Filed by the Registrant | x |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant | o |
Check the appropriate box:
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
x | Definitive Proxy Statement |
o | Definitive Additional Materials |
o | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x | No fee required. |
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
To the Stockholders of
P&F Industries, Inc.:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of P&F Industries, Inc. will be held at the Conference Center at 445 Broadhollow Road, Melville, New York 11747 on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 at 10:00 A.M., for the following purposes:
(1) | To elect two directors to hold office for three years; |
(2) | To consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of CohnReznick LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2014; |
(3) | To consider and approve an advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the compensation of our named executive officers; and |
(4) | To consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
In accordance with the provisions of the Companys By-laws, the Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 11, 2014 as the date for determining stockholders of record entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.
Your attention is directed to the accompanying Proxy Statement.
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. If you do not expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please vote, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy as promptly as possible in the enclosed reply envelope.
By order of the Board of Directors JOSEPH A. MOLINO, JR. Secretary |
Dated: | April 25, 2014 Melville, New York |
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2014:
This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, are available at: https://materials.proxyvote.com/692830.
i
ii
This proxy statement is being furnished by the Board of Directors of P&F Industries, Inc. (the Company) to holders of the Companys Class A Common Stock, $1.00 par value (the Common Stock), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Companys Board of Directors for use at its 2014 annual meeting of stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof (the Annual Meeting).
The Companys principal offices are located at 445 Broadhollow Road, Suite 100, Melville, New York 11747. The Company anticipates mailing this proxy statement to stockholders on or about April 25, 2014.
The Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 21, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. local time at the Conference Center at 445 Broadhollow Road, Melville, New York.
The Board of Directors established the close of business on April 11, 2014 as the record date for determining the holders of the Common Stock entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, 3,695,177 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Companys stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held as of the record date on all matters.
Only stockholders and persons holding proxies from stockholders may attend the Annual Meeting. If your shares are registered in your name, you must bring a form of identification to the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, trust, bank or other nominee, otherwise known as holding in street name, you must bring a proxy or letter from that broker, trust, bank or other nominee that confirms you are the beneficial owner of those shares. Cameras and recording devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting.
Transaction of business at the Annual Meeting may occur if a quorum is present. If a quorum is not present, it is expected that the Annual Meeting will be adjourned or postponed in order to permit additional time for soliciting and obtaining additional proxies or votes, and, at any subsequent reconvening of the Annual Meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as such proxies would have been voted at the original convening of the Annual Meeting, except for any proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn.
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the total votes entitled to be cast constitutes a quorum. If a share of Common Stock is represented for any purpose at the Annual Meeting, it is deemed to be present for quorum purposes and for all other matters as well. Shares of Common Stock represented by a properly executed proxy will be treated as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, without regard to whether the proxy is marked as casting a vote or abstaining.
Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote the shares on a proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power for a particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner regarding voting. Brokers who hold shares for the accounts of their clients have discretionary authority to vote shares in the absence of specific instructions with respect to the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of our directors or on the two advisory votes relating to executive compensation, so we encourage you to provide instructions to your broker regarding the voting of your shares.
1
The Company will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies from its stockholders. In addition to solicitation by mail, the directors, officers and employees of the Company, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies from stockholders by telephone, by letter, by facsimile, in person or otherwise.
Whether you hold shares of Common Stock directly as a registered stockholder or beneficially as a beneficial stockholder, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the Annual Meeting. For directions on how to vote, please refer to the proxy card provided.
All proxies properly submitted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated thereon. If no instructions are provided, such proxies will be voted FOR the nominees set forth in Proposal 1, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.
You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Votes in person will replace any previous votes you have made. The Company will provide a ballot to registered stockholders who request one at the meeting. Shares of Common Stock held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted on that ballot. Shares of Common Stock held beneficially in street name may be voted on a ballot only if you bring a legal proxy from the broker, trust, bank or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares. Attendance at the Annual Meeting without voting or revoking a previous proxy in accordance with the voting procedures will not in and of itself revoke a proxy.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please take the time to vote that your shares will be represented at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a beneficial stockholder, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote by following the separate instructions provided by your broker, trust, bank or other nominee. If you are a registered stockholder, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by (i) delivering written notice, bearing a date later than the proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked, (ii) submitting a later-dated proxy relating to the same shares prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting, or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting and properly giving notice of revocation to the inspector of elections or voting in person.
The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters to be properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals relating to election of two nominees as directors for three-year terms, the ratification of the appointment of the Companys independent registered public accountant for 2014 and the approval of an advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the compensation of named executive officers. The Company does not intend to bring any other matters before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the holders of the proxies will vote them in their discretion.
2
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of the record date, including shares as to which a right to acquire ownership within 60 days of the record date exists (for example, through the exercise of stock options) within the meaning of Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act, by (i) each director and nominee for director, (ii) the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table (Richard A. Horowitz and Joseph A. Molino, Jr.), (iii) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Common Stock, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as indicated in the applicable footnotes, each beneficial owner listed has sole voting power and sole investment power over the shares of Common Stock indicated. Except as indicated in the applicable footnotes, the address of each beneficial owner is in the care of the Company, 445 Broadhollow Road, Suite 100, Melville, New York 11747.
Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class |
||||||
Howard Brod Brownstein | 12,566 | (1) | * | |||||
Jeffrey D. Franklin | 3,832 | (1)(2) | * | |||||
Richard A. Horowitz | 1,344,629 | (3) | 34.12 | % | ||||
Joseph A. Molino, Jr. | 123,833 | (4) | 3.24 | % | ||||
Richard P. Randall | 3,332 | (1)(5) | * | |||||
Kenneth M. Scheriff | 4,266 | (1)(2) | * | |||||
Mitchell A. Solomon | 4,932 | (1)(2) | * | |||||
FMR LLC | 369,300 | (6) | 9.99 | % | ||||
Grace Horowitz | 242,731 | (7) | 6.57 | % | ||||
Lawndale Capital Management, LLC | 367,086 | (8) | 9.93 | % | ||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons) | 1,497,390 | (9) | 36.85 | % |
* | Less than 1%. |
(1) | Includes 666 restricted shares of Common Stock which provide for vesting on May 28, 2014. |
(2) | Includes 2,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. |
(3) | Includes 245,188 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. Excludes 10,000 shares owned by The Linda and Richard Horowitz Foundation. |
(4) | Includes 123,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. |
(5) | Includes 2,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. |
(6) | Information obtained from a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on February 14, 2014, by FMR LLC. FMR LLC is the parent holding company of Fidelity Management & Research Company, a registered investment adviser to Fidelity Low Priced Stock Fund (the Fund), the beneficial owner of such 369,300 shares. Edward C. Johnson 3d and members of his family are a controlling group of FMR LLC. According to such Schedule 13G/A, FMR LLC and Edward C. Johnson 3d each has the sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of all shares held and neither FMR LLC nor Edward C. Johnson 3d has the power to vote or direct the vote of the shares held, which power resides with the Funds board of trustees. The address of FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. |
(7) | Information obtained from a Schedule 13G, dated July 20, 2011, filed with the SEC by Grace Horowitz. According to such Schedule 13G: Mrs. Horowitz has sole voting and dispositive power over 227,991 shares, of which she owns 85,248 shares directly; 142,343 are held by a family trust, for which Mrs. Horowitz is the Trustee and sole beneficiary; and 400 shares are held by a private charitable foundation of which she is the sole director. Mrs. Horowitz has shared voting and dispositive power over 14,740 shares with respect to shares held by a family trust for the benefit of her daughter, for which both Mrs. Horowitz and the daughter are trustees. The address of Grace Horowitz is c/o Moomjian, Waite & Coleman, LLP, 100 Jericho Quadrangle, Suite 225, Jericho, New York 11753. |
3
(8) | Information obtained from a Schedule 13D/A, dated April 29, 2013, filed with the SEC by Lawndale Capital Management, LLC, Andrew E. Shapiro and Diamond A Partners, L.P. According to such Schedule 13D/A, each of Lawndale Capital Management, LLC and Andrew E. Shapiro share voting and dispositive power with respect to 367,086 shares, and Diamond A. Partners, L.P. shares voting and dispositive power with respect to 310,286 of such shares. The address of each of the foregoing is 591 Redwood Highway, Suite 2345, Mill Valley, California 94941. |
(9) | Includes 378,021 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. |
4
As permitted by Delaware law, the Board of Directors is divided into three classes, the classes being divided as equally as possible and each class having a term of three years. Each year the term of office of one class expires. A director elected to fill a vacancy, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors, serves for the remaining term of the class in which the vacancy exists. The Board of Directors presently consists of six members, with each class consisting of one, two or three directors (the classes are currently unbalanced due to the departure of two members of the Board of Directors from the same class effective as of the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders).
The Board of Directors proposes that Messrs. Scheriff and Solomon, whose terms of office expires at the Annual Meeting, each be elected as director to serve for a term to expire at the Companys 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. Unless otherwise indicated, the enclosed proxy will be voted for the election of Messrs. Scheriff and Solomon as nominees. Should such nominees become unable to serve for any reason or, for good cause will not serve, which is not anticipated, the Board of Directors may, unless the Board of Directors by resolution provides for a lesser number of directors, designate a substitute nominee, in which event the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote for the election of such substitute nominees.
The director will be elected by the plurality vote of the holders of the Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and present in person or by proxy.
5
Certain information regarding our nominee for director, including his experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board of Directors to conclude that the individual should serve on the Board of Directors and his principal occupation and directorships during the past five years, is set forth below. Also set forth below is the name and age of such nominee for director and each director currently in office and whose term continues, his principal occupation, the year each became a director of the Company and a description of his principal occupation for the past five years and certain other qualifications. Such information is not provided for Robert L. Dubofsky and Alan I. Goldberg, each of whom served as directors during a portion of 2013 but are not current directors or nominees. The information set forth below is as of the record date.
Name | Age | Served as Director Continuously Since |
||
Nominees to Continue in Office Until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: |
||||
Kenneth M. Scheriff | 64 | 2005 | ||
Mitchell A. Solomon | 54 | 2004 | ||
Director to Serve in Office Until the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: |
||||
Richard A. Horowitz | 64 | 1975 | ||
Directors to Serve in Office Until the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: |
||||
Howard Brod Brownstein | 63 | 2010 | ||
Jeffrey D. Franklin | 60 | 2004 | ||
Richard P. Randall | 76 | 2012 |
Richard A. Horowitz has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since November 1995 and has been President of the Company since 1986. Mr. Horowitz brings valuable insight and knowledge about the Company to the Board of Directors due to his experience as an executive officer of the Company, his perspective as a long-standing significant Company stockholder, and his many years of oversight of the businesses which the Company operates.
Howard Brod Brownstein has been the President of The Brownstein Corporation, a turnaround and crisis management consulting, advisory and investment banking firm, since 2010. From 1999 through 2009, Mr. Brownstein was a Principal of NachmanHaysBrownstein, Inc., a management consulting firm. From 2003 through 2006, he served on the boards of directors and audit committees of Special Metals Corporation, a privately held nickel alloy producer (where he also chaired the audit committee) and Magnatrax Corporation, a privately held manufacturer of metal buildings. In 2010, he served on the board of Betsey Johnson, a privately held apparel designer and retailer. Additionally, in 2014, Mr. Brownstein joined the board of directors of LMG2, a privately-held Chicago-based parking facility operator. Mr. Brownstein brings to the Board of Directors a broad financial and management consulting background, including extensive experience in financing, restructuring and strategic planning matters.
Jeffrey D. Franklin has been an Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Executive Charge Inc., a company providing billing and administrative services for affiliated corporations in the transportation, package delivery, radio communications and real estate management industries, for more than the past five years. Mr. Franklin is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in the State of New York. Mr. Franklin brings to the Board of Directors significant financial, accounting and managerial experience.
Richard P. Randall served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Direct Holdings Worldwide, LLC, the parent company of Lillian Vernon Corp. and Time-Life, from 2002 until 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Randall was the Chief Financial Officer of Coach, Inc. from 2000 to 2001 and the Chief Financial Officer of Lillian Vernon Corp. from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Randall holds a degree in accounting and is a Certified Public Accountant, and has more than 40 years of experience in various accounting and finance positions. Mr. Randall has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Aceto Corp. since May 2009 and currently serves as chair of its Audit & Risk Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Randall has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of Steven Madden, Ltd. since 2006, where
6
he is the Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and the Investment Committee. Mr. Randall is also a former director and member of the Executive, Finance, Audit and Research Committees of The Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, and currently serves as a Member Emeritus of the Executive Committee and retains a board seat on The Burke Foundations board. Mr. Randall also served as a director and chair of the Audit Committee for two unrelated Chinese companies publicly traded in the U.S., Universal Travel Group and Home Systems Group, from 2007 until 2008. Mr. Randall brings to the Board of Directors extensive knowledge of accounting and finance, the retail industry (including overseas importing) and the issues impacting a publicly traded company.
Kenneth M. Scheriff has been the Executive Vice President of New York Commercial Bank, the commercial banking subsidiary of New York Community Bancorp, Inc., a financial institution listed on the New York Stock Exchange, since January 2008. From 2005 through December 2007, Mr. Scheriff was Executive Vice President of the Commercial Loan Group of State Bank of Long Island, a commercial bank listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, and was employed in an executive capacity with such bank since 1995. Mr. Scheriff brings to the Board of Directors executive level experience and extensive knowledge of the banking industry and credit markets.
Mitchell A. Solomon has been President of EBY Electro, Inc., a manufacturer of electric and electronic connectors and power supplies, for more than the past five years. Mr. Solomon brings a strong operational and strategic background and valuable business, leadership and management experience to the Board of Directors, including extensive experience in foreign manufacturing and importing of industrial goods.
7
The Company operates within a comprehensive plan of corporate governance for the purpose of defining independence, assigning responsibilities, setting high standards of professional and personal conduct and assuring compliance with such responsibilities and standards.
The standards relied upon by the Board of Directors in affirmatively determining whether a director is independent, in compliance with NASDAQ rules, are comprised, in part, of those objective standards set forth in the NASDAQ rules. In addition to these objective standards and in compliance with NASDAQ rules, no director will be considered independent who has a relationship which, in the opinion of the companys Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Board of Directors exercises appropriate discretion in identifying and evaluating any such relationship. The Board of Directors, in applying the above-referenced standards and after considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances, has affirmatively determined that the Companys independent directors are: Howard Brod Brownstein, Jeffrey D. Franklin, Richard P. Randall, Kenneth M. Scheriff and Mitchell A. Solomon, representing a majority of the members of the Companys Board of Directors.
The Companys independent directors hold annually at least two formal meetings independent from management. In 2013, the Companys independent directors held four such meetings. The Lead Independent Director, or in his absence, another independent director chosen by the independent directors, presides at such non-management sessions of the Board of Directors. The role of the Lead Independent Director is discussed in greater detail under Board Leadership Structure below.
During 2013, the Board of Directors held eight meetings and acted by written consent on one occasion. No director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and all committees on which he served.
During 2013, the Board of Directors had an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and a Strategic Planning and Risk Assessment Committee. In addition, from time to time, special committees may be established under the direction of the Board of Directors when necessary to address specific issues.
During 2013 and as of the record date, the members of the Audit Committee were Messrs. Franklin (Chairman), Brownstein and Randall. During 2013, the Audit Committee held four meetings.
| Each member of the Audit Committee has been determined by the Board of Directors to meet the standards for independence required of audit committee members by the NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules. For more information on the NASDAQ standards for independence, see Corporate Governance Director Independence above. |
| The Board of Directors has further determined that all members of the Audit Committee are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. |
| The Board of Directors has determined that Jeffrey D. Franklin is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. |
| The Audit Committee appoints the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the overall scope and the results of the Companys annual audit and reviews the Companys overall internal controls. |
8
| The Companys independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee. |
| The Audit Committee, consistent with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules adopted thereunder, meets with management and the Companys independent registered public accountants, at least quarterly, prior to the filing of officers certifications with the SEC to receive information concerning, among other things, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, if any, and to discuss the scope and results of the annual audit, quarterly reviews and issues of accounting policy and internal controls. |
| The Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints by Company employees regarding the Companys accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. |
| The Audit Committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and standards of performance. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge from the Companys website at www.pfina.com. |
During 2013 and as of the record date, the members of the Compensation Committee were Messrs. Scheriff (Chairman) and Franklin. During 2013, the Compensation Committee held four meetings.
| All members of the Compensation Committee have been determined to meet the NASDAQ standards for independence. See Director Independence above. Further, each member of the Compensation Committee is a Non-Employee Director as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. |
| The Compensation Committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and standards of performance. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge from the Companys website at www.pfina.com. |
| The Compensation Committee reviews, recommends and approves changes to our compensation policies and benefits programs, administers our executive compensation program and otherwise seeks to ensure that our compensation philosophy is consistent with our Companys best interests and is properly implemented. The Compensation Committee also serves as the administrator of our 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, and as such, all option grants and grants or restricted stock are approved by the Compensation Committee. |
From January 1, 2013 through March 25, 2013 the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee were Messrs. Brownstein (Chairman) and Dubofsky. Mr. Randall was elected to serve as an additional member of such committee as of March 25, 2013. As of the May 22, 2013 annual meeting, Mr. Dubofsky was no longer a member of the Board of Directors or such committee, so as of such date and as of the record date, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was comprised of Messrs. Brownstein (Chairman), and Randall. During 2013, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held three meetings.
| All members of the Nominating Committee have been determined to meet the NASDAQ standards for independence. See Director Independence above. |
| The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends to the Board of Directors as director nominees individuals of established personal and professional integrity, ability and judgment, who are chosen with the primary goal of ensuring that the entire Board of Directors collectively serves the interests of the Companys stockholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy relating specifically to the consideration of diversity in making recommendations of qualified nominees for election to the Board of Directors. Due consideration is given to assessing the qualifications of potential nominees and any potential conflicts with the Companys interests. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also |
9
assesses the contributions of the Companys incumbent directors in connection with their potential re-nomination. In identifying and recommending director nominees, the Committee members take into account such factors as they determine appropriate, including recommendations made by the Board of Directors and stockholders. Once the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has identified prospective nominees, background information is elicited about the candidates, following which they are interviewed and evaluated by the Committee, which then reports to the Board of Directors. |
| The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee review and reassess the Companys corporate governance procedures and practices, and recommend any proposed changes therein to the Board; and oversee the evaluation of the Board, its committees and the Companys management. |
| The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and standards of performance. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge from the Companys website at www.pfina.com. |
The Board of Directors adopted a policy setting forth that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider individuals suggested by stockholders for nomination as candidates for election to the Board of Directors at annual meetings of stockholders. Such suggested nominees will be considered in the context of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees determination regarding all issues relating to the composition of the Board of Directors, including the size of the Board of Directors, any criteria the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may develop for prospective Board of Directors candidates and the qualifications of candidates relative to any such criteria. Any stockholder who wishes to submit an individual for nomination as a Board of Directors candidate by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee should be directed in writing to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o the Secretary of the Company, P&F Industries, Inc., 445 Broadhollow Road, Suite 100, Melville, New York 11747. Such submission should include the name of the individual submitted for nomination, information as to such individuals background and experience and a representation from such individual that he or she is willing to be nominated by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and, if elected, to serve, and the information regarding such individual that would be required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to be included in the Companys proxy statement issued in connection with its annual meeting. Stockholders are also permitted to submit nominees for election directly to stockholders subject to compliance with the advance notice requirements of the Companys By-laws, summarized below under Stockholder Nominations for Board of Directors Membership and Other Proposals for 2015 Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors also maintains a Strategic Planning and Risk Assessment Committee, comprised of independent members of the Board of Directors. During 2013 and as of the record date, Messrs. Brownstein (Chairman) and Solomon were the members of this committee. Additionally, as of March 25, 2013 and as of the record date, Mr. Randall was elected as an additional member of such committee. Such committee reviews, on behalf of the Company, managements long-term strategy for the Company, which include material business strategy, financial and capital matters in the pursuit of continuing the long-term success of the Company and risk appetite/tolerance relating thereto, and make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the foregoing. The Strategic Planning and Risk Assessment Committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and standards of performance. During 2013, the Strategic Planning and Risk Assessment Committee held four meetings.
Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge from the Companys website at www.pfina.com.
10
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is designed to help officers, directors and employees resolve ethical issues in an increasingly complex business environment.
| The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to all of the Companys officers, directors and employees, including the Companys principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller and other persons performing similar functions. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers topics including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of information and compliance with laws and regulations. |
| Waivers from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are discouraged. Any waivers from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that relate to the Companys directors and executive officers must be approved by the Board of Directors, and will be posted on the Companys website at www.pfina.com. |
| The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be obtained free of charge from the Companys website at www.pfina.com. |
The Companys Chief Executive Officer also serves as its Chairman of the Board. The Board of Directors believes that a combined CEO/Chairman of the Board arrangement and having a Lead Independent Director (as further discussed below) is currently the best structure for the Companys Board of Directors, as its Chief Executive Officer is most familiar with the Companys business and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying the Companys priorities and leading the execution of its strategy. The Companys independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside the Company and industry, while the Chief Executive Officer brings company-specific experience and expertise. Combining the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and the Board of Directors.
Because the Board of Directors also believes that strong, independent Board leadership is a critical aspect of effective corporate governance, the Board of Directors has established the position of Lead Independent Director. Our Lead Independent Director is an independent director elected annually by the independent directors. Mr. Solomon serves as our Lead Independent Director, a position that he held since September 12, 2012. Our Lead Independent Directors responsibilities and authority include, among other things, advising on Board meeting schedules and agendas, calling meetings of the independent directors, chairing the executive sessions of the independent directors and chairing the meetings of the Board of Directors if the Chairman of the Board is not present. Copies of the charter of the Lead Independent Director can be obtained free of charge from the Companys website at www.pfina.com.
While risk management is primarily the responsibility of the Companys management team, the Board of Directors is responsible for overall supervision of the companys risk management efforts as they relate to the key business risks facing the organization. As discussed in greater detail above, the Board of Directors maintains a Strategic Planning and Risk Assessment Committee as a standing committee with the responsibility of working with management to identify, assess, and manage the risks most critical to the Companys operations and routinely advise the Board of Directors on those matters. Those areas of material risk can include operational, financial, legal, regulatory, human capital, informational technology, and strategic and reputational risks, among others. In addition, the Board of Directors regularly reviews with management, at Board of Director meetings, any risk management issues that any director wishes to discuss. Finally, the Board of Directors other committees each oversee certain aspects of risk management and report its respective findings to the Strategic Planning and Risk Assessment Committee or the full Board of Directors as appropriate.
11
It is the policy of Companys Board of Directors to expect that all directors attend annual meetings of stockholders except where the failure to attend is due to unavoidable circumstances or conflicts discussed in advance by the director with the Chairman of the Board. All of the members of the Board of Directors attended the Companys 2013 annual meeting of Stockholders.
Any stockholder or interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors, or specific individual directors, or the non-management directors as a group, may do so by directing a written request addressed to such directors or director, care of the Lead Independent Director, P&F Industries, Inc., 445 Broadhollow Road, Suite 100, Melville, New York 11747. Communication(s) directed to members of the Board of Directors who are not non-management directors will be relayed to the intended Board member(s) except to the extent that it is deemed unnecessary or inappropriate to do so pursuant to the procedures established by a majority of the independent directors. Any communication so withheld will nevertheless be made available to any non-management director who wishes to review it.
12
The Companys Code of Ethics provides that the Companys compliance officer (currently the Companys General Counsel) must be fully informed of any proposed transaction between the Company, on the one hand, and any employee, officer or director, on the other, and must communicate the Companys approval of any such transaction before the agreement or transaction can be commenced. Further, pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5630(a), the Companys Audit Committee (or another committee made up of independent directors) must review and have oversight over all transactions with related parties required to be disclosed under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-K, Item 404. Related parties include the Companys directors, executive officers, and stockholders known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Companys Common Stock, and their respective immediate families. The Company does not have formal written procedures to implement this policy, and instead the Audit Committee (or another committee made up of independent directors) reviews and, where appropriate approves, related party transactions on a case by case basis.
There were no related party transactions entered into, or proposed, in 2013.
The following table shows the compensation of the Companys Non-Employee Directors for services in all capacities to the Company in 2013. The table includes compensation of Messrs. Dubofsky and Goldberg, who tenures as directors concluded at the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders. Information with respect to the compensation of Richard A. Horowitz, the Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and a director, is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below.
Name of Director | Cash fees ($)(1) |
Stock awards ($)(2) |
Total compensation ($) |
|||||||||
Howard Brod Brownstein | 35,500 | 5,961 | 41,461 | |||||||||
Robert L. Dubofsky | 6,167 | -0- | 6,167 | |||||||||
Jeffrey D. Franklin | 45,500 | 5,961 | 51,461 | |||||||||
Alan I. Goldberg | 4,167 | -0- | 4,167 | |||||||||
Richard P. Randall | 39,250 | 5,961 | 45,211 | |||||||||
Kenneth M. Scheriff | 31,500 | 5,961 | 37,461 | |||||||||
Mitchell A. Solomon | 30,500 | 5,961 | 36,461 |
(1) | Relates to annual directorship fees and fees paid for meetings attended. |
(2) | The amount shown reflects the fair value of the 666 shares of restricted Common Stock granted to each of Messrs. Brownstein, Franklin, Randall, Scheriff and Solomon in 2013, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and is not necessarily indicative of the compensation actually received by such directors. The fair value of each such restricted stock grant is estimated based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value are set forth in the Footnotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2013 as filed with the SEC. |
During 2013, each Non-Employee Director received an annual Board of Director directorship fee of $10,000 plus $2,000 for each of the four meetings of the Board of Directors held at the Companys offices attended. No additional fees were paid for the additional telephonic meetings held throughout 2013. Each member of the Audit Committee also received an additional $10,000 as an annual directorship fee (with the chairman receiving $13,500), and $1,250 for each of the four meetings of the Audit Committee held at the Companys offices attended in person. No Audit Committee meeting fees were paid for any other Audit Committee meetings, including telephonic meetings or those held in conjunction with a Board of Directors meeting. Each member of the Compensation Committee received an additional $9,000 as an annual directorship fee (with the chairman receiving $13,500). Each member of the Strategic Planning and Risk
13
Assessment Committee received an additional $5,000 as an annual directorship fee. Each member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee received an additional $2,500 as an annual directorship fee. The Lead Independent Director received an additional $7,500 as an annual directorship fee. Upon initial election to the Board of Directors, each Non-Employee Director receives an option to purchase 2,000 shares of Common Stock.
Each Non-Employee Director received 666 restricted shares of Common Stock in November 2012 and May 2013, and it is anticipated that an additional 666 restricted shares will be granted to each Non-Employee Director in office following the Annual Meeting. The Company may consider changing the fees paid to the Companys non-management directors and/or granting additional options or other forms of equity-based compensation to such directors. Directors who are also officers of the Company are not compensated for their duties as directors.
Set forth below is the name and age of each executive officer of the Company. The information set forth below is as of the record date.
Name | Age | Title | ||
Richard A. Horowitz | 64 | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Assistant Treasurer | ||
Joseph A. Molino, Jr. | 50 | Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |
Each of the foregoing Executive Officers was elected by the Board of Directors to serve until his successor is chosen and qualified.
Mr. Horowitz serves as an executive officer of the Company under the terms of an employment agreement expiring in December 2014. (See Employment Agreement with Executive Officer below.)
Mr. Molino has been Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since December 1997, and has served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company since May 2005. From July 1990 until November 1997, Mr. Molino was chief financial officer of several small private manufacturing and service companies.
14
The following table sets forth all compensation for 2013 and 2012 awarded to or earned by the Companys Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. We refer to these individuals collectively in this Proxy Statement as named executive officers.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) |
Bonus ($)(1) |
Stock Awards ($) |
Option Awards ($)(2) |
Non-Equity Plan Compensation ($)(3) |
All other Compensation ($)(4)(5) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard A. Horowitz Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
2013 | 650,000 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 635,300 | 115,202 | 1,400,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 650,000 | 1,882 | -0- | -0- | 822,890 | 107,564 | 1,582,336 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph A. Molino, Jr. Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
2013 | 350,000 | -0- | -0- | 100,800 | 164,600 | 52,788 | 668,188 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 350,000 | 1,882 | -0- | 162,000 | 157,500 | 52,056 | 723,438 |
(1) | The amounts shown for each of Mr. Horowitz and Mr. Molino in 2012 represent an amount paid in cash outside of the Companys Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan in lieu of certain contribution to the P&F Industries, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan for 2012. |
(2) | The amounts shown for Mr. Molino for each of 2013 and 2012 reflect the aggregate fair value of stock options granted to Mr. Molino computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and is not necessarily indicative of the compensation actually received by such named executive officer. The fair value of such option grant is estimated based on the fair market value on the respective date of grant. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of our options are set forth in the Footnotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for each of 2013 and 2012 as filed with the SEC. |
(3) | The amounts for Mr. Horowitz for 2013 and 2012 represent awards granted under the Companys Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan with respect to the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The amount for Mr. Molino for 2013 represents an award granted under the Companys Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the amount for Mr. Molino for 2012 represents an award granted to him under a fiscal year 2012 bonus program which was subject to terms and conditions of the Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan, other than with regard to compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
(4) | The amounts in the column reflect the following: (a) contributions made under a Company-sponsored defined contribution retirement plan on behalf of Mr. Horowitz in 2013 and 2012 of $16,255 and $9,567, respectively, and on behalf of Mr. Molino in 2013 and 2012 of $16,255 and $14,567, respectively; (b) $45,064 to Mr. Horowitz in each of 2013 and 2012 to cover premiums on a life insurance policy; (c) health insurance premium payments on behalf of Mr. Horowitz in 2013 and 2012 in the amounts of $42,214 and $31,549 respectively and on behalf of Mr. Molino in 2013 and 2012 in the amounts of $26,418 and $25,649, respectively; and (d) legal and consulting fees on behalf of Mr. Horowitz in 2012 of $8,691, relating to his employment agreement and related matters, and matters relating to his Common Stock ownership, and legal fees on behalf of Mr. Molino in 2012 of $3,500 relating to his severance agreement. |
(5) | Also includes additional perquisites for Mr. Horowitz of $11,669 and $12,693 for 2013 and 2012, respectively, relating to the personal use of a Company-leased automobile, and additional perquisites for Mr. Molino of $10,115 and $8,340 for 2013 and 2012, respectively, relating to the personal use of a Company-leased automobile. |
On April 11, 2013, the Company granted Mr. Molino an option to purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Companys 2012 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $8.21 per share, the fair
15
market value on the day of grant. Such option vests as to one-third on each of the respective first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.
On June 22, 2012, the Company granted Mr. Molino an option to purchase 40,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Companys 2012 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $4.95 per share, the fair market value on the day of grant. Such option vests as to one-third on each of the respective first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.
No options were granted to Mr. Horowitz in 2013 or 2012.
16
The following table set forth information regarding exercisable and unexercisable stock options held by each of the named executive officers on December 31, 2013. There were no other options or unvested shares, units or other rights owned by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2013.
Option Awards | ||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercized Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercized Options (#) Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
||||||||||||
Richard A. Horowitz Chairman of the Board, President and Chief (Principal Executive Officer) |
75,188 | 8.06 | 7/9/2014 | |||||||||||||
25,000 | 11.20 | 6/18/2017 | ||||||||||||||
145,000 | 4.16 | 6/23/2018 | ||||||||||||||
Joseph A. Molino, Jr. Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
10,000 | 8.06 | 7/9/2014 | |||||||||||||
20,000 | 16.68 | 6/30/2015 | ||||||||||||||
20,000 | 11.20 | 6/18/2017 | ||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.16 | 6/23/2018 | ||||||||||||||
15,000 | 3.05 | 12/13/2020 | ||||||||||||||
10,000 | 4.56 | 5/15/2021 | ||||||||||||||
5,000 | (1) | 4.56 | 5/15/2021 | |||||||||||||
13,333 | 4.95 | 6/21/2022 | ||||||||||||||
13,334 | (2) | 4.95 | 6/21/2022 | |||||||||||||
13,333 | (3) | 4.95 | 6/21/2022 | |||||||||||||
5,000 | (4) | 8.21 | 4/10/2023 | |||||||||||||
5,000 | (5) | 8.21 | 4/10/2023 | |||||||||||||
5,000 | (6) | 8.21 | 4/10/2023 |
(1) | Option becomes exercisable on May 16, 2014 |
(2) | Option becomes exercisable on June 22, 2014 |
(3) | Option becomes exercisable on June 22, 2015 |
(4) | Option became exercisable on April 11, 2014 |
(5) | Option becomes exercisable on April 11, 2015 |
(6) | Option becomes exercisable on April 11, 2016 |
During 2013, neither executive officer exercised any options to purchase shares of Common Stock.
The named executive officers are covered by a Company-sponsored defined contribution retirement plan, which covers all eligible employees of the Company. In 2013, the Company contributed $16,255 for each of Mr. Horowitz and Mr. Molino, to such defined contribution retirement plan. In 2012, the Company contributed $9,567 and $14,567, respectively, for Mr. Horowitz and Mr. Molino, to such defined contribution retirement plan. The named executive officers have no other reportable pension benefits provided by the Company and no nonqualified deferred compensation in 2013 or 2012.
17
As a smaller reporting company, the Company has presented the information in this proxy statement in accordance with the scaled disclosure requirements permitted under applicable SEC regulations, and as such, the Company has not included a compensation discussion and analysis. However, the Company has provided the following section of the proxy statement in order to provide stockholders with a better understanding of the Companys compensation philosophy and agreements with respect to its named executive officers.
The Companys overall executive compensation philosophy is to align its compensation program with optimizing stockholder value. To that end, the program is designed to recognize successful operating performance and to attract, retain and motivate the executive talent essential to the Companys financial success. Consistent with this philosophy, the Compensation Committee is guided by the following objectives when administering the Companys overall compensation program:
| Attract and retain highly qualified executives; |
| Motivate executives to provide excellent leadership and achieve the Companys goals; |
| Provide substantial performance-related incentive compensation that is aligned with the Companys strategies and directly tied to meeting specific Company objectives; and |
| Strongly link the interests of the executives to the value derived by the Companys stockholders. |
In furtherance of these objectives, the following considerations underlie the Compensation Committees determination with respect to the following principal elements of compensation for the officers of the Company and its operating subsidiaries:
Base Salary. Individual salary determinations should be based upon the officers qualifications, experience and performance.
Annual Cash Incentives. Executives should have a portion of their total cash compensation at risk, contingent upon meeting specific Company objectives, in order to further align the interests of the executives with the stockholders. To that end, executives are only rewarded with cash bonuses to the extent stated objectives are achieved or exceeded.
Long-Term Equity-Based Awards. Where and when appropriate, executives who are critical to the Companys long-term success including the named executive officers should participate in long-term incentive opportunities that link a portion of their total compensation to stockholder value.
Retirement Plans and Other Benefits. Executives should be eligible to participate in the Companys benefit programs, such as life and health insurance and retirement plans at a level consistent with Company policy, prevailing law and current regulations.
Total compensation is intended to correlate to the Companys profitability and growth, which in turn enhances the Companys stockholder value.
In 2013, the Compensation Committee engaged Steven Hall & Partners, LLC, an independent third-party compensation consultant, to assist it with determining the level and composition of compensation for the named executive offers. The Compensation Committee also engaged separate legal counsel during 2013 with regard to certain compensation-related legal matters.
As discussed in greater detail below, the 2013 compensation for Richard A. Horowitz, the Companys President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board was governed by an executive employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Horowitz which was entered into as of January 1, 2012 following the completion of the prior executive employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Horowitz. The new employment agreement contained, among other provisions, an annual rate of base salary of $650,000. It also provided the opportunity for Mr. Horowitz to receive a contingent bonus under the Companys Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan based on Company performance with a target of 50% of his base salary if the performance target was achieved, with a maximum bonus of 150% of his base salary. The criteria for the 2013 bonus, which was set by the Compensation Committee in March 2013, was based on achievement of certain target levels of Company
18
profit, calculated primarily upon the level of earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization achieved by the Company for fiscal 2013 with certain adjustments, on a sliding scale if a threshold level was achieved. In the event the Company did not achieve its performance target, Mr. Horowitz could have received no performance bonus or a bonus that was below the target bonus amount based on a sliding scale, depending on to what extent the Companys actual results were below the performance target. However, as a result of the amount by which the Companys performance exceeded the performance target for 2013, Mr. Horowitz received a bonus of $635,300 for 2013. Mr. Horowitz did not receive any equity award from the Company in 2013.
With respect to the 2013 compensation for Joseph A. Molino. Jr., the Companys Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, there is no employment agreement. Mr. Molino is a party to a severance agreement as discussed below. The Compensation Committee maintained his annual rate of base salary of $350,000 for 2013. He was also eligible to receive a performance based bonus based on Company performance with a target of 35% of his base salary if the performance target (based on the Companys earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization, with certain adjustments) was achieved with a maximum bonus of 52.5% of his base salary. In the event the Company did not achieve its performance target, Mr. Molino could have received no performance bonus or a bonus that was below the target bonus amount based on a sliding scale, depending on to what extent the Companys actual results were below the performance target. However, as a result of the amount by which the Companys performance exceeded the performance target for 2013, Mr. Molino received a bonus of $164,600. In 2013, Mr. Molino also received an option to purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock from the Company. The Company may increase or decrease Mr. Molinos salary from time to time in the future.
On December 29, 2011, the Company and Richard A. Horowitz entered into an executive employment agreement (the Employment Agreement), effective as of January 1, 2012. The Employment Agreement provides for Mr. Horowitz to serve as the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and, if elected by the Board, Chairman of the Board, for a term expiring on December 31, 2014, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of the Employment Agreement. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Horowitz will receive a minimum annual base salary of $650,000. Mr. Horowitzs base salary will be reviewed annually by the Board of Directors and may be increased, but not decreased, from time to time. Mr. Horowitz will be eligible for an annual incentive payment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Companys Bonus Plan (as defined in the Employment Agreement) with performance goals to be set by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion (after discussions with Mr. Horowitz), with a target of 50% of his then-current base salary, and a maximum bonus based on exceeding performance targets as established by the Compensation Committee of 150% of his then-current base salary. Beginning in 2013, the Compensation Committee would have been permitted to reduce the percentage of the target bonus and the maximum bonus and apply such target amount to a long-term cash or equity incentive plan award.
The Employment Agreement further provides that Mr. Horowitz will also receive (i) senior executive level employee benefits, (ii) continuation of the annual payment of approximately $45,000 to cover premiums on a life insurance policy, (iii) a Company-provided automobile and the payment of certain related expenses and (iv) payment and/or reimbursement of certain legal and consultants fees. Mr. Horowitz received no equity grants in connection with the Employment Agreement. In the event Mr. Horowitzs employment is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement), or Mr. Horowitz resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement), then subject to his execution of a general release, (i) he will continue to receive his base salary for 18 months, (ii) he will receive a pro rata bonus for the year of termination (the Pro Rata Bonus), and (iii) the Company will pay him monthly an amount equal to the difference in his COBRA premium and the active employee contribution for medical coverage until the earlier of (a) 18 months from the date of termination, (b) his becoming eligible for medical benefits from a subsequent employer, or (c) his becoming ineligible for COBRA. In the event Mr. Horowitzs employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason within two years following a Change in Control (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or, under certain circumstances, within six months prior to a Change in Control, then he will receive the amounts set forth in the previous paragraph either in whole or in part in a lump sum, subject to his execution of a general release. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event an Excise Tax (as defined in the Employment Agreement) would otherwise be incurred
19
by Mr. Horowitz, amounts paid to Mr. Horowitz upon a Change in Control will be reduced to 2.99 times his base amount (as determined in accordance with Sections 280G of the Internal Revenue Code).
Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, during term of his employment and for a period of twelve months after termination of his employment, Mr. Horowitz is prohibited from (i) competing with the Company, (ii) soliciting or hiring the Companys employees, representatives or agents, or (iii) soliciting any of the Companys customers. The Employment Agreement also prohibits Mr. Horowitz from using or disclosing any of the Companys non-public, proprietary or confidential information.
The Company does not have an employment agreement with its other named executive officer, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., who is deemed to be an employee at will. As of June 22, 2012, however, the Company and Mr. Molino entered into a Severance Agreement (the Severance Agreement), effective as of June 22, 2012, which agreement provides that in the event Mr. Molinos employment is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in the Severance Agreement) on or prior to December 31, 2014 and a Change in Control (as defined in the Severance Agreement) has not occurred, then subject to his execution of a general release, he will continue to receive his base salary for 12 months (the Severance Amount).
In the event Mr. Molinos employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the Severance Agreement) within two years following a Change in Control (as defined in the Agreement) that occurs prior to December 31, 2014, then subject to his execution of a general release (i) he will receive the Severance Amount either in whole or in part in a lump sum depending on whether the Change in Control constitutes a change in control event within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, (ii) he will receive an amount equal to his target annual bonus for the fiscal year such termination occurs, and (iii) the Company will pay him monthly an amount equal to the difference in his COBRA premium and the active employee contribution for medical coverage until the earlier of (a) 12 months from the date of termination, (b) his becoming eligible for medical benefits from a subsequent employer, or (c) his becoming ineligible for COBRA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event an Excise Tax (as defined in the Severance Agreement) would otherwise be incurred by Mr. Molino, amounts paid to Mr. Molino upon a Change in Control will be reduced to 2.99 times his base amount (as determined in accordance with Sections 280G of the Internal Revenue Code).
In the event of a termination of Mr. Molinos employment due to his death or by the Company due to his disability (i) he will receive a pro rata bonus for the year of termination and (ii) the Company will pay him or his estate monthly an amount equal to the difference in his COBRA premium and the active employee contribution for medical coverage until the earlier of (a) one year from the date of termination, (b) Mr. Molino or his dependents becoming ineligible for COBRA or (c) in the case of a termination due to disability, his ceasing to have a physical or mental disability that would prevent him from performing his material duties for the Company.
Pursuant to the Severance Agreement, during the term of his employment and for a period of twelve months after termination of his employment, Mr. Molino is prohibited from (i) competing with the Company, (ii) soliciting or hiring the Companys employees, representatives or agents, or (iii) soliciting any of the Companys customers. The Severance Agreement also prohibits Mr. Molino from using or disclosing any of the Companys non-public, proprietary or confidential information.
In March 2014, the Compensation Committee, acting on behalf of the Company in applying the Companys executive compensation philosophy, modified certain terms of the Employment Agreement: (i) the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Horowitzs annual rate of base salary from $650,000 to $700,000 effective as of January 1, 2014 and (ii) with respect to the potential 2014 bonus pursuant to the Companys Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee increased the target from 50% of Mr. Horowitzs then-current base salary to 55% of his current base salary, and the maximum bonus based on exceeding performance targets was increased from 150% of his then-current base salary to 165% of his current base salary. The Compensation Committee agreed to such modifications because among other factors, under Mr. Horowitzs stewardship, since the beginning of the term of the Employment Agreement, the Company has experienced considerable revenue growth, profitability and liquidity.
20
In March 2014, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Horowitz and Mr. Molino would each be participating in the Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan for 2014, and set forth the maximum bonus for 2014 for each such named executive officer, based on the achievement level of Company profit, calculated based upon the level of earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization to be achieved by the Company for fiscal 2014 with certain adjustments, which is subject to reduction by the Compensation Committee based on a narrower earnings-based achievement standard and other factors.
The P&F Industries, Inc. Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan was approved by the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors and the Stockholders in 2006 and was amended and restated upon the approval of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors and the Stockholders in 2011.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits a corporation from taking a tax deduction in any tax year for compensation it pays to the chief executive officer and certain other named executive officers in excess of $1 million unless such compensation qualifies as performance based and satisfies certain requirements. The Company maintains the Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan to permit, when appropriate, annual incentive award to qualify as performance based compensation and, to the extent they qualify, be deductible for income tax purposes under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Similarly, the Company has provisions in its 2012 Stock Incentive Plan to permit certain equity grants, when appropriate, to qualify as performance based compensation. The Compensation Committee considers the application of Section 162(m) when structuring awards. Section 162(m) regulations are complicated and subject to change. In addition, a number of requirements must be met in order for particular compensation to qualify as deductible under the section. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the compensation intended to qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code awarded or paid by the Company will be fully deductible.
Under the Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee selects the employees of our Company and its subsidiaries who will participate in the Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan for each performance period. The Compensation Committee establishes the objective performance goals, formulae or standards and the individual target performance award (if any) applicable to each participant for a performance period prior to the beginning of such performance period or at such later date as permitted under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and while the outcome of the performance goals are substantially uncertain. As stated above, Mr. Horowitz and Mr. Molino each participated in the Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan in 2013 and were determined to participate in such bonus plan in 2014.
The Companys 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, awards subject to vesting and/or restrictions will not accelerate and vest or cause the lapse of restrictions upon a change in control (as defined in the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan). Instead, such awards will be, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, either (i) assumed and continued or substituted in accordance with applicable law; (ii) purchased by the Company for an amount equal to the excess of the price of the Companys Common Stock paid in a change in control over the exercise price of the award(s) (such purchase price not to exceed the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time of purchase), or (iii) cancelled if the price of the Common stock paid in a change in control is less than the exercise price of the award. The Committee may also, in its sole discretion, provide for accelerated vesting or lapse of restrictions of an award at any time.
In the event of a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation or in the event of a transaction that results in the acquisition of all or substantially all of the Companys Common Stock or assets, the Compensation Committee may elect to terminate all outstanding exercisable awards granted under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, provided that during the period from notification of such termination to the date of consummation of the relevant transaction (which must be at least 20 days) each participant shall have the right to exercise all of his or her exercisable awards in full (without regard to any restrictions on exercisability), contingent on the consummation of such transaction.
The Companys 2002 Stock Incentive Plan provides that in the event of a change in control, notwithstanding any vesting schedule with respect to an award of options or restricted stock, such option shall
21
become immediately exercisable with respect to 100% of the shares subject to such option, and the restricted period shall expire immediately with respect to 100% of such shares of restricted stock. The 2002 Stock Incentive Plan further provides that in the event of a change in control, all other awards shall become fully vested and/or payable to the fullest extent of any award or portion thereof that has not then expired, and any restrictions with respect thereto shall expire.
The following table presents equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2013:
Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column) |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 633,188 | $ | 6.76 | 199,512 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | | |||||||||
TOTAL | 633,188 | $ | 6.76 | 199,512 |
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Companys directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Companys equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To the Companys knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company or written representations that no other reports were required, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with during, or in respect of, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and prior periods.
22
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of P&F Industries, Inc. is composed of three independent directors appointed by the Board of Directors (each of whom is independent under NASDAQ and applicable SEC rules) and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9, 2004. During 2013 and as of the record date, the members of such committee were Messrs. Franklin (Chairman), Brownstein and Randall. Management is responsible for the Companys internal accounting and financial controls, the financial reporting process and the internal audit function. The Companys independent registered public accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committees responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and report its findings to the Board of Directors.
In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions separately, and jointly, with each of management and the Companys independent registered public accountants. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Companys consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accountants matters required to be discussed under PCAOB standards. The independent registered public accountants have provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accountants communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accountants such registered public accountants independence. The Audit Committee has concluded that the independent registered public accountants provision of audit and non-audit services to the Company is compatible with such registered public accountants independence.
Based on the Audit Committees discussion with management and the independent registered public accountants, and the Audit Committees review of the representation of management and the report of the independent registered public accountants to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC.
Members of the Audit Committee
Jeffrey D. Franklin (Chairman)
Howard Brod Brownstein
Richard P. Randall
* | This section is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. |
23
The Audit Committee has appointed CohnReznick LLP (CohnReznick) as independent registered public accountants for the Company and its subsidiaries for the year 2014 and has further directed that management submit the selection of independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. CohnReznick has audited the Companys financial statements since 2008. Representatives of CohnReznick are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Neither the Companys By-laws (as amended on January 14, 2013) (the By-laws) nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the appointment of CohnReznick as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee seeks to have the appointment of CohnReznick ratified. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent registered public accountants at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
The following table sets forth the fees billed by CohnReznick for professional services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 304,000 | $ | 319,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees | -0- | -0- | ||||||
Tax Fees | -0- | -0- | ||||||
All Other Fees | $ | 4,000 | 6,148 | |||||
$ | 308,000 | $ | 325,148 |
Audit fees include fees billed for the audit of P&F Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries, the review of quarterly financial information, and attendance at Audit Committee meetings.
Audit-Related Fees include certain services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the P&F Financial Statements. There were no such fees in 2013 or 2012.
Tax fees include fees billed for services relating to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. There were no such fees in 2013 or 2012.
All Other Fees includes fees billed for services not classified in any of the above categories. For 2013 and 2012, such fees are comprised of certain out-of-pocket expenses.
The Audit Committee negotiates the annual audit fee directly with the Companys independent registered public accountants. Any additional services to be performed by the Companys independent registered public accountants requires the advance approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining its independent registered public accountants independence.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the appointment of CohnReznick. Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes cast on proposals presented to the stockholders and will have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes are counted towards a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining whether this matter has been approved.
24
In accordance with legislation which has recently become effective as to companies of our size, and as required by Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), the Company is providing stockholders with an advisory (non-binding) vote on compensation programs for our named executive officers (sometimes referred to as say on pay). Accordingly, you may vote on the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Companys named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the section captioned Compensation Philosophy and Agreements with Named Executive Officers as well as the compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.
This non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation will be considered approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of shares present and entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the matter and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote. Although this vote is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee, which is comprised of independent directors, expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions to the extent they can determine the cause or causes of any significant negative voting results.
As described in greater detail under Compensation Philosophy and Agreements with Named Executive Officers, our compensation programs are designed to motivate our executives to create a successful company. We believe that our compensation program rewards sustained performance that is aligned with long-term stockholder interests. Stockholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Philosophy and Agreements with Named Executive Officers, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure included in this Proxy Statement.
25
The submission deadline for stockholder proposals to be included in our proxy materials for the 2015 Annual Meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act is December 26, 2014. All such proposals must be received by the Corporate Secretary at P&F Industries, Inc., 445 Broadhollow Road, Suite 100, New York 11747 by the required deadline and must comply with all other applicable legal requirements in order to be considered for inclusion in the Companys 2015 proxy materials. Any such proposal should be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, or other means, including electronic means, that allow the stockholder to prove the date of delivery.
The Companys By-laws require that, for nominations of directors or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting, advance written notice of such nomination or proposal for other business must be furnished to the Company. Such notice must contain certain information specified in the Companys By-laws concerning the nominating or proposing stockholder and information concerning the nominee (if any) and, subject to certain conditions set forth in the By-laws, must be furnished by the stockholder (who must be entitled to vote at the meeting) to the Secretary of the Company, as the address set forth above, not more than 120 days nor less than 90 days in advance of the one year anniversary of the previous years annual meeting of stockholders; provided however, that, if the meeting is convened more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more than 30 days after the anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting, or if no annual meeting was held in the preceding year, notice by the Nominating Stockholder to be timely must so be received not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day before such annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. In the case of the annual meeting to be held in 2015, written notice of a nomination or proposal must be received no earlier than January 21, 2015 and no later than February 20, 2015. A copy of the applicable provisions of the By-laws may be obtained by any stockholder, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth below. The foregoing is a summary of the applicable provisions of the Companys By-laws, which should be read in their entirety.
Stockholders of record on April 11, 2014 will receive a copy of the Companys 2013 Annual Report, containing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (without exhibits), along with this Proxy Statement. You may also obtain copies of exhibits to the Form 10-K, but we may charge a reasonable fee to stockholders requesting such exhibits. If you would like copies of any of the exhibits to the Form 10-K, you should direct your request in writing to the Company at 445 Broadhollow Road, Suite 100, Melville, New York 11747, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K, including exhibits, is also available free of charge on the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
By order of the Board of Directors
JOSEPH A. MOLINO, JR.
Secretary
Date: April 25, 2014
26