies in which it owns, directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, over 50 percent of the voting rights. The companies acquired during the financial period have been consolidated from the date that Metso acquired control. Subsidiaries sold have been included up to their date of disposal.

     All intercompany transactions are eliminated as part of the consolidation process. Minority interests are presented separately before net income. They are also shown separately from shareholders’ equity and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

     Acquisitions of companies are accounted for using the purchase method. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase cost over the book value of the net assets of the acquired companies. A portion of the goodwill is allocated to fixed assets, which are depreciated over their useful lives. The remaining goodwill arising from acquisitions is amortized over a period not to exceed twenty years. Deferred credit (negative goodwill) represents the excess of net assets of acquired companies over the purchase cost. Deferred credit arising from acquisitions is allocated to reduce the acquired fixed assets.

     The equity method of accounting is used for investments in associated companies in which the investment provides Metso the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee company. Such influence is presumed to exist for investments in companies in which Metso’s

F-10


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

direct or indirect ownership is between 20 and 50 percent. Under the equity method, the share of profits and losses of associated companies is included in the consolidated statements of income. The share of the result of associated companies, the activity of which is closely connected with the business areas of Metso, is recorded in other income and expenses, net. Metso’s share of post-acquisition retained profits and losses of associated companies is reported as part of investments in associated companies in the consolidated balance sheets.

     Other shareholdings and securities (voting rights less than 20 percent) are stated at cost and dividends received are included in the statements of income; a write-down is made where it is deemed necessary to reduce the cost to estimated net realizable value.

  Foreign currency translation

     Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing at the date of the transactions. At the end of the accounting period, unsettled foreign currency transaction balances are valued at the rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Trade flow related foreign currency exchange gains and losses are treated as adjustments to sales and purchases. Foreign exchange gains and losses associated with financing are entered as a net amount under financial income and expenses.

     The statements of income of foreign subsidiaries (i.e., outside the euro area) are translated into euro at the average exchange rates for the financial year and the balance sheets are translated at the exchange rate of the balance sheet date. The resulting translation differences are recorded directly to equity. When Metso hedges the equity of its foreign subsidiaries with foreign currency loans and with financial derivatives, the translation difference is adjusted by the currency effect of hedging instruments and recorded in equity, net of taxes.

  Derivative financial instruments

     Metso uses a variety of derivative financial instruments, mainly forward exchange contracts, and a limited number of interest rate, currency and cross-currency swaps as well as currency options, interest rate futures and commodity contracts, as part of an overall risk management policy. These instruments are used to reduce the foreign currency and interest rate risks relating to existing assets, liabilities, firm commitments, forecasted sales and estimated consumption of raw materials.

     Metso does not hold nor issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

     Metso uses principally forward exchange contracts to hedge the currency risk on certain commercial assets (receivables) and liabilities (payables) and firm commitments (orders). The derivatives are designated at inception as a hedge with respect to the hedged item or group of items with similar characteristics. If a derivative has been contracted to close or reduce net exposure to a certain currency or group of currencies, it is fair valued quarterly and the arising variation in fair values is recognized in the consolidated statements of income.

     Currency options are used to hedge forecasted sales. Options are recorded at fair value.

     Metso hedges its net foreign investments in certain currencies to reduce the effect of exchange rate fluctuations. The hedging instruments are mainly foreign currency loans and forward exchange contracts, and to some extent cross-currency swaps. Both realized and unrealized exchange gains and losses measured on these instruments are recorded, net of taxes, in a separate component of equity against the translation differences arising from consolidation to the extent that these hedges are effective.

     Currency and cross-currency swaps are used to hedge foreign currency denominated loans. The translation differences arising from the derivative instruments are recorded concurrently with the translation difference of the underlying loans. Interest expense and income, net is recognized as incurred.

     Metso’s exposure to interest rate risk, arising from interest bearing receivables and loans, is managed through interest rate swaps and interest rate futures. The net of interest payable and receivable on the swaps is accrued and recorded in interest and other financial expenses to match the interest income/expense on the related underlying hedged items. Realized gains and losses occurring from early termination of contracts are recorded in income over the remaining period of the original swap agreement.

F-11


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     If the interest leg of a cross-currency swap or an interest swap has not been designated as a hedge of an underlying item at its inception, the interest portion of the swaps is recorded at fair value. Interest rate futures are fair valued quarterly and the change in fair value is recognized in financial income and expenses, net.

     Metso has entered into electricity futures to reduce the effects of the volatility of the electricity prices of its units located in Finland. The unrealized gains and losses of the contracts are deferred and recognized concurrently with the underlying consumption at the maturity date of the related contracts.

  Other long-term investments

     Marketable debt securities, e.g., bonds, commercial papers and time deposits are included in other long-term investments when their maturity, at the time of their inception, exceeds one year. The unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities are deferred and recognized in income when realized either at disposal or at maturity.

  Capitalization of costs related to exchange of debt instruments

     Costs and fees arising from exchange of debt instruments are capitalized and amortized over the remaining period of the modified liability provided the new conditions obtained through the exchange do not substantially differ from those of the original debt. The assessment of whether the conditions are substantially different is based on a comparison of the discounted present value of the cash flows under the new terms and the present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial liability. Should the difference be less than ten percent, the conditions are not considered to be substantially different and the costs and fees are capitalized.

  Revenue recognition

     Revenues from goods and services sold are recognized, net of sales taxes, discounts and foreign exchange differences, when substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer, or when legal title of the goods and responsibility for shipment has transferred to the buyer. The transfer of risk takes place either when the goods are shipped or made available to the buyer for shipment, depending on the delivery clause of the contract. The credit worthiness of the buyer is verified before engaging into a sale. However, should a risk of non-payment arise after revenue recognition, a provision for non collectibility risk is established.

     Percentage-of-completion method: Sales and anticipated profits under significant long-term engineering and construction contracts are recorded on a percentage-of-completion basis. The measurement is done either by units of delivery, which are based on predetermined milestones and on the realized value added (contract value of the work performed to date) or by the cost-to-cost method of accounting. Estimated contract profits are recorded in earnings in proportion to recorded sales. In the cost-to-cost method, sales and profits are recorded after considering the ratio of accumulated costs to estimated total costs to complete each contract. In certain cases, subcontractor materials, labour and equipment, are included in sales and costs of goods sold when management believes that Metso is responsible for the ultimate acceptability of the project. Changes to total estimated contract costs and losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined.

     Sales with repurchase commitments are recognized at the time of the delivery and the commitment is included in contingent liabilities.

     Trade-ins: Sales, against which trade-ins are accepted, are recorded at contract price. Any reduction between the agreed trade-in price and its recorded value in the inventory is recognized in cost of goods sold concurrently with the sale.

  Shipping and handling costs

     The Company includes shipping fees billed to customers in revenues and shipping costs incurred in cost of sales.

  Advertising costs

     Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

F-12


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

  Research and development

     Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs comprise salaries, administration costs, depreciation and amortization of tangible and intangible fixed assets.

  Maintenance, repair and renewals

     Maintenance, repairs and renewals are charged to expense as incurred. However, major betterments are capitalized and depreciated over their expected useful lives.

  Pensions and coverage of pension liabilities

     The companies within Metso have various pension schemes in accordance with the local conditions and practices in the countries in which they operate. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or to trustee-administered funds as determined by periodic actuarial calculations. Metso has met local minimum funding requirements for the countries in which it maintains pension schemes. Metso’s contributions to defined contribution plans and to multi-employer and insured plans are charged to the income statement concurrently with the payment obligations.

  Fixed assets and long-term investments

     Intangible and tangible assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Land and water areas are not depreciated.

     Depreciation and amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives of the assets as follows:

         
Buildings
  15 – 40 years
Machinery and equipment
  3 – 20 years
Other tangible assets
  5 – 20 years
Intangibles, other than goodwill and trade names
  3 – 12 years
Trade names
  20 years
Goodwill
  5 – 20 years

     Impairments of fixed assets and capital gains and losses on the disposal of fixed assets are included in operating profit (loss) or in extraordinary items depending on the nature of the event.

     Goodwill arising from strategic business acquisitions is amortized over 20 years. The acquisition of Svedala in 2001 has been classified as strategic and the goodwill arising from it is being amortized over 20 years.

     Metso reviews long-lived assets and certain intangibles, other than goodwill, to be held and used by the company for impairment whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

     The carrying value of goodwill for each business area is reviewed annually or, more frequently, if the facts and circumstances, such as declines in sales, operating profit or cash flows or material adverse changes in the business climate, suggest that its carrying value may not be recoverable. The testing is performed at the reporting unit level, which in Metso is one level below the segment level. The annual testing may be waived if there has not been significant changes to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, if in the previous testing the fair value clearly exceeded the carrying values tested, and if the likelihood that the current fair value would be less than the current carrying value of the reporting unit is remote. Metso uses discounted cash flow analysis to assess the fair value of goodwill.

  Capitalization of interest expenses

     The interest expenses of self-constructed investments are capitalized in Metso’s financial statements. The capitalized interest expense is amortized over the estimated useful life of the underlying asset.

F-13


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

  Revaluation of fixed assets

     Fixed assets are stated at historical acquisition price reduced by accumulated depreciation. Revaluations are not permitted.

  Leasing

     Rental expenses for operating leases are expensed as incurred. Acquisitions of property and equipment under capital lease arrangements are recorded in fixed assets and depreciated over their expected useful lives.

  Own shares (treasury stock)

     Own shares held by Metso are valued at reacquisition price in a separate caption under financial assets. Own shares have been deducted from the number of shares outstanding and the share capital for the calculation of per share and other performance related indicators.

  Cash and cash equivalents

     Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and other liquid investments with a maturity of ninety days or less.

  Inventories

     Inventories are stated at the lower of historical cost calculated on an “average cost” basis or net realizable value. Historical costs include purchase costs as well as transportation and processing costs. The costs of finished goods include direct materials, wages and salaries plus social costs, subcontracting and other direct costs. In addition, production costs include an allocable portion of production and project administration overheads. Net realizable value is the estimated amount that can be realized from the sale of the asset in the normal course of business after allowing for the costs of realization.

     Inventories are shown net of a reserve for obsolete and slow-moving inventories. A reserve is established and a corresponding charge is taken to income in the period in which the loss occurs based upon an assessment of technological obsolescence, turnover and related factors.

     Trade-in equipment received is recorded as inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

  Accounts receivable and securitization

     Accounts receivable are recognized at original invoice amount to customers net of allowance for doubtful receivables. The allowance is recorded on the basis of periodic reviews of potential non-recovery of receivables by taking into consideration individual customer credit risk, economic trends in customer industries and changes in payment terms. Bad debts are written off when official announcement of receivership, liquidation or bankruptcy is received confirming that the receivable will not be honoured. If extended payment terms, exceeding two years, are offered to customers, the invoice amount is discounted to its present value and interest income is recognized over the credit term.

     Metso sells certain receivables through arrangements with third party financial institutions. If specific criteria are met, including legal isolation from the Company, these receivables are removed from Metso’s books, and a gain or loss on sale of the receivables is recorded.

  Nonrecurring operating income and expenses

     Nonrecurring operating income and expenses include restructuring and reorganization costs which have either been realized or planned and to which the management is committed, and other major one-time operating income and expenses.

  Extraordinary items

     Extraordinary items, net of taxes, include significant unusual income and expenses not resulting from the ordinary course of business operations.

F-14


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

  Equity share of untaxed reserves

     In Finland and certain other countries, companies are permitted to reduce or increase taxable income by adjustments to untaxed reserve accounts, provided that such amounts are reflected in the company’s financial statements. Such amounts are included, net of taxes, in other shareholders’ equity in the consolidated accounts.

  Warranty

     An accrual is made for expected warranty costs. The adequacy of this accrual is reviewed periodically based on an analysis of historical experience and anticipated probable warranty liabilities.

  Restructuring costs

     A provision for restructuring is recognized only after management has developed and approved a formal plan to which it has committed. The costs included in a provision for restructuring are those costs that are either incremental and incurred as a direct result of the plan or are the result of a continuing contractual obligation with no continuing economic benefit to Metso or a penalty incurred to cancel the contractual obligation. Restructuring costs also include other costs incurred as a result of the plan, which are recorded separately under nonrecurring income and expenses, such as asset write-downs, environmental liabilities and costs to transfer operations to new locations.

  Environmental remediation costs

     Metso accrues for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility study. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable.

  Income taxes

     Income taxes presented in the income statement consist of current and deferred taxes. Current taxes include estimated taxes corresponding to the results for the financial year of the companies, and adjustments of taxes for previous years.

     A deferred tax liability or asset has been determined for all temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their amounts in financial reporting, using the enacted tax rates effective for the future years. The deferred tax liabilities are recognized in the balance sheet in full, and the deferred tax assets at their estimated realizable amounts. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence including internal projections of future earnings, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

     No deferred tax liability has been recognized for undistributed earnings of domestic subsidiaries (i.e., Finnish) since such earnings can be transferred to the Parent Company without tax consequences. Metso does not provide deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, except in situations where Metso has elected to distribute earnings of foreign subsidiaries.

  Earnings per share

     Earnings per share is based on income before extraordinary items and income taxes adjusted for minority interests and taxes related to normal business operations. The amount is divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. The average number of own shares has been deducted from the number of outstanding shares.

     The diluted earnings per share have been computed by applying the “treasury stock” method, under which earnings per share data is computed as if the warrants and options were exercised at the beginning of the period, or on the issuance of, if later, and as if the funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. In addition to the weighted average number of shares outstanding,

F-15


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

the denominator includes the incremental shares obtained through the assumed exercise of the warrants and options.

     The assumption of exercise is not reflected in earnings per share when the exercise price of the warrants and options exceeds the average market price of the common stock during the period. The warrants and options have a dilutive effect only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the warrants and options.

Note 2. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

     Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of the following:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Marketing and selling expenses
    548       492       481  
Research and development expenses, net(1)
    146       126       103  
Administrative expenses
    341       299       278  
Other income
    (26 )     (17 )     (25 )
Other expenses
    6       6       7  
 
                 
Total
    1,015       906       844  
 
                 


(1)   Research and development expenses are presented net of grants received of 8 million, 7 million and 8 million and net of capitalized investments of 13 million, 7 million and 4 million and include depreciation of 11 million, 11 million and 10 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

F-16


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 3. Personnel Expenses and Number of Personnel

     Information regarding personnel expenses and number of personnel is as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Salaries to the members of Boards of Directors and Managing Directors of group companies
    14       13       10  
Other wages and salaries
    1,062       951       871  
Pension costs
    112       104       104  
Other indirect employee costs
    183       173       152  
 
                 
Total
    1,371       1,241       1,137  
 
                 
                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
Number of personnel:
                       
Personnel, average
    29,258       27,400       24,363  
Personnel, at end of year
    28,489       26,240       22,802  

Note 4. Nonrecurring Operating Income and Expenses

     Nonrecurring operating income and expenses consist of the following:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Gain on sale of businesses
          12       2  
Gain on sale of listed and other shares
    8       3       7  
Other income
                3  
 
                 
Nonrecurring operating income, total
    8       15       12  
 
                       
Restructuring expenses(1)
    (28 )     (108 )     (17 )
Loss on sale of businesses
                (20 )
Other expenses
    (7 )     (13 )     (0 )
 
                 
Nonrecurring operating expenses, total
    (35 )     (121 )     (37 )
 
                 
Nonrecurring operating income and expenses, net
    (27 )     (106 )     (25 )
 
                 


(1)   For additional information on restructuring expenses, see also Note 9.

F-17


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 5. Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of the following:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Intangible assets
                       
Goodwill
    57       51       37  
Other intangible assets
    19       16       16  
Tangible assets
                       
Buildings
    26       25       24  
Machinery and equipment
    87       84       72  
Other tangible assets
    8       7       6  
 
                 
Total
    197       183       155  
 
                 

     Depreciation and amortization charged against operations by activity are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Cost of goods sold
    83       82       71  
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses
                       
Marketing and selling
    12       8       8  
Research and development
    11       11       10  
Administrative
    34       31       29  
Goodwill
    57       51       37  
 
                 
Total
    197       183       155  
 
                 

Note 6. Financial Income and Expenses, net

     The following table provides a summary of financial income and expenses:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Financial income
                       
Dividends received
    7       4       3  
Interest income
    11       7       8  
Other financial income
    3       1       1  
Net gain (loss) from foreign exchange
    (4 )     (4 )     (2 )
 
                 
Financial income total
    17       8       10  
 
                 
 
                       
Financial expenses
                       
Interest expenses
    (87 )     (73 )     (63 )
Other financial expenses
    (4 )     (9 )     (9 )
 
                 
Financial expenses total
    (91 )     (82 )     (72 )
 
                 
 
                       
Financial income and expenses, net
    (74 )     (74 )     (62 )
 
                 

F-18


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 7. Investments in Associated Companies

     In addition to information provided below for investments in associated companies, see also Note 13.

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Dividends received
    0       0       0  
Share of profits or losses in associated companies
    1       2       4  
Equity value of investments in associated companies
    14       15       17  

Note 8. Income Taxes

     The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before extraordinary items and income taxes are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Finland
    103       (48 )     (8 )
Other countries
    (10 )     (255 )     57  
 
                 
Total
    93       (303 )     49  
 
                 

     The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Current taxes
                       
Finland
    (18 )     (12 )     (6 )
Other countries
    17       33       35  
 
                 
 
    (1 )     21       29  
 
                 
 
                       
Deferred taxes
                       
Finland
    22       (53 )     (44 )
Other countries
    5       (12 )     (6 )
 
                 
 
    27       (65 )     (50 )
 
                 
 
                       
Income tax expense (benefit)
    26       (44 )     (21 )
 
                 

F-19


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     The Finnish corporate income tax rate was 29% for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. As of January 1, 2005, the enacted rate was reduced to 26%, thus impacting the deferred tax amounts presented in below table for the year ended December 31, 2004. The differences between income tax expense (benefit) computed at Finnish statutory rates and income tax expense (benefit) provided on earnings are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Income tax expense (benefit) at Finnish statutory rate
    27       (88 )     14  
Income tax for prior years
    (9 )     (3 )     (4 )
Write-down of subsidiary shares(1)
    (29 )     (53 )     (53 )
Temporary differences for which no deferred tax has been provided
    2       (3 )     0  
Benefit of operating loss carryforwards
    (3 )     (12 )     (10 )
Amortization and impairment of goodwill
    16       74       11  
Nondeductible expenses
    1       1       1  
Taxes on foreign subsidiaries’ net income in excess of income taxes at Finnish statutory rates
    4       8       6  
Operating losses with no current tax benefit(2)
    16       26       4  
Change in Finnish statutory rate as of January 1, 2005
                3  
Other
    1       6       7  
 
                 
 
                       
Income tax expense (benefit)
    26       (44 )     (21 )
 
                 


(1)   Write-down of subsidiary shares includes, for the year ended December 31, 2003, the impact of a realized tax benefit of 51 million related to a write-down of subsidiary shares recorded in 2002 , which was not recognized until 2003. Correspondingly, the tax benefit of 53 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 relates to a write-down recorded in 2003.
 
(2)   Operating losses with no current tax benefit relate to current year losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognized.

     The components of net deferred tax asset (liability) consist of the following:

                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Non-current assets
               
Tax losses carried forward
    171       210  
Provisions
    21       33  
Other
    0       0  
Valuation allowance
    (111 )     (113 )
 
           
 
    81       130  
 
               
Current assets
               
Intercompany profit in inventory
    8       7  
Provisions
    116       80  
Valuation allowance
    (3 )     0  
 
           
 
    121       87  
 
               
Current liabilities
               
Inventories and other
    (6 )     (1 )
 
           
 
               
Non-current liabilities
               
Accelerated depreciation and other untaxed reserves
    (22 )     (8 )
Other
    (51 )     (29 )
 
           
 
    (73 )     (37 )
 
           
 
               
Deferred tax asset (liability), net
    123       179  
 
           

F-20


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     As at December 31, 2004, Metso had 672 million of losses carried forward, primarily attributable to foreign subsidiaries. New losses for the year ended December 31, 2004, amounting to 87 million, increased the deferred tax asset on loss carry-forward by 17 million. Approximately 25 percent of the accumulated loss carry-forwards at December 31, 2004 have no expiration date, 45 percent expires between years 2005-2014 and the remaining 30 percent between years 2015-2024.

     The valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset has been as follows:

                                 
    Balance at                     Balance at  
    Beginning                     End  
    of Year     Deduction     Increase     of Year  
    ( in millions)  
2003
                               
Losses carried forward
    110       (49 )     50       111  
Other
    0       0       3       3  
 
                       
Total
    110       (49 )     53       114  
 
                       
2004
                               
Losses carried forward
    111       (20 )     22       113  
Other
    3       (3 )     0       0  
 
                       
Total
    114       (23 )     22       113  
 
                       

Note 9. Restructuring costs

  2003 Program

     In June 2003, Metso launched its group-wide efficiency improvement program aiming to reach substantial cost savings. The plan included streamlining of sales and administrative organizations and closing down of sites both in the United States and in Europe. As a result of the efficiency improvement program, Metso’s personnel has been reduced by some 1,900 persons. Based on decisions already made, the number of personnel will be reduced further by some 140 persons in 2005.

     For the year ended December 31, 2003, the costs recognized under the program amounted to the following:

         
    Year ended  
    December 31,  
    2003  
    ( in millions)  
Pensions and postretirement benefits
    21  
Employee termination and exit cost
    42  
Write-down of fixed assets and inventory
    25  
Restructuring expenses
    7  
Other expenses
    8  
 
     
2003 program, total
    103  
 
     

     During the year ended December 31, 2004, the 2003 program cost was reduced by 10 million due to receiving the results of a final soil contamination analysis, finding more favourable solutions to certain termination plans and reducing certain personnel costs. In addition, gains on the sale of fixed assets and business activities of 2 million, and increases in the program cost of 2 million, were recorded under nonrecurring items.

     No further costs are expected under the 2003 efficiency improvement program.

F-21


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     The accrued liabilities related to the 2003 program are the following:

                 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Pensions and postretirement benefits(1)
    12       7  
Employee termination and exit cost
    33       7  
Restructuring expenses
    7       3  
Other expenses
    25       1  
 
           
Accrued liabilities at end of year
    77       18  
 
           


(1)   As at December 31, 2004, accrued pensions comprised 6 million of long-term liabilities.

  2004 Program

     In June 2004, Metso announced a program for the renewal of Metso Paper’s business concept, which targets to streamline cost structure. The main locations affected by the measures are in the Finnish, Swedish and North American operations. The measures comprise personnel reductions in certain administrative and production functions, disposal of non-core sites and global reorganization of the tissue business line. The costs related to the program are not expected to exceed 40 million.

     For the year ended December 31, 2004, the costs recognized under the program amounted to the following:

         
    Year ended  
    December 31,  
    2004  
    ( in millions)  
Pensions and postretirement benefits
    6  
Employee termination and exit cost
    8  
Write-down of fixed assets
    10  
Other expenses
    2  
 
     
2004 program, total
    26  
 
     

     For the year ended December 31, 2004, the accrued liabilities related to the 2004 program amounted to the following:

         
    Year ended  
    December 31,  
    2004  
    ( in millions)  
Pensions and postretirement benefits(1)
    4  
Employee termination and exit cost
    7  
Other expenses
    1  
 
     
Accrued liabilities at end of year
    12  
 
     


(1)   4 million of pension liabilities recognized under the program are long-term liabilities payable after 2006.

F-22


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

  Other Restructuring Programs

     Other restructuring programs refer to restructuring programs other than 2003 program or 2004 program. During 2003 and 2004, other restructuring program costs charged to expense amounted to 5 million and 6 million, respectively. The 6 million charged in 2004 primarily relates to site closures within Metso’s business areas. During 2004, 3 million of prior year reserves were reversed.

     The change in accruals related to restructuring programs have been recognized as follows during the financial year 2004:

                                                 
            Impact     Additions     Adjustments     Amounts        
    Balance at     of     charged     to     paid/     Balance  
    beginning     exchange     to     prior year     charged     at end of  
    of year     rates     expense     reserves     to reserve     year  
    ( in millions)  
2003 and 2004 programs:
                                               
Pension liabilities for personnel with terminated contracts
    12       0       6       (2 )     (5 )     11  
Employee termination and exit costs
    33       0       10       (3 )     (26 )     14  
Accrued restructuring expenses
    7       0       1       (1 )     (4 )     3  
Other
    25       (1 )     1       (4 )     (19 )     2  
Other restructuring programs
    23       0       6       (3 )     (10 )     16  
 
                                   
Total
    100       (1 )     24       (13 )     (64 )     46  
 
                                   

     The total expense, net of reversals, by restructuring programs has been recognized as follows in the consolidated income statement:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
2003 Program
          (103 )     10  
2004 Program
                (26 )
Other restructuring programs
    (28 )     (5 )     (1 )
 
                 
Total
    (28 )     (108 )     (17 )
 
                 

F-23


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 10. Earnings (Loss) per Share

     Earnings (loss) per share are calculated as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions, except for per  
    share amounts)  
Income (loss) before extraordinary items and income taxes
    93       (303 )     49  
Minority interests
    (2 )     1       (1 )
Taxes on normal business operations
    (26 )     44       21  
 
                 
 
    65       (258 )     69  
 
                 
 
                       
Weighted average number of shares issued and outstanding (in thousands)
    136,190       136,190       136,190  
 
                 
 
                       
Earnings (loss) per share,
    0.48       (1.89 )     0.51  
 
                 
 
                       
Weighted average number of diluted shares issued and outstanding (in thousands)
    136,190       136,190       136,192  
 
                       
Diluted earnings (loss) per share,
    0.48       (1.89 )     0.51  
 
                 

     The diluted earnings (loss) per share have been computed by applying the “treasury stock” method, under which earnings per share data is computed as if the warrants and options were exercised at the beginning of the period, or on the issuance of the warrants or options, if that occurs later during the period, and as if the funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. In addition to the weighted average number of shares outstanding, the denominator includes the incremental shares obtained through the assumed exercise of the warrants and options. The warrants and options have a dilutive effect only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the warrants and options.

Note 11. Intangible and Tangible Assets

     Intangible and tangible assets consist of the following:

                 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Goodwill
               
Acquisition cost at beginning of year
    1,137       888  
Increases
    1       1  
Decreases
    (13 )     (204 )
Impairment
    (205 )      
Translation differences
    (32 )     (7 )
Accumulated depreciation at end of year
    (265 )     (220 )
 
           
Net book value at end of year
    623       458  
 
           
 
               
Other intangible assets(1)
               
Acquisition cost at beginning of year
    202       233  
Increases(2)
    41       29  
Decreases
    (8 )     (66 )
Translation differences
    (2 )     (1 )
Accumulated depreciation at end of year
    (96 )     (91 )
 
           
Net book value at end of year
    137       104  
 
           

F-24


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Land and water areas
               
Acquisition cost at beginning of year
    85       80  
Increases
    1       0  
Decreases
    (4 )     (14 )
Translation differences
    (2 )     (1 )
 
           
Net book value at end of year
    80       65  
 
           
 
               
Buildings
               
Acquisition cost at beginning of year
    599       582  
Increases
    43       10  
Decreases
    (38 )     (80 )
Translation differences
    (22 )     (6 )
Accumulated depreciation at end of year
    (253 )     (249 )
 
           
Net book value at end of year
    329       257  
 
           
 
               
Machinery and equipment
               
Acquisition cost at beginning of year
    1,293       1,308  
Increases
    101       68  
Decreases
    (51 )     (171 )
Translation differences
    (35 )     (11 )
Accumulated depreciation at end of year
    (972 )     (911 )
 
           
Net book value at end of year
    336       283  
 
           
 
               
Other tangible assets
               
Acquisition cost at beginning of year
    93       90  
Increases
    9       4  
Decreases
    (8 )     (14 )
Translation differences
    (4 )     (2 )
Accumulated depreciation at end of year
    (62 )     (61 )
 
           
Net book value at end of year
    28       17  
 
           
 
               
Assets under construction
               
Acquisition cost at beginning of year
    82       37  
Increases
    25       11  
Decreases(2)
    (70 )     (29 )
Translation differences
    0       0  
 
           
Net book value at end of year
    37       19  
 
           


(1)   Includes patents and licenses for a net book value of 32 million and 40 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
 
(2)   Includes reclassifications between Other intangible assets and Assets under construction of 20 million and 10 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

Goodwill impairment

     Metso assesses the value of the goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently, if facts and circumstances indicate the need, using fair value measurement techniques, such as the discounted cash flow methodology. The testing is performed on the reporting unit level, i.e., one level below reportable segment. In the discounted cash flow method, Metso discounts forecasted performance plans to their present value. The discount rate is the weighted average cost of capital for the reporting unit, calculated as the opportunity cost to all capital providers weighted by their relative contribution to the reporting unit’s total capital and the risk associated with the cash flow and the timing of the cash flow. The comparison methods and other estimation techniques are utilized to verify the reasonableness of the value derived from the discounted cash flow.

F-25


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     In the year ended December 31, 2003, Metso Minerals had to face tightened competition, reduced demand in certain market areas and unfavourable exchange rate development, especially the impact of the weakened U.S. Dollar, and its operating profits were lower than expected for the year. As of September 30, 2003, upon completion of the annual impairment assessment, based on updated forecasted plans approved by the Board of Directors, it was determined that Metso should recognize an impairment loss of 205 million related to the Metso Minerals and Discontinued Operations.

     A summary of changes in Metso’s goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 by business segments is as follows:

                                         
                    Translation              
    Balance at             difference              
    beginning             and other     Impairment     Balance at  
    of year     Amortization     changes     loss     end of year  
    ( in millions)  
2003
                                       
Metso Paper
    96       (8 )     (10 )           78  
Metso Minerals
    562       (29 )     (4 )     (143 )     386  
Metso Automation
    25       (3 )     (1 )           21  
Metso Ventures
    16       (1 )     0             15  
Discontinued Operations
    196       (10 )     (1 )     (62 )     123  
 
                             
Total
    895       (51 )     (16 )     (205 )     623  
 
                             
 
                                       
2004
                                       
Metso Paper
    78       (7 )     (4 )           67  
Metso Minerals
    386       (21 )     (4 )           361  
Metso Automation
    21       (4 )     0             17  
Metso Ventures
    15       (2 )     0             13  
Discontinued Operations
    123       (3 )     (120 )            
 
                             
Total
    623       (37 )     (128 )           458  
 
                             

Note 12. Capitalization of Interest Expenses

     The capitalized interest expenses consist of the following:

                 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Net capitalized interest, beginning of year
    3       2  
Amortization of capitalized interest expense
    (1 )     (1 )
 
           
Net capitalized interest, end of year
    2       1  
 
           

F-26


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 13. Shareholdings and Other Securities

     Investments in associated companies are as follows:

                                                                 
            Year ended December 31,  
            2003                     2004  
            %     Equity                     %     Equity  
            ownership     value                     ownership     value  
                    ( in millions)                             ( in millions)  
Allimand S.A.
            35.8       5                       35.8       5  
Valmet-Xian Paper Machinery Co. Ltd.
            48.3       5                       48.3       7  
Shanghai Neles-Jamesbury Valve Co. Ltd.
            50.0       3                       50.0       3  
Avantone Oy
                                        48.2       1  
Others
                    2                               1  
 
                                                   
Total investments in associated companies
                    15                               17  
 
                                                   
 
     Investments in shareholdings and other securities consist of the following:
 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    Number     %     Book     Fair     Number     %     Book     Fair  
    of shares     ownership     value     value     of shares     ownership     value     value  
                    ( in millions)                     ( in millions)  
Tamfelt Corporation, Finland(1)
    484,200       2.7       4       7       726,300       2.7       4       6  
Sato Corporation Plc, Finland
    239,555       10.9       12       12                          
Exel Plc, Finland
    650,000       12.2       5       8                          
Other shares and securities
                    8       8                       6       6  
 
                                                       
Total investments in shares and other securities
                    29       35                       10       12  
 
                                                       
Total shareholdings and other securities
                    44                               27          
 
                                                           


(1)   Bonus Issue in 2004: 1 new share for each two shares held.

     Investments in own shares are as follows:

                                                                 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    Number     %     Book     Fair     Number     %     Book     Fair  
    of shares     ownership     value     value     of shares     ownership     value     value  
                    ( in millions)                     ( in millions)  
Own shares held by Metso Corporation
    60,841       0.0       1       1       60,841       0.0       1       1  

F-27


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 14. Other Long-term Investments

     Other long-term investments consist of certificates of deposits, bonds and other securities with a maturity of greater than one year at the time of acquisition. Other long-term investments amounted to 10 million at December 31, 2003 and to 4 million at December 31, 2004. Other long-term investments are recorded at the lower of cost or market value.

     Information regarding other long-term investments is as follows:

                                                                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003     2004  
            Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair             Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     gains     losses     value     Cost     gains     losses     value  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Debt Securities
 
Bonds and Treasury bills
    5       0             5       2       0             2  
Other securities
    5       0             5       2       0             2  
 
                                               
Total
    10       0             10       4       0             4  
 
                                               

Note 15. Costs and Earnings of Projects under Construction in Excess of Billings/Billings in Excess of Costs and Earnings of Projects under Construction

     Information on balance sheet items of uncompleted contracts at December 31, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

                         
    Costs and              
    earnings of              
    uncompleted     Billings of        
    projects     projects     Net  
    ( in millions)  
2003
                       
Projects where costs and earnings exceed billings
    600       331       269  
Projects where billings exceed costs and earnings
    420       461       41  
 
                       
2004
                       
Projects where costs and earnings exceed billings
    576       385       191  
Projects where billings exceed costs and earnings
    428       552       124  

F-28


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 16. Interest bearing and Non-interest bearing Assets

     Interest bearing and non-interest bearing assets are as follows:

                                                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003     2004  
            Non-                     Non-        
    Interest     interest             Interest     interest        
    bearing     bearing     Total     bearing     bearing     Total  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Financial assets
                                               
Loan and other receivables(1)
    9       28       37       6       48       54  
Accounts receivable
    1       1       2       6       1       7  
Other long-term investments
    10             10       4             4  
 
                                   
Total
    20       29       49       16       49       65  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Receivables
                                               
Accounts receivable
    0       719       719       0       651       651  
Costs and earnings of projects under construction in excess of billings
          269       269             191       191  
Loans receivable
    3       2       5       3       2       5  
Prepaid expenses and accrued income
          88       88             86       86  
Deferred tax asset
          145       145             187       187  
Other receivables
          53       53             52       52  
Other short-term investments
    7             7       4             4  
 
                                   
Total
    10       1,276       1,286       7       1,169       1,176  
 
                                   


(1)   Non-interest bearing loan and other receivables include 18 million and 19 million of prepayments to foreign pension plans and of pension insurance premiums at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. At December 31, 2004, the non-interest bearing portion also includes 21 million of capitalized costs related to the exchange and issuance of bonds.

Note 17. Shareholders’ Equity

     At December 31, 2004, Metso had 136,250,545 issued shares with a par value of 1.70 per share, the share capital being 232 million. Under its Articles of Association, Metso Corporation’s authorized share capital may not be less than 170 million nor more than 680 million.

     At December 31, 2004, Metso held 60,841 of its own shares. The reacquisition price of 1 million has been recorded in the reserve of own shares at cost. In the shareholders’ meeting held on April 6, 2004, the shareholders of Metso renewed the authorization for the Board of Directors to reacquire treasury stock in the limit of five percent of the nominal value of outstanding shares at the time of purchase. Treasury stock can be utilized for business acquisitions, for major investments and for incentive plans of key personnel.

     Calculation of distributable funds is as follows:

         
    As at  
    December 31,  
    2004  
    ( in millions)  
Other reserves
    202  
Retained earnings
    386  
Result for the financial year
    69  
Equity share of accelerated depreciation and other untaxed reserves
    (5 )
Translation differences
    (80 )
 
     
Total distributable funds
    572  
 
     

F-29


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     The Parent Company’s distributable funds at December 31, 2004 were 543 million. The distribution of dividends to shareholders is limited to the lower of consolidated distributable funds or distributable funds held by the Parent Company.

     During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Parent Company paid a dividend of 27 million to shareholders, or 0.20 per common share. During the year ended December 31, 2003 dividends paid amounted to 82 million, or 0.60 per common share.

     Foreign currency translation adjustment included in the shareholders’ equity consists of the following:

                 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Cumulative translation adjustment at beginning of year
    (60 )     (76 )
Change in foreign currency translation
    (55 )     (12 )(1)
Hedging of net investment denominated in foreign currency, net of tax expense of 16 million and 3 million, respectively
    39       0 (1)
Transfer of translation differences
          8  
 
           
Cumulative translation adjustment at end of year
    (76 )     (80 )
 
           


(1)   Net of effect of translation differences and respective net investment hedge related to disposed businesses.

Note 18. Long-term Debt

     Long-term debt consists of the following:

                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Bonds
    697       746  
Loans from financial institutions
    187       114  
Loans from pension institutions
    38       13  
Other long-term debt
    52       66  
 
           
 
    974       939  
 
               
Less current maturities
    17       19  
 
           
Total
    957       920  
 
           

  Bonds

     The bonds consist principally of three loans: a USD 174 million (128 million) bond, a 156 million bond and a 274 million bond. The USD denominated bond was issued in the United States in December 1997 and registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). It matures in 2007 and bears a fixed annual interest rate of 6.875%. A portion of the bond has been converted through a currency swap agreement of GBP 45 million (64 million) into British pound sterling with a fixed annual rate of 7.51%. The currency swap agreement matures concurrently with the bond.

     In December 2000, Metso established a Euro Medium Term Note Program of 1 billion, under which originally a 500 million bond was issued in December 2001. The bond matures in 2006 and carries a fixed interest of 6.25%. As at December 31, 2004, the outstanding amount of this bond totaled 156 million after the impact of the bond exchange described below. In November 2004, Metso completed its offer to exchange bonds to new Euro-denominated bonds maturing in 2011. 256 million of existing notes were validly submitted and accepted for exchange, corresponding to 62% of the total outstanding amount of existing notes. 274 million of new bonds were issued and they carry a fixed interest of 5.125%.

F-30


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     21 million of costs related to the exchange offering and bond issuings have been included in long-term receivables and 4 million in short-term receivables. These costs are expensed over the maturities of the bonds.

  Loans from financial institutions

     Loans from financial institutions consist of international bank borrowings with either fixed or variable interest rates. A major share of loans is either USD or SEK denominated. The interest rates vary from 2.4% (USD) to 10.5% (ZAR). The loans are payable from year 2005 to 2011.

     In June 2003, Metso signed a five-year 450 million revolving credit facility agreement with a syndicate of 14 international banks. Of the current revolving facility 66 million was utilized as at December 31, 2003. As at December 31,2004, the facility was undrawn.

     As at December 31, 2004, the undrawn committed long-term facilities of Metso totaled 450 million.

     In the end of May 2004, Metso signed a ten-year 135 million loan agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB). Funds may be drawn within 18 months from signing. As at December 31, 2004, the facility was undrawn.

  Loans from pension institutions

     Pension loans consist of Finnish pension insurance reborrowing loans amounting to 8 million and of 5 million foreign pension loans.

  Other long-term debt

     As at December 31, 2003, other long-term debt comprised 29 million pension liabilities, 16 million obligations under finance leases and 7 million other liabilities. As at December 31, 2004, other long-term debt comprised 30 million pension liabilities, 24 million obligations under finance leases and 12 million other liabilities.

     Maturities of long-term debt as at December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                                         
            Loans from     Loans from     Other        
            financial     Pension     long-term        
    Bonds     institutions     Institutions     debt     Total  
    ( in millions)  
Year
                                       
2005
    0       7       8       4       19  
2006
    156       45       0       7       208  
2007
    128       11       1       13       153  
2008
    0       25       0       3       28  
2009
    83       11       0       3       97  
2010 and after
    379       15       4       36       434  
 
                             
Total
    746       114       13       66       939  
 
                             

F-31


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 19. Other Long-term Liabilities — Accrued Expenses

     Long-term accrued liabilities consist of the following:

                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003(1)     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Pension liabilities and other postretirement benefits
    95       91  
Warranty and guarantee liabilities
    12       8  
Accrued restructuring expenses(2)
    13       14  
Other long-term provisions and accruals(3)
    14       9  
 
           
Total
    134       122  
 
           


(1)   Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
 
(2)   For additional information on restructuring expenses, see also Note 9.
 
(3)   Includes various amounts, which are individually insignificant.

Note 20. Other Interest Bearing Short-term Debt

     Other interest bearing short-term debt consists of the following:

                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Loans from financial institutions
    25       17  
Domestic commercial paper financing
    262        
Other
    8       14  
 
           
Total
    295       31  
 
           

     The weighted average interest rate applicable to short-term borrowing at December 31, 2003 and 2004 was 2.4 percent and 3.8 percent, respectively.

     Metso had undrawn committed short-term credit facilities with banks totaling 100 million at December 31, 2004.

     Metso has established a short-term Euro Commercial Paper Program of 150 million and a domestic commercial paper program amounting to 300 million. Both facilities were undrawn as of December 31, 2004.

F-32


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 21. Accrued Expenses and Deferred Income

     Accrued expenses and deferred income consist of the following:

                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003(1)     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Accrued restructuring expenses(2)
    87       32  
Accrued interest expenses
    6       7  
Accrued personnel expenses
    156       165  
Accrued project costs
    322       300  
Environmental and product liabilities
    4       3  
Taxes currently payable
    51       32  
Warranty and guarantee liabilities
    127       112  
Other(3)
    65       68  
 
           
Total
    818       719  
 
           


(1)   Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
 
(2)   For additional information on restructuring expenses, see also Note 9.
 
(3)   Includes various amounts, which are individually insignificant.

Note 22. Changes in cost accruals

     The cost accruals, including both long- and short-term portions, have changed as follows during the financial year 2004:

                                         
    Balance at     Impact of     Additions     Deductions/        
    beginning of     exchange     charged to     other     Balance at  
    year(1)     rates     expense     additions     end of year  
    ( in millions)  
Allowance for doubtful notes and receivables
    34       (1 )     2       2       37  
Allowance for inventory
    67       (2 )     5       (13 )     57  
Environmental and product liabilities
    4       0       0       (1 )     3  
Accrued restructuring expenses(2)
    100       (1 )     11       (64 )     46  
 
                             
Total
    205       (4 )     18       (76 )     143  
 
                             


(1)   Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
 
(2)   For additional information on restructuring expenses, see also Note 9.

     The cost accruals for warranty and guarantee liabilities have changed as follows during the financial year 2004:

                                                 
            Impact     Increase for     Increase for                
    Balance at     of     current     previous                
    beginning of     exchange     year's     years'             Balance at end  
    year     rates     deliveries     deliveries     Deductions(1)     of year  
    ( in millions)  
Warranty and guarantee liabilities
    139       (2 )     52       17       (86 )     120  


(1)   Includes reversals of 20 million related to expired warranty and guarantee liabilities.

F-33


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Metso issues various types of contractual product warranties under which it generally guarantees the performance levels agreed in the sales contract, the performance of products delivered during the agreed warranty period and services rendered for a certain period or term. The warranty liability is based on historical realized warranty costs for deliveries of standard products and services. The usual warranty is 12 months from the date of customer acceptance of the delivered equipment. For larger projects, the average warranty period is two years. For more complex contracts, including long-term projects sold by Metso Paper and Metso Minerals, the warranty reserve is calculated contract by contract and updated regularly to take into consideration any changes in the potential warranty liability.

     Metso is subject to potential liability under certain government regulations and various claims and legal actions that are pending or may be asserted against Metso concerning environmental matters. The maximum potential future obligation related to certain environmental guarantees cannot be estimated due to numerous uncertainties, including the enactment of new laws and regulations, the development and application of new technologies, the identification of new sites for which Metso may have remediation responsibility and the apportionment and collectibility of remediation costs when other parties are involved.

     When circumstances indicate that a payment obligation becomes probable, a liability is recognized in the consolidated balance sheet with an offsetting amount recorded as an expense.

Note 23. Mortgages and contingent liabilities

     Mortgages and contingent liabilities consist of the following:

                 
    As at December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Mortgages on corporate debt
    1       2  
 
           
 
               
Other pledges and contingencies
Mortgages
    2       2  
Pledged assets
    4       4  
Guarantees on behalf of associated company obligations
           
Other guarantees
    7       9  
 
           
 
    13       15  
 
           
 
               
Repurchase and other commitments
    48       42  
 
           

     The mortgage amount on corporate debt has been calculated as the amount of corresponding loans. The nominal value of the mortgages at December 31, 2004 was 0.2 million higher than the amount of the corresponding loans.

     Other guarantees include 6 million guarantees given on behalf of sold businesses. The respective buyers have indemnified Metso and have committed themselves to release Metso from its guarantee obligations within agreed time periods.

     The repurchase commitments, amounting to 20 million and 10 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively, represent engagements whereby Metso guarantees specified trade-in values for products sold to customers and third parties. The amounts in the above schedule comprise the agreed value in full of each repurchase commitment.

     Other commitments include 13 and 24 million of unfunded pension liabilities for foreign subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

F-34


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 24. Lawsuits and Claims

     Several lawsuits, including product liability suits in the United States, are pending against Metso Corporation. However, management does not believe that the outcome of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on Metso’s business, liquidity, results of operations or financial condition. The normal risks of legal disputes concerning deliveries cannot either be regarded as material in terms of Metso’s total business activities.

  Pending asbestos litigation

     As of December 31, 2004, there had been a total of 349 complaints alleging asbestos injuries filed in the United States in which a Metso entity is one of the named defendants. Where a given plaintiff has named more than one viable Metso unit as a defendant, the cases are counted by the number of viable Metso defendants. Of these claims, 134 are still pending and 215 cases have been closed. Of the closed cases, 160 were dismissed and 55 were settled. For the 55 cases settled the average compensation has been USD 540 per case. The outcome of the still pending cases is not expected to materially deviate from the outcome of the previous claims. Hence, management believes that Metso has no material asbestos related liability in the United States.

  Pending environmental litigation

     Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has been named, together with a number of other parties, as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for the remediation of two Wisconsin landfills (Hunt and Muskego), which have been designated as superfund sites under CERCLA. As a PRP, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. is jointly and severally liable for the clean-up costs of such sites. With respect to Hunt landfill site, Metso Minerals Industries Inc., together with the other named PRPs, has entered into a consent decree with the U.S. government pursuant to which Metso Minerals and such other parties have agreed to cover the clean-up costs of the Hunt site, which had been estimated to be in the range of U.S.$13 million to U.S.$22 million. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has a 6.3 percent share of the clean-up costs and is also covered by an indemnification agreement with a previous owner of Nordberg. Construction at the Hunt site was completed in 1996 and Metso Minerals has paid a total of approximately U.S.$0.4 million for the clean-up costs. Additional work at the Hunt site may be required at an estimated cost to Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. of approximately U.S.$0.2 million. Efforts are ongoing to contact appropriate regulatory agencies to determine the extent, if any, of additional work required. With respect to the Muskego site, there is an administrative order in place, with a total estimate of U.S.$15 million for design and clean-up costs, of which the share of the previous owner and Metso Minerals is expected to be at the level of the already paid U.S.$125,000. No activities at the Muskego site have occurred since 1996. Management estimates that Metso Minerals’ maximum remaining liability with respect to the Hunt and Muskego sites will not exceed the currently established reserve of U.S.$267,000, and that the reserve for the remediation costs of the two landfill sites will be sufficient for any remaining liability due to above reasons and the fact that no activity on these sites has occurred for several years.

     In furtherance of the planned closure and sale of the Metso Minerals’ Milwaukee, Wisconsin, manufacturing facility, a Phase II Environmental Assessment (“ESA”) was commenced in early 2004 and completed in April of that year. The ESA indicated the existence of soil and groundwater contamination at the facility, the existence of which was communicated to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“WDNR”) in May 2004. The WDNR notified Metso Minerals Industries Inc. by letter dated May 10, 2004 of its investigation and cleanup responsibilities under applicable law. In October 2004, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. entered into a contract with an environmental consulting and remediation firm to clean up the property for all identified matters in accordance with applicable law for a fixed price. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. also purchased environmental insurance consisting of remediation cost cap insurance in the amount of U.S.$3.3 million and a 10-year, U.S. $10 million in third party pollution legal liability coverage for unknown matters, subject to standard exclusions. The cost of the basic remediation of U.S.$1.1 million has been fully funded. The entire insurance premium of approximately U.S.$425,000 has also been paid by Metso Minerals Industries Inc. On January 31, 2005, this property was sold with the purchaser accepting assignment of the remediation contract, including the potential responsibility for any additional payments thereunder as well as Metso Minerals Industries Inc.’s insured status under the insurance policy. Formal assignment of the insurance policies is expected in the first quarter of this year. Notwithstanding assignment, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. will remain an additional insured party under the third party pollution legal liability portion of the insurance policy and shares the responsibility for up to one-half of the U.S.$250,000 deductible should there be any claims.

F-35


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     As a result of the acquisition of Svedala, Metso Minerals has two sites with certain environmental concerns. The first is a former manufacturing site in Mt. Olive, New Jersey, which Svedala acquired in 1992. The company acquired by Svedala operated this site from 1955 to 1987. With the closing of manufacturing operations in 1987, the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act triggered an environmental assessment. Both soil and groundwater contamination was identified. The source of most of the contamination was traced back to prior owners and operators of the property, which had been an industrial site since the early 1900s. All known contaminated soil has been removed and the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) has issued a “No Further Action” letter regarding the soil contamination. Metso Minerals has sold the site in Mt. Olive in December 2003. However, liabilities for ground water contamination issues were retained by Metso Minerals. In addition to the prior remediation activities at the site, Metso Minerals conducted a baseline ecological evaluation of the property as required by the NJDEP. The basic purpose of such evaluation was to determine whether site-related contamination presents a risk to or has impacted environmentally sensitive areas within or adjacent to the property. Such evaluation, together with a recommendation that no further ecological evaluation or testing be conducted at the site, was submitted to the NJDEP by an environmental consultant retained by Metso. There can be no assurance that the NJDEP agrees with such recommendation. However, taking into account (i) that Metso has purchased a pollution legal liability insurance policy for the site, which generally covers, subject to standard exclusions, clean-up costs, bodily injury and property damage for pre-existing and unknown pollution conditions, and (ii) that extensive prior remediation activities at the site have already been conducted, Metso does not anticipate any liability arising out of the final evaluation to be material. The estimated reserve required for the remediation measures relating to the ground water contamination and the completion of the baseline evaluation is U.S.$620,000.

     The second site with environmental concerns is a former manufacturing property in Danville, Pennsylvania. Both soil and groundwater are contaminated with oil from the manufacturing process. In conjunction with the state of Pennsylvania, an approved remediation plan has being developed. Some soil remediation has already been completed. Two additional areas of concern are being investigated and possibly remediated. An U.S.$1.2 million reserve is the best estimate of potential remediation costs at this time.

     Metso Minerals, through its Reedrill business that was divested on December 31, 2004, was earlier identified as a PRP in two CERCLA sites. At one of the sites, liability has been assumed by a predecessor company. Regarding the other site, Metso Minerals (Svedala) has responded in March 2000 to a request for information and identified predecessor companies as the potentially responsible parties. To date, no response by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has been received.

     Metso Minerals Industries Inc. may become subject to remedial costs relating to an old industrial facility in Colorado Springs, Colorado, which was used in foundry and test laboratory operation. The site is for sale. Phase I level evaluations do not suggest any environmental conditions of any major concern. However, in mid-2004, an area of stained soil identified in the Phase I was evaluated and determined to be contaminated with hazardous materials and, thereafter, excavated and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. Additional Phase II level evaluations are likely depending on the requirements of potential purchasers. A reserve of approximately U.S.$420,000 exists to account for the anticipated Phase II costs and the purchase of environmental insurance.

     Since 1992, Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has been monitoring the groundwater at its Keokuk, Iowa facility after the removal of contaminated soil and pursuant to a plan of natural attenuation of affected groundwater, under the direction of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (“IDNR”). In November 2004, the IDNR advised that monitoring requirements for most of the compounds being tested for were eliminated. However, IDNR also stated that there had been insufficient attenuation of certain chlorinated compounds and directed Metso Minerals Industries Inc. to prepare a work plan that would enhance the degradation of these compounds. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. accepted a bid for the investigation, delineation and preparation of a work plan. A reserve of U.S.$100,000 was established for estimated costs associated with near-term compliance with IDNR investigation requirements.

     In October 2004, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”) advised Metso Minerals Industries Inc. that an alleged predecessor, McNally Pittsburg Manufacturing Corporation, had disposed of foundry sand at a location where the soil now contains lead and chromium. The KDHE has invited participation in a voluntary cleanup program, failing which administrative action will be taken. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. has retained local legal counsel to investigate the scope of potential liability, if any, and has reserved U.S. $100,000 for estimated legal fees and investigation costs.

F-36


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Metso Panelboard, part of the Metso Ventures business area, has previously owned a site with certain environmental concerns. The site, located in Belgium, was owned by Constructiewerkhuizen De Mets N.V., a company divested in 2001. Pursuant to the sale agreement, Metso is required to provide the purchaser with an environmental certificate by the Belgian authorities, to the effect that the soil at the site has not been contaminated. Consequently, a third party conducted environmental studies and assessed the site. The completed report of the results was sent to OVAM (Belgian environmental authority) for acceptance during the fall of 2004. The studies indicate that groundwater has been polluted by chlorinated hydrocarbons but that soil has not been polluted. The use of the chemicals in the groundwater ended at site in 1989. The precautionary measures to prevent the spreading of this historical pollution started in January 2005. A cleaning plan can be presented for acceptance to OVAM after the completed report has been accepted. In accordance with the conditions of the sale agreement, it has been estimated that Metso’s remaining responsibility for remediation costs will be limited to the currently established reserve of 0.8 million.

Note 25. Lease Contracts

     Metso leases offices, manufacturing and warehouse space under various non-cancellable leases. Certain contracts contain renewal options for various periods of time. As of December 31, 2004, the capitalized value of leased buildings and machines amounted to 27 million. The related debt, totaling 24 million, has been reported under other long-term debt for an amount of 20 million, the remaining portion being under current portion of long-term debt.

     Minimum annual rentals for operating and capital leases in effect at December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                 
    Operating     Capital  
    leases     leases  
    ( in millions)  
Fiscal year
               
2005
    40       4  
2006
    28       5  
2007
    21       4  
2008
    15       2  
2009
    12       2  
2010 and later
    26       6  
 
           
Total minimum lease payments
    142       23  
 
           

     Total rental expense amounted to 41 million, 39 million and 42 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

  Future lease payments for empty premises

     Due to reorganization of production and sales activities, Metso has, from time to time, empty leased premises with non-cancellable rental engagements. A cost reserve for the remaining lease period is made when it is probable that economically realistic sub-lease or early termination arrangements cannot be negotiated. The cost accrual is based on discounted future lease payments. Metso has recognized an accrual for duplicate lease costs, and the remaining reserve amounted to 5 million and 4 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Note 26. Financial Instruments

  Foreign currency risk management

     Both the production and sales activities of Metso are geographically widely spread creating exposure to various currency risks, the main currencies being USD, EUR, SEK and CAD.

F-37


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Foreign exchange gains and losses, reported in the operating profit resulted in a net loss of 3 million in 2002 and a net gain of 1 million in 2003 and a net gain of 9 million in 2004.

  Trade flow related derivatives

     The trade flow related currency exposures are hedged with forward exchange contracts. The Corporate Treasury monitors the global currency risk and enters into forwards with third parties to reverse the currency exposures created through internal derivative transactions with the subsidiaries. External forwards contracted by the Corporate Treasury are fair valued quarterly. External currency forwards entered into directly by the subsidiaries are designated at inception as hedges of an underlying transaction. The currency leg of such forwards is fair valued and the interest component is recognized upfront concurrently with the respective underlying.

  Foreign currency denominated equity

     Metso hedges its USD, SEK and, to some extent, CAD denominated net investments to reduce the effect of exchange rate fluctuations. As of December 31, 2004, the hedging instruments were foreign currency loans and forward exchange contracts. Both realized and unrealized exchange gains and losses measured on these instruments are recorded, net of taxes, in a separate component of equity against the translation differences arising from consolidation. The forwards are designated as hedges of net investments at inception and their effectiveness is measured quarterly. The interest component of forwards is fair valued and the change in fair value is recognized in the income statement.

  Foreign currency denominated loans

     Metso has made medium-term, mainly USD denominated, loans to its foreign subsidiaries. The resulting currency risk has been hedged with cross-currency swaps and forward exchange contracts.

  Short-term funding and liquidity management

     Forward exchange contracts are used to mitigate foreign currency risk arising from short-term borrowing and liquidity management. Such forwards are fair valued quarterly. Metso also enters into call and put options to allow more flexible control of the net currency exposures. The options have maturities not exceeding twelve months and they are fair valued quarterly.

     Metso measures and monitors foreign currency risk using sensitivity analysis. The consolidated net exposures in different currencies are continuously controlled and the risk is mitigated through different financial instruments, including derivatives, as required by the Corporate Treasury Policy. The financial derivatives for other than trade flow related currency risks are all entered into by the Corporate Treasury.

  Interest rate management

     Metso uses both interest rate and cross-currency swaps and interest rate futures contracts to mitigate the risks arising from interest bearing receivables and debt. The notional amount of interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2004 was 60 million and 188 million, respectively. The notional amount of interest rate futures contracts at December 31, 2003 and 2004 amounted to 15 million and 10 million, respectively. The interest rate risk is measured using sensitivity analysis and controlled by the Corporate Treasury.

  Commodity risks

     In 2003, Metso extended its risk management policy to include the volatility in electricity prices and authorized its affiliates located in Finland, together with the Corporate Treasury, to enter into electricity forward contracts. The commodity risk is measured using sensitivity analysis.

F-38


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     The utilization of financial derivatives (expressed as notional amounts) is divided as follows:

                 
    At December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Trade flow related currency derivatives
               
Fair valued derivatives
    654       275  
Ear-marked with underlying item
    3       234  
Foreign currency denominated equity
    481       445  
Foreign currency denominated loans
    84       75  
Short-term funding and liquidity management
    405       421  
Currency risk management
    71       421  
Interest risk management
    75       198  
 
           
Total notional amount of derivative instruments
    1,773       2,069  
 
           

     The following table presents the notional amounts, carrying amounts and fair values of derivative financial instruments:

                                                 
    At December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    Notional     Carrying     Fair     Notional     Carrying     Fair  
    Amount     Amount     Value     Amount     Amount     Value  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Forward exchange contracts
    1,567       20       36       1,770       3       18  
Cross-currency swaps
    3       0       0       2       0       0  
Currency swaps
    81       (1 )     (2 )     73       (8 )     (8 )
Interest rate swaps
    60       (1 )     0       188       (1 )     (4 )
Interest rate futures contracts
    15       0       0       10       0       0  
Option agreements
                                               
Bought
    13       0       0       10       0       0  
Sold
    34       (1 )     (1 )     16       0       0  
       
Electricity forward contracts(1)
    344       0       (1 )     329       0       (1 )


(1)   Notional amount GWh

     Carrying amounts noted in the table above are included in the balance sheet. The notional amounts indicate the volumes in the use of derivatives, they do not indicate the exposure to risk. The fair value reflects the estimated amounts, that Metso would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date, thereby taking into account the current unrealized gains or losses of open contracts.

F-39


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     At December 31, 2004, the maturities of the financial derivatives are as follows (expressed as notional amounts):

                                         
                                    2009  
    2005     2006     2007     2008     and after  
    ( in millions)  
Forward exchange contracts
    1,659       73       38              
Cross-currency swaps
                2              
Currency swaps
    7             64       2        
Interest rate swaps
          40                   148  
Interest rate futures contracts
    10                          
Option agreements
                                       
Bought
    10                          
Sold
    16                          
       
Electricity forward contracts(1)
    188       105       36              


(1)   Notional amount GWh

  Fair value of financial instruments

     U.S. FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments,” requires the disclosure of estimated fair values for all financial instruments, both on- and off-balance-sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Metso has used a variety of methods and assumptions, which were based on market conditions and risks existing at the time to estimate the fair value of the Group’s financial instruments at December 31, 2003 and 2004. For certain instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accruals and short-term debt, it was assumed that the carrying amount approximated fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments. Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for the same or similar financial instruments were used to estimate the fair value for marketable securities and long-term investments. Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows or replacement cost have been used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments.

                                 
    Year ended December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    Carrying     Fair     Carrying     Fair  
    Value     Value     Value     Value  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Assets
                               
Shareholdings and other securities (excluding shares in associated companies)
    29       35       10       12  
Own shares
    1       1       1       1  
Loan and other receivables, long-term
    37       37       54       54  
Accounts receivable, long-term
    2       2       7       7  
Other interest bearing long-term investments
    10       10       4       4  
Accounts receivable, short-term
    719       719       651       651  
Loans receivable, short-term
    5       5       5       5  
Short-term investments
    7       7       4       4  
Cash and cash equivalents
    130       130       419       419  
 
                               
Liabilities
                               
Bonds
    695       731       746       774  
Loans from financial institutions
    183       187       107       109  
Loans from pension institutions
    29       29       5       5  
Other long-term debt
    50       50       62       62  
Current portion of long-term loans
    17       17       19       19  
Other interest bearing short-term debt
    295       295       31       31  

F-40


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 27. Concentrations of Credit Risk

     Metso is exposed to credit risk primarily in relation to project deliveries, trade receivables and the use of financial instruments. The companies within Metso conduct diverse business activities with a large number of customers and suppliers. The receivables are well diversified and, where appropriate, secured by various trade finance instruments such as letters of credit, export guarantees or by withheld security interest in products sold under extended credit terms. In the use of financial instruments, Metso minimizes credit and counterparty risk by dealing only with major local or international banks and financial institutions or companies with investment grade credit ratings.

     Management believes that no significant unmanaged concentration of credit risk with any individual customer, counterparty or geographical region exists for Metso.

Note 28. Principal Subsidiaries

Listed below are the principal subsidiaries of Metso Corporation:

             
        Percentage  
    Country   of Ownership  
Metso Paper
           
Metso Paper Oy
  Finland     100.0  
Metso Paper USA Inc.
  United States     100.0  
Metso Paper Sundsvall AB
  Sweden     100.0  
Metso Paper Valkeakoski Oy
  Finland     100.0  
Metso Paper Ltd
  Canada     100.0  
Metso Paper Pori Oy
  Finland     100.0  
 
           
Metso Minerals
           
Metso Minerals Industries Inc.
  United States     100.0  
Metso Minerals (Tampere) Oy
  Finland     100.0  
Metso Minerals (France) S.A.
  France     100.0  
Metso Minerals (Australia) Ltd
  Australia     100.0  
Metso Brazil Indústria e Comércio Ltda
  Brazil     100.0  
 
           
Metso Automation
           
Metso Automation Oy
  Finland     100.0  
Metso Automation USA Inc.
  United States     100.0  
 
           
Metso Ventures
           
Metso Drives Oy
  Finland     100.0  

F-41


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 29. Business and Geographic Information

     Metso’s reportable segments are comprised of strategic business areas that offer different products and services. They are further divided into subsegments or business groups. Each business area is managed separately because each segment requires different technology and marketing strategies. At December 31, 2004, the main reportable segments are Metso Paper, Metso Minerals, Metso Automation and Metso Ventures.

     Metso Paper: Metso Paper develops, designs and manufactures pulp and paper industry machinery and equipment, complete production lines for pulp and papermaking, and machinery and equipment for the packing and converting industries. In November 2002, Metso announced a formal plan to dispose of its Converting equipment business. The business was sold to the Swiss company, Bobst Group SA, on January 30, 2004. In the following segment schedules, Converting equipment is presented separate from Metso Paper under Discontinued Operations.

     Metso Minerals. Metso Minerals covers the production and marketing of rock and mineral processing solutions for quarries, mines and civil engineering contractors and also production and marketing of metal recycling equipment. On June 30, 2004, the compaction and paving group (Dynapac) was sold to the Nordic private equity investor, Altor. In the following segment schedules, Dynapac is presented separate from Metso Minerals under Discontinued Operations. On December 31, 2004, the Reedrill rock drilling equipment business was sold to an U.S. company, Terex Corporation, and in the following segment schedules it has been transferred from Metso Minerals to Discontinued Operations.

     Metso Automation. Metso Automation develops, designs and supplies application networks and systems and field solutions for automation and information management in the process industry.

     Metso Ventures: In October 2003, the foundry operations in Finland and Sweden, formerly part of Metso Paper and of Metso Minerals, were transferred to the Metso Ventures business area and all prior year data has been restated to conform to the new structure. The other subsegments of Metso Ventures are Metso Panelboard, Metso Drives, Metso Powdermet and Valmet Automotive. Metso Ventures covers gears for industries, machinery and equipment for manufacturing panelboards, and assembly of specialty cars.

     The presentation below is prepared according to the current structure to assess the performance of the various business segments.

     The accounting policies of the reportable segments and their subsegments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. All intersegment sales are market based. Metso evaluates the performance of its operating segments and allocates resources to them based on the operating profit (loss). No single customer represents more than ten percent of Metso’s net sales.

     Information about Metso’s reportable segments as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is shown in the following tables.

F-42


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Net sales by business area

     Net sales by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    1,778       1,651       1,559  
Metso Minerals
    1,406       1,253       1,343  
Metso Automation
    622       531       535  
Metso Ventures
    446       370       387  
Intra Metso net sales
    (119 )     (122 )     (115 )
 
                 
Continuing operations
    4,133       3,683       3,709  
Discontinued Operations
    558       567       267  
 
                 
Metso total
    4,691       4,250       3,976  
 
                 

Operating profit (loss), nonrecurring items and amortization of goodwill by business area

     Operating profit (loss) before nonrecurring operating items and amortization of goodwill by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    129       69       37  
Metso Minerals
    74       48       100  
Metso Automation
    22       32       58  
Metso Ventures
    29       (3 )     (6 )
Corporate Office and other
    (32 )     (36 )     (29 )
 
                 
Continuing operations
    222       110       160  
Discontinued Operations
    29       23       13  
 
                 
Metso total
    251       133       173  
 
                 

     Nonrecurring operating items by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    (6 )     (36 )     (19 )
Metso Minerals
    (13 )     (65 )     5  
Metso Automation
    (3 )     (1 )     (1 )
Metso Ventures
    (7 )     (5 )     1  
Corporate Office and other
    7       2       7  
 
                 
Continuing operations
    (22 )     (105 )     (7 )
Discontinued Operations
    (5 )     (1 )     (18 )
 
                 
Metso total
    (27 )     (106 )     (25 )
 
                 

F-43


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Amortization of goodwill by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    (8 )     (8 )     (7 )
Metso Minerals
    (33 )     (29 )     (21 )
Metso Automation
    (3 )     (3 )     (4 )
Metso Ventures
    (2 )     (1 )     (2 )
Corporate Office and other
                 
 
                 
Continuing operations
    (46 )     (41 )     (34 )
Discontinued Operations
    (11 )     (10 )     (3 )
 
                 
Metso total
    (57 )     (51 )     (37 )
 
                 

     Operating profit (loss) by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    115       25       11  
Metso Minerals
    28       (189 )(1)     84  
Metso Automation
    16       28       53  
Metso Ventures
    20       (9 )     (7 )
Corporate Office and other
    (25 )     (34 )     (22 )
 
                 
Continuing operations
    154       (179 )     119  
Discontinued Operations
    13       (50 )(1)     (8 )
 
                 
Metso total
    167       (229 )     111  
 
                 


(1)   The operating losses of Metso Minerals and Discontinued Operations include a goodwill impairment charge of 205 million recorded in September 2003.

Capital employed by business area

Capital employed by business area as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

                         
    At December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    498       538       356  
Metso Minerals
    996       741       729  
Metso Automation
    207       150       136  
Metso Ventures
    172       160       126  
Corporate Office and other
    417       340       682  
 
                 
Continuing operations
    2,290       1,929       2,029  
Discontinued Operations
    452       370        
 
                 
Metso total
    2,742       2,299       2,029  
 
                 

F-44


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Gross capital expenditures by business area

     Gross capital expenditures (including business acquisitions) by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    72       54       33  
Metso Minerals
    39       27       24  
Metso Automation
    13       8       6  
Metso Ventures
    40       24       18  
Corporate Office and other
    18       5       14  
 
                 
Continuing operations
    182       118       95  
Discontinued Operations
    12       12       4  
 
                 
Metso total
    194       130       99  
 
                 

Depreciation and amortization by business area

     Depreciation and amortization by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    62       60       60  
Metso Minerals
    72       62       47  
Metso Automation
    18       15       14  
Metso Ventures
    22       22       21  
Corporate Office and other
    3       4       4  
 
                 
Continuing operations
    177       163       146  
Discontinued Operations
    20       20       9  
 
                 
Metso total
    197       183       155  
 
                 

F-45


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Orders received by business area

     Orders received by business area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    1,611       1,710       1,726  
Metso Minerals
    1,437       1,213       1,566  
Metso Automation
    643       531       570  
Metso Ventures
    468       398       361  
Intra Metso orders received
    (120 )     (121 )     (113 )
 
                 
Continuing operations
    4,039       3,731       4,110  
Discontinued Operations
    607       525       264  
 
                 
Metso total
    4,646       4,256       4,374  
 
                 

Order backlog by business area

     Order backlog by business area as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

                         
    At December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    735       784       946  
Metso Minerals
    413       347       560  
Metso Automation
    185       145       176  
Metso Ventures
    154       175       118  
Intra Metso order backlog
    (55 )     (55 )     (55 )
 
                 
Continuing operations
    1,432       1,396       1,745  
Discontinued Operations
    157       109        
 
                 
Metso total
    1,589       1,505       1,745  
 
                 

F-46


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Information about Metso’s operations in different geographical areas as at and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

     Net sales to unaffiliated customers by destination:

                                                                         
            Other     Other                             Rest              
            Nordic     European     North     South     Asia-     of the           Metso  
Year   Finland     Countries     Countries     America     America     Pacific     World     Eliminations     Total  
    ( in millions)  
2002
    382       453       1,363       1,199       417       652       225             4,691  
2003
    357       310       1,272       989       264       824       234             4,250  
2004
    332       337       1,017       837       298       909       246             3,976  

     In 2004, 20 percent of net sales was recognized under the percentage of completion method. The percentage was highest in the Metso Paper business area, where it accounted for 40 percent of net sales.

     Metso’s exports, including sales to unaffiliated customers and intragroup sales from Finland, by destination for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                                                         
    Other     Other                             Rest of        
    Nordic     European     North     South     Asia-     The        
Year   Countries     Countries     America     America     Pacific     World     Total  
    ( in millions)  
2002
    297       567       183       137       248       21       1,453  
2003
    195       523       209       38       372       15       1,352  
2004
    210       420       141       75       526       23       1,395  

     Fixed assets and financial assets by location as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                                                                         
            Other     Other                             Rest                
            Nordic     European     North     South     Asia-     of the             Metso  
Year   Finland     Countries     Countries     America     America     Pacific     World     Eliminations     Total  
    ( in millions)  
2002
    514       935       108       357       24       57       10             2,005  
2003
    504       746       96       233       23       52       10             1,664  
2004
    481       499       47       190       25       45       9             1,296  

     Fixed and financial assets include goodwill, other intangible assets, tangible assets, shares and other long-term interest bearing and non-interest bearing receivables.

     Gross capital expenditure (excluding business acquisitions) by region for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                                                                         
            Other     Other                             Rest                
            Nordic     European     North     South     Asia-     of the             Metso  
Year   Finland     Countries     Countries     America     America     Pacific     World     Eliminations     Total  
    ( in millions)  
2002
    119       23       23       14       5       8       1             193  
2003
    70       15       19       10       5       7       2             128  
2004
    54       10       11       9       8       4       1             97  

F-47


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 30. Differences between Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in Finland and the United States

     Metso’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Finnish GAAP, which differ in certain respects from the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The principal differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP are presented and described below, together with explanations of the adjustments that affect consolidated net income (loss) and total shareholders’ equity as of and for the periods indicated. The financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been restated for 2002 and 2003. See Notes 30 d) and q) for additional information related to these restatements. As detailed further below, the significant business combination of Valmet and Rauma is accounted for as the pooling of interests under Finnish GAAP, but is accounted for using the purchase method under U.S. GAAP. This difference impacts the valuation of a number of financial statement accounts at the date of the combination. For presentation purposes in the following reconciliation, the “Business combination, net” item solely includes the impact of differences that arose using the purchase method under U.S. GAAP. The other items reflect the post-combination differences between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
    (restated)     (restated)          
Reconciliation of net income
                       
Net income in accordance with Finnish GAAP
    65       (258 )     69  
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
                       
a) Business combination, net
    (8 )     (6 )     (19 )
b) Purchase accounting, net
    (21 )     (6 )     (5 )
c) Amortization of goodwill
    52       47       34  
d) Impairment of goodwill
          (30 )      
e) Impairment of brand names
          (13 )      
f) Fair value of financial derivatives
    35       (24 )     3  
g) Pension surplus refund
    2       1        
h) Employee benefit plans
    (4 )     (2 )     (15 )
i) Restructuring costs
    (5 )     30       (31 )
j) Written put option on subsidiary shares
          (5 )     5  
l) Net investment hedge
    7       (4 )     1  
m) Repurchase commitments
          (3 )     2  
p) Fees on bond exchange
                (2 )
q) Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets
    (91 )     28       1  
r) Discontinued Operations
          2       (44 )
Deferred tax effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments
    (10 )     8       3  
 
                 
Net income (loss) in accordance with U.S. GAAP
    22       (235 )     2  
 
                 
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    3       (196 )     66  
Discontinued Operations:
                       
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of income tax expense of 2 million, tax benefit of 2 million and tax expense of 4 million, respectively
    19       (39 )     8  
(Loss) on disposal of Discontinued Operations, net of income tax expense of 9
                (72 )
 
                 
Net income (loss) on Discontinued Operations
    19       (39 )     (64 )
 
                 
 
                       
Net income (loss) in accordance with U.S. GAAP
    22       (235 )     2  
 
                 
 
                       
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
                       
Continuing operations
    0.02       (1.44 )     0.48  
Discontinued Operations
    0.14       (0.29 )     (0.47 )
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
    0.16       (1.73 )     0.01  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding under U.S. GAAP (in thousands):
                       
Basic
    136,190       136,190       136,190  
Diluted
    136,190       136,190       136,192  

F-48


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                 
    As of December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
    (restated)  
Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity
               
Shareholders’ equity in accordance with Finnish GAAP
    1,024       1,052  
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
               
a) Business combination, net
    75       55  
b) Purchase accounting, net
    (41 )     (47 )
c) Amortization of goodwill
    110       116  
d) Impairment of goodwill
    (30 )     (44 )
e) Impairment of brand names
    (13 )      
f) Fair value of financial derivatives
    3       2  
g) Pension surplus refund
    (0 )      
h) Employee benefit plans
    (52 )     (77 )
i) Restructuring costs
    30       (1 )
j) Written put option on subsidiary shares
    (5 )      
k) Investments
    6       2  
m) Repurchase commitments
    (3 )     0  
n) Treasury stock
    (1 )     (1 )
o) Translation difference
    (72 )     (56 )
p) Fees for bond exchange
          (2 )
q) Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets
    (48 )     (42 )
r) Discontinued Operations
    2        
Deferred tax effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments
    13       21  
 
           
Shareholders’ equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP
    998       978  
 
           

     The financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been restated for 2002 and 2003. The below table summarizes the changes made, due to the restatements, in the reconciliation of net income and equity as previously presented. See Notes 30 d) and q) for additional information related to these restatements.

                                                 
    Year ended December 31,
    2002   2003
    As previously   Impact of   As   As previously   Impact of   As
    reported   Restatement   restated   reported   Restatement   restated
    ( in millions)
Reconciliation of net income
                                               
Net income (loss) in accordance with Finnish GAAP
    65             65       (258 )           (258 )
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
                                               
a) Business combination, net
    (8 )           (8 )     (6 )           (6 )
b) Purchase accounting, net
    (21 )           (21 )     (6 )           (6 )
c) Amortization of goodwill
    52             52       47             47  
d) Impairment of goodwill
                      (12 )     (18 )     (30 )
e) Impairment of brand names
                      (13 )           (13 )
f) Fair value of financial derivatives
    35             35       (24 )           (24 )
g) Pension surplus refund
    2             2       1             1  
h) Employee benefit plans
    (4 )           (4 )     (2 )           (2 )
i) Restructuring costs
    (5 )           (5 )     30             30  
j) Written put option on subsidiary shares
                      (5 )           (5 )
l) Net investment hedge
    7             7       (4 )           (4 )
m) Repurchase commitments
                      (3 )           (3 )
p) Fees on bond exchange
                                   
q) Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets
          (91 )     (91 )           28       28  
r) Discontinued Operations
                      2             2  
Deferred tax effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments
    (10 )           (10 )     8             8  
 
                                               
Net income (loss) in accordance with U.S. GAAP
    113       (91 )     22       (245 )     10       (235 )
 
                                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    94       (91 )     3       (206 )     10       (196 )
Discontinued Operations:
                                               
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of income tax expense of 2 million in 2002 and tax benefit of 2 million in 2003
    19             19       (39 )           (39 )
(Loss) on disposal of Discontinued expense of 9 million
                                   
 
                                               
Net income (loss) on Discontinued Operations
    19             19       (39 )           (39 )
 
                                               
Net income (loss) in accordance with U.S. GAAP
    113       (91 )     22       (245 )     10       (235 )
 
                                               
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
                                               
Continuing operations
    0.69       (0.67 )     0.02       (1.51 )     0.07       (1.44 )
Discontinued Operations
    0.14             0.14       (0.29 )           (0.29 )
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
    0.83       (0.67 )     0.16       (1.80 )     0.07       (1.73 )
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding under U.S. GAAP (in thousands):
                                               
Basic
    136,190             136,190       136,190             136,190  
Diluted
    136,190             136,190       136,190             136,190  
Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity
                                               
Shareholders’ equity in accordance with Finnish GAAP
    1,379             1,379       1,024             1,024  
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
                                               
a) Business combination, net
    81             81       75             75  
b) Purchase accounting, net
    (35 )           (35 )     (41 )           (41 )
c) Amortization of goodwill
    63             63       110             110  
d) Impairment of goodwill
                      (12 )     (18 )     (30 )
e) Impairment of brand names
                      (13 )           (13 )
f) Fair value of financial derivatives
    27             27       3             3  
g) Pension surplus refund
    (1 )           (1 )     (0 )           (0 )
h) Employee benefit plans
    (59 )           (59 )     (52 )           (52 )
i) Restructuring costs
                      30             30  
j) Written put option on subsidiary shares
                      (5 )           (5 )
k) Investments
    3             3       6             6  
m) Repurchase commitments
                      (3 )           (3 )
n) Treasury stock
    (1 )           (1 )     (1 )           (1 )
o) Translation difference
    (47 )           (47 )     (70 )     (2 )     (72 )
p) Fees for bond exchange
                                   
q) Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets
          (91 )     (91 )           (48 )     (48 )
r) Discontinued Operations
                      2             2  
Deferred tax effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments
    9             9       13             13  
 
                                               
Shareholders’ equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP
    1,419       (91 )     1,328       1,066       (68 )     998  
 
                                               

a) Business combination

     The merger of Rauma and Valmet, which, under Finnish GAAP, was accounted for by the pooling of interests method, was consummated on July 1, 1999. The net income and shareholders’ equity of Rauma, existing prior to the consummation date, was pooled with the shareholders’ equity of Valmet.

     Under U.S. GAAP, the merger was accounted for as a purchase, with Valmet as the accounting acquirer. The total purchase consideration of Rauma was determined on the basis of the fair value of the transaction when the combination was announced on November 17, 1998.

     The impact of the adjustments on the reconciliation of net income and of the shareholders’ equity is as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Net income
                       
Amortization of goodwill
    5       4       3  
Impairment of goodwill
          11        
Depreciation of buildings and structures
    (3 )     (3 )     (6 )
Depreciation of other tangible assets
    (10 )     (9 )     (19 )
Write down of fixed assets
          (11 )     (10 )
Disposal of fixed assets
    (5 )     (6 )     3  
Deferred taxes
    5       8       10  
 
                 
Total
    (8 )     (6 )     (19 )
 
                 

F-49


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                 
    As of December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Shareholders’ equity
               
Historical goodwill of Rauma
    (19 )     (13 )
Land and water areas
    1       1  
Buildings and structures
    83       67  
Machinery and equipment
    91       72  
Employee benefits
    (33 )     (33 )
Current liabilities
    (12 )     (12 )
Deferred taxes
    (36 )     (27 )
 
           
Total
    75       55  
 
           

     The following table presents the change in U.S. GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, respectively:

                                 
    Opening             Accumulated     Closing  
    balance     Decreases     amortization     balance  
    ( in millions)  
Year 2003:
                               
Land and water areas
    2       (1 )           1  
Buildings
    96       (4 )     (9 )     83  
Machinery and equipment
    155       (29 )     (35 )     91  
 
                       
Total
    253       (34 )     (44 )     175  
 
                       
Year 2004:
                               
Land and water areas
    1                   1  
Buildings
    92       (10 )     (15 )     67  
Machinery and equipment
    126             (54 )     72  
 
                       
Total
    219       (10 )     (69 )     140  
 
                       

     In the year ended December 31, 2004, Metso reviewed the remaining economic life of certain fixed assets, which were acquired in the business combination in 1999. Because of the accelerated of changes in the production technology and of Metso’s refocus from its own production to higher reliance on outsourced production, the remaining economic life for buildings has been reduced from 30 years down to a maximum of 15 years, and that of other tangible assets down to 5 years.

F-50


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

b) Purchase accounting, net

     During the year ended December 31, 2001, Metso acquired Svedala Industri AB, a Swedish industrial group. The following table reflects the U.S. GAAP purchase accounting adjustments:

         
    in millions  
    (restated)  
Goodwill
    711  
Land and buildings
    34  
Other tangible assets
    15  
Patents
    7  
Trademarks
    58  
Customer value
    67  
Order backlog
    30  
Inventories
    10  
Liability for pensions under FAS87 and FAS106
    (28 )
Deferred taxation on the above adjustments
    (56 )
 
     
Excess of purchase consideration over the net assets acquired
    848  
 
     

     The following table presents the change in U.S. GAAP purchase accounting adjustments, excluding goodwill, during the financial year 2004:

                                         
    Purchase                             Purchase  
    accounting                             accounting  
    adjustments at     Decreases/     Accumulated     Translation     adjustments at  
    beginning of year     Increases     amortization     differences     end of year  
    ( in millions)  
    (restated)                                  
Brand names(1)
    39       (29 )           4       14  
Customer value
    63       (6 )     (30 )     0       27  
Patents(1)
    7       (0 )     (2 )     (1 )     4  
Land and water areas(1)
    11       (1 )           0       10  
Buildings(1)
    17       (6 )     (2 )     0       9  
Other tangible assets(1)
    14       (5 )     (4 )     0       5  
Liability for pensions under FAS87 and FAS 106
    (28 )     (0 )                 (28 )
Deferred taxes
    (36 )     14       11       (1 )     (12 )
 
                             
Total
    87       (33 )     (27 )     2       29  
 
                             


(1)   In the year of acquisition, Metso recorded following purchase accounting adjustments under Finnish GAAP (as gross values): 58 million for brands, 7 million for patents, 13 million for land and water areas, 21 million for buildings and 15 million for other tangible assets.

     The amortization periods of assets assigned from the excess of purchase consideration are:

     
Buildings
  20 years
Other tangible assets
  8 years
Patents
  Average of 9 years and 5 months
Customer value
  From 40 months to 80 months depending on the type of customer group
Order backlog and inventory
  Average of 15 months

F-51


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     The impact of these adjustments on the reconciliation of net income and shareholders’ equity, excluding the impact of result on Discontinued Operations, translation difference and impairment loss on intangible assets, between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP for the Svedala acquisition are as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Difference between net income under Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP
                       
Reversal of amortization of brand names
    4       3       2  
Amortization of customer value under U.S. GAAP
    (11 )     (11 )     (10 )
Difference between amortization of other intangible assets
    0       0       0  
Difference between depreciation of tangible assets
    1             0  
Amortization of order backlog under U.S. GAAP
    (16 )            
Inventory: amortization of difference between the fair value and net book value under U.S. GAAP
    (8 )            
Deferred taxes
    9       2       3  
 
                 
Total difference between net income for continuing operations under Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP
    (21 )     (6 )     (5 )
 
                 
 
                       
Effect of disposals to the cumulative difference in shareholders’ equity
                (1 )
 
                 
Difference of cumulative effect on shareholders’ equity between Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP after disposals
    (35 )     (41 )     (47 )
 
                 

c) Amortization of goodwill

     Under Finnish GAAP, goodwill is amortized over its estimated useful life. Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill and certain intangible assets having indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization.

     For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, the impact on net income between Finnish and U.S. GAAP is as follows:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Difference between net income under Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP
                       
Goodwill amortization under Finnish GAAP
    57       51       37  
Amortization of goodwill existing in Rauma prior to the merger of Valmet and Rauma in 1999, adjusted in Note a)
    (5 )     (4 )     (3 )
 
                 
Remaining U.S. GAAP net income adjustment.
    52       47       34  
 
                 

     In the year ended December 31, 2004, 28 million of goodwill amortization, reversed under U.S. GAAP related to disposed businesses.

d) Impairment of goodwill

     Under U.S. GAAP, as a result of the adoption of SFAS 141 and SFAS 142, goodwill and certain intangible assets having indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization. Their book values are tested annually for impairment, or more frequently, if facts and circumstances indicate the need. Fair value measurement techniques, such as the discounted cash flow methodology, are utilized to assess potential impairments. The testing is performed on the reporting unit level, which can

F-52


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

be either a reportable segment or one level below reportable segment. In the discounted cash flow method, Metso discounts forecasted performance plans to their present value. The discount rate utilized is the weighted average cost of capital for the reporting unit, calculated as the opportunity cost to all capital providers weighted by their relative contribution to the reporting unit’s total capital and the risk associated with the cash flows and the timing of the cash flows. Comparison methods (e.g., peer comparables) and other estimation techniques are used to verify the reasonableness of the fair values derived from the discounted cash flow assessments.

     Upon adoption of SFAS 142 as of January 1, 2002, Metso completed the transitional impairment test and concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill or identifiable intangibles with indefinite lives. Metso also completed this annual impairment test as of September 30, 2002 and no impairment in the carrying value was recorded as a result of those tests. In 2003, as a result of tightened competition, reduced demand in certain market areas and the development of exchange rates, especially the impact of the weakened U.S. dollar, the operating profits of Metso Minerals operations were lower than expected. As of September 30, 2003, upon completion of the first step of the annual impairment assessment, based on updated forecasted plans approved by the Board of Directors, it was determined that a potential risk of impairment existed, since the carrying values exceeded the fair values of certain Metso Minerals’ reporting units. The second step of the impairment test compared the implied fair value of these reporting units goodwill to the corresponding carrying value of goodwill. The outcome of the second step was that the carrying value of goodwill of such reporting units exceeded the implied fair value of the goodwill by 224 million (as restated, see below). Accordingly, an impairment loss of this amount was recognized.

     Concurrently, Metso performed an impairment assessment of its goodwill under Finnish GAAP, which resulted in an impairment loss of 205 million, see Note 11. The difference in the amount of the goodwill impairment under Finnish GAAP versus U.S. GAAP, adjusted for goodwill reversed in the business combination under U.S.GAAP, has been reported in the reconciliation of income statement and shareholders equity of Note 30. The business combination has been explained in Note 30 (a).

     In conjunction with the transition to IFRS, in 2004, the Company undertook a complete review of the defined pension benefit liability under IAS 19. In the course of this review, an error was detected in the purchase accounting related to the U.S. GAAP pension liability recorded in the acquisition of Svedala in 2001 (see note b) on purchase accounting). In order to correctly record this pension liability in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the balance sheet at the time of acquisition would have reflected an additional pension liability of 20 million, net of tax effect of 8 million, instead of a pension asset of 6 million, net of tax effect of 2 million, as reported prior to the restatement. The corresponding increase to goodwill would have been 26 million, which would have been allocated to the underlying reporting units in accordance with SFAS 142. The 2002 and 2003 financial statements, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, have been restated to reflect the impact of adjustments made to the pension assets and liabilities combined with the increase in goodwill from the Svedala acquisition in 2001.

In 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge on its goodwill. After consideration of this additional goodwill, the impairment charge in 2003, under U.S. GAAP, would have been increased as a result of this additional goodwill. As a result, the restated U.S. GAAP income statement reflects an additional impairment loss of 18 million in 2003. The impact of this restatement on the U.S. GAAP financial statements has been summarised in Note 30 (see Note 30).

In the year ended December 31, 2004, Metso performed its annual impairment test and concluded that there were no indications of impairment.

F-53


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     An analysis of goodwill by reporting segment under U.S. GAAP, as restated is given below:

                                                 
    Paper   Automation   Minerals   Ventures   Discontinued   Total
    ( in millions)
2003:
                                               
As of January 1, 2003
    84       25       512       16       190       827  
Translation difference
    (11 )     (1 )     (18 )     0       (6 )     (36 )
Increases
                                   
Impairment
                (175 )           (49 )     (224 )
Decreases
                                   
 
                                               
As of December 31, 2003
    73       24       319       16       135       567  
 
                                               
2004:
                                               
Translation difference
    (3 )     (1 )     (6 )     1             (9 )
Increases
    1       0                         1  
Decreases
          (0 )     (4 )           (135 )     (139 )
 
                                               
As of December 31, 2004
    71       23       309       17             420  
 
                                               
    An analysis of identifiable intangible assets under U.S. GAAP is given below:
                                         
                    Order   Other intangible    
    Brand Names   Customer Value   Backlog   assets   Total
            ( in millions)                
2003:
                                       
As of January 1, 2003
    55       64       30       133       282  
Translation difference
    (3 )     (1 )           (3 )     (7 )
Additions
                      39       39  
Decreases
    (13 )(1)                 (3 )     (16 )
Accumulated amortization expense
          (24 )     (30 )     (84 )     (138 )
 
                                       
As of December 31, 2003
    39       39             82 (2)     160  
 
                                       
2004:
                                       
As of January 1, 2004
    39       63             166       268  
Translation difference
    4       (0 )           (1 )     3  
Additions
                      25       25  
Decreases
    (29 )     (6 )           (32 )     (67 )
Accumulated amortization expense
          (30 )           (80 )     (110 )
 
                                       
As of December 31, 2004
    14       27             78 (2)     119  
 
                                       
 
(1)   Impairment loss on brand names (see adjustment e) impairment of brand names).
 
(2)   Includes patents and licenses for a net book value of 32 million and 39 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
    Brand names have been designated as intangible assets with an indefinite life under U.S. GAAP and, as such, have not been amortized. Under Finnish GAAP, brands continue to be amortized, for the reversal of amortization cost, see note b) on purchase accounting.
    For the year ended December 31, 2004, the amortization expense of the other identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization was 22 million. The amortization expense is expected to be 22 million, 22 million, 22 million, 17 million and 13 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

e) Impairment of brand names

     Under Finnish GAAP, brand names are amortized based on their estimated economic life. Their carrying value is tested for impairment when there are indications that the income generating capacity of the brand name has been reduced due to internal or external factors. Under Metso’s impairment principles, if a reporting unit, subject to impairment testing, carries both goodwill and intangible assets on its balance sheet, any impairment loss is primarily offset against the goodwill. If the impairment loss exceeds the carrying value of goodwill, the excess will be written off against other intangible assets.

     Under U.S. GAAP, certain intangible assets, such as brand names, are considered to have an indefinite life and therefore are not amortized. Their carrying value is tested annually for impairment either separately or together with goodwill. In the second phase of the goodwill impairment assessment, in order to arrive at the implied fair value of the goodwill, the company has to calculate the fair values of the assets and liabilities related to the reporting unit subject to testing. Should the carrying value of an intangible asset with indefinite life exceed its implied fair value calculated for the second phase, as was the case in 2003, in the impairment assessment of one of Metso Minerals’ reporting unit, the excess would be recognized as an impairment loss. In 2003, as a result of the second phase test, Metso recognized an impairment loss of 13 million on brand names. The implied fair value of the brand names was evaluated through the relief from royalty method.

     In the year ended December 31, 2004, Metso performed its annual impairment test and concluded that there were no indications of impairment.

F-54


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

f) Fair value of financial derivatives

     Under U.S. GAAP, all derivative financial instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair values recognized through earnings unless strict hedge accounting criteria for cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments have been met. In addition, SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” requires the Company to bifurcate certain hybrid contracts (i.e. contracts with embedded derivatives) and to fair value the derivative components through earnings.

     Metso enters into forward exchange contracts to manage its foreign exchange exposure related to firm commitments and anticipated revenues net of expenses denominated in foreign currencies other than the functional currencies. As permitted under Finnish GAAP, Metso has deferred the unrealized gains and losses (balance sheet date fair values) on such hedges until the underlying transaction has been recorded in the financial statements. Under U.S. GAAP, as Metso has not met the SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting criteria, such unrealized gains and losses must be included in the determination of net income, resulting in a U.S. GAAP income adjustment of 33 million, (10) million and (1) million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

     Metso has entered into long-term swap contracts to hedge its interest rate exposure. Under Finnish GAAP, the Company accounts for the swap contracts using the accrual method. Under U.S. GAAP, swap contracts are fair valued and changes in fair values must be included in the determination of net income resulting in a U.S. GAAP income adjustment of 3 million 0 million and (3) million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

     Under Finnish GAAP, the Company is not required to bifurcate and fair value foreign currency embedded derivatives included in firm commitments. Under U.S. GAAP, firm commitments, in which the currency is not the functional currency of either counter-party, must be fair valued on the balance sheet with changes in fair values recorded through earnings. The recording of embedded derivatives, at fair values, in Metso’s U.S. GAAP net income amounted to (1) million, (13) million and 3 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

     In 2003, Metso extended its risk management policy to include commodity forwards. Their designation and effectiveness testing do not meet hedge accounting criteria under U.S. GAAP and the changes in fair value are recognized through earnings. Their effect to Metso’s U.S. GAAP net income was (1) and (0) million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

     The combined effect of these adjustments in Metso’s U.S. GAAP net income and shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, is as follows:

                         
    Gross     Tax     Net  
    ( in millions)  
Balance sheet difference as at January 1, 2002
    (8 )     2       (6 )
Changes in fair values recognized through 2002 U.S. GAAP earnings
    35       (10 )     25  
 
                 
 
                       
Balance sheet difference as at December 31, 2002
    27       (8 )     19  
Changes in fair values recognized through 2003 U.S. GAAP earnings
    (24 )     7       (17 )
 
                 
Balance sheet difference as at December 31, 2003
    3       (1 )     2  
 
                 
 
                       
Changes in fair values recognized through 2004 U.S. GAAP earnings:
                       
Continuing operations
    3       (1 )     2  
Discontinued Operations
    (4 )     1       (3 )
 
                 
Balance sheet difference as at December 31, 2004
    2       (1 )     1  
 
                 

F-55


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Under Finnish GAAP, Metso applies hedge accounting and records the realized gains and losses on hedging instruments to the same income statement line item and cash flow statement line item as the underlying hedge transaction is recorded. Under U.S. GAAP, the following adjustments would be made to the income statement line items for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Operating profit
    (74 )     (56 )     3  
Financial income and expenses
    109       32       (0 )
Income taxes
    (10 )     7       (1 )
Discontinued Operations
                (3 )
 
                 
Net income
    25       (17 )     (1 )
 
                 

g) Pension surplus refund

     During 2000, Metso received a surplus refund amounting to 14 million before taxes from the Swedish pension insurer Alecta (SPP). The refund was received partly in cash with the remaining portion of the total amount mainly utilizable against future pension premiums. Under Finnish GAAP, the total surplus refund was recognized in income in 2000.

     Under U.S. GAAP, only the portion reimbursed in cash can be recognized in income. As at December 31, 2001, Metso had received, of the total refund, 11 million in cash. In consecutive years, the cash payments have amounted to 2 million and 1 million before taxes for the years ended December 31 2002 and 2003, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the total refund has been received or utilized against premiums settling the difference between Finnish and US GAAP from previous years.

h) Employee benefit plans

  Pensions and other postretirement benefits

     Metso generally records pension expense in accordance with local accounting practices in the countries in which employees are provided with such benefits.

     Under U.S. GAAP, pension expense is recorded on a full accrual basis and reflected in the income statement over the working lives of the employees provided with such benefits. The economic and demographic assumptions used in calculating pension expense are to be reviewed and updated periodically to the extent that local market economic conditions and demographics change.

     The companies within Metso have various pension schemes pursuant to local conditions and practices of the countries in which they operate. Most of these programs are defined benefit pension schemes with retirement, disability, death and termination income benefits. The retirement income benefits are generally a function of years of employment and the final salary with Metso, and are usually coordinated with local national pensions. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or to trustee-administered funds as determined by periodic actuarial calculations. Metso also maintains some multiemployer pension arrangements, insured plans and defined contribution pension arrangements. Contributions to these plans amounted to approximately 75 million, 67 million, and 84 million for years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.

     Metso provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Substantially all the U.S. and Canadian employees are provided these benefits. Under U.S. GAAP, SFAS No. 106 “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions” requires Metso to accrue the estimated cost of postretirement benefit payments during the years the employee provides services.

     Metso uses December 31 as measurement date for its pension plans.

F-56


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     For its noninsured, employer-sponsored defined benefit pension schemes, net periodic benefit cost included in Metso’s net profit (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, includes the following components for companies subject to SFAS No. 87 and 106 recalculation:

                                                 
                            Pension and post-retirement  
    Pension benefits, domestic     benefits, foreign  
    2002     2003     2004     2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Service cost
    16       14       9       10       8       6  
Interest cost
    6       6       6       22       20       19  
Expected return on plan assets
                (0 )     (15 )     (12 )     (13 )
Net amortization
    2       0       (1 )     1       2       2  
Employee contributions
                                   
 
                                   
Net periodic benefit cost
    24       20       14       18       18       14  
 
                                   
Special adjustments:
                                               
SFAS No. 88 events
                            1       (11 )
Other adjustment
                4       1       3       7  
 
                                   
Grand total net periodic benefit cost
    24       20       18       19       22       10  
 
                                   

     The following tables set forth the change in benefit obligation and the amounts, which would be recognized in Metso’s consolidated balance sheet in accordance with U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004:

                                 
                    Pension and post-  
    Pension benefits, domestic     retirement benefits, foreign  
    2003     2004     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Change in benefit obligation
                               
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
    102       102       334       335  
Service cost
    14       9       8       6  
Interest cost
    6       6       20       19  
SFAS No. 88 events
    (3 )           (4 )     (12 )
Participant contributions
                1       1  
Amendments
          (7 )     2       (1 )
Special termination benefits
                4        
Increase in coverage
          11       4       6  
Acquisitions
                      0  
Actuarial loss (gain)
    (1 )     (12 )     22       14  
Benefits paid
    (16 )     (5 )     (21 )     (20 )
Currency effect
                (35 )     (13 )
 
                       
Benefit obligation at end of year
    102       104       335       335  
 
                       

F-57


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                                 
                    Pension and post-retirement  
    Pension benefits, domestic     benefits, foreign  
    2003     2004     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Change in plan assets
                               
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
          0       167       167  
Actuarial return on plan assets
          1       21       16  
Company contribution
    16       7       22       13  
FAS 88 events
                       
Participant contribution
                1       1  
Other adjustment
                      (1 )
Benefits paid
    (16 )     (5 )     (21 )     (20 )
Increase in coverage
          7             1  
Currency effect
                (23 )     (8 )
 
                       
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
    0       10       167       169  
 
                       
Funded status reconciliation
                               
Funded status
    (102 )     (94 )     (168 )     (165 )
Unrecognized transitional obligations (asset)
                0       0  
Unrecognized prior service cost
    (6 )     (12 )     5       3  
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss
    15       1       41       45  
 
                       
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost
    (93 )     (105 )     (122 )     (117 )
 
                       

     Under U.S. GAAP, an additional minimum liability is recognized and a charge made to other comprehensive income when the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets to the extent this amount is not covered by the net liability recognized in the balance sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, an additional minimum liability of 25 million and 35 million was recognized, respectively.

     Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:

                                 
                    Pension and post retirement  
    Pension benefits, domestic     benefits, foreign  
    2003     2004     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)     ( in millions)  
Accrued employee benefit liability
    (93 )     (105 )     (152 )     (157 )
Prepaid benefit cost
                5       5  
Intangible asset
                5       4  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
                20       31  
 
                       
Net amount recognized
    (93 )     (105 )     (122 )     (117 )
 
                       
For plans where ABO exceeds assets:
                               
ABO
    71       81       238       260  
PBO
    102       97       258       311  
Fair value of assets
          4       131       143  

     Weighted average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

                                 
                    Pension and post-retirement  
    Pension benefits, domestic     benefits, foreign  
    2003     2004     2003     2004  
Discount rate
    5.50 %     5.25 %     6.45 %     6.02 %
Expected return on plan assets
                7.89 %     8.04 %
Rate of compensation increase
    3.50 %     3.00 %     3.69 %     3.55 %

     The expected return on plan assets is set by reference to historical returns on the main asset classes, current market indicators such as long-term bond yields and the expected long-term strategic asset allocation of each plan.

F-58


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations as of December 31 are as follows:

                                 
                    Pension and post-retirement  
    Pension benefits, domestic     benefits, foreign  
    2003     2004     2003     2004  
Discount rate
    5.25 %     5.00 %     6.02 %     5.71 %
Rate of compensation increase
    3.00 %     3.22 %     3.55 %     3.68 %

     An increase of one percentage point in the assumed health care cost trend would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by 2 million at December 31, 2004. It would increase the sum of the service and interest cost by 0.2 million for 2004. A decrease of one percentage point in the assumed health care cost trend would decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by 2 million at December 31, 2004. It would decrease the sum of the service and interest cost by 0.2 million for 2004. The health care cost trend during the next four years is expected to fall from 9 percent to five percent.

     Following additional information, as required in accordance with SFAS 132 “Employers Disclosure about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Revised”, which was issued in December 2003, applied to domestic plans in the year of issue and was extended to include foreign plans in 2004.

     In 2005, Metso expects to contribute 16 million in respect to the Finnish TEL system for the pension liability. At December 31, 2003 and 2004, the accumulated benefit obligation for domestic plans amounted to 71 million and 86 million, respectively.

     The weighted-average plan asset allocations were following as of the balance sheet date:

         
Asset category   2004  
Equity securities
    52 %
Bonds
    45 %
Other
    3 %

     The asset allocation for each plan is determined locally in conjunction with investment and actuarial advice, with reference to the plan’s liability profile and any local statutory requirements. The current allocation of assets is in line with the target allocation of assets.

     The estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are following:

                 
    Pension        
    plans     Other plans  
    ( in millions)  
Year
               
2005
    19       3  
2006
    19       3  
2007
    20       3  
2008
    20       3  
2009
    21       3  
2010-2014
    107       14  

F-59


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

i) Restructuring costs

     Timing difference in recognition of restructuring costs under Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP in the year December 31, 2002

     Under Finnish GAAP, Metso recognized downsizing and restructuring costs of 36 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.

     Under U.S. GAAP, certain portions of the restructuring and integration costs, amounting to 5 million, did not qualify for accrual and expense recognition in the year ended December 31, 2001. As the total amount was realized in the year ended December 31, 2002, the difference between income under Finnish and U.S. GAAP was reversed in 2002.

     Timing difference in recognition of restructuring costs under Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP in the year ended December 31, 2003

     In June 2003, Metso announced an efficiency improvement program affecting all business areas. The program was designed to cut overhead costs aiming to achieve substantial cost savings. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Metso recognized 103 million of expenses under the efficiency improvement plan in accordance with Finnish GAAP. The plan included streamlining of sales and administrative organizations and closing down plants to reduce excess production capacity in the United States and in Europe. The personnel cuts have resulted in a reduction of some 1,900 persons both through involuntary terminations and through disposals and outsourcing solutions. The realization of final measures under the plan is expected to cause a further reduction of 140 persons in 2005. The realized and planned costs have been presented in detail in Note 9.

     Under U.S. GAAP, a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity is measured at fair value and recognized when the liability is incurred. These costs include, but are not limited to, one-time benefits provided to current employees, who are involuntarily terminated and costs to terminate contracts, other than capital leases. If employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits, the cost under U.S. GAAP is recognized ratably over the future service period whereas under Finnish GAAP, a provision for the full termination benefit cost is recognized in the period in which the Company becomes legally or constructively committed to a plan. Certain portions of the costs related to efficiency improvement program, amounting to 30 million before a tax effect of 6 million, did not meet the criteria for accrual and expense recognition under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2003, and were reversed in the income statement and shareholders’ equity reconciliation of Note 30.

     In the year ended December 31, 2004, the final outcome of certain measures, including gains on disposals, under the efficiency improvement program differed from the initial projections by 10 million, reducing the total cost from the expected 103 million down to 93 million. Under Finnish GAAP, the reduction was recognized under nonrecurring items in 2004. As certain employee termination and other costs included in this reduction had not met the recognition criteria under U.S. GAAP in the previous year, the impact of the reduction to the net income under U.S. GAAP was 2 million.

     In addition, as part of the program, Metso sold certain assets related to production operations, including land, buildings and equipment to a buyer for 6 million and recognized under nonrecurring items, as part of the savings of 10 million, a gain on sale of these assets of 3 million in accordance with Finnish GAAP. Concurrently, Metso entered into a partnering agreement with the buyer for production of certain goods. As part of the sales agreement, Metso is obligated to repurchase the assets disposed if the buyer defaults on the partnering agreement within the first year commencing on October 1, 2004.

     For U.S. GAAP, a sale cannot be recognized if continuing involvement of the seller exists in relation to the assets sold. As such, this sale cannot be recognized as the obligation to repurchase the assets sold within the first year of the contract constitutes continuing involvement for Metso. An adjustment of 2 million, net of tax effect of 1 million, has been recorded to reverse the gain on sale of the assets.

F-60


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     No more costs are expected to be recognized under the 2003 program. The total cost of the program per reporting segment has been following:

         
    ( in millions)  
Metso Paper
    33 (1)
Metso Minerals
    52  
Metso Automation
    6  
Metso Ventures
    5  
 
     
Total cost of the program
    96  
 
     


(1)   Includes impact of reversal of gain of 3 million on disposal under U.S. GAAP.

     Under U.S. GAAP, a cost reserve of 24 million, net of tax effect of 6 million, resulting from the program, which did not qualify for recognition in the year ended December 31, 2003, was reversed in 2004 eliminating the timing difference between Finnish and U.S. GAAP.

     Timing difference in recognition of restructuring costs under Finnish GAAP and U.S. GAAP in the year ended December 31, 2004

     In 2004, Metso decided on a program for renewal of Metso Paper’s business concept with the aim to streamline the cost structure. The main locations affected by the program are operations in Finland, Sweden and in North America. The measures include personnel reductions in production and administration, disposals of non-cores sites and reorganization of the tissue business line.

     Under Finnish GAAP, Metso recognized 26 million of restructuring costs under the 2004 program, see Note 9 for additional information. Under U.S. GAAP, certain costs, amounting to 1 million, net of tax effect of 1 million, related to the program did not qualify for recognition and have been reversed in the income statement and shareholders’ equity in the year ended December 31, 2004.

     Cost accruals under U.S. GAAP for restructuring plans

     The table below illustrates the activity in the restructuring reserves:

                 
    As of December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Balance as at January 1
    53       53  
Translation difference
    (3 )     (1 )
Additions to current year reserves
    39       58  
Adjustments to prior year reserves
          (2 )
Amounts paid/charged to the reserve
    (36 )     (64 )
 
           
Balance as at December 31
    53       44  
 
           

     Included in the balances above are amounts related to lease contracts and post-employment pension amounting to 9 million and 14 million at December 31, 2003 and 2004 respectively, which have been included in long-term liabilities as the payout of these obligations will not be completed within one year.

F-61


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Under U.S. GAAP, the cost accrual for the 2003 efficiency improvement program was as follows:

         
    As of December 31,  
    2003  
    ( in millions)  
Reserve recorded under Finnish GAAP
    77  
Reclassified under U.S. GAAP as deductions to fixed assets and inventory
    (17 )
 
     
Efficiency improvement program reserve related to restructuring costs under Finnish GAAP
    60  
Amounts reversed under U.S. GAAP
    (30 )
 
     
U.S. GAAP reserve as of December 31, 2003
    30  
 
     

     Under Finnish GAAP, as of December 31, 2003, certain impairment losses on fixed assets and an inventory obsolescence reserve together totalling 17 million under the program were included as provisions to the balance sheet under Finnish GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP such amounts are recorded as deductions of the related asset balances.

     The reserve recorded under U.S. GAAP was mainly composed of pension liabilities and early retirement measures, which amounted to 10 million, and of employee termination benefits of 16 million. The remaining amount of 4 million included other restructuring costs related to reduction of production capacity and streamlining of the sales organization under the program.

j) Written put option on subsidiary shares

     Under Finnish GAAP, certain obligations, such as written put options on subsidiary shares, need not be recognized before they become exercisable by the counterparty.

     Under U.S. GAAP, Metso was required to fair value such written put options and to recognize them as a liability on the balance sheet. Metso had issued a put option obligating it to redeem, at a fixed price, the minority ownership in one of its subsidiaries. The option, which could be exercised between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2005, was fair valued by discounting the settlement amount to its present value, adjusted by the value of the minority ownership under U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2003.

     In the year ended December 31, 2004, Metso exercised its right to repurchase the minority ownership at a pre-agreed price causing the written put option to lapse.

     Under Finnish GAAP, Metso reversed 5 million of the previously recognized gain and recorded the shares at their fair value eliminating the timing difference in net income between U.S. GAAP and Finnish GAAP.

k) Investments

     Under Finnish GAAP, Metso records short-term investments at market value and changes in the market value are recorded as part of “financial income and expense” in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Under Finnish GAAP, Metso records other long-term investments, other than equity securities, at lower of cost or market value. Shares are recorded at lower of cost or market value, when the market value is considered to reflect a permanent impairment of the investment.

     For U.S. GAAP purposes, all of Metso’s short-term and other long-term investments in debt securities and equity securities with a readily determinable market value are classified as “available-for-sale” and recorded at fair value with changes in unrealized appreciation recorded directly to shareholders’ equity, net of applicable deferred income taxes. As a result, Metso recognized 6 million and 2 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively as an adjustment to shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP.

F-62


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Available-for-sale securities in accordance with U.S. GAAP are summarized as follows:

                                 
            Gross     Gross        
    U.S. GAAP     unrealized     unrealized     Market  
    Cost(1)     holding gains     holding losses     Value  
            ( in millions)                  
December 31, 2003
    35       6       (0 )     41  
December 31, 2004
    7       2       (0 )     9  


(1)   U.S. GAAP cost is comprised of the historical acquisition price.

     The gain realized on disposal of available-for-sale securities was 4 million and 3 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

l) Net investment hedge

     In the year ended December 31, 2002, Metso had designated an intercompany foreign currency denominated loan as a hedge of a net investment under Finnish GAAP and as a result recorded the exchange rate difference against the translation difference arising from the hedge of the net investment at consolidation. Under U.S. GAAP, hedge accounting may be applied in consolidation only if the intercompany loan designated as a hedging instrument is offset by a third-party loan. The exchange rate gain has been reversed from cumulative translation adjustment accounts and recognized as income in the year ended December 31, 2002.

     Under Finnish GAAP, Metso has applied hedge accounting for a forward exchange contract designated as a hedge of its net investments in foreign subsidiaries denominated in CAD and USD. The subsidiaries are owned by the parent company, which has the euro as its functional currency.

     Under U.S. GAAP, the hedge effectiveness criteria are not met as the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument is based on changes in CAD/USD spot exchange rates where as the translation adjustment arises between CAD and EUR and USD and EUR, respectively. As a result, the unrealized loss on the hedging instrument has been included in the determination of net income under U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004.

m) Repurchase commitments and securitization

     Repurchase commitments

     Metso has entered into certain contracts to sell machines, which include commitments to buy back the machine at a minimum specified value at the end of the contract period. Under Finnish GAAP, revenue is recognized in full and any liability resulting from the guarantee is disclosed as a contingent liability and recognized only when incurred.

     U.S. GAAP precludes recognition of revenue for these contracts and accordingly, the revenue and gross profit related to these sales, net of taxes, has been reversed. Under U.S. GAAP, the amounts received for these machines, net of the guaranteed amount, are recorded as deferred revenue and amortized over the contract period. The equipment remains as an asset on the balance sheet and is amortized over the contracted period to the lower of its repurchase value or market value. At the end of the contract period, if the repurchase commitment has not been exercised, the remaining deferred revenue is recognized as income against the remaining value of the equipment.

     Securitization

     Metso has entered into various agreements with third party financial institutions to sell certain receivables with recourse. These agreements require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to five years from inception, with interest rates based on market conditions. Metso has retained the servicing of substantially all of these contracts.

     The Swedish Export Credits Guarantee Board provides an export guarantee for the benefit of the Company covering 100% political risk and 80-85% of commercial risk on the receivables. Metso provides the

F-63


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

buyer of the receivables with a guarantee to cover any non-payment by the customer not covered by the Swedish Export Credits Guarantee.

     Net receivables outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2004 relating to finance contracts sold were 14 million and 5 million respectively.

n) Treasury stock

     Under Finnish GAAP, treasury stock is presented within financial assets. Under U.S. GAAP, treasury stock is to be shown as a deduction of the consolidated shareholder’s equity and, consequently, 1 million at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively, has been deducted from the shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP.

o) Translation difference

     Under Finnish GAAP, the Company records certain purchase accounting adjustments related to foreign subsidiaries in euro, which is the functional currency of the Parent Company.

     Under U.S. GAAP, purchase accounting adjustments are recorded in the functional currency of the subsidiary to which they relate. As a result, currency translation differences have been recognized with respect to such purchase accounting adjustments. The translation difference is following:

                 
    As of December 31,  
    2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Goodwill
    (61 )     (50 )
Brand names
    (6 )     (2 )
Customer value
    (5 )     (4 )
Patents
    (0 )     (0 )
Land and water areas.
    (1 )     (1 )
Buildings
    (2 )     (1 )
Other tangible assets
    (1 )     (1 )
Deferred taxes
    4       3  
 
           
Total
    (72 )     (56 )
 
           

p) Fees for bond exchange

     During 2004, Metso entered into several transactions with existing lenders to exchange 344 million of 500 million bonds issued under Euro Medium Term Note Program for new bonds with a lower interest rate and a longer term. As a result of these transactions, under Finnish GAAP, Metso capitalized 23 million of premiums paid to existing lenders to reacquire the original bonds and 1 million of fees paid to third parties to execute these transactions. Metso also wrote off 1 million of unamortized costs relating to the original bonds (See Note 18 for further details on these exchange transactions).

     U.S. GAAP classifies exchanges of debt into two categories: extinguished or modified. This classification is determined based on a test of the change in the present value of remaining cash flows for the original debt and the new debt. If this change exceeds 10% of the original debt remaining cash flow, the debt exchange is considered to be an extinguishment of the original debt. The accounting treatment of the fees paid to creditors and third parties varies depending on the classification of the exchange. Finnish GAAP does not have this classification and treats all debt exchanges in the same manner. In 2004, for U.S. GAAP purposes, some of the exchange transactions qualified as extinguishments of debt, while others qualified as modifications. For U.S. GAAP, 2 million of the 23 million of premiums paid to existing lenders is recorded as a loss on extinguishment of the bonds, as these bonds qualified as extinguished under U.S. GAAP. For the transactions which the bonds qualified as modified under U.S. GAAP, the fees of 1 million paid to third parties are expensed and the 1 million of unamortized costs relating to the original bonds remain as an asset on the balance sheet.

F-64


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

q) Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets

    Under Finnish GAAP, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Available evidence includes internal projections of future earnings which are utilized to assess the probability that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Under U.S. GAAP, if there is objective negative evidence, such as cumulative losses for recent years, the weight given to positive evidence would be commensurate with extent to which it can be objectively verified. As a result, internal projections normally would not be assigned any significant weight in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.
 
    In addition, in accordance with Finnish GAAP, the need for a valuation allowance is assessed based only on the deferred tax assets which are expected to be utilized over a reasonable time in the future. In determining the need for a valuation allowance in accordance with U.S. GAAP, a company is required to consider taxable income that will arise within the statutory period over which the deferred tax asset may be utilized.
 
    Due to these items, differences may arise in regards to the determination of the valuation allowance under Finnish GAAP versus U.S. GAAP.
 
    In connection with the preparation of the annual report on Form 20-F, an error was detected in the 2002 and 2003 financial statements regarding the application of the provisions for valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FAS 109”). In accordance with FAS 109, the determination of the amount of a valuation allowance is based on the weight of all available evidence, both positive and negative. When negative evidence exists, such as cumulative losses for recent years as is the case in the Company’s U.S. operations, projections of future taxable income will generally not be sufficient to overcome the negative evidence of cumulative losses. When positive evidence exists, such as taxable income, as is the case in the Company’s German operations, the valuation allowance should reflect that amount which is more likely than not to not be realized within the statutory period over which the deferred tax asset may be utilized.
 
    In order to correctly record the valuation allowance in accordance with FAS 109, an additional valuation allowance related to the Company’s U.S. operations of 91 million has been recorded as of December 31, 2002, with a corresponding increase to deferred income tax expense. In 2003, the consolidated balance sheet would still reflect substantially a full valuation allowance for the U.S. deferred tax assets; however, the amounts previously recognized in 2003 to increase this valuation allowance would have been recorded in the previous year as noted above. In addition, the amount previously recognized as a valuation allowance related to the German operations has been reversed in 2003. The impact of this restatement on the U.S. GAAP financial statements has been summarized in Note 30 (see Note 30).
 
    Under Finnish GAAP, the balance sheet presentation of deferred taxes differs from the presentation requirements set forth in U.S. GAAP, see Note 8 for Finnish GAAP disclosure.
 
    Under U.S. GAAP, the current and non-current deferred tax liabilities and assets are presented as a net current and as a net non-current amount, consistent with the classification of the related assets and liabilities having generated the deferred tax. The classification is made for each separate tax-paying component within each taxing jurisdiction. Following table presents the deferred tax assets and liabilities under U.S. GAAP according to the presentation prescribed by SFAS 109 Accounting for Income Taxes :

F-65


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                 
    As of December 31,
    2003   2004
    ( in millions)
Non-current assets
               
Tax losses carried forward
    171       210  
Other
    31       38  
Valuation allowance
    (106 )     (106 )
 
               
 
    96       142  
Current assets
               
Inventory
    23       19  
Reserves
    34       31  
Accruals
    37       32  
Medical benefits
    15       2  
Other
    5       3  
Valuation allowance
    (55 )     (49 )
 
               
 
    59       38  
Current liabilities
               
Inventory
    0       (0 )
Inventory
    (1 )     0  
 
               
 
    (1 )     0  
 
               
Non-current liabilities
               
Fixed assets
    (53 )     (4 )
Purchase price adjustments
    (37 )     (40 )
Tax allocation reserve
    (12 )     (0 )
Other
    (2 )     (0 )
 
               
 
    (104 )     (44 )
 
               
 
               
Deferred tax asset, net
    50       136  
 
               

r) Discontinued Operations

     In November 2002, Metso announced it signed a memorandum of understanding with a Swiss buyer Bobst Group SA to dispose of the Converting Equipment group, which manufactures equipment for the packaging industry. The transaction was closed on January 30, 2004.

     As part of reorientation of Metso’s strategic direction and to strengthen its balance sheet, Metso announced in February 2004 its intention to explore the business development possibilities, including disposal, of its Compaction and Paving business line within Metso Minerals. The disposal of Compaction and Paving was completed on June 30, 2004. As part of its policy to dispose of non-core businesses, Metso announced in November 2004 the sale of Reedrill, specialized in sale and manufacturing of drilling equipment, to Terex Corporation, U.S. based group. The transaction was closed in December 2004.

     In accordance with Finnish GAAP, the results of Discontinued Operations are included in the determination of consolidated net income.

     Under U.S. GAAP, the Converting Equipment group, Compaction and Paving business line and Reedrill business meet the criteria of a component entity classified as held for sale under SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, and accordingly, income from continuing and Discontinued Operations has been presented separately and all prior period information have been restated to reflect such presentation.

F-66


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Certain income statement line items for the Discontinued Operations are presented in the following table:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
    (restated)  
Net sales
    558       560       263  
Operating profit
    19       (42 )     12  
Net income
    19       (39 )     8  

     The above table has been reclassified for years 2002 and 2003 to include Reedrill, which qualified as held for sale in 2004.

     As of December 31, 2003, the main balance sheet items for the Discontinued Operations were:

         
    ( in millions)  
Fixed assets and long-term investments
    232  
Inventories
    120  
Other current assets
    151  
 
     
Total assets
    503  
 
     
 
       
Shareholders’ equity
    192  
Long-term liabilities
    58  
Short-term liabilities
    253  
 
     
Shareholders’ equity and liabilities
    503  
 
     

     The goodwill related to the disposed operations amounted to 135 million of which 122 million concerned the Compaction and Paving business.

     Under Finnish GAAP, intangible and tangible fixed assets related to Discontinued Operations continue to be amortized even after having being qualified as held-for-sale.

     Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with SFAS 144, fixed assets, which qualify as held-for-sale either individually or as part of a disposal group, are no longer amortized when the held-for-sale criteria is met. A depreciation cost of 2 million related to Discontinued Operations recognized under Finnish GAAP in the year ended December 31, 2003 was reversed under U.S. GAAP. As the disposals of the businesses have been realized in the year ended December 31, 2004, the previous year adjustment has been offset against the loss on disposal under U.S. GAAP.

     Under U.S. GAAP, the loss on disposal of Discontinued Operations was 72 million, which is 46 million higher than the loss recognized under Finnish GAAP. The loss under U.S. GAAP differs from the loss under Finnish GAAP due to differences in the underlying book values of the disposed operations, primarily arising from certain intangible assets and goodwill which are not amortized under U.S. GAAP. The accumulated goodwill amortization on Discontinued Operations recognized under Finnish GAAP and reversed under U.S. GAAP amounted to 28 million.

F-67


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

s) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

     The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for the reporting and presentation of comprehensive income and its components. The Company has chosen to present comprehensive income in accordance with Finnish GAAP and components of comprehensive income consist of the following:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
Comprehensive income
                       
Net income under Finnish GAAP
    65       (258 )     69  
 
                 
Other comprehensive income
                       
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    (127 )     (55 )     (12 )
Hedging of net investment denominated in foreign currency, net of taxes of (17) million,
(16) million and 3 million, respectively
    42       39       0  
Additional minimum liability, net of tax benefit of 3 million, 4 million and 1 million, respectively
    (5 )     (6 )     (2 )
 
                 
Other comprehensive income
    (90 )     (22 )     (14 )
 
                 
Comprehensive income
    (25 )     (280 )     55  
 
                 

t) Earnings per share

     Earnings per share for Finnish GAAP purposes is based on income before extraordinary items and income taxes, adjusted for minority interest and taxes related for normal business operations (see Note 1 “Accounting Principles” for detailed discussion). Under U.S. GAAP, basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of outstanding shares to include the weighted average number of potential common stock, such as stock options. Weighted average shares diluted include 100,000 stock options, which could be exercised to the employee’s favor at December 31, 2004. In prior years, these stock options were anti-dilutive.

u) Customer tooling

     The fixed asset balance as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 includes 18 million and 29 million, respectively, related to amounts received from customers to invest in specific equipment to fulfill the contractual obligations to them. The amounts received have been recorded as a liability under advances received and are being amortized. As a result of the offsetting impact of the depreciation of such assets and amortization of amounts received, the net impact to the earnings under U.S. GAAP is zero.

v) Stock compensation

     Pursuant to SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, the Company has elected to account for its stock option plan under the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and adopt only the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123. As of December 31, 2004, the compensation expense was not considered as material under APB 25 related to the Company’s employee stock options. Under SFAS No. 123, stock options are valued at grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model and compensation costs are recognized ratably over the vesting period. Had compensation costs been determined as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to pro forma amounts indicated in the following table:

F-68


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
    ( in millions)  
    (restated)   (restated)  
Net income (loss)
                       
as reported
    22       (235 )     2  
Stock based compensation cost included in the determination of net income, net of taxes
                 
Stock based compensation cost that would have been included in the determination of net income if the fair value method was used, net of taxes
    (3 )     (1 )     (0 )
Pro forma
    19       (236 )     2  
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
                       
as reported
    0.16       (1.73 )     0.01  
Pro forma
    0.14       (1.73 )     0.01  

     The Company has currently three option programs, the 2000 stock option plan, the 2001 stock option plan and the 2003 stock option plan.

     The Board of directors of Metso Corporation proposed to the 2003 Annual General Meeting held in April 2003 that stock options, named 2003A, 2003B and 2003C, be issued to the key persons of Metso Group and to its wholly owned subsidiary, Metso Capital Oy (the “2003 Plan”). Upon issue all stock options were distributed to Metso Capital Oy. Metso Capital Oy distributes stock options to the key persons of Metso Group by the resolution of the Board of Directors. The total number of stock options distributed to the key persons under the 2003 Plan cannot exceed 5,600,000 stock options.

     No stock options under the 2003 Plan have been granted, apart from 100,000 options granted on March 1, 2004 to the new President and chief executive officer. Compensation costs recorded for this grant are considered to be immaterial.

     Metso’s Board of Directors decided on May 26, 2004 to reduce the number of options related to the year 2003 option program to 2,900,000. Metso’s Board decided that it will not distribute the total 4,900,000 (2,400,000 2003A and 2,500,000 2003C) options, and it will propose to the 2005 Annual General Meeting that these options be canceled. With respect to the year 2003 program, Metso’s Board of Directors reserved 100,000 year 2003A options and 100,000 year 2003C options for future needs.

     Metsos’ Board of Directors also decided that the maximum number of year 2003B options that could be distributed would be 2,500,000 but as the minimum performance criteria were not fulfilled in 2004, no options will be distributed from the program.

F-69


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                         
    2003A   2003B   2003C
Number of stock options
    2,600,000       2,600,000       2,600,000  
 
                       
Subscription period
  April 1, 2006 — April 30, 2009   April 1, 2007 — April 30, 2010   April 1, 2008 — April 30, 2011
 
                       
Share subscription price per stock option.
  The trade volume weighted average quotation of the Metso share on the Helsinki Exchanges between January 1 and March 31, 2004 adjusted by dividends payable after January 1, 2004 but before the date of the share subscription. The exercise price cannot be below par value.   The trade volume weighted average quotation of the Metso share on the Helsinki Exchanges between January 1 and March 31, 2005 adjusted by dividends payable after January 1, 2005 but before the date of the share subscription. The exercise price cannot be below par value.   The trade volume weighted average quotation of the Metso share on the Helsinki Exchanges between January 1 and March 31, 2006 adjusted by dividends payable after January 1, 2006 but before the date of the share subscription. The exercise price cannot be below par value.
 
                       
Subscription   One stock option gives the right to subscribe one share.

     If a subscriber of the options under the 2003 Plan ceases to be employed by or in the service of the Metso Group for any other reason than retirement or death before April 1, 2008, such person is obligated without delay to offer to the Company free of charge the warrants for which the share subscription period had not begun at the last day of such person’s employment.

     The 2001 Annual General Meeting approved of an issue of two series of warrants (the “2001 Plan”), named A and B, to persons belonging to the management and to certain other key persons with following conditions:

                 
    A warrants   B warrants
Number of warrants
    500,000       500,000  
 
               
Exercise period
  April 1, 2001 — April 30, 2005   April 1, 2003 — April 30, 2005
 
               
Exercise price per warrant   15.60 adjusted by dividends payable after March 1, 2001. The exercise price cannot be below par value.
 
                       
Subscription   One stock option gives the right to subscribe one share.
 
               

     The series A and B stock options issued by Metso in 2001 were combined and made available for trading as a separate security on the main list of the Helsinki Exchanges from April 1, 2003.

     The 2000 Annual General Meeting approved a plan (the “2000 Plan”) in order to standardize the incentive programs of the Group in such a manner that the warrant holders of Valmet Corporation and Rauma Corporation were offered a possibility to convert their warrants in the aforementioned companies to the warrants being issued. As a result of the 2000 Plan, 3,500,000 outstanding Valmet and Rauma warrants were converted to the plan. Under the 2000 Plan, two series of warrants, named A and B, are issued to persons belonging to the management and certain other key persons with following conditions:

F-70


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                 
    A warrants   B warrants
Number of warrants
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
 
               
Exercise period
  April 1, 2001 — April 30, 2005   April 1, 2003 — April 30, 2005
 
               
Exercise price per warrant   16 adjusted by dividends payable after March 1, 2000. The exercise price cannot be below par value.
 
                       
Subscription   One warrant gives the right to subscribe one share.
 
               

     To the extent the subscription rights of warrants are not used by the persons included in the 2000 or 2001 Plan, they can be subscribed by Metso Corporation’s subsidiary, Metso Capital Oy. The Board of Directors of Metso Corporation is authorized to transfer such warrants in future to persons becoming eligible to its incentive plan.

     The series B stock options that Metso issued in 2000 were made available for trading on the main list of the Helsinki Exchanges combined with the series 2000 A stock options from April 1, 2003.

     If a subscriber of the warrants under the 2000 or 2001 Plan ceases to be employed by or in the service of the Metso Group for any other reason than retirement or death before April 1, 2003, then such person is obligated without delay to offer to the Company free of charge the warrants for which the share subscription period had not begun at the last day of such person’s employment.

     The following tables summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:

                         
    Number of     Weighted     Weighted  
    Shares to be     Average     Average  
    subscribed     Fair Value     Exercise Price  
2000 Plan
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at January 1, 2000
                   
Granted
    4,902,500       2.82       15.60  
Forfeited
    35,000               15.60  
Outstanding at January 1, 2001
    4,867,500               15.60  
Granted
    295,000       0.68       15.00  
Forfeited
    227,500               15.60  
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2001
    4,935,000               15.57  
Granted
                 
Forfeited
    61,000               15.56  
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
    4,874,000               15.56  
Granted
    30,000       0.07       14.20  
Forfeited(1)
    34,250               15.56  
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
    4,869,750               15.56  
Granted
                 
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
    4,869,750               15.65  


(1)   The forfeiture requirement has expired on April 1, 2003.

F-71


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                         
    Number of     Weighted     Weighted  
    Shares to be     Average     Average  
    subscribed     Fair Value     Exercise Price  
2001 Plan
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at January 1, 2001
                   
Granted
    675,000       1.11       15.00  
Forfeited
                   
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2001
    675,000               15.00  
Granted
    120,000       1.62       14.40  
Forfeited
                   
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
    795,000               14.91  
Granted
    105,000       0.23       13.80  
Forfeited(1)
    27,500               15.56  
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
    872,500               14.54  
Granted
    30,000       0.11       13.25  
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
    902,500               14.49  


(1)   The forfeiture requirement has expired on April 1, 2003.

     The fair value of the 2001 plan option is based on the quoted market value of the option in the Helsinki Stock Exchange on the date of grant March 1, 2004.

                         
    Number of     Weighted     Weighted  
    Shares to be     Average     Average  
    subscribed     Fair Value     Exercise Price  
2003 Plan
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at January 1, 2003
                   
Granted
    100,000       4.79       9.75  
Forfeited
                   
Exercised
                   
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
    100,000               9.75  

     The fair value of the options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
2000 Plan
                       
Expected volatility
          33.11 %      
Risk-free interest rate
          2.52 %      
Dividend yield
          6.11 %      
Expected life (years)
          1.33        

F-72


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004  
2001 Plan
                       
Expected volatility
    46.45 %     31.87 %      
Risk-free interest rate
    3.80 %     2.50 %      
Dividend yield
    5.55 %     6.09 %      
Expected life (years)
    1.7       1.29        
 
2003 Plan
                       
Expected volatility
                39.93 %
Risk-free interest rate
                3.29 %
Dividend yield
                0.00 %
Expected life (years)
                5.17  

     Valmet

     The 1998 Annual General Meeting approved an issue of two series of warrants to persons belonging to the management of the Company and to certain other key persons (the “1998 I plan”). The warrants entitle the holders to subscribe to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares in Valmet (1,000,000 shares in each series). The subscription period for the new shares commenced on April 1, 2001 for the first series, entitling holders to subscribe for new shares of Valmet at a price of 18.16 per share, and on April 1, 2003 for the second series, entitling the holders to subscribe new shares of Valmet at a price of 19 per share. The subscription period for both series will close on March 31, 2005. The share subscription price for both series is adjusted by dividends distributed after May 1, 1998 and before the date of the subscription. As of December 31, 2004, no shares had been subscribed for under the 1998 I plan. Consequent to the approval of the 2000 plan of Metso, the holders utilized the possibility to convert their warrants of the 1998 I Plan to warrants under the 2000 Plan.

     Rauma

     In February 1998, the shareholders approved a plan (the “1998 II plan”) to issue warrants (A, B and C warrants) to certain senior management employees of Rauma. The aggregate amount of warrants issued was 1,100,000. Each warrant entitles its holder to subscribe for one share of Rauma. The A warrants entitle the holders to subscribe to 330,000 shares of Rauma during the period from April 17, 2001 to April 17, 2005. The B warrants entitle the holders to subscribe to 330,000 shares of Rauma during the period from April 17, 2002 to April 17, 2005. The C warrants entitle the holders to subscribe to 440,000 shares of Rauma during the period from April 17, 2003 to April 17, 2005. The original subscription price was 20.35 per share, adjusted by the dividends distributed after May 1, 1998 and before the date of subscription. The merger between Valmet and Rauma adjusted the subscription price to 18.68 per share for both warrants based on the exchange ratio. The expiration date for all warrants is April 17, 2005. No share entitlements provided by options transferred from Rauma Corporation were subscribed for in 2003 or in 2004.

     Consequent to the approval of the 2000 plan of Metso Corporation, the holders utilized the possibility to convert their warrants of the 1998 II Plan to warrants under the 2000 Plan.

     No other bonds with warrants or convertible bonds were outstanding during 2004.

w) Classification differences and Other Disclosures

     Cash and cash equivalents

     Under Finnish GAAP, the cash and cash equivalents include liquid funds and traded short-term investments with a maturity not exceeding three months as of the date of closing.

     Under U.S. GAAP, the cash equivalents include only short-term liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The shorter maturity would reduce “Cash and cash equivalents” of the consolidated balance sheet by 47 million and increase “Other short-term investments” by the same amount in the year ended December 31, 2004. This would also impact the cash flow statement as an increase in funds

F-73


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

invested in marketable securities by 47 million and as a reduction of the net cash provided by the investing activities from 359 million down to 312 million.

     Discontinued Operations

     Under Finnish GAAP, the long-term items related to Discontinued Operations remain classified as long-term in the consolidated balance sheet based on their maturity in the entity carrying the respective items.

     Under U.S. GAAP, long-term assets and liabilities of Discontinued Operations are reclassified as short-term in the consolidated balance sheet from the moment onwards that the operations qualify as held-for-sale. In the year ended December 31, 2003, Discontinued Operations included 232 million of long-term assets and 58 million of long-term liabilities, which, under U.S. GAAP, would have been classified as current. In the year ended December 31, 2004, Metso did not own operations, which would have qualified as held-for-sale.

     Impairment

     Under Finnish GAAP, impairment losses on intangible and tangible assets can be recognized as liabilities, especially if the underlying asset is held for sale and the reserve reflects the expected unrealized loss at disposal. In connection with the efficiency improvement program launched in 2003, Metso recognized various write-downs of long-lived assets and inventory obsolescence for an amount of 17 million as accrued liabilities.

     Under U.S. GAAP, impairment losses and inventory obsolescence are recognized as a reduction of the cost basis of the underlying assets. The write-downs would have impacted the value of inventory by 1 million, the value of intangible assets by 2 million and the value of tangible fixed assets by 14 million.

     Service revenues

     The service revenue, consisting solely of service such as repair and maintenance provided to customers and third parties, is less than 10 percent of Metso’s consolidated net sales in 2004. The aftermarket activity as defined in Metso comprises, but is not limited to spare and wear part sales, certain modernizations of customer equipment, performance testing and evaluation.

x) Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

     Allowance for doubtful accounts for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is set forth below:

                                         
    Balance at     Charged to                     Balance at  
    Beginning     Cost and                     End  
    of Year     Expenses     Deductions     Other(1)     of Year  
    ( in millions)  
2002
    56       13       (16 )     (8 )     45  
2003
    45       5       (13 )     (3 )     34  
2004
    34       12       (4 )     (5 )     37  


(1)   Includes foreign currency translation effects.

F-74


Table of Contents

METSO

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

     Allowances for inventory accounts for the three years ended December 2002, 2003 and 2004 is set forth below:

                                         
    Balance at                             Balance at  
    Beginning                             End  
    of Year     Additions(1)     Deductions     Other(2)     of Year  
    ( in millions)  
2002
    80       12       (13 )     (7 )     72  
2003
    72       15       (15 )     (5 )     67  
2004
    67       10       (18 )     (2 )     57  


(1)   Excludes amounts recorded as direct write-off of inventories of 7 million, 3 million and 6 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
 
(2)   Includes foreign currency translation effects.

y) New Accounting Standards

     In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvements and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Medicare Act) was approved in the United States. The Medicare Act provides for two new prescription drug benefit features under Medicare. Metso provides post-retirement benefits to some of its United States employees so the benefits provided are impacted by the Medicare Act. SFAS 106, Employers’ Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, requires that enacted changes in the law that take effect in future periods and that will affect the future level of benefit coverage be considered in the current period measurements for benefits expected to be provided in those future periods. Metso has determined the Medicare Act had an immaterial effect on the cost of medical benefits to be borne by Metso.

     In March 2004, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 03-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments” (“EITF 03-01”). EITF 03-01 provides guidance on other-than-temporary impairment models for marketable debt and equity securities and non-marketable securities accounted for under the cost method. On September 30, 2004, the FASB issued FSP 03-01-1, Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF Issue 03-01, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments, delaying the effective date for the recognition and measurement guidance in EITF 03-01, until certain implementation issues are addressed and a final FSP is issued. The disclosure requirements in EITF 03-01 remain effective. Metso has complied with the disclosure requirements for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, clarifying the existing requirements in ARB No. 43 regarding normal capacity, spoilage costs and idle capacity costs. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of FAS 151 will not have an impact on the Metso’s consolidated results of operation or financial position, since the key elements are already utilized in Metso’s US GAAP consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2004, the FASB published FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004). Share-Based Payments. This provides guidance on how companies must recognize the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions in their financial statements. It will require companies to recognize a compensation cost for the value of options granted in exchange for employee services, based on the grant date fair value of those instruments. FASB No. 123 (revised) is effective for public entities as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, however early application is possible. Metso intends to adopt this revised standard from January 1, 2005. Metso is currently assessing what impact the pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 31. Subsequent Events

     In March 2005, Metso announced the disposal of Metso Drives, a business line reported under the segment of Metso Ventures. The debt-free price for the divestment amounted to roughly 98 million. Metso Drives manufactures mechanical power transmission equipment. The sale will become effective after the buyer obtaining the relevant regulatory approvals.

F-75