NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

OF REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.

THURSDAY, APRIL 24, 2014

To our shareholders:  You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Republic Bancorp, Inc.  The following are details for the meeting:

Date:      Thursday, April 24, 2014

Time:      9:00 A.M., EDT

Place:    Republic Bank Building, Lower Level, 9600 Brownsboro Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40241

Items on the agenda:

1.             To elect seven directors;

2.             To ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2014; and,

3.             To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Record date:         The close of business on February 14, 2014 is the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Your vote is important.  Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we hope you will vote as soon as possible.  Please review the instructions with respect to each of your voting options as described in the proxy statement and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND:  Please note that space limitations may make it necessary to limit attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  Shareholders holding stock in brokerage accounts (“street name holders”) may be asked to produce a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date and provide photo identification. Cameras, recording devices or other like forms of electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Louisville, Kentucky

March 14, 2014

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on April 24, 2014.

The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available online at www.investorvote.com/RBCAA.

REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.

601 West Market Street

Louisville, Kentucky  40202

PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Republic Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “Republic”).  The proxies will be voted at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”) of Republic on April 24, 2014, and at any adjournments of the meeting.

This proxy statement, notice of annual meeting and form of proxy are first being mailed or made available to shareholders on or about March 14, 2014.  As used in this document, the terms “Republic,” the “Company,” “we,” and “our” refer to Republic Bancorp, Inc., a Kentucky corporation.

VOTING

Record date.  You are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, if you held of record, shares of our Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock at the close of business on February 14, 2014.  On that date, 18,544,745 shares of Class A Common Stock and 2,259,926 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued and outstanding for purposes of the Annual Meeting.

Voting rights.  Each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to one (1) vote and each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten (10) votes.  Based on the number of shares outstanding as of the record date, the shares of Class A Common Stock are entitled to an aggregate of 18,544,745 votes, and the shares of Class B Common Stock are entitled to an aggregate of 22,599,260 votes at the Annual Meeting.

Voting by proxy.  If you received the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you may follow the instructions on that notice to access the proxy materials and download the proxy and vote online via the Internet.  If you request a paper or electronic copy of the proxy materials, the proxy will be mailed or e-mailed to you along with the other proxy materials.  If you received a paper copy of this proxy statement, the proxy card is enclosed.  If a proxy card is properly executed, returned to Republic and not revoked, the shares represented by the proxy card will be voted in accordance with the instructions set forth on the proxy card.  If no instructions are given, the shares represented will be voted (i) “For” the Board of Director nominees named in this proxy statement, as well as (ii) “For” the ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014. For participants in the Republic Bancorp, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan Trustee shall vote the shares for which it has not received voting direction from the Plan participants, utilizing the same voting percentages derived from the Plan participants who did direct how their shares are to be voted.  The Board of Directors at present knows of no other business to be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, persons named in the proxy, or their substitutes, will have discretionary authority to vote on any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof and will vote the proxies in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.

You may attend the Annual Meeting even though you have executed a proxy. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by delivering written notice of revocation to the Secretary of Republic, by delivering a subsequent dated proxy, by voting by telephone or online through the Internet on a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

2

Quorum and voting requirements and counting votes.  The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority in voting power of the combined voting power of the Class A Common Stock and the Class B Common Stock will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as being present or represented at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of establishing a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner is otherwise present by proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes duly cast is required for the election of directors.  All other matters presented at the meeting will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast on any matter to which they relate and will have no impact on the outcome of any matter.

SHARE OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the outstanding shares of Republic as of February 14, 2014, based on information available to the Company. The Class B Common Stock is convertible into Class A Common Stock on a share-for-share basis. In the following table, information in the column headed “Class A Common Stock” does not reflect the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Class B Common Stock.  Information is included for:

(1)           persons or entities who own more than 5% of the Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock outstanding;

(2)           directors placed in nomination;

(3)           the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CHAIR/CEO”), the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and three other Executive Officers of Republic who earned the highest total compensation payout during 2013 (collectively, with the CHAIR/CEO and CFO, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”); and,

(4)           all executive officers and directors of Republic as a group.

Except as otherwise noted, Republic believes that each person named below has the sole power to vote and dispose of all shares shown as owned by such person.  Please note that the table provides information about the number of shares beneficially owned, as opposed to the voting power of those shares.

3

Executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group (collectively 11 persons) hold 71% of the combined voting power of the Class A and Class B Common Stock which represents 52% of the total number of shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock outstanding as of February 14, 2014 as detailed below:

*  Represents  less than 1% of total

4

(1)           Includes 7,165,051 shares held of record by Teebank Family Limited Partnership (“Teebank”) and 750,067 shares held of record by Jaytee Properties Limited Partnership (“Jaytee”).  With respect to Teebank and Jaytee, Steven E. Trager is a general partner and a limited partner, as trustee, as well as co-trustee of a trust which is a general partner of each of these limited partnerships.  Trusts for the benefit of, among others, Steven E. Trager’s two children, are limited partners of both Teebank and Jaytee.  Includes 7,478 shares held by Steven E. Trager’s spouse, Amy Trager.  Includes 300,134 shares held of record by the Trager Family Foundation, a charitable foundation organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.  Steven E. Trager shares voting and investment power over these shares with Jean S. Trager, Shelley Trager Kusman and Amy Trager.  Also includes 12,085 shares held in Republic’s 401(k) plan and 267,291 shares held by the estate of Bernard M. Trager, for which Steven E. Trager serves as executor.

(2)           Includes 939,449 shares held of record by Teebank and 168,066 shares held of record by Jaytee.  With respect to Teebank and Jaytee, Steven E. Trager is a general partner and a limited partner, as trustee, as well as co-trustee of a trust which is a general partner of each of these limited partnerships.  Trusts for the benefit of, among others, Steven E. Trager’s two children are limited partners of both Teebank and Jaytee.  Also includes 1,215 shares held in Republic’s 401(k) plan and 671,583 shares held by the estate of Bernard M. Trager, for which Steven E. Trager serves as executor.

(3)           Includes 7,165,051 shares held of record by Teebank and 750,067 shares held of record by Jaytee.  With respect to Teebank and Jaytee, Jean S. Trager is a limited partner and co-trustee of a trust which is a general partner of each of those limited partnerships.  Also includes 300,134 shares held of record by the Trager Family Foundation of which Jean S. Trager shares voting and investment power with Steven E. Trager, Shelley Trager Kusman, and Amy Trager.

(4)           Includes 939,449 shares held of record by Teebank and 168,066 shares held of record by Jaytee.  With respect to Teebank and Jaytee, Jean S. Trager is a limited partner and co-trustee of a trust which is a general partner of each of these limited partnerships.

(5)           Includes 7,165,051 shares held of record by Teebank and 750,067 shares held of record by Jaytee.  A. Scott Trager is a limited partner of both Teebank and Jaytee.  A. Scott Trager shares voting authority over shares held by both Teebank and Jaytee as a member of each partnership’s voting committee.  Includes 51,697 shares held of record by a family trust of which A. Scott Trager is a co-trustee and a beneficiary.  Also includes 18,448 shares held in Republic’s 401(k) plan and 7,500 shares for options that are exercisable within 60 days.  Also includes voting rights for 7,500 restricted shares which vest 50% in November 2017 and 50% in November 2018.

(6)           Includes 939,449 shares held of record by Teebank and 168,066 shares held of record by Jaytee.  A. Scott Trager is a limited partner with shared voting authority of both Teebank and Jaytee.  Includes 4,107 shares held of record by a family trust of which A. Scott Trager is a co-trustee and a beneficiary.  Also includes 1,190 shares held in Republic’s 401(k) plan.

(7)           Includes 7,165,051 shares held of record by Teebank and 750,067 shares held of record by Jaytee.  Sheldon Gilman, as trustee of trusts, is a limited partner of both Teebank and Jaytee.  Sheldon Gilman shares voting authority over shares held by both Teebank and Jaytee as a member of each partnership’s voting committee.  Also includes 39,307 shares held by Sheldon Gilman’s spouse.

(8)           Includes 939,449 shares held of record by Teebank and 168,066 shares held of record by Jaytee.  Sheldon Gilman, as trustee of trusts, is a limited partner of both Teebank and Jaytee.  Sheldon Gilman shares voting authority of both Teebank and Jaytee as a member of each partnership’s voting committee.

(9)           Teebank and Jaytee are limited partnerships of which Steven E. Trager, Jean S. Trager, A. Scott Trager, Sheldon Gilman, as trustee of trusts, and The Estate of Bernard M. Trager are limited partners.  Steven E. Trager is also a general partner of each partnership and is co-trustee with Jean S. Trager of a trust which is a general partner of

5

Teebank and Jaytee.  Teebank and Jaytee each has a voting committee comprised of Steven E. Trager, A. Scott Trager and Sheldon Gilman.  These committees direct the voting of the shares held by Teebank and Jaytee.  The following table provides information about the units of Teebank and Jaytee owned by directors, officers and 5% shareholders of Republic.  The number of units owned by the partners of Teebank and Jaytee are as follows:

   * - Represents  less than 1% of total

(a)   Includes 135,657 limited units held by the Jean S. Trager Revocable Trust and 20,000 general units held by the Jean S. Trager Trust.

(b)   Includes 267,474 limited and 20,000 general units held in a revocable trust and 20,000 general units held by the Jean S. Trager Trust.

(c)   Includes 353,936 limited units held by the Jean S. Trager Revocable Trust and 20,000 general units held by the Jean S. Trager Trust.

(d)   Includes 152,874 limited and 20,000 general units held in a revocable trust and 20,000 general units held by the Jean S. Trager Trust.  Also includes 179,985 limited units held by the Trager Trust of 2012.

(10)         Bernard M. Trager’s date of death was February 10, 2012.  Includes 6,566 shares held in Republic’s 401(k) plan.  Steven E. Trager is the executor of Bernard M. Trager’s estate.

(11)         Includes 6,951 shares issuable to Craig A. Greenberg upon vesting in accordance with the terms of the Company’s deferred compensation plan.

(12)         Includes 7,685 shares issuable to Michael T. Rust upon vesting in accordance with the terms of the Company’s deferred compensation plan.

(13)         Includes 247 shares held by Sandra Metts Snowden’s spouse.  Also includes 8,799 shares issuable to Sandra Metts Snowden upon vesting in accordance with the terms of the Company’s deferred compensation plan.

(14)        Includes 5,352 shares held jointly by R. Wayne Stratton with his spouse and 11,423 shares held by R. Wayne Stratton’s spouse. R. Wayne Stratton shares investment and voting power over these shares.  Also includes 4,626 shares issuable to R. Wayne Stratton upon vesting in accordance with the terms of the Company’s deferred compensation plan.

(15)         Includes 849 shares held jointly by R. Wayne Stratton with his spouse and 1,214 shares held by R. Wayne Stratton’s spouse.  R. Wayne Stratton shares investment and voting power over these shares.

(16)         Includes 6,979 shares issuable to Susan Stout Tamme upon vesting in accordance with the terms of the Company’s deferred compensation plan.

(17)         Includes 3,000 shares for stock options held by Robert J. Arnold that are exercisable within 60 days.  Also includes 4,599 shares held in Republic’s 401(k) plan.  Also includes voting rights for 3,000 restricted shares which vest 50% in November 2017 and 50% in November 2018.

6

(18)         Includes 7,000 shares for stock options held by William R. Nelson that are exercisable within 60 days.  Also includes voting rights for 3,000 restricted shares which vest 50% in November 2017 and 50% in November 2018.

(19)         Includes 7,500 shares for stock options held by Kevin Sipes that are exercisable within 60 days.  Also includes 3,954 shares held in Republic’s 401(k) plan.   Also includes voting rights for 7,500 restricted shares which vest 50% in November 2017 and 50% in November 2018.

(20)         Includes the shares as described above held by the directors, nominees and NEOs, along with an additional 62,931 shares, of which 5,000 shares are for stock options that are exercisable within 60 days.

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Republic’s Board of Directors is comprised of one class of directors that are elected annually.  Each director serves a term of one (1) year or until his or her successor is duly elected or qualified.  Republic’s Bylaws provide for not less than five (5) or more than fifteen (15) directors. In accordance with the Company’s Bylaws, the Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the 2014 Annual Meeting at seven (7). The Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors have nominated for election as directors: Steven E. Trager, A. Scott Trager, Craig A. Greenberg, Michael T. Rust, Sandra Metts Snowden, R. Wayne Stratton and Susan Stout Tamme. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board of Directors.

Director nominees Craig A. Greenberg, Michael T. Rust, Sandra Metts Snowden, R. Wayne Stratton and Susan Stout Tamme comprise a majority of the Board of Directors, and the Board has determined that each is an “independent director” as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ listing standards. While the Company is a “controlled company” as defined under the NASDAQ rules and thus is entitled to an exemption from the majority independence rule, the Company has not elected this exemption for its 2014 election of directors, but reserves the right to claim this exemption in the future.

Neither the Nominating Committee nor the Board of Directors has reason to believe that any nominee for director will not be available for election or to serve following election. However, if any of the nominees should become unavailable for election, and unless authority is withheld, the holders of the proxies solicited hereby will vote for such other individual(s) as the Nominating Committee or the Board of Directors may recommend.

The following table details the indicated information for each nominee and incumbent director:

7

8

9

None of the directors placed in nomination currently holds or has in the past five (5) years held any directorships in any other company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

Republic’s directors were elected at the most recent Annual Meeting held on April 25, 2013, to a one (1) year term. The Company’s executive officers are selected by the Board of Directors and hold office at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Steven E. Trager and A. Scott Trager are cousins.

The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” all of the proposed Board of Director nominees named in this proxy statement.

The Board of Directors and its Committees

The Board

Each director is expected to devote sufficient time, energy and attention to ensure diligent performance of his or her duties and to attend all Board, committee and shareholders’ meetings. The Board of Directors held six (6) regularly scheduled board meetings in 2013. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors.  Also, each of the directors attended at least 75% of the committee meetings held on which such directors served during their respective terms of service in 2013.  Also, some selected Company directors were paid a committee fee for attending certain Bank committee meetings.

The Company believes it is both prudent and expedient and in the best interest of shareholders that the Chairman and CEO positions are combined and that such combination has no negative effect on the operation and direction of the Company.  This structure allows the independent directors to concentrate on the oversight of the Company without the added burden of also addressing what are normally less material day to day managerial concerns.  The Company does not have a lead independent director, but the independent directors meet privately following each regularly scheduled board meeting and have the authority to request to speak with any officer or other employee of the Company.  They also have direct access to and the authority to retain, at the Company’s expense, any outside auditors, accountants and attorneys at their discretion.

While the Company’s Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, selected Board committees play an important role in assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities.  The

10

Board evaluates risk factors at its regularly scheduled Board meetings and also more specifically through its Nominating Committee, Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and its Compliance and Community Reinvestment Committee.  The Compliance and Community Reinvestment Committee is a committee of the Bank’s Board.  Craig A. Greenberg and Steven E. Trager, both Company directors, serve on this Bank Committee.  The Compliance and Community Reinvestment Committee assists the Board in monitoring the compliance and community reinvestment activity of the two subsidiary banks, including compliance with all applicable laws and regulations with respect to compliance and community reinvestment, and compliance with any and all orders or agreements entered into between the banks or the Board with any of the banks’ regulatory supervision agencies.  The Committee is also responsible for the oversight of the Company and its subsidiary banks’ Third Party Risk Management Program.  The Third Party Management Steering Committee, chaired by the Chief Risk Officer, reviews and approves third party due diligence completed by the Company’s management responsible for the Company and its subsidiary banks’ third party relationships.  Third party risk reports are provided through this Committee on at least an annual basis to the Board of Directors concerning the Third Party Management Program and any significant third party arrangements.  It also monitors and oversees the activities of the subsidiary banks’ Compliance and Community Reinvestment Departments, monitors the banks’ Compliance Management Systems and is responsible for reviewing the Compliance Policy of the subsidiary banks annually.

The Company Board and the subsidiary bank boards receive regular and timely reports from these Company committees.  More specifically, the Audit Committee also regularly reviews risks associated with insurance, credit, debt, financial, accounting, legal, reputational, compliance, third party, information technology security and other risk matters involving the Company.  Enterprise Risk Management reports and Business Continuity Planning reports are received and reviewed by the Audit Committee.  In addition, the Compensation Committee considers risks related to succession planning and approves the Company’s Succession Plan. The Compensation Committee also considers risks related to the attraction and retention of critical employees and risks relating to the Company’s compensation programs and contractual employee arrangements.  In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation and benefit plans affecting employees generally in addition to those applicable to the NEOs. The Company’s Board considers strategic risks and opportunities and regularly receives detailed reports from its committees and other bank committees regarding risk oversight. The Company’s Board also receives regular reports directly from management and committee chairpersons.  The Company’s Board is responsible for setting and formally approving policies regarding risk management and compliance oversight, as well as other matters. The Company employs a high level Risk Manager who regularly attends all Company Board meetings and who reports directly to the CHAIR/CEO of the Company.

Committees of the Company’s Board

The Company’s Board has three (3) standing committees to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities. The Board committees consist of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee. In accordance with NASDAQ listing standards, the Board has determined that each of the Board committee members meets the definition of “independent director” and satisfies the NASDAQ listing standards for service on the Board committees on which each serves.  In making these determinations, the Board considered all relevant factors, including:  (i) Susan Stout Tamme is the President, Louisville Market of Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. doing business as Baptist Hospital East, a hospital that leases space to Republic.  Fees paid by Republic totaled $15,415 for the year ended December 31, 2013; and (ii) Craig A. Greenberg is employed as “of counsel” to the law firm of Frost

11

Brown Todd LLC, a law firm that provides general legal services to Republic.  Republic paid the law firm legal fees totaling $964,303 for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Charters for each Board committee, as well as the Code of Conduct and Ethics, are available on the Company’s website at www.republicbank.com.  The information contained on Republic’s website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of, this Proxy Statement.

The table below details current membership for each of the standing Board committees:

* - Denotes Committee Chairperson

The Audit Committee held eight (8) meetings during 2013. The Company’s Board of Directors has evaluated the credentials of and designated and appointed R. Wayne Stratton, CPA, as Chairman of the Audit Committee and as the “audit committee financial expert” as required by Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Company’s Board of Directors adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which sets out the functions and responsibilities of the Audit Committee.  As described in the charter, the Audit Committee, among other things, is directly responsible for the selection, oversight and compensation of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.  It is also responsible for the oversight of the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company, audits of the financial statements and pre-approval of any non-audit services of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Company’s Board of Directors with respect to: the review and scope of audit arrangements; the independent registered public accounting firm’s suggestions for strengthening internal accounting controls; matters of concern to the Audit Committee, the independent registered public accounting firm, or management relating to the Company’s consolidated financial statements or other results of the annual audit; the review of internal accounting procedures and controls with the Company’s financial and accounting staff; the review of the activities and recommendations of  the Internal Auditor and compliance auditors; and the review of the consolidated financial statements and other financial information published by the Company. Auditors for the Company are required to report directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has recommended, and the Board of Directors has approved and adopted, a Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy that applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company and its banking subsidiaries, including the principal executive and financial officers, the controller and the principal accounting officer. The Company intends to post amendments to, or waivers from, its Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy, if any, that apply to the principal executive and financial officers, the controller or the principal accounting officer on its website.  There were no amendments or waivers approved, granted or posted in 2013.

12

The Compensation Committee held two (2) meetings during 2013. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Company’s Board of Directors as to the amount and form of NEO compensation and option awards, if any. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves the Company’s and the two subsidiary banks’ Management Succession Plans on an annual basis. Neither the Compensation Committee, the Board, the Company, nor its management utilized the services of an independent compensation consultant in 2013, nor do any of them have any current arrangements with any compensation advisors or consultants. The CHAIR/CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to all NEO compensation, including his own compensation.

The Nominating Committee held one (1) meeting in 2013. In 2014, the Nominating Committee and the Company’s Board of Directors approved the director nominees to be considered for election at the Annual Meeting.  All director nominees for 2014 served as directors during 2013. No candidates for director nominees for the 2014 Annual Meeting election of directors were submitted to the Nominating Committee or the Company’s Board of Directors for consideration by any non-management shareholder.

The Nominating Committee will consider candidates for director nominees at the 2015 Annual Meeting properly put forth by shareholders. Shareholders should submit nominations, if any, to the Company’s Secretary, Michael A. Ringswald at 601 West Market Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202 no later than November 15, 2014.  The Nominating Committee will consider candidates who have a strong record of community leadership in the Company’s and its banking subsidiaries’ markets.  Candidates should possess a strong record of achievement in both business and civic endeavors, possess strong ethics and display leadership qualities including the ability to analyze and interpret banking financial statements and regulatory requirements, the competence to evaluate endeavors of an entrepreneurial nature and be able to attract new Company banking relationships.  Board diversity as a whole is also considered, although the Company does not have a formal diversity policy.  Recommendations of the “Trager Family Members” (generally defined to include Steven E. Trager and Jean S. Trager and their descendants, and companies, partnerships or trusts in which they are majority owners or beneficiaries), as well as prior service and performance as a director, will also be strongly considered.  The Company does not pay a third party fee to assist in identifying and evaluating director nominees, but the Company does not preclude the potential for utilizing such services, if needed, as may be determined at the discretion of the Nominating Committee.  No candidate that was recommended by a beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the Company’s voting Common Stock was rejected.  The “Trager Family Members” recommended all director nominees submitted to the Nominating Committee and the Company’s Board of Directors; no other shareholders submitted a recommendation for a director nominee for 2014.

All Company directors attended the 2013 Annual Meeting.  All Company directors are requested and are expected to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Committee, which is comprised of three independent Company directors, is responsible for approving the compensation of the Company’s NEOs and NEO compensation policies

13

for Republic.  The Company does not separately compensate its NEOs, all of whom are also executive officers of the Bank and all of whom are compensated directly by the Bank for their services.

In deciding to continue with Republic’s existing executive compensation practices, the  Compensation Committee has considered that the holders of over 99.3% of the votes cast on an advisory basis at Republic’s 2013 annual meeting of shareholders approved the compensation of the Company’s NEOs as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for that 2013 Annual Meeting.  Also, in accordance with the affirmative votes cast at the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to hold advisory votes on executive compensation every two (2) years, the shareholders will vote on the compensation of the NEOs at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Objectives of Republic’s Compensation Program.  The purpose of Republic’s Compensation Program is to establish and maintain suitable financial compensation and financial rewards for job performance that principally focuses on whether or not the Company’s profit objectives have been met or substantially met.  Other goals are assigned and attributed to certain NEOs in the primary areas of loan and deposit growth, risk management, regulatory control, loan loss control, customer service and operations.

With respect to the NEOs listed in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee also establishes goals other than profit goals in order to provide incentives for the NEOs to perform in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and also to provide measurable components against which the NEOs’ total performance and contributions can be evaluated.  While those additional goals may or may not be directly related to the Company’s profit objectives, they are defined by the Compensation Committee and reviewed with each NEO. Pre-tax net income for the Company and its operating subsidiaries remains the central and most important goal in evaluating and determining NEO compensation.  Therefore, if profitability goals are met, compensation generally increases and some significant level or percentage of the NEOs’ incentive bonus potential will normally, but not necessarily, be awarded even if other NEO goals other than profit may not have been fully achieved.

The NEOs are currently comprised of Steven E. Trager, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CHAIR/CEO”); A. Scott Trager, President (“PRES”); Kevin Sipes, Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”); Robert J. Arnold, Senior Vice President, Commercial Lending (“SVP”) and William R. Nelson, President/Republic Processing Group (“PRES/RPG”).

Compensation Elements.  The Company’s executive compensation program has three (3) principal components: base salary, the NEO incentive compensation program or incentive bonus program, and the stock award program.  Also, some NEOs, based on their respective participation, may also be included in the Company’s acquisition bonus program.  The Company’s acquisition bonus program provides for a bonus payout for the achievement of profit objectives based solely on the profitability of the Company’s bank acquisitions, as may be applicable.  Base salary compensation and the Company’s performance-based incentive program are annual programs.  The stock award program is not typically an annual program, but stock awards in the form of stock options or stock grants could be awarded at any time during the year to some or all of the Company’s NEOs, subject to the

14

recommendation of the CHAIR/CEO and the approval of the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. The NEOs also participate in Company-wide employee benefit plans and typically are rewarded, as part of their base compensation, additional selected business-related perquisites such as, by way of example, car allowances and country club memberships.

Purpose of Republic’s Compensation Elements.  The primary purpose of the base salary component of Republic’s compensation program is to provide base compensation for ordinary living expenses.  The Company wants to provide its NEOs with a base salary that supports a reasonable lifestyle that is comparable to their high and visible standing in the community, that supports the demands from the community given that standing and their community visibility and also provides reasonable compensation for the performance of their duties and responsibilities directly associated with their executive officer status.  As long as the Company’s financial performance is deemed acceptable, additions to base salary are typically granted annually in response to generally recognized cost of living factor increases and as a reward for performance. While the Compensation Committee considers cost of living adjustments when evaluating base pay, such adjustments are not automatic, but are also dependent on satisfactory earnings and other performance factors.  The Compensation Committee, in making this determination, used its collective judgment and the recommendations of the CHAIR/CEO in determining base compensation levels for 2013.  The Compensation Committee does not apply any particular formula or measurement in making these determinations.  Going forward, the Compensation Committee will continue to make its determinations by using its collective judgment and giving strong consideration to the recommendations of the CHAIR/CEO.  It will continue not to apply any particular formula or measurement, but the Company’s financial profit performance relative to budget remains a primary consideration.

Company bonus incentive potentials in terms of both dollar amount and profit objectives are set at the beginning of each of the Company’s fiscal years by the Compensation Committee and are used to provide the NEOs with incentives to improve both short-term and long-term Company performance.  Stock awards are also granted from time to time to provide the NEOs with incentives to maximize the Company’s financial performance, as well as providing retention incentives.  Acquisition bonus awards are granted to incentivize NEOs and other Company associates to maximize Company profit and bank integration components relating to acquisitions, such as timely and accurate system conversions in order to maximize operational efficiencies.

Establishment of Compensation Levels.  Republic’s compensation elements are designed to be generally competitive with similar employment opportunities or positions in similar sized companies in the metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky area. The Compensation Committee, however, does not rely on benchmarking to determine its compensation elements; rather, the Compensation Committee gives strong consideration and does not typically deviate from the recommendations of the CHAIR/CEO, whose recommendations are based upon his subjective judgment.  The Compensation Committee does annually review various benchmarking publications to determine if compensation levels are within reasonable ranges as compared to those benchmarks, but the benchmarks are not used to set compensation.  The Compensation Committee has not previously engaged a third-party executive compensation consultant and has no immediate plans to do so in the future.

15

The CHAIR/CEO will make specific executive compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee on all compensation elements.  The CHAIR/CEO will recommend his own compensation, which, if reasonable in the subjective judgment of the Compensation Committee, is normally and historically accepted and approved by the Compensation Committee and ultimately the Board of Directors without modification.

The compensation of the remaining NEOs is principally recommended by the CHAIR/CEO. In the case where a Company NEO reports to another NEO, the supervising NEO’s recommendations are also strongly considered. These recommendations, if reasonable in the subjective judgment of the Compensation Committee, are also normally and typically accepted and approved by the Compensation Committee and ultimately the Board of Directors without change.  All salary and incentive executive compensation is approved by the Board of Directors upon recommendation by the Compensation Committee.

NEO Incentive Compensation Program.  The NEO incentive compensation program is designed to reward those individuals who contribute through their own performance and their influence on others to achieve and exceed Republic’s financial goals and to a lesser extent, other goals required to run a successful banking operation.  All NEO incentive compensation is tied to the Company’s budgeted pre-tax net income goals except for the PRES/RPG and the PRES.  The PRES/RPG has goals expressly tied to the profitability of the Company’s Republic Processing Group business operating segment.  Unlike the other NEOs, whose goals are based on the Company’s fiscal year of January 1 through December 31, the PRES/RPG has goals based on a July 1 through June 30 fiscal year performance.  The PRES has goals expressly tied to the profitability of the Company’s banking operations only, exclusive of the Republic Processing Group business operating segment.  NEO incentive compensation is tied principally to the annual pre-tax net income achieved as compared to the internal annual budget approved by the Board of Directors.

The Compensation Committee, on the recommendation of the CHAIR/CEO, sets individual incentive potentials at the end of each fiscal year to be applied to the next fiscal year for all NEOs.  The incentive potential for 2013 was $185,000 for the CHAIR/CEO, $175,000 for the PRES, $237,500 for the PRES/RPG, $125,000 for the CFO, and $75,000 for the SVP. No bonus incentives were awarded to any NEO for 2013 performance, except that the PRES/RPG received a one-time  bonus of $50,000 in consideration of his leading RPG in its transition from a business segment that previously offered the Refund Anticipation Loan (“RAL”) product to a business segment that operated without the availability of the RAL product.

The incentive compensation potential for the CHAIR/CEO and the CFO were tied to the total Company pre-tax net income.  The total Company pre-tax net income objective at the primary level tier for 2013 was $59.3 million, and the superior performance tier level was $68.3 million.  The incentive compensation potential of the PRES was tied principally to the profitability of the total Company pre-tax net income excluding the RPG business segment. The RPG business segment pre-tax net income objective at the primary level tier for 2013 was $10.1 million and the superior performance tier level was $15.1 million. Certain one-time financial events of a non-recurring nature, whether positive or negative, may be excluded from the pre-tax net income objective for incentive purposes.

16

For 2014, the budget contains goals, which if reached, allow for an “Entry” level of potential bonus and also a “Maximum” bonus level. Thus, incentive bonus potential for each NEO has two tiers, a primary level tier and a superior performance tier, both tiers being for performance that exceeds the Company’s operating budget.  If the primary level or “Entry” tier is achieved, the NEO would likely be awarded 40% to 50% of the NEO’s respective bonus incentive potential.  If the superior or “Maximum” level tier is achieved, the NEO would likely be awarded 90% to 100% of his respective incentive potential.  The determination of the amount of bonus actually awarded is determined by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. The budgeted profit goals are designed to be a challenge to meet, particularly for the superior or “Maximum” performance tier, but the budgeted goals and the tiers associated with those goals are not set so as to be impractical or impossible to achieve.  The NEO profit goals are designed to provide an incentive for the NEOs to achieve performance in excess of budgeted financial expectations. The Company’s profit goals should not be relied upon by any investor as an indication of management’s prediction of its future financial performance.

In its discretion, the Company may modify its budgeted goals and the Compensation Committee may elect to exclude any extraordinary income or other items from its determination as to whether or not the financial goals were, in fact, met or substantially met.  A percentage of the total bonus incentive potential may be awarded to NEOs even if budgeted profitability goals for bonus incentive purposes are not fully achieved.

The Maximum incentive potential for 2014 performance remains unchanged from 2013 for all NEOs, except the PRES/RPG; $185,000 for the CHAIR/CEO, $175,000 for the PRES, $125,000 for the CFO, and $75,000 for the SVP.  The PRES/RPG is eligible for a maximum bonus potential of $225,000 in 2014.  All NEOs except the PRES/RPG must be in good standing as of March 13, 2015, in order to receive any incentive approved for payment. The PRES/RPG must remain an employee in good standing as of August 1, 2014.

By written agreement with each NEO, the incentive compensation potential is subject to amendment, either upward or downward, at the discretion of the CHAIR/CEO.  By written agreement with each NEO, the individual goals are subject to amendment at the discretion of the CHAIR/CEO.

There are potentially some occasions when an NEO may be awarded incentive bonus compensation based on factors such as competitive information about the salaries or bonuses paid for similar positions at other local companies or awarded based on achievements other than profit, although no such incentive bonuses above the stated incentive bonus potential for any NEO were awarded in 2013.

Overall Company stock performance is not a component of evaluation for the purpose of NEO incentive compensation.  Republic’s stock is not actively traded and thus may be subject to market fluctuations beyond the reasonable control of management. Also, in the Compensation Committee’s view, the significant stock holdings of the CHAIR/CEO and his related interests provide material executive motivation to not only preserve but to grow shareholder value, particularly long-term shareholder value.

17

Ultimately, the Compensation Committee believes that reasonable and consistent earnings over time will translate into appropriate and favorable stock performance. The Compensation Committee’s policies are not designed to encourage Republic’s NEOs to manage the Company on a quarter to quarter time horizon or even over a one year time period.  Investment in capital improvements, product development and new market expansion can act to reduce short-term profits while providing for a larger future, longer-term profit potential and/or provide for the long-term soundness and sustainability of the Company’s operations and, thus, its long-term profit potential.  All of these factors are taken into account by the Compensation Committee in its subjective annual evaluation process and deliberations.

The Compensation Committee or the CHAIR/CEO is authorized to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, the Bonus Incentive Plan in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events, including acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, tax rates and regulations or business conditions or in view of the Compensation Committee’s or CHAIR/CEO’s assessment of the business strategy of the Company, economic and business conditions, personal performance of a particular NEO and any other circumstances deemed relevant.

Acquisition Bonus Plan.  In addition to the incentive potential described above, certain NEOs may qualify under the Company’s Acquisition Bonus Plan for an additional incentive bonus to be determined by the CHAIR/CEO and approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee relating to Bank acquisitions.

The purpose of the Acquisition Bonus Plan is to set forth the terms and conditions of financial rewards for the job performance of associates of the Company, including certain NEOs who materially participate in the negotiation, consummation and transition of a bank acquisition or merger and contribute to the long-term profitability of the acquisitions, whether through an asset purchase, stock purchase, merger or other corporate transaction.  The Company may engage in a number of acquisitions from time to time, and each acquisition may have a specific bonus incentive program subject to the provisions of the Acquisition Bonus Plan.

The bonus incentive pool, with respect to each acquisition, will be in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, the amount to be determined by the Company’s CHAIR/CEO within 60 days of the closing of each acquisition and subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee.

The determination of the amount of Acquisition Bonus Plan awards that may be paid to any individual is based on performance criteria as determined by the Compensation Committee and may include one or more of the following criteria:  (a) successful branch consolidations and core system conversions; (b) a limitation of any losses resulting from operational errors to less than a discretionary dollar amount as determined by the CHAIR/CEO; (c) operating profit (gross or net); (d) earnings including operating income, net operating income, earnings before or after taxes, earnings before or after interest, depreciation, amortization, or extraordinary or special items, or book value per share (which may exclude non-recurring items) or net earnings; (e) pre-tax income or after-tax income or pre-tax profits or after-tax profits; (f) revenue, revenue growth or rate of revenue growth; (g) return on assets (gross or net), return on investment (including cash flow return on investment), return on capital

18

(including return on total capital or return on invested capital), or return on equity; (h) return on sales or revenues; (i) operating expenses; (j) cash flow (before or after dividends), free cash flow, cash flow return on investment (discounted or otherwise), net cash provided by operations, cash flow in excess of cost of capital or cash flow per share (before or after dividends); (k) implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; (l) operating margin or profit margin; (m) cost targets, reductions and savings, productivity and efficiencies; (n) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, human resources management, supervision of litigation and other legal matters, information technology, and goals relating to budget comparisons; (o) personal professional objectives, including any of the foregoing performance targets, the implementation of policies and plans, the negotiation of transactions, and the development of long-term business goals; (p) improvement in or attainment of expense levels or working capital levels; (q) operating portfolio metrics, or (r) any combination of, or a specified increase in, any of the foregoing.  Where applicable, the performance targets may be expressed in terms of attaining a specified level of the particular criteria or the attainment of a percentage increase or decrease in the particular criteria, all as determined by the Compensation Committee.  The performance targets may include a threshold level of performance below which no payment will be made, levels of performance at which specified payments will be made, and a maximum level of performance above which no additional payment will be made.  Each performance target is determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, if applicable, and is subject to certification by the Compensation Committee provided that the Compensation Committee has the authority to adjust such targets in recognition of extraordinary items or other items that may not be infrequent or unusual but which may have inconsistent effects on performance.

The Acquisition Bonus Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee has delegated to the CHAIR/CEO of the Company the authority, subject to such terms as the Compensation Committee shall determine, to perform such functions, including administrative functions, except that the Compensation Committee may not delegate authority to an officer or employee to grant a bonus award or otherwise make determinations with respect to the officer or employee to whom the authority is delegated.

Unless otherwise specifically determined by the Committee or CHAIR/CEO, the bonus incentive award is deemed earned and vested only with respect to a participant who remains employed at the Company and is in good standing at the time of the determination.  However, under certain special conditions, this requirement may be subject to waiver by the CHAIR/CEO.

Results Rewarded Under Republic’s Compensation Program

All NEOs, except the PRES/RPG, received a base salary increase of 2% to 4% effective December 24, 2012.  The Compensation Committee recommended a 3% salary increase for the CHAIR/CEO to $365,000, 3% salary increase for the PRES to $360,500, a 4% salary increase for the CFO to $292,800 and a 2% increase for the SVP to $242,500.  The Compensation Committee determined that RPG’s overall performance in the 2013 tax season was not sufficient to award any base salary compensation increase to the PRES/RPG for 2013.

19

No NEOs received a base salary increase for the calendar year 2014.  It was the Compensation Committee’s determination that the Company’s overall performance in 2013 was not sufficient to award any additional base salary compensation increases.

The principal Company achievement that is rewarded under Republic’s Incentive Compensation Program with respect to NEO compensation is the degree of attainment of Company profit goals as determined by budgeted income objectives. Consideration is given if profit objectives are not fully met due to factors beyond the control of the respective NEO. Such factors have historically included economic factors, regulatory changes impacting profit objectives, or management decisions that may impact current profitability in return for the potential for greater long-term profitability.  These decisions may include such things as technology upgrades or other similar circumstances that were not evident when the budget was initially approved by Republic’s Board of Directors. The Company Compensation Program is flexible and will take into account factors beyond the control of any NEO in determining the amount of compensation to be paid in any given year. If the Company’s budgeted pre-tax net income goals are not achieved, then a percentage of the potential incentive payout may be awarded based on any intervening factors that may have been outside the control of the respective NEO, or due to other meaningful contributions of the respective NEO, or as a result of meaningful profitability performance even though the budgeted profitability goals may not have been fully met or even substantially met. Nonetheless, Republic’s Compensation Program does not automatically result in incentives being paid based on a pre-set percentage of any particular goal attainment.  Given the Company’s overall financial performance in 2013, no incentive compensation was paid or will be paid to any NEO other than the PRES/RPG as described above.

Equity Compensation.  The Company’s primary form of equity-based incentive compensation has historically been incentive stock options. This form of compensation was historically used by the Company due to previously favorable accounting and tax treatment. Incentive stock options are also granted by the Company’s competitors and the Compensation Committee believes incentive stock options have been an expectation of business executives in Republic’s marketplace.  Despite the ramifications from the adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 718, the Compensation Committee believes that incentive stock options, as well as stock grants, constitute a favorable retention factor and enhance the Company’s ability to maintain the employment of its high performing executives. Additionally, Republic’s equity-based incentive agreements provide for a two (2) year prohibition, following the termination of employment of an equity-based incentive recipient, on the solicitation of any customer of the Company or the recruitment and hiring of any Company associate. The Company’s equity-based incentive agreement also has confidentiality requirements which act to protect the Company’s proprietary information. A violation of those provisions allows the Company to require a forfeiture of equity-based incentive or the profits derived from the sale of that stock if sold. All equity-based incentive agreements have a change in control provision providing for immediate vesting of any unexercised equity-based incentives.

Equity stock incentives for NEOs are typically recommended to the Compensation Committee by the CHAIR/CEO and are normally reviewed during the last calendar quarter when NEO performance during that calendar year can also be considered. In choosing the date for the grant of equity stock incentives, the Compensation Committee gives no consideration to market events, as any relationship

20

between the equity stock incentive date and the price of the Company’s stock on that date is strictly coincidental. No stock options were granted to any NEO during 2013.

Post-Employment Benefits.  As described under the heading “Post-Employment Compensation” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, Republic has entered into Officer Compensation Continuation Agreements with each of the currently serving NEOs, with the exception of William R. Nelson and Robert J. Arnold. As described herein, the Officer Compensation Continuation Agreements provide for the payment to an NEO terminated following a change in control equal to up to 24 months of the NEO’s base salary and benefits. The Company deems the agreements necessary for the maintenance of sound management and essential to protecting the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The agreements are intended to encourage the NEOs to remain in the employment of the Company and to continue to perform their assigned duties without distraction in the face of potentially disruptive events that would normally surround a Company change in control.  Potential payments and benefits under these arrangements have no bearing on the Compensation Committee’s deliberations regarding all other compensation elements.  The Company has modified these agreements to conform them to changes in law under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Members of the Compensation Committee:

Sandra Metts Snowden, Chairwoman

Craig A. Greenberg

Susan Stout Tamme

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

During 2013, non-employee directors of Republic and its principal banking subsidiary received fees of $2,000 for each board meeting attended and fees ranging from $150 to $750, based on the particular committee, for each committee meeting attended.  On occasion, brief, typically single-issue telephonic meetings may be held for which there is no compensation.  Non-employee directors have the option of allocating their fees into a Director Deferred Compensation Plan.  Compensation paid or deferred to directors of Republic during 2013 for services as a director of Republic were as follows:

21

2013 DIRECTOR SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(1)              Steven E Trager and A. Scott Trager, who served as directors in 2013, are not included in this table as they received no additional compensation for their services as directors. The compensation received by these individuals is included in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(2)              Of these fees, the directors deferred the entire amount of their fees earned, except for R. Wayne Stratton who deferred $10,375.

(3)              The amounts in column (f) reflect cash dividend equivalents and the change in the stock value during 2013 on deferred compensation balances which reflect amounts deferred in 2013 and previous years and are deemed by the plan to be invested in Republic stock.  Cash dividend equivalents are accumulated and converted into stock equivalents on a quarterly basis.

CERTAIN INFORMATION AS TO MANAGEMENT

The following table contains information concerning the compensation received by Republic’s CHAIR/CEO, its CFO and its other three most highly compensated NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013:

22

2013 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

23

GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS DURING 2013

(1)         Represents target and maximum payout levels for awards granted under the NEO Incentive Compensation Program for 2013 performance.  The potential payouts are performance-driven and therefore completely at-risk.  The performance goals and target payout under the Program for each NEO are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.  The actual amount of incentive compensation earned by each NEO is reported under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table for the year in which it was earned.  Additional information regarding the design of the NEO Incentive Compensation Program is included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

24

(2)         Represents threshold, target and maximum payout levels for awards granted under the NEO Incentive Compensation Program for 2013 RPG performance.  $50,000 represents a one-time minimum transitional bonus for the RPG business segment paid pursuant to this grant.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2013

(1) The first exercisable date for each option listed by expiration date is as follows:

25

OPTIONS EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING 2013

POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

Republic entered into Officer Compensation Continuation Agreements with Steven E. Trager and A. Scott Trager, which became effective January 12, 1995.  Republic entered into an Officer Compensation Continuation Agreement with Kevin Sipes, which became effective June 15, 2001 (all collectively, “Agreements”). These Agreements provide for the payment of the executive officer’s base salary for up to a period of two (2) years in the event of disability or if, following the announcement of a potential change in control, or after an actual change in control, the executive officer terminates his employment for “Good Reason” or his employment is terminated other than pursuant to death or for “Cause,” as defined in the Agreements. “Good Reason” is defined to include a material diminution in duties or demotion, material change in benefit plans or fringe benefits, or a reduction in base salary.  In addition, benefits provided by the Bank are to continue for the salary continuation period, to the extent possible, or alternative benefits are to be secured. For purposes of these Agreements, a change in control includes the acquisition by a person of beneficial ownership of securities representing greater voting power than held by the “Trager Family Members” as a group or a reduction to less than 25% of the combined voting power of the stock held by the “Trager Family Members.”

Republic and its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Republic Bank & Trust Company, approved separate Modification Agreements (collectively, “Modifications”) to the Agreements on February 15, 2006.  Each Modification conformed the Agreement to changes in law enacted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and generally provided that payments under an Agreement to an executive who is a “key employee” may not commence earlier than six (6) months following the executive’s separation from service from Republic and Republic Bank & Trust Company. The initial payment to an executive will include any make up payments that would have been made to the executive but for the delay due to the executive’s status as a “key employee.” In other respects, the original Agreements continue in effect, without change. The agreement signed by Kevin Sipes called for a lump sum payment at its present value, rather than continuation of periodic compensation payments.  The Modification for Kevin Sipes provided that his lump sum would not be paid earlier than six (6) months following his separation from service. All of the Agreements limit the total value of the

26

consideration paid to three times the five-year average of the executive’s prior taxable compensation, so as to avoid lost tax deductions or excise taxes under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G.

In 2008, each of these agreements was amended and restated to incorporate prior changes and to conform to certain language and definitions, and clarify the timing of payment, to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A final regulations.

The Agreements detailed above were renewed effective as of December 31, 2013 for a term to cover any change in control that occurs within three (3) years after that date. The Agreements are automatically extended for one (1) additional year at each December 31, to maintain a three (3) year coverage period, unless Republic gives notice to the executive(s) that it elects not to extend the Agreement(s).

Finally, under these Agreements, any stock options or other similar rights will become immediately exercisable upon a change in control that results in termination.  Similarly, stock option grant agreements affecting other NEOs provide for vesting upon the happening of a change in control.

Detail of executive agreements which trigger post-employment payments, trigger events and estimated payment amount/values follow, including, in the case of NEOs who do not have change in control agreements, the potential spread in value that would be realized on as-yet unvested equity awards if a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2013: