form10q.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[
X
] QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
[ ]
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
file number: 000-23192
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3361050
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
9503
East 33rd
Street
|
|
One
Celadon Drive
|
|
Indianapolis,
IN
|
46235-4207
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
|
(317)
972-7000
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
"accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [X]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12-b2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
[ ] No [X]
As of
April 30, 2009 (the latest practicable date), 22,097,932 shares of the
registrant's common stock, par value $0.033 per share, were
outstanding.
Index
to
March
31, 2009 Form 10-Q
Part
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and June 30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
I. Financial
Information
Item
I. Financial
Statements
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March
31, 2009 and June 30, 2008
(Dollars
in thousands except per share and par value amounts)
|
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,781 |
|
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
Trade receivables, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,079 and $1,194 at March 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
48,471 |
|
|
|
69,513 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
|
|
12,590 |
|
|
|
16,697 |
|
Tires in
service
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
Income tax
receivable
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
5,846 |
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
72,497 |
|
|
|
101,181 |
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
|
252,414 |
|
|
|
270,832 |
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
69,091 |
|
|
|
64,633 |
|
Net
property and equipment
|
|
|
183,323 |
|
|
|
206,199 |
|
Tires
in service
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
19,137 |
|
|
|
19,137 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
277,623 |
|
|
$ |
329,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
6,858 |
|
|
$ |
6,910 |
|
Accrued salaries and
benefits
|
|
|
10,272 |
|
|
|
11,358 |
|
Accrued insurance and
claims
|
|
|
9,504 |
|
|
|
9,086 |
|
Accrued fuel
expense
|
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
Other accrued
expenses
|
|
|
11,360 |
|
|
|
11,916 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
8,290 |
|
Current maturities of capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
6,608 |
|
|
|
6,454 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
51,667 |
|
|
|
66,184 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current
maturities
|
|
|
14,661 |
|
|
|
45,645 |
|
Capital lease obligations, net
of current maturities
|
|
|
37,019 |
|
|
|
42,117 |
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
33,202 |
|
|
|
31,512 |
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.033 par
value, authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued 23,842,177 and 23,704,046
shares at March 31, 2009
and June 30,
2008, respectively
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Treasury stock at cost;
1,744,245 and 1,832,386 shares at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
(12,025 |
) |
|
|
(12,633 |
) |
Additional paid-in
capital
|
|
|
96,369 |
|
|
|
95,173 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
63,270 |
|
|
|
60,881 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(7,352 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
141,049 |
|
|
|
143,852 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
277,623 |
|
|
$ |
329,335 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars
in thousands except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
the three months ended
March
31,
|
|
|
For
the nine months ended
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight revenue
|
|
$ |
96,152 |
|
|
$ |
112,401 |
|
|
$ |
303,979 |
|
|
$ |
340,779 |
|
Fuel surcharges
|
|
|
10,725 |
|
|
|
26,489 |
|
|
|
69,412 |
|
|
|
70,499 |
|
|
|
|
106,877 |
|
|
|
138,890 |
|
|
|
373,391 |
|
|
|
411,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages, and employee
benefits
|
|
|
36,990 |
|
|
|
40,231 |
|
|
|
116,144 |
|
|
|
117,396 |
|
Fuel
|
|
|
22,146 |
|
|
|
41,421 |
|
|
|
100,093 |
|
|
|
112,466 |
|
Operations and
maintenance
|
|
|
8,711 |
|
|
|
9,832 |
|
|
|
26,944 |
|
|
|
27,434 |
|
Insurance and
claims
|
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
10,374 |
|
|
|
11,704 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
10,123 |
|
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
|
26,802 |
|
|
|
23,833 |
|
Revenue equipment
rentals
|
|
|
7,774 |
|
|
|
6,376 |
|
|
|
20,814 |
|
|
|
20,025 |
|
Purchased
transportation
|
|
|
12,469 |
|
|
|
19,362 |
|
|
|
40,989 |
|
|
|
62,927 |
|
Costs of products and services
sold
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
4,620 |
|
|
|
4,862 |
|
Communications and
utilities
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
3,785 |
|
Operating taxes and
licenses
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
7,148 |
|
|
|
6,718 |
|
General and other
operating
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
6,293 |
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
|
108,747 |
|
|
|
136,564 |
|
|
|
363,955 |
|
|
|
398,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
9,436 |
|
|
|
13,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income)
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
Other expense,
net
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Income (loss) before income
taxes
|
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
6,514 |
|
|
|
9,300 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(2,078 |
) |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
2,390 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Basic earnings per
share
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Average shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
21,910 |
|
|
|
22,122 |
|
|
|
22,852 |
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
21,722 |
|
|
|
21,706 |
|
|
|
22,607 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For
the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars
in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
2,390 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided
by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
27,478 |
|
|
|
23,268 |
|
(Gain) Loss on sale of
equipment
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
565 |
|
Stock based
compensation
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
Provision for doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
Changes in assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
20,964 |
|
|
|
(6,004 |
) |
Income tax
recoverable
|
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
Tires in
service
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
Other
assets
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(7,554 |
) |
|
|
5,188 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
53,717 |
|
|
|
30,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and
equipment
|
|
|
(28,336 |
) |
|
|
(46,079 |
) |
Proceeds on sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
42,344 |
|
|
|
28,123 |
|
Purchase of business, net of
cash
|
|
|
(24,100 |
) |
|
|
--- |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
(10,092 |
) |
|
|
(17,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuances of common
stock
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Purchase of treasury
stock
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
(13,848 |
) |
Proceeds (payments) from bank borrowings and debt
|
|
|
(38,226 |
) |
|
|
7,184 |
|
Principal payments under capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
(4,943 |
) |
|
|
(4,830 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
(43,169 |
) |
|
|
(10,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of
year
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of
year
|
|
$ |
2,781 |
|
|
$ |
2,584 |
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$ |
2,974 |
|
|
$ |
3,484 |
|
Income taxes
paid
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
$ |
3,182 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Celadon Group, Inc. and its majority owned subsidiaries (the
"Company"). All material intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in the United
States of America pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim financial statements. Certain
information and footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the
accompanying unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments (all of a
normal recurring nature), which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial condition and results of operations for these periods. The
results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of
the results for a full year. These condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company's
audited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included
in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2008.
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
2.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements required under other accounting pronouncements, but does not change
existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair
value. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
information used in developing assumptions when pricing an asset or
liability. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. 157-2, which provides a one-year delayed application of SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually). The Company's adoption of the provisions of SFAS 157
with respect to the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value did
not have a material impact on the fair value measurements or the consolidated
financial statements. See Note 12 for additional
information. In accordance with SFAS 157-2 the Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact of applying the provisions of SFAS 157 to
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities beginning in fiscal 2010,
including but not limited to the valuation of the Company's reporting units for
the purpose of assessing goodwill impairment, the valuation of property and
equipment when assessing long-lived asset impairment and the valuation of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. In October
2008, the FASB issued SFAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, which
became effective upon issuance, including periods for which financial statements
have not been issued. SFAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS
157. The Company's adoption of SFAS 157-3 in determination of fair
values did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In
December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141R (revised 2007), Business Combinations ("SFAS
141R"), which replaces SFAS No. 141. The statement retains the
purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of
changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized in
the purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the
capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value, and
requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. The
impact to the Company from the adoption of SFAS 141R will depend on the
acquisitions at the time. SFAS 141R is effective for us beginning
July 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively to business combinations completed on
or after that date.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
In
December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB 51 ("SFAS 160"),
which changes the accounting and reporting for minority
interests. Minority interests will be recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests and will be reported as a component of equity separate
from the parent's equity, and purchases or sales of equity interests that do not
result in a change in control will be accounted for as equity
transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face
of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well
as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss
recognized in earnings. SFAS 160 is effective for us beginning July
1, 2009 and will apply prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which will apply retrospectively. We are currently
assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS 160 will have on our
financial statements.
In March
2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133, ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities, including
(i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No.
133, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Accordingly, the
Company will adopt SFAS 161 in fiscal year 2010.
3. Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense varies from the federal corporate income tax rate of 35%, primarily
due to state income taxes, net of federal income tax effect and our permanent
differences primarily related to per diem pay structure. Income tax
expense for fiscal 2009 included an adjustment of approximately $300,000 related
to per diem calculations for prior years.
Effective
July 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ("FIN
48"). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As of March
31, 2009, the Company had recorded a $0.7 million liability for unrecognized tax
benefits, a portion of which represents penalties and interest.
As of
March 31, 2009, we are subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for the
tax years 2006 through 2008. We file tax returns in numerous state
jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
4. Earnings Per
Share
The
difference in basic and diluted weighted average shares is due to the assumed
exercise of outstanding stock options. A reconciliation of the basic
and diluted earnings per share calculation was as follows (amounts in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
For
three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
For
nine months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(2,078 |
) |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
2,390 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
21,722 |
|
|
|
21,706 |
|
|
|
22,607 |
|
Equivalent
shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and restricted stock
vesting
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
shares
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
21,910 |
|
|
|
22,122 |
|
|
|
22,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Diluted(1)
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
(1)
Diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 does not
include the anti-dilutive effect of 188,000 stock options and other incremental
shares.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
5. Segment
Information and Significant Customers
The
Company operates in two segments, transportation and e-commerce. The
Company generates revenue in the transportation segment, primarily by providing
truckload-hauling services through its subsidiaries Celadon Trucking Services
Inc. ("CTSI"), Celadon Logistics Services, Inc ("CLSI"), Servicios de
Transportacion Jaguar, S.A. de C.V., ("Jaguar"), and Celadon Canada, Inc.
("CelCan"). The Company provides certain services over the Internet
through its e-commerce subsidiary TruckersB2B, Inc.
("TruckersB2B"). TruckersB2B is an Internet based
"business-to-business" membership program, owned by Celadon E-Commerce, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Celadon Group, Inc. The e-commerce segment
generates revenue by providing discounted fuel, tires, and other products and
services to small and medium-sized trucking companies. The Company
evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating income
(amounts below in thousands).
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
E-commerce
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
104,744 |
|
|
$ |
2,133 |
|
|
$ |
106,877 |
|
Operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
136,740 |
|
|
$ |
2,150 |
|
|
$ |
138,890 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
366,752 |
|
|
$ |
6,639 |
|
|
$ |
373,391 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
9,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
404,196 |
|
|
$ |
7,082 |
|
|
$ |
411,278 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
12,013 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
13,127 |
|
Information
as to the Company's operating revenue by geographic area is summarized below (in
thousands). The Company allocates operating revenue based on country
of origin of the tractor hauling the freight:
|
|
For
the three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
For
the nine months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Operating
revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
93,976 |
|
|
$ |
117,914 |
|
|
$ |
326,964 |
|
|
$ |
344,459 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
7,146 |
|
|
|
13,584 |
|
|
|
26,837 |
|
|
|
42,703 |
|
Mexico
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
|
7,392 |
|
|
|
19,590 |
|
|
|
24,116 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
106,877 |
|
|
$ |
138,890 |
|
|
$ |
373,391 |
|
|
$ |
411,278 |
|
No
customer accounted for more than 5% of the Company's total revenue during any of
its three most recent fiscal years or the interim periods presented
above.
CELADON GROUP,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
6. Stock Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for all share-based grants to employees based upon a grant-date
fair value of an award in accordance with SFAS 123(R). In January
2006, stockholders approved the Company's 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2006
Plan"), which provides various vehicles to compensate the Company's key
employees. The 2006 Plan utilizes such vehicles as stock options,
restricted stock grants, and stock appreciation rights ("SARs"). The
2006 Plan authorized the Company to grant 1,687,500 shares (adjusted for the
3-for-2 stock splits declared by the Company's Board of Directors effective
February 15, 2006 and June 15, 2006). At the November 14, 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, the Company's stockholders approved an amendment to the
2006 Plan, which increased the number of shares of common stock reserved and
available for issuance of stock grants, options, and other equity awards to the
Company's employees, directors, and consultants, by 1,000,000
shares. In fiscal 2009, the Company granted 9,500 stock options and
248,866 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the 2006 Plan. The
Company is authorized to grant an additional 1,049,041 shares pursuant to the
2006 Plan.
The
following table summarizes the expense components of our stock based
compensation program (in thousands):
|
|
For
three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
For
nine months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options expense
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
Restricted
stock expense
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Stock
appreciation rights expense/(income)
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
Total
stock related compensation expense
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
1,441 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
The Company has stock options under
various plans. Options granted to employees have been granted with an
exercise price equal to the market price on the grant date and expire on the
tenth anniversary of the grant date. The majority of options granted
to employees vest 25 percent per year, commencing with the first anniversary of
the grant date. Options granted to non-employee directors have been
granted with an exercise price equal to the market price on the grant date, vest
over one to four years, commencing with the first anniversary of the grant date,
and expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date.
A summary
of the activity of the Company's stock option plans as of March 31, 2009 and
changes during the period then ended is presented below:
Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2008
|
|
|
1,319,898 |
|
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
|
7.98 |
|
|
$ |
1,742,049 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
$ |
10.27 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(7,875 |
) |
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
|
|
(31,681 |
) |
|
$ |
12.17 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Outstanding
at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,289,842 |
|
|
$ |
9.88 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
|
|
$ |
332,312 |
|
Exercisable
at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
681,964 |
|
|
$ |
10.09 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
|
|
$ |
332,312 |
|
CELADON GROUP,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
The fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value
|
|
$ |
4.22 |
|
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
52.1 |
% |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Expected
lives
|
|
4.0
years
|
|
|
4.3
years
|
|
Restricted
Shares
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair
Value
|
|
Unvested
at July 1, 2008
|
|
|
156,200 |
|
|
$ |
12.22 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
248,866 |
|
|
$ |
11.40 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(63,391 |
) |
|
$ |
9.72 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(30,469 |
) |
|
$ |
14.93 |
|
Unvested
at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
311,206 |
|
|
$ |
11.81 |
|
Restricted
shares granted to employees have been granted with a fair value equal to the
market price on the grant date and vest by 25 or 33 percent per year, commencing
with the first anniversary of the grant date. In addition, certain
financial targets must be met for some of these shares to
vest. Restricted shares granted to non-employee directors have been
granted with a fair value equal to the market price on the grant date and vest
on the date of the Company's next annual meeting.
As of
March 31, 2009, the Company had $2.0 million and $3.0 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock,
respectively, that is expected to be recognized over the remaining period of
approximately 2.8 years for stock options and 3.3 years for restricted
stock.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair
Value
|
|
Unvested
at July 1, 2008
|
|
|
167,202 |
|
|
$ |
8.68 |
|
Paid
|
|
|
(19,322 |
) |
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
$ |
8.64 |
|
Vested
at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
144,844 |
|
|
$ |
8.64 |
|
SARs
granted to employees are all currently vested (as of October 28, 2008) and
expire periodically until October 28, 2014. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company gave SARs grantees the opportunity
to enter into an alternative fixed compensation arrangement whereby the grantee
would forfeit all rights to SARs compensation in exchange for a guaranteed
quarterly payment for the remainder of the underlying SARs
term. This alternative arrangement was subject to continued service
to the Company or one of its subsidiaries. These fixed payments were
accrued quarterly until March 31, 2009. The Company offered this
alternative arrangement to mitigate the volatility to
earnings from stock price variance on the SARs.
CELADON GROUP,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
7. Stock
Repurchase Programs
On October 24, 2007, the
Company's Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to
which the Company purchased 2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an
aggregate cost of approximately $13.8 million. We intend to hold
repurchased shares in treasury for general corporate purposes, including
issuances under employee stock option plans and restricted stock
grants. We account for treasury stock using the cost
method.
8. Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive
income consisted of the following components for the quarter and the nine months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Nine
months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income/(loss)
|
|
$ |
(2,078 |
) |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
2,390 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
Foreign
currency contracts
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
--- |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(6,684 |
) |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
$ |
(3,172 |
) |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
(4,612 |
) |
|
$ |
4,808 |
|
9. Commitments
and Contingencies
The
Company has outstanding commitments to purchase approximately $55.8 million of
revenue equipment at March 31, 2009.
Standby
letters of credit, not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements, aggregated approximately $5.6 million at March 31,
2009.
The
Company has employment and consulting agreements with various key employees
providing for minimum combined annual compensation of $700,000 in fiscal
2009.
There are
various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company and its
subsidiaries in the normal course of the operation of their businesses with
respect to cargo, auto liability, or income taxes.
On August
8, 2007, the 384th District Court of the State of Texas situated in El Paso,
Texas, rendered a judgment against CTSI, for approximately $3.4 million in the
case of Martinez v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., which was originally filed
on September 4, 2002. The case involves a workers' compensation claim
of a former employee of CTSI who suffered a back injury as a result of a traffic
accident. CTSI and the Company believe all actions taken were proper
and legal and contend that the proper and exclusive place for resolution of this
dispute was before the Indiana Worker's Compensation Board. While
there can be no certainty as to the outcome, the Company believes that the
ultimate resolution of this dispute will not have a materially adverse effect on
its consolidated financial position, cash flows, or results of
operations. The Company has not recognized any expense related to the
case other than legal defense costs at this time. CTSI filed an
appeal of the decision to the Texas Court of Appeals in October
2007. Trial transcripts have been prepared for the Court of Appeals
and Celadon’s appellate brief was field in December 2008. Mr.
Martinez's reply is due in April 2009.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
10. Acquisitions
On
December 4, 2008, the Company acquired certain assets of Continental Express,
Inc. ("Continental"). Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, our
wholly-owned subsidiary, CTSI, acquired assets of Continental's truckload,
intermodal, and brokerage business, including 400 tractors and 1,100 trailers
for approximately $24.1 million of cash consideration, with the purchase
accounting allocating $10.3 million to trailers and the remaining balance
allocated to tractors. In connection with the acquisition, we offered
employment to approximately 250 qualified, former Continental drivers, of which
approximately 200 became Celadon drivers. Approximately 30 non-driver
personnel were hired.
11. Goodwill
The
Company accounts for goodwill pursuant to SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. Pursuant to SFAS 142, at least
annually, the Company evaluates goodwill, based on its two separate reporting
units, transportation and e-commerce, by comparing the current carrying value of
net assets with fair value of the reporting units. The goodwill
assigned to each reporting unit represents the initial purchase price allocation
to goodwill as a result of their respective acquisitions. Total
goodwill at March 31, 2009 was $19.1 million and was comprised of $16.7 million
related to the transportation reporting unit and $2.4 million related to the
e-commerce reporting unit.
Given
that the Company's market capitalization was less than its book value at March
31, 2009 indicating a potential devaluation of the Company’s assets, the Company
has performed its annual goodwill impairment assessment under SFAS 142, as of
April 1, 2009. The Company has determined that no impairment has
occurred as of March 31, 2009 based upon a set of assumptions which represent
the Company's best estimate of future performance at this time. The
Company has reconciled the aggregate estimated fair value of reporting units to
the market capitalization of the consolidated Company. In addition to
traditional control premiums, the Company noted that the overall market
conditions have depressed the stock value. Based on these factors,
the Company concluded that the market capitalization with the control premium
represents the fair value of the Company. The Company will review its
impairment assessment at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009. If there is impairment, the non-cash charge associated with the
impairment could result in a substantial reduction of the carrying value of
these assets.
12. Fair Value
Measurements
As
discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, for
financial assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer liability in
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. The standard establishes a fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad
levels:
Level 1 –
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2 –
Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable
either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices in markets
that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities, such as models or other valuation
methodologies.
Level 3 –
Unobservable inputs that are based on the company’s assumptions, are supported
by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own
assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability. Level 3 assets and liabilities include
instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant
management judgment or estimation.
The
following table summarizes the Company's financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with SFAS 157 as of
March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Description
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets
(Level
1)
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
Assets:
|
|
---
|
|
---
|
|
---
|
|
---
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Contracts
|
|
$312
|
|
---
|
|
$312
|
|
---
|
Foreign
Currency Contracts
The
Company pays a fixed contract rate for foreign currency. The fair
value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on a valuation model that
discounts cash flows resulting from the differential between the contract price
and the market-based forward rate.
Item 2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Disclosure
Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This
Quarterly Report contains certain statements that may be considered
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. These forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual
results, events, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from any future results, events, performance, or achievements
expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such
statements may be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. These statements generally use words
such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "project," "forecast," "should,"
"estimate," "plan," "outlook," "goal," and similar expressions. While
it is impossible to identify all factors that may cause actual results to differ
from those expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements, the risks and
uncertainties that may affect the Company's business, include, but are not
limited to, those discussed in the section entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors
set forth below.
All such
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form
10-Q. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. The Company expressly disclaims any
obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the
Company's expectations with regard thereto or any change in the events,
conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
References
to the "Company," "we," "us," "our," and words of similar import refer to
Celadon Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Business
Overview
We are
one of North America's twenty largest truckload carriers as measured by
revenue. We generated $565.9 million in operating revenue during
our fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. We have grown significantly
since our incorporation in 1986 through internal growth and a series of
acquisitions since 1995. As a dry van truckload carrier, we generally
transport full trailer loads of freight from origin to destination without
intermediate stops or handling. Our customer base includes many
Fortune 500 shippers.
In our
international operations, we offer time-sensitive transportation in and between
the United States and two of its largest trading partners, Mexico and
Canada. We generated approximately one-half of our revenue in fiscal
2008 from international movements, and we believe our annual border crossings
make us the largest provider of international truckload movements in North
America. We believe that our strategically located terminals and
experience with the language, culture, and border crossing requirements of each
North American country provide a competitive advantage in the international
trucking marketplace.
We
believe our international operations, particularly those involving Mexico, offer
an attractive business niche. The additional complexity of and need
to establish cross-border business partners and to develop strong organization
and adequate infrastructure in Mexico affords some barriers to competition that
are not present in traditional U.S. truckload services.
Our
success is dependent upon the success of our operations in Mexico and Canada,
and we are subject to risks of doing business internationally, including
fluctuations in foreign currencies, changes in the economic strength of the
countries in which we do business, difficulties in enforcing contractual
obligations and intellectual property rights, burdens of complying with a wide
variety of international and United States export and import laws, and social,
political, and economic instability. Additional risks associated with
our foreign operations, including restrictive trade policies and imposition of
duties, taxes, or government royalties by foreign governments, are present but
largely mitigated by the terms of NAFTA.
In
addition to our international business, we offer a broad range of truckload
transportation services within the United States, including long-haul, regional,
dedicated, intermodal, and logistics. With six different asset-based
acquisitions from 2003 to 2008, we expanded
our operations and service offerings within the United States and significantly
improved our lane density, freight mix, and customer diversity.
We also
operate TruckersB2B, a profitable marketing business that affords volume
purchasing power for items such as fuel, tires, and equipment to approximately
21,000 trucking fleets representing approximately 480,000
tractors. TruckersB2B is included in our e-commerce unit, which is a
separate operating segment under generally accepted accounting
principles.
Recent
Results and Financial Condition
For the
third quarter of fiscal 2009, revenue decreased 23.0% to $106.9 million,
compared with $138.9 million for the third quarter of fiscal
2008. Excluding fuel surcharge, freight revenue decreased 14.4% to
$96.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, compared with $112.4 million
for the third quarter of fiscal 2008. In the third quarter of fiscal
2009, we recorded a net loss of $2.1 million compared to a net income of $0.1
million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Diluted earnings (loss)
per share decreased to $(0.10) in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, from $0.01
in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. A weakened freight market,
weakened economy and a surplus of available equipment in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008 were the primary
factors for our decreasing revenue. This decrease in revenue was
partially offset by a decrease in fuel prices.
At March
31, 2009, our total balance sheet debt (including capital lease obligations less
cash) was $56.6 million, and our total stockholders' equity was $141.0
million. At March 31, 2009, our debt to capitalization ratio was
28.6%. At March 31, 2009, we had $50.4 million of available borrowing
capacity under our revolving credit facility, which does not include the
additional borrowing capacity under the accordion feature. For
additional information on our credit facility, see the "Liquidity and Capital
Resources – Primary Credit Agreement" section below.
Revenue
We
generate substantially all of our revenue by transporting freight for our
customers. Generally, we are paid by the mile or by the load for our
services. We also derive revenue from fuel surcharges, loading and
unloading activities, equipment detention, brokerage, other trucking related
services, and from TruckersB2B. We believe that eliminating the
impact of the sometimes volatile fuel surcharge revenue affords a more
consistent basis for comparing our results of operations from period to
period. The main factors that affect our revenue are the revenue per
mile we receive from our customers, the percentage of miles for which we are
compensated, the number of tractors operating, and the number of miles we
generate with our equipment. These factors relate to, among other
things, the U.S. economy, inventory levels, the level of truck capacity in our
markets, specific customer demand, the percentage of team-driven tractors in our
fleet, driver availability, and our average length of haul.
Expenses
and Profitability
The main
factors that impact our profitability on the expense side are the variable costs
of transporting freight for our customers. These costs include fuel
expense, driver-related expenses, such as wages, benefits, training, and
recruitment, and independent contractor costs, which we record as purchased
transportation. Expenses that have both fixed and variable components
include maintenance and tire expense and our total cost of insurance and
claims. These expenses generally vary with the miles we travel, but
also have a controllable component based on safety, fleet age, efficiency, and
other factors. Our main fixed cost is the acquisition and financing
of long-term assets, primarily revenue equipment. Other mostly fixed
costs include our non-driver personnel and facilities expenses. In
discussing our expenses as a percentage of revenue, we sometimes discuss changes
as a percentage of revenue before fuel surcharges, in addition to absolute
dollar changes, because we believe the high variable cost nature of our business
makes a comparison of changes in expenses as a percentage of revenue more
meaningful at times than absolute dollar changes.
The
trucking industry has experienced significant increases in expenses over the
past three years, in particular those relating to equipment costs, driver
compensation, insurance, and variability in fuel prices. Until
recently many trucking companies had been able to raise freight rates to cover
the increased costs based primarily on an industry-wide tight capacity of
drivers. As freight demand has softened, carriers have been willing
to accept rate decreases to utilize assets in service.
Revenue
Equipment and Related Financing
For the
remainder of fiscal 2009, we expect to obtain tractors primarily for
replacement, and we expect to maintain the average age of our tractor fleet at
approximately 1.7 years and the average age of our trailer fleet at
approximately 4.0 years. At March 31, 2009, we had future
operating lease obligations totaling $177.9 million, including residual value
guarantees of approximately $70.2 million.
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Tractors
|
|
|
Trailers
|
|
|
Tractors
|
|
|
Trailers
|
|
Owned
equipment
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
Capital
leased equipment
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
Operating
leased equipment
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
Independent
contractors
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Total
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
10,041 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
8,927 |
|
Independent
contractors are utilized through a contract with us to supply one or more
tractors and drivers for our use. Independent contractors must pay
their own tractor expenses, fuel, maintenance, and driver costs and must meet
our specified guidelines with respect to safety. A lease-purchase
program that we offer provides independent contractors the opportunity to
lease-to-own a tractor from a third party. As of March 31, 2009,
there were 198 independent contractors providing a combined 6.2% of our tractor
capacity.
Outlook
Looking
forward, our profitability goal is to achieve an operating ratio of
approximately 90%. We expect this to require improvements in rate per
mile and miles per tractor and decreased non-revenue miles. Because a
large percentage of our costs are variable, changes in revenue per mile affect
our profitability to a greater extent than changes in miles per
tractor. For the remainder of fiscal 2009, the key factors that we
expect to have the greatest effect on our profitability are our freight revenue
per tractor per week (which will be affected by the general freight environment,
including the balance of freight demand and industry-wide trucking capacity),
our compensation of drivers, our cost of revenue equipment (particularly in
light of the 2010 EPA engine requirements), our fuel costs, and our insurance
and claims. To overcome cost increases and improve our margins, we
will need to achieve increases in freight revenue per
tractor. Operationally, we will seek improvements in safety, driver
recruiting, and retention. Our success in these areas primarily will
affect revenue, driver-related expenses, and insurance and claims
expense. Given the difficult freight market confronting our industry
and the difficult economy, we believe achieving our profitability goal during
fiscal 2009 is unlikely, although we continue to strive toward that
goal.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth the percentage relationship of expense items to
freight revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
For
the three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
For
the nine months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Freight
revenue(1)
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages, and employee
benefits
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
34.4 |
% |
Fuel(1)
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
Operations and
maintenance
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Insurance and
claims
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
Revenue equipment
rentals
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Purchased
transportation
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Costs of products and services
sold
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Communications and
utilities
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Operating taxes and
licenses
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
General and other
operating
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating
expenses
|
|
|
101.9 |
% |
|
|
97.9 |
% |
|
|
96.9 |
% |
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income
(loss)
|
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
exchange (gain)/loss
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income
taxes
|
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Provision
(benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
(loss)
|
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
(1)
|
Freight
revenue is total revenue less fuel surcharges. In this table,
fuel surcharges are eliminated from revenue and subtracted from fuel
expense. Fuel surcharges were $10.7 million and $26.5 million
for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $69.4
million and $70.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
|
Comparison
of Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 to Three Months Ended March
31, 2008
Revenue
decreased by $32.0 million, or 23.0%, to $106.9 million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2009, from $138.9 million for the third quarter of fiscal
2008. The decrease in our revenue was
primarily caused by the weakened freight
market and weakened economy in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 2008. The addition of the Continental assets
and intermodal operations had a positive affect on our operating
revenue. However, for the foreseeable
future we don't expect incremental growth in our fleet size following the
Continental acquisition.
Freight
revenue decreased by $16.2 million, or 14.4%, to $96.2 million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2009, from $112.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal
2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in
freight demand, due to a weakened economy. Freight from Mexico into
the U.S. declined significantly, causing us to reduce the number of shipments
to/from Mexico. Domestic freight levels were basically flat due to
miles associated with Continental customers and intermodal
operations. Accordingly, billed miles decreased to 55.1 million for
the third quarter of fiscal 2009, from 62.5 million for the third quarter of
fiscal 2008, and average miles per tractor per week decreased from 1,984 miles
to 1,652 miles. Other factors included an increase in non-revenue
miles from 10.6% to 11.1% of total miles, primarily related to a shift in
business between domestic and international freight, and a reduction in average
freight revenue per loaded mile to $1.46 from $1.50 for the third quarters of
fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. As the economy and freight market
weakened, rates for both domestic and international freight dropped as customers
and third party logistics managers were very aggressive in reducing their
costs. Average revenue per tractor per week, net of fuel surcharge,
which is our primary measure of asset productivity, decreased 19.7% to $2,136 in
the third quarter of fiscal 2009, from $2,661 for the third quarter of fiscal
2008.
Revenue
for TruckersB2B was $2.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, compared
to $2.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2008. To the
extent small and mid size carriers continue to be affected adversely by the
weakened economy, lagging freight demand, limited financing availability, and
licensing, insurance, and other costs, we anticipate the revenue for TruckersB2B
to be negatively impacted as well.
Salaries,
wages, and employee benefits were $37.0 million, or 38.5% of freight
revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to $40.2 million,
or 35.8% of freight revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal
2008. The dollar decrease in salaries, wages, and benefits is largely
due to decreased driver payroll related to decreased
miles. Additionally, decreases in administrative payroll resulting
from ongoing efforts to consolidate and/or eliminate several functions into
Indianapolis from various terminals, which plan reduced our non-driver
administrative workforce by approximately 5%, also decreased our salaries,
wages, and benefits. Also a factor was the decrease in the value of
stock appreciation rights, which was due, in large part, to a reduction in stock
prices caused by the lagging economy. However, these factors were
more than offset by reduced freight revenue resulting in an increase in
salaries, wages, and employee benefits as a percentage of freight
revenue.
Fuel
expenses, net of fuel surcharge revenue of $10.7 million and $26.5 million for
the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, decreased to
$11.4 million, or 11.9% of freight revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal
2009, compared to $14.9 million, or 13.3% of freight revenue, for the third
quarter of fiscal 2008. These decreases were attributable to a 43.7%
decrease in average fuel prices to $1.87 per gallon in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009, from $3.32 per gallon in the third quarter of fiscal 2008, and a
decrease in the gallons purchased due to fewer miles driven and increased miles
per gallon related to the Company's strategic plan to reduce idling and operate
more efficient tractors.
Operations
and maintenance expense decreased to $8.7 million, or 9.1% of freight
revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, from $9.8 million, or 8.7% of
freight revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Operations and
maintenance consist of direct operating expense, maintenance, and tire
expense. The dollar decrease in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 is
primarily related to a decrease in costs associated with physical damage
expense, due to fewer accidents in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, as well as
decreased variable maintenance expense due to fewer miles driven in the
quarter.
Insurance
and claims expense decreased to $3.5 million, or 3.6% of freight revenue, for
the third quarter of fiscal 2009, from $3.7 million, or 3.3% of freight
revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Insurance consists of
premiums for liability, physical damage, cargo damage, and workers compensation
insurance, in addition to claims expense. This decrease resulted
primarily from decreases in our cargo claims expense, related to the decreased
number of claims in the quarter. Our insurance program involves
self-insurance at various risk retention levels. Claims in excess of
these risk levels are covered by insurance in amounts we consider to be
adequate. We accrue for the uninsured portion of claims based on
known claims and historical experience. We continually revise and
change our insurance program to maintain a balance between premium expense and
the risk retention we are willing to assume. Insurance and claims
expense will vary based primarily on the frequency and severity of claims, the
level of self-retention, and the premium expense.
Depreciation
and amortization, consisting primarily of depreciation of revenue equipment,
increased to $10.1 million, or 10.5% of freight revenue, for the third quarter
of fiscal 2009, compared to $8.4 million, or 7.5% of freight revenue, for
the third quarter of fiscal 2008. These increases are related to a
year over year increase in the number of owned trailers and tractor and trailer
costs. The assets purchased from Continental are being depreciated
approximately $400,000 per month. These increases also include losses
on sales of equipment in the quarter. Revenue equipment held under
operating leases is not reflected on our balance sheet and the expenses related
to such equipment are reflected on our statements of operations in revenue
equipment rentals, rather than in depreciation and amortization and interest
expense, as is the case for revenue equipment that is financed with borrowings
or capital leases.
Revenue
equipment rentals increased to $7.8 million, or 8.1% of freight revenue,
for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to $6.4 million or 5.7% of
freight revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2008. This increase
is primarily related to the net addition of approximately 480 tractors and 520
trailers under operating lease. We believe this number will continue
to grow over the remainder of calendar 2009.
Purchased
transportation decreased significantly to $12.5 million, or 13.0% of
freight revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, from $19.4 million,
or 17.2% of freight revenue, for the third quarter of fiscal
2008. The majority of this decrease is related to fewer miles by our
independent contractor fleet which has decreased to 198 at March 31, 2009 from
305 at March 31, 2008. The decreases also relate to the reduction of
the fuel surcharge component of their payments by $0.10 per mile, resulting from
decreased fuel costs. Independent contractors are drivers who cover
all their operating expenses (fuel, driver salaries, maintenance, and equipment
costs) for a fixed payment per mile.
All of
our other operating expenses are relatively minor in amount, and there were no
significant changes in such expenses. Accordingly, we have not
provided a detailed discussion of such expenses.
Our
pretax margin, which we believe is a useful
measure of our operating performance because it is neutral with regard to the
method of revenue equipment financing that a company uses, decreased
380 basis points to (2.8)% of freight revenue for the third quarter of fiscal
2009, from 1.0% of freight revenue for the third quarter of fiscal
2008.
In
addition to other factors described above, Canadian exchange rate fluctuations
principally impact salaries, wages, and benefits and purchased transportation
and therefore impact our pretax margin and results of operations.
Income
taxes decreased to a benefit of $0.6 million, with an effective tax rate of
22.8%, for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, from expense of $0.9 million, with
an effective tax rate of 86.4%, for the third quarter of fiscal
2008. The effective tax rate decreased as a result of the decreased
impact of our non-deductible expenses related to our per diem pay structure on
our decreased earnings. As per diem is a partially non-deductible
expense, our effective tax rate will fluctuate as net income and per diem
fluctuate in the future.
As a
result of the factors described above, a net loss of $2.1 million was recorded
for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to a net income of $0.1 for the
third quarter of fiscal 2008.
Comparison
of Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009 to Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2008
Revenue
decreased by $37.9 million, or 9.2%, to $373.4 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009, from $411.3 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2008. Going forward, we expect the addition of
the Continental assets and intermodal operations to have a positive affect
partially offsetting the impact of the current weak economy and reduced Mexico
import/export business related to our revenue.
Freight
revenue decreased by $36.8 million, or 10.8%, to $304.0 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009, from $340.8 million for the nine months ended March
31, 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in
freight demand, due to a weakened economy and the
difficult freight market confronting our
industry. Accordingly, billed miles decreased by 17.2 million,
from 188.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008, to 171.3 million
for the nine months ended March 31, 2009, average miles per tractor per week
decreased from 2,000 miles to 1,789 miles, and non-revenue miles increased from
10.5% to 10.9% of total miles. As the economy and freight market
continued to weaken, rates for both domestic and international freight dropped
as customers and third party logistics managers were very aggressive in reducing
their costs. In addition, non-revenue miles increased as we
repositioned tractors for the next load. Average revenue per tractor
per week, net of fuel surcharge, which is our primary measure of asset
productivity, decreased 12.0% to $2,365 in the nine months ended March 31, 2009,
from $2,688 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
Revenue
for TruckersB2B was $6.6 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to $7.1 million for the nine months
ended March 31, 2008. The decrease was related to decreases in fuel
and tire rebate revenue due to small and mid size carriers being adversely
affected by the lagging freight demand. To the extent small and mid
size carriers continue to be affected adversely by the weakened economy, lagging
freight demand, limited financing availability, and licensing, insurance, and
other costs, we anticipate the revenue for TruckersB2B to be negatively impacted
as well.
Salaries,
wages, and benefits were $116.1 million, or 38.2% of freight revenue, for
the nine months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $117.4 million, or
34.4% of freight revenue, for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. The dollar decrease in salaries, wages, and benefits is largely
due to decreased driver payroll related to decreased
miles. Additionally, decreases in administrative payroll resulting
from ongoing efforts to consolidate and/or eliminate several functions into
Indianapolis from various terminals, which plan reduced our non-driver
administrative workforce by approximately 5%, also decreased our salaries,
wages, and benefits. Also a factor was the decrease in the value of
stock appreciation rights, which was due, in large part, to a reduction in stock
prices caused by the lagging economy. However, these factors were
more than offset by reduced freight revenue resulting in an increase in
salaries, wages, and employee benefits as a percentage of freight
revenue.
Fuel
expenses, net of fuel surcharge revenue of $69.4 million and $70.5 million for
the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively, decreased to
$30.7 million, or 10.1% of freight revenue, for the nine months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to $42.0 million, or 12.3% of freight
revenue, for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. These decreases
were attributable to a 8.1% decrease in average fuel prices to $2.82 per gallon
for the nine months ended March 31, 2009, from $3.07 per gallon, for
the nine months ended March 31, 2008, and a decrease in the gallons
purchased due to fewer miles driven and increased miles per gallon related to
reduced idling and operating more fuel efficient tractors.
Operations
and maintenance decreased to $26.9 million, or 8.9% of freight revenue, for
the nine months ended March 31, 2009, from $27.4 million, or 8.1% of
freight revenue, for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. Operations and maintenance consist of direct operating expense,
maintenance, physical damage, and tire expense. These dollar
decreases in fiscal 2009 are primarily related to a decrease in costs associated
with tractor and other maintenance expenses and physical damage expenses,
partially offset by an increase in tire expense and miscellaneous direct
operating expenses.
Insurance
and claims expense was $10.4 million for the nine months ended March 31,
2009, compared to $11.7 million for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. As a percentage of freight revenue, insurance and claims
remained constant at 3.4% for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008. Insurance consists of premiums for liability, physical damage,
cargo damage, and workers compensation insurance. The decrease in the
overall dollar amount is attributable to a decrease in workers compensation
claims and cargo claims expense, due to a reduction in the number and severity
of claims reported. Our insurance program involves self-insurance at
various risk retention levels. Claims in excess of these risk levels
are covered by insurance in amounts we consider to be adequate. We
accrue for the uninsured portion of claims based on known claims and historical
experience. We continually revise and change our insurance program to
maintain a balance between premium expense and the risk retention we are willing
to assume.
Depreciation
and amortization, consisting primarily of depreciation of revenue equipment,
increased to $26.8 million, or 8.8% of freight revenue, for the nine months
ended March 31, 2009, from $23.8 million, or 7.0% of freight
revenue, for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. These increases
are related to an increase year over year in the number of owned trailers and
tractor and trailer costs. These increases are offset by gains on
sales of equipment in the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Revenue
equipment held under operating leases is not reflected on our balance sheet and
the expenses related to such equipment are reflected on our statements of
operations in revenue equipment rentals, rather than in depreciation and
amortization and interest expense, as is the case for revenue equipment that is
financed with borrowings or capital leases.
Revenue
equipment rentals were $20.8 million, or 6.8% of freight revenue, for the
nine months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $20.0 million, or 5.9% of
freight revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The
majority of this increase is related to the net addition of approximately 520
trailers under operating lease, which has increased our trailer
rents. Tractors held under operating lease increased in fiscal 2009,
but have yet to have a significant impact on the year-to-date
numbers. We believe this number will continue to grow over the
remainder of fiscal 2009.
Purchased
transportation decreased significantly to $41.0 million, or 13.5% of
freight revenue, for the nine months ended March 31, 2009, from $62.9
million, or 18.5% of freight revenue, for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. The majority of this decrease is related to fewer miles by our
independent contractor fleet which has decreased to 198 at March 31, 2009 from
305 at March 31, 2008. The decrease also relates to the reduction of
the fuel surcharge component of their resulting from decreased fuel
costs. Independent contractors are drivers who cover all their
operating expenses (fuel, driver salaries, maintenance, and equipment costs) for
a fixed payment per mile.
All of
our other operating expenses are relatively minor in amount, and there were no
significant changes in such expenses. Accordingly, we have not
provided a detailed discussion of such expenses.
Our
pretax margin, which we believe is a useful
measure of our operating performance because it is neutral with regard to the
method of revenue equipment financing that a company uses decreased 60
basis points to 2.1% of freight revenue for the nine months ended March 31,
2009, from 2.7% of freight revenue for the nine months ended March 31,
2008.
In
addition to other factors described above, Canadian exchange rate fluctuations
primarily impact salaries, wages and benefits, and purchased transportation, and
therefore impact our pretax margin and results of operations.
Income
taxes decreased to $4.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009,
compared to $4.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008, while the
effective tax rate increased from 53.0% to 63.3%. Income tax expense
for fiscal 2009 included an adjustment of approximately $300,000 related to per
diem calculations for prior years. As per diem is a partially
non-deductible expense, our effective tax rate will fluctuate as net income and
per diem fluctuate in the future.
As a
result of the factors described above, net income decreased by $2.0 million
to $2.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009, from a net income of
$4.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Trucking
is a capital-intensive business. We require cash to fund our
operating expenses (other than depreciation and amortization), to make capital
expenditures and acquisitions, and to repay debt, including principal and
interest payments. Other than ordinary operating expenses, we
anticipate that capital expenditures for the acquisition of revenue equipment
will constitute our primary cash requirement over the next twelve
months. We frequently consider potential acquisitions, and if we were
to consummate an acquisition, our cash requirements would increase and we may
have to modify our expected financing sources for the purchase of
tractors. Subject to any required lender approval, we may make
acquisitions in the future. Our principal sources of liquidity are
cash generated from operations, bank borrowings, capital and operating lease
financing of revenue equipment, and proceeds from the sale of used revenue
equipment.
As of
March 31, 2009, we had on order 591 tractors for delivery through fiscal
2010. These revenue equipment orders represent a capital commitment
of approximately $55.8 million, before considering the proceeds of equipment
dispositions. We are using a mixture of cash and operating leases to
purchase our new tractors. At March 31, 2009, our total balance sheet
debt, including capital lease obligations and current maturities less cash, was
$56.6 million, compared to $94.4 million at March 31, 2008. Our
debt-to-capitalization ratio (total balance sheet debt as a percentage of total
balance sheet debt plus total stockholders' equity) was 28.6% at March 31, 2009,
and 40.2% at March 31, 2008.
We
believe we will be able to fund our operating expenses, as well as our current
commitments for the acquisition of revenue equipment over the next twelve months
with a combination of cash generated from operations, borrowings available under
our primary credit facility and lease financing
arrangements. Although we expect to maintain the approximate size of
our fleet, we will continue to have significant capital requirements over the
long term, and the availability of the needed capital will depend upon our
financial condition and operating results and numerous other factors over which
we have limited or no control, including prevailing market conditions and the
market price of our common stock. However, based on our operating
results, anticipated future cash flows, current availability under our credit
facility, and sources of equipment lease financing that we expect will be
available to us, we do not expect to experience significant liquidity
constraints in the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows
For the
nine months ended March 31, 2009, net cash provided by operations was $53.7
million, compared to cash provided by operations of $30.2 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in cash provided by
operations related to decreases in trade receivables, other current assets,
income tax receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Net cash
used in investing activities was $10.1 million for the nine months ended March
31, 2009, compared to $18.0 million for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. Cash used in investing activities includes the net cash effect
of acquisitions and dispositions of revenue equipment during each
period. Capital expenditures for equipment totaled $28.3 million for
the nine months ended March 31, 2009, and $46.1 million for the nine months
ended March 31, 2008. In fiscal 2009, we used $24.1 million to
purchase the assets of Continental. We generated proceeds from the
sale of property and equipment of $42.3 million for the nine months ended March
31, 2009, compared to $28.1 million in proceeds for the nine months ended March
31, 2008.
Net cash
used in financing activities was $43.2 million for the nine months ended March
31, 2009, compared to $10.9 million for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. The increase in cash used for financing activities was
primarily due to increased payment on our revolving debt line and the buy-out of
mortgaged equipment. Financing activity represents borrowings (new
borrowings, net of repayment) and payments of the principal component of capital
lease obligations.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Operating
leases have been an important source of financing for our revenue
equipment. Our operating leases include some under which we do not
guarantee the value of the asset at the end of the lease term ("walk-away
leases") and some under which we do guarantee the value of the asset at the end
of the lease term ("residual value"). Therefore, we are subject to
the risk that equipment value may decline, in which case we would suffer a loss
upon disposition and be required to make cash payments because of the residual
value guarantees. We were obligated for residual value guarantees
related to operating leases of $70.2 million at March 31, 2009 compared to $66.8
million at March 31, 2008. To the extent the expected value at
the lease termination date is lower than the residual value guarantee; we would
accrue for the difference over the remaining lease term. We
anticipate that going forward we will use a combination of cash generated from
operations and operating leases to finance tractor purchases and operating
leases to finance trailer purchases.
Primary Credit
Agreement
On
September 26, 2005, Celadon Group, Inc., Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., and
TruckersB2B entered into an unsecured Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement")
with LaSalle Bank National Association, as administrative agent, and LaSalle
Bank National Association, Fifth Third Bank (Central Indiana), and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as lenders. The Credit Agreement was amended on
December 23, 2005, by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement, pursuant to which
Celadon Logistics Services, Inc. was added as a borrower to the Credit
Agreement. The Credit Agreement, as amended by the Third Amendment on
January 22, 2008, matures on January 23, 2013. The Credit Agreement
is intended to provide for ongoing working capital needs and general corporate
purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are based, at the
option of the Company, on a base rate equal to the greater of the federal funds
rate plus 0.5% and the administrative agent's prime rate or LIBOR plus an
applicable margin between 0.75% and 1.125% that is adjusted quarterly based on
cash flow coverage. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by Celadon
E-Commerce, Inc., CelCan, and Jaguar, each of which is a subsidiary of the
Company.
The
Credit Agreement, as amended by the Third Amendment, has a maximum revolving
borrowing limit of $70.0 million, and the Company may increase the revolving
borrowing limit by an additional $20.0 million under the accordion feature, to a
total of $90.0 million. In order to use the accordion feature of our
credit facility, we may be required to renegotiate the terms of such
feature. However, we believe we will be able to fund our operating
expenses without using the accordion feature of our credit facility and do not
anticipate needing to use or renegotiate the accordion feature in the
foreseeable future. Letters of credit are limited to an aggregate
commitment of $15.0 million and a swing line facility has a limit of $5.0
million. A commitment fee that is adjusted quarterly between 0.15%
and 0.225% per annum based on cash flow coverage is due on the daily unused
portion of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement contains
certain restrictions and covenants relating to, among other things, dividends,
tangible net worth, cash flow, mergers, consolidations, acquisitions and
dispositions, and total indebtedness. We were in compliance with
these covenants at March 31, 2009 and believe we will remain in compliance for
the foreseeable future, assuming no material deterioration in demand or results
of operation. At March 31, 2009, $14.0 million of our credit facility
was utilized as outstanding borrowings and $5.6 million was utilized for standby
letters of credit.
Contractual
Obligations
As of
March 31, 2009, our operating leases, capitalized leases, other debts, and
future commitments have stated maturities or minimum annual payments as
follows:
|
|
Annual
Cash Requirements
as
of March 31, 2009
(in
thousands)
Payments
Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less
than
1 year
|
|
|
1-3
Years
|
|
|
3-5
Years
|
|
|
More
than
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
$ |
107,714 |
|
|
$ |
32,948 |
|
|
$ |
48,666 |
|
|
$ |
15,902 |
|
|
$ |
10,198 |
|
Lease
residual value guarantees
|
|
|
70,203 |
|
|
|
11,341 |
|
|
|
34,587 |
|
|
|
15,665 |
|
|
|
8,610 |
|
Capital
leases(1)
|
|
|
47,927 |
|
|
|
8,478 |
|
|
|
32,041 |
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Long-term
debt(1)
|
|
|
15,944 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Sub-total
|
|
$ |
241,788 |
|
|
$ |
54,022 |
|
|
$ |
115,983 |
|
|
$ |
52,975 |
|
|
$ |
18,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
purchase of revenue equipment
|
|
$ |
55,761 |
|
|
$ |
39,620 |
|
|
$ |
11,481 |
|
|
$ |
4,660 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Employment
and consulting agreements(2)
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Standby
Letters of Credit
|
|
|
5,571 |
|
|
|
5,571 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
303,820 |
|
|
$ |
99,913 |
|
|
$ |
127,464 |
|
|
$ |
57,635 |
|
|
$ |
18,808 |
|
(1)
|
Includes
interest.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts reflected in the table do not include amounts that could become
payable to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
under certain circumstances if their employment by the Company is
terminated.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that impact the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Therefore, the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses, and associated disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities are affected by these estimates and assumptions. We
evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, utilizing
historical experience, consultation with experts, and other methods considered
reasonable in the particular circumstances. Nevertheless, actual
results may differ significantly from our estimates and assumptions, and it is
possible that materially different amounts would be reported using differing
estimates or assumptions. We consider our critical accounting
policies to be those that require us to make more significant judgments and
estimates when we prepare our financial statements. Our critical
accounting policies include the following:
Depreciation of Property and
Equipment. We depreciate our property and equipment using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. We
generally use estimated useful lives of two to seven years for tractors and
trailers, and estimated salvage values for tractors and trailers generally range
from 35% to 50% of the capitalized cost. Gains and losses on the
disposal of revenue equipment are included in depreciation expense in our
statements of operations.
We review
the reasonableness of our estimates regarding useful lives and salvage values of
our revenue equipment and other long-lived assets based upon, among other
things, our experience with similar assets, conditions in the used equipment
market, and prevailing industry practice. Changes in our useful life
or salvage value estimates or fluctuations in market values that are not
reflected in our estimates, could have a material effect on our results of
operations.
Revenue
equipment and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever an
event occurs that indicates an impairment may exist. Expected future
cash flows are used to analyze whether an impairment has occurred. If
the sum of expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of
the long-lived asset, then an impairment loss is recognized. We
measure the impairment loss by comparing the fair value of the asset to its
carrying value. Fair value is determined based on a discounted cash
flow analysis or the appraised or estimated market value of the asset, as
appropriate.
Operating
leases. We have financed a substantial percentage of our
tractors and trailers with operating leases. These leases generally
contain residual value guarantees, which provide that the value of equipment
returned to the lessor at the end of the lease term will be no lower than a
negotiated amount. To the extent that the value of the equipment is
below the negotiated amount, we are liable to the lessor for the shortage at the
expiration of the lease. For all equipment, we are required to
recognize additional rental expense to the extent we believe the fair market
value at the lease termination will be less than our obligation to the
lessor.
In
accordance with SFAS 13, "Accounting for Leases,"
property and equipment held under operating leases, and liabilities related
thereto, are not reflected on our balance sheet. All expenses related
to revenue equipment operating leases are reflected on our statements of
operations in the line item entitled "Revenue equipment rentals." As
such, financing revenue equipment with operating leases instead of bank
borrowings or capital leases effectively moves the interest component of the
financing arrangement into operating expenses on our statements of
operations.
Claims Reserves and
Estimates. The primary claims arising for us consist of cargo
liability, personal injury, property damage, collision and comprehensive,
workers' compensation, and employee medical expenses. We maintain
self-insurance levels for these various areas of risk and have established
reserves to cover these self-insured liabilities. We also maintain
insurance to cover liabilities in excess of these self-insurance
amounts. Claims reserves represent accruals for the estimated
uninsured portion of reported claims, including adverse development of reported
claims, as well as estimates of incurred but not reported
claims. Reported claims and related loss reserves are estimated by
third party administrators, and we refer to these estimates in establishing our
reserves. Claims incurred but not reported are estimated based on our
historical experience and industry trends, which are continually monitored, and
accruals are adjusted when warranted by changes in facts and
circumstances. In establishing our reserves we must take into account
and estimate various factors, including, but not limited to, assumptions
concerning the nature and severity of the claim, the effect of the jurisdiction
on any award or settlement, the length of time until ultimate resolution,
inflation rates in health care, and in general interest rates, legal expenses,
and other factors. Our actual experience may be different than our
estimates, sometimes significantly. Changes in assumptions as well as
changes in actual experience could cause these estimates to change in the near
term. Insurance and claims expense will vary from period to period
based on the severity and frequency of claims incurred in a given
period.
Goodwill. During
the third quarter of fiscal 2009, given the economy and its impact on our
current market capitalization, we performed an assessment of impairment for
goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142 and have determined that no impairment has
occurred as of March 31, 2009. See Note 11 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activity. We use derivative financial instruments to manage the economic
impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Derivative
financial instruments related to currency exchange rates include forward
purchase and sale agreements which generally have terms no greater than 12
months.
To
account for our derivative financial instruments, we follow the provisions of
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as
amended by SFAS No. 137, SFAS No. 138 and SFAS No. 161. Derivative
financial instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as
either assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. Changes
in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in earnings or
accumulated other comprehensive income, depending on whether a derivative is
designated and effective as part of a hedge transaction, and if it is, the type
of hedge transaction. Gains and losses on derivative instruments
reported in accumulated other comprehensive income are subsequently included in
earnings in the periods in which earnings are affected by the hedged
item. These activities have not had a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations for the periods presented
herein.
Accounting for Income
Taxes. Deferred income taxes represent a substantial liability
on our consolidated balance sheet. Deferred income taxes are
determined in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes." Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit
carry-forwards. We evaluate our tax assets and liabilities on a
periodic basis and adjust these balances as appropriate. We believe
that we have adequately provided for our future tax consequences based upon
current facts and circumstances and current tax law. However, should
our tax positions be challenged and not prevail, different outcomes could result
and have a significant impact on the amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements.
The
carrying value of our deferred tax assets (tax benefits expected to be realized
in the future) assumes that we will be able to generate, based on certain
estimates and assumptions, sufficient future taxable income in certain tax
jurisdictions to utilize these deferred tax benefits. If these
estimates and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to
reduce the value of the deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax
expense. We believe that it is more likely than not that the deferred
tax assets, net of valuation allowance, will be realized, based on forecasted
income. However, there can be no assurance that we will meet our
forecasts of future income. We evaluate the deferred tax assets on a
periodic basis and assess the need for additional valuation
allowances.
Federal
income taxes are provided on that portion of the income of foreign subsidiaries
that is expected to be remitted to the United States.
Seasonality
We have substantial operations in the
Midwestern and Eastern United States and Canada. In those geographic
regions, our tractor productivity may be adversely affected during the winter
season because inclement weather may impede our operations. Moreover,
some shippers reduce their shipments during holiday periods as a result of
curtailed operations or vacation shutdowns. At the same time,
operating expenses generally increase, with fuel efficiency declining because of
engine idling and harsh weather creating higher accident frequency, increased
claims, and more equipment repairs.
Inflation
Many of
our operating expenses, including fuel costs, revenue equipment, and driver
compensation, are sensitive to the effects of inflation, which result in higher
operating costs and reduced operating income. The effects of
inflation on our business during the past three years were most significant in
fuel. The effects of inflation on revenue were not material in the
past three years. We have limited the effects of inflation through
increases in freight rates and fuel surcharges.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We
experience various market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates, and fuel prices. We do not enter into
derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes,
nor when there are no underlying related exposures.
Interest Rate
Risk. We are exposed to interest rate risk principally from
our primary credit facility. The credit facility carries a maximum
variable interest rate of either the bank's base rate or LIBOR plus
1.125%. At March 31, 2009 the interest rate for revolving borrowings
under our credit facility was LIBOR plus 1.25%, an effective rate of
1.66%. At March 31, 2009, we had $14.0 million variable rate term
loan borrowings outstanding under the credit facility. A hypothetical
10% increase in the bank's base rate and LIBOR would be immaterial to our net
income.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate
Risk. We are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk,
specifically in connection with our Canadian operations. While
virtually all of the expenses associated with our Canadian operations, such as
independent contractor costs, Company driver compensation, and administrative
costs, are paid in Canadian dollars, a significant portion of our revenue
generated from those operations is billed in U.S. dollars because many of our
customers are U.S. shippers transporting goods to or from Canada. As
a result, increases in the Canadian dollar exchange rate adversely affect the
profitability of our Canadian operations. Assuming revenue and
expenses for our Canadian operations identical to that in the first nine months
of fiscal 2009 (both in terms of amount and currency mix), we estimate that a
$0.01 decrease in the Canadian dollar exchange rate would reduce our annual net
income by approximately $97,000. We have mitigated some of this risk
through currency exchange agreements. We currently have contracts for
$750,000 Canadian dollars per month over the next 9 months, representing
approximately 75% of our Canadian currency exposure. Derivative
gains/(losses), initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income,
are reclassified to earnings in the period when the forecasted transaction
affects earnings.
We
generally do not face the same magnitude of foreign currency exchange rate risk
in connection with our intra-Mexico operations conducted through our Mexican
subsidiary, Jaguar, because our foreign currency revenues are generally
proportionate to our foreign currency expenses for those
operations. For purposes of consolidation, however, the operating
results earned by our subsidiaries, including Jaguar, in foreign currencies are
converted into United States dollars. As a result, a decrease in the
value of the Mexican peso could adversely affect our consolidated results of
operations. Assuming revenue and expenses for our Mexican operations
identical to that in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 (both in terms of
amount and currency mix), we estimate that a $0.01 decrease in the Mexican peso
exchange rate would reduce our annual net income by approximately
$53,000. We currently have contracts for 4.5 million Mexican pesos
per month over the next 9 months, representing approximately 75% of our Mexican
currency exposure. Derivative gains/(losses), initially reported as a
component of other comprehensive income, are reclassified to earnings in the
period when the forecasted transaction affects earnings.
Commodity Price
Risk. Shortages of fuel, increases in prices, or rationing of
petroleum products can have a materially adverse effect on our operations and
profitability. Fuel is subject to economic, political, climatic, and
market factors that are outside of our control. Historically, we have
sought to recover a portion of short-term increases in fuel prices from
customers through the collection of fuel surcharges. However, fuel
surcharges do not always fully offset increases in fuel prices. As of
March 31, 2009, we had no derivative financial instruments in place to reduce
our exposure to fuel price fluctuations.
Item
4. Controls and
Procedures
As
required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the Company has carried out an evaluation of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. This evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2009
that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports filed
or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure controls and
procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding disclosures.
The
Company has confidence in its disclosure controls and
procedures. Nevertheless, the Company's management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our
disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors or intentional
fraud. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of such internal controls are met. Further, the design of
an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been
detected.
Part
II. Other
Information
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
There are
various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company and its
subsidiaries which arose in the normal course of the operations of its
business. The Company believes many of these proceedings are covered
in whole or in part by insurance and that none of these matters will have a
material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations in any given period.
On August
8, 2007, the 384th District Court of the State of Texas situated in El Paso,
Texas, rendered a judgment against CTSI, for approximately $3.4 million in the
case of Martinez v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., which was originally filed
on September 4, 2002. The case involves a workers' compensation claim
of a former employee of CTSI who suffered a back injury as a result of a traffic
accident. CTSI and the Company believe all actions taken were proper
and legal and contend that the proper and exclusive place for resolution of this
dispute was before the Indiana Worker's Compensation Board. While
there can be no certainty as to the outcome, the Company believes that the
ultimate resolution of this dispute will not have a materially adverse effect on
its consolidated financial position, cash flows, or results of
operations. The Company has not recognized any expense related to the
case other than legal defense costs at this time. CTSI filed an
appeal of the decision to the Texas Court of Appeals in October
2007. Trial transcripts have been prepared for the Court of Appeals
and Celadon’s appellate brief was field in December 2008. Mr.
Martinez’s reply is due in April 2009.
While we
attempt to identify, manage, and mitigate risks and uncertainties associated
with our business, some level of risk and uncertainty will always be
present. Our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, in the
section entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors, describes some of the risks and
uncertainties associated with our business. Please also see our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 30, 2008, for a
description of the risks and uncertainties associated with certain credit
factors affecting the trucking industry. These risks and
uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows, projected results, and future
prospects. In addition to the risk factors set forth in our Forms
10-K and 10-Q, we believe that the following additional issues, uncertainties,
and risks, should be considered in evaluating our business and growth
outlook:
Restrictions on travel to and from
Mexico due to health epidemics could significantly disrupt our operations and
may materially and adversely affect our ability to provide services to our
customers and results.
A
significant amount of our business involves freight moving to or from
Mexico. Our business could be materially and adversely affected by
restrictions on travel to and from Mexico due to a health epidemic or outbreak
such as the swine flu. Any restrictions on travel to and from Mexico
due to the swine flu or another epidemic or outbreak in Mexico may significantly
disrupt our operations and decrease our ability to provide services to our
customers. Additionally, any such epidemic or outbreak may have a
materially adverse effect on demand for freight into and out of Mexico, which
could severely disrupt our business operations and adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Our
primary credit agreement contains certain covenants, restrictions, and
requirements, and we may be unable to comply with the covenants, restrictions,
and requirements. A default could result in the acceleration of all
or part of our outstanding indebtedness, which could have an adverse effect on
our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and the price of our
common stock.
We have
financing arrangements that contain certain restrictions and covenants relating
to, among other things, dividends, liens, acquisitions and dispositions outside
of the ordinary course of business, affiliate transactions, and financial
covenants. If we fail to comply with any of our financing arrangement
covenants, restrictions, and requirements, we will be in default under the
relevant agreement, which could cause acceleration. The current
credit market crisis may make it difficult or expensive to refinance accelerated
debt or we may have to issue equity securities, which would dilute stock
ownership. Even if new financing is made available to us, the current
lack of available credit and consequent more stringent borrowing terms may mean
that credit is not available to us on acceptable terms. A default
under our financing arrangements could cause a materially adverse effect on our
liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations. See "Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Primary Credit Agreement" for
additional information on our primary credit agreement.
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, effective
January 12, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on January 30,
2006.)
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Designation for Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2000, filed with the SEC on
September 28, 2000.)
|
3.3
|
Amended
and Restated By-laws of the Company. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 3, 2006.)
|
4.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, effective
January 12, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on January 30,
2006.)
|
4.2
|
Certificate
of Designation for Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2000, filed with the SEC on
September 28, 2000.)
|
4.3
|
Rights
Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, between Celadon Group, Inc. and
Fleet National Bank, as Rights Agent. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
8-A, filed with the SEC on July 20, 2000.)
|
4.4
|
Amended
and Restated By-laws of the Company. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 3, 2006.)
|
|
Certification
pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Stephen Russell, the
Company's Chief Executive Officer.*
|
|
Certification
pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Paul Will, the Company's
Chief Financial Officer.*
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, by Stephen Russell, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer.*
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Paul Will, the Company's Chief
Financial Officer.*
|
* Filed
herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
Celadon
Group, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Stephen Russell |
|
Stephen
Russell
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Paul Will |
|
Paul
Will
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
Treasurer,
and Assistant Secretary
|
|
|
Date: April
30, 2009
|
|